In Belgium, there is no special legislative code compiling advertising standards. Commercial advertising is governed by a regulatory framework constituted of binding legal provisions and self-regulating, non-binding professional rules.
The Belgian Code of Economic Law (CEL) sets out the core principles governing advertising practices in Belgium:
Provisions governing the processing of personal data include:
Depending on the nature of the product or service, additional rules may apply in order to advertise them lawfully. Such product-specific rules are included in the legislation regarding that product or service.
The laws and regulations governing advertising practices are, in principle, enforced by the Belgian courts.
Only specific regulatory authorities are charged with enforcing advertising law provisions, such as the Belgian Data Protection Authority (DPA), for breach of data protection law, the Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA), for advertising for insurance products, the Federal Agency for medicines and health products or the SPF Economy via its mediation service. Further, there is a self-regulatory body named the Jury for Ethical Advertising (1.4 Self-Regulation).
Action for an Injunction (Action en Cessation)
In case of unlawful advertising, consumers, the relevant organisations, or undertakings can bring an action for an injunction before the president of the competent commercial court (Article XVII.1. of the CEL).
The president can ascertain the existence of the unlawful advertising and order, possibly under payment of a penalty, the cessation, prohibition or even the adaptation of the disputed advertising practice.
The judgment can be published, either in full or in extracts, its publication on the internet, on radio or on television, its public display, or even its distribution to customers at the expense of the losing party.
Proceedings on the Merits
Consumers can obtain damages and the company in question can be criminally sanctioned (Article XV.69 of the CEL).
Reimbursement without Restitution
The legislator has introduced a mechanism to ensure rapid and actual compensation for the harm suffered by the consumer.
If a contract with a consumer has been concluded as a result of an unfair commercial practice, the courts can order the reimbursement of sums paid by the consumer, without restitution of the delivered product (Article VI.38 Section 2 of the CEL).
In Belgium, there is no general rule regarding liability for advertising. Generally, the advertiser is held responsible if they did not comply with the applicable rules and regulations. Further, every member of the advertising chain who has materially contributed to the breach, intentionally or negligently, can be held liable.
In the event of an action for injunction, Article XVII.10 of the CEL sets forth a cascading presumption of liability:
The legislator's objective is to ensure that illegal advertising initiated outside Belgium cannot be broadcasted in Belgium without impunity. Liability can be shared between co-authors. Further, advertisers can be held criminally liable.
The Centre for Communication
The Centre for Communication is the professional organisation that brings together all the communication professions, themselves represented by their respective associations.
It organises advertising self-regulation in Belgium. The Jury for Ethical of Advertising (JEP) is its independent self-regulatory body and has two main competences (opinion procedure and complaint procedure).
Jury for Ethical Advertising
The Jury for Ethical Advertising (JEP) is the self-regulatory body of the advertising sector in Belgium. The JEP’s mission is to ensure fair, decent, truthful, legal and socially responsible advertising. The Jury is composed of equal numbers of members from the civil society and members of the advertising sector.
The JEP examines the compliance of the content of advertising messages with the applicable legislation and the self-regulatory conventions, codes and rules that complement the legislation.
JEP main competences
The opinion procedure
An advertiser, agency or media can request an opinion before, during or after the broadcast of an advert. Opinions are confidential and are non-binding. The JEP renders two opinions:
The complaint procedure
Consumers, socio-cultural associations, professional federations and public authorities may lodge a complaint with JEP against any advertising content.
The JEP does not issue fines or award damages. It can only issue recommendations, advice and injunctions to stop or modify the advertising. Further, the JEP’s decisions do not constitute any warranty.
Any dispute which is not solved by the JEP may be brought to Court.
Codes Issued by Self-Disciplined Bodies/Organisations
In Belgium, self-disciplined bodies publish various codes, rules and recommendations on professional ethics regarding advertising. These texts are important because the JEP bases its decisions on both the applicable legal provisions and self-regulatory provisions (codes). Actors agree to respect them in the exercise of their professional activity.
These codes are either:
As mentioned in 1.4 Self-Regulation, consumers can challenge advertising practices by launching complaints before the JEP. These are free of charge and must relate to a concrete advertising content broadcast via the media within the JEP’s area of expertise. An advertisement can be challenged immediately or within a short period of time.
The complaint must be based on the visual or editorial elements of the advertising (eg, misleading or deceptive elements, non-compliance with applicable legislation and/or codes, shocking or offensive nature, etc). The JEP or its Secretariat may, on its own initiative, invoke other elements (eg, non-compliance with legislation and/or other self-regulatory rules). The JEP can only issue recommendations, advices and injunctions to stop or modify the advertising.
As mentioned in 1.2 Regulatory Authorities, a consumer can commence an action for injunction before the Belgian courts in order to obtain, for example, the cessation of an unfair advertising or damages.
Under Belgian law, there are a number of types of products and services that are either prohibited from being advertised or are subject to additional regulations.
Products Banned from Advertising
In Belgium, there is notably a general ban on advertising of:
Advertising Regulated for Certain Products
Law of 24 January 1977 and self-regulated convention of 12 May 2005 delegates regulation of the advertising of alcohol productsto the alcohol trade sector itself. The parties in this sector have signed a self-regulatory convention on the conduct and advertising of drinks containing alcohol which prohibits alcohol advertising from:
Beer advertising must include the educational slogan “Beer brewed carefully, to be consumed with care”. For spirits, the message must read “Taste our know-how wisely”. The convention stipulates that sales may not take place near schools and that free distribution is prohibited.
Such list is not exhaustive.
Advertising Regulated for Certain Services
The Act of 4 April 2019 expanded the provisions of the CEL relating to unfair market practices by transposing into the B2B universe the provisions applicable in B2C relationships that prohibit misleading and aggressive market practices. In addition to the prohibition of unfair market practices by Article VI.104 of the CEL, misleading and aggressive commercial practices are specifically prohibited by a new Article VI.105 of the CEL.
If advertising is directed to one or more businesses as well as to consumers, the (more stringent) rules regarding business-to-consumer (B2C) will apply.
Finally, the Belgian Data Protection Authority adopted in January 2020 a new recommendation on direct marketing.
Trends in Case Law
There were no significant trends in case law in the last 12 months in Belgium.
On 15 October 2019, the Belgian Supreme Court defined what the word “poster” meant, in the context of advertising of cosmetic products, in its original common sense, a billboard.
Usually, the examination of the advertising claims will be carried out in stages (“cascade loyalty test”).
The general standards to determine if advertising claims are misleading or aggressive for B2C and B2B commercial practices are globally similar.
Article VI.93 of the CEL prohibits unfair commercial practices (ie, advertising) that are contrary to the requirements of professional diligence and that distort the economic behaviour of the average consumer. To assess this impact, consumer behaviour or, where the offending practice is aimed at a targeted group, the behaviour of a representative member thereof, will be considered.
Article VI.104 of the CEL states that any act contrary to fair market practice which harms or may harm the professional interests of one or more other undertakings is prohibited.
Under Article VI.94 of the CEL, commercial practices directed at consumers are unfair if they are either misleading within the meaning of Articles VI.97 to VI.100 of the CEL, or aggressive within the meaning of Articles VI.101 to VI.103 of the CEL.
In parallel, under Article 104/1 of the CEL, B2B market practices directed at other undertakings are unfair if they are either misleading within the meaning of Articles VI.105 to VI.109 of the CEL or aggressive within the meaning of Articles VI.109/1 to VI.109/3 of the CEL.
Black List of Misleading and Aggressive Commercial Practices
The Belgian legislator has set out a list of commercial practices that are universally misleading (Article VI.100 of the CEL) or aggressive (Article VI.103 of the CEL) commercial practices against consumers, eg, claiming a product increases the chances of winning at games of chance, falsely claiming that a product is likely to cure diseases, communicating factually inaccurate information on market conditions or on the possibilities of finding the product, with the aim of inciting the consumer to acquire the product under less favourable conditions than normal market conditions, etc.
Grey List of Misleading and Aggressive Commercial Practices
The Belgian legislator has set out a list of commercial practices that are presumed to be misleading (Article VI.97-99 of the CEL) or aggressive (Article VI.101-102 of the CEL) commercial practices against consumers.
A practice is misleading if it contains false information and is therefore untruthful or otherwise misleads or is likely to mislead the consumer/undertaking and causes or is likely to cause the consumer/ undertaking to take a transactional decision that he would not have taken otherwise (eg, false information on the existence or nature of the product, its main characteristics it’s the price, etc).
Further, a practice is considered as a misleading omission if it omits material information which the consumer/ undertaking needs to take an informed transactional decision and thereby causes or is likely to cause the consumer/undertaking to take a transactional decision that it would not have taken otherwise.
If advertising materially impairs or is likely to materially impair, as a result of harassment, coercion or undue influence, the consumer/undertaking’s freedom of choice or conduct with respect to the product and thereby causes or is likely to cause the consumer/undertaking to make a decision with respect to the transaction that it would not otherwise have made. it is deemed aggressive.
In order to determine if a practice is aggressive, the following elements are taken into account:
Similar rules apply in case of misleading or aggressive commercial practices in a B2B context.
All advertising claims are subject to regulation. All claims, both express and implied are prohibited if they constitute unfair commercial practices or unlawful comparative advertising.
There is no exception in Belgian law for claims that cannot be objectively measured. As long at the claims do no constitute a misleading commercial practice, they are allowed under Belgian law.
Regulators and courts determine and assess implied claims on their own.
To support advertising claims, information should be truthful and should therefore not mislead the average consumer/undertaking. In some sectors, the type of substantiation depends on the nature of the claim.
Medicinal Products for Human Use (Article 4 of the Royal Decree of 7 April 1995)
All elements of drug advertising must be accurate, up-to-date and verifiable. For homeopathic medicines, all elements of the advertising must be consistent with the information on the package leaflet or labelling.
For advertising content for prescribers and pharmacists, all the information must be sufficiently complete to enable the recipient to form their own opinion of the therapeutic value of the product.
Food (Royal Decree of 17 April 1980, Fevia Code)
It is prohibited to attribute properties regarding composition which cannot be demonstrated through objective or measurable criteria. Any claim or communication that can reasonably be interpreted by the consumer as a nutrition or health claim must be scientifically substantiated in an appropriate manner.
Cosmetics (Code of Advertising for Cosmetic Products)
Any cosmetic claim, express or implied, must be supported by adequate and appropriate evidence demonstrating the products' performance. The context and circumstances in which the claim is made (including social and cultural factors) are taken into account.
No general standard applies to testing that is conducted to support advertising claims. However, under Article XV.16.1. of the CEL, the Belgian authorities may require a company to provide evidence of the material accuracy of the factual data that it communicates in the course of commercial practice.
A company must provide, within a one month, evidence of the material accuracy of the factual data. The company can prove the accuracy of its argument by any means of proof. If the evidence required is not provided or deemed insufficient, Belgian authorities can consider the commercial practice to be unfair or an act contrary to fair market practices.
Under the code of advertising for cosmetic products, when studies or tests are mentioned in advertising:
Medicinal Products for Human Use
The advertising claims must be in line with the data that has been approved as part of the marketing authorisation or registration of the product. Therefore, the principles that apply to testing under the marketing authorisation or registration indirectly apply to advertising claims.
Article 5, 10° of the Royal Decree of 14 December 2006 states that the marketing authorisation application must include all the administrative information and scientific documentation necessary to demonstrate the quality, safety and efficacy of the medicinal product namely the pharmaceutical, pre-clinical and clinical test results.
For medicinal products for human use, the principles that apply to testing under the marketing authorisation or registration indirectly apply to advertising claims.
The Environmental Advertising Code applies to all advertising that refers to the environmental effects of a product. For example, under this code:
Claims in Cosmetics
Cosmetic advertising claims are subject to the Code of Advertising for Cosmetics. Under that Code:
In Belgium, there are specific rules that apply to comparative advertising claims. Comparative advertising is defined as any advertising that explicitly or implicitly identifies a competitor or goods or services offered by a competitor (Article I.8.14° of the CEL).
Under Article VI.17 of the CEL, comparative advertising is lawfulwhen it meets eight conditions. Comparative advertising must not be misleading, confusing, disparaging or take unfair advantage of the reputation of the competitor. It is therefore permissible to identify a competitor by name if the requirements of Article VI.17 of the CEL are met.
Comparative advertising presupposes the implicit or explicit identification of a competitor.
Explicit or Implicit Comparative Advertising
Comparative advertising is:
Identification of a Competitor – Competitive Link
In order to assess whether a competitor is identified, the competitive relationship must be examined. This link between competitors is assessed in the light of the substitutability, in the eyes of the consumer, of the products or services offered by the competitor from those of the advertiser. The point of view of the average consumer, normally informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, must be taken into account.
Lawfulness if Eight Conditions are Met
Under Article VI.17 of the CEL, comparative advertising is lawful only if the following conditions are met:
Under Article VI.17 of the CEL (see 3.2 Comparative Advertising Standards), the principle is the lawfulness of comparative advertising and its prohibition is the exception.
A comparative advertising claim will be upheld if the eight conditions laid out in Article VI.17 of the CEL are met, cumulatively, or will otherwise be prohibited.
In order to challenge comparative advertising claims, the targeted company has to prove:
The remedies available to a competitor targeted by comparative advertising are either a complaint before the JEP or an action for an injunction before the president of the competent Commercial Court (see 1.2 Regulatory Authorities and 1.4 Self-Regulation). The competitor will most likely start an action for injunction.
There have been no particular trends in case law in the past 12 months. Not all comparative advertising results in a court decision. Further, some are not the subject of any action, some are settled, and some court decisions may remain unpublished.
However, it is recognised that Belgian judges often consider comparative advertising to be unlawful and are somewhat reluctant to accept the practice.
Advertising on the internet, in particular on social/digital media, is subject to all the rules applicable to all forms of advertising, regardless of the medium used.
Identification and Transparency Principles
The principles of identification and transparency of commercial practices on the internet were introduced by the E-Commerce Directive and are transposed into Belgian law by book XII of the CEL and apply to all advertising on social media.
Under Article XII.12 of the CEL, any internet advertising must comply with the following principles:
Article XII.6 of the CEL lays down additional information and transparency requirements for the provider of an information society service (in this case the advertising agency), which must ensure that the recipient of the service and the competent authorities have easy, direct and permanent access to the information listed in the Article.
In addition, the Centre for Communication of Belgium recently adopted recommendations on influencers and native advertising.
Transparency and Information Issues
The versatility of content on social media makes it more difficult for the user to distinguish between a personal post and advertising. The distinction is often blurred by either the social media interface or the content creators themselves. It is therefore crucial that users be as explicit as possible regarding advertisements in their communications.
Users must also ensure that the recipient of the information and the competent authorities have easy, direct and permanent access to a range of information listed in Articles XII.6 and XII.12 of the CEL.
Data Protection Issues
As mentioned in 1.3 Scope of Liability, there is no general rule regarding liability for advertising.
Advertisers can be held responsible if they did not comply with the applicable rules and regulations. In addition, every member of the advertising chain who has materially contributed to the breach, intentionally or negligently, can also be held liable.
On social media platforms, advertisers have the possibility to create a dedicated page or profile on which they can advertise content. Other users can subscribe to this page and receive information directly in their personal space. The owner of a commercial page will therefore have to ensure not only compliance with the principles of identification, transparency and loyalty, but also obtain the informed consent of the person who subscribes to it.
If they are qualified as joint controllers under the GDPR, they can also be held liable for every breach of such regulation.
As illustrated in 4.1 General Requirements, additional disclosure requirements apply to social media advertising in view of the principles of transparency and information on the internet.
Under Article XII.12 of the CEL, the natural or legal person on whose behalf the advertising is made should be clearly identifiable. However, this information does not have to appear on the advertising itself. The explanatory memorandum says that a hyperlink to this information is sufficient. This exception applies to all advertising on the internet.
Under the same article, the conditions for benefiting from a promotion or participating in a contest or game must be easily accessible and presented in an accurate and unambiguous manner. Such requirement can also be met by referring, by means of a hyperlink, to a web page containing all the relevant information.
There are no unique rules or regulations that apply to the use of any of the major social media platforms in Belgium.
Using editorial content in the media to promote a product when the company has financed the promotion itself, without it being clearly indicated, is a commercial practice that is considered a misleading practice against consumers (Article VI.100, 11° of the CEL). Therefore, native advertising is only allowed under Belgian law if it is clearly indicated in the content or using images or sounds clearly identifiable by the consumer that the communication was financed by the company promoting the product.
The Code for the Identification of Native Advertising and Related Commercial Communications
This code was drafted by the Centre for Communication of Belgium and is enforced by the JEP and outlines the major principles applicable to native advertising.
The commercial nature of native advertising and related communications must be instantly and clearly identifiable by the group targeted by the communication. Whether this requirement is met, will have to be considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account specific circumstances, the general impression given by the communication in question being decisive. In some cases, the content and/or context of the native advertising already immediately indicates that it is a commercial communication.
Where the commercial objective of the communication is not immediately and clearly apparent from the content and/or context, an explicit statement (marker) must be used to identify the commercial nature of the communication (eg, "advertising", "publicity", "advertorial", "advertorial promotion", "proposed by (...)", "produced in close collaboration with (...)", "powered by (...)", etc).
In Belgium, as in the rest of the world, influencers are increasingly called upon to highlight the products and services of advertisers and/or recommend them to their followers, the advertiser's target group.
A global trend is emerging towards greater transparency and control of influencer campaigns. As an illustration of this, in October 2018 the Centre for Communication published a recommendation on online influencers.
The core objective of this recommendation is to protect consumers and make sure they know whether a post should be qualified as an opinion, experience, or is a commercial communication.
This recommendation applies if two conditions are met:
Under the recommendation mentioned in 5.1 Trends, all commercial communications must be clearly identifiable to the recipient.
Moreover, commercial communications must be fair: their message should not contain incorrect information or mislead the target group with false statements, nor encourage children to persuade their parents or other adults to buy the products for them.
The recommendation on online influencers recommends:
The recommendation on online influencers states that whoever places the post, the online influencer is responsible for breach of this recommendation. In addition, companies that request the placing of advertising posts, networks, agencies, platforms and other parties involved in social media marketing may also be held liable for violations of this recommendation.
The advertiser can therefore be held liable for content posted by influencers and has a duty to monitor them.
As mentioned, all advertising on the internet is subject to the rules applicable to all forms of advertising, regardless of the medium used. In addition, the principles of identification and transparency of Articles XII.12 and XII.6 of the CEL apply to email marketing.
The rules concerning publicity by email are set out in Book XII of the CEL, as well as in the Royal Decree of 4 April 2003 to regulate the sending of advertising by email, the legislation on data protection (GDPR) and the recommendation of the Belgian Data Protection Authority on direct marketing.
Article I.18. of the CEL defines electronic mail as "any message in the form of text, voice, sound or image sent over a public communications network that may be stored in the recipient's network or terminal equipment until retrieved by the recipient". This is interpreted broadly to include text messages.
Soft Opt-in Regime
The use of electronic mail for commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior, free, specific and informed consent of the recipient of the message (Article XII.13 of the CEL), with the exceptions set out in the Royal Decree of 4 April 2003 to regulate the sending of advertising by email.
The service provider is free to obtain the consent of the recipients by any appropriate means, provided that these means comply with the various legal requirements, in particular GDPR and its Article 7 on consent.
In addition, when sending an advertising by email, the service provider should:
Exercise of the Rights
Under the Royal Decree of 4 April 2003 to regulate the sending of advertising by email and the GDPR, any person may notify a specific service provider directly, without charge or indication of reasons, of their wish to no longer receive advertising by email.
In such event, the service provider concerned is obliged to:
The regime set up by the Belgian legislator can be qualified as a "soft opt-in", since two exceptions temper the stringency of Article XII.13 of the CEL. The Royal Decree of 4 April 2003 to regulate the sending of advertising by email exempts the service provider from obtaining prior consent in two hypotheses:
According to the CEL, the service provider is responsible for the respect of the aforementioned rules.
According to GDPR, the service provider acting as controller is responsible for the respect of the aforementioned rules.
Breach to Articles XII.6 and XII.12 of the CEL is punishable by a criminal fine of EUR208 to EUR80,000 (Article XV.119 of the CEL).
Breach to Article XII.13 of the CEL is punishable by a criminal fine of EUR208 to EUR200,000 (Article XV.120 of the CEL).
If the infringements to Articles XII.6, XII.12 and XII.13 of the CEL are committed in bad faith, they are punishable by a criminal fine of EUR208 to EUR200,000.
Moreover, the (administrative) sanctions of the GDPR may also apply.
The use of an automated calling system, without human intervention, or a fax machine for direct marketing purposes is prohibited without the prior, free, specific and informed consent of the intended recipient (Article VI.110 of the CEL).
Unsolicited communications for the purposes of direct prospecting, carried out by techniques other than the automated calling system or fax, are authorised in the absence of manifest opposition from the recipient, whether a natural or legal person.
With regard to telecom subscribers, the operator must comply with a specific set of rules laid down in Article VI.111 of the CEL.
Belgium has a "Do Not Call" list which allows natural and legal persons to prevent commercial phone calls. Direct marketers are obliged to consult the list before calling someone for such purposes.
Infringements of Article VI.110 and VI.111 of the CEL are punishable by a criminal fine of EUR208 to EUR80,000 (Article XV.83 of the CEL).
Moreover, under Article VI.103.3° of the CEL, making repeated unwanted solicitations by telephone, fax, email or other means is a commercial practice that is in all circumstances an aggressive commercial practice.
Moreover, the sanctions related to GDPR may also apply.
The definition of “electronic mail” in Article I.18. of the CEL includes SMS text messages, MMS messages and instant messaging discussions. See 6.1 Email Marketing.
In Belgium, there are no special regulatory or self-regulatory requirements regarding the use of consumer data for the purposes of targeting consumers.
See 4.1 General Requirements regarding the principles of information and transparency contained in Articles XII.6 and XII.12 of the CEL. In addition, the provisions set out in the ICC code on targeted/interest-based advertising apply.
Targeted/interest-based advertising must comply both with the legislation on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and with Article 129 of the Act of 13 June 2005 on electronic communications and the GDPR, which permits the storage of personal information only if:
In Belgium, advertising and marketing directed at children is not covered by a single law or regulation. A number of rules on this subject are contained in multiple Belgian laws and/or regulations.
It is considered a misleading commercial practice to directly encourage children to buy or persuade their parents or other adults to buy an advertised product (Article VI.103 of the CEL).
Under Article 380 of the Belgian Criminal Code, it is forbidden to advertise services of a sexual nature directed specifically at minors or where it refers to services offered either by minors or by persons claiming to be minors.
Special Regulations Concerning Advertising and Children
Alcohol (convention on the advertising and marketing of beverages containing alcohol)
Alcohol advertising cannot:
Under the code of advertising for foodstuffs:
The “Belgian Pledge” is a self-regulatory commitment taken by the actors of the food industry to promote responsible food advertising to children. With this initiative, food companies, retailers and restaurant chains that have signed up make clear commitments regarding food advertising to children under the age of 12.
Radio and television advertising
The Flemish Media Decree (Articles 70 to 77) and the French Media Decree (Articles 13 and 14) establish, without much difference, that:
The main difference is that the French Media Decree applies to minors (less than 18 years of age) whereas the Flemish Media Decree’s principles apply to “children”, being defined as children of less than 12 years of age (Article 2.18°).
The Notions of “Personal Information” and “Children”
Under Belgian law, personal data is any information relating to a person that makes it possible to identify them directly or indirectly.
There are a number of rules on the subject of advertising and marketing to children:
Collection and Use of Personal Information from Children
In the case of products and services intended exclusively for adults, data from minors may not be collected.
If products and/or services are addressed in whole or in part to minors, personal data of minors may in principle only be used for direct marketing purposes in two situations:
In the case of information society services (ie, a service provided in principle at a distance, digitally) where the minor is asked to consent to the processing of its personal data for direct marketing purposes, the minor must be at least 13 years old to do so.
If the minor is younger than 13, the controller may only process the minor’s personal data if the holder of parental authority over the minor authorises it.
Belgian law makes a distinction between sweepstakes (lottery) and contests. A sweepstake is defined as an activity where a participant has a chance to win a prize and where the winners are determined exclusively or mostly by luck. A stake is not required but it has to be public.
A sweepstake is subject to a very strict regulation, namely Article 301 of the Criminal Code and (Lotteries Act of 31 December 1851). According to such provisions, it is forbidden, and even criminally sanctioned, to organise a sweepstake unless organised in partnership with one of the philanthropic registered associations or with the National Lottery.
Being commercial practices, sweepstakes and contests should not be misleading or aggressive, and should respect the principles in 2.1 General Standards. In addition, certain practices relating to sweepstakes and contests are considered, in all circumstances, as being misleading. The following are considered misleading:
Consumers can be required to make a purchase in order to participate.
Belgian law makes a distinction between lotteries, games of chance and contests (of skill). A lottery is defined as an activity where a participant has a chance to win a prize and where the winners are determined exclusively or mostly by luck. A stake is not required but it has to be public (see 7.1 Sweepstakes).
The Act of 7 May 1999 on games of chance, gaming establishments and the protection of players defines the term “game of chance” as a game or bet in which placing a stake of any kind results either in the loss of that stake by at least one of the players or betters, or in the winning of whatever nature by at least one of the players, betters or organisers of the game or bet and in which the element of chance is only of secondary importance in the gameplay, the indication of the winner or the determination of the size of the winnings.
Contests (of skill) are not regulated by law. The latter is defined as a game which requires the active participation of candidates and more particularly that they make some intellectual, creative or physical effort, on which the outcome is based. The selection could include some aspect of luck, but luck should be ancillary to the selection process (for eg, participants could first answer "no" to some obvious question and the winner could then be randomly selected from amongst the participants who have replied correctly). This is allowed under Belgian law. The rules have only to be clear in order to avoid misleading the participants as to the duration of the contest, the prizes, the conditions of participation, etc.
Games of Chance
According to the Act of 7 May 1999 on games of chance, it is prohibited to operate games of chance without obtaining a licence, issued by the Gaming Commission, to take part in illegal games of chance, facilitate the operation thereof or to run advertising for such games of chance.
There are eight types of licences. In order to be granted, they require the filing of specific forms (available on the website of the Gaming Commission).
Contest (of Skill)
There is no need to register the rules of a contest, nor to have such rules approved by a regulatory body.
There are no special laws or regulations that apply to loyalty programmes in Belgium. The rules have only to be clear in order to avoid misleading the participants on the duration of the programme, the prizes and the conditions of participation.
Loyalty cards can be simply made of a non-personalised piece of cardboard where each purchase is validated by a stamp. Nevertheless, most cards are personal and associated with a customer file. In this case, they must comply with data protection law.
A company offering promotions, in particular in the form of price-reduction advertising, must comply with the prohibition of unfair commercial practices towards consumers. This means that a price reduction announcement must be effective and not misleading, ie, it must be applied to a price that has been previously applied for a certain period of time.
Seasonal Sales (Articles VI.25-30 of the CEL)
Twice a year, traders may sell at greatly reduced prices using the denomination "sales" or another equivalent denomination (Articles VI.25-30 C of the CEL).
A company may sell goods on sale if these goods:
The trader that sells on sale must charge reduced prices. The goods must be discounted from their reference price.
Clearance Sales (Articles VI.22-24 of the CEL)
Clearance sales are permitted when specific circumstances require the accelerated disposal of stock or an assortment of goods.
Articles VI.22 of the CEL and following of the CEL set out the obligations to which companies are bound and list the circumstances in which such a sale may take place:
Pursuant to Article VI.23, Section 3 of the CEL, only the assets that are part of the stock of the enterprise before the start of the clearance sale may be put up for sale or sold in clearance sales.
Any advertising or other publicity concerning a clearance sale must specify the date of the beginning of the clearance sale.
Combined Offers of Products or Services (Articles VI.80-81 of the CEL)
Without prejudice to Article VI.81, combined offers to consumers are allowed as long as they do not constitute an unfair commercial practice within the meaning of Articles VI.93 et seq of the CEL.
According to Article VI.81.1 Section 1 of the CEL, any joint offer to the consumer, of which at least one element constitutes a financial service, and which is made by one enterprise or by different enterprises acting with a common purpose, is prohibited.
By derogation from paragraph 1, however, it is permitted to make a combined offer for:
The vouchers must mention the possible limit of their period of validity, as well as the terms of the offer.
Free Offer of Vouchers (Articles VI.31-32 of the CEL)
Pursuant to Article VI.31 of the CEL, vouchers offered by a company at the time of the acquisition of a good or service and entitling the holder to a subsequent refund of the price or part of the price mention the following data:
Under Article VI.2.6 of the CEL, before the consumer is bound by a contract, the seller must provide the consumer with information about the term of the contract or, in the case of a contract of indefinite duration or automatic renewal, the conditions for terminating the contract.
The seller must therefore inform the purchaser of this renewal clause before the contract is entered into, unless this information is apparent from the context. Otherwise, the automatic renewal is illegal and the purchaser can then demand a refund of the sums charged and cancel its subscription.