Last Updated October 08, 2019

Law and Practice

Authors



Winston & Strawn London LLP provides a wide range of legal services through its banking and finance practice, to public and private companies, leading financial institutions, multilateral and development finance institutions, private equity and investment funds, alternative funding sources, investors and emerging companies, on investment grade, leveraged and mezzanine financings. The firm advises on high-profile transactions and matters ranging from cross-border transactions, initial public offerings (IPOs) and project finance matters, to distressed acquisitions and creative “first-of-their-kind” financings. Clients include leading international funding sources which provide senior, subordinated, secured and unsecured debt, and hybrid (equity/debt) products, as well as institutional investors who regularly participate in senior debt markets, equity sponsors, and borrowers in both developed and emerging economies. Additional thanks to partners Ed Denny and Dan Meagher and associate Shaheer Momeni, among others, for their contributions to this chapter.

Under English law, the board of directors of an English company must act in the best interests of the company of which they are directors, rather than in the interests of its associated companies or the group as a whole.

Issues of corporate benefit often arise in the context of upstream and cross-stream guarantees. 

In essence, an upstream guarantee will be acceptable if the guarantor company’s board of directors reaches the conclusion that the giving of the guarantee will bring real benefit to the company or their actions are ratified by a resolution of all the shareholders of the company. Such benefit could consist of the group as a whole receiving financing that would otherwise not be available to it on favourable terms and the parent or other group member agreeing to share the benefit of that financing to the guarantor company in consideration of the guarantee given by it. Transfer pricing rules may lead to guarantee fees being payable between members of the group. In all circumstances, the question of whether there is sufficient corporate benefit will depend on the specific facts of the transaction which the directors must carefully consider.

The position is more complicated if there is a risk that the proposed guarantor is insolvent and a shareholder resolution will be insufficient to protect against creditors seeking to set the guarantee aside on the insolvency of the guarantor.

Winston & Strawn London LLP

1 Ropemaker St
London
EC2Y 9AW

020 7011 8700

+44 20 7011 8800

JeRobertson@winston.com www.winston.com
Author Business Card

Authors



Winston & Strawn London LLP provides a wide range of legal services through its banking and finance practice, to public and private companies, leading financial institutions, multilateral and development finance institutions, private equity and investment funds, alternative funding sources, investors and emerging companies, on investment grade, leveraged and mezzanine financings. The firm advises on high-profile transactions and matters ranging from cross-border transactions, initial public offerings (IPOs) and project finance matters, to distressed acquisitions and creative “first-of-their-kind” financings. Clients include leading international funding sources which provide senior, subordinated, secured and unsecured debt, and hybrid (equity/debt) products, as well as institutional investors who regularly participate in senior debt markets, equity sponsors, and borrowers in both developed and emerging economies. Additional thanks to partners Ed Denny and Dan Meagher and associate Shaheer Momeni, among others, for their contributions to this chapter.

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.