Blockchain 2024

Last Updated June 13, 2024

Israel

Law and Practice

Authors



Zioni Pillersdorf Phillip Advocates is a boutique law firm in Tel Aviv. Established in 2010, the firm specialises in civil, commercial and administrative litigation, class actions, commercial law, hi-tech, fintech and medical malpractice. Since 2017, the firm has developed special expertise in the field of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, leading some of Israel's most complicated crypto-related litigation, including no less than four crypto-related cases before the Israeli Supreme Court.

Israel's blockchain and cryptocurrencies space is bustling with innovation and Entrepreneurship, true to the “Start Up Nation” tradition of the country. Israeli companies and entrepreneurs are active in every bracket of the blockchain space. However, Israeli law and regulation have been relatively slow to adopt new laws and supporting regulation, and Israeli banks have also been reluctant to provide services to crypto related endeavors as well as to private customers who are active in the cryptocurrencies arena.

During the past 12 months, significant events impacted Israel's cryptocurrency landscape. Here are some of the major events:

  • An updated directive by issues by the Bank of Israel was supposed to ease the relations between crypto holders and banks, but has yet to make a substantial impact.
  • The Israeli supreme court ruled that it is not illegal for banks to be sell cryptocurrencies to the public, but called on the legislators to bring more clarity around this issue. It should be mentioned that no bank in Israel has started selling any cryptocurrency to the public, but do offer trade in BTC ETFs.
  • As a result of the attach by Hamas on 7 October 2024 and the war that ensued thereafter, the Israeli crypto community came together and raised significant funds in crypto for philanthropic needs. Israeli crypto firms also joined in a significant effort to find and report any terror financing endeavors.
  • Bits of Gold, a licensed crypto broker, announced a pilot of an New Israeli Shekel stable coin called BILS, on Solana. 
  • The Israeli Tax Authorities published a new protocol in an attempt to facilitate the payment of crypto related taxes in cases where the banks would not accept the funds in order to transfer them to the tax authorities.
  • Tectona is the first publicly traded Israeli company (and fifth overall) to receive a crypto services licence from the Israeli Capital Markets Authority.

According to the Israeli Crypto Blockchain and Web3 Companies Forum, there are no less than 174 companies operating in this space, employing approximately 3,800 employees. Companies ranging from crypto investment firms, algo trading firms, technical infrastructure, blockchain related RegTech innovations, cyber security and many other initiatives.

At this stage, Israeli individuals are using cryptocurrencies mostly for investment purposes. Cryptocurrencies, especially stable coins, are also used in some niche markets for payments – especially cross-border payments.

While, as in most jurisdictions, there has not been widespread adoption of blockchain based applications in the Israeli business community, there are many significant initiatives that suggest this may change in the near future. For example: 

  • The Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) has been public about working on a blockchain-based platform for issuing and trading digital securities in collaboration with Fireblocks, which includes tokenised bonds and deposits.
  • The Bank of Israel has also widely publicised its exploration and experimentation with infrastructure for a CBDC - the digital Shekel.

NFTs that gained popularity in art and entertainment initiatives in Israel have seen a decline in popularity, but there are numerous initiatives in Israel regarding the use of NFTs in relations to authentication of ownership of tangible assets, intellectual property rights in music, etc. These initiatives are relatively in their embryonic stage and have not gained significant traction in the general business community.

Israeli law has not addressed the issue of when a transfers of digital asset via a blockchain network considered final. In case law regarding blockchain based assets, there have not been significant findings regarding this issue. 

In a report published by the Israel Securities Authority (ISA), it made a distinction between “security tokens”, “utility tokens” and “payment tokens”.

While all type of crypto currencies are subject to AML rules, it is yet unclear where the line falls between the supervision of the ISA – regarding security tokens and what will probably remain in the sole jurisdiction of the Capital Market Authority – utility tokens and payment tokens. In regards to payment tokens, the Bank of Israel (BOI) has published a paper suggesting that it will have the authority to supervise stablecoins that will become a meaningful means of payment in the market.

The ISA is promoting legislation changes to the securities laws that will define “digital assets”, and which digital assets are “digital investment assets” and allows the ISA to give the necessary orders in order to supervise securities that take the form of “digital assets” and “digital investment assets”. So far these changes to the legislation have not been approved.

So far there is no specific law or regulation regarding tokenised securities in Israel. By default, these assets are under the jurisdiction of the ISA. As mentioned above, the ISA is now promoting legislation changes which will allow it to give any necessary order regarding such tokens in order to bring give specific instructions in order to protect the investor’s interests.

In February 2023, the Bank of Israel published a paper titled “Principles for activity of Stable Coins” inviting comments from the public. The paper has no legal binding effect, but it does provide a window into the state of mind of the BOI who is in charge of Israel's currency and payment systems. The paper makes a distinct distinction between stablecoins backed by deposits of fiat currency which it considers stable coins and “algorithmic” stablecoins that use a formula to maintain their peg which it considers to be speculative and are not regarded as stable coins.

The paper also suggests that the issuing of stable coins in Israel should be regulated and overseen by the Capital Market Authority, which regulates and oversees financial services companies that provide crypto related services. However, the paper suggests that if the use of a certain stable coin in Israel will become wide enough, the BOI will be able to declare it as a major payment system and assume the regulation and oversight of such stable coin.

In March of 2024, Bits of Gold, an Israeli licensed crypto broker and custodian, announced the launch of a stable coin pegged to the Israeli shekel called BILS, on the Solana infrastructure in collaboration with QEDIT and Fireblocks. The project is supervised by the Capital Markets Authority that has so far approved a limited pilot within a “sandbox” framework.

No information has been provided in this jurisdiction.

Although no cryptocurrency is considered legal tender, accepting payments in cryptocurrencies is allowed in Israel, and the Israeli Tax Authority issued orders explaining how the accepting party should report such payments – taxes (including VAT) will be paid in shekels. However, due to associated exchange costs, so far payment in crypto is rare.

At this stage, there are no specific regulatory orders relating to the use of digital assets in collateral arrangements in Israel.

At this stage, there are no specific Israeli laws, regulations or binding judicial decisions addressing the legal enforceability of private contractual arrangements made in whole or in part utilising an agreed-upon computer code that executes across multiple “nodes” on a blockchain-based network. Therefore, general principles of contract law will apply.

The Israeli regulatory jurisdiction regarding blockchain technology and digital assets currently adopts an approach of integrating these innovations within established regulatory frameworks rather than instituting standalone regulatory structures. In this section, we delve into the ongoing implementation of this approach across diverse regulatory spheres in Israel. This process commences with the integration of digital currency under the classification of a “financial asset”, consequently invoking additional obligations prescribed by pertinent legislation. These obligations encompass provisions pertaining to applying for a licence to provide services, preventing money laundering, customer relations, disseminating marketing materials and more.

In Israel, the oversight of financial service providers falls under the purview of the Supervision of Financial Services (Regulated Financial Services) Law, 2016 (the “Supervision Law”). This legislative framework serves as the cornerstone for regulating activities related to financial assets, which has recently expanded to encompass digital currencies. The law’s primary aim is to cultivate the financial services sector as a robust alternative to traditional banking, foster competition and ensure thorough supervision of the industry to prevent its misuse of illegal activities.

The Capital Market, Insurance, and Savings Authority (the “Capital Market Authority”) is the regulatory body responsible for overseeing financial service providers. As part of its responsibilities, the Capital Market Authority oversees and manages the licensing process, setting out specific requirements and obligations that must be fulfilled to obtain a licence to operate with financial assets.

The licensing process mandates a thorough evaluation of the applicant’s financial capacity and origins, entailing the submission of a company’s activity document or business plan and proof of adequate financial (with a business turnover surpassing ILS30 million). Further prerequisites for applying comprise a minimum equity of ILS1 million, integrity assessments, competency evaluations for the applicant, executives, controlling shareholders and stakeholders, and obtaining authorisation for controlling interests and controllers.

In addition to the provisions outlined in the Supervision Law, the Capital Market Authority has issued updated procedures for applying for financial services licences, elaborating on the requirements stipulated in the Supervision Law. The application process necessitates the submission of a comprehensive business plan evaluating the applicant’s organisational structure and financial robustness (including assessment of transaction volume and methods for valuing virtual currencies), along with documents detailing organisational structure, operational reviews, fraud and embezzlement prevention strategies, data privacy and security, business continuity plans, customer management protocols, currency volatility risk management, anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing measures, outsourcing arrangements, cyber risk management and adherence to consumer protection regulations.

The law imposes stringent criminal penalties and significant financial sanctions on financial service providers, controlling owners, and corporate officers who do not adhere to the licensing process’s legal requirements. Corporations intending to offer services related to financial assets must obtain an extended licence, which complies with the requirements presented in this section.

Zioni Pillersdorf Phillip Advocates successfully guided Bits of Gold through the licensing process over the past few years, helping it become one of the first Israeli companies to obtain an extended licence.

It is pertinent to note that current Israeli legislation pertains solely to virtual currencies and transactions involving the exchange, redemption, sale, conversion or transfer of financial assets and their management or custody. Israeli regulators have yet to issue specific regulatory guidance exclusively for DeFi or DAOs.

Financial service providers must comply with the Supervision Law provisions, which mandates complete and transparent disclosure to customers and includes additional measures to prevent misleading information in advertising materials. These obligations entail disclosing all essential details concerning the content, scope, conditions, pricing and cancellation procedures of the services provided and maintaining transparency in all marketing and advertising materials to prevent the dissemination of misleading advertisements.

Additionally, applicants are required to provide the Capital Market Authority with a customer care document as part of the licensing application process. This document should detail their interactions and practices with customers, including marketing presentations, links to online advertisements and other relevant information.

Concerning the anti-money laundering obligations imposed on financial service providers, the Anti-Money Laundering Order (Duties of Identification, Reporting and Record-Keeping of Money Service Businesses and Credit Service Providers for the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terror Financing) 5778-2018 is the comprehensive regulatory framework applicable to all entities operating in the financial services sector. The order extends the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) framework to encompass financial service providers that handle digital currencies, ensuring oversight of financial services involving intangible assets. The order’s primary objective is establishing a robust framework for preventing money laundering across the industry. The order outlines various obligations, including customer due diligence, identification and verification procedures, obtaining declarations from beneficiaries and owners, obligations concerning electronic transfers, and reporting routine and suspicious activities to the Authority for the Prohibition of Money Laundering and Financing Terrorism. Moreover, the order mandates regular monitoring and record-keeping practices and additional requirements based on transaction volumes.

In terms of international standards, Israel joined the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in 2018, marking a significant milestone that demonstrates a major shift in Israel’s approach towards safeguarding the integrity and security of its financial system, positioning Israel at the forefront of the global effort to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, and recognising a substantial national strategic achievement. The FATF’s evaluation report acknowledges Israel as one of the leading nations in combating terrorist financing and money laundering, comparable to countries such as the United States of America and the United Kingdom. In the FATF’s audit report, the Israel Money Laundering and Terror Financing Prohibition Authority (IMPA) was ranked as part of the audit report as one of the two best authorities for the prohibition of money laundering and terrorist financing in the world.

The Supervision Law does not delineate specific guidelines specifically crafted for entities that manage digital assets and seek modifications in their governance structure. As previously indicated, entities engaged with digital assets desiring alterations in their control framework are governed under the identical stipulations applicable to traditional financial service providers. According to the Supervision Law, “Control” is defined as the capacity, either alone or in conjunction with others, to guide the operations of a corporation, excluding the capacity derived solely from serving as a director or other officer in the corporation. Without limiting the breadth of the above, an individual will be deemed to have control over a corporation if (1) they possess half or more of a specific type of control in the corporation, or (2) they have the capability to obstruct business decisions within the corporation, except for decisions pertaining to the sale or liquidation of the majority of the corporation's businesses or a significant alteration therein.

The Supervisory Law states that no person may exercise control over a corporation that offers financial services unless they have a specific permit issued by the supervisory authority, subject to the conditions specified in the licence. As previously stated, considerable importance is given to the identity of the controlling owners and the statements they provide during the licence submission process.

Currently, Israeli regulations do not specify insolvency or resolution regimes uniquely designed for digital asset firms. These firms are subject to the same general principles of asset liquidation and creditor prioritisation that apply to all corporations.

In addition to existing regulations for entities involved in digital assets, the Israel Securities Authority has recently proposed amendments that detail how Securities Law 5728-1968 should be applied to digital assets. This proposal addresses several areas, including public offerings, stock exchange operations, clearing systems, investment consulting, portfolio management and collective investments in trusts. The proposed amendments specify that securities laws will be applicable to activities involving digital assets that exhibit characteristics similar to those regulated under current regulations.

No information has been provided in this jurisdiction.

In recent years, there have been discussions in Israel surrounding the bill to encourage the development of technology in the financial sector in Israel 2021. This sandbox is intended to serve as a testing ground for fintech companies to trial their models and assess their effects on consumers. The bill proposes the formation of a committee to supervise this programme, provides pathways for companies seeking regulatory approval, and sets forth guidelines for safeguarding potential customers and investors.

Recently, within the established framework, Zioni Pillersdorf Phillip Advocates has actively guided and assisted Bits of Gold through a pilot programme for a stablecoin within a regulatory sandbox environment. This initiative is governed by the Capital Market Authority’s specific guidelines and its ongoing oversight. This engagement showcases our capability to navigate complex regulatory landscapes and positions our clients at the forefront of financial innovation. It presents a significant opportunity to shape the evolving digital currency market and sets a precedent for similar ventures in the sector, potentially influencing future regulatory frameworks and market strategies.

Regarding compliance with global standards in the blockchain sector, Israel actively aligns itself with international norms, particularly those outlined by the Financial Action Task Force. As a member state of the FATF organisation, Israel adheres to its standards. Israel’s dedication to these standards was underscored in the 2022 audit report, earning a commendable “Largely Compliant” rating in emerging technologies, particularly virtual currencies. This achievement reflects Israel’s dedication to combating money laundering and terrorist financing, as evidenced by the amendment of the money laundering prohibition order. Israel’s significant progress in this area underscores its position as a global leader in regulating asset and cryptocurrency activities. This accomplishment is the result of collaborative efforts by various Israeli authorities over the past few years.

In Israel, the regulatory oversight of digital assets is vested in several vital agencies, with the Capital Market, Insurance and Savings Authority playing a pivotal role as an independent financial regulator.

  • The Capital Market Authority oversees non-banking financial entities, including insurance companies, pension funds, provident and training funds, and regulated financial services like non-bank credit providers, payment services, money transfers, fintech companies and financial service providers that handle digital assets. As the primary supervisory body for financial service providers, including those dealing in digital assets, the Capital Market Authority adopts a prudent approach to ensure compliance with the licensing requirements stipulated by the Supervision Law. Given the significant failures witnessed in recent years, such as the collapse of Luna Terra, the crypto exchange FTX and the American Israeli company Celsius, the Authority not only maintains a cautious stance but also actively enforces regulations by warning the public against engaging with unlicensed entities that offer financial services involving virtual currencies. This proactive approach aims to safeguard market integrity and protect investors from potential risks associated with the digital asset sector.
  • The Bank of Israel, acting as the central bank for the State of Israel, carries out several critical functions including the supervision of Israeli banks, the management of foreign exchange, the maintenance of price stability, and the provision of economic guidance to the government to facilitate various monetary policies. Recently, the Bank has broadened its regulatory oversight to include digital assets utilised for payment purposes. In response, it has crafted specific principles aimed at digital assets primarily employed in payment transactions, and it promotes the adoption of stablecoins within Israel. Given the rapid expansion in digital asset activities and the global setbacks linked to digital currencies, the necessity for stringent regulation and comprehensive oversight of digital asset usage has become increasingly apparent.
  • The Israel Tax Authority, operating under the Ministry of Finance, has taken a significant step toward regulating and taxing virtual currency activities. In response to the growing prevalence of virtual currencies, it has developed a procedure that allows individuals to directly remit taxes on profits from digital currency sales to the Tax Authority’s account at the Bank of Israel. This initiative aims to standardise work processes and inspections, making it easier for individuals to transfer tax payments. While regulatory frameworks for virtual currencies in Israel are still in development, this initiative by the tax authority is a notable stride in the right direction.

As digital currencies become more integrated into Israel’s regulation, it is expected that an increasing number of entities will exercise both influence and regulatory control over digital currencies, thus shaping the discourse regarding blockchain and digital assets within Israel.

In Israel, while no official self-regulatory organisations (SROs) exclusively govern blockchain businesses or users, several trade groups and industry associations play significant roles in shaping the landscape for blockchain technology and digital assets. These organisations often work collaboratively with governmental bodies to advocate for favourable policies, provide educational resources and establish best practices for the industry. The Israel Blockchain Association is essential in shaping the blockchain and cryptocurrency sectors. This notable organisation serves as a platform for dialogue with regulators, aiming to influence the regulatory framework, promote innovation and foster the adoption of blockchain technology across various industries while ensuring compliance and integrity. Additionally, it focuses on cryptocurrency-related issues, advocating for users’ rights and influencing public policy to support technological growth and consumer protection. The association is instrumental in creating a supportive ecosystem where blockchain technologies can develop responsibly and transparently, even without specific government-imposed regulatory frameworks. While there may be other smaller or less prominent groups or initiatives, the Israel Blockchain Association stands out as the leading organisation facilitating dialogue between the industry and regulators and advocating for blockchain technology and its integration into various sectors.

As mentioned, in Israel, the government has shown interest in understanding and potentially integrating blockchain technology in various sectors, including financial services, government operations and more. As a result, several initiatives and task forces have been established to investigate the potential benefits and challenges of the technology; among them is the Bank of Israel’s initiative to establish a committee tasked with drafting regulations to oversee currency stability within Israel. The principles detailed in the document are intended to regulate the use of stable currencies in Israel, to ensure that their activities are conducted using risk management measures, and to match consumer protection and stability requirements with this distinct form of currency. Another initiative is the Securities Authority committee established to assess the regulation of decentralised cryptocurrency offerings to the public. This committee examined how the Securities Law 5728 would apply to offers and issuances made to the Israeli public using distributed ledger technology and trading in such assets. The committee’s findings were that (a) a particular disclosure framework should be created for issuers of cryptographic assets, drawing from local or international regulatory experience; (b) establish a “regulatory sandbox” to support experiments in cryptographic asset issuances; and (c) examine a dedicated trading platform for cryptographic assets classified as securities and examine a crowdfunding-like model for such ventures.

Currently, there is no substantial legal litigation process that specifically addresses the interpretation of laws that govern blockchain and digital assets, which could significantly impact the blockchain sector. However, a notable judicial case involves our firm’s petition filed with the Supreme Court on behalf of Bits of Gold and the Israeli Bitcoin Association. This legal challenge was directed against the Bank of Israel’s approval for “Pepper”, the digital branch of Bank Leumi, to offer trading services in virtual currencies. In the petition, we argued that this approval extends beyond the activities permitted under the Banking (Licensing) Law, 5741-1981, and that the Bank of Israel failed to satisfy the conditions for such an expansion. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, underlining the need for a flexible interpretation of the law to adapt to the changing financial landscape, including incorporating digital currencies.

This decision carries significant consequences. On the one hand, it showcases the adaptability of regulations and laws to innovation and the dynamic nature of financial environments. It empowers banks to provide services in digital assets, even in the absence of explicit legal frameworks. On the other hand, it also highlights the ambiguity surrounding regulating digital assets and the uncertainties prevailing in Israel’s legal landscape regarding blockchain and digital assets.

In Israel, enforcement actions related to blockchain, and cryptocurrency have been instrumental in defining the regulatory perimeter for market participants. The following are the key authorities' activities:

  • The Capital Market, Insurance, and Savings Authority - this authority is pivotal in issuing licences to financial service providers, including those handling virtual currencies. By regulating and licensing entities in the digital asset space, the Capital Market Authority ensures that these companies meet strict standards for financial stability, consumer protection and compliance with AML regulations. Their rigorous licensing process helps maintain the integrity of the financial services market, particularly concerning new and emerging technologies like blockchain.
  • The Bank of Israel - the Bank of Israel has taken a proactive approach to exploring and potentially regulating stablecoins. The Bank’s involvement is crucial in establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoins, which are increasingly seen as an essential bridge between traditional finance and cryptocurrencies. This involvement includes assessing risks, potential benefits and the overall impact of stablecoins on the financial system and monetary policy.
  • The Israel Securities Authority - the Israel Securities Authority has actively monitored Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), stepping in when tokens are deemed securities offered without proper authorisation. This has emphasised the necessity for entities planning ICOs to comply with securities regulations if their tokens qualify as securities.
  • The Israel Tax Authority - the Israel Tax Authority is responsible and focused on ensuring that cryptocurrency transactions are properly reported and taxed, clarifying tax obligations for traders and investors in digital assets.
  • The Financial Sanctions Committee According to Prohibition on Money Laundering Law, 5760-2000 - The Financial Sanctions Committee serves a critical role in overseeing enforcement actions pertaining to breaches of the law. However, its mandate extends beyond mere enforcement to encompass scenarios where substantial money laundering risks are identified within financial activities.

A recent case serves as a clear example of enforcement action. The Financial Sanctions Committee, operating under the Money Laundering Prohibition Law, levied a fine of ILS700,000 on IBI Investment House Ltd (IBI). This penalty stemmed from their activities involving the conversion of digital currencies into fiat currencies for clients between 2017 and 2020 and their subsequent deposit into Israeli bank accounts. The committee’s investigation revealed that IBI initiated these practices without implementing adequate policies, procedures and controls to mitigate the significant risks associated with money laundering. Notably, this represents the most substantial sanction imposed under this law on an entity supervised by the Israel Securities Authority recently.

These enforcement measures are not just punitive, but also serve as a guidepost for the future. As the blockchain sector continues to evolve, it is anticipated that further regulatory adjustments and enforcement actions will be necessary to provide continued guidance and oversight. Such measures are not just essential, but imperative for maintaining the integrity and security of financial transactions in this dynamic and rapidly developing landscape.

The Tax Authority regulated the taxation of activities involving virtual currencies in Income Tax Circular 05/2018 on 17 January 2018, titled “Taxation of Activities in Decentralized Payment Methods (referred to as 'Virtual Currencies')”.

The circular stipulates (Section 3.1.2) that the sale of decentralised payment methods (such as Bitcoin) “will be classified as capital income and will be taxed as capital gains”. Thus, the capital gain resulting from the sale of virtual currencies is taxable in Israel, and those engaged in trading virtual currencies must report and pay taxes accordingly.

In many cases, even after the taxpayer has reported income derived from crypto activities, and in more extreme cases, even after signing a tax assessment agreement with the Israeli tax authorities, the taxpayer found themselves at a loss and helpless against Israeli banks which refused to accept money derived from crypto activities, even when presenting the tax assessment agreement, due to the banks’ concerns about money laundering.

Therefore, the Tax Authority published on 23 December 2023, a “Temporary Procedure for Accepting Tax Payments from Profits on the Realization of Decentralized Payment Methods”.

According to the procedure, a virtual currency constitutes an asset as defined in the Income Tax Ordinance. Therefore, profits from the realisation of a virtual currency are subject to capital gains tax and in certain cases, income tax, due to being considered business income. The procedure explains that the current commercial banking system in Israel poses challenges in accepting money originating from virtual currencies due to the difficulty in tracking the source of the funds and concerns about money laundering, and that the banking system’s refusal to accept such funds also applies to tax payments derived from profits on the realisation of virtual currencies.

Therefore, the procedure clarifies that the Tax Authority intends to allow taxpayers who have profited from the realisation of virtual currencies to pay the taxes due from those realisations. The procedure sets the following instructions:

  • The taxpayer must prove that the commercial bank refused to accept the tax money in question originating from virtual currencies.
  • The taxpayer must detail their activities in virtual currencies, their taxable income, the taxes due, and so forth.

The money deposited in the Tax Authority’s bank account will be deposited in shekels only, and it will be transferred from a foreign bank account, including accounts of a crypto exchange, investment house or other financial service provider operating in a foreign bank.

The taxpayer must provide a declaration that the funds used to purchase the virtual currencies from which the income was derived are legal, that the tax is paid from the income derived from the virtual currencies, and the taxpayer must attach documentation regarding the source of the funds. Additionally, the taxpayer must provide documentation evidencing the “virtual currency path”, ie, the transactions conducted in virtual currencies.

There are no specific ESG/sustainable finance requirements for companies involved in digital assets in Israel.

Israel has extensive laws and regulations regarding privacy and data protection, bringing it in line with other advanced privacy regimes such as the GDPR and the CPAA. At this point in time, there are no specific rules or regulations regarding privacy and data protection for blockchain-based products or services.

Zioni Pillersdorf Phillip Advocates

8 Shaul Hamelech Blvd
P.O. 40002
Tel Aviv
Israel

+972 3 5244 442

+972 3 716 5379

office@zplaw.co.il www.zplaw.co.il/en/
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Zioni Pillersdorf Phillip Advocates is a boutique law firm in Tel Aviv. Established in 2010, the firm specialises in civil, commercial and administrative litigation, class actions, commercial law, hi-tech, fintech and medical malpractice. Since 2017, the firm has developed special expertise in the field of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, leading some of Israel's most complicated crypto-related litigation, including no less than four crypto-related cases before the Israeli Supreme Court.

Introduction

Israel is often referred to as the “Start Up Nation”, a description that extends to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies sectors as well. Israeli companies and entrepreneurs are active in every bracket of the blockchain space and have a massive international presence. According to the Israeli Crypto Blockchain & Web3 Companies Forum, there are no less than 174 companies operating in this space, employing approximately 3,800 employees. Companies activities range from crypto investment, algo trading, technical infrastructure, blockchain-related RegTech innovations, cyber security and many other initiatives. 

As for the Israeli public, a handful of Israeli brokers have been serving the Israeli public for over a decade, but Israeli consumers were also quick to adopt international platforms for buying and selling crypto assets. The Israeli Bitcoin community has its roots as early as 2011, and the Israeli Bitcoin Association, a nonprofit dedicated to advance the exposure of Bitcoin (and later additional crypto currencies) was established a decade ago.

As will be elaborated on, Israeli crypto related regulation and banking lagged behind the booming scene - and up to this point in time, significant sub-sectors of the crypto domain are still not dealt with specifically in Israeli law.

This section will explore several key aspects of Israel’s cryptocurrency landscape, focusing on the regulatory frameworks, banking relationships, and tax implications that shape the industry. It will delve into the challenges and opportunities presented by Israel’s legal and financial institutions, examining how these factors influence both local and international crypto-related activities. Additionally, the discussion will highlight notable legal cases that have set precedents in the sector and assess the potential impacts of emerging technologies like stable coins. By providing a comprehensive analysis of these themes, the essay aims to offer insights into the current state of the cryptocurrency industry in Israel and its future trajectory. 

Legal Framework and Regulatory Regime

Crypto licences and supervision

Israeli legislation and regulation took a while to catch up to the technological progress made by the local community and its relatively enthusiastic adoption of blockchain technologies. Cryptocurrencies were only formally introduced into Israeli law in 2016 – when it was decided that acting as a broker or custodian of virtual currencies (as they are referred to in Israeli law), requires a licence that will be issued and supervised by the Capital Market Authority (CMA), the Israeli regulator in charge of savings and Insurance. The law regarding financial service providers puts forward significant consumer protection and security orders as well as significant supervision power to the CMA.

Although the law regulating crypto firms was put in place in 2016, the first crypto licence was issued only recently, in September 2022, with four more issued since. It should be mentioned that Israeli brokers have been active for over a decade, but have had to do without a formal regulatory framework. Thus, these companies had to practice self regulation until the initially tedious and slow going licensing process was finished. It should be noted that in recent years the licensing process of financial services (and especially the crypto licence which is a specific class within these licences) has become much more efficient.

Other key regulators

Although the law puts the CMA in charge of crypto exchanges and custodians, other Israeli regulators are involved in regulating the space, and are expected to become more significant in the coming years. For one, the Israeli Securities Authority (ISA) is the regulator expected to be in charge of any security tokens that will be issued by Israeli companies and is now promoting legislation changes regarding “digital assets” including, but not restricted to, virtual currencies. These changes are intended to better assist the ISA to regulate and supervise activities regularly supervised by it, such as trading platforms, advisors, fund managers etc, where it comes to assets using blockchain or other DLT technologies.

The ISA also regulates the Israeli Stock Exchange, where securities of two companies dedicated to crypto activities are traded: one is an investment firm focused on crypto assets, and the other is involved in various crypto-related endeavors, including algo trading. The latter is the most recent company to receive a crypto licence from the Capital Markets Authority.

The Bank of Israel (BOI), which holds both the Israeli central bank and the body regulating and supervising Israeli banks is also a key player in the Israeli crypto space. As will be detailed shortly, Israeli banks have been reluctant to allow crypto related funds to be deposited in client’s bank accounts, and have also been reluctant in serving crypto related companies. New orders by the Bank of Israel were put in place in an attempt to address the issue, with limited success so far. The Bank of Israel has also been experimenting with Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) related infrastructure, but no decision has been taken regarding central adoption of a cryptocurrency as of yet. However, in a draft of guidelines issued by the BOI it is suggested that in case that a private stable coin attached to the Israeli shekel will be widely adopted it will naturally be brought under the supervision on the BOI.       

Regulatory advances have also been made as taxes on crypto related profits are concerned, as will be elaborated on.

As for AML and crypto in Israel - in November of 2021, a comprehensive order went into effect bringing Israel in line with leading AML regulations as required by the FATF. The Israel Money Laundering and Terror Financing Prohibition Authority has led the changes in regulations in order to set the guidelines for the operations in crypto. The order specifies, inter alia, strict KYC requirements, blacklists checks and reporting mechanisms.

Banking-Crypto relations

The challenging link in the Israeli crypto space is, and has been for a while, the reluctance of Israeli banks to allow crypto related funds into the bank account both of individuals and companies. With the intervention of the courts and involvement of the Bank of Israel in its capacity as the regulator in charge of the banking sector, some changes have been introduced lately that are making marginal improvements in bank-crypto relations.

Bits of Gold v Leumi Bank

In two landmark cases, the courts in Israel had to intervene in order to allow the Israeli crypto space to exist. The first notable event was when Leumi Bank, one of the two dominant banks in Israel, decided back in 2015 not to allow any crypto related activity in the account held in the bank by Bits of Gold, an Israeli broker (now licensed by the CMA). The bank’s main argument (among other complaints against the company which the court did not accept), was that it does not know how to manage the risks in crypto related activities due to the risky nature of the crypto space and the lack of any regulatory framework regarding this sort of activity. In June 2017, the District Court accepted the bank's position and allowed the bank to effectively close the company's bank account (1992-06-15).

Bits of Gold appealed the District Court’s decision to the Israeli Supreme Court (case number 6389/17), which in a landmark interim decision in February 2018, decided to allow the company’s activity determining that as the bank has the right to examine any transaction and manage its risks accordingly, it will not be allowed to deny the company the use of the account in its crypto related activity. The case was later settled by the parties with the active involvement and approval of the Supreme Court during a hearing held in June 2019. In the settlement, which was in line with the spirit of the interim decision, it was agreed that the bank will retain its right to examine any transaction and take any steps it deems necessary to manage its risks, but will not halt the company’s crypto related activity. Although both the interim decision and the settlement specifically stated that they were not meant to be binding precedents, they were quoted and referred to both by lower courts and regulators as guidelines to the industries relations with banks in Israel.

Arav v Mercantile Discount Bank

Another landmark case was the case of Arav v Mercantile Discount Bank. While the Bits of Gold case was related to banks serving a crypto broker, Arav’s case was an important milestone in regard to individuals attempting to deposit crypto related funds into their private banks accounts in Israel. The District Court, after receiving input from all relevant regulatory authorities via the office of the state attorney, published its decision on February 2021 stating that a blanket policy of a bank, which completely prohibits opening an account for a customer dealing in digital currencies, is not reasonable. The court went on to suggest that the banks need to manage risks related to crypto and accept funds that originate from low-risk activities within the crypto space. It went on to order that Arav’s funds will be allowed into his bank account subject to an external expert report tracking the relevant coins and showing they presented low risk of money laundering. It is important to mention that the District Court’s decision in Arav case was given before any licences were issued in Israel to crypto brokers or exchanges (in this case Bit2C now licensed by the CMA) and before the AML orders were updated to accommodate crypto activity.

The bank appealed to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court rejected the appeal in January 2023 explaining that the appeal has become theoretical due to the fact that the District Court's decision has already been executed in fact.

The Supreme Court also noted that the Attorney General and the Bank of Israel had reached an agreement on regulating the deposit of funds from virtual currencies. This issue is now governed by Proper Banking Management Directive 411, which addresses risk management in services related to virtual assets and provides a legally binding framework for all banking corporations dealing with private customers.

Banking Management Directive 411

In May 2022, while the appeal in the Arav case was still pending, the BOI updated its Banking Management Directive 411, which is the directive dealing with AML risk management. For the first time, the BOI officially ordered that banks operating in Israel will not automatically refuse to provide services related to funds related to crypto currencies. The directive obliges the banks to formulate a policy for receiving funds related to virtual currencies that reflects risk management that, among other things, will take into account the following issues: the type of cryptocurrency and the degree of anonymity it allows for its users, the identity of the cryptocurrency service provider and the characteristics of the customer’s activity.

In addition, the directive states that each bank must determine risk-reducing paths.

It was further determined that if the scope of a customer’s activity exceeds ILS100,000 per year, the bank should find out the source of the funds used to purchase the cryptocurrency, as well as the path of the tokens or coins relevant to the transaction. The Directive allows the bank to rely on licensed Israeli crypto services providers in regard to the source of funds and the examination of the path of the virtual currencies.

Current challenges

Following the implementation of Directive 411, the banks in Israel have adopted risk management policies to funds related to crypto activity. However, there is a very harsh criticism among the crypto community in Israel claiming that the policies adopted by the banks are too conservative. Thus, to the best of our knowledge, most banks in Israel have approved a very limited list of virtual currencies (mainly Bitcoin, Ethereum and USDC) and have also approved the receipt of funds from very few international platforms, in addition to the handful of companies holding an Israeli licence on behalf of the CAM. We assume that in the next few years the BOI, as well as the Israeli courts due to litigation, will be forced to be involved and have a say about the implementation of the 411 directive by the banks.

It should be added that more complicated cases of funds related to crypto activity are also accepted by banks on a case-by-case basis. These cases usually need to be backed up by an expert opinion analysing the root of the virtual currencies and the money laundering risks relevant to the transaction. 

Cryptocurrency Taxes in Israel

The Tax Authority regulated the taxation of activities involving virtual currencies in Income Tax Circular 05/2018 on 17 January 2018, titled “Taxation of Activities in Decentralized Payment Methods (referred to as 'Virtual Currencies')”.

The circular stipulates that the sale of decentralised payment methods (such as Bitcoin) “will be classified as capital income and will be taxed as capital gains”. Thus, the capital gain resulting from the sale of virtual currencies is taxable in Israel, and those engaged in trading virtual currencies must report and pay taxes accordingly.

In many cases, even after the taxpayer has reported income derived from crypto activities, and in more extreme cases, even after signing a tax assessment agreement with the Israeli tax authorities, taxpayers found themselves at a loss and helpless against Israeli banks which refused to accept money derived from crypto activities, even when presenting the tax assessment agreement, due to the banks’ concerns about money laundering.

Therefore, on December 23, 2023, the Tax Authority published a “Temporary Procedure for Accepting Tax Payments from Profits on the Realization of Decentralized Payment Methods”.

According to the procedure, a cryptocurrency constitutes an asset as defined in the Income Tax Ordinance. Therefore, profits from the realisation of a cryptocurrency are subject to capital gains tax, and in certain cases, income tax, due to being considered business income. The procedure explains that the current commercial banking system in Israel poses challenges in accepting money originating from virtual currencies due to the difficulty in tracking the source of the funds and concerns about money laundering, and that the banking system’s refusal to accept such funds also applies to tax payments derived from profits on the realisation of virtual currencies.

Therefore, the procedure clarifies that the Tax Authority intends to allow taxpayers who have profited from the realisation of virtual currencies to pay the taxes due from those realisations. The procedure sets the following instructions:

  • The taxpayer must prove that the commercial bank refused to accept the tax money in question originating from virtual currencies.
  • The taxpayer must detail their activities in virtual currencies, their taxable income, the taxes due and so forth.
  • The money deposited in the Tax Authority’s bank account will be deposited in Israeli shekels only and it will be transferred from a foreign bank account, including accounts of a crypto exchange, investment house or other financial service provider operating in a foreign bank.
  • The taxpayer must provide a declaration that the funds used to purchase the virtual currencies from which the income was derived are legal, that the tax is paid from the income derived from the virtual currencies, and the taxpayer must attach documentation regarding the source of the funds. Additionally, the taxpayer must provide documentation evidencing the “virtual currency path”, ie, the transactions conducted in cryptocurrency.

An Israeli Stable Coin Attached to the Shekel is in the Pipeline

At this point, there is no approved regulatory framework for stable coins in Israel and no stable coins pegged to the Israeli shekel are in circulation. As mentioned above, the BOI is experimenting in infrastructure related to a possible future CBDC, and has also issued an initial draft of ideas regarding future supervision of stable coins, but these have not made their way to the Israeli rule book as of yet.

Recently, Bits of Gold, a licensed crypto financial services company, licensed and supervised by the CMA, announced the launch of its shekel-backed “stablecoin” named BILS™ in collaboration with Solana, QEDIT and Fireblocks. The pilot stage of the first Israeli stable coin has been approved by the CMA. The timeline for the release of the Israeli shekel-pegged stable coin to the public has not been announced yet.

In Summary

In summary, the cryptocurrency industry in Israel is marked by a dynamic blend of innovation and regulatory challenges. As Israeli firms continue to push the boundaries of blockchain technology, the regulatory framework slowly adapts, striving to balance market freedom with investor protection and financial stability. Legal precedents and the evolving stance of Israeli banks towards crypto transactions have played pivotal roles in shaping the industry’s landscape. Looking ahead, the introduction of stable coins and further developments in cryptocurrency regulation could significantly influence Israel’s economic landscape. Embracing these changes while ensuring robust consumer protection and anti-money laundering measures will be crucial for sustaining Israel’s position as a leader in the global cryptocurrency arena.

Zioni Pillersdorf Phillip Advocates

8 Shaul Hamelech Blvd
P.O. 40002
Tel Aviv
Israel

+972 3 524 4442

+972 3 716 5379

office@zplaw.co.il www.zplaw.co.il/en/
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Zioni Pillersdorf Phillip Advocates is a boutique law firm in Tel Aviv. Established in 2010, the firm specialises in civil, commercial and administrative litigation, class actions, commercial law, hi-tech, fintech and medical malpractice. Since 2017, the firm has developed special expertise in the field of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, leading some of Israel's most complicated crypto-related litigation, including no less than four crypto-related cases before the Israeli Supreme Court.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Zioni Pillersdorf Phillip Advocates is a boutique law firm in Tel Aviv. Established in 2010, the firm specialises in civil, commercial and administrative litigation, class actions, commercial law, hi-tech, fintech and medical malpractice. Since 2017, the firm has developed special expertise in the field of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, leading some of Israel's most complicated crypto-related litigation, including no less than four crypto-related cases before the Israeli Supreme Court.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.