Child Relocation 2026

Last Updated September 08, 2026

UAE

Law and Practice

Author



Awatif Mohammad Shoqi Advocates & Legal Consultancy is a Dubai-based full-service law firm with a 50+ multidisciplinary legal team, led by Emirati advocate Mrs Awatif Al Khouri, who has more than three decades of experience in complex personal status matters. The firm is based in Dubai and represents UAE nationals, expatriates and international clients before all levels of the UAE courts, including the Federal Supreme Court. Its family law practice covers divorce, child custody, guardianship, visitation, child and spousal maintenance, relocation disputes, inheritance-related matters, marital agreements, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, and cross-border family disputes. The team also draws on the firm’s wider civil, criminal, commercial and dispute resolution capabilities where family matters involve property, financial claims, criminal allegations, business interests or overseas proceedings.

In the UAE, there is no single concept directly equivalent to “parental responsibility”. Decision-making authority over a child is addressed through custody, guardianship and, under the civil family law regimes, joint custody. Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 (“Federal Personal Status Law”) applies in the circumstances specified in Article 1, including to UAE citizens where one or both parties are Muslim. Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2022 on Civil Personal Status (“Federal Civil Personal Status Law”) provides the federal civil personal status framework for persons falling within its scope, subject to the choice-of-law provisions in Article 1. Abu Dhabi Law No 14 of 2021 and Decision No 8 of 2022 provide a separate civil family law framework for persons falling within their scope before the Abu Dhabi Civil Family Court.

Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 on Personal Status

The Sharia-based Federal Decree Law No 41 of 2024 provides for the custody and guardianship of children. Under Article 112, custody concerns the preservation, upbringing and care of the child, while guardianship concerns the broader supervision of the child’s affairs.

During marriage, Article 114 provides that custody is upon both parents. Following separation, the mother is first in the statutory order of custody, followed by the father, although the court may depart from that order where the child’s best interests require. Article 112 further provides that the father – or another guardian where applicable – generally oversees the child’s affairs, discipline, orientation and education. However, a custodial mother has educational guardianship over the child, subject to the child’s best interests and the court’s power to determine any dispute concerning educational guardianship. Separately, Article 106 generally places responsibility for a child’s maintenance on the father, subject to the conditions set out in that Article.

Under Articles 122 and 123, the custody of the child ends at the age of 18 years regardless of gender. Once a child reaches the age of 15, they are free to choose to reside with either parent, subject to the child’s best interests.

Federal Decree Law No 41 of 2022 on Civil Personal Status

The Federal Civil Personal Status Law provides for joint custody of the child till the age of 18 years. Thus, both the father and the mother have an equal and joint right over the children.

Abu Dhabi Law No 14 of 2021 on Civil Marriage and Its Effects

According to Article 16(4) of the Abu Dhabi Civil Personal Status Law, the parents shall have equal rights regarding child custody until the age of 16 years; after this age, the child shall have the right to choose between their parents.

Under the Federal Personal Status Law, a birth mother does not need to make a separate application to obtain parental responsibility. Article 87 provides that a child’s lineage to the mother is established by proof of birth. In practice, the mother’s identity is usually recorded through the birth certificate and related hospital or civil-registration documents.

Once maternity is established, the mother will ordinarily be entitled to exercise custody of the child, which includes the child’s day-to-day care, upbringing, health and welfare, subject to any court order and the child’s best interests. This is distinct from guardianship, which may be exercised by the father under the Federal Personal Status Law.

Under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law, there is likewise no separate parental responsibility application for a birth mother. Article 14 provides that a child’s parentage may be established through marriage or the declaration of the father and mother, following which the relevant authority issues the child’s birth certificate in accordance with the applicable procedures.

Under the Abu Dhabi civil family law regime, there is likewise no separate application by a birth mother merely to acquire custody rights. Article 14 of Abu Dhabi Law No 14 of 2021 addresses proof of the child’s parentage and the procedures for issuing the child’s birth certificate. Following divorce or separation, both parents generally have joint legal and physical custody, unless one parent waives that right or the court orders otherwise.

Under the Federal Personal Status Law, a father does not usually need to make a separate application to obtain parental responsibility once legal parentage has been established. Article 87 provides that paternity may be established by birth during a valid marriage, by acknowledgement, by evidence or by scientific methods. Article 90 permits the court to order DNA testing in specified circumstances, including where there is a dispute over the establishment of lineage. Before determining lineage on that basis, the court must also verify that the child’s lineage is unknown and that the age difference supports the claimed relationship.

Once parentage is established, the father will ordinarily exercise guardianship rights and responsibilities in relation to the child, including financial support and general supervision of the child’s affairs. This remains distinct from physical custody, which may be exercised by the mother, subject to the court’s orders and the child’s best interests.

Article 14 of the Federal Civil Personal Status Law provides that parentage may be established through marriage or by the acknowledgement of the father and mother. The court may also order DNA testing, but an order establishing parentage on that basis is subject to statutory conditions, including that the child is of unknown parentage and that the age difference is consistent with the claimed relationship. Once legal parentage is established, both parents generally participate in joint custody following divorce under Article 10.

Under the Abu Dhabi civil family law regime, Article 14 of Law No 14 of 2021 provides that the child’s paternity may be established by marriage or by the declaration of the father or mother. Once parentage has been established, the father generally participates in joint legal and physical custody under the Abu Dhabi civil family law framework, subject to any contrary court order.

A person who is not the child’s legal or biological parent does not automatically acquire parental rights merely by caring for the child or being married to one of the child’s parents. Any authority over the child must arise under the applicable statutory framework, a recognised legal relationship or an order of the competent court.

UAE law also provides for foster or alternative family arrangements. Federal Law No 3 of 2016 on Child Rights recognises alternative care through a foster family where a child is deprived of the natural family environment. The Executive Regulations prescribe eligibility conditions and obligations for foster families. Such arrangements place responsibility for the child’s care on the foster family but do not, by themselves, create the same legal lineage as biological parentage.

Article 14(3) of the Federal Civil Personal Status Law also permits the Cabinet to regulate the procedures and legal consequences of adoption and alternative family arrangements. The precise position of a non-genetic parent therefore depends on the legal basis on which that person’s relationship with the child is recognised.

Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 on Personal Status

Article 87 of Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 provides that a child’s lineage to the father may be established by birth during a marriage contract, by admission, by evidence or by scientific methods. Article 88 further regulates proof of paternal lineage where the child is born during an existing marriage, including by reference to the statutory minimum and maximum periods of pregnancy.

Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2022 on Civil Personal Status

Article 14 of the Federal Civil Personal Status Law provides that parentage may be established through marriage or by the acknowledgment of the father and mother. Marriage may therefore provide a direct basis for establishing parentage, although the law also provides mechanisms for establishing parentage outside marriage.

Abu Dhabi Law No 14 of 2021 on Civil Marriage and Its Effects

Under the Abu Dhabi civil family law regime, Article 14 of of Abu Dhabi Law No 14 of 2021 provides that a child’s paternity may be established by marriage or by the declaration of the father or mother. Marriage is therefore one of the statutory means by which paternity may be established under the Abu Dhabi framework, but it is not the only means provided by law. The conditions and procedures for issuing the child’s birth certificate are determined by the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department.

The UAE legal framework does not recognise same-sex marriage nor provide a separate process for obtaining parental responsibility in same-sex relationships.

As a general rule, UAE law does not operate the traditional adoption model under which an adopted child acquires a new legal lineage equivalent to that of a biological child. Instead, Federal Decree-Law No 24 of 2022 Regarding Children of Unknown Parentage provides for children of unknown parentage to be placed in the custody of approved custodial families. Such arrangements provide for the child’s care and upbringing without creating biological lineage.

Separately, Article 14(3) of Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2022 on Civil Personal Status authorises the Cabinet, on the proposal of the Minister of Justice, to issue a resolution regulating the procedures, provisions and effects of adoption and alternative families. Accordingly, any application falling within the civil personal status regime must be considered by reference to the specific legislation and implementing rules applicable to the particular circumstances.

In Abu Dhabi, Law No 14 of 2021 on Civil Marriage and Its Effects and Decision No 8 of 2022 establish a separate civil family law framework. Decision No 8 of 2022 expressly includes adoption within the definition of “Civil Family Matters” falling within the framework of the Abu Dhabi Civil Family Court. However, that definition does not by itself create a complete substantive adoption procedure, nor automatically confer parental responsibility. Any such application must therefore be considered by reference to the legislation and procedures applicable to the particular circumstances.

Relocation of the child in the UAE commonly arises in the context of a parent seeking to take a child outside the UAE temporarily for holidays, education, medical treatment or family visits, or permanently following separation or divorce. The applicable legal position depends on whether the family is governed by the Federal Personal Status Law, the Federal Civil Personal Status Law or the Abu Dhabi Civil Personal Status Law. In either case, the consent of the other parent is important while making such decisions, as UAE law underscores the importance of the involvement of both parents in the affairs of their children.

Short-Term Travel

Under Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 on Personal Status Law, the custodial parent may travel outside the UAE with the written consent of the other parent or the guardian over the person in the event of the father’s death; in the absence of consent, the court’s permission may be sought. The guardian, usually the father, retains the passport of the child and hands it over to the custodian (usually the mother) for authorised travel. If the guardian unreasonably refuses to hand over the passport, the court may intervene. The court may grant permission to the custodial parent to travel with the child for a period or periods not exceeding a total of 60 days in a year, provided that a guarantee is provided to the court to ensure the return of the child. The court may exceed the 60-day period where the travel is for the benefit of the child, for treatment or for another necessity determined by the court after considering the other parent’s or guardian’s position.

Under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law, joint custody is the starting point following divorce. Article 21 of Cabinet Resolution No 122 of 2023 provides that, while joint custody is in effect, neither parent may travel outside the UAE with the child by unilateral decision where the other parent objects, unless permission is obtained from the competent court. Travel requires the other parent’s consent or an order of the competent court.

Under Article 37 of Abu Dhabi Decision No 8 of 2022, neither parent may travel outside the UAE with the child unilaterally while joint custody is in force. Travel may take place with the written consent of the other parent authorised by the court, or with permission from the judge where the other parent objects. The court may also require sufficient guarantees for the child’s return.

Permanent Relocation

A permanent relocation abroad is materially different from a short trip. A permanent relocation abroad should not be undertaken unilaterally where the applicable regime requires the other parent’s approval or court permission. The court examines the practical impact of the intended move, including the child’s welfare, stability, education and care arrangements, and the effect on the other parent’s relationship with the child. If the custodian relocates to a place with the intention of residing there, the custody of the child may be forfeited as per Article 115 (c) of the Personal Status Law if the relocation is against the child’s best interests.

For families governed by the Federal Personal Status Law, Article 124 of Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 states that the child’s identification documents may not be used for travel without the guardian’s permission or a court order. This sits alongside the rules requiring consent or court permission for travel outside the UAE.

Under the civil family law regimes, both parents may apply for a temporary travel ban to prevent the child from leaving the UAE without consent. This is expressly provided for under Article 22 of Cabinet Decision No 122 of 2023, which implements the Federal Civil Personal Status Law, and under Article 38 of Abu Dhabi Decision No 8 of 2022 on the Civil Marriage and Divorce Procedures in Abu Dhabi. Where either parent is concerned that the other may relocate the child from the UAE without agreement, they may file an urgent application before the competent court, setting out the reasons for the requested restriction. The court will decide whether a travel ban is justified in the circumstances of the case. Once such a ban is in effect, if a parent wishes to travel outside the UAE with the child, they may approach the court requesting the court to allow travel with the child.

Please see 2.3.1 Factors Determining an Application for Relocation regarding the factors considered by the court when determining a contested relocation application.

Where the consent required for relocation is not available, the parent seeking to relocate with the child cannot simply proceed on the basis that they are the child’s day-to-day carer or that the move may benefit them personally. The issue should be resolved through an agreed parental settlement arrangement or, where agreement is not possible, by the competent UAE court.

Under the Federal Personal Status Law, where the required written approval of the other parent or, following the father’s death, the guardian over the person cannot be obtained, the custodial parent may apply to the court for permission to travel with the child. The court may authorise travel where it is satisfied that the arrangement serves the child’s interests, and may impose conditions to ensure the child’s return.

Where the proposed move is intended to be permanent, the court will consider the wider consequences of the relocation, including whether it would affect custody, the guardian’s rights or the child’s relationship with the parent remaining in the UAE.

In deciding whether to permit relocation, the court will assess the circumstances of the proposed move, including:

  • the reason for relocation;
  • the child’s age and wishes, where relevant;
  • education and healthcare arrangements;
  • housing;
  • family support in the proposed country;
  • the relocating parent’s immigration or employment position; and
  • the practical arrangements for the child to maintain contact with the other parent.

The court may permit, refuse or impose conditions on the proposed relocation.

Under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law, joint custody is the starting point after divorce. Cabinet Decision No 122 of 2023 provides that neither parent may travel outside the UAE with the child by unilateral decision during joint custody. Where there is disagreement regarding travel or relocation, either parent may refer the matter to the competent court.

A similar approach applies under Abu Dhabi Law No 14 of 2021 and Abu Dhabi Decision No 8 of 2022. Parents generally have equal rights under the joint custody framework, and the Abu Dhabi Civil Family Court may make directions regarding the child’s residence, travel, schooling and contact arrangements, and any safeguards required before travel.

Before or during proceedings, the parents may resolve the issue through a parental settlement agreement, which may address:

  • the child’s proposed country of residence;
  • travel arrangements;
  • education and healthcare decisions;
  • handover arrangements;
  • holiday contact;
  • online communication;
  • passport custody;
  • financial responsibilities; and
  • arrangements for the child’s return to the UAE, where applicable.

A parental settlement may reflect arrangements previously determined in a foreign court order, or may contain arrangements newly agreed between the parents. The procedure for recording or approving such an agreement depends on the applicable family law regime. Under the Federal Personal Status Law, the supervising judge may refer the parties to the Family Guidance Department where amicable resolution is considered feasible. However, urgent and temporary cases are expressly excluded from referral, including urgent and temporary orders concerning custody. If a settlement is reached before the Family Guidance Department and approved by the supervising judge, it has the force of an execution writ.

Under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law, divorce proceedings filed under that law are expressly excluded from referral to Family Guidance and are presented directly to the court.

Under the Abu Dhabi civil family law regime, Article 39 of Decision No 8 of 2022 expressly excludes civil divorce cases from submission to Family Guidance Committees, and provides that they are submitted directly to the Civil Family Court. Accordingly, the route for approving or giving effect to a parental settlement should be determined by reference to the applicable legal regime and the nature of the proceedings.

There is no fixed statutory checklist for relocation applications in the UAE. The court will consider the particular circumstances of the family and determine whether the proposed move serves the child’s best interests.

The court is likely to examine the reason for the relocation, including whether it is linked to employment, immigration status, family support, education, healthcare or other genuine practical needs. It will also consider the child’s current living arrangements, schooling, healthcare, housing and overall stability, as well as the suitability of the arrangements proposed in the new country.

A key consideration will be the effect of the move on the child’s relationship with the parent remaining in the UAE. The parent seeking relocation should therefore be able to show how contact will be maintained, including holiday arrangements, travel arrangements, video calls, the cost of travel and the practical ability of the child to return to the UAE for contact where appropriate.

Under the Federal Personal Status Law, the court will also consider the impact of the move on custody and guardianship rights. A permanent move by a custodian may become relevant where it adversely affects the child’s interests or substantially restricts the guardian’s relationship with the child.

Under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law and the Abu Dhabi civil family law framework, the court will consider whether the move is compatible with joint custody and shared parental involvement. Both regimes allow the court to determine disputes between parents concerning joint custody according to the child’s best interests.

The child’s wishes and feelings may be relevant to a relocation application, but they are not the only factor and will not automatically determine the outcome. The weight given to the child’s views will depend on the child’s age, maturity and ability to express an informed preference.

Under the Federal Personal Status Law, a child who has reached the age of 15 may choose to live with either parent, subject to the court being satisfied that the arrangement is in the child’s best interests. The child’s views may therefore carry particular weight where a proposed relocation would affect which parent the child lives with.

Under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law, joint custody generally continues until the child reaches 18, after which the child has freedom of choice.

Under the Abu Dhabi civil family law regime, joint custody generally continues until the child reaches 16, after which the child may choose between the parents. In disputes concerning the removal of a parent from joint custody, the court may also take into account the wishes of a child who has reached the age of 12.

In a relocation dispute, the court may consider the child’s views alongside the practical effect of the proposed move, including schooling, emotional welfare, family support, stability and the child’s relationship with both parents.

Under the Federal Personal Status Law, custody generally ends when the child reaches 18 years of age, regardless of gender. From the age of 15, the child may choose to reside with either parent, subject to the court being satisfied that the choice serves the child’s best interests.

Under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law, joint custody generally continues until the child reaches 18 years of age. Under the Abu Dhabi civil family law regime, parents generally share joint custody until the child reaches 16 years of age, after which the child may choose between the parents, subject to the court’s assessment of welfare. Before that age, in cases of disputes concerning the removal of a parent from joint custody, the Abu Dhabi Civil Family Court may nevertheless take account of the child’s wishes where the child has sufficient age and understanding.

UAE law does not contain a specific rule requiring siblings to remain together in every relocation case. However, where a proposed move would separate siblings, the court is likely to consider the effect of that separation on each child’s welfare and emotional stability, and on existing family arrangements.

Keeping siblings together may support continuity of care and stability, particularly where they have been living together with the same primary caregiver. The court may also consider the children’s ages, the strength of their relationship, their schooling and care arrangements, and whether the proposed move would result in one child remaining in the UAE while another relocates abroad.

The issue is not decisive in itself. The court may approve different arrangements where there is a clear reason why this better serves the welfare of an individual child, but the parent proposing separation would need to explain why it is necessary and how the children’s relationship would be preserved.

The likely effect of relocation on the child’s relationship with the parent remaining in the UAE is an important consideration. A move abroad may reduce regular in-person contact and make it more difficult for the child to participate in ordinary aspects of the left-behind parent’s life, including school events, medical appointments, weekends and day-to-day decisions.

The parent seeking relocation should therefore show that the proposed move will not unnecessarily weaken the child’s relationship with the other parent. This may include a clear proposal for holiday contact, video calls, visits to the UAE, travel arrangements, responsibility for travel costs and the practical arrangements for handovers.

Under the Federal Personal Status Law, the court will consider whether the move would affect the guardian’s rights and the child’s welfare. The issue is particularly significant under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law and the Abu Dhabi civil family law regime, because both parents generally have joint custody rights and share responsibility for the child’s upbringing. The court may therefore place conditions on relocation, in order to preserve meaningful contact with the other parent.

The weight given to loss of contact will depend on:

  • the child’s age;
  • the existing relationship with each parent;
  • the distance involved;
  • the proposed country of relocation;
  • travel costs;
  • immigration restrictions;
  • the ability to maintain regular communication; and
  • whether the relocating parent has made realistic arrangements to support the child’s continuing relationship with the left-behind parent.

There is no fixed list of reasons that will automatically justify relocation. The court will consider whether the proposed move is genuinely in the child’s best interests and likely to improve or preserve the child’s welfare, stability and long-term care arrangements. A relocation application may be viewed more favourably where it offers the child secure housing, stable schooling, appropriate healthcare, reliable day-to-day care and a supportive family environment. The court may also consider a parent’s immigration, employment or family support circumstances, but only to the extent that these affect the child’s welfare.

A parent may oppose relocation by arguing that the move is not in the child’s best interests. This may include concerns that the proposed arrangements abroad are uncertain, that the move would disrupt the child’s established routine, or that it would interfere with the parent’s existing custody, guardianship or joint custody rights.

The court is likely to give greater weight to objections supported by evidence, such as a lack of confirmed housing, schooling, visa status or employment arrangements in the proposed country, or evidence that the relocation plan is not workable in practice. Under the civil family law regimes, a parent may also argue that the move is inconsistent with the existing joint custody arrangement.

There is no single fixed cost for a relocation application across the UAE. Court fees differ depending on the competent court, the Emirate and the type of application being made. The overall cost may also include legal representation, Arabic translation of foreign-language documents, legalisation or authentication of overseas documents, expert fees where required and the costs of any appeal.

An urgent application dealing only with travel permission or a temporary travel restriction will ordinarily involve a different cost structure from fully contested custody or relocation proceedings. Parties should therefore obtain an estimate based on the particular court and procedural route involved.

There is no fixed statutory period within which a contested relocation application must be finally determined. The timescale depends on:

  • the applicable family law regime;
  • the complexity of the dispute;
  • service on the other parent;
  • the evidence required; and
  • whether expert or social assessments are ordered.

Urgent applications concerning travel permission or a temporary travel ban may be dealt with on an expedited basis. A fully contested relocation or custody dispute may take several months, and longer if the judgment is appealed. The particular circumstances of the case and the court in which proceedings are brought therefore have a significant effect on the overall timescale.

There is no express statutory relocation presumption automatically favouring either the parent seeking relocation or the parent opposing it. Under the Federal Personal Status Law, the existing custody and guardianship arrangement will be relevant. Under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law and the Abu Dhabi civil family law regime, both parents generally have equal rights under joint custody. The court will assess whether the proposed relocation serves the child’s best interests, taking into account the child’s care, stability and continuing relationship with both parents.

Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 expressly requires consent or court permission for travel outside the UAE; however, internal relocation must still serve the child’s best interests and may affect custody if it harms the child or disrupts contact with the other parent.

Under Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2022, and in Abu Dhabi under Law No 14 of 2021, an internal move that materially affects joint custody should be agreed between the parents or determined by the court.

The court may consider whether the distance will affect the child’s stability, schooling or transport arrangements and the other parent’s involvement, particularly where the parents have agreed or court-ordered contact arrangements.

Under the Federal Personal Status Law, a custodian’s move may become an issue where it prevents or seriously restricts the guardian’s ability to exercise rights relating to the child. The court will consider whether the proposed residence is suitable and whether the move serves the child’s best interests.

Under the Federal Civil Personal Status Law and the Abu Dhabi civil family law regime, a parent who objects to an internal move may apply to the competent court where the relocation would disrupt the joint custody arrangement or materially affect the child’s relationship with that parent.

A parent who removes a child from the UAE without the consent required under the applicable custody, guardianship or joint custody arrangement may face legal consequences before the UAE courts. The other parent may seek urgent protective measures, including a travel ban, custody-related orders or other appropriate relief, depending on the circumstances and the applicable legal regime. The position will depend on matters such as whether there was an existing court order or settlement agreement, whether the child was taken permanently or temporarily, and whether the removal was contrary to the child’s best interests.

Article 116 of Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 regulates travel outside the UAE with a child in custody. Article 252 provides that a custodian who takes a child under custody outside the UAE without the permission of the child’s guardian or the court may be punished with imprisonment and/or a fine of between AED5,000 and AED50,000. The same Article also applies where the custodian uses a document or copy thereof belonging to the child, or benefits from it, without rightful cause.

Article 251 deals separately with misconduct by persons responsible for managing the affairs of a minor or the like, including misuse of the minor’s property or documents and unjustified refusal to hand over the minor’s documents, accounts or related materials. It should therefore be distinguished from Article 252, which specifically addresses unauthorised travel outside the UAE with a child in custody.

The Federal Civil Personal Status Law and the Abu Dhabi Civil Personal Status Law do not contain the same detailed penalty provisions. However, both laws provide that where a matter is not specifically addressed, the relevant laws in force may apply. As a result, a parent who is subject to the civil family law framework and fails to comply with travel, document or custody-related obligations may also face legal consequences under the relevant laws in force.

The United Arab Emirates is not a signatory to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Accordingly, where a child has been removed from the UAE without consent, the left-behind parent would generally need to seek urgent relief in the country to which the child has been taken, relying on the laws and procedures of that country, while also obtaining appropriate custody, guardianship or travel-related orders from the UAE courts where necessary.

The fact that the child has been taken to a Hague Convention country does not itself create a Hague Convention remedy, as the Convention operates between contracting states and the UAE is not a contracting state.

Where a UAE custody, guardianship or return order has been obtained, the left-behind parent may need to seek recognition or enforcement of that order, or other return relief, in the country to which the child has been taken. The procedure will depend on the domestic law of that country and any applicable bilateral or multilateral agreement with the UAE.

The UAE is not a party to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction; therefore, the procedures and remedies available under the Convention do not apply in the UAE. Cases involving children brought to or retained in the UAE are dealt with under the applicable UAE laws and court procedures (see 3.4 Non-Hague Convention Countries).

The UAE is not a party to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Accordingly, there is no automatic Hague Convention procedure requiring the immediate return of a child brought to the UAE. A parent seeking the return of the child must rely on the applicable UAE laws, any relevant international or bilateral agreement, and the orders of the competent UAE court.

Child Removed or Brought From a Foreign Country to the UAE

Where the parent seeking the child’s return already has a foreign judgment or order concerning custody or return of the child, they may seek its recognition and enforcement in the UAE under Article 222 of the UAE Civil Procedure Law, subject to any applicable treaty or agreement.

The application is submitted by petition to the Execution Judge. Before ordering enforcement, the Judge must verify that:

  • the UAE courts are not exclusively competent to determine the dispute;
  • the foreign court had jurisdiction under its own law;
  • the judgment or order was issued in accordance with the law of the country concerned and duly ratified;
  • the parties were properly summoned and represented;
  • the judgment has the force of res judicata; and
  • it does not conflict with a UAE judgment or order or with UAE public order or morals.

Article 222 provides that the Execution Judge shall issue an order within five days from submission of the petition. The order may be appealed. The Judge may also request supporting documents before issuing the decision.

Where the foreign decision takes the form of an authenticated document or a court-approved settlement rather than a judgment, Article 224 provides a separate mechanism for enforcement, subject to the conditions stated in that provision. Articles 222–224 are also subject to any applicable treaties or agreements between the UAE and the foreign country under Article 225.

Where There Is No Enforceable Foreign Order

Where there is no foreign judgment capable of recognition or enforcement in the UAE, the parent may need to commence proceedings before the competent UAE family court concerning custody, residence, guardianship or other appropriate relief relating to the child.

The UAE court will determine the matter under the personal status regime applicable to the family. The child’s welfare and best interests will be an important consideration, together with matters such as:

  • the existing custody arrangements;
  • the circumstances in which the child was brought to the UAE;
  • the child’s relationship with each parent;
  • stability;
  • education and care arrangements; and
  • any existing foreign proceedings or orders.

Criminal Proceedings

In certain circumstances, the removal or retention of a child may also have criminal consequences. Article 380 of Federal Decree-Law No 31 of 2021 on the Crimes and Penalties Law applies where a parent or grandparent abducts a minor child, or refuses to return or deliver the child to the person entitled to custody or care under a final judicial decision or judgment. Such criminal proceedings are separate from the family or enforcement proceedings concerning the child’s return.

Where international criminal co-operation is sought, this is governed by Federal Law No 39 of 2006 concerning International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters and any applicable treaty arrangements. Extradition is dealt with through the competent prosecution, central and judicial authorities and should not be treated as an automatic consequence of a parental child-abduction complaint.

Costs and Timescale

There is no fixed cost or standard timescale for a non-Hague child-return case in the UAE. Costs will depend on:

  • the nature of the proceedings;
  • court fees;
  • legal representation;
  • translation and authentication of foreign documents;
  • expert requirements;
  • appeals; and
  • enforcement proceedings.

The duration will similarly depend on whether the application concerns the enforcement of an existing foreign judgment or requires fresh custody or child-related proceedings. Urgent or interim applications may be dealt with more quickly, while contested proceedings involving jurisdiction, foreign judgments or appeals may take longer.

Relevance of the Country From Which the Child Was Removed

The country from which the child was brought can affect the procedure. In particular, the existence of a bilateral or multilateral judicial co-operation treaty between that country and the UAE may affect the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and the procedural route available.

Where no applicable treaty exists, recognition and enforcement will generally be considered under Article 222 of the UAE Civil Procedure Code. The foreign country may also be relevant when the UAE court considers the validity and effect of an existing foreign judgment or custody arrangement. However, the ultimate approach will depend on the facts of the particular case and the applicable UAE family law regime.

Awatif Mohammad Shoqi Advocates & Legal Consultancy

29th Floor, 2904
H Hotel Office Tower
P.O. Box 40073
Sheikh Zayed Road
Dubai
United Arab Emirates

+971 43254000

info@alrowaad.ae www.alrowaad.ae
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Author



Awatif Mohammad Shoqi Advocates & Legal Consultancy is a Dubai-based full-service law firm with a 50+ multidisciplinary legal team, led by Emirati advocate Mrs Awatif Al Khouri, who has more than three decades of experience in complex personal status matters. The firm is based in Dubai and represents UAE nationals, expatriates and international clients before all levels of the UAE courts, including the Federal Supreme Court. Its family law practice covers divorce, child custody, guardianship, visitation, child and spousal maintenance, relocation disputes, inheritance-related matters, marital agreements, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, and cross-border family disputes. The team also draws on the firm’s wider civil, criminal, commercial and dispute resolution capabilities where family matters involve property, financial claims, criminal allegations, business interests or overseas proceedings.

Introduction

Child relocation has become an increasingly significant issue for families in the United Arab Emirates. Following separation or divorce, a parent may face changes in employment, a return to their home country, changes in the child’s educational opportunities, healthcare needs, or financial pressures. However, where the move would affect the child’s relationship with the other parent, it can quickly become a sensitive custody and travel dispute.

The UAE’s modern personal status framework has brought greater clarity to issues involving child custody, travel, passports, contact arrangements and enforcement. The implementation of Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 on Personal Status has strengthened the child-focused approach to custody matters, while Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2022 on Civil Personal Status and Abu Dhabi Law No 14 of 2021 continue to provide separate civil family law routes.

The key development is that relocation is no longer viewed simply as a question of which parent has physical care of the child: it is increasingly assessed as a decision that affects the child’s welfare, stability, education, identity, contact with both parents and long-term family relationships.

The Child’s Best Interests as the Central Consideration

The child’s best interests remain the overriding consideration in disputes concerning custody, residence, travel and relocation. UAE courts have broad discretion to consider the circumstances of each family and are not required to follow a rigid outcome merely because one parent is technically the custodian or guardian.

A proposed relocation may be assessed by reference to several connected factors, including:

  • the child’s age, maturity and wishes;
  • the child’s emotional attachment to each parent;
  • the stability of the child’s home, school and social environment;
  • the practical reason for the proposed move;
  • the relocating parent’s ability to meet the child’s daily needs;
  • the impact of the move on the child’s relationship with the left-behind parent;
  • the feasibility of continued in-person contact;
  • the financial ability of both parents to maintain contact arrangements;
  • the availability of suitable education, healthcare and family support in the proposed destination; and
  • whether the relocation is genuinely child-focused or is likely to obstruct the other parent’s relationship with the child.

A court will not automatically favour either the relocating parent or the parent opposing the move. The practical issue is whether the proposed arrangement best protects the child’s welfare while preserving the child’s meaningful relationship with both parents, as far as possible.

A More Structured Distinction Between Custody, Guardianship and Travel

One of the most important practical developments under the Personal Status Law is the clearer treatment of custody, guardianship and travel as related but distinct matters.

Custody concerns the child’s day-to-day care, upbringing and residence. Guardianship traditionally involves responsibility for the child’s personal and legal affairs, including certain major decisions. In practice, relocation disputes often arise because a parent may have custody of the child but cannot unilaterally make a decision that requires the other parent’s consent or a court order.

Under Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024, custody is a right of the child and is shared by both parents while the marriage exists. Following separation, custody is generally granted to the mother, followed by the father and other persons entitled under the statutory order. However, the court may depart from that order where doing so better serves the child’s interests.

The law also provides that custody may be affected if a custodian relocates to a place of residence that does not serve the child’s interests. This may be relevant where a parent intends to move the child to another emirate or outside the UAE in a manner that substantially reduces the child’s ability to maintain a relationship with the other parent.

Accordingly, a parent considering relocation should not assume that custody alone gives them unrestricted authority to change the child’s country of residence.

International Travel Is Not the Same as Permanent Relocation

The law draws an important practical distinction between temporary travel and a permanent or long-term relocation.

Article 116 of Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024 provides that a custodial parent may travel outside the UAE with a child only with the written approval of the other parent, or of the relevant guardian where applicable. Where consent is not available, the court may authorise travel for a period or periods not exceeding a total of 60 days per year, subject to an appropriate guarantee that the child will return.

The court may allow travel beyond this period where it is in the child’s interests, including for treatment or a necessity determined by the court after considering the other parent’s position, where possible.

This provision is particularly relevant in expatriate families. A parent may wish to take a child abroad during school holidays, visit relatives, attend a family event, seek medical treatment or spend time in the child’s home country. These arrangements may appear straightforward, but they can become contentious where there is a history of disagreement, concern that the child may not return, or a pending custody dispute.

A permanent relocation is more substantial than a temporary travel request. It may affect the child’s school, residence, visa status, contact schedule, access to extended family and relationship with the left-behind parent. Courts are therefore likely to examine a relocation proposal in greater depth, and may require a detailed plan showing how the child’s best interests will be protected.

Passport Control and Identification Documents

The handling of passports remains one of the most common sources of conflict in UAE family disputes. Under Article 117 of the Personal Status Law, the guardian may retain the child’s passport, although it must be handed to the custodian for permitted travel. The court may direct that the passport be held by the custodian where the guardian acts unreasonably or refuses to hand it over when needed.

The custodian is generally entitled to retain the child’s original birth certificate and other identification documents, or authenticated copies, as well as the child’s identification card. However, these documents cannot be used to travel with the child without the required consent or court authorisation.

This approach seeks to balance two concerns. The first is the child’s need for access to essential identity documents for education, medical care, visa matters and daily administration. The second is the need to prevent a unilateral international move that could undermine the other parent’s rights or the court’s jurisdiction.

In relocation disputes, the passport issue is therefore not merely administrative: it can be central to the court’s assessment of risk, co-operation between the parents and the likelihood that a future order will be complied with.

The Growing Importance of Contact and Parenting Arrangements

A major trend in relocation disputes is the growing focus on the practical preservation of the child’s relationship with the left-behind parent. Under Article 121 of Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2024, where a child is in one parent’s custody, the other parent has the right to visit the child, take the child for visits and have overnight contact, subject to agreement or a court determination based on the child’s interests.

This means that a relocation proposal should not simply state that the child will have “online contact” with the other parent. A credible proposal should deal with the practical details of how the relationship will continue after the move. This may include:

  • a school holiday contact schedule;
  • arrangements for travel between countries;
  • the allocation of flight, accommodation and travel expenses;
  • video-call schedules that are appropriate to the child’s age and school routine;
  • arrangements for birthdays, religious holidays and significant family events;
  • procedures for sharing school reports, medical updates and major decisions; and
  • provisions for additional in-person contact when the child or parent visits the UAE.

The more detailed and realistic the proposed contact plan, the more likely it is to demonstrate that the relocating parent is acting in the child’s interests rather than seeking to weaken the other parent’s involvement.

The Child’s Views and Increasing Autonomy

The 2024 Personal Status Law gives greater recognition to the views of older children. Article 122 provides that a child is entitled to choose which parent to live with when they reach the age of 15, unless the court considers that a different outcome better serves the child’s interests.

This does not mean that a child’s preference is automatically decisive. The court may consider whether the child’s view is freely expressed, informed and consistent with their welfare. The court may also assess whether the child has been placed under pressure or influenced by one parent.

Nevertheless, the child’s wishes may carry considerable weight in a relocation dispute, particularly where the child is mature, settled in a particular educational environment or has strong views about remaining in the UAE or moving abroad.

Custody generally ends when the child reaches 18 years of age, subject to circumstances involving incapacity or illness. A person who has reached 18 years of age and has full legal capacity may retain their own passport and identification documents, unless the court decides otherwise.

Civil Family Law and Joint Custody

Federal Decree-Law No 41 of 2022 on Civil Personal Status introduced a different approach based on joint custody. Both parents have an equal right to joint custody of the child until the child reaches 18 years of age, after which the child has freedom of choice.

The civil family law model does not necessarily mean that the child spends precisely equal periods of time with each parent. Rather, it reflects the principle that both parents should retain an active and meaningful role in the child’s upbringing and major decisions.

In Abu Dhabi, Law No 14 of 2021 and its implementing regulations also provide for joint custody as the general position following divorce. Both parents share responsibility for raising the child, unless one parent relinquishes that right or the court finds a valid reason to remove or restrict joint custody.

This has particular significance in relocation disputes. A parent seeking to relocate under a joint custody framework must address how the relocation will affect the other parent’s ability to exercise their role. The court may be less likely to approve an arrangement that results in one parent being practically excluded from the child’s day-to-day life without a compelling welfare reason.

Travel Bans and Protective Measures

A child travel restriction should be distinguished from the general travel ban regime that applies to debtors. In family matters, the Personal Status Execution Judge has jurisdiction over the execution of personal status decisions and may issue travel ban orders. Article 324(3) of the Civil Procedure Code specifically permits the Personal Status Execution Judge to prevent a child in custody from travelling if such travel would violate the conditions set out in the Personal Status Law.

This is particularly relevant where a parent proposes to take a child outside the UAE without the written approval required under Article 116 of the Personal Status Law, or without a court authorisation where consent has not been obtained. The measure is intended to ensure compliance with the applicable custody and travel rules, and to preserve the child’s position while the dispute is addressed through the proper legal process.

A travel restriction is therefore not an automatic consequence of a disagreement between parents. The court will consider the applicable personal status arrangements, any existing judgment or execution proceedings, and whether the proposed travel is consistent with the child’s interests and the legal requirements governing travel outside the UAE.

The Role of Settlement and Court-Ratified Arrangements

Agreed arrangements can be particularly valuable in relocation cases because they allow parents to address the practical consequences of a move in a detailed and child-focused manner. An agreement may cover the child’s residence, school holiday contact, travel arrangements, passport handover, video communication, the sharing of travel costs and the procedure for making future decisions.

Where a dispute is suitable for amicable resolution, the supervising judge may refer the parties to the Family Guidance Department or Section. A settlement reached there is recorded in a report signed by the parties and the mediator; once approved by the supervising judge, it has the force of an execution writ, provided it does not conflict with the Personal Status Law.

Enforcement of Judgments in the UAE

In the UAE, the enforcement of judgments – whether domestic or foreign – is governed by the Civil Procedure Code and is carried out through the competent Execution Court. Once a UAE judgment becomes final and enforceable, it may be executed through the Execution Judge, who has the authority to take necessary measures to ensure compliance, including attachment of assets, travel bans and other enforcement actions in accordance with the law.

Article 222 of the UAE Civil Procedure Code sets out the conditions under which foreign judgments may be recognised and enforced within the UAE. The Execution Judge must verify that:

  • the foreign court had proper jurisdiction;
  • the parties were duly summoned and represented;
  • the judgment is final and binding in the issuing jurisdiction;
  • it does not conflict with a prior UAE judgment; and
  • it does not violate UAE public order or morals.

In addition, reciprocity between the UAE and the issuing country may be considered, unless otherwise provided by applicable treaties or conventions.

It is important to note that enforcement in the UAE is not automatic and requires a formal application before the Execution Court. The court will examine the legal requirements before granting enforcement. In family matters, including custody and personal status judgments, the court will also consider the best interests of the child and compliance with the UAE Personal Status Law.

Conclusion

The current legal framework recognises that a child’s relationship with both parents should be protected wherever possible. At the same time, it acknowledges that there may be legitimate reasons for a move, including education, employment, healthcare, family support or a parent’s return to their country of origin.

The outcome of a relocation dispute will depend on the individual facts. A parent seeking to relocate should present a clear and child-focused proposal that addresses the reason for the move, the child’s welfare, schooling, accommodation, contact with the other parent and practical travel arrangements. A parent opposing relocation should similarly focus on the impact on the child and propose workable alternatives rather than relying only on objections to the move.

Awatif Mohammad Shoqi Advocates & Legal Consultancy

29th Floor, 2904
H Hotel Office Tower
P.O. Box 40073
Sheikh Zayed Road
Dubai
United Arab Emirates

+971 43254000

info@alrowaad.ae www.alrowaad.ae
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Author



Awatif Mohammad Shoqi Advocates & Legal Consultancy is a Dubai-based full-service law firm with a 50+ multidisciplinary legal team, led by Emirati advocate Mrs Awatif Al Khouri, who has more than three decades of experience in complex personal status matters. The firm is based in Dubai and represents UAE nationals, expatriates and international clients before all levels of the UAE courts, including the Federal Supreme Court. Its family law practice covers divorce, child custody, guardianship, visitation, child and spousal maintenance, relocation disputes, inheritance-related matters, marital agreements, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, and cross-border family disputes. The team also draws on the firm’s wider civil, criminal, commercial and dispute resolution capabilities where family matters involve property, financial claims, criminal allegations, business interests or overseas proceedings.

Trends and Developments

Author



Awatif Mohammad Shoqi Advocates & Legal Consultancy is a Dubai-based full-service law firm with a 50+ multidisciplinary legal team, led by Emirati advocate Mrs Awatif Al Khouri, who has more than three decades of experience in complex personal status matters. The firm is based in Dubai and represents UAE nationals, expatriates and international clients before all levels of the UAE courts, including the Federal Supreme Court. Its family law practice covers divorce, child custody, guardianship, visitation, child and spousal maintenance, relocation disputes, inheritance-related matters, marital agreements, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, and cross-border family disputes. The team also draws on the firm’s wider civil, criminal, commercial and dispute resolution capabilities where family matters involve property, financial claims, criminal allegations, business interests or overseas proceedings.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.