International Trade 2026 Comparisons

Türkiye was a founding member of the WTO on 26 March 1995 and has been a member of the General Agreement of Trade and Tariffs since 17 October 1951. Türkiye is an observer of the Committee on Trade in Civil Aircraft and an observer of the Committee on Government Procurement. Türkiye also takes part in plurilateral initiatives under the WTO framework, such as the Information Technology Agreement and the Joint Statement Initiative on Services Domestic Regulation.

Türkiye has 24 free trade agreements (FTAs) currently in force. These agreements are between Türkiye and the following countries/parties: Albania (2008), Bosnia and Herzegovina (2003), Chile (2011), Egypt (2007), the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) (1992), the Faroe Islands (2017), Georgia (2008), Israel (1997), Kosovo (2019), Malaysia (2015), Mauritius (2013), Moldova (2016), Montenegro (2010), Morocco (2006), North Macedonia (2000), Palestine (2005), Qatar (2025), Serbia (2010), Singapore (2017), South Korea (2013), Tunisia (2005), the UK (2021), the UAE (2023) and Venezuela (2020).

The FTA between Türkiye and Ukraine signed on 3 July 2022, was approved by the president of the Republic of Türkiye on 4 October 2024. Nevertheless, the agreement has not yet entered into force.

As of May 2024, Türkiye suspended all export and import transactions with Israel. The bilateral FTA technically remains in force; however, its implementation has been effectively halted.

Türkiye has also enacted preferential trade agreements (PTAs) that grant lower customs duties on goods originating from its partners. In this context, Türkiye has PTAs with Iran (2015), Azerbaijan (2021), Uzbekistan (2023) and Pakistan (2023). An additional protocol, which extended the scope of the PTA with Azerbaijan entered into force on 1 July 2024.

Türkiye has been administering a Generalised System of Preferences since 2002, through which it grants preferential access in three categories: developing countries, least-developed countries, and countries benefiting from special incentives.

In this regard, the Communiqué on the Generalised System of Preferences (Imports: 2025/6), dated 31 December 2024, outlines the provisions that serve as the basis for determining the goods and countries eligible for tariff concessions under the Generalised System of Preferences within the Import Regime Decree, enacted by Presidential Decree No 3350, dated 31 December 2020.

Customs tariffs on certain products between Türkiye and Syria are being re-evaluated, and negotiations will be launched to resume the FTA that has been suspended since 2011.

At the same time, the first round of negotiations for updating the FTA with the UK has been completed. Moreover, the rules of origin under the FTA with Georgia are set to be revised, and implementation of the signed protocol that expands the scope of the FTA is planned to be completed soon. The FTAs negotiated with Sudan and Lebanon are in the ratification process and are expected to enter into force in the near future.

Lastly, there are currently ongoing negotiations for PTAs with Algeria and Maldives.

The FTA between Türkiye and Ukraine signed on 3 July 2022, was approved by the president of the Republic of Türkiye on 4 October 2024. Nevertheless, the agreement has not yet entered into force.

The FTA between Türkiye and Qatar was signed on 26 November 2018 and entered into force on 1 August 2025.

Türkiye aims to modernise its customs union agreement with the EU, which requires Türkiye to align its trade policy with the EU. The customs union agreement that has been in force since 1995 is considered insufficient to address contemporary policy issues. Türkiye aims to find solutions to the systemic problems encountered under the customs union and to extend preferential trade and economic relations with the EU to new areas such as agriculture, public procurement, services and e-commerce with the modernisation of the agreement.

Negotiations to broaden the scope of the FTA with the UK to include services, investment, and digital trade are also ongoing.

In addition, FTAs negotiated with Sudan and Lebanon are in the ratification process and are expected to enter into force in the near future. The rules of origin under the FTA with Georgia are to be updated, and the protocol expanding the FTA’s scope is expected to be finalised soon.

Law No 4458 on Customs (the “Customs Law”), which lays down the general framework of customs legislation, is enacted by the Grand National Assembly of Türkiye. The secondary legislation that clarifies and enforces these rights and obligations is enacted by the Turkish Ministry of Trade. All regulations, communiqués, decisions, directives and guidelines must comply with the provisions of the Customs Law.

The Customs Law is enforced by the customs administration spread around the entry and exit points of Türkiye, such as borders, airports and ports. As per Article 3 of the Customs Law, the central administration (the General Directorate of Customs established under the Turkish Ministry of Trade) is also a customs administration responsible for administering and enforcing the Customs Law. Additionally, the General Directorate of Customs Protection ensures border security and combats smuggling through inspections, risk analysis, and collaboration with law enforcement. Customs and Foreign Trade Regional Directorates oversee operations, enforce laws, and support anti-smuggling efforts within their regions.

Apart from the trade remedies regime of Türkiye, which is summarised in 5. Anti-Dumping and Countervailing (AD/CVD), Türkiye does not have a comprehensive regime to address the negative impacts of other jurisdictions’ trade practices. Domestic companies can report these barriers to the Turkish Ministry of Trade through its website. Findings from these investigations are published by the Turkish Ministry of Trade, giving information regarding the reasons for any measures imposed. Currently, Türkiye enforces multiple anti-dumping and countervailing measures across sectors such as steel, textiles, glass, chemicals, etc.

Amendment to the Customs Regulation

In January 2025, Türkiye enacted a comprehensive amendment to the Customs Regulation (Official Gazette No 32783, 15 January 2025), introducing a series of changes across key customs procedures. The reform updated definitions and procedural references, introduced stricter conditions for the licensing and operation of bonded warehouses and temporary storage facilities (including capital, criminal record and infrastructure requirements), and clarified obligations regarding certificates of origin where preferential tariffs or additional duties apply. It also revised the framework for authorised customs brokers and approved exporter status, updated rules on the handling of goods in customs warehouses, and introduced an annual adjustment mechanism for customs laboratory fees based on the revaluation rate under the Tax Procedure Law. In addition, the amendment strengthened the Ministry’s authority to revoke permits in case of non-compliance and aligned electronic application procedures with the Single Window System, reflecting a broader shift towards modernisation and stricter enforcement in customs administration.

Additional Customs Duties

Since 2011, Türkiye has been applying additional customs duties on the import of certain products, in addition to regular customs tariffs. The products subject to additional customs duties and the applicable rates are announced through presidential decrees published in the Official Gazette. At the beginning of 2025, the additional customs duties applied to bags, leather clothing, footwear and lighting products were increased, while new additional duties were introduced on items such as wooden crates, pallets, reels and pallet lifters, paper and cardboard products, and headlamp and taillight covers. On the other hand, under the presidential decree published on 22 September 2025, the additional customs duty applied to the import of electric vehicles was abolished. Additional customs duties do not apply to countries with which Türkiye has an FTA, or to EU member states under the Customs Union.

Trade Remedy Cases

Apart from this, Türkiye remained active in trade remedy cases in 2024. Türkiye currently imposes trade remedy measures on a wide range of products, including steel, textiles, solar panels, and tyres. In this context, during 2024, 25 new trade remedies investigations were initiated, anti-dumping measures were imposed following six anti-dumping investigations, and 22 investigations were concluded through the imposition of new measures, modification of existing ones, or the continuation of current measures. As of November 2025, a total of 16 new investigations have been initiated, including eight anti-dumping, one expiry review, five anti-circumvention, and two safeguard investigations.

Tariffs and Trade Measures Imposed on Türkiye

In addition to the customs duties and trade defence measures implemented by Türkiye, there have also been significant developments regarding the tariffs and trade measures imposed on Türkiye by its key trading partners. On 1 August 2025, the United States announced a new tariff list, under which tariffs on imports from Türkiye were increased from 10% to 15%. On 7 May 2024, the EU extended existing anti-dumping and countervailing duties on stainless-steel cold-rolled flat products to include imports from Türkiye, Taiwan and Vietnam. In a similar vein, on 14 May 2024, the EU extended anti-dumping duties on birch plywood, originally imposed on Russia, to cover imports from Türkiye and Kazakhstan.

Türkiye frequently amends its customs legislation – predominantly the secondary legislation enacted by the executive brands – to address contemporary issues. However, the general framework of the Customs Law, which was enacted in 1999 and has been revised several times, is not expected to drastically change in the near future.

To combat terrorist financing and proliferation financing, Türkiye implements UN targeted financial sanctions (TFS) regimes pursuant to its domestic legal framework, including Law No 6415 on the Prevention of the Financing of Terrorism.

In the context of TFS for terrorist financing, Türkiye has implemented UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCR) 1267/1989/2253 sanctions against ISIL, Da’esh and Al-Qaida, as well as the 1988 sanction regime for the Taliban. These sanctions regimes impose stringent measures, including an arms embargo, a travel ban, and asset freezes for individuals and entities. The asset freeze extends to trade in various goods, including petroleum products, natural resources, chemical and agricultural products, weapons and antiquities, with the names of designated persons and entities regularly published in the Official Gazette.

Furthermore, concerning TFS for proliferation financing, Türkiye has implemented UNSCR 1718 and subsequent resolutions targeting economic and financial sanctions against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. This regime involves various measures such as arms embargoes, nuclear and ballistic missile embargoes, sectoral sanctions on specific goods, jurisdiction restrictions on access to crude oil and petroleum products, financial sanctions, travel bans, and asset freezes for designated individuals and entities. Unlike the EU or the US, Türkiye does not apply unilateral sanctions, but strictly enforces UN-mandated regimes.

The Turkish president has the authority to impose embargoes. Customs-related sanctions are to be implemented by the customs administration.

Türkiye’s sanctions framework is primarily based on the UN International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, Law No 6415 on the Prevention of the Financing of Terrorism, and Law No 7262 on Preventing the Financing of Weapons of Mass Destruction.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has the authority and responsibility to propose individuals and entities for designation to both the 1267/1989 Committee and the 1988 Committee. The president of Türkiye serves as the competent authority to designate persons and entities in accordance with UNSCRs.

The Financial Crimes Investigation Board (Mali Suçlar Araştırma Kurulu, or MASAK) is in charge of processing incoming foreign requests. Requests may also be submitted to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the Ministry of Justice, and will then be forwarded to MASAK for further examination. The assessment commission responsible for freezing assets evaluates proposals for designations.

Those subject to Türkiye’s sanctions laws and regulations include government agencies, financial institutions, and designated non-financial businesses and professions.

Türkiye maintains lists of sanctioned individuals and entities under the Council of Ministers Decisions numbered 2017/9950 and 2018/11480, focusing on sanctions against North Korea. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs proposes individuals or entities to relevant UN committees, while the president of Türkiye handles the designation process under UN Security Council resolutions. MASAK reviews and processes foreign designation requests. The Assessment Commission – comprising members from various ministries and agencies – reviews proposals for sanctions. Once approved, designations are published in the Official Gazette, and the relevant bodies, including financial institutions, government agencies, and registries, are notified to enforce the sanctions.

Türkiye follows the UN in adopting sanctions against sanctioned countries.

Türkiye enforces UN sanctions against North Korea with additional measures. These include Prime Ministerial Circulars (numbered 2006/36 and 2009/17) and Council of Ministers Decisions (numbered 2017/9950 and 2018/11480), which mandate financial sanctions and asset freezes under various UN Security Council Resolutions targeting North Korean entities.

Furthermore, following the UN’s reinstatement of sanctions against Iran, Türkiye imposed asset freezes on persons and entities linked to Iran’s nuclear activities through Presidential Decree No 10438. The sanctions cover various organisations operating in Iran’s energy, maritime, banking, and research sectors.

In addition, the Ministry of Trade made a public announcement on 2 May 2024 regarding the ban on imports from and exports to Israel. In this announcement, the Ministry declared a strict ban on the imports and exports of all products, without exemption. It also stated in its announcement that the origin of goods in transactions facilitated through other countries would be scrutinised.

Türkiye does not maintain any other types of sanctions.

Türkiye does not apply or threaten sanctions in connection with transactions that have no nexus with Türkiye.

Terrorist Financing Sanctions

Article 15 of Law No 6415 on Prevention of the Financing of Terrorism stipulates that individuals who do not comply with, or neglect or delay adhering to, asset-freezing decisions made in accordance with UNSCR 1267/1988/1989 may face imprisonment ranging from six months to two years, or be liable for a judicial fine corresponding to the respective imprisonment term. If these individuals hold positions of responsibility within legal entities – for example, as directors or representatives – or act on behalf of the entity, their inaction may result in a heavy administrative fine. The amount of this fine ranges from TRY10,000 to TRY2 million and may not be less than the value of the funds or assets involved, if such amount can be determined.

Proliferation Financing Sanctions

Article 5 of Law No 7262 on the Prevention of Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction specifies that individuals not adhering to financial sanctions may face imprisonment lasting from one to five years, or a judicial fine corresponding to the respective jail term. Individuals who are not in compliance with the prohibition on procuring materials may be subject to imprisonment ranging from two to eight years, or a judicial fine aligned with the applicable jail term.

Individuals not abiding by or neglecting/delaying compliance with asset-freezing decisions may be imprisoned for a period ranging from six months to two years, or may be liable for a judicial fine in line with the respective jail term.

If these individuals hold positions of responsibility within legal entities (such as that of a director or representative) or act on behalf of the entity, their inaction may result in administrative fines of up to TRY2 million for the legal entity. The legal entity may also be subject to security measures.

The licences specified in the UNSCRs are applicable.

Law No 5549 on the Prevention of Laundering Revenues of Crime, along with the Regulation on Compliance Programmes for the Prevention of Laundering Revenues of Crime and the Financing of Terrorism mandate that certain obliged institutions (including banks, capital markets intermediary institutions, insurance and pension companies, financing and factoring companies, portfolio management companies, precious metal dealers, electronic payment systems, and payment institutions) must establish compliance programmes tailored to sector-specific risks.

The required compliance programme must encompass:

• the development of institutional policies and procedures for compliance;
• the formulation of a risk management policy;
• the establishment and execution of monitoring and control mechanisms;
• the appointment of a compliance officer and the establishment of a compliance department;
• conducting internal audits; and
• the provision of training for personnel.

Within a seven-day timeframe, individuals, financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and entities – as well as designated institutions and organisations – must promptly report to the competent authorities any assets linked to listed individuals or transactions within the scope of UNSCRs.

Türkiye does not have any blocking statutes, anti-boycott regulations or other restrictions that prohibit adherence to other jurisdictions’ sanctions.

On 1 October 2025, Türkiye froze the assets of individuals and entities linked to Iran’s uranium enrichment and nuclear activities, in line with the latest UN sanctions, through a presidential decision published in the Official Gazette. The decision covers organisations operating in Iran’s energy, shipping, banking, and research sectors, and updates Türkiye’s previous actions taken in 2006, 2015 and 2021 to implement UNSC resolutions concerning Iran.

One of the significant issues related to sanctions for Türkiye is the ongoing challenge of CAATSA sanctions (a US law enacted in 2017 that imposes sanctions on countries engaged in significant transactions with Russia’s defence and intelligence sectors) imposed due to Türkiye’s acquisition of the S-400 air defence system. This affects Türkiye’s defence sector, particularly its exclusion from the F-35 programme. Türkiye and the USA are working on diplomatic efforts to resolve these sanctions. Türkiye is also increasingly focused on compliance with sanctions and export control regimes maintained by the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom, particularly those targeting Russia and Iran, as enforcement efforts have intensified. Accordingly, Turkish companies and financial institutions are prioritising enhanced sanctions compliance and due diligence processes to mitigate potential exposure under these frameworks.

Turkish export legislation in the broad sense consists of the Customs Law, foreign exchange legislation, the Legislation on the Türkiye Exporters’ Assembly and Exporters’ Unions, relevant international conventions, Central Bank circulars, and the communiqués and circulars based on these legislations.

Export legislation in the narrow sense includes the Export Regime Decree and Export Regulation, which apply the general principles to be complied with in export transactions, and the Inward Processing Regime Decree, Outward Processing Regime Decree, and Export Communiqués on the basis of the Export Regime Decree.

Pursuant to the Export Regime Decree, the Turkish Ministry of Trade is the competent authority for exports. Public institutions and organisations are obliged to consult the Turkish Ministry of Trade when preparing laws and decrees for the restriction or prohibition of exports in terms of quantity or period.

The relevant regulations specify both the regulatory authorities responsible for overseeing the control of goods and the authorities responsible for granting approval for their exportation. Accordingly, the main authorities managing export control are the Ministry of Defence for military supplies and equipment, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for live animals and some agricultural products, the Turkish Atomic Energy Authority for nuclear and nuclear dual-use materials, and the Turkish Ministry of Trade for other dual-use materials.

Generally, the inspectorates of standardisation for foreign trade have the authority to perform conformity assessments on exported products to verify their compliance with the required standards, technical regulations and quality specifications.

For goods requiring prior export authorisation, compulsory standard and commercial quality controls, or specific documentation, customs procedures are carried out in accordance with the procedures and principles set forth in the relevant legislation, as stipulated by special laws or other regulations. For example, the products listed in Appendix 1 and 2 of the Regulation on Goods Subject to Export Prohibition and Pre-Authorisation fall within this scope.

The following products are subject to export control:

• military equipment, weapons, war tools, explosive materials, and military technologies (Communiqué setting out the List regarding War Tools and Equipment, Weapons, Ammunitions and Spare Parts thereof, Military Explosive Materials and Technologies thereof established based on the Law No 5201);
• cultural and historical artifacts, certain animals, wood, certain agricultural products such as tobacco seeds and cannabis sativa, racehorses, and sugar (Communiqué No 96/31 on the Goods whose Export is Prohibited or Subject to a Pre-Authorisation; Communiqué No 2006/7 on the Goods whose Export is Subject to Registration); and
• nuclear and nuclear dual-use goods (Communiqué No 2007/1 on the Warning List regarding Nuclear Transfer and the List of Nuclear Dual-Use Goods).

Türkiye does not have any export restriction or prohibition scheme. However, Türkiye adheres to the lists of sanctioned individuals and entities as defined by the UN.

Specific certificates and analyses may be necessary, especially for plant and livestock exports. For unprocessed agricultural product exports, a phytosanitary certificate is required to confirm that the shipment complies with phytosanitary export standards, in accordance with the 1951 Treaty of Rome. Additionally, all agricultural products must have a health certificate that aligns with the regulations of the purchasing country. The assessment of the inspection report and analysis results is based on either the purchasing country’s requirements or the Turkish Food Codex.

Additional procedures are also in place, such as the EU’s requirement for an analytical report and a health certificate to confirm acceptable aflatoxin levels when exporting nuts and dried fruit, or the need for a radiation analysis to demonstrate that radiation levels are within acceptable limits for mushroom exports.

Türkiye is also a participant in several international agreements and groups aimed at controlling the export of materials and technology that could be used for developing weapons of mass destruction, including the Wassenaar Arrangement, the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Missile Technology Control Regime, the Australia Group, the Zangger Committee, and the Nuclear Suppliers Group.

Türkiye does not implement other export controls.

Article 235/2 of the Customs Law provides for the consequences of violating export controls. Accordingly, where the exportation of a good is prohibited by an administrative act, an administrative fine of double the customs value may be imposed. The exportation of goods without obtaining the required licence, meeting the required conditions or obtaining the required approval may lead to an administrative fine worth 10% of the customs value.

In addition, pursuant to Article 3 of Law No 5607 on Anti-Smuggling, any person who exports goods where this is prohibited by law will be imprisoned for from one to three years and will face a judicial fine of up to 5,000 days (judicial fines in Turkey are calculated in days, with the amount per day ranging from TRY20 to TRY100, depending on the individual's economic situation), unless the act constitutes another offence requiring a heavier penalty.

There are three main licensing institutions in Türkiye:

• the Ministry of National Defence deals with the export control of military material and equipment;
• the Turkish Atomic Energy Authority deals with the export control of nuclear and nuclear dual-use material; and
• the Ministry of Economy deals with other dual-use material’s export control.

Export controls of dual-use and sensitive materials are carried out by the Ministry of Economy in accordance with the provisions of the Communiqué on Export Control of Dual-Use and Sensitive Substances numbered 2003/12 and the Communiqué on Export of Chemical Substances Annexed to the Chemical Weapons Convention numbered 2002/12. Within the scope of the application, the exporting company must apply to the General Secretariat of Istanbul Mineral and Metals Exporters’ Association (“IMMIB”) for a licence.

For the export controls applied in transit trade, within the scope of the circular issued by the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye:

• in requests for transit trade of goods subject to the Missile Technology Control Regime, it is necessary to submit a form with a note from the IMMIB regarding the registration of the relevant sale;
• in requests for transit trade of chemical substances other than the substances included in the Annexes of the Chemical Weapons Convention from the substances included in the Australian Group Chemical Precursors List, the IMMIB’s letter stating that the sale has been registered must be submitted; and
• in requests regarding the transit trade of substances included in the annexes of the Chemical Weapons Convention, a letter of conformity/permission of the IMMIB must be submitted.

There is no separate regulation on export control compliance in Türkiye. Exporting companies are required to comply with export legislation in the broad sense. If companies are subject to export restrictions for the products they are exporting, they must also comply with specific regulations on these restrictions.

There is no separate export reporting requirement.

The Communiqué dated 14 December 2024 and numbered 2024/41 on the Export List of Natural Flower Bulbs for 2025 established the list of flower bulbs that are forbidden to be collected from nature and exported, or whose production is limited by quota for the year 2025.

Furthermore, with the Communique dated 31 December 2024 and numbered 2025/21 on the Commercial Quality and Control in Export and Import of Some Agricultural Products, procedures and principles were established for conducting commercial quality inspections of specified agricultural products based on risk analysis where necessary, as part of both export and import processes.

There are no pending significant changes pertaining to export controls on the horizon in Türkiye in the next 12 months.

The Board of Evaluation of Unfair Competition in Imports (the “AD/CVD Board”) evaluates the outcome of the AD/CVD investigations conducted by the General Directorate of Imports and decides whether a measure will be imposed. Similarly, the Board of Evaluation of Safeguard Measures in Imports (the “Safeguards Board”) evaluates the outcome of safeguard investigations conducted by the General Directorate of Imports, and decides on whether a measure will be imposed.

Customs authorities administer and enforce AD/CVD duties and safeguard measures at the point of importation.

Trade Remedy Regulation

The Regulation on the Prevention of Unfair Competition in Imports (the “Trade Remedy Regulation”) allows domestic companies to request a review of existing measures on the following grounds.

Interim review investigation

After the lapse of the first year of a measure, domestic industry can request an interim review provided that the existing measure is not (or is no longer) sufficient to counteract the dumping or subsidy that is causing injury. During the course of this investigation, it is possible to examine whether the circumstances regarding the dumping or subsidy and injury have changed significantly or whether the existing measures are achieving the intended results in removing the injury previously established.

Expiry review investigation

Before the expiry of measures (AD/CVD measures are generally enacted for five years, whereas safeguard measures are enacted for three years), domestic industry can request an expiry review by providing sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping or subsidy and injury.

Reopening of an investigation

If definitive duties are neutralised owing to a fall in export prices, domestic industry can request the reopening of an investigation by providing sufficient evidence showing that measures have led to no movement or insufficient movement in sales prices of the product subject to measures in the Turkish market.

A new exporter review investigation

If a new exporter or producer has not exported the product to Türkiye during the investigation period, they can request an individual dumping margin determination. The applicant must prove that it has no affiliation with those subject to duties and demonstrate its intent to export significant quantities. This process begins after considering comments from domestic producers.

Review investigations can be initiated on an ex officio basis. Domestic industry can submit petitions if the conditions provided in the Trade Remedy Regulation and/or the time limitations are fulfilled. However, investigations are generally initiated pursuant to a request from domestic industry.

Exporters, producers, industry associations, and government bodies of the countries subject to the investigation can participate in the investigation. Other non-domestic parties can participate if they can show a legitimate interest in the case.

An AD/CVD investigation is usually initiated pursuant to a complaint/petition from domestic companies fulfilling the representativeness test. Safeguard investigations can also be requested by professional organisations and chambers representing interested parties.

AD/CVD Investigations

For new AD/CVD investigations, a representativeness test exists to ensure that the investigation has sufficient support from domestic industry producing the subject product. At least 25% of total domestic production must support the complaint/request and domestic producers representing more than 50% of domestic production must not express opposition.

Following a complaint or ex officio review in AD/CVD investigations, the General Directorate of Imports should complete its review in 45 days and refer the case to the AD/CVD Board to decide whether initiation of an investigation is necessary. If the AD/CVD Board decides to initiate an investigation, this is published in the Official Gazette with a communiqué providing details of the investigation, such as the countries concerned, the product scope, and the procedure of the investigation. Interested parties are given 37 days to submit their responses to the questionnaire and be considered as interested parties. After the submission of the questionnaires, the General Directorate of Imports evaluates the information and documents provided by the interested parties and may conduct verification visits. Based on its evaluations and the comments provided by the interested parties, the General Directorate of Imports prepares a final notice containing its determinations and suggestions to the AD/CVD Board and invites interested parties to submit their views/comments. Interested parties can also request a public hearing to submit their arguments orally. The investigation process should be completed within a year but can be extended for six months under special circumstances. After the conclusion of the investigation phase, an investigation report is prepared by the General Directorate of Imports to be submitted to the AD/CVD Board for the final evaluation. Based on the information contained therein, the AD/CVD Board decides whether a measure can/should be imposed and publishes its decision via a communiqué in the Official Gazette.

Safeguard Investigations

For safeguard investigations, the Safeguards Board conducts a preliminary analysis based on the information provided in a complaint or by the General Directorate of Imports in ex officio cases, and decides whether initiation of a safeguard investigation is necessary. If the Safeguards Board decides to initiate an investigation, the decision is published in the Official Gazette with a communiqué inviting interested parties to fill out the questionnaire within 40 days in order to be considered as interested parties. As with the AD/CVD investigations, the General Directorate of Imports evaluates the information and comments provided by the interested parties and may conduct verification visits. The investigation phase should be completed within nine months, although this can be extended for another six months. The final decision of the Safeguards Board is published in the Official Gazette with a communiqué which recommends that the president should impose specific measures. Pursuant to the communiqué and usually in line with the recommendations of the Safeguards Board, a presidential decree imposing a safeguard measure is published in the Official Gazette.

The reports of the General Directorate of Imports summarising the findings of the investigations are published as annexes of the implementing legislation. The final disclosure reports in the context of the investigations are also published on the Turkish Ministry of Trade’s website.

In principle, AD/CVD duties and safeguard measures can be imposed against any jurisdiction and can cover any product.

AD/CVD duties can be implemented for a maximum of five years and lapse after the expiry of this period. Domestic industry may request an expiry review for the extension of existing measures.

Safeguard measures may last up to four years. Where they exceed three years, they must be reviewed at mid-term and can be extended once for up to a maximum of ten years in total against the members of the WTO.

Upon request from domestic industry three months before the expiry of the measure or at the discretion of the Turkish Ministry of Trade, an expiry review for the extension of the existing measures can be initiated, provided that there is sufficient evidence demonstrating that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping or subsidy and injury. The process and timeline that applies vis-à-vis initial investigations is also applicable to expiry reviews.

As per Article 24 of Law No 2575 on the Council of State, annulment of presidential decisions (covering decrees implementing safeguard measures) and legislation enacted by the administrative authorities with nationwide application (covering communiqués implementing AD/CVD measures) can be requested within 60 days of their publication.

Türkiye is a notable user of trade remedies and is expected to remain so during the current global protectionist tendencies. The Turkish Ministry of Trade has been actively initiating and concluding investigations with the aim of protecting the interests of domestic industry. Indeed, as of November 2025, 256 anti-dumping and anti-subsidy and 11 safeguard measures have been applied by Türkiye. Within the framework of the WTO dispute settlement procedure, Türkiye has initiated six cases as a complainant, while 13 cases have been brought against it.

The FTA signed between Türkiye and Ukraine aims to improve economic co-operation by reducing trade barriers between the two countries, and to promote economic growth by liberalising trade. Accordingly, the termination or amendment of anti-dumping measures will serve this purpose. Therefore, it is possible that changes to anti-dumping measures concerning Ukraine may occur in the near future to align with these objectives.

Legal Framework

The primary legal framework with regard to foreign direct investment in Türkiye includes international treaties, the Foreign Direct Investment Law No 4875 (the “FDI Law”), and the Regulation on the Implementation of the Foreign Direct Investment Law (the “FDI Regulation”).

Under the FDI Law, investors need to:

• notify the Ministry of Treasury and Finance of their investment (eg, greenfield investment, share transfer or otherwise);
• notify the amount of foreign capital brought to Türkiye; and
• register certain information (such as shareholding structure, share transfers and/or increase or decrease in the share capital) on an online platform – namely, the Electronic Incentive Application and Foreign Investment Information System (“E-TUYS”).

The FDI Law stipulates principles such as the freedom to invest, valuation of non-cash capital and the employment of foreign personnel. Foreign investors can freely establish an entity, open a branch and/or acquire shares of an existing company and conclude know-how/technical assistance agreements with domestic companies. Companies with a foreign shareholding, that are established in line with the Turkish Commercial Code, are treated equally to companies with a local shareholding.

Bilateral and Multilateral Investment Treaties

Aside from its FDI Law, Türkiye has entered into numerous bilateral and multilateral investment treaties. As of November 2025, Türkiye has entered into bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with 98 countries. However, Türkiye is a dualist country, where an international treaty has to be ratified and promulgated in order to become part of the national legal system. In this regard, 89 BITs have so far come into effect.

The participating nations encompass all EU member states (excluding Ireland) and all OECD member countries, with the exception of Iceland, Canada, Norway and New Zealand. Türkiye is actively engaged in a programme both to establish new BITs and revise existing ones to align with evolving developments. On 12 January 2024, Türkiye and the UK signed an agreement for the Joint Economic and Trade Committee and a memorandum of understanding with the aim of enhancing co-operation with other nations.

Apart from domestic legislation and BITs, Türkiye is actively pursuing engagement in various multilateral investment treaties to enhance economic co-operation with other nations. In this context, Türkiye is a participant in the Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures within the WTO, the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, and the Energy Charter Treaty.

According to the FDI Law, certain information related to foreign investors must be reported to the Ministry of Industry and Technology by foreign companies through the Incentive Implementation and Foreign Capital Directorate.

The Ministry of Industry and Technology is authorised to take precautions, make regulations in line with the provisions of the implementation of the FDI Law, examine and conclude special and obligatory situations, resolve potential disputes through administrative means, and address technical issues arising from implementation.

Foreign capital (foreign-partnered) companies and their branches in Türkiye are required to make notifications.

In Türkiye, foreign direct investments have become liberalised, transitioning from a system requiring approval and/or permission to a notification system.

Companies that are entirely domestically owned and fall outside the scope of the FDI Law become subject to notification if a foreign investor participates in the company or if a capital increase is made with the participation of a foreign investor outside the company.

No penalties or consequences are applicable for failure to file necessary notifications.

No fee is required when submitting the notification.

There has not been a recent significant development in the investment security regime of Türkiye, which already adopts a lenient regime.

The Turkish treasury and finance minister announced new regulations to attract more international capital into Türkiye’s start-up ecosystem. This regulation allows venture capital funds to invest in foreign start-ups, as long as the majority of their investments are directed towards Türkiye. This initiative appears to be part of a broader strategy to encourage international investment in Türkiye and enhance co-operation with global investors, aligning with the Action Plan of the Coordination Council for the Improvement of the Investment Environment. Although primarily focused on facilitating investment, the regulation supports investment security by fostering a more stable and favourable climate for international investors.

Decision No 2012/3305 on State Aids in Investments (the “State Aids Decision”) and its secondary legislation govern the general framework government incentives in Türkiye, which aim to decrease trade deficit, support high and medium-high technology investments, promote development in the least-developed areas/cities, and increase the efficiency of investments. The State Aids Decision employs the following incentives programmes, each of which is subject to different types of incentives.

Incentives Programmes

Regional investment incentive scheme

The State Aids Decision provides a list dividing regions of Türkiye into six separate categories based on the development level of these areas, and provides various incentives in varying amounts based on the amount of the investment and its location.

Priority investment incentive scheme

The scheme is provided for hi-tech investments, such as:

• pharmaceuticals;
• office, accounting and computing machinery;
• radio, TV and communications equipment;
• medical, precision and optical instruments; and
• aircraft and spacecraft.

These investments benefit from the incentives provided for Region 5, regardless of their location.

Strategic investment incentive scheme

The scheme provides specific incentives for investments to be made for the production of intermediate or final products, of which more than 50% are supplied through imports. Energy investments and investments approved by the Technology Focused Industry Movement Programme are also considered strategic investments.

General investment incentive scheme

Regardless of the location of the investment, the scheme is available for all investments that fall outside the scope of the aforementioned schemes, provided that the investment meets the minimum fixed investment thresholds (which differ based on the location).

Subsidies

Depending on the type of applicable incentive scheme and the location of the investment, the following subsidies are available, at varying rates in the context of the State Aids Decision:

• VAT exemption;
• customs duty exemption;
• tax deduction;
• social security premium support (employee and employer shares);
• interest/profit-share support;
• land allocation; and
• VAT refund.

In addition to the incentives provided by the State Aids Decision, the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu) and the Small and Medium Industry Development Organisation (Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmeleri Geliştirme ve Destekleme İdaresi) can provide project-based incentives for smaller investments.

Law No 7223 on Product Safety and Technical Regulations governs the main principles in the application of standards and technical specifications, and provides the main responsibilities of manufacturers, importers and distributors. Said law, which was renewed in 2020 to align Turkish legislation with that of the EU, is clarified and enforced through product-specific regulations that lay down the specific requirements.

Law No 5996 on Veterinary Services, Plant Health, Food and Feed and its secondary legislation, enacted in line with the Codex Alimentarius, form the basis of sanitary and phytosanitary requirements. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no requirement in these regulations that aims at reducing imports and/or encouraging domestic production.

There is no de jure price control policy and regulation in Türkiye. However, surveillance measures adopted by the Turkish Ministry of Trade with communiqués pursuant to the Decision on Surveillance Measures in Imports provide a base price level for imports whereby importers of goods falling below specified prices must obtain a surveillance licence from the Turkish Ministry of Trade.

There is no privatisation measure employed by Türkiye that aims to reduce imports and/or encourage domestic production.

Article 63 of Law No 4734 on Public Procurement grants preference to local companies in that a 15% price advantage can be given to these companies in the event of a tender.

Pursuant to Article 33 of Law No 6769 on Industrial Property, food, agricultural, mining, handicraft and industrial products that are formed with natural and anthropic elements in Türkiye can qualify for geographical indications.

There were no significant issues or developments in Turkish international trade law in 2025.