Contributed By SSEK Law Firm
Blockchain Use in Indonesia
In Indonesia, the primary application of blockchain technology to date has centred on crypto-asset trading. The existing regulatory framework for crypto-assets – principally Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, or OJK) Regulation No 27 of 2024 regarding the Implementation of Digital Financial Asset Trading, including Crypto Assets (OJK Reg 27/2024) – focuses on the operation and supervision of trading-related activities conducted by licensed entities such as Digital Financial Asset Traders, Bourses, Clearing Institutions and Custodians (Digital Financial Asset Trading Providers).
Over the past 12 months, the OJK has issued OJK Regulation No 23 of 2025 regarding the Amendment of OJK Regulation No 27 of 2024 (OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended), which introduces a number of key changes, including the formal recognition of digital financial asset derivatives, the Electronic System Provider (ESP) registration requirement, and revised obligations for Digital Financial Asset Trading Providers, signalling the regulator’s continued and active development of the framework. However, OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, does not specifically address broader uses of blockchain technology beyond this trading context.
At the business registration level, Indonesia’s standard business classification system (Klasifikasi Baku Lapangan Usaha Indonesia, or KBLI) recognises blockchain-related businesses, with KBLI No 62014 regarding Blockchain Technology Development Activities. This classification encompasses companies engaged in the development and implementation of blockchain technology, including smart contracts and the design of public and private blockchain infrastructure. However, this recognition has not been accompanied by a specific licensing regime from the OJK or any other regulator for companies operating solely in the blockchain development space.
Looking ahead, the most significant issue likely to impact the use of blockchain in Indonesia over the next 12 months is the gap between the pace of innovation and the pace of regulation. Many business models that leverage blockchain innovation remain in a regulatory grey area, either unaddressed by existing regulation or subject to uncertainty regarding their permissibility. This uncertainty affects how blockchain-based businesses structure their operations in Indonesia, and may deter some foreign players from entering the market.
Intellectual Property
The intersection of intellectual property law and blockchain in Indonesia remains largely unexplored in practice. Given that most blockchain-related activity in Indonesia is channelled through regulated crypto-asset trading rather than broader blockchain applications, there has been limited occasion for intellectual property considerations to arise specifically in connection with blockchain businesses. The general intellectual property framework applies to blockchain-related developments, but no blockchain-specific intellectual property rules or guidance have been issued.
OJK Regulatory Sandbox
Indonesia provides a regulatory sandbox mechanism for financial innovations that fall outside existing regulatory frameworks. The sandbox is administered by the OJK and is intended to allow financial technology innovations to be tested under OJK supervision before a formal regulatory regime is established. The mechanism is governed by OJK Circular Letter No 5/SEOJK.07/2024 regarding Mechanism for the Testing and Development of Innovations dated 3 June 2024 (OJK CL 5/2024).
To be eligible for the sandbox, an innovation must satisfy the following criteria:
Where a blockchain-based business model satisfies the above criteria, an entity may apply to the OJK to participate in the sandbox. Sandbox approval is assessed on a case-by-case basis and is not guaranteed.
Government and Regulatory Attitude
The Indonesian government’s general approach to blockchain and crypto-asset businesses reflects a cautious stance, balancing innovation with consumer protection. The OJK has progressively expanded the scope of regulation over the digital asset sector, addressing areas such as crypto-asset derivatives and primary market offerings through new, upcoming and amended regulations. Entities that provide financial services in Indonesia using blockchain technology without the requisite licence risk having their platform access blocked in Indonesia, which has been actively enforced against a number of foreign platforms.
The regulatory sandbox serves as the primary pathway for blockchain-based innovations that fall outside existing frameworks. However, sandbox participation does not guarantee regulatory approval, and the absence of a formal framework may mean that businesses are unable to operate lawfully even after sandbox testing, and might need to wait until a more specific regulation regarding blockchain is issued. This illustrates the tension between encouraging innovation and the practical constraints of a regulatory environment still developing in response to market developments.
Regulation of Blockchain Technology
Blockchain technology in itself, distinct from crypto-asset trading, is not specifically regulated in Indonesia. The only formal recognition of blockchain as a business activity is KBLI Code 62014 for Blockchain Technology Development Activities. There is currently no specific licence from the OJK or any other Indonesian regulator requirement for companies engaged solely in blockchain development. As a result, regulated firms that outsource to or utilise blockchain technology solutions are subject to their existing regulatory requirements and general technology-related obligations, without blockchain-specific rules.
Data Privacy
As there is no blockchain-specific regulatory framework, there are no blockchain-specific data privacy obligations applicable to blockchain companies; such companies are subject to the general personal data protection framework. The potential conflict between the obligations under such personal data protection framework and the nature of blockchain has not yet been addressed through specific guidance or regulation in Indonesia.
Recognition of Smart Contracts
Smart contracts are not specifically regulated or defined under Indonesian law. The only formal reference to smart contracts appears in the elaboration to KBLI Code 62014, which describes the relevant business classification as covering blockchain technology development activities, including the implementation of smart contracts. This reference is limited to business classification purposes and does not constitute a regulatory or legal framework for smart contracts.
Enforceability
The enforceability of smart contracts in Indonesia is not expressly addressed by the laws and regulations. Under Indonesian contract law, a valid contract generally requires agreement between parties, capacity to contract, a specific object and a lawful cause. In principle, smart contracts could be assessed against these requirements, but there is no judicial or regulatory guidance specifically addressing this. Parties relying on smart contracts in Indonesia accordingly face legal uncertainty, and it is advisable to supplement smart contract arrangements with traditional written agreements governed by Indonesian law
There are several trade associations representing Indonesia’s blockchain industry, including Asosiasi Blockchain Indonesia (Indonesian Blockchain Association, or ABI) and the Indonesia Blockchain Society (IBS). These associations serve primarily as forums for industry players to network and share knowledge, and they engage with the government and regulators on policy matters relevant to the blockchain sector. Their role is consultative rather than regulatory, as they do not possess self-regulatory authority over their members.
Classification of Crypto-Assets
Under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, crypto-assets are classified as digital financial assets, defined as financial assets stored or represented digitally, including crypto-assets. This classification is primarily regulatory in nature and does not establish crypto-assets as a form of property in the traditional civil law sense. The legal characterisation of crypto-assets as property capable of ownership under Indonesian civil law has not been definitively settled.
Transfer of Ownership
In practice, the transfer of ownership of crypto-assets in Indonesia occurs through buying and selling or transferring crypto-assets on or through licensed Digital Financial Asset Traders. Regulated activities under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, include:
Ownership transfers occurring outside these regulated channels are not explicitly recognised or addressed under Indonesian law.
Collateral Arrangements
The use of crypto-assets in collateral arrangements is not expressly addressed or regulated under Indonesian law. As crypto-assets are not formally recognised as property under the civil law framework, the legal mechanics of creating a security interest over crypto-assets remain uncertain. In practice, ownership disputes and collateral-related issues involving crypto-assets have not featured prominently in Indonesian legal proceedings, in part because most crypto-asset activity occurs through licensed Digital Financial Asset Traders where ownership records are relatively straightforward.
Payment Service Provider Requirements
Companies providing crypto-asset services in Indonesia are required to partner with a licensed Payment Service Provider (Penyedia Jasa Pembayaran, or PJP) for their Rupiah payment processing needs. A PJP is a company licensed by Bank Indonesia to provide payment system services. Licensed Digital Financial Asset Traders are single-purpose entities and are therefore not permitted to hold a PJP licence concurrently.
There are currently no ESG or sustainable finance requirements, such as specific disclosure or reporting obligations, applicable to digital assets or digital asset businesses under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, or any other Indonesian regulation specifically governing the digital asset sector. Digital Financial Asset Trading Providers are subject to general corporate reporting and governance obligations applicable to Indonesian companies, but no ESG framework has been developed for the digital asset industry.
Tax Treatment of Crypto-Assets
Indonesia’s tax regime has not been comprehensively updated to address blockchain technology or digital assets. The most notable crypto-specific tax development is the imposition of income tax (PPh) and value-added tax (PPN) on crypto-asset transactions. Crypto-asset sellers are subject to final income tax, while buyers pay value-added tax on the transaction value, with the licensed Digital Financial Asset Trader or Bourse required to collect and remit these taxes.
Outside these transaction-specific provisions, the general Indonesian tax framework applies to crypto-asset businesses and individuals. Uncertainty remains around how certain crypto-asset-related income and gains are characterised for tax purposes, particularly for transactions or arrangements falling outside straightforward buying and selling on licensed platforms. Further regulatory or fiscal guidance is anticipated but has not yet been issued.
Voluntary Cessation of Business
Under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, Digital Financial Asset Trading Providers wishing to cease operations must submit a written application to the OJK requesting the cessation of business activities. The application must be accompanied by:
Upon OJK approval, the entity must cease its activities and promptly settle all obligations to consumers and counterparties.
Licence Revocation
Following settlement of all obligations, the entity may apply for a formal licence revocation. This application must include:
The OJK will revoke the licence upon being satisfied that all requirements have been met.
The primary association for the crypto-asset industry in Indonesia is Asosiasi Pedagang Aset Kripto Indonesia (ASPAKRINDO), which serves as a forum for members to share knowledge and research, and to co-ordinate on industry matters. It also plays a consultative role in OJK and government policy-making processes, providing industry input on draft regulations and regulatory initiatives relevant to the crypto-asset sector.
Regulatory Bodies
The primary regulator for blockchain and crypto-asset businesses in Indonesia is the OJK. Following the enactment of Law No 4 of 2023 regarding the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector (P2SK Law), supervisory authority over crypto-assets was transferred from the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi, or Bappebti) to the OJK, with effect from January 2025. The OJK is responsible for licensing entities in the digital financial asset sector, supervising licensed entities’ compliance, and issuing sector regulations.
Bank Indonesia (the central bank) retains relevance to the extent that crypto-asset transactions intersect with the payment system, given its authority over PJPs and its ongoing development of the Digital Rupiah. The Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs is also relevant, as Digital Financial Asset Trading Operators are required to be registered as ESPs with that ministry – a requirement expressly confirmed under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended.
Regulatory Approach
The OJK’s approach to regulating the digital asset sector has been incremental and consultative. The regulator has progressively expanded the scope of the framework, from the foundational regime to addressing crypto-asset derivatives under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, and primary market offerings through the Draft OJK Regulation on digital financial asset offerings. The OJK typically consults industry associations and stakeholders when developing new regulations.
Classification of Crypto-Assets
Under OJK Reg 27/2024, crypto-assets are classified as digital financial assets, characterised as digital commodities intended for investment. Despite being supervised by the OJK, crypto-assets are not classified as financial instruments in the traditional sense. The framework distinguishes between backed crypto-assets, whose value is tied to underlying assets, and unbacked crypto-assets, which have no such backing.
Regulated Activities
The activities regulated under OJK Reg 27/2024 are those conducted by licensed Digital Financial Asset Trading Providers. The Digital Financial Asset Trader licence is the most commonly sought authorisation by foreign entities entering Indonesia, and permits the following activities:
Prohibited Activities
There is no exhaustive list of prohibited crypto-asset activities. However, the use of crypto-assets as a means of payment is not permitted, as the Rupiah is the sole recognised legal tender in Indonesia. PJPs are also prohibited from processing payment transactions involving crypto-assets. In addition, only crypto-assets listed on the official approved list may be traded on licensed platforms; assets not on this list cannot be offered or traded through Indonesian licensed channels.
Upcoming Regulations
The most significant near-term regulatory development is the anticipated finalisation of the OJK’s draft regulation on digital financial asset offerings, which would establish Indonesia’s first regulatory framework for Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) and Initial Token Offerings (ITOs). Published for public consultation in September 2025, this regulation will introduce a structured approval and disclosure regime for primary market activities in the digital asset sector, once finalised.
The use of a legal wrapper, such as a fund, does not alter the fundamental licensing requirements applicable to crypto-asset activities in Indonesia. Any entity that conducts activities falling within the scope of regulated digital financial asset trading activities under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, will be required to obtain the appropriate OJK licence, regardless of its corporate form, as the licensing obligation attaches to the nature of the activity being conducted rather than the legal form of the entity. This also means that any fund wishing to conduct activities within the scope of OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, would need to obtain the requisite licence.
Regulatory Status of ICOs and ITOs
Indonesia does not yet have a finalised regulatory framework governing the issuance of crypto-assets to the public through ICOs or ITOs. The OJK published a draft regulation on digital financial asset offerings for public consultation in September 2025, but it has not yet been finalised. Until it comes into force, there is no formal process through which an entity can lawfully conduct an ICO or ITO in Indonesia.
Listed Assets Requirement
Under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, only crypto-assets included in the official list of approved digital financial assets may be traded on licensed platforms in Indonesia. Any crypto-asset not on this list cannot be offered or traded through Indonesian licensed channels, regardless of how the asset was issued. This gatekeeping mechanism effectively determines which crypto-assets have access to the Indonesian market.
Crypto-Asset Markets
There is currently no market abuse or insider trading framework specifically applicable to crypto-asset trading in Indonesia. OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, and its amendments do not contain provisions addressing market manipulation, insider trading or other forms of market abuse in the crypto-asset context. This represents a notable gap in the regulatory framework, particularly as the crypto-asset market continues to grow.
Capital Markets Framework
By contrast, Indonesia’s capital markets framework contains well-established insider trading provisions under Articles 95 to 98 of Law No 8 of 1995 regarding Capital Markets, which are applicable to securities traded on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. The following conduct is prohibited:
These provisions apply to securities and do not extend to crypto-assets. The absence of an equivalent framework for crypto-asset markets means that conduct prohibited in the securities context may not currently be subject to regulatory sanction in the crypto-asset context.
Enforcement Against Unlicensed Entities
The most visible enforcement mechanism applied in Indonesia’s crypto-asset sector is the blocking of access to foreign platforms that provide regulated crypto-asset services to Indonesian consumers without a local licence. In practice, the websites and applications of such platforms are blocked in Indonesia and cannot be accessed without a VPN. This has been applied to a significant number of foreign crypto-asset platforms, and reflects a consistent regulatory policy.
Enforcement Against Individuals
Enforcement actions specifically targeting individual foreign nationals providing crypto-asset services to Indonesian consumers have not been a prominent feature of the regulatory landscape. The enforcement focus to date has been on the entities providing the services rather than on individuals.
Outlook
The regulatory enforcement stance is unlikely to change materially in the next 12 months. The approach of blocking unlicensed foreign platforms has been consistent since the early development of the crypto-asset industry in Indonesia, and reflects a settled policy position. As the OJK’s institutional capacity grows, more active enforcement across a broader range of non-compliant conduct may be expected over time.
Triggers for Licensing
A licence from the OJK is required when a company wishes to conduct activities falling within the scope of regulated digital financial asset trading activities under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended. This encompasses the activities of Digital Financial Asset Trading Providers. Any company whose proposed business model involves any activity that falls within the defined scope of these licenceswill be required to obtain the relevant licence before commencing operations.
Territorial Scope
The licensing requirement applies to entities providing services to consumers in Indonesia, regardless of where the entity is incorporated or based. The OJK takes the position that foreign entities actively offering or providing regulated crypto-asset services to Indonesian consumers are subject to Indonesian licensing requirements. The most common basis for requiring a foreign entity to establish a local presence is the solicitation or provision of services to Indonesian residents.
Grandfathering
There are no grandfathering provisions under the Indonesian crypto-asset regulatory framework. All entities wishing to conduct regulated digital financial asset activities in Indonesia must obtain the relevant OJK licence before commencing operations. There are no transitional arrangements permitting existing businesses to continue operating during the course of a licensing application.
To obtain a Digital Financial Asset Trader licence, which authorises the holder to provide crypto-asset buying, selling, exchange, custody and wallet transfer services to Indonesian consumers, the following principal requirements apply.
Capital Requirements
Applicants must demonstrate paid-up capital of at least IDR100 billion (approximately USD6 million) and maintain equity of at least IDR50 billion (approximately USD3 million). Capital used to fund the entity may not be sourced from loans or other forms of debt financing.
Personnel and Organisational Requirements
The applicant must employ at least one staff member holding a Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) certification. A minimum of three directors is required, with the majority being Indonesian citizens domiciled in Indonesia, and the President Director is required to be an Indonesian citizen. A minimum of two commissioners must also be appointed, with the total number not exceeding the number of directors. The organisational structure must include at a minimum divisions for information technology, audit, legal, consumer complaints, client support, and accounting and finance.
Operational and Regulatory Requirements
The applicant must operate an online trading system through which it provides its services, and must maintain standard operating procedures covering all obligations under applicable regulations. The applicant must also be registered as an ESP with the Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs – a requirement confirmed under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended.
Any change in the shareholders, directors or commissioners of a licensed Digital Financial Asset Trading Provider requires prior OJK approval through a Fit-and-Proper Test (FPT) process. Accordingly, the acquisition of a licensed Digital Financial Asset Trading Provider resulting in a change of controlling shareholder requires the incoming shareholder to undergo and pass the OJK FPT before the change of control takes effect. The same requirement applies to changes at the director and commissioner level.
The FPT involves the OJK assessing the integrity, competence and financial soundness of the proposed shareholder, director or commissioner. In practice, parties planning an acquisition of a licensed entity should factor in the time required for the FPT process when structuring the transaction timeline, and acquisition agreements typically include the successful completion of the FPT as a condition precedent to closing.
Indonesia does not operate a licence passporting regime. A licence obtained from the OJK to conduct digital financial asset activities is valid only within Indonesia and does not confer any right to conduct equivalent activities in other jurisdictions. Similarly, licences obtained in foreign jurisdictions do not provide any regulatory recognition or benefit in Indonesia. Each jurisdiction must be approached on its own terms, requiring a separate application process.
Cross-Border Service Restrictions
The cross-border provision of regulated digital financial asset services into Indonesia without a local licence is not permitted. The OJK’s position is that entities providing regulated crypto-asset services to Indonesian consumers must hold the appropriate Indonesian licence. Foreign entities that continue to provide such services without a licence face the risk of having their platform access blocked in Indonesia – a measure that has been actively enforced against a significant number of foreign crypto-asset platforms.
Exemptions and Reverse Solicitation
There are no formal exemptions to the licensing requirement for cross-border service providers. Reverse solicitation does not provide reliable protection in Indonesia, as the practical risk of platform access being blocked continues regardless of which party initiated contact. Reliance on reverse solicitation as a basis for serving Indonesian consumers without a licence carries significant regulatory risk given the OJK’s active enforcement stance.
Marketing of Digital Assets
There are no marketing restrictions in Indonesia specifically directed at digital assets themselves. Applicable marketing restrictions are directed at licensed Digital Financial Asset Traders and relate to how they promote their services. In particular, Digital Financial Asset Traders are prohibited from representing that crypto-asset investments are guaranteed to generate profits or are free from the risk of loss. General Indonesian consumer protection and advertising standards also apply to marketing activities in the digital asset sector.
White-label arrangements in the digital financial asset sector are not expressly addressed under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended. Given that the licensing obligation attaches to the activity conducted rather than the specific commercial model used, a white-label arrangement through which an unlicensed entity provides regulated services to Indonesian consumers using an existing licensed entity’s licence would need to be carefully structured to ensure the licensed entity retains full regulatory responsibility and control.
Any arrangement that effectively results in an unlicensed entity providing regulated services to Indonesian consumers risks being viewed by the OJK as a circumvention of the licensing requirement. Parties considering such arrangements should seek specific regulatory guidance from the OJK before implementation.
DeFi in Indonesia
Decentralised finance is not yet explicitly regulated in Indonesia. There is no dedicated regulatory framework addressing DeFi activities, and the existing digital financial asset framework under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, does not specifically contemplate DeFi structures or activities.
CeFi Firms and DeFi
Licensed Digital Financial Asset Traders (the primary category of centralised finance entities in the Indonesian crypto-asset context) are permitted to engage in activities beyond their core licensed activities, subject to prior OJK approval. This provides a potential pathway for licensed Traders to incorporate DeFi-related elements into their service offerings. There is no established precedent regarding the terms on which such approval would be granted, and any DeFi-related product or service would be subject to OJK review.
As DeFi is not yet explicitly regulated in Indonesia, there are no established corporate structures used specifically for operating DeFi activities in the country. Decentralised autonomous organisations and similar structures do not have a recognised legal form under Indonesian law. Any entity wishing to engage in DeFi-related activities in Indonesia would need to operate through a recognised legal entity and, where those activities constitute regulated digital financial asset activities, would need to obtain the relevant OJK licence or approval.
As DeFi is not yet explicitly regulated in Indonesia, there is no established judicial or regulatory guidance addressing accountability and liability for harm caused by DeFi activities. No significant enforcement actions relating to DeFi have been reported in Indonesia to date. In the absence of a specific framework, claims arising from DeFi-related activities would need to be assessed under Indonesia’s general civil and commercial law, which is not designed to address the specific characteristics of decentralised protocols. This represents a significant area of legal uncertainty for DeFi participants operating in or in connection with Indonesia.
Payments in crypto-assets are not permitted in Indonesia. The Rupiah is the sole recognised legal tender, and all transactions within Indonesia must be denominated and settled in Rupiah. Crypto-assets are not recognised as a means of payment under any Indonesian regulation. PJPs are expressly prohibited from processing payment transactions involving crypto-assets as a payment instrument, reinforcing the prohibition at the payment infrastructure level.
Indonesian regulations do not draw a distinction between fiat currency-backed stablecoins and algorithmic stablecoins. OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, does not define or specifically address stablecoins as a separate category. Any crypto-asset is treated as a crypto-asset under the Indonesian framework, whether backed by fiat currency reserves or maintaining its value through an algorithmic mechanism. The only fundamental distinction made under Indonesian law is between Rupiah as legal tender and crypto-assets as digital financial assets.
Fiat-backed stablecoins are not specifically regulated in Indonesia and are treated as crypto-assets under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, subject to the same regulatory framework as other crypto-assets. There is no specific stablecoin regulatory framework in Indonesia, and stablecoins have not been retrofitted into the existing payments regulatory framework. Stablecoins listed on the approved list of digital financial assets may be traded on licensed platforms; conversely, those not on the list may not be offered or traded in Indonesia.
OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, recognises two broad categories of crypto-assets:
The regulation does not impose specific requirements regarding the composition, location or management of backing assets for backed crypto-assets. There are no requirements mandating that crypto-assets be backed, nor are there provisions governing whether backed crypto-assets may pay interest or yield to holders.
There are no special regulatory considerations or requirements applicable to stablecoins that may pose a systemic risk in Indonesia. As stablecoins are treated as crypto-assets rather than as payment instruments or monetary instruments, systemic risk considerations of the kind that have emerged in other jurisdictions in relation to large-scale stablecoin adoption have not been addressed in the Indonesian regulatory context.
Regulatory Classification
Under OJK Reg 27/2024 and the Draft OJK Regulation on digital financial asset offerings, tokenised assets are recognised as a distinct category of digital financial assets. The Draft OJK Regulation distinguishes between backed tokenised assets, supported by underlying real-world assets, and unbacked tokenised assets, which are not asset-backed. This classification reflects the OJK’s intention to develop a framework accommodating real-world asset tokenisation as a distinct product category.
Comparison With Non-Blockchain Equivalents
Traditional securities such as shares and bonds are regulated under Law No 8 of 1995 regarding Capital Markets, and supervised by the OJK’s capital markets division. Tokenised versions of such assets, to the extent they constitute digital financial assets under OJK Reg 27/2024, as amended, would fall under the digital financial asset framework rather than the capital markets framework.
Mayapada Tower I, 14th Floor
Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 28
Jakarta, 12920
Indonesia
+62 21 2953 2000 / +62 21 521 2038
+62 21 521 2039
ssek@ssek.com www.ssek.com