Contributed By Walkers
The fintech market in the Cayman Islands has developed over the last 12 months to become a technology talent pool and its increasingly mature technology industry is developing and strengthening the financial services industry of the Cayman Islands. The Cayman Islands is the leading offshore jurisdiction for investment funds, one of the top financial centres of the world, as well as a world leader in structured finance, and its government has been positive about encouraging fintech in the financial services industry. It has been a busy year for the Cayman Islands government, embracing technology in its processes and services, and encouraging technology companies to move to the Cayman Islands and develop a technology industry there. At the same time, the Cayman Islands financial services regulator (the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, or the Authority) and technology regulator (the Utility Regulation and Competition Office, or OfReg) have been educating themselves about blockchain, smart contracts and cryptocurrencies.
The Special Economic Zone (SEZ) was introduced by the government to encourage the development of certain industries in the Cayman Islands, including technology, by granting certain incentives for technology companies to relocate physically and work in the Cayman Islands. The SEZ now has over 250 companies, including approximately 60 blockchain-focused companies.
Given the proximity to the USA, the similar time zone to the USA, the established reputation of the Cayman Islands as a financial services capital, and the increasing difficulty in obtaining work visas in the USA, some technology companies have opened offices and have located their employees in the Cayman Islands.
In addition to the SEZ, TechCayman was established in August 2018 to encourage technology entrepreneurs to establish their businesses in the Cayman Islands and to create a hub where the technology community can come together to collaborate and build new programmes and ecosystems.
In August 2017, the IP legislation in the Cayman Islands was updated to strengthen and protect IP rights, and it now permits direct registration of IP rights in the Cayman Islands rather than via the United Kingdom.
The Cayman Islands government has also established an e-government unit responsible for transitioning manual and paper-based government services to an electronic and online system to follow the Estonia model. This process is ongoing and the unit is considering all forms of technology, from blockchain to digital ID, to automate government processes and services.
The need to increase the local talent pool to service the technology industry has come to the attention of the Cayman Islands government and it is in the process of establishing women and youth coding programmes. The University College of the Cayman Islands also launched coding programmes in 2019 due to the demand for such courses.
The Cayman Islands regulators are continuing their focus on blockchain and virtual assets after the run-up in prices of cryptocurrencies in 2017. The Authority established a working group in March 2018 to get up to speed in understanding virtual assets and how best to regulate these assets. OfReg is encouraging the development of blockchain projects by considering and proposing changes to the Cayman Islands Electronic Transactions Law to incorporate express recognition of blockchain and smart contracts.
While the development of a regulatory regime that aims to regulate virtual asset-related business in a workable and appropriate manner is expected, following the crypto winter, many Cayman Islands companies who hold large portions of their worth in crypto-assets may become unable to meet their liabilities as they fall due and fulfil the promises they made to investors (token purchasers and otherwise). When this happens, and consequent disputes arise, creditors, contributories and other interested parties will need to evaluate their options and the recourse available to them from a dispute resolution and insolvency perspective. Fortunately, the Cayman Islands has a robust and predictable legal regime that can assist such parties in enforcing rights they may have against the company, although this new asset class demands service providers who truly understand the technology that underpins the operation of such assets to provide effective advice and services.
The predominant verticals that apply in the Cayman Islands relate to blockchain and virtual assets.
Cayman Islands vehicles' involvement in blockchain is typically as crypto funds, funds investing in blockchain projects, token issuers in the context of security token offerings (STOs) or initial coin offerings (ICOs), joint-venture vehicles developing blockchain projects, service providers such as broker dealers and custodians, and IP holding vehicles. There are no legacy players, as such, as this is a relatively new industry.
The financial services sector in the Cayman Islands is regulated by the Authority, which receives its supervisory powers from the Monetary Authority Law (MAL). In summary, the regulatory laws provide for a licensing process whereby entities and individuals conducting regulated activity are required to obtain a licence or be registered with the Authority to conduct the regulated activities.
The Authority supervises the regulated entities and individuals through its supervisory process and powers emanating from the MAL. This supervisory oversight includes desk-based supervision and on-site inspection. The Authority also has supervisory oversight over the anti-money laundering (AML) practices of entities within the scope of the Cayman Islands AML Regulations, including virtual asset service providers such as exchanges and custodians.
There are a number of legislative obligations that are required to be considered alongside the regulatory laws, including the beneficial ownership regime, the economic substance regime and the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI).
The Cayman Islands currently does not have legislation or regulation specific to virtual assets, payments and products such as virtual currencies, blockchain-based tokens and blockchain coins (known together as virtual assets). However, subsequent to an amendment to the Proceeds of Crime Law, virtual asset services are now subject to the Cayman Islands AML regime. Additionally, the Cayman Islands government recently announced a framework to be adopted to promote and regulate new financial technologies, including virtual assets. Refer to 2.5 Regulatory Sandbox for details of the regulatory sandbox to be adopted.
There are no restrictions in the Cayman Islands on the compensation models that industry participants are allowed to use to charge customers.
The Authority does not differentiate between fintech participants and legacy participants. The Authority's licensing structure applicability centres on the activities conducted by the participant. A fintech participant falls within the Authority's regulatory scope if it conducts a licensed activity.
The Cayman Islands government has announced a framework to be adopted to promote and regulate new financial technologies, including virtual assets. The government has proposed an adaptable, technology-neutral, regulatory sandbox-type framework that welcomes new and existing, innovative and pioneering businesses, and that provides sufficient oversight and monitoring to ensure the activities taking place are compliant, fair and transparent. It is understood that this versatile approach is intended to allow the Authority to observe new ideas, understand them, shape them if appropriate, and generate insights to feed back into mainstream regulatory activities.
This regulatory sandbox will encourage, foster and incubate legitimate activities while adapting the laws and regulations of the Cayman Islands on an ongoing basis as the need arises. The Cayman Islands government is collaboratively engaged in the process of developing the necessary legislative changes to implement this regulatory sandbox.
The Authority regulates the financial services industry in the Cayman Islands and has four principal functions.
Among the Authority's obligations in carrying out its functions are the requirements to:
The TIA and DITC
The Tax Information Authority (TIA) was established by the Tax Information Authority Law (TIA Law) and is the Cayman Islands competent authority for the purposes of international assistance in tax matters.
The overriding objective of the Department for International Tax Co-operation (DITC) is to carry out the lawful and effective implementation of Cayman’s international co-operation arrangements in tax matters. With separate statutory schemes governing the TIA on the one hand and the AEOI on the other, the DITC carries out its responsibilities in a separate and distinct manner in these two areas of activity.
The DITC operates in an open, transparent and accountable manner, while having due regard for the highly confidential nature of the detailed information that it is responsible for handling. These important principles ensure that the international obligations of the Cayman Islands are honoured and that the DITC effectively maintains its integrity in the performance of its statutory functions; engenders and preserves the confidence of the public and the financial services community in its work; and meets its obligations to foreign counterpart authorities.
The TIA is also the relevant authority for the International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Law, known as the Economic Substance Law, in determining whether a relevant entity satisfies the economic substance test in respect of its relevant activities. The types of relevant activities that fall within the Economic Substance Law include holding company business, headquarters business, fund management business and Intellectual Property (IP) business.
The Office of the Ombudsman (Ombudsmen) is the supervisory authority for data protection-related matters. The Ombudsmen is empowered as an independent office of the legislature to investigate, mediate and decide complaints under the Data Protection Law, 2017 (DPL) which came into effect on 30 September 2019.
The Authority provides guidance to regulated entities on the establishment of outsourcing arrangements and the outsourcing of material functions or activities (Guidance). The Guidance is provided on the basis that regulated entities remain ultimately responsible for all outsourced material functions or activities, regulatory requirements and any other requirements of the Authority.
The Guidance stipulates that a regulated entity should assess the materiality of its outsourcing arrangements, considering the impact of the outsourcing on the regulated entity, and its risk management structure and internal controls. The Guidance further requires that a regulated entity should maintain the same level of oversight and accountability with respect to the outsourcing of any material function or activity as it would apply to its non-outsourced material functions or activities.
The Authority requires that a regulated entity’s relationship and obligations towards its clients must not be altered as a result of the outsourcing of any material function or activity. In addition, a regulated entity’s level of net risk should not materially increase as a result of outsourcing, compared to if it carried out the material function or activity itself.
Where a regulated entity intends to outsource a function, it should perform, document and maintain as part of its records a due diligence assessment of a service provider before entering into the initial outsourcing agreement, and on a regular basis thereafter, to ensure that the service provider is fit and proper, and can effectively perform the outsourced material function or activity, and to ensure high ethical and professional standards. Lastly, a regulated entity should have a detailed, legally binding, written outsourcing agreement or contract in place for all material outsourcing arrangements, irrespective of whether such arrangements are with related or unrelated parties.
As virtual assets are currently not regulated, except for AML requirements applicable to virtual asset service providers (such as exchanges and custodians), the Authority does not have enforcement powers over virtual assets unless they fall within a regulated activity. To date, the Authority has not taken any enforcement actions in the virtual assets space.
The Cayman Islands AML Regulations require that entities that conduct "relevant financial business", which includes providing virtual asset services, must comply with the AML Regulations.
Data Protection Legislation
The Cayman Islands also has data protection legislation (DPL), which requires entities within the scope of the legislation to comply with the data protection principles defined in the legislation.
The DPL requires a data controller to comply with eight data protection principles when processing personal data and to ensure that those principles are complied with in relation to personal data processed on the data controller’s behalf under a written contract. The DPL also deals with data security, data breaches and the rights of individual data subjects, including providing a privacy notice.
The DPL applies to personal data processed by “data controllers” and “data processors”. Financial sector entities established in the Cayman Islands are generally data controllers, data processors or both. The DPL applies to processing carried out by data controllers established within the Cayman Islands. In certain cases, it applies to data controllers outside the Cayman Islands that process personal data within the Cayman Islands.
The Utility Regulation and Competition Office has been given the remit by the Cayman Islands government to regulate cybersecurity and it has proposed a Cyber Law. The draft of such law is not yet available.
However, the Authority recently published for consultation their proposed rule and statement of guidance relating to cybersecurity for entities regulated by the Authority. Such rule and statement of guidance require regulated entities to ensure that robust cybersecurity measures are in place and that they can appropriately identify, protect, detect, respond to and recover from cybersecurity-related threats, incidents and breaches.
The use of social media and similar tools is currently not regulated, apart from previously defined legislation such as the DPL.
Cayman Islands-based service providers (eg, auditors or administrators) to virtual assets entities are required to comply with Cayman Islands law. If any person who is resident in the Cayman Islands has a suspicion that a transaction involving a Cayman Islands entity (by way of subscription or otherwise) contains the proceeds of criminal conduct, that person is required to report such suspicion in accordance with the Proceeds of Crime Law (as amended).
Digital Cayman and the Blockchain Association of the Cayman Islands (BACI) have been established with the aim of facilitating collaboration in the tech industry (in the case of Digital Cayman) and the blockchain industry (in the case of BACI), creating guidelines for the tech industry, and lobbying the Cayman Islands government and the regulators to encourage the development of the tech industry.
Apart from AML requirements, the offering of virtual assets is currently not regulated, unless the activity falls within the definition of financial services business that is currently regulated. Where an entity's activities fall within the scope of regulated activities, its operations will be subject to supervision by the Authority.
If the product is the offering of equity interests in an investment fund investing in crypto-currencies and permits the redemption of equity interests at the option of the investors, the investment fund is typically structured as a Cayman Islands exempted company or limited liability company. If the investment fund is investing in long-term blockchain projects and does not permit the redemption of equity interests at the option of the investors, the investment fund is typically structured as a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership.
If the product is a securities token offering, the preferred vehicle appears to be a Cayman Islands foundation company due to historical reasons of Swiss foundations being used as the token issuers.
If it is proposed that parties engage in a joint venture to develop a blockchain product, the joint-venture vehicle is typically structured as a Cayman Islands limited liability company, due to the ease of combining the shareholder arrangements within the limited liability company agreement while having a corporate form.
Cayman Islands legislation does not expressly contemplate robo-advisers. To the extent that a legal entity holds the algorithm or software that provides the function of a robo-adviser and that legal entity is a Cayman Islands entity or a non-Cayman Islands entity registered in the Cayman Islands, it will be required to be registered or licensed under the Securities Investment Business Law (SIBL).
No Cayman Islands service providers appear to have introduced robo-advisers at this stage. However, there have been instances of Cayman Islands entities being managed by entities that rely on proprietary robo-advice algorithms or licensed software.
This is not applicable in the Cayman Islands.
The business of loans to individuals is currently not regulated in the Cayman Islands. However, the provision of loans falls within the scope of the AML Regulations, which do not distinguish between the recipients of the loans.
The underwriting process is currently not regulated in the Cayman Islands. Instead, the Authority requires lenders to be in compliance with the laws of the jurisdiction in which the underwriting is taking place (which is typically located onshore and not in the Cayman Islands).
Retail lending to Cayman Islands residents is primarily conducted by Class A-licensed Cayman Islands banks which conduct banking business that is regulated by the Authority. The source of funds for this lending stems from the deposits received from the Class A-licensed Cayman Islands banks.
In terms of sources of funds for loans to Cayman Islands entities, the Cayman Islands is viewed by lenders as a creditor-friendly jurisdiction. Lenders are able to enforce their security without going to the Cayman Islands courts; the Cayman Islands courts have a separate financial services division that specifically deals with financial services disputes and the Cayman Islands has an established legal system based on English common law. Accordingly, there is a healthy appetite for banks to lend to Cayman Islands entities. Borrowing by Cayman Islands entities is not currently regulated in the Cayman Islands.
Credit funds are increasingly popular with investors as they present a steady income. Law firms have formed many Cayman Islands credit funds and this has been one of the most popular investment strategies for investment funds for the last few years, which still appears to be going strong. Cayman Islands credit funds are providing a much-needed source of funding as traditional banks reduce their lending. Lending by Cayman Islands entities is not currently regulated in the Cayman Islands.
Securitisations are also popular and Cayman Islands vehicles, in the form of exempted companies or limited liability companies, are typically used as the issuers. Various income streams have been securitised, including real estate mortgages and aviation leasing streams. Cayman Islands securitisation vehicles are not currently regulated in the Cayman Islands.
Peer-to-peer lending is not currently regulated in the Cayman Islands.
The syndication of loans takes place onshore rather than in the Cayman Islands. Accordingly, to the extent that the Cayman Islands lending vehicle is involved in a syndication, it must be in compliance with the laws of the onshore jurisdiction.
Payment processors must use existing payment rails at this stage. However, with the introduction of a regulatory sandbox in the Cayman Islands in the near future, it is expected that new and innovative payment rails, such as payment in cryptocurrencies, will be available.
The money services business is a regulated activity in the Cayman Islands, and businesses providing this are required to be licensed in accordance with the Money Services Law (as amended). Money services business is defined as:
Entities licensed to conduct money services business are regulated and supervised by the Authority. The activity of cross-border payments is not in itself a regulated activity; however, if cross-border payments involve the transfer of funds through the bank account of a Cayman Islands-regulated bank, such activity will be regulated and supervised under the Banks and Trust Companies Law (as amended).
Cayman Islands-based administrators must hold a licence in accordance with the Mutual Funds Law (MF Law), which requires a Cayman Islands-licensed mutual fund administrator to satisfy itself as to various criteria regarding the business and operation of a mutual fund and its service providers before providing fund administration to a mutual fund.
A number of provisions are being incorporated into fund administration documents, many of which stem from regulatory obligations and in particular AML Regulations and the DPL. Essentially, fund administration agreements include provisions requiring the administrator to provide information and documentation relevant to AML requirements to the regulated fund itself or the Authority. The AML Regulations also require the fund administrator to maintain records of AML documentation for at least five years after conclusion of the transaction. These agreements also require the administrator to report any suspicions it may have relating to money laundering potentially occurring through the fund to the fund's money-laundering reporting officer.
In addition to AML requirements, the fund administration agreement will often have provisions requiring the administrator to safeguard and treat personal data in accordance with certain prescribed standards.
Cayman Islands-based service providers are required to comply with Cayman Islands law. If any person who is resident in the Cayman Islands has a suspicion that a payment to a Cayman Islands entity (by way of subscription or otherwise) contains the proceeds of criminal conduct, that person is required to report the suspicion under the Proceeds of Crime Law (as amended).
In addition, a Cayman Islands-licensed mutual fund administrator has certain obligations to report to the Authority under the MF Law regarding the operation of a fund that it administers. If a licensed mutual fund administrator knows or has reason to believe that a mutual fund for which it provides services:
Under the Stock Exchange Company Law of the Cayman Islands, the Cayman Island Stock Exchange (CSX) has the sole and exclusive right to operate one or more securities markets in the Cayman Islands. A "securities market" is defined as a stock market or a place where, or facility or arrangement by which (situated in whole or in part in the Cayman Islands), securities are listed, regularly offered for purchase or sale, or by reference to which transactions in securities are regularly entered into by, or on behalf of, competing buyers. In light of such a broad definition, the only trading platform for securities in the Cayman Islands is the CSX. It is expected that the proposed regulatory sandbox will permit the introduction of other securities exchanges or platforms, particularly for virtual assets.
See 7.1 Permissible Trading Platforms.
See 7.1 Permissible Trading Platforms.
The CSX has published listing rules that are applicable to the listing of securities on the exchange. There are no separate industry standards for listing on the CSX.
There are no order handling rules in the Cayman Islands.
See 7.1 Permissible Trading Platforms. There are no peer-to-peer trading platforms in the Cayman Islands.
This is not applicable in the Cayman Islands.
This is not applicable in the Cayman Islands.
There are currently no regulations in the Cayman Islands specifically regulating the creation and usage of high-frequency and algorithmic trading; however, such activities fall within the definition of financial services business and are therefore subject to supervision by the Authority. Businesses established in the Cayman Islands that are conducting high-frequency and algorithmic trading are rare, as the broadband speeds are relatively slow compared to the USA. The Cayman Islands Utility Regulation and Competition Office is currently seeking expressions of interest to install new submarine cables to increase broadband speeds in the Cayman Islands, as the existing submarine cables are nearing the end of their life.
See 8.1 Creation and Usage Restrictions. There are no exchange-like platforms in the Cayman Islands, as the CSX has the sole and exclusive right to operate securities markets in the Cayman Islands.
This is not applicable in the Cayman Islands.
This is not applicable in the Cayman Islands.
Cayman Islands-domiciled investment funds that engage in these activities need to be registered as mutual funds under the MF Law if they are open-end funds. Cayman Islands-domiciled investment managers for such funds need to be registered or licensed under the SIBL. If the Cayman Islands-domiciled investment manager is a Cayman Islands company, limited liability company or limited liability partnership engaging in fund management business (where it exercises discretion in the management of securities on behalf of the investment fund), it is subject to the economic substance regime of the Cayman Islands and it will therefore need to satisfy the Economic Substance Law requirements of the Cayman Islands.
This is not applicable in the Cayman Islands.
The Cayman Islands-domiciled operators of financial research platforms are not subject to registration unless the platforms also provide investment advice, in which case the operator of the platform will need to be registered or licensed under the SIBL.
There are no securities laws in the Cayman Islands. Accordingly, the spreading of rumours and other unverified information is not regulated there. The Authority would require the Cayman Islands-domiciled operator of such platform to comply with the laws of the jurisdiction in which the platform is operating.
See 9.2 Regulation of Unverified Information.
Cayman Islands-based service providers are required to comply with Cayman Islands law. If any person who is resident in the Cayman Islands has a suspicion that a payment to a Cayman Islands entity (by way of subscription or otherwise) contains the proceeds of criminal conduct, that person is required to report their suspicion in accordance with the Proceeds of Crime Law (as amended).
While insurtech has been recognised as an important part of the discussion on the development of the insurance industry in the Cayman Islands, there do not appear to be any specific and material insurtech underwriting initiatives or developments in the Cayman Islands at present.
Any person carrying on insurance business, reinsurance business or business as an insurance agent, insurance broker or insurance manager in or from the Cayman Islands is required to hold a valid licence issued for that purpose under the Insurance Law. Domestic insurers offer insurance to Cayman Islands residents and businesses under a Class A licence. The non-domestic market comprises both insurers that insure non-domestic risks under a Class B licence and insurance-linked securities structures under a Class C licence. Reinsurers offer reinsurance products for domestic or foreign risks under a Class D licence.
Regtech providers are regulated depending on their activities. Where an entity's activities fall within the scope of regulated activities, its operations are subject to supervision by the Authority.
A number of provisions are being incorporated into contracts with technology providers. The key provisions generally relate to protection of IP rights and confidentiality. The contracts often have provisions requiring the technology providers to safeguard and treat personal data in accordance with certain prescribed standards under data protection laws.
Cayman Islands-based service providers are required to comply with Cayman Islands law. If any person who is resident in the Cayman Islands has a suspicion that a payment to a Cayman Islands entity (by way of subscription or otherwise) contains the proceeds of criminal conduct, that person is required to report their suspicion in accordance with the Proceeds of Crime Law.
There are no legacy players in the Cayman Islands and therefore the implementation and thought leadership relating to blockchain in the financial services industry are being driven by new players and certain existing service providers. Despite the lack of legacy players and the fact that the Cayman Islands does not yet have a dedicated blockchain statutory and regulatory regime, the jurisdiction is at the forefront of the fintech "revolution". It is one of the leading jurisdictions for STOs based on funding volume and has seen a wide range of investment funds focusing on blockchain-related investments. These funds have been established in the hedge fund and venture capital space, using exempted company, exempted limited partnership and limited liability company vehicles. This is testament to the Cayman Islands' well-tested structures, with which managers and investors are familiar and comfortable.
More recently the blockchain world has started to embrace the use of Cayman Islands foundation companies. The vast majority of blockchain protocols, which have their own custom blockchain, are community projects; many of them with community governance at their core. As these protocols mature and seek to attract investment to fund their growth, they are required to house the protocol in something tangible which can accept this investment. Traditional corporate structures are at odds with the protocol’s “community”. Foundation companies, however, can be structured in such a way that they do not require an owner and instead they can be governed by a community-elected board acting in accordance with by-laws which have been established to protect and promote the protocol in question.
The Cayman Tech Zone
The legal and regulatory framework in the Cayman Islands is designed to facilitate growth and enterprise, and to provide a flexible business environment. One example of how the Cayman Islands government is helping to facilitate the growth of fintech business there is the introduction of the Cayman Tech Zone housed within Cayman Enterprise City and TechCayman. Each of these initiatives has been established to encourage technology businesses, from start-ups through to established players, to come and do business in the Cayman Islands. Many of their current members are developing cutting-edge software, including blockchain, and they have found that having their IP offshore and operating from a tax-neutral platform has not only made them more profitable, but has also accelerated rapid growth.
At the time of writing, there is no legislation or guidance issued with respect to blockchain by the Authority.
The Authority has established an internal virtual assets working group comprising representatives of the Authority, the Cayman Islands Ministry of Financial Services, the Department of Commerce and Investment, and Walkers as the sole legal industry representative.
The Authority has also indicated that it is keen to explore the possibility of implementing a regulatory sandbox for virtual assets and other types of financial technologies, including blockchain. This idea is inspired by the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which introduced its own regulatory sandbox in 2015. A regulatory sandbox is a "safe space" in which businesses can test innovative products, services, business models and delivery mechanisms without immediately incurring all the normal regulatory consequences of engaging in the activity in question. This concept is seen by the Authority as a way for it to work with fintech businesses to ensure that any legislation or guidance that it does ultimately pass is flexible and business-friendly.
There is no formal guidance on whether the Authority considers blockchain assets a form of regulated financial instrument.
The Authority has indicated that, to the extent that the tokens are issued by the token issuer to raise funds for the purposes of developing the technology platform, this is likely to mean that the token is a security.
At this time is it not possible to say definitively how the remainder of potential blockchain assets will be regulated in the Cayman Islands.
The Authority has released a public advisory to warn of the risks associated with investments in ICOs and virtual currencies, and sets out some of the red flags potential investors should look out for to help identify potentially fraudulent ICOs.
To the extent that a blockchain asset is characterised as a security under Cayman Islands law, the issuer will need to conduct AML due diligence on all holders of the blockchain asset and all subsequent transferees of the blockchain asset. The AML standards to be applied must be adequate to satisfy the AML Regulations.
In addition, the Cayman Islands is traditionally an offshore investment fund jurisdiction targeting high net worth or sophisticated investors in onshore jurisdictions. Accordingly, to the extent that the blockchain asset is a security, it is likely that the Authority may require that such security be offered only to high net worth or sophisticated investors. No blockchain asset that is a security can be offered to the public in the Cayman Islands, as the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands provides that an exempted company that is not listed on the CSX is prohibited from making any invitation to the public in the Cayman Islands to subscribe to any of its securities.
Section 4 of the Stock Exchange Company Law of the Cayman Islands provides that the CSX has the sole and exclusive right to operate one or more securities market(s) in the Cayman Islands. The CSX currently does not have the functionality to trade blockchain assets; however, it is considering doing so.
If the Section 4 rule is relaxed and it is possible for other players to establish trading platforms, and if such blockchain assets are characterised as securities, the entity that runs the platform may possibly be engaging in securities investment business under the SIBL, as it will be making arrangements with a view to another person buying, selling or subscribing for securities. If the entity is engaging in securities investment business involving high net worth or sophisticated investors, it will need to be registered with the Authority under the SIBL. If the company is engaging in securities investment business involving non-high net worth or non-sophisticated investors, a much more strenuous regime of licensing will be required under the SIBL.
The regulation of invested funds will depend upon the structure of the investment fund.
If the fund is structured as an open-end fund, usually as a Cayman Islands exempted company, it needs to be registered with the Authority. This structure is more common for those managers looking to pursue an investment strategy that focuses on trading in virtual currencies. These strategies tend to be more liquid in nature and investors are able to redeem their investment at their own initiative. These structures are therefore open-end and similar to a traditional hedge fund. To the extent that the equity interests of the fund are to be tokenised, the Authority would consider the fund still to be offering equity interests and therefore registration with the Authority will be required.
If the fund is structured as a closed-end fund, usually as a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership, there is no Authority registration required at this stage. However, legislation will be enacted this year requiring the registration of closed-end funds with the Authority. This structure is more common for those managers looking to pursue an investment strategy that focuses on long-term investments in blockchain start-ups or projects. These strategies tend to be illiquid in nature and investors are unable to redeem their investment without the manager's consent. These types of funds are akin to a private equity or venture capital fund.
Except for certain aspects of the Cayman Islands anti-money laundering regime applicable to virtual asset service providers, there is no formal legislation or guidance on virtual currencies or blockchain assets.
In line with international data protection principles and, in particular, the EU General Data Protection Regulation, which has extraterritorial impact on certain Cayman Islands entities, the DPL provides that a data controller must comply with the following eight data protection principles, which are expanded on in the DPL:
The DPL's restrictions on data processing and cross-border transfer on one hand, and blockchain's claims of transparency and immutability of data on the other, create tensions that are as yet unresolved, not only in the Cayman Islands, but globally.
There are currently no regulations in the Cayman Islands with respect to open banking.
Banks and technology providers will need to comply with the DPL once in force. There are mechanisms available under the DPL that banks and technology providers may be able to utilise to enable compliance in the context of open banking.