Contributed By Basham, Ringe y Correa S.C.
Mexico's copyright statute and regulation is the Federal Copyright Act (1996) (hereinafter, “FCA”) and the Regulations to the Federal Copyright Act (1998). There are also the following provisions governing copyright:
https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/mx/mx047en.pdf;
https://www.indautor.gob.mx/documentos/marco-juridico/L_Fed_Derecho_de_Autor_(English).pdf;
http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/regley/Reg_LFDA.pdf;
http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/2_030619.pdf;
http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/3_311218.pdf;
http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/144_140618.pdf;
http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/112_180518.pdf; and
Mexico signed the Paris Act on 24 July 1971. The Bern Convention was published in the Federal Official Gazette on 24 January 1975: https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_to_imagen_fs.php?codnota=4745026&fecha=24/01/1975&cod_diario=204455
Mexico ratified the two WIPO Copyright treaties in 1996. It is a member of the WTO and has followed the TRIPS Agreement since 1 January 1994.
Mexico is a party to the following multilateral agreements.
Mexico is a party to the following bilateral and regional agreements:
Foreign authors or holders of rights and their successors in title shall enjoy the same rights as Mexican nationals under the terms of the FCA and international treaties on copyright and related rights signed and approved by Mexico.
The protection provided by the FCA is granted to works from the moment they are fixed on a material medium, regardless of their merit, intended purpose or form of expression.
The recognition of copyright and neighbouring rights does not require registration nor documentation of any kind, and is not subject to compliance with any formality.
The FCA provides that copyright protection will be granted to works from the moment they are fixed on a material support. No special notices are needed for protection; protected works under the Federal Copyright Act must display the notice “Reserved Rights”, or its abbreviation “D.R.”, followed by the © symbol, the full name and address of the copyright holder and the first year of publication. The omission of these requirements will not imply the loss of copyright but it constitutes a copyright infringement and could result in economic penalties against the licensee or responsible editor.
There is the Public Registry of Copyright and it is available to the public.
The categories of copyrightable works in Mexico are:
Other works which, by analogy, may be considered literary or artistic will be included in the branch which is most appropriate given their nature.
Software is protected by copyright in the same way literary works are protected.
Databases may benefit from copyright protection as compilations if they constitute an original intellectual creation by reason of their selection or the arrangement of their contents or subject matter.
The FCA provides that databases that are not original will be protected in their exclusive use by whom elaborated them, during a term of five years.
Access to private information related to the persons contained in the databases, as well as the publication, reproduction, dissemination, public communication and transmission of said information, will require the prior authorisation of the persons in question.
The FCA does not provide express copyright protection to industrial designs.
However, the owner of a design may obtain both industrial design and copyright protection (as a pictorial or drawing work), if the design complies with the legal requirements for protection.
The FCA regulates a figure that grants legal protection, called the Reservation of Rights to the Exclusive Use. These reservations can grant a right of exclusive use over the following genres.
A person whose name or pseudonym, either known or registered, appears as that of the author of a work shall be considered such in the absence of proof to the contrary, and actions brought by that person for the violation of his/her rights shall consequently be entertained by the competent authorities and/or courts.
With regard to works written under a pseudonym or whose authors have not made themselves known, litigation for the protection and enforcement of the rights therein shall be the responsibility of the person who makes them known to the public with the author’s consent. This responsible person shall serve as an administrator until the owner of the rights appears in the concerned proceedings, unless previously agreed otherwise.
According to the FCA, works of joint authorship are those that have been created by two or more authors.
The rights granted by the FCA regarding works of joint authorship shall accrue to all the authors equally, unless otherwise agreed or unless the authorship of each one is specified.
In order to exercise the rights established by the FCA, the consent of a majority of the authors is required, which will bind all. In that case, the minority is not compelled to contribute to the expenses but may have access to the benefits obtained. When the majority makes use or exploits the work, it will deduct from the total collection the amount of expenses incurred and will give the minority the corresponding participation. When the part made by each of the authors is clearly identifiable, they may freely exercise the rights referred to in the FCA in the part corresponding to them. Unless otherwise agreed, each of the co-authors of a work may apply for registration of the complete work with the National Institute of Copyright (INDAUTOR).
Unless otherwise agreed, the copyright in a work with music and words shall belong in equal shares to the author of the literary part and to the composer of the musical element. Each may freely exercise the rights in the part attributable to him/her or in the whole work, and in the latter case he/she shall unmistakably notify the other co-author, mentioning that co-author’s name on the publication, and in addition shall pay him/her the share to which he/she is entitled when the rights are exercised for profit-making purposes.
Upon the death of one of the co-authors or holders of the economic rights without heirs, his/her right shall accrue to the other co-authors.
Unless otherwise agreed, a film producer shall be considered the owner of the economic rights in the entire work.
The FCA recognises the protection of copyright for pseudonymous works. Anonymous works may be freely used until the author makes himself/herself known or there not an identified owner of economic rights.
In terms of authorship, works in Mexico can be as follows:
The owner of the moral rights may at any time:
Any person, whether natural person or legal entity, who publishes a work must state the author’s name or pseudonym. If the work is anonymous, it shall be so stated.
A person whose name or pseudonym, either known or registered, appears as that of the author of a work shall be considered such in the absence of proof to the contrary, and actions brought by that person for the violation of his/her rights shall consequently be entertained by the competent courts.
In Mexico there is no concept of “orphan works" since every work is considered to have an author, and in case of a lack thereof, the rights would correspond to the heirs.
As per the FCA, collective works are those created by the initiative of a natural or legal person who publishes and discloses the work under its direction and name and in which the personal contribution of the authors who participated is joined in the unit for which it has been conceived, without it being possible to attribute to each of them a different and undivided right over the entire work.
There are no specific provisions in the FCA regarding the way collective works are exploited.
Only natural persons can be considered authors of works in Mexico. A corporation in Mexico cannot be considered the author of a work, but it can be the owner of the economic rights of the author of a work by means of a contract or work relation, in such a way that the author is the natural person who has created a work and the corporation can be owners of copyright.
Unless otherwise agreed, the person, whether natural person or legal entity, who commissions the production of a work or produces such a work with others working for remuneration shall enjoy the ownership of the economic rights therein, and the rights relating to the disclosure and integrity of the work and the making of collections involving this type of creation shall accrue to him/her.
Works done in the official government service, entities at different levels of government and universities are understood to be done under the terms of the paragraph above, unless otherwise agreed in each case.
In the case of a work carried out as a result of an employment relationship established through an individual employment contract in writing, in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, it will be presumed that the economic rights are divided equally between the employer and the employee. The employer may disclose the work without the employee's authorisation, but not vice versa. In the absence of a written individual contract of employment, the rights to property shall be vested in the employee.
The owners of the economic rights may authorise or prohibit:
Economic rights shall remain in force for:
The owner of the economic rights may freely, subject to the provisions of the FCA, transfer his/her economic rights or grant exclusive or non-exclusive licences for use.
As a particularity, any transfer of economic rights must be in exchange of a consideration and temporary. In the absence of agreement on the amount of remuneration or the procedure for setting it, or on the time limits for the payment thereof, the competent courts shall decide the matter.
In the absence of any express provision, any transfer of economic rights shall be deemed to be for a term of five years. A term of more than 15 years may only be agreed upon in exceptional cases dictated by the nature of the work or the scale of the required investment.
Acts, agreements and contracts by which economic rights and licences granted are transferred shall invariably be made in writing. Failure to do so will result in the agreement being null and void.
Any transfer of economic rights shall provide for the grant to the author or to the owner of the economic rights of a proportional share in the proceeds from the exploitation concerned, or a predetermined, fixed amount of remuneration. That right is non-renounceable.
Any licence affording exclusive rights shall be expressly granted as such and shall give the licensee, where not otherwise agreed, the right to exploit the work to the exclusion of any other person, and the right to grant non-exclusive authorisations to third parties.
The acts, agreements and contracts by which economic rights are transferred shall be entered in the Public Copyright Register in order to have effects against third parties.
As per the FCA, economic rights shall remain in force for the life of the author and 100 years after his/her death. Therefore, the heirs may exercise and dispose of economic rights upon the death of the author.
When the work belongs to two or more co-authors, the 100 years shall be counted as from the death of the last co-author.
If the owner of the economic rights is different from the author and dies without heirs, the faculty of exploiting the work will correspond to the author. In the absence of the latter, the federal government, through INDAUTOR, will exploit the economic rights.
There is no minimum age requirement in the copyright law; however, in Mexico, only individuals of legal age (18 years and over) may exercise legal rights. Therefore, in case of minors, the general provisions established in the Federal Civil Code shall apply, ie, a minor may exercise his or her rights or enter obligations through his or her legal representatives, parents, guardians or legal tutors.
The following types of specific contracts for the transfer of economic copyright are regulated by the relevant legislation:
The above are not the only form of transfer of economic copyright, as there are also the Contract of Work Made for Hire, the Labour Contract, the licences for the use of works and other contacts in multiple fields which may involve the transfer of these rights.
Acts, agreements and contracts by which economic rights and licences granted are transferred shall invariably be made in writing. Failure to do so will result in the agreement being null and void.
Any transfer of economic rights shall provide for the grant to the author or to the owner of the economic rights of a proportional share in the proceeds from the exploitation concerned, or a predetermined, fixed amount of remuneration. That right is non-renounceable.
The acts, agreements and contracts by which economic rights are transferred shall be entered in the Public Copyright Register of INDAUTOR in order to have effects against third parties.
With regard to the distribution of the work, including sale or other forms of transfer of the ownership of the physical material in which it is embodied, and any form of transfer of the use or exploitation thereof, where distribution is made by means of sale, the right of opposition shall be considered exhausted on the first sale. As an exception to this provision, the owner of economic rights with respect to software or a database, will maintain, even after the sale of specimens thereof, the right to authorise or prohibit the leasing of said specimens. This will not apply, however, when the specimen of the software of a database does not constitute essential subject matter of a licence.
The author is the sole, original and perpetual owner of the moral rights in works created by him/her.
Moral rights shall be regarded as vesting in the author and shall be inalienable, imprescriptible, non-renounceable and non-seizable.
The owner of the moral rights may at any time: (i) decide whether the work is to be disclosed and if so in what form, or whether it is to remain unpublished; (ii) demand recognition of his/her authorship in relation to the work or decide that it is to be disclosed as an anonymous or pseudonymous work; (iii) demand respect for the work and object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification thereof, or any act or action in relation to the work that might detract from its merit or prejudice its author’s reputation;(iv) amend the work; (v) withdraw the work from the market; and (vi) object to the attribution as author of a work not created by him/her.
The right to exercise moral rights shall belong to the creator of the work or to his/her heirs.
Heirs may only exercise the rights described in points (i), (ii), (iii) and (vi). Where applicable, the federal government may exercise those described in points (iii) and (vi).
The importation, manufacture, distribution and use of apparatus, or the rendering of services, the purpose of which is to remove the technical protection of transmissions by electromagnetic waves and over telecommunication networks, is forbidden as per the FCA and constitute trade-related infringements.
A person shall be liable for damages and lost profits if, without the permission of the lawful distributor of the signal if he/she:
Also, as per Mexico's Federal Criminal Code, manufacturing for profit a device or system, the purpose of which is to deactivate the electronic protection devices of a computer program, is considered a felony, punishable with three to ten years' imprisonment and a fine.
The FCA does not make express reference to copyright management information. However, it does forbid the importation, manufacture, distribution and use of apparatus, or the rendering of services, the purpose of which is to remove the technical protection of computer programs and programs containing electronic elements.
The importation, sale, rental or any act that affords possession of a device or system whose purpose is to deactivate electronic devices for protection of a computer program, constitute trade-related infringements when they are engaged for direct or indirect profit-making purposes.
A collective management society (CMS) is a nonprofit legal entity that is set up with the purpose of protecting both national and foreign authors and owners of neighbouring rights, and collecting and delivering to those persons the sums payable to them by virtue of their copyright or neighbouring rights.
The successors in title of authors and owners of neighbouring rights, whether national or foreign but residing in Mexico, may belong to CMSs.
The societies shall be formed for aiding their members and shall base their actions on the principles of collaboration, equality and equity.
The right to operate as a collective management society requires authorisation by INDAUTOR, which shall order publication of the said authorisation in the Official Gazette of the Federation.
There can be - and currently is - more than one CMS, and the administrative authority on copyright has and will authorise societies that may operate to defend the rights and prerogatives of authors or holders of related rights and their successors in title, in accordance with the following: (i) by branch or category of work creation; (ii) by category of holders of related rights; and (iii) by mode of exploitation, where several categories of creation of works or holders of related rights are involved, and provided that the nature of the rights entrusted to their management so justifies.
CMSs shall pursue the following aims:
CMSs have the following obligations:
A music publishing contract is that under which the author or owner of the economic rights assigns the right of reproduction to the publisher and entitles him/her to carry out the fixation and phonographic reproduction of the work, its audiovisual synchronisation, communication to the public, translation, arrangement or adaptation, and any other form of exploitation provided for in the contract; the publisher, for his/her part, shall undertake to disclose the work by all means available to him/her, receiving in return a share in the economic profits realised through the exploitation of the work, according to the agreed conditions.
However, in order to carry out audiovisual synchronisation, adaptation for advertising purposes, translation, arrangement or adaptation, the publisher must in each specific case have the express permission of the author or his/her successors in title.
Literary and artistic works that have been disclosed may be used only in the following cases without the consent of the owner of the economic rights and without payment, provided that the normal exploitation of the work is not adversely affected thereby and provided also that the source is invariably mentioned, and that no alteration is made to the work.
Additionally, the following may be done without authorisation.
a) transmission shall take place within the period agreed for the purpose;
b) no related or simultaneous broadcast or communication shall be made on the pretext of the recording; and
c) the recording shall afford entitlement to one broadcast only. The recording and fixation of the image and sound, carried out in the manner described above, shall not require any additional payment other than that due for the use of the works. This provision shall not apply where the authors or performers have entered into an agreement for consideration that authorises subsequent broadcasts.
The Mexican system provides for specific limitations to copyright and related rights in which the publication or translation of literary or artistic works necessary for the advancement of national science, culture and education is in the public interest. When it is not possible to obtain the consent of the owner of the corresponding economic rights, and by means of the payment of a compensatory remuneration, the Federal Executive, through the Ministry of Culture, ex officio or at the request of a party, may authorise the publication or translation mentioned. The foregoing shall be without prejudice to the international treaties on copyright and related rights signed and approved by Mexico. Upon the death of one of the co-authors or holders of the economic rights without heirs, his/her right shall accrue to the other co-authors.
The Mexican legal system provides legal certainty and guarantees to cultural industries to establish clear and precise exceptions instead of having general and ambiguous legal provisions subject to interpretation that is not otherwise clear or secure for the sector.
An exception to copyright for private copying is established in Mexico, so that a work may be reproduced only once, and in a single copy, of a literary or artistic work, for the personal and private use of the person making it and without profit-making purposes; however, legal entities may not avail themselves of this, except in the case of an educational or research institution, or one not engaged in commercial activities.
Literary and artistic works that have been disclosed may be used without the consent of the owner of the economic rights and without remuneration, provided that the normal exploitation of the work is not adversely affected thereby, that the source is mentioned and that no alteration is made to the work. This includes the reproduction, communication and distribution of drawings, paintings, photographs and audiovisual processes of works that are visible from public places.
For the reproduction for commercial purposes of certain buildings and monuments, as per the Federal Law on Archeological Zones, Artistic and Historic Monuments, it is necessary to request an authorisation. Depending on the type of monument, the authorisation is provided either by the National Institute of Fine Arts (INBA) or the National History Institute (INAH), and an additional entity in the case of certain centres of religious worship.
An exception to copyright for activities carried out by intermediaries is not currently established in the FCA, but a provision is included in the new regional trade treaty between Mexico, the USA and Canada (USMCA).
An exception to copyright for satire and/or parody is not established in the FCA.
The Mexican Constitution establishes freedom of expression of ideas in all its manifestations and guarantees the right to information. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which Mexico is a party, also protects this right.
The registration of a literary or artistic work may not be refused or suspended in Mexico on the ground that it is contrary to morality, respect for private life or public order, except by court ruling.
The exceptions to copyright described in 7.1 Fair Use Doctrine/Fair Dealing have, among others, the purpose of protecting freedom of speech, right of information and other human rights. However, the exercise of these rights may not affect the exclusive rights afforded by copyright.
Performers
Performer is the actor, narrator, speaker, singer, musician, dancer or any other person who performs a literary or artistic work or an expression of folklore or who engages in a similar activity, even though he/she may have no pre-existing text to guide his/her performance.
The performer shall have the right to have his/her name associated with his/her performances, and to object to any distortion or mutilation of his/her performance or other adverse act in relation to it that might damage his/her prestige or reputation.
Book Publishers
The book publisher is the natural person or legal entity that chooses or plans a publication and carries out the production directly or through third parties.
Book publishers shall have exclusive rights in the typeface and graphic features of each book insofar as they are original.
Producers of Phonograms
A producer of phonograms is the natural person or legal entity who first fixes the sounds of a performance or other sounds, or a digital representation thereof, and shall be responsible for the editing, reproduction and publication of phonograms.
Producers of phonograms shall be entitled to receive remuneration for the use or exploitation of their phonograms for direct or indirect profit-making purposes, in any medium or communication to the public or making them available.
Producers of Videograms
A producer of videograms is the natural person or legal entity who first fixes related images, with or without incorporated sound, that give an impression of movement, or a digital representation of such images, whether constituting or not constituting an audiovisual work.
The producer shall enjoy with respect to his/her videograms the right to authorise or prohibit their reproduction, distribution and communication to the public.
Broadcasting Organisations
An entity holding a concession or licence that is capable of emitting sound or visual signals or both that may be received by an audience of more than one person shall be considered a broadcasting organisation.
Mexico's copyright regulation does not provide for specific contracts in order to transfer, licence or sell neighbouring rights.
The following may be done without authorisation.
a) transmission shall take place within the period agreed for the purpose;
b) no related or simultaneous broadcast or communication shall be made on the pretext of the recording; and
c) the recording shall afford entitlement to one broadcast only. The recording and fixation of the image and sound, carried out in the manner described above, shall not require any additional payment other than that due for the use of the works. The provisions of this subparagraph shall not apply where the authors or performers have entered into an agreement for consideration that authorises subsequent broadcasts.
Additionally, the FCA provides that the publication or translation of literary or artistic works necessary for the advancement of national science, culture and education is considered of public utility. When it is not possible to obtain the consent of the owner of the corresponding economic rights, and through the payment of compensatory compensation, the Federal Executive, through the Ministry of Culture, ex officio or at the request of the party, may authorise the publication or translation. The foregoing will be without prejudice to international treaties on copyright and related rights signed and approved by Mexico.
The following constitute copyright infringements:
The following practices constitute trade-related infringements when they are engaged in for direct or indirect profit-making purposes:
Copyright holders may file civil, criminal and administrative complaints, depending on the nature of the infringement and the right that will be enforced.
The defences include the possibility of requesting inspections and cautionary measures to prevent the rights violation persisting or becoming more widespread.
In disputes over rights protected by the FCA, the parties may submit their dispute to mediation (settlement meetings or arbitration proceedings as alternative means of dispute resolution) or arbitration.
The proceedings available will depend on the type of right to be enforced and the nature of the infringement. These proceedings include the following.
Copyright Infringement Action
Copyright infringement action may be filed before INDAUTOR or may be initiated ex officio. A written complaint to the administrative authority containing the following must be filed:
The defendant will have a 15-day term to respond to the complaint. After this period, or earlier if the probable offender replies before, a date will be set for the hearing to hear evidence and arguments, within a period of no more than ten days. Once the evidence has been presented and the arguments heard, a decision will be issued within 15 days of the hearing.
The person who recklessly initiates this administrative procedure will be liable for the damages caused.
Those affected by the acts and decisions issued by the administrative authority in matters of copyright that end an administrative procedure, an instance or a decision on a case may lodge an appeal for review with INDAUTOR or bring an action for annulment before the specialised court of copyright and industrial property of the Federal Court of Administrative Justice, which has a specialised chamber on intellectual property matters.
Trade-Related Infringement Action
Trade-related infringements are substantiated by the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (MIIP). While the MIIP is the administrative government body for the registration and protection of industrial property rights, lawmakers decided that given its “eminently mercantile” character, it was more convenient that this administrative entity oversee trade-related infringements.
The trade-related infringement writ must contain the relevant information pertaining to the parties, the asserted rights, account of the facts giving rise to the complaint, applicable law and documents proving the capacity of the legal representative of the complainant. The FCA indicates that, when applicable, the complainant should file a copy of the certificate or recordal office action at INDAUTOR.
Civil Action
Civil actions may be filed before civil courts in cases including breach of contract, dispute of rights derived from the death of copyright holders, among others. These procedures generally cover the filing of the civil action and the response by the defendant, hearings, incidental actions, pleadings, decisions by the judge and appeal.
In proceedings before the judicial authorities, the federal courts shall hear disputes arising from the application of the Federal Copyright Act, but where such disputes affect only particular interests, they may be heard, at the choice of the plaintiff, by the courts of common law. Damages may be sued directly in the civil courts for compensation, payment of damages and moral damages.
Criminal Action
Criminal complaints may be filed before criminal courts in cases that are considered felonies, such as the following:
Criminal matters include the following procedures after the complaint is filed with the public prosecutor:
Depending on their nature, copyright proceedings may be initiated before INDAUTOR, the MIIP, civil courts or criminal courts.
The federal courts shall hear disputes arising from the application of the Federal Copyright Act, but where such disputes affect only particular interests, they may be heard, at the choice of the plaintiff, by the local courts of the common order.
According to amendments made to the FCA in 2015, for the exercise of the actions derived from the FCA and its Regulations, it will not be necessary to exhaust any administrative procedure or previous action as a condition for the exercise of such actions, so the affected party may choose to go to a specialised court or directly to the federal courts.
The parties are the complainant, the alleged infringer and, in accordance with the supplementary provisions, any interested third party. Licensees are free to participate in the procedure with the authorisation of the licensor.
Third parties are treated as parties to the proceedings with full procedural guarantees.
The holders of the rights recognised by the FCA, their representatives or the CMSs that represent them may request the federal courts and/or tribunals of the states and/or Mexico City, the granting and execution of the following precautionary measures to prevent, impede or avoid the violation of their economic rights.
The use of experts in judicial proceedings depends on the judge and the parties involved or the enforcement authorities. Their use is gradually increasing.
Within the private arbitration procedure, the use of private experts is indispensable for the alternative resolution of copyright disputes.
The Mexican legal system contemplates the seizure of counterfeit goods by means of an administrative procedure before the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property or before the Office of the Attorney General, but it does not contemplate to date ex officio powers of the customs authority for the seizure.
In general, the following remedies and sanctions are available for copyright infringement:
As explained in 9.3 Proceedings, under certain circumstances, administrative infringements may qualify as criminal offences. Civil sanctions may also apply depending on each case under the 2014 reforms to the Federal Copyright Act.
The type of appellate procedure will depend on the nature of the proceeding with respect to which the appeal is filed (eg, administrative, civil, criminal).
Decisions issued by INDAUTOR and the MIIP may be challenged through a writ of review, which is filed before the same administrative authority.
Another alternative for challenging decisions issued by INDAUTOR and the MIIP is filing an appeal before the Specialised Chamber on Intellectual Property Matters of the Federal Administrative Justice Tribunal (FAJT). This alternative is available against first instance decisions of the referred administrative authorities and is also a means of appealing decisions regarding writs of review.
The decisions of the FAJT may be challenged before federal circuit courts. This is usually the last instance; however, in certain cases, decisions of the circuit courts may be appealed before the Supreme Court.
There are provisions in the Commercial Code that allow nine days to file an appeal against a final judgment, six days for an interlocutory judgment or an order for immediate processing, and three days to file a preventive appeal against an interlocutory judgment or an order for processing jointly with the final judgment.
Appeals are also available against decisions issued in civil and criminal procedures. An appeal is a request to the higher court to confirm, amend or revoke the decisions of the lower court that can be challenged by the appeal. An appeal may be filed by:
In administrative proceedings, each party is responsible for bearing their own costs and expenses.
In civil proceedings, courts may decide on the payment of costs of litigation that are commonly awarded to the winner of a trial when the loser files appeals to delay the court proceedings and the enforcement of the judgment.
The FCA establishes two alternative procedures for the resolution of disputes related to the subject matter of copyright and related or associated rights, namely conciliation and arbitration.
Conciliation proceedings shall take place before the INDAUTOR, at the request of either of the parties, in order to amicably settle a dispute that has arisen out of the interpretation or implementation of the FCA. The proceeding is initiated on a complaint, which is filed in writing with the INDAUTOR by the person who considers that his/her copyright, neighbouring rights or other rights protected under the FCA have been adversely affected.
The deliberations of the hearing shall be considered confidential, and consequently all records thereof shall be notified only to the parties to the dispute or to competent authorities that request them.
Where the conciliation procedure is not successful, the INDAUTOR shall urge the parties to resort to arbitration.
The maximum duration of the arbitration shall be 60 days, which period shall be calculated from the day following the date specified in the document containing the acceptance of the arbitrators.
It should be noted that both alternative procedures for the resolution of disputes must have the express consent of the parties for their origin, otherwise any dispute must be dealt with before the competent courts.
Paseo de los Tamarindos
400-A 9° Piso
Bosques de Las Lomas
Ciudad de México
+52 55 5261 0600
+52 55 5261 0411
mbusto@basham.com.mx www.basham.com.mx