Contributed By Kelemenis & Co.
Greece has been a World Trade Organization (WTO) member since 1 January 1995 and a signatory to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) since 1 March 1950. Greece has also been a party to the Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), a plurilateral agreement included in Annex 4 of the WTO Agreement. In 1996 the country also joined the Information Technology Agreement (ITA), a tariff cutting mechanism that is intended to eliminate duties on IT products covered by the Agreement. Greece has also been a signatory to the agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft (see https://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/ngo_e/csend_plurilateral_agreements.pdf).
Greece is a member of the European Free Trade Association and a member of all key international organisations, unions and treaties including the European Monetary Union, the International Chamber of Commerce, the International Monetary Fund, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the Energy Community and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.
The EU has established certain preferential tariff arrangements, according to which favourable tariff treatment is provided for goods of certain third countries. Under Article 28.1 of the Greek Constitution, Greece ratifies any such agreements concluded by the EU. For instance, Greece has ratified the free trade agreement between the EU and the Republic of Korea by Law 4259/2014, the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between the EU and Canada, and the economic partnership between the EU and Japan.
There are other trade agreements in Greece imposing legally binding obligations, including autonomous preferential arrangements. But there are also various bilateral agreements and memorandums of understanding aimed at enhancing economic co-operation between Greece and third countries.
Save for tax treaties whose ratification is pending there are no other trade agreements, applicable or under consideration or under negotiation, that are of note.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Directorate of Tariff Affairs has issued several rules regulating trade policy matters. For instance, new arrangements have been introduced (Circulars ΨΤΦΖ46ΜΠ3Ζ-7ΜΤ/15.04.2020 and 6Γ9546ΜΠ3Ζ-7ΝΠ/21.04.2020) to simplify the issuance of licences required by preferential trade agreements. Similar arrangements have been introduced (Circular Ψ9ΔΕ46ΜΠ3Ζ-Φ46) to regulate commercial transactions and to simplify the issuance of licences.
The most important pending change is the one relating to Brexit and the way in which Greece will treat the import and export of goods and services, and the free movement of individuals, with the UK.
Customs matters are regulated by Law 2960/2001 (Government Gazette A’ 265/2001), which is known as the Greek Customs Code. The authority supervising customs is the Customs Authority and its branches throughout Greece. It falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Finance (General Secretariat for Public Revenue). By Law 4389/2016 the General Secretariat for Public Revenue has become an Independent Administrative Authority which enjoys a high degree of autonomy and independence.
The Customs Authority is the enforcement authority. Under Article 3 of Law 4758/2020 (Government Gazette A’ 242/04.12.2020) on the containment of smuggling, a so-called “central operational co-ordination mechanism” acting as a co-ordination centre between the various departments involved, is to be set up.
The Greek legislation addressing the negative impacts of trade practices in other jurisdictions, aimed at the protection of the Greek market and consumer interests, are:
If an authorisation scheme is required for access to a service activity or its exercise (for example, for reasons of public interest), then the service provider should file an application for the respective authorisation. The service provider may be, as per Article 2, paragraph 2 of Law 3844/2010, any Greek natural person, or any domestic or non-domestic legal person established in an EU member state, which offers or provides such service.
The authorities do not publish any reports of their findings. Publication may arise only in the case of a court decision ordering the cessation of an unfair commercial practice (Article 9(i), paragraph 3.2 of L. 2251/1994), issued upon the respective application filed by a consumer or a consumers’ association. The parties and the products to which the aforementioned measures are applicable are any Greek natural person, or any domestic or non-domestic legal person established in an EU member state offering or providing a service concerning any self-employed economic activity provided for remuneration.
The recently adopted Law 4758/2020 (Government Gazette A’ 242/04.12.2020) amended some of the provisions of the Greek Customs Code and aims at a more efficient legal framework preventing the smuggling of goods. The amendments are intended to reinforce co-ordination of the relevant administrative authorities, the severity of sanctions and to simplify current enforcement procedures. The new rules:
The COVID-19 pandemic has led the General Secretariat for Public Revenue to introduce electronic procedures (E.2033/19.03.2020, E.2105/01.07.2020) to simplify the import of goods.
On 28 September 2020, the European Commission proceeded to a “plan for action” for the Customs Union to be taken to “the next level”. To this end, customs authorities are expected to operate in a fully integrated way, so as to:
How these will translate into local rules and enforcement procedures is yet to be seen and will play a key role in the near future.
Sanctions are varied and can be severe. They range from administrative sanctions (from small fines to huge penalties and seizure of goods) that apply to all persons involved, including transport companies and wholesalers, to criminal sanctions of imprisonment (especially for smuggling of goods as per Article 157 of the Greek Customs Code).
The authority that will impose the sanctions is the competent branch of the Greek Customs Authority located in the region where the infringement took place or, if the region cannot be determined, the branch of the customs authority located in the territorial jurisdiction in which the infringement was recorded.
Under the Greek Customs Code (Articles 180 et seq), the Minister of Finance is authorised to issue the respective decision specifying the details related to the sanctions regime. On certain occasions, depending on the type of infringement, it may be a joint ministerial decision of the Minister of Finance together with another Minister (or Ministers) who may have a legal interest in the supervision of the market sector to which the infringement relates.
The persons subject to sanctions laws and regulations are:
There is no list of sanctioned persons maintained by the Greek authorities.
Greece does not maintain any comprehensive sanctions or embargoes against countries or regions except those maintained by the EU as a whole.
Pursuant to ministerial decision 91,354 (Government Gazette Β' 2983/30.08.2017) on packaging, import and distribution of products imported by third countries or countries within the EU, the following economic operators may be subject to penalties in case of infringement:
No arrangements are in place to apply or threaten sanctions in connection with transactions that have no nexus to Greece (ie, so-called secondary sanctions).
If the sanctions laws and regulations are violated the procedure of recovery of the imposed fines is set in motion as per the Greek Code on the Recovery of Public Revenue (Legislative Decision No 356/1974, the so-called KEDE). Violation may also trigger criminal sanctions.
In Greece there no licences available which would authorise activities otherwise prohibited by current sanctions laws and regulations.
For the intent and purpose of the Greek legislative framework, there are no expectations and standards of liability other than the administrative, monetary and criminal penalties set out in the law.
Infringement of the provisions on goods import and distribution, customs requirements, smuggling and movement of goods and services, may result in the temporary deprivation of the licence to practise of the persons involved in the transportation of the goods and in criminal sanctions that may also entail the revocation of a professional or trade licence. This may also result in blocking persons involved in such activities from participating in public procurement opportunities.
At European level, Regulation (EU) 2018/302 applies on addressing unjustified geo-blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality, place of residence or place of establishment within the internal market and aims to address unjustified geo-blocking by removing barriers to the functioning of the internal market.
At national level, blocking statues and anti-boycott provisions are found in Ministerial Decision 188/2019 (Government Gazette Β’ 746/2019) on the transposition into Greek legislation of Regulation (EU) 2018/302. The ministerial decision provides that the competent authority for the determination of infringement of the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2018/302 is the Directorate of Consumer Protection of the Ministry of Economy and Development. In the case of an infringement, penalties are imposed on the trader.
As regards third countries, the rules of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Article 28) apply, under which a common customs tariff is to apply to third countries.
The key developments regarding sanctions in the last 12 months concern Law 4758/2020 (Government Gazette A’ 242/04.12.2020) on the restriction of smuggling. They can be summarised as:
There are no significant pending changes, hot topics or issues on the horizon over the next 12 months pertaining to sanctions.
As in other member states, the EU export control regime is governed by Regulation 428/2009, which set up a community regime for the control of exports, transfers, brokering and transit of dual-use items.
Furthermore, the Union Customs Code Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (UCC), applicable from 1 May 2016, is also relevant in combination with:
The Common Customs Tariff, along with the Integrated Tariff (TARIC), are applied to goods from non-EU countries. Goods moving freely within the EU must comply with the rules of the internal market and with certain provisions of the Common Commercial Policy. In addition, EU regulations implementing the Union Customs Code provisions ensure that Greece applies the rules in uniformity with other EU countries.
Finally, the Greek Customs Code lays down specific rules regarding customs procedures, duty assessment and collection, and sanctions for customs violations.
Branches of the Customs Authority are the only authorised administrative authority that controls the application of the customs rules and procedures.
The Customs Authority is overseen by the General Directorate for Customs and Excise Taxes, which, in turn, falls under the authority of the General Secretariat for Public Revenue of the Ministry of Finance.
Transactions between residents of EU countries are not considered exports and, therefore, are not charged with customs duties. The Common Customs Tariff of the EU applies to goods originating outside Europe. EU export controls apply to both tangible and intangible exports of controlled items. Exports to non-EU countries are free from quantitative restrictions with the exception of oil and gas. In addition, special rules apply to the export of:
There is also a ban on the export of goods that are intended for capital punishment or for torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment. Also, Greece specifically bans genetically modified products.
Greece follows the consolidated list of persons, groups and entities subject to EU financial sanctions that can be downloaded from the Financial Sanctions Database, known as the FSF platform. There are over 30 EU, autonomous and UN transposed sanctions regimes in place (eg, sanctions imposed on Syria, Iran, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Venezuela, Libya, Russia and Ukraine and North Korea). In addition, the EU has also adopted horizontal regimes targeting terrorism, cyber-attacks, proliferation and the use of chemical weapons.
Greece is in line with EU legislation on sensitive goods and products, as set out below.
For all these sensitive goods and products special procedures in export controls are applied in Greece as they are in other EU member states.
EU export control rules can also apply to exports of non-listed items, if there is knowledge, awareness or suspicion of a sensitive end use. This includes certain end uses relating to the military sector or weapons of mass destruction.
Penalties for breaches of export controls can include civil/administrative and criminal penalties. Typical penalties may involve:
There are no licences which would authorise activities otherwise prohibited by Greece’s sanctions laws and regulations.
Greece's compliance expectations and standards are those set by the EU. Under the EU Dual-Use Regulation each member state must take appropriate measures to ensure proper enforcement, including penalties that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Greece follows EU policy, as formulated on an ongoing basis. Every three years, the Commission reviews the implementation of the Regulation for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items and presents a report to the European Parliament and the Council on its application and proposed amendments. Greece supports the Commission to this end.
During 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the EU published an Implementing Regulation on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to respond to potential future shortages in the EU. The Regulation prohibited exports (unless a licence was granted) of the PPE listed, including mouth and nose protection equipment, gloves and other protective garments, whether or not these originated in the EU.
The pending change relates to the regulation setting out the EU regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, and the transit and transfer of dual-use items. The new framework needs to be endorsed by member states sitting on the Permanent Representatives Committee. It is intended:
Moreover, the EU Commission is launching a pilot e-licensing system in five countries, one of them being Greece, which is aimed at an entirely paperless process between economic exporters and licensing authorities. The e-licensing system covers exports as well as transit, brokering and imports.
Greece, like other EU member states, has transferred to the EU all power relating to anti-dumping and countervailing duties. Thus, from the Greek perspective, the EU has centrally become the competent authority to enforce trade rules on both the EU's export markets and within the EU itself. The EU’s anti-dumping and anti-subsidy legislation was first enacted in 1968 and has since been modified several times. The key texts, which form the legal basis of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations in the EU, as codified in 2016 to revise the rules introduced in the late 1990s, are:
Both regulations were later modified by Regulation (EU) 2017/2321 and Regulation (EU) 2018/825 of 30 May 2018.
The current EU safeguard instruments are covered by:
Being Regulations, these texts are in no need for transposition into Greece legislation.
From the Greek perspective, the European Commission is the responsible body for investigating and deciding on dumping or safeguards claims or on any alleged subsidy, and for imposing the relevant measures.
The investigation to determine the existence, degree and effect of any alleged dumping or subsidy is as determined by EU legislation. It can be initiated by:
The safeguard procedure is slightly different from anti-dumping and anti-subsidy: the investigation procedure is implemented only when a member state informs the Commission if trends in imports appear to call for surveillance or safeguard measures. If a natural or legal person believes safeguard action might be justified, a duly substantiated request to the Greek authorities must be made. If the Commission considers there is sufficient evidence to justify an investigation, it will open one, by publishing a notice in the EU’s Official Journal. The Commission may also launch safeguard investigations at its own initiative.
Domestic companies are able to petition the relevant authorities on an ad hoc basis, provided they have sufficient evidence to support their claims.
The notice of initiation of proceedings for investigating dumping or safeguards claims, or any alleged subsidy, should indicate, among other things, the periods within which interested parties, including non-domestic companies, may make themselves known, present their views in writing and submit information.
The Commission provides the full text of the written complaint received to the known exporters and to the authorities of the exporting country, and makes it available upon request to other interested parties involved. The interested parties may be heard if they have made a written request for a hearing showing that they are likely to be affected by the result of the proceedings and that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.
Opportunities will, on request, be provided for the importers, exporters, representatives of the government of the exporting country and the complainants, to meet those parties with adverse interests, so that opposing views may be presented and rebuttal arguments offered. Therefore, non-domestic companies are not excluded.
Anti-dumping and Anti-subsidy Investigation
Once the Commission receives a valid complaint from an EU industry, providing sufficient evidence that exporting producers from one or more countries are dumping or that a country is subsidising companies exporting a particular product to the EU market, the Commission launches an investigation within 45 days to examine whether:
A Notice of Initiation is published in the EU's Official Journal, specifying the product under investigation, the country/countries to be investigated, the rights and obligations of interested parties to the proceeding, and the deadlines which will apply.
At the same time, a questionnaire is sent to exporters and authorities (government and/or public bodies) in the country/countries concerned, EU producers and importers, and users. The deadline for replies to the questionnaire and claim forms are set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Parties who do not reply to the questionnaire or do not co-operate in other ways may be regarded as not co-operating with the investigation. The Commission will continue the investigation and may use other information available. The duty imposed on a non-co-operating exporter is likely to be higher than if it had co-operated.
Once companies have replied to the questionnaire sent to them, case officers verify the data (usually by inspecting records at the company's premises). The Commission then makes provisional findings. At this point, it may:
All parties have the right to comment on the provisional findings and receive disclosure of the essential facts and considerations that form the basis of the provisional findings. The Commission takes due account of the comments received when it continues the investigation. The definitive findings are also disclosed to interested parties and comments requested.
Based on its final findings, the Commission either:
The Commission must impose any measures within 15 months of the initiation of the investigation for dumping and within 13 months of the initiation of the investigation for any alleged subsidy.
A safeguard investigation must normally be completed in nine months but, in exceptional circumstances, may be extended to 11 months.
The investigation examines:
The main conclusions of the finished investigation are published as a regulation in the EU’s Official Journal.
If the investigation shows that imports have increased so much that they cause or threaten to cause serious harm to EU producers, the Commission can impose safeguard measures. Safeguard measures can take various forms – eg, increased customs duties or quotas (including tariff quotas). Quotas are normally set at least as high as the average level of imports over the last three representative years.
Provisional measures (maximum 200 days) may be imposed in critical circumstances and if a preliminary determination provides clear evidence of harm or impending harm.
Definitive measures must not exceed four years (including the duration of any provisional measures) – unless extended, to a total maximum of eight years.
Measures apply to all countries without discrimination, although developing countries with low import shares can be excluded. Before and during the investigation, the Commission consults the national authorities in the Safeguard Advisory Committee (representatives of each EU country). The Commission must notify member governments of any decision it takes on safeguard measures. Any government that disagrees may refer the decision to the Council, which can confirm, amend or revoke it (by qualified majority). If the Council fails to react within three months, the Commission decision is automatically revoked.
There are no national anti-dumping and countervailing reports. It is again the Commission that presents an annual report to the European Parliament and to the Council, which includes information about the application of provisional and definitive measures, the termination of investigations without measures, reinvestigations, reviews and verification visits, and the activities of the various bodies responsible for monitoring the implementation of the measures and fulfilment of the obligations arising therefrom. No later than six months after presenting the report to the European Parliament and to the Council, the Commission shall make the report public.
Although, there are no jurisdictions in which the Commission will not impose measures, there are currently in place EU trade agreements with Canada, Japan and Singapore that contain specific terms for the imposition of anti-dumping and countervailing duties.
Anti-dumping and Anti-subsidy Investigation
Measures lapse after five years. In that period, the Commission can conduct an interim review if:
In the final year of measures, the EU producers may ask the Commission to conduct an expiry review. This review determines whether the expiry of the measures could lead to continued or recurring dumping/subsidising and injury. If so, the measures may continue for another five years.
Furthermore, companies that either did not exist, or did not export to the EU during the original investigation, can request a new exporter review to have their own individual duty rate established.
Finally, when there is evidence of duties being absorbed, the original trade defence investigation may be reopened (anti-absorption reinvestigation) at the request of any interested party (EU producer, exporter, importer, user), EU country or the Commission. Duties are said to be absorbed when, after anti-dumping or countervailing duties have been imposed, export prices decrease or the resale prices of the imported goods do not increase sufficiently, so the measures do not have the expected effect
No later than the mid-point of the period of application of measures of a duration exceeding three years, the safeguard measures are reviewed in order to:
Anti-dumping and Anti-subsidy Investigation
To request an interim review, the interested party should contact the Commission in writing, stating the reasons for the review and providing prima facie evidence substantiating the need for it. If the Commission accepts the request, it will then publish a Notice of Initiation in the EU’s Official Journal and send out questionnaires to interested parties, just as in the original investigation. A review should be concluded within, at most, 12–15 months.
New exporter review
Companies that either did not exist, or did not export to the EU during the original investigation, can request a new exporter review to have their own individual duty rate established. To qualify as a “new exporter”, a company must:
If a company appears to meet the above criteria, a review will be opened. The review will investigate whether the criteria are met and, if so, establish an individual margin of dumping for the company concerned. Specific rules apply when the applicable duty was established on the basis of a sample of exporting producers.
Reopening an investigation
Any interested party EU industry, exporter, importer, user which finds evidence of absorption of duties, EU country or the Commission, can either lodge a complaint with the European Commission (Directorate General for Trade, Directorate H) or inform national authorities, who may ask for the investigation to be reopened. When there is evidence of duties being absorbed, the original trade defence investigation may be reopened. The reinvestigation is initiated by publishing a Notice in the EU’s Official Journal, normally within two years of the original measures being imposed. It should take no more than nine months to complete. The reinvestigation gives exporters, importers, EU producers and users the opportunity to explain the export prices and EU resale prices. If the conclusion is that the duties should have resulted in price changes that did not take place, the dumping margins can be recalculated and the duties increased up to double the rate of the original duty.
While any surveillance or safeguard measure applied is in operation, the Commission may, either at the request of a member state or on its own initiative, and no later than at the mid-point of the period of application of measures of a duration exceeding three years:
Where the Commission considers that any surveillance or safeguard measure should be revoked or amended, it shall revoke or amend the measure. Where the decision relates to regional surveillance measures, it shall apply from the sixth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Any interested parties can appeal to the General Court and the Court of Justice against the decision of the Commission to impose (or not) any duties.
Until 15 May 2020, the European Commission managed, at EU level, the issuance of prior import authorisations for certain steel and aluminium products under the prior surveillance regime. The prior surveillance regime has been replaced by a monitoring system, based on data collected by the Commission in the framework of Article 56(5) of the Union Customs Code, by which the release for free circulation or the export of goods may be made subject to surveillance.
While the prior surveillance regime allowed obtaining information on intentions to import, the new monitoring system is an ex-post system based on actual import data transmitted by the member states customs authorities. This data is indicative and may be slightly different from the official import statistics made available by Eurostat two months after the actual import. The monitoring reports are updated on a monthly basis, and cover steel and aluminium products previously subject to prior surveillance as well as product more recently added to the original list of products subject to the US Section 232 measures. As from the 1 July 2020, a specific report showing the development of imports for the product categories subject to the steel safeguard measures is also available and updated on a monthly basis at the same time as the other reports.
The Commission is currently developing a new internal system that will improve the monitoring of the effectiveness of measures in force. The system will integrate, into one storage place, information on trade flows and employment figures related to investigations and measures. The Commission will regularly update data to allow the comparison of figures before and after the imposition of relevant measures.
At European level, the recently adopted Regulation (EU) 2019/452, which has now come into force, applies to investment security mechanisms establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investment into the EU on the grounds of security or public order and for a mechanism for co-operation between member states, and between member states and the Commission. It also includes the possibility for the Commission to issue opinions on such investments.
Under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2019/452, certain criteria may be considered by the member states and the Commission in determining whether a foreign direct investment is likely to affect security or public order.
In determining whether a foreign direct investment is likely to affect security or public order, the following may also be taken into account.
At national level, besides the above Regulation, the following legal instruments are also in force, aimed at the development of investment and the security of Greek economy.
Under the main investment incentives law (Law 4399/2016), the review procedure is initiated as soon as the investor submits an investment file before the competent authority of the Ministry of Development and Investments. The review process is set out in detail in Ministerial Decision No 500/2020.
At national level, the “National Register of Certified Assessors”, as per Article 14 of Ministerial Decision No 500/2020 in conjunction with the Ministerial Decision 134/2019 on the establishment of the competent bodies of the security mechanisms for investment projects (adopted under Law 4399/2016), is the responsible agency for all proceedings related to the submission and the review of the investment files submitted. The aforementioned agency is also responsible for enforcing investment security measures by rejecting any applications in the case of deficiencies of the respective files.
The beneficiaries of the provisions of the main investment incentives Law (Law 4399/2016) are, as per Article 6, all enterprises located in Greece and all branches located in Greece at the time of submitting the investment file. The transactions subject to the investment security measures cover most economic sectors. Regulation (EU) 2019/452 (Article 2.1) on the establishment of a framework for the screening of foreign direct investment into the EU, stipulates that the investment security measures apply to any private investment of any kind by a foreign investor aiming to establish or maintain lasting and direct links between the foreign investor and the entrepreneur to whom – or the undertaking to which – the capital is made available in order to carry on economic activity in a member state, including investments which enable effective participation in the management or control of a company carrying out an economic activity.
According to Law 4608/2019 and Law 4399/2016, an investor should submit an investment file at the competent authority of the Ministry of Finance.
There are several exemptions from review which are provided for in Articles 6 and 7 of Law 4399/2016. For instance, if an undertaking changes its seat in the period starting two years before the investment and ending two years after the completion of the investment, it will be excluded from aid schemes. Moreover, certain sectors – such as energy, transport, construction, education, retail, law and insurance – are excluded.
The review of an investment file may be rejected by the competent authority for reasons laid down in Law 4399/2016, such as the incompleteness of the file. Undertakings that have received investment aid may not cease their activity and may not file any false information at any stage of the process. If they do, they must refund any aid received.
The fees associated with investment security reviews or filings vary (Article 13 of Law No 4399/2016 and Ministerial Decree under No 130/2020 Government Gazette Β’ 5398/2020) depending on the amount of the investment project.
One key development in this area was the new call for investment schemes that was announced in mid-2020 [Ministerial Decree No 500/2020 (Government Gazette Β’ 1936/2020)].
There are no pending changes expected in this area in the next 12 months.
Law No 4399/2016 (on the Statutory framework for the establishment of Private Investments Aid Schemes for the regional and economic development of the country - Establishment of Development Council and other provisions) is the main investment incentives law. Also, the notice for investment projects, given by virtue of the Ministerial Decree No 500/2020 (Government Gazette Β’ 1936/2020) is the key instrument providing for subsidy and incentive programmes in Greece.
Regulations (EU) 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs and 668/2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs as well as Ministerial Decision 8187/2019 (Government Gazette 4721/19.12.2019) provide for standards and technical requirements encouraging domestic production.
At the national level, the national technical requirements include a certification procedure for acquiring a verification for a “protected designation of origin” product (“POP”/“PDO”) by applying the relevant application to the competent department of the Ministry of Rural Development. Law 4384/2016 (Article 38) also provides for the establishment of “Product protection and management teams” for compliance with the requirements of the protected designation of origin.
The sanitary and phytosanitary requirements in Greece are set out in Law 4036/2012 and relate to the transposition of:
The Directorate for the Protection of Plant Production of the Ministry of Rural Development and Food is the competent authority for monitoring the implementation of the requirements indicted in this legislation.
Τhe fixing and co-ordination of purchase or selling prices and other trading conditions aimed at policy and price controls are provided in Law 4529/2018 on the transposition into Greek legislation of EU Directive 2014/104 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law. Furthermore Law 3959/11 on free competition makes reference to Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for the protection of competition. Law 146/1914 still applies on unfair competition.
According to its founding Law. 3986/2011, the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund (HRADF or TAIPED) leverages the State’s private property, according to the country's international obligations. In co-operation with the Greek Government, the HRADF promotes the implementation of privatisations in the country.
No “Buy National/Local” requirements in government procurement apply in Greece.
Please see 7.2 Standards and Technical Requirements.
There are no other significant issues or developments in the law not otherwise addressed in this chapter.