Contributed By Scanlen & Holderness
The main types of companies permitted under Zimbabwean law include:
Foreign investors tend to use private limited companies as they have governance structures that are familiar in most jurisdictions, including a board of directors and management with responsibilities and duties, such as regarding the company strategy and day-to-day running of the company, respectively.
The typical shares and classes of shares issued by companies include the following.
While shares with preferred voting rights are used to maintain a controlling stake in the company (despite the fact that one may only have a minority stake), shares with preferred financial rights have a higher claim to dividends or proceeds from liquidation, though in some instances with fewer controlling interests. The company’s memorandum of association usually governs the shares and their corresponding rights and obligations.
The primary rights common to all shareholders include the right to:
These rights may be varied through the company’s memorandum and articles of association, by a special resolution of the shareholders’ meeting or by agreement among the shareholders.
There are no minimum share capital requirements for either public or private limited companies. However, in practice, companies usually start up with a low nominal amount of capital. In addition, in some instances, the listing regulatory authority (including the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange) for public limited companies may require a certain amount of capital for the company to be listed. Specially regulated companies such as financial institutions have minimal capital requirements.
The minimum number of shareholders for a public entity is 51.
Conversely, the minimum is one shareholder for:
Generally, there is no requirement for any such shareholder to be resident in Zimbabwe, although some sectors are reserved to indigenous persons subject to the foreign shareholder obtaining regulatory authority. Foreign residents require exchange control approval to hold shares in a Zimbabwean registered company.
Shareholders’ agreements are very common in privately held companies. They are effective in delineating the rights and obligations of the respective shareholders in the joint venture company. The same principle applies to joint venture agreements.
Shareholders’ agreements typically contain provisions regarding the following.
Furthermore, the primary provisions concerning applicable law, jurisdiction of the courts and/or arbitration, and confidentiality are also found in the relevant agreement(s). Such agreement is enforceable through the courts of Zimbabwe, between the shareholders. It is not a requirement that the agreement be made public.
Every company is obliged by law to hold an annual general meeting (AGM) at least once in every 12-month period. Failure to do so attracts a civil penalty.
Thus it is statutorily mandated that a company must hold an AGM at least once a year. The notice should be made via a special resolution to that effect.
The issues usually included on the agenda for an AGM include:
A company’s AGM may be called by 21 days’ notice in writing; and a meeting of a company, other than an AGM or a meeting for the passing of a special resolution, may be called by 14 days’ notice in writing or, in the case of a private company, by seven days’ notice in writing.
Generally, the notice period cannot be reduced, and any provision of a company’s articles shall be void in so far as it provides for the calling of a meeting of the company (other than an adjourned meeting) by shorter notice. It should be noted, however, that a meeting of a company shall (notwithstanding that it is called by shorter notice) be deemed to have been duly called if it is so agreed (with the officer responsible for calling the meeting) in writing to that effect:
Any general meeting other than an AGM must be called by 14 days’ written notice. It is generally not permissible to shorten the notice period, and any notice contrary to this is deemed invalid unless it is so agreed (with the officer responsible for calling the meeting) in writing to that effect:
In principle, general meetings are called by the board of directors. However, a requisition may be made by members of a company holding, at the date of the deposit of the requisition, not less than 5% of the paid-up capital of the company when the deposit carries the right of voting at general meetings of the company. The directors of the company (notwithstanding anything in its articles) must then, within 21 days of the deposit of the requisition, issue a notice to members convening an extraordinary general meeting of the company for a date not less than 14 and not more than 28 days from the date of the notice – if a special resolution is to be submitted, the period of the notice must not be less than 21 days.
The acceptable form of the notice is specified in the articles of association of the company (registered letter, publication in a newspaper, electronic means). The information rights are also included in the company’s constitutive documents. However, the Companies and Other Business Entities Act (Chapter 24:31) also contains provisions obliging the company and its directors to make the following documentation available to the shareholders.
Moreover, at each annual shareholders’ meeting, the company’s board of directors
must report to the meeting on the company’s compliance with its guidelines and their conformity to the principles set forth in the National Code on Corporate Governance, and explain the extent (if any) to which it has varied them or believes that any non-compliance therewith is justified. Under Section 12 and 32 of the Code, shareholders are entitled to reasonable and transparent access to relevant company records.
If provided in the articles of a company or by a resolution thereof, the law permits both private and public companies in Zimbabwe to hold virtual meetings, but members who are not physically present at the meeting should be heard and seen by the other members via electronic means.
The majority of the total number of votes entitled to vote on a matter shall constitute a quorum for decisions of the meeting on that matter, unless the company’s articles of association provide for a greater or lesser quorum – but not less than one third of the votes of the shares entitled to so vote.
There is an ordinary and a special resolution. These are determined by the company’s constitutive documents, as well as by statutory regulation. Instances that may require a general resolution include affairs concerning the day-to-day business of the company. Conversely, a special resolution will require significant actions, such as:
The resolutions may be by electronic or physical means, depending on the company’s constitution.
Generally, matters reserved as requiring shareholder approval in the constitutive documents of a company must receive shareholder approval before being implemented. The majority of the shareholders entitled to vote shall be taken as the required vote. Matters falling within this purview usually include:
A special resolution requires the approval of 75% of the shareholders. An ordinary resolution requires a simple majority.
Shareholders are entitled by law to vote either in person or through a duly appointed proxy of their choice. Generally, a resolution put to the vote must be decided by a show of hands unless a poll is duly demanded in accordance with the articles. Votes can, however, be cast electronically. In private companies, voting is often conducted by a show of hands, while an electronic poll is preferred for publicly held companies.
Generally, only matters within the scope of the previously sent notice and agenda may be voted on, except in the case of essential and urgent matters which arose after the notice was given and could not have been included in the notice – though this restriction shall not prevent discussion of other matters, and shareholders shall be free to raise any other matters.
Shareholders can challenge any resolutions passed by the shareholders’ meeting that are null and void, at an extraordinary general meeting or at the AGM, provided the issue in question is placed on the agenda, and/or if it is not, provided that the issue is added as agreed upon – see 2.1 Types of Meeting, Notice and Calling a Meeting.
In addition, a shareholder may institute derivative action proceedings in the High Court under the Companies and Other Business Entities Act. A derivative action is a claim instituted by a shareholder seeking a remedy on behalf of a company when the directors are either unable or unwilling to so provide, as long as the following statutory requirements are satisfied.
Under Section 233 of the Act, a shareholder may also object to a contemplated resolution by a company – eg, variation of rights attaching to shares or merger with another company – before such resolution is voted on. The objecting shareholder may demand that the company pay the shareholder the fair value for all the shares of the company held by that person, if the shareholder:
This applies when the company has adopted the resolution contemplated, and when the shareholder would have voted against that resolution as well as gave the requisite notice objecting to the resolution.
The Companies and Other Business Entities Act (Chapter 24:31) contains various provisions that permit shareholders to influence and monitor a company’s actions. Institutional investors tend to have more expertise and resources available for challenging the company’s actions and/or influencing its decisions compared to individual shareholders.
Actions taken to influence or monitor a company’s actions include the following.
The shareholders holding their shares through nominees shall have the same rights as any other shareholder as stated in 1.4 Variation of Shareholders’ Rights, provided that the beneficial owner has been disclosed and accepted as provided for by the law.
Written resolutions can be approved by all entitled to vote at a meeting – such passed resolutions are valid and binding.
Existing shareholders have pro rata subscription rights in the event of issuance of new shares.
Generally, subject to the shareholders’ agreement and the company’s constitutive documents, there are no restrictions on the transfer or disposal of shares. The aforesaid documents usually have pre-emptive rights which mandate that any shares should initially be offered to current shareholders before any disposal and/or transfer thereof.
In addition, no shares may be transferred to a foreign resident without prior exchange control approval. It should also be noted that certain industries and sectors in Zimbabwe are reserved for locals under the indigenisation laws. Any transfer of shares in the reserved sectors can only be made upon the granting of an application to operate within such sector by the relevant authorities.
Lastly, other industries such as the telecommunications sector require that the controlling shareholder be ordinarily resident in Zimbabwe.
Shareholders of a company have the right to grant a security interest over their shares, unless the contrary is provided for in the company’s constitutive documents – that is, its memorandum and articles of association. In addition, shareholders’ agreements usually restrict the ability of the parties to pledge their shares in the company without the consent of the other shareholders.
For a privately held company, and subject to anti-money laundering disclosures, shareholders are generally not required to disclose their interests in a company formed under the Zimbabwean jurisdiction. However, in certain sectors (such as banking or securities trading) the regulatory authorities have to be notified when shareholders acquire or dispose of a certain qualifying shareholding. The regulatory authorities may also make a request concerning the ultimate beneficial owner of a company in certain instances.
In addition, new foreign investors are not allowed in certain sectors without the prior approval of the authorities, including in the following sectors:
The same applies for foreign investors, as the Exchange Control Authority must approve any transactions relating to the acquisition of shares in a local entity by a foreign resident. Furthermore, the Zimbabwe Investment and Development Agency must be notified in circumstances wherein a company shareholder has been issued with an investment licence. The change in the shareholding structure must thus be communicated to the Agency.
Depending on the circumstances, shares can be cancelled after issue, including in the following instances.
For a co-operative, a share may be cancelled and the amount paid up thereon be refunded in such circumstances as relate to the termination of membership or as are otherwise authorised in its articles.
This is provided that no such cancellation of a share or refund of the amount paid up thereon shall:
A company may, if authorised by its articles and in advance of the general meeting, purchase its own shares, including any redeemable shares. An authority granted by the company in a general meeting shall not be valid unless it specifies:
Such authority shall also not be granted where the shares are to be purchased other than on a securities exchange registered under the Securities and Exchange Act (Chapter 24:25), if any person holding shares to which the authority relates has voted for the resolution conferring the authority. This shall not apply for a private company or for a public company when a class of shares is all to be purchased or is to be purchased pro rata from all the shareholders who hold shares of the class concerned.
For public companies, the listing rules provide that a share buyback must be approved by special or general resolution conducted at a general meeting, such as an AGM. Only a maximum of 20% of the class of shares that is outstanding in a financial year can be bought back. In addition, buybacks cannot result in a single shareholder with control that they did not have prior to the undertaking. It should also be noted that a company cannot institute a buyback while trading under a cautionary statement or during the closed period (the period between financial statements being prepared and being announced).
Lastly, a company may not purchase its own shares if, as a result of the purchase, there would no longer be any member holding shares other than redeemable shares.
Dividends distribution requires a board of directors’ and shareholders’ resolution. Dividends can only be distributed out of the profits of the company or from reserves accumulated for such purpose.
The appointment and/or removal of directors requires the majority votes of the shares present or represented at the shareholders’ meeting. Individual shareholders do not have any right to participate in the management of a company. The proposal to dismiss a director can be added to the agenda of any shareholders’ meeting by shareholders who hold the required minimum shareholding.
A decision taken by directors can be challenged by a shareholder at the AGM or in a court of law via a derivative action. Section 167(3) of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act entitles a shareholder to present their concerns and proceed to vote, as well as to enquire regarding certain decisions at the AGM. In addition, Section 61 of the Act permits a shareholder to institute a claim on behalf of the company against a decision of a director where such decision constitutes a breach of the directors’ fiduciary duties and/or has brought harm or is likely to bring harm to the company in question.
See also 2.11 Challenging a Resolution.
The company’s auditors are appointed and revoked by a shareholders’ resolution requiring the majority of the shares present or represented at the shareholders’ meeting. The proposal to dismiss and replace the company’s auditors can be added to the agenda of any shareholders’ meeting by shareholders who hold the required minimum shareholding.
For public companies, Section 220 of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act provides that the board of every public company must establish or adopt written corporate governance guidelines, covering matters such as those listed in 2.4 Information and Documents Relating to the Meeting.
See again 2.4 Information and Documents Relating to the Meeting regarding the board of directors’ reporting requirements.
There is no such requirement in respect of all other entities, unless specifically stated in the entity’s constitutive documents.
There is no prescribed duty or liability that a controlling company has to the shareholders of the company it controls. However, as a shareholder, the controlling company has a duty to other shareholders to ensure that it acts lawfully and does not oppress the interests of the other shareholders in terms of Sections 223 and 225 of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act.
Unless also a creditor of the company, shareholders have very limited rights in the event of the company becoming insolvent. Shareholders are entitled to their pro rata share of the residue of the company.
Shareholders have legal remedies against the company as established in 2.11 Challenging a Resolution and 11.1 Legal and Regulatory Provisions.
The primary legal remedy against the company’s directors by its shareholders is via Section 167(3) of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act, which entitles the latter to present their concerns and proceed to vote, as well as to enquire regarding certain decisions at the AGM. The directors can also be removed from the company at the AGM.
In addition, the directors of the company are liable to the company and to the shareholders for any losses or damages resulting from a breach of their fiduciary duties. See 2.11 Challenging a Resolution and 2.12 Institutional Shareholder Groups.
A derivative action is permissible under Zimbabwean law. See 2.11 Challenging a Resolution and 10.2 Remedies Against the Directors.
The key regulatory provisions that govern/restrict shareholder activism in Zimbabwe include the following.
The company’s constitutive documents (ie, its memorandum and articles of association) may govern/restrict shareholder activism.
Section 167(3) of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act entitles the shareholders to present their concerns and proceed to vote, as well as to enquire regarding certain decisions at the AGM.
Section 60 of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act governs direct claims by shareholders against directors. See 2.12 Institutional Shareholder Groups.
Section 61 of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act governs derivative actions. See 2.12 Institutional Shareholder Groups.
Section 223 as read with Section 225 of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act permits a shareholder of a company to apply to the court for an appropriate order against another shareholder on the grounds that the company’s affairs are being or have been conducted in a manner which is oppressive or unfairly prejudicial to the interests of some part of the members (including themself), or that any actual or proposed act or omission of the company, including an act or omission on its behalf, is or would be so oppressive or prejudicial to the shareholder in question.
If the court is so satisfied, the court’s order may:
Section 233 of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act provides for an exit remedy to shareholders who are of the sentiment that the company’s strategy no longer aligns with their interests. To invoke this remedy, the shareholder must give written notice objecting to a contemplated resolution by the company – eg, variation of rights attaching to shares or merger with another company – before such resolution is voted on. See 2.11 Challenging a Resolution.
The Corporate Governance Code of 2014 applies for public companies. Also, see 2.4 Information and Documents Relating to the Meeting regarding the obligations of a company and its directors.
In addition to the above, the strategies stated in 11.3 Shareholder Activist Strategies are generally available to activist shareholders.
The typical aims of activist shareholders include:
The strategies commonly employed by activist shareholders to build their stake in a company include:
There are no particular industries/sectors in Zimbabwe that have been especially targeted by activist shareholders. Past and present activist shareholders seem to be those that respond to circumstances specific to the company in question, where the company has poor governance structures or is facing liquidity issues and/or is insolvent.
There are no statistics that reveal whether a particular group/type of shareholders is more active than others in Zimbabwe. However, over the years active shareholders have tended to be minority shareholders who institute litigation on behalf of a company to protect the company’s interests via derivative actions, or who institute shareholder oppression claims to protect themselves.
There are no statistics available regarding the success rate of shareholder activist campaigns in Zimbabwe.
A company may consider responding to an activist shareholder via the following methods:
13th Floor, CABS Centre
74 Jason Moyo Avenue
Harare
Zimbabwe
+263-242702561-8
+263-242-702569
info@scanlen.co.zw www.scanlenandholderness.com