Litigation 2024 Comparisons

Angola's legal system is of the civil law type. As a former Portuguese colony, Angola inherited this legal system from Portugal and still adopts some important legal diplomas that were in force before the date of its independence.

The procedural model is dialectical and the parties are generally allowed to submit successive pleadings and applications. Every application filed, by either party, that may affect the rights of the opponent shall be notified to the other party for opposition purposes. The process is typically a written one, but provides for hearings for the oral discussion of technical issues, for attempts at conciliation, evidence and closing arguments.

Under the Angolan Constitution, the highest courts are the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Military Court and the Court of Auditors.

Until 2015, ordinary jurisdiction was based on only two levels of courts: the Supreme Court and the Provincial Courts. Law No 2/15 of 2 January 2015 created a new structure for the ordinary judicial system, which was amended again with the entry into force of Law No 29/22 of 29 August 2015 – Organic Law on the Organisation and Functioning of the Ordinary Courts of Jurisdiction, although this is not such a substantial change in general terms. Under this new law, the judicial system is made up of the Supreme Court as the highest court in the hierarchy of the Common Courts, with the District Courts as the courts of first instance and the Court of Appeal as the second instance.

The District Courts have Chambers and Sections that are designated by their jurisdiction by reason of the subject matter, as follows:

• Civil and Administrative;
• Criminal;
• Family;
• Labour;
• Commerce;
• Intellectual and Industrial Property;
• Administrative, Tax and Customs Litigation;
• Maritime Matters; and
• Civil and Penalty Enforcements.

In addition, if justified, Specialised Competence Rooms may be created in each of the subjects.

The Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have the following specialised Chambers:

• Criminal;
• Civil;
• Administrative, Tax and Customs Litigation;
• Labour; and
• Family and Juvenile Justice.

Where the workload so requires, the Supreme Court may order that those chambers be subdivided.

The Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have the following specialised sections:

• Criminal;
• Civil;
• Administrative, Tax and Customs Litigation;
• Labour; and
• Family and Juvenile Justice.

Judgments of the Court of Appeal can be appealed to the Supreme Court and from there to the Constitutional Court if they offend fundamental principles or rights enshrined in the Constitution.

Access to and examination of a lawsuit is only permitted for the parties and their attorneys; there is no formal ban on opening hearings to the public, but there are many reasons why the court may prohibit the publicity of hearings. This is the case when it comes to matters or interests related to children or young people, intimacy or the honour of persons, personal data, and professional or trade secrets.

After they have been notified, judgments and explanations of votes, if any, must be disclosed in full on the respective websites, as well as in official publications of said courts, safeguarding the identity of the parties.

In most cases, the parties must be represented by attorneys.

Only lawyers registered with the Angolan Bar are permitted to practise law in Angola; no party may be represented in court by a lawyer who is not registered. Although the registration of foreign lawyers with the Angolan Bar is not totally prohibited, such membership is currently very restrictive, which makes it very difficult for foreign lawyers to register.

Litigation funding is not expressly provided for or practised in Angola, but neither is it expressly prohibited. Under the principle of contractual freedom, it must be assumed that such funding is permitted in the terms of the Civil Code and commercial and financial regulations.

As third-party funding is neither prohibited nor regulated, it is allowed for any type of proceedings.

Third-party funding should be considered admissible for either plaintiffs or defendants.

There are no minimums or maximums stipulated for third-party funding.

Any court costs, professional fees and other related costs may be considered for third-party funding.

Angolan law does not allow quota litis – ie, fees set exclusively on a contingency basis. However, success fees are allowed and commonly used.

There is no deadline for obtaining third-party funding.

No pre-trial action is legally required before starting a court case. Exceptions occur in labour lawsuits, where a pre-trial conciliation attempt is compulsory in most cases.

The civil law differentiates between limitation periods according to the kind of liability with regard to the origin of the obligation.

The general limitation period for contractual liability is 20 years, but only three years for non-contractual liability. However, in the case of contractual liability, the limitations may be shorter in certain cases, such as accommodation or professional fees. In the case of non-contractual liability, if the fact giving rise to the obligation also constitutes a crime, the criminal statutes of limitations apply.

The jurisdiction of Angolan courts depends on any of the following circumstances:

• if the jurisdiction is attributed to Angolan courts by the domestic rules on territorial jurisdiction;
• if the facts on which the lawsuit is based were practised in Angola;
• if the defendant is foreign and the plaintiff is Angolan, provided that, in reverse, the Angolan could be sued by the courts of the foreign country; and
• if the effectiveness of the lawsuit is only possible in Angola, provided that there is any personal or material connection with Angola.

Following internal territorial rules, jurisdiction should still be attributed to Angolan courts in a lawsuit relating to real estate located in Angola or when the lawsuit action seeks the fulfilment of obligations that must occur in Angola or the payment of compensation. In the case of non-contractual liability, jurisdiction belongs to the court of the place where the unlawful act was committed.

The initial complaint must be addressed to the court with jurisdiction, indicating the parties and the form of the proceedings (common or special proceeding); if common, the proceedings may be ordinary or summary. The complaint should describe the subject matter and applicable law, ending with the remedies sought. All documents supporting the alleged subject matter should be lodged alongside the complaint.

The plaintiff is also required to file a power of attorney and evidence of the fulfilment of income tax duties (if the claim is related to any activity that is subject to tax payment). If the plaintiff is a corporation, a certificate of incorporation should also be filed, and the evidence of the fulfilment of annual income tax duties is always due.

The summons is always served by the court, by an official or court clerk when possible. If the defendant is a corporation, the summons shall be served to its legal representative; in exceptional circumstances, where it is proved that it was not possible to summon the legal representative, the summons may be served to any company employee. If the summons cannot be served personally due to the whereabouts of the defendant being unknown, it may be made by the publication of edicts.

The servicing of defendants residing in a foreign country is usually by registered letter with acknowledged receipt, unless otherwise provided for in any Convention or Treaty.

If the defendant does not reply to the complaint, the facts alleged by the plaintiff are considered proven, provided that they are related to disposable rights. Once the facts are considered proven, the plaintiff will be given a notice for filing closing written arguments and the court shall issue the judgment in accordance with the applicable law.

If the lawsuit relates to non-disposable rights, the plaintiff will have to produce evidence of the alleged facts.

The commencement of collective actions is a right enshrined in constitutional law. However, although this right is reflected in several other laws, the form of its exercise is not specifically regulated. It is commonly admitted that collective actions are allowed in some cases, such as actions brought by unions, professional or consumer associations. Collective actions follow the procedure provided for in the civil procedural law.

Lawyers' fees are freely set between lawyer and client. It is advisable for an engagement letter to be produced, or at least for the conditions to be set by written communication.

The court tax code (Código de Custas Judiciais) sets the amounts for court fees and other applicable court costs. The value of the court fees is calculated on the basis of the value attributed to the lawsuit by applying the legal table. This table of fees is regressive – ie, the rate decreases as the process value increases. Furthermore, there is a maximum limit for the court tax, regardless of the lawsuit value.

Interim applications are allowed for certain purposes, such as injunctive relief, early proof production, amendment of statement of case (only until reply to the opposition), extension of time or enabling successors.

An early judgment is admitted, either in respect of procedural matters or on the merits. The parties may apply, in the pleadings, for an early judgment in respect of legal matters such as the jurisdiction of the court, the legal standing of the parts and any other legal questions that may refrain the court from issuing a judgment on the merits.

Regarding the judgment on the merits, and regardless of any request for this purpose, the court should consider whether there are sufficient grounds for a safe early judgment – ie, when there is no need for further evidence of the relevant facts. If so, the court may issue the judgment on the merits immediately. However, the law does not foresee partial judgments on the merits.

As stated in 4.2 Early Judgment Applications, it is only permitted to discuss the matter of fact or of law in foreseen proceedings. However, the parties are allowed to file late applications regarding supervening facts that may lead to dismissal or affect the judgment.

Interested parties are allowed to intervene in the process in various circumstances. This intervention can be provoked by either party or can be voluntary. Intervention provoked by the defendant is intended to share or exclude their responsibility and is based on the assumption that the new party has an interest identical to or competing with one of the initial parties. The procedural position of the called person may be parallel to that of the plaintiff or the defendant.

Interested parties may also intervene as assistants of the plaintiff or the defendant, in which case they will only have an auxiliary role for that party.

An intervention at the request of the defendant shall be requested within the time limit for the opposition. If such request is filed by the plaintiff, the time limit will be that for replying to the opposition. Where intervention is voluntary (to intervene as a party or to assist one of the initial parties), such request should be submitted spontaneously at any time, provided that it is before the date of the trial has been designated or, if no trial is to take place, before any judgment has been handed down.

The intervention of any interested person in the process is done through third-party intervention, “call to the authorship”, “call to the demand”, assistance, opposition and main intervention.

The defendant cannot request that the plaintiff makes a security payment for the defendant's costs.

To the extent that they do not fall under the common procedure, interim applications are considered incidents subject to additional court fees. When lodged, the court sets the amount of these fees in accordance with the legal cost table.

There is a general deadline of five calendar days for the judge to rule on any claims submitted by the parties; this period may differ for certain specific acts of the judge. The timeframes within which officers have to comply with their acts should always be added to these deadlines.

In procedures that are considered legally urgent, some deadlines may be exceptionally short. However, it is normal for courts not to comply with these deadlines and therefore any applications may not be ruled on for a much longer time.

There are no discovery mechanisms in civil cases. However, there is a general duty of co-operation, which allows either party to request that any person or the opposing party delivers documents in their possession.

Only applying for a court order can prompt third parties to deliver documents in their possession.

The law of civil procedure enshrines the principle of the co-operation of all persons to discover the truth, whether parties or third parties. However, the production of evidence within this co-operation is ruled by court orders under either party's request. Lawyers are not entitled to request any documents or information directly from any other person, except public registries.

The evidence may consist of documents, confessions of the parties, expert evidence, judicial inspection and witness evidence. Evidence must be produced at the trial on the initiative of the parties, and the court has the power to take all steps necessary to obtain such evidence. The parties must present the documents in their possession as evidence of the facts they claim alongside the pleadings.

Expert evidence, judicial inspections and witness evidence should be indicated by the interested party previous to the trial. Confession may take the form of statements or omission of a response from either party in the pleadings concerning material facts alleged by the other party.

Prior to the commencement of proceedings, or pending proceedings, the court may be requested to allow the earlier obtaining or production of evidence, including third-party testimony, where there is reason to fear that such evidence may not be obtained or produced later.

The law recognises attorney-client privilege, encompassing the facts transmitted to each other as well as the work carried out with respect to the subject matter of the dispute.

However, this privilege is controversial in the case of in-house lawyers; neither the law nor the scarce case law makes it possible to ensure that the privilege is maintained in this case.

There are circumstances in which the party may refuse to submit documents, such as if they are privileged or if such presentation:

• violates the privacy of personal and family life, human dignity or professional secrecy;
• causes serious harm to the honour and consideration of a person or close family member; or
• causes serious property damage to such persons.

However, the party may never refuse to submit books and documents relating to its business accounts. Under the terms of Law No 11/15 of June 17, every trader is obliged to file the correspondence issued and received, and their commercial bookkeeping and the documents relating to it, and must keep everything for a period of ten years; after this period, the trader is not obliged to produce such documents.

Furthermore, within the ten-year period, the judicial exhibition of the commercial bookkeeping and related documents can only be ordered in favour of the interested parties, in matters of universal succession, communion or partnership and in the event of insolvency.

Injunctive relief is allowed whenever someone has a justified fear that someone else may cause serious injury – before the action is brought or when it is pending – that becomes difficult to remedy. A further requirement is that the relief sought does not cause greater harm than the outcome intended to be avoided.

The following different kinds of relief injunctions are specified by law:

• seizure of assets;
• impounding of goods;
• suspension of corporate deliberations;
• provisional restitution of possession;
• embargo on new construction; and
• provisional maintenance.

There are also unspecified relief injunctions, usually seeking authorisation to practise certain acts, to subpoena the other party to refrain from certain conduct or to demand the delivery of assets to a depositary.

The procedure for inhibiting someone from taking legal action in another jurisdiction is not foreseen; in any case, such inhibition would only have effect in the Angolan jurisdiction, as it would not be binding in the other jurisdiction.

Alongside the application, the applicant will offer summary evidence of the threatened right and of the fear of injury to that right. The court may order the notice of the opposing party if this does not endanger the purpose of the injunction; if it does, the other party may file an opposition. The court may also decide to hold a hearing for the production of evidence, if deemed necessary.

There is no possibility to request the action outside court hours.

The relief may be obtained without notice being provided to the opposing party for the purpose of opposition, in some cases determined by law and where such notice might compromise the purpose of the relief injunction. In this case, the court may decide to hold a hearing for the production of evidence without the presence of the defendant.

If the injunction is found to be unjustifiable or lapses for reasons attributable to the claimant, the claimant is liable for any damage caused to the other party. The court may rule that the relief granted is made subject to the lodging of a bond by the claimant.

In certain circumstances, the defendant may be allowed to replace the relief granted by a bond.

The injunctive relief should apply only to assets located in the country. Therefore, the court shall not determine that the injunctive relief covers worldwide assets.

Injunctive relief cannot usually be obtained against third parties. However, it may affect third parties to the extent that they may hold any assets on behalf of or owned by the defendant.

If the defendant fails to comply, the consequences depend on the kind of relief awarded. When enforcement is possible (for example, seizure or impounding of goods), the court will adopt all necessary means for such enforcement. In cases where enforcement is not possible, the defendant is liable for the damage they have caused the claimant by not complying.

After the pleadings, there is usually a trial hearing. The hearing is intended for the production of evidence and closing arguments of the parties, although in certain cases the closing arguments in matters of law may be filed after the hearings. Witnesses, experts and parties may be heard at the hearing. During the trial, a judicial inspection may also be carried out.

The length of the trial depends, essentially, on the number of witnesses or the quantity of other evidence to be produced, as well as the complexity of the factual evidence. Both the plaintiff and the opposing defendant may indicate up to 20 witnesses in respect of the grounds of the claim. If there is a counterclaim, they may offer additional witnesses in respect of the grounds of such counterclaim. In any case, either party may offer only three witnesses for each specified fact.

In the simplest cases, there is usually only one hearing. More complex cases may require two or more hearings, for the reasons described above.

There are no deadlines for the hearings. The speed of the proceedings depends on the availability of the court, the complexity of the case and the diligence of the parties.

There are no jury trials in civil cases.

The subject matter regarding which evidence is admissible is previously specified by the court; therefore, only the production of evidence on these specific facts is allowed.

Evidence to be produced at the trial is provided by the parties in advance, once the matter subject to evidence is ruled by the court. The production of all evidence that the party intends to present, such as questioning witnesses and experts, or conducting judicial inspections, as well as requesting documents and information from third parties, should be applied for within the deadline for that purpose, after the court has specified the controversial facts to be proven.

However, documents intended to establish the grounds of the action or of the defence must be filed alongside the pleading in which the facts those documents purport to prove are relied on. When presented later, up to the end of the pleadings, the party who presented it will be subject to a fine, unless it can be shown that it could not have presented the information before. After the pleadings, it is not possible to add documents unless the interested party demonstrates that they could not have been presented earlier.

Notice may be given to the opposing party requesting the submission of documents in its possession that may be of interest to the case. The court may also be required to request documents or information from any other parties.

Parties are permitted to require the production of evidence by experts. The court may also take the same initiative.

The trial hearing is public, except when the court decides otherwise to safeguard people's dignity and public morality, to maintain the confidentiality of any evidence or to ensure the courts' normal functioning.

It is very common for family law hearings to take place behind closed doors, given the sensitivity of the issues discussed in the hearing and the involvement, in some cases, of minors.

The judge is free to intervene not only to maintain the proper functioning of the hearing, but also to question witnesses or experts and to obtain clarifications or information from third parties, whenever they deem it appropriate.

Under civil procedural law, once the argument is over, the court must retire to the conference room to decide, once it has sufficiently clarified the questions of law and fact. However, this is not what happens in practice. Normally, the courts do not decide at the hearings, but only notify the parties of the judgment or sentence they have handed down, either because of the volume of cases pending or because of the complexity of the case.

Initial Complaint

The lawsuit starts with the filing of the initial complaint at the court. After the opposing party has been served the summons, they may reply within a legal deadline (usually 20 calendar days). The defendant may present a counterclaim in the same pleading. After the opposition of the defendant, a further pleading of the plaintiff and of the defendant is allowed in most cases. If there is a counterclaim, or if the defendant has raised legal questions precluding further proceedings, the plaintiff may also reply with a new pleading limited to this new matter.

After this phase, new pleadings will only be admitted if they relate to supervening facts of interest to the cause. If this happens, the opposing party may always respond.

Pre-trial Hearing

The judge may then designate the date for a pre-trial hearing; although it is optional, it is a frequent procedure. The pre-trial hearing seeks a possible conciliation and/or the discussion of some legal aspects raised by the parties in their pleadings.

In pursuing the proceedings, if no agreement was reached, the court will examine the preliminary legal issues and rule whether or not there is any obstacle to the lawsuit proceeding to the merits of the case.

If the court finds that it has all the facts to that effect, it may render its judgment on the merits. If it considers that there are still factual matters to be discussed, it must first rule which specific facts it considers to be already proven and which facts must be substantiated.

This order is subject to the parties' claim and appeal to a higher court. If this happens, the lawsuit will only continue at the lower court after the appeal has been heard in the higher court.

Providing Evidence

After this stage, the parties will indicate the evidence they intend to produce at the trial. The court will then designate the date of the trial hearing. After the trial, the court will render the judgment.

The total length of the proceedings depends on several circumstances, such as the summons procedure (depending on the place of residence of the defendant), the eventuality of an ex parte judgment, the complexity of the case or of evidence to be produced, and interim appeals or other incidents. In the simplest cases, the total length should not exceed one year. In other cases, it can take two or more years. Unfortunately, cases often drag on for five or more years due to their complexity, appeals and the slowness of the courts.

The parties are free to settle the case at any stage of the court proceedings. If they do so, the settlement agreement is subject to subsequent approval by the court, which will be awarded unless the settlement agreement violates any principles of public interest.

The court-approved agreement is part of the judgment and is therefore not considered confidential. However, the court may keep it confidential, at the request of the parties, if there are justified reasons for doing so.

Settlement agreements approved by the court may be enforced in the same way as any other court judgment.

Once approved by the court, the settlement agreements have the same value as a judgment; however, they may be annulled or declared null and void under the same terms as other acts or contracts of the same kind by legal action to that effect.

A successful litigant must be reinstated to their previous position, either in kind or in compensation. The costs of the proceedings shall be borne by the unsuccessful party, and the winning party shall be reimbursed for the amounts it has paid in advance to the court. The winning party is also awarded a fee corresponding to forensic representation fees; however, this amount is calculated according to legal criteria and does not usually correspond to the amounts actually paid to lawyers. If the parties have previously agreed an amount to be paid as legal fees, this is the amount to be awarded to the winning party.

If success is only partial, these awards should be attributed in proportion to that success.

The general rule is that damages should be paid in such a way as to reinstate the offended party as if their right had not been violated. This compensation comprises the gains that the offended party failed to obtain as a normal consequence of the offence. Compensation must also cover moral damage, where it exists.

Civil liability exists, regardless of fault, when someone charges someone else on a particular commission, for the damage caused by the commissioner, provided that the commissioner also has an obligation to compensate.

Where liability is based on mere fault, compensation may be set at a lower value than the damage caused, subject to specific circumstances.

The indemnity resulting from a traffic accident or damage caused by gas or power installations, when the responsible person is not at fault (ie, liability is based on the interest or risk of the activity), has certain limits established by law, according to the kind of consequences and the number of people injured.

The winning party is entitled to interest for the period prior to the judgment, from the due date of the obligation, and to interest accruing after the commencement of the action until the obligation has been fulfilled. In either case, the claim for interest must be filed in the initial complaint and must be expressly granted by the court in the judgment.

In order to enforce a national judgment, enforcement proceedings shall be initiated and attached to the lawsuit in which the judgment was handed down.

Enforcement must have one of the following purposes:

• the payment of a certain amount;
• the delivery of a specific thing; or
• a de facto performance.

Once the enforcement procedure is initiated, the opposing party is given a notice to voluntarily comply. If it fails to do so, the necessary means of enforcement shall be used, which may include the attachment and sale of goods or the judicial delivery of goods to the claimant.

The enforcement in Angola of a judgment rendered by a foreign court is subject to the prior review and confirmation of that judgment by an Angolan higher court. The reviewing and confirmation of the judgment is a lawsuit in which the court does not hear the decision on the merits, but enforces certain legal requirements, namely:

• that there is no doubt about the authenticity of the document containing the judgment or about its intelligibility;
• that the judgment is final – ie, not subject to appeal or any other way of ordinary challenge under the rules of the country of origin;
• that it has been delivered by a court with jurisdiction;
• that lis pendens or the existence of res judicata cannot be invoked, based on legal action carried out at an Angolan court;
• that the defendant has been duly summoned and that, if they have been convicted ex parte (due to non-opposition), the service has been given in person;
• that it does not contain decisions that are contrary to the principles of Angolan public order; and
• that when the judgment is handed down against an Angolan defendant, it does not offend the provisions of Angolan private law when the matter should be resolved by the Angolan conflict of law rules.

In recent decades, the judicial system has been based on just two bodies: the provincial courts and the Supreme Court. The replacement of the provincial courts by District Courts (judicial districts are generally smaller than the provincial division) is currently legislated and in an advanced process of implementation. There are three levels of common courts in this new judicial structure:

• the Supreme Court;
• the Court of Appeal; and
• the District Courts.

The Court of Appeal has already been fully implemented and operational in the provinces of Luanda and Benguela since 2021, so appeals against decisions handed down by the District Courts are now heard by the Court of Appeal; previously, the court of appeal was the Supreme Court.

Furthermore, decisions handed down in cases where the Administrative, Tax and Customs Litigation Chamber of the Supreme Court is competent to judge at first instance can be appealed to the Plenary of the Supreme Court.

It is possible to appeal against judgments given by the lower courts, subject to jurisdiction rules and a minimum amount in controversy. Nonetheless, there is a Constitutional Court ruling that considers it unconstitutional to dismiss an appeal on the grounds of the low value of the claim. According to this ruling, this ground violates the constitutional principle of affective judicial protection. Either party is entitled to appeal the part of the judgment that was unfavourable to it.

Awards of the Court of Appeal are subject to appeal to the Supreme Court, but such appeals are limited to matters of law.

When there is an offence to constitutional principles or rights, awards of the Supreme Court may also be challenged through appeal to the Constitutional Court.

The deadline for lodging an appeal is eight days from the notice of the judgment rendered. The application for an appeal shall be lodged with the court that delivered the judgment (court a quo) and that will rule on its admission. The lawsuit is then remitted to the higher court (court ad quem) for further prosecution of its terms.

There are two kinds of ordinary appeals, depending on whether or not the appeal is in respect to a judgment on the merits. In the case of an appeal of a judgment on the merits, the arguments on the appeal shall be submitted after a notice for that purpose has been given by the higher court, with the maximum deadline of 20 calendar days. In other cases, the arguments shall be submitted at the court a quo, within an eight-day deadline.

An appeal to the Court of Appeal can concern both the facts of the case and points of law. However, in the Supreme Court, the arguments can only concern points of law. The appeal consists of written submissions containing criticisms of the judgment under appeal.

As far as the facts are concerned, there is no further hearing in the higher court for the production of evidence; arguments concerning the evidence must be based on the evidence already filed. The trial of the appeal consists of a conference of judges who make up the Court of Appeal and who will discuss and issue the judgment.

There are no court-imposed conditions for the admission of an appeal.

The Court of Appeal may uphold, annul or replace the judgment under appeal.

Responsibility for the costs of litigation is ruled on by the court in the judgment. The liability for court costs shall be attributed to the unsuccessful party; in the case of partial success, the liability may be assigned to both parties in proportion to their failure.

Recoverable costs are those costs paid upfront to the court. The court should also award compensation to the winning party for attorney costs, but this calculation follows a formula that generally does not correspond to actual attorney costs. Where there is an agreement between the parties on the costs of litigation to be borne by the unsuccessful party, the court shall order the unsuccessful party to pay such amount as agreed between the parties.

When there is no contractual arrangement between the parties, the costs are always calculated according to legal rules and limits. The court may also award compensation to the winning party when it considers that the losing party has litigated in bad faith and the winning party requests such compensation.

If the losing party does not agree with the costs to be paid, it can challenge the final account by applying to the court that so decided, which must respond in writing, and whose decision can be appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Interest is not calculated on court costs.

Law No 12/16 of 12 August 2016 provides for conflict mediation and conciliation rules. The establishment of these conflict resolution mechanisms is a recent addition to Angola law and is increasingly accepted for minor conflicts.

There is an ongoing reform of the arbitration law.

Conflict resolution mechanisms are always voluntary and constitute a non-judicial form of conflict resolution. Usually, the proceedings are initiated on the initiative of one of the interested parties. These proceedings may also be requested by a court, Labour General Inspectorate or public prosecutor, but in these cases the procedure will only continue if the parties agree to mediate or conciliate. However, the final agreements between the parties in the mediation or conciliation proceedings may be enforced by a court.

The law provides for public and private mediation and conciliation centres. The existing ones have an acceptable level of organisation, and their procedures are reasonably quick.

Voluntary arbitration is governed by Law No 16/03 of 25 July 2003. Arbitration may be conducted by an ad hoc court or by an institutional one, chosen by the parties. There are a few institutional arbitral courts currently in existence.

Disputes over non-disposable rights or even those disputes subject to obligatory arbitration or to judicial courts are excluded from voluntary arbitration.

Some restrictions apply to the signing of voluntary arbitration agreements by the State; when the State is a party, arbitration is allowed in private law issues, administrative contracts and other cases specifically provided for by law.

Minors and interdicted or disabled persons cannot enter into arbitration agreements, nor are arbitration agreements allowed on their behalf. In exceptional cases, minors and interdicted or incapacitated persons may intervene in arbitration proceedings within the scope of agreements entered into by their legal representatives by way of hereditary succession. In other words, since business deals are not usually extinguished by the death of the contracting party, minors and incapacitated or disabled persons may succeed their legal representatives who are parties to the business deal in the arbitration proceedings, in the event of the representative's death.

Arbitral awards may be challenged on the following grounds:

• the subject matter of the dispute is legally excluded from arbitral award;
• the award was given by an arbitral court without jurisdiction;
• the arbitration agreement has expired;
• the award was given by an irregularly constituted court;
• there was a lack of reasoning;
• there has been an offence to any of the principles of equal treatment of the parties, to the opportunity for defence at all stages of the proceedings and to the opportunity for closing arguments, either oral or written, prior to the final award;
• the arbitral court has ruled on matters that it should not hear, or has not ruled on questions on which it should have ruled; and
• there has been a breach of the principles of public interest of the Angolan legal system.

The award of an Angolan arbitral court may be enforced by judicial courts in the event of a failure to comply. The judicial court will confirm the jurisdiction of the arbitral court, upon application of the interested party, and enforcement proceedings will follow the same rules as apply to the enforcement of a judicial court judgment.

Angola acceded to the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in 2017 and has since adopted the provisions of that Convention.

Reform of the arbitration law is ongoing, but no date has yet been set for its publication.