Insurance & Reinsurance 2026 Comparisons

The primary legislation regulating the Indian insurance sector is the Insurance Act 1938 (the “Insurance Act”) and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act 1999 (the “IRDA Act”). In 2024, the Ministry of Finance proposed significant amendments to the Insurance Act and the IRDA Act through the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill 2024, which – if brought into force in its current form – will result in various significant changes to registration requirements and operational matters. The Bill, however, is yet to be tabled before the Indian Parliament.

The Marine Insurance Act 1963 has its basis in the UK Marine Insurance Act 1906. Although the Marine Insurance Act primarily regulates marine insurance, Indian courts (akin to those in the UK) have applied some of its principles to non-marine insurance contracts.

Indian courts are constitutionally mandated to follow the precedent system, based on the doctrine of stare decisis, as far as questions of law are concerned. The lower courts are bound to follow the decisions of the courts above them in the hierarchy. Therefore, the decisions of the Supreme Court of India are binding on all lower courts. However, it is not uncommon to see conflicting decisions.

Insurance and reinsurance companies and insurance intermediaries in India are governed by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI). Insurance entities established in the International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) in India are also governed by the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA).

Pursuant to the powers granted to the IRDAI under the IRDA Act, the IRDAI has issued various regulations governing the licensing and functioning of insurers, reinsurers and insurance intermediaries. The regulations issued by the IRDAI govern a wide range of aspects, including:

• registration of Indian insurance and reinsurance companies and foreign reinsurance branch (FRB) offices;
• registration of insurance intermediaries;
• establishment and closure of liaison offices in India by an insurance company registered outside India;
• the assets and solvency margins required to be maintained by insurers;
• issuance of capital;
• manner of preparation of financial statements;
• commission/remuneration and expenses of management (EOM) limits;
• outsourcing arrangements; and
• corporate governance norms for companies operating in the insurance sector.

The regulations issued by the IRDAI govern all insurers – namely:

• life insurers;
• general insurers;
• standalone health insurers; and
• reinsurers.

In addition, the IRDAI regulations govern all insurance intermediaries, which are:

• insurance brokers;
• corporate agents;
• web aggregators;
• third-party administrators;
• surveyors and loss assessors; and
• insurance marketing firms.

Further, the Foreign Exchange Management (Insurance) Regulations 2015 (the “FEMA Insurance Regulations”) regulate the manner in which a person resident in India (ie, a person who has been residing in India for more than 182 days in the preceding financial year) can take or continue to hold a general insurance or a life insurance policy issued by an insurer outside India. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also issued “Master Direction – Insurance” on 1 January 2016 (amended on 7 December 2021), which – read with the FEMA Insurance Regulations – provides guidance on various issues, including issuing policies, collecting premiums, and settling claims with regard to general, life and health insurance policies from insurers outside India.

Under the Insurance Act, an Indian insurance company is permitted to carry out insurance business in India. An Indian insurance company is a public limited company formed under the Companies Act 2013 that exclusively carries out life insurance business, general insurance business, health insurance business or reinsurance business.

An entity that seeks to carry out insurance business is required to apply for a certificate of registration from the IRDAI in accordance with a three-stage process set out under the IRDAI (Registration, Capital Structure, Transfer of Shares and Amalgamation of Insurers) Regulations 2024 (the “Registration Regulations”).

A certificate of registration is required for each category of insurance business (ie, life, general, standalone health, and reinsurance). In addition, the Registration Regulations set out the essential requirements that an applicant applying for registration is required to fulfil, including (but not limited to):

• permissible foreign investment limits;
• minimum capitalisation requirements;
• minimum qualifications of the directors and principal officers;
• planned infrastructure; and
• general track record of conduct and performance of each of the Indian promoters and foreign investors in the business or profession they are engaged in.

The applicant must also provide adequate documentation in support of their application, as prescribed under the Registration Regulations.

Foreign Reinsurers

The Insurance Act permits the establishment of FRBs as well as the setting up of service companies under the Lloyd’s India framework. Foreign insurers and syndicates of Lloyd’s may apply for registration of a foreign reinsurer branch in accordance with the IRDAI (Registration and Operations of Foreign Reinsurers Branches and Lloyd’s India) Regulations 2024 (the “FRB Regulations”).

The FRB Regulations specify the eligibility criteria of a foreign reinsurer, such as:

• credit rating;
• infusion of minimum assigned capital into the foreign reinsurer branch;
• in-principle clearance from the home-country regulator; and
• minimum solvency margin and net-owned funds.

Further, foreign reinsurers can also be registered with the IRDAI as cross-border reinsurers (CBRs) in accordance with the Master Circular on Reinsurance 2024 (the “Reinsurance Master Circular”). The Reinsurance Master Circular categorises CBRs into two categories (“eligible CBRs” and “non-eligible CBRs”) – based on the eligibility criteria stipulated at R4(1) of the IRDAI (Reinsurance) Regulations 2018 (the “Reinsurance Regulations”) – and allows for auto-renewal of a CBR’s permission (by way of a filing reference number).

A foreign reinsurer may also apply to the IFSCA to set up a branch within the IFSC and obtain registration as an IIO for carrying out reinsurance business. In order to set up an International Financial Service Centre Insurance Office (IIO), a foreign reinsurer is required to comply with the IFSCA (Registration of Insurance Business) Regulations 2021 (the “IIO Regulations”) (which was recently amended by way of IFSCA (Registration of Insurance Business) (Amendment) Regulations 2024) and the IFSCA (Operation of International Financial Services Centres Insurance Office) Guidelines 2021 (the “IIO Guidelines”), which govern the registration requirements for an entity seeking to conduct reinsurance business in the IFSC. The IFSCA (Management Control, Administrative Control and Market Conduct of Insurance Business) Regulations 2023 provide guidance in relation to the managerial and administrative functions of IIOs.

Premiums received on account of insurance and reinsurance business are subject to applicable taxes, including the goods and services tax. Income tax laws provide deductions for the policyholder on life and health insurance premiums paid. In the case of AXA France Vie India v Union of India & Ors (WP(C)No 4136/2024), the central government exempted the payment of goods and services tax on certain specified life and general government insurance schemes.

Overseas, non-admitted insurers cannot write direct insurance business in India. As a general rule, the purchase of insurance from overseas insurers by Indian residents is prohibited in India, unless the purchase falls within the general or specific approval of the RBI.

Non-admitted insurers who have registered with the IRDAI as CBRs can write reinsurance of Indian risks from overseas in accordance with the Reinsurance Regulations. In addition, the IRDAI issued Guidelines on the Establishment and Closure of Liaison Office in India by an Insurance Company Registered Outside India on 17 October 2022, which lay down the framework for overseas insurers to open liaison offices in India.

Indian residents are permitted to purchase health insurance policies from overseas insurers, provided the aggregate remittance (including premium) does not exceed the limits prescribed by the RBI under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme. Indian residents are also permitted to purchase insurance policies in respect of any property in India or any ship, vessel or aircraft registered in India from an insurer whose principal place of business is outside India – albeit only with the IRDAI’s prior permission.

The overarching regulatory framework for reinsurance is set out in the Reinsurance Regulations. The guiding principle is maximising retention within India, so each insurer must maintain the maximum possible retention commensurate with its financial strength, risk quality, and volume of business, and ensure it is not merely “fronting” for a reinsurer or retrocessionaire. In this context, fronting is defined as a process of transferring risk in which an Indian insurer cedes, or retrocedes, most or all of the assumed risk to a reinsurer or retrocessionaire.

The IRDAI has issued the IRDAI (Reinsurance) (Amendment) Regulations 2023, which modified the existing Reinsurance Regulations in an attempt to “harmonise the provisions of various regulations applicable to Indian insurers and Indian reinsurers (including FRBs and IIOs), encourage more reinsurers to set up business in India, and enhance ease of doing business”. In this respect, the amendment introduced various changes in relation to reinsurance placements by Indian cedants – for example, streamlining the “order of preference” from six to four levels and simplifying the various filing requirements for cedants.

Acquiring Stakes

The insurance sector has, in recent years, been abuzz with news of new players seeking to acquire stakes in insurance companies and intermediaries. Although such restructuring is a complicated process in itself, the approval requirements stipulated by the IRDAI additionally extend the process. Sections 35, 36 and 37 of the Insurance Act prescribe the procedure for obtaining the approval of the IRDAI for amalgamation and transfer of insurance business of insurers. The IRDAI has also notified scheme rules prescribing the procedures insurers must comply with for the purpose of amalgamations and transfers of business under the Registration Regulations.

The parties are required to prepare a scheme that sets out the agreement under which the transfer or amalgamation is proposed to be effected and contains such further provisions as may be necessary to give effect to the scheme. Two months prior to making an application to the IRDAI for the approval of this scheme, a notice of intention to make such application must be sent to the IRDAI along with a statement of the nature of the transaction and the reasons thereof, as well as four certified copies of the following documents:

• a draft of the agreement or deed under which it is proposed to effect the amalgamation or transfer;
• balance sheets in respect of the insurance business of each of the insurers concerned in such amalgamation or transfer;
• a report on the proposed amalgamation or transfer, prepared by an independent actuary who has never been professionally connected to any of the parties concerned in the amalgamation or transfer in the preceding five years;
• actuarial reports and abstracts in respect of the insurance business of each of the insurers; and
• any other reports on which the scheme of amalgamation or transfer was founded.

The statutory and regulatory framework lays down the manner in which approval from the IRDAI may be sought, the documents required and the pre- and post-approval actions that must be complied with by the parties.

Amalgamations

In addition to the foregoing, pursuant to the powers conferred under Section 37A of the Insurance Act, the IRDAI also has the power to prepare a scheme for the amalgamation of an insurer with another insurer if the IRDAI is satisfied that such an amalgamation is necessary either:

• in the public interest;
• in the interest of policyholders;
• in order to secure the proper management of an insurer; or
• in the interest of the insurance business of the country as a whole.

Transferring the amalgamation of the business of an insurer without the approval of the IRDAI is also grounds for suspension of the insurer’s certificate as issued by the IRDAI. The IRDAI clarified in the Registration Regulations that provisions concerning the transfer of shares will apply mutatis mutandis to the creation of a pledge or any other encumbrance over the shares of an insurer.

The IRDAI has issued regulations setting out the licensing or registration requirements and procedures for all recognised intermediaries, including insurance agents, corporate agents, brokers, surveyors, third-party administrators, web aggregators, insurance repositories and insurance marketing firms. The IRDAI (Insurance Intermediaries) (Amendment) Regulations 2022 amends the maximum number of arrangements that a corporate agent is permitted to enter into with life, general and health insurers under the IRDAI (Registration of Corporate Agents) Regulations 2015, in addition to amending the maximum limit of tie-ups permitted to insurance marketing firms with life, general and health insurers and increasing their area of operation under the IRDAI (Registration of Insurance Marketing Firms) Regulations 2015.

Individual Insurance Agents

An application for a licence to operate as an individual insurance agent is required to comply with the conditions provided under the Insurance Act and the regulations issued by the IRDAI in this regard. Individual agents must have completed practical training and possess the requisite knowledge to solicit insurance business before applying for a licence. Individual agents are expected to engage only in insurance distribution services and are permitted to solicit business only for one insurance company in each class of insurance business.

Corporate Agents

Entities eligible to operate as corporate agents include firms, banks, non-banking financial companies, co-operative societies, NGOs and companies. Corporate agents are permitted to engage in any business as their main business, apart from insurance distribution. However, if a corporate agent has a main business other than insurance distribution, it is not permitted to make the sale of its products contingent on the sale of an insurance product (or vice versa). Corporate agents are allowed to have arrangements with a maximum of nine insurers in each class of insurance business.

Insurance Brokers

Insurance brokers are required to exclusively carry out the distribution of insurance products. Any company, limited liability partnership or co-operative society may apply to the IRDAI for the grant of an insurance broker certificate of registration. Applicants can register as direct brokers, reinsurance brokers, or composite brokers (involved in both direct and reinsurance broking). The minimum capital is INR7.5 million for direct brokers, INR40 million for reinsurance brokers and INR50 million for composite brokers. All insurance brokers are required to be part of the Insurance Brokers Association of India.

Insurance Marketing Firms

Entities that are licensed as insurance marketing firms are permitted to distribute insurance products along with mutual funds, pension products and certain other financial products, provided that permissions are in place to distribute those financial products from the respective regulator. Insurance marketing firms are required to have a minimum net worth of INR1 million. They are also permitted to undertake survey functions through licensed surveyors employed on their rolls, as well as policy servicing activities and other activities permitted to be outsourced by insurers under the applicable regulatory framework. Insurance marketing firms are allowed to have tie-ups with a maximum of six insurers in each class of insurance business.

Web Aggregators

An entity, such as a company or a limited liability partnership, that is registered as a web aggregator is permitted to display on its website information on insurance products of those insurers with whom the web aggregator has entered into an agreement. The web aggregator is also permitted to display product comparisons on its website, carry out activities for lead generation, and share leads with insurers. A web aggregator must have a minimum capital of INR2.5 million.

Point-of-Sales Persons

The IRDAI has issued guidance on the appointment of a point-of-sale person (POSP) for the solicitation and servicing of point-of-sale products on behalf of life, general, and health insurers. A POSP may be appointed by either an insurer or an insurance intermediary. The entity engaging the POSP is required to train the POSP and conduct an in-house examination of such POSP in accordance with the norms issued by the IRDAI.

Motor Insurance Service Providers

The IRDAI issued Guidelines on Motor Insurance Service Providers 2017 (the “MISP Guidelines”) to regulate the role of automobile dealers in the distribution and servicing of motor insurance products. A duly registered motor insurance service provider (MISP) is permitted to solicit, procure and service motor insurance policies for insurers or insurance intermediaries (as the case may be) in accordance with the provisions of the MISP Guidelines.

All insurance policies in India contain insuring clauses, general conditions, exclusions and definition sections. The insuring clause, exclusion, and definition wording depend on the type of policy being issued and the type of cover requested, although the conditions are fairly standard and will include notification, co-operation, consent, changes in material risk, and other insurance clauses. These clauses can be deleted or modified by way of endorsements.

Insurance contract wording is highly regulated in India. The Tariff Advisory Committee (TAC)—a statutory body established under the Insurance Act—issued standard policy terms and conditions for fire, marine (hull), motor, engineering, industrial risks, and workers’ compensation insurance. These standardised terms cannot be altered by insurers, and most businesses are still required to follow them. However, the tariff general regulations, terms, conditions, clauses, warranties, policy, add-ons, endorsement wording, and proposal form applicable to specific coverage under fire and allied perils insurance business, governed by the erstwhile All India Fire Tariff 2001, have been de-notified with effect from 1 April 2021. The other remaining tariffed lines under fire, motor (ie, All India Motor Tariff), engineering, marine and workers’ compensation also stand de-notified with effect from 1 April 2024.

For health insurance policies, the IRDAI had previously specified a standard set of definitions, general conditions, exclusions, standard nomenclature for critical illnesses, and a standard list of generally excluded expenses. However, pursuant to the IRDAI (Insurance Products) Regulations 2024 (the “Products Regulations”) and the IRDAI’s Master Circular on Health Insurance Business 2024 of 29 May 2024 (the “Health Master Circular”), the IRDAI has done away with the above-mentioned standardisation requirements and now offers more flexibility to health insurers vis-à-vis coverage and presentation of health insurance policies.

Policy Terms

There are also extraneous rules that affect policy terms – for example, the Insurance Act gives the policyholder the right to override contrary policy terms in favour of Indian law. The IRDAI (Protection of Policyholders’ Interests, Operations and Allied Matters of Insurers) Regulations 2024 (the “Policyholders Regulations”) along with the IRDAI’s Master Circular on Operations and Allied Matters of Insurers of 19 June 2024 and Master Circular on Protection of Policyholders’ Interests 2024 of 5 September 2024 prescribe certain matters to be mandatorily incorporated in life insurance, general insurance and health insurance policies. Some of the key requirements are:

• the name and unique identification number (UIN) allotted by the IRDAI for the product, its terms and conditions, and details of the sales person;
• benefits payable and the contingencies upon which these are payable, as well as the other terms and conditions of the insurance contract, including any riders/endorsements;
• details of the nominee(s);
• the premiums payable, frequency of payment, grace period allowed, and implications of discontinuing the payment of an instalment of the premium;
• any special clauses, exclusions or conditions imposed on the policy;
• the address and email of the insurer to which all communications in respect of the policy must be sent;
• details of the insurer’s internal grievance redressal mechanism, along with the right of the insured to approach the insurance ombudsman that has the requisite territorial jurisdiction;
• procedure to register a claim/grievance;
• issuance of the Customer Information Sheet; and
• the list of documents that are normally required to be submitted in the event of a claim.

Where exclusions are to be stipulated in the policy, the Policyholders Regulations require that – wherever possible – insurers must endeavour to classify the exclusions into the following:

• standard exclusions applicable to all policies;
• policy-specific exclusions that cannot be waived; and
• exclusions that can be opted for a cover by paying an additional premium.

Similarly, to provide the policyholder with clarity and understanding of the conditions, insurers are also required to try to broadly categorise policy conditions into the following:

• conditions precedent to the contract;
• conditions applicable during the contract;
• conditions when a claim arises;
• conditions for the renewal of the contract;
• conditions for cancellation of the contract; and
• conditions for grievance redressal.

Although a broad product classification based on the target customer base exists under general insurance and health insurance policies in India, the above-mentioned requirements apply uniformly to both consumer and commercial contracts.

In 2020–21, the IRDAI standardised various general, health, and life insurance policy wordings that insurance companies must follow. However, the IRDAI has recently expressly repealed such standardised wordings, except for four standardised products: two life insurance and two health insurance policies.

Good Faith and Other Obligations

It is a fundamental principle of insurance law that utmost good faith (uberrimae fide) must be observed by the contracting parties. The duty of utmost good faith places an obligation on the insured to voluntarily disclose all material facts that are relevant to the risk being insured. If there has been a misrepresentation or non-disclosure of a material fact, an insurer can avoid the policy from the beginning. Even though a policy may not expressly say so, all insurance policies are based on this principle.

Further, the Indian Marine Insurance Act 1963 and the Policyholders Regulations mandate that an insured is under an obligation to disclose all material information sought by the insurer in the proposal before the inception of the policy. An insurer is therefore entitled to receive full and fair disclosure of the material information that would influence the judgment of the insurer in determining whether to accept or reject the risk. The Supreme Court of India has stated that this is to be done through the proposal form and through the representation made during the course of negotiations.

The Policyholders Regulations also impose an obligation on the insured to disclose all material information in the proposal form. This forbids the insured from concealing what they privately know with a view to drawing the insurer into a bargain based on their ignorance of that fact. The insured’s duty to disclose is not confined to the facts that are within its knowledge but, rather, extends to all material information that the insured ought to have known. The duty of good faith is a continuing obligation that applies to both the insured and the insurer, and it continues throughout the policy period and even thereafter.

Recently, the Supreme Court of India reiterated the law that the insured cannot make a profit. Once the insured has been paid by one insurer, it cannot claim for the same loss from another insurer.

An insurer is entitled to receive a fair presentation of the risk. As mentioned in 6.1 Obligations of the Insured and Insurer, if there is a misrepresentation or non-disclosure of a material fact, the insurer has the right to void the policy ab initio. Unless the misrepresentation or non-disclosure was fraudulent, the premium must be returned to the policyholder. In the case of life insurance policies, the policy cannot be called into question on any grounds (including fraud) after more than three years from the date of issuance or the policy’s revival. Similarly, insurers are restricted from contesting health insurance policies (issued by general/health insurers) after five years of continuous coverage on the grounds of non-disclosure and misrepresentation (except for established fraud).

An insurance intermediary involved in contract negotiation is required to consider a prospect’s needs when recommending insurance. Intermediaries are expected to act in the interest of policyholders.

Insurance is a contract of indemnity. In addition to the requirements of a valid contract as per the Indian Contract Act 1872, the person entering into the contract of insurance must also have an insurable interest in the subject matter of the contract. The element of insurable interest must be present in all types of insurance – failing which, it would simply be a wagering contract that would be void.

An insurance contract is required to contain certain mandatory clauses, as enumerated in 6.1 Obligations of the Insured and Insurer.

The present regulatory framework does not set out express norms on the payment of claims to unnamed insureds. Typically, therefore, coverage of such parties largely depends on the terms and conditions of the underlying insurance policy.

The Reinsurance Regulations issued by the IRDAI define a contract of reinsurance as a legally binding document for all parties that provides a complete, accurate, and definitive record of all terms and conditions and other provisions of the reinsurance contract. Reinsurance arrangements do not need to be pre-approved by the IRDAI.

ART is expressly recognised in India by way of the Reinsurance Regulations. The Reinsurance Regulations stipulate that an Indian insurer intending to adopt ART solutions must submit such proposals to the IRDAI, which may, after necessary examination and upon being satisfied with the type of ART solution, allow the ART proposal on a case-by-case basis. The Reinsurance Regulations do not expressly set out the benchmarks based on which the IRDAI will examine these proposals.

Per the directions of the IRDAI issued in 2004, any ART arrangement must be accounted for based on the principle of “substance over form”. If the agreement is in the form of reinsurance coupled with a financing arrangement, and the components are capable of being separated, each element should be accounted for in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

However, when the aforementioned components are inseparable, the entire arrangement should be treated as a financial transaction and accounted for accordingly. All non-life insurers must account for ART arrangements based on the “substance over form” principle in accordance with GAAP.

When interpreting insurance contracts, Indian courts have held that, in construing the terms of an insurance contract, the words used therein must be given paramount importance, and it is not permitted for the court to add, delete, or substitute any words. It has also been observed that the terms of an insurance policy have to be strictly construed in order to determine the extent of the liability of the insurer, given that, upon issuance of an insurance policy, the insurer undertakes to indemnify the loss suffered by the insured on account of risks covered by the policy.

The general rule is that oral evidence cannot be submitted to explain or vary the terms of a written contract. While contracts must be construed according to the parties’ intention, that intention can only be determined from the written instrument itself. All other evidence of intention is excluded because, when an agreement is reduced to writing, the parties thereto are bound by the terms and conditions of that agreement.

In the event that any policy provision is ambiguous or there is uncertainty as to its meaning or intention, it must be construed contra proferentem – that is, against the maker of the document.

Warranties are the clauses that form the basis of the insurance contract. Usually, clauses intended to operate as warranties are expressly stated to be so in the insurance policies. All warranties under an insurance policy must be strictly complied with, whether material to the risk or not. If a warranty is breached, an insurer is discharged from all liability under the policy. The Supreme Court of India has held that mere knowledge on the part of the insurer that the insured had breached a warranty would not, in the absence of an express representation by the insured, amount to a waiver.

Usually, an insurance policy will expressly state the provisions that are conditions precedent to liability. If any condition precedent has been breached, the insurer has the right to repudiate the claim. However, where it is not expressly stated, the Indian courts will make efforts to decide whether a particular clause is merely a condition or a condition precedent to the insurer’s liability.

Insurance policies are structured to incorporate comprehensive mechanisms for dispute resolution, both in respect of coverage and quantum disputes. Insurance policies typically include details of the insurance ombudsman appointed to address insureds’ complaints (inter alia) regarding the settlement of claims.

The IRDAI requires insurers to formulate a grievance redressal policy and file it with the IRDAI. An insurer is also required to provide the details of the grievance redressal mechanism within the policy. Insureds who have complaints against insurers must first approach the grievance or customer complaints department of the insurer. If the insurer fails to reply or the insured is not satisfied with the insurer’s reply, the insured can approach the insurance ombudsman, provided:

• the claim value is up to INR5 million (approximately USD60,000); and
• the complaint is made within one year from:
1. the date of the rejection of the complaint by the insurer; or
2. the expiry of one month following filing the complaint if the insurer fails to reply.

Insurers are required to form a part of the Integrated Grievance Management System put in place by the IRDAI to facilitate the registration/tracking of complaints online by the insureds. In cases of delay or no response relating to policies and claims, the IRDAI can take up matters with the insurers to ensure speedy resolution. Although the insureds can approach the IRDAI for assistance, advocates, agents, and other third parties are not permitted to do so.

Insureds

Insureds have no exclusive judicial forums available to them for the resolution of insurance or reinsurance disputes. Insureds, however, are treated in law as consumers of insurance services and can therefore approach the consumer courts for relief. Insureds can also approach commercial courts or civil courts, depending upon the value of the claim, or can invoke arbitration for recovering monies under an insurance policy – provided the insurance policy contains an arbitration clause. However, the right to approach a consumer forum exists even where an arbitration clause is in place.

Disputes before consumer forums

Consumer courts follow a three-tier hierarchy, which – in ascending order – is as follows:

• the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (the “District Commission”);
• the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (the “State Commission”); and
• the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (the “National Commission”).

Consumer courts have the jurisdiction to deal with complaints arising out of a contract for services or goods involving allegations of “deficiency in service”. The District Commission can entertain complaints where the consideration does not exceed INR5 million (approximately USD60,000). For the State Commission, the threshold is from INR5,000,001 (approximately USD60,000) up to INR20 million (approximately USD236,000), whereas the National Commission can adjudicate original complaints where the consideration is above INR20 million (approximately USD236,000). The District Commission and the State Commission must also possess the necessary territorial jurisdiction.

A person availing a service for commercial purposes is excluded from the definition of a “consumer” under Indian law. Recently, the Supreme Court of India in National Insurance Co Ltd v Harsolia Motors (2023 INSC 367) has clarified that an insured comes within the scope of “consumer”, given that availing an insurance policy is an act of indemnifying a risk of loss/damages and there is therefore no element of profit generation generally. The Supreme Court of India has held that the relevant consideration in determining if an insured is a “consumer” is whether the items sold, or services offered, are directly related to the activity that generates profit for the insured. In another landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India held that an insured cannot make a profit from an insurance policy and – once an insured has been paid by one insurer – it cannot claim the same loss from another insurer.

Disputes before civil/commercial courts

Insureds can also file a commercial suit against an insurer for enforcing their claims. The Commercial Courts Act 2015 (the “CCA 2015”) recognises insurance disputes exceeding a value of approximately INR300,000 (approximately USD3,600) as commercial disputes and provides for a fast-track procedure for adjudicating disputes. The Supreme Court in Patil Automation (P) Ltd v Rakheja Engineers (P) Ltd (2022 INSC 841) has clarified that it is mandatory for parties to undergo mediation before filing a commercial suit, unless urgent interim relief is sought. The urgent interim relief sought must be genuine and bona fide and not a mere attempt to wriggle out of mediation.

Coverage, Limitation Periods and Beneficiaries

Disputes pertaining to coverage are rarely arbitrated. Insurance policies generally provide for arbitration in the case of quantum disputes only and coverage disputes are usually excluded. The exception to such exclusions may, in certain cases, be liability policies.

The limitation period for making an insurance claim before a consumer court is two years. For commercial suits and arbitration, the limitation period is three years from the date of rejection of the claim by an insurer or from the date on which the claim arose, whichever is applicable.

Unnamed beneficiaries or third parties cannot enforce rights under a general insurance contract. Typically, general insurance contracts have clauses that prohibit the assignment of rights under an insurance contract to a third party without the consent of the insurer.

Indian courts are increasingly enforcing the choice of law and jurisdiction made by parties in a contract. Party autonomy is respected, except where public interest or policy issues are involved. Where an express choice of law and jurisdiction has not been specified in a contract, Indian courts will usually apply conflict-of-law principles to determine the forum and law that are closest to the dispute. Even in the case of arbitration, a similar approach has been followed. India is a signatory to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (the “New York Convention”) and the Geneva Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1927 (the “Geneva Convention”) for the enforcement of foreign awards.

An insured may, depending on the facts of the case, approach a civil/commercial court or a consumer court. Proceedings before the consumer courts are summary in nature. This means that typically no cross-examination of witnesses takes place and the dispute is adjudicated based on the documents filed and arguments led by the parties.

The broad ascending hierarchy of the civil courts is similar to that of the consumer courts. It comprises 688 district courts, 25 High Courts, and the Supreme Court of India (the highest court in India). Out of the 25 High Courts, five High Courts – namely, the High Courts of Calcutta, Madras, Bombay, Delhi and Himachal Pradesh – have original jurisdiction, which means that matters exceeding particular pecuniary thresholds will be heard by the High Court in the first instance. For some of these five High Courts, there are territorial limits within which the cause of action must arise for it to be heard by the High Court at the first instance.

Trials before the civil courts follow the usual process of pleadings, evidence and arguments as in other common-law jurisdictions. As such, they can take an unusually long time to conclude.

Special Benches

The CCA 2015 carves out special benches in all existing civil courts to exclusively adjudicate commercial matters. Since the CCA 2015 recognised insurance disputes as commercial disputes, all insurance disputes valued above INR300,000 (approximately USD3,600) are now required to be filed before a commercial court with appropriate territorial jurisdiction at the district level or before the High Court having original jurisdiction if the dispute so qualifies and are no longer filed before civil courts. There are strict timelines that all commercial courts need to follow and the CCA 2015 is meant to speed up the adjudication process. The CCA 2015 also provides for compulsory mediation for parties before filing a commercial suit, except where a party seeks urgent interim relief.

Appeals against the orders of commercial courts of first instance lie before a commercial appellate court or a commercial appellate division of the High Court concerned (as the case may be). The CCA 2015 does not allow any further appeals against orders of either the commercial appellate court or the commercial appellate division of a High Court; only a Special Leave Petition can be filed before the Supreme Court of India. It is at the discretion of the Supreme Court of India to entertain such a petition, which it does sparingly.

Indian litigation can often be time-consuming and potentially expensive. The number of reported pending cases exceeds 50 million. Attempts to clear the backlog have not yielded the desired results, even though the inception of commercial courts has somewhat expedited the trial process.

The Indian Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) lays down the procedure for the enforcement of Indian and foreign judgments. A judgment or decree passed by a court in India can be enforced either by the court that passed it or by the court to which it is sent for execution. With regard to the enforcement of a foreign judgment or decree, the basic principle that is followed is to examine whether the foreign judgment or decree is a conclusive one in terms of Section 13 of the CPC, based on the merits of the case and passed by a superior court of a reciprocating territory as notified by the Indian government. Furthermore, a foreign judgment can be enforced in India by filing an execution petition under Section 44-A of the CPC before an appropriate district court (as defined under the CPC); this also includes High Courts with original civil jurisdiction.

A foreign judgment passed by a court in a non-reciprocating territory is not directly enforceable in India and a fresh suit may be filed on the basis of the foreign judgment or decree. In such situations, the foreign judgment is considered of evidentiary value only under Section 88 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. The process of enforcement of judgments can also prove to be slow in such cases.

Domestic Arbitration

Typically, Indian courts strictly enforce arbitration clauses. This position also holds true for insurance and reinsurance contracts.

The courts will generally refer a dispute to arbitration after determining whether an arbitration agreement exists and will leave the arbitral tribunal to decide issues such as novation, settlement, arbitrability, and limitation. Additionally, the courts have held that a party that has approached a consumer commission cannot be forced to arbitrate the dispute (where such an agreement exists), as the Consumer Protection Act 2019 (the “Consumer Protection Act”) is a beneficial legislation and provides the consumer with an independent right of action.

Furthermore, in many insurance agreements, the arbitration clause provides for a quantum-only arbitration (ie, if the insurer denies liability, the arbitration clause cannot be triggered). However, in cases where such denial is based on the execution of a discharge voucher or settlement agreement by an insured, the dispute will still be referred to arbitration, with the question of settlement being left open for the tribunal to decide.

Form of Arbitration Agreement

An arbitration agreement, as per the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the “Arbitration Act”), must be in writing and signed by the parties. Although it is advisable to have an arbitration clause in the contract itself, it is not mandatory. An arbitration agreement may also arise if it is contained in a subsequent exchange of letters, telex, telegrams, or other means of telecommunications (including electronic means) that provide a record of the intent to arbitrate.

The agreement should reflect the parties’ intention to submit their dispute(s) to arbitration. The Supreme Court of India has recently clarified that the mere use of the words “arbitration” or “arbitrator” in a clause in the contract cannot constitute a binding arbitration agreement between the parties, especially if it requires further or fresh consent from the parties.

Generally, there is no prescribed form required for the purpose of an arbitration agreement. However, with regard to insurance policies, the IRDAI issued a circular dated 27 October 2023 (the “Circular”) directing that all insurance policies issued under the commercial lines of business must have a mandatory arbitration clause stipulating that “the parties to the contract may mutually agree and enter into a separate arbitration agreement to settle any and all disputes in relation to this policy”. If the parties mutually agree on an arbitration agreement, then the arbitration proceedings will be conducted as per the provisions of the Arbitration Act. The Circular has further deleted arbitration clauses from all polices under the retail lines of business prospectively. For existing retail policies, the arbitration clause shall remain valid until the policy expires, unless a policyholder specifically requests the insurer to replace it with the clause mandated by the IRDAI. This also applies to all existing policies issued under the commercial lines of business.

A seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India – in a curative petition titled In Re: Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements Under the Arbitration Act and the Indian Stamp Act 1899 (2023 INSC 1066) – has held that unstamped or inadequately stamped arbitration agreements are inadmissible as evidence but not void. The Supreme Court of India held that non-payment of stamp duty is a curable defect, and any objection to the stamping of the agreement falls within the ambit of the arbitral tribunal.

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Cox & Kings Ltd vs SAP India (P) Ltd (2024 INSC 670) held that even non-signatories can be bound by an arbitration agreement if they clearly intended to be part of the contractual arrangement. Such intent is to be inferred from their conduct and involvement in negotiating, performing, or terminating the contract. In order to bind a non-signatory, courts must holistically assess factors such as mutual intention of the parties, composite nature of the transaction, commonality of subject matter, relationship with signatory parties and active involvement of the non-signatory in performance of the contract.

Further, the Supreme Court in ASF Buildtech (P) Ltd v Shapoorji Pallonji & Co (P) Ltd (2025 INSC 616) upheld the impleadment of a non-signatory and, for the first time, expressly recognised that sectors such as reinsurance often involve complex contractual arrangements where this principle may be appropriately applied.

Foreign Arbitration

Even for foreign-seated arbitrations, the position remains broadly the same. Courts are typically inclined to refer disputes with an arbitration clause to arbitration.

Section 45 of the Arbitration Act requires an Indian court seised of any dispute to refer the parties to arbitration at the request of any one of the parties, “unless it prima facie finds that said agreement is null and void, inoperative and incapable of being performed”.

The enforcement of domestic awards rendered in India is governed by Part I of the Arbitration Act, whereas the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards rendered in a recognised jurisdiction is governed by Part II of the Arbitration Act. Domestic and foreign awards are both enforced as a decree of the civil court.

A domestic award may be enforced only after the expiry of three months from the date on which the arbitral award was received. Three months is significant here, as it is also the time period within which a party has the right to challenge the award. After three months, the decree holder can initiate proceedings to enforce the award, and such proceedings are to continue unless the court deciding the challenge to the award has stayed the enforcement of the award in question on such terms as reasoned by the court. The usual condition for staying the enforcement of an award involving a money decree is generally the entire deposit of the awarded sums with the court; however, the said condition is subject to judicial discretion. In cases where a court prima facie finds that the award was obtained by fraud or corruption, an unconditional stay of enforcement may be granted.

Recently, the Supreme Court in MMTC Limited v Anglo American Metallurgical Coal (P) Ltd (2025 INSC 1279) held that the objections against enforcing an arbitral award are maintainable only in circumstances when a decree is void or passed without jurisdiction. The Court recognised that belated objections raised at the enforcement stage are impermissible and emphasised its duty to prevent unwarranted litigation.

Conventions

India is a party to the New York Convention and the Geneva Convention dealing with recognition and enforcement of foreign awards. Therefore, if the seat of arbitration is in a country that is a signatory to the New York Convention or the Geneva Convention, Indian courts would be able to enforce convention awards.

The party applying for the enforcement of a foreign award is required to produce the following as evidence:

• the original award or a duly authenticated copy of the award;
• the original arbitration agreement or a duly certified copy thereof; and
• any other evidence necessary to prove that it is a foreign award.

The grounds for refusing to enforce a foreign award in India are the same as those laid down in the New York Convention. These include:

• incapacity of parties or invalidity of the arbitration agreement;
• violation of principles of natural justice;
• the award being beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement;
• the composition of the tribunal not being in accordance with the agreement between the parties or with the law of the country in which the arbitration took place;
• the award having not yet become binding between the parties or having been set aside or suspended at the seat of the arbitration;
• the subject matter of the arbitration not being arbitrable; and
• the award being contrary to public policy.

In foreign arbitration, the grounds for challenging an award are narrower than those for a domestic award, as the ground of “patent illegality” is not available.

Where a court is of the view that there are elements of a settlement that may be acceptable to the parties before it, the court may formulate the possible terms of settlement, hear the views of the parties, and refer the parties to:

• arbitration;
• conciliation;
• judicial settlement, including settlement through Lok Adalat; or
• mediation.

This power is derived from Section 89 of the CPC.

This kind of referral demands the parties’ consent when required by law, such as in arbitration cases.

Mediation proceedings and settlement discussions are typically confidential. However, in certain circumstances, the mediator may be required to file a report before the court if so directed. The Mediation Act 2023 (the “Mediation Act”) was enacted to establish an efficacious mediation ecosystem in India, especially for institutional mediation. However, only certain limited provisions relating to the Mediation Council of India and the Mediation Fund, as well as the application of the Mediation Act – together with other miscellaneous provisions (including definitions, the power to make rules and regulations under the Mediation Act, and other transitional provisions) – have been notified to date. The other provisions will only come into force once notified.

The Consumer Protection Act gives the court discretion to refer the dispute to mediation with the parties’ consent if there are elements of the settlement that may be acceptable to them (except in matters relating to criminal and non-compoundable offences, fraud, medical negligence, etc). Pursuant to this, the Indian government has also issued the Consumer Protection Mediation Rules 2020.

In practice, courts in India are now progressively encouraging parties to explore the possibility of an out-of-court settlement, with a view to ending litigation between them. The courts usually have in-house mediation centres where experienced senior lawyers are appointed as mediators to resolve long-pending disputes.

The Policyholders Regulations prescribe the claims procedure that must be followed by insurers to ensure expeditious processing of claims. These regulations ensure that insurers settle claims promptly. Insurers must pay interest at 2% above the prevailing bank rate when claim payments are delayed. However, the Supreme Court of India has held that the applicability of this rate is not a mandatory rule and that an arbitral tribunal has the discretion to determine the rate of post-award interest as it deems fit.

There is statutory and judicial recognition of the right of subrogation. In relation to statutes, the Marine Insurance Act 1963 (specifically, Section 79) provides for the insurer’s right to subrogation. Equally, Indian courts have recognised subrogation as an equitable corollary of the principle of indemnity – under which, the rights and remedies of the insured against the wrongdoer are transferred to and vested in the insurer.

No separate contractual clause is required to trigger this; however, in practice, policies do also contain subrogation clauses and insurers will frequently obtain “subrogation letters” and an “assignment” of the third-party claim from the insured. The Policyholders Regulations also obligate the insured to assist its insurer in recovery proceedings, if the insurer so requires. The Delhi High Court in Fresenius Medical Care Dialysis Service India Pvt Ltd v Kerry Indev Logistics Pvt Ltd (ARBP 180 of 2022) held that, in cases of subrogation-cum-assignment, the insurer has the right to recover from a third party any amount paid to the insured – although the insured retains the right to recover any excess amount beyond what was paid by the insurer. This arrangement allows the insurer to step into the insured’s shoes to recover the amount paid, but does not prevent the insured from pursuing further recovery beyond that.

Thus, subrogation entitles the insurer to recover only to the extent of the indemnity, with any additional recovery going to the insured. In another judgment, the Delhi High Court clarified that, once an insurer steps into the shoes of the insured, the arbitration clause between the insured and a third-party will be binding on the insurer, even though it was not a party to the original agreement.

Insurers in India are using insurtech, including applications, AI, telematics, and the internet of things (IoT), to transform their business operations. Key applications of insurtech are detailed below.

Websites and Apps

Indian insurers and intermediaries are partnering with tech companies to develop websites and mobile applications to facilitate the sale and servicing of insurance policies online. Insurers are also collaborating with various tech companies to digitise customer verification, underwriting, premium payment and claims-processing functions, as well as to automate the policy-issuance and claims-settlement processes.

Health Insurance

Health insurers are collaborating with fitness technology firms to track users’ behaviours and offer insurance discounts to those who have a healthier lifestyle. General insurers are collaborating with tech companies to explore IoT solutions to track, inter alia, cargo, theft, hijack attempts, and wastage.

Regulatory Sandbox

The IRDAI has notified the IRDAI (Regulatory Sandbox) Regulations 2025 (the “Sandbox Regulations”), which repeals the IRDAI (Regulatory Sandbox) Regulations 2019. The Sandbox Regulations are issued with an aim to promote innovation in the insurance sector while ensuring policyholder protection and orderly market growth. The Sandbox Regulations, inter alia, expand the scope of permissible innovations across the “insurance value chain” and any area where regulatory relaxation is being sought, while continuing to exclude matters related to prudential and financial stability, such as capital adequacy, liquidity, and solvency. Further, in relation to the timelines for the approval period and extension of an approval period, the Sandbox Regulations replace the fixed 36-month approval and 12-month extension under the erstwhile guidance with an ‘experiment period’ as specified by the IRDAI, beyond which no extension will be granted.

The IRDAI has issued various norms to address technological advancements and to regulate insurtech developments. The key regulatory changes are summarised as follows.

• With the significant increase in e-commerce transactions in recent years, the IRDAI has recognised the sale and servicing of insurance products online as well as the issuance of e-insurance policies. The IRDAI introduced the IRDAI (Bima Sugam – Insurance Electronic Marketplace) Regulations 2024, with the vision of “insurance for all by 2047”. Bima Sugam is an e-commerce platform that will act as a centralised hub, aggregating offerings from various insurance companies. It aims to provide a seamless and end-to-end digital experience for buyers of insurance products. The IRDAI initiative will compete with current insurance e-commerce platforms and shows the transformative power of technology in the insurance industry.
• The IRDAI’s Information and Cybersecurity Guidelines 2023 of 24 April 2023 sets out certain norms in relation to the collection of data and the usage of policyholders’ data both by the insurers and insurance intermediaries involved, as well as by any third-party service providers engaged by them.
• The IRDAI’s Master Guidelines on Anti-Money Laundering/Counter-Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) 2022 provide for a video-based identification process (VBIP) as one of the methods for insurers to perform mandatory KYC processes for their customers.
• The IRDAI issued its circular of 14 November 2022 on Participation in Account Aggregator Framework in order to provide guidance on the participation of Indian insurance companies and insurance repositories (ie, National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL), Central Depository Services Limited (CDSL), Karvy and Computer Age Management Services (CAMS)) in the RBI’s account aggregator framework. In addition, the IRDAI issued a circular on Participation in the Account Aggregator (AA) Framework as a Financial Information User on 3 November 2023, which sets out certain requirements that must be complied with by entities registered with the IRDAI.
• The IRDAI has set a limit on the maximum expenses that are permitted to be incurred by an Indian insurance company and set out an additional limit on expenses that are permitted for insurtech.

A growing number of cyber-insurance covers have been issued and a growing number of claims have been made under them. This has also led to an increased need for forensic expert analysis for the purposes of assessment of coverage under such policies. This trend is likely to continue given the growing cyber risks. However, as cybercovers are comparatively recent in this jurisdiction, there has yet to be any litigation involving cyberpolicies.

Further, the IRDAI has strongly encouraged insurers to implement robust IT security frameworks and to check their systems for vulnerabilities in order to prevent data leaks and protect policyholders’ data.

The Indian insurance industry has seen a wave of new insurance products, partly due to regulatory and/or statutory simplifications and partly due to new risks emerging through innovations in other industries. While the industry has been typically slow to adapt and embrace new trends in terms of product offerings, new products have been filed in terms of:

• index-linked life insurance products;
• long-term insurance covers;
• health insurance covers for mental illness;
• standard life insurance products;
• telematics-based riders;
• specific endorsements for data protection and impersonation frauds (which even cover the resultant fund transfers) in both cyber- and crime insurance; and
• a new range of fitness and wellness-focused products in the health sector.

Products

The IRDAI has notified the Products Regulations, along with the corresponding master circulars on life, health, and general insurance products, which set out revised norms vis-à-vis the design and issuance of life, health and general insurance policies. The Products Regulations aim to enhance insurance innovation, encourage adoption of good governance, and ensure effective governance and oversight in product design and pricing.

Product Filing Procedures

In 2024, the IRDAI introduced many changes in the procedure for product filing for all lines of insurance products, as follows.

• General insurance products – the IRDAI has issued the IRDAI’s Master Circular on General Insurance Business of 11 June 2024 (the “General Master Circular”), which repeals the earlier circulars on product filing of general insurance products and provides that all general insurance products will be introduced or modified through the “use and file” procedure.
• Health insurance products – the IRDAI has issued the Health Master Circular, which provides that all categories of health insurance products and riders are to be introduced or modified through the “use and file” product filing procedure.
• Life insurance products – the IRDAI has issued the IRDAI’s Master Circular on Life Insurance Products 2024 of 13 June 2024 (the “Life Master Circular”), which repeals the earlier circulars on product filing of life insurance products. The Life Master Circular specifies that the “use and file” product filing procedure is applicable to certain life insurance products/riders – for example, individual and group non-linked term products, individual and group linked insurance products, group fund-based insurance products, group credit life insurance products, and combi products. In cases where the insurer issues a product that does not fall under the ambit of the “use and file” procedure, the “file and use” procedure shall apply.

Additional Market Developments

Recent years have been significant for the insurance sector, as they have seen the issuance of several regulations and guidelines issued by the IRDAI, including the following.

• The IRDAI (Maintenance of Information by the Regulated Entities and Sharing of Information by the Authority) Regulations 2025 consolidate and repeal the erstwhile norms on the sharing of confidential information concerning regulated entities by the IRDAI, and maintenance of minimum information by insurers (including FRBs) and insurance intermediaries.
• The IRDAI has issued the Insurance Fraud Monitoring Framework Guidelines 2025 on 9 October 2025 (the “Guidelines”), which will take effect from 1 April 2026 and repeal the existing 2013 framework. The Guidelines expand their scope to cover distribution channels in addition to insurers and reinsurers, introduce new fraud categories ie, “external fraud” and “affinity/complex fraud”, and require insurers to establish a Fraud Monitoring Committee and a supporting Fraud Monitoring Unit. The Guidelines, inter alia, prescribe standardised reporting requirements, mandate the adoption of a strong cybersecurity framework to address cyber fraud, call for regular awareness programmes, and require distribution channels to implement fraud risk management frameworks aligned with their operations.
• The Policyholders Regulations along with Master Circular on Operations and Allied Matters of Insurers of 19 June 2024 and the Master Circular on Protection of Policyholders’ Interests 2024 of 5 September 2024 which consolidate and repeal the earlier norms in relation to the protection of policyholder’s interests, advertisements, outsourcing, receipt of premium, nomination, assignment, grievance redressal procedures, places of business, group insurance, and usage of trade logos by insurers.
• The Registration Regulations and the Master Circular on Registration, Capital Structure, Transfer of shares and Amalgamation of Insurers 2024 of 15 May 2024 consolidate and repeal the IRDAI’s erstwhile norms in relation to registration, permitted capital structure, transfer of shares and amalgamation of insurers.
• The IRDAI (Corporate Governance for Insurers) Regulations 2024 and the Master Circular on Corporate Governance for Insurers 2024 of 22 May 2024 specify a governance structure framework for all insurers (excluding FRBs) and include norms pertaining to the composition of the Board along with its power, roles and responsibilities, required Board committees, appointment and remuneration of KMPs, disclosure and reporting requirements.
• The IRDAI (Expenses of Management, including Commission, of Insurers) Regulations 2024 and the Master Circular on Expenses of Management, including Commission, of Insurers, 2024 of 15 May 2024, which together consolidate and repeal the recently revised norms on expenses of management of insurers and commission payable to insurance agents and intermediaries.
• The IRDAI (Actuarial, Finance and Investment Functions of Insurers) Regulations 2024 and the Master Circular on Actuarial, Finance and Investment Functions of Insurers of 17 May 2024 consolidate and repeal the IRDAI’s erstwhile norms in relation to an Indian Insurer’s appointed actuary appointments, duties and responsibilities, valuation of assets, liabilities and maintenance of solvency margin, financial statements preparation, investments, and loans and advances.
• The IRDAI (Rural, Social Sector and Motor Third Party Obligations) Regulations 2024 (the “Rural Sector Regulations”), along with the IRDAI’s Master Circular on Rural, Social Sector and Motor Third Party Obligations of 17 May 2024 (the “2024 Master Circular”), to consolidate and repeal the IRDAI’s 2015 norms governing the insurer’s obligations towards the rural and social sector, and motor third party insurance business. The 2024 Master Circular set out the minimum thresholds to be achieved for life, general and health insurers to fulfil their statutory obligations under the Insurance Act for FY 2024-25. Subsequently, the IRDAI issued the Master Circular on Rural, Social Sector and Motor Third Party Obligations 2025 on 25 July 2025, which supersedes the 2024 Master Circular and specifies the revised obligations to be achieved by Insurers for FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27 under the Rural Sector Regulations.
• The FRB Regulations, which consolidate and repeal erstwhile norms on registration and operations of FRBs and Lloyd’s India.
• The IRDAI has issued the Exposure Draft, IRDAI (Internal Insurance Ombudsman) Guidelines 2025, proposing the creation of an internal insurance ombudsman to enhance the standards of insurers’ complaint management systems and facilitate speedy grievance resolution. Although the exposure draft is currently at the deliberation stage and stakeholder comments have been invited, it is anticipated that new guidelines will be issued in due course.

In addition, the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill 2024 proposes to introduce various significant changes. Some of the key proposed changes include:

• increasing the limit on FDI in insurance companies from 74% to 100%;
• introducing composite licences for insurance companies;
• implementing differential capital requirements;
• enabling a one-time registration for insurance intermediaries in place of periodic renewals; and
• allowing individual agents to distribute policies from multiple insurance companies.

As regards claims, whereas the focus used to be on more traditional lines of insurance (such as catastrophe, life, health, and motor insurance), the Indian insurance market has evolved during the past decade or so and liability products such as professional indemnity (PI) insurance, D&O insurance, cyberpolicies, and employment practices liability insurance have come to the forefront. There is a familiarity with and demand for these products and, consequently, significant claims activity. Among liability products, the past five years show there has been a steady upward trend in claims made under PI policies, and this remains the busiest claims area, followed closely by D&O insurance.

As well as an upsurge in the frequency of claims, there has also been a sharp increase in the quantum being claimed by the insured, indicating that claims severity is also on the rise. Additionally, a growing number of cyber-insurance covers are being issued, with claims being made under them. As mentioned in 11.1 Emerging Risks Affecting the Insurance Market, this has led to an increased requirement for forensic expert analysis for the purposes of assessment of coverage under such policies.