Anyone choosing to set up a business in the UK may choose between a broad range of business structures.
The most common type of company in England and Wales is a private company limited by shares. A company limited by shares is one in which, in the event that the company goes into liquidation, the liability of its shareholders is limited to the amount paid or payable when subscribing for those shares (that is, limited liability). Private limited companies are not able to offer shares to the public, meaning they cannot offer shares if they consider those shares might become available to anyone other than those receiving the offer.
Companies that wish to offer securities to the public are most commonly registered as a public company limited by shares. UK legislation also affords limited liability to shareholders in public companies but imposes certain additional restrictions on public companies for the protection of shareholders and creditors. More detail on public companies can be found in 3 Management of the Company.
Other less frequently used forms of company structure include the following.
The key legislation governing the operation of a company incorporated in England and Wales includes the following.
A key source of a company's corporate governance requirements will be its articles of association. The articles of association govern the internal affairs of the company and regulate a great range of matters (subject to the requirements of the Companies Act). These include the rights attached to the company's shares' (including voting rights), the powers of the directors, the regulation of shareholders' and directors' meetings, the alteration of capital and the transfer of shares.
The key corporate governance codes and principles include the following:
In addition to the requirements of the sources identified in 1.2 Sources of Corporate Governance Requirements, companies whose shares are publicly traded need to consider the following.
A number of organisations produce guidance on corporate governance issues in the UK. In particular, the FRC has issued:
A number of institutional investor bodies, including The Investment Association and the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, also produce their own corporate governance guidelines that listed companies need to be aware of, and the Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators regularly issues guidance notes on corporate governance issues.
There has been considerable focus in the UK on corporate governance in recent years, following a renewed emphasis on the role of business in society. This, coupled with continuing concerns about the rising levels of executive pay, led to a focus on the behaviour and transparency of large UK businesses and how the interests of their wider stakeholders should be taken into account. Prompted by this, the government published a corporate governance consultation paper in November 2016 that discussed a number of potential options for UK corporate governance reform under three broad headings: executive pay; strengthening the employee, customer and wider stakeholder voice; and corporate governance in large privately held businesses. The government published its response paper in August 2017, setting out proposed corporate governance reforms, including new corporate governance reporting requirements, recommendations for provisions in an updated Governance Code and the introduction of a corporate governance code for large privately held companies.
A range of new corporate governance reporting requirements have been introduced for UK-incorporated companies as part of the government's corporate governance reform agenda. They cover areas including performance of the director's Section 172 duty to promote the success of the company, employee and other stakeholder engagement, governance arrangements and chief executive officer (CEO) pay ratios. Each of these reporting requirements applies to a different sub-set of UK-incorporated companies by reference to their size. They apply for financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2019.
UK Corporate Governance Code
A new edition of the Governance Code was published in 2018. It contains a range of new requirements for corporate behaviour and reporting, including:
The 2018 edition of the Governance Code applies to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2019.
Corporate Governance Code for Private Companies
The Wates Corporate Governance Principles for Large Private Companies are a set of corporate governance principles for large privately held businesses. Six areas of corporate governance are discussed: purpose and leadership, board composition, director responsibilities, opportunity and risk, remuneration, and stakeholder relationships and engagement. The Wates Principles adopt an 'apply and explain' approach; that is, companies are expected to apply each principle and, for each one, provide a supporting statement that gives an understanding of how their corporate governance processes operate and achieve the desired outcomes.
The Wates Principles provide very large private companies with a framework for complying with the new corporate governance reporting requirement, which applies to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019, which requires very large UK-incorporated companies to state which corporate governance code, if any, they applied and how that corporate governance code was applied. This is the first attempt to introduce governance conduct provisions for non-listed companies in the UK.
UK Stewardship Code
The UK Stewardship Code (Stewardship Code), which outlines good practice for institutional investors in their engagement with UK listed companies, is currently the subject of a review. Following this review, the Stewardship Code is expected to include a greater focus on investors' values and a need for investors to take account of environmental, social and governance factors in making their decisions. The revised version is expected to be published later in summer 2019.
Implementation of the EU Shareholder Rights Directive
A directive amending the Shareholder Rights Directive was published in the EU Official Journal in May 2017 (SRD II). It was implemented into UK law with effect from 10 June 2019. SRD II seeks to enhance transparency and encourage long-term shareholder engagement in companies whose shares are traded on an EU-regulated market. The key features of SRD II, as implemented in the UK, include the following.
Reform of the Financial Reporting Council
The government asked Sir John Kingman to lead a review of the FRC in April 2018. The Kingman Review was published in December 2018 and sets out 83 recommendations, including that the FRC be replaced with an independent statutory regulator. The new regulator would have a new mandate, new clarity of mission, new leadership and new powers.
In March 2019, the government published an initial consultation seeking views on the reforms of the FRC proposed in the Kingman Review. It confirmed that it intends to replace the FRC with a new independent statutory regulator that will be called the Audit, Reporting and Governance Authority.
Reform of the Statutory Audit Market
There has been considerable focus in the UK on the purpose and effectiveness of the statutory audit process in recent years.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) launched a detailed study of the audit market in October 2018 and published its final report in April 2019, which concluded that there is a shortfall in the quality of audits in the UK. In light of this, the CMA recommended that the government implement a package of remedies designed to increase the effectiveness of audit committees across FTSE 350 companies, increase market resilience and the choice of statutory audit providers, and address audit quality concerns. The recommended remedies include the following.
Separately, the government asked Sir Donald Brydon to lead an independent review into audit standards and the quality and effectiveness of the UK audit market. The Review will primarily focus on the purpose, scope and quality of audit.
The UK Parliament House of Commons Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Select Committee also published a report on The Future of Audit in March 2019 following an inquiry into the audit sector.
The principal bodies and functions involved in the governance and management of a company in the UK are as follows.
The decision-making of a company is generally delegated to the board of directors (although there are some decisions that are reserved for the shareholders). The key decisions made at each level of the management of a company are as follows.
The board of directors, management team and shareholders make decisions in the following ways.
Requirements in Law
Under the Companies Act, private companies must have at least one director and public companies at least two directors and a company secretary.
Companies have a single-tier, unitary board. Executive and non-executive directors are both members of the board, in contrast to other jurisdictions where non-executive directors sit on a separate supervisory body.
Requirements under the Governance Code
The Governance Code provides that at least half the board, excluding the chair, should be comprised of independent non-executive directors. The Governance Code also provides that companies should form three committees: a nomination committee, a remuneration committee and an audit committee. The nomination committee should lead the process for making and recommending appointments to the board. The main role of the audit committee is to monitor the integrity of the company's financial statements and review the company's internal controls. The remuneration committee should have responsibility for determining the policy for executive director remuneration and setting remuneration for the chair, executive directors and senior management. The remuneration and audit committees should be comprised entirely of independent non-executive directors and the nomination committee should have a majority of independent non-executive directors.
Directors can be executive (with a service contract) or non-executive. The board of directors will typically comprise the following.
Subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, the articles of association may prescribe a maximum or minimum number of directors. Corporate directors are currently permitted, but at least one of the directors must be an individual.
The Governance Code recommends that the directors have appropriate skills, experience, independence and knowledge of the business to discharge their responsibilities properly and effectively. The Governance Code recommends that directors are appointed with regards to the benefits of diversity, including diversity of gender, social and ethnic backgrounds, cognitive and personal strengths.
There has been a focus on board diversity for a number of years in the UK. In 2010, Lord Davies was invited by the government to review and identify barriers to women reaching the boardroom and to make recommendations as to how the proportion of women on listed company boards could be increased. Building on this work, the Hampton-Alexander Review was formed in 2016, extending the focus on improving gender balance beyond the boardroom to improving the representation of women in leadership positions of FTSE 350 companies. Its recommendations include that by 2020 a minimum of 33% of a FTSE 350 company's board of directors should be female and a minimum of 33% of a FTSE 100 company's executive committee and direct reports to the executive committee should be female.
In addition, the Parker Review Committee was set up in 2017 to look at ethnic diversity on listed company boards.
The Companies Act sets out the requirements for appointing directors upon incorporation of a company but is silent on subsequent appointments. Therefore, the process will be set out in the company's articles of association, which usually stipulate that directors can be appointed by a decision of the board of directors or by shareholders, in each case by simple majority.
Upon incorporation, a statement must be delivered to Companies House setting out the proposed directors and a confirmation from each director that he or she is willing to act as a director.
Listed companies typically have a nomination committee that has responsibility for recommending board appointments. The Governance Code recommends that all directors of premium listed companies stand for re-election annually at the company's annual general meeting regardless of the size of the company.
There are a number of ways a director can be removed from office. The Companies Act provides that a director may be removed by ordinary resolution (before the expiration of the director's term). If a director is to be removed before the expiration of his or her term, the Companies Act sets out a number of protections that must be complied with, including that the ordinary resolution cannot be a written resolution and that the director has the right to be heard by the shareholders at the general meeting. In addition, a company's articles of association typically set out grounds for removal.
There are no requirements at law regarding independence of directors. However, the Governance Code provides that at least half the members of the board of a premium listed company should comprise independent non-executive directors, determined in accordance with the Governance Code. Independent non-executive directors should not have been an employee of the company or group within the last five years, should not have had a material relationship with the company in the last three years, should not have close family ties with any of the company's advisers, directors or senior employees and should not represent a significant shareholding. However, a company may, notwithstanding the existence of these circumstances, determine a director to be independent. If they do so, this should be explained in the company's annual report.
Under the Companies Act, directors have a duty to avoid situations in which they have, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the interests of the company. The duty is stated to apply, in particular, to the exploitation of any property, information or opportunity. A director will therefore need to consider carefully whether an opportunity rightfully belongs to the company before exploiting it.
There are a number of exceptions to this duty, including where the matter has been authorised by the company's directors, where the company has given authority to the directors for something to be done or where the articles of association contain a provision for dealing with conflicts and the directors are acting in accordance with that provision.
Directors have three related duties, including the duty not to accept benefits from third parties, the duty to declare any interest in a proposed transaction and the duty to declare an interest in an existing transaction (see 4.6 Legal Duties of Directors/Officers). These interests would typically be declared at the board meeting authorising the transaction.
The rules governing directors' duties are set out in the Companies Act.
The Companies Act includes a statutory statement of the duties a director owes to the company. The statutory directors’ duties are:
The duties apply to all the directors of a company. However, the statutory statement of duties does not cover all the obligations of a director. Other obligations are contained throughout the Companies Act, such as the duty to deliver accounts and the obligation to disclose an interest in an existing transaction with the company. There are also obligations contained in other statutes; for example, the Insolvency Act 1986. In addition, directors have a general fiduciary duty to their shareholders that arises from the relationship of trust and confidence between them and their shareholders.
The directors' statutory duties as set out in the Companies Act are owed directly to the company (not to any individual shareholder(s) or to any stakeholder(s)). However, embedded within them is a requirement to have regard to the interests of a number of stakeholders. The duty to promote the success of the company requires directors to have regard to the interests of its employees, community and the environment, and to foster the company's relationships with suppliers, customers and others when considering this duty.
In addition, the directors owe a fiduciary duty under the common law to shareholders to provide them with information that is sufficient, clear and not misleading, to enable them to make an informed decision as to how to vote at a shareholder meeting.
As a general rule, a company is the only person able to bring a claim against one of its directors for breach of duty, since the duty is owed by the directors to the company itself. This means that a shareholder (acting on their own behalf) cannot bring an action against a director for breach of duty, which results in practical difficulties, in so far as the board is unlikely to approve the company bringing an action against one of their own for breach of duty. To mitigate this, the Companies Act contains a statutory procedure pursuant to which a shareholder may, in certain circumstances, bring a derivative claim on behalf of the company. Further detail on such actions is set out in 5.4 Shareholder Claims.
In addition to liability relating to breaches of duty, directors may also be liable for breaches of statutory provisions within the Companies Act, such as those relating to unlawful distributions or unlawful directors' remuneration payments. In certain circumstances, directors may also be subject to criminal penalties, particularly in relation to health, safety and environmental matters; competition and anti-competitive behaviour; and bribery, corruption and fraud.
Directors can to an extent protect themselves from the liabilities arising from their role; however, there are some limitations on public policy grounds. A company may generally indemnify directors against liability incurred towards a third party in the performance of their role. However, companies may not indemnify their directors for breaches of duties or negligence. Similarly, there are limitations to the extent to which a company can indemnify directors in circumstances where criminal proceedings are being brought against them.
A company may also purchase D&O insurance for directors.
At law, approval by shareholders is required for any director's service contract for which the guaranteed term is longer than two years. Failure to obtain approval makes the relevant contractual provision void and allows the company to terminate the service contract at any time by giving reasonable notice.
A quoted company (that is, a company whose equity share capital is listed on the Official List in the UK, a company officially listed in an EEA state or admitted to dealing on NASDAQ or the NYSE) may not make any remuneration payment to a director or former director unless that payment is in accordance with its latest remuneration policy approved by shareholders (or the payment has been separately approved by shareholders). The directors' remuneration policy is a binding policy and must be approved by an ordinary resolution of shareholders at least once every three years. In addition, shareholders are required to vote on a statement disclosing the directors' remuneration and loss of office payments for the previous year. This vote is indicative and does not have the effect of clawing back any payment that has already been made; however, if the directors' remuneration report is not approved by shareholders, the company is required to table a new remuneration policy the following year. These requirements have recently been extended to non-quoted traded companies to comply with the requirements of SRD II (see 2.2 Current Issues and Developments). Traded companies are companies with voting share admitted to trading on a regulated market in an EEA state.
The Governance Code also places additional reporting requirements on a company's remuneration committee in relation to the pay of directors and senior managers. The remuneration committee is required to provide a full description of its strategic rationale in making remuneration decisions, including explaining why the remuneration is appropriate; how the committee addressed issues such as clarity, risk and proportionality; and whether any shareholder engagement or workforce engagement has been sought. A quoted company must also publish the pay difference between its CEO and its average UK employee.
Certain details of a director's remuneration are required to be disclosed in the directors' remuneration report contained in a quoted company's annual report and accounts.
A directors' remuneration report must contain a statement from the chair of the remuneration committee that summarises major decisions on directors' remuneration, any substantial changes relating to directors' remuneration made during the year and the context in which those changes and decisions occurred or were taken. There are then a number of detailed disclosures that must be included on topics, including a single total figure of remuneration of each director; any variable pay awards made under bonus or incentive schemes; pensions entitlements; and directors' shareholdings. If a directors' remuneration policy is included in the report, it must cover pay and benefits for current directors and potential new recruits, and exit payments for directors who leave. These requirements have recently been extended to non-quoted traded companies to comply with the requirements of SRD II (see 2.2 Current Issues and Developments).
Additionally, directors' service contracts must be open to inspection by members and members may request copies.
A shareholder’s relationship with the company in which he holds shares is a contractual one. Under the Companies Act, the articles of association bind the company and its members to the same extent as if they were covenants on the part of the company and each member to observe the provisions. The articles of association therefore constitute a form of contract between the company and its shareholders, and between the shareholders themselves. The shares held by the members give a right of participation in the company on the terms of the articles of association.
A shareholder does not have a proprietary interest in the underlying assets of a company. Shareholders are entitled in proportion to their respective shareholdings to a share of the distributed profits of the company and, on a winding-up, to the surplus assets of the company after the company’s creditors have been repaid in full. Shareholders are not liable for the acts of the company, except in very limited circumstances when the corporate veil can be pierced, where a company's limited liability status is set aside and a shareholder is liable for the company's acts.
Articles of association usually delegate to the directors the exercise of the powers of the company, save for those powers that are required by the articles or the Companies Act to be exercised by the shareholders in a general meeting or by shareholder resolution. Therefore, it is rare for shareholders in their capacity as such to have involvement in the day-to-day running of the company. Shareholders in joint venture companies may agree contractually that certain actions will not be taken by the company unless agreed by a particular number or majority of shareholders.
If desired, shareholders can direct the management of a company to take, or refrain from taking, certain actions in the business by directing the directors to call a general meeting. The shareholders must hold more that 5% of the voting rights to make this request and must explain the general nature of the issues they wish to raise at the meeting. Directors will not be required to table a resolution if it is defamatory, frivolous or vexatious, or if it would not be effective if passed.
A public company is required to hold an AGM every year within six months of its financial year-end. There is no statutory requirement for a private company to hold an AGM but there may be an express requirement to hold one in the company’s articles of association. For public companies, 21 clear days’ notice of the AGM is required, unless all who are entitled to attend and vote consent to shorter notice being given.
Any shareholder meeting other than an AGM is a general meeting. The minimum statutory notice period required for a general meeting of a private company (which is not a traded company) is 14 clear days. For public companies, the minimum statutory notice period for general meetings other than AGMs is 14 clear days; however, it is 21 clear days for public companies which are traded companies. Traded companies can reduce the minimum notice period for these meetings to 14 clear days if (i) shareholders have passed an annual resolution to shorten the notice period to 14 clear days and (ii) the company allows shareholders to appoint a proxy by electronic means via a website.
Shareholders holding 90% (in the case of private companies) or 95% (in the case of public companies) of the nominal value of shares giving a right to attend and vote may agree to shorter notice of general meetings. The articles of association may specify a longer notice period (but the articles of association cannot specify a shorter period).
Shareholder meetings are almost exclusively physical meetings. There are very few examples of virtual, or electronic, shareholder meetings (that is, a shareholder meeting held exclusively through the use of online technology, with no physical meeting). Increasingly articles of association permit companies to hold virtual shareholder meetings, that is, a physical meeting where shareholders can also participate online as an alternative to attending the physical location in person, although these are rare in practice.
As a general rule, a company is the right person to bring a claim against one of its directors for breach of duty, since the duty is owed to the company. However, the Companies Act contains a statutory procedure under which a shareholder may bring a derivative claim – that is, proceedings on behalf of a company – against a director, for negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust.
The factors that the court will look at when deciding whether to allow a derivative claim include whether a director who is acting to promote the success of the company would proceed with it, whether the relevant act or omission was previously authorised by the company, whether the breach has been ratified and the views of independent shareholders.
In addition, shareholders can apply to the court for protection against unfair prejudice if they believe the company's affairs are being or have been conducted in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of its members or a group of its members.
Claims against the company may also arise if a publicly traded company does not behave properly in relation to the treatment of the release of information to the market. In particular, under Section 90A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, a company is liable to pay compensation to a person who acquires, continues to hold or disposes of the securities in reliance on information disclosed by the company using recognised means and who suffers loss in respect of the securities as a result of either any untrue or misleading statement in that published information, or the omission from that published information of any information required to be included in it. The company is then only liable if a person discharging managerial responsibilities knew that the statement was untrue or misleading, or was reckless as to whether it was, or knew the omission was a dishonest concealment of a material fact.
Any shareholder whose interest in the voting rights of a publicly traded company reaches, exceeds or falls below 3%, 4%, 5% and each 1% threshold thereafter must disclose this to the company, which must notify the market.
The Takeover Code requires that for any public listed companies, if any person, or group of persons acting in concert, acquires 30% or more of the company's voting rights, they will trigger an obligation to make a general takeover bid to acquire the remainder of the shares.
Companies are required to publish an annual report and accounts for each financial year, unless an exemption applies. A public company must do so within six months of the end of its financial year, whereas a private company must do so within nine months. The Companies Act sets out the contents requirements of the annual report and accounts, which is supplemented by various regulations, including, for example, The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts & Reports) Regulations 2008 (as amended). Generally, the Companies Act requires the annual report and accounts to comprise a directors' report, a strategic report and financial statements. Quoted companies and traded companies are also required to include a directors' remuneration report. Listed companies also include a corporate governance statement discussing their corporate governance arrangements.
The purpose of the strategic report is to inform members of the company and help them assess how the directors have performed their duty under Section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company). It must contain a fair review of the company's business and a description of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the company. It must also contain an analysis of the development and performance of the company's business during the financial year and the position of the company's business at the end of the year, consistent with the size and complexity of the business. Certain companies must also include information on their greenhouse gas emission and workforce gender diversity statistics. The strategic report may also contain key performance indicators on various financial and non-financial matters. Following implementation of the EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive in the UK, "public interest entities" (that is, companies whose transferable securities are admitted to trading on an EU-regulated market, insurers and credit institutions) with more than 500 employees are required to include prescribed non-financial information in their strategic report. The required information includes disclosures in relation to anti-corruption and anti-bribery matters, environmental matters, employees, social matters and respect for human rights; a description of the company's policies in relation to the non-financial matters; and the principal risks relating to the non-financial matters arising in connection with the company's operations.
The directors' report is now effectively a repository for a number of miscellaneous statutory disclosures, including in relation to the directors, company constitution, share capital and political donations.
See 4.11 Disclosure of Payments to Directors/Officers for discussion of the contents requirements of the directors' remuneration report and see 6.2 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Arrangements for discussion of the contents requirements of the corporate governance statement.
For listed companies, the contents requirements set out above are supplemented by the provisions contained in the Transparency Rules. In particular, these provide that the annual report must include consolidated audited accounts, a management report and a responsibility statement. The Transparency Rules require a company to publish an annual report as soon as possible and in any event within four months after the end of each financial year. The Transparency Rules also require listed companies to produce a half-yearly report within three months of the half-year end comprising a condensed set of financial statements, an interim management report and responsibility statements.
A company must also file certain information with the UK companies registry, Companies House, on an annual basis. This includes the annual report and accounts. The annual filing requirements also include a confirmation statement confirming information in respect of its shareholders, directors and persons who have significant control over the company.
Pursuant to the Listing Rules, companies are required to state how they have applied the principles of the Governance Code in a manner that would enable shareholders to evaluate how the principles have been applied and state whether they have complied with the provisions of the Governance Code, and if not, explain why.
The Governance Code also sets out certain information that should be included in the corporate governance statement contained in the annual report. This includes discussion of matters including board composition, the remuneration of directors and the relationship between a company and its auditor. The Governance Code does not have the force of law but premium listed companies are required to report annually on their compliance and explain any extent to which they have not complied, providing reasons for that non-compliance.
Private companies over a certain size are required to include in their annual report a statement on the company's governance arrangements.
A company must notify Companies House as and when there are any changes to its particulars, such as the registered office, directors or changes in share capital. In addition, all special resolutions must be filed at Companies House within 15 days of being passed and the Companies Act specifies certain ordinary resolutions that are required to be filed at Companies House (eg, an ordinary resolution authorising directors to allot shares). All documents filed with Companies House will be publicly available for free online.
A company is required to appoint an external auditor when preparing its annual accounts unless it is subject to an exemption. Small and dormant companies are exempt from audit unless a sufficient number of members require an audit. A company will be classed as small if it is not exempt and meets two of the following three thresholds:
Directors are responsible for the preparation of the company accounts in accordance with all relevant law and regulations. Auditors report on whether the accounts meet the requirements as asserted by the directors, but this does not relieve the directors of their responsibilities.
The EU Audit Regulation also governs the relationship between public listed companies and their auditors, and applies additional requirements to the relationship between auditors and the companies, such as the mandatory rotation of auditors after a maximum of 20 years and the requirement to run a tender process of audit services.
The Governance Code places new requirements on premium listed companies to confirm within their annual report that they have carried out a robust assessment of the company's risks. In particular, directors must include a statement explaining how they have had regard to the need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others, and a statement explaining how the directors have engaged with employees and have regard to employee interests. Directors are also required to confirm that they have assessed the company's 'emerging risks' in addition to its principal risks and that they have assessed the prospects of the company, and have a reasonable expectation that it will continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of its assessment.
In addition, to assess the company's financial risks and controls functionally, premium listed companies are required to appoint an audit committee of non-executive directors, whose role is to ensure that shareholder interests are properly protected in relation to financial reporting.