Corporate Governance 2024

Last Updated May 29, 2024

Cabo Verde

Law and Practice

Authors



Raposo Bernardo & Associados is dedicated to turning governance challenges into business opportunities. Key services focusing on governance: ESG strategy development – crafting tailored governance strategies that align with client business goals, identifying and prioritising key governance issues relevant to the industry, and integrating ESG considerations into overall business strategy; governance policy and compliance – advising on the development and enforcement of good governance policies, and ensuring compliance with local and international governance regulations; stakeholder engagement and communication – facilitating effective communication with stakeholders on governance matters, helping clients build and maintain a positive reputation, and advising on transparency and disclosure practices; sustainability reporting and impact assessment – assisting with the preparation of sustainability reports in accordance with global standards (eg, GRI and SASB), conducting environmental and social impact assessments, and providing metrics and analytics to measure governance performance. The firm has been assisting in navigating regulatory frameworks and compliance to improve companies’ governance ratings.

In Cabo Verde, most business organisations are incorporated in the form of companies with distinct legal personality. The corporate forms are as follows.

Public Limited Companies (Sociedade Anónima or SA) – Used for Large Companies

This type of company has the following characteristics.

  • Minimum share capital of EUR0.01.
  • A minimum of two shareholders. A single-shareholder public limited company incorporation is permitted if the single shareholder is another company.
  • As a general rule, public limited companies are incorporated by means of a private document (articles of association). Additional formalities may apply if the shareholders perform contributions in kind.
  • As a rule, the transfer of shares is free and may be carried out by means of an agreement between the parties.
  • The governing bodies of a public limited company are as follows.
    1. A management board, generally with a minimum of three members. Management can be entrusted to one director if the turnover for two consecutive years is expected to be less than CVE10 million. In addition to the election of the effective members of the board of directors, substitute directors must be elected in numbers not exceeding one third of the effective directors – this means three effective members and one substitute member, or one effective member and one substitute.
    2. A shareholder meeting.
    3. A supervisory board (three members) or one auditor – a member of the supervisory board or the auditor must be certified.
    4. An auditor (for large companies).
  • Shareholders’ liability is limited to capital subscribed, but shareholders are jointly and severally liable for all contributions contained in the by-laws.
  • Flexibility of capital – only registered shares are allowed. Registered shares are transferred by endorsing the share certificate in the name of the transferee. Notice must be given to the company for the purposes of registration in the share book. Book-entry shares are transferred by registration in the transferee’s bank account. The only limit on the free transfer of shares may arise from any pre-emption rights that have been established by the shareholders in the articles of association.

Limited Liability Partnership (Sociedade por Quotas) – Primarily Used for Small Businesses

This type of company has the following characteristics.

  • A minimum share capital of EUR0.01.
  • A minimum of two shareholders as a rule. Single-shareholder limited liability company incorporation is permitted.
  • As a general rule, limited companies are incorporated by means of a private document (articles of association). Additional formalities may apply if the shareholders perform contributions in kind.
  • The transfer of shares may be carried out by means of an agreement between the parties, except when the incorporation has been made through public deed.
  • The company is governed by management with one or more directors. An auditor is not mandatory, but companies that do not have a supervisory body must appoint a certified auditor to carry out the statutory audit if turnover is greater than CVE10 million and/or the number of employees is more than ten.
  • Shareholders’ liability is limited to capital subscribed, but shareholders are jointly and severally liable for all contributions contained in the by-laws.
  • The transfer of shares must be made by written agreement between the parties. The articles of association may set limits or conditions on the transfer of shares or pre-emptive rights in favour of other shareholders or the company itself.

Corporate governance requirements are derived from laws and regulations, recommendations and internal rules set forth by companies themselves.

Laws and Regulations

These contain the majority of corporate governance rules and requirements:

  • The Commercial Companies Code (CSC) approved by Legislative Decree No 2/2019.
  • The Securities Code in its latest version approved by Law 101/IX/2020.
  • The Banking Law approved by Law No 62/VIII/2014.

Recommendations

Listed companies and the ones operating in banking and financial sector are subject to additional recommendations issued by corporate governance codes, to which they must refer.

They must also take into consideration recommendations issued by the by sectoral regulatory entities, such as the Central Bank of Cape Verde or the Multisectoral Economic Regulatory Agency.

Internal Rules

Companies may adopt internal rules, such as by-laws, board internal regulations, codes of ethics or of conduct which set forth specific corporate governance rules and requirements.

Listed companies are subject to mandatory corporate governance requirements and recommendations. First of all, only companies organised as public limited companies (sociedade anónima or SA) are authorised to trade their shares on a regulated market.

To promote a high corporate governance standard, the Securities Code contains corporate governance standards, especially with regard to compliance with the duty of information. Companies must produce annual information on corporate governance, in the following terms.

  • Capital structure, including indication of shares not admitted to trading, different categories of shares, rights and duties inherent to them and percentage of capital that each category represents.
  • Possible restrictions on the transferability of shares, such as consent clauses for sale, or limitations on share ownership.
  • Qualified holdings in the company’s share capital.
  • Identification of shareholders holding special rights and description of these rights.
  • Control mechanisms provided for in a possible system of employee participation in capital, to the extent that voting rights are not exercised directly by them.
  • Possible restrictions on voting rights, such as limitations on the exercise of voting depending on the ownership of a number or percentage of shares, deadlines imposed for the exercise of voting rights or systems for highlighting rights with patrimonial content.
  • Shareholder agreements that are known to the company and may lead to restrictions on the transfer of securities or voting rights.
  • Rules applicable to the appointment and replacement of members of the management body and amendments to the company’s statutes.
  • Powers of the management body, particularly with regard to decisions to increase capital.
  • Significant agreements to which the company is a party and which come into force, are amended or terminate in the event of a change in control of the company following a public takeover bid, as well as the respective effects, unless, by their nature, their disclosure would be seriously detrimental to the company, unless the company is specifically obliged to disclose such information due to other legal imperatives.
  • Agreements between the company and the members of the management body or employees that provide for compensation in the event of the employee’s resignation, unfair dismissal or termination of the employment relationship following a public takeover bid.
  • Internal control and management risk systems implemented in the company.

The following mandatory corporate governance mechanisms are also envisaged in these companies.

  • The existence of the Certified Auditor as an autonomous body, not being part of the Supervisory Board.
  • The Supervisory Board must include at least one member who has a higher education degree appropriate to the exercise of their functions and knowledge in auditing or accounting and that is independent.
  • The Supervisory Board must be composed of a majority of independent members.

The members of the board of general meeting:

  • are subject to the incompatibility regime;
  • must be independent;
  • can only be removed by the general assembly with just cause; and
  • can only receive fixed remuneration.

As for the members of the management body, a regime prohibiting the waiver of deposits to hold administrators liable is established.

The Conduct Code (Circular 3/2012), issued by the Cape Verdean stock exchange, lays down further rules on the corporate governance of listed companies.

As has occurred in several jurisdictions, the factors underpinning ESG are increasingly being introduced into the reality of companies in Cabo Verde.

The legislative changes resulting from the approval of the new Commercial Companies Code also reinforced the corporate rights of minority shareholders, as well as access to company information.

Furthermore, several companies are creating internal Corporate Governance regulations based on internationally consolidated principles.

There are no mandatory requirements for companies in relation to reporting on ESG issues. However, there are certain recent developments on corporate governance that might impact ESG issues, such as the creation of the Institute for Corporate Governance, a private entity aiming to work and develop the matter in Cabo Verde.

It must also be noted that the launch of some financial products, called social, green and blue bonds, aim to allow the financing of sustainable projects within the framework of ESG policies.

Some entities operating in regulated sectors, such as telecommunications, energy, banking and finance, include information on ESG in their reports.

Principal Bodies of Public Limited Companies (Sociedade Anónima or SA)

Management board

  • Generally, there are a minimum of three members. Management can be entrusted to one director if the turnover for two consecutive years is expected to be less than CVE10 million. In addition to the election of the effective members of the board of directors, substitute directors must be elected in numbers not exceeding one third of the effective directors – this means three effective members and one substitute member, or one effective member and one substitute.

A supervisory board

  • Composed by three members or one auditor – a member of the supervisory board or the auditor must be certified.

A shareholder meeting

  • The board of the general assembly is composed of a President and a Secretary.

An auditor

  • Applicable in case of large companies and listed companies.

Principal Bodies of Limited Companies (Sociedade por Quotas)

Management board

  • The company is governed by management with one or more directors.

A shareholder meeting

  • The board of the general assembly is composed of a President and a Secretary.

A supervisory board

  • An auditor is not mandatory, but companies that do not have a supervisory body must appoint a certified auditor to carry out the statutory audit if turnover is greater than CVE10 million and/or the number of employees is more than ten.

The powers and types of decisions made by the corporate bodies differ depending on the corporate form of the company.

Sociedade Anónima

The board of directors is competent to determine the strategic orientations of the company’s business and ensure their implementation within the limits of the company’s interest. The board of directors is responsible for managing the activities of company, and must be subordinated to the deliberations of the general meeting or interventions of the supervisory board only in cases where the law or company articles so determine. In particular, the board of directors:

  • chooses its president, except when the company’s articles of association attribute this responsibility to the shareholders;
  • requests to convene general meetings;
  • prepare and submit the annual reports and accounts to be submitted for shareholder approval;
  • acquisition, disposal and encumbrance of real estate;
  • provision of personal or real guarantees and deposits by the company;
  • opening or closing of establishments or important parts thereof;
  • important extensions or reductions in the company’s activity;
  • establishment or termination of lasting and important co-operation with other companies;
  • change of headquarters and capital increases, under the terms set out in the articles of association;
  • merger, spin-off and company transformation projects; and
  • any other matter on which any administrator requires deliberation by the board.

The CEO and the deputy CEOs, if any, are in charge of the day-to-day management of the company, within the limits of the corporate object of the company and the board of directors’ powers.

Sociedade por Quotas

In the Sociedade por Quotas, the managing directors have the broadest powers to manage the company and represent it to third parties, within the limits of the corporate purpose and shareholders’ powers.

Refer to 5.2 Role of Shareholders in Company Management for a description of the shareholders’ decision-making powers.

The decisions of the Board of Directors are adopted either following a board meeting (held in-person or via a teleconference), or by having all directors sign a decision.

The Board of Directors (BOD) meets whenever it is called to by the President or by two other administrators. The BOD must meet at least once each month, unless otherwise provided for in the articles of association. The directors must be asked to convene in writing, with adequate advance notice, except when the contract of the company or a board regulation provides for the meeting on pre-fixed dates or another form of call.

The BOD cannot deliberate without being present or represented by the majority of its members. Decisions are taken by majority vote of directors present or represented.

Shareholders’ meetings are called by the president or, in the special cases provided for by law, by the supervisory board or by the court, at least 21 days in advance.

The shareholders who, according to the law and the by-laws, are entitled to at least one vote, have the right to be present at the general meeting and discuss and vote at such meeting.

As a rule, the general assembly can make decisions, in the first call, regardless of the number of shareholders present or represented. During second call, the assembly may decide regardless of the number of shareholders present or represented and the capital represented by them.

So that the general assembly can deliberate in the first call on matters for which the law requires a qualified majority, shareholders holding at least 1/3 of the share capital with voting rights must be present or represented.

The general assembly decides by a majority of votes issued, whatever the percentage of share capital represented therein, unless otherwise provided by law or the contract, and abstentions are not counted.

The decision on changing the articles of association, merger, division, transformation, dissolution of the company or other matters for which the law requires a qualified majority without specifying it, must be approved by 2/3 of the votes cast, whether the assembly meets in the first or second call.

In Public Limited Companies (Sociedade Anónima), the Board of Directors is made up of at least three members (there must always be an odd number). However, the law allows administration to be entrusted to a single director whose turnover, for two consecutive years, is less than CVE10 million (GBP76,432.69).

If a legal person is appointed director, they must appoint a natural person to hold the position in their own name.

The Board of Directors can further delegate the management and representation powers to one or more individuals, directors or third parties, or to an executive committee.

In the case of Sociedade por Quotas, management is carried out by one or more natural persons (partners or non-partners).

The Companies Code establishes that the board of directors is a collegiate body. As a principle, the directors collectively exercise the functions assigned to the board and they do not have any individual powers, except for the chairperson of the board. The chairperson is in charge of organising and directing the work of the Board of Directors and reporting to the general meeting.

The Board of Directors may grant specific assignments to individual directors, in order to improve the corporate governance of the company and facilitate the board’s mission.

The following composition requirements are in place.

  • The Board of Directors of Sociedade Anónima is made up of at least three members (there must always be an odd number).
  • The Board of Directors of Sociedade por Quotas is carried out by one or more natural persons (partners or non-partners).
  • Directors may be individuals or legal persons. If a legal person is appointed director, they must appoint a natural person to hold the position in their own name.
  • Along with the election of effective members of the Board of Directors, directors may be elected as substitutes in a number that does not exceed one third of the effective administrators.

Special Board of Directors composition requirements may also apply to specific types of companies due to the special regime to which they are subject (for example, aviation, banking and finance).

Electing Directors

The members of the BOD are appointed in the by-laws or elected by the general assembly. The directors are appointed or elected for a period set out in the company’s articles of association, and in the absence of an appointment period, it is understood that the appointment is made for four calendar years, with re-election being permitted.

The articles of association may stipulate that the election of the Board of Directors must be approved by a certain percentage of capital or that election of some of them must be approved by the majority of votes cast by a certain category of shares, as well as stating that certain categories of shares are granted the right to elect a certain number of directors, in a number not exceeding one third of the total.

The articles of association may establish that, for a number of directors not exceeding one, two or three, depending on whether the total number is three, five or more than five, an isolated election is carried out, between persons proposed on lists subscribed by groups of shareholders, as long as none of these groups has shares representing more than 20% or less than 10% of the total share capital.

Substitute Directors

If a director is definitely missing, he or she must be replaced, as follows.

  • By calling substitutes made by the president, according to the order in which they appear on the list submitted to the general meeting of shareholders.
  • By co-option, when there are no substitutes, unless there are not enough current directors for the board to function.
  • By designating a substitute by the supervisory board, in the event that there has been no co-option within 60 days of the absence.
  • By election of a new director.

Removal and Renunciation

Any member of the board of directors may be removed by resolution of the general meeting, at any time.

One or more shareholders holding shares corresponding to at least 10% of the share capital may, until a general meeting has been called to deliberate on the matter, request the judicial dismissal of a director, based on just cause.

In particular, serious breach of the administrator’s duties and his/her inability to carry out his/her duties normally constitutes just cause for dismissal.

Any director may resign from the exercise of his/her duties, by means of a written document addressed to the chairperson of the BOD. The resignation only takes effect 30 days after it is communicated, unless, in the meantime, a replacement is designated or elected. Resignation without just cause must be communicated within a reasonable period of time.

The Commercial Companies Code enshrines some legal provisions that aim to highlight the need for markedly independent management of commercial companies and avoid conflicts of interest.

Firstly, a general prohibition is established on granting loans or any form of credit to its directors, providing guarantees for obligations assumed by them or providing them with advances on salaries exceeding one month.

Furthermore, it was established that, unless expressly consented to by the General Assembly, transactions are concluded between:

  • the company and the director, in their own name, directly or through an intermediary; or
  • the company and the director, representing a third party,

and the company is one in which a director performs management functions.

These prohibitions remain in place in the year following the termination of duties by the director and are extended to transactions concluded with companies that are in a controlling or group relationship with the one in which the contracting party is a director.

Furthermore, the Commercial Companies Code establishes that during the period for which they were appointed or elected, directors cannot exercise, in the company or in companies that are in a controlling or group relationship with them, any temporary or permanent functions at the same time, under an employment or service-provision contract, or regarding entering into any such contracts aimed at providing services when a director’s duties cease. When someone who is linked to the company by an employment or service provision contract is appointed or elected as a director, this contract is suspended and is resumed immediately after the termination of duties.

Unless express authorisation is given at a general meeting, the director cannot carry out, on his/her own or on behalf of others, activities competing with those actually carried out by the company, nor can they carry out functions in a competing company or be appointed on behalf of it.

Directors stand in a fiduciary relationship towards the company. Directors are expected to act in good faith and in the best interest of the company at all times. This involves preserving the company’s assets as well as furthering the company’s business interests.

In general, directors must conduct the company’s affairs with the due care of a prudent and diligent business-person, in particular in accordance with the applicable laws and the articles of association (duty of legality) and taking into account the interests of shareholders and employees.

The duty to act diligently includes, in particular, the duty to obtain the necessary technical competence and sufficient knowledge of the company’s activities, and the duty to act in informed terms, free from any personal interest and in accordance with criteria of business rationality.

The members of the supervisory body must act in accordance with high standards of professional diligence and loyalty.

The directors owe their duties to the company. They always have to act in the best interests of the company. As established by the law, they shall act also taking into account, to a certain extent, the interests of the shareholders, creditors and employees of the company.

The Companies Code organises the topic of directors’ civil liability into three large groups:

  • civil liability towards company (Articles 78 and 79 of the CSC);
  • civil liability for social creditors (Article 84 of the CSC); and
  • civil liability towards partners and third parties (Article 85 of the CSC).

Civil Responsibility Towards the Company

Article 79, paragraph 1 establishes the principle that the members of the management body are answerable to the company for damages caused to it by breach of legal and contractual duties. A presumption of guilt is attributed to the members of the management body, which may be revoked “if they prove that they acted without fault”.

Responsibility is joint among directors.

The operationalisation of the civil liability mechanism of the members of the management body towards the company depends on the deliberation of the shareholders, taken by an absolute majority, and must be proposed within a period of six months counting from said deliberation, and for the exercise of the right of compensation, the partners may appoint special representatives. The civil liability of administrators can even be triggered during the meeting that considers the financial statements, although this matter is not included in the notice.

Civil Liability Towards Creditors

The civil liability of the board of directors towards creditors arises from the culpable non-compliance with legal or contractual provisions intended to protect them, and the social assets become insufficient to satisfy the respective credits.

The protection of corporate creditors is reinforced, as the compensation obligation cannot be excluded by the company’s resignation or transaction or by the fact or omission based on a resolution of the general meeting.

Creditors’ rights may even be exercised during the insolvency process by the administration of the insolvent estate.

Civil Liability Towards Shareholders and Third Parties

Finally, the Companies Code establishes a civil liability regime for the management body towards partners and third parties for damages directly caused to them in the exercise of their functions. This regime is complemented by the provisions of the Civil Code, which reinforces liability based on breach of contractual and legal duties.

The responsibility of the members of the management body towards shareholders and third parties is joint and several.

It is important to highlight that the civil liability regime for members of the management body also applies to “other people entrusted with management functions”. In other words, it does not only apply to members of the management body formally designated by the partners. It applies to directors and managers and not just in formal terms.

In Cabo Verde, directors and officers can be held liable for criminal and civil charges. Regarding criminal liability, in certain circumstances, directors may also be subject to criminal penalties for other violations of the Corporate Law – for example:

  • for knowingly making a false or misleading statement to the public;
  • for knowingly preparing or approving incorrect or misleading financial statements; or
  • for obstructing the conduct of an audit by statutory auditors or auditors appointed for the conduct of an extraordinary audit.

Criminal and/or administrative penalties are provided for by other special laws, particularly in relation to tax, labour, health, safety and environmental violations.

Directors and officers can also be civilly liable if they commit a breach of laws and/or regulations applicable to the company (breach of the articles of association or internal regulations).

Liability cannot be limited and the law requires managers to take out insurance. However, it may be waived by the general meeting, except in companies issuing securities admitted to trading on the stock exchange and in large companies.

The general meeting of shareholders or a committee appointed by it is responsible for setting the remuneration of each director, taking into account the functions performed and the economic situation of the company.

The remuneration may be certain or partially consist of a percentage of the year’s profits, but the maximum percentage allocated to directors must be authorised by a clause in the company’s articles of association.

All companies in Cabo Verde are required to disclose the total remuneration of the management board in the annual financial statements.

Directors’ fees must also be disclosed to the tax authorities as a form of income.

The entire structure of the company is defined by the shareholders when the company is formed. The purpose of the company is determined by its shareholders in the articles of association. The company and its shareholders are legally bound by the by-laws, which constitute the company’s internal regulations. As a result, shareholders collectively own the company.

The shareholders have the right to appoint corporate bodies, to attend and vote at AGMs, to receive dividends, and other rights. They may also, in certain circumstances, be called upon to finance the company.

One of the basic rules of corporate law under the Companies Code is that the business shall be managed by or under the direction of a board of directors. Thus, shareholders are generally not involved in the direct management of the company.

However, they may have some influence on management, as the law gives shareholders the right and the power to elect the board of directors, as well as the right to vote on and approve extraordinary transactions, such as any amendment to the certificate of incorporation or the by-laws, a merger, consolidation or conversion, the sale of all or a substantial amount of the assets of the corporation or the dissolution.

Shareholders participate in the decision-making process through the exercise of their voting rights in the general meetings.

The ordinary shareholder meeting of the company is held regularly once a year, within the first three months following the end of each financial year, to:

  • deliberate on the management report and accounts for the year;
  • deliberate on the proposed application of results;
  • carry out a general assessment of the administration and supervision of the company and, if applicable and although these matters are not on the agenda, proceed with the dismissal of members of the corporate bodies, when the general assembly has the power to do so, or express their distrust of them, when the authority to dismiss them lies with the supervisory board; and
  • carry out elections within its competence.

An extraordinary shareholder meeting may be convened on the initiative of the chairperson of the Board of General Meetings, by the Supervisory Board or by the court, whenever deemed necessary, in order to resolve the matters that are reserved for the exclusive competence of the shareholder meeting or any other matter that the BOD may consider of such importance that it requires the approval of the general meeting or at the request of shareholders holding at least 5% of the company’s share capital (2% in the case of a listed company), in exercise of the minority rights provided under the Companies Law.

The shareholder meeting is convened 21 full days prior to the date of the meeting through the publication of the invitation, which includes the items of the agenda, details of the place and time of the general meeting and rights that the shareholders may exercise within the 21-day period and during the meeting.

According to the law, regardless of the claim for compensation for individual damages caused, one or more shareholders who own at least 5% of the share capital may file a liability action against members of the management body, with a view to reparation, in favour of the company, for the loss it has suffered, when the company has not filed it.

In companies listed on the stock exchange, the law establishes that anyone who reaches or exceeds a shareholding of 10%, 20%, one third, half, two thirds or 90% of the voting rights corresponding to the share capital of a public company, subject to Cape Verdean personal law, and anyone who reduces their participation to a value lower than any of those limits must, within four business days after the day of the occurrence of the fact or its knowledge:

  • inform the General Audit of the Securities Market and the company of this fact; and
  • make the entities referred to in this section aware of the situations that determine the attribution to the participant of voting rights inherent in securities belonging to third parties.

Companies are required to file various documents relating to their accounts for the previous financial year with the registrar of commercial companies.

The filing covers the following documents:

  • the annual accounts;
  • the management report;
  • minutes of approval of the accounts for the year and application of results;
  • balance sheet, income statement and annex to the balance sheet and income statement;
  • legal certification of accounts; and
  • opinion of the supervisory body, if such body exists.

The management report is prepared by the directors and covers principally the company’s corporate governance arrangements, the performance of the company during the year under review, and the outlook for the coming year.

Corporate governance arrangements are disclosed as part of the regulatory reports expected from companies.

Any updates to the constitutive documents during the life of the company must be filed with the companies registry. These updates and their related corporate documents are publicly available and include amendments to the articles of association, changes to board composition, transfers of the registered office, changes to the share capital, among others aspects.

In case of failure to comply with the filing obligations, companies or their officers may be exposed to administrative fines.

The appointment of an external auditor by the shareholders’ ordinary general meeting becomes mandatory if, at the end of the financial year, the company exceeds at least one of the following thresholds:

  • turnover exceeding CVE200 million (over GBP1.528 million); and
  • total net assets exceeding CVE15 million (GBP114,654.19).

Auditors are subject to certain requirements regarding their independence, which prohibits them from having any personal, financial or professional relationships that are incompatible with the functions of an auditor.

Companies issuing securities admitted to trading on the stock exchange are also required to have an external auditor.

The law establishes that members of the company’s management bodies must act with diligence and loyalty, in the interests of society, having taken into account the interests of partners and employees. The duty to act diligently includes, in particular, obtaining the necessary technical capacity and sufficient knowledge of the company’s activities.

Therefore, such a duty must be understood as also including the obligation of the company’s management to establish risk management policies and internal control systems in the more general context of promoting the company’s interests and business activity.

Raposo Bernardo & Associados

Av. Fontes Pereira de Melo, No 35 18ºA
Lisboa
Portugal

+351 21 3121 330

lisboa@raposobernardo.com www.raposobernardo.com
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Raposo Bernardo & Associados is dedicated to turning governance challenges into business opportunities. Key services focusing on governance: ESG strategy development – crafting tailored governance strategies that align with client business goals, identifying and prioritising key governance issues relevant to the industry, and integrating ESG considerations into overall business strategy; governance policy and compliance – advising on the development and enforcement of good governance policies, and ensuring compliance with local and international governance regulations; stakeholder engagement and communication – facilitating effective communication with stakeholders on governance matters, helping clients build and maintain a positive reputation, and advising on transparency and disclosure practices; sustainability reporting and impact assessment – assisting with the preparation of sustainability reports in accordance with global standards (eg, GRI and SASB), conducting environmental and social impact assessments, and providing metrics and analytics to measure governance performance. The firm has been assisting in navigating regulatory frameworks and compliance to improve companies’ governance ratings.

Corporate Governance in Cape Verde

Framework

The topic of corporate governance is of paramount importance for commercial companies and is increasingly highlighted in the economies of medium-developed countries, such as Cape Verde.

Although there is no legal definition of corporate governance, it is generally understood as a set of practices, principles, and structures that define how a company is managed and supervised. It aims to ensure that a company is managed responsibly, transparently, and fairly, considering the interests of all stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers, and the broader community. Essentially, it is a system of organisation and management aimed at providing responsible and transparent administration to create value for shareholders and all stakeholders.

Some of the main principles of corporate governance include:

  • Transparency – the company must disclose relevant information about its activities and decisions clearly and accessibly to all stakeholders.
  • Fairness – all stakeholders must be treated with respect and fairness, and their rights must be protected.
  • Accountability – the company’s management must be responsible for its actions to the stakeholders.
  • Social responsibility – the company must consider the impact of its activities on society and the environment and act ethically and responsibly.

The importance of corporate governance lies in creating a conducive environment for the sustainable growth of companies, ensuring the protection of stakeholders’ rights, efficient resource management, and accountability for management’s actions.

From a normative perspective, corporate governance derives from laws and regulations concerning corporate law and securities law. Additionally, corporate governance has also been developed at the level of soft law, such as ethical standards, recommendations, best practice norms, and codes of conduct, which, despite being non-legal norms lacking legal sanctions, play a predominant role in the development of companies’ activities.

Topics related to corporate governance have gained prominence in Cape Verde in recent years, especially following the implementation of various legislative and regulatory reforms.

The need to align with international best practices has also driven significant advancements. The Commercial Companies Code (CSC) approved by Legislative Decree No 2/2019 of 23 July is the primary legislation regulating corporate governance in Cape Verde. The CSC covers various aspects of business management, including the structure and functioning of the board of directors, shareholders’ rights, and internal control mechanisms. Besides the CSC, notable mentions include the Securities Code in its latest version approved by Law 101/IX/2020 of 21 August, as well as the Banking Law approved by Law No 62/VIII/2014 of 23 April, which play a crucial role in promoting good corporate governance practices in Cape Verde.

Experience has shown that companies that adopt corporate governance principles generally demonstrate the following advantages:

  • Higher level of investor confidence.
  • Better access to domestic and foreign capital.
  • Greater operational efficiency.
  • Reduction in reputational risk.
  • Increased sustainability.

Corporate governance topics are becoming increasingly transversal and comprehensive. In this regard, topics such as sustainability, environmental and social risk, and the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms are currently being addressed at the corporate governance level, as they promote and enhance the pursuit of the company’s long-term interests, performance, and sustainable development.

The new aspects of corporate governance have been structured to allow consideration of the interests of shareholders and other investors, workers, customers, creditors, suppliers, and other interested parties, contributing to strengthening trust in the quality, transparency, and ethical standards of management and oversight, as well as to the sustainable development of the community in which companies operate and the development of the capital market.

Particular emphasis has been placed on the relationship that should exist between companies and the general community, recommending that companies, within the scope of corporate governance, explain to the public how their strategy seeks to ensure the achievement of their long-term goals and the main contributions resulting therefrom for the general community, by identifying the main policies and measures adopted concerning the achievement of their environmental and social objectives.

The importance of implementing corporate governance is manifested at various levels, such as:

  • diversity in the composition and functioning of corporate bodies;
  • functioning of corporate bodies;
  • relationship between executive and non-executive directors;
  • relationship between corporate bodies;
  • management of conflict of interest situations;
  • transactions with related parties;
  • shareholders and general meeting;
  • company oversight;
  • annual performance evaluation;
  • remuneration policy;
  • internal control norms and procedures;
  • information disclosure; and
  • legal audit of accounts.

The importance of corporate governance recommendations is evidenced, for example, through the establishment of principles that determine that, concerning diversity in the composition and functioning of corporate bodies, criteria and requirements related to the profile of members suitable for the function to be performed should be established in advance and abstractly, considering, in particular, individual attributes (such as competence, independence, integrity, availability, and experience), and diversity requirements (with particular attention to gender equality), that can contribute to improving the performance of the body and to balance its composition.

It also follows from internationally recognised and applied corporate governance norms and principles that companies should adopt a whistleblowing policy that outlines the main rules and procedures to be followed for each report and an internal reporting channel that also includes access by non-employees, as provided by applicable law.

Regarding the relationship between corporate bodies, corporate governance principles recommend that statutes establish procedures to ensure that members of management and supervisory bodies have permanent access to all necessary information for assessing the performance, situation, and development prospects of the company, including, notably, minutes, supporting documentation for decisions taken, meeting notices, and archives of executive management body meetings, without prejudice to access to any other documents or individuals from whom clarifications may be requested.

In the field of managing conflict of interest situations, corporate governance principles recommend adopting internal regulations on the matter, as well as procedures ensuring that the member in conflict does not interfere in the decision-making process, without prejudice to the duty to provide information and clarifications requested by the body or its members.

Transactions with related parties are also included in corporate governance principles, which recommend the mandatory disclosure by the management body, in the governance report or other publicly available means, of the internal procedure for verifying transactions with related parties.

The adoption of corporate governance principles is fundamental to promoting transparency, fairness, and accountability in companies. In Cape Verde, the implementation of good corporate governance practices has shown to be a factor in investor confidence, better access to capital, and greater operational efficiency. Furthermore, by aligning with international best practices, companies contribute to sustainable development and the strengthening of the capital market, highlighting the crucial importance of these principles for the economic and social growth of the country.

Integration of ESG in corporate governance structures

In a modern and constantly evolving corporate scenario, corporate governance cannot be seen solely from a purely business perspective focused on financial efficiency and profit generation. The concept of ESG (environmental, social and governance) has increasingly assumed a decisive role. Companies are increasingly recognising and valuing the importance of sustainable and responsible practices grouped under the ESG concept.

ESG is a set of criteria used to measure the sustainability and ethical impact of an investment in a company. The criteria are divided into three main categories:

  • environmental;
  • social; and
  • governance.

The incorporation of ESG into corporate governance structures is not just a trend but a strategic necessity to ensure long-term sustainability and competitiveness in the global market. It is in this context that the integration of ESG factors emerges as a fundamental element to ensure long-term sustainability and responsible growth of organisations. They are part of a strategy considered essential to guarantee the viability and sustainable growth of companies in the long term.

When we talk about integrating ESG factors into corporate governance structures, we are considering certain environmental, social, and corporate governance indicators created to measure the degree of organisational commitment to sustainable development goals.

ESG emerged in Cape Verde within the framework of strategic objectives associated with the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) and has been adopted as criteria for evaluating companies’ and institutions’ performance in sustainability.

Next, the authors will present some topics related to the integration of ESG in corporate governance structures, identifying some practices, policies, benefits, and challenges.

ESG factors provide a holistic approach to corporate responsibility. In environmental terms, they relate to the impact of the company’s activity on the environment, including greenhouse gas emissions, consumption of natural resources, waste management, sustainability practices, environmental management systems, environmental programs, and training and awareness programs, reuse of raw materials or their replacement with more environmentally friendly and less harmful materials, measures to reduce energy intensity, water consumption management, among others.

In the social domain, they are linked to hiring practices and human rights, health and safety systems at work, well-being, measures to increase workforce diversity and inclusion, equal pay and gender equality, worker qualification, work-life balance measures, community engagement, local networks and partnerships, among others.

Regarding governance, we can highlight approaches related to anti-corruption policy, codes and ethical values, salary and conduct policy, gender diversity in management, transparency and legal compliance, responsible purchasing policies, supplier codes and due diligence measures in supply chains, risk management, among others.

Companies in Cape Verde have already realised that transitioning to an economic development model based on sustainability brings inevitable changes in how company value will be assessed. And the ESG acronym was established in the field of sustainable finance as a reporting standard to respond to investor demands in evaluating business behavior and policies in non-financial areas. Due to the dissemination of ESG factors, companies are increasingly aware that the economic results they achieve are only one component of evaluation, similar to ESG factors. In other words, evaluation processes also consider how results were achieved in terms of responsible management and business contributions to global goals related to environmental action, biodiversity, water management, gender equality, fair wages, diversity in executive positions, among others.

Therefore, it is urgent to develop a more robust legislative framework in Cape Verde associated with sustainable finance, establishing a set of norms and criteria to assess the eligibility and alignment of economic activities with sustainability principles.

And in a world increasingly aware of the importance of sustainability, small, medium, and large companies in Cape Verde that wish to thrive in the market need to adapt to this new reality, which necessarily involves integrating ESG factors into their businesses. This is not just a matter of social responsibility but also a crucial factor for accessing financing, competitiveness, and long-term success. The risk assessment of companies by private investors and banks will also integrate the sustainability dimension due to the legal obligations that these institutions are subject to both locally and internationally.

Cape Verde is a country that imports a significant portion of the products and goods it consumes. International suppliers, already subject to sustainability regulations, will demand that Cape Verdean companies demonstrate sustainable practices through the incorporation of ESG factors into their businesses. Thus, this alignment becomes increasingly urgent, under the penalty of supply chain interruptions. Practically, Cape Verdean companies that do not adapt to this new reality risk seeing their growth compromised.

The integration of ESG factors by Cape Verdean companies constitutes an opportunity that cannot be missed to become more competitive, resilient, and prepared for the future. It provides several benefits, such as:

  • Risk mitigation – adopting sustainable practices helps mitigate environmental and social risks that can negatively impact the company.
  • Attracting investments – investors are increasingly focused on companies that demonstrate a commitment to ESG, considering these factors in risk assessment and decision-making.
  • Reputation and brand – companies that adopt ESG practices tend to be more valued by consumers, improving their reputation and brand loyalty.
  • Operational efficiency – responsible environmental and social practices can lead to greater operational efficiency and cost reduction.

In summary, integrating ESG into the corporate governance structure is not just about regulatory compliance or responding to external pressures. It is a strategic approach that can bring significant long-term benefits.

Civil liability of directors

In the context of corporate governance, the civil liability of members of the management body is an extremely relevant topic, especially in light of Cape Verdean legislation. This topic is frequently discussed in corporate governance debates, focusing on how companies can be managed efficiently, ethically, and transparently, with clear accountability.

The civil liability of directors must always be analysed considering the general duties of directors provided in the Commercial Companies Code (CSC), specifically between Articles 77 and 91, Chapter VII (Civil Liability for the Constitution, Administration, and Supervision of the Company).

The CSC organises the topic of civil liability of administrators into three major groups:

  • civil liability towards the company (Articles 78 and 79 of the CSC);
  • civil liability towards social creditors (Article 84 of the CSC); and
  • civil liability towards shareholders and third parties (Article 85 of the CSC).

Civil liability towards the company

Article 79, paragraph 1 establishes the principle that members of the management body are liable to the company for damages caused by violating legal and contractual duties. A presumption of fault is attributed to the members of the management body, which can be rebutted “if they prove that they acted without fault”.

Liability is joint and several among directors Despite this regime, the CSC establishes a regime of exemption from liability for members of the management body for damages resulting from a collegial decision if the members of the management body did not participate in it, when their participation was not required, or if they voted against it, with the possibility of recording their dissenting vote within five days in the minutes book or in a communication addressed to the supervisory body or before a notary.

Members of the management body are also obliged to oppose harmful acts and to eliminate or mitigate the harmful effects of acts already performed, under penalty of being jointly and severally liable for the acts they could have opposed.

The CSC also establishes that the liability of members of the management body towards the company does not apply when the act or omission is based on a shareholders’ resolution, even if voidable, unless the resolution was proposed by the said members of the management body.

The operationalisation of the civil liability mechanism of members of the management body towards the company depends on a shareholders’ resolution, taken by an absolute majority, and must be proposed within six months from the said resolution, and for the exercise of the right to compensation, the shareholders may appoint special representatives. The civil liability of directors can even be triggered during the meeting that approves the annual accounts, even if this matter is not on the agenda.

Civil liability towards social creditors

The civil liability of the management body towards social creditors arises from the culpable non-compliance with legal or contractual provisions intended for their protection, and the company’s assets become insufficient to satisfy their claims. The protection of social creditors is reinforced, as the obligation to indemnify cannot be excluded by the company’s waiver or settlement nor by the fact or omission based on a general meeting resolution.

The rights of creditors can even be exercised during the insolvency process by the administration of the insolvent estate.

Civil liability towards shareholders and third parties

Finally, the CSC establishes a regime of civil liability of the management body towards shareholders and third parties for damages directly caused to them in the exercise of their functions. This regime is complemented by the provisions of the Civil Code, which reinforces liability based on the violation of contractual and legal duties.

The liability of members of the management body towards shareholders and third parties is joint and several.

Duties include diligence, loyalty, vigilance, the prohibition of distributing company assets to shareholders when the net situation is less than the sum of the capital and mandatory reserves, the preparation of the management report and presentation of the annual accounts, informational and publicity duties, duties related to mandatory registrations, duties related to merger, division, dissolution, and transformation operations of companies, among others.

Extent of civil liability

It is important to note that the regime of civil liability of members of the management body also applies to “other persons entrusted with management functions”. In other words, it does not apply only to members of the management body formally appointed by the shareholders.

The CSC refers to management in functional terms, including de facto directors or managers and not just in formal terms.

In conclusion, the civil liability of members of the management body is an essential component of corporate governance, ensuring that administrators fulfil their legal and contractual duties, promoting transparency and accountability. The regime established by the CSC in Cape Verde provides a robust framework to protect the company, creditors, shareholders, and third parties, encouraging ethical and efficient management practices.

Raposo Bernardo & Associados

Av. Fontes Pereira de Melo, No 35 18ºA
Lisboa
Portugal

+351 21 3121 330

lisboa@raposobernardo.com www.raposobernardo.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Raposo Bernardo & Associados is dedicated to turning governance challenges into business opportunities. Key services focusing on governance: ESG strategy development – crafting tailored governance strategies that align with client business goals, identifying and prioritising key governance issues relevant to the industry, and integrating ESG considerations into overall business strategy; governance policy and compliance – advising on the development and enforcement of good governance policies, and ensuring compliance with local and international governance regulations; stakeholder engagement and communication – facilitating effective communication with stakeholders on governance matters, helping clients build and maintain a positive reputation, and advising on transparency and disclosure practices; sustainability reporting and impact assessment – assisting with the preparation of sustainability reports in accordance with global standards (eg, GRI and SASB), conducting environmental and social impact assessments, and providing metrics and analytics to measure governance performance. The firm has been assisting in navigating regulatory frameworks and compliance to improve companies’ governance ratings.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Raposo Bernardo & Associados is dedicated to turning governance challenges into business opportunities. Key services focusing on governance: ESG strategy development – crafting tailored governance strategies that align with client business goals, identifying and prioritising key governance issues relevant to the industry, and integrating ESG considerations into overall business strategy; governance policy and compliance – advising on the development and enforcement of good governance policies, and ensuring compliance with local and international governance regulations; stakeholder engagement and communication – facilitating effective communication with stakeholders on governance matters, helping clients build and maintain a positive reputation, and advising on transparency and disclosure practices; sustainability reporting and impact assessment – assisting with the preparation of sustainability reports in accordance with global standards (eg, GRI and SASB), conducting environmental and social impact assessments, and providing metrics and analytics to measure governance performance. The firm has been assisting in navigating regulatory frameworks and compliance to improve companies’ governance ratings.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.