There are several options available when doing business in Canada. The choice of structure is generally dictated by a number of factors, based mainly on tax and liability considerations. The most used structures are:

• corporations;
• unlimited liability companies (ULCs);
• partnerships;
• joint ventures; and
• sole proprietorships.

Corporations

Businesses are generally carried on by corporations, which are legal entities with a patrimony distinct from that of their shareholders. These entities may be incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act or under an equivalent law of a province or territory. Their popularity stems from two main factors:

• the shareholders’ liability is limited to their investment in the corporation; and
• the corporation is taxed as a separate entity, generally at lower rates than individuals.

ULCs

ULCs are a form of corporation that’s only available in three Canadian provinces (Alberta, Nova Scotia and British Columbia), and the specificities may vary between each jurisdiction. ULCs are distinct legal entities, but in some situations the shareholders’ liability is unlimited. Under Canadian tax laws, ULCs are considered corporations and are taxed as separate entities. They’re sometimes used where there are US shareholders, since ULCs may be treated as “disregarded entities” under US tax laws, therefore leaving taxation of the ULC’s income in the US shareholders’ hands directly, for US tax purposes.

Partnerships

Both general partnerships and limited partnerships are relationships governed by provincial legislation between two or more persons who carry on a business.

In a general partnership, each partner is liable for the partnership’s liability in relation to third parties.

In a limited partnership, there are two kinds of partners:

• general partners, who are exposed to unlimited liability; and
• limited partners, whose liability is limited to their capital investment if they take no part in the management or control of the business.

A partnership is not subject to income tax as a separate entity. Rather, the partnership acts as a “flow-through” entity where the net income is calculated at the partnership level and allocated to its partners, who are liable for the taxes on such income.

Joint Ventures

Joint ventures share some similarities with partnerships but, unlike the latter where two or more partners conduct business together, a joint venture is created when two or more persons wish to collaborate for a specific project. A joint venture is not taxed as a separate entity, and the liability of each partner is set out in the joint venture agreement. Typically, this type of agreement clearly state that the parties do not wish to form a partnership; otherwise, the joint venture could be considered as such.

Sole Proprietorships

Sole proprietorships are unincorporated businesses owned by a single individual. Such individual’s liability is unlimited, and the income generated by the business is added to the individual’s other income, if any, and taxed at the personal rates.

Partnerships are commonly used to create investment funds, as the potential limitation of liability and the absence of taxation at the entity level are valuable advantages to the partners.

Since the income and loss are calculated jointly for the parties in a joint venture, this type of entity is popular in real estate investments as the joint parties may personally determine the depreciation expense that will be utilised when calculating their income, instead of having it calculated at the partnership level.

The residence of an incorporated business, also known as a corporation, is determined in two steps:

• first, by reviewing the deeming provisions of the Income Tax Act (ITA); and
• if none are applicable, by application of the common law.

The ITA deems a corporation to be a Canadian resident throughout a tax year if the corporation was incorporated in Canada after 26 April 1965. Where the corporation was not incorporated in Canada or was incorporated in Canada prior to 26 April 1965, its residency status for Canadian tax purposes will depend on where its central management and control is located.

The aforementioned deeming provisions will not apply if the corporation is deemed to be resident in another country, pursuant to a tax treaty between Canada and the other country.

A partnership with one or more non-resident partners is not a “Canadian partnership” and is therefore treated as a non-resident partnership for income tax purposes. The partnership may then need to withhold taxes prior to allocating income to certain partners.

The federal tax rates applicable to incorporated businesses resident in Canada vary depending on the type of income earned, whether the corporation is a private corporation, and whether the corporation is controlled by Canadian residents for income tax purposes. A private corporation that is resident in Canada and controlled by Canadian residents qualifies as a Canadian-controlled private corporation (CCPC). As of 1 January 2025, the federal tax rates for CCPCs are as follows:

• active small business income (up to CAD500,000): 9%;
• active business income (ABI) (above CAD500,000): 15%; and
• investment income (other than dividends): 38.67%, a portion of which (representing 30.67% of said investment income) is refundable upon the payment of taxable dividends by the corporation at a rate of CAD1 of tax reimbursed to the corporation for each CAD2.61 of dividends paid to its shareholders.

The federal tax rate applicable to corporations that do not qualify as CCPCs is 15% for business and investment income, as of 1 January 2025. The active small business income rate is not available to corporations that do not qualify as CCPCs.

As for dividend income, taxable dividends received by corporations resident in Canada are generally deductible for the purpose of computing their taxable income. However, private corporations may be subject to a refundable tax on dividends received from corporations that are not “connected”, or on dividends received that entitled the payer corporation to a dividend refund. The dividends received would then be subject to a 38.33% tax, which is refundable upon the payment of taxable dividends at a rate of CAD1 of tax reimbursed to the receiver corporation for each CAD2.61 of dividends paid to its shareholders.

A payer corporation is “connected” to the receiver corporation if the latter (or persons not dealing at arm’s length with the latter) controls the payer corporation or if the receiver corporation owns more than 10% of the shares of the payer corporation in votes and value.

As of 2026, the federal tax rates applicable to individuals are as follows:

• 14% on the first CAD58,523 of taxable income; plus
• 20.5% on the portion of taxable income between CAD58,524 and CAD117,045; plus
• 26% on the portion of taxable income between CAD117,046 and CAD181,440; plus
• 29% on the portion of taxable income between CAD181,441 and CAD258,482; plus
• 33% on the portion of taxable income over CAD258,482.

The net income of a partnership is taxable at the partner level, at the rates applicable to the partner, since it is a flow-through entity.

Corporations and individuals are also subject to provincial income tax.

The taxable income of a corporation is composed of business income, property income (interest, rent, royalties, and dividends) and 50% of capital gains (see 2.7 Capital Gains), and is the result of its income for the year minus allowable deductions. The deductions a corporation is allowed to claim are expenses incurred for the purpose of earning business or property income. This usually covers salaries, insurance expenses, maintenance and repairs, licences, accounting and legal fees, and advertising expenses.

The net income reported on financial statements will often not be the same as the net income calculated for tax purposes, since some income and expenses reported in financial statements may not be used in the calculation of net income for tax purposes. Income is generally reported using the accrual method – only farmers, fishermen and self-employed commission sales agents are allowed to use the cash method.

The Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) programme encourages all Canadian businesses, regardless of their size or sector, to develop new, improved or technologically advanced products by taking advantage of three tax incentives:

• an income tax deduction;
• an investment tax credit (ITC); and
• a refund, in specific circumstances.

The ITC amount and the availability of a refund under the SR&ED programme depend on whether the corporation qualifies as a CCPC, and on the qualifying expenditures incurred in Canada (wages, machinery, equipment, etc). Unused ITCs may be carried back three years or forward up to 20 years. Provincial incentives are also available.

Canadian film or video production tax credits are available for certain expenses for certified films or videos.

Also, an accelerated investment incentive was introduced in 2018 that provides for an enhanced first-year depreciation deduction on certain depreciable properties, and for the immediate write-off of the full cost of machinery and equipment for manufacturing and processing businesses and of the full cost of specified clean energy equipment for clean energy businesses. These deductions are in their phase-out period and will be progressively reduced from 2024 to 2027.

Canadian taxable corporations have access to four refundable tax credits known as the Clean Economy ITCs, aimed at supporting the transition to net zero emissions. Those credits are:

• Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) ITC;
• Clean Technology ITC;
• Clean Hydrogen ITC; and

• Clean Technology Manufacturing ITC.

These ITCs apply to eligible expenditures or property that is acquired and becomes available for use before 31 December 2034 (with the exception of the CCUS ITC, which ends on 31 December 2040). Generally speaking, it is only possible to claim one of the Clean Economy ITCs for the same eligible property.

Canada has implemented a temporary measure to reduce corporate income tax rates by 50% for qualifying zero-emission technology manufacturers.

Provinces may also offer targeted incentives for specific industries (the production of multimedia titles to support digital transformation in print media companies, etc).

A corporation may incur two types of losses:

• capital losses; and
• non-capital losses.

Capital Losses

Capital losses occur upon the disposal of a capital property for an amount that is less than its cost. Generally, a capital loss may only offset capital gains – it cannot be applied to other income unless it qualifies as an allowable business investment loss (ABIL). Capital losses may be carried back three years or carried forward indefinitely.

An ABIL is a capital loss incurred on the sale of shares of a small business corporation to a third party, or upon the bankruptcy, insolvency or winding-up of a small business corporation. ABILs may offset income from all sources. They can be carried back three years or carried forward for ten years, after which they are converted into capital losses and may be carried forward indefinitely.

Non-Capital Losses

Generally, a non-capital loss is any loss incurred from carrying on a business. Non-capital losses may offset income from all sources. They can be carried back three years or carried forward for 20 years.

When a business is carried on through a limited partnership, a limited partner’s share of the limited partnership’s loss from a business or property may only be deducted by the limited partner if such loss does not exceed the limited partner’s “at-risk amount” (generally the amount of capital contributed by the partner to the partnership) for the year. The excess loss can be carried forward indefinitely.

Generally, interest expense is considered a capital expenditure and is not deductible unless it meets specific requirements in the ITA, which include that the amount must be payable in the year under a legal obligation to pay interest, and that the amount must be reasonable.

Where the above conditions are fulfilled, the ITA nevertheless restricts the deduction for interest paid or payable by certain corporations resident in Canada in a taxation year on debts owing to specified non-residents if the ratio of these debts to the corporation’s equity exceeds 1.5:1.

Furthermore, for taxation years beginning after 30 September 2023, the ITA restricts the deduction for excessive interest and financing expenses. The rules adopt an “earnings stripping” approach, which restricts a taxpayer’s deductions for interest expense and other financing costs to an amount that is proportional to the taxable income generated by its activities in Canada. The rules limit the amount of net interest and financing expenses that may be deducted in computing a taxpayer’s income to no more than a fixed ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA). The ratio is 40% for taxation years beginning after 30 September 2023 and before 1 January 2024, and is lowered to 30% for taxation years beginning after 31 December 2023.

Certain entities may be exempt from these rules, either because they do not meet the de minimis thresholds or because they operate almost entirely in Canada and meet the conditions prescribed under the ITA. Other sector-specific exclusions may apply in respect of borrowings made for certain projects.

Unlike other jurisdictions, Canada does not have a formal system providing for the consolidated taxation of corporate groups.

A corporation’s losses may be used by other members of the corporate group through reorganisations or financing arrangements, but such transactions require thoughtful planning and may even require advance tax rulings.

Only 50% of the capital gain of a corporation is taxable, and that amount is taxed as investment income. The tax rate will depend on whether the corporation qualifies as a CCPC (see 1.4 Tax Rates for additional information on tax rates paid by corporations).

There is no exemption or relief from the taxation of capital gains for corporations.

In addition to the federal income tax, corporations may be subject to goods and services tax, municipal taxes, land transfer taxes, federal and provincial social security contributions, and provincial payroll taxes.

Corporations are also subject to provincial income tax.

See 2.8 Other Taxes on Transactions.

Most businesses are carried on by corporations.

One of the main advantages of providing services through a corporation is the ability to benefit from the small business deduction, which provides a preferential tax rate of 9% at the federal level on the first CAD500,000 of ABI earned by a corporation that qualifies as a CCPC. ABI above CAD500,000 is taxed at a federal rate of 15%.

However, this preferential tax rate does not apply to personal services businesses carried on by a corporation. A personal services business is one that provides services where the individual who performs the services on behalf of the corporation (ie, the incorporated employee) would reasonably be regarded as an employee of the person or partnership to which the services were provided, but for the existence of the corporation. These rules are not restricted to professionals.

The taxable income of a personal services business is taxed at a flat rate equal to the top marginal personal tax rate, thus removing the advantage afforded by the lower corporate tax rates.

Passive income rules provide for a gradual reduction of the small business active income limit of CAD500,000 available to CCPCs, known as the business limit, on which the preferential tax rate of 9% applies where a corporation, together with its associated corporations, earned investment income of between CAD50,000 and CAD150,000 in a year. The reduction effectively decreases the annual business limit by CAD5 for each CAD1 of investment income earned in excess of CAD50,000.

Pursuant to such rules, when the aggregate investment income of a CCPC earning active income and its associated corporations is CAD150,000 or higher for a given year, the CCPC will not have access to the preferential tax rate of 9% applicable to ABI and will therefore be taxed at the regular rate of 15%.

Dividends From Private Corporations

Three types of dividends can be paid by a corporation resident in Canada in favour of an individual resident in Canada:

• eligible dividends (dividends paid by a corporation taxed at the 15% rate);
• non-eligible dividends (dividends paid by a corporation taxed at the 9% rate); and
• capital dividends.

At the federal level, if an individual receives an eligible dividend, a grossed-up amount equal to 138% of the dividend is included in computing the individual’s income and the individual is allowed a dividend tax credit equal to 15.02% of the grossed-up amount, the whole resulting in an eligible dividend being taxable in the hands of an individual at a top federal marginal tax rate of 24.81%.

At the federal level, if an individual receives a non-eligible dividend, a grossed-up amount equal to 115% of the dividend is included in computing the individual’s income and the individual is allowed a dividend tax credit equal to 9.03% of the grossed-up amount, the whole resulting in a non-eligible dividend being taxable in the hands of an individual at a top federal marginal tax rate of 27.57%.

Eligible and non-eligible dividends are also taxable at the provincial level.

A capital dividend is a dividend paid by a corporation out of its capital dividend account (which is essentially composed of the non-taxable portion of capital gains realised by the corporation) and is not taxable in the hands of the individual.

Gain on the Sale of Shares in Private Corporations

50% of a capital gain realised by an individual is taxable at the individual’s applicable federal and provincial income tax rate, including a capital gain realised on shares of a private corporation. This results in an effective federal marginal tax rate for capital gains of 16.5% and an effective total marginal tax rate for capital gains of between 22.25% and 27.40%, depending on the applicable provincial rate (see 2.7 Capital Gains).

An eligible individual resident in Canada is entitled to a lifetime capital gains exemption on gains realised on the disposal of qualified small business corporation shares. If the capital gain realised by the individual qualifies under these rules, the capital gain – up to the limit – will be exempt from income tax. The lifetime capital gains exemption limit was increased to CAD1,250,000 in 2024–2025 and is to be indexed annually. Therefore, the limit should be set at CAD1,275,000 for 2026, based on the federal indexing factor of 2%.

Dividends From Publicly Traded Corporations

Dividends received from a Canadian public corporation are considered eligible dividends. Therefore, at the federal level, a grossed-up amount equal to 138% of the dividend is included in computing the individual’s income and the individual is allowed a dividend tax credit equal to 15.02% of the grossed-up amount, the whole resulting in an eligible dividend being taxable in the hands of an individual at a top federal marginal tax rate of 24.81%.

Dividends received from a company resident in another country are not subject to the gross-up or the dividend credit. The entire dividend amount is taxable in Canada and may be subject to withholding in the other country.

Gain on the Sale of Shares in Publicly Traded Corporations

50% of a capital gain realised by an individual is taxable at the individual’s applicable federal and provincial income tax rate, including a capital gain realised on shares of a publicly traded corporation (see 2.7 Capital Gains).

Canada imposes a 25% federal withholding tax on certain types of passive income from Canadian sources, such as interest, dividends and royalties paid or credited to non-residents.

Subject to limited statutory exemptions, the Canadian payer is required to withhold tax from the gross amount paid or credited to the non-resident payee, and to remit it to the tax authorities on its behalf. The withholding tax rate can often be reduced to 15%, 10% or even 0% under Canada’s tax treaties. However, before withholding less than 25%, the Canadian payer will normally require a completed declaration of eligibility for benefits under a tax treaty (ie, Form NR301, NR302 for a partnership, or NR303 for a hybrid entity such as a US LLC).

Canada currently has 93 tax treaties in force with foreign countries, which mainly follow the OECD Model Tax Convention (subject to exceptions).

The OECD Multilateral Instrument (MLI) entered into force in Canada on 1 December 2019 and introduces a treaty anti‑abuse rule into most of Canada’s tax treaties, which will deny the benefits of the applicable treaty where one of the principal purposes of the arrangement or transaction is to obtain the benefits of the treaty. For example, if determination is made that one of the principal purposes for using a subsidiary in a particular treaty jurisdiction is to access the benefits of that treaty, then the benefits of that treaty are denied.

The tax authorities’ position is that, in certain circumstances, Canada’s General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) could be applied to transactions that are undertaken primarily to secure a tax benefit afforded by a tax treaty.

Transactions regarding goods, services (ie, management) and intangibles (ie, patents, trade marks) with non-arm’s length non-residents are required to occur under arm’s length terms and conditions. Otherwise, adjustments will be made to ensure that the Canadian payer’s transfer prices or cost allocations reflect arm’s length terms and conditions.

Should the Canadian tax authorities adjust transfer pricing, penalties could apply if the taxpayer has not made reasonable efforts to determine and use arm’s length transfer prices. Prescribed documentation must be maintained, since a taxpayer who fails to do so will not be considered to have made “reasonable efforts” to determine and use arm’s length transfer prices.

Multinational business groups with more than EUR750 million in annual consolidated revenues must file a country-by-country report containing various financial and operational information. Country-by-country reporting requirements in Canada were added based on recommendations made as part of the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project.

Related-party limited risk distribution arrangements should reflect arm’s length terms and conditions in line with the transfer pricing principles outlined in 4.4 Transfer Pricing Issues for Inbound Investors.

In addition, consideration should be given to Article 12 of the OECD MLI regarding the avoidance of permanent establishment status through the use of an agent that is not independent.

Canadian transfer pricing rules are generally in line with the OECD principles.

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) encourages taxpayers who are subject to double taxation to consider the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) programme.

In its 2024 MAP Programme Report, the CRA mentions that:

• the CRA had 200 negotiable MAP cases on 1 January 2024;
• the CRA accepted 97 new MAP cases and closed 76 MAP cases during that year;
• the average time to complete a negotiable MAP case was 23.70 months;
• of the 76 MAP cases closed in 2024, 50 (65.79%) resulted in full relief from double taxation upon negotiation, three (3.95%) had objections not justified, and four (5.26%) were resolved through unilateral relief – the remaining 19 cases (25%) were withdrawn by the taxpayer, were resolved via domestic remedy or without relief, resulted in partial relief of double taxation upon negotiation, resulted in no agreement, were denied MAP access, or had another unmentioned outcome;
• of the 76 MAP cases closed in 2024, 55 (72.37%) were initiated from actions in Canada and 21 (27.63%) from actions in other countries; and
• as of 31 December 2024, the CRA was engaged in negotiable MAP cases involving taxpayers from 35 different jurisdictions of which the United States represented 38.46%.

Under domestic law, upward and downward adjustments can be made to transfer pricing disputes. It should be noted that downward adjustments are made only if, in the opinion of the tax authorities, the circumstances indicate the adjustments are appropriate.

Unless the issue is one that the CRA has decided not to consider, as a matter of policy, the CRA will accept a case under the MAP that involves a request for a downward adjustment in the following circumstances.

• The upward adjustment has been accepted for consideration by the other jurisdiction.
• The other jurisdiction takes steps to resolve the case under the MAP by reviewing the case, providing the CRA with a detailed analysis as to why it agrees with the adjustment and agrees to negotiate the case. The request for competent authority assistance is made within the time limits of the applicable treaty.

If the above requirements are not met, the CRA will advise the taxpayer that their MAP case will be closed.

A non-Canadian entity may operate in Canada through a subsidiary or a branch.

Through a Canadian Subsidiary

Assuming it is a resident of Canada for tax purposes, a Canadian subsidiary will be taxed on its worldwide income from all domestic law sources. In general, a corporation is a Canadian resident if it is incorporated or has its central management and control in Canada.

Subject to treaty relief, the Canadian subsidiary will have to withhold tax on several types of payments to non-residents, including dividend distributions, interest paid to non-arm’s length parties, participating interest, certain management or administration fees and rents, as well as royalties and similar payments.

Through a Canadian Branch

Under the branch scenario, the non-resident corporation will be liable for income tax on its Canadian-source business income at the same rates as Canadian-resident corporations.

Moreover, and as a general rule, a 25% branch tax (which may be reduced under certain tax treaties to the rate applicable to dividend distributions) will apply to the after-tax profits of a non-resident corporation that are not reinvested in Canada.

The branch tax is intended to approximate the withholding tax that would have applied to taxable dividends from a Canadian subsidiary if the non-resident corporation had incorporated a Canadian subsidiary to carry on business in Canada instead of using a branch.

Generally, Canada does not tax the capital gains realised by a non-resident on the disposal of shares in a Canadian-resident corporation.

An exception to that principle applies if the disposed shares qualify as “taxable Canadian property”, which generally includes shares of corporations that are not listed on a designated stock exchange if more than 50% of the fair market value of the shares was derived from one or any combination of the following, at any time in the previous 60-month period:

• real or immovable property located in Canada;
• resource property located in Canada;
• timber resource property located in Canada; or

• options or interests in any of the above.

In general, tax on the disposal of taxable Canadian property should not result in double taxation for a non-resident residing in a jurisdiction with which Canada has a tax treaty.

Change of control provisions will not trigger immediate tax or duty charges. However, the following occurs when there is a change of control:

• the taxation year of the corporation is deemed to end, and a new taxation year is deemed to begin;
• the corporation cannot deduct non-capital loss carry-forwards unless it carries on the business that gave rise to the loss for a profit or with a reasonable expectation of profit, in which case the losses are deductible only against the corporation’s income from the same or a similar business;
• the corporation’s net capital loss carry-forwards expire;
• accrued capital losses cannot be carried forward; and
• the carry-forward of ITCs is restricted following the change of control.

The disposal of an indirect holding in a Canadian corporation higher up in the foreign group could trigger the change of control provisions because “indirect control” has to be considered, as well as “direct control”.

A decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has also introduced the concept of “effective control”, which has been described by the SCC as including “forms of de jure and de facto control”.

There is no mandatory formula to determine the income of a foreign-owned local affiliate selling goods or providing services in Canada. Transactions with the corporate group’s foreign entities should rely on the arm’s length principle of the transfer pricing rules.

Generally, a local affiliate’s expenses are non-deductible, unless they are made or incurred for the purposes of earning income from a business or property. Therefore, local affiliate expenses that are made or incurred for the purposes of earning foreign business or property income would normally be deductible to reduce the taxpayer’s net income.

Canada has a set of thin capitalisation rules that may apply where the lender to a Canadian corporation is a non-resident person who, alone or with other related persons, owns more than 25% of the Canadian corporation’s shares (by vote or value). The interest expense on the loan would otherwise be deductible to the Canadian corporation. These rules may also apply to trusts and to partnerships of which a Canadian-resident corporation is a member.

The acceptable level of non-arm’s length interest-bearing debt allowed for the Canadian thin capitalisation rules is a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.5:1. Interest deduction will be limited proportionally if a debtor’s outstanding debts to a “specified non-resident shareholder” exceed that ratio.

Any non-deductible “excess” interest is treated as a dividend for withholding tax purposes and would trigger withholding tax at a rate of 25% (which may be reduced under certain tax treaties).

Debt financing provided by a Canadian corporation to its non-resident shareholders or any other non-resident persons connected to the non-resident shareholders is generally deemed to be a dividend paid to the non-resident, and is subject to Canadian withholding tax at a rate of 25% (which may be reduced under certain tax treaties).

Notable exceptions are where the loan is repaid within one year after the end of the lender’s taxation year and the repayment is not part of a series of loans and repayments, or where the loan is considered a “pertinent loan or indebtedness” (PLOI) under the PLOI regime. In such a scenario, the Canadian corporation must include a deemed interest income in its taxable income.

Canada also has “excessive interest and financing expense limitation rules”, the purpose of which is to restrict interest and financing deductions to a proportion of the profits of certain taxpayers. In general terms, interest expenses are required not to exceed 30% of taxable income calculated before interest income, interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation expense. Any portion of an interest expense in excess of such percentage is generally not deductible in computing income. A deduction so denied may be carried forward indefinitely, provided it is within the above percentage in the year the deduction is claimed. Also, an election may be made to transfer unused cumulative excess deductions within a group of eligible corporations in Canada.

A Canadian-resident corporation is subject to Canadian corporate income tax on worldwide income. Foreign income is taxed in Canada at the same federal and provincial corporate tax rates as local income.

However, if a corporation has income sourced from another country and is taxed in that other country, it could be entitled to apply for foreign tax credits against its tax payable in Canada, to prevent double taxation on the same income. Separate foreign tax credit calculations are prescribed for business and non-business income on a country-by-country basis.

Generally, local expenses are non-deductible unless they are made or incurred to earn income from a business or property. Therefore, local expenses made or incurred for the purpose of earning foreign business or property income would normally be deductible to reduce the taxpayer’s net income.

Canadian taxation of a dividend received from a foreign corporation will depend on the foreign corporation’s qualification. As a general rule, dividends must be included in computing the recipient’s taxable income. If the foreign corporation is not a foreign affiliate (FA) of the dividend recipient, no relief will be available for the foreign corporation’s underlying taxes. An FA is a foreign corporation of which a Canadian corporation owns an equity percentage of at least 1% of any class of its outstanding shares, and the same Canadian corporation owns – alone or together with related persons (individuals or corporations) – an equity percentage of at least 10% of any class of its outstanding shares, in which the notion of “equity percentage” refers to shares held directly or indirectly, through another entity.

When an FA pays a dividend to a Canadian corporation, the FA’s surplus account must be determined. The four different surplus accounts accumulate differently and their treatment differs.

Exempt Surplus Treatment

An exempt surplus is generally ABI earned by an FA that is resident in, and carries on an active business in, a country with which Canada has signed a tax treaty. A dividend from this surplus account is fully deductible to the Canadian corporation receiving it. If the FA is resident in a non-treaty country, a dividend paid to the Canadian may also qualify as exempt surplus if the foreign country has entered into a tax information exchange agreement with Canada.

Hybrid Surplus Treatment

Hybrid surplus will generally include 100% of any gains from the sale of shares of an FA and/or partnership interest by another FA, provided certain conditions are met. Dividends paid out of hybrid surplus are included in the Canadian corporation’s income, though a 50% deduction and relief in respect of underlying foreign taxes may be available. The 2024 federal budget proposed to increase this inclusion rate after 24 June 2024 to 66% in the same proposals outlined in 2.7 Capital Gains.

Taxable Surplus Treatment

Taxable surplus generally captures “net earnings” from an active business carried on by the FA in a country with which Canada does not have a tax treaty and in respect of its foreign accrual property income (FAPI – see 6.5 Taxation of Income of Non-Local Subsidiaries Under Controlled Foreign Corporation-Type Rules). Dividends paid out of this surplus account are generally included in the Canadian corporation’s income, though relief may be available in respect of underlying foreign taxes and amounts previously subject to Canadian tax.

Pre-Acquisition Surplus Treatment

Finally, a dividend may be paid from a pre-acquisition surplus. Such dividend is deductible in computing the Canadian corporation’s income but reduces the adjusted cost base of the shares in the FA. To the extent that the adjusted cost base of the shares is reduced below nil, a taxable gain will arise.

Non-Canadian subsidiaries can use intangibles developed by Canadian corporations. However, the Canadian corporation that owns and markets the intellectual property must charge an arm’s length price to the related entity for the use of the intangible under the transfer pricing rules. The income earned from this agreement with the foreign subsidiary, such as royalties from a licensing agreement, is taxable in Canada for the Canadian parent.

Canadian corporations are taxed on the FAPI of an FA controlled by the Canadian taxpayer (controlled foreign affiliate – CFA) in the proportion of ownership in the CFA. FAPI is essentially passive income earned by the CFA, notably property income and certain capital gains realised on assets not used in an “active business”, but the FAPI rules include numerous statutory inclusions and exceptions. In brief, if a Canadian corporation controls 80% of the CFA, 80% of the FAPI earned in the CFA at the end of each taxation year will have to be reported in the controlling Canadian corporation’s tax return. It is taxed on an accrual basis (ie, even where this income is not repatriated to Canada).

If the CFA is taxed in the foreign jurisdiction, the Canadian parent is allowed a deduction, based on the foreign accrual tax multiplied by the relevant tax factor in order to avoid double taxation. The relevant tax factor varies depending on the corporate structure of the Canadian parent. For general corporations, the relevant tax factor is 4, resulting in no net FAPI income where the foreign accrual tax is 25% or higher. Under proposed legislation, (Budget 2022 reprised in Budget 2025; applicable to taxation years that begin after 6 April 2022), the relevant tax factor for CCPCs would be 1.9, resulting in no net FAPI income only where the foreign accrual tax is 52.6% or higher (a tax rate similar to that applicable to Canadian individuals). Mechanisms are also proposed to mitigate additional Canadian taxation on the repatriation and subsequent distribution of such highly taxed income to shareholders.

By contrast, all income of foreign branches of a Canadian corporation is included in the corporation’s income for Canadian tax purposes, since the Canadian resident taxpayer is subject to tax on its worldwide income, which is subject to foreign tax credits to which it may be entitled.

Canadian domestic legislation does not directly require substance in foreign subsidiaries. However, an FA may only earn “exempt surplus” to the extent it is resident in the treaty country, with residence for Canadian tax purposes, determined by where its central management and control is exercised. Certain exceptions to FAPI are also available in limited circumstances, where the CFA employs more than five full-time employees and other conditions are met.

A Canadian-resident corporation is taxable in Canada on its worldwide sources of income, including capital gains from the sale of FAs. Half of the gain is included in the taxpayer’s net income in Canada (as described in detail under 2.7 Capital Gains). A deduction may be claimed with respect to available surplus pools. Where the capital gain is also subject to tax in the foreign jurisdiction in which the FA is resident, applicable tax treaties may limit or allocate taxing rights between Canada and that jurisdiction.

The ITA contains a GAAR that applies to abusive tax avoidance cases where the ITA provisions result in a tax benefit outside of their original purpose. A transaction is considered an avoidance transaction when all three of the following conditions are met:

• tax benefit must result from one transaction or a series of transactions – namely a reduction, avoidance or deferral of tax or an increased tax refund;
• tax benefit results directly or indirectly from a transaction that is considered an avoidance transaction, unless the transaction can reasonably be undertaken or arranged primarily for business purposes other than to obtain a tax benefit; and
• tax avoidance as a result of not being able to reasonably conclude that the tax benefit is consistent with the object, spirit or purpose of the provision invoked by the taxpayer.

It is incumbent on the taxpayer to establish that the first two conditions do not apply, while the burden for the third condition lies with the tax authorities.

Any GAAR-issued assessment will have to be reviewed by a committee established by the CRA. If the CRA establishes abusive tax avoidance, the GAAR will apply and the tax benefit will be denied. If there is ambiguity with respect to abusive tax avoidance, the taxpayer is given the benefit of the doubt.

Recently, amendments were made to broaden the definition of “tax benefit” to ensure that the GAAR will apply to transactions that affect tax attributes that have not yet become relevant to the computation of tax (eg, a tax loss that has not yet been used to offset taxable income). Furthermore, stricter rules applying for GAAR purposes have been implemented as of 2024, in order to:

• lower the “avoidance transaction” standard;
• increase the reassessment period by an additional three years (unless the transaction was disclosed to CRA); and
• introduce a new economic substance rule to target transactions that lack economic substance.

In addition, a 25% penalty has been introduced for transactions subject to the GAAR. This penalty is applied to the denied tax benefit and is effective for transactions entered into on or after 20 June 2024. However, the penalty can be avoided if the transaction was disclosed to the CRA or if it was reasonable to conclude that the GAAR would not apply based on existing guidance or court decisions.

Canadian tax law does not outline specific rules regarding audit cycles, so Canada has no periodic routine audit cycle. Tax audits are typically carried out at the tax authorities’ discretion; as such, an audit of a timely filed tax return can be conducted at any time by the Canadian tax authorities with all due dispatch.

Audit Process

Auditors have consequential investigative powers and may require the filing and disclosure of documents and information necessary for the assessment.

In general, the audit may begin with a formal demand letter requesting access to specific information, a physical visit to the place of business and/or a meeting with the individual taxpayer. In addition, the auditor may request, and be granted, access to third-party information, including banking and supplier documents and, to a limited extent, accountant files.

The process usually results in a draft or preliminary assessment, allowing for a 30-day window for the taxpayer to submit new information regarding the draft assessment issues. The formal time limit for issuing a reassessment notice is generally three or four years following the initial assessment notice for a given year depending on the status of the taxpayer, except in cases of negligence, fraud or failure to disclose transactions as required under the newly expanded mandatory disclosure rules. The reassessment period has also been extended by an additional three years unless the transaction was disclosed to the CRA. Some corporations will also face varying deadlines, depending on the nature of the audit.

Budget 2025 confirms the government’s intention to proceed with proposed amendments introducing a new “notice of non-compliance” regime that would grant the CRA broad discretionary powers to compel information, suspend normal reassessment periods for all issues and non-arm’s length parties, and impose daily penalties for non-compliance. If enacted, these measures would significantly strengthen the CRA’s audit capabilities while limiting judicial oversight and a taxpayer’s recourse in case of failure to comply with a requirement or notice to provide information, documents, or assistance during an audit.

Canada has implemented the BEPS recommended changes, as follows.

Action 1: “Address the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy”

In October 2021, a statement of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on a two-pillar solution to further this action was proposed and accepted by more than 130 countries, including Canada. Pillar One is focused on nexus and profit allocation, applying to certain multinational enterprises (MNEs) that have consolidated revenues of more than EUR20 billion and profitability margins exceeding 10%. This pillar indicates that, whether or not an MNE has a physical presence in a country where it earns revenues, a portion of its profits is to be reallocated from the MNE’s home country to the countries where the MNE earns profits. Canada has a strong preference for the multilateral approach, which has yet to be adopted by OECD members, and initially released draft legislation implementing a Digital Services Tax (DST). In 2025, Canada decided to repeal its previous DST and its regulations, as part of broader trade negotiations with the United States and in anticipation of a multilateral agreement on digital taxation. Canada has stated that taxpayers that had previously made DST payments would be refunded.

Pillar Two is focused on a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15% on profits for MNEs with revenues of more than EUR750 million. Canada has enacted new legislation to implement Pillar Two in its legislation, imposing a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15% on profits for MNEs with revenues above EUR750 million. The new Global Minimum Tax Act (GMTA) legislates an income inclusion rule and a qualified domestic minimum top-up tax, and applies to the fiscal years of MNEs beginning on or after 31 December 2023. Draft legislation was released to introduce an undertaxed profits rule (UTPR) for fiscal years commencing on or after 31 December 2024.

Following discussions within the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, Canada stated that there is a shared understanding that a “side-by-side” Pillar 2 system exempting US-parented groups from certain Pillar 2 rules to the extent they are subject to US minimum tax rules could preserve progress in addressing base erosion and profit shifting while enhancing stability and certainty in the international tax system. This understanding supports continued multilateral co-operation and further dialogue on digital taxation and tax sovereignty. In light of these changes, it is unclear whether Canada will proceed with its draft legislation to implement the UTPR component of its GMTA or otherwise delay its proposed effective date of 31 December 2024, although Canada confirmed its intention to proceed therewith.

Actions 2–10 and 12–15

• Action 2: “Neutralise the effects of hybrid mismatch arrangements” – Canada has implemented the recommendations made by the OECD, with appropriate adaptations to the Canadian income tax context in respect of deduction/non-inclusion mismatches arising in respect of certain payments and instruments. In January 2026, Canada released proposed amendments implementing most of the remaining recommendations of BEPS Action 2 to address hybrid mismatches arising from the hybridity of the entities involved. These proposed amendments are expected to become effective on 1 July 2026.
• Action 3: “Strengthen CFC Rules” – Canada has adopted controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules and applies a rather wide definition of CFC as well as legal and economic control tests to define a CFC.
• Action 4: “Limit base erosion via interest deductions and other financial payments” – Effective 1 October 2023, Canada introduced new earnings-stripping rules that limit interest deductions by certain Canadian entities and branches of non-resident taxpayers to a proportion of their tax EBITDA, subject to certain transitory rules.
• Action 5: “Counter harmful tax practices more effectively, taking into account transparency and substance” – Canada agreed to exchange information regarding cross-border rulings relating to preferential regimes, transfer pricing legislation, downward adjustment not directly reflected in the taxpayers’ accounts, permanent establishment determination, and related-party conduit rulings.
• Action 6: “Prevent treaty abuse” – Canada announced that it would adopt the principal purpose test to address treaty abuse in 2017, according to the OECD’s minimum standard. The principal purpose test is an anti-abuse provision that seeks to deny treaty benefits where one of the main objectives of an arrangement or transaction is to obtain treaty benefits.
• Action 7: “Preventing the artificial avoidance of permanent establishment status” – Canada has chosen not to adopt the expanded definition of a permanent establishment in most of its tax treaties, to reflect the recommendations set out in this action.
• Actions 8 to 10: “Transfer pricing” – Canada’s transfer pricing guidelines are consistent with those established by the OECD.
• Action 12: “Disclosure of aggressive tax planning” – Canada has amended its legislation to widen the range of transactions that are to be reported. For example, this requirement extends to reporting uncertain tax treatments for specified corporations. The reporting requirements for reportable transactions and notifiable transactions have been in effect since 22 June 2023 and apply to transactions that span that date. The reporting requirement for uncertain tax treatments applies to taxation years beginning after 2022, with penalties only applying for taxation years beginning on or after 22 June 2023.
• Action 13: “Re-examine transfer pricing documentation” – Canada implemented country-by-country reporting as of 1 January 2016. This reporting applies to multinational corporations whose total annual consolidated group revenue is EUR750 million or more. Such corporations will be required to file a country-by-country report with the CRA within one year of the end of the fiscal year to which the report relates.
• Action 14: “Dispute resolution” – Canada has reviewed stage two of Action 14 and has made recommendations. Canada opted for the mandatory binding agreement as proposed by BEPS Action 14.
• Action 15: “Develop a multilateral instrument” – Canada ratified the MLI in 2019. The MLI applies to some of Canada’s tax treaties, effective as of 1 January 2020, for Canada’s treaty partners that have also ratified the MLI.

Where Canada has not implemented specific legislative changes concerning the above-mentioned BEPS Actions, it can generally be explained by the fact that it has introduced a series of domestic measures over the past decade to prevent perceived abuses also targeted by the BEPS Actions.

Canada has been actively involved in the BEPS project deployed by the G20 and OECD, and continues to work with the international community to ensure a coherent and consistent response to BEPS. Canada has endorsed all the recommendations developed under the BEPS project. Canada and other G20 members believe that broad and consistent implementation will be critical to the project’s effectiveness. While some BEPS Actions have already been implemented, Canada continues to analyse recommendations related to other aspects of BEPS.

International taxation has gained a high public profile in Canada, with the government taking active steps in the fight against aggressive international tax avoidance, protecting the Canadian tax base and enhancing the overall fairness and transparency of Canada’s tax administration.

Canada recognises the significance of business income tax in improving the country’s international competitiveness, believing that certain BEPS Actions will enhance Canada’s international competitiveness. Canada remains committed to ensuring that its tax policies are aligned with international standards to attract foreign investment and prevent base erosion.

Canada has implemented a number of tax incentives to support Canadian businesses, including income tax credits for Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) activities.

Budget 2025 further enhanced these credits under the SR&ED programme by increasing the eligibility thresholds, raising the expenditure limits, extending eligibility to certain public corporations, and restoring the eligibility of capital expenditures. In addition, the annual expenditure limit for the enhanced 35% credit will be increased to CAD6 million for taxation years beginning on or after 16 December 2024.

BEPS Action 2 seeks to neutralise the effect of cross-border hybrid mismatch arrangements that produce multiple deductions for a single expense or a deduction in one jurisdiction with no corresponding taxation in the other jurisdiction.

Canada implemented hybrid mismatch rules in line with the recommendations in, and generally consistent with, BEPS Action 2, the rules of which came into effect on 1 July 2022. Under these rules, payments made by Canadian residents under hybrid mismatch arrangements would not be deductible for Canadian income tax purposes to the extent that they give rise to a deduction/non-inclusion mismatch (eg, either by way of the payment giving rise to a deduction or not being included in the ordinary income of the non-resident recipient). Conversely, to the extent that a payment made under such an arrangement by a non-resident of Canada is deductible for foreign income tax purposes, no deduction in respect of the payment would be permitted against the income of a Canadian resident. Any amount of the payment received by a Canadian resident would also be included in income, and, if the payment is a dividend, it would not be eligible for the deduction otherwise available for certain dividends received from foreign affiliates (FAs).

In January 2026, Canada released proposed amendments implementing most of the remaining recommendations of BEPS Action 2 to address hybrid mismatches arising from the hybridity of the entities involved. These proposed amendments are expected to take effect on 1 July 2026.

Canada also relies on the GAAR to prevent undue tax benefits.

Canada has a worldwide tax regime for resident corporations’ income but has some aspects of a territorial tax regime for its FAs. For example, all dividends derived from active income earned by an FA will be fully exempt from tax in Canada if the FA is a resident of, and earns active income in, a country with which Canada has a tax treaty or a tax information exchange agreement.

However, passive investment income earned by an FA – typically interests, royalties, rents and certain capital gains – will be taxable in Canada regardless of whether or not the profits are repatriated. These foreign accrual property income (FAPI) rules ensure that passive income is taxed on a current basis to mitigate the tax advantage of shifting domestic income to low-tax jurisdictions.

This issue is not applicable in Canada. Canada’s existing CFC rules are considered comprehensive and align with BEPS principles.

Recent case law on the application of the GAAR to perceived abuse of a tax treaty concluded that whether or not the income is subject to taxation in a foreign jurisdiction (double non-taxation situation) and the residence of the ultimate shareholder were irrelevant in determining if a transaction is abusive, and that treaty shopping arrangements are not inherently abusive for Canadian tax purposes.

BEPS Actions 8 to 10 addressed several transfer pricing areas related to the arm’s length principle and introduced significantly revised guidance in the form of amendments to the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations.

Following consultations announced in Budget 2021, Budget 2025 proposed a comprehensive modernisation of Canada’s transfer pricing framework to better align it with international consensus and the analytical approach set out in the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines.

The proposed changes establish a more structured framework for analysing cross-border transactions between non-arm’s length parties, focusing on the accurate delineation of transactions based on economically relevant characteristics, including their actual conduct. The rules clarify that the determination of arm’s length conditions requires the use of the most appropriate transfer pricing method and allow adjustments – only in exceptional circumstances – to reflect what would have been determined if arm’s length conditions had applied (either under alternative transactions or in the absence of a transaction). Budget 2025 also introduced targeted administrative measures to reduce compliance burdens and enhance audit efficiency, including higher penalty thresholds, simplified and aligned documentation requirements, and a shortened documentation submission deadline.

The proposed measures are expected to apply to taxation years and fiscal periods beginning after 4 November 2025. These measures are currently being reviewed by the Senate as part of its legislative process.

Canadian country-by-country reporting legislation generally conforms to the OECD model legislation, with the notable exceptions that it has not adopted the OECD’s master or local file requirements. Under domestic law, contemporaneous transfer pricing documentation is required in place of the local file requirements.

As recommended by BEPS Action 13, country-by-country reporting applies to MNEs with an annual consolidated group revenue equal to or exceeding EUR750 million in the previous year, and applies for fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2016.

Filed reports are automatically exchanged with other jurisdictions in which the multinational business group operates, provided that:

• the other jurisdiction has implemented country-by-country reporting legislation;
• both Canada and the other jurisdiction have a legal framework in place for the automatic exchange of information; and
• both Canada and the other jurisdiction have entered into a qualifying competent authority agreement.

Budget 2025 confirmed the government’s intention previously announced on 29 June 2025, and proposed legislation was introduced to formally repeal the DST Act retroactively as at its original enactment.

Pending the rescission of the DST, the CRA has deferred the requirement to file a DST return since 30 June 2025 and has confirmed that businesses will not be required to file DST returns or remit any DST-related amounts. The CRA has also indicated that it will waive or cancel penalties for late-filed DST returns, as well as any interest on DST-related liabilities. If legislation repealing the Act is introduced and receives Royal Assent, taxpayers who have already paid the DST will be entitled to a refund, with interest calculated at the rate generally applicable to corporate tax refunds from the date of payment.

See 9.12 Digital Economy Businesses.

Offshore intellectual property deployed within Canada may result in taxation under generally applicable Canadian principles. Royalties paid to foreign recipients are among the categories of income subject to withholding tax. The 25% withholding rate may be reduced by treaty.