Businesses commonly adopt a corporate form. The most common structures are corporations and limited liability companies (partnerships), which can adopt the following forms:
Corporate structures are taxed as independent entities. Shareholder and partner liability is limited to the amount of their equity in the company.
Consortiums and joint ventures are corporate entities that are not widely used in Ecuador. They are used primarily when undertaking public works contracts as well as specific projects with a limited duration. For tax purposes, consortiums and joint ventures are regarded as independent entities and taxed accordingly. Nevertheless, their members’ liability is not limited to their equity.
All corporate entities are considered to be independent taxpayers. The Ecuadorian regime does not provide for tax-transparent entities.
Dividends paid by corporate entities are subject to income tax withholding, unless the beneficiary is a local corporation. Individual beneficiaries of dividends are subject to a 12% income tax withholding on the relevant dividend distributed. Dividends paid to foreign individuals and entities are subject to a 10% income tax withholding (see 3.4 Taxation of Individuals on Shares in Closely Held Corporations).
Stakeholders in sectors such as banking, insurance, the stock exchange and securities are obliged to use corporations to carry out their business.
The Ecuadorian stock exchange law provides for trusts, investment funds, commercial funds and hedge funds. Under Ecuadorian law, these legal entities are considered to be independent for both commercial and tax purposes. In some cases, trusts and funds are obliged to act as tax withholding agents.
Stakeholders in the construction sector (both for private and public projects) normally perform their activities using trusts, consortiums and joint ventures.
Overall, whenever an entity is domiciled and/or incorporated within Ecuadorian territory, it is regarded as a tax resident in the country.
Under Ecuadorian law, tax residency is determined as follows.
Pursuant to most double taxation treaties concluded by Ecuador, construction projects executed during a specific period, a factory, an industrial or assembly plant, or an industrial or assembly workshop may be regarded as a permanent establishment and therefore as a tax resident where the relevant activities are executed.
Entities are subject to a 25% income tax levied on their net taxable profit. However, a 28% income tax rate applies whenever:
Ecuadorian law provides for 15% employee profit-sharing, meaning that the entity is obliged to distribute 15% of its accounting profits among its employees. This expense is tax-deductible when determining the taxable base.
Income tax is paid in a single instalment during the first quarter of the fiscal year following the fiscal year that the profit corresponds to.
Since 2022, micro businesses are subject to up to 2% income tax levied on their net income.
Regarding transparent entities, see 1.1 Corporate Forms and Their Tax Treatment and 1.2 Use and Taxation of Transparent Business Structures.
Individuals are taxed at progressive rates. The payable income tax bands and rates for 2026 are as follows:
Ecuadorian commercial entities are obliged to keep their accounting records in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and International Accounting Standards (IAS). However, accounting profit is subject to adjustment for tax purposes.
The main adjustments (accounting profit versus taxable profit) are as follows.
The adjustments are made in the applicable tax return, based on accounting records.
Profits are taxed on an accrual basis.
An income tax rate reduction is enforced for technology-related initiatives. Indeed, taxpayers who invest their profits in certified projects regarding technological development may benefit from an 8% to 10% reduction in their income tax rate pursuant to the conditions provided by the Ecuadorian tax regime. Nevertheless, new investments may apply for a general incentive; see 2.3 Special Incentives.
Ecuadorian tax law provides for a three-percentage points reduction in the income tax rate for new corporations and investments. The latter will be applicable for up to 15 years. The accumulated exemption may not exceed the amount invested.
Entities that concluded new investment contracts with the Ecuadorian government after November 2021 will benefit from a five-percentage points reduction in the income tax rate. The accumulated exemption may not exceed the invested amount. The exemption will apply during the contract’s term, which may not exceed 15 years, unless the contract provides for a longer term. Nevertheless, the contract may be renewed by the same time period or less. The entities may also benefit from an exemption on specific foreign trade taxes and the capital remittance tax (Impuesto a la Salida de Divisas or ISD), regarding the importation of capital goods and raw materials related to the investment (whenever certain conditions are met).
Operators of free trade zones will benefit from a 0% income tax rate starting from the first year in which the competent authority qualified the latter as such. Henceforth, a 15% rate will be applicable for such operators.
Public-private partnership (APP) is a regime wherein an entity of the government delegates the execution of a specific activity to a private corporation or enterprise. Said regime is applicable, for example, to the execution of a specific public work or the management of a public asset. The APP regime is applicable to projects that meet specific requirements that include the investment of funds by the private entities.
Legal stability is guaranteed for specific regulatory aspects, provided these are regarded as essential by the competent authorities. The term of an APP contract may be up to 30 years. Such term may be extended for an additional ten-year term. In no case may an APP contract have a duration exceeding 40 years, or have a term of less than five years.
The income derived from bonds or other securities issued to finance public projects developed through an APP partnership as well as the profit earned in trading such securities are income tax exempted. The benefit does not apply to transactions concluded between related parties.
Losses registered in a fiscal year can be amortised (carried forward) for up to five years. Taxpayers may offset only up to 25% of the taxable income.
Ecuadorian law does not provide for loss carry-back, nor for offsetting income losses against capital gains or vice versa. Losses incurred in transactions with related parties are not tax-deductible.
Interest is deductible whenever the related loan is needed for the debtor to undertake its commercial activity. For tax purposes, interest is deductible provided the rate does not exceed the maximum rate set by the Ecuadorian Monetary Authority. The amount that exceeds such rate is not tax-deductible.
This also applies to foreign loans, which, in certain cases, are subject to registration before the Ecuadorian Central Bank. For registration purposes, the capital of the loan must be deposited in an Ecuadorian bank. Interest paid exceeding the maximum rate applicable to this kind of transaction is subject to income tax withholding.
Interest paid to related parties that exceeds 20% of the entity’s EBITDA will not be deductible.
The consolidation of financial statements for tax purposes is not allowed under Ecuadorian law. As such, groups of companies are not allowed to record losses reported by entities other than those incurring the loss. However, for reporting purposes before the Superintendence of Companies, IFRS rules on consolidating financial statements apply.
Overall, Ecuadorian law does not provide for a particular tax treatment on capital gains, which are taxed as general income.
However, there are exceptions to the general rule, as follows.
The taxable base applicable to the disposal of shares is determined as the difference between the sale price and:
Whenever the seller is a foreign entity, the Ecuadorian company whose shares are being transferred is obliged to act as a substitute taxpayer and pay the tax on behalf of the shareholder.
The sale of shares listed on an Ecuadorian stock exchange may benefit from the following exemptions and reductions:
The following taxes are applicable.
Value-Added Tax (VAT)
VAT of 15% is levied on the sale or provision of goods and services. The tax is collected by the business that sells the goods or provides the services. VAT is paid on a monthly basis. Businesses are allowed to deduct (tax credit) the VAT paid when acquiring goods and using services in the ordinary course of business.
The VAT rate levied on the provision of tourism services may be reduced to 8% whenever the services are rendered during certain national holidays or specific weekends defined by the President through an executive decree.
ICE (Excise Tax)
Excise tax is levied on specific imported or domestic goods (generally luxury or demerit goods). For example, alcoholic beverages, cigarettes and vehicles are subject to the aforementioned tax. ICE is collected by the seller of the goods and paid on a monthly basis.
ISD (Capital Remittance Tax)
Capital remittance tax is levied at a 5% rate on funds sent abroad by any Ecuadorian entity. It also applies to payment for imports. ISD paid for the execution of the taxpayer’s economic activity may be used as an income tax deductible expense or incorporated into the cost of goods. Exporters that have not deposited into an Ecuadorian account the funds received for their exports must also pay the ISD. When certain requirements are met, the payment of dividends and interest may be exempt from ISD.
As of January 2026, differentiated ISD rates apply for certain goods: 0% for specific pharmaceutical products and 2.5% for specified productive sectors.
Tax on Overseas Financial Assets
This tax applies to funds held abroad by the following entities:
The rate of this tax is 0.25% per month on the applicable tax base for funds available in foreign entities and for off-bound investments. This rate could increase to 0.35% whenever certain conditions are met. The rate may be reduced up to 0.1%, pursuant to duly justified economic or social reasons.
Tax on Profit Generated on the Sale of Real Estate
Profit generated on the sale of real estate is subject to this tax at a rate of 10% and payable to the municipality in which the asset is located.
A deduction of 5% of the net profit for each year of ownership is permitted when determining the taxable base. Once the elapsed time from the date of acquisition by the seller is 20 years, the transfer is tax-exempt.
“Alcabala” Tax (Impuesto de Alcabala)
The “Alcabala” tax is levied on the transfer of real estate property. Transactions such as donations or transfer of property through inheritance, as well as transfer by the trustee to the trust’s beneficiaries, are levied with this municipal tax. The “Alcabala” tax rate is 1%.
Municipal Patent Tax
Businesses – whether individual or corporate structures – are also subject to a municipal tax called “Patente Municipal”, which is payable on an annual basis. The rate of the tax is determined by the municipality based on the entity’s equity. However, as of July 2025, a new regime applies to taxpayers not required to keep accounting records: the Municipality established a single fixed fee of USD15, covering one or more economic activities. In no case will the tax be lower than USD10 or higher than USD25,000.
“1.5 Per Thousand Tax” on Assets
Businesses are obliged to make an annual tax payment to the municipality of their residence equivalent to 1.5 per thousand (or 0.15%) of their total accounting assets.
Most closely held local businesses operate using a corporate form. Commonly, the preferred corporate form is a corporation or a limited liability company. New businesses are expected to be incorporated as a simplified joint-stock corporation, as it is significantly cheaper to incorporate this type of entity.
Even though corporate rates are lower than individual rates, there are no rules to prevent individual professionals from earning income at corporate rates, as dividends paid by companies to individuals are, in most cases, subject to a 12% income tax on distribution (see 3.4. Taxation of Individuals on Shares in Closely Held Corporations). The income tax withheld by the entity distributing the dividends may be recorded as a tax credit by the individual, who then deducts such credit from their final tax.
There are no legal provisions that prevent closely held corporations from accumulating earnings for investment purposes. However, Ecuadorian law considers loans granted by a business to shareholders or partners as taxable dividends.
As a general rule, the 12% rate applies to dividend distributions to individual residents of Ecuador. Conversely, dividend distributions to individuals or entities resident abroad are subject to a 10% rate on the distributed amount – a rate that, for practical purposes, is equivalent to that in effect prior to the reform.
However, the 12% rate shall apply to distributions abroad if the beneficial owner is determined to be a resident of Ecuador. Moreover, if the ownership chain of the distributing company includes a resident in a tax haven jurisdiction and the beneficial owner of the dividends is a resident of Ecuador, the applicable rate shall be 14%. The same 14% rate shall apply to dividend distributions in the event that the distributing company has failed to comply with its obligation to report its ownership structure or chain, irrespective of the identity of the beneficial owner. In all such cases, the exemption of up to three unified basic salaries does not apply.
Regarding capital gains on the transfer of shares, see 2.7 Capital Gains.
Dividends paid by publicly traded corporations are subject to the same treatment applicable to dividends in general; see 3.4 Taxation of Individuals on Shares in Closely Held Corporations.
As for capital gains on the sale of shares of publicly traded corporations in Ecuadorian stock exchanges, some exemptions may apply. Regarding the exemptions on the transfer of shares, see 2.7 Capital Gains. If a transaction is not made through an Ecuadorian stock exchange, capital gains are subject to a tax rate of 10%.
Where no double taxation treaties are applicable, the following tax withholding rates apply.
The Ecuadorian tax authority is determined to collect taxes in all transactions. Overall, expenses are tax-deductible whenever the relevant tax is withheld by the payor (unless a specific exemption applies). The Ecuadorian tax authority has a particular interest in determining whether the benefits provided for by tax treaties are in fact applicable to transactions concluded by Ecuadorian residents with entities domiciled abroad. Indeed, tax treaties provide for exemptions and reductions on withholding rates. Therefore, the Ecuadorian tax authority analyses whether the provisions of the tax treaties are applicable.
Another aspect on which the Ecuadorian tax authority focuses is the economic substance of the transaction (see 4.3 Tax Authority Scrutiny of “Treaty Shopping” Practices). Nevertheless, the Ecuadorian tax authority faces certain challenges regarding international taxation (see 9.3 International Tax).
Ecuador has entered double taxation treaties with the following countries: Argentina (limited to air transportation), the Andean Community (Bolivia, Peru and Colombia), Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Qatar, Romania, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Russia, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, the United Arab Emirates and Uruguay.
Ecuadorian double taxation treaties generally follow the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) model, except for the Andean Community Treaty, certain elements of which follow the United Nations’ Model Double Taxation Convention.
Under most of the double taxation treaties, Ecuadorian-source income is taxed locally except for corporate profits (for treaties that follow the OECD model). However, certain income sources – such as dividends, royalties, interests – are subject to tax at lower rates (between 5% and 15% compared to the general 25% rate).
Despite the fact that Ecuador has entered into various double taxation treaties and a general treaty concluded within the Andean Community of Nations (which includes Colombia, Peru and Bolivia), the primary tax jurisdictions that foreign investors use to invest in local corporate stock or debt are Spain, Uruguay, Germany, Brazil, Mexico and Canada.
Ecuador does not challenge the use of treaty country entities by non-treaty country residents. Nevertheless, Ecuador has implemented provisions in order to track the entities that benefit from the provisions of tax treaties and other exemptions. Indeed, local taxpayers are required to file a yearly report on their shareholders to their beneficial owners. Likewise, in order to apply lower withholding rates pursuant to tax treaties, taxpayers must hold a certificate of tax residence of the beneficiary of the payments issued by the competent authority.
The Ecuadorian Tax Administration may analyse whether the transactions that benefit from the treaties lack economic substance. In such case, the payments that benefited from the tax treaties will not be considered deductible for income tax purposes for the local corporation.
Benefits provided by certain tax treaties concluded with countries such as Uruguay, South Korea and China are conditional. Namely, a corporation may benefit from the tax treaty whenever a specific percentage of its beneficial owners are residents in such countries, or if the corporation’s shares are listed on a stock exchange.
Even though Ecuador is not a member of the OECD, the country applies the transfer pricing parameters contained in the guidelines issued by the organisation. Indeed, its general provisions have become part of Ecuadorian tax law and its regulations.
The main concern is related to export prices as well as royalties, technical service fees and interest paid to related parties. Regarding these issues, local law allows Ecuadorian entities to file a consultation (request for an advance pricing agreement) with the tax authority to determine the parameters under which the transfer pricing valuation will be performed.
Corporations that make frequent transactions with related parties (whenever certain requirements are met) must file a yearly transfer pricing report with the Ecuadorian Tax Administration. In this report, the corporation must demonstrate that the transactions concluded with its related parties comply with the arm’s length principle.
For tax purposes, and particularly for determining transfer pricing, transactions with entities domiciled in tax havens are regarded as if they were concluded with related parties.
Local tax authorities have not challenged the use of related-party limited risk distribution arrangements for the sale or provision of goods or services locally. Nonetheless, Ecuadorian tax law states that transactions between related parties should follow the arm’s length principle.
Ecuador is not a member of the OECD. Nevertheless, Ecuadorian transfer pricing principles and the applicable methodologies generally follow OECD guidelines. Accordingly, local transfer pricing rules and/or enforcement in theory do not vary from OECD standards.
In the past few years, the Ecuadorian tax authority has been focusing its audits on the transfer pricing regime applied by multinational corporations. Regarding the possibility of re-opening earlier years to analyse the fulfilment of the transfer pricing regime, the general rules on tax audits apply (see 8.1 Regular Routine Audit Cycle).
Commonly, transfer pricing disputes are resolved before local tax authorities and/or courts. The authors are not aware of any international transfer pricing disputes being resolved through double taxation treaties. Local law does not provide for a specific procedure to handle mutual agreement procedures (MAPs) to resolve transfer pricing issues between tax authorities and private entities. Local tax authorities have not publicly entered into a MAP with foreign tax authorities. Nevertheless, tax disputes may be solved through mediation.
Transfer pricing issues and claims have been resolved through administrative claims and judicial actions filed by private entities against the Ecuadorian tax authority. The authors are not aware of any specific MAP and/or pass-through company (PTC) processes that Ecuador has been a part of.
Local branches of non-local corporations and local subsidiaries of non-local corporations are taxed equally. The Ecuadorian Constitution and law expressly prohibit any discrimination in the treatment applicable to local and foreign individuals and entities. Nevertheless, payments made by local branches or subsidiaries to their parent corporation may be subject to lower taxation pursuant to tax treaties (see 4.1 Application of Withholding Taxes).
Capital gains of non-residents on the sale of shares in local corporations are taxed in Ecuador. Indeed, the tax applies when the gains relate to shares of a non-local holding company that owns the shares of a local corporation, both directly and indirectly.
The main principle under Ecuadorian tax law is to tax capital gains on the sale of shares issued by local corporations whenever the indirect transfer of equity within the chain of ownership (including one abroad) affects the ownership of an Ecuadorian entity and certain requirements are met. Nevertheless, capital gains on the indirect transfer of shares are taxed whenever certain conditions are met.
Double taxation treaties may eliminate taxation of both direct and indirect transfer of shares.
There are no change of control provisions that could apply to trigger tax or duty charges, and, in particular, there are no such provisions that could apply to the disposal of an indirect holding much higher up in the overseas group. All issues related to the direct or indirect transfer of shares are included in previous sections of this chapter. Nevertheless, taxpayers are obliged to inform the Internal Revenue Service (Servicio de Rentas Internas or IRS) of any change in the chain of ownership.
There are no formulas used to determine the income of foreign-owned local affiliates selling goods or providing services. However, transfer pricing guidelines and the arm’s length principle apply to them.
Ecuador allows for the deduction of payments made to foreign companies, including foreign affiliates, whenever income tax is withheld and payments do not exceed certain limits. Ecuadorian entities may only deduct 5% of their taxable base on foreign allocated expenses and costs paid to a non-local affiliate. Royalties, and technical, administrative and consulting services fees paid by local affiliates to their head office and related entities, will be tax-deductible up to a limit equivalent to 5% of the taxable income of each fiscal year. However, the limit may increase when certain requirements are met.
The general provisions applicable to interest related to foreign loans are explained in 2.5 Deduction of Interest. Additionally, the net amount of interest paid on loan transactions with related parties (for tax purposes) should be no greater than 20% of EBITDA of the given fiscal year.
Ecuadorian corporations are taxed on their worldwide business income. As such, foreign income is taxed in Ecuador. However, Ecuadorian law states that the tax paid abroad on foreign income may be used as a tax credit in the local corporation’s annual tax return. The tax credit may be applied only to the foreign-source income, and cannot exceed the relevant tax due.
In general, expenses incurred to generate exempted income are non-deductible. This also applies to foreign exempt income.
Dividends paid by subsidiaries located abroad are regarded as foreign income (see 6.1 Foreign Income Exemptions) and taxed accordingly.
Intangible assets developed by local corporations can be used by non-local subsidiaries in their business. However, under transfer pricing principles, the local entity is obliged to charge for such use under the arm’s length principle. All related income is taxable in Ecuador.
Ecuadorian tax law provides a Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) regime. Pursuant to such regime, the income of foreign companies whose final beneficiaries (individuals) are residents in Ecuador will be subject to taxation in the country. However, if the relevant income was already taxed under another applicable regime in Ecuador (eg, dividends or payments to non-residents), it will not be subject to the CFC regime. The final beneficiary (individual resident in Ecuador) will be responsible for paying the relevant tax.
A foreign entity and its income will be subject to the CFC regime whenever the following conditions are met.
To calculate the taxable base, the net profit earned by the entity at the end of the fiscal year applicable in its jurisdiction will be considered.
There are no rules related to the substance of non-local affiliates. Nevertheless, to record an expense as deductible, the latter must be related to taxable income, and the transaction must reflect economic substance. Therefore, under Ecuadorian law, transaction simulation is regarded as a felony and is punishable by law. Likewise, practices regarded as tax avoidance are penalised under Ecuadorian criminal law.
Gains obtained by local corporations on the sale of shares held in non-local affiliates are taxed in Ecuador. No specific rule exists on the matter in local law. As such, these gains will be subject to a 25% income tax rate. If the income is taxed abroad, the local corporation could use tax credit in Ecuador, as outlined in 6.1 Foreign Income Exemptions.
Overall, the Ecuadorian tax regime considers any practice that involves simulating a transaction for the sole purpose of evading taxes as a felony, and it is punishable as such. It is important to note that assessments from the tax authorities in recent years tend to challenge tax-relevant transactions and operations that do not reflect economic substance and/or essence.
Additionally, the new CFC regime may be viewed as an anti-avoidance provision. For further details, refer to 6.5 Controlled Foreign Corporation-Type Rules.
The Ecuadorian IRS does not have a regular, routine audit cycle. Nevertheless, audits of a fiscal year are usually conducted within four years of the date of filing the corresponding tax return. Audits can be conducted within six years if the taxpayer fails to file the tax return on time.
Tax audits are normally performed by reviewing all accounting records and their supporting documentation. The reports issued regarding tax audits can be challenged before the IRS. Any final administrative resolution issued by the IRS can be challenged before the Ecuadorian tax court.
The Ecuadorian government has already taken certain actions that are partially aligned with Action 1 of the BEPS plan, and specifically the International VAT/GST Guidelines.
Even though Ecuador has not adopted BEPS within its tax regime, the following standards have been implemented.
CFC
For further details, refer to 6.5 Controlled Foreign Corporation-Type Rules.
Beneficial Owners
Ecuadorian taxpayers must report their chain of ownership and other key related parties up to their final beneficiaries. Taxpayers who fail to report such information will be taxed at a 28% rate.
VAT
The legal system expressly states that digital services are subject to VAT if the consumer is a resident in Ecuador and the payment is made by such resident. The Ecuadorian tax system provides for a registry of digital service suppliers that are not domiciled in Ecuador, which is administered by the Ecuadorian IRS.
Whenever the provider of a digital service is not registered before the Ecuadorian IRS, the consumer is obliged to act as tax collector. However, if the payment is made through an intermediary (credit card issuer or bank), the intermediary will be liable for collecting the VAT.
The Ecuadorian government is committed to complying with OECD standards and participating in the organisation’s committees. To that end, the Ecuadorian government ratified the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters.
Nevertheless, there are no indications that the Ecuadorian government will sign the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.
The authors consider that, to date, international tax does not have a high public profile in Ecuador. However, it is evident that any new development on the matter, particularly regarding BEPS, will in a relatively short period be adopted by local authorities, as noted in relation to VAT applicable to digital services, transfer pricing information requirements and reports regarding beneficial owners.
Regarding Pillar Two of BEPS (substance), as stated in previous sections, the deductibility of expenses is allowed whenever the transaction reflects economic substance. The economic substance in transactions has been an important principle used by the Ecuadorian tax authority in its audits.
Regarding Pillar One of BEPS (coherence), the Ecuadorian tax system lacks a strong technical background on international taxation. The Ecuadorian regime requires a comprehensive reform to comply with Pillar One.
The Ecuadorian tax system is generally fair and balanced as regards competition between foreign and local entities.
Nevertheless, the existence of indiscriminate tax benefits creates a false sense of competitiveness. Over the past decade, Ecuador has implemented several tax benefits that have not incentivised new national and international investment. This has also been to the detriment of good tax practice by going against the principles of generality and equality that should be present in any tax regime.
Considering the particularities of the Ecuadorian tax regime regarding the characteristics of the country’s productive sectors, there does not appear to be any pressure for BEPS to be applicable in Ecuador. The country’s exposure to the international community is marginal. Therefore, it is unlikely that there will be pressure from the international or local community to implement tax amendments to fully comply with BEPS, notwithstanding what is stated in previous sections.
The main issue with the tax system in Ecuador is enforceability, as well as generalised mistrust of taxpayers by the tax authority. In that sense, the tax authority has implemented initiatives for co-operative tax assessment/audit with key taxpayers that have voluntarily participated in such initiatives.
Direct state aid in recent years has mostly been in the form of subsidies granted to the general public applied to the prices of hydrocarbons and fuels. However, these subsidies have now been reduced, although the government has decided not to remove them entirely due to concerns over potential civil unrest.
As previously stated, the Ecuadorian tax system lacks a strong technical background on international taxation. As such, the implementation of new mechanisms, such as actions to deal with hybrid instruments, is far from becoming a reality. Likewise, there do not appear to be any pieces of legislation or proposals for dealing with hybrid instruments in Ecuador.
Overall, the current tax regime applicable to interest does not provide for restrictions tailored to territorial tax regimes (special economic development zones). Ecuador is a country that requires strong inflows of capital, including capital related to foreign loans. In this sense, imposing additional restrictions on the deductibility of interest would be inconvenient.
Nevertheless, the Ecuadorian tax regime provides for free trade zones that benefit from incentives including an ISD tax exemption on loans paid to foreign entities by the operators of such zones (see 2.3 Special Incentives).
See 6.5 Controlled Foreign Corporation-Type Rules.
The double tax convention limitations should not have any impact on either inbound or outbound investors. It is important to note that Ecuador has complementary rules in place to avoid evasion and abuse of law.
The application of transfer pricing in Ecuador is still limited, and for now mainly applies to export activities. In this sense, before the country implements any changes to transfer pricing, Ecuador needs to further develop its current system. The taxation of profits from intellectual property is not a particular source of controversy or difficulty under Ecuador’s tax regime. Profits related to intellectual property are generally taxed as royalties.
Should the proposal for transparency and country-by-country reporting be formally implemented, it is unlikely to have any relevance for Ecuadorian taxation purposes. Nevertheless, recent reforms made by the tax authority require ample information of the multinational group of the local reporting taxpayer (Master File). In practice, the Ecuadorian tax authority requires a country-by-country report, similar to the one that is filed by the OECD members.
Ecuador has implemented certain legal provisions to tax transactions effected by digital businesses operating largely outside Ecuadorian territory. Specifically, the Ecuadorian tax system has implemented a registry for foreign digital service providers. Likewise, credit card issuers and banks are responsible for collecting the VAT charged on digital services provided by entities that are not registered with the Ecuadorian IRS. Similarly, the income generated by digital platforms for sports predictions has been targeted in recent reforms by the Ecuadorian tax regime.
Ecuador has taken a few steps in relation to digital taxation; specifically, regarding Action 1 under the International VAT/GST Guidelines of BEPS. In this regard, Ecuador has issued legal provisions to collect the VAT charged on digital services provided by foreign entities (see 9.1 Adoption of BEPD Recommendations and 9.12 Digital Economy Businesses).
The income perceived by operators of sports-prediction digital platforms is subject to a special income tax. The latter is also applicable to tax residents in Ecuador that engaged in sports-prediction operations and perceived profits. The income tax rate is set at 15% of the taxable base.
Non-resident operators must comply with various formal tax obligations. This involves registering before the Ecuadorian tax authority and appointing a representative in the country, as well as fulfilling formal obligations such as filing returns. If the foreign operator does not comply with such formal obligations, corrective measures may be applied, such as blocking the relevant IP address. Additionally, operators must pay a yearly contribution to legally operate digital platforms for Ecuadorian users.
Ecuador has not introduced any other provisions dealing with the taxation of offshore intellectual property deployed within the country. However, regarding the deductibility of royalties and technical service fees, see 4.1 Application of Withholding Taxes. Nevertheless, intellectual property licensing agreements must be registered before the Ecuadorian intellectual property authority; otherwise, the relevant royalties will not be income tax deductible.
Whymper N27-70 y Orellana
Edificio Sassari
Piso 8
Quito D.M.
Ecuador
+59 32 292 8115
law@almeidaguzman.com www.almeidaguzman.com
Amendments to the Tax Haven and Low-Tax Jurisdiction Regime
Modifications to the tax haven list
In 2025, the Ecuadorian Internal Revenue Service (IRS) amended its list of jurisdictions deemed to be tax havens. Two exclusions merit particular attention: the Republic of Panama and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Tax treatment of tax havens and low-tax jurisdictions
Both tax havens and low-tax jurisdictions are subject to specific and more onerous tax rules under Ecuadorian law. Overall, payments made from Ecuador to beneficiaries resident in tax havens or low-tax jurisdictions are subject to a 37% income tax withholding rate, representing a 12-percentage point increase over the generally applicable rate of 25%. Moreover, certain exemptions and preferential tax treatments available under Ecuadorian law are expressly inapplicable to transactions involving entities located in tax havens or low-tax jurisdictions.
Distinction between tax havens and low-tax jurisdictions
The principal distinction between a tax haven and a low-tax jurisdiction lies in the designation mechanism: a tax haven requires specific qualification and inclusion on a list published by the Ecuadorian IRS, whereas any jurisdiction may be characterised as a low-tax jurisdiction upon satisfaction of certain statutory criteria without the need for express designation. The adverse tax treatment applicable to each category does not materially differ.
Prior regime
Prior to 2025, the qualification criteria differed between low-tax jurisdictions and tax havens.
Current regime
As of 2025, the qualification standards have been materially amended such that two of the three conditions referred to above must be satisfied for a jurisdiction to be characterised as either a tax haven or a low-tax jurisdiction. The sole remaining distinction is that tax haven status additionally requires express designation by the Ecuadorian IRS through inclusion on its published list, whereas low-tax jurisdiction status arises automatically upon satisfaction of two of the three statutory criteria (which in practice should be assessed by taxpayers or the IRS during an audit).
Practical implications of the reform
Given that characterisation as either a tax haven or a low-tax jurisdiction requires satisfaction of two of the aforementioned conditions, transactions with both the UAE and Panama should, as a general matter, be subject to the generally applicable tax regime and rates. The IRS’s removal of these jurisdictions from the tax haven list necessarily implies that they fail to satisfy two or more of the required conditions.
UAE – treaty override
The case of the UAE warrants specific consideration. Ecuador entered into a double taxation treaty with the UAE that entered into force in 2022 and adheres to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Model Tax Convention. Under the treaty, payments whose beneficial owners are UAE residents are either exempt from Ecuadorian taxation or subject to reduced withholding rates as specified in the treaty.
As a matter of international law, the provisions of the bilateral tax treaty supersede domestic tax legislation. Consequently, even if the UAE were to satisfy the criteria for characterisation as a low-tax jurisdiction under domestic law, the treaty provisions would prevail with respect to transactions covered by the treaty, thereby rendering the domestic tax haven or low-tax jurisdiction analysis largely academic for treaty-eligible transactions.
Republic of Panama
The removal of Panama from the tax haven list represents a normalisation of bilateral tax relations. Given that Panama now fails to satisfy the cumulative three-part test for tax haven or low-tax jurisdiction status, transactions with Panamanian residents should generally be subject to standard Ecuadorian income tax withholding rates (25%) rather than the enhanced 37% rate applicable to tax havens and low-tax jurisdictions, in the absence of other applicable exemptions or treaty relief.
Amendment to the Dividend Distribution Tax Regime
Background and previous regime
Prior to the enactment of the Organic Law on Social Transparency published on 28 August 2025, Ecuador’s dividend taxation regime imposed tax exclusively on 40% of dividends actually distributed. For dividends distributed to individual residents of Ecuador, the maximum applicable rate was 25% (representing a maximum effective rate of 10% on the distributed dividends), though lower rates could apply pursuant to specific schedules established by the Ecuadorian tax authority. For dividend distributions abroad, whether to individuals or legal entities, a flat rate of 25% applied (representing an effective rate of 10% on the distributed dividends).
Key reform
The reform eliminated the provision limiting taxation to 40% of distributed dividends. The new regime establishes a minor exemption of up to three unified basic salaries (approximately USD1,500) on the taxable amount, applicable annually. Beyond this exemption, the entire dividend is subject to income tax at rates ranging from 10% to 14%.
Applicable rates
As a general rule, the 12% rate applies to dividend distributions to individual residents of Ecuador. Conversely, dividend distributions to individuals or entities resident abroad are subject to a 10% rate on the distributed amount – a rate that, for practical purposes, is equivalent to that in effect prior to the reform.
However, the 12% rate shall apply to distributions abroad if the beneficial owner is determined to be a resident of Ecuador. Moreover, if the ownership chain of the distributing company includes a resident in a tax haven jurisdiction and the beneficial owner of the dividends is a resident of Ecuador, the applicable rate shall be 14%. The same 14% rate shall apply to dividend distributions in the event that the distributing company has failed to comply with its obligation to report its ownership structure or chain, irrespective of the identity of the beneficial owner. In all such cases, the exemption of up to three unified basic salaries does not apply.
Triggering event and withholding obligation
It is important to note that the obligation to withhold income tax on the transaction is triggered at the moment the resolution to distribute dividends is adopted, regardless of when payment is actually made. That is, the triggering event occurs when the company, through its authorised governing body, resolves to deliver dividends to its shareholders or partners and, consequently, records the corresponding accounts payable.
Capital reductions as dividend distributions
The reform introduces a significant new taxable event: capital reductions derived from undistributed profits shall be treated as dividend distributions. Until the effective date of the reform, this constituted common practice in Ecuador, whereby companies increased capital through undistributed profits and subsequently transferred such amounts to shareholders and beneficial owners through capital reductions, without the law expressly characterising such transactions as dividends. It was a mechanism to not pay – altogether – the tax on dividends. Previously, the tax authority audited significant capital reductions as the aforementioned and treated them as taxable dividend distributions, notwithstanding the absence of explicit statutory regulation for such characterisation. Notably, however, the reform does regard capital increases charged to profits as a taxable event.
Branch profit determination
The reform further established the methodology for determining the benefits of branches of foreign companies domiciled in Ecuador attributable to their head offices. Any excess in favour of the head office shall be deemed a dividend from the branch. Such excess must be determined in accordance with the arm’s length principle and considering income, costs and expenses attributable to local operations, after deducting employee profit sharing (in Ecuador, 15% of the taxpayer’s accounting profit) and income tax accrued during the period.
Provisions unchanged by the reform
Notwithstanding the reform, several aspects of the dividend distribution regime remain unchanged. Particularly, dividend distributions between companies are not subject to tax provided that both the distributing and receiving entities are domiciled in Ecuador.
Advance dividend distributions
Another noteworthy aspect unchanged by the reform concerns advance dividend distributions, which remain subject to an additional income tax withholding beyond the otherwise applicable rate. The withholding in such cases is 25% of the distributed amount. Critically, however, this amount is borne by the Ecuadorian company distributing the advance dividends and is not deducted from the amount to be received by the beneficiaries. The Ecuadorian company may, in any event, utilise the 25% withheld (and borne by it) as an income tax credit.
Strictly speaking, advance dividend distributions occur when distribution is made against the prospective results of a fiscal year. No advance dividend distribution occurs when distribution is made against profits from a closed fiscal year with known results, regardless of when such distribution takes place. In any event, tax regulations treat, as advance dividend distributions, cases in which a company domiciled in Ecuador grants cash loans to its shareholders or holders of equity rights. This treatment applies equally to loans made to related parties where such loans lack a demonstrable commercial purpose. In such cases, the transfer of funds to shareholders, beneficial owners or related parties shall be taxed as an advance dividend distribution. The only exception to the advance dividend distribution regime applies to entities whose sole economic activity is the holding of shares (holding companies).
Creation of a Taxable Event Imposing Income Tax on Undistributed Profits
Legislative intent and scope
The Organic Law on Social Transparency established a new income tax taxable event. Under this new provision, taxation applies when a company resident in Ecuador or a permanent establishment (branch) of a foreign company has failed to distribute its accumulated profits from the prior fiscal year or to capitalise such profits by July 31st of each fiscal year, provided that undistributed profits exceed USD1 million.
Progressive rate structure
Upon occurrence of the taxable event, a progressive rate shall apply to the entirety of undistributed profits in accordance with the following schedule based on the amount of undistributed profits:
Tax credit mechanism
The regulations authorise using the tax referred to herein as a tax credit against various tax obligations, provided that two requirements of a factual and temporal nature are satisfied:
Distribution scenarios
The distribution of dividends charged to undistributed profits enables the company to utilise the tax credit to offset the amount to be remitted to the IRS pursuant to the withholding obligation applicable to its shareholders as referenced in the preceding section.
It is important to emphasise that the tax credit to which the distributing company is entitled can be used with respect to the withholding that must be remitted to the tax authority; that is, it does not obviate or eliminate the withholding obligation referenced in the preceding section. The withholding must be performed; however, upon remitting the amount withheld from shareholders or beneficial owners to the tax authority, the company may deduct such amount by crediting the payment previously made for having registered undistributed profits (which were subsequently distributed).
In instances where the amount paid on account of undistributed profits cannot be fully offset against withholdings applied to distributed dividends, the distributing company may offset the tax credit against income tax accrued in the fiscal year in which the payment becomes a tax credit – namely, in the year in which dividends are distributed and up to the following two fiscal years.
Finally, if the credit cannot be offset in the manner indicated, the entity that paid the tax on undistributed profits may request a refund of the balance within three years from the close of the fiscal year in which the credit became enforceable.
Capitalisation scenarios
Because capitalisation of profits does not constitute a triggering event for income tax on dividend distribution, this scenario gives rise to a tax credit that may be utilised directly against accrued income tax. However, the capitalisation must satisfy one of the following conditions for the tax paid to qualify as a tax credit:
The credit may be used in the year in which capitalisation occurred and up to the following two fiscal years, or a refund may be requested in accordance with the timeframes referenced above with respect to the credit for dividend distribution.
Publication of the Double Taxation Treaty Between Ecuador and the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland
On 17 January 2025, the double taxation treaty between Ecuador and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland came into effect. The tax treaty adheres to the OECD Model Tax Convention. Accordingly, business profits earned in Ecuador by a tax resident of the United Kingdom are not subject to the 25% income tax withholding (the general rate for taxable outbound payments from Ecuador).
Among other relevant provisions, the tax treaty establishes a 10% tax rate on the gross amount of interest and royalties paid from one contracting state to the other. With respect to dividends, applicable tax rates on payments from one state to the other range from 5% to 15%, depending on the beneficial owners and other specific conditions.
Diplomatic Tensions Between Ecuador and Colombia Resulting in Increased Foreign Trade Levies
Background and Ecuador’s justification
In early 2026, Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa asserted that the Colombian government was failing to ensure adequate cross-border security, alleging that a substantial quantity of narcotics exported from Ecuador to destinations including the United States and Europe enters Ecuadorian territory from its northern neighbour. Additionally, President Noboa cited a trade deficit of USD1 billion in Ecuador’s bilateral commerce with Colombia.
Imposition of customs security surcharge
In response to these concerns, Ecuador established what it has characterised as a “security fee for customs control” (tasa de seguridad por control aduanero) applicable to all goods entering Ecuador from Colombia, effective 1 February 2026. According to the formal statement of purpose issued by the Ecuadorian government, the primary objective of this measure is to strengthen customs control mechanisms and enhance national security. The surcharge is assessed at 30% of the customs value of imported goods and is payable to the Ecuadorian IRS.
Colombian countermeasures and regional challenge
Colombia responded by imposing a similar surcharge on a designated group of Ecuadorian products. Additionally, Colombia challenged Ecuador’s measure before the Andean Community of Nations (Comunidad Andina de Naciones), of which both Ecuador and Colombia are member states.
Pending developments
The outcome of Colombia’s challenge, any provisional measures or interim relief that may be ordered by the Andean Community Secretary, the effective collection and enforcement of these surcharges by each state, and their material impact on bilateral trade between the two nations will be determined during the first half of 2026. These proceedings bear close monitoring given their potential implications for Andean regional integration and bilateral commercial relations.
Whymper N27-70 y Orellana
Edificio Sassari
Piso 8
Quito D.M.
Ecuador
+59 32 292 8115
law@almeidaguzman.com www.almeidaguzman.com