Businesses seeking long-term growth and continuity typically adopt a corporate form, most commonly the private limited liability company (ltd). An ltd may be incorporated with a single shareholder but must not have more than 50 shareholders, and is required to restrict the transfer of its shares.
Another widely used corporate structure is the public limited liability company (plc), which must have at least two shareholders and may have an unlimited number. A plc is the prescribed form for companies listed on the stock exchange.
Other corporate forms recognised under Nigerian law include the unlimited liability company, under which shareholders bear unlimited liability, although this structure is rarely utilised. There is also the company limited by guarantee, which is a non-profit structure used for charitable or similar objects.
In addition, limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are recognised as having a separate legal personality distinct from their partners. However, LLPs are not tax-transparent in Nigeria, and, like corporate structures, are subject to taxation at the corporate level.
The following transparent entities are recognised by Nigerian law:
Many small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as petty traders, carry on business as partnerships or sole proprietorships.
Tax Residence for Incorporated Businesses
A company is resident for tax purposes in Nigeria if:
Resident companies are subject to income tax on their worldwide profits. Therefore, the profits of a Nigerian company are deemed to accrue in Nigeria, regardless of where they actually arise.
There are three instances where a non-resident company (NRC) would be liable to tax in Nigeria.
The first instance is where it has a permanent establishment (PE) in Nigeria. An NRC would be deemed to have a PE in Nigeria where it:
The second instance is where the NRC has a significant economic presence (SEP) in Nigeria. An NRC shall be deemed to have SEP in Nigeria where the person transmits, emits or sends by itself or through other person, signals, sounds, messages, images or data of any kind by cable, radio, electromagnetic systems or any other electronic or wireless apparatus to Nigeria in respect of any activity, including electronic commerce, application store, high-frequency trading, electronic data storage, online adverts, participative network platforms, online payments, supply of user data, search engines, digital content services, online gaming, cloud computing and online teaching services, and profit can be attributable to such activity.
The NRC would be subject to tax on the income attributable to its PE and SEP.
The third instance is where the NRC receives payment from a Nigerian resident or a Nigerian PE of an NRC:
Tax Residence for Transparent Entities
The income of transparent entities (general partnership, sole proprietorship and limited partnership) is taxed in the hands of their owners, where the owners are deemed to be tax-resident in Nigeria.
An individual is deemed to be tax-resident in Nigeria if the person:
The income, gains or profits of a Nigerian resident are treated as accruing in Nigeria and are taxable regardless of where they arise or whether they are brought into or received in Nigeria.
Companies pay corporate income tax (CIT) at the rate of 30%. The Nigeria Tax Act (NTA) empowers the President to reduce the CIT rate to 25% on the advice of the National Economic Council. However, “small” companies (ie, those with a turnover of less than NGN100 million with total fixed assets not exceeding NGN250 million) are subject to CIT at 0%.
In addition to CIT, companies that have converted from the Petroleum Act (PA) regime to the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) regime pay a hydrocarbon tax (HT) of 15% for operations in onshore and shallow waters pursuant to a Petroleum Prospecting Licence (PPL) and 30% in respect of operations in onshore and shallow waters pursuant to a Petroleum Mining Lease (PML).
Companies that opt not to convert to the PIA regime will continue to pay petroleum profits tax (PPT) at rates that vary between 50% and 85%, depending on the nature of the company’s operations. Also, a company that has not commenced the sale of crude oil under a programme of continuous production will enjoy a reduced PPT rate of 65.75% until all pre-production capitalised costs have been fully amortised.
Individuals are allowed a rent relief of 20% of annual rent paid, subject to a maximum of NGN500,000, whichever is lower. The balance of the income after the relief will be taxed in accordance with the graduated tax rates set out below:
Taxable profits are arrived at by aggregating all income and gains and then deducting exempt income, allowable expenses, capital allowance and carried-forward losses.
Under the former CIT Act regime, capital allowances comprised both initial and annual allowances, each applying at different rates. The NTA abolishes the initial allowance, leaving only annual allowances, and also introduces several new categories of qualifying expenditure, including intangible assets, heavy transportation infrastructure (such as pipelines and cables) and software expenditure. These changes will slow capital cost recovery and result in higher tax liabilities in the year of asset acquisition.
Allowable expenses must be “wholly and exclusively” incurred in making profits. Profits are taxed on an accrual basis, and tax is paid on a preceding-year basis, except for tax on profits from petroleum operations, which is paid, on a current year basis, in monthly instalments based on projected profits, with a reconciliation made at the end of the tax year to reflect actual profits.
There is an exemption on gains arising from the disposal of the shares of a start-up licensed by the National Information Technology Development Agency (labelled start-up), provided that the shares have been held for a minimum of 24 months.
There is also a reduced withholding tax rate of 5% on payments to foreign companies that provide technical, consulting, professional or management services to a labelled start-up, which is the final tax. Investors in a labelled start-up also enjoy a 30% investment tax credit. There are no special incentives for a patent box.
The NTA repeals the Industrial Development (Income Tax Relief) Act (IDITRA) and replaces the Pioneer Status Incentive (PSI) with the Economic Development Tax Credit (EDTC). The EDTC is a 5% annual tax credit on qualifying capital expenditure, which applies to the tax payable on the profits of a priority product or service. Any unused EDTC can be carried forward for a maximum of an additional five years, after which it will lapse. The EDTC is available to companies whose capital investment in a priority sector or product meets the threshold specified in the NTA.
Oil and Gas Companies
The following incentives apply to companies that have converted to the PIA regime.
Additionally, companies that have converted to the PIA regime can also offset the costs of producing associated gas upstream of the measurement point from their crude oil production profits.
Companies that have yet to convert from the PA regime to the PIA regime and have executed a production sharing contract (prior to 1998) with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation enjoy an investment tax credit (ITC) or an investment tax allowance (ITA) of 50% of their qualifying expenditure. The ITA is deductible from revenue in arriving at taxable profits. The ITC operates as a full tax credit and does not reduce qualifying capital expenditure for the purposes of calculating capital allowances. Upon conversion to the PIA regime, the ITA and ITC no longer apply.
Companies that have yet to convert to the PIA regime can also offset their gas-related capital allowance against their oil production profits.
Free Trade Zones
Approved enterprises operating within a free trade zone are exempt from all federal, state and local government taxes, levies and rates where:
Such approved enterprises are required to file annual tax returns with the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) regardless of tax liability.
Loss carry back is not permitted, but all companies can carry operating losses forward indefinitely.
There are thin capitalisation rules under which the tax-deductibility of interest expense on any related-party loan is limited to 30% of EBITDA in any given tax year. Deductible interest expense not fully utilised can be carried forward for a maximum of five years.
In addition, existing anti-avoidance provisions allow the tax authority to disallow/reduce the interest charged between related parties where such interest is not reflective of the arm’s length principle.
Nigerian law does not permit tax grouping; each company within a group is individually taxable in Nigeria. Consequently, losses suffered by one member of a group of companies cannot be utilised to reduce the tax liability of another company within the group but can be carried forward and set off against the future profits of the company that incurred them.
Chargeable gains are now computed alongside income tax and taxed at the same rate. Chargeable gains are computed by deducting from the disposal proceeds any incidental costs wholly and exclusively incurred in selling the asset, and, where capital allowance has been claimed, the residue of the asset.
All forms of property are chargeable assets under Nigerian law, regardless of where they are located, including foreign currency, securities, digital assets, debts and incorporeal property generally. Gains arising from the disposal of the following are exempt from tax:
Capital gains tax (CGT) is not payable where the proceeds from the disposal of the shares in a Nigerian company are utilised to acquire shares in the same or other Nigerian companies in the year of the disposal of the shares.
VAT is levied on the supply of all goods and services, with a few exceptions, at the rate of 7.5%, and is collected by the supplier and remitted to the tax authority. However, oil and gas companies – including oil service companies, ministries, departments and agencies of governments, deposit money banks, and select telecommunications companies – must withhold the VAT on the invoices from their suppliers and remit it to the NRS.
A non-resident company supplying taxable services to a resident is required to charge, collect and remit VAT to the NRS. Where the non-resident company fails to do so, the NRS will demand the VAT from the resident.
An importer of goods purchased online from a non-resident supplier is required to provide proof of the registration of the non-resident supplier to the NRS in order to avoid paying VAT at the port. Pursuant to the NTA, all input VAT is now recoverable, provided that such supplies are consumed, utilised or supplied while making taxable supplies. Lagos State levies a 5% consumption tax on services by hotels, restaurants and event centres.
Stamp duty is paid on most instruments, including electronic instruments. The rates differ for various instruments and can be as high as 3% of the value of the underlying transaction.
The following taxes or levies are notable.
The annual levy for PIEs listed on any recognised exchange in Nigeria ranges from 0.002% to 0.10% of market capitalisation, capped at NGN25 million. For PIEs other than listed entities, the annual levy ranges from 0.02% to 0.05% based on turnover. In June 2025, the Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment announced that the President formally approved the suspension of the implementation of the FRCN levy applicable to unlisted PIEs. The Minister further stated that the FRCN has been directed to impose an interim cap of NGN25 million on annual dues payable by such entities, aligning with the existing cap applicable to listed PIEs.
The NTA imposes a Development levy of 4% on the assessable profits of companies (excluding small companies and non-resident companies). This levy consolidates and replaces the Tertiary Education Tax, the Nigeria Police Trust Fund levy, the National Information Technology Development Agency levy, and the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure levy.
Payroll Taxes
An employer is required to:
Closely held local businesses commonly adopt the structure of a private company limited by shares.
See 1.4 Applicable Corporate and Individual Tax Rates.
Where it appears to the NRS that a Nigerian company controlled by not more than five persons has not distributed profits to its shareholders with a view to reducing the aggregate of the tax chargeable in Nigeria, the NRS may direct the undistributed profits to be treated as distributed and taxable in the hands of the shareholders in proportion to their shares.
There are no special rules on the taxation of gains on the sale of shares in closely held corporations.
There are no special rules on the taxation of dividends from, or gains on, the sale of shares in publicly traded corporations.
Withholding tax (WHT) of 10% applies to interest, dividends and rents. For royalty payments, the WHT rate is 10% for corporate recipients and 5% for non-corporate recipients. This WHT is treated as the final tax when the payment is due to a non-Nigerian company.
Relief in the form of WHT exemptions is available on outbound payments where:
Nigeria has double tax treaties (DTTs) with Belgium, Canada, China, the Czech Republic, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Pakistan, the Philippines, Romania, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Many investors use vehicles set up in the Netherlands and South Africa. Mauritius is increasingly becoming an attractive jurisdiction even though the DTT between Nigeria and Mauritius is yet to come into force.
There is also a double tax agreement (DTA) between the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) countries, which Nigeria has ratified.
The NRS is empowered to challenge the use of treaty country entities by non-treaty country residents if it is of the view that the use of the treaty country entity was designed to take advantage of the treaty or abuse its provisions.
The availability of local comparables is one of the biggest transfer pricing challenges for inbound investors operating through a local corporation; transfer pricing compliance requirements are another. This is because there is a minimum penalty of NGN10 million for each failure to declare relevant group information, to disclose related-party transaction(s) or to maintain contemporaneous transfer pricing documentation, where required.
The local tax authorities challenge the use of related-party limited risk distribution arrangements for the sale of goods or the provision of services locally if they determine that the arrangement provides a tax advantage and has not been made on arm’s length terms.
The transfer pricing standards of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and those of the UN apply in Nigeria unless they conflict with the local standards. The local transfer pricing standards conflict with the OECD standards in two major regards.
There is no published data regarding the use of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP) by Nigeria’s competent authorities to resolve international transfer pricing disputes.
The NRS is open to resolving tax disputes through the MAP process. In 2018, the NRS (then the Federal Inland Revenue Service) issued the Guidelines on MAP in Nigeria to guide Nigerian residents seeking to initiate the MAP process regarding tax disputes, including transfer pricing disputes involving a treaty partner. By the combined provision of these guidelines and the TP Regulations, where a Nigerian resident initiates a MAP in respect of a transfer pricing adjustment made by the tax authorities of a treaty partner, the NRS will allow a corresponding adjustment where it agrees that the adjustment done by the tax authorities of the treaty partner is consistent with the arm’s length principle. If the NRS does not agree that the adjustment by the tax authorities of the treaty partner is consistent with the arm’s length principle, Nigeria’s competent authority will initiate the MAP.
However, it is unlikely that Nigeria’s competent authority would resolve international transfer pricing disputes via MAPs initiated by Nigerian residents, given Nigeria’s status as an import-dependent nation and its low-tax treaty network.
The TP Regulations do not make provisions for compensating adjustments. Therefore, the OECD and UN standards would apply.
Unless granted a special exemption, branch operations by non-local corporations are not permitted in Nigeria. As such, non-local corporations seeking to carry on business in Nigeria must set up a subsidiary for that purpose. There are separate rules for the taxation of local branches of non-local corporations that carry on the business of transport by sea or air.
Capital gains of non-residents from the sale of shares of a local entity are subject to tax. Also, gains from any indirect transfer of shares in a Nigerian company are subject to tax if the transfer results in a change in the ownership or control of the Nigerian company, and more than 50% of the value of the disposed shares is derived from the Nigerian company.
The gains from a direct or indirect disposal would be exempt if:
The treatment of gains arising from the direct or indirect transfer of shares under a DTA depends on the precise wording of the particular DTA. In practice, however, Nigeria’s DTAs generally do not eliminate taxation on such gains.
See 5.3 Capital Gains of Non-Residents.
There are no special formulas for determining the taxable income of foreign-owned local affiliates. However, formulas are used to determine the taxable income of NRCs derived from Nigeria, where an NRC:
Profits attributable to a PE/SEP are primarily computed based on Nigerian-sourced income less only expenses wholly and exclusively incurred in generating the PE/SEP’s profits, with deductions disallowed for royalties, fees or similar payments to the non-resident head office or connected persons, except as reimbursement of actual costs. Where profits cannot be reliably determined on this basis, the tax authority may apply the NRC’s global profit margin to Nigerian-sourced income. Where profits are determinable under the primary rule, the taxable profit will be the higher of that amount and the margin-based amount. Nonetheless, the tax payable cannot be less than tax withheld at source or, where withholding does not apply, 4% of total Nigerian-sourced income.
For NRCs carrying on the business of transport by sea or air, the NRS is entitled to tax on a turnover basis. In practice, 20% of turnover is deemed as profit, which is then taxed at the income tax rate of 30%, resulting in an effective tax of 6% of turnover.
Payments by local affiliates to non-local affiliates for management and administrative expenses incurred in the production of the taxable profits are attributable to the PE and consistent with the arm’s length principle. Also, management and service agreements between local affiliates and non-local affiliates are required to be registered with the National Office for Technology Acquisition and Promotion (NOTAP). Failure to register such agreements with NOTAP hinders the local affiliates’ ability to remit payments pursuant to the agreements through licensed banks.
Related-party borrowing must comply with the arm’s length principle. The thin capitalisation rules discussed under 2.5 Deduction of Interest will also apply.
The foreign income of a local corporation is not exempt from corporate tax, as a Nigerian company is taxed on its worldwide income. However, dividends, interest, rents and royalties earned abroad and brought into Nigeria through the commercial banks are exempt from tax.
Expenses that are attributable to foreign income would be deductible to the extent that they were incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of making a company’s profits.
Dividends earned from foreign subsidiaries of local corporations would be subject to income tax unless they were brought into Nigeria through any of the commercial banks. Such dividends would enjoy any relief in an applicable DTT where the dividends are not brought into Nigeria through any commercial banks.
Intangibles developed by local corporations in Nigeria cannot be freely transferred or licensed to foreign subsidiaries without Nigerian tax consequences. Outright transfers may trigger CGT, while licensing arrangements attract WHT on royalties.
Also, the NRS can rely on the general anti-avoidance provisions in the law to attribute a profit to the local corporation if it considers that the terms of the transfer of the intangibles do not reflect the arm’s length principle.
The NTA provides that where a foreign company, which is controlled by a Nigerian company, has not distributed its profits in a given year, the portion of those profits attributable to the Nigerian company (which could have been distributed without harming the business) will be deemed distributed and taxed in Nigeria. This introduces a Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) regime, effectively subjecting Nigerian companies to tax on retained foreign earnings of their subsidiaries.
Rules related to the substance of non-local affiliates do not apply in Nigeria.
Local corporations are taxed on gains on the sale of shares of non-local affiliates, whether or not the gains are received in, or brought into, Nigeria.
There is a general anti-avoidance provision in the NTA, which empowers the tax authorities to make necessary adjustments to counteract any tax reduction that would result from transactions that are considered artificial. The tax authorities may deem any transaction artificial if they find that its terms have not been effected or, if it is a transaction between related parties, that its terms do not reflect the arm’s length principle.
There is no fixed audit cycle; however, large corporates are typically audited annually.
In response to BEPS, Nigeria did not adopt the Two-Pillar solution introduced by the OECD. However, Nigeria has signed the following instruments:
Despite Nigeria not adopting the Two-Pillar Solution, the NTA introduces similar concepts through a minimum effective tax regime applicable to resident and non-resident companies that are either part of a multinational group with aggregate group turnover of at least EUR750 million (or its equivalent) or annual turnover of at least NGN50 billion. Under the NTA, where a company’s effective tax rate in Nigeria falls below 15%, additional tax is payable to bring the tax up to the prescribed minimum threshold.
Also, where an NRC is a subsidiary of a Nigerian company or a member of a multinational group of a Nigerian company, and the income tax paid in its home country in any year is below the minimum effective tax rate of 15%, the Nigerian parent company is required to pay a top-up amount to bring the subsidiary’s tax up to the prescribed minimum effective tax rate.
Nigeria has also put the following guidelines in place to give effect to the above instruments:
In May 2025, the Federal High Court held that the Income Tax (Country-by-Country Reporting) Regulations, 2018 (the “CbCR Regulations”) were ultra vires and of no legal effect, as they were issued by the then Federal Inland Revenue Service when a board was not properly constituted. Until this decision is overturned, the CbCR Regulations remain invalid and unenforceable.
The Nigerian government is keen on eliminating BEPS, as shown by its signing, domestication and active enforcement of anti-BEPs instruments, as well as its introduction of the CFC rule and a minimum effective tax rate. The tax-to-GDP ratio of Nigeria is among the lowest in the world, and the government expects that the BEPS plans will increase revenue from taxation.
International tax does not have a high public profile in Nigeria.
Despite its low tax-to-GDP ratio, Nigeria has competitive tax policies aimed at increasing foreign and local participation in the economy, including:
Nigeria does not have state aid constraints but applies domestic anti-abuse rules aggressively. See the incentives discussed under 2.3 Special Incentives.
Nigeria does not have domestic legislation to deal with hybrid instruments. However, once Nigeria ratifies the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty-Related Measures to Prevent BEPS, Article 3 thereof will apply to transparent entities resident in tax treaty countries.
Nigerian companies are taxed on their worldwide income. However, a Nigerian company’s foreign-earned dividend, interest, rent and royalty income are exempt from tax if brought into Nigeria through a commercial bank. Also, see the thin capitalisation rules discussed under 2.5 Deduction of Interest.
See the discussion under 6.5 Controlled Foreign Corporation-Type Rules.
Nigeria has anti-avoidance rules in some of its tax treaties, and has indicated its intention to adopt the “principal purpose test” and the competent authority tiebreaker provisions of the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty-Related Measures to Prevent BEPS.
The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations and the UN Practical Manual on Transfer Pricing for Developing Countries, and all future updates, apply in Nigeria unless they conflict with the TP Regulations, in which case the latter will prevail.
Nigeria favours the OECD proposals for transparency and country-by-country reporting and, among others, has signed the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, the Country-by-Country Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement, and the Common Reporting Standards Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement.
Foreign companies with a digital presence in Nigeria are subject to CIT; see 1.3 Tests for Determining Tax Residence.
Payments to NRCs who remotely provide services to Nigerian residents attract a final WHT. The WHT rate can either be 10% or 5%. Technical, management, professional and consultancy services are subject to WHT at 10%, while all other payments attract WHT at 5%.
See 9.12 Digital Economy Businesses.
WHT of 10% (which is the final tax) applies to all offshore royalty payments. There are no special rules for IP owners in a tax haven.
4th Floor, Marble House
1 Kingsway Road
PO Box 52901
Falomo
Ikoyi, Lagos
Nigeria
+234 703 413 6930
+234 1 4617 092
lagos@aelex.com www.aelex.com
Introduction
The Nigerian tax system has undergone a significant overhaul over the last year. This was as a result of the enactment, and coming into effect, of a range of tax reform legislation (ie, The Nigeria Tax Act (NTA), the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA), the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act (the “NRS Act”) and the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act (the “JRBN Act”) (together the “Tax Reform Acts”)). The Tax Reform Acts were signed into law on 26 June 2025 with the NTA coming into force on 1 January 2026, while the other Acts were stated to commence on 26 June 2025. There have also been other notable development relating to taxation during the same period, which have impacted on the corporate tax landscape in Nigeria, including tax decisions of the courts and the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT or the “Tribunal”), executive orders on taxation, and the regulations, directives and notices issued by the tax authorities.
The general tenor of tax development in Nigeria has been towards the modernisation of tax laws, streamlining taxes through the elimination of double/multiple taxation, increasing the government’s non-oil revenue by ensuring wider tax coverage through a country-wide taxpayer identification numbering system and curbing of tax evasion while reducing the tax burden on small and medium taxpayers for the purpose of achieving economic growth. Nigeria has also witnessed a significant drive by government to increase receipts from oil and gas activities by (i) promoting a reduction in operational costs for oil exploration and production through provision of incentives for cost-efficient operations; and (ii) closing leakages in the administration and collection of revenue by requiring direct remittance to the Federation Account in certain cases. There have also been changes to the tax incentive regime with the goal of stimulating economic growth in identified key sectors where incentives are required and ensuring that the incentives result in measurable growth in investment.
Even though some of these reforms are still at the early implementation stage, this article considers some of the key developments, and identifies some of the legal issues that may arise from their implementation.
The Tax Reform Acts
The NTA
The NTA primarily seeks to unify the major tax legislation in Nigeria – such as the Personal Income Tax (PIT) Act, the Companies Income Tax (CIT) Act, the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) Act, the Value Added Tax (VAT) Act, the Petroleum Profits Tax (PPT) Act, and the Stamp Duties Act (SDA) – into a single tax statute. The NTA therefore repealed in entirety the PIT Act, the CIT Act, the CGT Act, PPT Act, SDA and the VAT Act as well as the Industrial Development (Income Tax Relief) Act (IDITRA) that provided for the pioneer status incentive (PSI), amongst other laws (together the “Repealed Acts”). It also amended tax-related provisions in other statutes such as the Petroleum Industry Act, the National Information Technology Development Agency Act (NITDA), the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (Establishment, etc) Act (the “TETF Act”), and the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (Establishment) Act (the “NASENI Act”).
Uniform tax rate for CIT and CGT
The NTA now treats profits as well as capital gains from the disposal of chargeable assets as income tax for the purpose of the Act by providing that income tax shall be determined in accordance with the NTA and imposed on the “profits or gains of any company or enterprise” (Section 3(a), NTA). And the assessable profit of a company for any year of assessment includes the chargeable gains for the purpose of determining the total profit of a company after deducting any losses and capital allowances under the NTA (Section 27(1), NTA). Accordingly, the income tax rate of 30% shall apply to the chargeable gains (which forms part of the total profits) of a company or enterprise except for small companies, which are liable to income tax at 0% (Section 56, NTA). The NTA defines a “small company” as a business that earns gross turnover of NGN100 million or less per annum with total fixed assets not exceeding NGN250 million. A company other than a small company or a non-resident company will also be liable to pay a development levy of 4% of its assessable profit, which consolidates and replaces the levies previously applicable under various pieces of legislation, including the NITDA Act, TETF Act, and NASENI Act.
Rules on controlled foreign companies, effective tax rate and indirect disposition of assets
In order to check harmful tax avoidance practices, the NTA introduced new rules on controlled foreign companies (CFCs) with the effect that where a foreign company that is controlled by a Nigerian company has not, in a year, distributed profits to its shareholders, the proportion of the profits of the CFC attributable to the Nigerian company, which could have been distributed without detriment to the company’s business shall be construed as distributed and included in the profits of the Nigerian company for the purposes of taxation of the Nigerian company (Section 6(2), NTA). Section 57 of the NTA also provides for an effective tax rate (ETR), which mirrors the global minimum tax principle under Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Model Rules, with the effect that where, in any year of assessment, the effective tax rate (ie, covered taxes as a percentage of net income) of a company is less than 15%, such company shall pay an additional tax or top-up, which shall make its effective tax rate equal to 15%. Covered taxes for the purpose of the section means CIT, PPT and hydrocarbon tax, the development levy, and priority sector tax credit; while “net income” refers to the profit before tax as reported in the audited financial statements excluding franked investment income and unrealistic gains or losses; and in the case of a life insurance company, the net income shall not include the gross income and investment income for policyholders.
The ETR provision applies to:
The ETR provision is not applicable to an enterprise operating in a free zone with respect to its approved activities, but applies to its sales within the customs territory. Similar rules apply where a non-resident company which is a subsidiary of a Nigerian company yields less than the ETR, in which case the Nigerian parent company shall pay an amount to make that non-resident subsidiary’s income tax equal to the minimum effective tax rate (Section 6(3), NTA). The NTA also makes provision for the treatment of gains from indirect transfer of ownership of companies or assets by non-residents as constituting chargeable gains in Nigeria where it results in a change of ownership of any Nigerian company or assets in Nigeria (Section 47, NTA).
The economic development tax incentive
Following the repeal of IDITRA and consequently the pioneer status incentive (PSI) provided for therein, the NTA now provides for an economic development tax incentive (EDI). A company that is granted an EDI certificate (ie, a priority company) will enjoy a 5% annual tax credit for five years on qualifying capital expenditures in the priority sectors listed in the 10th Schedule to the NTA. The EDI is renewable for a further term of five years if the priority company invests 100% of its profits during the incentive period in expansion of the priority product(s).
An applicant for EDI must show a commitment of, or the ability to commit, the minimum capital required to invest in the specified priority sector as provided in the 10th Schedule to the NTA. A company granted an incentive under IDITRA shall continue to enjoy the reliefs applicable thereunder for the unexpired period at the commencement of the NTA (Section 182(2), NTA). However, it is unclear whether a company currently enjoying a PSI can apply for renewal of that incentive under the EDI regime, although there is no provision in the NTA that prevents a company, which has enjoyed a PSI, from applying for a grant of an EDI where it is involved in a priority product/service, and plans to make qualifying capital expenditure up to the minimum amount specified in the NTA.
Claim of input VAT on services and fixed assets
Unlike the repealed VAT Act, the NTA provides for the recovery of input VAT on all purchases including purchase of services and fixed assets. Accordingly, companies that provide services for which input VAT was previously not recoverable, will deduct input VAT from output VAT paid on their taxable supplies, provided that the input VAT:
The NTAA
The NTAA makes uniform provisions for the assessment and collection of, and accounting for, revenue accruing to the federation and federal, state, and local governments, and it prescribes the powers and functions of tax authorities.
Tax registration and Tax ID
The NTAA requires every taxable person to register with the relevant tax authority (RTA) and obtain a taxpayer identification (“Tax ID”). The obligation to obtain Tax ID extends to every ministry, department, agency of a federal or state government, and the local government, as well as every non-resident person that supplies goods and services to a person in Nigeria or derives income in Nigeria except a non-resident person that derives only passive income from investment in Nigeria (Sections 4, 5 and 6, NTAA). A unified Tax ID can now be generated from the website of the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) using the company’s registration number issued by the Corporate Affairs Commission for companies or the national identification number for individuals.
Withholding tax
Further, unlike the Repealed Acts, which specified the rate of withholding tax for passive income such as rent, interest and dividends, while allowing for the general power of the Minister to prescribe rates of WHT by regulation, the NTAA does not specify any rate for WHT on passive income but provides for the applicable rates to be prescribed in regulations relating to deduction of tax at source (Section 51, NTAA). Accordingly, the NTAA has given full effect to the provisions of the Deduction of Tax at Source (Withholding) Regulations, 2024 (the “WHT Regulations”) and the WHT rates specified therein. However, a non-resident company that provides technical, consulting, professional or management services to a labelled start-up (as defined in the Nigeria Startup Act No 32, 2022) shall be subject to a 5% deduction on income derived from the provision of such services, which shall be the final tax to be paid by such non-resident company (Section 51(8), NTAA).
Advance tax ruling
The NTAA now makes provision for the power of the RTA to issue advance tax rulings. The RTA may issue an advance ruling for the purposes of clarity, consistency and certainty regarding the interpretation and application of any tax law (Section 73, RTA). Upon receipt of an application, the RTA is required to issue an advance ruling within 21 days of the receipt thereof or give reasons in writing for inability to do so. However, the RTA may reject an application that:
Regulation and taxation of virtual assets
The 5th Schedule to the NTAA provides for the administration of the taxation of virtual asset service providers (VASP) who are required to be registered with the RTA and comply with tax reporting obligations, anti-money laundering reporting, and KYC obligations.
The NRS Act and JRBN Act
The NRS Act established the NRS, which replaced the Federal Inland Revenue Service as the body charged with powers of assessment, collection of, and accounting for, revenue accruable to the government of the federation. The Act also repealed the FIRS (Establishment, etc) Act (FIRSEA). Similarly, the JRBN Act established the Joint Revenue Board, the TAT and the Office of the Tax Ombud and makes provisions for the harmonisation, co-ordination and settlement of disputes arising from revenue administration in Nigeria.
The JRBN Act introduced a few notable changes to the procedure of the TAT. First, while Section 23 of the JRBN Act provides for the jurisdiction of TAT to settle any tax dispute and controversy arising from the administration of the JRBN Act or “any other tax laws made by the National Assembly”, Section 29 of the JRBN Act extends this jurisdiction to disputes arising from tax laws passed by the House of Assembly of a State, thereby seemingly expanding the scope of the TAT to include matters relating to taxes validly created by the laws of a state.
This expanded jurisdiction appears ultra vires the National Assembly under parts I and II of the 2nd schedule to the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (the “Constitution”) since (a) the Constitution enables the House of Assembly of a State (the “State House of Assembly”), to the exclusion of the National Assembly, to make tax laws other than laws that affect the taxes expressly listed in the 2nd schedule to the Constitution (ie, stamp duties and taxation of incomes, profits and capital gains), and (b) the National Assembly cannot make laws for the settlement of disputes arising from a tax law validly made by a State House of Assembly in respect of a tax over which the National Assembly lacks legislative competence.
It is therefore likely that the courts will nullify Section 29 of the JRBN Act for being unconstitutional (A. G., Abia State and ors v Imo Transport Company Limited (2025) LPELR 80609(SC)). Second, the NTAA specifically provides that the proceedings of the TAT and its decisions shall follow the provisions of the Evidence Act (paragraph 8, 2nd schedule, JRBN Act), thus making it very challenging for non-lawyers to represent parties at the Tribunal.
Tax Decisions of the Courts and Tribunals
Oando Oil Limited v FIRS (2026) 96 TLRN 1
The decision relates to the application of stamp duty to share sale agreements in Nigeria. The respondent, by a letter dated 30 July 2024 had assessed the appellant for USD88,258,099.32 in unpaid stamp duty, penalties and interest thereon in connection with the transfer of the shares of ConocoPhillips to the appellant, which led to the acquisition of an ownership interest by the appellant in oil mining leases (OML) 60, 61, 62, 63, 131 and 214.
The assessment was based upon three share purchase and sale agreements (SPAs) dated 20/12/2012, 18/07/2014 and 20/12/2012 between the following parties:
The appellant contended the SPAs were not dutiable by virtue of paragraph 13 of the schedule to the SDA (in pari materia with Section 184(h) of the NTA), which exempts all documents relating to the transfer of shares or stock from stamp duty. However, the TAT, after referring to two cases in which it was decided that shares could pass from one person to another “by transfer” or “by purchase on the secondary market”, held that the SPAs did not constitute mere transfer of shares but were agreements for the purchase and sale of shares, which did not qualify for the exemption under paragraph 13 of the SDA.
The Tribunal therefore held that the SPAs were liable to stamp duty by a combined reading of Section 59 and the schedule to the SDA. In arriving at this decision, the Tribunal, without the benefit of the SPAs (which were not put in evidence before the TAT), found that the SPAs were contracts under seal for sale of stocks or shares on the basis that the nature and characterisation of the SPAs could be deduced from their headings.
We are of the opinion that the basis of the Tribunal’s decision is not supportable. First, an agreement for the sale and purchase of shares will ultimately lead to a transfer of shares. There is therefore no distinction in substance between a document made for the transfer of shares and a document made for the sale and purchase of shares. In the circumstances, the specific provision that exempts instruments for the transfer of shares from stamp duty should prevail over the general provision in Section 59 of the SDA on payment of stamp duty on contracts under seal. Further, the distinction in the decisions cited by the Tribunal was between a bilateral transfer of shares on the one hand and the transfer or purchase of shares in secondary markets such as the stock exchange on the other, which is inapplicable in the present case.
Plateau State Internal Revenue Service v Jos Electricity Distribution Plc (2025) 90 TLRN 01
In this case, the Court of Appeal held that the TAT and the Federal High Court have jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to personal income tax (and other federal taxes) payable to a state government – but not disputes relating to revenues accruable to a state government pursuant to a law made by a state government. The decision was based on the Court’s interpretation of Section 251(1)(b) of the Constitution, which provides that the Federal High Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction in all civil matters “connected with or pertaining to the taxation of companies and other bodies established or carrying on business in Nigeria and all other persons subject to Federal taxation” (emphasis supplied). The court determined that:
Other Developments
Other notable developments include the Upstream Petroleum Operations (Cost Efficiency Incentives) Order, 2025, signed on 30 April 2025, which aims to align Nigeria’s upstream operating costs with global standards, and to promote cost discipline to enhance competitiveness. The order introduced a framework to be managed by the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission and NRS (formerly FIRS), and set annual Unit Operating Cost benchmarks for different terrains. Eligible operators that achieve these targets are entitled to claim tax credits, capped at 20% of their annual tax liability, valid until 31 May 2035.
Further, the Presidential Executive Order to Safeguard Federation Oil and Gas Revenues and Provide Regulatory Clarity, 2026 came into force on 13 February 2026 with the aim of enforcing direct remittance of petroleum revenues into the Federation Account, overriding previous deduction mechanisms to ensure full compliance with the provisions of the Constitution that mandate payment of all revenues accruing to the federation to the Federation Account (Sections 162(1), 120(1) and 80(1), Constitution).
The NRS has, further to the relevant provision of the NTA and the NTAA, issued a public notice setting out the implementation timeline for a phased roll-out of e-invoicing and an electronic fiscal system for taxpayers with annual turnover above NGN5 billion expected to commence between April and June this year.
Conclusions
While the reforms under the Tax Reform Acts have been generally commendable, issues have arisen around some aspects of the reform, which have been interpreted as increasing the tax burden on citizens and business and potentially constraining economic growth. For example, concerns have been raised regarding the potential reduction in private equity investment in Nigeria following the increase in the CGT rate from 10% to 30% for companies other than small companies. Also, the 5% surcharge on fossil fuel products supplied or produced in Nigeria, other than those exempted, which is chargeable on the retail price of chargeable fossil fuel products under the NTA, and which will become effective upon the order of the Minister of Finance to that effect, has also been the subject of wide criticism and debate.
2nd Floor, 3A Force Road
Onikan Lagos Island
Lagos
Nigeria
+234 803 403 5581
info@ikeyishittuco.com www.Isc.ng