Employee Incentives 2025

Last Updated February 26, 2025

Sweden

Law and Practice

Authors



Vinge is one of Sweden’s largest full-service business law firms, with more than 500 employees. Vinge’s employment and benefits team, consisting of around 30 lawyers across Stockholm, Gothenburg and Skåne, is a top-tier team, ranked in Band 1 (Employment) in the Chambers Europe Guide 2024. The team covers the full range of employment law as well as benefits and incentives matters, including contentious matters, disputes and arbitrations, termination matters, labour relations issues, reorganisations and reduction in force, work environment matters, and advising on pension, benefits and incentive schemes. The employment team collaborates closely with other practice areas, such as M&A, corporate law, tax, intellectual property and data protection, providing comprehensive solutions for clients. Vinge’s diverse client base includes large Swedish employers, multinational corporations, financial institutions, manufacturers, energy companies and tech and gaming companies. The firm’s strong teamwork ensures efficient handling of complex legal challenges, delivering practical, tailored solutions across various industries and jurisdictions.

It is common, although not mandatory, for employees in Sweden to be offered participation in cash or share incentive plans. This particularly applies to employees who are members of the company’s senior management team or hold positions of key importance for the company. These plans are generally designed to align the interests of employees with those of the company, motivating them to contribute to the company’s success. They are an essential part of the compensation strategy for many Swedish companies, helping to attract, motivate, and retain talent.

Examples of common employee incentive plans in Sweden include annual bonuses, profit-sharing plans, performance-based bonuses, stock options, restricted stock units and employee stock purchase plans.

One decisive distinction between share incentive plans and cash plans is that the former may be subject to capital gains tax, while cash plans are always subject to income tax. The principal distinctions between incentive plans offered by publicly listed companies in Sweden as opposed to private companies pertain to the transparency and disclosure requirements, including trading prohibitions, applicable to the former. Also, listed companies, whose shares are traded on an organised market with a transparent price, often have benefits in constructing different share incentive plans, as measurability as well as the employees’ exit possibilities are more favourable than for private companies.

Under the Market Abuse Regulation, persons discharging managerial responsibilities in a listed company must report changes in their holdings to the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority. This includes changes in holdings related to incentive programmes, such as the allocation of warrants, subscription, and subsequent allocation of shares through the exercise of warrants. The obligation to report such changes arises only when the person discharging managerial responsibilities has conducted transactions in the issuer amounting to at least EUR20,000 within a calendar year, including the transaction that causes the threshold to be exceeded.

Furthermore, persons discharging managerial responsibilities in a listed company are, with certain limited exceptions, prohibited from carrying out transactions in financial instruments issued by the company for a period of 30 calendar days before the publication of an interim or year-end report.

In addition to the transparency and disclosure requirements, there are provisions in the Swedish Companies Act (Aktiebolagslagen (2005:551)) that impose stricter majority requirements on public companies than on private companies. A resolution on a directed issue of shares or warrants to either the board members, CEO, or employees, amongst others, in the issuing company must be supported by nine-tenths of both the votes cast and the shares represented at the general meeting for the resolution to be valid. Furthermore, it is not possible for the general meeting to authorise the board of directors to resolve on said issues.

In May 2023, the European Union adopted the Pay Transparency Directive. The directive shall be implemented in all EU member states, including Sweden, by 7 June 2026. The directive aims to strengthen the application of the principle of equal pay, including variable pay such as bonuses, for equal work or work of equal value between men and women. This will be achieved by increasing pay transparency, establishing minimum requirements for the regulatory framework on the prohibition of pay discrimination and strengthening enforcement mechanisms. The directive has not yet been implemented in Swedish law at the time of writing (January 2025). However, the upcoming implementation is anticipated to introduce some changes, including the right for job applicants and employees to obtain information on pay and certain incentive plans, new rules for companies conducting pay surveys, and a requirement for companies with at least 100 employees to regularly report on pay and certain incentive plans as well as any gender pay gaps, which shall include payments made under incentive plans.

Cash incentive plans are popular in Sweden and can take various forms, including, for example, the following:

  • Annual Bonuses: Employees receive a cash bonus based on individual performance, company performance, or a combination of both. These bonuses are typically paid out annually following the end of the company’s financial year.
  • Profit Sharing: Employees receive a share of the company’s profits, usually distributed as a cash bonus. This plan directly ties employee rewards to the company’s financial success.
  • Performance-Based Bonuses: Employees receive bonuses for achieving specific performance targets, which can be individual, team-based, and/or company-wide.

Share incentive plans are also widely used and can, for example, include the following:

  • Warrants: Employees are given statutory securities under the Swedish Companies Act, purchased at market price pursuant to Black-Scholes.
  • Performance Shares: Shares are granted to the employee after a vesting period provided that the employee remains in service and one or more performance targets are met.
  • Stock Options: Employees are given the right to purchase company shares at a predetermined price after a certain period.
  • Employee Stock Purchase Plans: Employees can buy company shares at a discount, often through payroll deductions over a set period.
  • Qualified Employee Stock Options (also known as QESO): Employees are given the right to purchase company shares at a predetermined price. The difference between a stock option programme and a QESO programme is mainly that QESOs may be given free of charge to the employee and any gains are taxed as capital gains, not income. Very specific prerequisites must be adhered to.

In addition to the above, long-term incentive plans are also relatively common in Sweden. These plans are designed to reward employees for their contributions over a longer period, typically three to five years. They can include a mix of cash and share-based incentives and are often used to retain key employees and align their interests with the long-term goals of the company.

Neither the offer, grant, vesting or exercise of share awards or options nor the issue or transfer of shares under a share plan gives rise to any prospectus or similar securities law implications for the parent company and/or the local employer. An explicit exception in the EU Prospectus Regulation (2017/1129), which states that the obligation to publish a prospectus is not applicable when securities are offered, allotted or to be allotted to existing or former directors or employees by their employer or by an affiliated undertaking. However, the exception only applies when a document is made available containing information on the number and nature of the securities, as well as the reasons for and details of the offer or allotment.

The promotion and communication of a share plan to employees and other participants of a share plan is normally not restricted as it consists of the documentation provided before the general meeting that is to resolve on the implementation of the share plan.

Additionally, if a company that is operating from Sweden is bound by a collective bargaining agreement, the company is obliged to consult with relevant trade unions before making decisions about, for example, the implementation or amendment of an incentive plan. The union consultations must be concluded before any decision is made by the company. Hence, if the company has a duty to consult, it is important that it takes the initiative to consult with the unions before issuing any new incentive plans or policies. If there is a need to inform the employees of the implementation of an incentive plan before consultations have been finalised, it is important to clarify in the communication to the employees that the implementation of the intended incentive plans is subject to consultations with the relevant unions. Further, it should be noted that the consultations do not have to lead to an agreement. The company is free to take any kind of decision (subject to mandatory law and any applicable collective bargaining agreement) after having fulfilled its duty to consult.

A local employer in Sweden may provide funding for the costs of the plan. Cash bonuses may, for instance, be given to pay the Black-Scholes value of warrants. This is, however, not standard practice since the cash bonus will be subject to income tax.

The general meeting may either resolve to implement an incentive programme – typically based on a proposal from the board of directors – or authorise the board of directors to implement a share plan, including the issuance of warrants or shares (public companies cannot utilise an authorisation). The subsequent allocation of warrants or shares is resolved on by the board of directors. The resolutions typically require at least two-thirds of both the votes cast and the shares represented at the general meeting to be in favour of the proposal, since it is a deviation from the shareholders’ pre-emptive rights to any new warrants or shares in the company. However, the company’s articles of association may contain a provision that requires a larger majority. There are also certain provisions in the Swedish Companies Act that impose stricter majority requirements on public companies than on private companies. A resolution on a directed issue of shares or warrants to either the board members, CEO, or employees, amongst others, in the issuing company must be supported by nine-tenths of both the votes cast and the shares represented at the general meeting for the resolution to be valid.

Shareholders shall be provided with accurate, relevant, and clear information prior to the general meeting’s decision on the incentive scheme as a basis for the decision. In listed companies, certain additional rules apply according to the remuneration rules of the Stock Market Self-Regulation Committee. The documentation for the general meeting shall thereby provide the shareholders with the reasons for the proposal and how the proposal has been prepared, the number of securities as well as their market value and the price at which the instruments can be acquired, among several other information points listed by the Stock Market Self-Regulation Committee.

There are no local exchange control regulations that would impose exchange control restrictions or reporting requirements which would arise from (i) an employee sending local currency out of the jurisdiction in order to pay for shares/an option exercise price; (ii) the employee selling shares and sending currency into the jurisdiction; or (iii) the local employer sending funds out of the jurisdiction to provide funding for the plan.

However, depending on the circumstances at hand and the countries and currencies involved, international exchange and sanctions control regulations would need to be complied with by both the employee and the employer.

The granting of an option/award/RSU and the vesting or exercise of such option/award/RSU may be subject to taxation at grant if the options qualify as securities. Generally, warrants (teckningsoptioner) issued under the Swedish Companies’ Act are taxed as securities. Options taxed as securities are subject to taxation at the point in time that the option is subscribed or purchased. Taxation occurs if the subscription or purchase price is lower than the fair market value of the option at that point in time – ie, a benefit is deemed at hand. The employee will be subject to dry salary tax on the benefit, subject to up to 53% taxation. The employer or issuing entity will be subject to employer’s social security contributions on the benefit amount (up to 31.42%).

Other options such as ESOPs, RSUs, or call options with vesting and leaver restrictions are generally not considered as securities. Consequently, they are generally taxed upon exercise. If the exercise price payable for the underlying securities is less than the fair market value of the securities at exercise, a taxable benefit occurs. The benefit is taxed as salary for the employee, and social security contributions are payable by the employer or issuing entity.

Divestment of shares purchased or subscribed for will, in general, be subject to tax on any capital gains realised. The gains are computed as the sales price less costs for the sale, reduced by the acquisition cost for the shares (price paid plus potential benefit taxed amount). Capital gains are taxed between 20% and 53% depending on the status of the shares. The general tax rate is 30%. 

Swedish tax legislation does not recognise the concept of restricted shares. Either the employee has acquired a real share with all the benefits and liabilities that come with a share (eg, entered the share ledger, ability to vote on the shares, and restrictive covenants that are time-barred). Shares that fulfil such criteria are taxed as securities (see 2.6 Employee Tax and Social Security: Share Options/Awards/RSUs for further information on taxation).

Shares that do not fulfil the above criteria should be taxed as a phantom scheme and may be subject to salary taxation on distributions and “capital gains” on the shares. As a consequence, the employer or issuing entity will be subject to social security contributions on the same taxable basis. Basically, the full amount paid available to the employee should be subject to taxation for the employee and employer/issuer. 

The local employer or the issuer (if Swedish) will be liable to withhold preliminary taxes on salary the month the benefit is taxable (see 2.6 Employee Tax and Social Security: Share Options/Awards/RSUs and 2.7 Employee Tax and Social Security: Restricted Shares). If the gross salary paid to the employee that month does not cover the taxes to be withheld, the excess liability falls on the employee and is payable after filing the annual tax return of the individual (generally filed in May of the calendar year after the year a taxable benefit occurs).

A Swedish entity correctly bearing the employer costs for the plan should be entitled to a corporate tax shield on the costs – ie, the costs should be deductible for Swedish corporate income tax purposes.

In 2018, Sweden introduced rules on tax-exempt employee stock options, so-called qualified employee stock options (QESOs). The rules are found in the Swedish Income Tax Act (Inkomstskattelagen (1999:1229)) (SITA) chapter 11 a. The legislation imposes a vast quantity of absolute criteria to be fulfilled by the issuer, the participant and the issued instrument. The rules are very strict. If one criterion is not fulfilled during the relevant measuring period, the scheme will not be tax-exempt. Delivery of shares under a QESO scheme often takes place via the issuance of warrants by the company to itself, where the warrants will sit until the time of exercise. At the time of exercise, the warrants are delivered to the participant, who will immediately and exclusively use the warrants to subscribe for shares in the company.

QESOs that qualify for tax exemption are tax-exempt upon grant and exercise. A subsequent sale of shares is subject to capital gains tax at the rates outlined in 2.6 Employee Tax and Social Security: Share Options/Awards/RSUs.

It is possible to apply malus and/or claw-back provisions to share or cash awards (including bonuses) in Sweden. For instance, a company may include a provision stipulating that the company reserves the right to reclaim a bonus payment from an employee if it is found that the bonus was disbursed based on an inaccurate financial report. These provisions are often included but are rarely used by the company.

If employees are part of a cash or share incentive plan, such incentive plans will typically apply throughout the employment if they are not withdrawn or modified by the employer. The employer’s right to modify or withdraw the incentive plan will depend on the terms and conditions for the incentive plan and how they have been applied in practice. As a starting point, entitlement to incentive plans will apply during an employee’s notice period if the conditions for entitlement do not state otherwise.

During a transfer of undertaking, the rights and obligations that are based on the employment agreement and the employment relationship that applies during the transfer will also be transferred to the new employer. This includes benefits, such as entitlement to incentive plans, if not otherwise agreed. Hence, incentive plans will typically continue to apply after a transfer of undertaking.

If a company that is operating from Sweden is bound by a collective bargaining agreement, the company is obliged to consult with relevant trade unions before making decisions about, for example, the implementation or amendment of an incentive plan. The union consultations must be concluded before any decision is made by the company. Hence, if the company has a duty to consult, it is important that it take the initiative to consult with the unions before issuing any new incentive plans or policies. If there is a need to inform the employees of the implementation of an incentive plan before consultations have been finalised, it is important to clarify in the communication to the employees that the implementation of the intended incentive plans is subject to consultations with the relevant unions. During the consultation process, the company shall provide the union representatives with relevant information about the incentive plan, or the amendment of such, and answer questions that the representatives may have. Further, it shall be noted that the consultations do not have to lead to an agreement. The company is free to take any kind of decision (subject to mandatory law and any applicable collective bargaining agreement) after having fulfilled its duty to consult.

It is rather common for sharesave schemes and/or bonus schemes (where the bonus is to be used, in whole or in part, to purchase shares) to contain post-vesting or post-employment periods, meaning that the shares must be held for a certain period after allocation or purchase.

It is quite common for awards to be subject to post-employment holding periods, especially for employees holding senior or management positions, or for employees that hold specific knowledge or know-how that is important to keep within the company. Such holding periods are used as an incentive for these employees to stay with the company during a transition period, for example.

As a starting point, consent shall not be used as a lawful basis for processing personal data in an employer/employee relationship due to the imbalance of power within such a relationship. Based on this imbalance of power, it is generally seen as impossible for an employee to give his or her consent freely, which is a requirement for the consent to be considered valid. Depending on the purpose of the collection or transfer of personal data at hand, in relation to a cash or share incentive plan, the processing would typically be based on a contract or a weighing of interests.

Contract as a lawful basis for processing means that the processing is necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject is party. A weighing of interests means that the processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the employer (or by a third party), except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject, who in this situation is typically the employee and therefore requires the protection of personal data. These considerations and assessments follow from the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which is the main legislation regarding data protection and privacy in Sweden.

There is no explicit legal requirement to translate cash or share incentive plan documents into Swedish, or into another language that an employee may prefer. However, in general, an employer shall ensure that the employees understand all documents that are important for their employment. If there are any ambiguities due to an employee’s inability to understand the content of a document, such ambiguity will be at the employer’s risk, as a starting point. Hence, we recommend that employment-related documents be provided in Swedish if there are uncertainties about whether all employees fully understand the English language.

Listed companies are normally obligated to disclose resolutions on the implementation of a share plan. Such disclosure requirements are set out in the rulebooks for the respective regulated market or trading platform. The disclosure shall normally include information on the main terms and conditions of the scheme and provide investors with information on the motivating factors for management and employees and also on the dilutive effects of the incentive scheme to help investors understand the potential cost of the scheme. Shareholders shall also be provided with accurate, relevant, and clear information prior to the general meeting’s decision on the incentive scheme as a basis for the decision. The information provided should allow for a comprehensive and accurate evaluation of the scheme’s significance for the company and confirm that it has been developed in accordance with the remuneration rules of the Stock Market Self-Regulation Committee.

In addition, if a company that is operating from Sweden is bound by a collective bargaining agreement, the company is obliged to consult with relevant trade unions before making decisions about, for example, the implementation or amendment of an incentive plan. The union consultations must be concluded before any decision is made by the company. Hence, if the company has a duty to consult, it is important that it take the initiative to consult with the unions before issuing any new incentive plans or policies. If there is a need to inform the employees of the implementation of an incentive plan before consultations have been finalised, it is important to clarify in the communication to the employees that the implementation of the intended incentive plans is subject to consultations with the relevant unions. During the consultation process, the company shall provide the union representatives with relevant information about the incentive plan, or the amendment of such, and answer questions that the representatives may have. Further, it shall be noted that the consultations do not have to lead to an agreement. The company is free to take any kind of decision (subject to mandatory law and any applicable collective bargaining agreement) after having fulfilled its duty to consult.

Persons discharging managerial responsibilities must report changes in their holdings to the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority. This includes changes in holdings related to incentive programmes. The definition of persons discharging managerial responsibilities includes directors of the board and managing directors, including deputies, as well as other persons in the management team, such as chief financial officer and chief marketing officer. The obligation to report such changes arises only when the person discharging managerial responsibilities has carried out transactions in the issuer amounting to at least EUR20,000 in a calendar year, including the transaction that entails that the threshold is passed.

In accordance with the EU Pay Transparency Directive, which shall be implemented in all EU member states, including Sweden, by 7 June 2026, a new duty to provide pay reports will apply for employers with 100 or more employees. Such employers are required to provide pay reports every year or every third year, depending on their size. The reports shall include data on the gender pay gap across the entire workplace, as well as the proportion of female and male employees who have received pay increases or variable payments. Further, the reports shall be shared with the Swedish Equality Ombudsman (Diskrimineringsombudsmannen), which will cause the reports to become public information. This duty to report will include the monthly salary, but also other complementary or variable components of the pay, following from cash incentive plans, for example. It shall be noted that the directive has not yet been implemented in Swedish law at the time of writing (January 2025) and may be subject to further amendment.

Vinge

Smålandsgatan 20
Box 1703
111 87 Stockholm
Sweden

+46 106 143 000

contact@vinge.se www.vinge.se/en/expertise/practice-areas/employment-and-benefits/
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Vinge is one of Sweden’s largest full-service business law firms, with more than 500 employees. Vinge’s employment and benefits team, consisting of around 30 lawyers across Stockholm, Gothenburg and Skåne, is a top-tier team, ranked in Band 1 (Employment) in the Chambers Europe Guide 2024. The team covers the full range of employment law as well as benefits and incentives matters, including contentious matters, disputes and arbitrations, termination matters, labour relations issues, reorganisations and reduction in force, work environment matters, and advising on pension, benefits and incentive schemes. The employment team collaborates closely with other practice areas, such as M&A, corporate law, tax, intellectual property and data protection, providing comprehensive solutions for clients. Vinge’s diverse client base includes large Swedish employers, multinational corporations, financial institutions, manufacturers, energy companies and tech and gaming companies. The firm’s strong teamwork ensures efficient handling of complex legal challenges, delivering practical, tailored solutions across various industries and jurisdictions.

Trends in Variable Remuneration Packages

Traditionally, Swedish employers have commonly implemented company-based or group-based profit-sharing schemes, typically calculated based on annual results and sometimes linked to individual performance targets. Additionally, it has long been standard practice to include bonuses or variable pay incentives in the compensation and benefits packages offered to managerial staff, senior managers, and other key employees.

However, in recent years, it has become more and more common for Swedish employers to also have other types of incentive programmes for a broader group of employees, especially for white-collar employees working in the non-public sector.

As an example, it has become more common for companies to provide share-based incentive schemes to their employees. Even though there are considerable differences in the structure of the programmes depending on the industry and the companies involved, stock options programmes and share-based programmes have become the most established incentive schemes implemented by employers. Based on recent studies, approximately 85% of the so-called large-cap companies listed on the Swedish stock market (ie, companies that have a market value of more than EUR1 billion) have some kind of share-based incentive programme for their employees. By contrast, interest in warrants has declined.

More specifically, it is very common for tech companies and start-ups to have profit-sharing incentive programmes and share-based incentive schemes for their employees. In recent years, tech companies have been at the forefront of introducing such broader share-based incentive schemes, applying them to all employees rather than limiting them to senior management, executives, or key personnel. This wider application of share-based incentives has become a significant trend in Sweden, particularly given the growing importance of the tech industry and the impressive number of global tech companies and “unicorns” that Sweden has produced relative to its size.

There are several other interesting trends with respect to variable remuneration packages that are worth mentioning. An increasing number of companies are including ESG metrics in their executive remuneration plans, in line with wider trends and a focus on ESG in the business world. ESG, which stands for environmental, social, and governance, refers to the three central factors in measuring the sustainability and societal impact of an investment in a company. As a result of the growing importance of sustainability and the growing importance that investors are placing on ESG factors when considering new investment opportunities, it has become more common to include ESG metrics in companies’ incentive programmes.

Traditionally, however, there has been some resistance when attempting to integrate ESG metrics into remuneration strategies. The reasons for this could be that there has been a tendency towards conservative pay structures, a cultural reliance on voluntary action, and the use of warrants which tend to prioritise financial performance over sustainability, for example. As a result, surveys point out that there has been a notable discrepancy in the full integration of ESG metrics into remuneration structures for Nordic companies compared to their global counterparts – 45% compared to 81% globally. Hence, Swedish and other Nordic companies are still behind global companies in this respect.

Another important trend worth mentioning is an increase in variable remuneration packages for female CEOs of companies listed on the Swedish stock market. Interestingly, female CEOs of such companies have, generally speaking, still a lower base salary compared to their male counterparts. On average, female CEOs have a 5% lower annual base salary than male CEOs. However, an analysis of total compensation packages shows that female CEOs receive a higher total remuneration package than their male counterparts, when also including bonuses and other incentive programmes. This indicates that female CEOs generally receive higher bonus payouts.

The Swedish Model and Its Effects on Benefits and Incentives

The Swedish labour market is characterised by the so-called Swedish model, which impacts most employment laws and regulations, including regulations related to employee benefits and incentives in Sweden.

The Swedish model is based on the approach that the parties to the labour market, that is, the trade unions as employee representatives on the one hand and the employers’ associations representing employers on the other hand, shall regulate the main terms and conditions of employment through nationwide (central) collective bargaining agreements. Often, the legislation only provides a framework that the parties to the labour market need to adhere to.

Therefore, as a main rule, the legislature will only “interfere” where it considers necessary. Generally, the Swedish legislature avoids introducing employment and labour laws unless it assesses that it is compelled to do so. In addition, a lot of the employment and labour legislation in Sweden today is derived from EU directives. This is also true with regards to benefits and other incentives that employees may be entitled to, with a few exceptions.

Collective bargaining agreements, however, do not automatically apply to all employers having business in Sweden. To be bound by a collective bargaining agreement, an employer must actively enter into such agreement. This is generally done either by becoming a member of an industry-specific employers’ association, or by entering into an agreement directly with the trade unions. The former option is a more common approach for employers who want to be bound by a nationwide collective bargaining agreement.

In total, around 90% of the Swedish workforce is covered by collective bargaining agreements, which amplifies the importance of collective bargaining agreements in the Swedish labour market. Furthermore, collective bargaining agreements have a wider impact on the labour market since the terms and conditions of nationwide collective bargaining agreements are used as a form of benchmark for employers that are not directly bound by them as well. Therefore, collective bargaining agreements have had and continue to have a significant impact on the Swedish labour market.

The Importance of Collective Bargaining Agreements on Employee Incentives

In line with the above, in Sweden, employees’ right to compensation and benefits from their employer is – with a few exceptions – not regulated by any law. Instead, apart from individually agreed terms and conditions, it is the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreements that determine what right to benefits the employees have and what compensation they are entitled to from their employer. This concerns, among others, the right to minimum salary, annual salary increases, overtime work regulations and compensation for such overtime work, as well as the calculation of holiday pay (which may deviate from the Swedish legislation on the right to annual leave and holiday pay).

Nationwide collective bargaining agreements do not regulate the right of employees to bonuses, long-term or short-term incentives or other variable remuneration. However, the right to such incentives may give rise to obligations for employers to make additional payments to employees. For example, employers may be obliged to include the payments made under a performance-based commission plan or bonus or other incentive programme when calculating other compensation that the employees are entitled to, such as holiday pay, overtime pay, sick pay, etc.

Consequently, it is very important to understand the rules and regulations of the applicable collective bargaining agreement before deciding on an incentive programme in order to understand what other obligations such programmes may result in for the employer.

The Upcoming Re-negotiations of Collective Bargaining Agreements

Nationwide collective bargaining agreements are usually valid for a period of two or three years before they are re-negotiated. Usually, the entire collective bargaining agreement is not re-negotiated. Instead, the parties will negotiate a few key terms that either side wishes to amend. In addition, and more importantly, the salary agreements are re-negotiated after each term to determine what minimum annual salary increases shall apply during the term of the re-negotiated collective bargaining agreement.

In 2025, many Swedish nationwide collective bargaining agreements will be re-negotiated. During the spring of 2025, more than 350 collective bargaining agreements will be re-negotiated. By the end of 2025, approximately 500 collective bargaining agreements are expected to have been re-negotiated. These agreements will cover approximately 3.4 million employees in Sweden. The re-negotiation of the collective bargaining agreements, including the annual salary increases for the next few years that may be agreed on, will thus have an important impact on the labour market.

The Swedish Implementation of the Pay Transparency Directive

In May 2024, the Swedish government published its official report, the “SOU 2024:40”, regarding the Swedish implementation of Directive (EU) 2023/970 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 to strengthen the application of the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms (the “Pay Transparency Directive”).

The implementation date of the Pay Transparency Directive is scheduled for 7 June 2026. However, given the significant practical implications that the Directive may have for at least larger Swedish companies, a lot of work needs to be done to prepare for its implementation. The Directive is relevant in relation to certain employee incentives as the concept of pay in the Directive comprises not only salaries, but also complementary or variable components of the pay. Any benefits in addition to the ordinary basic or minimum salary that the employee receives directly or indirectly, whether in cash or in kind, should be considered a complementary or variable component.

According to the official report, several new measures will be introduced. The following are of particular importance to employers in Sweden.

Salary transparency during the hiring process

Employers will be required to provide information on the starting salary or starting salary range applicable to the position to be filled to job applicants. This information must be provided in a timely manner prior to salary negotiations. This is a new rule for Swedish employers that may have a practical impact on how to approach salary negotiations.

At present, salary and benefits are often treated by Swedish employers as confidential or sensitive information that should not be revealed to a wider group. Typically, the salary and benefits for a certain role are not revealed until the final candidate has been chosen and when it is time to have a salary negotiation. This new rule will thus have a practical impact on how Swedish employers will need to approach salary negotiations in the future and what information should be provided to applicants and when.

In addition, it will not be permitted for employers to enquire about or attempt to obtain information regarding the salary of a job applicant, either currently held or previously received. This will also be a new feature in Sweden since it is currently both possible and common to ask candidates about their existing salary and benefits during the application process.

Information on criteria for setting pay

Employers are required to inform their employees of the criteria used to determine remuneration. The criteria must be objective and free from any gender bias. In accordance with the official report, employers are entitled to utilise the information derived from the annual pay survey.

Right to information on average pay

Employees will have the right to request data regarding both their own salary and the average pay levels by gender for groups of workers performing similar or equivalent roles. Employers must provide this information within two months of the request being made. It is within the prerogative of the employer to stipulate that employees do not reveal the information to third parties for purposes other than exercising the right to equal pay for work of equal value or work of equal standing. However, employees are entitled to share information about their own remuneration.

Extended obligations for pay surveys

Currently under Swedish law, employers have an obligation to conduct pay surveys to, inter alia, analyse the regulations that are being used for determining salaries and payments made to the employees. Further, employers have a certain obligation to analyse the difference in pay between men and women for work that is considered to be equal or of equal importance.

Beyond these existing provisions, new rules have been proposed that would expand employers’ obligations. These changes would require employers to, inter alia, analyse pay trends among male and female employees who have been on parental leave, comparing their salaries with those of employees performing equal or equivalent work who have not been on parental leave. In addition, employers bound by collective bargaining agreements are required to co-operate with the trade union parties to the applicable collective bargaining agreements when setting the criteria for determining pay.

Pay reports

Employers with 100 or more employees are required to provide pay reports every one or three years, depending on their size. The pay reports must include data on the gender pay gap across the entire workplace, as well as the proportion of female and male employees who have received pay increases or variable payments. Salary reports must be shared with the Swedish Equality Ombudsman (Diskrimineringsombudsmannen), which will result in the reports becoming public information.

Pay review

If an employer with 100 or more employees has an unfair pay gap of 5% or more between women and men doing the same or equivalent work, and has not remedied the gap within six months, a joint pay review must be carried out. The joint pay review must include measures to address the pay gap and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the measures.

It is important to note that the consultation period is still open regarding the official report on the implementation of the Pay Transparency Directive. Thus, it should be noted that the current proposal is not definitive and may be subject to further amendment. Further clarification on specific matters is expected when the government publishes a bill on the implementation of the Directive.

Vinge

Smålandsgatan 20
Box 1703
111 87 Stockholm
Sweden

+46 106 143 000

contact@vinge.se www.vinge.se/en/expertise/practice-areas/employment-and-benefits/
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Vinge is one of Sweden’s largest full-service business law firms, with more than 500 employees. Vinge’s employment and benefits team, consisting of around 30 lawyers across Stockholm, Gothenburg and Skåne, is a top-tier team, ranked in Band 1 (Employment) in the Chambers Europe Guide 2024. The team covers the full range of employment law as well as benefits and incentives matters, including contentious matters, disputes and arbitrations, termination matters, labour relations issues, reorganisations and reduction in force, work environment matters, and advising on pension, benefits and incentive schemes. The employment team collaborates closely with other practice areas, such as M&A, corporate law, tax, intellectual property and data protection, providing comprehensive solutions for clients. Vinge’s diverse client base includes large Swedish employers, multinational corporations, financial institutions, manufacturers, energy companies and tech and gaming companies. The firm’s strong teamwork ensures efficient handling of complex legal challenges, delivering practical, tailored solutions across various industries and jurisdictions.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Vinge is one of Sweden’s largest full-service business law firms, with more than 500 employees. Vinge’s employment and benefits team, consisting of around 30 lawyers across Stockholm, Gothenburg and Skåne, is a top-tier team, ranked in Band 1 (Employment) in the Chambers Europe Guide 2024. The team covers the full range of employment law as well as benefits and incentives matters, including contentious matters, disputes and arbitrations, termination matters, labour relations issues, reorganisations and reduction in force, work environment matters, and advising on pension, benefits and incentive schemes. The employment team collaborates closely with other practice areas, such as M&A, corporate law, tax, intellectual property and data protection, providing comprehensive solutions for clients. Vinge’s diverse client base includes large Swedish employers, multinational corporations, financial institutions, manufacturers, energy companies and tech and gaming companies. The firm’s strong teamwork ensures efficient handling of complex legal challenges, delivering practical, tailored solutions across various industries and jurisdictions.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.