Employment 2023

Last Updated September 07, 2023

Sweden

Law and Practice

Author



Advokatfirman Cederquist KB is a Swedish independent law firm that offers full service from its Stockholm office. It engages more than 100 lawyers from the Swedish market and has developed non-exclusive relationships with firms globally to assist clients in cross-border matters. Major international deals and transactions handled by the firm include acting as legal adviser in corporate acquisitions of Swedish companies on behalf of foreign corporations, investment banks and law firms, as well as acquisitions of companies outside Sweden. Cederquist’s employment and benefits team manages all labour law risks. Its labour law practice consists of one partner, one senior counsel and seven associates and is responsible for a wide range of matters relating to the legal areas of labour, pensions and benefits. Cederquist is a member of L&E Global, an alliance of employers’ counsel worldwide and the alliance for cross-border labour and employment law services

In Sweden, there are no statutory definitions of white and blue-collar workers. Instead, these groups are defined by the applicable trade unions of which the workers are members and, therefore, different collective bargaining agreements (CBA) apply to these two groups. In some labour market areas, the CBA regulations are uniform and a categorisation of these two groups of workers is not necessary.

General regulations regarding employment protection are found in the EPA. Certain terms for employees in the public sector in Sweden are regulated through the Public Employment Act. However, the same rules essentially apply to private and public employees, and the Public Employment Act only contains a few specific rules for public employees.

The general rule is that an employment agreement is for an indefinite period, unless agreed otherwise. The EPA allows for a special fixed-term employment when the employer is in need of fixed-term employees. A fixed-term employment agreement may also be concluded for a temporary substitute employment and for seasonal employment. An employee who, during the past five years, has been employed either for a special fixed-term employment or as a substitute for an aggregate of more than 12 months, will have their employment converted into indefinite-term employment. A special fixed-term employment may also be converted into an indefinite-term employment if the employee has been employed in different consecutive fixed-term employments. A special fixed-term employment or a temporary substitute employment will not convert into an indefinite-term employment if the employee has reached the age of 67, or, if the employee was employed after 1 January 2020, the age of 68.

Note that CBAs may contain regulations deviating from the statutory rules governing fixed-term employment.

In Sweden, an employment agreement does not have to take any specific form in order to be valid. However, Sweden has implemented the Directive 2019/1152 on Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions in the European Union. An employer must provide certain information in writing to the employee concerning the principal terms of the employment within one month of the commencement of the employment. Failure to do so can result in an obligation to pay damages to the employee concerned.

The requisite information includes, inter alia, the name and address of the employer and the employee, the commencement date, the place of work, duties and title, whether employment is fixed or for an indefinite term, the length of the probationary period, periods of notice, payment and other employment benefits, the length of paid annual leave, the length of the normal working day or working week, and information on the applicable CBAs.

The maximum normal working hours are 40 hours per week. In addition to this, the Working Hours Act sets forth rules concerning overtime work as well as daily and weekly rest for employees.

Deviations from certain regulations in the Working Hours Act can be made by CBA, but not in individual employment agreements.

For part-time employees, the equivalent to overtime is called additional time, which comprises the working hours in excess of the employee’s regular working hours and on-call time. When there is a special need to increase the number of hours worked, an additional maximum of 200 hours may be worked per employee over a calendar year (general additional time). When there are special grounds, additional time in excess of general additional time may be worked up to a maximum of 150 hours per employee over a calendar year. Together, extra additional time and general additional time may not exceed 48 hours per employee over a period of four weeks, or 50 hours over a calendar month.

Overtime comprises working hours in excess of regular working hours and on-call hours. Where additional working hours are required, overtime hours may not exceed 48 hours over a period of four weeks or 50 hours over a calendar month, subject to a maximum of 200 hours per calendar year.

Statutory law does not contain regulations regarding overtime pay, which is normally provided for in CBAs. In general, employees may choose to receive overtime pay in terms of money or compensatory leave. If no CBA exists, the employee is not entitled to overtime pay unless agreed upon individually. If a CBA exists and provides a right to overtime pay, it may contain provisions that make it possible for the employee to waive the right to overtime pay and instead receive compensation in the form of compensatory leave. However, such waiver usually only applies to employees who have flexible working hours, or if special reasons apply.

There are no provisions regarding minimum wage requirements in Swedish law, but such provisions are often found in CBAs.

In Sweden, it is common for employers and employees to agree that part of the full salary will be paid as variable salary. The different types of variable salary vary and can be paid out, inter alia, as commission (eg, a certain percentage of the contractual sum for provided services) or bonus (eg, variable salary paid out in accordance with specific and determined targets with financial parameters of the performance of the employing company and/or personal performance of the employee). The payment of variable salary is not regulated in statute and is rather a matter of negotiation between the parties to the employment agreement. It is most common for the terms for payment of variable salary to be set out in the employment agreement, or for the variable salary targets and the payment of variable salary to be decided annually at the employer’s discretion. It should be noted that variable salary generally qualifies for the payment of holiday pay in Sweden.

In Sweden, a 13th-month payment is not normally applied, but some employers do choose to award their employees with an annual bonus, paid at the company’s discretion, if the company has performed well during the year. Such a bonus is paid as a gratuity and normally does not qualify for the payment of holiday pay or occupational pension contributions.

There is no general government intervention on compensation and salary increases in Sweden, but such matters are often regulated in CBAs. It should be noted that compensation in connection with holiday, parental and sick leave is statutorily regulated.

Holiday and Holiday Pay

Holiday entitlement is regulated by the Annual Leave Act, which distinguishes between holiday days and holiday salary, and between a "holiday year" (1 April to 31 March) and a "qualifying year" (the 12-month period prior to the holiday year). The normal and minimum vacation entitlement is 25 days per year. An employee earns his or her entitlement to vacation salary during the qualifying year and is entitled to use his or her paid vacation during the vacation year. CBAs or employment agreements generally contain rules entitling employees to a longer period of annual leave – up to 30 paid days – if the employee is not entitled to overtime pay. This is normally the case for white-collar employees.

Employees are entitled to take a continuous four-week holiday during the period from June to August, unless there are circumstances justifying other arrangements. Employees who have been given a period of notice of termination of less than six months cannot be required to take their holiday entitlement during the notice period, unless they agree to do so. Under certain conditions, employees are entitled to exchange annual leave that has already been scheduled for sick leave or parental leave, for example. It is possible for employees to carry over their entitlement to paid holiday days to the next holiday year (but not unpaid holiday days), but only if the employee has earned more than 20 days of paid holiday, and only for those days that exceed 20 days.

Deviations from certain regulations in the Annual Leave Act can be made by CBA.

Holiday pay is usually paid out in connection with the employee’s use of their accrued holiday. According to the Swedish Annual Leave Act, holiday pay may be calculated in two ways: according to the same salary rule or the percentage rule. The same salary rule applies to employees whose remuneration is calculated on a monthly or weekly basis, while the percentage rule applies to employees whose remuneration is not calculated on a weekly or monthly basis or has a high variable element. If the variable elements of the salary amount to at least 10% of the total salary during the year, the percentage rule shall be used.

According to the same salary rule, the employee is paid their regular salary plus a holiday supplement of 0.43% of their monthly salary per day. For variable parts of the salary, the employee is paid 12% of the variable salary if he or she is entitled to 25 days of holiday. According to the percentage rule, the holiday pay for employees is 12% of the total salary during the accruing year when the employee is entitled to 25 holiday days.

If the employment ends before the employee has taken paid annual leave to which he or she is entitled, the employer must pay the employee in lieu of the unused holiday pay entitlement.

Required Leave

An employee may go on parental leave until their child is 18 months old. Thereafter, the employee is entitled to leave for as long as he or she receives compensation from the state. Compensation is paid by the state for a total of 480 days per child. The compensation may be paid until the child reaches the age of 12 years, but only 96 days may remain when the child reaches the age of four years.

In addition to parental leave, the mother is entitled to parental allowance during the 60 days prior to the expected birth of the child. The father of the child may also be on paternity leave for ten days in connection with the birth of the child.

The entitlement to parental days is divided equally between the parents, but the parents have the right to transfer their entitlements to each other, with the exception of 90 days; these 90 days will be forfeited if they are not used. As a result, one parent may use a maximum of 390 days, during which the allowance is capped at 80% of the employee’s salary up to a certain salary level. If a CBA is in force in the workplace, the employee may be entitled to compensation from the employer in addition to the compensation from the state. A parent is also entitled to parental leave and temporary parental benefit if their child is sick.

An employee is entitled to mandatory sick pay payable by the employer, provided that the employment is expected to continue for more than one month or that the employee has been working for more than 14 consecutive days. During days 1-14 of the sick leave, the employee is entitled to 80% of the estimated salary and employment benefits the employee receives during a normal week. From the sick pay, a deduction of 20% is made (karensavdrag). If the employee falls ill again within five days, the previous sick leave period will continue and no further deductions will be made. From day 15 in the sickness period, the employee may be entitled to compensation payable by the state. The entitlement to such compensation is based on strict rules and is decided by the Swedish Social Insurance Agency. There is no obligation for the employer to provide any supplementary sick pay, unless such is provided for in an applicable CBA or individual agreement.

Limitations on Confidentiality

An employee’s obligation not to reveal confidential information about the employer’s business follows from the employee’s duty of loyalty during the employment. However, according to the Trade Secrets Act, a disclosure of a company’s trade secret by an individual for the purpose of making public or revealing to a public authority or other authorised body a matter that may reasonably be suspected of constituting a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment or that is deemed to constitute another serious irregularity in the company’s business activities is not considered an unlawful disclosure. A comparable principle is found in the Whistle-Blowing Act. As a main principle, there are no limitations on confidentiality agreements in terms of time, but such an agreement may be considered unreasonable and unenforceable by a court if it is too burdensome for the employee.

Non-disparagement clauses are not that common in Sweden, but the duty of loyalty includes a duty not to be disloyal towards the employer by way of disparagement. However, an employee has a right to put forward critique towards the employer when it is justified, as mentioned above.

Employee Liability

The main principle is that the employer is responsible for all damage caused by the employee in the employment. For damage that an employee causes through fault or negligence in his or her employment, the employee is responsible only to the extent that there are exceptional circumstances with regard to the nature of the act, the employee’s position, the interest of the injured party and other circumstances, according to the Tort Liability Act.

The main rule is that post-employment restrictive covenants are valid only if they are reasonable, taking many different factors into account, such as whether employees receive some kind of compensation for the restriction, whether the restriction is limited to certain companies, whether the restriction is limited geographically, etc. An overall assessment of all relevant factors has to be made in each individual case.

According to CBAs and market practice, employers are obliged to pay approximately 60% of the monthly income from the employer as compensation for inconvenience caused by the non-competition clause. However, a general assessment of the reasonableness of a non-competition clause must be made in each individual case, which means that other types of compensation may also be accepted as long as they are linked to the non-competition clause.

Post-termination covenants are valid under certain circumstances. Covenants regarding confidentiality are normally used for all kinds of employees. However, non-compete covenants should normally only be used for employees whose position in the company makes such restrictions necessary. In principle, the period of a non-compete covenant should not exceed nine months, or, under certain conditions, a maximum of 18 months.

Non-compete covenants are normally combined with a contractual penalty, which must be reasonable in relation to the employee’s salary. Such a penalty is usually set at between three and six months’ salary for each breach. Furthermore, restrictive covenants may also be combined with a continuing penalty, and the employer can also be entitled to further damages if the damage caused by the employee exceeds the amount of the contractual penalty.

For employees, there is no limitation in time for non-solicitation covenants, but they generally follow the same time limitations set forth in non-compete covenants. A clause regarding the non-solicitation of employees does not usually need to be combined with any compensation in order to be considered reasonable (unlike non-competition clauses) but should be limited, eg, to colleagues that the employee has worked with. A general assessment of the reasonableness of a non-solicitation clause must be made in each individual case.

With reference to customers, there is no limitation in time for non-solicitation covenants, but they generally follow the same time limitations set forth in non-compete covenants. Furthermore, in the same way as non-competition clauses, a clause regarding the non-solicitation of customers needs to be combined with compensation in order to be considered reasonable. However, a general assessment of the reasonableness of a non-solicitation clause must be made in each individual case.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is applicable in Sweden and provides protection for individuals against violation of their personal integrity by the processing of personal data. Accordingly, there are restrictions on employers’ use of data regarding employees, former employees and applicants. There are certain basic requirements for any form of processing of personal data that is fully or partly computerised, according to the GDPR.

Personal data may only be processed if it is lawful to do so. The personal data must be collected for specific, explicitly stated and justified purposes. The collected personal data needs to be relevant and necessary for the purpose stipulated and may not be stored for longer than necessary with reference to the specified purposes. It must also be accurate and processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the personal data. The GDPR also stipulates situations in which personal data may be processed if the individual has not given his or her consent to the processing. For example, personal data may be processed in order to satisfy a purpose that concerns a legitimate interest of the employer, provided that this interest outweighs the interest of the registered person in protection against violation of their personal integrity.

Certain types of personal data are considered special categories of personal data; for example, information about employees’ or applicants’ race or ethnic origin, genetic data, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, membership of a trade union, or personal data concerning health or sexual preference. Special categories of personal data may only be processed in special circumstances.

The GDPR sets forth certain rights for the registered individuals, such as the right to information concerning the processing of their personal data, the right to access, and the right to rectification, erasure and restriction of processing.

Citizens of countries outside the EU must have a work permit to work in Sweden. In order for a person to obtain such a permit, the employer must have prepared an offer of employment and advertised the job in Sweden and the EU for ten days (this applies to new recruitment). The person applying for a work permit must also be able to show a signed written employment agreement. The terms of employment must be equal to or better than those provided under a Swedish CBA or that are customary for the occupation or sector. In addition to this, the employee shall be entitled to health insurance, life insurance, industrial injuries insurance and occupational pension insurance. The employee must also earn enough from the employment to be able to support himself or herself, the gross salary should be at least SEK13,000 per month and the relevant trade union must have been given the opportunity to express an opinion on the terms of employment.

The Posting of Workers Act applies to posted workers in Sweden.

EU and EEA citizens do not need a visa and have the right to work in Sweden without work permits or residence permits. People who have a residence permit in an EU country but are not EU citizens can apply to obtain the status of long-term resident in that country, thereby enjoying certain rights similar to those of EU citizens.

The increase in mobile work imposes new demands on the work environment. The employer's responsibility for the work environment is regulated by the Work Environment Act, which requires employers to take all necessary measures to prevent workers from being exposed to ill health or accidents. The employer must therefore systematically plan, direct and monitor activities in a manner that ensures that the work environment meets the prescribed requirements for a good work environment. The employer's responsibility for the work environment applies even when employees work remotely. However, the employer and employees must co-operate to create a good work environment. In the case of mobile work, when the employer's insight into the work environment is limited, employees must consequently alert the employer to any deficiencies in the working environment. The employer’s responsibilities include the physical work environment, such as equipment, as well as the social work environment, such as working hours. Furthermore, the rules regarding working hours in the Working Hours Act must be complied with even when an employee is working remotely. Employees are therefore entitled to a minimum rest period of 11 consecutive hours in any 24-hour period (“daily rest”), as well as a rest period of 36 consecutive hours per 7-day period (“weekly rest”).

GDPR applies to mobile work and the protection of personal data must be upheld in accordance with the GDPR, regardless of where the work is carried out.

An employee working remotely is entitled to the same social security as an employee performing work at a fixed location. This means that the same rights to sick pay, parental leave and holiday pay apply.

The term sabbatical is not used in Swedish labour law. However, employees may be legally entitled to leave of absence depending on the purpose of the leave. The leave of absence entails unpaid leave for a period of time. An employee is not entitled to general leave, but the employer may choose to grant it. Under certain conditions, an employee may be entitled to necessary leave from his or her employment to receive education. Pursuant to the Employee Leave (Education) Act, this applies if an employee has been an employee of the employer during the most recent six months or for a total of not less than twelve months during the last two years. An employee may also be entitled to leave from work for a maximum of six months in order to pursue a business activity by themselves or through a legal entity. However, the employee's activities must not compete with the employer's business. Employees may have a legal right to leave of absence for family-related reasons as well, for instance because of a family member’s accident or to care for a seriously ill relative.

Gig work or platform work is becoming increasingly common. Gig work involves individuals working through platforms, such as an application, and receiving orders for tasks. This type of work is not separately regulated in Swedish law. An important issue that arises in connection with gig work is whether the individuals working are to be regarded as "employees" in the context of the law, or as independent agents. To be covered by the protection of Swedish labour law, the person carrying out the work must be considered an employee. There is no legal definition of the term employee; instead, the court must decide in each individual case whether a gig worker is to be considered an employee. Note, however, that gig work may be regulated in the future, for instance by the proposed EU directive on improving working conditions in platform work.

Almost one out of ten employers in Sweden are members of an employers’ organisation and approximately 70% of employees in Sweden are members of a trade union. There are approximately 110 different trade unions and employers’ organisations on the Swedish labour market. The parties have agreed on more than 650 CBAs, so trade unions are very prevalent on the Swedish labour market. The “Swedish model” of industrial relations is characterised by a high degree of organisation, even though trade union density is currently falling.

The Co-Determination Act contains the general provisions governing the relationship between employers and the trade unions in areas such as association, information, negotiations, industrial actions and labour stability obligations.

According to the Co-Determination Act, an employer has certain consultation and information obligations towards the trade unions. For example, prior to any decision to reorganise the business or terminate employment contracts, the employer must call for and conduct consultations with the trade unions under the applicable CBAs (at both local and national level, if applicable). Even if the employer is not bound by a CBA, they are obliged to consult the trade union of which the employee concerned is a member regarding the planned reorganisation and potential redundancies.

The Act also contains certain interpretation regulations, to the benefit of the trade unions. Generally, these rules give the trade union the right to interpret the CBA until the matter has been finally decided by court and are therefore important in the case of disputes.

The local trade unions usually elect one or more representatives to represent the employees at a workplace, under the provisions of the Trade Union Representatives Act. Employees who are trade union representatives may not be prevented from carrying out union work during working hours, may not be discriminated against due to their union activities and are entitled to a reasonable leave of absence to carry out their union activities. The local trade union representative shall manage questions relating to labour at the specific workplace – issues of salary, work environment, reorganisations, etc, are normally covered. A trade union representative enjoys extended protection in a redundancy situation.

Furthermore, the Board Representation Act entitles employees of private companies that are bound by CBAs and have at least 25 employees to appoint two ordinary and two deputy employee representatives to the board of directors. Employees of companies that have at least 1,000 employees and are engaged in different industries are entitled to appoint three ordinary and three deputy employee representatives to the board of directors.

Moreover, Sweden has implemented the European Works Council Directive (Directive 2009/38/EC) and the Directive establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community (Directive 2002/14/EC).

Lastly, in a workplace where at least five employees are regularly employed, one or more safety representatives should be appointed, in accordance with the Working Environment Act. If the employer is bound by a CBA, the safety representatives are appointed by the trade union; otherwise, they are appointed by the employees.

The Swedish system is based on the principle that law and CBAs together shall provide a comprehensive framework.

Through membership in an employers’ organisation, the employer is bound by the CBAs applicable to that organisation. The employer is also obliged to apply the terms and conditions of the CBA to employees that are not members of a trade union. It is also possible for an employer to sign a CBA directly with one or more trade unions.

Once a collective bargaining agreement has been entered into and is in effect, an obligation to refrain from industrial action comes into effect and prohibits strikes or lock-outs. Breaking the peace obligation will incur liability for damages on the breaching party.

A dismissal must be based on objective reasons, which are not defined by statute or case law but can relate either to redundancy or to the employee personally. Redundancy covers all reasons attributable to the employer, such as reorganisations, shortage of work or the economic situation of the employer, while personal grounds are all grounds attributable to the employee, such as the employee’s conduct or performance.

An overall assessment of all the factors involved must be made when determining whether there are objective reasons for dismissal. A dismissal with notice will never be considered as being based on objective reasons if there were other alternatives available to the employer, such as relocating the employee elsewhere within the business. Thus, an employer must investigate whether there are any vacant positions within their business that the employee can be offered before a notice of termination is given.

Dismissal Procedure

The procedure for dismissing employees varies to some extent, depending on whether the dismissal is due to redundancy or personal reasons. The procedural requirements to follow are laid down in the EPA. Prior to terminating an employment agreement due to redundancy, the employer may be obliged to conduct consultations under the Co-Determination Act if the employer is bound by a CBA or if the employee is a member of a trade union.

The basic principle to be applied when the labour force has to be made redundant is that the employee with the longest aggregate period of employment with the company should be entitled to stay the longest: the employer must select those to be laid off on a “last in, first out” basis. A condition for continued employment is that the employee has sufficient qualifications for one of the available positions that may be offered.

Prior to terminating an employment agreement on personal grounds, the employer must notify the employee concerned in writing and the trade union, if the employee is a trade union member, two weeks in advance. If an employer wants summarily to dismiss an employee without notice, the information must be given one week before the actual dismissal. The employee or the trade union may request consultations with the employer concerning the dismissal, within one week of receiving the information.

The employer must observe certain formal rules set out in the EPA when serving a notice of termination to an employee. Notices shall always be made in writing and must state the procedure to be followed by the employee if they wish to claim that the notice of termination is invalid or to claim damages as a consequence of the termination. The notice shall also state whether or not the employee enjoys rights of priority for re-employment. Several statutes contain limitation periods for bringing employment claims, including the Co-Determination Act, the Annual Leave Act and the EPA. Furthermore, the Limitations Act stipulates limitation periods for salary and pension claims.

Dismissal of Multiple Employees

In Sweden, there is no principal difference between a termination due to redundancy involving one employee or such a termination involving 150 employees. Hence, the Co-Determination Act does not recognise the term “collective redundancies”. In contrast to many other European countries where the obligation to consult collectively is triggered only if there are several redundancies, the provisions on obligations to consult according to the Co-Determination Act are applicable even if the redundancy concerns only one employee (please see the outline for termination due to redundancy described above).

If more than five employees are subject to a redundancy situation and their employments are being terminated, the employer is obliged to notify the Swedish Employment Agency a certain period in advance, depending on how many employees are being terminated. This also applies if the total number of notices of termination is expected to be 20 or more during a 90-day period. Failure to observe this notification obligation may result in a liability to pay a special fee to the state.

Statutory notice periods from the employer’s side vary between one and six months, depending on the length of the employment term, as described below:

  • one month if the length of the employment term is less than two years;
  • two months if the length of the employment term is at least two years but less than four years;
  • three months if the length of the employment term is at least four years but less than six years;
  • four months if the length of the employment term is at least six years but less than eight years;
  • five months if the length of the employment term is at least eight years but less than ten years; and
  • six months if the length of the employment term is at least ten years.

The length of the notice period may be extended by virtue of CBAs or individual contracts. During the notice period, the employee is obliged to perform work for the employer and is entitled to salary and all other employment benefits. It is possible for an employer to release the employee from the duty to perform work during the notice period.

The minimum notice period in the case of a termination from the employee’s side is one month but can be extended by a CBA or an individual employment contract.

There are no statutory provisions regarding severance pay. However, an employee may be entitled to severance pay in accordance with an employment agreement or an exit agreement.

Please see 7.1 Grounds for Termination regarding union consultations and union representation where the employee is a member of a trade union.

Summary dismissal may take place where the employee has grossly neglected his or her obligations to the employer.

The summary dismissal may not be based exclusively on circumstances of which the employer was aware either longer than two months prior to the notice of summary dismissal or, should such a notice not be issued, longer than two months prior to the summary dismissal.

Prior to summarily dismissing an employee, the employer must notify said employee in writing and the trade union, if the employee is a trade union member, one week in advance. Within one week of receiving the information, the employee or trade union may request consultations with the employer concerning the dismissal.

The summary dismissal shall be in writing and shall be given to the employee personally. In the notification of summary dismissal, the employer shall state the provisions with which the employee must comply if he or she wishes to bring legal action alleging that the summary dismissal is invalid or to seek damages on the grounds of the summary dismissal.

Upon the employee's request, the employer shall state the circumstances invoked as reasons for the summary dismissal, in writing if the employee so requests.

Summary dismissal shall be deemed effected when the employee receives the notification of summary dismissal.

Summary dismissal means that the employee is not entitled to any notice period or other termination benefits, according to the employment agreement.

The employer and employee are free to enter into a final settlement in a termination agreement. Hence, the employment may be terminated disregarding the strict rules of the EPA. Consequently, an employee may waive his or her contractual rights. As a rule, an employee cannot waive rights laid down in mandatory law that are not yet accrued, but an employee is free to waive rights that are already accrued. Normally, the employee is financially compensated in order to enter into an exit agreement with the employer that includes a full and final release. There are no specific procedures or formalities to consider when entering into a termination agreement with an employee.

There are no specific requirements for termination agreements in Swedish law. However, all agreements can be deemed unreasonable and amended or declared invalid by a court, according to general contractual law.

Dismissals that are considered discriminatory according to the Discrimination Act are prohibited. Furthermore, several other regulations protect employees from unfair dismissals. For instance, an employee may not be dismissed for reasons related to parental leave or leave of absence for educational purposes, or part-time employment. Trade union representatives also have specific protection against dismissal and against discrimination based on their union activities.

A trade union representative may not be given less favourable working conditions or employment terms and conditions as a result of his or her activities. Upon termination of his or her duties, the employee shall be ensured the same or a comparable position in respect of working conditions and employment terms and conditions as if he or she had no trade union-related duties. Furthermore, in conjunction with a termination due to redundancy and in conjunction with lay-offs, the union representative shall be given priority for continued work, provided it is of specific importance for trade union activities at the workplace.

In the case of wrongful termination of employment, the termination could be challenged by the employee as not having an objective reason and could be declared invalid by the court. If the termination is declared invalid, the employer may be obliged to pay salary and benefits during the court proceeding, as well as punitive damages, compensation for economic losses and the costs of the litigation.

Anti-discrimination legislation consists of the Discrimination Act, which prohibits both direct and indirect discrimination as well as harassment in working life based on sex, ethnicity, religion or other belief, disability, sexual orientation, transgender identity or expression, and age.

Furthermore, employers may not discriminate against part-time or fixed-term employees, nor may they treat an applicant or an employee unfairly for reasons related to parental leave under Swedish law. Trade union representatives are also protected from discrimination based on their union activities.

Where a person who believes that they have been subject to discrimination or reprisals proves facts that give cause to believe that they have been subject to discrimination or reprisals, the defendant must prove that there has been no such discrimination or reprisals.

A party who violates the prohibitions against discrimination or reprisals, or who fails to fulfil its obligations to investigate and take measures against harassment or sexual harassment under the Discrimination Act, shall pay compensation for discrimination for any humiliation and personal indignity resulting from the violation. When compensation is decided, the specific purpose of combating such violations of the Act shall be taken into consideration. The compensation shall be paid to the person offended by the violation.

An employer who discriminates against an employee, applicant, etc, or breaches the provisions regarding prohibition against reprisals shall also pay compensation for the loss incurred. However, this does not apply to loss that is incurred in conjunction with a decision pertaining to employment or promotion, nor to loss incurred as a result of discrimination in the form of insufficient access.

Furthermore, if someone is discriminated against by a provision in an individual contract or in a CBA in a manner that is prohibited under the Discrimination Act, the provision shall be modified or declared invalid if the discriminated person requests it.

Digital court hearings have become more frequent. However, no new legislation has been implemented that specifically regulates digital court proceedings. It is common for a party to a court hearing or a witness to participate digitally. Pursuant to the Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure, the court may decide that a participant in a hearing should be present via video if it is appropriate and there are specific reasons for doing so. Digital participation in court hearings is in general in compliance with the right to a fair trial in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is incorporated into Swedish law. Digital trade union consultations have become more common as well. There is no regulation on the possibility of digital trade union consultations; instead, it is up to the parties involved to decide how a consultation should proceed.

The Labour Court is the first and only instance for employment disputes concerning a CBA or in accordance with the Co-Determination Act, or if a CBA applies between the parties. Other employment disputes are resolved in the district courts, with the Labour Court as the first and final instance of appeal.

Negotiations and consultations between employers and organisations can be held at both a local and a central level.

Regarding judicial disputes, since a trade union organisation has the right to bring an action before the court – regarding a dispute of CBA, for example – this constitutes a form of class action. According to the Class Action Act, an organisational class action can be commenced by a non-profit association that, according to its statutes, will protect the interest of its employees. Class action claims are uncommon in Sweden.

Further, the right to resort to industrial action is a constitutional right laid down in the Instrument of Government, which applies only to trade unions, employers or employers’ organisations. Restrictions of this right are set forth in the Co-Determination Act, which stipulates that an employer and an employee that are bound by a CBA may not initiate or participate in industrial action if an organisation is party to that agreement and has not duly sanctioned the action.

Normally, the employee is represented by a union representative in court if they are a trade union member. Hence, the employee bears no costs for his or her representation in court, as the costs are borne by the trade union. Employers are also sometimes represented by their employers’ organisation, but more often they are represented by an in-house legal representative or by a law firm.

The employer and the employee may agree in an employment agreement that any future disputes shall be settled by arbitration. Such a clause may be deemed unreasonably burdensome for the employee and set aside by the courts, particularly if the employee does not occupy a managerial or comparable position.

Dispute resolution regulations may also be specified in CBAs.

For employment disputes, the main principle regarding liability for litigation costs is found in the Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure, namely that the losing party shall be ordered to bear the prevailing party’s litigation costs. However, according to the Labour Disputes Act, each party may be ordered to bear its own litigation costs if the losing party had reasonable grounds to bring the action. However, this rule is normally only applied in collective bargaining disputes.

Advokatfirman Cederquist KB

Hovslagargatan 3
SE-111 96 Stockholm
Sweden

+46 8 522 065 00

+46 8 522 067 00

advokat@cederquist.se www.cederquist.se
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



KANTER Advokatbyrå is a Stockholm based business law firm focusing on Corporate/M&A, Intellectual Property and Dispute Resolution. KANTER has special expertise in several areas of law, such as employment and labour law. All partners have solid track records with leading law firms in Stockholm as well as in New York, London and Hamburg. The associates are skilled lawyers, also trained with renowned firms and in-house. The stand-alone business of the Employment and Labour Law Department makes it unique in Sweden, highly recognized and with an exceptional reputation. Further, the Corporate M&A department has naturally resulted in a substantial amount of work for the Employment and Labour Law Department at KANTER. The three-lawyer team provides the clients with legal and strategic advice concerning all aspects of employment law, including protection of human capital and trade secrets, pensions and incentive schemes. The team is, in particular, focused on litigation and arbitration, as well as employment law issues in connection with M&A and business restructuring.

Developments in Swedish Employment Law

Changes in the Swedish employment protection legislation

General

In 2022, Swedish employment legislation was subject to a rather extensive reform. The reform aimed to adapt employment protection to changes and developments in the labour market.

The amendments mainly involved changes to the Swedish Employment Protection Act (EPA), which is one of the most fundamental pieces of legislation in Swedish employment law. Contrary to what previously applied, the EPA is now in part applicable also to employees who by virtue of their duties and conditions of employment may be deemed to be in a managerial or comparable position, such as CEO. However, this mainly applies to the rules regarding limitations to prohibit sideline occupations and the employer’s information obligations, as described below.

Most of the legislative changes entered into force on 30 June 2022 and were applied for the first time on 1 October 2022.

Termination due to personal reasons

Termination of employment is strictly regulated under Swedish law. The employer must have objectively justifiable reasons for terminating an employee. There are two different objectively justifiable reasons for termination:

  • shortage of work (or redundancy); and
  • personal reasons – ie, reasons related to a specific employee, such as different kinds of misconduct by the employee.

Contrary to some other legal regimes, Swedish law provides no general possibility for the employer to “buy out” the employment at a fixed cost. However, an employer and an employee can always agree on terminating the employment through a termination/exit agreement.

One of the most important changes to the EPA relates to termination of employment due to personal reasons.

The meaning of the term “objectively justifiable reasons” is not defined in the EPA but has instead been developed through extensive case law. To determine whether there are objectively justifiable reasons to terminate an employment due to personal reasons, an overall assessment shall be made considering a variety of different circumstances. Naturally, the seriousness of the employee’s breach of the employment agreement is a key factor in the assessment. However, other factors that must also be taken into account include the measures the employer has taken to come to terms with the misconduct and the employee’s attitude regarding the misconduct. 

The complex, overall assessment to be made means that it is difficult for the employer to determine if, and at what point in time, there are justifiable reasons to terminate an employment due to personal reasons. The aim of the changes to the EPA was to increase the predictability of the requirements for a valid termination by the employer in this regard.

Previously, the focus of the assessment has been whether or not the employee will be able to change his/her conduct in the future, rather than the misconduct itself. The purpose of the new legislation has been to limit the number of circumstances that must be considered in the overall assessment, so that the assessment will focus on the misconduct at hand.

Pending guiding case law, our assessment is that the new legislation likely will have very limited effects in most cases. A termination due to personal reasons will still entail a complex assessment, and we recommend always seeking legal advice before terminating an employment – especially if the termination is due to personal reasons. A wrongful termination may lead to the termination being declared invalid, as well as entailing high costs for the employer in form of damages.

Order of priority

Furthermore, the new legislation has entailed changes regarding the rules on the order of priority in connection with termination by an employer due to shortage of work.

Under Swedish law, it is not automatically the employee who holds the position that has become redundant who is to be terminated. The order of termination is instead determined by the order of priority, meaning that an employee with a longer aggregate term of employment will have priority to continue his/her employment over an employee with a shorter aggregate term of employment. This is termed the “last in, first out” principle.

According to the new rules, all employers, regardless of the number of their employees, are entitled to exclude three employees before determining the order of priority. Hence, this change gives the employer a greater freedom to select which employees will remain within the business. 

Fixed-term employment

Under Swedish law, an employment can generally either be on an indefinite contract, or for a fixed term.

Previously, the employment form “general fixed-term employment” allowed for a fixed-term employment of up to 24 months, before the employment was automatically transformed into an employment on an indefinite contract. This form of employment has now been replaced by “special fixed-term employment”. In short, the new rules provide that the special fixed-term employment will automatically be transformed into an employment on an indefinite contract when the employee has been employed for more than 12 months. Due to one month being calculated as 30 days under the new legislation, transformation into an employment on an indefinite contract will occur several days prior to the lapse of a full year.

Further, full-time employment (ie, 40 hours per week) is now the default rule of presumption, meaning that the employment will be considered full-time employment unless the parties have explicitly agreed otherwise. If the employment is not full-time, the employer is obligated to state the reasons for this in writing upon request by the employee.

Staffing business

Changes have been made regarding employees who are employed in a staffing business (ie, temporary-work agencies) and are temporarily assigned to work for a client company, usually referred to as temporary workers.

Under the new rules, a client company is obligated to offer the temporary worker employment on an indefinite contract if the temporary worker has been assigned to the client at the same operating unit for more than 24 months during a 36-month period. If the temporary worker accepts the offer, the employment with the temporary-work agency automatically expires when the employment with the client company commences. Instead of offering employment on an indefinite contract, the client company can choose to pay compensation to the temporary worker corresponding to two months' salary. 

Employment during a dispute

The changes have also included measures for reducing the employer’s costs in connection with terminations, as well as making the costs more predictable. Under the previous legislation, in a case where the employee had disputed a termination and requested that the termination be declared invalid, the employment would, as a rule, continue during the course of the dispute. Under the new legislation, this is no longer the case.

The new rule has great practical impact on the possibilities for the employer to avoid court proceedings in termination disputes. We assess that the change will mean that employees are less likely to make a claim for wrongful termination in court. Instead, disputes regarding a wrongful termination will to a higher degree be settled between the employer and the employee by means of a settlement agreement outside of the courts.

Raised retirement age

Previously, an employee had the right to remain in employment until the end of the month when the employee turned 68 years, also known as the “EPA age”. As of 2023, the EPA age has now been raised to 69 years.

It should also be noted that termination of an employee who has reached the EPA age can be made without objectively justifiable reasons. The employer can thus terminate the employment whenever the employer chooses. In return, the employee is entitled to his or her ordinary period of notice in the event of termination. Depending on the term of employment, the notice period can range between one and six months or, if the employer is bound by a CBA, even up to 12 months.

New legislation on transparent and predictable working conditions

As of 29 June 2022, the new rules in the EPA regarding transparent and predictable working conditions entered into force. The legislation is an implementation of the EU Directive on transparent and predictable working conditions (Directive (EU) 2019/1152), which was adopted in 2019.

The changes have entailed a substantially extended obligation for the employer to provide information to the employees, including the CEO, about various matters.

This includes, among other things, information on all terms and conditions of essential importance for the employment. The information shall be provided in writing and within certain time limits. If the terms and conditions later change due to a decision by the employer or an agreement between the employer and the employee, the employer shall provide written information on those changes as well.

The new information requirement means that the employment procedure becomes more formalistic. A relevant question is how this extensive information should be provided to the employee. The legal implication of including information in the employment agreement is that the information might become employment conditions, which the employer cannot unilaterally change. Given this legal implication, it is our recommendation not to include most of the information in the employment agreement. Instead, the main part of the information should preferably be provided by means of an appendix to the employment agreement. 

New legislation regarding the employee’s duty of loyalty

The EPA also includes a new provision that limits an employer’s ability to prohibit employees from having sideline occupations.

The employer may not prohibit an employee from having another employment during the term of employment, except if such other employment:

  • is in competition with the employer;
  • negatively impacts the employee’s performance of his/her work duties; or
  • in any other way may harm the employer’s business, such as by damaging the employer’s reputation. 

It follows from the employee’s duty of loyalty, which is a fundamental principle in the employment relationship, that the employee has a duty to act in the best interests of the employer and not act in a way that may harm the employer. However, this duty is not without limitations, and the employer cannot generally decide what the employee does in his/her free time, except in the specific situations mentioned above. The duty of loyalty is even more limited in relation to part-time employees’ right to have additional employments or sideline occupations.

These principles have now been codified through legislation and have thereby become mandatory rights.

Collective bargaining agreements

The Swedish labour law model is characterised by a long-standing tradition of self-regulation by the parties in the labour market through collective bargaining agreements (CBAs). In Sweden, most employers, and thereby most employees, are covered by various CBAs, which contain regulations on generally all key terms and conditions of employment. Due to this, the Swedish legislature is only responsible for a minor part of the regulations affecting the labour market.

There is no legal obligation for an employer to enter into a CBA. However, a trade union that wishes to enter into a CBA with an employer generally has the right to take industrial action against the employer in order to conclude a CBA. Furthermore, in some sectors, it is a common requirement that the employer must be bound by a CBA in order to receive certain business deals. For example, this is common in the field of public procurement.

Swedish collective agreement law is complex and give rise to a range of legal issues. One fundamental issue that has recently and repeatedly been subject to assessment by the Swedish Labour Court is the question of what regulations shall apply if the employer is bound by several different CBAs.

It is highly common for an employer to be bound by two different CBAs; one in respect of white-collar employees (or salaried employees) and one in respect of blue-collar employees (or workers). In such cases, the CBAs usually co-exist side by side without giving rise to any major issues.

A more complicated situation arises if the employer is bound by several competing CBAs, meaning CBAs that are applicable to the same category of employees. This is more often the case with blue-collar employees. The main question here is which of the CBAs should take precedence, if any, and in which respects.

In its recent case law, the Swedish Labour Court has, amongst other things, confirmed that it is the principles of the first-concluded CBA that shall apply. Hence, if the CBAs are incompatible with regards to their terms and conditions of employment for the relevant employees, the employer shall only apply one of the CBAs: that is, the first concluded CBA. However, this does not mean that the later-concluded CBA is without legal effect. For example, the rules in the later-concluded CBA that regulate the relationship between the employer and the trade union shall still be applied.

Generally, competing CBAs give rise to a highly complicated legal situation for the employer, and entail a great risk of the employer committing breaches of one or several CBAs.

Enhanced protection for whistle-blowers

As of 2021, new legislation on the protection of whistle-blowers has entered into force: the Swedish Whistle-blower Act. The Act is an implementation of the EU Directive on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (Directive (EU) 2019/1937), adopted in 2019. 

In addition to reporting on breaches of Union law, the Swedish Whistle-blower Act also applies to persons who in a work-related context have gained knowledge of information on irregularities, in cases where it is in the interest of the public that such irregularities are reported and come to light.

The Act provides protection for the whistle-blower in the form of immunity from liability in the event of a breach of confidentiality, and a prohibition on any form of retaliation, such as unfair treatment, reprimand or dismissal.

The main obligation for the employer under the Act is the obligation to implement secure internal reporting channels and routines for receiving and handling reports on irregularities (ie, so-called internal whistle-blowing systems). The reports are to be investigated and documented. The whistle-blower shall receive information within certain timeframes regarding, among other things, receipt of the report and the investigation. Furthermore, the employer shall appoint independent and autonomous persons to handle the reports.

This obligation applies for all companies and organisations with 50 or more employees. Generally, it is not possible for a group company to have an internal whistle-blowing system that is fully shared with another company within the group. This also applies to foreign groups with a subsidiary in Sweden. However, certain functions can be shared.

The obligation to provide a whistle-blowing system will enter into force on 17 December 2023 for private companies with 50 to 249 employees. For other companies, the obligation has been in force since 2022. Breaches of the Act may oblige the employer to pay damages or fines.

The new legislation has implications for the legal relationship between the employer and employee. An employee who reports an irregularity in good faith may not be subject to termination or be held liable for damages. This applies regardless of whether the reporting entails a disclosure of trade secrets. The protection for the reporting person is absolute and has priority over other commitments, such as a confidentiality clause in the employment agreement.

It is our experience that many companies’ internal policies and routines do not correspond to the Act, and it is not uncommon that companies have more strict internal rules than what follows from the law. This can cause problems in several ways when it comes to compliance and the management of whistle-blowing reports. Our recommendation is for the company to ensure that the internal policy and routines for whistle-blowing are in accordance with the rules in the Act.

Trends in Swedish Employment Law

Non-competition clauses in employment agreements

Under Swedish employment law, it is possible and common to include non-competition clauses in the employment agreement. The purpose of the non-competition clauses is to regulate and restrict a former employee’s activities in different ways during a certain period after the employment has expired. There are three types of non-competition clauses:

  • a non-compete clause, which prohibits the employee from taking employment with, or otherwise engaging in, a business competing with the employer;
  • a non-solicitation clause, which prohibits the employee from recruiting the employer’s employees to another business; and
  • a customer protection clause (sometimes also referred to as a “non-solicitation of customers clause”), which prohibits the employee from contacting the employer’s customers with the purpose of persuading them to cease doing business with the employer.

A recurring question is the validity of these non-competition clauses. The non-competition clause must be reasonable in order to be enforceable. A non-competition clause that is unreasonable may be adjusted or, more importantly, be declared invalid by the court. What is considered reasonable differs between the different types of clauses.

In Sweden, there is no legislation on non-competition clauses. Instead, the applicability of such restrictive agreements is based on case law. The Swedish Labour Court has adopted a restrictive approach to non-competition clauses, especially for non-compete clauses.

A non-compete clause can only be applied to a very limited range of employees, generally only CEOs and employees with more extensive knowledge of the employer’s trade secrets and who also have the ability to make use of such trade secrets. Non-solicitation and customer protection clauses can be utilised on a wider range of employees. However, such clauses should not generally be included in all employment agreements, but should rather be used for a limited range of employees.

In recent years, the enforceability aspects of non-competition restrictions have been developed further, mainly through case law. The developments concern, among other things, the length of the prohibition period, the scope of the clause and the possibility for the employer to waive or self-adjust the clause by limiting the non-competition clause in different ways.

The following should especially be noted in this regard:

  • It is not possible for the employer to self-adjust a non-competition clause that is obviously unreasonable to begin with.
  • A non-solicitation clause can generally only apply for a maximum period of six months. Furthermore, the former employee can only be prohibited from soliciting certain categories of employees, not all employees.
  • A customer protection clause cannot include all the employer’s customers. The prohibition should be limited with regard to, amongst other things, which customers the clause covers as well as the geographical extent. 

Considering the above developments, it is important for the employer to review the non-competition clauses applied in employment agreements, to ensure that these are not unreasonable and at risk of being non-enforceable, which would thereby leave the employer without any protection.

Dispute resolution in form of arbitration

The use of arbitration clauses in employment agreements is becoming increasingly common. Such clauses stipulate that disputes arising out of, or in connection with, the employment agreement are to be settled by arbitration proceedings, instead of regular court proceedings.

Under Swedish law, it is possible to include an arbitration clause in individually agreed employment agreements; ie, for salaried employees in higher positions. However, if the employer is bound by a CBA, such clauses may conflict with the rules on dispute resolution in the CBA. Arbitration clauses are most commonly applied to CEOs and other employees in management roles.

The parties can choose which rules are to be applicable on the arbitration. In Sweden, it is common either to apply the Swedish Arbitration Act, or to specify that the arbitration shall be administered by the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Arbitration Institute according to their rules. 

An arbitration clause does not affect the employer’s obligation to abide by other procedural rules under Swedish labour and employment law. Such rules mainly follow from the Swedish Employment (Co-Determination in the Workplace) Act and the EPA. Under these rules, the employer has an obligation to inform and consult with relevant trade unions before certain measures are decided and effectuated, such as termination of employment.

KANTER Advokatbyrå KB

Engelbrektsgatan 3
114 32 Stockholm
Sweden

+46 8 407 37 00

tabrizi@kntr.se www.kntr.se
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Author



Advokatfirman Cederquist KB is a Swedish independent law firm that offers full service from its Stockholm office. It engages more than 100 lawyers from the Swedish market and has developed non-exclusive relationships with firms globally to assist clients in cross-border matters. Major international deals and transactions handled by the firm include acting as legal adviser in corporate acquisitions of Swedish companies on behalf of foreign corporations, investment banks and law firms, as well as acquisitions of companies outside Sweden. Cederquist’s employment and benefits team manages all labour law risks. Its labour law practice consists of one partner, one senior counsel and seven associates and is responsible for a wide range of matters relating to the legal areas of labour, pensions and benefits. Cederquist is a member of L&E Global, an alliance of employers’ counsel worldwide and the alliance for cross-border labour and employment law services

Trends and Developments

Authors



KANTER Advokatbyrå is a Stockholm based business law firm focusing on Corporate/M&A, Intellectual Property and Dispute Resolution. KANTER has special expertise in several areas of law, such as employment and labour law. All partners have solid track records with leading law firms in Stockholm as well as in New York, London and Hamburg. The associates are skilled lawyers, also trained with renowned firms and in-house. The stand-alone business of the Employment and Labour Law Department makes it unique in Sweden, highly recognized and with an exceptional reputation. Further, the Corporate M&A department has naturally resulted in a substantial amount of work for the Employment and Labour Law Department at KANTER. The three-lawyer team provides the clients with legal and strategic advice concerning all aspects of employment law, including protection of human capital and trade secrets, pensions and incentive schemes. The team is, in particular, focused on litigation and arbitration, as well as employment law issues in connection with M&A and business restructuring.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.