The grounds for divorce are the same for all marriages and same-sex marriages. Civil partnerships are not considered marriages in Spanish family law, and their status is not regulated in the Spanish Civil Code or at a national level.
Several autonomous communities in Spain have established their own specific laws regarding civil partnerships, including provisions for a partnership register. These communities are:
In contrast, Catalonia only offers municipal registers for civil partnerships, and the existence of a partnership is verified through an authentic or notarial deed.
Each autonomous community regulates the register in a different way, and the effects of registration range from being simply declarative to having practical equivalence with marriage. Some autonomous communities do not provide for such a regional register.
“No-fault” divorce
Spain is a “no-fault” divorce jurisdiction. There are neither grounds for divorce nor a required period of separation. One or both parties can issue separation/divorce proceedings three months after the marriage. These three months will not be required in cases where there is a danger to the petitioner or the children.
The timescale for a first-instance divorce decree is approximately a year, although it is very different from court to court. The appeal may take about one year. If any party requests a psychological forensic report via the court, the timescale will be longer because forensic psychologists are overloaded with work.
Uncontested divorce proceedings are much quicker: between two and six months to obtain a Divorce Absolute.
Each court’s head of the court administration (Letrado de la Administración de Justicia) is responsible for the service of documents and other acts of communication. Once a party has filed a divorce petition, the court will admit it and issue divorce proceedings, ordering service upon the other party. A court’s agent will serve the other party at his residence in person.
Service by a particular method is also possible. The petitioner can request the court that his private court’s clerk (procurator) personally serve the divorce petition.
Hague convention
Spain is a party to the Hague Convention on the service abroad of judicial documents signed on 15 November 1965. A form must be filled out and sent to the Spanish Central Authority with the divorce petition and documents. The Central Authority forwards the document to the Dean Judge (Juzgado Decano) of the Courts of First Instance within the judicial territory (partido judicial) where the document is to be served. This court office is competent for distributing the different proceedings (including service of documents) among the judicial authorities that fall under its jurisdiction.
Although a different form of service is not prohibited in Spanish domestic law in principle, the Central Authority does not usually receive a special request by the applicant for service by a particular method.
Between member states of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2020/1784 of 25 November 2020 on the service in the member states of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (recast) is applicable.
Religious marriages are recognised in Spain, as set out in Article 60 of the Civil Code. Catholic, Protestant, Jewish and Muslim marriages are recognised in Spain.
Separation proceedings are treated like divorce proceedings, with the same effects, except the dissolution of the matrimonial bond.
Nullity
The grounds for nullity are different, and it is much more difficult to obtain an annulment than a divorce or separation. To obtain an annulment of the marriage, you have to prove the grounds of annulment of a contract, such as lack of free consent or goodwill or that the spouse entered into marriage because of fear, deceit, threats, etc. It is governed by Article 73 of the Civil Code. Other grounds for nullity are marriage with a minor, a close relative or polygamy.
Spain is a party to Council Regulation (EU) No 2019/1111 of 25 June 2019 on the jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, and on international child abduction (recast). This Regulation currently rules the Spanish international private law concerning international jurisdiction on divorce, and the grounds of jurisdiction set out in Article 3 of the Regulation apply. The Spanish Law on Judicial Power was reformed in 2015 with regard to international jurisdiction, and its Article 22 quáter (c) adopts the very same grounds for jurisdiction as Article 3 of the Regulation.
Spain retains the residual jurisdiction on divorce when the following apply:
The same grounds apply to same-sex marriages. Civil partnership status is not regulated in the Spanish Civil Code or at a national level. Civil partners are not considered to be married, and therefore, they cannot apply for divorce.
The main concept for determining jurisdiction is the habitual residence of the spouses. When both spouses have Spanish nationality, they can also apply for divorce in Spain. “Domicile” is not a legal concept in Spain’s jurisdiction.
A party can contest jurisdiction within ten days of being served with the divorce petition. Due to a lack of international jurisdiction, the “Declinatoria” proceedings are provided for by Articles 63–66 of the Spanish Law of Civil Procedure (LEC1/2000) and Article 39 of the Law on International Judicial Co-operation in Civil Matters (29/2015).
As explained above, it is not possible to apply to stay proceedings in order to pursue divorce proceedings in a foreign jurisdiction apart from a challenging jurisdiction.
Law No 29/2015
International lis pendens is ruled by Article 39 of Law No 29/2015, of 30 June, on International Judicial Co-operation in Civil Matters:
“1. When there exist pending proceedings with an identical object and cause of action, between the same parties, before a Spanish court, the Spanish court may stay proceedings, at the instance of a party and following a report from the Public Prosecutor’s office, always provided that the following requirements are met:
The foreign court’s jurisdiction is based on a reasonable connection with the litigation. The existence of a reasonable connection will be presumed when the foreign court has based its international jurisdiction on criteria equivalent to those provided for in Spanish Law for that specific case.
It is foreseeable that the foreign court will issue a resolution susceptible to being recognised in Spain; and
The Spanish court considers it necessary to stay proceedings in the interest of the proper administration of justice
2. The Spanish court may order the continuation of proceedings at any time at the instance of a party and following a report from the Public Prosecutor’s Office when any of the following circumstances apply:
Should the foreign court have declared it has no jurisdiction, or should it, at the request of any of the parties, have failed to pronounce on its own jurisdiction;
Should the proceedings before the court of the other State have been suspended or finalised without issuing a resolution;
Should it be considered unlikely that the proceedings before the court of the other State will be concluded within a reasonable time;
Should the continuation of proceedings be considered necessary for the proper administration of justice;
Should it be understood that the final judgement that may eventually be handed down will not be susceptible to being recognised and, where appropriate, enforced in Spain?
3. The Spanish court shall end proceedings and close the case if the proceedings before the other State’s court have been concluded with a decision susceptible of recognition and, where appropriate, enforcement in Spain.”
Lis pendens is regulated in Article 20 of Council Regulation 2019/1111 and is applicable between EU member states:
“Where proceedings relating to divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment between the same parties are instituted before courts of different Member States, the court second seised shall of its own motion stay its proceedings until such time as the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established.
Where the jurisdiction of the court first seised is established, the court second seised shall decline jurisdiction in favour of the court first seised.
In that case, the party who instituted proceedings before the court second seised may bring those proceedings before the court first seised.”
Regarding Article 3 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on the jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and co-operation in matters relating to maintenance obligations in Member States, jurisdiction shall lie with:
Article 22 quáter (f) of the Spanish Law on Judicial Power regulates the international jurisdiction of the Spanish courts on maintenance obligations, as set out in Article 3 of the “Maintenance Regulation”.
Spain retains the residual jurisdiction on maintenance obligations when:
Spain is a party to the Council Regulation (EU) No 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016, which implements enhanced co-operation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law, and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes. This regulation is applicable between member states as of 29 January 2019.
According to this Regulation, jurisdiction in matters of the matrimonial property regime in the event of the death of one of the spouses will be retained by the court of the member state that is ruling the succession of the spouse pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 on Succession. Jurisdiction in matters of the matrimonial property regime in cases of divorce, legal separation or annulment will be ruled by the court of the member state that is seised for the divorce, legal separation or annulment pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 2201/2003.
Article 22 quáter (c) of the Spanish Law on Judicial Power rules the international jurisdiction of the Spanish courts in matters of matrimonial property regimes. Spain retains the residual jurisdiction in matters of matrimonial property regimes when:
The court can hear financial claims in Spain after a foreign divorce. First, the foreign divorce must be recognised by the Spanish courts. The financial claim must be related to immovable assets situated within the Spanish jurisdiction upon which the foreign judge did not have jurisdiction to rule. It might also consist of liquidating a Spanish property regime before the Spanish courts if it was not decided in the foreign divorce decree. This is not commonplace.
The service requirements in financial proceedings are the same as in any other civil proceedings. Each court’s head of the court administration (Letrado de la Administración de Justicia) is responsible for the service of documents and other acts of communication. After a party has filed a financial petition, the court will admit it and issue financial proceedings, ordering service upon the other party. A court’s agent will serve The other party at his residence in person.
Service by a particular method is also possible. The petitioner can request the court that his private court’s clerk (procurator) personally serve the divorce petition.
Spain is a party to the Hague Convention on the service abroad of judicial documents signed on 15 November 1965. A form must be filled out and sent to the Spanish Central Authority with the divorce petition and documents. The Central Authority forwards the document to the Dean Judge (Juzgado Decano) of the Courts of First Instance within the judicial territory (partido judicial) where the document is to be served. This court office is competent for distributing the different proceedings (including service of documents) among the judicial authorities that fall under its jurisdiction.
Although a different form of service is not prohibited in Spanish domestic law in principle, the Central Authority does not usually receive a special request by the applicant for service by a particular method.
Between member states of the European Union, Regulation 2020/1784 of 25 November 2020 on the service in the member states of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (recast) is applicable.
The financial orders on divorce are spousal and child maintenance and the use of the matrimonial home in the child’s best interests. The proceedings can take about one year for the first-instance court order and another year for the appeal at the Higher Court.
Spouses can issue court proceedings to liquidate the matrimonial property regime with the divorce petition or after the divorce decree has been rendered. There are two parts to the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime proceedings:
If there are many appeals, each part can take about one to two years. If the parties can reach an agreement, the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime will be much quicker.
Financial Orders
The financial orders on divorce are spousal and child maintenance, using the matrimonial home in the child’s best interests and liquidating the matrimonial property regime.
In the case of the separation of assets matrimonial regime, a compensation order to a spouse for their dedication to the family that has produced a corresponding loss of professional opportunities, as well as a financial order to put an end to the joint property ownership of the spouses, can both be made on divorce.
Spanish law does not provide for the possibility that, once the marriage is dissolved, the courts may ex officio establish patrimonial measures between the parties. On the contrary, any such measure between the spouses (such as spousal maintenance, financial compensation for family work or the allocation of the use of the family home) must be expressly requested by a party in the originating petition or in a defence and counterclaim to such petition, for the court to order (or not) corresponding measures in the judgment it issues.
The liquidation of a matrimonial property regime is a different matter, which can be decided in a later court proceeding, separate from the divorce action itself.
The court will only order spousal maintenance obligations if requested in the divorce petition. The aim of maintenance orders is to redistribute the family incomes in order to minimise the effects of the divorce, primarily upon the children’s costs and expenses, and, secondarily, upon the spouses. The spouse with the larger income must pay more child maintenance and, eventually, maintenance to the other spouse. Maintenance obligations between spouses are not commonplace.
Capital orders are made regarding the rules of the liquidation of the matrimonial property regimes of the Spanish Civil Code. The assets and liabilities of the marriage will be split between the spouses following these articles in quite an impartial manner.
The exception is the matrimonial property regime of asset separation. If there is no matrimonial property on divorce, the court can issue an order to compensate one of the spouses for their dedication to the family, resulting in a corresponding loss of professional opportunities.
If the couple has children, child maintenance orders must be made by the court on divorce, regardless of whether there is an agreement or not. If there is an agreement, the judge and the Ministerio Fiscal must approve the settlement protecting the child’s best interests.
The court can request disclosure obligations from the spouses, although there is no subsequent penalty if the spouses do not comply. The court can request information about the spouses’ income from the Spanish Tax Revenue Office (Agencia Tributaria). The court can identify the spouses’ properties at the Spanish Property Registry and obtain information from the Register of Companies and the Cars Register. The main Spanish Banks co-operate with the court and can provide information regarding the spouses’ bank accounts or investment funds in their companies.
The court cannot make orders for disclosure against third parties.
There are three matrimonial property regimes recognised in the Spanish Civil Code:
The matrimonial property regime will finish the ope legis on the date of the divorce decree. After the divorce decree, the parties can issue the specific liquidation of the matrimonial property regime and proceed to distribute the assets and liabilities between them. They can also make an out-of-court agreement and liquidate the matrimonial property regime in a notary public deed.
Spain is comprised of 17 autonomous communities (Comunidades autónomas), some of which have their own rules of law regarding family and succession. The common point is that, in all of them, you can choose your matrimonial property regime in a notary public deed. However, in the absence of an agreement, one of the following matrimonial property regimes will apply by default:
The matrimonial property regime can be implemented with a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement.
Spain is not a party to the Hague Convention of 1985, and trust is not a legal concept or regulated in Spain.
Foreign Trusts
Foreign trusts can be recognised by the Spanish courts subject to proof of the foreign trust law or providing the judge with a similar civil law legal concept that would meet the purpose of the trust on a case-by-case basis: eg, donations, agency, company, mortgage, mandate, fiducie and foundation. On divorce, the court will check the nature of the assets held in a trust, the owner of the assets held in the trust, who was the owner of the assets before the transfer to the trust, etc, to calculate the matrimonial assets.
After a divorce, it is generally expected that each spouse will support themselves. The main aim of spousal maintenance is to help the ex-spouse to maintain the same “standard of living as during the marriage”. The main criteria for spousal maintenance are:
Age, health, duration of the marriage and the spouse’s career prospects and ability to earn a living are also taken into account.
The compensation usually consists of temporary maintenance payments for a couple of years, but a single payment can also be considered. Lifelong spousal maintenance orders are rare and only apply in cases where the marriage is very long and the spouse is of an age with no prospects to earn a living after having invested their life in the family’s welfare.
A party can apply for interim maintenance pending the final outcome. This amount, for the spouse, until there is a divorce order, is considered an obligation for family support during the marriage.
Prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, although not included in the Spanish Civil Code (CC), will be recognised by the Spanish courts on the basis of the principle of freedom of party autonomy (Article 1.255 CC) and the freedom of agreements between spouses (Articles 1323 and 1325 CC). These marital contracts must meet the criteria for a valid contract, such as free consent, object and motive (Article 1261 CC). Moreover, the principle of goodwill and compliance with the ordre public have to be observed. The most recent judgment of the Spanish Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo) on marital contracts is Sentencia número 428/2022, dated 30 May 2022, proceedings Casación número 6110/2021.
Spousal maintenance obligations or financial terms will be binding on divorce. Terms regarding child arrangements and the use of the family home will be taken into account by the court, but they will be checked by the judge and the public prosecutor to protect the child’s best interests.
Marital agreements are recognised as private contracts under Spanish law and are therefore binding on the contracting parties if they are not against the child’s best interests and the Spanish ordre public. The marital agreement will be enforceable when included in a court order after the divorce proceedings.
A marital agreement can be directly enforceable if it is granted in a deed executed before a Spanish notary public. Marital agreements can cover a spouse’s financial claims on divorce, such as maintenance. However, they cannot deal with child maintenance or other claims regarding children, which must be approved by the judge and the Ministerio Fiscal, who protects the child’s best interests.
The election of the matrimonial property regime must be granted in a deed executed before a Spanish notary public.
In the absence of children, parties can claim compensation and an order to sell their joint properties. Claims must be lodged in the civil courts; they are not under the jurisdiction of family law.
In order to make a financial claim, a party must prove that the couple had joint properties, joint bank accounts, etc. The grounds for making a financial claim are the intention and existence of shared estates between the cohabitees.
Parties can prove that they are in a civil partnership where they were not registered by virtue of the length of cohabitation or the existence of children, but they do not acquire any rights other than those granted to civil partners by each autonomous community.
A party can file an enforcement application before the same court that rendered the divorce order. In the enforcement application, the petitioner can provide the court with information regarding the other party’s assets and request disclosure from the other party.
The petitioner can also request the court’s help to investigate the other party’s assets at the Spanish Land Registry, Register of Companies, Cars Register, Spanish Banks, Spanish Tax Revenue, Spanish Employment Office, Spanish National Social Security System, etc.
The court will charge the enforced party’s assets, including their payslips, bank accounts, etc.
International enforcement of a financial order is permitted when this order has been recognised in Spain. The European Regulation 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on maintenance obligations rules the enforcement of maintenance obligations between European Union member estates. The Hague Convention of 23 November 2007 on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance (the “2007 Hague Convention”) is applicable to enforce maintenance orders from signatory countries in Spain.
Capital orders regarding the liquidation of the matrimonial property will be enforced according to Council Regulation (EU) No 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016, which implements enhanced co-operation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law, and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the matrimonial property regime between member estates of the European Union and Spain.
Otherwise, exequatur proceedings before the Spanish court will be needed for the recognition and enforcement of a financial order.
The media and press are not able to report on financial cases because family proceedings are private, and the public cannot access them.
Parties can resolve their financial disputes by signing an agreement or liquidating their matrimonial property before a public notary. The notary deed will have the same effects as a court order.
No ADR methods are mandated by the court. Courts always offer the parties the option to stay the divorce proceedings to attend mediation. However, there is no penalty if any party decides not to participate in mediation or any other ADR.
There are family arbitrators and collaborative lawyers, but they are not commonplace.
An agreement reached via a non-court process is a private contract between the parties, and for it to be enforceable, it must be included in a consent court order.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2019/1111 of 25 June 2019 on jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, and on international child abduction (recast) is the applicable law on jurisdiction in Spain regarding parental responsibility.
Article 7 of Council Regulation No 2019/1111 rules that the member state’s courts where the child is habitually resident at the time the court is seised shall have international jurisdiction for parental responsibility and childcare arrangements. Spain will have jurisdiction for bringing children proceedings when the children are habitual residents in Spain when the court is seised.
Article 10 of Council Regulation No 2019/1111 rules the choice of court by the parents:
“1. The courts of a Member State shall have jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility where the following conditions are met:
(a) the child has a substantial connection with that Member State, in particular by virtue of the fact that:
(i) at least one of the holders of parental responsibility is habitually resident in that Member State;
(ii) that Member State is the former habitual residence of the child; or
(iii) the child is a national of that Member State;
(b) the parties, as well as any other holder of parental responsibility, have:
(i) agreed freely upon the jurisdiction, at the latest at the time the court is seised; or
(ii) expressly accepted the jurisdiction in the course of the proceedings, and the court has ensured that all the parties are informed of their right not to accept the jurisdiction; and
(c) the exercise of jurisdiction is in the best interests of the child.”
The applicable law on international jurisdiction in maintenance obligations is European Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on maintenance obligations. According to Article 3 (b), Spain would have jurisdiction for child maintenance when the child has a habitual residence in Spain.
The most relevant concept for determining jurisdiction in children matters is the child’s habitual residence at the time the court is seised. In the case of Articles 10 and 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2019/1111, the nationality of the child can be a factor in proving a special connection of the child with that state for an agreement between the parents on the choice of court or a transfer of jurisdiction to the court of another member state.
Parental Responsibility and Custody
Article 156 of the Civil Code states that both parents have the same parental responsibility and must agree on the child’s upbringing, such as schooling, medical treatment, religion, holidays, etc. In case of dispute, either parent can issue a proceeding and the judge, after having heard both parents and the child (mandatory for children older than 12 years), will issue an order stating which parent can decide on this specific matter. The parental responsibility matters of Article 156 are urgent proceedings on family law that must be heard in court within a month.
Parental responsibility will not be affected by a divorce. In Spain, “rights of custody” refers to “parental responsibility” for both parents. When they cannot agree on an issue, they must take the matter to a court, which will issue an order stating which parent decides on this specific matter.
The court must decide at the time of the divorce which parent the child lives with (physical custody) and which parent has the “right of access”. There is no difference between married or unmarried parents in the exercise of rights of custody.
The legal approach now to (physical) custody is that joint custody subsequent to post-marital separation is the optimal solution to safeguarding the “interests of the child”. Law No 15/2005, of 8 July, amending the Civil Code and the Civil Judicial Proceedings Act in matters of separation and divorce, introduced joint custody into the Spanish Civil Code. According to Article 92 of the Civil Code, judges could henceforth order joint custody even without the agreement of both parents.
The court must automatically make a child arrangements order on divorce. The Ministerio Fiscal must be invited to the divorce proceedings to protect the child’s best interests. Members of the Ministerio Fiscal represent the Spanish authorities’ protection of the child’s best interests. The Ministerio Fiscal co-operates closely with the court and has a similar education and professional background as a judge; however, members of the Ministerio Fiscal are not independent because they are Spanish government civil servants.
A parent can also request the court to order interim measures regarding maintenance, custody, access rights, and use of the family home until the divorce decree is produced.
Children’s orders can be made until the children are 18 years old. Normally, however, they stop at the age of 16 because, at this age, it is purposeless and counterproductive to oblige a child to visit or live with a parent if they do not want to.
A father who has been accused of violence against his spouse/partner cannot be granted his children’s custody by the court on divorce or separation.
Child Support
Content of child support
Article 142 of the Civil Code provides for child maintenance, such as food, clothing, housing, health assistance, and education. Each parent will support their children according to their wealth and income.
Proportionality test
The amount of child support must be proportional to the parent’s wealth and income and the child’s needs and circumstances (Article 146 Civil Code). The judge will check the proportionality test on a case-by-case basis.
Calculation of child support
The petitioner must provide the court with evidence regarding the child’s costs, such as school fees, schoolbooks, extra-curricular activities, clothing, housing, etc. Each parent must also inform the court about their income and wealth, with the aim of covering the child’s necessities.
Apart from the monthly child support, each parent will bear the cost of 50% of the following.
The Spanish General Council of Judges’ online portal provides a table to calculate child support by entering the parents’ monthly incomes.
Payment obligation
The payment obligation starts on the date the application for child support is lodged in court (Article 148 Civil Code).
The parties can’t agree on child maintenance arrangements without the court’s involvement because any child arrangement must be approved by the judge and the public prosecutor (Ministerio Fiscal), who protects the child’s best interests.
The court can order child maintenance until the child turns 18 or until the child is financially independent. The court can also terminate the child maintenance obligation if the supporting parent can prove that the young adult is neither studying nor seeking a job.
The child cannot apply for financial provision themselves until they turn 18 years old. An adult can make a claim for financial support directly against their parents when they are older than 18 and the child maintenance obligation has ended. The court will take into account the reasons and circumstances that force the adult to make a financial claim (eg, unemployment) and the parents’ resources.
Article 156 of the Civil Code says that both parents have the same parental responsibility and must agree on the child’s upbringing, such as schooling, medical treatment, religion, holidays, etc. In case of dispute, either parent can issue a proceeding and the judge, after hearing both parents and the child (mandatory for children older than 12 years), will issue an order stating which parent can decide on this specific matter. The parental responsibility matters of Article 156 of the Civil Code are urgent proceedings on family law that must be heard in court within a month.
The Constitutional Act No 1/2004 of 28 December on Integrated Protection Measures Against Gender Violence was promulgated to combat male violence against women, and, as a result, Spanish law contains a variety of mechanisms that target male violence. As a consequence, a father accused of violence against his partner will not have his children’s custody and eventually, neither will he be able to have the right of access to his children. Although both the government and the General Council of the Judiciary have taken a stand against the deployment of the parental alienation syndrome in the legal system, this notion is used in family courts. Allegations of parental alienation and those of “false complaints” are made in an attempt to falsify denunciations of gender violence. They argue that women manipulate children or press charges falsely in order to:
The Sentence TS:2016:129 of the Supreme Court rejected the appeal of a father who requested a change of custody in his favour based on the alleged existence of parental alienation. Although the Sentence did not reject parental alienation in itself, the Supreme Court confirmed that there was no evidence that the children in question had suffered from parental alienation, dismissing the father’s claim. However, there is no clear jurisprudence against parental alienation. The courts will check parental alienation allegations on a case-by-case basis, supported by strong evidence and the forensic psychologist’s report.
Children are able to give evidence in court according to their age and maturity. They will be heard by the forensic psychologist and eventually by the judge alone. Children must be heard in court when they reach 12 years old. The court will take into account its evidence when convinced that it was free from any parent’s manipulation or influence. When children are older than 16 years old, the court usually follows their wishes because the court considers that at this age, it is very difficult to make them abide by an order that they oppose.
Law No 15/2015 on Jurisdicción Voluntaria introduced the consent divorce before a notary in Spain. The notary will declare the dissolution of the marriage instead of the judge, but they will have the same competence by virtue of Law No 15/2015. The notary must check the legal terms and equity of the divorce agreement. If the notary finds the divorce agreement unfair for one of the spouses or their grown-up children, they can decide not to ratify it, and the spouses must go to court (the notary cannot amend the agreement, nor can the spouses go to another notary).
A notary from the spouses’ last habitual residence or the habitual residence of one of them will have jurisdiction. The spouses must attend personally to sign the deed in front of the notary and be legally assisted by at least one lawyer representing both parties, who will usually write the divorce agreement.
The divorce agreement must address the use of the family home, spousal maintenance, and support for grown-up children. Any other agreement regarding the spouses, such as donations, can also be included. The liquidation of the matrimonial property regime can be done in the same agreement or afterwards. The notary deed (escritura) will be considered equivalent to a court order.
However, there is discussion in Spain about the legal nature of this new concept: whether it is a private divorce produced by the spouses’ consent and willingness to dissolve their marriage (a private contract) or a consent divorce ratified by the notary as a public authority.
Spouses cannot divorce on the basis of a private divorce if they have minor or disabled children. However, they can divorce children older than 18, who must appear before the notary and sign the divorce deed if they are affected by the divorce agreement. The law does not refer to “common minor children,” so it is unclear whether a notarial divorce is possible if only one of the spouses has minor children.
No ADR methods are mandated by the court. Courts always offer parties the option to stay in the divorce proceedings and attend mediation. However, there is no penalty if a party decides not to participate in mediation or any other ADR.
There are family arbitrators and collaborative lawyers, but they are not commonplace.
The media and press may report on relevant child cases, but the child must be anonymised in the case report. The media cannot access the proceedings’ information, which remains a protected private matter.
Calle Doctor Manuel Perez Bryan, 3-6
E-29005 Malaga
Spain
+ 34 678 50 88 91
amparo@arbaizarabogados.com www.arbaizarabogados.comPets and Children’s Shared Custody in Spain
Law number 17/2021, of 15 December 2021, updates the regulations regarding animals in Spanish Law. In accordance with Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals of 1987 and Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the new Law 17/2021 considers that animals are sentient beings and have a special relationship with man.
Law 17/2021 of 15 December amended several articles of the Spanish Civil Code and Law of Civil Procedure to consider animal welfare requirements. This reform was necessary not only to adapt the Civil Code to the real nature of animals but also to the nature of the coexistence relationships established between animals and human beings.
For this reason, agreements on domestic animals and the criteria that the courts must follow to decide who will be made responsible for the animal’s care, always considering the animal’s well-being, have been introduced into the rules relating to family crises.
Article 333 bis of the Civil Code says that animals are sentient beings. The legal rules for movables and goods would only apply to animals as far as they are compatible with their nature and protection regulations. If an injury to a pet has caused death or damage to its physical or mental health, the pet’s proprietor has a right to compensation.
Article 605 of the Law of Civil Procedure (Ley 1/2000, de Enjuiciamiento Civil) has been amended to state that pets cannot be seized in enforcement proceedings since they are not considered goods. Conversely, the proceeds that pets might produce can be seized.
Animals no longer fit the legal concept of movables, goods or mere things.
The new Law 17/2021, of 15 December 2021, affects the Spanish Family Law as well as the Law of Successions of the Civil Code and the Law of Civil Procedure on family proceedings at court.
Article 774, 4 of the Law of Civil Procedure (Ley 1/2000, de Enjuiciamiento Civil) has been amended to stipulate that on divorce or legal separation or children’s arrangements, the court must rule the custody of pet animals considering the family members’ best interest and the welfare requirements of animals. The court must also rule on the right of access to pets and the payments of their maintenance costs. The same applies to Article 771, 2 of the Law of Civil Procedure regarding provisional measures on divorce or legal separation or children’s arrangements. (This rule does not apply to civil partnerships without common minor children.)
Article 94 bis was included in the Civil Code to regulate the care of pets in divorce:
“The judicial authority will entrust the care of the pets to one or both spouses and will determine, where appropriate, how the spouse to whom they have not been entrusted may have them in their company, as well as the distribution of the burdens associated with the care of the animal, taking into account the interest of the family members and the well-being of the animal, regardless of the ownership of the animal and who has been entrusted with its care. This order will be recorded in the corresponding animal identification record.”
It is now possible to arrange for shared time with a pet between both spouses, making it feasible to establish a regulatory agreement that ensures the pet spends equal time living with each partner – for example, one week with one spouse and the next week with the other.
In an amicable separation or through a consensual divorce, the spouses can mutually decide whether the pet will reside with only one of them while granting the other access or if they will divide the pet’s time equally between them.
Spouses have the option to split their time with their pets equally or to establish an unequal arrangement. In the latter case, the pet may live primarily with one spouse, while the other spouse is granted specific days or weekends to visit and spend time with the pet. This visiting arrangement can include certain weekends, holidays, long weekends, or vacation periods.
In the event of a discrepancy, the judge will decide, considering the interests of the family members and the animal’s well-being.
Following the reform carried out by Law 17/2021 on the legal regime for animals, the Civil Code began to consider animals as sentient beings, not mere things. From that moment on, multiple resolutions regulate the spouses’ economic contribution to the burdens associated with animal care; therefore, a monthly maintenance payment can be established to cover this type of expense.
This pension covers all the costs associated with caring for the animal, including, among others:
Shared custody of children will not be granted by the court in cases of domestic abuse upon the spouse or children. Ill-treatment or violence inflicted on animals with the intention to cause pain or control the spouse or children will be regarded as domestic abuse, Article 340, 2b) of the Criminal Code (Código Penal).
In the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime, pets are regarded as sentient beings rather than mere possessions. Consequently, they cannot be divided like other assets. While selling a pet and sharing the profits is allowed, this must be agreed upon by the parties and will not be determined in court. If the spouses cannot agree on selling the pet or who should have custody, the judge will decide the pet’s future. The decision will consider the interests of both owners and the animal’s welfare. The judge may also allocate shared custody and care responsibilities for the pet and associated costs.
On successions, Article 914 of the Civil Code rules that in the absence of a testament, the pet will be given to the inheritor who requests it. If there is no agreement on succession, the pet will be given to a third person (for example, Animal Protection Society) until the inheritors find an agreement. If there is no agreement, the judge will decide the pet’s destiny, paying regard to the welfare requirements of animals and taking the necessary steps to ensure that the animal is handed over to an entity or organisation that will protect it.
Many people leave their pets as heirs, especially when they do not have forced heirs. However, Spanish law is forceful in this regard, and the Spanish legal system does not allow an inheritance to be left to an animal. However, the testator can choose through a will which heir the pet will be with, granting a legacy, for example.
The testator can also appoint the heir on the condition that he takes care of his pet to ensure that the new owner will take care of the pet until his death instead of getting rid of it.
Case Law on Pets
The Judgement nº 526/2023 of Pontevedra High Court (Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra), dated 3 November 2023, orders a maintenance obligation of EUR40 per month for the care of the family pet. This measure was established in the divorce decree in addition to the children’s arrangements.
The case is a divorce, in which, among other measures, it was ordered that the pet would be left in the care of the ex-wife, and her ex-husband would have to pay her maintenance to support part of the pet’s expenses:
“The spouses’ pet will be in the care of Ms. Sagrario, and the extraordinary and veterinary expenses will be paid in half. Mr Pablo will contribute to the cost of the animal with the amount of 40 euros per month, payable in the first five days of each month and updateable annually in accordance with the CPI. “.
The ruling also references the case law of the Spanish Supreme Court (STS nº 257/2013, of 29 April), which states that shared custody for children should be established unless it can be demonstrated that it would be harmful to the minor. Shared custody is not considered an exceptional measure and is viewed as the standard and even preferable arrangement. This approach ensures that children maintain relationships with both parents, even during times of crisis, whenever possible and appropriate.
Pontevedra High Court ordered that children’s arrangements would be regulated through a system of shared custody with weekly exchanges. In addition, provisions were detailed for the Christmas, Easter and summer holidays.
According to the Judgement of Huelva High Court (Audiencia Provincial de Huelva) dated 23 February of 2023: “as it is well known that the rapid affection and subsequent emotional bond that arises with respect to any pet when one lives with it, the equitable distribution between both spouses of the care and possession of the animal, as well as the burdens that this implies, should prevail as a general rule, without taking into account the specific ownership of the same, nor whether this cohabitation may have been more or less extensive unless there are circumstances of sufficient gravity and entity to promote the exception to the general rule.”
The Judgement of Madrid High Court (Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, secc.24), dated 16 March 2023, orders that: “The “animal” belongs to the entire family unit, and its well-being depends on it being with the minors, and consequently with each of the litigating parties, in the periods in which they are entitled to be with their children, according to the established shared custody regime.”
The Judgment of the Supreme Court, number 1015/2024, dated 17 July 2024 (Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Civil), declares that pets are not subject to the same civil procedure rules that apply to proceedings regarding minor children, such as Article 752 of the Law of Civil Procedure (752 LEC). The protection of a child’s best interests is a paramount principle of public order, whereas the protection of pets does not hold the same level of importance.
Children’s Shared Custody in Spain
Following the Spanish Supreme Court case law (STS nº15/2020 of 16 January), the High Court reiterates that in the absence of fundamental causes, the application of shared custody will proceed: “There is no cause in the procedure that advises against shared custody; therefore, it must be established. Article 92 of the Civil Code and the Supreme Court case law are violated since the interest of the affected minors has not been adequately safeguarded in a resolution that has not taken into account the parameters repeatedly established by the Supreme Court for the correct application of the principle of protection of the minor’s interest to order sole custody, which in this case will not allow the daughters’ right to interact with both parents to be effective.”
“On the other hand, as this High Court has already said on numerous previous occasions, the Court does not care so much about the past as much as the present and the future if the father’s involvement was not as intense as the appellant wanted, or considered that it should have been, the opportunity for the father to do so is now, that is, through shared custody.”
The Supreme Court recognises in its ruling of 29 November 2013 that the relationship between the parents is not a crucial factor in the application of this custody regime, and the fundamental thing is always to ensure the child’s best interest: “The relationship between spouses alone are neither relevant nor irrelevant to determine shared custody. They only become relevant when they affect, detrimentally, the interest of the minor”.
Shared custody is becoming the rule on a child’s arrangements at court, and the burden of proof that it is not in the child’s best interest lies in the party that applies for sole custody.
In this sense, the clear exception to the rule for shared custody is that a parent is involved in a criminal investigation for domestic violence or abuse as set out in Articles 94, 4 and 97,2 of the Civil Code:
Article 94.4 of the Civil Code: “The establishment of a visitation or stay regime will not proceed, and if it exists, it will be suspended, with respect to the parent who is involved in a criminal process initiated for attacking the life, physical integrity, freedom, moral integrity or sexual freedom and indemnity of the other spouse or their children. It will also not proceed when the judicial authority notices, from the allegations of the parties and the evidence produced, the existence of well-founded indications of domestic or gender violence. However, the judicial authority may establish a visitation, communication or stay regime in a resolution motivated by the best interest of the minor and after evaluating the situation of the parent-child relationship.”
Article 92. 7 of the Civil Code: “Joint custody will not apply when one of the parents is involved in a criminal process initiated for attempting to attack the life, physical integrity, freedom, moral integrity or sexual freedom and indemnity of the other spouse or the children. It will also not apply when the judge notes, from the allegations of the parties and the evidence produced, the existence of well-founded indications of domestic or gender violence. For these purposes, the existence of mistreatment of animals, or the threat of causing it, will also be considered as a form of controlling or victimising any of these people.”
Calle Doctor Manuel Perez Bryan, 3-6
E-29005 Malaga
Spain
+34 678 50 88 91
amparo@arbaizarabogados.com www.arbaizarabogados.com