In Argentina, there are neither grounds for terminating marriage nor a required period of personal separation before for filing a divorce.
Argentina is a codified law jurisdiction. Its Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) has eliminated any form of fault-alleging by either of the spouses and, therefore, the possibility of initiating claims for damages (against the other spouse) is not allowed.
Divorce Proceedings
Either spouse may file, unilaterally or jointly, a divorce procedure. If a unilateral procedure has been filed, the parties may have an uncontested divorce. However, the judge will rule the same way as in a joint procedure, as there are no grounds for divorce.
Argentine law has recognised marriage between same-sex couples since 2010, so the same marital regime will apply in such cases. Adoption is also allowed for same-sex couples under the same terms as those required for heterosexual couples. Same-sex marriage and cohabitation have been recognised and enforced since 2015, with the sanction of the CCC.
The divorce process is initiated by filing a petition with the court based on the principle of the last marital domicile. This can be done by both spouses together (joint petition) or by one spouse alone (unilateral petition). A divorce petition can be filed at any time after marriage, as there are no required separation periods or specific grounds needed to request a divorce. If both parties agree on the terms, the court can issue a divorce decree within a period of two to three months. The divorce becomes official once the court’s decision is registered in the Civil Registry of the jurisdiction where the marriage took place.
The rule for service of divorce proceedings is the last effective marital domicile or the domicile of the defendant spouse, at the plaintiff spouse’s discretion. If one of the spouses does not have a domicile in Argentina, the action may be brought before the court of the last domicile they had within Argentina, provided the marriage was celebrated there. If the location of the last marital domicile cannot be established, the general rules of jurisdiction will apply.
Religious Marriages
Religious marriages have no legal effects in Argentina. In the Catholic Church, there is no divorce or separation. However, there is the annulment of marriage. Divorced Catholics can marry in the church only if it has been demonstrated through the church’s internal process that they are free to marry. This also applies to non-Catholics who wish to marry a Catholic or convert to Catholicism.
Marriage Annulment
The annulment of a marriage is another process that spouses may file in relation to ending a marriage. When any of the grounds established by law arise, it is possible to request the annulment of a civil marriage, meaning it will be rendered null and void. Unlike divorce, when a marriage is declared null, it is as if it never existed. The grounds for declaring the annulment of a civil marriage are:
The annulment is processed through legal proceedings before a judge. The process begins with a lawsuit, for which presenting the marriage certificate is a fundamental requirement. Once the marriage is annulled, all reciprocal rights and obligations arising from it cease as of the same day. If bad faith is proven in one of the spouses, they will be obligated to compensate the other for all damage caused.
Separation of Assets
Under the CCC, there is no judicial process under which spouses can obtain a separation sentence other than liquidation of marital assets. Separation of assets refers to a resolution by which the communal marital assets are divided between the spouses, who continue to be married under a different marital asset system (the separated patrimony system).
However, a process of judicial separation of marital assets may be filed in case spouses intend to extinguish the marital assets and for some reason (ie, religious) they do not want to file for divorce. The judicial separation of assets may be requested by one of the spouses:
The law of the last marital domicile determines the applicable law and court jurisdiction in divorce cases and all matters concerning marriage nullity. Argentina adopted a federal system of government in which each of the 23 provinces (and the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires) has its own procedural law. Thus, the applicable law is always the CCC, and the court with jurisdiction is the provincial court where the last marriage residence was settled. The same grounds apply to same-sex marriages.
A party to a divorce may contest jurisdiction if the last marriage domicile is not in Argentina.
Marriage dissolution procedures are governed by the spouses’ last marital residence law. However, if the last marital residence was in a foreign country, the parties may file for divorce in that country and then register the resolution at the local register. An Argentine judge’s intervention is needed to receive all foreign-certified divorce documents.
Foreign divorces are recognised when the sentence is issued according to the last marital domicile principle. Therefore, if the last marital residence is located in a different jurisdiction, spouses must register the divorce resolution before the Argentine Civil Registry with the intervention of an Argentine judge who will have received all certified divorce documents filed by the interested party.
Notably, if there are proceedings in another jurisdiction, the proceedings filed in Argentina can be stayed until the jurisdictional dispute has been resolved. The CCC incorporates the international legal principle of avoiding contradictory rulings over the same matter passed by different courts.
It is important to mention that the court’s role in divorce proceedings is limited to supervising that rules of public order (normas de orden público) have not been infringed and to ensure, upon petition, a fair resolution of the unresolved effects of the divorce (either patrimonial or not). Having said that, upon petition, financial orders to enforce child support and financial orders to liquidate and distribute marital assets can both be made on divorce.
The choice of divorce orders and how to obtain them from the courts are ruled in the CCC and in each province’s Civil and Commercial Procedure Codes.
The divorce decree shall rule regarding the communication regime when minors are involved (under 18 years old) and the attribution of the family home (according to the rules established in the CCC). If petitioned, the court will only order temporary and exceptional spousal maintenance or compensation obligations.
Any spouse may file preventive measures on child support or custody before or during the divorce procedure to ensure financial orders.
First, a foreign divorce decree needs to be recognised in Argentina – for which, summary information known as an “exequatur” must be made whereby an Argentine judge, once they have verified that all the requirements are met (ie, no breach of public order rules and does not oppose another decree passed in Argentina), orders the registration of the divorce in the corresponding Argentine Civil Registry. If bilateral international treaties have been signed, said rules shall apply.
Financial claims may be related to immovable assets located in Argentina and to enforcing child maintenance.
It is important to mention that a foreign financial decree duly certified in its jurisdiction can be enforced if:
Financial settlements must go through a prejudicial mediation process before filing in court. If no agreement is reached, filing the complaint in court is permitted in order to be served. There is no arbitration in family law matters.
Under the CCC, when a divorce occurs, assets can be divided either through the court or privately. The court does not have to address marital regimes in the divorce decree; instead, the parties can privately settle the liquidation of their marital property. They can agree on how to distribute the assets between themselves. Alternatively, if needed, either or both parties may file a petition for a judicial liquidation and distribution procedure.
The CCC includes two forms of marital estate: property earned or purchased by the husband or wife during the marriage. This marital property can then be classified as marital estate administered by the husband during the marriage and marital estate administered by the wife during the marriage, regardless of who holds title over the specific good. This means that any spouse can hold the title of a property, which is still considered marital estate – although it will be administered by the spouse holding its title. The marital estate also comprises all assets under the names of companies or third parties that have been established using marital assets or because of the liquidation of marital assets.
When a marriage is terminated (due to death or divorce), the assets that qualify as shared/marital property are grouped together. After the applicable liabilities and claims of each spouse have been worked out (which may include compensation for the differences in the value of the property), they are divided and distributed equally between the spouses (in case of divorce) or between the heirs and the surviving spouse (in case of death).
Trusts
Argentine law recognises the concept of trusts. Although Argentina has not signed the Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and Their Recognition (1985), some court precedents acknowledge the existence and enforceability of foreign trusts, provided that such trusts do not violate Argentine public order (eg, rules regarding inheritance for descendants and spouses).
Regulations or by-laws of a trust cannot override the forced heirship rule. As this rule is part of public order, any provisions or structures (such as trusts) that conflict with it can be challenged in court. Argentine law offers legal remedies for cases where a forced heir has been negatively affected regarding the forced share they are entitled to receive. In this context, any heir is entitled to file a collatio bonorum claim, which involves joining the assets together into a common fund.
There are precedents from Argentine courts where forced heirship claims have been admitted against trust assets where the legitimate portion of one of them was infringed.
The case of Vogelius, Angelina y otros c/Vogelius, Federico y otros
In this case, the Supreme Court of Argentina ruled that even though a trust was established in the UK with assets located there, the succession must be governed by Argentine civil law. The court addressed the issue of collatio bonorum (accounting for gifts made during the settlor’s lifetime) and determined that a trust created to benefit a forced heir of the settlor might be classified as a gift to that heir made prior to the settlor’s death. Consequently, this trust must be included in the estate’s accounting, as its implications go beyond what is allowed under inheritance law.
Regarding private international law matters, the court established that even though the trust was governed by UK law, the succession was subject to Argentine law because the deceased was last domiciled in Argentina.
The CCC establishes spousal maintenance or economic compensation in exceptional and temporary circumstances, including:
Compensation may consist of a one-time benefit, an income for a specified time or, exceptionally, an income for an indefinite period. Financial compensation claims have a six-month statutory limit after the divorce decree has been issued.
Under the CCC, marital agreements (conventions) are accepted under Argentine law. For such agreements to be valid, the marriage must be celebrated, and the agreements are required to determine:
These agreements need to be signed by public deed. Argentina has only two marital property regimes: the community property and the separate property regime. The community regime acts principally as the default regime if spouses keep silent on which regime they adopt. Also, spouses may change the matrimonial property adopted (only from a community regime to a separate regime and vice versa) within a year of marriage or once a year has passed since the last change.
If foreign prenuptial agreements are made, they must adhere to CCC regulations and be filed and registered with the Civil Registry if the marriage celebrated in another country is also registered in Argentina.
No postnuptial agreements are recognised by law. However, some private postnuptial agreements may be agreed upon by the spouses when a private separation and liquidation of the marital assets is signed.
For (pre)marital agreements to be enforceable, they must be documented through a public deed, and their content must comply with legal requirements. Courts have seen cases challenging whether the proper formal procedures were followed. Due to the variety of clauses included in these agreements, there is no significant case law.
The CCC recognises certain rights for cohabitants – between unmarried couples – provided they have been together for at least two years. Through “cohabitation agreements” (pacto de convivencia), domestic partners can regulate different aspects of their lives together, such as economic aspects for distributing property and other responsibilities.
The CCC also provides protection for the family home and, if one partner dies, the survivor is granted the right to free housing in the home they shared for a period of two years. The law recognises other partial effects on partners (ie, social security and pension rights); however, the legal recognition provided for them is restricted. Partners or cohabitants do not have inheritance rights; therefore, a testator/testatrix may dispose of their wealth to the partner up to the disposable portion (one-third of the estate).
Under the CCC, a cohabitant with no children who suffers a clear imbalance in their economic situation (due to the end of the cohabitation) may claim economic compensation before the court within six months of the breakdown.
Upon petition, to ensure financial orders regarding enforcement of child support or economic compensation, the execution of a court’s ruling may include seizure, lien or restraint of assets.
Execution of a court’s ruling may include seizure, lien or restraint of assets (depending on the local jurisdiction where the procedure has been filed).
In Argentina, traditional methods to ensure child support fulfilment were ineffective. For this reason, additional approaches have been adopted to ensure that those responsible fulfil their obligations. Following the commitment adopted by Argentina to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, a Registry of Child Support Debtors was created.
In this way, the Registry seeks to ensure that debtors fulfil their obligation to pay child support, with a focus on the well-being of minors. Due to the challenges in achieving positive outcomes through enforcement actions, sanctions are applied to encourage debtors to rectify their situation.
International enforcement of a financial order is permitted in Argentina, following international regulations and special procedures.
When minors are involved, the law prohibits the publication, dissemination or advertising of certain facts related to individuals under the age of 18.
Proceedings are set out in public files. However, family proceedings are reserved files, and only the parties involved have access to them.
There is no ADR in Argentina. However, parties could reach private agreements with legal counsellors in order to resolve financial matters.
For children proceedings, the jurisdictional grounds are the same for marriage and financial cases.
It is important to note that the last domicile will give the judge grounds to decide the children’s proceedings and which of the spouses will remain in the family home. As such, the judge considers the following concepts:
Communication and Contact Arrangements
If there is no (private) agreement between the parents through a parental agreement, the judge will decide on the “communication agreement”. The contract agreement shall address the following:
When courts approach an application for child support or related matters in the context of family law, they generally follow a process that ensures the child’s best interests are prioritised. For a general overview of how courts typically handle such applications, please see 3.1 Choice of Jurisdiction in Children Proceedings.
Following the breakdown of a relationship or marriage, the legal approach to custody and parental responsibility focuses on ensuring the children’s best interests are upheld. The courts typically follow a structured process determined by the CCC when determining custody and the allocation of parental responsibility.
In Argentina, there are certain restrictions on the court’s ability to make orders regarding a child’s living and contact arrangements, particularly to ensure the child’s best interests are always the primary consideration. These restrictions are in place to protect the child’s welfare and ensure that decisions regarding custody and visitation are not harmful to the child’s emotional, physical or psychological development.
Child Maintenance
In Argentina, child maintenance (alimentos) is defined as the financial support that one parent provides to the other for the care, upbringing, and welfare of their children after the breakdown of a relationship or marriage. The obligation to provide maintenance arises from the legal duty of parents to support their children, ensuring they have access to the basic needs necessary for their development, such as food, clothing, education, health, and shelter.
The child maintenance applies to both biological parents, regardless of marital status or relationship. Alimentos shall include:
Parents are expected to share the responsibility for maintaining their children, and the law recognises that these duties do not end when the child reaches adulthood in certain situations – for example, if the child is still studying or is unable to support themselves.
The parents’ incomes and the financial agreements between the spouses in a divorce directly affect the calculation of child maintenance.
While there is no fixed formula for calculating child maintenance in Argentina, the law typically sets out a percentage of the non-custodial parent’s income, which the court may adjust based on the child’s needs and the financial ability of both parents. By way of example, child maintenance may range between 15% and 25% of the non-custodial parent’s income, depending on the number of children and other relevant factors. The percentage may increase or be adjusted if there is more than one child. In cases where the parents are not in agreement about the amount of maintenance, a judge will evaluate the parents’ incomes, the needs of the child, and other factors to determine an appropriate maintenance amount.
In joint or shared custody cases, where the child spends an equal amount of time with both parents, the amount of maintenance may be adjusted, with both parents contributing proportionally to the child’s needs. The court will consider both parents’ incomes and the practicalities of care and financial support.
As described previously, parents may address child maintenance arrangements privately and then seek the judge’s acknowledgement.
Permanent and temporary maintenance orders
In Argentina, the court can issue both temporary and permanent maintenance orders, which are granted while a case is still pending, ensuring that the child’s needs are met before a final decision is made. The weaker party typically requests this type of order. Conversely, permanent maintenance orders are established once a final decision is reached and remain in effect until the child turns 18 or until there is a change in circumstances.
In Argentina, child maintenance orders generally last until the child reaches the age of 21 (unless the adult child has sufficient resources to provide for themselves). However, there are exceptions and, in some cases, the maintenance obligation can extend beyond this age limit until the child reaches the age of 25 (for children attending university or vocational school and if they cannot support themselves). Moreover, beyond the age of 21, if the child is incapacitated or unable to work due to a physical or mental condition, the parent may still be required to provide maintenance, regardless of the child’s age (on a case-by-case basis).
The minimum age for a child to be able to apply for maintenance directly in Argentina is 18 years old, as this is the age of legal majority and the capacity to make independent legal decisions.
Medical treatments
It is important to highlight that under the CCC, there is a presumption that children between the ages of 13 and 16 can make decisions regarding non-invasive medical treatments that do not compromise their health or pose a serious risk to their lives or physical integrity.
For invasive treatments that do compromise their health, or when their integrity or life is at risk, the adolescent must give their consent with the assistance of their parents. In the event of a conflict between the parents, the matter is resolved by prioritising the adolescent’s best interests based on medical opinions regarding the consequences of carrying out or not carrying out the medical procedure.
Courts in Argentina have the authority to issue orders regarding the upbringing of a child when parents have not reached an agreement regarding schooling, medical care, religion and holidays.
In Argentina, courts consider allegations of parental alienation to be a restrictive matter that considers the best interests of the child (as a public order rule). The factors to be considered are:
In respect of parental alienation, the court may also:
When parental alienation is established, the court can take measures such as adjusting custody or visitation arrangements, mandating therapy, or imposing penalties on the alienating parent to safeguard the child’s welfare.
Once again, the principle of protecting the child’s well-being applies to children giving evidence in court. The CCC grants children the right to be heard in legal proceedings affecting them – taking into account their age, maturity and level of understanding.
Ultimately, the court uses the child’s testimony as one of several factors to determine the course of action that best aligns with the child’s rights and welfare.
Mediation is a well-established mechanism that helps parties resolve all family disputes (including child support, spousal maintenance and marital asset division). It is a widely used ADR method in Argentina. Mediation involves a neutral third party (the mediator) who facilitates communication and negotiation between the parties to reach a mutually agreeable solution. The rule of confidentiality allows parties to negotiate freely without fear that their discussions will be used against them in court.
The law also allows private agreements to be settled by the parties with the participation of legal advice as a requirement.
In many provinces in Argentina, both mediation and private agreements are mandated by law as a prerequisite to filing certain types of court cases, including financial disputes.
In Argentina, reporting cases involving children is highly restricted to protect their privacy and safeguard their best interests. Both parents and public child advocate may request anonymisation of the proceedings. The applicable regulations are:
Media outlets are prohibited from publishing names, photographs or any identifying details about the child or their family. Violations of these rules can result in legal penalties, including fines or sanctions for the publication.
Anonymity
All case reports will anonymise children’s information to protect their identity. Names and other identifying details, such as addresses, school names or photographs, will be redacted or replaced with initials or pseudonyms in all official records and public communications.
In family law cases, proceedings involving children are automatically anonymised as a matter of law to protect their privacy and dignity. Parents may still wish to ensure further anonymisation or privacy.
If any party, media outlet or individual breaches confidentiality rules, the court may impose fines or sanctions. The offending party may face additional legal consequences.
Esmeralda 1061 PB
C1007ABM
Buenos Aires
Argentina
+54 11 7078 1112
+54 11 7078 1112
info@estudiomcewan.com.ar www.estudiomcewan.com.ar
Choice of Matrimonial Property Regime in Argentina
Why choosing (or not choosing) a matrimonial property regime matters
Argentine law has progressively evolved in order to align with contemporary social and economic realities and with legal practices commonly adopted across civil law jurisdictions.
In the same way that the legal system has strengthened autonomy of will in matters of succession planning and family organisation, it has also modernised the rules governing marriage. Since the entry into force of the Argentine Civil and Commercial Code (Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación – CCyC), the system has expressly recognised broader party autonomy in the patrimonial dimension of marriage. Specifically, future spouses may choose between two matrimonial property regimes and formalise that choice through marital agreements (convenciones matrimoniales), which are subject to a restrictive numerus clausus.
However, this autonomy is not unlimited. The CCyC adopts a closed-option model: spouses may opt either for (i) the community of gains regime (régimen de comunidad/ganancialidad) or (ii) the separation of property regime (régimen de separación de bienes). Where the parties do not validly choose separation of property, the law provides that the default legal regime shall be the community of gains regime.
Accordingly, marriage does not merely create a civil status and a set of personal and family duties; it also establishes a patrimonial framework that has immediate effects between spouses and, in many cases, vis-à-vis third parties (creditors, purchasers and public registries, among others).
In practice, the choice of regime has a direct impact on sensitive issues that affect the spouses throughout married life, including:
This decision therefore requires careful consideration of the legal consequences attached to each regime. Many couples marry without realising that, if no express election is made, they will automatically be subject to the legal default regime of community of gains; and that if they later wish to change regimes, the CCyC allows such change only under strict formal and temporal requirements.
This contribution reviews the current Argentine framework and the alternatives provided by the CCyC, focusing on marital agreements, their legal nature, permitted content, validity requirements and the possibility of modifying the matrimonial property regime after marriage.
The alternatives under the CCyC
The CCyC sets out clear rules on the matrimonial property regime. Title II, which regulates patrimonial relations between spouses, is divided into three chapters: (i) general provisions applicable to both regimes; (ii) a specific chapter on the community regime; and (iii) a specific chapter on the separation of property regime.
Within the general provisions, the Code introduces marital agreements as the mechanism through which future spouses may, before marrying, agree on certain matters that will govern their patrimonial relationship.
Marital agreements: concept, legal nature and limits
As stated above, the CCyC grants a degree of autonomy of will by allowing future spouses, prior to marriage, to enter into marital agreements. However, this autonomy is strictly limited: the subject matter of such agreements is confined to the matters expressly listed in Article 446 CCyC.
Those matters are:
This framework shows two core features. First, the legislature authorises party autonomy, but only within a closed statutory system. Second, the instrument serves purposes of publicity, evidentiary certainty and predictability, both for the spouses and, in relation to the matrimonial property regime, for third parties.
From a systematic standpoint, marital agreements are contracts with a family-law subject matter, but with restricted party autonomy. Their effectiveness is causally linked to the celebration of the marriage: they do not fully operate if the marriage is not celebrated or is later annulled, without prejudice to the nuances of nullity and good faith.
They are also formal legal acts, binding upon the parties, which must be executed and performed in good faith.
Article 448 CCyC establishes the formal validity requirement: marital agreements must be executed by public deed (escritura pública) prior to marriage. They become effective upon the celebration of the marriage, provided the marriage is not annulled.
This requirement is not merely evidentiary; it is constitutive. In the absence of a public deed, the marital agreement is ineffective as such.
Furthermore, where the agreement includes the election of the matrimonial property regime, that election must be recorded by marginal annotation in the marriage record in order to be enforceable against third parties.
This legal nature explains why notarial and registry practice tends to be particularly strict with respect to compliance with form and correct registration.
At stake is transactional legal certainty: a creditor or third-party contracting party must be able to ascertain which regime applies, as this determination affects key rules on liability and enforcement.
From a professional perspective, it is not sufficient to treat the execution of the public deed as the end of the process; it is essential to ensure that the regime election is properly recorded in the relevant marriage registry, to prevent future disputes.
Can a marital agreement be modified?
The CCyC introduces limited flexibility by allowing spouses to modify the matrimonial property regime after one year of application of the existing regime, counted from the celebration of the marriage. Such modification must likewise be made by agreement between the spouses, executed by public deed, and recorded by marginal annotation in the marriage record in order to be enforceable against third parties.
Additionally, the law provides specific protection for pre-existing creditors who may be adversely affected: they may request that the change be declared unenforceable against them within the statutory time limit, calculated from the moment they became aware of the change (as provided by the relevant provision).
In practical terms, changing the regime is not an automatic shield against existing debts. If the change is used as a means to frustrate third-party rights, the legal system provides mechanisms to neutralise its effects vis-à-vis affected creditors.
Content: what may – and may not – be validly included in a marital agreement
A common question in practice is: “May we agree on anything we want regarding property?” The legal answer is no. If the agreement addresses matters beyond Article 446 CCyC, the relevant clause is ineffective and, depending on the circumstances, may impact the agreement’s validity or severability.
Accordingly, spouses may include only clauses that fall within the expressly permitted categories.
Identification and valuation of contributed assets
The agreement may include an inventory and valuation of assets owned by each party prior to marriage. By way of example, the spouses may agree on clauses identifying each asset, assigning a valuation or stating the origin of ownership. This serves several purposes:
From a practical standpoint, inventories should be as detailed as possible. Generic descriptions (eg, “a car” or “household furniture”) often lead to litigation.
Disclosure of debts
Debt disclosure functions as an informative declaration: it makes pre-existing liabilities visible, promotes transparency, and may influence subsequent discussions regarding liability and reimbursements. It can be evidentially relevant, especially if disputes later arise as to whether a debt was incurred before or during the marriage and for what purpose.
It may also refer to reimbursement consequences associated with such debts or their impact on the enforceability of claims against the family home.
Donations between future spouses
The CCyC allows donations between future spouses. In practice, such donations may serve multiple purposes – facilitating housing, balancing contributions, or supporting a business venture. As with any gratuitous transfer, they must be carefully assessed in light of patrimonial and succession consequences, potential future reduction claims and, where applicable, collation.
The central clause: election of the matrimonial property regime
The principal feature of marital agreements is the ability to formalise the election of the matrimonial property regime. The parties may confirm the community regime (which would apply by default) or elect the separation of property regime, which operates under the closed statutory framework established by the Code.
What cannot be included
Marital agreements cannot validly include clauses purporting to create binding obligations such as:
This does not prevent spouses from using other lawful instruments (eg, corporate structures, trusts, donations within legal limits or testamentary planning), but such measures cannot be included within a marital agreement as if it were a “comprehensive patrimonial contract”.
Validity, capacity and legal scrutiny: essential requirements
Beyond form and publicity, general principles govern validity.
Permitted regimes
Community of gains (default legal regime)
As a rule, if the parties do not validly elect separation, the community regime applies. Legal doctrine often refers to this as “community of gains”. Functionally:
Under this regime, the key issue is not merely title, but asset characterisation (separate versus community), management powers, limits on disposition, and the consequences upon dissolution (divorce, annulment, death, etc). In family litigation, characterisation and traceability of assets often become central evidentiary issues.
Separation of property (conventional regime)
As mentioned, the alternative regime is one of separation of property, adopted by express election through a marital agreement prior to marriage or through a later modification.
Its guiding principles are:
Functional comparison between community and separation
Asset management and disposition
Under community, the law establishes specific rules on administration and limits on disposition, particularly regarding registrable assets, the family home, or acts affecting family interests. In practice, this often entails stricter requirements for spousal consent and control.
Under separation, each spouse manages and disposes of their assets, subject to limitations arising from the primary regime (including protection of the family home and duties of contribution).
Liability for debts
This issue often motivates the choice of separation. However, it should not be approached simplistically. Even under separation, obligations linked to the satisfaction of family needs may give rise to concurrent or joint liability, depending on the circumstances and the source of the obligation, together with the protection afforded to good-faith third parties.
Under community, depending on the origin of the debt and its relationship with family interests or the administration of community assets, liability may extend to community assets or, in some cases, to separate assets. Legal advice should therefore be tailored to the case (activity, risk exposure, patrimonial structure, expected indebtedness, etc).
Dissolution: liquidation and partition
Under community, dissolution requires liquidation and partition of the community pool, including characterisation of separate and community assets, reimbursements and interspousal credits. This process may be straightforward or highly complex depending on the patrimonial structure (family businesses, significant unregistered assets, assets abroad, untraceable cash flows, etc).
Under separation, there is no community pool to be divided; nonetheless, disputes may still arise (co-ownership, interspousal claims, proof of contributions, family home disputes, post-divorce economic compensation – which is distinct from the patrimonial regime – and maintenance issues).
Practical criteria for choosing between community and separation
In practice, there is no universally “best” regime. The appropriate choice depends on the family’s needs and the spouses’ patrimonial and life project. The following sets out an example.
Situations where separation is commonly recommended:
Situations where community may be functional:
However, while separation may reduce certain disputes typical of community liquidation, it may intensify others (co-ownership disputes, evidentiary issues regarding contributions, credit claims, improvements to separate property, loan repayments and, outside the patrimonial regime, economic compensation). For that reason, separation should ideally be accompanied by systematic documentation of ownership and contributions.
Adequate legal advice is recommended so that spouses can make an informed decision and fully understand the consequences of each regime.
Marital agreements versus cohabitation agreements (cohabitation unions)
By way of comparison, the CCyC recognises cohabitation unions in Title III and allows cohabitation agreements.
In this regard, it allows cohabitants to enter into agreements to regulate certain aspects of their life together.
Unlike marital agreements, cohabitation agreements may cover a broader scope, reflecting genuine autonomy of will rather than a closed list. Article 514 provides that such agreements may regulate, among other matters:
The expression “among other matters” broadens the range of permissible provisions, allowing regulation of matters such as allocation of expenses, residence, household assets, children’s residence, co-ordination of family income, and economic compensation upon separation – covering both personal and patrimonial aspects.
The only limits are public policy, equality between partners, and the protection of fundamental rights.
To be effective against third parties, the cohabitation union must be registered together with the agreement, which must be in writing. If the agreement involves real estate or other registrable assets, it must be executed by public deed. It may also be amended or terminated by mutual agreement without further restrictions.
Accordingly, cohabitation agreements allow broader regulation of the relationship and may facilitate a less contentious asset division upon separation.
Conclusions
Argentine matrimonial property law currently offers two clear alternatives: the community of gains regime (default legal regime) and the separation of property regime (conventional regime). The principal mechanism to exercise that choice is the marital agreement, whose object is strictly limited to Article 446 CCyC and whose validity requires execution by public deed prior to marriage, taking effect upon celebration and requiring registry publicity to be enforceable against third parties.
Although the CCyC expanded party autonomy, the system remains a closed-option model, as the election is limited to the two regimes under exclusive statutory conditions.
Moreover, as discussed, the regime may be modified subject to strict requirements: after one year of application of the existing regime, by public deed, with marginal annotation, and with specific safeguards for pre-existing creditors adversely affected, pursuant to Article 449 CCyC.
From a practical standpoint, the recommended approach is preventive: to assess each party’s patrimonial situation, identify assets, debts and risks, and then align the election with the family project through proper documentation.
It should be understood that failing to elect a regime results, in practice, in the application of the default regime.
With adequate information and advice, proper formalisation, and registry publicity, the matrimonial property regime can become a tool for order, predictability, and dispute prevention, without undermining the protection afforded to the family and to third parties.
Esmeralda 1061 PB
C1007ABM
Buenos Aires
Argentina
+54 11 7078 1112
+54 11 7078 1112
info@estudiomcewan.com.ar www.estudiomcewan.com.ar