The White Paper and Recent Changes
In April 2023, the government published its long-awaited White Paper, “High Stakes: Gambling Reform for the Digital Age” (the “White Paper”). The highly anticipated White Paper formed part of the review of the Gambling Act 2005 that was launched by the UK government in December 2020 and designed to “protect vulnerable users in [a] smartphone era” by striking a better balance between consumer freedoms and the protection of the vulnerable.
The White Paper detailed more than 60 proposals. Since publication, significant progress has been made with a number of White Paper proposals coming into effect through a combination of primary and secondary legislation, changes to the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP), and voluntary commitments.
Key changes that have been implemented further to the White Paper include the following.
Upcoming changes emanating from the White Paper
At the time of writing (November 2025), the following changes are scheduled.
Awaited changes
Several proposals were made in the White Paper that are still awaiting progress. These include the following.
AML
In the past year, changes have been made to AML legislation impacting the AML/CFT obligations of licensees. The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) was updated in July 2025 by separate legislation to increase the threshold amount for submitting a defence against money laundering to GBP3,000.
In April 2025 and October 2025, the Gambling Commission published emerging risk updates, identifying emerging money laundering and terrorist financing risks in the gambling industry. The risks identified include:
The emerging risks are expected to be considered by operators when conducting their money laundering, terrorist and proliferation financing risk assessments. In July 2025, HM Treasury published an updated National Risk Assessment, which – notably – increased the money laundering risk of casinos from “low” to “medium”.
In October 2025, the Gambling Commission updated its casino AML guidance to include changes to The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 and changes to POCA, as well as the Gambling Commission’s expectation that operators must give due consideration to money-laundering risks posed by their business-to-business relationships.
Tax
The Labour government’s budget announced on 30 October 2024 did not increase UK gambling taxes. However, the government plans to reform, consolidate and simplify the current structure for remote gambling. At the time of writing, it is expected that the Labour government’s Autumn Budget (to be delivered on 26 November 2025) will increase UK gambling taxes.
Personal Accountability of Management
On 29 November 2024, Licence Condition 1.2.1 of the LCCP was amended to clarify and increase personal management licence (PML) coverage. The changes include:
The following online sectors are regulated in Great Britain:
Free-to-play social gaming is not regulated. The Gambling Commission concluded, following a scoping review in 2015, that the sector did not require regulation but would continue to be monitored by the Gambling Commission for any potential risks.
Please refer to 2.2 Land-Based Gambling for product definitions.
The following land-based sectors are regulated in Great Britain.
The key legislation applicable to the gambling sector is as follows:
The Gambling Act 2005 is set out as follows:
The LCCP is issued under Section 24 of the Gambling Act 2005 and is, in the authors’ opinion, the key reference document with which all licence holders should familiarise themselves.
Gambling, per the Gambling Act 2005, means gaming, betting or participating in a lottery.
Gaming means “playing a game of chance for a prize”, including games where the chance element can be eliminated by superlative skill. “Prize” constitutes money or money’s worth and “playing” means a chance of winning, irrespective of whether there is a risk of any loss.
Betting means the making of, or acceptance of, bets on:
Subcategories of betting include:
Lotteries are classed as “simple” or “complex” and they cannot be run for private or commercial gain. Lotteries are “simple” if:
Complex lotteries differ on the point of prize allocation, whereby prizes are allocated by a series of processes – the first of which relies wholly on chance.
Subcategories of lotteries include:
The Gambling Act 2005 also addresses the following cross-category activities in the event that products satisfy more than one of the above-mentioned definitions of gambling:
Land-based gambling is not specifically defined under the Gambling Act 2005.
Online gambling is referred to as “remote gambling” and means “gambling in which persons participate by the use of remote communication”. Remote communication includes:
Part 3 of the Gambling Act 2005 covers all offences; however, one of the key offences is providing facilities for gambling (Section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005, Section 33):
“Providing facilities for gambling” occurs where a person either:
Other key offences of note include:
As part of its focus on tackling unlicensed gambling, the Gambling Commission will be given new powers to disrupt illegal gambling. For further details, please see 9.5 Sanctions/Penalties for advertising sanctions and penalties and the UK Trends and Developments chapter.
The penalties for the key offences listed in 3.5 Key Offences and 9.5 Sanctions/Penalties are a maximum of 51 weeks’ imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.
The Gambling Commission and various licensing authorities enforce the Gambling Act 2005. Under Part 2 of the Gambling Act 2005, the Gambling Commission’s primary functions include:
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) regulates gambling advertising in the UK. For further details, see 11. Enforcement.
The Gambling Commission’s approach to regulation is risk-based, with the aim of continuing to raise standards. The Gambling Commission indicated in its three-year corporate strategy for 2024–27 that its five strategic focus areas are:
The types of licences are:
Generally, the operating licence types are:
The Gambling Act 2005 enables the Gambling Commission to authorise all regulated land-based and online activities outlined in 2.1 OnlineGambling and 2.2 Land-Based Gambling, including gambling software. Licences authorising multiple licensable activities (for instance, bingo and casino) are classed as a “combined operating licence”. Subject to exceptions, licences are also amenable to “umbrella” arrangements for those acting in the course of another’s business. “Umbrella” arrangements are approved at the Gambling Commission’s discretion following a review of various factors, including:
See also 6. Online Gambling.
Premises Licences
Premises licences – issued by the relevant licensing authority (not the Gambling Commission) – are available, authorising the following activities:
See 5.1 Premises Licensing for requirements.
Operating licences and personal licences are readily available, subject to the fulfilment of application criteria and the payment of the application fee.
Land-based casino premises licences are subcategorised into “small”, “large”, “converted” and “extended converted”. Converted casino premises licences were awarded under the repealed Gaming Act 1968. They may be moved to alternative premises within the same licensing authority area, but there are no new licences available. Extended converted casinos premises licences apply to converted casinos that have exercised their rights to extended entitlements set out in Schedule 4 of the Gambling Act 2005 (Commencement No 6 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2006 (amended by the Gambling Act 2005 (Commencement No 6 and Transitional Provisions) (Amendment) Order 2025). Sixteen “small” and “large” casino premises licences were issued under the Gambling Act 2005 and awarded by the relevant licensing authority area following a public competition. To date, four of the large casino premises licences have been awarded, with one casino since closing. The White Paper proposes to reallocate any unused Gambling Act 2005 casino premises licences to other local authority areas (see 4.3 Types of Licences (Premises Licences)).
Pursuant to Section 110 of the Gambling Act 2005, operating licences are indefinite in duration, subject to the payment of annual fees and compliance with licence terms and conditions.
Key Application Requirements for Operators
Operating licence applications must be submitted to the Gambling Commission, which will conduct an extensive investigation (having regard to the licensing objectives) in order to determine the applicant’s suitability to carry out the licensed activities. The Gambling Commission broadly uses the following principles of suitability to assess any application:
Section 69(2) of the Gambling Act 2005 requires that operating licence applications:
Currently, there are no server location or data storage obligations.
Furthermore, the Gambling Commission introduced a strict policy in April 2018 to reject incomplete applications.
Key Differences Between Application Requirements for Land-Based and Online Operators
Land-based casinos are generally considered to be a high-impact activity in terms of the Gambling Commission’s work, which means that applications may attract a high level of scrutiny and interest. In addition, non-remote casino operating licence applications must be accompanied by a casino premises licence application, which must be submitted to the licensing authority of the area in which the premises are situated.
Subject to full information being provided, Gambling Commission guidance indicates that operating licence applications take approximately 16 weeks to process – although the Gambling Commission acknowledges on its website that applications may take longer. These timescales may be affected by the quality and complexity of the application, suitability of the applicant or those relevant to the application, demand and caseworker availability, links to other applications, and links to any existing licence reviews.
In 2024–25, 156 new operating licence applications were submitted and 75% were processed within 16 weeks.
Application fees for operating licences are determined by the types of activities and financial projections for the first year. These can be calculated using the Gambling Commission’s online fees calculator. As announced in the White Paper, fees are expected to increase. At the time of writing (November 2025), a consultation is awaited and likely to take place in 2026.
Annual fees are determined in the same way as application fees (outlined in 4.8 Application Fees). Annual fees may be found on the Gambling Commission’s website or may be calculated using the online fees calculator.
Types of Authorisations and Licences
Personal Licences
Personal licences are issued by the Gambling Commission under Section 80 and Part 6 of the Gambling Act 2005 and governed by Part 3 of the LCCP. They allow the Gambling Commission to regulate individuals occupying specific roles and/or responsible for certain activities, and to hold them to account for failings, including any inadvertent or deliberate breaches of the LCCP committed by a gambling business.
The two types of personal licences are:
At the time of writing, the LCCP requires persons with responsibility for any of the following specified management offices – as listed in Licence Condition 1.2.1 of the LCCP – to hold a PML:
The Gambling Commission will also assess, on a case-by-case basis, whether CEOs and directors of “parent companies or subsidiaries in the group” need to hold PMLs.
Key individuals for small-scale operators (SSOs) may be exempt from this requirement to hold a PML and instead may continue to apply to hold an Annex A authorisation.
Individuals working in a casino who perform any function that enables to influence the outcome of gambling, or who are handling cash (eg, croupiers, dealers and cashiers), must hold a PFL. Under Section 133 of the Gambling Act 2005, personal licences may not be issued to individuals who already hold such a licence, but may authorise the performance of more than one function.
Annex A authorisation
Annex As are a type of Gambling Commission approval or authorisation. Individuals who are in management positions at SSOs, or who are representatives taking bets on behalf of an operator at the tracks, or who are controllers (generally, with 10% or more equity and/or voting rights in an existing or proposed licensee or in its parent company) must apply for an Annex A authorisation from the Gambling Commission. Subject to the Gambling Commission’s discretion, operators meeting the SSO exemption may hold Annex As instead of PMLs.
Application Process
Personal licence and Annex A applications must be submitted to the Gambling Commission, which will assess the application according to the same suitability criteria as for operating licences.
The requirements for personal licence applications and Annex A applications are broadly the same, but the specific requirements may vary depending on the particular circumstances. Generally speaking, applications require:
At the time of writing, application fees for personal licences are GBP370. There is no application cost for Annex A applications.
The Gambling Commission’s standard service time for processing personal applications is eight weeks. In 2024–25, 3,491 personal licence applications were submitted, and 95% were processed within eight weeks.
Ongoing Annual Fees
Personal licences are subject to mandatory maintenance every five years by providing updated personal information and paying a fee of GBP370. Failure to maintain the licence will result in revocation.
There are no ongoing fees for Annex As.
Ongoing Requirements
General conditions for licences, as stipulated by Section 75 of the Gambling Act 2005, are listed under Part 3 of the LCCP. Notably, Licence Condition 1(3) of the LCCP requires personal licence holders to notify the Gambling Commission within ten working days of any personal key events, which include:
Personal Sanctions
Following the review of a personal licence, the Gambling Commission may impose:
To date, the Gambling Commission has not imposed a financial penalty or reached a payment in lieu of a financial penalty (as part of a regulatory settlement) in respect of a personal licence. The Gambling Commission keeps a regulatory sanctions register, which contains details of sanctions imposed on personal licence holders following licence reviews.
The requirements for a premises licence are:
Historically, remote operating licences did not reflect the distinction between B2B and B2C business models. B2B operators hosting games through B2C websites required a licence authorising remote casino, bingo, betting (virtual events) or betting (real events) – in addition to gambling software – as hosting games constitutes providing facilities for gambling.
However, new legislation introduced in April 2017 – namely, the Gambling (Operating Licence and Single-Machine Permit Fees) Regulations 2017 (SI 2017 No 303) – created the following B2B-specific “host” subcategories:
Nonetheless, these licences are subject to various requirements, including that:
See 6.1 B2C Licences.
Affiliates are not regulated by the Gambling Commission, as companies only providing advertising services or branding to a gambling operator do not require an operating licence. SRCP 1.1.2 provides that responsibility for third-party compliance lies squarely with the licence holder, who must ensure that third parties “conduct themselves in so far as they carry out activities on behalf of the licensee as if they were bound by the same licence conditions and subject to the same codes of practice as the licensee”. SRCP 1.1.3 provides that remote licensees must ensure that third-party user interfaces comply with the RTS. This positive obligation on licensees was confirmed in the White Paper and by the current Gambling Commission’s deputy CEO, Sarah Gardner, who reiterated the obligation on licensees by stating on 15 June 2023 that “many operators” should check “whether appropriate oversight of affiliates is in place”.
See 6.3 Affiliates. The Gambling Commission also provided guidance on how it expects licence holders to conduct white-label partnerships in Section 7 of its Compliance and Enforcement Report 2019–20.
There are no technical measures in place regarding consumer protection (other than as set out in the RTS and the LCCP) and the Gambling Commission does not have direct powers to enforce either payment or website blocking. However, the Gambling Commission seeks to protect consumers’ rights, through its powers under the Gambling Act 2005 for seeking enforcement action. As part of the White Paper proposals, the Gambling Commission will be given new powers to disrupt illegal gambling, including powers to block IP addresses. For further details, please refer to the UK Trends and Development chapter.
Responsible gambling – now termed “safer gambling” by the Gambling Commission – remains one of the Gambling Commission’s biggest areas of focus, spanning licensing, compliance and enforcement. Its oversight and requirements are broad, meaning they cannot be summarised in this chapter. The focus, which stems from the third licensing objective (protecting children and other vulnerable persons from being harmed or exploited by gambling), is proper identification and engagement with those who may be at risk of, or experiencing, harm, ensuring that terms and conditions are clear, fair and straightforward for consumers and do not target vulnerable or self-excluded customers.
There have been repeated examples of customers being allowed to gamble significant sums of money in short timeframes, considerably beyond their personal affordability, and without any intervention from the operator.
Key SG requirements include:
Operators are encouraged by the Gambling Commission to participate in GamProtect’s single customer view scheme, which is a mechanism through which participating operators share information of customers at risk of gambling-related harms. The scheme was facilitated by the Betting and Gaming Council and is supported by the Gambling Commission and the UK government.
As explained in 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes, the White Paper proposed the creation of a non-statutory gambling ombudsman to handle social responsibility complaints from consumers. However, at the time of writing, the position of the new government on the gambling ombudsman is unclear.
Gambling management tools include:
The Multi-Operator Self-Exclusion Scheme (MOSES) assists land-based operators with identifying at-risk gamblers. GAMSTOP is the online equivalent, initiated by the Gambling Commission and led by the Remote Gambling Association. Since 31 March 2020, all online gambling operators have been required – under the LCCP – to join GAMSTOP. Since 1 April 2024, this requirement extends to all gambling operators that make and accept bets by telephone and email.
The current primary legislation is the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (implementing the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive). This was amended in January 2024 by various regulations to update the meaning of a “high-risk third country” and address the treatment of politically exposed persons (PEPs) who are entrusted with prominent public functions in the UK (“domestic PEPs”).
Money-laundering offences are outlined in POCA and TACT. The exemption threshold for paying away funds when exiting a relationship with a customer was increased from GBP1,000 to GBP3,000 in July 2025.
The Gambling Commission has also issued guidance for casinos – and, separately, for non-casinos – regarding their duties and responsibilities under POCA. The Gambling Commission most recently updated its guidance for casinos in October 2025 to incorporate:
See 8.1 AML Legislation. The AML requirements are complex and cannot be adequately summarised here, particularly given the Gambling Commission’s ongoing focus and extensive casework in this area. Generally, the Gambling Commission expects licensees to comply fully with the terms of their licence in relation to AML and CFT and to pay close attention to the various guidance documents it issues.
Compliance and enforcement activity continue to reveal that operators’ AML policies, procedures and controls are not fit for purpose and, in many cases, customers are allowed to gamble using the proceeds of criminal activity. The Gambling Commission has warned the industry that “a failure to digest [its] guidance and implement the legislative requirements applicable to Great Britain... must change, for these are not just regulatory matters but breaches of UK law” and that “[t]hose failing to learn these lessons will face further draconian action”.
The ASA regulates UK advertising and, therefore, gambling advertising. However, it does not carry any enforcement powers. Instead, and given that the LCCP has specific rules on advertising, any gambling advertising breaches by a licence holder may lead to enforcement action by the Gambling Commission. This includes seeking criminal prosecution, as breach of a licence condition is a criminal offence under Section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005.
“Advertising” is widely defined under Section 327 of the Gambling Act 2005 and generally encompasses any action that encourages one or more persons, either directly or through an agent, to engage in facilities for gambling. This covers most forms of advertising, including online content and emails to consumers.
See 9.2 Definition of Advertising. Advertising must be socially responsible and comply with the LCCP – in particular, SRCP 5.1.6. The key LCCP advertising provisions are that:
The following codes are also applicable:
The ASA website includes a number of guidance documents, including:
The Gambling Commission’s web page “Advertising/marketing rules and regulations” provides an overview covering the various LCCP and industry regulations.
See 9.3 Key Legal, Regulatory and Licensing Provisions. In addition, since 1 November 2014, gambling operators wishing to advertise in the UK must hold a Gambling Commission operating licence pertaining to the type of activity advertised. Separately, the Gambling Commission has made clear that advertising-only licences will not be granted.
Since August 2019, a voluntary “whistle-to-whistle” sports-betting advertising ban initiated by the UK betting sector (including a ban on all TV betting adverts during pre-watershed live sport) has been effective.
In relation to online search activity, from 1 October 2020, the industry introduced a list of negative keywords against which no online gambling advertising should be served. This is a voluntary measure that was introduced in the Industry Code.
In 2022, the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) announced the introduction of tough new rules for gambling advertisements. The new rules (effective as of 1 October 2022) comprise a strong appeal test, which prohibits advertisements that are “likely to be of strong appeal to children or young persons, especially by reflecting or being associated with youth culture” – meaning that sportspeople, social media influencers and other celebrities who are prominent in youth culture are prohibited from being featured in gambling advertisements. On 14 September 2025, the CAP updated its guidance to further strengthen and clarify rules related to strong appeal.
From 1 September 2025, the scope of the CAP Code was extended to apply to non-paid-for online marketing communications (content marketing such as social media posts) aimed at UK customers by advertisers who are subject to licensing conditions imposed by a UK public authority or UK public body that require compliance with the CAP Code. The authors understand that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport is reviewing UK football sponsorship intended to target foreign audiences.
The White Paper did not materially restrict gambling advertising. However, it proposed that additional protections be required relating to cross-selling, free bets and bonuses, as well as the need to strengthen safer gambling messaging.
In April 2023, the Premier League made a voluntary commitment to banning advertising on the front of football shirts, commencing at the end of the 2025–26 season. Following the White Paper commitment to developing a cross-sport gambling sponsorship code, a number of major sports’ governing bodies also agreed to Codes of Conduct for Gambling-Related Agreements, which was announced in August 2024.
The following constitute criminal offences and attract up to 51 weeks’ imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine:
The Gambling Commission also has the power to take regulatory enforcement action for breaches, including seeking to prosecute offenders.
Disclosure of a change of control of gaming and gambling companies to the Gambling Commission – via a key event notification using the Gambling Commission’s eServices, an online portal – is required as soon as reasonably practicable and, in any event, within five working days after the licensee becomes aware of the change of control.
Separately, a change of control application providing detailed information and the appropriate fee must be submitted to the Gambling Commission for assessment of the suitability of the new controller(s) to uphold the licensing objectives contained in the existing licence. The application or notification of licence surrender must be provided within five weeks of the change occurring; otherwise, the licence will be revoked.
Subject to the Gambling Commission’s assessment of all necessary information, the existing licence will either be granted continuance under the new controller(s) or will be revoked. Applications generally take much longer than the advertised 12 weeks.
Under Section 103 of the Gambling Act 2005, advance applications for persons or entities expected to become a controller can also be made prior to the change occurring. The Gambling Commission will make a determination, based on the information submitted, that – if the change were to occur – the Gambling Commission is either “minded to grant” continuance of the existing licence or “minded to revoke” the existing licence.
A change of corporate control is defined in Section 102 of the Gambling Act 2005 and occurs when a person or legal entity becomes a new “controller” (as derived from Section 422 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000). This is a complex definition, and needs to be considered in detail, but is generally broken down as:
The same requirements as previously stated in 10. Acquisitions and Changes of Control apply, as there are no exemptions for passive investors.
Under Part 2 of the Gambling Act 2005, the Gambling Commission has the power to investigate and prosecute offences directly. Its regulatory powers also include calling licences for review and initiating investigations in the following circumstances:
The Gambling Commission’s regulatory powers include:
The Gambling Commission also has the power to commence a criminal prosecution. Where serious failings are revealed by a compliance assessment, the Gambling Commission may place a licensee in “special measures”, which requires the licensee to prepare, submit and agree to an action plan to remedy the identified failings.
The Gambling Commission’s approach to enforcement is currently set out in three key documents:
Contravention of the Gambling Act 2005, including the LCCP (issued under the Gambling Act 2005), results in criminal liability. In August 2017, the Gambling Commission set out its “new vision” for its enforcement, emphasising its focus on putting consumers first. The key changes proposed included:
In recent years, the Gambling Commission has garnered a reputation for taking enforcement against its licensees. In certain cases, a “regulatory settlement” is reached, meaning that it is not a sanction and stops short of a formal licence review. This is subject to the Gambling Commission’s discretion and will only be considered if various factors are met, including:
The regulatory settlements and licence reviews are detailed in numerous public decisions or public statements issued on the Gambling Commission’s website and usually include a financial penalty. The record penalty package remains GBP19.2 million issued to William Hill Group in March 2023. Recent financial penalties imposed by the Gambling Commission include a GBP10 million fine against Platinum Gaming Limited in October 2025, a GBP1 million fine against ProgressPlay Limited in August 2025, and a GBP2 million fine against Spreadex Limited in May 2025. The fines were issued as a result of numerous social responsibility and AML failures.
A financial penalty imposed by the Gambling Commission will usually consist of two elements:
The Gambling Commission will take into account all material circumstances of the case, such as:
From October 2025, the Gambling Commission will ordinarily approach the quantum of a financial penalty by following a seven-step process set out in its updated Statement of Principles for Determining Financial Penalties. Following the seven-step process, the Gambling Commission will ordinarily further consider:
It is worth noting that the financial elements of regulatory settlement, which are not sanctions, are calculated differently. The Gambling Commission also has the power to impose a financial penalty without carrying out a licence review.
The Gambling Commission is responsible for issuing and enforcing financial penalties regarding any LCCP breaches. Any contravention of the Gambling Act 2005 is a criminal offence in itself and will trigger a potentially unlimited fine, enforced by the courts, and imprisonment for up to 51 weeks (see 3.6 Penalties for Unlawful Gambling and 9.5 Sanctions/Penalties).
It is worth noting that any payment made as part of a regulatory settlement is not a financial penalty (as it is not a sanction) and is a payment made in lieu of a financial penalty. These regulatory settlements are treated differently by the Gambling Commission and could, theoretically, be enforced by recommencing the licence review.
The following gambling tax rates are effective from 1 April 2022 and are applicable at the time of writing (November 2025). These are expected to materially increase in the Autumn Budget of 26 November 2025, with remote gaming duty and machine gaming duty expected to increase the most.
Please note, the majority of gambling activities are exempt from VAT.
Hamilton House
1 Temple Avenue
London
EC4Y 0HA
UK
020 3334 8225
info@harrishagan.com www.harrishagan.com
How Changes in the Wake of a White Paper Are Shaping the Gaming Industry’s Regulatory Landscape in Great Britain
The regulatory and licensing landscape of the gambling industry in Great Britain has evolved significantly during the past 12 months, largely owing to the implementation of many of the proposals set out in the UK government’s 2023 White Paper, “High Stakes: Gambling Reform for the Digital Age” (the “White Paper”). Although the move to a post-White Paper era brings much-needed certainty to the regulatory landscape, the proposed reform surrounding tax harmonisation – the outcome of which is not known at the time of writing – seriously threatens to cast gloom over the sector from a commercial perspective.
The Gambling Commission is continuing to take regular enforcement action, and failings relating to customer interaction and AML persist, with an apparent renewed focus on the latter. Generally speaking, the failings identified have been less egregious and the financial penalties lower than in previous years – although recent enforcement activity, including two operating licence suspensions, might be indicative of a shift in approach. Further, the industry has witnessed an accelerated regulatory focus on tackling the illegal market, including concerns over supplier licensing and the need for licensees to conduct adequate due diligence on their partners.
White Paper
After the change in UK government in 2024, there was concern as to whether the White Paper proposals – broadly regarded as a fair and balanced response to the previous UK government’s April 2023 review of the Gambling Act 2005 – would progress as originally envisaged. Concerns were largely unfounded, and implementation has progressed with vigour throughout 2025, bringing much-needed certainty to the industry after a long period of unrest.
Noteworthy changes implemented include the following.
Despite the progress made to date, some cornerstone proposals are still in the pipeline. There has been limited update on progress in relation to the creation of a gambling ombudsman, which was originally due to start taking claims from summer 2024. The intention is for the gambling ombudsman to be an independent, free-to-use, non-statutory body that will handle social responsibility complaints from consumers. However, there has been limited progress on the creation of the gambling ombudsman.
Further, the industry awaits the outcome of the Gambling Commission’s pilot testing the practicalities of remote operators using frictionless financial risk assessments to assess the risk of gambling harm for the highest-spending customers. The purpose of the three-stage pilot was to test how financial risk assessments would work in practice and to assess appropriate thresholds. Finally, and in line with the commitment in the White Paper to review its funding, the Gambling Commission announced in April 2025 that it will be launching a fees review in 2025. Increases to licence fees can be expected to follow.
Illegal gambling
Tackling illegal gambling and the unlicensed market is a priority for the Gambling Commission, with its three-year corporate strategy for 2024–27 citing increased investment, resources and capacity to tackle illegal gambling as a key commitment. That focus has accelerated during the past 12 months, with Gambling Commission CEO Andrew Rhodes stating that “the illegal online market is unsafe, unfair and criminal – that is why the [Gambling] Commission has invested heavily in this area in recent years”.
One of the White Paper proposals was to increase the Gambling Commission’s powers to tackle the illegal gambling market. On 25 February 2025, the Crime and Policing Bill was introduced to Parliament, which includes provisions for the Gambling Commission to obtain suspension orders to take down IP addresses and domain names associated with unlicensed gambling. At the time of writing, the Crime and Policing Bill is at the committee stage in the House of Lords. In the meantime, the Gambling Commission has been continuing its efforts in this area and – in addition to its issuing of cease and desist notices and referring concerning URLs to search engines to have unlicensed gambling websites taken down – it has achieved the following.
It is highly likely that the Gambling Commission will continue to focus on this area in 2026 and that it will seek to set more defined expectations of licensees.
AML
AML has always been a key aspect of the regulatory landscape in Great Britain, given that the first licensing objective set out in the Gambling Act 2005 is to prevent gambling from being a source of crime or disorder, being associated with crime or disorder, or being used to support crime. However, there has been an increased focus on this area during the past 12 months, as technological developments and industry trends introduce new and evolving risks.
Under Licence Condition 12.1.1 of the Gambling Commission’s Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP), licensees are required to conduct an assessment of the risks of their business being used for money laundering and terrorist financing, taking into account applicable learning or guidelines published by the Gambling Commission. The Gambling Commission has published three “emerging risk” updates within 18 months, identifying new risks to the gambling industry that licensees must consider as part of their AML/CFT risk assessments. The risks identified include the following.
Further, in July 2025, HM Treasury published an updated National Risk Assessment (NRA) of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing – stating in the Ministerial Foreword that, since the publication of the previous NRA in 2020, “the threat from money laundering and terrorist financing continues to evolve, shaped by new technologies, geopolitical tensions, and the increasing sophistication of criminal and terrorist networks”. Importantly, the NRA increased the money laundering risk for casinos from “low” to “medium”, with the main drivers of increased risk being:
The gambling industry is reacting to societal change and, with the ever-increasing use of AI, it is probable that new money laundering and terrorist financing risks to the gambling industry will be identified in the coming year.
Enforcement
The Gambling Commission has continued to exercise its enforcement powers against licensees. An overall raising of standards across the industry means that, generally, failings that have been identified are less severe; this has been reflected in the sanctions imposed. However, the pace of enforcement action has not slowed and recent enforcement activity (including two operating licence suspensions) might be indicative of a shift in approach. Common enforcement themes include:
Tax
A UK government consultation on gambling taxes has triggered a heated debate in the industry. The UK government is proposing a consolidation of taxes, which would result in a significant tax increase for some sectors, particularly betting and online gambling. The debate has caused deep tension, not only in industry but more broadly, and has led to fears of betting shop closures in the land-based sector, the possibility of remote operators investing in other jurisdictions, and the expansion of the illegal market. At the time of writing, the outcome of tax harmonisation proposals is unknown; however, on 7 November 2025, in a report on the taxation of gambling, the Treasury Committee concluded that “we are not convinced that current Treasury policy on the taxation of gambling captures the varying extent of [gambling] harms”.
Outlook
Changes introduced in the wake of the White Paper during the past 12 months have increased stability in the gambling industry in Great Britain. New requirements – in particular, financial vulnerability checks and the statutory levy – mark industry milestones and evidence the effect that the White Paper has had on the regulatory and licensing landscape.
In the post-White Paper era, new themes are emerging – tackling the illegal market has become a clear priority for the Gambling Commission (and other industry stakeholders) and taxation reform has become a new concern. Although fewer regulatory and licensing changes are anticipated during the next 12 months, the industry will need to keep abreast of risks associated with technological advancements, be prepared for the outcome of the tax debate, and continue to raise standards in respect of both AML and safer gambling requirements.
Hamilton House
1 Temple Avenue
London
EC4Y 0HA
UK
020 3334 8225
info@harrishagan.com www.harrishagan.com