International Tax 2026

Last Updated April 23, 2026

Mauritius

Law and Practice

Authors



CMS Prism in association with CMS specialises in all aspects of revenue law, including tax advisory, transactional tax and tax controversy matters, with a significant cross-border element. It represents clients at all levels of the dispute resolution process, including before the Supreme Court of Mauritius and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The firm’s expertise is consistently sought out for high-profile tax litigation on complex cross-border matters, including transfer pricing cases. In addition to domestic and international tax planning, the firm has a strong private wealth practice. It helps (ultra) high net worth individuals, business owners and family offices structure their affairs in a tax-efficient and compliant manner. The firm’s founder, Johanne Hague, has appeared as an expert witness in Mauritius tax laws before the UK’s First-tier (Tax) Tribunal and regularly lectures on tax issues at both local and international levels (notably at the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation).

The main sources of international tax law in Mauritius are domestic law, public international law and judicial precedents.

Primary Mauritian Legislation

The principal source of domestic tax law is the Income Tax Act 1995 (“ITA 1995”).

Subsidiary Legislation

Regulations made by the Minister of Finance pursuant to Section 161 of the ITA 1995 have the force of law. The main sources of legislation for tax purposes include:

  • the Income Tax Regulations 1996;
  • the Income Tax (Foreign Tax Credit) Regulations 1996;
  • the Income Tax (Negative Income Tax Allowance) Regulations 2017; and
  • the Income Tax (Financial Assistance) Payment Special Allowance Regulations 2025.

International instruments

Mauritius follows a dualist approach: tax treaties and other international agreements have no direct effect in domestic law unless and until they are expressly incorporated and duly ratified. Once so incorporated and ratified, they have the force of law. More notably, Mauritius is a party to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969 and has signed the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting.

Mauritius has developed an extensive treaty network with African, Asian and European jurisdictions. As at February 2026, Mauritius has concluded 46 tax treaties. There are seven treaties pending ratification; seven more await signature and 19 are being negotiated.

Beyond tax treaties, Mauritius participates in information exchange and mutual administrative assistance networks (eg, arrangements for automatic exchange of financial account information), which reinforce international transparency and compliance standards.

Jurisprudence

Case law is an important source of law in tax disputes before the Revenue Tribunal and the Supreme Court of Mauritius. Where there is limited local jurisprudence on specific concepts, the courts may seek persuasive guidance from Commonwealth authorities – principally the United Kingdom and New Zealand, given the similarities of their legislation to the ITA 1995. Domestic jurisprudence, however, has limited bearing on the interpretation of tax treaty provisions.

Tax administration

The Mauritius Revenue Authority (MRA) is the statutory body established under the Mauritius Revenue Authority Act 2004 to administer and enforce the revenue laws of Mauritius, including the assessment and collection of taxes under the ITA 1995.

Tax rulings

A taxpayer may apply to the Director-General (DG) of the MRA for a ruling in relation to a transaction. The DG must issue the ruling within 30 days of receipt of the application. Such ruling is binding on the MRA (but not on the courts), except where there is a material difference in the facts.

Statements of Practice and guidance

Pursuant to Section 159A of the ITA 1995, the MRA issues Statements of Practice (SOPs) on the application of legal provisions. The MRA also issues communiqués and guidance notes to clarify aspects of the tax legislation. SOPs and guidance notes are persuasive in nature and are not binding on a court of law.

International tax rules do not apply automatically in Mauritius until they are expressly incorporated and ratified into Mauritian law and operate with the force of law.

Matters not governed by an applicable treaty remain subject to domestic tax law. Where both domestic law and an incorporated treaty purport to apply to the same subject matter, the treaty (as implemented in Mauritian law) prevails to the extent of any inconsistency.

Mauritius broadly follows the recognised OECD model of taxation, and the tax treaties are generally drafted in compliance with OECD rules. Where the treaties are not modified by the Multilateral Instrument (MLI), the country uses bilateral protocols, for instance with India.

Mauritius is a signatory to the MLI, which was signed on 5 July 2017 and ratified on 18 October 2019. The MLI entered into force on 1 February 2020. Mauritius has listed 44 of its 46 tax treaties as Covered Tax Agreements, which, once modified, incorporate the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) minimum standards, with the principal purpose test as the main anti‑abuse provision.

For individuals, Mauritius applies a mixed source and remittance regime. Income derived from within Mauritius is chargeable regardless of the taxpayer’s residence status, and foreign-source income is chargeable only when remitted to the country by a Mauritian resident.

Resident companies are subject to corporate income tax on their worldwide chargeable income at a rate of 15%, subject to any applicable exemption or credits available. Additional taxes may be imposed based on the turnover of the company – see 3.2 Business Profits.

All taxes in Mauritius are administered under a unified tax system at the national level. Mauritius does not operate any separate regime for islands other than the main island.

Tax residence of individuals is determined according to one of the three criteria below, depending on whether an individual:

  • (i) has their domicile in Mauritius, unless their permanent place of abode is outside Mauritius;
  • (ii) has been present in Mauritius in that income year, for a period of, or an aggregate period of, 183 days or more; or
  • (iii) has been present in Mauritius in that income year and the two preceding income years, for an aggregate period of 270 days or more.

A person will be considered tax resident in Mauritius in any income year if one of those criteria is met save for (iii) above, in which case tax residence takes effect prospectively as from the third income year.

An individual who is tax resident in Mauritius is taxed on all Mauritius-source income, other than exempt income, derived by them during the preceding income year. They are taxed on foreign source only if it is remitted to Mauritius.

Definition of Income

Income for the purposes of the ITA 1995 includes:

  • any advantage in money or in money’s worth such as salary, wages, leave pay, fee, overtime pay, perquisite, allowance, bonus, gratuity, commission or other reward or remuneration in respect of or in relation to the office or employment of that individual, any superannuation, compensation for loss of office, pension, retiring allowance, annuity or other reward in respect of or in relation to past employment or loss or reduction of future income of that individual, whether receivable by that individual or by any person who is or has been the spouse or dependant of that individual;
  • any gross income derived from any business;
  • any rent, royalty, premium or other income derived from property;
  • any dividend, interest, charges, annuity or pension;
  • basic retirement pension payable under the National Pensions Act 1976;
  • any gross income, in money or money’s worth, derived from the sale of immovable property in the course of any business; and
  • any other income derived from any other source.

Income Tax Bands

As from the income year beginning on 1 July 2025, the Mauritius personal income tax regime provides for three tax bands, with the lowest bracket of income (up to MUR500,000 per annum) having a tax rate of 0%. The second bracket (MUR500,001–MUR1 million) attracts a rate of 10%. The highest bracket (above MUR1 million) is subject to a tax rate of 20%.

Fair Share Contribution

Individuals with a total annual income (including local dividends, which are usually exempt) exceeding MUR12 million in an income year are also liable to a “Fair Share Contribution” of 15% on the leviable income in excess of MUR12 million. This is payable at the time of the filing by the individual of their return of income. Dividends or distributions received from entities holding a global business licence, as well as from a foundation or a trust are, however, excluded from the total income considered.

Deductions

Personal reliefs, deductions and allowances under the ITA 1995 can only be claimed by resident individuals in an income year. Deductions can also be claimed in relation to an individual’s dependants.

Exempt income is listed in the Third Schedule to the ITA 1995 and include, inter alia, dividends paid by a resident company.

Estate, Inheritance and Gift Taxes

There is no inheritance, succession, estate, donation or gift tax in Mauritius.

A non-resident is only taxable on all Mauritius-source income, other than exempt income. The types of income are addressed in 2.3 Taxation of Resident Individuals.       

The rule of tax residence for companies in Mauritius is determined based on the company’s incorporation in Mauritius or the location of the company’s central management and control.

A company is considered tax resident in Mauritius if:

  • it is incorporated in Mauritius; or
  • its central management and control are in Mauritius.

However, Section 73A of the ITA 1995 provides that a company incorporated in Mauritius, but centrally managed and controlled outside of Mauritius, may be deemed to be non-resident for tax purposes.

For Mauritius tax purposes, trusts and foundations are treated as companies (other than charitable trusts or foundations).

A trust is treated as tax resident:

  • where the trust is administered in Mauritius and a majority of the trustees are resident in Mauritius; or
  • where the settlor of the trust was resident in Mauritius at the time the instrument creating the trust was executed.

A foundation, on the other hand, is deemed resident:

  • where it is registered in Mauritius; or
  • where it has its central management and control in Mauritius.

Pursuant to the MRA’s SOP 24/21 on trusts and foundations, a trust or foundation set up in Mauritius is treated as non-resident if it is centrally managed and controlled outside Mauritius. Central management and control is determined as follows:

  • For trusts:
    1. the trust is administered in Mauritius and a majority of the trustees are resident in Mauritius;
    2. the settlor of the trust was resident in Mauritius at the time the instrument creating the trust was executed or at such time as the settlor adds new property to the trust; and
    3. a majority of the beneficiaries or class of beneficiaries appointed under the terms of the trust are resident in Mauritius.
  • For foundations:
    1. the founder is resident in Mauritius; and
    2. a majority of the beneficiaries appointed under the terms of a charter are resident in Mauritius.

The ITA 1995 only defines a permanent establishment for the purposes of the qualified domestic minimum top-up tax (QDMTT) provisions, which are duly aligned with the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital, as:

  • (a) a place of business situated in a jurisdiction and treated as a permanent establishment in accordance with an applicable tax treaty in force, provided that such jurisdiction taxes the income attributable to it in accordance with a provision similar to Article 7 of the OECD Model Tax Convention;
  • (b) if there is no applicable tax treaty in force, a place of business in respect of which a jurisdiction taxes under its domestic law the income attributable to such place of business on a net basis similar to the manner in which it taxes its own tax residents;
  • (c) if a jurisdiction has no corporate income tax system, a place of business situated in that jurisdiction that would be treated as a permanent establishment in accordance with the OECD Model Tax Convention provided that such jurisdiction would have had the right to tax the income attributable to it in accordance with Article 7 of that Convention; or
  • (d) a place of business that is not already described in paragraphs (a) to (c) above through which operations are conducted outside the jurisdiction where the entity is located provided that such jurisdiction exempts the income attributable to such operations.

Although the ITA 1995 does not contain a general definition of permanent establishment beyond the QDMTT provisions as provided above, the MRA would typically rely on Section 74 of the ITA 1995 to assert whether a foreign company has a taxable presence where it is carrying on business wholly or partly in Mauritius.

From a treaty perspective, most treaties generally define a permanent establishment as “a fixed place of business through which the business of the enterprise is wholly or partly carried on”. The definition is further typically supplemented by an enumerated, non‑exhaustive list of inclusions. For instance, the Mauritius–South Africa treaty, under Article 5, provides that permanent establishment includes, inter alia, a place of management, branch, office, factory, workshop, or site of natural‑resource extraction, and the same is followed by express exclusions for activities such as use of facilities solely for the purpose of storage, display or delivery of goods.

Rental income from immovable property located in Mauritius is deemed to be Mauritius-source income and is subject to income tax regardless of whether it is received by a resident or a non-resident.

Rental income paid by any person other than an individual is also subject to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) at a rate of 7.5% for residents and 10% for non-residents.

TDS is applicable when the rental payment exceeds MUR500 per transaction. Generally, payments made by individuals are not subject to TDS unless the rental is for business purposes.

Sales of immovable property undertaken in the course of business will be tantamount to the income derived from such sale being generally taxable at the rate of 15%. However, a sale of immovable property not undertaken as trade shall not attract any tax inasmuch as capital gains are not taxable in Mauritius.

Resident companies are generally subject to the headline rate of 15% on their worldwide chargeable income subject to any credits or exemptions that may be applicable. The chargeable income is defined as net income, which is the amount remaining after allowable deductions from the gross income.

Exemptions and deductions may be applicable depending on the type of income or activity. For instance, companies involved in the import and export of goods are subject to a reduced rate of tax of 3%. Certain incentivised sectors also benefit from tax holidays.

Specific partial exemptions are also applicable to designated types of income such as foreign dividends or interest income subject to substance requirements being met.

Fair Share Contribution

The Fair Share Contribution (FSC) was introduced in the ITA 1995 in August 2025 and is applicable to companies having a turnover exceeding MUR24 million, and is applicable as from the year starting 1 July 2025 up until 30 June 2028. The FSC, however, does not apply to companies holding a global business licence in Mauritius nor to companies benefiting from tax holidays.

Corporate Social Responsibility Fund

Companies are required, in every year, to set up a corporate social responsibility (CSR) fund equivalent to 2% of their chargeable income in the preceding year. For CSR funds set up on or after 1 January 2019, 75% of the fund must be remitted to the DG of the MRA. For CSR funds set up prior to this, at least 50% should be remitted.

CSR is not applicable to companies holding a global business licence issued by the Financial Services Commission.

Corporate Climate Responsibility Levy

Companies and sociétés (partnerships) that have a turnover above MUR50 million are subject to a 2% corporate climate responsibility levy on their chargeable income. In addition, companies are required to set up a corporate social responsibility fund equivalent to 2% of their chargeable income in the preceding year.

Dividends

Dividends declared by local companies are exempted from tax in the hands of the recipient.

Foreign-source dividends received by residents are taxable at the rate of 15%. However, a tax credit for any foreign withholding tax (WHT) already suffered in the country of origin subject to proof may be applied. Alternatively, corporates may opt to apply for the partial exemption of 80% on the foreign dividends and reduce the tax chargeable to 3% upon satisfaction of prescribed substance requirements.

No WHT applies to dividends declared by resident companies.

Interest

Interest is generally taxable at 15% subject to the application of the 80% partial exemption, which may reduce the effective tax rate on such interest to 3% if the prescribed substance conditions are satisfied. Foreign tax credits for any WHT suffered abroad may also be applied.

Interest paid by any person, other than a bank or a non‑bank deposit‑taking institution, to a non‑resident is generally subject to WHT at 15%. However, no WHT applies where the interest is paid by a company holding a global business licence to a non‑resident not carrying on business in Mauritius. This rate applies unless reduced or exempted under any tax treaty.

Royalties

Royalties are taxed at 15%.

Royalties paid to residents are subject to WHT at the rate of 10%, while those paid to non-residents are subject to a rate of 15%. However, there is no WHT on royalties paid by a company out of its foreign-source income to a non-resident. Treaties may provide for specific provisions for taxing royalties.

The ITA 1995 also provides that interests, rents, royalties, compensations and other amounts paid by a special purpose fund to a non-resident shall bear no WHT.

There is no capital gains tax levied in Mauritius.

Pay As You Earn

Employment income is taxed under the pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) withholding system, whereby employers are required to withhold tax from emoluments when paid to employees and remit the tax to the MRA on a monthly basis. Employees can claim personal reliefs and deductions subject to the provisions of the ITA 1995 in respect to each income year by submitting an Employee Declaration Form to the MRA.

Pursuant to the First Schedule to the ITA 1995, tax is levied on remuneration as follows:

  • the first MUR500,000 attracts a rate of 0%;
  • the next MUR500,000 attracts a rate of 10%; and
  • the remainder attracts a rate of 20%.

Cross-Border Employment

Emoluments are treated as Mauritius‑source where they arise from an employment, the duties of which are performed wholly or mainly in Mauritius, irrespective of whether such emoluments are received in Mauritius or not.

Premium Visa

In a bid to encourage foreign nationals to have a digital nomad lifestyle in Mauritius, the Government of Mauritius introduced the Premium Visa in 2020. This visa enables non-citizens to stay in Mauritius for a period exceeding six months up to one year, with an option to renew.

Where an individual holding a Premium Visa derives income from work performed remotely from Mauritius, that income is deemed to be derived by them in Mauritius when it is remitted in Mauritius. Money spent in Mauritius via foreign credit or debit cards will not be considered to have been remitted in Mauritius and will not be subject to tax in Mauritius.

No specific types of income other than those listed above are subject to special taxation rules.

Mauritius is an active member of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS and intends to implement the two-pillar solution. Pillar One is yet to be directly implemented in Mauritius.

Mauritius has not implemented Pillar One Amount A. However, it remains committed to actively participating in the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS and is aligning its tax legislation with international standards. It is not primarily focusing on the adoption of Pillar, as explained below.

Following amendments made to the ITA 1995 in 2025, Mauritius implemented the QDMTT in line with the OECD’s Pillar Two framework. The QDMTT will be applicable to every person who is a member of a multinational enterprise group with an annual consolidated revenue of EUR750 million or more in the consolidated financial statements of the ultimate parent entity in at least two of the four fiscal years immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the QDMTT is leviable, as from the year of assessment 2025/2026. However, regulations clarifying the scope of application of the QDMTT and computation method are expected to be issued in order to ascertain its precise application.

Regulations with regard to the implementation of QDMTT delineating its scope, computation, administration and compliance obligations under the ITA 1995 are yet to be issued.

Starting from 1 January 2026, a value-added tax (VAT) of 15% has been introduced on digital and electronic services supplied to a person in Mauritius by a foreign supplier having no permanent establishment in Mauritius.

Digital or electronic services include website supply, web hosting, programs on demand and software supply, amongst others.

Pursuant to the VAT Act 1998, a foreign supplier is required to be registered in Mauritius for VAT purposes, and where its turnover of taxable supplies exceeds, or is likely to exceed, MUR3 million (or its equivalent in foreign currency), the foreign supplier shall appoint a tax representative having a permanent establishment in Mauritius.

Tax legislation in Mauritius does not provide for a specific definition of tax fraud or tax evasion.

While the ITA 1995 does not set out an exhaustive definition of tax avoidance, it lays down that tax avoidance includes directly or indirectly:

  • altering the incidence of income tax;
  • relieving any person from liability to pay income tax; and
  • avoiding, reducing or postponing any liability to pay income tax.

General anti-avoidance provisions under the ITA 1995 apply to any transaction entered into or effected that has, or would have had, the effect of conferring a tax benefit on a person and the MRA considers that the transaction was entered into or carried out for the sole and dominant purpose of enabling a taxpayer to obtain a tax benefit, having regard to:

  • the manner in which the transaction was entered into or carried out;
  • the form and substance of the transaction;
  • the result that would have been achieved by the transaction;
  • any change in the financial position of the relevant taxpayer that has resulted, will result, or may reasonably be expected to result, from the transaction;
  • whether the transaction has created rights or obligations which would not normally be created between persons dealing with each other at arm’s length under a transaction of the kind in question; and
  • the participation in the transaction of a corporation resident or carrying on business outside Mauritius.

The ITA 1995 also provides for targeted anti-avoidance provisions, such as in the following circumstances:

  • the payment of excessive management fees;
  • excessive remuneration to shareholders or directors;
  • the provision of non-dividend benefits to shareholders or relatives of shareholders; or
  • the retention of rights over income in circumstances where property or income rights are transferred to a relative but the transferor retains control or enjoyment.

With the aim of deterring tax fraud, the MRA has adopted a significantly higher rate of penalties (50%) than generally imposed on assessments as per the MRA’s SOP on penalties.

Tax avoidance, where established, is generally addressed through the assessment mechanism. The MRA may counteract the arrangement by raising an assessment on the basis of the tax outcome that would have applied in the absence of the avoidance scheme, thereby giving rise to additional tax and, where applicable, interest and administrative penalties.

By contrast, tax evasion is treated as an offence and may additionally trigger criminal enforcement whether there is an underlying tax assessment or not. In practice, the Fiscal Investigations Department of the MRA is mandated to combat fraud and other forms of tax evasion, and it conducts investigations into suspected tax evasion cases, gathers evidence and may recommend prosecution for relevant alleged offences.

The ITA 1995 provides that a number of breaches of its provisions constitute offences. More particularly, the ITA 1995 criminalises the behaviour of any person who wilfully and with intent to evade income tax:

  • submits a false return of income;
  • gives any false information;
  • prepares or maintains or authorises the preparation or maintenance of any false books, records or documents or falsifies or authorises the falsification of any books, records or documents;
  • produces for examination any false books, records or documents;
  • makes default in the performance of any duty imposed on them under the ITA 1995;
  • refuses, or fails, to attend and give evidence when required by the DG of the MRA or to answer truly and fully to any question put to them or to produce any document required of them; or
  • misleads or attempts to mislead the DG of the MRA, in relation to any matter or thing affecting their own or any other person’s liability to income tax,

to carry a liability to a fine not exceeding MUR50,000 and to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years. Any conviction may also carry an order from the court to pay an amount which shall not exceed three times the difference between the income tax to which the person is liable and the income tax paid or payable in terms of any return of income submitted.

Mauritius does not maintain its own list of non-cooperative or high-risk jurisdictions under its tax laws. The country, however, generally aligns with OECD and EU standards focusing on automatic exchange of information and transparency.

Common Reporting Standard

Mauritius is a signatory to the Common Reporting Standard (CRS). In June 2015, Mauritius signed the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters developed by the OECD and started to exchange information under the CRS as from 2018. Under the CRS, the MRA receives from the relevant Financial Institutions (as defined in the CRS) based in Mauritius, the information required to be disclosed and transmits that information to the relevant tax authorities.

Mauritian financial institutions are required to identify and report relevant accounts of non‑residents to the MRA in a prescribed format, for onward automatic exchange with participating jurisdictions.

Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act

Mauritius has implemented the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) under the Model 1 Intergovernmental Agreement, effective as from July 2014. The FATCA framework provides for exchange of tax information (upon request, spontaneous and automatic) between Mauritius and the USA. The implementation imposes reporting obligations on Mauritian financial institutions to the MRA, which then transmits the data to the US Internal Revenue Service.

Tax Information Exchange Agreements

Mauritius has concluded a network of tax information exchange agreements (TIEAs), alongside its double tax treaties, which enhance cross-border tax co-operation. The TIEA framework provides for exchange of information on request and may include data on ownership and from banks and financial institutions subject to confidentiality safeguards. Mauritius has 11 TIEAs in force as at February 2026.

In cases of suspected fraud or evasion, the MRA is empowered to investigate and request information from an individual or company. This includes site visits, access to records and collection of documents after formal requests. In this context, the MRA is not limited by the usual three-year timeframe to conduct audits and raise assessments. The Fiscal Investigations Department of the MRA is further able to conduct investigations into potential tax evasion cases, to collect evidence and recommend prosecution for offences. Additionally, the Legal Services Department of the MRA can conduct inquiries with similar powers to those of police officers and lodge a case before the competent court of Mauritius.

The MRA is vested with the statutory power to conduct any audit on a taxpayer’s affairs and raise assessments where the MRA is not satisfied with the return filed by a taxpayer. It may revise the tax return of the taxpayer and impose an additional tax liability together with administrative penalties and interests. In its SOP on ‘Imposition of Assessing Penalty’ (SP 13/16), the MRA provides a comprehensive method by which such penalties are calculated. The MRA may impose an assessing penalty of 50% where it concludes that there has been a tax fraud.

Tax evasion, which is treated as a criminal offence under the ITA 1995, will be subject to criminal proceedings and attract penalties as well as imprisonment terms. The Mauritian case law, however, does not include many convictions in relation to tax evasion.

Tax fraud usually would not lead to prosecution per se. In cases of suspected tax fraud, the MRA will conduct audits to consider whether there has been an understated tax liability. In the affirmative, the MRA will reassess the tax liability and impose high penalties and interest.

Criminal proceedings usually start once the civil tax matter has been concluded or upon recommendation from the Fiscal Investigations Department of the MRA after completion of its inquiry.

Where the facts indicate a wider financial crime dimension, the MRA can co-ordinate with other regulatory authorities in Mauritius, including in cases where tax evasion is investigated alongside money laundering.

Mauritius is a member of the OECD G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS and has ratified the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, which supports multilateral administrative co-operation. The country is also compliant with EU recommendations.

Mauritius also has an extensive network of double taxation avoidance agreements (DTAAs) that cater for co-operation between competent authorities of the contracting states.

Mauritius participates in the automatic exchange of information as a signatory to the CRS and under FATCA.

Mauritius has also implemented Country-by-Country Reporting in accordance with BEPS Action 13.

Mauritius currently has TIEAs with 11 countries.

Mauritius participates in several multilateral tax arrangements beyond mutual agreement procedures/advance pricing agreements, notably as a signatory to the MLI to combat BEPS. It also participates in the automatic exchange of information via the CRS and is a member of the OECD Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes. It, however, does not currently participate in OECD’s International Compliance Assurance Programme.

Mauritius has implemented BEPS Action 14, which seeks to improve the resolution of tax-related disputes between jurisdictions, through the MLI. Tax treaties concluded between Mauritius and other states generally contain the provisions of Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention to resolve issues arising where the actions of one or both contracting states result in taxation contrary to the provisions of a tax treaty. As such, the relevant article dealing with Mutual Agreement Procedures (MAPs) has been amended to allow a taxpayer to present a case to the competent authority of either Contracting State for mutual agreement assistance.

The legal footing rests on the tax treaty being ratified and published in the Government Gazette; its provisions are deemed to be effective as if they had been incorporated into the ITA 1995, by virtue of Section 76 of the ITA 1995.

This enables taxpayers to seek relief where actions of one or both contracting states result (or will result) in taxation not in accordance with the DTAA. Treaties incorporating the BEPS Action 14 guidelines contain clearer timelines for notification and initiating of the MAP and for binding arbitration in the event that the MAP is not successful, such as the Mauritius–Germany DTAA.

The time limit for filing a MAP request is set by the applicable tax treaty. Most Mauritian DTAAs (reflecting Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention) require the taxpayer to lodge a MAP request within three years from the first notification of the measure that gives rise to taxation not in accordance with the treaty; an exception is the Mauritius–Nepal DTAA, which generally applies a two‑year limit.

As highlighted in the MRA guidance notes on MAP issued in November 2020, Mauritius has opted for the mandatory binding arbitration provisions under Part VI of the MLI. These provisions will apply only between Contracting States that have chosen to apply Part VI to their Covered Tax Agreements. The following treaty partners of Mauritius have chosen to apply Part VI:

  • Barbados
  • Belgium
  • Congo
  • Estonia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Lesotho
  • Luxembourg
  • Malta
  • Monaco
  • Singapore
  • United Kingdom

It is apposite to note that Mauritius has reserved the right to exclude cases in relation to anti-avoidance cases and criminal offences.

Mauritius has not implemented an advance pricing agreement programme as at February 2026.

A taxpayer may apply to the MRA for a tax ruling pursuant to Section 159 of the ITA 1995. The tax ruling is binding on the MRA, save and except where there is a material difference in the facts of a transaction compared with the facts disclosed in the ruling application. This includes rulings on the application of treaty provisions to which Mauritius is a party.

CMS Prism – in association with CMS

Level 7, IconEbene,
Rue de L’Institut,
Ebene,
Mauritius

+2304030900

info@cms-prism.com www.prismchambers.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



CMS Prism in association with CMS specialises in all aspects of revenue law, including tax advisory, transactional tax and tax controversy matters, with a significant cross-border element. It represents clients at all levels of the dispute resolution process, including before the Supreme Court of Mauritius and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The firm’s expertise is consistently sought out for high-profile tax litigation on complex cross-border matters, including transfer pricing cases. In addition to domestic and international tax planning, the firm has a strong private wealth practice. It helps (ultra) high net worth individuals, business owners and family offices structure their affairs in a tax-efficient and compliant manner. The firm’s founder, Johanne Hague, has appeared as an expert witness in Mauritius tax laws before the UK’s First-tier (Tax) Tribunal and regularly lectures on tax issues at both local and international levels (notably at the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation).

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.