Investment Funds 2025

Last Updated June 17, 2025

Canada

Law and Practice

Authors



Fasken was founded in the mid-19th century and merged with another leading firm in 2000 to form what is now one of the largest firms in Canada with an international reach. A premier law firm with over 950 lawyers worldwide, Fasken’s investment products and wealth management group is composed of legal professionals who have in-depth knowledge of all the different types of investment vehicles used in Canada to regroup the assets of retail, HNW or institutional investors, and deploy various investment strategies.

Canada has a well-established and diversified investment funds market that includes both a highly regulated retail funds sector and a growing, sophisticated alternative investment funds sector.

Alternative Investment Funds Market

The Canadian alternative funds market continues to expand, driven by investor appetite for diversification, yield and exposure to private markets. Alternative funds in Canada typically include hedge funds, private equity and venture capital funds, infrastructure and real estate funds, and private credit vehicles. These funds are often structured as limited partnerships or trusts and distributed by way of prospectus exemption under National Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus Exemptions (NI 45-106). Regulatory oversight is lighter than for retail funds, with fewer investment restrictions but greater emphasis on disclosure and suitability at the point of sale.

Retail Funds Market

Canada’s retail funds market is one of the most developed globally, with assets under management in mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) exceeding CAD2 trillion. These funds are primarily governed by National Instrument 81-102 – Investment Funds (NI 81-102), which imposes detailed requirements relating to liquidity, leverage, investment restrictions, custody and disclosure. Canadian investors have access to a broad range of retail investment products, including fixed income, equity, balanced and sector-specific funds. Distribution is generally conducted through registrants such as dealers or advisers, with oversight by provincial securities regulators and the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO).

Market Activity in the Past Year

The Canadian funds market remained active over the past year despite macroeconomic headwinds. While fundraising activity in the private markets slowed somewhat compared to the post-pandemic boom, asset managers continued to launch sector-focused funds (eg, energy transition, technology and real estate credit) and follow-on vehicles to support existing portfolio companies. The ETF market saw continued growth, especially in thematic and actively managed products. On the regulatory side, Canadian securities regulators maintained a focus on investor protection, ESG-related disclosures, and the use of AI and digital tools in the funds industry.

The choice of legal structure for alternative investment funds in Canada, as in many jurisdictions, is primarily influenced by two key factors: tax implications and the degree of liability protection offered to investors. Among the options available, the limited partnership stands out as the most frequently utilised legal vehicle for alternative investment funds in Canada. This preference stems from the limited partnership’s ability to offer both tax transparency and limited liability protection to its investors, making it an attractive choice for fund managers and investors alike.

Alternative funds — including private equity, venture capital, private credit, real estate, and infrastructure funds — are typically structured as limited partnerships formed under provincial partnership legislation, with a corporate general partner and a separate management or advisory entity.

Private alternative funds themselves are not subject to direct registration or approval by Canadian securities regulators, provided that all securities are offered in reliance on exemptions under NI 45-106.

The following are the core documents typically prepared in connection with an alternative fund launch:

  • limited partnership agreement;
  • subscription agreement;
  • management agreement; and
  • side letter (for some limited partners). 

Some fund sponsors use a marketing deck or a private placement memorandum to offer the fund.

The formation process for alternative funds is relatively efficient but varies from case to case. From mandate to first close, the timeline typically ranges from ten to 16 weeks, depending on complexity and investor negotiations. Both internal factors specific to the fund sponsor, such as its track record, investment thesis, and size and external factors such as macroeconomic and geopolitical considerations, interest rates and the risk aversion of investors in times of uncertainty, may result in the fundraising process being the most lengthy part of launching an alternative fund.

Relative to international fund formation hubs, establishing an alternative fund in Canada is reasonably priced. Legals fees vary depending on many factors including the complexity of the structure, number and sophistication of limited partners and extent of customisation.

In Canada, limited partnerships can be formed under the laws of any province or territory. The legal framework governing limited partnerships is largely consistent across Canadian jurisdictions, offering liability protection to investors who do not play an active part in the partnership’s business.

If a private placement memorandum (PPM) is used, the applicable laws in certain Canadian jurisdictions grant investors statutory rights to rescission or damages if the PPM contains misrepresentations.

The investor appetite for alternative funds in Canada remains good for all alternative asset classes and with respect to all types of investors (institutional investors, accredited investors and HNW clients, family offices, government investors and increasingly, for retail investors).

See 2.1.1 Fund Structures.

Most alternative investment funds in Canada are distributed under exemptions from prospectus requirements under NI 45-106.

The most commonly used exemptions for such distributions are the private issuer exemption and the accredited investor exemption which require the fund sponsor to ensure that all investors are “accredited investors” at the time of their investment.

Beyond these prospectus exemptions, there are no additional restrictions on the types of investors that can invest in alternative investment funds in Canada.

As previously described, alternative funds themselves are not subject to direct registration or approval by Canadian securities regulators, provided that all securities are offered in reliance on exemptions under NI 45-106.

In most cases, fund managers/sponsors also do not require any registrations under securities laws to distribute or manage alternative funds. However, while rare, the management of certain more passive strategies or the more widespread or frequent distribution of alternative funds may trigger registration requirements for the manager.

There are no specific regulatory limitations on the investment activities of alternative investment funds in Canada, allowing for flexibility in investment strategies and asset allocation.

Non-local service providers – including administrators, custodians and director services providers – are not subject to regulation/registration requirements.

The registration requirements outlined in 2.3.1 Regulatory Regime also apply to non-local managers of alternative funds in Canada. Even if the registration requirements are triggered, exemptions are available to non-Canadian managers who are already registered in their home jurisdiction.

This is not applicable in Canada.

Other than complying with the prospectus exemption (described in 2.2.3 Restrictions on Investors), there are generally no specific regulations addressing pre-marketing activities for alternative funds.

See 2.3.5 Rules Concerning Pre-Marketing of Alternative Funds.

If using the private issuer or accredited investor exemption, alternative funds should only be marketed to “accredited investors”.  See 2.2.3 Restrictions on Investors.

Authorisation or notification is not required by the national regulator prior to the marketing of alternative funds.

Some prospectus exemptions (eg, the accredited investor exemption) require alternative funds to make certain filings when distributing to their Canadian investors. 

There are no additional investor protection provisions or regulatory reporting requirements.

The regulatory authorities in Canada are generally approachable and willing to engage in constructive dialogue with industry participants. Face-to-face meetings with regulatory officials are possible when circumstances warrant such direct interaction.

Alternative investment funds are not regulated in Canada.

Borrowing for alternative funds is generally limited to capital call facilities. Restrictions on borrowing are typically negotiated with investors and outlined in the fund’s constituting documents. It is standard practice for lenders to require a security interest on capital commitments and a power of attorney in case of defaults. NAV loans remain rare in Canada. 

Limited partnerships are generally not subject to Canadian federal income tax. Instead, the general partner calculates the partnership’s income and losses for each fiscal period and allocates them to partners, who report their share on their income tax returns. Income sources, including capital gains and losses, retain their character when allocated to partners, making the limited partnership tax-transparent.

However, certain exceptions exist, such as specified investment flow-through (SIFT) partnerships, which may be taxed on some categories of Canadian income, including capital gains, if their investments are (or become) listed or traded on a public market.

Canada’s retail investment fund market is well developed and tightly regulated. The principal types of retail funds include mutual funds and ETFs, both of which are typically structured as open-end trusts, although corporations are also occasionally used.

Mutual fund trusts are the most familiar and widely accepted structure. They offer flow-through tax treatment and flexibility for launching multiple series or classes of units with different fee structures, and they are operationally efficient for daily pricing and subscriptions/redemptions. Investors investing in trusts subscribe for units.

Mutual fund corporations historically offered tax deferral benefits by allowing the offsetting of capital gains and losses across different classes but have lost some of that flexibility due to tax law changes in 2016 limiting the switching of assets between classes on a tax-deferred basis. Mutual fund corporations, despite the elimination of the tax-free switch mechanism, remain relevant in Canada for several reasons – see 3.6 Tax Regime. Investors investing in mutual fund corporations subscribe for shares.

To offer a retail fund to the public, the fund must file and obtain a receipt for a prospectus with the relevant securities regulators through the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) passport system. Key requirements include:

  • filing of a preliminary and final simplified prospectus and Fund Facts (for mutual funds) or ETF Facts (for ETFs); and
  • approval from the principal regulator, which then grants a passport receipt applicable across most provinces and territories (with a separate filing typically required in Quebec).

The fund manager must be registered as an investment fund manager. The investment adviser must be registered as a portfolio manager. The entity distributing the fund must generally be registered as dealer.

The key documents involved in the formation and launch of a retail fund include (but are not limited to):

  • a declaration of trust (for mutual fund trusts) or articles and by-laws (for mutual fund corporations);
  • a simplified prospectus, and Fund Facts;
  • a management agreement;
  • sub-advisory or portfolio management agreements (if applicable); and
  • a custody agreement.

The set-up and approval process for a retail fund is relatively lengthy compared to private funds. From initial structuring to final regulatory approval and launch, the process typically takes at least three to six months.

Launching a retail fund in Canada is relatively expensive, due to regulatory, legal and operational requirements, and the need to translate it into French (if offered in Quebec). Fees associated with launching a retail fund in Canada must be paid by the fund sponsor.

For mutual fund trusts, investors hold units of the trust and are considered beneficiaries under provincial trust law. Their liability is generally limited to the amount of their investment. The declaration of trust typically includes an express limitation of liability clause stating that unitholders are not personally liable for the obligations of the fund or the trustee.

For mutual fund corporations, investors hold shares of the corporation and benefit from the limited liability protections afforded under Canadian corporate law. Shareholders are generally not responsible for the debts or liabilities of the fund beyond the value of their investment. Their liability is limited to the capital invested in their shares.

Canadian retail funds are subject to extensive disclosure and reporting obligations under securities regulations, primarily National Instrument 81-101 – Mutual Fund Prospectus Disclosure (NI 81-101), NI 81-102, and National Instrument 81-106 – Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure (NI 81-106).

Key requirements include:

  • Prospectus disclosure – funds must file a simplified prospectus and deliver a Fund Facts (or ETF Facts) document to investors at or before the point of sale.
  • Financial reporting – funds must prepare and file annual audited and interim unaudited financial statements, along with Management Reports of Fund Performance (MRFPs).
  • Material change reporting – a fund must issue a press release and file a report if a material change occurs (eg, a strategy shift, change in managers or a fund merger).
  • Governance disclosure – funds must disclose proxy voting records and provide annual reports from the Independent Review Committee (IRC), which oversees conflicts of interest.

All disclosure documents must be filed on SEDAR+ (Canada’s official platform for filing and accessing regulatory documents) and made available to investors. These requirements ensure transparency and investor protection in the retail market.

Investor appetite for retail funds in Canada remains strong and diversified, reflecting a mature and stable market. As of 2024, total assets under management in Canadian mutual funds and ETFs exceeded CAD2 trillion, with retail funds serving as a core investment vehicle for Canadian households.

In Canada, retail fund managers are typically structured as corporations, most often federally or provincially incorporated companies.

Most retail investment funds in Canada are designed to be widely accessible, with relatively low minimum investment requirements and simplified investment processes. This accessibility is intended to encourage broad participation from various types of investors (ie, individual investors who can invest through various accounts including registered accounts; institutional investors such as pension funds, endowments and foundations; and accredited investors including HNW individuals and entities with significant assets), promoting diversification and the pooling of capital for investment purposes.

Certain sector-focused retail investment funds may have additional suitability requirements or restrictions to ensure that investors understand the risks involved and that the fund is appropriate for their investment objectives and risk profile.

Retail investment funds in Canada are governed by a comprehensive regulatory framework designed to ensure investor protection, product transparency, and liquidity.

Retail funds must be qualified by a prospectus, subject to regulatory review and continuous disclosure requirements. Retail funds must appoint a registered investment fund manager, a qualified portfolio manager, and a qualified custodian (see below). An Independent Review Committee (IRC) must oversee conflicts of interest as provided under National Instrument 81-107 – Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds (NI 81-107).

Retail funds are subject to detailed rules on valuation, liquidity, leverage, borrowing, derivatives use, and securities lending. They are subject to a range of investment restrictions and limitations, including the following.

Key Rules Applicable to Retail Funds

Concentration limits

A mutual fund cannot invest more than 10% of its net asset value (NAV) in the securities of any single issuer. This limit helps ensure diversification and reduce the risk associated with a concentrated investment in any one issuer.

Control restrictions

A mutual fund cannot hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any issuer. This rule prevents funds from exerting undue influence or control over the companies in which they invest.

Prohibited investments

Mutual funds are generally prohibited from investing in certain types of securities, including physical commodities, mortgages (other than guaranteed mortgages), real estate (other than listed real estate investment trusts – REITs), and loans.

Illiquid assets

A mutual fund cannot invest more than 10% of its NAV in illiquid assets. Illiquid assets are those that cannot be readily sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business within seven days at their fair value.

Borrowing and leverage

Traditional mutual funds are generally not allowed to borrow money or use leverage, except for temporary borrowing to meet redemption requests or to settle portfolio transactions (up to 5% of the fund’s NAV). Alternative mutual funds, however, are permitted to use leverage, with a total leverage exposure limit of 300% of the fund’s NAV.

Short selling

Traditional mutual funds are not permitted to engage in short selling. Alternative mutual funds are allowed to short-sell securities, with the maximum aggregate market value of securities sold short not exceeding 50% of the fund’s NAV. Additionally, the fund must hold cash cover equal to at least 150% of the market value of the securities sold short.

Derivatives

Mutual funds can use derivatives for hedging purposes and non-hedging purposes, subject to certain conditions.

Related party transactions and conflicts of interests

Mutual funds are subject to restrictions on transactions with related parties, including the fund manager, portfolio adviser, and their affiliates.

Qualified custodian

The assets of a mutual fund must be held by a qualified custodian. Qualified custodians typically include banks, trust companies and other financial institutions that meet specific regulatory requirements. The custodian must generally be a Canadian entity or have a Canadian affiliate that is a qualified custodian. In certain limited circumstances, assets of Canadian retail investment funds may be held outside Canada by a qualified foreign custodian or sub-custodian, if appropriate to facilitate portfolio transactions of the investment fund outside Canada.

See 3.3.1 Regulatory Regime.

Non-Canadian managers that seek to offer retail investment funds to retail clients in Canada are generally subject to Canadian securities laws and must comply with the same regulatory framework applicable to domestic fund sponsors.

Exemptions may be available to non-Canadian managers looking to distribute a non-Canadian retail fund to non-retail investors (permitted clients).

For retail investment funds in Canada, regulatory approval is required through the prospectus review process, administered by the CSA under the passport system.

The typical timelines vary between eight to 12 weeks from the filing of the preliminary prospectus to receipt of the final prospectus, assuming there are no major issues or deficiencies, and four to six weeks to add a new fund to an existing shelf, as the issuer benefits from an established filing history and streamlined review.

Where the fund will be listed on an exchange (eg, the TSX or NEO), the exchange listing process runs in parallel and usually does not significantly extend the timeline if co-ordinated properly.

These timelines may vary depending on the completeness of the submission, the complexity of the strategy, and whether the issuer is seeking exemptive relief (eg, for novel fund features).

Canadian securities laws prohibit the sale of mutual fund units or shares before the fund’s prospectus has been receipted by the relevant securities regulatory authority. This means that no sales can be made, and no binding commitments can be accepted from investors during the pre-marketing phase. The distribution or publication of advertisements, sales literature, or other promotional materials that solicit or recommend the purchase of mutual fund securities is generally prohibited before the prospectus has been receipted.

Investment fund managers may communicate with potential investors and financial advisers to provide general information about the fund and its investment objectives, strategies and features. However, these communications must not be promotional in nature and must clearly indicate that the fund has not yet been receipted and that no sales can be made until the receipt is issued.

Nevertheless, prior to launching any pre-marketing activities, it is recommended that investment fund managers engage legal and compliance professionals to review pre-marketing activities and materials, to ensure compliance with applicable securities laws and regulatory requirements.

Firms marketing retail funds must generally be registered as mutual fund dealers or investment dealers. A Fund Facts (or ETF Facts) document must be delivered to investors at or before the point of sale, in accordance with NI 81-101 and National Instrument 41-101 – General Prospectus Requirements (NI 41-101).

Sales communications must present performance data using standardised periods (eg, one, three, five and ten years) and prescribed calculation methods, to ensure consistency and comparability. Appropriate disclaimers and explanations are required to help investors interpret performance figures. Marketing materials must refer investors to the fund’s prospectus and Fund Facts, which provide a concise summary of investment objectives, performance, risks and fees.

National Instrument 81-105 – Mutual Fund Sales Practices (NI 81-105) also regulates sales practices and prohibits compensation arrangements that could create conflicts of interest. For example, fund managers may not provide incentives to dealers or representatives that could unduly influence investment recommendations. All compensation and sales incentives must be fully disclosed in the fund’s offering documents.

In Canada, retail investment funds can be marketed to all members of the public, including individual retail investors, institutional investors, advised clients and self-directed investors. There are no eligibility or accreditation requirements for investors purchasing prospectus-qualified retail funds.

See 3.3.4 Regulatory Approval Process.

For firms that have marketed a retail fund in Canada, there are several ongoing regulatory requirements that must be adhered to in order to ensure continued compliance with Canadian securities laws. These requirements are designed to maintain transparency, protect investors, and uphold the integrity of the financial markets. The specific requirements can vary by province or territory, but generally include the following.

Regulatory Requirements for Marketing a Retail Fund

Continuous disclosure obligations

Funds must file and deliver to investors annual and interim financial statements; MRFPs; updated Fund Facts or ETF Facts documents; material change reports, if applicable.

Prospectus renewals

The prospectus for a retail fund must be renewed every two years. This involves updating the prospectus to reflect any changes in the fund’s operations, investment strategies, risks, fees and other relevant information.

Fund facts renewal

The Fund Facts document for each class or series of securities of the investment fund must be updated no sooner than 13 months and no later than 11 months before the lapse date of the previous prospectus.

Compliance with ongoing regulatory obligations for registered firms

Registered firms (the investment fund manager, the portfolio manager and dealer) must comply with capital, insurance, reporting and conduct obligations under National Instrument 31-103 – Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (NI 31-103) and are subject to periodic reviews from the securities commissions or the Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO).

Conflict of interest matters/NI 81-107

Managers of retail investment funds must refer conflict-of-interest matters to the IRC for review, recommendation or approval. The manager must comply with the IRC’s recommendations and ensure that the investment fund operates in accordance with the approved policies and procedure.

In addition to the general framework provided by NI 81-107 governing conflict-of-interest matters, Canadian securities regulations include several investor protection provisions and regulatory reporting requirements for retail investment funds.

Suitability Requirements

Know Your Client (KYC): Investment fund managers and dealers must collect detailed information about their clients’ financial situation, investment knowledge, risk tolerance and investment objectives to ensure that any recommendations or transactions are suitable for the client.

Know Your Product (KYP): Representatives of mutual fund dealers and investment dealers must thoroughly understand the products they offer to ensure they are appropriate for their clients.

The Canadian Investor Protection Fund (CIPF)

The Canadian Investor Protection Fund (CIPF) is a non-profit compensation fund that provides limited protection to clients of insolvent investment dealers that are members of CIRO.

Statutory Right of Action

Applicable laws in certain Canadian jurisdictions grant investors statutory rights to rescission or damages if the prospectus, Fund Facts or financial statements of a retail fund contain a misrepresentation.

See 3.3.4 Regulatory Approval Process.

.

See 3.3.1 Regulatory Regime.

See 3.3.1 Regulatory Regime.

In Canada, the tax regime applicable to retail mutual funds is decided by whether the fund is structured as a trust or corporation. The following is an overview of the key tax considerations for each structure.

Mutual Fund Trusts

Taxation at the trust level

Flow-through status: Mutual fund trusts generally qualify as flow-through entities for tax purposes. This means that the trust itself is not subject to tax on its income, provided it distributes all of its net income (including net realised capital gains) to its unitholders within the year.

Distribution of income: The trust must distribute its income to unitholders, who then include their share of the income in their personal tax returns. The types of income distributed can include interest, dividends, foreign income and capital gains.

Taxation at the unitholder level

Interest and foreign income: These are taxed as ordinary income at the unitholder’s marginal tax rate.

Dividends: Canadian dividends may be subject to a preferential tax rate to reflect the corporate taxes already paid on this income.

Capital gains: Only 50% of capital gains is taxable, providing a tax advantage to unitholders receiving capital gains distributions.

Other considerations

Return of capital: Distributions classified as a return of capital are not taxable but reduce the adjusted cost base (ACB) of the units, potentially resulting in a higher capital gain (or smaller capital loss) when the units are sold.

Foreign reporting: Trusts with significant foreign investments may have additional reporting requirements.

Mutual Fund Corporations

Taxation at the corporate level

Taxation of income: Mutual fund corporations are subject to corporate tax on their income, but they can generally deduct dividends paid to shareholders and certain expenses.

Capital gains refund mechanism: Corporations can benefit from a capital gains refund mechanism, which allows them to recover taxes paid on capital gains if they distribute sufficient dividends to shareholders.

Taxation at the shareholder level

Dividends: Shareholders are taxed on dividends received. Eligible dividends are subject to a preferential tax rate, while non-eligible dividends are taxed at a higher rate.

Capital gains: Shareholders realise capital gains (or losses) when they sell their shares. Only 50% of capital gains is taxable.

Reinvestment plans: Some mutual fund corporations offer dividend reinvestment plans (DRIPs), allowing shareholders to reinvest their dividends into additional shares which may be issued at a small discount without triggering immediate tax consequences.

Other considerations

Mutual fund corporations, despite the elimination of the tax-free switch mechanism, remain relevant in Canada for several reasons. Here are some of the key factors contributing to their continued relevance.

Tax efficiency in distributions

Preferential tax rate: Mutual fund corporations can distribute Canadian dividends to shareholders, who may benefit from a preferential tax rate. This allows for more favourable tax treatment compared to interest income.

Capital gains refund mechanism: Mutual fund corporations can benefit from the capital gains refund mechanism, which allows them to recover taxes paid on capital gains if they distribute sufficient dividends to shareholders. This can help minimise the tax impact on the corporation.

Flexibility in investment strategies

Multiple share classes: Mutual fund corporations can offer multiple classes of shares, each representing a different investment strategy or asset class. This allows investors to diversify their portfolios within a single corporate structure.

For more information about the Canadian tax treatment of mutual funds, see the book entitled Taxation of Mutual Funds and Their Investors authored by Mitch Thaw, a former Fasken tax partner. 

Below are some of the recent developments and proposals in the investment funds market in Canada.

Creation of CIRO and Consolidation of the Rules Governing Investment and Mutual Fund Dealers

The creation of CIRO on 1 January 2023 represented a significant development in the Canadian regulatory landscape applicable to the distribution of investment funds, including retail mutual funds. CIRO is the result of the consolidation of two existing self-regulatory organisations (SROs) in Canada: the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA). This consolidation aims to streamline regulatory oversight, enhance investor protection, and improve the efficiency of the regulatory framework. The consolidation of IIROC and MFDA into CIRO has created a single, unified regulatory framework for investment dealers and mutual fund dealers. This unified approach may lead to more consistent and streamlined regulatory oversight across different types of investment firms. The creation of CIRO may encourage the consolidation of distribution channels for retail mutual funds. Investment firms that previously operated under separate regulatory regimes for mutual fund dealers and investment dealers may find it more efficient to integrate their operations and distribution channels under a single regulatory framework. Since the creation of CIRO, there appears to have been an increase in the number of dealing firms being duly registered as investment and mutual fund dealers.

Rise of Responsible Investing and ESG Funds

ESG funds are becoming increasingly popular, as investors seek to align their investments with their values. These mutual funds consider ESG factors in their investment decision and aim to promote sustainable and responsible business practices. In light of their increased popularity in 2024, the CSA updated its previously published staff notice entitled “CSA Staff Notice 81-334 ESG-Related Investment Fund Disclosure (Revised)”. This revised notice does not change the guidance that was published in January 2022. Rather, it addresses matters that were not covered in the original notice and reflects developments and issues that have arisen since. The update also includes guidance addressing different levels of disclosure expectations for mutual funds whose investment objectives do not reference ESG factors, but that use ESG strategies. Generally, the guidance sets out different levels of disclosure expectations depending on the extent to which ESG factors are considered in a fund’s investment process.

Alternative Mutual Funds (As Defined in NI 81-102)

The introduction of liquid alternative mutual funds offered by prospectus (“liquid alts”) has provided retail investors with access to alternative investment strategies that were previously only available to institutional investors. These funds use strategies such as long/short equity, market neutral, and global macro to diversify portfolios and manage risk.

Fee Transparency (Total Cost Reporting Reform)

The Total Cost Reporting (TCR) reform is a significant initiative by Canadian securities regulators to enhance transparency around the costs associated with investment fund ownership. Jointly introduced by the CSA and the Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators (CCIR), the TCR aims to enhance fee transparency and investor understanding by ensuring that clients receive a comprehensive, dollar-based report of the total costs they incur when investing in investment funds and other securities.

Crypto-Assets Mutual Funds As Reporting Issuers

Canada has been at the forefront of regulatory innovation in the cryptocurrency space, leading to the creation and approval of various crypto-asset investment vehicles, including closed-end investment funds, mutual funds and ETFs offered to retail investors. The CSA has issued guidance on the custody, valuation and risk disclosure requirements for crypto-asset investment funds. Regulators emphasise the importance of clear and comprehensive disclosure, to ensure that retail investors understand the risks associated with crypto-asset investments. This includes providing information on market volatility, regulatory risks and technological risk.

Fasken

Fasken Martineau DuMoulin SENCRL, srl
800 Victoria Square, Suite 3500
Montreal, QC
H3C 0B4
Canada

(514) 397-7400

(514) 397-7600

montreal@fasken.com www.fasken.com
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Fasken was founded in the mid-19th century and merged with another leading firm in 2000 to form what is now one of the largest firms in Canada with an international reach. A premier law firm with over 950 lawyers worldwide, Fasken’s investment products and wealth management group is composed of legal professionals who have in-depth knowledge of all the different types of investment vehicles used in Canada to regroup the assets of retail, HNW or institutional investors, and deploy various investment strategies.

Introduction

The Canadian private funds landscape has undergone significant transformations over the past few years. Now, in 2025, fund managers and investors are navigating a complex environment shaped by economic uncertainty and ongoing liquidity challenges. This article provides an overview of the current fundraising climate and trends that are influencing the private funds market in Canada, including alternative liquidity sources, fund structuring trends, private credit fund strategies, general partner (GP) stakes transactions, and emerging technologies. By understanding these elements, stakeholders can better position themselves to capitalise on opportunities and mitigate risks in this dynamic sector.

Fundraising Environment

The fundraising landscape faced significant challenges in 2024. Limited partners (LPs) exhibited caution, driven by skepticism regarding portfolio investment valuations, the need for liquidity solutions due to restricted private fund distributions, or over-allocation to private asset classes. This cautious stance led to tighter capital flows, complicating efforts for fund managers to secure new commitments. Since the start of 2025, there have been early signs of recovery, although LPs still prioritise liquidity, increasingly favouring secondary transactions. The market is witnessing a consolidation trend, with larger, established managers attracting most new capital, while emerging managers face significant hurdles in raising funds, as Canadian institutional investors prefer to make larger fund commitments which are often too large for mid-sized funds (CAD200–500 million).

Regarding sector allocations, private credit remains robust, appealing to investors for its potential for steady returns in the current interest rate environment. Conversely, venture capital and real assets are encountering more difficulties due to market uncertainties and valuation challenges. Liquidity remains a critical concern, with traditional exits still proving difficult. Consequently, managers are more focused on demonstrating their ability to achieve liquidity, emphasising distributions to paid-in capital (DPI) metrics alongside internal rate of return (IRR). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors continue to influence the market, though there is a noticeable shift in approach. While ESG is not in retreat, fund managers are adopting more pragmatic methods to integrate these principles.

Alternative Sources of Liquidity

Liquidity remains a pressing issue for LPs. As such, the secondary market has seen significant growth, driven by the need for fund managers to provide liquidity to investors. Two key solutions are gaining traction: GP-led secondaries or continuation funds and net asset value (NAV) facilities.

Continuation funds rise in Canada

GP-led secondaries have become a significant component of the private funds landscape in Canada, and their prominence continues to grow. According to recent Preqin data, 2024 saw a global record of USD36 billion in continuation vehicles, with 65 transactions, the majority of which were first-time funds for their managers. This trend has resulted in an increase in the number of GP-led secondaries in Canada. Over the past decade, these transactions have become a well-established mechanism for offering liquidity solutions to general partners and investors. Historically used to provide liquidity at the end of a fund’s term, continuation vehicles (CVs) are now also being utilised to raise additional growth capital during a fund’s life or to extend the window of time to maximise the underlying value of portfolio assets.

A typical GP-led secondaries transaction generally includes the following features:

  • A new CV established by the sponsor and capitalised by new LPs, typically secondary funds or sophisticated institutional investors. One or more investors may lead the investment in the CV and negotiate terms with the sponsor.
  • A process led by the GP to actively provide liquidity options to existing LPs, while also securing additional time and/or capital for a specific investment or group of investments.
  • An election process whereby LPs can choose between cashing out of the existing fund or rolling their interests over into the new CV. Depending on the structure and terms, current fund LPs may also be offered a “status quo” option, allowing them to roll over to the CV on the same economic terms.

Given that these transactions involve the sale of one or more portfolio assets among affiliated entities, it is essential to adequately consider, disclose and obtain approval for any conflicts of interest. Additionally, the GP must demonstrate that a thorough and impartial pricing process was followed, often involving a financial adviser to manage the secondary process and provide a fairness opinion or valuation report. Tax structuring and aligning incentives through rolled carried interest must also be carefully considered. Representations and warranties insurance may also be necessary given the fund-to-fund nature of these transactions.

NAV facilities gain traction in Canada

Net asset value (NAV) facilities, though more common in the US, are increasingly drawing attention in Canada. These facilities offer leverage based on the value of a fund’s assets, presenting an alternative to subscription line facilities which are backed by unfunded commitments and used as a short-term cash management tool to bridge capital calls. NAV facilities are secured by the value of a fund’s underlying assets and can be employed for various purposes, including to facilitate early distributions to investors, make follow-on investments or pursue other growth opportunities. While they can enhance liquidity and DPI ratios, NAV facilities are met with some skepticism from LPs due to concerns about the potential artificial inflation of performance metrics. Recent guidance from the Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) underscores best practices for the use of NAV facilities, stressing the importance of transparency and the alignment of interests between GPs and LPs. Existing limited partnership agreements (LPAs) often lack clarity on these matters, so implementing NAV facilities may require approval from limited partner advisory committees or necessitate formal amendments to the LPA. Addressing provisions related to NAV facilities when establishing new funds and clearly communicating their intended use is thus now essential. A proactive approach will ensure that both GPs and LPs are aligned and that the use of NAV facilities is well documented and transparent from the outset.

Evergreen and Hybrid Funds: A Sustained Trend Among Institutional LPs

Evergreen and hybrid funds continue to be popular with institutional LPs. These funds offer distinct advantages over the traditional closed-end model commonly used in the private funds sector. They do not have a fixed term or fundraising period and allow investors to commit and redeem capital with greater flexibility. They offer bespoke provisions regarding liquidity, redemption gates, side pockets, NAV reporting, and carry calculation and payment. The specific terms of these provisions vary based on the underlying asset class and type of institutional investor. They are particularly well suited to investments in income-generating assets (eg, real estate, infrastructure and private credit), which provide capital for ongoing redemption requests. Evergreen funds are also emerging in less liquid areas, such as private equity and venture capital. For GPs, evergreen funds provide the benefit of continuous capital without the pressure of frequent fundraising cycles or a set deadline for returning investments, subject to redemption rights.

Despite their many advantages, evergreen funds also come with certain disadvantages that investors and fund managers need to carefully consider. One significant drawback is the complexity of managing continuous capital inflows and outflows, which can complicate liquidity management and valuation processes. The lack of a fixed term can also lead to challenges in aligning the interests of all investors, as some may seek short-term liquidity while others are focused on long-term growth. Additionally, the lack of standard market terms has given rise to bespoke provisions, such as tailored liquidity options, redemption gates, and side pockets, which require sophisticated and robust operational frameworks, increasing administrative burdens and costs. Some early adopter investors (especially institutional investors) have had mixed experiences with regard to the feasibility and timeframe of withdrawals from such funds and this has resulted in increased caution and diligence in investing in these vehicles.

From a GP standpoint, the continuous fundraising aspect means that fund managers must maintain ongoing investor relations and marketing efforts, potentially diverting focus from core investment activities.

These factors can make evergreen funds less appealing for certain investors and managers who prefer the more “standard” terms and defined timelines of traditional closed-end funds.

Enhanced Access to Private Wealth Channels

Private fund managers increasingly target accredited investors (eg, HNW individuals and family offices) and the growing private wealth market. Evergreen funds, known for their flexibility and improved liquidity options, are proving particularly attractive to HNW individuals and family offices. While these funds often appeal to the same institutional investors as traditional drawdown funds, their adaptability makes them well suited to the private wealth segment.

Blurring lines between fund structures

In the HNW (non-institutional) channels, the distinction between hedge funds and private market funds is becoming increasingly blurred. Fund managers are designing hybrid structures that cater to private wealth advisers, utilising open-end formats which do not require capital commitments and which manage liquidity through various mechanisms such as liquidity sleeves, subscription and redemption gates, and leverage. These hybrid funds necessitate bespoke terms and specific regulatory and operational arrangements. Fund sponsors have been exploring ways to provide retail access to private funds while addressing the issue of long-term capital lock-up. This has led to a shift towards “evergreen” or “open-end” fund structures. Unlike traditional closed-end funds, evergreen funds do not have a finite life, allowing for continuous capital investment without the pressure of frequent fundraising cycles. Investors can buy into the fund at the current NAV, and the fund operates similarly to a mutual fund, albeit with more limited redemption opportunities.

Key considerations for private fund managers establishing such vehicles include:

  • Distribution networks – partnering with intermediaries with strong distribution networks is essential to reach potential investors.
  • Back office impact – enhancing fund administration capabilities and liquidity management systems to handle the complexities of open-end structures.
  • Funding redemptions – utilising mechanisms such as gates or promissory notes, with careful tax planning, to manage liquidity effectively.

The convergence of these trends – blurring lines between fund structures and the proliferation of open-end funds – represents a significant shift in the private funds landscape. By adopting innovative hybrid and evergreen fund structures, fund managers can offer more flexible and attractive investment options to both institutional and private wealth investors, positioning themselves for future growth and success. However, by providing greater retail access to private funds, managers are increasingly subject to scrutiny by the securities regulators who are now seeking to better understand the private fund landscape.

Private Credit Fund Strategies

Private credit strategies experienced substantial growth in 2024, a trend that is expected to continue into 2025, though with heightened competition. This has been true with regard to all segments of the industry, from high-yield debt funds to senior secured debt funds. It has also covered all private credit strategies including infrastructure and project lending, bridge lending, mortgage lending and corporate lending. The significant expansion observed in the private credit sector in 2024 was driven by several factors, including an increasing interest rate environment and the increasing demand for alternative financing solutions by borrowers. This momentum is expected to carry forward at least into the first half of 2025, notwithstanding the Bank of Canada lowering interest rates during the last half of 2024.

Open-end fund structures are gaining popularity within the private credit space, primarily due to credit portfolios being relatively easy to value (especially in comparison to private equity or venture capital assets) and due to the fact that private credit strategies provide for income streams which can alleviate some liquidity and withdrawal concerns.

GP Stakes Transactions

GP stakes transactions are becoming increasingly common as fund managers seek to raise capital for GP commitments, launch new strategies, or facilitate senior partner retirements, although they are still relatively rare in Canada due to the smaller size of the GP market. While GPs have traditionally relied on retained earnings generated through management fees or carry to finance their operations and growth, this approach has inherent limitations on the manager’s ability to grow the business, facilitate succession planning, and achieve other strategic objectives. The introduction of GP stakes has helped overcome these challenges by allowing GPs to sell minority stakes to third-party investors, thus providing the necessary liquidity. GP stake transactions involve a third party investing in a GP or fund manager, usually in the form of minority equity investments. These transactions inject capital into the business without requiring repayment, offering GPs the financial flexibility to fund commitments, launch new offerings, and enter new markets.

GP stakes come with both advantages and disadvantages. While they provide immediate liquidity and can bring strategic support and operational insights from the new investor, they also require the GP to sell a permanent stake in the business. This can be a one-time option due to limitations imposed by fund documentation, and it may raise concerns among existing LPs regarding fees and carry paid to a passive investor. Conversely, structured preferred equity solutions offer a non-dilutive alternative to GP stakes. These solutions involve creating a new preferred security that provides the investor with a preferred return, which is repaid from the fund’s cash flows. Unlike GP stakes, preferred equity does not require the sale of a permanent stake in the sponsor, making it an attractive option for fund managers seeking liquidity without diluting ownership.

As the size of the Canadian GP market continues to grow, we can expect private-fund sponsors to increasingly turn to GP stakes and structured preferred equity investments to finance their growth.

Tech Trends for GPs

Online subscription agreements

The transition to online subscription agreements for private funds promises a more seamless and efficient process for both GPs and LPs. However, the implementation of these digital agreements presents significant challenges. Some LPs are resistant to adopting online platforms, preferring traditional paper-based processes. This resistance can necessitate dual processes, where both digital and paper-based agreements are maintained, thereby complicating operations and potentially diminishing the efficiency gains that online systems are designed to provide. Overcoming these challenges requires addressing LPs’ concerns, providing adequate training and support, and demonstrating the security and reliability of online systems.

Cybersecurity

As cyber-threats continue to evolve, fund managers must remain ever vigilant. The nature of these threats is becoming increasingly sophisticated, driven by advancements in AI and malware technologies. Cybersecurity measures must be continually updated to protect sensitive information and maintain the integrity of fund operations. This includes implementing robust security protocols, conducting regular security audits, and staying informed about the latest threat vectors and defence strategies.

By staying ahead of these tech trends, GPs can enhance their operational efficiency, safeguard their assets, and better serve their investors.

Closing Thoughts

The trends and developments outlined in this article, from the growing importance of liquidity solutions and evergreen funds to the rise of private credit strategies and GP stakes transactions, highlight the dynamic nature of the Canadian private funds sector. As it continues to evolve in 2025, fund managers and investors who remain informed and adaptable will be better positioned to navigate these changes and capitalise on emerging opportunities.

Fasken

Fasken Martineau DuMoulin SENCRL, srl
800 Victoria Square, Suite 3500
Montreal, QC
H3C 0B4
Canada

(514) 397-7400

(514) 397-7600

montreal@fasken.com www.fasken.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Fasken was founded in the mid-19th century and merged with another leading firm in 2000 to form what is now one of the largest firms in Canada with an international reach. A premier law firm with over 950 lawyers worldwide, Fasken’s investment products and wealth management group is composed of legal professionals who have in-depth knowledge of all the different types of investment vehicles used in Canada to regroup the assets of retail, HNW or institutional investors, and deploy various investment strategies.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Fasken was founded in the mid-19th century and merged with another leading firm in 2000 to form what is now one of the largest firms in Canada with an international reach. A premier law firm with over 950 lawyers worldwide, Fasken’s investment products and wealth management group is composed of legal professionals who have in-depth knowledge of all the different types of investment vehicles used in Canada to regroup the assets of retail, HNW or institutional investors, and deploy various investment strategies.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.