India offers the following frameworks for domestic and overseas fund managers looking to set up alternative investment funds.
Fund managers intending to set up India-focused funds would need to determine whether a Domestic AIF or a GIFT Fund would be the best choice based on criteria such as the investors involved and the fund’s investment strategy. GIFT Funds are treated as non-resident for the purposes of India’s foreign exchange laws, so any exposure of GIFT Funds to India would be via available foreign investment route – eg, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI). If the fund expects to pool monies from resident Indians to primarily make Indian investments, a Domestic AIF would be the proposed structure. India-focused funds expecting participation from both overseas and domestic investors might consider a unified structure (a Domestic AIF acting as a master fund and a feeder vehicle in GIFT or other similar jurisdiction) or a co-investment structure with a Domestic AIF and an overseas vehicle (in GIFT or another similar jurisdiction) operating in parallel. A key point to note is that, in a unified structure, as long as the ownership and control of the manager and sponsor of the Domestic AIF are vested with Indian resident citizens, the investments made by the Domestic AIF are not subject to any FDI limitations.
GIFT Funds need not be limited to India-focused funds, and can be global funds raising capital from resident Indians or overseas investors.
Domestically, retail funds are regulated as Mutual Funds, as discussed in 3. Fund Formation. GIFT Funds can also launch schemes for retail investors subject to the criteria specified under the FM Regulations.
Domestic AIFs and GIFT Funds
Under the AIF Regulations, a Domestic AIF may be set up in the form of a trust, a company, a limited liability partnership (LLP) or a body corporate.
Under the FM Regulations, a GIFT Fund intending to operate as a “venture capital scheme” or a “restricted scheme” may be set up in the form of a trust, a company or an LLP, while “retail schemes” can be set up in the form of a trust or a company.
Trust structures have been consistently adopted by the industry as the default standard for both Domestic AIFs and GIFT Funds due to their operational flexibility, for confidentiality reasons and because regulatory compliance requirements are less stringent versus those for structures such as an LLP or a company.
Domestic AIFs and GIFT Funds set up as trusts would be governed by the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, would be governed by the Companies Act, 2013 (“Companies Act”) if set up as companies, and would be governed by the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (“LLP Act”) if set up as LLPs, in addition to the AIF Regulations and the FM Regulations, respectively.
On making an investment, “units” are issued to the investors, evidencing beneficial interest in a particular scheme of a Domestic AIF or a GIFT Fund.
Choice of structure for managers
The managers of both Domestic AIFs and GIFT Funds are mostly structured in the form of an LLP or a company. For GIFT Funds, the manager may be structured as the branch of an entity which is already registered and/or regulated by a financial sector regulator in India or a foreign jurisdiction for conducting similar activities.
LLPs have relatively fewer compliance and regulatory requirements compared to companies. The costs incurred setting up and maintaining an LLP are also lower. LLPs are beneficial in cases where stakeholders wish to regularly withdraw profits since, once the LLP has discharged tax on its income, the distributions received by partners from the LLP are free of tax. However, LLPs are subject to a higher tax rate than companies. Companies may be preferred if the stakeholders do not intend to regularly withdraw profits as dividends, as tax on the distribution of dividends additionally applies to the recipients.
Domestic AIFs
To begin the process of registration, the entity to be registered as a Domestic AIF must be set up under the applicable law:
Thereafter, the applicant is required to obtain a Permanent Account Number (PAN) and make an application via the SEBI Intermediary Portal (SI Portal) along with necessary documents and information. Some of the key requirements are as follows:
The approval process generally takes two to three months, and, after authorisation, the fund must pay the fee applicable to its Domestic AIF category. The SEBI takes a record of the PPM for the first scheme under the Domestic AIF at the time of registration itself, and the Domestic AIF (barring Category I Domestic AIFs – Angel Funds) can launch further schemes by filing a PPM and requisite information along with the required fees.
GIFT Funds
The Fund Management Entity or FME must identify office space with adequate infrastructure at GIFT City for the purposes of incorporation. Thereafter, an application may be made to SEZ (Special Economic Zones) Authority and IFSCA via the Single Window IT System (SWITS) for registration. Based on the type of funds to be managed, the FME may decide to apply as an Authorised FME, Registered FME (Non-Retail) or Registered FME (Retail).
Key requirements for all FMEs include the following.
The approval process generally takes two to two and a half months, and, after it has been approved, the FME can launch schemes based on the category of FME registration obtained. Also, an annual fee for renewal of FME registration is payable by the FME to the IFSCA.
Based on the FME category, Venture Capital Schemes, Restricted Schemes and Retail Schemes can all be launched in accordance with the FM Regulations.
The FM Regulations also permit utilising Third-Party Fund Management Services offered by FMEs in GIFT City to manage GIFT Funds (being Restricted Schemes) for up to USD50 million.
For companies and LLPs, there are statutory limits on the liability of shareholders and partners, respectively. For trusts, there is no statutory liability. Irrespective of the structure, fund managers ensure that the liability of investors is contractually limited for Domestic AIFs and GIFT Funds.
Domestic AIFs
The following disclosures must be made to investors.
The following disclosures must be made to the SEBI.
On receipt of any foreign investment, or when the investments of the Domestic AIF are to be treated as indirect foreign investments due to the ownership of the manager or sponsor, additional reporting under the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 (“NDI Rules”) may be applicable.
GIFT Funds
While the IFSCA does not prescribe a template for PPMs, it mandates minimum disclosures similar to the template PPM for Domestic AIFs.
Finally, FM Regulations prescribe certain reporting requirements to the IFSCA and investors that are less stringent than those prescribed for Domestic AIFs.
For the quarter ending 30 September 2025, total commitments raised from both domestic and foreign investors in Domestic AIFs amounted to around INR15,05,372 crore (approximately USD 166.5 billion) as per the statistics published by the SEBI. Similar statistics released by the IFSCA as of 30 September 2025 suggest that commitments to the tune of USD26.3 billion have been raised by GIFT Funds. A diverse set of investors have shown interest in Domestic AIFs and GIFT Funds, including high net worth individuals, family offices and institutional investors as well as overseas development financial institutions, sovereign wealth funds and pension funds.
Please see 2.1.1. Fund Structures.
Domestic AIFs
Domestic investors
Most investors can freely invest in Domestic AIFs, with certain limitations for specific classes of institutional investors, with the key considerations summarised below.
Foreign investors
Foreign entities from Financial Action Task Force (FATF)-compliant jurisdictions are generally permitted to invest in Domestic AIFs under the automatic route under the Non-Debt Instruments Rules. Investors from countries sharing a land border with India or those with beneficial owners from these countries can invest through the government approval route. Foreign investors may prefer to invest via a feeder vehicle into Domestic AIFs to avoid the requirement of a permanent account number, or PAN.
Category III Domestic AIFs accepting foreign investment can only make portfolio investments in those securities authorised for a foreign portfolio investor, irrespective of ownership and control of the manager and sponsor.
GIFT Funds
There are no specific restrictions on types of investors that can invest in GIFT Funds. Participation by Indian investors in GIFT Funds would be subject to Indian overseas investment laws.
Domestic AIFs
The main features of Domestic AIFs are as follows.
GIFT Funds
There are no concentration norms applicable as such, although other conditions apply for investments that can be made by Venture Capital Schemes and Restricted Schemes.
Retail Schemes also have certain investment restrictions which are not as stringent as those applicable to mutual funds.
An overview of the various categories of GIFT Funds are as follows:
Domestic AIFs
Service providers for Domestic AIFs primarily include custodians, merchant bankers, issue registrars and/or share transfer agents (to be appointed for the collection of stamp duty upon issuance and transfer of AIF units). These service providers must be registered with the SEBI and must have a presence in India. Certain local services providers, including trustees and benchmarking agencies, may not require SEBI registration to provide services to Domestic AIFs.
GIFT Funds
Custodians, distributors and depository participants offering services at GIFT City may be required to secure registration under the International Financial Services Centres Authority (Capital Market Intermediaries) Regulations, 2025 (“CMI Regulations”). Other service providers at GIFT City may also require registration with the IFSCA.
Domestic AIFs
The manager entity of a Domestic AIF must be incorporated in India under the country’s applicable laws. Foreign investment in the manager of a Domestic AIF may be made via the automatic route in accordance with NDI Rules.
If ownership and control of both the manager and sponsor of a Domestic AIF does not lie with Indian resident citizens, investments made by the Domestic AIF in equity instruments – equities, compulsorily convertible preference shares or debentures, or warrants – of an Indian entity will be considered to be indirect foreign investment for the investee Indian entity, and would be subject to the sectoral caps, pricing guidelines and other conditions set out under the NDI Rules.
GIFT Funds
GIFT does not have any specific requirements for non-local fund managers.
Please see 2.3.2 Requirements for Non-Local Service Providers.
Domestic AIFs
Domestic AIFs are only permitted to raise funds by way of private placement after receipt of approval from the SEBI. Managers cannot publicly advertise investment offers.
Pre-marketing is not recognised as a concept under the AIF Regulations. In practice, pre-marketing is carried out in India by incorporating suitable disclaimers in pre-marketing pitchbooks and presentations so that it is distinguishable from any kind of (disallowed) public offer to subscribe to the units of a Domestic AIF.
GIFT Funds
Pre-marketing is not specifically recognised as a concept under the FM Regulations and/or other regulatory frameworks managed by the IFSCA. Pre-marketing at GIFT City is carried out by incorporating suitable disclaimers in pre-marketing pitchbooks and presentations so that it is distinguishable from any kind of general offer to subscribe to the units of GIFT Funds.
Please refer to the requirements for distributors in 2.3.6. Rules Concerning Marketing of Alternative Funds.
Domestic AIFs
There is no specific regulatory framework for distributors, although the AIF Regulations govern the commission payable to distributors for marketing of units of Domestic AIFs on a private placement basis, as follows:
GIFT Funds
Distributors who wish to set-up operations in GIFT City and engage with an issuer or a service provider to facilitate investment or subscription in GIFT Funds, India funds or funds of any foreign jurisdiction must register with the IFSCA under the CMI Regulations prior to the commencement of operations. Distributors (registered or otherwise) would need to ensure compliance with the Code of Conduct prescribed by the IFSCA to distribute GIFT Funds on an ongoing basis.
See 2.2.3 Restrictions on Investors.
Domestic AIFs
Please see 2.1.2 Common Process for Setting Up Investment Funds; 2.3.5 Rules Concerning Pre-Marketing of Alternative Funds; and 2.3.6 Rules Concerning Marketing of Alternative Funds.
GIFT Funds
Please see 2.1.2 Common Process for Setting Up Investment Funds; 2.3.5 Rules Concerning Pre-Marketing of Alternative Funds; and 2.3.6 Rules Concerning Marketing of Alternative Funds.
See 2.3.5 Rules Concerning Pre-Marketing of Alternative Funds and 2.3.6 Rules Concerning Marketing of Alternative Funds.
Domestic AIFs
Each manager of a Domestic AIF must designate a staff member to address investor grievances.
SCORES (SEBI Complaints Redressal System)
If the investor remains dissatisfied with the response or resolution provided by the AIF, they can file a complaint on SCORES, the SEBI’s online grievance redress platform.
ODR (Online Dispute Resolution) Portal
The ODR platform was set up to allow online conciliation and arbitration for resolution of disputes in the Indian Securities Market. Any investor may raise a dispute on this portal to seek online dispute resolution.
To ensure investor protection, the AIF Regulations require that approval be sought from a specified percentage of investors for certain decisions such as, among others, in specie distributions, early wind-up, term extension, transactions with associates and change of investment strategy.
AIF Regulations also lay down a strict code of conduct for Domestic AIFs, trustees, managers, key management personnel, and members of investment committees, ensuring high standards of governance and further protecting investor interests.
GIFT Funds
Investor protection norms similar to those applicable to Domestic AIFs have been established under the FM Regulations and circulars issued by the IFSCA for GIFT Funds.
Domestic AIFs
SEBI has developed the SI Portal, which can be accessed for all relevant registration and post-registration activities under the AIF Regulations. The SEBI also offers an Informal Guidance Scheme under which investors, market intermediaries or other entities can seek guidance on any regulatory matters for a fee.
Meetings may be possible, depending on context.
GIFT Funds
An approach similar to that of the SEBI has been adopted by IFSCA officials. Meetings with IFSCA officials are possible.
Domestic AIFs
AIF Regulations and various circulars issued by the SEBI for market participants require the Domestic AIF/manager to adopt various policies covering areas such as risk, valuation, insider dealing and market abuse, and anti-money laundering.
Some key policies and their features are provided below.
Risk management
As per the applicable Code of Conduct, AIFs must ensure that an effective risk management process and appropriate internal controls are in place, including making disclosures to investors. Also, for investments in listed securities, the manager is mandated to adopt a stewardship code.
Valuation and pricing of the assets held by the fund
AIFs are required to follow standardised valuation practices per the AIF Regulations. For unlisted and thinly traded securities, valuations are based on the IPEV Guidelines.
Insider dealing and market abuse
SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 (“PIT Regulations”) require the manager to formulate a code of conduct to regulate, monitor and report trading by designated persons and immediate relatives of the designated persons, as applicable in the case of certain AIFs.
Anti-money laundering
Domestic AIFs must adopt Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) and anti-money laundering (AML) policies, inter alia, covering client due diligence, investor-risk categorisation, transaction monitoring and reporting to the Financial Intelligence Unit – India in the event of suspicious transactions. The appointment of a designated director and a principal officer to monitor implementation is required.
GIFT Funds
Please refer to 2.3.1 Regulatory Regime.
GIFT Funds need to adopt various policies covering areas such as risk, valuation, insider trading, AML, etc, on lines similar to those adopted by Domestic AIFs.
Generally, GIFT Funds that are Restricted Schemes may undertake short selling subject to leverage limitations.
Domestic AIFs
Category I and Category II Domestic AIFs
Category I and Category II Domestic AIFs may borrow funds to cover a drawdown shortfall for investments. The borrowed amount cannot exceed 20% of the proposed investment in the investee company, 10% of the fund’s investable funds, or the pending commitment from investors, whichever is lower. Borrowing for day-to-day operational requirements cannot be for more than 30 days, on not more than four occasions in a year and the amount must not represent more than 10% of the investable funds.
Category III AIFs
Category III Domestic AIFs can borrow or use leverage – eg, by investing in derivatives or by borrowing or any other means – and must comply with the prudential requirements laid down by the SEBI. The leverage ratio of a Category III Domestic AIF is limited to two times the NAV of the fund, meaning the fund’s exposure should not exceed twice its net asset value.
GIFT Funds
Venture Capital Schemes and Restricted Schemes are permitted to undertake borrowings without restriction, with the consent of investors and appropriate disclosures in PPM. Any change to the terms would require the consent of two-thirds of the investors by value.
Retail Schemes are permitted to borrow up to 20% of assets under management (AUM) for six months only to meet temporary liquidity needs for the purposes of redemption.
Domestic AIFs
The Income-tax Act, 1961, intended to be replaced by the Income Tax Act, 2025 from 1 April 2026 as announced in Indian Union Budget 2026-27 (“IT Act”) is the statute governing income taxes in India, and provides for a tax pass-through status to Category I and II Domestic AIFs – ie, their income is directly taxable in the hands of their investors as though it were received by or was accruing to them had they invested directly in the underlying securities. The tax pass-through status applies to all income earned by Domestic AIFs apart from income taxable under the heading “Profits and gains of business or profession”. This business income is taxable at the maximum marginal rate applicable in that financial year and due by the Domestic AIF. Thereafter, this business income is tax-exempt for investors.
Category III Domestic AIFs are not granted the above pass-through status under the IT Act. However, if they are set up as trusts, they can be structured for tax transparency if the general principles of trust taxation and other provisions of the IT Act are applied.
Non-resident investors are eligible to claim the benefits of a double-taxation avoidance agreement, or Tax Treaty, entered into between their country of residence and India. The provisions of the Tax Treaty would supersede the provisions of the IT Act if they are more beneficial than the provisions of the latter, subject to other requirements and customary substance requirements. Where investors are from countries with which India does not have a Tax Treaty, the provisions of the IT Act will continue to apply.
GIFT Funds
GIFT Funds in the nature of Category I and Category II AIFs have been accorded a pass-through status similar to Domestic AIFs. Business income is eligible for a 100% tax holiday for ten years within the first 15 years. Non-resident investors enjoy tax exemption on offshore income made through GIFT Funds, and are not required to obtain a PAN or file a tax return in India. Losses (except for business losses) can be passed through to investors, provided units are held for 12 months or more. Investors are also eligible to claim benefits (if any) under the applicable double taxation avoidance agreements.
GIFT Funds are taxed at fund level, with exemptions for non-resident investors on income arising from the transfer of securities (other than the shares of Indian companies) such as derivatives, debt securities, offshore securities, mutual funds and specified securities listed on the IFSC exchanges.
FMEs enjoy a 100% corporate tax holiday for ten years within the first 15 years, reduced Minimum Alternate Tax/Alternate Minimum Tax rates and GST exemption on services provided to GIFT Funds.
Notably, the Union Budget 2026 has proposed a significant enhancement to taxation of eligible GIFT Funds and FMEs, with effect from 1 April 2026. The income-tax holiday for IFSC units, including FMEs and eligible GIFT Funds, is set to be extended to 20 consecutive years within the first 25 years of operations, effectively doubling the duration of the 100% tax exemption. Furthermore, to provide long-term certainty beyond the holiday period, the budget introduces a concessional tax rate of 15% on business income for these units once the tax holiday concludes.
Domestic Mutual Funds
Structure of mutual funds
Mutual funds are trusts set up under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, through a registered trust deed. The trust is established by one or more sponsors, who are similar to the promoters of a company. It is registered with the SEBI under the MF Regulations as a mutual fund, and this fund can launch multiple schemes, each with assets and liabilities that are segregated and ring-fenced from other schemes of the mutual fund. The investors contributing to the schemes of a mutual fund are the beneficial owners of that scheme.
In addition, the sponsor establishes a trustee company in India which holds the property of the mutual fund for the benefit of the investors.
The trustee company of the mutual fund in turn appoints an Asset Management Company (AMC), a limited liability company incorporated in India, which is approved by the SEBI, for management of the mutual fund.
The decentralised structure of mutual funds in India ensures that a system of checks and balances is maintained. No party can unilaterally take a decision which may not be in the interests of the investors. However, a decentralised structure also leads to increased reporting requirements and higher set-up and administration costs.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
Please see 2.1.1 Fund Structures.
Domestic Mutual Funds
A mutual fund in India can initiate its operations and collect monies from investors and issue units to them only after obtaining prior approval from the SEBI, which is a two-step process.
The sponsor is also required to pay INR5 lakhs (approximately USD5,556) plus taxes at the time of filing the application for in-principal approval, and a fee of INR25 lakhs (approximately USD27,778) plus taxes after final approval is granted.
To sum up, it generally takes 12 to 15 months for the SEBI to analyse and satisfy itself that a sponsor, AMC and trustee company are fit to launch and manage a mutual fund, and for the entire mutual fund application to be approved.
If a mutual fund plans to launch a Specialized Investment Funds (SIF) in addition to the above, it will be required to file a further application upon receipt of the final approval for registration as a mutual fund to launch the SIF.
Also, if a sponsor wishes to set up an MF Lite, a simpler regime for mutual funds that intends to only launch passive mutual fund schemes, the aforementioned process remains the same, with certain relaxations. For instance, in the case of an application made under Route 1 and Route 2, the net-worth requirement falls to INR35 crore (approximately USD3.89 million) and INR75 crore (approximately USD8.33 million), respectively.
Launch of mutual fund schemes
After seeking registration as a mutual fund, the AMC can launch mutual fund schemes by filing the relevant documents – ie, a SID, or Scheme Information Document, providing the key features of the scheme of a mutual fund; an SAI, or Statement of Additional Information, which provides standard terms of engagement of the AMC with respect to mutual funds, as well as other terms and conditions with respect to investments, redemptions and restrictions; and a KIM, or Key Information Memorandum, which provides a brief snapshot of the scheme, and the details for various entities, fund managers and key investment personnel involved in the operations of the mutual fund. For a SIF, an Investment Strategy Information Document (ISID) instead of a SID must be filed with the SEBI for the respective investment strategies.
The first mutual fund scheme must be launched within six months of the date of receipt of mutual fund registration.
Any subsequent schemes, on which SEBI observation letter has been issued, can be launched by filing a draft SID with the SEBI at least 8 working days prior to launch of the new mutual fund schemes for public comments. During this period, the SEBI will examine the SID and, if there are any inaccuracies, will request that the AMC appropriately carry out changes and file a final SID before it is issued for circulation to the investors.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.1.2 Common Process for Setting Up Investment Funds.
Domestic Mutual Funds
Liability of the investors is limited to the number of units they hold in the schemes of the Mutual Fund, and they do not have any personal liability.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.1.3 Limited Liability.
Domestic Mutual Funds
Disclosures made under fund documents
Mutual funds are required to make disclosures through various fund documents such as the aforementioned SID, SAI and KIM which should be filed with the SEBI and circulated among investors.
Periodic reporting
The mutual fund’s AMC is required to make various disclosures on daily, monthly, quarterly, half-yearly and yearly basis to the investors, trustees of the mutual fund and SEBI, such as daily disclosure of net asset value, a quarterly report to the trustee on operations of the mutual fund, an annual report to the SEBI and investors, intimations of any deviations from the scheme’s objective, etc.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.1.4 Disclosure Requirements.
Domestic Mutual Funds
The Indian retail market has seen a remarkable surge in activity among several investor categories, including individual retail investors, institutional investors, domestic and foreign investors, high net worth investors and non-resident investors. This is reflected in the exponential increase in the mutual fund segment’s AUM from INR27.05 trillion as on 30 November 2019 to INR81.32 trillion on 30 November 2025, according to the AMFI.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.2.3 Types of Investors in Alternative Funds.
Domestic Mutual Funds
Mutual Funds are managed by an asset management company (AMC) which is structured as a limited liability company under the Companies Act, 2013.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
Please refer to 3.2.2 Legal Structures Used by Fund Managers.
Domestic Mutual Funds
There are no restrictions on investors making investments in mutual funds other than in the case of a SIF. However, they must meet the conditions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and adhere to the SEBI’s “Guidelines on Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Standards and CFT/Obligations of Securities Market Intermediaries under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and Rules Framed Thereunder” (“AML/CFT Guidelines”) setting down the AML KYC guidelines. Further, under these guidelines, the mutual fund is required to ensure that the investor is from a competent jurisdiction, is not a Politically Exposed Person (PEP) and is not undertaking any dubious or unusual transactions.
For a SIF, the investor is required to invest at least INR10 lakhs (approximately USD11,000) across various investment strategies under the SIF and the same will be required to be maintained at all times.
With respect to investment in mutual funds by persons resident outside India, certain jurisdictions restrict solicitation of foreign funds and accordingly, mutual funds may impose conditions on such investors at the time of onboarding them.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.2.3 Restrictions on Investors.
Investment Restrictions
Various restrictions on investments by a mutual fund scheme are covered by Regulation 44(1) and Regulation 49AA with Schedule VII of the MF Regulations. These include limits with respect to exposure in various instruments, issuer company, and group-level restrictions. They are presented in order to ensure that, while investment decisions are made by the AMC, a balanced view is taken given the exposure inherent in certain instruments. For instance, the scheme must not invest more than 10% of its NAV in debt instruments rated investment grade – ie, BBB- and above – and issued by a single issuer, comprising money market instruments and non-money market instruments. A mutual fund should also not own more than 10% of any company’s paid-up capital carrying voting rights. Similarly, an investment scheme under an SIF must not invest: i) more than 20% of its NAV in debt and money market securities issued by a single issuer and rated AAA; (ii) 16% in securities rated AA; or (iii) 12% in securities rated A and below – extendable by up to 5% of the NAV of investment strategy with prior approval of trustees of the mutual fund and board of AMC.
Further, an industry-wide limit of USD7 billion has been set for overseas investments, with a USD1 billion cap per individual mutual fund. In addition, mutual funds are permitted to make overseas investments in an Exchange Traded Fund with an industry-wide limit of USD1 billion and a cap of USD300 million per individual mutual fund.
See 2.3.1 Regulatory Regime.
Under MF Regulations, a mutual fund can only engage with SEBI-registered intermediaries. If any entity is not required to be registered with the SEBI, it can be engaged only in terms of compliance, with outsourcing conditions laid down by the SEBI. Further, AMCs are restricted from carrying out operations relating to including trading, investor servicing and investor operations outside India.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.2 Requirements for Non-Local Service Providers.
Domestic Mutual Funds
Under the MF Regulations, a sponsor of a Mutual Fund shall be required to appoint or incorporate an AMC in India, which will undertake fund management activities for the Mutual Fund. However, an asset management company can be formed by a sponsor which is a non-resident Indian entity and the same is permissible under automatic route as per the Foreign Direct Investment Policy.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.3 Local Regulatory Requirements for Non-Local Managers.
Domestic Mutual Funds
See 3.1.2 Common Process for Setting Up Investment Funds.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.4. Regulatory Approval Process.
Domestic Mutual Funds
There is no pre-marketing of mutual fund schemes in India.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.5 Rules Concerning Pre-Marketing of Alternative Funds.
Domestic Mutual Funds
As mentioned, at the time of investor on-boarding, all fund documents – SID, SAI and KIM – must be made available to investors.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.7 Marketing of Alternative Funds.
Domestic Mutual Funds
In India, there are no specific restrictions as to whom the mutual funds can be marketed. It can be marketed to the general public at large, subject to compliance with marketing rules as prescribed above.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.7 Marketing of Alternative Funds.
Domestic Mutual Funds
See 3.3.6 Rules Concerning Marketing of Retail Funds.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.8 Marketing Authorisation/Notification Process.
Domestic Mutual Funds
See 3.3.6 Rules Concerning Marketing of Retail Funds.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.9 Post-Marketing Ongoing Requirements.
Domestic Mutual Funds
The SEBI has introduced various structures and measures to safeguard investor interests, including the following.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.10 Investor Protection Rules.
Domestic Mutual Funds
The SEBI is known for its approachability and proactive engagement with investors and market participants.
During the process of evaluating mutual fund applications, SEBI officials actively liaise with a designated contact from the applicant organisation to address queries, request additional information, and ensure a smooth application process. This approach reflects SEBI’s commitment to transparency and effective communication.
The SEBI also offers an Informal Guidance Scheme under which investors, market intermediaries, or other entities can seek its written guidance by paying a prescribed fee on any regulatory matters.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.3.11 Approach of the Regulator.
Domestic Mutual Funds
Categories of mutual fund schemes
The schemes of a mutual fund, including for SIFs, can be broadly split into two categories, as follows:
Asset Protection
The mutual fund is mandated to appoint a SEBI-registered custodian to hold the securities in which the mutual fund schemes will invest. The SEBI must be informed of the appointment of the custodian within 15 days of the appointment date. The trustees are responsible for the funds and property of the schemes and must hold them in trust for the unitholders, in accordance with MF Regulations.
Policy requirements
Some of the key policies and frameworks adopted by a Mutual Fund to ensure effective management of the schemes are as follows.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.4 Operational Requirements.
Domestic Mutual Funds
Borrowings
Mutual Funds cannot borrow unless it is to meet temporary liquidity needs (which cannot be more than 20% of NAV) for the purposes of repurchases, redemption of units or payment of interest or dividends to unitholders. The duration of borrowing cannot exceed a period of six months. The costs of borrowing for a given mutual fund scheme must be adjusted against the portfolio yield of the scheme and the borrowing costs in excess of portfolio yield, if any, will be borne by the AMC.
If an associate of the sponsor or AMC is the borrower, disclosure must be provided to the trustee and investors regarding the reasons for borrowing and the competitiveness of the terms of the borrowings.
Also, any general borrowings by AMCs must be disclosed to trustees and investors.
Further, in the case of SIFs, investment strategies can take exposure of up to 25% of net assets in permissible exchange-traded derivative instruments specifically for purposes other than hedging and portfolio rebalancing.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.5 Fund Finance.
Domestic Mutual Funds
Mutual funds are tax exempt, in accordance with the provisions of Section 10(23D) of the IT Act. The funds receive their income without any deduction of tax at source.
For investors, units of a mutual fund held for more than 12 months are treated as long-term capital assets. The capital gain is charged after deduction of expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively on this transfer and cost as inflated by the cost-inflation index released by the Central Government of India for unitholders.
Individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (HUF) whose total income excluding long-term capital gains falls below the threshold of income, chargeable to tax, this shortfall must be deducted from the long-term capital gain and only the balance of the gain will be chargeable to tax.
Any loss arising from the sale of units can be deducted from the other capital gains of the investor; however, the deduction will only be made from the capital gains, and any capital loss must be carried forward separately to be offset against capital gains in the next year.
Retail Schemes Under GIFT Funds
See 2.6 Tax Regime.
Domestic AIFs have undergone significant regulatory evolution over the past few years, with the SEBI introducing reforms aimed at making it easier to do business while reinforcing investor protection.
Recent measures include: (i) the introduction of AI-only AIFs with operational flexibilities and reduced compliance obligations; (ii) a reduction in minimum ticket size for LVFs; (iii) co-investment vehicles for making co-investments via the AIF route; and (iv) comprehensive overhaul of the Angel Fund regime.
Last year the SEBI reinforced principles of fairness and alignment of interests through circulars mandating pro rata investments and distributions while prescribing limited permissible differential rights. It is considering further amendments to address various interpretation issues concerning the pro rata requirement. Commendably, the SEBI is working together with the Standards Setting Forum for AIFs (SFA), a body comprising representatives from the financial services industry and enabling the SFA to lay out implementation standards for certain regulatory requirements.
Overall, fund managers remain optimistic about the Indian alternatives market. To simplify the regulatory framework and make it easier for mutual funds to do business, the SEBI has notified the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 2026 which shall come into force from 1 April 2026. Some of its major changes include a change in the expense-ratio calculation to ensure higher consistency across market participants, digital and reduced filings and disclosures, etc.
In recent years, GIFT City has also emerged as a prominent international financial services hub. Its ranking improvement in the Global Financial Centres Index 2025 reflects its growing appeal. Key reforms by the IFSCA include reduced minimum corpus requirements for making fund investments, green channel clearance for certain schemes set up in the IFSC, ease of KMP appointment processes, and ease of operations for fund-of-fund structures. Further, a framework permitting co-investment through Special Purpose Vehicles has also been introduced. In addition, to align with global practices, the IFSCA has introduced Third-Party Fund Management Services allowing fund managers to explore opportunities within GIFT City prior to undertaking full-scale operations. The IFSCA is also looking to streamline several operational aspects relating to GIFT Funds, providing an alternative for principal officers of an FME to obtain a certification to be eligible for reduced experience criteria, and rationalisation of the continuing interest requirements. The IFSCA is also contemplating permitting differential distribution for non-retail GIFT Funds to facilitate blended finance and other fund structures.
Collectively, these regulatory developments have significantly strengthened GIFT City’s position as a competitive and globally aligned international financial hub.
For further discussion of all these recent developments, please refer to the India Trends and Developments chapter in this guide
Suite 3, 12th Floor
Times Square
Marol
Andheri East
400059 Mumbai
India
+91 226 184 9901
tejesh.chitlangi@regfinlegal.com www.regfinlegal.com
The past year has seen India’s alternatives sector evolve rapidly, driven by both market growth and regulatory change. For the quarter ending 31December 2025, total commitments raised from domestic Alternative Investment Funds (“Domestic AIFs”) equalled approximately INR15 trillion (approximately USD166.5 billion), based on statistics published by the Securities Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”). Similar statistics released by the International Financial Services Centres Authority (“IFSCA”) suggest that commitments of USD26.3 billion have been raised by funds in GIFT City (“GIFT Funds”). This growth is being sustained by regulatory support and traction, with both the SEBI and IFSCA pushing for “Ease of Doing Business” measures.
On the Domestic AIFs front, the SEBI reduced the minimum commitment for Large Value Funds for Accredited Investors (“LVFs”) from INR70 crore (approximately USD7.8 million) to INR25 crore (approximately USD2.8 million) and created a new regulatory framework for Accredited Investor-only AIFs (“AI-only AIFs”) with reduced compliance and increased operational flexibility, as well as a framework for AIFs to launch Co-Investment Vehicles (“CIVs”). These supply-side reforms have been matched by demand-side liberalisation – eg, the notification by the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (“PFRDA”) allowing pension funds to deploy capital into Domestic AIFs, and the operationalisation of the RDI (Research, Development, and Innovation) Fund (“RDI Fund”), which opens a sovereign-backed pipeline for investments in deep technology, clean energy, AI, biotech and semiconductors.
This “Ease of Doing Business” push is also visible in GIFT City. In a bid to compete with Singapore and Mauritius, the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) has aggressively dismantled operational bottlenecks. The introduction of Third-Party Fund Management Services (TPMS) has operationalised a “plug-and-play” model, allowing global managers to utilise the existing infrastructure of GIFT City Fund Management Entities (FMEs) to pool capital without the heavy capex of a full set-up. Simultaneously, the regulator has moved to resolve the talent crunch by streamlining Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) appointment norms. This liberalisation is set to accelerate further with the comprehensive overhaul of the regulatory framework proposed by the IFSCA, ranging from rationalised “skin-in-the-game” norms to permissible differential distribution structures for blended finance.
The retail funds markets have seen significant developments as well, with the introduction of Specialized Investment Funds (“SIFs”) to bridge the gap between mutual funds and portfolio management services, and the rollout of the “MF Lite” regime for passive strategies. Collectively, these measures signal a decisive move away from a “one-size-fits-all” regulator approach to a nuanced, product-specific framework. In addition, multiple domestic asset managers have set-up outbound retail schemes at GIFT City offering Indian investors exposure to global securities.
A summary of the key developments is provided below.
Liberalisation of Large Value Funds (LVFs) and AI-Only AIFs
In a significant move to align regulations with investor sophistication, SEBI has introduced AI-only AIFs and overhauled the LVF framework. The amendments reduce the minimum investment threshold for LVFs from INR70 crore (approximately USD7.8 million) to INR25 crore (approximately USD2.8 million). Furthermore, to facilitate “ease of doing business”, AI-only AIFs have been granted:
The benefits extended to AI-only AIFs are available for LVFs also, in addition to existing benefits available only for LVFs, such as more relaxed diversification norms, waivers from the template PPM format, appointment of a merchant banker, and so on. Existing Domestic AIF schemes can migrate to these categories subject to investor consent, ensuring a seamless transition to this lighter regulatory compliance regime if the Domestic AIF agrees to limit participation to only Accredited Investors.
CIVs by Domestic AIFs
In September 2025, the SEBI notified a dedicated regulatory framework for CIVs. Category I and Category II Domestic AIFs are permitted to launch separate CIV schemes to enable accredited investors in the main AIF to co-invest alongside it in unlisted securities of a particular investee company, providing an on-structure alternative to the existing co-investment portfolio management route under the SEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 2020 (“CPMS route”). Each CIV scheme must be investment-specific and maintain separate bank and demat accounts with assets ring-fenced from other schemes and the main AIF scheme. Only Accredited Investors of the main Domestic AIF may participate in a CIV scheme, and investors excused, excluded or in default in relation to the main Domestic AIF’s investment in that company may not co-invest through the CIV scheme; co-investors must also exit in lock-step with the main Domestic AIF’s exit from the relevant investee company. SEBI has placed a cap on an investor’s cumulative CIV exposure in a particular investee: co-investments across all CIV schemes must not exceed three times the investor’s contribution to the main Domestic AIF’s investment in that investee company, subject to exceptions for specified classes of institutional investors such as multilateral or bilateral development finance institutions, state industrial development corporations, government-owned/controlled entities, central banks and sovereign wealth funds (which are exempt from this cap). The CIV framework also imposes certain governance and regulatory safeguards: investments cannot be made where direct investment by such co-investors would be impermissible or trigger additional disclosures. While CIVs address industry demand for pooled co-investment vehicles, certain constraints remain relative to the CPMS route, which continues to be available and allows non-Accredited Investors to co-invest directly (without pooling) in unlisted securities and without subjecting them to any limits on the co-investment size, albeit with participants holding securities in their own names.
Special Schemes by GIFT Funds
Akin to SEBI’s CIV framework, the IFSCA has also introduced a co-investment framework permitting registered FMEs to establish Special Schemes for co-investment alongside an existing GIFT Fund. Under this regime, an existing GIFT Fund that is a Venture Capital Scheme or Restricted Scheme may sponsor a Special Scheme, which must mirror the investment strategy, category and tenure of the base scheme and is typically structured to make investments in a single portfolio company; subsequent investments in multiple companies may arise only pursuant to corporate actions affecting the original investee company. To ensure alignment, the base scheme must hold at least 25% of the capital or interest in the Special Scheme and retains full decision-making and control over the investment. Eligible participants include investors in the base scheme as well as new investors, subject to the minimum contribution norms applicable to the base scheme. For investors already on-boarded in the base scheme, Know-Your-Customer (“KYC”) and suitability requirements are streamlined to facilitate operational efficiency. The Special Scheme framework also provides operational flexibility: leverage may be utilised within overall disclosed limits for the main GIFT Fund, regulatory reporting is consolidated with that of the base GIFT Fund, and a prescribed term sheet must be filed with IFSCA within 45 days of the investment. This regime reflects IFSCA’s intent to provide a commercially viable, globally comparable co-investment mechanism within GIFT City that preserves regulatory oversight and investor protection while facilitating deal-specific co-investment structures.
Revised Angel Fund Regulatory Framework
SEBI has undertaken a significant recalibration of the Angel Fund framework within Domestic AIFs with the objective of aligning it more closely with the evolving start-up and Accredited Investor ecosystem. Angel Funds are now limited to raising capital only from Accredited Investors, reflecting the high-risk, early-stage nature of such investments and reducing regulatory friction around suitability. Further, the SEBI has enhanced investment flexibility by:
A glide period has been provided for existing Angel Funds to transition to the revised regulatory framework.
RBI Directions on Banks/NBFCs Investing in AIFs
On 29 July 2025, the RBI issued new Master Directions governing Domestic AIF investments by regulated entities such as banks, NBFCs, All India Financial Institutions, etc (“REs”). Under the new framework (effective 1 January 2026), an individual RE may invest at most 10% of any Domestic AIF’s corpus, and in aggregate can only invest up to 20% of a Domestic AIF. An RE’s stake in an AIF of up to 5% has been streamlined to disapply any checks around debtor companies; however, once the RE’s stake crosses 5% and that Domestic AIF has any downstream investment exposure to the RE’s debtor company (ie, a company to which the RE had loan or investment exposure – excluding equity instruments – in the previous 12 months), the RE must provision 100% of the related exposure. In comparison to the earlier regime that only exempted Domestic AIFs investing in equity shares of the debtor company from triggering the provision rule, the RBI has allowed for Domestic AIFs to invest in equity as well as compulsory convertible debentures and preference shares of Domestic AIFs without triggering any provisioning for REs. Any investment in subordinated units of a Domestic AIF must be fully deducted from the RE’s capital.
Liberalisation of Investment by Pension Funds in AIFs
A notable institutional development has been the formal inclusion of Domestic AIFs within the investment universe of pension schemes regulated by the PFRDA. Pension funds are now permitted to allocate to Category I and Category II AIFs as part of their permitted asset classes. The effective pension fund exposure to individual Domestic AIFs is subject to a further 10% cap of a Domestic AIF’s size and the Domestic AIF must have a minimum corpus of INR100 crore (approximately USD11.1 million). Other investment conditions need to be met, such as ensuring the monies of the pension funds are not invested overseas by Domestic AIFs and requirements that the Domestic AIF’s sponsor and investment manager be independent of the pension fund and its promoter group. Collectively, these changes signal a cautious but meaningful expansion of pension capital into private market strategies via Domestic AIFs, supported by clear prudential guardrails.
Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Fund of Funds
The Government of India launched a landmark INR1 lakh crore (approximately USD11.1 billion) Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Scheme, aiming to catalyse private sector investment in research, development and innovation across strategic and sunrise sectors including deep technology, clean energy, AI, biotech and semiconductors. The RDI Fund operates through a two-tiered funding structure under the Department of Science & Technology (DST) and the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF), whereby a Special Purpose Fund (SPF) at the first level acts as custodian of the corpus and allocates capital to second-level fund managers such as Domestic AIFs, development finance institutions and NBFCs. These second-level managers, in turn, channel financing to transformative R&D projects. While the RDI Fund does not invest directly in industry or start-ups, its reliance on Domestic AIFs and other professional investors is designed to bridge the financing gap for private R&D and position India as a global innovation hub in line with the Viksit Bharat 2047 vision and this has been re-emphasised in the Budget for the FY 2026–27.
Notification of SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 2026
In order to align the provisions of the regulations with changing market dynamics and promote ease of doing business by simplifying compliance requirements, SEBI has notified a new regulatory framework, which shall come into force from 1 April 2026. The revised regulatory framework provides for simplified reporting and disclosure requirements, brings greater clarification to the calculation of the total expense ratio and reduces regulatory obligations such as the frequency of board meetings of the trustee company.
Mutual Fund Lite (MF Lite) Framework
To democratise the passive investment landscape and reduce entry barriers for new AMCs, the SEBI introduced the Mutual Fund Lite (“MF Lite”) framework in December 2024. Designed for passively managed schemes, such as Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and Index Funds, this “light-touch” regulatory regime decouples passive funds from the compliance-heavy requirements of active fund management. By relaxing sponsor eligibility criteria (including net worth and track record requirements) and streamlining governance structures, MF Lite aims to foster innovation and deeper market penetration in the passive segment, allowing sponsors to focus on liquidity and low-cost tracking without the administrative overheads of full-service AMCs.
Specialised Investment Funds (SIFs)
Bridging the structural gap between retail Mutual Funds and high-ticket Portfolio Management Services (PMS), SEBI has operationalised Specialised Investment Funds (SIFs) effective 1 April 2025. Positioned as a new asset class for semi-sophisticated investors, SIFs mandate a minimum investment ticket of INR10 lakhs (approximately USD11,111), waived for Accredited Investors, and permit complex investment strategies previously restricted in the mutual fund space, such as long-short equity, inverse strategies, and higher unhedged derivative exposure (up to 25% of net assets). This framework allows AMCs to offer differentiated, risk-adjusted returns to investors seeking sophistication beyond traditional mutual funds.
Third-Party Fund Management and Platform Services in GIFT City
A notable regulatory development in GIFT City has been the formal recognition of third-party fund management and platform service models. The framework permits entities in GIFT City to act as platform providers offering fund management, advisory, and operational support services to offshore and onshore sponsors who may not themselves establish a full-fledged presence in the IFSC. This has enabled global fund managers to launch GIFT Funds through a regulated FME, without duplicating infrastructure. This model mirrors similar third-party management platforms seen in jurisdictions such as Singapore, Luxembourg and Mauritius and is increasingly being viewed as a catalyst for attracting niche strategies, co-investment vehicles and continuation structures into GIFT City, particularly from managers testing the Indian market or seeking global fund structuring solutions.
Amendments to the IFSCA (Fund Management) Regulations, 2025
Acknowledging the practical challenges in talent acquisition and ecosystem maturity, the consultation paper proposes significant relaxations to the regulatory framework for funds in GIFT City, on 27 January 2026 IFSCA, further provided relaxation to the entry barrier for Key Managerial Personnel (KMPs) by introducing an alternative eligibility route: professionals with three years of post-qualification experience (reduced from the standard five years) will now be eligible to act as principal officers of FMEs, provided they hold valid certifications from recognised institutions which have been notified by IFSCA. This move is designed to widen the talent pool and reduce hiring bottlenecks for FMEs. Simultaneously, it has provided relaxation on the supply-side constraints in the custodial ecosystem by transitionary period to meet with the requirement of appointing a custodian in India, or any foreign jurisdiction, that is regulated by the financial sector regulator in that jurisdiction and make necessary arrangement to provide any information to IFSCA whenever directed to do so. It also provides for relaxation in manner of seeking extension for the PPM in case the fund is unable to achieve its minimum corpus size as per IFSCA Regulations.
Developments in the Budget for the FY 2026–27
In the recent budget, the central government has proposed to boost domestic capital inflows by augmenting the Self-Reliant India Fund, established in 2021, with an infusion of INR2,000 crore (approximately USD222 million) to continue supporting micro enterprises and ensure sustained access to risk capital. Further, to promote equity financing in high-potential enterprises, it is proposed to establish a dedicated INR10,000 crore (approximately USD1.1 billion) SME Growth Fund.
With respect to GIFT City IFSC, the Budget has proposed to extend the tax deduction period to 20 consecutive years out of a block of 25 years for GIFT City IFSC units, and to 20 consecutive years for Offshore Banking Units (OBUs). Further, it is proposed that business income earned by these units after the expiry of the deduction period will be taxed at a concessional rate of 15%.
Looking Ahead
India’s fund environment is clearly in a fast-evolving phase. Regulators have taken bold steps to liberalise structures (introduction of AI-only AIFs, CIV schemes and its GIFT City equivalent of Special Schemes, third party platform services) while aiming for stability. For fund managers and investors, the landscape offers more options and clearer rules than ever before. Key watch‑points for the near future include the introduction of the VCC, the impact of RBI’s caps on AIFs raising capital from banks/NBFCs and liberalisation of pension funds investing into AIFs. The introduction of AI-only AIFs, relaxations to the LVF and the overhaul of the Angel Funds framework to limit participation to Accredited Investors also seem to indicate a shift towards structures with a lighter-regulatory touch if the investors of such structures are Accredited Investors possessing the requisite knowhow and risk-appetite.
In summary, alternative funds in India are going through an interesting phase of liberalisation and reform not only in terms of the regulatory landscape but also the opening up of domestic pools of capital to asset managers. Firms are structuring innovative vehicles to meet bespoke needs, and the policy framework is aligning with global norms. Whether financing high-growth startups, infrastructure megaprojects, or sustainable ventures, Domestic AIFs and GIFT Funds are now firmly part of India’s capital landscape. Fund managers should watch this space closely, as continued regulatory fine-tuning is likely to unlock further opportunities in the year ahead.
Suite 3, 12th Floor
Times Square
Marol
Andheri East
400059 Mumbai
India
+91 226 184 9901
tejesh.chitlangi@regfinlegal.com www.regfinlegal.com