Life Sciences 2024

Last Updated March 18, 2024

Portugal

Law and Practice

Authors



PLMJ is a law firm based in Portugal that combines a full service with bespoke legal craftsmanship. For more than 50 years, the firm has supported clients in all areas of the law, often with multidisciplinary teams, and always acting as a business partner in the most strategic decision-making processes. PLMJ has specialist lawyers that know the sectors and markets they work in well, and keep in close contact with the regulators for each sector. The firm created PLMJ Colab, a collaborative network of law firms spread across Portugal and other countries with which it has cultural and strategic ties. PLMJ Colab makes the best use of resources and provides a bespoke response to clients' international challenges. International co-operation is ensured through firms specialising in the legal systems and local cultures of Angola, Cabo Verde, China/Macau, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Timor-Leste. The firm would like to thank Vasco Granate for his contribution to this chapter.

The rules on medicines for human use come from Decree-Law 176/2006 of 30 August 2006, while the rules on medical devices come from Decree-Law 145/2009 of 17 June 2009, Decree-Law 29/2024 of 5 April 2017, and Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 (the Medical Devices Regulation – MDR). There are also several sets of regulations implementing the decree-laws in different matters.

The regulatory body that applies and enforces pharmaceutical and medical device regulation is INFARMED (the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products, IP), which is part of the State's indirect administration and is endowed with administrative and financial autonomy. It is responsible for carrying out the responsibilities of the Ministry of Health under the supervision and guidance of the Minister of Health.

As a rule, decisions regarding expenditure on medicines and medical devices are taken by the Minister of Health, who may delegate these decisions to INFARMED.

INFARMED's decisions regarding medicines and medical devices may be challenged through administrative and/or judicial channels, within a given period.

Individuals and entities who are affected by these decisions can react against them, mainly on the grounds of breach of the law. These means of reaction are common to decisions that affect other products (eg, food supplements and cosmetics), although there may be specific details.

Certain categories of medicines and medical devices are subject to specific regulation. For example:

  • medicines containing psychotropic and narcotic substances are regulated by Decree-Law 15/93 of 22 January 2022, Decree-Regulation 61/94 of 12 October 1994, Law 33/2018 of 18 July 2018 and Decree-Law 8/2019 of 15 of January; and
  • medical devices for in vitro diagnosis are regulated by Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 and Decree-Law 189/2000 of 12 August 2000.

Clinical trials of medicines and clinical studies of medical devices are regulated by different pieces of legislation.

Medicines

Clinical trials of medicines are regulated by Regulation (EU) 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 (“Clinical Trials Regulation”) and Law 21/2014 of 16 April 2014 (“Clinical Trials Law”).

The entry into force of the Clinical Trials Regulation on 31 January 2022 involved the entry into force of the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS), through which all clinical trial submission, assessment and supervision processes in the EU are to be submitted. The Clinical Trials Regulation provides for a three-year transition period, with the following timeline:

  • from 31 January 2022 to 31 January 2023, clinical trial sponsors were able to choose to submit their clinical trial applications under the Clinical Trials Directive or through the CTIS;
  • from 31 January 2023, new applications for clinical trials in the EU and the European Economic Area must be submitted under the CTIS; and
  • by 31 January 2025, all ongoing trials will have to be transferred to the CTIS under the Clinical Trials Regulation.

Medical Devices

The rules regarding clinical studies of medical devices are found in Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices and in DL 24/2024, implementing MDR in Portugal.

In Vitro Medical Devices

The legal rules applicable to in vitro medical devices are established in Decree-Law 189/2000 of 12 August and Decree-Law 145/2009.

Regulation (EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR) has been applicable since 26 May 2022. In January 2023, the European Parliament and the Council adopted a staggered extension of its transitional period, ranging from 26 May 2025 for high-risk IVDs to 26 May 2027 for lower-risk IVDs, and to 26 May 2028 for certain provisions concerning devices manufactured and used in health institutions.

In January 2024, the European Commission published a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 regarding a gradual roll-out of a European database on medical devices (EUDAMED), an information obligation in case of interruption of supply and transitional provisions for certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices.

The amending act must now go through the EU legislative process, starting with the public consultation.

Medicines

In the transition period up to 31 January 2023, authorisation to conduct a clinical trial of a medicine was obtained under the rules established in the Clinical Trials Law or through the CTIS, pursuant to the Clinical Trials Regulation.

Since 31 January 2023, new applications for clinical trials in the EU and the European Economic Area must be submitted under the CTIS, under the terms provided by Regulation (EU) 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials of medicinal products for human use. In this case, applications must be submitted through the CTIS and the sponsor should propose a reporting member state, which will be responsible for the analysis of the application.

Until 31 January 2023, if the sponsor opted for the Clinical Trials Law arrangements, the application for authorisation to conduct clinical trials had to be submitted to INFARMED through the National Clinical Trials Register, together with the relevant documentation.

INFARMED will decide on the application for authorisation within 30 days, and may ask the applicant for additional information once only.

Within the period granted, the sponsor may change the content of the application for authorisation, only once, and the period will be suspended until the change is made. If the sponsor does not change the application as requested, the clinical trial may not be conducted.

INFARMED may decide on the need to obtain express authorisation to conduct trials involving the following medicines:

  • those that do not have a marketing authorisation (MA) and that are listed in Annex A to Regulation (EC) 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004; and
  • those that have special characteristics – ie, whose active substance or substances are biological products of human or animal origin or contain biological components of human or animal origin, or whose production requires such components.

Clinical trials involving the following medicines will require express authorisation from INFARMED:

  • those for gene therapy;
  • those for somatic cell therapy;
  • those containing genetically modified organisms; and
  • those for xenogeneic cell therapy.

Medical Devices

Applications to conduct clinical investigations as defined in the MDR must be submitted by the sponsor to the member state(s) in which the clinical investigation is to be conducted. The application must be submitted through the electronic system referred to in the MDR, accompanied by the documents referred to in Chapter II of Annex XV of the MDR.

Clinical trials of medicines and clinical studies of medical devices are available on the National Clinical Trials Register website at www.rnec.pt. The results of clinical trials and clinical studies of medical devices are not available in publicly accessible databases.

The methods of recruitment for clinical trials of medicines and clinical studies of medical devices must follow the legally prescribed rules. In addition to physical advertising methods, digital means can be used for this purpose. These means may also be used for monitoring purposes, provided that they do not jeopardise the purpose and safety of the trial.

Data from clinical trials of medicines and clinical studies of medical devices may qualify as personal data in the sense of sensitive data. However, if the data is fully anonymised (and not merely pseudonymised), it is no longer personal data so does not fall within the category of sensitive data. Anonymisation implies that the identity of the data subject is unobtainable, in which case the data becomes anonymous.

If the resulting data is still personal data, it might be transferred to third parties or affiliates, provided such transfer complies with the requirements set out in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), notably when it comes to consent and information obligations, security of the processing issues, joint-controllership or sub-processing agreements, and international data transfers. If the resulting data is anonymised data, then those GDPR requirements do not apply.

The requirements under the GDPR regarding the processing of health data apply with regard to the grounds for the lawfulness of processing, transparency and security measures.

Products are classified through the definition of medicine (function and/or presentation) and the definition of medical device provided in the applicable legal provisions. In the case of borderline products, the purpose intended by the manufacturer of the product in question and the mechanism through which the main desired effect is achieved are taken into consideration.

Medicines developed by means of one of the following biotechnological processes must be subjected to the centralised community procedure:

  • recombinant DNA technology;
  • controlled expression of genes coding for biologically active proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes including transformed mammalian cells; and
  • hybridoma and monoclonal antibody methods.

Medicines

In the case of medicines, the MA is valid for five years; after the first renewal, it is valid indefinitely or, if considered necessary, for a second five-year period. The renewal of the MA is subject to a specific renewal procedure.

An MA may be revoked, suspended or amended whenever there is non-compliance with the applicable legal and regulatory provisions, or with the conditions of the MA in question. This includes when it is concluded that the risk-benefit balance is unfavourable, the medicine is harmful or the manufacturing process does not comply with the applicable good practices.

Medical Devices

No authorisation is required for placing medical devices on the market. The manufacturer must submit the medical device to a conformity assessment and notify the competent authority that the medical device has been made available on the market. INFARMED may withdraw a product from the market or may suspend, restrict or subject to certain conditions the placing on the market and putting into service of a device or group of medical devices under certain conditions – namely, when the use of medical devices could compromise the health and safety of patients or other persons, or for public health reasons.

The marketing of a medicine may follow one of these procedures:

  • a national procedure, if the medicine is intended to be approved only for placing on the Portuguese market;
  • a mutual recognition procedure, in which an authorisation obtained in a member state is used to apply for authorisation in a new member state;
  • a decentralised procedure, when the application is submitted in several member states simultaneously and when the medicine does not have an MA in any member state; and
  • a centralised procedure, managed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), leading to an MA that is valid in all member states.

Any change in the terms of an MA must be subject to an application for a variation of the MA, including changes to the summary of product characteristics and any conditions, obligations or restrictions affecting the MA, or changes to the labelling or package leaflet in connection with changes to the summary of product characteristics.

An MA may be transferred to a new holder through the submission of a transfer application by the MA holder.

The placement of a medical device on the market does not require authorisation (see 3.3 Period of Validity for Marketing Authorisation for Pharmaceutical or Medical Devices).

Medicines without an MA or without an MA that is valid in Portugal may be made available to patients through the exceptional use authorisation, under which they can be accessed by patients through early access programmes, which have a specific regulation issued by INFARMED.

Regarding medical devices, INFARMED may authorise the placing on the market or putting into service of a medical device for which no conformity assessment procedures have been carried out but the use of which is in the interest of public health or patient safety or health.

Compassionate use also takes place in the context of clinical trials.

The MA for a medicine may be granted subject to the subsequent conduct of additional studies or compliance with special rules regarding safety and the reporting of all incidents associated with the use of the medicine and the measures to be taken, the conduct of a post-authorisation safety or efficacy study, or the fulfilment of other obligations established by INFARMED.

After the granting of an MA, INFARMED may require its holder to conduct a post-authorisation safety study if there are doubts about the risks of the authorised medicine or if knowledge about the disease or clinical methodology indicates that previous efficacy evaluations may need to be significantly revised.

The holder of an MA is obliged to comply with the obligations provided for by law – namely, to comply with pharmacovigilance obligations and to make this or other data proving that the benefit-risk relationship of the medicine remains favourable available to INFARMED.

Manufacturers of medical devices other than investigational devices must report any field safety corrective action to INFARMED, as well as any serious incident or any statistically significant increase in the frequency or severity of incidents that are not serious incidents or that are expected to have undesirable side effects that could have a significant impact on the benefit-risk analysis, and which have led or may lead to unacceptable risks to the health or safety of patients, users or other persons.

INFARMED publishes information on the status of an MA application and its assessment report on its website. It suppresses any commercially confidential information and allows access to the summary of product characteristics and the package leaflet, as well as information on the medical devices placed on the market.

Decree-Law 26/2018 of 24 April 2018 incorporated the European legislation on falsified medicines into Portuguese law. This legislation establishes the mandatory placement of safety devices on the packaging of certain medicines, which must be checked by all participants in the chain, to allow the detection of falsified or adulterated medicines in the circuit and the individual identification of packaging.

Under the regulatory framework, INFARMED must draw up an annual surveillance activity plan and perform appropriate checks on the conformity characteristics and performance of medical devices, including, where appropriate, a review of documentation and physical or laboratory checks based on adequate samples.

INFARMED established a protocol with the Tax and Customs Authority to inspect and intercept counterfeit medicines. The Legal Framework for Tax Infractions and Customs Crimes also provides for the existence of customs offences and crimes associated with the counterfeiting of goods, which may include counterfeit medicines and medical devices.

The manufacture of medicines, experimental medicines and medical devices requires authorisation from INFARMED.

The manufacture of medicines requires the existence of facilities licensed for the purpose, and compliance with good manufacturing practices. The facilities are subject to periodic inspections by INFARMED, which certifies their compliance and issues a certificate of good manufacturing practices, which is valid for three years.

For medical devices, facilities must obtain an industrial activity licence in accordance with the applicable legislation and have an industrial activity code associated with the categories of medical devices produced in conjunction with the respective manufacturing activities performed.

Authorisation for the wholesale of medicines is issued by INFARMED and covers the activities of supplying, holding, storing or delivering medicines for processing, resale or use in medical services, healthcare facilities and pharmacies, excluding the supply to the public. It specifies the facilities from which distribution is carried out and is subject to the validity of the certificate of good distribution practices, which must be renewed every five years.

The wholesale of medical devices is subject to prior notification to INFARMED and covers the activities of supplying, holding, storing or supplying medical devices for resale or use in medical services, healthcare facilities, pharmacies and other points of sale to the public, excluding supply to the public.

For dispensing to the public, medicines are classified into prescription-only medicines (MSRMs) and non-prescription medicines (MNSRMs). The former can also be classified as renewable, special or for restricted use in specialised monitored conditions, and the latter as MNSRMs for dispensing only in pharmacies.

The import and export of medicines is regulated by Decree-Law 176/2006 of 30 August 2006 and by related legislation on good practice in transportation and distribution. For medical devices, the MDR and Decree-Law 29/2024 are applicable.

INFARMED is the entity responsible for monitoring compliance with these regulations.

Any natural or legal person can be an importer of medicines and medical devices if they are duly authorised and licensed for that purpose by INFARMED.

The import and export of medicines and medical devices require the economic operator to be licensed by INFARMED for that purpose. For personal use, medicines can be transported only for the necessary period, provided that they are accompanied by a medical prescription, when necessary. In the case of emergency situations or donations, INFARMED will assess each case individually.

The following regulations are to be considered upon the importation of any products into the Portuguese territory, which is part of the customs territory of the European Union:

  • Regulation (EU) 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013, which approves the Union Customs Code;
  • Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 of 28 July 2015; and
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015.

Portugal is part of the EU and the single European market, and it applies the principle of free movement of goods and services; it also has harmonised regulatory rules for medicines and medical devices.

Price Control for Medicines

Non-reimbursed medicines have free pricing arrangements, but all other medicines have their prices regulated and are subject to maximum price rules or notified price rules. They cannot be sold unless the MA holder obtains a retail price (RP).

The RP of the medicine is composed of:

  • the ex-factory price (EFP), which is the maximum price at the stage of production or import and has fixed rules for its determination;
  • the wholesalers' and retailers' selling margins, as fixed by ministerial order;
  • the tax on the sale of medicines; and
  • value-added tax (VAT).

The MSRMs intended to be dispensed and used in National Health Service (NHS) establishments are also subject to maximum price rules, and their final price is composed of the EFP, the sales tax and VAT.

The prices of medicines subject to the maximum price rules are reviewed annually. The pricing rules for medicines are set out in Decree-Law 97/2015 of 1 June 2015 and regulated by several Ministerial Orders (in particular Ministerial Order 195-C/2015 of 30 June 2015 and Ministerial Order 154/2016 of 27 May 2016).

Requests for price authorisation and price revision communications follow their own procedures and are submitted to INFARMED by the MA holder.

Price Control for Medical Devices

As a rule, medical devices financed by the State have fixed maximum prices. Medical devices not financed by the State have free pricing.

The pricing rules for medical devices are set out in Decree-Law 97/2015 of 1 June 2015, and there are Ministerial Orders that define the maximum prices applicable to certain devices or groups of medical devices, which usually include the marketing margins and VAT. In these cases, the RP proposed is indicated by the manufacturer at the time of the request for reimbursement to INFARMED, which follows its own procedure.

Medicines

The price of medicines is generally set and reviewed on the basis of the prices in the reference countries with comparable GDP per capita or lowest price level, defined annually among EU countries.

Ministerial Order 39-C/2024 of 2 February has defined Spain, France, Italy and Slovenia as reference countries in 2024.

Medical Devices

The price of medical devices does not depend on the prices applied in other countries.

Public financing of medicines and medical devices depends on an application to INFARMED by the MA holder or the manufacturer, respectively. This public financing may be full or partial and differs according to various factors, such as pathologies or special groups of patients, therapeutic indications, prevalence of certain diseases in the population, etc; see 7.4 Cost-Benefit Analyses for Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices.

Medicines

As a rule, State funding of medicines is cumulatively subject to prior technical-scientific demonstration of therapeutic innovation or equivalence for the therapeutic indications claimed, as well as demonstration of the economic advantage of the medicine. These factors are not decisive in fixing the price of medicines, because these prices tend to be fixed taking into account the prices in the reference countries – see 7.1 Price Control for Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices and 7.2 Price Levels of Pharmaceuticals or Medical Devices.

Medical Devices

A cost-benefit analysis is also carried out in the financing of medical devices by the State, considering the therapeutic innovation demonstrated for the clinical purposes claimed and the demonstration of an economic advantage – see 7.1 Price Control for Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices.

In order to ensure the sustainability of the NHS, the prescribing of reimbursed medicines is made using the international non-proprietary name and may only include the commercial name of the medicines in the exceptional cases listed in the law. Pharmacies are obliged to inform the patient about the medicine that, in compliance with the prescription, has the lowest price. These rules apply to reimbursed medical devices, with the necessary adaptations.

As software, medical apps are considered active medical devices under the MDR, with lifestyle and well-being apps being expressly excluded from the scope of the MDR. The classification criteria are provided by the MDR and supporting documents are published for this purpose by the European Commission.

The rules on telemedicine are laid down in the Code of Ethics of the Portuguese Medical Association, which establishes standards for the safety and quality of the means used.

The advertising of medicines and medical devices is highly regulated and there are specific regulations for each of these product categories, which are also applicable to online portals, company webpages and social networks.

Electronic prescribing is the rule and has been in place for several years. Non-electronic prescriptions are exceptions and are only allowed in specific cases.

Under certain circumstances, pharmacies and MNSRM outlets can perform home delivery of medicines, and such medicines can be ordered over the internet. Medicines cannot be delivered by post or courier.

It is possible to market medical devices online and deliver by post or courier. Admissibility must be assessed on a case-by-case basis and, in any case, the quality of the medical device must be guaranteed.

Health-related records are regulated as health data under the GDPR, and health-related information is considered sensitive data under the GDPR. Moreover, Law 58/2019 of 8 August 2019, which ensures the implementation of the GDPR, contains specific obligations regarding professional secrecy. These obligations apply to all corporate bodies, employees and service providers of the controller, and to students and researchers in the field of health who have access to such data. The data subject must be notified of any access made to their personal data, and the controller must ensure that a traceability and notification mechanism is in place.

There are no special requirements for cloud platforms. Portugal does not restrict the processing of health data to its territory, so the general rules provided in Chapter V of the GDPR on international data transfers apply. It is permitted to store sensitive patient data on cloud platforms. However, in addition to the general requirements of the GDPR, most public bodies, including public hospitals, are obliged to comply with Council of Ministers Resolution 41/2018 regarding information security. This contains technical guidelines for the Public Administration on the security architecture of networks and information systems regarding personal data.

The Portuguese Industrial Property Code (IPC) contains the most relevant provisions for patents, including for patent prosecution and enforcement.

Special inhibitory actions relating to pharmaceutical patents and generic medicines are available under Law 62/2011 of 12 December 2011.

The most common issues encountered by pharmaceutical companies in Portugal relate to patent disputes between originator and generic companies under Law 62/2011. Other issues that usually arise relate to the validity of patents and supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

There are no specific patentability requirements for medicines or medical devices per se. However, according to the IPC, processes for cloning human beings, processes for modifying the germinal genetic identity of the human being and uses of human embryos for industrial or commercial purposes are not patentable.

Methods of surgical or therapeutic treatment are also not patentable, but the products, substances or compositions used in any of these methods may be patented.

Second and subsequent medical uses of a known substance or composition are regarded as patentable in Portugal, provided that any such use meets the general patentability requirements.

According to the Guidelines of the Portuguese Institute of Industrial Property, the term “use” may include new dosage regimes and new patient groups.

There is no clear guidance from the Portuguese courts as to what specific activities constitute infringement of second and subsequent patents of medicines. However, in a 2015 judgment, the Lisbon Second Instance Court decided that the patent-holder of a second medical use patent can only react against the applicant of an MA for the generic medicine if the active pharmaceutical ingredient is prepared and adopted for the specific therapeutic use that is patented. In the first instance decision of this case, the ad hoc arbitral tribunal considered that one cannot conclude that there has been an infringement of the second use patent if the generic medicine does not have the patented use as a therapeutic indication according to the granted MA.

The patent-holder may obtain a patent term extension for medicines by applying for an SPC. The application for an SPC is regulated in the IPC and is governed by Regulation (EC) 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 (“SPC Regulation”). The SPC application must be filed with the Portuguese Industrial Property Office (INPI) in Portuguese, with a copy of the first MA of the product in Portugal.

If granted, the SPC can extend the protection conferred by the basic patent for the time that has passed between the filing of the patent application and the date of grant of the MA, minus five years. The validity of the SPC cannot exceed five years from the expiry of the basic patent, except when it concerns medicines for paediatric use, where a further six-month extension is available.

Patent term extensions via an SPC may be challenged by any interested party before the INPI if the date of the first MA indicated by the patent-holder in the SPC application is incorrect. The INPI can also amend the validity period of an SPC of its own motion when it verifies the existence of an error.

An action for the revocation of an SPC can be brought before the Portuguese Intellectual Property Court by any interested party, under the IPC.

Similarly to other patents, medicine or medical device patents give the patent-holder the right to prevent any third party from:

  • manufacturing, offering, stocking, placing on the market or using a product that is the subject matter of the patent, or importing or possessing it, for any of the purposes previously mentioned;
  • using the process that is the subject matter of the patent or, if the third party knows or should have known that the use of the process is prohibited without the consent of the patent-holder, offering to use it; and
  • offering, stocking, placing on the market or using, or importing or possessing for those purposes, products obtained directly by the process that is the subject matter of the patent.

Applying for an MA does not qualify as a patent infringement action in Portugal. However, the publication of an MA for a generic medicine by INFARMED enables the patent-holder to file a special inhibitory action under Law 62/2011 for invoking incompatible patent rights. The patent-holder can also request the IP Court (or an arbitral tribunal, if arbitration is agreed between the parties), in such action, to determine precautionary measures to prevent infringement of the patent in question.

The threat of infringement is actionable to inhibit any imminent infringement.

Specific defences to patent infringement in relation to medicines and medical devices in Portugal include an experimental use exemption and, in particular, the Bolar exemption.

Compulsory licences on patents are provided for in the IPC in general terms, but there are no relevant precedents in Portugal with regard to the granting of compulsory licences. In any case, compulsory licences may be granted in Portugal in the following circumstances:

  • lack or insufficient exploitation of the invention;
  • dependency between patents;
  • public interest;
  • under EU and Portuguese Competition law; and
  • under Regulation (EC) 816/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on compulsory licensing of patents relating to the manufacture of medicines for export to countries with public health problems.

Patent infringement proceedings may be brought by the patent-holder or by the licensee. The licensee’s right to bring an action depends on the specific terms of the corresponding licence agreement and on the record of the licence at the INPI.

Although patent infringement is a crime under Portuguese law, the typical procedure for patent infringement actions is a civil lawsuit at the IP Court. Special inhibitory actions relating to pharmaceutical patents and generic medicines are available under Law 62/2011 and must also be filed at the IP Court or, upon agreement of the parties, before an institutional or ad hoc arbitral tribunal.

Civil remedies include preliminary and permanent injunctions granting the patent-holder the right to prevent any imminent infringement or to prohibit the continuation of the infringement. There is also the possibility of requesting the IP Court to order the infringer to pay a periodic penalty for breach of the judgment, and to order the destruction, recall or definitive removal of the infringing goods from the channels of commerce. Damages claims for infringement are also possible.

Invalidity is available as a defence in civil infringement proceedings on the merits, through the filing of a counterclaim for revocation of the patent or SPC.

In theory, under the Civil Procedure Code, pre-launch declaratory actions are possible for generic market entrants, although as far as is known there are no relevant precedents in Portugal in this regard. Nullity actions for the invalidation of patents or SPCs in advance of attempted market entry are also possible.

Law 62/2011 (see 9.1 Laws Applicable to Patents for Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices) created a special action applicable to patent litigation involving generic medicines, whereby patent-holders can pursue an early assessment of prospective patent infringement, after publication of the MA applications for generic medicines. This law led to a large number of court cases and also to a large number of settlement agreements between patent-holders and generics.

Although the procedure provided for in Law 62/2011 is triggered by the publication of the MA, this procedure does not stay the grant of the MAs or their effect once granted, which means that no patent linkage effect exists.

Counterfeiting consists of the complete reproduction of a sign that is protected as a trade mark. The IPC provides that trade mark counterfeiting is a criminal offence, punishable with imprisonment for up to three years or a fine of up to 360 days. Civil liability also arises from trade mark counterfeiting.

Custom procedures against counterfeit medicines and medical devices are available under Regulation (EU) 608/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013.

Besides the general requirements and impediments provided for in the IPC with respect to trade mark composition (that apply to all marks), Decree-Law 176/2006 further provides that the name of a medicine may comprise a trade mark, as long as that trade mark is not misleading with regard to the therapeutic properties and nature of the product.

The EU Regulations on medical devices also prohibit the use of misleading trade marks.

Under trade mark law, non-counterfeit genuine medicine or medical device products may suffer import restrictions if there is a prior registered trade mark in Portugal that prevents the use of the mark by the importer (eg, on the basis of likelihood of confusion).

IP protection for the trade dress or design of medicines and medical devices, or their packaging, is potentially available under design rights, copyright and trade mark rights, provided they meet the legal requirements for that protection.

According to an a contrario interpretation of Decree-Law 176/2006, data exclusivity for medicines (chemical drugs and biologicals) will last for at least eight years from the date of the granting of the MA for the reference medicine.

Under the same Decree-Law, marketing exclusivity of the reference medicine lasts ten years from its first MA approval, or 11 years from its first MA approval if the originator obtained a new therapeutic indication that brings significant clinical benefit, within eight years of that date.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, INFARMED issued guidelines to simplify the import and export of medicines, particularly regarding the import and export of medicines with controlled substances.

INFARMED also issued transitional guidelines to make the import, manufacture and distribution of medical devices faster and more efficient during the pandemic. In addition, it relaxed several rules that made it very time-consuming to obtain the necessary devices.

Within the constraints imposed by the pandemic, INFARMED issued guidelines to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on clinical trials that were in progress or about to start. These measures do not specifically target clinical trials of medicines to treat COVID-19. INFARMED stressed the possibility of remote visits through technological means, ensuring the collection and recording of the information foreseen for the visit.

EMA also implemented exceptional measures regarding the approval and documentation of medicines to treat COVID-19.

EMA has created a specific, expedited procedure for the approval of medicines, which is characterised by significantly shorter timeframes for the review and approval process.

Within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, INFARMED established special and temporary abbreviated procedures for the certification of medical devices that are essential to answer the needs caused by the pandemic – eg, the certification of medical devices such as surgical masks and ventilators for medical purposes.

In the context of the outbreak of the pandemic, INFARMED and other authorities issued guidance on easing import requirements for medical devices needed to contain the spread of the virus.

Telemedicine was already allowed in Portugal before the pandemic. These means were used more frequently during the pandemic period, considering the saturation of the NHS hospitals and health facilities.

There is no intention to issue compulsory licences for COVID-19-related treatments or vaccines.

No liability exemptions have been introduced in existing or new provisions regarding COVID-19 vaccines or treatments.

During the pandemic period, industries were turned over to the production of medical devices. Several textile industries temporarily converted their production to the production of medical devices (mainly surgical masks).

Measures to make public procurement more flexible were adopted to ensure the immediate availability of goods and services urgently needed to respond to the pandemic. In addition, an exceptional system of public procurement, expenditure authorisation and administrative authorisation was created. In this system, the creation of exceptional arrangements for simplified direct adjustment stands out, particularly for the acquisition of medicines and medical devices.

PLMJ

Av. Fontes Pereira de Melo, 43
1050-119
Lisboa
Portugal

+351 213 197 300

+351 213 197 400

plmjlaw@plmj.pt www.plmj.com/en
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Sérvulo & Associados is a Portuguese full-service law firm with 25 years of operation. It has a highly competent multidisciplinary team of more than 100 lawyers who are trusted by a vast number of private and public entities, both domestic and international, in the Portuguese-speaking legal markets and in all the most significant economic sectors. The life sciences team has in-depth knowledge of the life cycles of drugs, medical devices and other health products, enabling it to provide specialised advice at all stages, including research and development of new products and their respective intellectual property issues, data protection, regulation and inherent litigation.

Life Sciences in Portugal: An Introduction

Overview

The technology and life sciences sector is experiencing rapid growth and evolution in Portugal due to advancements in research, regulatory policies and the integration of innovative technologies.

Portugal is a significant player in clinical trials and has attracted substantial investments from pharmaceutical companies, resulting in economic development. The government has taken steps to enhance the capacity and autonomy of Clinical Research Centres, and the compliance with the EU Regulation on Clinical Trials is transforming the landscape of clinical research practices.

Pioneering institutions like the Institute for Medical Systems Biology and the Católica Biomedical Research Centre are driving innovation in biomedical and digital technologies in Portugal.

Healthcare delivery in Portugal is undergoing a revolution with the adoption of cloud-based technologies and artificial intelligence (AI). From digital symptom evaluators to AI-powered dermatological diagnoses, technology is enhancing efficiency, accuracy and accessibility in healthcare services.

The integration of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and the implementation of the SPC Waiver Regulation are causing significant changes in intellectual property litigation in the life sciences sector.

Life Sciences and Technology

Research and investigation

The biomedical investigation industry has been growing rapidly and has attracted significant public and private investments, envisioning the prosperity and developments in the life sciences sector.

In line with this vision, the Institute for Medical Systems Biology (NIMSB) was developed in 2023 by Nova University of Lisbon, in partnership with the Max Delbrück Centre in Berlin. It presents itself as a new centre of excellence that aims to apply emerging biomedical and digital technologies and innovative health solutions, focusing on the understanding of human biology and physiopathology on a cellular and molecular level.

Moreover, in late 2023, the Faculty of Medicine of the Portuguese Catholic University opened a new research centre, the Católica Biomedical Research Centre, the main objective of which is to promote health through fundamental science. The centre is staffed by talented researchers who utilise innovative technologies to unify medicine, biology and engineering. They aim to understand complex systems and develop solutions to current and future social challenges related not only to human health but also to the planet’s well-being.

The government has recently created a programme called Saúde+Ciência (Health+Science) to boost scientific research in the field of healthcare. The aim of the programme is to encourage research in public institutions that offer health services and care, to train and appreciate health professionals, and to enhance the implementation of health promotion and disease prevention activities. Thus, the goal is to improve the organisation and quality of healthcare and services.

Focusing on projects targeted at specific therapeutics, the Champalimaud Foundation has recently received funding to invest in clinical research for pancreatic cancer.

The use of AI in the health sector

The healthcare industry has been undergoing a significant transformation due to technological advancements, particularly in AI. These advancements address various issues, including escalating costs, limited access to healthcare and disparities in healthcare delivery. AI's capacity to process large datasets and emulate human cognitive abilities has resulted in the creation of autonomous systems, reshaping healthcare models fundamentally.

Artificial intelligence is on the path to becoming consensually recognised by the scientific and clinical communities as a tool that can help increase accuracy and avoid delays in treatment, potentially saving lives when it comes to preventing the development of diseases and diagnosing pathologies.

Examples of how technology is being used in healthcare in Portugal include the following.

  • A digital symptom evaluator available on the CUF (a private Portuguese hospital) mobile app allows patients to answer a series of questions in order to receive a possible diagnosis or referral, serving as a preliminary assessment.
  • In early 2024, the National Health Service (NHS) introduced a funding line for the implementation of AI tools in dermatological diagnoses. Given the difficulty of accessing answers in this area, the NHS believes that the adoption of AI tools, which are duly validated and supervised by dermatologists, can provide faster and more accurate diagnoses for NHS users. Through an app, individuals can take a picture of their skin condition and, if necessary, it will be sent to a dermatologist with high priority, reducing the demand for face-to-face consultations.
  • The NHS has been investing in the use of robotics in medical interventions, which improves the quality of the procedure and patient recovery.
    1. In January 2024, the first robotic thyroidectomy was performed, at the Curry Cabral Hospital (an NHS hospital). This will revolutionise the way this common procedure is usually performed, allowing for a faster recovery and, because it is less invasive and aggressive, less significant physical sequelae.
    2. In February 2024, the first paediatric surgery with the use of a robotic arm was performed (before that, the robotic had only been used in adult surgeries).
  • During clinical trials, the recruitment of individuals or patients who fulfil the predetermined criteria outlined in the medicine study is essential. AI-based technologies play a crucial role in expediting, standardising and simplifying this selection process efficiently. Thus, researchers are now implementing AI algorithms on anonymised datasets to pinpoint clinical research centres housing patients suitable for the drugs under study.

Cloud data transformation

Many life sciences companies are now adopting cloud-based technologies to store their critical data remotely. This approach allows employees to access data from any location, at any time, while maintaining high levels of security. By utilising cloud infrastructure, these organisations are achieving greater operational flexibility, enabling faster decision-making and increasing overall efficiency.

Scientists at the Champalimaud Foundation have been working on the development of a cloud-based infrastructure to store health data for research purposes. This is the first time such a system has been created in Portugal. The goal of the project is to establish a standardised method of storing patient information in the cloud, with appropriate anonymisation, to allow secure access for researchers worldwide. Eventually, this system could also be used by clinicians and patients, who will be able to access the information online from anywhere in the world.

Clinical trials – complying with demand and recent EU regulation

In recent years, Portugal has experienced a significant increase in the number and scale of clinical trials conducted in various therapeutic areas. As a result, Portugal has been identified as one of the “core countries” for clinical trials.

This growth in clinical research has attracted major pharmaceutical companies to invest in Portugal, leading to the country’s economic development. However, the size of the industry and the increase in research activities requires adjustments in regulatory policies.

In an effort to promote the expansion of clinical research, the government issued Order No 1739/2024 on 14 February 2024. The order outlines a series of measures aimed at enabling Clinical Research Centres within the NHS to operate with increased capacity and autonomy by adopting new organisational forms.

Clinical trials for medicinal products are regulated by the Clinical Investigation Law (Law 21/2014 of 16 April). As of 31 January 2022, these trials must comply with the newest EU Regulation on Clinical Trials, which introduced the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS). This system will be used for submitting, examining and overseeing all clinical trials in the European Union.

Starting from 31 January 2023, new submissions for clinical trials in the EU and the European Economic Area must be submitted under the CTIS. By 31 January 2025, all ongoing trials must be transferred to the CTIS. INFARMED (the National Authority of Medicines and Health Products) has recently urged all ongoing clinical trial sponsors to transition to the CTIS as soon as possible, to ease the process and avoid any suspensions or trial interruptions.

Patient protection – information on the prices of medicines

A new law, Decree-Law 128/2023, was issued in December 2023, amending the Legal Regime of Medicines for Human Use (Decree-Law No 176/2006, of 30 August), bringing significant changes to the information about medicine prices. The primary objective of this decree-law is to enhance the information provided to users when dispensing medicines by eliminating the reference to the retail price (PVP) on the packaging, which has been found to be of little importance and challenging to comprehend.

According to the law’s recitals, the PVP appearance on the packaging does not usually reflect the actual cost of the medicine to the citizens, as there are too many variables that influence the final price, such as reimbursement and its varied application criteria. For that reason, eliminating the PVP on the packaging is intended to avoid providing misleading information and to avoid outdated information resulting from price changes. Instead, the government encourages other methods of accessing the pricing information, such as it being given by the pharmacies to the patient at the time of dispensing the medicine and being available by consulting the medicine search functionality of the INFARMED database.

For that reason, medicine packs distributed to pharmacies after 2 January 2024 no longer need to mention the PVP.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) in the life sciences sector

Life sciences companies, including those based in Portugal, are facing increased scrutiny regarding their ESG policies.

With regard to the upcoming legislative elections in Portugal (March 2024) and the pressing need for sustainable practices in the health industry, the Portuguese Council for Health and Environment expressed its concerns and proposals the political parties should include in their agendas, issuing a public Manifest in January 2024. Such proposals include the promotion of a national strategy for the implementation of good sustainability practices, particularly in terms of energy efficiency, the use of water and transport, and the waste of packaging and materials.

To that end, efforts have been made to promote sustainable practices in the life sciences industry. The Champalimaud Foundation signed a partnership with Philips to halve its CO2 emissions, and partnered up with the Greenvolt Group to achieve carbon neutrality. Using the energy generated by solar panels at the Champalimaud Centre and shared by other Greenvolt Communities, the foundation aims to be the first healthcare institution in the world to consume only clean energy within five years.

Intellectual Property Litigation and Life Sciences

Unified Patent Court (UPC)

In 2023, Europe entered a new chapter in patent litigation with the launch of the new unitary patent (UP) and the establishment of the UPC on 1 June. This milestone represents a pivotal moment aimed at simplifying patent disputes and fostering commercial certainty for businesses across various sectors. The life sciences sector has become a significant focal point of litigation and attention in these early months following the entry into force of the UPC.

One notable trend in the early stages of the UPC's operation is the heightened involvement of big life sciences companies in patent disputes brought before the court, namely between big pharma corporations Amgen and Sanofi. Despite some initial predictions that those players would stay out of the big field in the first stages, the prominence of the life sciences sector in the UPC litigation underscores the importance of intellectual property protection in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and medical devices.

Another interesting trend involves the use of protective letters, a legal figure not found in Portuguese law but allowed in the UPC under Rule 207 of the UPC's Rules of Procedure. A protective letter is typically submitted when an individual or entity anticipates the possibility of facing an application for provisional measures as a defendant in the UPC. Essentially, it serves as a proactive defence statement filed in advance to mitigate potential legal risks. This proactive action allows parties to address concerns regarding imminent legal proceedings and assert their position before the court. The increasing use of protective letters indicates a proactive strategy by companies preparing for a potential rise in preliminary injunctions within the UPC.

This trend highlights the importance of protecting intellectual property rights and proactively addressing potential disputes in patent law's constantly changing landscape, particularly in the UPC arena, with all its implications.

Furthermore, during the seven-year transitional period following the entry into force of the UPC Agreement, parties have flexibility in choosing the jurisdiction for actions involving classical European patents (excluding those with unitary effect). Article 83(1) of the UPC Agreement allows parties to bring such actions before national courts or other competent national authorities. Consequently, some companies are opting to pursue actions in national courts to avoid the potentially high litigation fees associated with the UPC.

This strategic decision, which has been embraced by several pharmaceutical companies in Portugal, underscores a practical approach aimed at navigating the transitional period effectively, weighting cost factors and litigation strategies within the evolving landscape of patent enforcement.

Although no lawsuits have yet been filed in the Lisbon Local Division, the judicial officer is actively handling cases in all divisions of the UPC. This highlights the efficiency and cohesion of the UPC's organisational structure, which operates like a well-oiled machine. The UPC's judicial officers' involvement in different divisions allows for streamlined patent litigation services across Europe, highlighting the importance of the organisational structure.

The Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) waiver

The process of developing medications and plant protection products involves significant research and investment, which highlights the need for additional protection for the underlying patent. The SPC is a specific right established to fulfil this purpose. It prolongs the exclusivity period of the pharmaceutical or plant protection product covered by a patent to make up for the time required to obtain initial administrative marketing authorisation.

The SPC Waiver Regulation of 2019 (Regulation (EU) 2019/933 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019) has been introduced as an attempt to balance the threat of unfair monopolies and access to the market with the compliance of intellectual property rights. The regulation has allowed other companies (as generics) to export and store protected products before the certificate's expiry, provided that they notify the Industrial Property Authority and the SPC holder.

The SPC waiver legislation allows manufacturers of generics and biosimilars who produce their products outside the EEA and launch them right after the expiry of SPC protection to establish supply chains within the EEA during the SPC period of validity in order to prepare for the immediate launch after expiry.

However, recent trends of compliance with the SPC waiver Regulation might be surpassing the initial purpose for which it was designed. A recent Review of the SPC Manufacturing Waiver was published by Medicines for Europe (which represents the European generic, biosimilar and valued added pharmaceutical industries) concerning the recent integration of the waiver system.

Many companies are now using SPC waivers, and more than half of them have submitted at least one notification since the legislation was introduced. However, some companies are hesitant to manufacture due to concerns about potential “frivolous and abusive” litigation from SPC holders.

The report highlights various tactics used by SPC holders, including:

  • initiating litigation based on hypothetical patents in export markets like the US; and
  • misusing confidential data obtained through the SPC waiver system.

These actions can deter legitimate manufacturing activity under the SPC waiver system because of the potential cost of litigation.

For those reasons, the Report calls for urgent action to address abusive tactics against companies that are using the SPC waiver system. Measures proposed in the report aim to inhibit SPC holders from discouraging legitimate manufacturing activity under the SPC waiver system. This could involve interventions by courts, the European Commission and national competition authorities to uphold fair competition and protect manufacturers against abusive litigation.

Conclusion

Portugal's life sciences industry has been rapidly evolving in recent years, driven by a combination of factors such as innovation, societal demands and regulatory changes. The country is increasingly establishing itself as a hub for biotechnological advancement and clinical research, with a growing number of companies and institutions conducting cutting-edge research in fields such as genetics and biomedicine.

However, despite the sector's growth, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed, such as regulatory compliance, as the industry must adhere to strict regulations and guidelines to ensure safety and efficacy.

Sustainability is becoming an increasingly pressing issue, as the industry seeks to balance economic growth with environmental and social responsibility. This requires not only the adoption of eco-friendly technologies and practices but also a commitment to transparency, inclusivity and social impact.

To overcome these challenges and sustain its growth, Portugal's life sciences sector has been incorporating technological innovations such as AI and cloud-based data storage, which have the potential to transform the industry by enabling faster, more accurate data analysis, and improving patient outcomes. However, it is crucial that these technologies are implemented in a way that prioritises ethical considerations, regulatory compliance and sustainability imperatives.

Ultimately, Portugal's life sciences sector has the potential to make significant contributions to global healthcare and scientific progress.

Sérvulo & Associados

Rua Garrett, n.º 64
1200-204
Lisboa
Portugal

+351 210 933 000

+351 210 933 001/2

geral@servulo.com www.servulo.com/en
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



PLMJ is a law firm based in Portugal that combines a full service with bespoke legal craftsmanship. For more than 50 years, the firm has supported clients in all areas of the law, often with multidisciplinary teams, and always acting as a business partner in the most strategic decision-making processes. PLMJ has specialist lawyers that know the sectors and markets they work in well, and keep in close contact with the regulators for each sector. The firm created PLMJ Colab, a collaborative network of law firms spread across Portugal and other countries with which it has cultural and strategic ties. PLMJ Colab makes the best use of resources and provides a bespoke response to clients' international challenges. International co-operation is ensured through firms specialising in the legal systems and local cultures of Angola, Cabo Verde, China/Macau, Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Timor-Leste. The firm would like to thank Vasco Granate for his contribution to this chapter.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Sérvulo & Associados is a Portuguese full-service law firm with 25 years of operation. It has a highly competent multidisciplinary team of more than 100 lawyers who are trusted by a vast number of private and public entities, both domestic and international, in the Portuguese-speaking legal markets and in all the most significant economic sectors. The life sciences team has in-depth knowledge of the life cycles of drugs, medical devices and other health products, enabling it to provide specialised advice at all stages, including research and development of new products and their respective intellectual property issues, data protection, regulation and inherent litigation.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.