Life Sciences 2026

Last Updated April 08, 2026

Spain

Law and Practice

Authors



Faus Moliner is a modern boutique law firm based in Barcelona that specialises in advising the pharmaceutical industry and companies that operate in the life sciences sector. The firm was founded in 1997 and currently has 15 members. It focuses on pharmaceutical law, commercial contracts, corporate transactions, corporate governance, compliance, competition law, public procurement, product liability, advertising, litigation and arbitration. The firm advises pharmaceutical and healthcare clients, large companies and smaller biotech start-ups, and is frequently called upon to advise public authorities on matters such as draft legislation. It combines legal skills and specialisation with a practical and business-oriented manner of practising law. Since its foundation, Faus Moliner has been recognised in several international publications as the market leader in pharmaceutical law in Spain.

Key Legislation

The following legislation governs medicinal products and medical devices in Spain.

  • General pharmaceutical legislation:
    1. Law 14/1986 (the “General Law on Public Health”);
    2. Law 16/2003, of 28 May, on the cohesion and quality of the National Health System; and
    3. Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015, which approves the consolidated version of the Law on Guarantees and Rational Use of Medicinal Products and Medical Devices.
  • The authorisation, registration and distribution of medicinal products:
    1. Royal Decree 1345/2007, which regulates the authorisation, registry and dispensation conditions of medicinal products for human use prepared industrially for human use;
    2. Royal Decree 477/2014, which regulates the authorisation of medicinal products for advanced therapies not prepared industrially;
    3. Royal Decree 824/2010 on pharmaceutical companies, manufacturers of active ingredients, foreign trade of medicinal products and investigational medicinal products;
    4. Royal Decree 1785/2000 on the intra-community trade of medicinal products for human use; and
    5. Royal Decree 782/2013, which regulates the distribution of medicinal products.
  • Medical devices:
    1. Royal Decree 192/2023, which regulates medical devices;
    2. Royal Decree 942/2025 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices;
    3. Royal Decree 1616/2009 on active implantable medical devices (partially repealed); and
    4. Royal Decree 1662/2000 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (partially repealed).
  • Clinical studies, pharmacovigilance and access to medicinal products in special situations:
    1. Royal Decree 1090/2015, which regulates clinical trials, ethics committees for research on medicinal products and the Spanish registry for clinical trials;
    2. Royal Decree 967/2020, which regulates observational studies of medicinal products for human use;
    3. Royal Decree 577/2013, which regulates pharmacovigilance in relation to medicinal products for human use;
    4. Law 14/2007 on biomedical research; and
    5. Royal Decree 1015/2009 on access to medicinal products in special situations.
  • Price, reimbursement and promotion:
    1. Royal Decree 271/1990, which regulates the prices of medicinal products reimbursed by the National Health System;
    2. Royal Decree 177/2014, which regulates the reference price system and homogeneous groups of medicinal products in the National Health System and information on the reimbursement and prices of medicinal products and medical devices;
    3. Royal Decree 823/2008, which establishes the margins, deductions and discounts corresponding to the distribution and dispensation of medicinal products for human use;
    4. Royal Decree 90/2026, which regulates the procedure for selective financing of medical devices charged to the pharmaceutical benefits of the National Health System for non-hospitalised patients and determining the margins corresponding to their distribution and dispensing (effective 1 July 2026);
    5. Royal Decree 1416/1994, which regulates the advertising of medicinal products, and provisions established in Articles 38–40 of Royal Decree 1594/2009, which regulates medical devices (partially repealed by Royal Decree 192/2023); and
    6. Royal Decree 870/2013, which regulates online sales to the public of non-prescription medicinal products.

Regional authorities (Spain is divided into 17 autonomous regions) may also enact and enforce regulations that are applicable at their level and within their scope of competence (eg, pharmacy offices or healthcare provision).

Furthermore, there is a self-regulatory framework established by trade associations (eg, Farmaindustria, Fenin and Aeseg) that enforce their own codes of practice. These codes of practice have a binding effect on their members and primarily govern advertising and interactions with healthcare organisations, healthcare professionals and patients’ organisations. Although adherence to these trade associations or their codes of practice is not mandatory, authorities often reference them as a reflection of the current social reality and take them into account in practice.

Regulatory Authorities

At the national level, the main regulatory authorities responsible for applying and enforcing regulations on medicinal products and medical devices are the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices (Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios; AEMPS). Among other functions, the MOH is responsible for drafting and implementing the rules on pricing and reimbursement of medicinal products. The AEMPS is responsible for the issuance of marketing authorisations (MAs) for medicinal products in Spain, which includes overseeing the authorisation process through national, mutual recognition and/or decentralised procedures, amongst other matters.

At the regional level, regional regulatory authorities enforce regulations in the aforementioned areas and enact rules within their scope of competence. Moreover, regions participate in the MOH’s committee responsible for evaluating pricing and reimbursement applications for medicinal products. High-level co-ordination among all regional healthcare systems mainly occurs through the National Health Service (NHS) Interterritorial Council, which comprises the national Minister of Health and the 17 regional ministers of health.

Decisions of regulatory bodies may be challenged through both administrative appeal and judicial review. In some cases, the administrative appeal is mandatory, and it must be filed within one month from receiving notice of the decision.

After administrative proceedings, the interested party may go to court within two months of receiving notice of the decision; if no notice is received, the deadline is six months from the presumed rejection date.

Medicinal Products

Article 8.1 of Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015 distinguishes between four types of medicinal products:

  • medicinal products for human and veterinary use that are industrially manufactured, or in the manufacture of which an industrial process is involved;
  • magistral formulae;
  • official preparations; and
  • special medicinal products (eg, vaccines and other biological medicinal products, advanced therapy medicinal products, radiopharmaceuticals, homeopathic medicinal products or medicinal gases).

In relation to prescription and dispensing conditions, Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015 contemplates the same classification set forth in Article 70 of Directive 2001/83/EC.

Medical Devices

Medical devices are classified into four classes (III, IIb, IIa and I), as are in vitro diagnostic medical devices (A–D). Devices are ranked considering their level of invasiveness according to Regulation (EU) No 2017/745 on medical devices (MDR) and Regulation (EU) No 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR). Additionally, medical devices can be categorised based on their intended purpose, following the classifications outlined in European regulations.

In Spain, clinical trials with medicinal products are mainly regulated by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015 and Royal Decree 1090/2015, whereas clinical investigations with medical devices are governed by Royal Decree 192/2023.

Moreover, the AEMPS has issued a document of instructions for the conduct of clinical trials with medicinal products in Spain and guidelines for conducting clinical investigations with medical devices, both of which are regularly updated.

Medicinal Products

To initiate a clinical trial with medicinal products, the following will be required:

  • prior authorisation by the AEMPS, after a scientific and ethical evaluation in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 536/2014;
  • a favourable opinion issued by an ethics committee for research on medicinal products (comité de ética de la investigación con medicamentos; CEIm) in Spain; and
  • a written agreement between the sponsor and the sites (clinical trial agreement; CTA).

The sponsor may select any CEIm within Spain to review the study and issue a favourable opinion. With respect to the CTA, there is no standardised template for all Spanish sites. In practice, each hospital/region usually has its own template. The sponsor may sign the CTA before obtaining the required authorisations (Article 17 of Royal Decree 1090/2015). In such cases, the CTA will become effective once both AEMPS and CEIm approvals are in place.

Medical Devices

Two different situations can be distinguished for clinical investigations involving medical devices:

  • clinical investigations involving medical devices without European Conformity (Conformité Européenne; CE) for conformity assessment, as well as those with CE marking used outside the scope of their intended purpose, require a favourable CEIm opinion, AEMPS approval and a written agreement between the sponsor and the sites; and
  • clinical investigations involving medical devices that have CE marking and are used in accordance with their instructions for use, and in line with the approved, intended purpose when the CE marking was issued, require a favourable CEIm opinion and a written agreement between the sponsor and the sites – AEMPS approval is exempted.

In the first situation, the sponsor must submit the documentation described in Chapter II of Annex 15 of Regulation (EU) No 2017/745. The AEMPS shall evaluate the documentation submitted and decide to either authorise or reject the clinical investigation.

Additionally, if patients will undergo procedures beyond those applied under normal conditions of use, and these procedures are invasive or burdensome, the sponsor shall notify this to the AEMPS through the database for clinical investigations involving CE-marked medical devices (NEOPS).

The Spanish Registry of Clinical Studies (Registro Español de Estudios Clínicos; REec) is a public database containing information on all clinical trials with medicinal products authorised by the AEMPS in Spain. It can be accessed through the AEMPS website.

The sponsor must publish the results of the clinical trial, whether positive or negative, preferably in scientific journals before disclosure to the general public, as well as in the REec.

For medical devices, there is currently no publicly available database specific for Spain.

The decentralisation of clinical trials (including the use of online tools for monitoring purposes) began with the COVID-19 pandemic, when the AEMPS amended its document of instructions to introduce exceptional measures regarding:

  • patient visits for ongoing clinical trials during the pandemic;
  • access to trial medicinal products;
  • the transfer of patients between sites; and
  • the procedure for obtaining patients’ informed consent.

In view of the positive experience acquired, it has been considered convenient to facilitate the use of these decentralised aspects in clinical trials beyond the COVID-19 pandemic period. In November 2024, the AEMPS published a guide for the implementation of decentralised elements in clinical trials, providing a series of recommendations on procedures performed with online tools to support clinical trials, such as online recruitment, electronic informed consent and telemedicine for remote monitoring. The use of these online tools is subject to appropriate safeguards to ensure participant safety and protect their rights. For example, the patient information sheet must clearly detail any decentralised elements, identify potential additional risks and specify the measures in place to protect patient privacy.

Provided that it is not aggregated or anonymised, the data resulting from clinical trials is recognised as a special category of personal data and is therefore subject to restrictive guarantees by the personal data protection regulations applicable in the EU (ie, the General Data Protection Regulation; GDPR) and Spain (ie, Law 3/2018 on the Protection of Personal Data).

Generally, personal data resulting from clinical trials may not be transferred to a third party, or an affiliate, in a country that does not provide an adequate level of protection without complying with the provisions of Chapter V of the GDPR. In such cases, the sponsor must adopt one of the safeguards set out in Article 46 of the GDPR.

In those cases where there is an intention to use participants’ data for future research or outside the protocol of the clinical trial (secondary use), data processing must be grounded in one of the lawful bases set forth in the GDPR. Additional Disposition 17 of Law 3/2018 has established specific provisions for secondary use of health data. In this regard, the re-use of data from previous studies is considered lawful and compatible with clinical investigation purposes, provided that the new research is related to the scientific area of the original study for which consent was obtained. In such cases, the site or the sponsor must publish the information established by Article 13 of the GDPR in an easily accessible place on its website and notify the data subjects. In addition, a prior favourable report from a CEIm is required.

Databases containing personal data (eg, health data) are subject to the GDPR and Law 3/2018. In this regard, it is necessary to obtain the patient’s informed consent prior to entering their data in the database, or to rely on another lawful basis for the processing of the data (Article 6.1 of the GDPR), as well as a valid exception to the prohibition of processing health data (Article 9.2 of the GDPR).

It is important to note that if a database involves the collection of information on medicinal products prescribed to patients, it may fall under the scope of observational studies involving medicinal products, as regulated by Royal Decree 967/2020, and thus be subject to the requirements established therein.

Products are classified as medicinal products or medical devices on a case-by-case basis.

According to Directive 2001/83/EC and Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015, a product shall be classified as a medicinal product if it achieves its intended effect by means of a pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action (medicinal product by function), or if it is presented as having therapeutic properties typical of medicinal products (medicinal product by presentation). These are alternative conditions, meaning that a given substance or combination will be considered a medicinal product if either or both definitions apply to it.

The AEMPS is responsible for attributing the status of a medicinal product to a substance in Spain. This can occur within the framework of a national marketing procedure or, subsequently, within the scope of the market surveillance functions of the AEMPS.

However, in the centralised procedure, it is the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that determines whether a substance is a medicinal product. Moreover, the EMA has the power to intervene in disputes arising during decentralised authorisation procedures.

The AEMPS is also responsible for the qualification and classification of medical devices in Spain.

The granting of an MA for biologic products is governed by the same obligations as for other medicinal products. Biosimilar medicinal products have to demonstrate comparability in efficacy, safety and quality through an abbreviated clinical and non-clinical development programme. Biological and biosimilar medicinal products developed by means of biotechnological processes, as described in Regulation (EU) No 726/2004, must be authorised by the European Commission through the centralised procedure. Other biological and biosimilar medicinal products may optionally undergo the centralised procedure or decentralised/national procedures.

Advanced therapy medicinal products (which can also be biologic products) that are non-industrially manufactured are regulated by Royal Decree 477/2014, which sets out that their individual use and manufacture must be authorised by the AEMPS on a case-by-case basis.

Medicinal Products

The MA of a medicinal product is valid for an initial period of five years. The marketing authorisation holder (MAH) may apply for MA renewal, pursuant to Article 27 of Royal Decree 1345/2007, at least nine months before expiration.

Once renewed, the MA will be valid for an unlimited period, unless the AEMPS requires an additional five-year renewal based on duly justified pharmacovigilance-related reasons. An MA shall be revoked if the product it refers to is not marketed for three consecutive years (ie, sunset clause).

Once the MA is granted, Royal Decree 1345/2007 imposes an obligation on the MAH to keep the market duly supplied. In practice, each October the MAH shall declare whether they intend to market the product during the following year. If they do not do so, they will be deemed to have requested a suspension of the validity of the MA.

Royal Decree 1345/2007 also empowers the AEMPS to keep MAs in force for reasons of public health interest, such as the creation of a treatment gap, either in the market in general or in the pharmaceutical provision of the NHS. This could contravene the provisions of Directive 2001/83/EC, which allows marketing cessation if notified two months in advance. In practice, AEMPS has adopted a rather strict position on this matter and is taking actions against companies that cease supplies or that are not able to meet market demand if they cause a therapeutic gap.

Medical Devices

The certificate of conformity for medical devices issued by the notified bodies is valid for a maximum of five years, in line with provisions set out at the EU level. The validity of the certificate may be extended for further periods, each not exceeding five years, based on a re-assessment conducted in accordance with the applicable conformity assessment procedures.

Medicinal Products

The AEMPS is in charge of granting MAs in Spain, which are regulated by Royal Decree 1345/2007. Some provisions of the Royal Decree also affect medicinal products authorised by the European Commission pursuant to the centralised procedure.

The AEMPS shall authorise a specific product if it:

  • fulfils the established quality requirements;
  • is safe under normal conditions of use;
  • is effective in the therapeutic indications;
  • is correctly identified; and
  • provides the patient with the necessary information.

The positive therapeutic effects of the medicinal product shall be assessed from a risk-benefit perspective.

The key stages of the authorisation procedure are as follows:

  • submission of the application to the AEMPS;
  • validation and acceptance of the submission;
  • issuance of the evaluation report; and
  • resolution of the application and granting, where appropriate, of the MA.

The maximum period to notify the applicant about the resolution of the authorisation procedure is 210 calendar days.

The main requirements for the different types of variations of MAs of medicinal products (ie, types IA, IB and II, and extensions) are regulated in Royal Decree 1345/2007.

Applications for variations must be submitted to the AEMPS, which has 30 days to approve or deny type IA and type IB variations, and 60 days for type II variations.

Transfers of MAs require prior authorisation by the AEMPS. The application is to be conducted through the Register of Authorisations of Pharmaceutical and Related Companies (Registro de Autorizaciones de Empresas Farmacéuticas y Afines – RAEFAR), where the data and documentation supporting the proposed transfer must be uploaded.

Medical Devices

Medical devices are divided into four classes (III, IIb, IIa and I) depending on the risk posed by the device, which is mainly determined according to its level of invasiveness, the part of the body it is in contact with and the duration of such contact, according to the classification rules of Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 2017/75. In vitro diagnostic medical devices can also be classified into four classes (A–D), taking into account the intended purpose of the devices and their inherent risks, in light of the classification rules in Annex VIII of Regulation (EU) No 2017/746.

Except for custom-made devices, medical devices must bear the CE marking to be placed on the market in Spain, which provides evidence of the device’s conformity with the applicable requirements. The evaluation and variation approval of medical devices are governed at the EU level in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/745.

Medicinal Products

Spain has two national exemption schemes, implemented under Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/83, which permit the importation of and patient access to medicinal products that do not have a valid MA in Spain – the so-called compassionate use and foreign use of medicinal products – both of which are regulated under Royal Decree 1015/2009 on access to medicinal products in special situations.

Compassionate use is allowed for patients with serious or life-threatening conditions when no authorised and commercialised alternatives are available; in such cases, the medicinal product must either be subject to an MA application or be part of a clinical trial. In practice, the AEMPS takes the view that, when a medicinal product already has a valid MA and is commercialised in Spain, no compassionate use programme can be opened for indications under investigation. This may raise issues in practice if companies wish to offer units of the commercialised product to be used for such unauthorised indication free of charge. Meanwhile, the foreign use regime enables the import of medicinal products approved in other countries but not yet authorised in Spain.

Both the compassionate use and the foreign use regimes require prior approval from the AEMPS, which manages these programmes with high efficiency through its website for medicines in special situations (medicamentos en situaciones especiales; MSE), allowing physician and healthcare centres to submit requests for individual or group patient access. Furthermore, under Spanish law, such uses are carried out under the exclusive responsibility of the physician and require prior informed consent from the patient or their legal representative, a clinical report justifying the need for the treatment and approval from the healthcare centre where it will be administered. The price of the product concerned is fixed by the importer, normally after negotiation with the pharmacy service of the healthcare centre. In compassionate use cases, the AEMPS, hospitals and regional authorities frequently put pressure on the company to supply the product free of charge. However, for the time being, Spanish law does not require that the supply be free of charge.

Finally, off-label use of medicinal products is accepted when there are no authorised alternatives for the patient. Off-label use does not require AEMPS approval and may be accomplished under the healthcare provider’s authority.

Medical Devices

Medical devices without CE marking, and those used outside of a clinical investigation or for conditions not included in the instructions for use, may be permitted under a compassionate use programme in accordance with the conditions established in Circular 7/2004 issued by the AEMPS. According to this Circular, the compassionate use of medical devices is carried out under the exclusive responsibility of the physician and requires prior informed consent from the patient or their legal representative, a clinical report justifying the need for the treatment, approval from the healthcare centre where it will be administered and authorisation from the AEMPS.

Medicinal Products

Royal Decree 577/2013 imposes the following main pharmacovigilance obligations on MAHs:

  • respect the good practices on pharmacovigilance published by the AEMPS;
  • have an adequate pharmacovigilance system;
  • have a suitably qualified person responsible for pharmacovigilance in both the EU and Spain;
  • submit periodic safety reports to the EMA;
  • have a risk management system for each medicinal product;
  • notify and record suspected adverse reactions;
  • monitor scientific literature worldwide;
  • carry out post-authorisation studies of efficacy and safety; and
  • perform a continuous evaluation of the risk-benefit parameters of the medicinal product.

The MAH shall conduct the post-authorisation efficacy studies required by member states or the European Commission in the following circumstances:

  • as a condition of the MA, where questions about the efficacy of the medicinal product arise that can only be resolved after the product has been placed on the market; and
  • subsequent to the granting of an MA, where knowledge of the disease or clinical methodology indicates that previous assessments of efficacy may need to be significantly revised.

Products subject to additional monitoring requirements must include a black inverted triangle in their package leaflet and data sheet, accompanied by the sentence “this medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring”.

Medical Devices

Manufacturers, authorised representatives and importers or distributors of medical devices must notify the AEMPS of:

  • any malfunction or alteration of the characteristics of the device, as well as any inadequacy in the labelling or instructions for use that could lead to death or serious damage to health; and
  • any reason of a technical or health-related nature linked to the characteristics or performance of a device that has led the manufacturer to take systematic action on devices of the same type.

Medicinal Products

Royal Decree 1345/2007 establishes the confidentiality/transparency regime that the AEMPS must follow in MA procedures for new medicinal products. Article 15 of Royal Decree 1345/2007 guarantees the absolute confidentiality of MA applications and the expert reports attached to such applications.

Royal Decree 1345/2007 also requires that the AEMPS must have a public database with information on authorised medicinal products in Spain. This database must include the evaluation report issued by the AEMPS during the authorisation procedure (or a link to the one issued by the EMA), as well as the summary of product characteristics (SmPC), the patient leaflet and any other relevant information (risk management of the product, usage restrictions, post-authorisation studies, etc).

All this information is included in a publicly accessible online database called CIMA (Centro de Información de Medicamentos; the Drug Information Centre), which incorporates all information regarding medicinal products authorised in Spain (through both the national and centralised procedures), as well as those whose MA has been revoked or temporarily suspended. This database does not display information on medicinal products with pending MA decisions or MA applications rejected by the AEMPS.

It is important to note that the activity of the AEMPS is subject to the provisions of Law 19/2013 on transparency and access to public information. This law states that any interested party may submit requests for access to public information. Based on this regulation, it is possible to request that the AEMPS report on the number of pending MA applications for a specific active substance.

Based on the firm’s experience with such requests, AEMPS provides information regarding the number of pending MA applications for a given active substance, the submission date of such application, the validation date, the pharmaceutical form, the registration status and the anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) code. However, the AEMPS does not disclose details regarding the name of the medicinal product or the applicant company, arguing that this information is confidential and that its disclosure could affect the economic and commercial interests of the applicants, as it forms part of their regulatory strategy.

The same rationale applies to requests regarding MAs that have been rejected by the AEMPS. The names of medicinal products whose MAs have been denied, as well as the name of the applicant company, remain confidential.

Medical Devices

Finally, concerning medical devices, the AEMPS does not maintain a public database of all medical devices marketed in Spain. The AEMPS only publishes three specific lists of medical devices, indicating the date of notification, the trade name, the composition, the manufacturer and the distributor. These lists refer to:

  • filler implants used for plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic purposes with CE marking marketed in Spain;
  • medical devices considered platelet-rich plasma collection systems; and
  • medical devices that were specifically used during COVID-19 and were found by the AEMPS to be non-compliant with regulations while on the market.

Additionally, Royal Decree 192/2023 created a registry for medical device distributors, requiring companies engaged in distribution activities to register. However, this registry is not yet operational. This Royal Decree also created the AEMPS Marketing Registry, where all medical devices placed on the market, except class I devices, must be registered. This registry is currently only operational for economic operators and is not public.

Fast-track registration routes are available for AEMPS-listed strategic medicinal products. While not explicitly established by law, these mechanisms have been implemented in practice by the AEMPS. The AEMPS regularly publishes and updates the strategic medicinal products list on its website, which includes medicinal products that meet two key criteria: criticality (ie, importance of the therapeutic indication) and vulnerability (ie, availability of alternative treatments).

The list of strategic medicinal products includes clinically essential but under-represented treatments in Spain, particularly those containing World Health Organization (WHO) essential active ingredients and those selected by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It also includes medicinal products for which cancellation or suspension requests have been denied due to their critical healthcare impact, as well as those authorised through the mutual recognition procedure to address supply shortages.

Additionally, the list includes vulnerable medicinal products essential for national clinical practice. Products from the European List of Critical Medicinal Products that meet Spain’s national criteria are also considered, along with those that have a high market concentration (over 70% share) and are manufactured nationally. Medicinal products still under market protection are excluded, as their availability is guaranteed through other mechanisms.

There are no fast-track registration routes in place for medical devices.       

Spain embraces regulatory reliance, particularly within the European Medicines Regulatory Network. The AEMPS operates within the EMA-co-ordinated network, contributing to centralised and mutual recognition procedures for MAs.

Furthermore, the AEMPS adheres to the mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) established between the EU and third-country authorities concerning good manufacturing practice (GMP) inspections and batch certification for human and veterinary medicinal products. In this context, the AEMPS regularly publishes communications detailing the procedures to be followed in Spain in alignment with the MRAs.

Medicinal Products

Any manufacturer or importer of medicinal products, and those involved in processes such as fractionation, packaging and presentation for sale, must be authorised by the AEMPS (Article 63 of Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015). This authorisation is also required if the medicinal product is for export only. To obtain the authorisation, the manufacturer must:

  • apply to the AEMPS through the website of the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios; LABOFAR), specifying the medicinal products and pharmaceutical forms to be manufactured or imported, as well as the location and facilities where the manufacturing or control will occur;
  • have suitable premises and technical and control equipment for the activity intended to be carried out; and
  • have a technical director, manufacturing manager and quality control manager with sufficient qualifications.

The AEMPS will verify that the application meets the formal requirements within ten days and conduct an inspection at the facilities. The AEMPS will then issue the authorisation resolution, notifying the autonomous regions. The maximum time for notification of the resolution is 90 days from the receipt of the application. The authorisation is valid indefinitely, unless revoked.

Medical Devices

Companies engaged in the manufacture, importation, grouping or sterilisation of medical devices, as well as the facilities where these activities are carried out, require a prior operating licence from the AEMPS.

The AEMPS will review the submitted application and notify its decision within three months from the application date. Operating licences might be refused, suspended or revoked if the documentation provided or inspection reports do not guarantee that the appropriate facilities, means, procedures and personnel are in place. Operating licences are valid for a maximum of five years and may be renewed upon application by the interested party.

Medicinal Products

In Spain, the distribution of medicinal products can be carried out by entities holding a wholesale distribution authorisation (WDA), or directly by the MAH or its local representative (LR). Notably, an LR that only purchases (acquires) and sells (invoices) the product, without physically handling it, is not required to hold a WDA. This distinction is important for two reasons. First, it highlights the priorities of the AEMPS regarding WDAs. AEMPS is primarily concerned with the physical flow of products and ensuring that any entity handling them holds the necessary regulatory permits. It places less emphasis on financial transactions, such as product ownership transfer and invoicing. Second, in practice, foreign MAHs often rely on an LR that does not physically handle the product.

Typically, the MAH appoints a Spanish company within its group as the LR, entrusting it with all responsibilities related to marketing the product, including invoicing hospitals. At the same time, the LR contracts a third-party logistics provider (3PL) to receive and physically deliver the product to hospitals. In such cases, ownership of the product usually transfers to the LR (from the MAH or another authorised entity) just before hospital delivery, allowing the LR to invoice under its VAT number. From a regulatory perspective, the 3PL must hold a WDA since it physically handles the product, whereas the LR does not require one.

Wholesalers and contract warehouses must obtain a WDA from the health authority of the autonomous region where the warehouse is located. This authorisation will specify the distribution activities the entity is authorised to perform, in accordance with the European format. Additionally, these entities must notify the AEMPS before starting their activities.

To grant this WDA, the regional authority will verify that such entities have the appropriate personnel, material and operational means to guarantee the correct development of their activity, as well as the capability to provide a quality service. In addition, a physical inspection of the premises will be carried out. The regional authority must notify its decision within 90 days of receiving the application. If no decision is made within this period, the applicant can consider their application approved.

The authorisation is valid indefinitely. However, it may be suspended in the following circumstances:

  • if the entity does not fully, effectively and continuously carry out all the distribution activities for which it has been authorised one year after the authorisation is granted; or
  • when the entity no longer meets the requirements that were considered to grant such authorisation or fails to comply with the legally established obligations.

Medical Devices

Distributors and other entities engaged in the sale of medical devices must submit prior notification of the start of their activity to the health authority of the autonomous region where the company’s registered office is located. They must also notify the health authority of the region where the warehouses are located, if they are in different regions. The notification must include:

  • identification of the distribution establishment;
  • the types of products it distributes or sells; and
  • identification and qualification of the responsible technician, where applicable.

In addition, any entity engaged in the sale of medical devices must be registered in the AEMPS Marketing Register prior to the start of its activity. This register is not yet operational. Once the European Database on Medical Devices (EUDAMED) is fully functional, all devices, except custom-made medical devices, will be reported in the new Medical Device Marketing Register.

According to AEMPS Guidelines of April 2025, until that register becomes operational, notifications of placement on the market and putting into service of Class IIa, IIb and III medical devices in Spain must be submitted through the AEMPS application for the notification of the marketing of medical devices (Comunicación de Comercialización de Productos Sanitarios – CCPS). Manufacturers, authorised representatives, system and procedure pack producers or sterilisation service providers established in Spain that place Class I or custom-made medical devices on the market must notify AEMPS for inclusion in the Register of the Responsible of Medical Devices.

Concerning the importer of record of pharmaceuticals and medical devices, please see 1.3 Difference Categories of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices.

The importation and exportation of medicinal products and medical devices is governed by Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015 (in particular, Articles 72 and 73, relating to exports) and Royal Decree 824/2010.

The AEMPS applies and enforces regulations regarding the import, export and intra-community trade of medicinal products and medical devices. In the exercise of its duties, the AEMPS has issued the following guidelines:

  • Circular 1/2025 on the foreign trade of medicinal products; and
  • Circular 2/2012 on the prior notification of shipments of medicinal products to other member states.

Parallel imports of nationally authorised medicinal products (ie, those which are distributed in Spain by an entity other than the MAH) are regulated by Royal Decree 1785/2000.

Medicinal Products

The importation of finished medicinal products, intermediates or bulk products from third countries may only be carried out by a duly authorised pharmaceutical importing laboratory. In addition, the importation itself is subject to prior authorisation by the AEMPS. Any individual or legal entity can apply for an import licence from the AEMPS if it complies with Article 63 of Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015. Requirements to obtain the import licence are the same as those listed for the application for manufacturing authorisations – please see 5.1 Requirement for Authorisation for Manufacturing Plants of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices for more details.

Medical Devices

Any natural or legal person engaged in the importation of medical devices, as well as the facilities where such activities are carried out, must obtain a prior operating licence. This licence is granted by the AEMPS. The requirements for obtaining such licence are set out in Article 8 of Royal Decree 192/2023 for medical devices and in Article 8 of Royal Decree 942/2025 for in vitro devices.

Prior authorisation is required for the importation of medicinal products into the EU customs territory, as established in Circular 2/2015.

When it comes to medical devices, no prior authorisation is required for each individual importation. Instead, the importer and its facilities must hold a valid prior operating licence granted by the AEMPS, and the authorities will verify that the device complies with the applicable requirements, including CE marking and conformity assessment under the MDR and IVDR.

Operating licences for both medical devices and in vitro diagnostic devices are valid for a maximum of five years.

Imports of healthcare products are controlled by the Pharmaceutical Inspectorate at customs, which will verify that the products comply with the requirements established in applicable European legislation, and that the importer has an operating licence.

Ministerial Order SPI/2136/2011 lays down the procedures for health control at the border by the Pharmaceutical Inspectorate and regulates the computerised pharmaceutical inspection system for border health controls. Annex I contains a non-exhaustive list of the headings subject to control. The products are classified according to the combined nomenclature (CN) code, according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87.

The import authorisation referred to in 7.2 Importer of Record of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices is not required if the product originates from another EU country (intra-community trade), or from Norway, Iceland or Liechtenstein, by virtue of the agreement for the European Economic Area (EEA) recognising the free movement of goods between the contracting parties, signed in Porto on 2 May 1992. In this case, a distribution licence is sufficient. For more information on distribution requirements, please see 6.1 Wholesale of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices.

Medicinal Products

Reimbursed medicinal products have a maximum ex-factory price (precio de venta laboratorio; PVL) set by the Interministerial Committee for the Price of Medicines (ICPM), a committee of the MOH. The PVL is the maximum price for the units of the reimbursed product that will be reimbursed by the Spanish NHS. To determine the PVL, Spain has always followed a cost-plus system, under which the maximum PVL should correspond to the cost of the product plus a given profit margin; this is what Royal Decree 271/1990 contemplates in accordance with the provisions of Directive 89/105/EEC relating to the transparency of measures regulating the pricing of medicinal products for human use. As a matter of practice, however, the price-approval process entails negotiation with the authorities, where the cost and profit margin are not the main variables considered. In the firm’s experience, companies should be prepared for prices to be determined based on:

  • a comparative pharmaco-economic evaluation of the medicinal product and its competitors; and
  • the price of the medicinal product in other EU member states.

Companies must also be ready for the authorities to consider other issues, such as the activities performed by the company in Spain (eg, R&D, manufacturing) and any relationship with a local company through a co-marketing or licensing arrangement. Reimbursed medicinal products also have a so-called notified price, which is the price at which the MAH may market such reimbursed product outside the Spanish NHS (eg, units supplied on a patient-payment basis). The notified price is in fact free, although according to Article 94.4 of Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015, it must be notified to the MOH, who may oppose to it on the grounds of protecting the public interest. The notified price is, by definition, higher than the PVL.

Finally, the MOH is working on an update of the rules governing the price and reimbursement of medicinal products. At the end of 2024, the MOH launched a public consultation on this matter.

Medical Devices

Unlike medicinal products, the vast majority of medical devices used at NHS hospitals do not have a maximum PVL determined at the national level. Instead, the price of such products is determined/negotiated on a case-by-case basis in public procurement proceedings.

Furthermore, certain medical devices/products for non-hospitalised patients (eg, bandages, gauze, catheters, urine collection bags) have a specific reimbursement regime laid down in Royal Decree 90/2026, which regulates the selective reimbursement procedure of medical devices for non-hospitalised patients. This Royal Decree establishes the procedure for reimbursement as well as the setting of their maximum industrial price (PVL máximo), the applicable wholesale and pharmacy margins, and the conditions for their dispensing.

As per Spanish regulations, the MOH is not allowed to reference international prices. International referencing was contemplated in the Law on Medicinal Products before 2012, but Royal Decree-Law 16/2012 of 20 of April removed any reference to this practice in 2012; subsequently, international referencing had no legal basis in Spain, and the judgments of the Supreme Court of 28 October 2015 and 11 November 2015 confirmed this.

However, in practice, external reference pricing influences price rulings in Spain. The fact that this practice has no legal basis makes it quite difficult to identify precisely how the MOH factors in international prices, and the sources from which these prices are obtained. In any case, as per the firm’s experience in dealing with the MOH, it has become clear that the MOH requests the MAH to provide information about how the medicinal product has been priced in other EU countries, and that EU prices operate as a cap for Spanish prices, meaning that prices in Spain are rarely fixed above the price of the same medicinal product in other EU countries.

With regard to international reference pricing for medical devices, Article 6.1(i) of Royal Decree 90/2026 provides that, when applying for reimbursement, the applicant must submit information on the status and price of the medical device in those EU member states where it is marketed. In addition, the company must provide, where available, information on the prices of similar medical devices marketed by the same company in Spain and in other EU countries. It remains to be seen how this provision will be implemented in practice, in particular whether and to what extent such cross-country price information will effectively influence the pricing decision.

Medicinal Products

For the reimbursement of medicinal products, two hurdles must be overcome. First, the product must not be specifically exempt from reimbursement; such products include those that:

  • are not subject to medical prescription;
  • are not designed to cure a specific illness;
  • are considered cosmetics, dietetics, mineral waters, elixirs, dentifrices or other similar products;
  • are indicated for syndromes or illnesses of minor severity; or
  • do not meet current therapeutic needs.

Second, a price and reimbursement proceeding must be completed before the MOH, in which the decision to reimburse a given product is taken considering the following criteria (Article 92 of Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015): (i) the severity, duration and sequelae of the different pathologies for which the product is indicated; (ii) the specific needs of certain groups; (iii) the therapeutic and social value of the medicinal product and its incremental clinical benefits, taking into account its cost-effectiveness; (iv) the rationale for public expenditure; (v) the existence of medicines or other therapeutic alternatives for the same condition/s at a lower price or with a lower treatment cost; (vi) the degree of innovation of the medicine; (vii) the contribution of the product to Spain’s gross domestic product; and (viii) return mechanisms that may be proposed by the MAH (discounts, price reviews).

It must be acknowledged that item (vii) in the foregoing list is rather peculiar, as it suggests that local manufacturing or development operations could influence price and reimbursement decisions, which would be entirely contrary to EU law principles. Nevertheless, in the firm’s experience, this criterion is occasionally applied by the Spanish authorities.

Item (viii) in the foregoing list reflects the growing significance of risk-sharing schemes in Spain. Many companies, particularly those with high-budgetary-impact products, are required to propose specific arrangements to obtain reimbursement. These arrangements may take various forms, including caps on the number of units reimbursed by the NHS and charge-backs if predefined therapeutic outcomes are not satisfied.

Medical Devices

Royal Decree 1030/2006 and Ministerial Order SCO/3422/2007 regulate the process of updating the package of benefits provided within the NHS. The rules state that any new technique, technology or process cannot be included in the NHS’s package of benefits unless it contributes effectively to:

  • the prevention, diagnosis or treatment of diseases;
  • the maintenance or improvement of life expectancy;
  • self-resilience; or
  • the elimination or reduction of pain and suffering.

Moreover, an improvement in safety, efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency or usefulness over other currently available alternatives must be demonstrated.

Royal Decree 90/2026, as mentioned in the foregoing, is the relevant legislation for the reimbursement of specific devices/products for non-hospitalised patients.

Medicinal Products

Spanish law does not make any reference to cost-benefit analyses when it comes to the reimbursement of medicinal products. However, Article 92 of Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015 includes a reference to “cost effectiveness” as one of the criteria to be considered in reimbursement decisions. Cost-effectiveness ratios are commonly used in price and reimbursement proceedings, but unlike in other jurisdictions, no official cost-effectiveness threshold (eg, the maximum amount a decision-maker is willing to pay for a unit of health outcome) applies in Spain.

With respect to the type of economic evaluation to be performed, Spanish law provides no guidance. However, the Spanish National Health System’s Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Financing (Comité Asesor para la Financiación de la Prestación Farmacéutica del Sistema Nacional de Salud; CAPF) published a guideline on this matter, which the MOH has informally confirmed will be used as a reference. In the guideline, it is stated that “Cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be prioritized” and that “In cases where a CUA is not feasible, justifications must be provided, and a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be conducted”.

Finally, in 2024, the MOH launched a public consultation for a new Royal Decree pertaining to health technology assessment (HTA) within the framework of the NHS. This legislation, which has not yet been approved (and is currently at the stage of requesting an opinion from the Council of State – a request submitted in January 2026 – will be the main legislation governing HTA in Spain. The first draft of the Royal Decree submitted for public consultation established that economic evaluations of health technologies “will provide useful information for decision-making… through a robust evaluation that considers the value of the medical technology from the perspective of relative effectiveness, the social value of the medical technology, and the impact on health-related quality of life. This information will identify the efficiency of the new technology compared to available alternatives, as well as analyse its budgetary impact”.

Medical Devices

Royal Decree 1030/2006 specifically requires that any new technique, technology or process that aspires to be eligible for reimbursement must “bring about an improvement, in terms of safety, efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency or proven usefulness, over other currently available alternatives”. Notably, this requirement is much stricter than the one applying to medicinal products in Article 92 of Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015, which states that “cost effectiveness” analysis “shall be taken into account”.

With regard to medical devices for non-hospitalised patients, Royal Decree 90/2026 expressly provides in Article 7 that, where appropriate, the technical evaluation may include a cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the device under assessment with similar alternatives available on the market.

Royal Legislative Decree 1/2015 governs the prescription and dispensing of medicinal products. The general rule is that prescriptions in the NHS should be based on the active ingredient/s. Prescriptions based on trade name are possible if the principle of greater efficiency for the NHS is respected, and for medicinal products considered non-substitutable (eg, biological medicinal products). When the prescription is made based on the active substance/s, the pharmacist shall dispense the lowest-priced medicinal product in the so-called homogeneous groups – ie, lists of products available for substitution.

Further, it is worth mentioning that the MOH may impose “singular dispensation reserves” on medicinal products, under which the affected products may only be dispensed by NHS hospital pharmacy services – ie, not by community pharmacies.

Faus Moliner

Rambla de Catalunya 135
08008
Barcelona
Spain

+34 93 292 2100

bcn@faus-moliner.com www.faus-moliner.com
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Faus Moliner is a modern boutique law firm based in Barcelona that specialises in advising the pharmaceutical industry and companies that operate in the life sciences sector. The firm was founded in 1997 and currently has 15 members. It focuses on pharmaceutical law, commercial contracts, corporate transactions, corporate governance, compliance, competition law, public procurement, product liability, advertising, litigation and arbitration. The firm advises pharmaceutical and healthcare clients, large companies and smaller biotech start-ups, and is frequently called upon to advise public authorities on matters such as draft legislation. It combines legal skills and specialisation with a practical and business-oriented manner of practising law. Since its foundation, Faus Moliner has been recognised in several international publications as the market leader in pharmaceutical law in Spain.

The pharmaceutical sector in Spain is currently facing an unprecedented situation in recent decades. For several years, the Ministry of Health (MOH) has been promoting an ambitious reform agenda affecting a significant portion of the laws and Royal Decrees governing the sector.

At the beginning of 2023, the MOH announced its intention to amend the Law on Guarantees and Rational Use of Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (Ley de Garantías y Uso Racional de Medicamentos y Dispositivos Médicos – LGURMPS), the main piece of legislation regulating the pharmaceutical sector. Subsequently, throughout 2024 and 2025, additional legislative initiatives have been announced, impacting multiple areas such as the advertising of medicinal products, regulation of medical devices and in vitro medical devices, health technology assessment (HTA), procedures for pricing and reimbursement of medicinal products, reimbursement of medical devices for non-hospital patients and digital health.

In this context, the sector’s main challenge is adapting to these regulatory changes, which are expected to be approved in 2026 or 2027. The following sections outline some of the key legislative initiatives currently underway, and the main challenges and opportunities they present.

Draft Law on Medicinal Products and Medical Devices

On 8 April 2025, the Council of Ministers approved the Draft Law for the Law on Medicines and Medical Devices (the “Draft Law”), which once approved will replace the LGURMPS. Shortly thereafter, a public consultation phase was opened to allow stakeholders to submit contributions to the Draft Law.

The Draft Law is structured around several strategic objectives aimed at ensuring the sustainability of the National Health System (NHS) and adapting the regulatory environment to scientific progress. Some of the main changes include the following.

Revised regulation of the pharmacist’s substitution authority

Under current regulations, products such as biological medicinal products and respiratory therapies administered via inhalation are considered non-substitutable; thus, the express consent of the prescribing physician is required for any change. The Draft Law modifies this rule, allowing pharmacists to substitute these medicinal products at the point of dispensing. According to the proposed text, only medicinal products that the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios – AEMPS) explicitly determines to be non-substitutable “due to their characteristics” will be exempt from this authority. This shift has sparked debate regarding the clinical equivalence of biosimilars, the preservation of the physician’s clinical autonomy and the potential impact on patient treatment adherence.

Introduction of the new selected price system (SPS) for homogeneous groups

The SPS represents a more aggressive price selection model. Pharmaceutical companies will be required, every six months, to submit blind price offers to the MOH for their off-patent products, which will then classify presentations into three distinct categories: lowest price, selected prices and non-selected presentations. Unlike previous systems, the Draft Law allows for a range of package sizes and “comparable” pharmaceutical forms to be grouped together, provided they are substitutable.

This system is linked to new dispensing regulations that shift a portion of the financial burden to the patient based on their choice. While the NHS covers the lowest-priced options, patients who prefer a “non-selected” presentation must pay the standard co-payment plus the full price difference. Stakeholders including Farmaindustria, Aeseg and BioSim have voiced criticism. They argue that an excessive focus on the lowest price could be counterproductive, and such a system may attract unsustainable bids from actors lacking robust logistical guarantees, potentially leading to supply shortages and discouraging investment in incremental innovations that provide genuine clinical value. As a result of the widespread opposition that this system generated, the MOH announced that it would work on an alternative mechanism, without further updates on this matter to date.

General obligation for pharmaceutical companies to supply medicinal products for free before obtaining formal marketing authorisation (MA)

This marks a major change from the current framework, where prices for non-authorised products used in special situations are typically negotiated individually with hospitals based on international benchmarks. In the firm’s view, the practical impact may be limited, as many companies already provide early access products free of charge. However, making this a general obligation could distort the exceptional nature of compassionate use and generate artificial demand effects, while the budgetary impact could be addressed through less burdensome mechanisms, such as the obligation to reimburse the differential between the price invoiced during the compassionate use phase and the final list price (precio de venta libre – PVL) (see “cost equalisation rule” in the following section).

New accelerated, conditional and provisional reimbursement system for certain medicinal products

This system is for products that address unmet medical needs, provide a relevant clinical benefit and must be used in treatment without delay. These products may be provisionally included within public reimbursement until a final decision is made. A “cost-equalisation rule” has been proposed, ensuring that provisional reimbursement does not result in costs or budgetary impact for the NHS higher than those resulting from the final decision; it also applies to special access programmes.

This mechanism represents a significant advance, enabling a binding national-level provisional decision for all regional health services. This reduces inequities and legal uncertainty while ensuring equitable access nationwide and facilitating rapid access to essential treatments in line with constitutional rights to life and health.

Promotion of medicinal products prior to pricing and reimbursement decisions

Health authorities have traditionally maintained that promotion is not permitted until reimbursement is granted, although a Supreme Court ruling in March 2025 introduced important developments.

However, the Draft Law classifies as a serious infringement the advertising of medicines authorised but not yet marketed in Spain, subject to fines ranging from EUR90,001 to EUR1 million. Following the publication of the Draft Law, officials from the MOH have announced their intention to remove this infringement and clarify the rules governing the promotion of medicines once MA has been obtained – and before the pricing and reimbursement decision is issued.

Changes to the reference price system (RPS)

Specifically, the Draft Law foresaw that medicinal products that, due to a new indication, a lower dosage, a new pharmaceutical form, a pharmacokinetic advantage or any other feature that objectively provides a benefit to patients – or a strategic advantage for the NHS – could be exempt from the RPS or benefit from the application of a coefficient that increases their price. Similarly, the Draft Law allowed for upward revision of the prices of strategic medicines included in the RPS.

This flexibilisation of the RPS represents a significant step forward and acknowledges a long-standing concern: the rigidity of the RPS could have undesired effects, such as disincentivising innovation or increasing the risk of shortages.

The Draft Law also provides, among other measures, that hospital-dispensed medicinal products be treated as independent groups, and that orphan medicinal products and plasma-derived products be excluded from the SPR. The exclusion of orphan medicinal products, de facto, has already been applied in recent years.

These SPR modifications were incorporated as amendments to the current LGRUMPS through a law passed by the Spanish Parliament in July 2025. Therefore, these measures are now law and are currently in force.

Information resulting from reimbursement agreements shall be considered confidential

One of the most controversial issues in the pharmaceutical sector in recent years has been the debate over the confidentiality of the PVL and the reimbursement conditions of medicinal products.

The current LGURMPS establishes that the technical, economic and financial information provided by pharmaceutical companies to the MOH during the reimbursement process is confidential. Both the companies and the MOH itself have argued that this confidentiality regime should extend to the PVL and the reimbursement conditions, as these are directly derived from information protected under that guarantee.

The current situation, however, remains unclear. On the one hand, following various freedom of information requests under Law 19/2013 of 9 December on Transparency, Access to Public Information, and Good Governance (LTAIBG), the Transparency and Good Governance Council (Consejo de Transparencia y Buen Gobierno – CTBG) has concluded that the PVL and reimbursement conditions must be made public. On the other hand, the National Court has ruled in favour of maintaining the confidentiality of the PVL and reimbursement conditions in three recent decisions (discussed in more detail below).

In this context, the Draft Law expressly recognises that information resulting from reimbursement agreements or their implementation (although it is not expressly stated, this is generally understood to also include the PVL) shall be considered confidential.

Streamlining the negotiated procedure without prior public notice for medicines with market exclusivity

Concerning the public procurement of medicinal products, the Draft Law does not adopt the industry’s request to completely exempt innovative and reimbursed medicines from the Public Procurement Act, which some critics see as a missed opportunity for clarity and efficiency, considering that the price of such medicinal products is already subject to regulatory intervention by the authorities.

Instead, the Draft Law focuses on streamlining the negotiated procedure without prior public notice for medicines with market exclusivity.

Also, the Draft Law introduces greater flexibility in contract duration by allowing supply contracts for one-off gene therapy medicinal products with long-lasting effects to exceed the general five-year limit, up to a maximum of ten years, where justified by the recovery of relevant investments and the nature of the treatment. It also introduces provisions to encourage joint procurement at the national or EU level, prioritising award criteria other than price, such as environmental performance and strategic autonomy.

Change in the scope of the tax on sales regulated in LGURMPS

A final relevant change introduced by the Draft Law concerns the scope of the tax on sales regulated in the LGURMPS.

Currently, this contribution applies solely to retail products. However, the extension to hospital-use or hospital-dispensed products had already been envisaged in the 2024–28 Pharmaceutical Industry Strategy, approved by the Council of Ministers in December 2024, as one of the measures to ensure the sustainability of the NHS.

In this context, the Draft Law introduces three main changes:

  • expanding the scope of the provision to all areas of sales of NHS-reimbursed medicinal products (including hospital use products and hospital-dispensed products);
  • revising the contribution percentages; and
  • redefining the allocation of the funds collected under this modification.

To calculate the contribution that pharmaceutical companies must pay, the Draft Law requires them to report, on a quarterly basis, the sales of medicines at acquisition price by hospital centres. Based on this information, the MOH will determine the amounts to be paid. The Draft Law also provides that, if companies fail to report their quarterly sales, or if significant errors are detected, the contribution calculations will be performed at the PVL (ie, without considering any discounts that may have been applied by the companies).

Following the contributions received during the public hearing, the MOH will produce a final draft for parliamentary processing. Given the technical complexity of the regulation and the current political landscape, final approval is not expected before the end of 2026.

Other Regulations Under Development or Already Approved

In addition to the Draft Law, during 2025 the MOH has been working on other regulations.

Law on Digital Health

The legislative journey of the future Spanish Digital Health Act (SDHA) began in September 2025, when the MOH opened the prior public consultation phase for its preliminary draft, seeking opinions following a set of questions to determine the exact content the future SDHA shall cover.

The future legislation will be articulated around two strategic pillars: implementing the European Health Data Space (EHDS) and the introduction of autonomous national measures to accelerate the digital transformation of the healthcare system.

Firstly, the SDHA aims to adapt Spanish legislation to the EHDS framework, ensuring a harmonised system for the primary and secondary use of health data across the EU. This involves establishing high standards for data interoperability and portability, allowing patients to share their health information securely with providers in any member state while fostering a robust environment for scientific research and innovation. Additionally, the text addresses the consolidation of a unified electronic health record system and the enhancement of cybersecurity protocols across regional health services.

Regarding secondary use of health data, one of the most debated open issues is how practical measures will be established to ensure that data holders can effectively protect information containing intellectual property or trade secrets while complying with data sharing requirements.

The future act is also set to include additional domestic measures specifically designed to modernise the NHS. A notable highlight is the creation of a formal regulatory pathway for the financing of digital medical devices (digital therapies, etc).

The prior public consultation closed on October 2025, and a draft act is expected to be made public during 2026.

Health technology assessment

The MOH published the draft of the new Royal Decree on Health Technology Assessment in August 2024. This new Royal Decree was the response to the judgment of the Spanish National High Court that declared void the “Plan for the Consolidation of the Therapeutic Position Reports”, and also reflects the need to regulate the national phase of the assessment process initiated under the EU HTA Regulation.

The MOH proposal is to create a HTA system separate from the price and reimbursement system. Therefore, the evaluation will be separated from the decision-making process.

A health technology evaluation includes an evaluation of clinical aspects and another of non-clinical aspects. The latter will assess economic, environmental, ethical and patient quality of life aspects. The guidelines that will be used to prepare these reports will be developed later by the MOH.

Once these two reports have been completed, the positioning group will make a final assessment of the clinical and non-clinical evaluation reports and will issue a recommendation. This recommendation, together with the two evaluation reports will serve as a basis for the decision-making body to decide on its reimbursement.

One element of the draft Royal Decree that has raised concerns among the national industry is the obligation for health technology developers to provide the “reliable costs of production, research and development, as well as the sources of financing of these costs, whether public or private”, because of the confidential nature and difficulty of obtaining such information. Following stakeholder feedback, the MOH has amended the wording in the current (still provisional) draft. The obligation is now limited to providing “information on public sources of funding or funding from non-profit entities, where applicable, as well as reliable information, regarding production and development costs, that is necessary to carry out the economic analysis”. This revised wording narrows the scope in two relevant ways:

  • first, it no longer refers to private sources of financing; and
  • second, it qualifies the cost information required by linking it to what is strictly necessary for the purposes of the economic analysis, which may help limit the breadth of information to be disclosed.

This new Royal Decree is expected to be approved during Q1–Q2 2026.

Pricing and reimbursement of medicinal products

The MOH launched a public consultation on the draft Royal Decree on pricing and reimbursement of medicinal products, which seeks to repeal Royal Decree 271/1990 and establish an updated regulatory framework.

This new regulation intends to regulate the process of reimbursement for medicinal products, the establishment of special reserves and special reimbursement conditions, the system for revising the PVL, the inclusion of new indications and the exclusion of medicines from reimbursement, among other things. It is expected that the draft of this new Royal Decree will be published during 2026.

Cannabis

In October 2025, the MOH published a Royal Decree establishing the conditions for the elaboration and dispensation of standardised magistral formulae of standardised cannabis preparations. Its purpose is to establish the conditions for the prescription, preparation, dispensing and use of standardised cannabis-based magistral formulas.

This new Royal Decree stems from the mandate of the Health and Consumer Affairs Committee of the Congress of Deputies, which in 2021 requested the creation of a subcommittee to study experiences in the regulation of cannabis for medical use. One of the conclusions reached by the subcommittee was the need to adopt measures to allow the availability of standardised cannabis preparations to address the needs of certain patients when authorised treatments have not been effective.

The Royal Decree allows the use of standardised cannabis-based magistral formulas. These formulas would be prepared in response to a medical prescription and, under the supervision of a pharmacist, by hospital pharmacy services, in compliance with applicable good preparation practices.

The National Formulary, which contains standardised magistral formulas, would include monographs for the use of standardised cannabis preparations. These monographs would establish the uses and indications for which these magistral formulas could serve as an alternative when other therapeutic options have failed.

Initially, the monograph will cover four indications: chronic pain, spasticity related to multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and intractable chemotherapy-related vomiting (all refractory to other treatments). In these cases, cannabis would be authorised as a last-line treatment.

Pricing and reimbursement of medical devices for non-hospitalised patients

In February 2026, the MOH published a new Royal Decree on the reimbursement of medical devices for non-hospitalised patients. This new Royal Decree repeals the current Royal Decree 9/1996 and updates the regulatory framework for these products.

The objectives of this regulation are twofold:

  • to set the retail price of reimbursed medical devices and the margins corresponding to the activities of wholesale distribution and dispensing to the public; and
  • to update the content of pharmaceutical provision by including new medical devices, altering them and excluding those that are not marketed.

Advertising on medicinal products and medical devices

In April 2023, the public consultation of the new Royal Decree on the promotion of medicinal products for human use was launched. This new regulation is intended to replace the current regulations dating from 1996.

The proposed draft is aimed at addressing digital advertising, the use of social media and audiovisual means, and the distribution of competencies between the state and the regions. It also includes obligations for ensuring accessibility for individuals with sensory disabilities in advertising.

As regards medical devices, the MOH published the draft Royal Decree governing the advertising of medical devices in March 2024. This draft encompassed several elements, such as streamlining the process for obtaining prior approval for the public promotion of medical devices, introducing a requirement for a responsible declaration in advertising specific devices and prohibiting hospitality in promotional meetings except for professional-scientific events. It also explicitly bans off-label promotion and offers detailed guidelines on permissible and prohibited content in advertisements directed to the public. This Royal Decree is expected to be approved during 2026.

Relevant Case Law

In addition to the legislative developments, two Supreme Court rulings of significant relevance were issued in 2025.

Promotion of medicinal products prior to reimbursement

As mentioned earlier, in March 2025 the Supreme Court ruled on whether a medicinal product could be advertised once it has been authorised but before a decision on pricing and reimbursement has been made.

In recent years, a key controversy in the Spanish pharmaceutical sector has been whether a medicinal product can be promoted before a pricing and reimbursement decision is issued. The issue arose when the Community of Madrid (Comunidad de Madrid – CAM) sanctioned a company for sending letters to healthcare professionals about a product that had an MA but lacked a price and reimbursement resolution. The CAM argued that promotion was not allowed until the official resolution was in place.

The first-instance court upheld the sanction, interpreting that promotional materials must include the product’s reimbursed price or, if not reimbursed, the notified price (the price that the company notifies the MOH will apply to units that are not reimbursed by the NHS). Since this information was not yet available, the court considered the promotion prohibited under Article 10.2 of Royal Decree 1416/1994.

In March 2025, the Supreme Court confirmed the sanction but clarified the reasoning. The Court emphasised that once a product is authorised, it may be promoted even if the pricing and reimbursement decision is pending, if the promotional material includes the product’s price (any price at which the product is supplied, without it necessarily being the PVL, which for obvious reasons is not available before the pricing and reimbursement procedure has been concluded). Regarding reimbursement conditions, the Supreme Court held that these should only be included “when available”, because it is not possible to report on what does not exist.

The Supreme Court’s ruling thus represents a paradigm shift: it removes the absolute prohibition on promotion prior to the pricing/reimbursement decision, conditioning it instead on compliance with legal advertising requirements. The sanction was confirmed solely because the promotional material failed to include the price, an essential element under the law.

For pharmaceutical companies, this decision has a significant impact. It enables early communication about authorised products, particularly in hospital settings, provided the promotion includes the applicable price.

Confidentiality of PVL and reimbursement conditions of medicinal products

On a different matter, there has been an ongoing debate over whether pricing and reimbursement decisions for medicinal products – including the PVL and reimbursement conditions – should be publicly accessible. Since the LTAIBG came into force, requests for access to this information have increased, but positions from authorities like the CTBG and lower courts have been inconsistent.

The dispute stems from a request for access to a MOH decision on a medicinal product’s price and reimbursement. After the MOH refused to disclose the information, the CTBG ruled in favour of disclosure, but that decision was challenged in court, leading to conflicting outcomes in different judicial instances.

On appeal, the Spanish National High Court (Audiencia Nacional) upheld the appeal brought by both the MOH and the MA holder. The court held that the specific confidentiality regime under Article 97.3 of the LGURMPS – which protects all technical, economic and financial information submitted during pricing and reimbursement procedures – should prevail over the LTAIBG. As such, the PVL and reimbursement conditions remain confidential.

The court reasoned that disclosing the PVL and reimbursement decision would allow inferences about a company’s technical, economic and financial data, potentially harming commercial interests. It also emphasised that any decision to grant access under the LTAIBG must balance public and private interests. In this case, the court found no overriding public interest that justified disclosure and concluded that confidentiality protects both company interests and the broader public interest in negotiating favourable terms for the NHS.

This ruling is not yet final and has been appealed before the Spanish Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling on this matter during 2026.

Faus Moliner

Rambla de Catalunya 135
08008
Barcelona
Spain

+34 93 292 2100

bcn@faus-moliner.com www.faus-moliner.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Faus Moliner is a modern boutique law firm based in Barcelona that specialises in advising the pharmaceutical industry and companies that operate in the life sciences sector. The firm was founded in 1997 and currently has 15 members. It focuses on pharmaceutical law, commercial contracts, corporate transactions, corporate governance, compliance, competition law, public procurement, product liability, advertising, litigation and arbitration. The firm advises pharmaceutical and healthcare clients, large companies and smaller biotech start-ups, and is frequently called upon to advise public authorities on matters such as draft legislation. It combines legal skills and specialisation with a practical and business-oriented manner of practising law. Since its foundation, Faus Moliner has been recognised in several international publications as the market leader in pharmaceutical law in Spain.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Faus Moliner is a modern boutique law firm based in Barcelona that specialises in advising the pharmaceutical industry and companies that operate in the life sciences sector. The firm was founded in 1997 and currently has 15 members. It focuses on pharmaceutical law, commercial contracts, corporate transactions, corporate governance, compliance, competition law, public procurement, product liability, advertising, litigation and arbitration. The firm advises pharmaceutical and healthcare clients, large companies and smaller biotech start-ups, and is frequently called upon to advise public authorities on matters such as draft legislation. It combines legal skills and specialisation with a practical and business-oriented manner of practising law. Since its foundation, Faus Moliner has been recognised in several international publications as the market leader in pharmaceutical law in Spain.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.