In the United Kingdom (UK), all proprietary rights in hydrocarbons are owned by the state under Section 2 of the Petroleum Act 1998. The UK government grants exploration and extraction licences for hydrocarbons.
There are multiple public authorities involved in the regulation of hydrocarbons in the UK.
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ)
DESNZ was created in February 2023 and is responsible for the UK’s energy markets. Its aim is to encourage efficiency, protect energy security and reduce the UK’s emissions.
The North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA)
NSTA (known as the “Oil and Gas Authority” prior to March 2022) regulates the oil, gas, offshore hydrogen and carbon storage industries in the UK. It is the body responsible for issuing petroleum exploration and extraction licences (this process is detailed in 2.1 Forms of Private Investment: Upstream and 2.2 Issuing Upstream Licences/Obtaining Hydrocarbon Rights).
NSTA works with the government, industry and other regulators to: (i) facilitate energy production and security; (ii) accelerate the transition to renewable energy sources; and (iii) reduce emissions.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE)
HSE is responsible for ensuring the safety of workers and enforcing health and safety laws.
HSE is the lead regulator under the Offshore Safety Directive (2015), working alongside NSTA and DESNZ.
HSE issues Approved Codes of Practice and technical guidance for safe operations addressing areas such as process safety, emergency response and hazardous substances.
Environment Agencies
The Environment Agency (EA) manages industrial activities and waste management in England. It issues environmental permits under the UK’s environmental permitting regime and grants water abstraction licences.
Natural Resources Wales, the Northern Ireland Environment Agency and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency are the equivalent agencies/bodies across the rest of the UK responsible for safeguarding the environment and the UK’s natural resources.
The Marine Management Organisation (MMO)
MMO is responsible for managing, regulating and controlling the marine environment. Its role includes granting marine licences, enforcing compliance with those licences and responding to marine pollution emergencies such as oil spills. MMO issues licences on behalf of the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in the waters adjacent to England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The Offshore Petroleum Regulator for Environment and Decommissioning (OPRED)
OPRED regulates the decommissioning of offshore oil and gas operations, alongside carbon capture and storage (CCS) operations, on the UK continental shelf (UKCS). It is also responsible for the development, administration and enforcement of offshore oil and gas regulatory regimes.
OPRED’s stated role involves working towards the government’s Net Zero Strategy with other regulators.
The UK government held majority stakes in two oil companies until the privatisation of the oil and gas industry in the late 1970s and early 1980s: British Petroleum (BP) and the British National Oil Corporation (BNOC) (BNOC later became “Britoil”, before being acquired by BP).
Today, the UK government has no direct involvement in oil and gas exploration and production through a national oil or gas company. BP, Shell, Centrica, Harbour Energy and other major oil and gas companies maintain a large presence in the UK.
The Petroleum Act 1998 is the core legal framework for exploration, production and licensing of petroleum and for rights of access and pipeline authorisation.
The Pipelines Safety Regulations 1996 (enforced by HSE) regulate the design, construction, operation and maintenance of pipelines.
Downstream activities are regulated less strictly than upstream and midstream activities, but legislation still imposes numerous standards in key areas such as emission reduction (Dangerous Substances Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002) and hazard safety (Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 2015).
Private investment in upstream interests is permitted through: (i) equity investments into oil and gas companies operating on the UKCS; (ii) bidding for licences (outlined below); and (iii) debt financing secured against cash flows from oil and gas production.
Exploration and extraction of petroleum on the UKCS requires a licence issued by NSTA under Section 3 of the Petroleum Act 1998. Companies wishing to participate in the upstream oil and gas sector must bid for a licence, acquire one from its current holder or purchase an interest in the holder of a licence.
NSTA grants and administers two types of licence:
NSTA is responsible for issuing licences for the exploration and extraction of petroleum on the UKCS pursuant to Section 3 of the Petroleum Act 1998.
Eligibility
Financing Arrangements
Where an applicant requires financing to meet its commitments under the prospective licence, NSTA requires supporting evidence. For instance, if a parent company loan will be required, NSTA expects a copy of the executed loan agreement alongside an executive summary of key terms. Where existing or anticipated bonds will be used for funding, NSTA expects detailed summaries of the arrangements including the borrowed amount, quantum and timing of capital repayments and interest payments.
Licensing Rounds
NSTA issues production licences through competitive rounds. Applications for petroleum licences during an open round are submitted online via the Licence Application Repository, a part of the UK Energy Portal.
Applications consist of (i) a completed form; (ii) evidence of financial viability and capability; (iii) technical and commercial evaluations of the blocks being applied for; and (iv) safety and environmental documentation for the Offshore Major Accident Regulator (OMAR) to assess.
Out-of-Round Process
NSTA has a process where a prospective licensee group can apply for production licences before the next open round. This process is set up for exceptional circumstances such as progressing activity in areas adjacent to acreage already held.
To maintain the competitive process, NSTA will invite applications for a licensing round once an out-of-round application is submitted.
Exploration licences can be applied for at any time as they are non-exclusive.
Current Government Policy
In March 2025, DESNZ published a consultation paper, “Building the North Sea’s energy future”, setting out the UK government’s commitment to issue no new offshore petroleum licences for blocks without licences in place. Extensions to term and duration are permitted for existing licences.
The model clauses for each offshore licence do not specify key fiscal terms.
Security
Licensees seeking to create charges on a licence must consider the terms of the Open Permission (Creation of Security Rights over Licences) (“Open Permission”) provided by the Department for Energy and Climate Change, 6 February 2012.
Open Permission requires NSTA to be notified of the following details within ten days of a charge being created: (i) size of the loan secured; (ii) licences affected; and (iii) the identity of the chargee.
Rentals
Each licence carries an annual charge, referred to as a “rental”, due each year on the licence anniversary, charged at an escalating rate on each square kilometre the licence covers at that date, with the exception of development areas and retention areas and exploration licences (which incur a flat-rate rental).
The taxation regime for upstream oil and gas operations consists of the following:
There is no national oil company.
The UK has not passed any laws or regulations that prescribe local content requirements, but under the North Sea Transition Deal of 2021, the upstream sector voluntarily committed to achieve 50% local UK content and 30% locally-provided technology across the lifetime for all new energy transition and oil and gas decommissioning projects.
NSTA has developed a methodology for measuring the UK content across project lifetimes called “supply chain action plans” (SCAPs). Since 2018, SCAPs have been mandatory on all major upstream projects.
Activities carried out under production licences must be performed by a field operator (appointed by the licence holders and approved by NSTA).
Under the model articles for offshore licensing production, NSTA’s consent is required to “erect or carry out permanent works for getting or conveying petroleum used”. This consent is referred to as the Development and Production Consent (DPC).
A field development plan (FDP) must be submitted with any application for a DPC, detailing technical, economic and emissions information for the development. If the proposed production will take place in more than one licensed area (ie, under two separate licences), NSTA may require the licensees to enter into a unitisation and unit operating agreement prior to submitting the FDP. That agreement also requires approval from NSTA.
In addition, NSTA will require letters from the licensee’s board confirming:
Where a project is within the scope of the Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration, Production, Unloading and Gas Storage (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2020, the agreement of the Secretary of State is required to grant consent to the project.
From a health and safety perspective, field operators must also submit design notifications to OMAR for any developments involving new installations. Following submission of design notifications, a safety case must also be approved by OMAR before operations can commence.
The model clauses for each offshore licence are found in: (i) the Schedule to the Petroleum Licensing (Production) (Seaward Areas) Regulations 2008 for Production Licences and (ii) the Schedule to the Offshore Exploration (Petroleum, and Gas Storage and Unloading) (Model Clauses) Regulations 2009 (SI 2009/2814) for Exploration Licences.
Production Licence Terms
Production periods
The model clauses provide for four production periods commencing from the date on which the licence was granted, unless otherwise specified. During or after the initial term, the licensee can modify the geographical apportionment of its licence subject to the approval of the Secretary of State for Business and Trade (“Secretary”) and other conditions specified by the model clauses. The 2008 model clauses incorporate the production periods defined in the updated Schedule 5 to the Petroleum (Production) Regulations of 1976. Those production periods are as follows:
The Secretary’s approval of continuation requests is conditional on the licensee satisfying the requirements specified in the relevant work programme described below.
Minimum work programmes
Work programme proposals must list at least three specifications:
Relinquishment requirements
The model clauses permit licensees to surrender their rights to parts of the licensed area by giving the Secretary at least one month’s notice specifying the exact parts of the licensed area being surrendered and retained. Any partial surrender by a licensee must be of at least 30 “sections”, defined as areas bounded by minute lines of latitude and longitude one minute apart respectively that all fall within the larger area comprised in the licence as the licence is delineated on the reference map deposited at the principal office of the Department for Business and Trade.
Extensions
Licensees may request to extend the Initial Term or the Second Term of their licence by notifying the Secretary no later than three months before the expiration of the current term. The Secretary has the discretion whether to grant the extension and may impose additional conditions upon granting the extension. If the Secretary grants an extension to the Initial Term or the Second Term, the term of the next production period will be reduced by an equivalent period of time.
Domestic supply requirements
The model clauses impose no quantity restrictions or requirements for licensees to sell the petroleum produced to domestic consumers. However, the model clauses do require licensees to notify the Secretary who they have sold the petroleum they produce to, and in what quantities.
Export rights
The model clauses impose no export restrictions on petroleum produced under a licence.
Liability and risk regime
The model clauses state that the following events will trigger the Secretary’s right to revoke a production licence:
Under the model clauses, the Secretary may partially revoke licences where the licensee’s breach is only in connection with specific parts of the licence or the licensed area.
The Secretary can also demand that the licensee comply with instructions “with a view to ensuring that funds are available to discharge any liability for damage attributable to the release of escape of petroleum” connected to the activities of the licence.
Withdrawal, termination and abandonment rights and obligations
The licensee can terminate its licence or partially surrender parts of the licensed area pursuant to the procedure described under “Relinquishment requirements” above. Following termination or partial surrender of a licence, the licensee loses all rights conferred by the licence to all of or part of the licensed area provided that:
Exploration Licence Terms
Exploration periods
The model clauses provide for a three-year term. The licensee may request an extension of this term by writing to the Secretary at least three months before the expiration of the licence.
Minimum work programmes
The model clauses limit the scope of exploration licences to prospecting, surveying (by physical or chemical means), or drilling for the purpose of obtaining geological information. Licensees cannot drill wells deeper than 350 metres below the surface of the seabed, unless the Secretary otherwise specifies.
The model clauses of exploration licences also prohibit licensees from getting petroleum for the purposes of production or injecting gas.
Relinquishment requirements
At any time, the licensee can terminate the licence by providing the Secretary with not less than one month’s notice in writing.
Extensions
After receiving a licensee’s written request for an extension of the term at least three months before the expiration of a licence, the Secretary may, in their discretion, extend the term for a further three-year period.
Export rights
Exploration licences do not permit the production of any petroleum.
Liability and risk regime
The model clauses state that the following events will trigger the Secretary’s right to revoke an exploration licence:
Under the model clauses, the Secretary can also “partially” revoke licences where the licensee’s breach is only connection with specific parts of the licence or the geographic area contained by the licence.
The model clauses also direct the licensee to perform exploration operations with “good industry practices”, meaning the exercise of degree and skill that would reasonably and ordinarily be expected from a skilled operator engaged in the exploration authorised under the licence. The licensee must also take all steps practicable to:
The licensee can object to additional restrictions as unreasonable.
The licensee is responsible for informing the Secretary of breaches of these conditions in a timely manner.
Withdrawal, termination and abandonment rights and obligations
The licensee can terminate its licence pursuant to the procedure described under “Relinquishment requirements” above. The licensee loses all rights conferred by the licence to all the initially licensed area once termination occurs.
The licensee may not assign its licence to any third party without the prior consent of NSTA. Any assignment without prior consent is typically considered grounds for immediate revocation of the licence.
Assignment Process
Applications for assigning offshore and onshore licences are processed through the UK Energy Portal. These applications are processed by NSTA.
NSTA’s approval for the assignment of a licence is valid for three months. If the approval lapses, the licensee can submit a revised planned completion date (although reissue of approval is not guaranteed).
Assignment Policy
The model clauses do not prescribe factors for NSTA to consider in determining whether to consent to an assignment.
From a policy perspective, NSTA will take into account the following factors when considering whether to consent to an assignment:
For intragroup assignments, NSTA will need to know who the buyer is in a corporate sale before granting approval. If the assignment is tax-related, NSTA may inform HMRC of any applications.
The assignment must be documented using a deed of assignment substantially in the form of a draft approved by NSTA. If a party wishes to use a bespoke deed of assignment, a copy must be submitted for NSTA’s approval.
The UK is not a member of OPEC and there are no explicit restrictions on the production of oil and gas rates.
However, the Oil and Gas Authority Strategy, which came into force on 11 February 2021, places an obligation on oil and gas companies to assist the UK government in meeting its net zero carbon targets, including by:
Midstream
Private monopoly
There is no government or private monopoly in the midstream operations sector in the UK. However, it is commonplace to have a dominant private operator in certain areas. For example, in midstream pipeline operations, a natural monopoly occurs where only one pipeline system is economically viable.
The National Gas Transmission System has a natural monopoly led by National Gas (which was formerly part of the National Grid and is now privately owned). The National Grid Transmission System is regulated by the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem).
Processing and fractionation systems
Private investment in processing and fractionation systems is permitted and can take various forms, including the following:
Any private investment in processing facilities must comply with oversight from HSE and EA.
Government approvals
Investors need to consider the need for planning and development consent from authorities such as MMO, and any potential Environmental Impact Assessments. Additionally, HSE and NSTA may need to be consulted depending on the proposed private investment.
In accordance with the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (NSIA), the Department for Business and Trade may need to be consulted over any proposed takeovers or ownership changes in the oil and gas sector.
In the UK, private investment in midstream operations is regulated as follows:
Downstream
Refineries and petrochemical facilities are long-term investments that require high capital expenditure. As a result, they are often financed through private investment via project finance and joint ventures. Less commonly, these facilities can be financed off corporate balance sheets.
In contrast, storage facilities and terminals often attract investments from infrastructure funds and institutional investors due to their relatively stable cash flows through sale-and-leaseback models.
Retail and wholesale fuel marketing networks often involve private equity, asset leasing or franchise models.
The UK’s energy transition targets are also attracting growing investment into hybrid downstream assets.
The UK does not have a national oil company and therefore has no national monopoly in the downstream industry.
Third-party access is broadly governed by commercial arrangements. The UK’s framework of competition law acts as a backstop for any issues with monopolistic investments.
While midstream and downstream oil and gas operations are not generally subject to a formal licensing regime in the same manner as upstream activities, certain areas such as pipeline construction, gas transportation, refining, fuel distribution and retail require regulatory approval.
Downstream
Under the Gas Act 1986, Ofgem is responsible for the regulation of the downstream gas industry. The Gas Act prohibits carrying out specified activities without a licence or an exemption.
Licences under the Gas Act include:
Licence Applications
Ofgem adopts a tiered approach to processing licence applications, applying greater scrutiny on the basis of risk, namely:
Applicants must publish a notice of their application within ten working days of notification that the application has been received. The notice must be published on both the applicant’s and Ofgem’s websites and remain accessible for 28 days to allow submissions to be made.
Under the Gas Act, Ofgem’s primary consideration in determining whether to grant or reject a licence is protecting the interests of existing and future gas consumers.
Ofgem assesses licence applications using a number of criteria, including:
Note that this licence application process does not apply to code manager licences nor to smart meter communication licences.
In some situations, a licence is not necessary. The Gas Act and the Electricity Act 1989 allow the Secretary to make orders giving exemptions from the need to hold licences.
Midstream Operations
In pipeline transportation, it is typical to see the following commercial arrangements used: (i) transportation agreements between infrastructure owners and shippers; and (ii) tariff-based pricing structures.
In gas storage, it is typical to see the following commercial arrangements used: (i) storage service agreements, which define the injection, withdrawal or working volume rights and (ii) revenue models, which are usually a mix of fixed capacity charges and variable throughput fees.
Downstream Operations
Tolling agreements are commonplace for oil refineries. The crude oil owner pays a fee to a refiner for processing it into various products. Similarly, crude supply and offtake agreements are used to supply oil traders with feedstock and products.
A different tax regime is applied to midstream and downstream activities from that for upstream activities. Companies involved in the midstream and downstream industries are subject to standard corporation tax (charged at 25% for companies with profits over £250,000). Deductions against a company’s tax liability may be available for qualifying capital expenditure including tanks, refineries or terminals through the Structures and Buildings Allowance.
The sale of refined products and chemicals is subject to value-added tax at the standard rate of 20%. Additionally, the retail and wholesale sale of petrol and diesel is subject to excise duty, a tax levied on specific goods produced or imported into the UK applying at the point of release for consumption.
Private investors in midstream and downstream oil and gas operations do not generally receive tax exemptions.
There is no national oil company.
There is no statutory local content quota for midstream and downstream operations in the UK, but there are certain policy incentives which encourage the incorporation of UK into investors’ operations.
The UK government recently published a green paper on its commitment to develop a modern, targeted industrial strategy with the objective of long-term, sustainable, inclusive and resilient growth, by spurring investment into all parts of the UK, titled “Invest 2035: the UK’s modern industrial strategy”.
Local authorities may also attach conditions to planning permissions (eg, local employment and skills plans).
Midstream Licences – Key Terms
Downstream Licence – Key Terms
In the UK, powers of compulsory purchase are granted to local authorities, government departments and other public bodies by legislation. The power to buy land without the consent of the owner is only permitted if it is in the public interest to do so.
Private investors can apply for a Development Consent Order (DCO) for consent to undertake a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP). The Planning Inspectorate will review and provide recommendations to the Secretary, who makes the final decision. This is a multi-stage process which can take around 18 months. A DCO is similar to planning permission but can include authorisation for the relevant public entity to compulsorily acquire land to facilitate an NSIP.
Compensation is provided to the former owners of forcibly acquired land to put them in the same position as if their land had not been forcibly acquired. The quantum of compensation is determined by the open market value of the land, ie, what it might have been worth if sold on the open market by a willing seller (and assuming that the NSIP was not taking place).
The transportation of hydrocarbons is regulated by the following governmental bodies:
The Petroleum Act 1998 and Energy Act of 2016 establish the legal framework for third parties to access privately constructed infrastructure. These acts make assets on the UKCS subject to a “negotiated third-party access” regime, the process of which is summarised below:
Although voluntary, the Code of Practice on Access to Upstream Oil and Gas Infrastructure also sets out principles and procedures for third-party access.
In the UK, the sale of products from midstream and downstream operations is primarily regulated by the promotion of competitive sales through the Competition Market Authority.
For midstream products such as natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG) or crude oil, technical standards (such as requirements for gas to be compliant with the National Grid’s entry specifications) apply.
Generally, no export licences are required for crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products. Export licences may be necessary if exporting to a sanctioned country or if the goods being transported are “strategic materials”. When exporting, a customs declaration is required, which includes details such as the commodity code and country of destination as well as the value and volume of goods.
The UK is a member of the International Energy Agency and therefore may be subject to export restrictions during global supply crises.
Imports of oil products from sanctioned countries are restricted under sanctions law.
Before transferring midstream and downstream operations and assets between private owners, purchasers will conduct a due diligence process to confirm asset condition, value and integrity, environmental compliance, that all required permits and licences are in place, etc.
Once diligence is completed to the purchaser’s satisfaction, the transfer will be structured as either an asset or share sale. Asset sales are used to transfer specific facilities such as pipelines or terminals, and share sales are for the transfer of equity ownership in the company holding the assets.
Any sale agreement will typically contain conditions precedent for regulatory approvals.
From a regulatory perspective, issues that can arise in connection with such transfers include:
The NSIA came into force on 4 January 2022. It introduced investment control regimes for acquisitions in the UK with a view to protecting UK national security.
The NSIA has a notification regime whereby a transaction involving a “trigger event” (an acquisition of a certain level of control) in certain sectors (including energy) must be notified to the Secretary. The NSIA also provides for voluntary notifications to be made.
Additionally, under the NSIA, the Secretary has the power to “call in” transactions for review where there is concern that they pose a risk to national security.
The regulations issued under the NSIA prescribe that the NSIA regime applies to investments into the following oil and gas activities:
The UK has a sanctions regime restricting, and in some cases prohibiting, investment in oil and gas sectors in jurisdictions where it is deemed such activities could support geopolitical threats, human rights abuses or sanctioned regimes. The sanctions regime is enforced by the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation, and entities that breach it can be sanctioned themselves. For example:
Broad Import/Export Sanctions
Individual Entity Sanctions
Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/office-of-financial-sanctions-implementation
UK Sanctions List: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-uk-sanctions-list
The principal environmental laws having jurisdiction over upstream, midstream and downstream operations in the UK are the Petroleum Act 1998, Energy Act 2008, Energy Act 2011, Energy Act 2016, Environment Act 2021 and Energy Act 2023.
The Petroleum Act 1998 established a legal framework for offshore installations and set out licensing requirements for petroleum exploration and production.
The Energy Act 2008, while implementing UK energy policy at the time, improved the offshore oil and gas licensing regime and enabled the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform to carry out its regulatory functions more effectively. It also allowed the Oil and Gas Authority, as it then was, to grant licences in respect of carbon storage (Section 18(11)).
The Energy Act 2011 consolidated existing provisions for third-party access to upstream oil and gas infrastructure, and streamlined procedures to facilitate determinations by the Secretary where required.
The Energy Act 2016 established the Oil and Gas Authority (now NSTA) as an independent regulator, granting it powers over the licensing and regulatory functions previously held by the Secretary.
The Environment Act 2021 is the UK’s legal framework for environmental protection, setting environmental targets and establishing the Office for Environmental Protection.
The Energy Act 2023 introduced measures to mitigate the environmental impacts of offshore facilities, introduced potential charges for the abandonment of offshore installations, updated the model clauses of petroleum licences to require NSTA’s consent to a change in control of the licensee, and gave NSTA the power to request information about change in control of licensees.
As previously mentioned, OPRED (part of DESNZ) is responsible for regulating environmental and decommissioning activity for offshore oil and gas operations, including CCS operations, on the UKCS. HSE is Britain’s national regulator for workplace health and safety, and together with the OPRED, forms OMAR. OMAR functions as the UK’s offshore competent authority and oversees industry compliance with the relevant offshore legislation.
After obtaining a licence, licensees require a DPC, as outlined in 2.7 Development and Production Requirements. In parallel, a private investor will be required to submit an environmental statement to OPRED as part of the consent process.
The environmental statement will set out key information including key environmental impacts and sensitivities.
HSE regulates risks to health and safety arising in the offshore industry. Operators/owners are required to:
Decommissioning is required at the end of an offshore installation’s operational lifetime (i) to manage potential environmental impacts (usually the risk of oil, gas and chemical leaks) and (ii) for navigational safety reasons.
The decommissioning of offshore oil and gas installations and pipelines on the UKCS is controlled through the Petroleum Act 1998. OPRED is responsible for ensuring the requirements of the Act are complied with.
The Act requires owners to set out the measures required to achieve the decommissioning of disused installations and/or pipelines in a decommissioning programme when required by the Secretary.
Section 29 Notices
The Secretary can serve a notice under Section 29 of the Act requiring the submission of a costed decommissioning programme for each offshore installation and submarine pipeline.
The abandonment programme must:
Section 29 notices can be served on: operators, licensees, JOA parties, pipeline owners and installation owners (for example floating, production, storage and offloading owners, but not anyone with a security interest under a loan such as a bank).
International Law
The UK is party to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic 1992 (OSPAR) aimed at protecting the North-East Atlantic marine environment. Decision 98/3 of the OSPAR Commission prohibits the dumping or leaving of disused offshore installations within the maritime area and provides that all installations positioned after 9 February 1999 must be completely removed. The founding principle is that a clear seabed should be left after the lifetime of an installation.
Decommissioning Security
In order to manage liabilities and provide security for future costs of decommissioning, it is industry practice for parties in offshore operations to enter decommissioning security agreements. Offshore Energies UK, a leading representative for UK offshore energy participants, provides two standard templates: (i) for fields subject to petroleum revenue tax and (ii) for all other circumstances.
Abandonment
In compliance with its “Wells Consent Guidance”, NSTA expects wells to be abandoned in a timely manner. On a case-by-case basis, and depending on circumstances at that time, NSTA may consider consenting to a request to suspend a well for a period longer than two years subject to, among other things, submission of a satisfactory detailed well abandonment strategy and plan. In such instances, the period of any such suspension will be determined by NSTA and will generally not exceed five years.
Climate Change Act 2008 (as Amended in 2019)
The UK’s primary climate change legislation is the Climate Change Act 2008, which was amended in 2019 to set a legally binding target of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 (“the Act”).
The Act establishes a framework for reducing emissions and adapting to the impacts of climate change, including legally binding carbon budgets and regular risk assessments. The Act also provides for emissions trading schemes and introduces a framework by which the government can require certain entities to prepare a report on proposals for adaptation to climate change.
Carbon budgets
The Act requires the government to prepare “carbon budgets”, setting targets for five-year periods with accompanying policies to meet the set targets, which are monitored by the Climate Change Committee. The UK has set six carbon budgets, and the seventh is due to be legislated in or around June 2026.
In the most recent carbon budget of 2021, the UK government introduced the Carbon Budget Order requiring greenhouse gas emissions to be cut by 78% by 2025. The government also published a Net Zero Strategy, which includes a commitment to end the UK’s domestic contribution to man-made climate change by 2050 and oil and gas-specific provisions for a new Climate Compatibility Checkpoint for future licensing on the UKCS.
Methane Reduction
In 2022, the UK signed the Global Methane Pledge to collectively reduce global methane emissions by at least 30% by 2030, in comparison to 2023 levels.
Carbon Taxes
While the UK does not have a singular carbon tax in the traditional sense, it has several mechanisms in place as follows:
The UK government will introduce the UK Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on 1 January 2027 to ensure highly traded, carbon-intensive products from overseas will have comparable carbon prices to those that would be paid if they were produced in the UK.
In the UK, local government has a role in regulating oil and gas developments through the local planning system, but ultimate responsibility for granting licences and consents for oil and gas activities sits at the central government level and with NSTA. This is not to say that UK local governments have no sway, but rather that they cannot unilaterally halt operations.
For example, in 2015, Lancashire County Council refused permission to extract shale gas at a site on the grounds of noise and traffic impact, but Cuadrilla (the applicant) appealed to the Secretary, who subsequently ruled in its favour.
The UK’s energy transition is supported by the following major laws:
The UK’s legislative framework is bolstered by government programmes such as its Modern Industrial Strategy with its accompanying Clean Energy Industries Sector Plan setting aside funding for frontier clean energy industries.
Transitional assets are being used in connection with energy projects in the UK. Notable examples include CCS and electrification initiatives, as outlined below.
CCS
NSTA aims to accelerate CCS deployment by reusing oil and gas infrastructure such as reservoirs, wells, platforms and pipelines to save capital expenditure. Where OPRED is considering a decommissioning plan, it must consult with NSTA, which will consider whether there is potential to reuse the asset rather than decommission it.
Electrification
Oil and gas platforms on the UKCS are generally powered by gas or diesel, but NSTA is moving towards electric alternatives, and new offshore oil and gas infrastructure has been designed with electrification in mind.
The linking of oil and gas licensing to the UK’s net zero target is evidenced by the introduction of Climate Compatibility Checkpoints for licensing rounds, as discussed in 5.5 Climate Change Laws. This means that there are fewer production and exploration licences being awarded and there is greater scrutiny on emissions and the carbon life cycle of a prospective project.
In November 2019, the UK government imposed a moratorium on shale gas fracking. This was briefly lifted in 2022, but was reinstated shortly after. At present, fracking is banned in England.
The UK does not produce LNG. The UK imports LNG to meet energy needs, but also has the capacity to re-export it to other European countries. There are no LNG liquefaction plants in the UK.
There are no special LNG laws in relation to the development of LNG projects, but the Energy Act 2008 requires importers to obtain offshore unloading licences from NSTA. Applications for a gas storage and unloading licence are sent to NSTA, which makes decisions on a case-by-case basis according to its licence assessment criteria.
The UK was the first G7 country to legally commit to reaching net zero by 2050.
The UKCS is a mature basin and provides for one of the largest decommissioning markets in Europe fuelled by a push for sustainable decommissioning practices. Accordingly, the UK is positioning itself as a global leader in decommissioning services.
There have been two material changes in oil and gas laws and regulations over the past year:
UK’s Policy and Priorities
One of the six pillars of Keir Starmer’s “Plan for Change” is to “Make Britain a Clean Energy Superpower”, with the mission to “secure home-grown energy, protect billpayers, and put us on track to at least 95% clean power by 2030, while accelerating the UK to net zero”. While ambitious, this is not necessarily a marked departure from previous government policy. What is new, however, is the emphasis on “home-grown” independent UK energy, driven by a legislative ban on Russian gas, rising geopolitical tensions and increasing global energy demand.
The creation of “Great British Energy” represents a flagship policy designed to achieve this ambition – a publicly owned, operationally independent company headquartered in Scotland with the purpose of investing in clean, home-grown energy. The Great British Energy Act (enacted on 15 May 2025) provides a statutory footing for the public company to deliver on its ambitions. In partnership with the Crown Estate, Great British Energy is backed by GBP8.3 billion, which is expected to be raised through an increased tax on oil and gas companies, as well as borrowing, and expected to be spent primarily on clean energy projects.
The government introduced its “Clean Power 2030 Action Plan” in December 2024, which includes the target to transition the electricity system to one with the following characteristics (in a typical weather year):
To reach this milestone, considerable investment and a highly significant build-out of renewable and low-carbon energy infrastructure, including grid infrastructure, will be necessary.
With this policy framework in mind, the UK energy landscape is under great pressure to shift and evolve. This chapter provides a snapshot of the UK’s position on energy market reform and different energy technologies, including type and level of support, and the consequential trends and developments which are emerging, and an overview of some of the recent key legal cases which are shaping the energy sector in the UK.
Electricity market
UK National Grid
The queue for grid connection has long been identified as a bottleneck. Companies are currently waiting up to 15 years to be connected to the grid, the current connection queue standing at over 770 GW. The increasing demand from data centres alone exemplifies the issue and explains why grid reform is a key item on the government’s agenda.
The National Energy System Operator (NESO) put forward its connection reform proposals, which Ofgem approved on 15 April 2025. NESO will focus on prioritising agreements for projects that are critical, “shovel ready” or well progressed, and bring these to the front of the queue. This will mean deprioritising projects that are not ready or not aligned with strategic plans. Projects will be required to submit transmission evidence in the set submission window in July 2025 as part of the reordering process.
Zonal pricing
Another development is the ongoing consideration of a move towards a “zonal pricing” system, which would see the UK move away from a single electricity price to having different wholesale electricity prices across the country based on regional supply and demand. This could help reduce grid and economic inefficiencies. Zonal pricing has been adopted by some Nordic countries and is increasingly being considered by other European countries. It has the potential to create better pricing signals for generation and consumption, encourage demand (such as data centres) to locate closer to more efficient sources of supply, reduce costly constraint payments currently paid by the government and generally contribute to net zero by incentivising development in areas where grid capacity is available.
Wind and solar
Renewables auction
The latest Contract for Difference auction has been billed by the government as “record-breaking”, potentially paving the way for 131 clean energy projects. That billing is unsurprising given some of the challenges associated with the previous round in 2023, which saw the government misprice the strike price and attract no bids from the offshore wind sector. Notably, this time around, the UK government sized the mechanism in such a way which allowed offshore wind projects to compete; this saw successful awards for the largest offshore wind farm project in Europe (Hornsea 3 project) and the largest floating offshore wind project in the world (Green Volt). The renewables auction saw particular support given for combined solar and onshore wind projects (115 out of the 131 projects). The investment in onshore wind is another development to note as it comes after the government lifted the “de facto” ban on onshore wind development in England; this forms part of a wider vision from the government to see new pylons, wind farms and infrastructure built across the country.
Flexibility
The intermittent nature of renewable power continues to present challenges for a country with a mature grid and a long history of baseload power. As part of the Clean Power 2030 Action Plan, the government will publish a “Low Carbon Flexibility Roadmap” later this year, with new actions to drive clean power flexibility by 2030. With this, we should expect a focus on batteries, long-term energy storage solutions and potentially some form of consumer incentivisation which incentivises power use when it is abundant and the reverse when it is not.
Nuclear
The government has opted for nuclear as a focal point of the UK’s generation system for years to come. The government set up “Great British Energy – Nuclear” (formerly named “Great British Nuclear”), which is responsible for driving delivery of new nuclear projects in the UK and has committed significant funding to the build-out of additional nuclear capacity.
Large nuclear power plants
On 10 June 2025, the chancellor committed GBP14.2 billion of taxpayer funding towards the construction of the new Sizewell C nuclear power station, which is expected to come online in the mid/late 2030s. The nuclear plant will follow Hinkley Point C, which is still under construction and is expected to come into operation in 2031.
Small modular reactors (SMRs)
On 10 June 2025, Rolls-Royce SMR was selected as the preferred bidder to build the UK’s first SMR. The government has committed GBP2.5 billion out of the GBP8.3 billion of the Great British Energy fund (that’s a considerable 30%) towards this venture and is clearly positioning SMRs as a key technology for the future (notwithstanding the fact that the technology itself remains relatively nascent).
CCUS
Clusters
The UK has one of the most advanced CCUS markets globally. The government has continued the commitment shown by the last government to CCUS projects, endorsed as a critical tool for decarbonisation. In the June 2025 spending review, the chancellor confirmed further support of GBP9.4 billion to CCUS, in part to maximise the use of CO₂ storage capacity in the first two funded CCUS clusters.
The two clusters (which form part of “Track 1”) are located (i) in the North East (Teesside), which reached financial close in December 2024, is set to start construction in 2025 and aims to be the first gas-fired power station with CCUS, and (ii) in the North West (Merseyside), which reached financial close in April 2025, paving the way for construction to begin. Beyond this, the government is also providing development funding to progress the clusters Acorn (in Scotland) and Viking (in the Humber) to FID.
Renewable fuels
Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF)
The UK SAF mandate came into force on 1 January 2025, obliging fuel suppliers to blend a minimum proportion of SAF into the aviation fuel mix. The mandated obligation starts with a requirement to have a minimum of 2% of SAF in total fuel supply in 2025, rising to 22% in 2040. The government has also committed to introducing a revenue support mechanism in the future (designed to bridge the gap between the cost of producing SAF and the cost of producing conventional jet fuel), though the cost of this is intended to be borne by the private sector (potentially by deploying the funds raised through penalties applicable to failure to comply with the mandate). The SAF market remains relatively nascent, but the UK, together with the EU, is leading the market, and its commitment to a robust mandate should lead to enhanced prospects for SAF producers across the country.
Hydrogen
Hydrogen allocation round (HAR)
The UK government, through its hydrogen allocation rounds, has been offering revenue support to successful clean hydrogen producers to overcome the cost gap between low carbon hydrogen and its fossil fuel alternatives. The roadmap of auctions includes seven HARs occurring at set intervals until the end of the decade. HAR1 has been and gone, having confirmed 11 successful projects totalling 125 MW in capacity. HAR2 is currently at the shortlist stage, in which 27 projects are under consideration. HAR3 was timetabled to launch in 2025, but we are yet to see any communication or details on the progress of meeting this timeline. The capacity ambitions and trajectory for existing rounds and beyond will depend on many factors, including the extent to which the clean hydrogen sector is politicised. The UK clean hydrogen sector is no different from the rest of the world, in the sense that it is encountering meaningful challenges, but there remains opportunity for projects which are seeking to co-locate supply and demand or where there is already an industrial use case in place.
Oil and gas
The UK regulatory regime for oil and gas projects is changing. As a result of the Finch ruling by the Supreme Court in June 2024 (see below, “Recent Case Law and Its Impact on UK Energy”), oil and gas projects are under ever-increasing scrutiny. The controversy surrounding the expansion of North Sea oil and gas exploration in the Rosebank and Jackdaw oil fields continues as politicians seek to walk the tightrope of maximising economic oil recovery and job prospects while preserving a commitment to net zero.
Recent Case Law and Its Impact on UK Energy
R (Finch) v Surrey County Council and Others [2024] UKSC 20
In a significant judgment delivered in June 2024, a 3:2 majority of the UK Supreme Court in R (Finch) v Surrey County Council and Others [2024] UKSC 20 overturned the decisions of the High Court and the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court held that environmental impact assessments (EIAs) for fossil fuel extraction projects must include consideration of “downstream” or “scope 3” greenhouse gas emissions – specifically in this case those generated when the extracted oil is refined and combusted by end users.
The decision considered the correct interpretation of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, which apply the European Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (together, the “EIA Regime”). The EIA Regime requires an assessment of development projects where there are likely to be significant environmental effects.
The factual background involved the granting of planning permission by Surrey County Council in September 2019 for the expansion of an onshore oil project through the drilling of four new wells over a projected 20-year period. The claimant, Sarah Finch, representing the Weald Action Group, brought a judicial review of the Council’s decision, arguing that the EIA should have examined the environmental impact of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions that would arise from the combustion of the fuel following refinement of the crude oil extracted from the site.
The Supreme Court unanimously found that these downstream emissions were “plainly” an environmental effect of the project and constituted a foreseeable and inevitable consequence of the extraction activity. A key issue before the Court was the appropriate legal test for identifying what constitutes the “effects of a project”. Lord Leggatt explored three approaches: (i) the “but-for” causation test; (ii) the “intervening act” test; and (iii) the “necessary and sufficient condition” test. Although the majority concluded that all three tests were satisfied on the facts of the case, the Court did not provide a definitive ruling as to which test should generally govern the scope of the EIA Regime. Further judicial clarification may be required in subsequent cases.
The Court confirmed that, in the context of oil and gas developments, EIAs must include information on scope 3 emissions associated with the foreseeable end use of fossil fuels. However, it emphasised that the legal framework does not prohibit the granting of development consent for environmentally harmful projects; rather, it requires proper assessment of the likely effects.
The Supreme Court dismissed concerns that the “floodgates” would open and complicate any future development which entailed carbon-intensive downstream effects, such as steel production, finding that the EIA Regime does not require that attempts be made to measure or assess putative effects which are incapable of assessment. While crude oil’s end use is foreseeable and lies within the scope of the EIA, this may not be the case for other materials, such as steel. The effects of steel manufacture, for example, are dependent on “downstream” decisions concerning how the steel is used and how products made from the steel are used. It would, therefore, be unfeasible to assess such scope 3 emissions when making the decision whether to grant development consent for the construction and operation of the steel factory. As a result, the decision in Finch is unlikely to apply beyond projects with clearly attributable scope 3 emissions.
Friends of the Earth v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities and Others; South Lakeland Action on Climate Change v Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities and Others [2024] EWHC 2349 (Admin)
In October 2024, the High Court applied Finch for the first time, quashing the granting of planning permission for a new deep coal mine in Cumbria. The judgment in Friends of the Earth and South Lakeland Action on Climate Change [2024] EWHC 2349 (Admin) was brought under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 (“2011 Regulations”).
Planning permission for the mine, intended to produce coke for use in the steel industry, had been granted by the Secretary of State in December 2022. The claimant NGOs argued that the EIA failed to assess the likely significant environmental effects associated with the combustion of the extracted coal, effects that were both indirect and downstream in nature.
Under Regulation 3(4) of the 2011 Regulations, the Secretary of State was required to consider “environmental information” in the form of an “environmental statement” before granting permission for projects where there are likely to be significant environmental effects. Applying Finch, the Court held that the combustion of the coal constituted an inevitable and significant environmental effect of the project. The Secretary of State had therefore acted unlawfully by failing to take such effects into account.
West Cumbria Mining (WCM), the developer, contended that the mine would not materially increase overall emissions, as the coal was intended to substitute for coal otherwise imported from the United States. The Court, however, rejected this argument, finding that the opening of the mine would increase supply to the global market. While not ruling out the substitution argument entirely, the Court held that a high threshold of “near-perfect substitution” would need to be met to negate environmental impact, a standard WCM had failed to satisfy.
Implications for the UK energy sector
The Finch and Friends of the Earth judgments collectively establish that EIAs for fossil fuel extraction projects must incorporate an assessment of downstream greenhouse gas emissions where these are foreseeable and significant. This marks a significant development in UK environmental and planning law, and places increased obligations on planning authorities and developers to consider the full climate implications of fossil fuel projects.
While these rulings do not prohibit the approval of environmentally damaging projects, they impose a more stringent procedural requirement. Planning authorities must now ensure that all relevant environmental effects – including scope 3 emissions – are considered at the assessment stage. It is of note that the Supreme Court expressly limited the scope of Finch to cases involving emissions that are both foreseeable and capable of assessment.
Conclusion
The current government has put the energy transition as a key focus of its Plan for Change, with a keen emphasis on building out infrastructure for domestically sourced clean energy. Decisions made by the government showcase a prioritisation of wind and solar projects, a keen effort to push ahead with the nuclear programme, and a doubling down on investing in the development of CCUS clusters. We can expect a reform to the electricity market and growth in battery energy storage systems. The government continues to build and scope the market for renewable fuels, as it keeps an eye on how the market for these develops. Its approach to oil and gas is somewhat uncertain, with the legal landscape shifting, increasing stringency over procedural requirements, and heavy criticism from climate activists. To meet a target of 95% clean power by 2030, we can expect plenty to watch in this space.