Oil, Gas and the Transition to Renewables 2025

Last Updated August 07, 2025

USA

Law and Practice

Author



Mitby Pacholder Johnson PLLC combines seasoned commercial trial lawyers, licensed patent attorneys and an award-winning general counsel to attack complicated legal issues and business disputes head-on. The firm has attorneys with deep experience navigating the complex legal landscape of the energy and oil and gas sectors, particularly for clients in Texas, as well as the chemicals, technology, construction, real estate development, and healthcare, medical and pharmaceutical sectors. They also deal with insurance coverage disputes. The team understands that the highly nuanced field of oil and gas litigation requires not only a thorough understanding of the industry but also a sharp focus on detail and the ability to craft effective strategies that lead to fair and just outcomes for clients.

In the USA, private ownership of oil and gas resources is the norm. In many states, the mineral estate is distinct from the surface estate, which means that the right to drill for and exploit hydrocarbons may be sold, transferred or inherited separately from the land itself. Large oil and gas-producing states such as Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Wyoming and Alaska recognise separate surface and mineral estates. Because the mineral estate is dominant, the law grants mineral owners a right of reasonable access to the land to develop underground resources.

Although there are no restrictions on private ownership of oil, gas and other minerals, the federal government – through the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) – owns more than 700,000 acres of minerals. The BLM leases some of that acreage to private oil and gas companies for development.

The Department of the Interior regulates oil and gas production on federal and some Native American tribal lands, as well as offshore operations on the Outer Continental Shelf. The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforces air and water quality regulations that affect oil and gas production. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement enforces environmental regulations applicable to offshore drilling in federal waters. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulates the interstate transportation of natural gas and oil through pipelines.

State agencies also have regulatory responsibilities for oil and gas exploration. In Texas, for example, the Railroad Commission (initially created to oversee railroads) regulates the drilling, operation and plugging of oil and gas wells, and oil and natural gas pipelines within the state and remediation of abandoned well sites. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality enforces state regulations related to air and water quality.

In the USA, oil and gas companies are privately owned.

Upstream

At the federal level, the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 governs the leasing and development of oil and gas resources on federal lands, and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act regulates offshore development on the Outer Continental Shelf. The National Environmental Policy Act requires federal agencies to assess the environmental impacts of oil and gas leases on federal land. The Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act governs lease and royalty agreements for development on federal lands. State law generally governs the sale, transfer and inheritance of mineral ownership on private land. States also regulate oil and gas development on private land by issuing drilling permits, regulating oil and gas wells, and balancing the rights of different operators operating in the same area.

Midstream

At the federal level, the Natural Gas Act of 1938 gives FERC the authority to regulate the interstate transportation of natural gas, including approving pipeline construction and setting rates. The Interstate Commerce Act grants FERC authority to regulate rates for interstate oil pipelines. The Department of Transportation (DOT) regulates pipeline safety. At the state level, state authorities regulate pipeline capacity and intrastate transportation. Some states (such as Texas) also require gas-gathering companies to purchase natural gas from all producers in a non-discriminatory manner.

Downstream

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act established the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, a federal emergency stockpile of oil, and sets energy efficiency standards. The Clean Air Act mandates fuel standards. The Petroleum Marketing Practices Act regulates petroleum supply contracts and the relationship between refiners and franchised gasoline retailers. States generally regulate retail gasoline and fuel oil sales as well as public utilities, and states have their own regulatory systems for environmental quality.

Private investment in the exploration and production of oil and gas includes working interests, royalty interests and mineral rights. Working interest owners share in the revenue and expenses of oil and gas production, bearing operational risks such as the cost of drilling and production. Royalty interest owners receive a percentage of the revenue from production without bearing any operational costs or risks. For that reason, royalty interests typically offer lower returns than working interests. Owners of mineral rights retain control over the subsurface estate and may grant leases to oil and gas companies in return for royalties. Companies and individuals may own these interests through a variety of business and investment entities, including corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships and trusts.

For privately owned minerals, oil and gas companies negotiate lease terms directly with the mineral estate owner. Those leases are subject to the law of the state in which the resources are located. For minerals located on federal land or offshore territory, the BLM or the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management hold competitive auctions for leases.

The financial terms of oil and gas leases normally include:

  • a one-time bonus payment upon signing based on the acreage of the lease; and
  • a royalty calculated as a share of revenues that ranges from the traditional rate of 12.5% up to 25% or more for highly competitive markets.

The terms of BLM leases include annual per-acre payments and a minimum royalty of 16.67%.

Upstream producers pay four primary types of taxes. First, they pay federal and state income tax on profits. The federal corporate tax rate is currently about 21%. Second, they pay state severance taxes based on the volume of production. In Texas, the severance tax rate is 4.6% of the market value of oil and 7.5% of the market value of gas. Third, producers pay state property taxes based on the estimated value of their mineral rights, equipment, and infrastructure. Fourth, producers pay a federal environmental tax based on the amount of oil and gas they extract. The current rate is about USD0.254 per barrel.

The USA does not have a national oil or gas company.

In the USA, state authorities typically regulate permitting, well spacing and density, air and groundwater pollution, production and reporting, plugging and abandonment requirements, and royalty payments for state-owned land. The Texas Railroad Commission (TRC), for example, issues drilling permits, determines the allocation of oil and gas among well operators in the same area, and makes permitting and spacing requirements. The TRC also imposes recording requirements on producers. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality enforces air and water pollution standards.

Local governments have authority over zoning, traffic, siting and setback requirements. Because most oil and gas production takes place in rural areas, those rules are usually less important than state regulation.

Drilling on private land is primarily regulated at the state level. Regulatory bodies such as the TRC or California’s Geologic Energy Management Division issue drilling permits that specify the location, depth and planned drilling methods for a well. States also regulate casing and cementing requirements to ensure well integrity and protect aquifers. Operators must comply with ongoing reporting requirements and often post bonds to cover the cost of plugging and abandonment after a well is decommissioned. The federal government imposes similar requirements on wells drilled on federal land or offshore.

The key terms of private oil and gas leases include:

  • the primary and secondary terms;
  • the upfront payment;
  • the royalty rate; and
  • shut-in royalties and other protections for landowners.

The primary term is the first phase of the lease, under which an oil company typically has three to five years to begin drilling. If the oil company does not begin producing during that period, the lease expires. The secondary term often continues if the lease is producing in paying quantities – meaning that the wells produce more income than the cost of extraction. As noted in the foregoing, leases often include an upfront payment calculated on a per-acre basis and a royalty rate that ranges from 12.5% to 25% or more. Shut-in royalties are a protection for landowners that require the oil company to pay royalties even if the well is not producing on a temporary basis. Of course, parties are free to modify the terms of an oil and gas lease at will to provide greater or lesser protections for the lessor and lessee.

Transfers of interests in private oil and gas leases and assets are normally governed by state real property and contract law. Transfers of lease interests on federal land or federal waters are controlled by the BLM or the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

States frequently set monthly or daily limits on production from private oil and gas wells, impose allocation requirements and regulate production to prevent waste. The federal government sets similar rules for federal land and offshore production. The USA is not a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and does not adhere to OPEC production quotas.

In the USA, the vast majority of pipelines, refineries and storage facilities are privately owned. The US government owns very limited pipeline and storage infrastructure to support the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the US government’s emergency supply of oil, which is stored in salt caverns along the Gulf Coast. Despite being privately owned, pipelines are subject to common carrier regulations and generally must transport oil and gas based on a published tariff on a non-discriminatory basis.

There are no national monopolies involved in any downstream operations in the USA.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

The USA does not have a national oil or gas company.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

Pipeline operators that are common carriers (meaning that they must transport oil and gas for the public under a published tariff and on a non-discriminatory basis) have condemnation and eminent domain rights. That means they have the legal right to take private property, generally in the form of an easement, for an underground pipeline. To exercise those rights, the pipeline operator must show necessity, pay market-based compensation and negotiate protections to protect the landowner. Landowners typically have limited rights to object to pipeline easements.

FERC regulates the rates and practices of interstate oil and gas pipelines. The DOT regulates pipeline safety, and the EPA has jurisdiction over pollution and waste management. States regulate intrastate pipeline transportation and safety. For example, in Texas, the Railroad Commission regulates rates and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality oversees pollution and contamination.

Pipelines are typically common carriers and must transport oil and gas for the public according to a published tariff, and in a non-discriminatory manner. Refineries and storage facilities, however, rely on private contracts with upstream producers, and their prices and practices are not subject to common carrier regulation. FERC and federal antitrust laws restrict the bundling of services by pipelines. For example, FERC Order No 636 (1992) required natural gas pipelines to unbundle their sales services.

The federal government regulates imports and exports of oil and gas into the US market, but there are very few restrictions on sales within the USA. Under the interstate commerce clause of the US Constitution, states are not permitted to discriminate against out-of-state sales. Retail gasoline and diesel sales are taxed by the federal government, and the transportation and sale of petroleum and natural gas is heavily regulated at the federal and state level.

Since legislation authorising crude oil exports was enacted in 2015, a licence is generally not required for most crude oil exports. The Department of Energy, however, must authorise exports and imports of natural gas under the Natural Gas Act of 1938. However, oil and gas exports and imports involving certain countries such as Iran, Venezuela, and Russia, are prohibited or restricted by sanctions applicable to those countries.

Midstream and downstream assets are primarily transferred in private market transactions. Natural gas pipeline systems are subject to federal regulatory approval by FERC. Oil pipeline transfers do not require federal approval but typically require state permits.

Foreign investment in the oil and gas sector is not normally restricted. However, the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 limits foreign acquisition of leases or rights-of-way on federal lands, including those for oil, gas and pipelines. Certain foreign investments can trigger review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the USA for national security concerns, and the Office of Foreign Assets Control can prohibit transactions based on US sanctions. Foreign investors generally have the same rights and legal protections as their domestic counterparts, including Fifth Amendment protection against “takings” and access to US courts to enforce their rights.

The USA has imposed oil and gas-related sanctions on Iran, Russia and Venezuela. US sanctions on Iran have targeted nearly 100 individuals, entities and vessels that participate in Iran’s petroleum industry, as well as Chinese entities involved in shipping Iranian oil. The USA has also sanctioned “shadow fleet” vessels used for covert shipments of Iranian oil. US sanctions on Russia focus on major Russian producers such as Gazprom Heft and Surgutneftegas, along with “shadow fleet” vessels used to transport Russian oil. US sanctions on Venezuela include direct sanctions as well as a 25% tariff on goods imported from any country that purchases Venezuelan oil.

The oil and gas industry is heavily regulated. The EPA oversees environmental regulations related to air quality, water quality and waste management under various federal statutes. FERC regulates the interstate transmission of electricity, natural gas and oil, including interstate pipelines and liquified natural gas (LNG) terminals. The Department of the Interior manages oil and gas development on federal and Indian lands, as well as offshore on the Outer Continental Shelf. The DOT oversees pipeline safety. State agencies also play a key role. In Texas, the Railroad Commission regulates the exploration, production and transportation of oil and natural gas within Texas, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality regulates air and water quality.

To commence a major hydrocarbon project, companies must satisfy extensive environmental obligations, primarily by conducting an environmental impact assessment and securing multiple permits from state and federal regulators. Permits may be needed for air, water and waste management impacts. In some cases, bonds or other security are required for future decommissioning requirements. For projects on public land, additional permits and leases are required.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the EPA and the US Coast Guard regulate offshore oil and gas activity based on worker safety and environmental protection.

In 2023 and 2024, the EPA announced final rules designed to reduce methane emissions from oil and gas operations as part of an overall greenhouse gas reduction programme. The new rules include a waste emissions charge on methane emissions. The EPA also implements programmes to reduce conventional air pollutants from power plants, including those that utilise oil and gas.

Most oil and gas regulation is at the federal or state level. Although local governments traditionally have authority over certain land use requirements and zoning, localities have little authority over oil and gas development, and some states have laws that specifically pre-empt local regulation of oil and gas.

The Trump administration and Congress have rolled back incentives for transitioning to alternative energy sources such as wind and solar, focusing more heavily on traditional oil and gas. A similar trend is taking place at the state level, with some states (such as Texas) providing incentives for traditional oil and gas as opposed to alternative energy sources.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

The current trend at the federal and state levels is to focus on energy dominance through traditional oil and gas. Energy transition has been de-emphasised and is in the process of being defunded.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

No response has been provided in this jurisdiction.

Mitby Pacholder Johnson PLLC

1001 McKinney Street
Suite 925
Houston
TX 77002
USA

+1 713 234 1446

info@mitbylaw.com www.mitbylaw.com
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Vinson & Elkins has 13 offices across the globe and approximately 700 lawyers, with a client base that includes many of the largest independent oil and gas exploration and production companies, renewables companies, and private equity firms including EnCap Investments, Continental Resources, Enbridge, Global Infrastructure Partners, and Mitsubishi Corporation. The firm’s experience in the oil and gas sector includes the purchase, sale, development and financing of oil and gas assets and projects, and its extensive knowledge covers the regulatory complexities and technical issues related to these types of transactions. The firm’s clean energy practice represents clients worldwide on a wide array of energy transition and decarbonisation transactions, including matters involving battery and energy storage, electric vehicles, wind and solar, biofuels and renewable natural gas, CCS/CCUS, hydrogen and ammonia, and other cutting edge clean technologies.

Upstream, Midstream and Downstream M&A Activity Shifts Towards Gas-Weighted Deals Amid Growing Natural Gas Demand

Oil demand decreases in market uncertainty; natural gas demand increases as a result of AI-driven data centres and LNG exports

Amid concerns of global tariffs, limited inventory, and other market uncertainties, crude oil prices have dropped in the first half of 2025. At the end of May 2025, oil traded at about USD60 per barrel, a significant decrease from its USD75-78 price in January. In addition, US drilling rig numbers across US basins have been decreasing this year, down from 614 on April 30th to 586 as of 31 May, with the sharpest decrease occurring in the Permian Basin (decreasing by 22 rigs in May, and 37 rigs in the past year). 

The dampened crude oil activity follows a number of high-profile upstream M&A transactions in recent years, primarily relating to Permian assets. In 2023, Exxon Mobil Corporation’s acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources and Occidental’s acquisition of CrownRock L.P. demonstrated a strong oil focus among large energy companies, with an emphasis on corporate consolidation rather than asset acquisitions. This trend continued in 2024 with Diamondback Energy’s merger with Endeavor Energy Resources, which was quickly followed by ConocoPhillips’s acquisition of Marathon Oil.

However, as noted by Enervus, while the first half of 2025 appeared to continue the streak of strong M&A activity in the Permian, only one company, Diamondback, accounted for almost 50% of total value with its transactions with Viper Energy Partners and Double Eagle IV. Other upstream companies have not fared quite as well. “Outside of Diamondback, buyers were already feeling the pressure of limited acquisition opportunities and high asking prices for undeveloped drilling inventory. On top of that, upstream companies will now have to navigate significant headwinds from falling oil and equity values.”

The downward trend in oil-based activity shows few signs of slowing down in the coming year. Recent data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasts slowing growth in global oil consumption, driven by a slowdown in economic growth in Asia, as well as the tariffs and ensuing trade wars. In addition, OPEC recently revised its 2025 oil demand growth forecast, now anticipating a demand increase of 1.3 million barrels per day (bpd), a decrease of 150,000 bpd from its previous projection. OPEC’s 2026 demand increase projection has also been decreased.

Amidst the global uncertainty affecting oil viability, energy companies are shifting their focus to natural gas. According to Hart Energy, “[b]etween 60% to 70% of the deals [Stephens, Inc.] is seeing today are gas-weighted... Just a few years ago, as much as 80% of buyer interest was on oil-weighted assets.”

The growing gas demand is driven in part by the need to power AI-driven data centres. Recent data from East Daley Analytics (EDA) forecasted about 7.8 Bcf/d of additional gas demand by 2030 to produce electricity to power data centres. EDA currently predicts a rapidly increasing number of data centre projects across the country, amounting to about 113.8 GW of electricity load to run the centres. Virginia and Texas currently lead with the largest predicted data centre market and potential gas demand, with the former forecasted for 19.7 MW load for data projects and accompanying 1.8 Bcf/d gas demand, and the latter with 17.5 MW and 1.7 Bcf/d gas demand. Georgia, Illinois and Nevada comprise the remainder of the top five states.

The growth in natural gas demand is also attributable to rising LNG exports. According to 2024 data from EIA, North America’s LNG export capacity was expected to double by 2028, from 11.4 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/D) in 2023 to 24.4 Bcf/d in 2028 (with the United States growing by 9.7 Bcf/d, and Canada and Mexico together growing by 3.3 Bcf/d), assuming that planned LNG projects begin operations as planned. As of the end of 2024, the United States completed its eighth LNG export terminal, with three other LNG export projects currently under construction. The USA remains the world’s largest LNG exporter, having hit a record 88.4 million metric tonnes at the end of last year.

While various companies have announced plans to decrease drilling rigs given the market uncertainty, there are natural gas operators (such as Sabine Oil & Gas) that have announced plans to increase drilling rigs on their acreage in the coming months.

While natural gas prices have been volatile in 2025, they have not suffered the type of price drops seen by crude oil. The growing relative demand and price stability of gas over oil appears to be resulting in more attention for gassier assets from buyers and investors, who have been positioning themselves to answer the rising natural gas demand.

Oil and gas companies strategically positioning themselves through M&A activity to benefit from rising natural gas demand

In light of the rising number of data centres and LNG exports, recent M&A activity among energy companies is trending towards natural gas-weighted deals. This shift is manifesting in unique ways across each of the upstream, midstream and downstream sectors.

Upstream

Recent deals demonstrate energy companies looking outside of Permian Basin

While major oil deals have largely been concentrated in the Permian Basin, the increasing gas focus has shifted emphasis to other plays throughout the USA. In April 2025, EQT Corporation agreed to acquire the upstream and midstream assets of Olympus Energy in a USD1.8 billion sale consisting of USD500 million in cash and USD1.3 billion in stock. EQT noted that the assets are near several proposed power generation projects in the Marcellus Shale, a natural gas-rich formation stretching across Pennsylvania, New York and West Virginia, putting EQT in a beneficial position for gas supply needs. Further, one year prior, Equinor ASA agreed to swap its onshore assets in the Appalachian Basin in exchange for 40% of EQT’s non-operated working interest in the Northern Marcellus Shale.

The Haynesville Shale has also been a focus, with its location near the Gulf Coast positioning it as a prime location for the USA’s LNG export corridor. Citadel LLC, a hedge fund, moved into the natural gas market with a USD1 billion purchase of upstream Haynesville assets from Paloma Natural Gas, a company holding 57,000 net mineral acres and backed by Encap Investments. The acquisition further demonstrates growing interest in the natural gas market, with companies focused on exports in addition to power generation.

Private equity funds

The upstream sector has recently seen an increase in fundraising, as it looks for opportunities from income-producing energy assets. Private equity capital raises had taken a dramatic dip since the USD73 billion raised in 2017. Late last year, EnCap and Quantum Capital Group announced closings of new energy funds totalling about USD15 billion in capital commitments. In May 2025, Kayne Anderson closed its largest energy private equity fund, Kayne Private Income Fund III, L.P., for USD2.25 billion in capital commitments. Kayne’s fund has already been put to use, providing over USD300 million of equity commitments to Terra Energy Partners II, LLC to aid the entity in acquiring cash-flowing oil and natural gas assets.

Family offices also step in as funding source

Family offices have been looking favourably on upstream opportunities as an inflation hedge and source of long-term, consistent cash flow. A major natural gas deal involved Purewest Energy, a leading Rocky Mountain independent natural gas producer, agreeing to a USD1.84 billion all-cash merger with a newly created entity sponsored by a private consortium of family offices consisting of A.G. Hill Partners, LLC, Cain Capital L.L.C., Eaglebine Capital Partners, LP, Fortress Investment Group, HF Capital, LLC, Petro-Hunt LLC and Wincorum Asset Management.

As noted by Stephens, family offices lack the same time constraints on their capital as private equity funds, making family offices an attractive option for long-term investment horizons. A representative of PureWest commented on the long-term value creation that the family office capital structure helped provide.

International buyers

Upstream M&A has also seen an influx of international companies capitalising on US gas demand. In April 2025, Tokyo Gas Co., through its joint venture owned with Castleton Commodities International, purchased 70% of Chevron U.S.A., Inc.’s Haynesville gas assets for USD525 million. Tokyo Gas is the largest natural gas utility in Japan.

Mubadala Energy, an energy company headquartered in Abu Dhabi, agreed to acquire a 24.1% interest in Kimmeridge’s SoTex HoldCo LLC, which owns Kimmeridge Texas Gas, its unconventional gas business. SoTex also owns Commonwealth LNG, its LNG business with an export facility in Louisiana.

European companies are entering the market as well. Last year, TotalEnergies acquired a 20% interest in Dorado leases in the Eagle Valley shale in Texas. TotalEnergies later acquired a 45% interest in dry gas producing assets from Lewis Energy Group in the Eagle Ford. While TotalEnergies is headquartered in France, it is the largest LNG exporter in the United States, and the company notes that these deals demonstrate their efforts to vertically integrate natural gas production into the US LNG value chain. The asset swap of Norwegian-based Equinor mentioned above is another recent example of international companies increasing their exposure to the US natural gas sector.

Midstream

The midstream sector has seen a surge in M&A activity, with notable deals in 2024 and 15 deals signed in the first quarter of this year, the largest amount since the fourth quarter of 2021. Many companies are investing in existing infrastructure through joint ventures and direct asset acquisitions rather than riskier construction projects – another effect of uncertainties resulting from tariffs and volatile commodity prices.

Joint venture prevalence

One recent example is a managed fund of ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC, acquiring an additional 25% interest in the Natural Gas Pipelines of America LLC, making it the largest owner of the infrastructure system with a 62.5% interest. NGPL is a joint venture among Arclight, Kinder Morgan, and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, spanning nine states and serving as a major transporter of natural gas to LNG export facilities on the Gulf Coast. A partner of Arclight commented on NGPL’s importance to LNG exports and data centres, as well as the historic power demand growth likely to extend into the next decade.

Other notable joint venture activity includes Blackstone and EQT’s Corporation’s JV formation, which consists of EQT’s interest in various midstream infrastructure assets including Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, the Hammerhead Pipeline, and other storage and transmission assets. In addition, Devon’s USD375 million sale of its 12.5% interest in the Matterhorn Express pipeline values, according to EDA, the pipeline at up to USD6.1 billion and evidences a “broader market divergence, with natural gas and [natural gas liquid (NGL)] assets commanding stronger investor interest” amid slowing oil growth.

Private equity exits; strategics look to improve synergies

Direct asset acquisitions have also played a role. Since last year, several private equity firms have exited investments in the Permian to capitalise on market conditions, selling developed systems to strategic buyers looking to expand their business and improve operational synergies. In May 2024, Global Infrastructure Partners sold EnLink Midstream and Medallion Midstream to ONEOK, Inc. for USD5.9 billion. This purchase complemented ONEOK’s existing gas platform, with ONEOK commenting that it “expects the natural gas transmission assets to benefit from strong industrial growth demand related to data centers, liquified natural gas, ammonia and hydrogen.”

Later in the year, Stonepeak Infrastructure Partners sold WTG Midstream to Energy Transfer for USD3.25 billion, expanding Energy Transfer’s natural gas infrastructure. More recently, in April of this year, Phillips 66 closed its USD2.2 billion purchase of EPIC Y-Grade GP, LLC and EPIC Y-Grade, LP, midstream companies previously owned by Ares Management Corporation and operating NGL pipelines, facilities and distribution systems.

Pipeline projects on the horizon

While acquiring existing assets has been a lower-risk method for bolstering a company’s natural gas stake, that is not to say that major infrastructure investors lack plans for long-term pipeline projects. EDA has noted several upcoming projects to bring gas to the Southeast, partially driven by energy demand for data centres. Boardwalk Pipeline Partners reached a final investment decision (FID) in late 2024 to move forward with its Kosci Junction project, a new pipeline to extend from the Greenville Lateral on the Texas Gas Transmission System to an interconnection with the Southern Natural Gas system in Mississippi. Energy Transfer is engaging in the South Mississippi project, extending between Mississippi and Alabama. Kinder Morgan also reached FID on the Mississippi Crossing project, which will have a similar route to Energy Transfer’s proposed pipeline. Further, Kinder Morgan is co-ordinating with Williams Cos. to progress the South System Expansion 4 in Georgia and Alabama. All of the pipeline projects indicate a growing appetite to invest in transportation projects to meet growing gas demands in the US and abroad.

Downstream

The downstream sector has also seen a shift to gas-weighted activity. As of late, technology giants such as Microsoft, Google, Meta and Oracle have been investing billions into AI infrastructure, causing a surge in natural gas demand as energy companies seek ways to power data centres.

Utility companies are looking to capitalise on this demand by purchasing power generation assets. In January of this year, Constellation announced its acquisition of Calpine Corp., the largest US producer of energy from low-emission natural gas generation, for a net purchase price of USD26.6 billion, creating the nation’s largest clean energy provider and leading competitive retail electric supplier. In addition, NRG Energy is planning to double its power generation capacity through a USD12 billion purchase of 18 natural gas plants across nine states.

Private equity has also been involved in power generation. Earlier this year, Blackstone agreed to acquire Potomac Energy Center, citing its commitment to investing in electric infrastructure to meeting data centre demand. In addition, Partners Group agreed to acquire Encap-owned Power Transitions, which will also simultaneously purchase a portfolio of natural gas plants.

Conclusion

The volatility in oil prices has been a challenge for energy M&A activity in recent years. However, greater demand and price stability for natural gas is expected to maintain an upward trajectory for M&A activity as the number of data centres and operating LNG facilities increase. Energy M&A activity, having come off the recent spree of major oil-weighted deals, will likely continue to demonstrate unique trends as each of upstream, midstream and downstream sectors capitalise on these trends in the natural gas market in the coming years.

Vinson & Elkins

845 Texas Avenue
Suite 4700
Houston, TX 77002
USA

+1 713 758 4762

skuperman@velaw.com www.velaw.com/
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Author



Mitby Pacholder Johnson PLLC combines seasoned commercial trial lawyers, licensed patent attorneys and an award-winning general counsel to attack complicated legal issues and business disputes head-on. The firm has attorneys with deep experience navigating the complex legal landscape of the energy and oil and gas sectors, particularly for clients in Texas, as well as the chemicals, technology, construction, real estate development, and healthcare, medical and pharmaceutical sectors. They also deal with insurance coverage disputes. The team understands that the highly nuanced field of oil and gas litigation requires not only a thorough understanding of the industry but also a sharp focus on detail and the ability to craft effective strategies that lead to fair and just outcomes for clients.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Vinson & Elkins has 13 offices across the globe and approximately 700 lawyers, with a client base that includes many of the largest independent oil and gas exploration and production companies, renewables companies, and private equity firms including EnCap Investments, Continental Resources, Enbridge, Global Infrastructure Partners, and Mitsubishi Corporation. The firm’s experience in the oil and gas sector includes the purchase, sale, development and financing of oil and gas assets and projects, and its extensive knowledge covers the regulatory complexities and technical issues related to these types of transactions. The firm’s clean energy practice represents clients worldwide on a wide array of energy transition and decarbonisation transactions, including matters involving battery and energy storage, electric vehicles, wind and solar, biofuels and renewable natural gas, CCS/CCUS, hydrogen and ammonia, and other cutting edge clean technologies.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.