Pensions 2026

Last Updated August 25, 2026

Switzerland

Law and Practice

Authors



Bär & Karrer Ltd is a leading Swiss law firm with more than 200 lawyers in Zurich, Geneva, Lugano, Zug, Basel and St Moritz. The firm’s core business is advising clients on innovative and complex transactions and representing them in litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. Clients range from multinational corporations to private individuals in Switzerland and around the world.

Three-Pillar Model Anchored in the Constitution

Switzerland organises old-age, survivors’ and disability provision around three pillars, enshrined in the Swiss Federal Constitution. Each pillar corresponds to a tier found in most systems: Pillar 1 is the state or public tier, securing a basic subsistence income; Pillar 2 is the workplace or occupational tier, maintaining the accustomed standard of living; and Pillar 3 is the individual or private savings tier, closing remaining gaps.

The state and occupational tiers

Pillar 1 comprises old-age and survivors’ insurance (the “AHV”), disability insurance (the “IV”) and supplementary benefits. It is mandatory and pay-as-you-go, financed by earnings-related contributions shared equally between employees and employers, and by contributions from self-employed persons, supplemented by federal funding. Contributions are levied on the entire income without ceiling, whereas benefits are capped between CHF1,260 and CHF2,520 per month in 2026 (CHF3,780 for couples), making the pillar strongly redistributive.

Pillar 2 is the capital-based occupational provision under the Federal Act on Occupational Old Age, Survivors’ and Disability Pension Provision (the “BVG”), organised through pension institutions that are legally separate from the employer. This is compulsory for employees earning above an entry threshold of CHF22,680 per annum in 2026 – each accrues an individual retirement balance from contributions and investment returns, later converted into a pension or drawn as capital, intended with Pillar 1 to replace roughly 60% of previous income. Self-employed persons may join Pillar 2 voluntarily (see 2.4 Professional and Self-Employed Pension Arrangements).

In both the first and second pillars, the employer pays both the employee’s and the employer’s contributions to the relevant compensation fund or pension fund, charging employees for their portion through payroll. Self-employed individuals, on the other hand, are responsible for paying their own contributions.

The private tier

Pillar 3 rests on voluntary provision, split into the tax-privileged tied form (Pillar 3a) and free savings (Pillar 3b). Pillar 3a is voluntary and open to people with earned income. Its schemes are held with a bank or insurer-linked foundation; the capital is tied up until shortly before retirement, with annual tax deductions up to statutory limits. Pillar 3b (which is generally not directly tax-incentivised) covers ordinary savings, life insurance and investments outside the dedicated tied-pension regime of Pillar 3a.

Primary and Secondary Legislation

Pillar 1 rests on the Federal Old-Age and Survivors’ Insurance Act (the “AHVG”) and the Federal Disability Insurance Act (the “IVG”), while the General Part of Social Security Law (the “ATSG”) provides common procedural rules and defines certain key terms. The core statute regulating Pillar 2 is the BVG, supplemented by the Vesting Act (the “FZG”) on the transfer of accrued benefits and by ordinances, notably occupational plans (the “BVV 2”), tied private provision (the “BVV 3”) and the vesting ordinance. The ATSG is mostly not applicable.

Regulatory Guidelines and Adjacent Fields

Rules of general application also stem from directives of the Occupational Pensions Supervisory Commission (the “OAK BV”), which are binding on supervisory authorities, and from circulars of the Federal Tax Administration on contributions and benefit taxation. The Federal Social Insurance Office (the “BSV”) issues further administrative guidance.

Occupational pension law intersects with employment, contract and social security law: the affiliation between employer and institution is a contract to which the Code of Obligations applies where the BVG is silent, while the employment relationship determines who must be enrolled.

International Framework

Switzerland is not bound by EU pensions directives, so the EU’s updated Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision (“IORP II”) Directive does not apply directly. The Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons with the EU and the EFTA Convention co-ordinate social security for mobile workers, while bilateral social security treaties with more than 20 non-EU/EFTA states address issues such as applicable legislation, insurance periods, export of benefits and avoidance of double contributions. These co-ordination rules primarily concern Pillar 1 entitlements and, to a limited extent, Pillar 2 coverage, since the obligation to contribute to the second pillar depends on affiliation with the first pillar.

Pillar 1: Compulsory Coverage

Pillar 1 participation is universal and cannot be waived. Persons who live or work in Switzerland are generally insured in this pillar; employed persons pay contributions from 1 January of the year they turn 18, while non-employed persons pay from 1 January of the year they turn 21. Any contribution gaps will reduce the pension ultimately payable.

Employer Obligation, Enrolment and Exemptions

Employers must affiliate with a registered Pillar 2 institution and insure every employee earning above the entry threshold of CHF22,680 per annum in 2026, funding at least half of total contributions. Death and disability cover begins at 18 and retirement saving at 25; enrolment is automatic once these conditions are met, so there is no opt-out. Workers below the threshold and those on fixed-term contracts of up to three months fall outside the mandate. Certain sectors, notably construction, add a further layer through collective labour agreements declared generally binding, requiring affiliation with a designated industry-wide institution. The self-employed are not subject to compulsory coverage but may join voluntarily or make enhanced Pillar 3a contributions instead (see 2.4 Professional and Self-Employed Pension Arrangements).

While coverage in Pillar 2 is mandatory on a salary band between CHF22,680 and CHF90,720 per annum (in 2026), the selection of a pension plan providing coverage beyond that band, up to a maximum insurable salary set by the plan’s own rules (up to CHF90,720 in 2026), is optional for employers.

Penalties and the Self-Employed

An employer that fails to affiliate with a Pillar 2 provider is assigned to the substitute institution, which enrols the workforce retroactively, and faces default interest, liability for arrears and criminal liability for wilful non-payment of withheld employee contributions.

Regional and Cantonal Authorities

Direct supervision of individual pension institutions is exercised by regional and cantonal authorities (independent public-law bodies), covering registration, review of pension regulations and annual reports. Their powers include intervening where governance, funding or investment falls short, from instructions and remedial measures to removal of governing-body members in serious cases. They also supervise the accredited pension experts and auditors.

OAK BV

System oversight sits with the OAK BV, a federal commission independent of the federal council and parliament. It ensures uniform supervisory practice nationwide through binding directives and oversight of regional authorities, and it directly supervises the investment foundations, the Guarantee Fund and the substitute institution, and accredits pension experts.

The BSV sets the policy and regulatory framework for the social insurance system, issues administrative guidance and directives, and oversees systemic aspects of Pillars 1 and 2 at the federal level.

Cross-Cutting Bodies

Pillar 1 administration is carried out by regional and industry sector-specific compensation offices under the BSV, responsible for registering insured persons, collecting contributions and paying benefits.

The conduct of insurers offering pension products is supervised by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (“FINMA”) under the Insurance Supervision Act, covering solvency, governance and market conduct.

Employers, Employees and Co-Determination

The employer is the core link for pension coverage: it affiliates with a compensation office (Pillar 1) and a pension provider (Pillar 2), deducts employee contributions and pays the full contribution (the employer’s share equalling the employee’s in Pillar 1 and at least matching aggregate employee contributions in Pillar 2), and must report salaries correctly to the involved office and provider.

Employees are the insured members and, in Pillar 2, enjoy a statutory right to parity representation on the governing body of the pension scheme, composed in equal numbers of employer and employee representatives elected or delegated by the workforce. Through these representatives, members participate in decisions on the institution’s rules, benefit levels, financing and restructuring measures.

Governing Board

In Pillar 2, the governing board owes fiduciary duties to the beneficiaries, sets investment policy, approves the accounts and decides on measures in cases of underfunding. Its members must meet fit-and-proper standards, manage conflicts of interest and may be held personally liable for breaches of duty.

Experts, Auditors and Social Partners

Two independent gatekeepers support governance within Pillar 2 schemes:

  • the accredited pension expert assesses the actuarial position and funding adequacy; and
  • the auditor reviews the accounts and legal compliance.

In certain industries, employer and employee associations negotiate collective labour agreements that include pension provisions; where these agreements are declared generally binding by the authorities, all employers in the sector must participate in the designated pension scheme, regardless of their individual preference.

Pillar 1

  • AHV 21, in force since 2024, was designed to secure Pillar 1’s financing and to harmonise the reference retirement age at 65 years old (previously 64 for women, although the retirement age for men was already 65). The principal change is the phased increase of the women’s reference age in three-month steps between 2025 and 2028, with compensatory measures for the transitional cohorts (born 1961–1969). It also introduced flexible drawing of the pension between ages 63 and 70 (early retirement/deferred retirement; see 4.2 Retirement Age).
  • Following a popular vote in March 2024, a 13th monthly AHV pension is being introduced, with the first supplement paid in December 2026. It equals one 12th of the annual pension and is granted automatically to old-age pensioners, without conversion of existing entitlements, although it does not extend to survivors’ or disability pensions. Its financing remains politically controversial; a vote on the partial financing solution adopted by parliament is expected in November 2026.

Pillar 2

A Pillar 2 reform aimed at stabilising financing and improving coverage for part-time and low-income earners was rejected in September 2024. It would have lowered the minimum conversion rate from 6.8% to 6%, replaced the fixed co-ordination deduction with a proportion of salary, and flattened the age-based savings credits. Because it failed, no conversion of existing accruals occurred and the fixed co-ordination deduction (CHF26,460 in 2026) and 6.8% conversion rate remain in force.

The underlying demographic and financing pressures persist, but no comparable reform has yet been enacted.

Insurers as Pension Providers

Life insurers are not themselves admitted as Pillar 2 or Pillar 3a pension providers, but they are closely involved in occupational provision. They offer full-insurance and semi-autonomous solutions to collective foundations and reinsure death and disability risks. In a full-insurance model, the insurer bears all investment and biometric risks.

Regulatory and Prudential Requirements

Insurers require authorisation from FINMA and are prudentially supervised under the Insurance Supervision Act, which imposes solvency, tied-assets and governance requirements. Where they act within the mandatory Pillar 2, the insurers must additionally observe BVG requirements, including the statutory minimum benefits, a minimum payout ratio on the mandatory portion and the rules on distributing surplus, and must account separately for the occupational business within their books.

Main Products

The principal products are full-insurance collective contracts, risk-only reinsurance for death and disability, vested-benefits policies for people between jobs, and Pillar 3a insurance combining savings with risk cover.

Types of Pension Fund

The dominant vehicle is the pension provider, typically constituted as an independent Swiss-law foundation. Several types are available:

  • employer-specific foundations;
  • collective foundations serving many unrelated employers;
  • communal foundations organised around a profession or industry; and
  • the government substitute institution.

Legal Form, Authorisation and Registration

Mandatory coverage requires registration with the competent supervisory authority, presupposing compliance with the BVG’s governance and financial requirements. Only registered institutions benefit from the guarantee-fund safety net.

Governance, Board Composition and Fiduciary Duties

The institution must be governed by a governing board composed in equal parts of employer and employee representatives, whose members satisfy fit-and-proper standards, manage conflicts of interest and observe the rules on transactions with related parties. Members owe fiduciary duties to the beneficiaries. Internal controls and accountability are reinforced by the appointment of an independent auditor and an accredited pension expert, and board members can be held personally liable for damage caused by breaches of duty.

Funding, Solvency and Investment

Institutions must be fully funded (as defined for Swiss law purposes) to meet their obligations at all times, invest prudently and diversify within the BVV 2 (Article 49 et seq) limits, and build technical provisions and fluctuation reserves.

Member Protection and Ongoing Supervision

Members are protected by vesting rules, by the prohibition on reducing accrued benefits and by the guarantee fund in insolvency (see 4.9 Insolvency).

Annual audited accounts, an actuarial review and ongoing reporting to the supervisory authority give supervisors continuous insight into each institution’s situation.

Aside from registered pension foundations, several further vehicles perform pension or pension-like functions, although none provides mandatory coverage.

  • Vested-benefits foundations hold the capital of persons who have left a scheme (eg, as a result of termination of employment) but not yet joined a new one; they qualify as vested-benefits foundations only if constituted as a foundation dedicated exclusively to that purpose and supervised accordingly.
  • Pillar 3a foundations, typically affiliated with a bank or insurer, administer tax-privileged private savings and must likewise confine their activity to tied pension provision to retain their tax-privileged status.
  • Employer welfare funds may provide discretionary or supplementary benefits under a lighter supervisory regime; because they do not provide mandatory BVG coverage as registered pension institutions and are solely employer-funded, they fall outside the ordinary registration requirement, although they remain subject to foundation supervision.
  • 1e pension schemes must be registered pension institutions; they allow for a certain level of individual investment choice but are only open to the salary band above the defined threshold and offer at least one low-risk investment option.

Self-Employed Individuals: Voluntary Pillar 2 Access

Self-employed individuals are not covered by the mandatory Pillar 2 but may insure themselves voluntarily (see 1.3 Voluntary or Compulsory Pension), joining the institution of their professional association, the institution covering their own employees, or the substitute institution.

Self-Employed Individuals: Enhanced Pillar 3a

Where a self-employed person has no Pillar 2 institution, they may instead make enhanced tax-privileged Pillar 3a contributions of up to 20% of net earned income, capped at CHF36,288 in 2026, well above the CHF7,258 limit (of 2026) applying to employees who are already institution members. If they are affiliated with a Pillar 2 institution, they may still contribute to Pillar 3a, but only up to the lower limit applicable to persons with occupational pension coverage.

Members of Regulated Professions

Members of regulated professions (eg, doctors, lawyers or architects practising independently) are treated as self-employed for pension purposes unless they are formally employed. In practice, many instead join association-based pension institutions established for their profession, which operate under the ordinary BVG framework; this gives their members the same governance protections, vesting rules and minimum benefits as employees.

Affiliation Agreement

The employer–institution relationship is governed by an affiliation agreement under which the employer joins the institution and undertakes to enrol its workforce and pay contributions.

  • Where the institution is a collective or communal foundation, this agreement is the administrative arrangement that defines the employer’s rights and obligations, while the institution’s pension regulations govern the substantive benefit relationship with the insured.
  • For pension providers limited in scope to an employer or group of employers, the affiliation agreement may, in practice, not exist at all or be very limited, and the relationship is governed by the pension provider’s regulations and the BVG.

Mandatory Content

The agreement and the pension fund regulations must reflect the BVG’s mandatory minimum, including the insured salary definition, age-based savings credits, death and disability benefits, vesting, buy-ins, financing and the treatment of surplus and underfunding. Any provision falling below this minimum is invalid to that extent and is replaced by the statutory rule. The affiliation agreement typically also addresses buy-in requirements on joining, the treatment of existing pensioners, and termination conditions.

Standard Terms and Freedom to Deviate

Collective foundations generally operate based on pre-drafted affiliation agreements and pension regulations to which the employer accedes, leaving less room for individual negotiation than in an employer-specific pension foundation. Multi-employer arrangements take two forms: collective foundations (separate plan per employer) and communal foundations (single shared plan, typically for a profession or industry). Within the limits of the BVG, pension institutions are free to structure their benefits, financing and organisation, and may provide benefits above the statutory minimum in the supplementary (supra-mandatory) range, such as higher insured salaries, more favourable conversion rates or additional survivor cover. This freedom is one-sided in the sense that the statutory BVG minimum operates as a floor: the parties may improve on it, but may not undercut it in the mandatory range.

General Principles of Contract Interpretation

Pension regulations issued by a foundation are interpreted like general terms and conditions or general insurance conditions: the focus is on the objective meaning that an insured person, acting in good faith, could and should attribute to them.

Individual affiliation agreements between employer and institution, by contrast, are interpreted under ordinary contract principles, giving priority to the parties’ true and common intention and, failing that, to the reliance principle – namely, what a reasonable party in the recipient’s position would have understood.

Specific Rules of Interpretation

Two further rules qualify the interpretation of standardised pension regulations. If after applying the ordinary methods of interpretation, a clause remains genuinely ambiguous, it is construed against the drafting institution under the unclear-terms rule. Clauses that are unusual and could not reasonably have been expected by the insured may also fail to bind them under the rule against unusual clauses. Both rules are correctives to the objective approach and are always read consistently with the mandatory BVG framework.

How Courts Approach Disputes

Where the wording of a rule is clear, it prevails without recourse to the specific rules above; where genuine ambiguity remains after ordinary interpretation, the unclear-terms rule may result in an interpretation that is more favourable to the insured. This layered approach gives a reasonably predictable framework.

Conditions for a Permissible Amendment

Institutions may amend their regulations within the limits of the BVG, their own governing documents and good faith: an amendment must pursue a legitimate, objectively justified purpose (eg, adapting to demographic or financial developments) and must respect the equal treatment of members within each affected category. An amendment lacking legitimate purpose or objective grounds is vulnerable to challenge. The affiliation agreement is typically amended by mutual consent of the employer and the institution, subject to the institution’s own rules on amendments to affiliation terms.

Procedural Requirements

The power to amend the regulations normally rests with the institution’s governing board, with parity representation of employer and employee delegates. Members must be informed of material changes.

Amendments remain subject to supervisory oversight, particularly where they affect organisation, financing or statutory compliance.

Extent to Which Accrued Rights May Be Affected

Accrued retirement assets, pensions already in payment and other acquired rights enjoy strong protection and cannot be reduced by a mere change of rules.

Future accrual, by contrast, may be modified prospectively (eg, changing conversion rates, contribution structures or benefit formulae for future service) provided the change respects the statutory minimum, equal treatment and good faith.

Protections Against Prejudicial Amendments

Members are protected by the prohibition on retroactive impairment of acquired rights, by parity representation on the governing board, and by judicial remedies before the competent occupational pensions court.

Liability Regime

Disputes arising from the pension relationship may engage several distinct bases of liability.

  • Between employer and pension provider, liability may arise from the affiliation agreement, including non-performance or defective performance of the employer’s affiliation and contribution obligations.
  • The pension provider itself is responsible for applying its pension regulations correctly towards the insured.
  • Persons entrusted with the administration, management or control of the institution may be personally liable under the BVG for damage caused intentionally or negligently in the performance of their duties.

The Guarantee Fund acts as a safety net in institutional insolvency (see 4.9 Insolvency).

Competent Bodies

Disputes between insured persons, employers and pension institutions concerning occupational pension rights and obligations are heard, at first instance, by the cantonal court designated under  Article 73 BVG, with further appeal to the Federal Supreme Court. This jurisdiction can also extend to affiliation-agreement claims rooted in occupational pension law.

It should be noted that pension funds generally do not have the authority to issue administrative decisions, which is why such legal disputes must typically be resolved through a claim and not, as provided for in Pillar 1, through appeal proceedings.

By contrast, supervisory matters (eg, compliance with organisational, governance and funding requirements) are dealt with by the competent supervisory authority, with administrative-law appeal routes.

Limitation Periods

Periodic pension benefits that have fallen due are generally subject to a five-year limitation period, while other claims are generally subject to a ten-year period; the underlying entitlement to benefits does not lapse in the same way as individual arrears where the statutory conditions are met.

Liability claims against governing bodies (Article 52 BVG) are subject to five-year relative and ten-year absolute limitation periods.

Scheme Types: DC, DB, Hybrid and Cash Balance

Pillar 1 operates as a pay-as-you-go defined-benefit (DB) system, with pension amounts determined by reference to contribution years and average income rather than funded capital. Swiss Pillar 2 schemes are, on the other hand, overwhelmingly defined-contribution (DC) schemes (as defined for Swiss-law purposes; this terminology may differ from international accounting standards): each member accrues an individual retirement balance from age-based credits (based on the insured salary) and interest, converted into a pension at retirement. Swiss-style pure defined-benefit promises are rare in the private sector, although some public-sector and legacy plans retain benefit-based features.

Cash-balance features are effectively how the mandatory portion operates, and genuine hybrid or collective DC schemes exist at the margins.

Funded, Insured Individual and Collective Arrangements

Pillar 2 is fully funded: pension providers must hold segregated assets sufficient to cover their obligations. In contrast, the pay-as-you-go Pillar 1 is financed on a current-cost basis. Book-reserve arrangements, in which an employer simply records a pension obligation on its balance sheet without segregating assets, are not permitted as a means of providing mandatory occupational benefits under Swiss law.

Institutions may be autonomous (bearing their own risks), semi-autonomous (reinsuring death and disability risks) or fully insured (transferring all risks to a life insurer).

Most members participate through collective, risk-pooling arrangements in which individual accounts sit within a collectively financed and invested institution. Only 1e plans allow high earners individual investment choice above a defined threshold, so the member bears that investment risk.

Guarantees, Indexation and Risk-Sharing

Swiss plans commonly combine:

  • a statutory minimum conversion rate of 6.8% on the mandatory portion, often lower in the supplementary range;
  • guaranteed minimum interest (1.25% in 2026) on mandatory retirement assets;
  • risk-sharing through fluctuation reserves and collectively funded death and disability cover; and
  • largely discretionary indexation of pensions in payment, decided year by year by the governing board.

Statutory guarantees apply to the mandatory portion; above that threshold in the supra-mandatory portion, guarantees and risk-sharing depend mainly on the plan rules, reserves and parity governance.

Legal Framework and the Reference Age

The reference age is set by statute at 65 for both genders since AHV 21, which harmonised what had previously been 64 for women; women’s retirement age is being raised in three-month steps between 2025 and 2028 (see 1.6 Recent and Upcoming Pension Reforms). This Pillar 1 reference age also serves as the default for Pillar 2, although institutions may set their own reference age within the bounds fixed by the BVG (no earlier than age 58).

Pillar 1 Flexibility

Pillar 1 allows the old-age pension to be drawn flexibly between ages 63 and 70, with actuarial reductions for early receipt and increases for deferral, calculated to be broadly cost-neutral and permits partial drawing. Persons who continue working beyond the reference age, benefit from a contribution exemption threshold on their AHV contributions.

Pillar 2 Flexibility and Differences Between the Tiers

Institutions may permit early retirement from age 58 and deferral up to age 70, adjusting the conversion rate to reflect the payout period; early retirement reduces the pension both because less capital has accrued and because a lower conversion rate applies.

Conditions for Entitlement

The Pillar 1 old-age pension requires reaching the reference age of 65 with at least one year of contributions; a full record gives the full pension, while gaps reduce it pro rata. Any missing contribution payments can be made retroactively for up to five years.

The Pillar 2 pension requires reaching the plan’s retirement age as a member with accrued retirement assets; no minimum contribution period applies beyond having been enrolled.

Basis of Calculation

The Pillar 1 pension is calculated from the individual’s average relevant income and the completeness of the contribution record, ranging in 2026 from CHF1,260 to CHF2,520 per month for a single person, with a couples’ ceiling of CHF3,780 (150% of the maximum, rather than double that); from December 2026 old-age pensioners also receive a 13th monthly payment.

The Pillar 2 pension applies the plan’s conversion rate to the accrued retirement savings, so it reflects the capital saved rather than a fixed proportion of final salary. This reflects the dominant contribution-primacy approach, whereas benefit-primacy plans have become rare.

Forms of Benefit and Flexibility

The Pillar 1 pension is paid only as a lifelong annuity; neither lump sum nor draw-down is available.

The Pillar 2 pension offers materially more choice: a lifelong annuity, a lump-sum capital payment, or a solution combining both. There is a statutory right to draw at least a quarter of the mandatory retirement assets as capital, and many institutions permit full capital withdrawal.

Legal Framework and Conditions of Entitlement

Survivors’ and orphans’ pensions exist in both pillars.

  • In Pillar 1 they are AHV benefits under the AHVG; entitlement depends on the survivor’s legal status and family situation, with the widow’s or widower’s pension generally 80% of the old-age pension the deceased would have received and the orphan’s pension 40%.
  • In Pillar 2, the BVG provides mandatory minimum benefits for surviving spouses, registered partners and orphans, while fund rules may extend protection to further beneficiaries such as qualifying life partners. Orphans’ pensions generally run until age 18, or 25 if the child is still in education.

The two levels are co-ordinated through the BVG over-indemnification rules: the institution may reduce its benefits where, together with other eligible benefits, they exceed the statutory over-compensation threshold, generally linked to 90% of presumed lost earnings.

Risk-Based Versus Accrual-Based Pensions

Whether a survivor’s pension is risk-based or accrual-based affects entitlement and amount but is largely a matter of plan design within the BVG framework.

  • A risk-based pension protects survivors even if the insured dies early with little capital, since it is calculated from the insured salary.
  • An accrual-based pension derives from actual assets, so its amount depends on the capital accumulated, and it is typically used after retirement.

Relevant Changes Affecting Entitlement

Survivors’ pensions, particularly in Pillar 1, remain under reform pressure following the European Court of Human Rights’ finding that the more restrictive treatment of widowers compared with widows was discriminatory (Application No 78630/12). Switzerland has introduced transitional handling for affected widowers, and the Federal Council has proposed linking survivors’ support more closely to care and child-raising responsibilities than to marital status. The reform remains pending.

Legal Framework and Conditions for Entitlement

Disability provision is delivered through the IV (Pillar 1) and the BVG (Pillar 2), co-ordinated under the BVG over-indemnification rules. The IV prioritises integration into the labour market over pension awards. In Pillar 1, entitlement depends on a formal IV assessment and the applicable insurance and contribution conditions (degree of disability (IV degree), relevant average income, and fulfilment of the contribution obligation). In Pillar 2, the person must have been insured when the health impairment first arose. Under the current linear system, the pension scales proportionally with the degree of disability.

Amount of the Pension

The disability pension amount generally follows the degree of disability established by the IV authorities, subject to the limits of the binding effect of that IV decision on the pension institution. It is calculated under the institution’s own rules, typically as a percentage of the insured salary or by reference to the retirement assets the member would have accrued by the ordinary retirement age. Mandatory risk pensions are periodically adjusted for inflation for a defined initial period after they begin.

Provider’s Role in Administration

The pension institution administers the disability benefit, co-ordinating with the IV authorities and other insurers to avoid gaps and duplication in the insured person’s protection.

Measuring Solvency and Obligations in Underfunding

A pension provider’s financial health is measured by its funding ratio, comparing assets to liabilities on a going-concern basis; below 100% signals underfunding and triggers a statutory duty to act.

The governing board must then notify the supervisory authority, adopt remedial measures proportionate to the shortfall, and restore full funding within a reasonable period under ongoing oversight. Permissible measures include additional restructuring contributions from the employer and employees, a temporary reduction of interest on mandatory retirement assets below the statutory minimum (within the strict limits of Article 65d BVG) and, only exceptionally and within the statutory restructuring framework, reductions affecting certain entitlements.

Conditions for a Forced Reduction of Benefits

A forced reduction is a last resort, must be proportionate and non-discriminatory, and may not readily affect pensions already in payment.

Contribution Discounts and Redistribution of Surplus

Where an institution is well funded and holds adequate fluctuation reserves, any remaining surplus may strengthen reserves, improve benefits, or fund an employer contribution reserve; contribution discounts are permitted only within the limits of the rules and where the funding position supports them. The allocation of surplus funds must respect equal treatment among categories of beneficiaries.

Statutory Indexation

Pillar 1 pensions are adjusted periodically by the federal council, ordinarily every two years, in line with a mixed index combining consumer prices and wages, so their value is adjusted automatically at system level, although not through full annual CPI indexation.

In Pillar 2, only survivors’ and disability risk pensions are subject to statutory inflation adjustment, and only for a defined initial period; such an adjustment took effect in 2026 for pensions first paid from 2022. Old-age pensions in payment carry no statutory indexation guarantee.

Discretionary Increases

Because most occupational indexation is discretionary, the governing board decides each year, within the institution’s financial means and funding position, whether to grant an increase. There is no automatic entitlement to an increase merely because an institution is well funded, but the decision must respect the rules, the institution’s purpose, equal treatment and proper exercise of discretion.

Benefit Reductions and Other Adjustment Mechanisms

Benefits in payment cannot ordinarily be reduced; reductions are permitted only as a last resort in situations of underfunding (under the conditions described in 4.6 Funding: Surplus and Deficit). Parameters affecting future accrual can be adjusted more readily on a prospective basis.

Vesting and Consequences of Termination

Portability is a cornerstone of the Pillar 2 system, governed by the Vesting Act. Termination of employment or scheme membership does not extinguish or reduce any accrued entitlement; it triggers the vesting event, on which the full vested benefit (ie, the accrued retirement assets, or at least the statutory minimum) becomes due for transfer.

Obligation to Transfer and Restrictions on Withdrawal

The pension provider must transfer the vested benefit to the new Swiss employer’s pension provider, or to a vested-benefits vehicle the member designates; in the absence of instructions, the capital goes to the substitute institution.

Cash withdrawal is permitted only in defined statutory cases, where the beneficiary is:

  • taking up permanent self-employment,
  • definitively departing from Switzerland (subject to limits on the mandatory portion for persons moving to an EU/EFTA state who remain insured there);
  • purchasing an owner-occupied property; or
  • only entitled to a de minimis benefit.

Otherwise, the capital remains in the supervised system.

Continued Voluntary Accrual

A vested-benefits vehicle does not accept new contributions. On joining a new pension provider, members may make voluntary buy-ins subject to applicable restrictions.

Separation of Assets and Priority Claims

Occupational pension assets are held in a legally separate foundation, ring-fenced from the sponsoring employer’s accounts, so employer insolvency does not expose members’ accrued assets to the employer’s creditors.

Where the pension provider itself is underfunded, the Guarantee Fund provides additional protection.

Where an insolvent employer has failed to remit contributions, the institution’s claims enjoy a privileged rank in the bankruptcy, and contributions withheld from salary but not paid over are specifically protected.

Guarantee Fund

The Guarantee Fund BVG is the ultimate safety net, stepping in where a pension institution itself becomes insolvent and cannot meet the statutory benefits from its own assets. It is funded by levies on all registered institutions and covers certain employer contribution shortfalls.

Pensions in Share Deals and Asset Deals

For Pillar 1, in M&A transactions and corporate reorganisations the focus is mainly on the employer’s compliance with contribution and payment obligations and on potential liability exposure.

For Pillar 2, the treatment depends on the transaction structure.

  • In a share deal, pension arrangements for targets affiliated to multi-employer pension providers generally remain unchanged, with no action required. For targets affiliated with pension providers limited in scope to the company or a corporate group, a change of ownership may trigger the necessity to transfer to a new pension provider, in many instances, also triggering a partial liquidation of the pre-existing pension scheme.
  • In an asset deal, the buyer must ensure BVG-compliant coverage from the transfer date; depending on the number of employees transferred, a partial liquidation of the previous pension scheme may be triggered.

Partial Liquidation

A partial liquidation requires a fair, supervisor-approved allocation of free funds (and any underfunding) to the departing group in proportion to their share of liabilities.

Typical Due Diligence Issues and Contractual Responses

Pension due diligence typically focuses on:

  • the funding ratio (as defined for Swiss law purposes and, on a broader scale, also for international accounting standards) and any existing underfunding or restructuring measures;
  • unpaid or under-reported contributions and correct historical enrolment of the workforce;
  • the affiliation agreement terms, contribution reserves, notice periods and exit conditions; and
  • the partial-liquidation consequences of the transaction and the treatment of free funds.

Buyers typically seek warranties, indemnities or price adjustments for identified pension exposures.

Co-Ordination, Expatriates and Seconded Employees

Cross-border social security is co-ordinated through the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons, the EFTA Convention and bilateral treaties with non-EU/EFTA states, which address applicable legislation, aggregation of insurance periods and export of benefits. Seconded employees may generally remain subject to their home system for a limited period where a certificate of coverage is obtained, whereas expatriates taking up Swiss employment without one are generally subject to the Swiss system and, if the BVG conditions are met, to Swiss occupational coverage.

Mobility of Accrued Benefits and Cross-Border Institutions

Vested Pillar 2 benefits do not automatically transfer to a foreign arrangement on departure; they remain within the Swiss system (usually in a vested benefits account) until a recognised payment event. Switzerland has no domestic equivalent of the EU cross-border IORP regime, so a multinational employer with employees subject to Swiss mandatory law must maintain or join a Swiss-compliant arrangement for its Swiss workforce, separately from any EU-based vehicle. Specific arrangements exist for certain cross-border transfers: inbound transfers from UK pension schemes may in some cases be structured under the UK’s Qualifying Recognised Overseas Pension Schemes (QROPS) framework, and outbound transfers of Swiss vested benefits to Liechtenstein are possible under a bilateral agreement between the two countries.

Restrictions on Transfers and Payments Abroad

Cash payment is restricted on definitive departure: the mandatory portion generally cannot be paid out if the person moves to an EU/EFTA state and remains compulsorily insured there for old age, death or disability, while the supplementary portion may generally still be withdrawn. Payments to beneficiaries resident abroad may also be subject to Swiss withholding tax, with reduction or refund depending on the applicable double-tax treaty and the type of benefit. Cash withdrawal to finance the purchase of owner-occupied residential property located abroad remains available under the same conditions as for Swiss property (see 4.8 Transfer and Portability of Pension Rights).

Statutory Framework and Actors’ Obligations

Equal treatment rests on the constitutional equality guarantee, the Gender Equality Act and the equal-treatment principles within the BVG. Institutions must treat members in comparable situations equally, in both the design and application of their rules, and may differentiate only on objective, permissible grounds. The obligation binds each actor differently: employers must not discriminate in enrolment or in the plan they offer, providers bear primary responsibility for the rules themselves, and supervisors review compliance as part of their oversight functions.

Gender, Age and Working Patterns

Direct sex discrimination is prohibited, and the harmonisation of the reference age under AHV 21 has removed a long-standing gender difference. The unresolved widower/widow inequality remains under reform (see 4.4 Survivors’ and Orphans’ Pensions). Age-based differentiation is inherent in the savings-credit structure and is permitted where it follows the statutory logic. Part-time and fixed-term workers are protected against unjustified disadvantage, although the fixed co-ordination deduction still reduces the insured salary of low-earning part-timers – an effect the rejected 2024 reform sought to mitigate.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Where a rule or practice discriminates unlawfully, affected members may challenge it before the competent court and obtain the benefit wrongly denied. Institutions may additionally face supervisory intervention.

Closure to New Entrants and Cessation of Accrual

An institution may be closed to new entrants or cease future accrual. Both engage the amendment and partial-liquidation rules; accrued entitlements remain protected, subject to the statutory rules on allocating any underfunding in a partial liquidation.

Wind-Up and Total Liquidation

Where an institution is wound up entirely, a total liquidation is carried out under supervisory oversight, with assets distributed to members and beneficiaries and any residual transferred as the law requires. The liquidation plan must protect accrued benefits in accordance with the statutory framework and allocate free funds fairly among categories of beneficiaries, and must be verified by the auditor and the pension expert and approved by the supervisory authority.

De-Risking and Restrictions on Discharge of Liabilities

De-risking is most commonly achieved through full-insurance solutions, reinsurance or portfolio transfers to a regulated life insurer; buy-in or buy-out structures are less common. More recently, 1e plan transfers have been used to shift investment risk on the supra-mandatory band to the individual member.

Mandatory Occupational Pillar

Pillars 1 and 2 are mandatory (see 1.3 Voluntary or Compulsory Pension for Pillar 1). The mandatory Pillar 2 imposes enrolment on employees who meet the BVG conditions, including the 2026 entry threshold of CHF22,680 per annum. Beyond this general mandate, some sectors operate quasi-mandatory arrangements in which a collective labour agreement establishes an industry-wide institution and participation is made generally binding, so all covered employers must affiliate regardless of their own preference.

Legislative Basis

The general mandate flows directly from the BVG, which obliges the employer to affiliate and enrol qualifying employees.

Sector-wide obligations derive from collective labour agreements declared generally binding, extending coverage to all employers in the industry.

Criteria for Determining Scope

Under the BVG, scope turns on objective criteria applied to the individual: annual salary above the entry threshold, age (risk cover from 18, retirement saving from 25) and an employment relationship not limited to three months or less. Under a generally binding agreement, scope turns on the industry, territorial and personal scope defined in the agreement, applied to the employer’s actual activity and the relevant employees. A worker may fall within both the BVG mandate and a sectoral scheme; such schemes are most prominent in the construction sector and related trades.

Effects and Enforceability

Mandatory participation obliges the employer to affiliate with the prescribed institution, enrol the covered workforce and pay contributions in full, deducting the employees’ share from salary (see also 1.3 Voluntary or Compulsory Pension and 1.5 Parties Involved in Pension Schemes), and the obligation is enforceable directly against the employer.

Where an employer does not comply, the institution or the substitute institution enrols the workforce retroactively and claims the outstanding contributions; withheld but unpaid employee contributions attract heightened protection and can give rise to personal and even criminal liability.

Limitation of Claims

Claims for outstanding contributions are subject to limitation periods. Periodic contribution claims are generally subject to a five-year limitation period, while other claims are generally subject to a ten-year period. Members’ entitlements are protected through retroactive enrolment and, within the statutory limits, by the Guarantee Fund.

“Prudent-Person Principle”

Investment is governed by the “prudent-person principle”: the governing board must invest so as to ensure security, an adequate return, appropriate diversification and sufficient liquidity, with security and the ability to pay benefits taking precedence over maximum return.

Quantitative Limits and Governance

The BVV 2 supplements the principle with categorical limits on asset classes and single-counterparty exposures, alongside qualitative requirements on organisation and risk management; an institution may exceed the categorical limits only if it demonstrates, in a documented extension, that security and diversification remain assured.

The governing board sets the investment strategy, defines risk tolerance and monitors implementation, ensuring that those managing assets are qualified and act in the beneficiaries’ interest, and rules on related-party transactions and retrocessions reinforce the integrity of the process. While many pension providers engage investment professionals on a mandate basis, overall investment responsibility remains with the governing board and cannot be delegated.

Permissibility and Retained Responsibility

Institutions may outsource both asset management and administrative functions (eg, record-keeping, member communication, benefit calculation and payment). Outsourcing does not transfer legal responsibility: the governing board remains responsible for proper selection, instruction, monitoring and control of outsourced functions.

Asset Management and Administration

Asset managers of Swiss occupational assets must meet the statutory eligibility requirements, being prudentially supervised or specifically authorised; the institution must define the mandate and risk parameters in writing and cannot delegate the setting of the investment strategy. Rules on retrocessions and related-party transactions apply.

Pension administrators are not subject to an equivalent pension-specific authorisation regime, so the burden falls on the institution’s diligence: it must verify the provider’s qualification, define duties, reporting and control rights in a written mandate, and retain access to member data at all times.

Monitoring, Exit and Supervisory Requirements

The institution must monitor performance and compliance on an ongoing basis, and arrangements must provide for continuity and an orderly exit.

The auditor reviews controls over outsourced functions as part of the annual audit, and the supervisory authority may intervene where outsourcing weakens governance.

Although Switzerland is not bound by the IORP II Directive, its domestic governance duties address similar concerns of retained responsibility, provider oversight and continuity, without creating a formal equivalent to Article 31 of the IORP II.

ESG Within the Fiduciary Framework

Swiss law does not mandate a specific ESG policy but permits institutions to take sustainability and climate-related financial risks into account as part of prudent risk management. Financially material ESG factors may need to be considered within ordinary risk management, without displacing members’ financial interests.

There is no ESG reporting duty comparable to the climate-disclosure ordinance, but many institutions voluntarily publish their approach. Financially material ESG factors should be reflected in the documented investment strategy.

Stewardship

Institutions directly holding shares in Swiss companies listed in Switzerland or abroad must exercise voting rights in the members’ interest on specified corporate matters and disclose how they voted (Articles 71a and 71b BVG). Broader engagement with investee companies is encouraged rather than required.

No Direct Application of IORP II

As a non-EU member, Switzerland is not subject to the IORP II Directive, so its governance, risk-management and disclosure requirements do not bind Swiss institutions, which are instead governed by the autonomous BVG framework. Swiss institutions cannot operate as cross-border IORPs under the IORP II regime. Mandatory Swiss occupational coverage must be provided through a Swiss BVG-compliant arrangement; an EU-based IORP does not replace the employer’s Swiss BVG affiliation obligation.

Functional Equivalence and Co-Ordination

The domestic regime achieves functional equivalence (see 1.2 Legislation and 4.11 Cross-Border Arrangements for cross-border co-ordination).

Information on Joining

On joining, the member must receive clear information about the benefits, financing and key features of the plan, typically through a pension certificate, with the pension regulations available to the member. The certificate should set out the insured salary, the accrued and projected retirement assets, the death and disability benefits, and the contributions payable.

Vesting Rules and Consequences of Termination

Vesting is full and immediate from the first day of membership, so termination of employment does not reduce or extinguish any accrued entitlement; it triggers the vested benefit, which comprises the accrued retirement assets and becomes due for transfer. The vested benefit is at least the statutory minimum, irrespective of length of service or the reason for leaving.

Information on Leaving and Value Transfer

The institution must inform the departing member of the amount of the vested benefit and the available transfer options, and must transfer the capital as instructed. Where the member designates no destination, the capital goes to the substitute institution after a defined period.

Annual Reporting to Active Members

Institutions must provide active members with an annual pension certificate summarising the insured salary, accrued retirement assets, projected retirement benefits, the death and disability cover in force, and the contributions payable.

Deferred Members and Pensioners

Deferred members receive a statement of capital and interest; pensioners are informed of the pension in payment and any adjustment.

Scenarios, Quality and Presentation

The BVG and its ordinances require the key figures to be presented and where projections are given, the underlying assumptions – notably the interest and conversion parameters – must be explained. Institutions increasingly show outcomes under different scenarios, such as annuity versus capital, or early versus deferred retirement. Beyond the certificate, institutions must make available, on request, information about their financial situation, organisation and investment policy.

No Consolidated Dashboard

Switzerland does not operate a single consolidated pensions dashboard covering all three pillars, so individuals assemble their overview from separate sources: an official Pillar 1 forecast from the compensation office, based on the individual account statement recording every year of contributions, and the annual pension certificate from each Pillar 2 institution to which they belong.

Pillar 2 Central Office

The one centralised mechanism is the Pillar 2 Central Office, established under the Vesting Act and attached to the Guarantee Fund. Institutions must report vested benefits for which no transfer instructions have been received or where the member cannot be contacted, and the Central Office matches these against enquiries. It holds only the identity of the institution in possession of the assets, not their amount, so it points the enquirer to the right place rather than providing an overview itself.

Participants’ Rights

Participants may request an official Pillar 1 forecast, obtain information on their entitlement from each institution they have belonged to, and enquire of the Central Office whether any dormant vested benefit is registered in their name. A diligent individual can build a reasonably complete picture, although no integrated national platform yet exists.

Deductibility of Contributions and Applicable Limits

Swiss pensions broadly follow an exempt-exempt-taxed (EET) logic: contributions are deductible, returns accrue untaxed, and benefits are taxed on payment. Pillar 1, 2 and 3a contributions are deductible within the limits of the applicable plan rules and the statutory framework; the practical ceiling is defined by the maximum insurable salary and the plan’s contribution structure rather than by a fixed statutory cap on deductions. Voluntary buy-ins are deductible up to the shortfall against the maximum benefits under the rules, subject to a three-year blocking period before a capital withdrawal, failing which the deduction is retrospectively denied. Pillar 3a contributions’ deductibility is capped at CHF7,258 in 2026 for those affiliated to a Pillar 2 institution, and at 20% of net earned income, up to CHF36,288, for the self-employed who are not affiliated.

Taxation of Investment Returns and Benefits

Returns on assets held within a pension institution or a Pillar 3a foundation accrue free of income tax; the institutions are exempt from profit and capital tax on assets; and the capital is outside the individual’s wealth tax base until paid out.

Annuity pensions are then taxed as ordinary income in the year of receipt, while lump-sum capital payments from Pillars 2 and 3a are taxed separately at a reduced rate, typically on a progressive basis and with payments received in the same year aggregated.

Cross-Border Payments

Payments to beneficiaries resident abroad are subject to Swiss withholding tax levied at source, which may be reduced or refunded under an applicable double-tax treaty; many treaties allocate primary taxing rights over pension payments to the recipient’s state of residence, although the allocation depends on the treaty and the type of benefit.

Applicable Tax Regime

Pension contributions and benefits are assessed under the ordinary income tax regime (federal direct tax alongside cantonal and communal tax) rather than under any pension-specific fiscal procedure, so the general assessment rules of the Federal Direct Tax Act and the harmonised cantonal tax laws apply. Within this framework, lump-sum payments are subjected to an isolated income taxation procedure.

Cross-border payments are instead governed by the separate withholding tax levied on benefits paid abroad.

Administrative Proceedings, Courts and Tribunals

A taxpayer who disagrees with an assessment (typically a refused buy-in deduction or the rate applied to a lump-sum withdrawal) must first lodge an objection with the assessing tax authority within 30 days of notification, which reconsiders its own decision.

Against the objection decision, the taxpayer may appeal to the competent cantonal tax appeal commission or administrative court, and thereafter to the Federal Supreme Court on questions of federal law. Disputes over withholding tax on pension payments to persons abroad follow a separate path, with the Federal Tax Administration deciding at first instance, and appeal lying to the Federal Administrative Court and ultimately the Federal Supreme Court.

Competent Courts

Pillar 1 (AHV/IV) disputes follow a separate path, beginning with an objection to the compensation office (with the exception of disputes under the IVG, where a preliminary decision procedure replaces the objection procedure) and proceeding to the cantonal social insurance court and then the Federal Supreme Court.

Pillar 2 disputes between insured persons, employers and institutions concerning benefits and the pension relationship are heard at first instance by the cantonal court designated under Article 73 BVG (often in the form of a complaint), with appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Procedural Rules

Proceedings are governed by cantonal procedural law within federal minimum standards. The court establishes the facts of its own motion, the procedure is generally free of charge for the parties in benefit disputes (with the exception of disputes concerning IV benefits), and legal representation is not mandatory. A successful party is generally entitled to a contribution to its legal costs.

Available Remedies

The court may grant declaratory relief establishing the existence or extent of an entitlement, or a performance judgment ordering the institution to pay or correct a benefit, with default interest where payment was overdue.

Procedure for Seeking Redress

Where a supervisory authority takes a decision affecting an institution, employer or member (eg, an order in a restructuring or a ruling approving a partial liquidation), the affected party may challenge it by administrative appeal. These matters follow the administrative-law route rather than the pension court. Standing requires the party to be particularly affected and to have an interest worthy of protection, extending to employers and, in partial-liquidation cases, to affected members.

Competent Court

Decisions of the regional and cantonal supervisory authorities are appealed to the Federal Administrative Court, as are decisions of the OAK BV in its areas of direct competence. The appeal must be filed within 30 days of notification, and the court reviews whether the authority correctly applied the law, established the facts accurately and properly exercised its discretion.

Further Appeal and Review

A further appeal lies to the Federal Supreme Court on points of federal law. Either court may confirm, annul or vary the contested decision, or remit the matter to the authority for a fresh decision. An appeal generally has suspensive effect unless the supervisory authority has ordered otherwise; in that case the party must request the appellate court to restore it.

Bär & Karrer Ltd

Brandschenkestrasse 90
8002 Zurich
Switzerland

+41 58 261 56 51

Ruth.BlochRiemer@BaerKarrer.ch www.baerkarrer.ch
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Bär & Karrer Ltd is a leading Swiss law firm with more than 200 lawyers in Zurich, Geneva, Lugano, Zug, Basel and St Moritz. The firm’s core business is advising clients on innovative and complex transactions and representing them in litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. Clients range from multinational corporations to private individuals in Switzerland and around the world.

Introduction

Switzerland’s pension system is a three-pillar model enshrined in the Swiss Federal Constitution: Pillar 1 is the state or public tier, securing a basic subsistence income; Pillar 2 is the workplace or occupational tier, maintaining the accustomed standard of living; and Pillar 3 is the individual or private savings tier, closing remaining gaps. The system continues to function well overall and there are currently no ground-breaking reforms in force or under serious discussion. Nevertheless, several areas remain the subject of active debate, driven by demographic change, labour market trends, financial market conditions and increasing governance expectations for pension fund management.

The following sections highlight the key trends and developments shaping the Swiss pension landscape in 2026.

Partial Liquidation of Pension Institutions in M&A Transactions

Mergers, acquisitions and corporate reorganisations continue to raise complex pension issues in Switzerland. A partial liquidation may be triggered if a transaction results in a significant reduction in the membership of a pension institution. This can occur, for example, in an asset deal where the buyer must establish new pension coverage that is compliant with the Federal Act on Occupational Old Age, Survivors’ and Disability Pension Provision (the “BVG”). The same applies to a share deal involving a company-specific or group-specific pension foundation.

The rules on partial liquidation require free funds – and, where applicable, any underfunding – to be allocated fairly to the departing group. The allocation must be approved by the supervisory authority and will generally reflect the group’s share of the pension institution’s liabilities. Collectively funded reserves and provisions must also be transferred on a proportionate basis.

In practice, partial liquidations are among the most litigated areas of Swiss pension law. Key issues include how free funds are calculated and allocated; when the partial-liquidation event is deemed to have occurred; how employer contribution reserves are treated; and whether individual members can challenge the supervisory authority’s approval of the distribution plan. The Federal Supreme Court has held that partial-liquidation regulations must apply consistent criteria to successive events. Voluntary departures, including ordinary retirements, do not in themselves give rise to a share of free funds.

From a transactional perspective, pension due diligence typically focuses on the Swiss-law funding ratio; existing underfunding or restructuring measures; unpaid or under-reported contributions; affiliation agreements; and exit conditions. The treatment of pensioners and the potential consequences of a partial liquidation are also key considerations.

Buyers are increasingly seeking contractual protection against these risks. This may take the form of warranties, indemnities or purchase-price adjustments. Particular attention is paid to the risk that a partial liquidation may not result in a proportionate transfer of free funds.

De-Risking of Occupational Pension Solutions from the Employer’s Perspective

Swiss employers are increasingly looking for ways to reduce their pension-related risks. Two trends stand out: the growing use of 1e pension plans and the shift from fully insured to semi-autonomous pension solutions.

1e plans

A 1e pension plan operates in the supra-mandatory portion of Pillar 2. In 2026, this covers salary components above CHF136,080 per annum. Under a 1e arrangement, each insured member selects an individual investment strategy from a range of options offered by the pension institution. The member bears the investment risk and receives the corresponding investment returns directly in their account.

There is no cross-subsidisation between active members and pensioners. From the employer’s perspective, 1e plans therefore transfer the investment risk on the supra-mandatory portion to the individual employee. This reduces the employer’s balance-sheet exposure and eliminates the risk of restructuring contributions for that portion.

The Occupational Pensions Supervisory Commission (the “OAK BV”) has introduced specific regulatory measures to accompany this trend, with new directives on the transfer of pension assets from non-1e institutions to 1e institutions (Weisungen W – 02/2025) coming into force in January 2026. These address, among other things, the allocation of collective reserves and provisions when assets are transferred from a traditional pension scheme to a 1e vehicle.

Pension institutions must now consider whether to waive a transfer reserve before the first such case arises. They must also document their decision so that it can be consistently applied in future cases.

Shift from full insurance to semi-autonomous solutions

Under a full-insurance model (Vollversicherung), a life insurer assumes all investment, biometric and longevity risks of the pension fund. This provides a high level of security, but generally comes at the cost of lower returns and less flexibility.

In a semi-autonomous arrangement, the collective foundation reinsures only the death and disability risks with a life insurer. The pension institution itself bears the investment risk.

The higher return potential of semi-autonomous solutions has encouraged many employers to move away from full insurance. This is particularly the case after several years of strong equity markets. The high funding ratios reported in 2025 – approximately 119.6% for private-sector institutions – have further increased the attractiveness of solutions that allow pension institutions and their members to participate more directly in investment performance.

Securing the long-term financing of the Swiss pension system

Pillar 1’s old-age and survivors’ insurance (“AHV”) is a pay-as-you-go system that is expected to return to a deficit as early as 2026. This is despite the additional revenue generated by the “AHV 21” reform, which took effect in 2024.

The introduction of a 13th monthly AHV pension adds further pressure. This was approved by popular vote in March 2024 and will be paid for the first time in December 2026. The initial annual cost is estimated at approximately CHF4.1 billion and is expected to rise to approximately CHF5 billion within five years.

How this additional benefit should be financed remains politically controversial. Parliament has adopted a partial financing package, but a popular vote on the proposal is only expected in November 2026.

Capital-funded Pillar 2 also faces structural challenges. At year-end 2025, pension institutions reported strong local-law funding ratios of close to 120%. This was supported by three consecutive years of favourable investment returns. The underlying demographic and financial pressures, however, remain.

The BVG reform package was intended to improve the financial stability of the mandatory part of Pillar 2. It proposed, among other things, reducing the minimum conversion rate from 6.8% to 6%, replacing the fixed co-ordination deduction with a salary-proportional deduction, and adjusting the age-based savings credits. Voters rejected the package by 67.1% in September 2024.

As a result, the fixed co-ordination deduction of CHF26,460 and the statutory minimum conversion rate of 6.8% remain in force in 2026. Parliament has since indicated that it currently favours incremental reforms. A renewed attempt to reduce the minimum conversion rate therefore appears politically out of reach for the time being.

The underlying demographic and financing pressures nevertheless remain. Finding a sustainable solution will therefore continue to shape the policy debate.

Financing and Treatment of Pensioner Populations

One of the most pressing structural issues in Pillar 2 is the redistribution from active insured members to pensioners.

The statutory minimum conversion rate of 6.8% for mandatory retirement assets was set in 2003 as part of the first BVG revision and took full effect in 2014. At that time, life expectancy was lower and interest rates were higher. Based on today’s demographic and financial parameters, a mathematically adequate conversion rate would be closer to 5%.

This gap creates so-called annuitisation losses (Verrentungsverluste). Where a pension institution grants a higher pension than its assets can sustainably support, the resulting shortfall must be financed from its reserves. This leaves less room for interest credited to the retirement accounts of active members.

Studies estimate that Swiss pension institutions collectively redistributed more than CHF65 billion from active members to pensioners between 2009 and 2019.

Many pension institutions have responded by reducing their envelope conversion rates. These rates apply to both mandatory and supplementary retirement assets and are generally well below the statutory minimum rate for the mandatory portion alone.

The mandatory BVG covers annual salaries between CHF22,680 and CHF90,720 in 2026. The co-ordination deduction of CHF26,460 determines the insured salary portion. The average envelope conversion rate for men aged 65 fell from 6.74% in 2010 to approximately 5.3% in 2025. Very few institutions increased their conversion rates between 2025 and 2026.

Since the statutory minimum acts as a floor, institutions achieve this reduction by absorbing the mandatory portion’s above-market conversion rate into the supplementary portion. In effect, supra-mandatory assets subsidise the mandatory guarantee.

At the same time, more people are choosing to withdraw their retirement assets as a lump sum rather than receiving a pension. Some commentators see this as a rational response to declining conversion rates. Over time, it may also reduce the volume of pensioner liabilities within the system.

Lump-sum withdrawals currently benefit from preferential tax treatment. They are taxed separately from ordinary income at a reduced rate. A federal council proposal to increase federal taxation of such withdrawals was rejected by both chambers of parliament in spring 2026.

For governing boards, the treatment of pensioners remains a governance-intensive issue. The indexation of pensions in payment is largely discretionary. Decisions on cost-of-living increases must therefore be balanced against the pension institution’s financial capacity and the principle of equal treatment.

A parliamentary motion by Councillor of States Pierre-Yves Maillard seeks to introduce a duty to periodically adjust Pillar 2 pensions for inflation. The motion notes that pensions paid in 2026 have lost approximately 9% of their purchasing power compared with those paid in 2015. Governing boards and employer associations have expressed concerns about the resulting costs.

Tightened Rules on Related-Party Transactions

In April 2026, the OAK BV issued binding directives (Weisungen W – 01/2026) setting out minimum requirements for transactions between pension institutions and “related parties” (Nahestehende).

The new directives apply to all supervised pension institutions. They respond to the risk that related parties may obtain advantages on non-market terms at the expense of the pension institution and its beneficiaries.

The definition of “related parties” is broad. It includes members of the governing body, affiliated employers, persons responsible for management or asset management, their close family members and legal entities controlled by these persons. The definition also covers indirect economic interests through a common controlling entity.

All contracts between a pension institution and a related party must be concluded on arm’s length terms. Before entering into a significant transaction, the pension institution must obtain competitive bids. For particularly significant transactions, the governing board must also obtain an independent expert opinion confirming that the terms are in line with market standards.

The directives form part of a broader governance and loyalty agenda pursued by the OAK BV. They are particularly relevant for pension institutions with complex multi-stakeholder structures, such as collective foundations affiliated with insurance groups, banks or asset managers. In these structures, conflicts of interest may be more difficult to identify and manage.

For practitioners advising pension institutions or their counterparties, the new directives call for a careful review of existing contractual arrangements. Where necessary, related-party mandates may need to be re-tendered or independently valued.

Data Protection and Cybersecurity in Occupational Pensions

The revised Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection (“nDSG”), which has been in force since 1 September 2023, has materially changed the regulatory landscape for pension institutions.

The nDSG brings Swiss data-protection law closer to the EU’s GDPR. It applies to the processing of personal data of natural persons. Pension institutions routinely process sensitive information, including health, salary and family-status data. This information is used, among other things, for benefit administration, disability cases and survivors’ pensions.

Many pension institutions have already implemented initial compliance measures. Important obligations nevertheless remain incomplete in practice. These include comprehensive records of processing activities, data protection impact assessments for high-risk processing and a clear allocation of data-protection responsibilities within the institution’s governance structure.

The Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (“EDÖB”) has signalled increasing vigilance in this area. Pension institutions should therefore treat nDSG compliance as an ongoing governance responsibility rather than a one-off implementation exercise.

Cybersecurity has also become a more pressing issue in Switzerland. The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC, now “BACS”) recorded approximately 65,000 cyber-incidents in 2025.

Since 1 October 2025, critical infrastructure operators – which may include certain pension service providers – have been subject to mandatory reporting of cyber-incidents under the Information Security Act. Non-compliance can result in fines of up to CHF100,000.

Pension institutions that outsource administration or asset management must therefore ensure that their service providers maintain appropriate cybersecurity standards. The governing board remains responsible for data protection and IT security, even when these functions are outsourced.

Social Security Coverage of a Globally Mobile Workforce

The correct social-security affiliation of internationally mobile employees remains a significant compliance challenge for Swiss employers with global operations.

Affiliation with Pillar 1 (AHV) is also relevant for mandatory Pillar 2 coverage. Determining which country’s social-security system applies to an employee is therefore a key starting point. It can affect pension coverage, contribution obligations and benefit entitlements across all pillars.

For employees moving within the EU/EFTA area, social-security co-ordination is governed by the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons. This includes the use of A1 certificates of coverage.

Recent European case law has added further complexity to multi-state employment arrangements. In December 2025, the European Court of Justice ruled in Case C-743/23 (GKV-Spitzenverband) that all professional activity must be taken into account when assessing whether an employee performs a “substantial part” of their activities in a particular country. This includes work carried out in third countries outside the EU/EEA and Switzerland.

For employees with links to non-EU/EFTA states, Switzerland’s network of more than 20 bilateral social-security agreements governs matters such as applicable legislation, insurance periods, the export of benefits and the avoidance of double contributions. The scope of these agreements varies considerably.

Employers therefore need to address social-security affiliation proactively. Incorrect affiliation can result in contribution gaps, double contributions, loss of benefit entitlements or retroactive adjustments.

The increasing use of remote and hybrid work across borders has made this issue even more relevant. This includes so-called “workation” arrangements. Regular review of the social-security status of internationally active employees is therefore becoming increasingly important.

Outlook

Switzerland’s pension system is currently characterised by a tension between strong short-term financial performance and unresolved long-term structural challenges.

The political impasse over Pillar 2 reform, the contested financing of the 13th AHV pension, and increasing governance expectations from the OAK BV all suggest that the regulatory environment will continue to evolve.

For employers, pension institutions and their advisers, this makes it increasingly important to monitor developments closely and take informed, proactive decisions within the existing legal framework.

Bär & Karrer Ltd

Brandschenkestrasse 90
8002 Zurich
Switzerland

+41 58 261 56 51

Ruth.BlochRiemer@BaerKarrer.ch www.baerkarrer.ch
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Bär & Karrer Ltd is a leading Swiss law firm with more than 200 lawyers in Zurich, Geneva, Lugano, Zug, Basel and St Moritz. The firm’s core business is advising clients on innovative and complex transactions and representing them in litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. Clients range from multinational corporations to private individuals in Switzerland and around the world.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Bär & Karrer Ltd is a leading Swiss law firm with more than 200 lawyers in Zurich, Geneva, Lugano, Zug, Basel and St Moritz. The firm’s core business is advising clients on innovative and complex transactions and representing them in litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. Clients range from multinational corporations to private individuals in Switzerland and around the world.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.