In Colombia, tax-resident individuals and local entities are subject to income tax on their worldwide income and capital gains. They are also required to report their worldwide net assets.
Meanwhile, non-resident individuals and entities domiciled abroad are subject to income tax only on their Colombian-sourced income and capital gains and should report their net assets located in Colombia. For details on the tax residency rules applicable in Colombia, see 7.1 Requirements for Domicile, Residency and Citizenship.
Colombian-sourced income includes income arising from the rendering of services inside Colombian territory, the transfer of assets located in Colombian territory at the time the title transfer takes place, and the exploitation of tangible or intangible assets located inside the country.
Concerning the indirect transfer of assets, income obtained by the transfer of entities or assets in Colombia through the transfer of shares, participations or rights in foreign entities or structures may also trigger income tax in Colombia.
Income Tax
Ordinary income v presumptive income
Income tax in Colombia is determined based on the taxpayer’s taxable income (ie, using the ordinary system calculation: revenues minus costs and deductions) or presumptive income.
Presumptive income is equivalent to a percentage of the taxpayer’s net equity in the prior taxable year. Taxpayers are only required to pay income tax under this system when the presumptive income basis is higher than the taxable income under the ordinary system. In the case of resident individuals, presumptive income should be compared to the “general basket income” only (as explained below).
Presumptive income as from FY 2026 is equivalent to 0% of the taxpayer’s net equity of the prior taxable period.
Income tax rate
Resident individuals
Tax-resident individuals are subject to progressive income tax rates ranging from 0% to 39%.
Non-resident individuals
Income tax derived from non-residents is generally collected through a tax withholding mechanism (at a 20% general rate, with some specific exceptions described in the “Tax withholding mechanism applicable to non-resident individuals and foreign entities” subsection, below), the filing of an income tax return or by a combination of both.
The applicable collection mechanism depends on the income tax characterisation and whether the appropriate tax withholding was applied.
The income tax rate applicable to non-resident individuals liable to file an income tax return in Colombia is 35%.
Dividends paid out of profits taxed at the corporate level are subject to a 20% tax rate. In the event dividends are paid out of profits that were not taxed at the corporate level, these will be subject first to the general tax rate applicable to local entities and then to the 20% dividends tax indicated above. The latter is applied once the general income tax has been reduced.
Colombian entities
The general income tax rate applicable to Colombian entities is 35%.
Dividends paid to Colombian entities out of profits already taxed are subject to a 10% income tax rate. In the event dividends are paid out of untaxed profits, these will be subject first to the general tax rate applicable to local entities and then to the dividend tax of 10% indicated above, which applies to the net dividend amount once the general income tax rate has been applied.
The estimated effective tax rate for dividends derived from untaxed profits is 41.5%.
Foreign entities
As in the case of non-resident individuals, income tax derived from foreign entities is generally collected through a tax withholding mechanism, the filing of an income tax return or by a combination of both.
The general income tax rate applicable to foreign entities liable to file an income tax return in Colombia is the same as that applicable to Colombian entities (35%).
In the case of dividends, the rules described for non-resident individuals are also applicable to foreign entities.
Determination of taxable income (special rules)
Basket system applicable to resident individuals
Resident individuals are subject to a basket system, where income is characterised in different baskets with the following determination rules.
General basket – this includes labour income, capital income and non-labour income. The following exemptions, reliefs or deductions are available for determining taxable income in this basket:
The above-mentioned tax benefits are applicable if they do not exceed 40% of the individual’s annual income limited to 1,340 Tax Units (approximately USD20,397).
Pensions basket – pensions not exceeding 1,000 Tax Units (approximately USD15,221) are exempted. Any amount exceeding this amount will be subject to income tax at the general progressive tax rates.
Dividends basket – dividends are taxed at the general progressive income tax rates. For dividends paid out of untaxed profits at the corporate level, these will be subject to the general tax rate applicable to local entities, depending on the period in which they are paid or accrued. The progressive income tax rates will apply once the entity’s income tax rate is reduced.
In addition, the following special tax withholding rules must be observed:
Individuals are also able to apply a 19% marginal tax credit upon their dividends’ taxable income exceeding 1,090 Tax Units (approximately USD16,591) within their annual income tax return.
Tax withholding mechanism applicable to non-resident individuals and foreign entities
Payments to foreign entities and/or non-resident individuals are generally subject to tax withholdings according to their nature, as follows.
If Colombian-sourced payments are not subject to income tax withholdings, the foreign entity or individual will be required to file an income tax return in Colombia. However, if income tax withholdings are applied in their entirety, this will be the final tax liability.
Tax treatment of payments made abroad may change if a double taxation treaty applies. Therefore, analysis should be carried out on a case-by-case basis.
Currently, Colombia has 14 enforceable double taxation treaties: with the Andean Community of Nations (Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru), Canada, Czech Republic, Chile, Spain, South Korea, Switzerland, India, Portugal, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Italy, Japan and France.
Controlled foreign corporations – CFC Regime
Colombian income taxpayers are required to report, within their income tax returns, passive income earned through controlled foreign corporations (CFCs).
Any entity being controlled by one or more tax residents in Colombia (subordinated or related parties) and not being deemed as domiciled or resident in Colombia, may be deemed to be a CFC for tax purposes. In order to determine the existence of control, the definition of subordinate entities and foreign related parties applicable for transfer pricing purposes must be observed. Note that there is a presumption of control when the entity is in a tax haven.
Once the entity is deemed to be a CFC, any individual or entity with a direct or indirect participation of 10% or more in the capital stock or results of the CFC must include in their income tax return the income, minus costs and expenses related to the passive activities carried out by the CFC, and pay tax on it. If the CFC’s passive income represents 80% or more of the entity’s income, it is presumed that all income, costs and deductions would be considered as passive and therefore would be subject to the CFC regime. Conversely, if the CFC’s active income represents 80% or more of the entity’s income, it is presumed that all income, costs and deductions would be considered as active and therefore would not be subject to the CFC regime.
Passive income is considered as income derived from:
A CFC’s net profits from passive income must be recognised in proportions equivalent to the taxpayer’s participation in the CFC’s capital or profits on an accrual basis and not a cash basis.
Capital Gains
Capital gains are defined as extraordinary income that is not related to the activities typically carried out by the taxpayer. The activities that trigger capital gains are specifically listed in the Colombian Tax Code (CTC) as follows:
Life insurance indemnities are taxed as capital gains, but only on the amount that exceeds 3,250 Tax Units (approximately USD49,469).
Distributions made by foreign trustees, private interest foundations or other similar fiduciary arrangements to Colombian tax residents are considered as gifts subject to capital gains tax.
The tax rate applicable to capital gains is 15%. As an exception, gains from lotteries, draws and gambling are subject to a flat rate of 20%.
Generally, the taxable base is the registered value of the assets or rights as of 31 December of the previous year.
Net Worth Tax
Individuals
Law 2277 of 2022 re-introduced a net worth tax applicable as of FY 2023 to individuals with large/high-value estates.
Net worth tax is levied mainly on resident individuals but also on non-resident individuals with respect to the equity they own in Colombia, as well as non-resident entities, with respect to assets located in Colombia such as real estate, yachts, boats, art, aircraft or mining or oil rights (other than shares, accounts receivables, portfolio investments, and/or financial leasing contracts with entities or persons resident in Colombia).
Net worth tax rate is 0.5% for the portion of the taxable equity exceeding 72,000 Tax Units (approximately USD1.096 million) and 1% for the portion that exceeds 122,000 Tax Units (approximately USD1.857 million). A temporary additional tax rate of 1.5% applies during FY 2023 to 2026 upon the amount exceeding 239,000 Tax Units (approximately USD3.638 million).
For the determination of this tax, the cost basis of the taxpayer’s primary residence could be excluded from the taxable base up to 12,000 Tax Units (approximately USD182,656).
Entities
For legal entities, Legislative Decree 0173 of 2026 introduced a wealth tax only for fiscal year 2026, applicable to taxpayer legal entities and de facto companies that are income tax filers, as well as permanent establishments (including branches) of foreign entities.
The tax is triggered by the possession of wealth as of 1 March 2026 equal to or exceeding 200,000 Tax Units (approximately USD3.04 million); the applicable rates are 0.5% as the general rule and 1.6% for certain taxpayers in the financial, insurance, securities market, and coal, lignite and crude oil extraction sectors.
The taxable base is the gross equity held as of 1 March less the taxpayer’s outstanding debts, subject to the exclusions expressly provided by the rule.
Other Taxes
The following taxes are also relevant to individual clients, estates and foundations.
Value-added tax – VAT
VAT is triggered on the import of goods into the country and rendering services when the direct user or recipient is located in Colombia. Certain goods (livestock, certain fruits and vegetables, seeds and others) and services (catering services for companies, food preparation services or bar services) are excluded from VAT. The general rate is 19%, but certain goods and services are subject to a 5% rate (coffee, corn for industrial use, agricultural machinery, prepaid medicine plans, security services and temporal services).
Industry and commerce tax
A municipal tax is triggered on revenues derived from the performance of industrial, service and commercial activities within a Colombian municipality at an applicable rate of 0.7% to 1%. The tax is triggered on gross income, excluding revenues for exports, proceeds from the sale of fixed assets, refunds, subsidies and withholdings.
Financial transactions tax
Financial transactions tax is imposed on any transaction whereby funds held by a Colombian entity in Colombian bank accounts are disposed of (eg, debits on bank accounts). The taxable base is the amount of funds withdrawn. The applicable rate is 0.4% and it is withheld and collected by the financial entities through which the transactions are conducted. This tax is generally levied on all financial transactions.
“SIMPLE” tax regime
As of 2020 (Law 2010 of 2019), a simplified tax regime was established for resident individuals and local entities whose prior year’s gross income does not exceed 100,000 Tax Units (approximately USD1.52 million) and who carry out certain economic or commercial activities (eg, owning a small shop, micro-market or hair salon), or who offer mechanical/technical services and consulting services, etc. A lower threshold of 12,000 Tax Units (approximately USD182,656) applies to individuals whose primary income derives from professional, consulting, or scientific services.
The SIMPLE tax regime unifies income tax, industry and commerce tax, VAT and excise tax for taxpayers registered under this regime. These taxpayers are obliged to file a unified annual tax return (although there are advance payments every two months) and make a unique tax payment at a rate between 1.2% and 8.3% on their gross income earned, depending on their economic activity code.
Inheritance and Gifts
Inheritance and gifts are deemed extraordinary income subject to the capital gains tax regime.
As mentioned in 1.1 Tax Regimes, the following extraordinary income is considered as exempted for capital gains purposes:
Transfer of Assets
Tax exemptions applicable on transfer of assets should be analysed on a case-by-case basis. As an example, in the case of real estate, Article 44 of the CTC establishes non-taxable income proportions, from 10% to 100% of the profits on the sale of a property used as the taxpayer’s residence, as long as the property was acquired between the years 1978 and 1986.
Income tax planning alternatives should be analysed on a case-by-case basis.
As an example, anticipating real estate property disposal/transfer, taxpayers could apply for a step-up in the tax basis (costs) by applying the rule established in Article 72 of the CTC, which allows them to take the cadastral official appraisal as the asset’s fiscal cost which can be adjusted/increased at the taxpayer’s request.
Note, however, that the application of Article 72 could be subject to some conditions and limitations. It offers a basis step‑up for duly reported real estate held as fixed assets only, constrained by prior‑depreciation adjustments, valuation floors and Tax Office scrutiny under Article 90 CTC, as well as potential local property tax impacts when self‑appraisals are increased.
In Colombia, pre-immigration and exit planning is not based on a special tax regime, but on managing the timing of when tax residence is triggered and properly documenting tax-residence acquisition or cessation upon arrival and departure.
Pre-arrival steps typically include identifying foreign assets that will become reportable once resident, reviewing exposure under the CFC regime for interests in foreign entities, and addressing potential net worth tax exposure for high net worth individuals.
For definitional and compliance background, see 7.1 Requirements for Domicile, Residency and Citizenship and 1.1 Tax Regimes. However, the appropriate planning should be determined on a case‑by‑case basis.
There are no specific tax rules or planning mechanisms relating to real estate owned by individuals who are non-residents or non-citizens. As a general rule, real estate located in Colombia is subject to taxation in the country regardless of whether or not the owner is a Colombian tax resident/citizen.
On average, Colombia has a tax reform every two years. This situation leads to great uncertainty and taxpayers are obliged to review their structures regularly. Fear of tax uncertainty leads many taxpayers to consider implementing estate-planning structures located in jurisdictions with greater legal stability or that have an enforceable investment protection treaty with Colombia.
Regarding any real or perceived abuses/loopholes in tax laws, the OECD has praised Colombia for its high level of commitment to the international standard for transparency and exchange of information. After an assessment of the domestic legal framework by the OECD, Colombia obtained an overall rating of “compliant”, due to its legal provisions on financial information and its widening network of treaties on exchange of information.
On 25 May 2018, OECD countries agreed to invite Colombia to join the OECD as a member of the organisation after subjecting it to in-depth reviews by 23 OECD committees, and the introduction of major reforms seeking to align its legislation on taxation, anti-bribery, and trade and labour issues, among others, to OECD standards. On 28 April 2020, Colombia officially became the 37th OECD member country.
Colombia has achieved tax transparency and met global reporting requirements using the following framework.
Exchange of Information
Colombia has entered into several agreements for the exchange of tax information. For a list of countries with which Colombia has agreed to share information under the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), see the OECD website.
The OECD – Global Forum’s Peer Review of the Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information 2025 Update, published in December 2025, remains the most recent substantive report on the implementation of the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI)/CRS standard. Recent updates to the OECD’s AEOI commitments list show that additional jurisdictions are scheduled to begin exchanges: Cameroon in 2026; Mongolia, Papua New Guinea and Paraguay in 2027; and Fiji, Tunisia and Zambia in 2028. The OECD also announced that Cabo Verde committed to start CRS exchanges by September 2027, while Morocco, despite its earlier voluntary commitment to begin exchanges in 2025, had not yet started and is now expected to do so by 2028 at the latest.
FATCA
In relation to the exchange of information, the Colombian and US governments have an enforceable Intergovernmental Agreement Model 1 (IGA), within the framework of Law 1666 of 2013, which made the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) mandatory for Colombian financial institutions and taxpayers. The IGA was implemented by means of Resolution 60 of 2015, issued by the Colombian Tax Office (CTO).
SARLAFT
Colombia’s AML and CFT framework (Sistema de Administración del Riesgo de Lavado de Activos y de la Financiación del Terrorismo, or SARLAFT) was established pursuant to Law 526 of 1999 and Law 1121 of 2006. Under this framework, financial entities supervised by the Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia are required to implement a comprehensive risk management system aimed at preventing and detecting money laundering and the financing of terrorism. As part of their SARLAFT obligations, these entities must apply enhanced due diligence (know-your-customer or KYC) procedures to identify and report to the Financial and Information Analysis Unit (Unidad de Información y Análisis Financiero, or UIAF) the ultimate beneficial owners of their clients, understood as the natural persons who ultimately own or control, directly or indirectly, a given entity or structure. This includes the obligation to detect and report suspicious transactions to the UIAF, as well as to maintain adequate records and documentation supporting the identification of the beneficial ownership chain.
Ultimate Beneficial Ownership
Taxpayers are required to identify and report to the CTO the ultimate beneficial owner of legal entities and non-corporate structures such as trusts and other fiduciary businesses, collaboration agreements, private capital funds and pension funds.
The tax reform enacted in September 2021 (Law 2155) included some changes to the definition of the ultimate beneficial owner, incorporating a broader definition in the case of non-corporate structures, in which settlors, trustees, fiduciary or financial committees, and conditioned beneficiaries, among others, may be deemed ultimate beneficial owners for the purposes of the aforementioned report. Law 2155 of 2021 also created the Beneficial Owners Registry (Registro Único de Beneficiarios Finales, or the “RUB”) in order to regulate the taxpayers who are obliged to report information about ultimate beneficial owners and manage said information.
For the purposes of the RUB, the definition of ultimate beneficial owners will depend on which subject provides the report, as follows.
First submissions to the RUB had to be completed before 31 July 2023 for legal entities/structures established before 31 May 2023. New legal entities or non-corporate structures established after 31 May 2023 must comply with the report within the two months following their inscription or obtaining their tax ID. Information provided to the RUB must be updated (if applicable) on the first day of January, April, July and October every fiscal year. Failure to comply with the reporting obligations, or the submission of incomplete or erroneous reports will trigger penalties for the taxpayers concerned.
This information will not be available to the public, but as set forth in Law 2195 of 2022 there will be some government entities that, in compliance with their legal and constitutional functions, will have guaranteed access to the information contained in the RUB (ie, the CTO, the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the General Comptroller’s Office, the Superintendence of Companies and Superintendence of Finance, among others).
Rules Against Tax Haven Practices
The national government enacted Decree 1966 of 2014 and Decree 2095 of 2014, which established the official list of jurisdictions that are deemed as low-tax jurisdictions for Colombian tax purposes.
Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Qatar, Kuwait, Hong Kong, Trinidad and Tobago, the Seychelles, Yemen, Lebanon and the Bahamas, among others, were included in the official list.
The Colombian government may review and modify the list of low-tax jurisdictions pursuant to the criteria contemplated in Article 260-7 of the CTC to determine if any current jurisdictions may be excluded or if additional jurisdictions need to be included. This list has not recently been updated.
Anti-Abuse Rules
Article 869 of the CTC established a tax anti-abuse rule. This rule allows the CTO to re-characterise or reconfigure any operations or series of operations that may constitute abuse for tax purposes and disregard their effect.
Conduct is considered abusive if:
The process of re-characterisation or reconfiguration of a potentially abusive operation would have to be initiated by the CTO within the term of expiration of the statute of limitation of the corresponding tax return. Relevant definitions and procedures applicable to the CTO in order to apply tax anti-abuse rules are established in Resolution 4 of 2020.
Transparency and Privacy
Colombia balances transparency with privacy through statutory tax secrecy rules and data protection law. Tax returns data is confidential under Article 583 of the CTC and may be used by the CTO only for tax control, assessment and administration. Beneficial ownership data filed in the RUB is not public; access is granted only to competent authorities under Law 2195 of 2022. In parallel, the habeas data framework (regulated by Law 1581 of 2012 and Law 1266 of 2008) imposes purpose limitation, confidentiality and security obligations on data processing, including for tax authorities and financial institutions reporting under the CRS, FATCA or the RUB.
Most Colombian companies are family-owned. These companies are usually founded and managed by a matriarch or patriarch. Other family members carry out other high management roles in the company. In most cases, the matriarch/patriarch is unwilling to turn over wealth and grant control to younger generations until their passing, or until they are no longer capable of handling the company’s affairs.
As Colombia has forced heirship rules forcing the testator to assign certain compulsory portions, applicable to half of their estate, even against their will, Colombian families are constantly concerned about implementing estate and succession planning solutions to ensure a successful turnover of wealth, allowing the family estate to increase in value over time.
Colombian families have become increasingly global. This situation has created various challenges when transferring wealth to family members, as Colombian rules on forced heirship are mandatory and apply to the estate of the individuals (both national and foreign) whose last residence was Colombia.
This transfer of wealth may provide various challenges from a tax and estate planning perspective when several jurisdictions are involved. Colombian courts usually apply local law in respect of real personal property located in Colombian territory.
Colombian rules on forced heirship are mandatory and apply to the estates of all individuals (national and foreign) whose last place of domicile was Colombia.
Colombian and foreign heirs have the same rights and are entitled to equal treatment in Colombian probate proceedings. The Colombian Civil Code forces the testator to assign certain compulsory portions, applicable to half of their estate, even against their will.
The compulsory portions are:
Maintenance Provided by Law
A compulsory portion is assigned for the subsistence of the beneficiary in a way that corresponds to their standard of living. Individuals entitled to maintenance include the deceased’s spouse, descendants per stirpes, ancestors or siblings. The amount of maintenance is assessed and declared by a judge.
Marital Portion
The marital portion corresponds to a part of the estate assigned by law to the surviving spouse or permanent partner lacking the necessary means for subsistence. Taking into account the existence of any legitimate descendants, the surviving spouse or partner will be included among the deceased’s heirs (children) and will receive a “marital portion” corresponding to a share of the estate equal to the portion to be inherited by each legitimate descendant.
Legitimate Portion
The legitimate portion corresponds to a part of the estate assigned by law to the legal heirs. Legal heirs are the deceased’s children or, in their absence, their descendants or ancestors. This portion is obtained by dividing half of the inheritance between all legitimate descendants and the surviving spouse or permanent partner.
The legal heirs converge to the succession and are excluded or represented according to the order and rules of the intestate succession.
Should there be any legitimate heirs
The testator may favour the particular descendant that they prefer, assigning part of the estate in the proportion desired.
Should there be no legitimate heirs
A testator may dispose of a certain part of their wealth, up to half of their estate. Should there be no descendants or beneficiaries entitled to inherit, either directly or by representation, the freely disposable portion will represent the entire estate. Otherwise, the Colombian state will inherit the entire estate, through the Colombian Family Welfare Institute.
The general rule for marital property is the community of property regime, which automatically comes into effect for all marriages and remains so until the community of property is dissolved either because of death, judicial decision or as result of free will. In this regime, the spouses commonly own community property. It is not similar to co-ownership because the spouses (joint owners) do not possess a share in the property but are owners of the community property.
Certain assets acquired by the spouses before marriage are considered as individual assets. However, any income, profits or increases in those assets’ value, derived from the individual property (including income generated by assets transferred to foundations and trusts), are part of the community property.
The right of a spouse to unilaterally dispose of assets is unlimited. A spouse is entitled to dispose of personal property and the assets of the community of property as they see fit. However, other dispositions will require, as a rule, the approval of the other spouse. This would be the case with real estate.
Colombian law respects both prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, although they must be granted by public deed. In the case of foreign agreements, the latter are recognised if they are duly notarised and apostilled.
The cost basis of property transferred during an individual’s lifetime is the registered value of the legal act including attributable costs. However, the cost basis of property transferred at death is the cost basis declared by the deceased as of 31 December of the previous year.
From a tax perspective, there are no mechanisms available to help the transfer of assets to younger generations, tax-free.
As a rule, inheritances or legacies are considered as capital gains, taxed at a 15% rate. However, certain structures may be used to obtain tax deferral or reduce the taxable base. This should be analysed on a case-by-case basis.
Colombia has no regulations concerning the succession of digital assets. However, general civil law principles apply: digital assets qualify as intangible property under Article 653 of the Civil Code, and the general rules on succession by cause of death extend to both tangible and intangible assets.
For tax purposes, the CTO’s Unified Ruling on Crypto‑Assets (2023) confirms that inherited crypto‑assets constitute capital gains under Articles 299 et seq of the CTC.
In practice, the main challenges are operational rather than legal. Access to digital assets such as email accounts, cryptocurrency or other tokenised assets depends on the availability of private keys or seed phrases, which may be irrecoverable if the decedent left no instructions. For assets held through foreign platforms, the provider’s terms of service and the law of its domicile will typically govern the access and transfer process, often requiring a grant of representation or court order.
Colombian law allows individuals to create trusts, private foundations, family companies, family partnerships or similar structures to hold, administer and regulate succession to private family wealth.
Civil Law
Colombian civil law does not provide rules on common law trusts or private foundations. However, there are rules on civil and commercial local trust agreements whereby a settlor transfers property or the administration of certain assets to a trustee in exchange for fiduciary rights.
Local trusts are commonly used in Colombia as instruments to administer properties or businesses with a specific purpose, or to grant guarantees or collateral, considering that trustees are professional regulated entities.
Common Law Trusts or Foreign Foundations
There are no civil or commercial regulations regarding the establishment of common law trusts or foreign foundations in Colombia. However, common law trusts are recognised in the CTC. The following requirements have to be observed.
Distributions made by a foreign trust or foundation
Colombian tax residents are subject to income tax based on their worldwide source income. Therefore, any distributions made by a foreign trust or foundation would be subject to tax in Colombia at a 15% rate as a capital gain. Life insurance indemnities are taxed as capital gains, but only on the amounts that exceed 3,250 Tax Units (approximately USD49,469).
Reporting of assets
Assets held by a trust/foundation (which is revocable and directed) are understood to be held directly by the unconditioned beneficiaries or by the settlor/founder and must be reported for all tax purposes as part of their own net worth.
If the underlying assets of an irrevocable and discretionary foundation cannot be attributed to the beneficiaries, the settlor must report the latter. But if the settlor cannot be identified or determined, the reporting obligation falls on the beneficiaries irrespective of whether they are conditioned or have control over the assets and income of the structure. This is the case, without any consideration of the trust/foundation’s irrevocable and discretionary character.
Reporting of income
If a trust/foundation were to be revocable and controlled by the settlor, then it would be considered as a controlled foreign corporation under Colombian law. Hence, net profits derived from passive income obtained by the trust/foundation must be recognised immediately in proportions equivalent to the participation in the trust/foundation’s capital or profits, and not upon receipt of profits, which means no tax deferral is applicable in this case.
Accordingly, Colombian tax residents must report the passive income realised by the trust/foundation in their income tax returns, considering the nature and characteristics of said income.
Civil Law
Colombian civil law does not provide rules on common law trusts or private foundations. However, there are rules on civil and commercial local trust agreements whereby a settlor transfers the property or administration of certain assets to a trustee in exchange for fiduciary rights.
Local trusts are commonly used in Colombia as instruments to administer properties or businesses with a specific purpose, or to grant guaranties or collaterals, considering that trustees are professional regulated entities.
Foreign Structures
There are no civil or commercial regulations regarding the establishment of foreign trusts and private foundations. However, foreign entities are recognised and respected by Colombian law and tax authorities and may be used as structures to administer private wealth and circumvent forced heirship rules in Colombia. Anti-abuse rules must be observed.
Local Trusts
In Colombia, only those companies duly authorised by the Colombian financial authority (Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia, or SFC) may offer local trust services and act as trustees. Such entities are subject to supervision and special regulations.
Colombian tax law treats local trusts as flow-through entities for tax purposes. Thus, a local trust must determine its profits annually and the beneficiaries have to include such profits in their own income tax returns for that same year and pay the relevant taxes.
Title to the assets that an individual contributes to the trust fund must pass to the trust (exceptions apply) or such assets will have to be declared by the individual as part of their equity and will thus be subject to net worth taxes. Additionally, if the individual receives fiduciary rights over the trust fund because of said contribution, they are required to report such rights for Colombian income tax purposes.
Foreign Structures
In the event beneficiaries are not subject to any condition necessary to benefit from the assets or income in a foreign trust or private interest foundation, they will be required to report their “participation” in the structure for all tax purposes.
If a beneficiary or the donor of a trust, foundation or similar entity also serves as a fiduciary in Colombia, the following rules must be observed.
Place of effective management
Entities incorporated in accordance with Colombian law, or having their main domicile in Colombia, or entities whose “place of effective management” (PEM) is located in Colombia are considered Colombian residents for tax purposes.
If the beneficiary or donor of a trust, foundation or similar entity serves as a fiduciary and is located in Colombian territory, a PEM would be triggered, as the entity would effectively be administered in Colombia.
CFC
If the trustee is located in Colombia and has control over the capital or economic rights over the trust, foundation or similar entity, then that individual will have to report in their income tax any passive income of the CFC, as if it was directly received by them.
In Colombia, the tax consequences of a beneficiary or donor also serving as fiduciary do not arise from the accumulation of roles per se, but from the degree of control, revocability or retained economic benefit over the underlying assets. Where the dual role evidences effective control or disposition, tax authority doctrine treats the assets and income as attributable to the Colombian tax resident holding that position.
Under rules introduced by Law 2155 of 2021, when beneficiaries are conditional or lack control over the trust or foundation assets, or if the ultimate beneficiary cannot be determined, the reporting obligation falls on the founder, settlor or original transferor – regardless of the structure’s discretionary or irrevocable character, and irrespective of the powers granted to protectors, advisers or other fiduciaries or third parties.
Additionally, where a Colombian tax resident or legal entity holds a fiduciary or equivalent position in a foreign trust, foundation or similar vehicle, the arrangement may trigger reporting obligations under the RUB, particularly regarding the identification of natural persons exercising ultimate effective control.
The most popular method for asset protection planning is the incorporation of a separate vehicle from the individual’s personal estate, providing asset protection from third parties or creditors.
Individuals may also place assets held in their own names into a local trust in order to designate them or their proceeds to a specific purpose or persons. The assets placed into a properly structured local trust form an estate separate from the assets of the settlor.
In structuring asset transfers, whether or not gratuitously made, attention should be paid to Colombia’s creditor protection laws. The Colombian Commercial and Civil Codes include specific rules on the enforcement of a revocation action (acción revocatoria) against the unjustified actions performed by debtors prior to the request of a treaty process, a mandatory liquidation process or a restructuring process.
Further asset protection can be obtained through an enforceable investment agreement with the following jurisdictions:
In Colombia, a testator only has an unlimited right of disposal over the half of their estate that corresponds to the freely disposable portion. The testator may decide the beneficiary of the assets comprising the remaining half of the estate, but must respect the compulsory portion that corresponds to their heirs.
Certain corporate arrangements (national or foreign), involving life insurance policies and the use of foreign or national legal entities/structures, may be implemented when forced heirship rules do not meet the wishes or needs of the testator or their family. These arrangements can be achieved by legally allowing assets to be passed down to intended beneficiaries, thereby successfully circumventing Colombian forced heirship rules.
Given these constraints, various lawful planning strategies may be implemented to facilitate the orderly transfer of wealth and control to the next generation while respecting forced heirship rules. Among the most commonly used structures and mechanisms are the following.
Wealth Transfer Structures
The most common vehicles include family holding companies – typically structured as a Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada (SAS) – which centralise assets and allow gradual share transfers through donations or sales during the founder’s lifetime. Other tools include donations with reservation of usufruct, lifetime partition of assets, life insurance policies (which pass outside the estate) and trusts or private foundations used to administer family assets with tailored distribution instructions.
Family Governance Arrangements
To reduce the risk of disputes and ensure continuity, Colombian families increasingly adopt governance frameworks alongside the corporate structure. These typically include:
While not binding in the same manner as corporate by-laws, family constitutions are recognised in practice and often incorporated by reference into shareholders’ agreements to strengthen their enforceability.
Partial Interest in an Entity Transferred During Life
If a partial interest is transferred during someone’s lifetime, it is presumed that the fair market value of the interest cannot be lower than its cost basis and its net asset value (valor intrínseco) increased by 30%.
If the partial interest being transferred is received as consequence of a gift, the value of the interest is its cost basis.
Partial Interest in an Entity Transferred After Death
However, if a partial interest is transferred at death, any amount received as consequence of an estate, legacy, donation or conjugal portion is considered as a capital gain subject to capital gains tax at a 15% rate. The value of the interest is its cost basis.
Colombia’s private wealth dispute landscape in 2026 is shaped by the convergence of enhanced tax enforcement capabilities, evolving reporting obligations for foreign structures, and an unprecedented period of fiscal instability driven by emergency legislation. While traditional succession disputes remain a constant, the disputes generating most advisory activity are those arising from the CTO’s increasingly sophisticated data-driven enforcement, the expanding scope of taxation under emergency decrees and the broader institutional uncertainty surrounding the constitutional limits of executive tax powers.
Tax Authority Enforcement and Information Cross-Referencing
The most significant structural driver of wealth-related disputes is the national tax and customs agency (Dirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales, or DIAN)’s deployment of automated cross-referencing tools fed by multiple data streams. Three mechanisms are particularly relevant to private clients.
First, the exogenous information (información exógena) reports which require banks, notaries, real estate registries, financial institutions and other third parties to report annually on transactions conducted with or on behalf of taxpayers. This information, which covers banking movements, property transfers, investment portfolios and, increasingly, digital economy transactions, feeds directly into the CTO’s cross-referencing engine and forms the evidentiary backbone of most enforcement proceedings. For private clients with complex asset structures, discrepancies between reported wealth and third-party data are typically the initial trigger for formal inquiries.
Second, the DIAN performs systematic cross-checks between a taxpayer’s income tax return, net worth tax filing, VAT declarations, withholding reports and banking records to identify inconsistencies. Where declared income appears insufficient to support reported asset growth, or where wealth tax filings are inconsistent with income declarations, the system generates automated flags that may lead to formal assessment proceedings. These cross-referencing exercises have become more precise following the implementation of real-time electronic invoicing validation and the integration of CRS data received from foreign jurisdictions.
Third, the CTO has adopted a campaign-based enforcement approach, directing targeted audit waves at specific taxpayer segments. Recent campaigns have focused on large-patrimony individuals, taxpayers reporting foreign assets, holders of interests in foreign fiduciary structures, and contributors to the tax normalisation programmes. In 2026, the DIAN initiated pre-filing audit campaigns verifying withholding certificates, self-withholding amounts and cost deductions before returns were even submitted.
These three mechanisms increasingly operate in tandem. The disputes that result typically take the form of formal assessment notices, penalty proceedings for under-reporting or omission, and administrative litigation before the DIAN and ultimately the Council of State.
Emergency Legislation and Constitutional Limits
Between December 2025 and March 2026, the government declared two successive states of economic emergency and used them to enact fiscal measures (including a reduced net worth tax threshold, a financial sector surcharge and a tax normalisation programme) that Congress had previously rejected through ordinary legislative channels. In January 2026, the Constitutional Court provisionally suspended the first emergency decree. The decree was subsequently declared unconstitutional, rendering all its implementing tax measures definitively void.
A second emergency, grounded in severe weather events affecting several Caribbean departments, remains partially in force and was used to issue a further wave of fiscal decrees extending the wealth tax to legal entities, permanent establishments and branches of foreign entities. For private clients, this situation creates an unusual category of disputes: taxpayers who complied with obligations under the first emergency now face unresolved refund claims, while those subject to the second emergency must comply with measures, the constitutional foundation of which remains under review. The disputes take the form of administrative refund proceedings, constitutional challenges to implementing decrees, and litigation over the scope of anti-fragmentation rules targeting corporate reorganisations carried out near the accrual date.
Political Transition
A new government will take office on 7 August 2026 with an ambitious fiscal adjustment programme and a commitment to restore the ordinary legislative process for tax policy. However, considerable uncertainty persists: the incoming administration lacks an automatic majority in Congress, and much of its fiscal agenda will require legislative approval in a politically fragmented environment. For private clients, the transition signals that a comprehensive tax reform is widely expected in the short term, but its content, timing and legislative vehicle remain unpredictable. Whether fiscal policy is institutionalised through Congress or continues the pattern of emergency legislation will materially affect the volume and nature of wealth-related disputes in coming years. Advisers should maintain planning flexibility and anticipate potential structural changes to wealth tax, reporting obligations and enforcement priorities.
Forms of Disputes
In practice, wealth disputes in Colombia take several concurrent forms:
This convergence underscores the importance for private clients and their advisory teams of being able to manage multiple fronts simultaneously – tax compliance, administrative defence and constitutional litigation – within a unified planning strategy.
Compensation for aggrieved parties in wealth disputes or disputes involving trusts, foundations or similar entities implies civil liability (torts) in Colombia. Requesting compensation for damages is usually carried out before the Colombian courts, which determine the type of damage and amount of compensation.
Local Trusts
Local trusts are used in Colombia as instruments to manage properties or businesses with a specific purpose or to grant guaranties or collaterals, considering that trustees are professional regulated entities.
Only those companies duly authorised by the SFC may offer trust services and act as trustees. Such entities are subject to supervision and special regulations.
Colombian law sets forth a number of legal duties for trustees, which cannot be delegated to third parties, or waived. These include the following:
Foreign Trusts
Regarding the use of corporate fiduciaries or other professional fiduciaries, there are no civil or commercial regulations establishing a higher standard of conduct or additional supervision or regulations.
Colombian law authorises individuals residing in Colombia and legal entities created under the laws of Colombia to invest and hold assets outside Colombian territory without the need to obtain further permits or authorisations. However, said tax residents and local entities must comply with all tax and foreign exchange reporting regulations.
In Colombia, the piercing of the corporate veil has been developed by case law and seeks to identify the individuals or legal persons who are beneficiaries of the legal entity. However, this procedure must be ordered by a judge and is not common on a day-to-day basis.
From a tax perspective, Article 869-2 of the CTC, allows the CTO to pierce the corporate veil of any entity used by its shareholders, partners, directors or administrators to commit tax abusive conduct under Article 869, mentioned in 1.7 Transparency and Increased Global Reporting.
The CTO may also obtain information regarding ultimate beneficial owners using the following mechanisms:
There are no specific laws that encourage fiduciaries to invest assets prudently. However, and as mentioned in 6.1 Prevalence of Corporate Fiduciaries, current regulations set forth a number of legal duties required of trustees in terms of investing and maintaining assets that cannot be delegated to third parties, or waived.
Generally, parties involved in a fiduciary agreement will determine the risks and limitations in the investment of assets. Colombian law does not require the diversification of assets or the application of modern portfolio theory. Certain exceptions may apply if government assets or pension funds are involved.
It is understood that a foreigner is a resident in Colombia when they are the holder of a residence visa.
An individual, whether Colombian or foreign, is a tax resident in Colombia if they remain in the country, continuously or discontinuously, for more than 183 calendar days in any period of 365 days. When a discontinuous residence of more than 183 days occurs between two taxable periods, the individual will be considered a resident as of the second taxable period.
Colombian nationals are considered as tax residents if:
Colombian individuals who meet the above-mentioned requirements will not be considered tax residents if:
Latin American or Caribbean citizens by birth may obtain Colombian citizenship if they are domiciled in Colombia for a term of one year. Spanish citizens may obtain Colombian citizenship if they are domiciled in Colombia for a term of two years.
Foreigners who are not Latin American, Caribbean or Spanish nationals may obtain Colombian citizenship provided that they are domiciled in Colombia for a term of five years counted from their visa’s date of issue. This term may be reduced to two years if the individual is married to a Colombian national or has Colombian children.
Foreign entities such as trusts and private foundations may be used to hold and manage assets for minor children or adults with disabilities and may be transferred once specific conditions are met.
Under Law 1996 of 2019, Colombia replaced judicial interdiction with a supported decision-making framework. A court proceeding is required only when no voluntary arrangement (support agreement or advance directive) has been put in place, or when additional safeguards are needed. In such cases, an interested party (such as a relative or spouse) may request the family judge to appoint one or more support persons to assist the individual in handling their affairs.
The court proceeding involves an assessment of the individual’s specific needs and determines the scope and duration of the support. Once appointed, the court retains supervisory authority: support arrangements are subject to periodic judicial review to ensure they remain appropriate and that the individual’s rights and autonomy are respected. The judge may modify or terminate the support if circumstances change.
Voluntary mechanisms, such as support agreements (formalised before a notary or conciliation centre) and advance directives (executed by public deed), do not require court intervention for their creation, although they may be subject to judicial review if challenged by third parties.
In practice, this has posed a difficulty in representing those individuals who were declared incapacitated under the previous legislation.
In Colombia, Law 1996 of 2019 provides a supported decision-making framework that enables individuals to plan in advance for potential loss of capacity. The principal voluntary mechanisms are:
In practice, these instruments are used to anticipate who may assist or represent the individual in legal, patrimonial, corporate, banking or tax decisions, preserving the individual’s autonomy and reducing the risk of disputes with third parties or family members.
In response to demographic trends and structural coverage gaps, Colombia enacted a major pension reform under Law 2381 of 2024, scheduled to take effect on 1 July 2025. This reform, one of the few major legislative initiatives successfully passed by the current administration, emerged from a process of public consultation led by the Comisión de Reforma de Protección a la Vejez, and seeks to promote equity and long-term sustainability in the national pension system.
The New System of Social Protection for Old Age
The law introduces a four-pillar model under the new System of Social Protection for Old Age, aiming to expand coverage, address gender disparities, and provide more flexible retirement pathways.
1. Solidarity pillar
This component is designed to support elderly individuals living in poverty or vulnerability who are not eligible for a pension. It grants a Solidarity Basic Income, a non-pension benefit adjusted annually based on Colombia’s CPI. Eligibility depends on age, nationality, residency, and socio-economic status, with special provisions for individuals with disabilities. While modest in value, this transfer plays a vital role in preventing extreme poverty among older adults.
2. Semi-contributory pillar
Targeting individuals who contributed to the pension system but did not meet the minimum requirements, this pillar grants a Lifelong Annuity, financed partly by state subsidies. While not inheritable, the annuity is meant to provide a stable post-retirement income. Women receive a higher state contribution (30% v 20% for men), reflecting policy efforts to address gender-based inequities.
3. Contributory pillar
This is the core of the reform and applies to all formal workers. It adopts a hybrid model: contributions on earnings up to 2.3 monthly minimum wages (approximately USD1,183 for 2026) go to “Colpensiones”, the public fund, while any excess is managed by private pension funds. The two components are integrated to form a unified pension. This design shifts part of the pension flow from private to public hands and changes the long-term dynamics of pension fund management.
4. Voluntary savings pillar
This final pillar remains unchanged and allows individuals to make additional contributions to supplement their retirement savings.
Transition Measures
To safeguard acquired rights, the law includes a transition regime: individuals close to retirement – that is, women with 750+ weeks and men with 900+ weeks of contributions by 1 July 2025, will remain under the previous legal framework. Additional provisions for women include a 50-week credit per child (up to three) and a gradual reduction of the contribution requirement to 1,000 weeks by 2036.
Legal Challenges and Institutional Uncertainty
Despite its scheduled implementation, the law’s future remains uncertain. Several constitutional claims have been filed, primarily questioning the legislative process that led to its approval.
In June 2025, the Constitutional Court identified procedural flaws in the legislative process, specifically in the final voting session, and suspended the law’s implementation, returning it to Congress for reconsideration. The House of Representatives re-approved the pension reform on 28 June 2025 – however, the suspension remains in effect until the Constitutional Court issues its final ruling on the law’s constitutionality (at the time of publication of this guide, the court had not yet ruled on this matter).
Implementation measures tied to pension transfers have also been challenged under litigation: in April 2026, the Council of State provisionally suspended Decree 415 of 2026, which ordered private pension funds to transfer certain assets to Colpensiones, after finding that the forced transfer of resources for individuals who have not yet consolidated their pension entitlement exceeded the government’s regulatory authority and contradicted the law’s own transitional framework (Article 76, Law 2381 of 2024; Decree 1225 of 2024).
As a result, most of Law 2381 of 2024 remains suspended, with narrow exceptions continuing to apply. Full implementation remains contingent on the Constitutional Court’s final decision and the resolution of related judicial proceedings.
There is no legal distinction for natural or adopted children, or those born out of wedlock, in terms of estate and succession planning. In accordance with Law 29 of 1982, natural and adopted children have the same rights and obligations. This would also be the case for posthumously conceived children.
A progressive recognition of legal rights for same-sex couples has taken place through case law. Currently, same-sex couples:
The most recent legal development took place with Ruling SU-214/2016, whereby the Constitutional Court accepted same-sex marriages.
In Colombia, unmarried couples may acquire legal recognition if they constitute a de facto marital union, defined under Law 54 of 1990 as a permanent and singular community of life between two adults not married to each other. Same-sex couples have been included since 2007 through Constitutional Court ruling C-075 of 2007.
Succession
A patrimonial partnership is presumed after at least two years of cohabitation or may be declared by public deed, conciliation agreement or judicial decision (Law 979 of 2005). For succession purposes, permanent partners have been progressively equated with spouses through Constitutional Court decisions (C-283 of 2011, C-238 of 2012 and C-456 of 2020), extending intestate succession rights and other civil law references to “spouse” to permanent partners of both different-sex and same-sex couples, on equal terms.
Tax Implications
From a tax perspective, permanent partners receive substantially the same treatment as married spouses. They qualify as dependants for income tax purposes, benefit from equivalent occasional-gains thresholds on inherited assets, and may be designated as beneficiaries under insurance and pension instruments with no adverse tax differentiation.
Reason to Formalise the Union
Compared with marriage, a de facto marital union may produce equivalent patrimonial, succession and tax effects, but generally requires formal declaration to be enforceable against third parties. Mere cohabitation without the elements of a permanent and singular community of life does not automatically give rise to a patrimonial partnership or succession rights. For this reason, planning commonly involves formalising the union, defining the patrimonial regime, preparing wills and reviewing beneficiaries across financial assets, insurance policies and wealth planning structures.
The CTC establishes that non-profit corporations, foundations and associations are subject to a special tax regime with respect to income tax (20% rate) and complementary taxes, provided that they comply with the following conditions:
Further to this, there is an annual registration requirement. The entity must file a yearly online request to continue benefiting from the special tax regimen. Otherwise, it will be subject to the general corporate income tax rate (35% from FY 2023 onwards).
Of the gifts made to entities operating under the special tax regime, 25% can be credited for income tax purposes. However, the above-mentioned requisites must be met.
Entities approved by the CTO as eligible for the special tax regime are subject to income tax at a 20% rate. However, any income surplus is considered exempt, if the funds are destined directly or indirectly for programmes that develop the entity’s social purpose and meritorious activities. Any excess benefits or surpluses that are not reinvested in programmes that develop the entity’s social purpose are deemed as taxable for the next fiscal year.
Calle 84A No 10–33
Oficina 803
Bogotá DC
110221
Colombia
+57 1514 2858
bogota@rimonlaw.com www.rimonlaw.com
Colombia: Fiscal Emergency, Constitutional Limits, and Political Transition
Introduction
Between December 2025 and February 2026, the Colombian government declared two successive states of emergency and issued exceptional regulations that overrode legislative acts by executive decree. For a country in which the tax system had already undergone constant reform, the shift towards legislating by decree marked a qualitative rupture: no deference to congressional oversight and a fracture of the constitutional balance of powers.
The Constitutional Court, in Ruling C-075 of 2026, declared the first emergency unconstitutional by majority vote. The court concluded that the government failed to demonstrate the existence of a grave, imminent and exceptional crisis that could not be addressed through ordinary legal mechanisms. Emergency powers, particularly those relating to the creation or modification of taxes, must meet strict constitutional standards of necessity, proportionality, and direct connection to the causes of the crisis.
As a consequence, Decree 1390 of 2025 was annulled for exceeding constitutional limits and undermining the principle of separation of powers. The second emergency (Decree 150 of 2026) remains in force, though the Constitutional Court, in its 24 June 2026 ruling, limited revenue collection exclusively to emergency relief in 181 municipalities at risk due to the rainy season, as reported by the National Unit for Disaster Risk Management (Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres, or UNGRD).
A new government led by Abelardo de la Espriella, elected on 21 June 2026 in the presidential election runoff, will take office on 7 August 2026 with an ambitious fiscal adjustment programme of COP70 trillion. This article examines the implications of these developments for legal certainty in Colombia during the ongoing political transition.
The pattern: Congress rejects, the government decrees
Congress rejected three successive tax reform proposals between 2024 and 2025, legitimately exercising its constitutional prerogative on each occasion. In response, the executive branch of the government declared an economic emergency that the Constitutional Court suspended, under the doctrinal framework of Interim Resolution 272 of 2023, then extended through Interim Resolution 082 of 2026, and ultimately declared unconstitutional.
On 9 December 2025, the Fourth Committee of the Senate voted nine to four to reject the latest tax bill for fiscal year 2026.
Just 13 days later, on 22 December 2025, the executive branch declared a State of Economic and Social Emergency through Decree 1390 of 2025, invoking Article 215 of the Constitution.
The legal community responded immediately, arguing that states of exception cannot be declared for reasons of mere political convenience. Congress’s rejection of a tax bill constitutes a legitimate exercise of a constitutional prerogative, not a supervening crisis justifying extraordinary executive powers.
The principle of fiscal legality enshrined in Articles 150, 338, and 215 of the Colombian Constitution establishes that taxes may only be created, modified, or eliminated by Congress. Widely known as “no taxation without representation”, this is one of the most fundamental guarantees of the rule of law. States of exception allow the Executive to enforce taxes on a transitional basis, but such measures must strictly comply with Article 215.
The Constitutional Court suspended the decree through Resolution 082 of 2026, and declared the decree unconstitutional in Ruling C-075 of 2026.
First emergency: Decree 1390 of 2025 (declared unconstitutional)
This decree declared a State of Economic and Social Emergency throughout the national territory for an initial period of 30 days. The government issued implementing decrees, including Decree 1474 of 2025 and Decree 044 of 2026, both of which were declared unconstitutional as a consequence of the invalidity of the underlying emergency declaration.
Unlike ordinary regulatory decrees, legislative decrees issued under a state of exception have the force of law and are hierarchically equivalent to statutes enacted by Congress; accordingly, they are subject to automatic constitutional review. The distinction is critical: when the court provisionally suspends the principal emergency decree, all implementing legislative decrees lose their constitutional foundation and become unenforceable.
Key tax measures in Decree 1474 of 2025 (now unconstitutional)
Second emergency: Decree 150 of 2026 (partially confirmed)
Just 13 days after the provisional suspension of Decree 1390 of 2025, the government declared a new State of Economic, Social, and Ecological Emergency, citing severe weather events that devastated eight Caribbean departments, affected 252,000 people, and generated an estimated recovery cost of COP8 trillion (approximately USD2.3 billion).
Unlike the first state of emergency, which has since been declared unconstitutional, this declaration was grounded in an unforeseeable event. The executive branch used this framework to issue a second wave of fiscal decrees, several of which reactivated measures previously suspended under the first state of emergency. The government issued implementing decrees, including Decree 173 of 2026 and Decree 0240 of 2026.
Key tax measure in Decree 173 (24 February 2026)
A wealth tax for legal entities with net worth exceeding 200,000 UVT (approximately USD3.04 million), at a general rate of 0.5% and 1.6% for the financial and extractive sectors.
Key tax measures in Decree 0240 (12 March 2026)
Collection data
The political transition
As mentioned earlier, Abelardo de la Espriella was elected in the presidential election runoff on 21 June 2026 and will assume office on 7 August 2026.
His administration proposes a fiscal adjustment of approximately COP70 trillion, including a “fiscal readjustment program” aimed at reducing the size of the State by up to one quarter. The fiscal deficit, which closed in 2025 at 6.4% of GDP (a reduction of 0.3 percentage points compared to 2024), is targeted to fall below 3.5% by 2030.
The administration’s most ambitious commitment is to stabilise the fiscal deficit at 4.8%, a reduction of 2.3 percentage points, within the first 360 days of government.
At the time of writing, the incoming administration of President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella announced a proposed tax reform bill aimed at fundamentally simplifying Colombia’s tax system. According to Minister of Finance-designate Miguel Gómez Martínez, the reform would reduce the number of national taxes administered by the DIAN from 15 to just three: (i) Impuesto sobre la Renta (income tax); (ii) IVA (VAT); and (iii) IVA externo (external VAT on digital services, licences, and intangibles consumed domestically). The 12 taxes slated for elimination or consolidation have not been formally enumerated, though the proposal contemplates eliminating the wealth tax (impuesto al patrimonio) as “antitechnical and costly”. The stated objectives are to simplify compliance, reduce administrative burdens on taxpayers and the DIAN, combat tax evasion (estimated at 35% for IVA and 40% for income tax), and attract foreign investment through regulatory stability. However, passage remains uncertain, as the incoming government lacks automatic majorities in Congress. The reform is expected to be filed after the administration takes office on 7 August 2026, and will be accompanied by a public spending freeze to address a fiscal deficit projected at 6.5–7.5% of GDP.
Legal risks and investor considerations
Taxes were collected between 1 and 29 January 2026, operating under the presumption of legality; however, no further revenue could be collected under the first emergency framework. This has raised numerous unresolved questions regarding the refund of taxes already collected. The principle of fiscal legality exists because taxation is, in essence, an act of power that demands democratic legitimacy.
As the Constitutional Court observed in Ruling C-1383 of 2000, a tax is constitutionally admissible when the consent of the political community, whether direct or indirect, has been obtained such that citizens recognise taxation as an effective and necessary mechanism to fund the State. The creation of taxes must accordingly reside in the organs of popular representation and be exercised with clarity and precision, as required by the democratic principle and the rule of law.
When emergency decrees supplant democratic deliberation, legal certainty evaporates. Taxpayers find themselves subject to obligations that their elected representatives never debated or approved, eroding the confidence of both investors and compliant taxpayers who already bear the heaviest fiscal burden.
Compliant taxpayers must now navigate a fragmented fiscal regime: ordinary legislation on one hand, and still-enforceable emergency legislation from the second declaration on the other. The tax system has ceased to be reliable because legislative deliberation has been supplanted by executive exceptionalism, and because the most fundamental principle of the rule of law in tax matters (ie, that taxes must originate in the legislature) has been subordinated to the urgency of the moment.
Conclusions
The first emergency (Decree 1390 of 2025) has been declared unconstitutional, definitively annulling all of its implementing fiscal decrees; the second emergency (Decree 150 of 2026) remains in force, validated by the Constitutional Court on 24 June 2026, but limited to emergency relief for the 181 at-risk municipalities. Compliant taxpayers must therefore navigate a fragmented fiscal regime: ordinary laws on one side, and emergency legislation from the second declaration – still in force – on the other.
The most fundamental principle of the rule of law in tax matters (ie, that taxes must originate in the legislature) has been subordinated to the urgency of the moment. The underlying challenge remains: how to build tax systems that are adequate to fiscal needs and anchored in democratic legitimacy.
Whether the new government will succeed in institutionalising fiscal policy or whether it will perpetuate the cycle of exceptionalism, remains to be seen. When the new government takes office on 7 August 2026, with ambitious fiscal targets but without a legislative majority, the fulfilment of its commitments will therefore depend on its ability to secure congressional support.
Calle 84A No 10–33
Oficina 803
Bogotá DC
110221
Colombia
+57 1514 2858
bogota@rimonlaw.com www.rimonlaw.com