Income Tax
Germany imposes a federal personal income tax on the worldwide income of resident individuals, under the Income Tax Act (ITA). Resident corporations, associations and certain segregated pools of assets are subject to federal corporate income tax, under the Corporate Income Tax Act (CITA). Both taxes are levied annually.
An individual who has a place of residence or a place of habitual abode in Germany has a worldwide income tax liability, pursuant to Section 1(1) of the ITA. While a place of residence is defined as the possession of a property with the intention to occupy (not necessarily on a full-time basis), a place of habitual abode is where the taxpayer remains for more than six months.
Non-resident individuals are subject to income tax from certain German sources specified in Section 49 of the ITA, especially on income derived from German real estate.
The following types of income are subject to income tax pursuant to Section 2(1) of the ITA:
There are specific rules for each category, which regulate the types of expenses that may be deducted and the tax-free allowance available for those categories. Gains on the sale of privately held assets are subject to income tax under Section 22 of the ITA if they have been held for less than ten years in the case of real estate, or one year in the case of other assets.
In calculating the individual’s taxable income, the income from each of the above categories is added together, and losses can be deducted. There are provisions by which losses can be carried backwards or forwards. A taxpayer can deduct special expenses such as pension contributions, health insurance, school fees and charitable donations, and extraordinary expenses such as the cost of medical treatment (in each case, up to a prescribed threshold). There are also tax reliefs for those with children, and rules that allow married couples and registered partnerships to be taxed jointly. A special tax regime applies to income from capital assets, which is subject to withholding tax at a rate of 25% and is not subject to supplementary taxation at the taxpayer’s usual rate.
The income tax rates for 2026 are as follows:
Corporations and other types of legal entities listed in Section 1(1) of the CITA are subject to corporation tax on their worldwide profits if their place of management or registered office is in Germany. Non-resident legal entities are subject to corporate tax from certain German sources mentioned in Section 2 of the CITA in connection with Section 49 of the ITA.
Partnerships are not subject to corporation tax, but the partners are individually subject to income tax. Partnerships may choose to be taxed as a corporation and for their partners to be taxed as shareholders of a corporation. Corporation tax is levied on a corporation’s income, which is determined in accordance with the income schedules in Section 2(1) of the ITA, as mentioned above (the CITA refers comprehensively to provisions of the ITA that deal with determining the income). After the deduction of any available allowance, profits are subject to corporate tax at a rate of 15% (plus the solidarity surcharge of 5.5% of the corporate tax liability).
Exit Tax
If an individual of any nationality who has been resident or has had a place of habitual abode in Germany for at least seven out of the last 12 years emigrates, the unrealised gain on any shareholding of at least 1% will be charged to income tax, according to Section 6 of the German Foreign Tax Act (FTA). However, the exit tax lapses with retroactive effect upon the re-establishment of German unlimited tax liability for a maximum period of 12 years (“temporary absence”). A limited tax deferral is possible in this case. The current FTA exit taxation regime has applied since 1 January 2022. Following the amendment, the payment can now be made in seven interest-free instalments.
The German tax authorities published a decree in 2025 on the application of the returnee provision above in cases of substantial distributions from the shareholding covered by the FTA. Distributions made after 16 August 2023 by corporations whose shareholders are subject to exit taxation trigger immediate exit taxation regarding the shares if the distributions exceed one quarter of the fair market value of the corporation.
In 2023, a 2011 relocation case to Switzerland that applied the previous legislation, which did not provide for a permanent, interest-free tax deferral for relocations to non-EU/EEA countries, was ruled on by the Federal Fiscal Court (Bundesfinanzhof or BFH), which held that such a tax deferral is applicable. Therefore, the BFH is expected to rule in favour of a permanent, interest-free tax deferral in EU/EEA cases. The German tax authorities issued a decree in 2025 that the ruling will only be applied to relocation cases to Switzerland prior to 2022.
However, no adaptation of the current exit taxation is in sight. Moreover, the German tax authorities published a decree in 2023 on the application of the exit tax: in the case of temporary absence, the exit tax only lapses with retroactive effect if Germany’s right of taxation is directly re-established exactly at the time of departure.
If a German citizen who has been an income tax resident in Germany for at least five of the last ten years moves to a country that is classified as a low-tax jurisdiction while retaining significant economic interests in Germany, the individual will be subject to extended limited income tax liability for ten years. This means that the individual will be subject to German income tax on a more extensive list of German income sources than other non-residents. Furthermore, extended limited inheritance tax liability will apply for the same period. If the emigrant makes gifts or dies during this period, the class of assets that are treated as German assets (and therefore subject to inheritance tax even if the donor and donee are non-resident) is widened, pursuant to Section 4 of the FTA. This is in addition to the standard five-year inheritance tax shadow.
A further German exit tax may be triggered if, for example, a limited partner of a German GmbH & Co KG that does not qualify as a permanent establishment under the relevant double tax treaty terminates their German residence.
The rules imposing ongoing tax liabilities on emigrants are subject to the application of any relevant double tax treaty in Germany’s wide treaty network.
In 2024, Germany also introduced an exit tax on interest and shares in investment funds where the historic acquisition costs per fund unit/share class exceed the amount of EUR500,000. The above rules on the deferral of payment of the exit tax apply also to the exit tax in shares of investment funds. These new provisions in the German Investment Tax Act are applicable to cases from 31 December 2024.
Gift and Inheritance Tax
General tax principles
Transfers at death and gratuitous transfers are subject to federal inheritance and gift tax under the Inheritance and Gift Tax Act (IGTA).
In Germany, the estate is not subject to inheritance tax, but the acquisition of the respective heir or legatee is; they are ultimately liable for tax on their individual share of the estate. Inheritance tax also depends on the family relationship between the decedent and the heirs.
Gift tax is levied on gratuitous transfers. Like inheritance tax, it is based on the concept of the accretion of wealth or enrichment. Only transfers that are not contingent on future events and that result in a present benefit to the transferee are taxable. While income tax employs factual criteria such as so-called economic ownership (beneficial ownership) in addition to legal criteria to identify taxable transfers, inheritance and gift tax takes a more formal approach. As a rule, a taxable transfer requires the transferee to obtain legal title to the property or at least an enforceable claim under private law.
Gift tax complements inheritance tax. Therefore, gratuitous transfers and transfers at death by an individual to the same recipient within ten years are aggregated into one transfer. Likewise, the same tax rates and tax-free allowances apply to gratuitous transfers and transfers at death.
There is an unlimited, extended unlimited, limited or extended limited gift or inheritance tax liability in Germany.
The (extended) unlimited inheritance and gift tax liability applies especially if the deceased/donor or the heir/legatee/donee has a residence or habitual abode in Germany or is a German citizen who left Germany for not more than five years (ten years in the case of Germany–USA).
In 2022, the BFH ruled that the extended unlimited inheritance and gift tax liability does not violate the principle of equality, the freedom to leave the country or the free movement of capital.
The limited inheritance and gift tax liability is applicable if a person who lives abroad has, for example, an interest in a German partnership with business assets, or holds a share of at least 10% in a German corporation (alone or with other closely related persons).
The extended limited inheritance and gift tax liability can be relevant for Germans who had unlimited income tax liability for at least five of the last ten years before leaving Germany.
After deducting the tax-free allowance, the tax rate applicable to the gift or inheritance is as follows.
As soon as the respective amount is exceeded, the entire amount is subject to the relevant tax rate.
If neither the donor nor the donee has a place of residence or habitual abode in Germany, the tax-free allowances may be reduced by a partial amount. Pursuant to Section 16(2) of the IGTA, the tax-free amount is to be granted pro rata when only part of the acquisition is subject to the limited tax liability. Previous pecuniary benefits accrued by the same person within ten years must also be included in the calculation of the specific allowance.
Germany has double tax treaties that cover inheritance taxes with five other countries. Furthermore, Section 21 of the German Inheritance Tax Act provides for foreign estate taxes on foreign property to be credited against the German inheritance tax liability when the donor/decedent or the donee/heir has their residence or place of habitual abode in Germany or opts to be treated as being resident in Germany.
Tax-Free Allowances
Spouses, children and stepchildren, grandchildren, other descendants or (in the case of inheritance upon death) parents or grandparents, fall within Tax Class I, under which:
Tax Class II includes parents or grandparents (in the case of a lifetime gift), siblings, nieces or nephews, step-parents, sons- or daughters-in-law, mothers- or fathers-in-law and former spouses, all of whom have an allowance of EUR20,000.
Other donees, such as trusts, fall within Tax Class III and have an allowance of EUR20,000. This allowance is granted once within ten years for the same donor and testator.
Tax Exemption Concerning Family Home
The family home can be transferred tax-free between living spouses without any restrictions. There is no inheritance tax on a transfer of the family home between spouses, and there is an exemption for the first 200 square metres of a family home transferred on death to the decedent’s children. However, the tax on a transfer on death can be clawed back if the property is sold or let within ten years.
Transfer of Business Assets, Agricultural or Forestry Property and Capital Interests
Special treatment applies to business assets, agricultural or forestry property, and capital interests in corporations. Two levels of relief are available for the transfer of business assets, agricultural or forestry property and capital interests, each with different conditions attached.
Relief of 85%
This is subject to the conditions that:
If there are more than five but fewer than ten employees, the total sum of salaries must be 250% of the annual average for the five years before; if there are more than ten but fewer than 15 employees, it must be 300%.
Relief of 100%
This is subject to the more stringent conditions that:
Relief depending on value
This relief cannot be claimed independently of the value of the acquired business assets. A particularly complex tax system applies if the value of the acquired business assets exceeds EUR26 million (all acquired business assets of the deceased/donor within a ten-year period have to be taken into account). According to the “ablation model”, the relief is reduced by 1% for each EUR750,000 by which the amount exceeds EUR26 million.
Above EUR90 million, the relief for business assets can no longer be claimed. If the value of the acquired assets exceeds EUR90 million or the transferee opts not to use the ablation model, they can only apply for an examination of need for relief. The transferee is not required to use “privileged” business assets, but they have to use 50% of the value of all other assets that they already own or that they acquire within a ten-year period to pay the regular rate on the privileged business assets.
They also have to use 50% of the value of the management assets that they already own or acquire within a ten-year period to pay the regular rate for business assets. The total rate for acquired assets that do not qualify as privileged business assets can be 80% or more. This makes tax planning complicated for entrepreneurs if the value of the privileged business assets exceeds EUR26 million.
Management assets
So-called management assets within the preferential business assets are fully taxable at the regular rate in so far as the value of such assets exceeds 10% of the acquired company’s assets. The management assets will be calculated and totalled at the group company level (consolidated appraisal of management assets). Therefore, all management assets in the company and its subsidiaries will be taken into consideration and must be valued.
Special Tax Relief for Family Businesses
The maximum special tax relief for family businesses is an additional 30%. There are special requirements for the articles of incorporation that have to be fulfilled (eg, limitation on disposal and on distributions or withdrawals). These provisions have to be incorporated in the articles of incorporation two years before the relevant transfer, and have to remain unchanged and respected for the subsequent 20 years. Family businesses are therefore advised to examine their articles of incorporation and amend them if their provisions do not meet the special requirements of tax relief for family businesses.
Transfer of Real Estate Property and Art
In principle, a 10% tax relief for gifts and inheritances is available for personally held real estate that is let for residential purposes and that is located in Germany, the EU or the EEA. Since 2024, the relief also applies to properties in non-EU/EEA countries that exchange inheritance and gift tax information with Germany.
There are also up to 100% reliefs for loss-making property or assets of artistic, historical or scientific importance, provided that the donee retains the property for ten years and additional conditions are fulfilled.
Tax Step-Up for Family Partnerships
Real estate that is privately held for more than ten years can be transferred to asset management limited partnerships without triggering income tax. The transferred real estate receives a step-up in basis to its fair market value. The step-up allows an additional depreciation volume for income tax purposes, and it can be repeated after ten years.
Immigrating to Germany may give rise to significant legal and tax consequences. Individuals who become resident in Germany are generally subject to German income tax on their worldwide income, and to inheritance and gift tax on their worldwide assets. Visas are generally required only for non-EU nationals. Settlors, trustees and beneficiaries should be aware that Germany has a strict taxation regime on trusts and foreign foundations. Changes in the trust deed prior to moving to Germany may prevent some of the strict taxation rules. Individuals holding assets through corporate or holding structures should carefully consider Germany’s controlled foreign corporation rules. In addition, corporate income tax implications may arise if a company establishes a permanent establishment or its place of effective management in Germany. Even if the stay in Germany is intended to be temporary, the potential application of Germany’s exit tax regime should be taken into account. Assets could be transferred to an opaque trust or foreign foundation to shelter them from exit taxation. Furthermore, immigrating to Germany may affect governing succession and matrimonial law; hence, implementing a choice of law and choice of court could be advisable.
The limited inheritance and gift tax liability is applicable when a non-resident, non-citizen directly owns real estate situated in Germany. The same applies to German real estate held via a partnership. However, a ruling of the German fiscal court held that a bequest of German real estate was not subject to limited inheritance tax liability. Following the ruling, the German legislature amended the IGTA to put domestic and foreign legatees on an equal footing.
Liabilities linked to real estate may be deducted from the taxable acquisition. In the case of limited tax liability, a pro rata deduction of debts and encumbrances has been possible since 2024, even if they are not economically related to assets that are subject to limited tax liability.
The transfer of foreign corporations holding German real estate is not subject to German inheritance and gift tax. Rental income derived from German real estate is generally subject to German income tax.
The German transfer tax regime is currently in a rather stable phase. Germany elected a new federal parliament (Bundestag) in 2025, with a government led by the Christian Democratic Union. So far, no major changes in transfer taxes have been announced.
However, it remains unclear if the gift and inheritance tax exemptions for business assets are constitutional. It can be expected that within the next two years the German Federal Constitutional Court will render a decision in this regard.
Since July 2020, there has been a reporting obligation for cross-border tax arrangements in Germany. Moreover, there is a publicly accessible transparency register in Germany. German-registered commercial partnerships and legal persons governed by German private law, as well as German-based trustees, must report their beneficial owners or beneficiaries.
The transfer of assets through generations is regularly performed with control rights in favour of older generations, especially if minors or inexperienced persons are involved. The donor of such assets can retain a usufruct right on the transferred assets, so that they can claim the emoluments of the assets after the transfer. The withholding of a usufruct right is an estate planning strategy that has been practised for hundreds of years.
The insertion of broad reclaim regulations in gift agreements or the appointment of executors in last wills, as well as the establishment of binding partnership structures, are used to divide control and wealth.
Advising high net worth individuals and their families has become an international matter, as younger generations are often not as deeply rooted in their native countries as former generations were. Nowadays, family members frequently change their life circumstances in accordance with their study and business plans, and it is not uncommon for children of high net worth individuals who have spent several years abroad to be married to partners of other nationalities. Consequently, estate structuring requires the interaction of estate planning teams from different jurisdictions.
One of the major issues in this area concerns exit tax planning. The cross-border donation of business assets can trigger gift tax as well as exit tax. Management holding partnerships are used in an effort to combat this tax burden.
The German forced heirship regime depends on the applicable succession law. The EU Directive on succession has been applicable since 17 August 2015, meaning that in principle the succession law of the last habitual residence of the deceased applies. However, the testator has the right to opt for the laws of the testator’s citizenship in the testator’s last will. If the testator had their last domicile in Germany or was a German national and chooses the German law of succession, the German succession law is applicable for their entire estate.
In 2022, the German Federal Court ruled that German forced heirship law was applicable even though the testator, an English national, had chosen English law to govern their succession. Here, the last habitual residence of the testator was in Germany and hence German law of succession was generally applicable. According to the German Federal Court, the choice of English law was (partially) in violation of the German ordre public, since the English law of succession does not provide for any kinds of forced heirship rights. Therefore, the choice of English law was (partially) invalid and, consequently, German forced heirship law was applied.
According to German succession law, descendants, spouses and parents may have a forced heirship right in the amount of 50% of their potential heirship share, according to the rules of intestate succession. The basis of the calculation is the estate at the time of death.
A so-called supplementary statutory share may also apply, since the testator will not be able to avoid forced heirship rights by minimising their estate through donations to third parties within a period of ten years before their death. For calculating the supplementary statutory share, the value of the decedent’s estate will be increased by the value of such donations. The donations will be fully taken into account within the first year prior to the decedent’s death, and will be taken into account by one tenth less for each further year prior to the decedent’s death.
The German statutory matrimonial property regime is the regime of accrued gains, if the spouses have not entered into a marital contract. The spouses are allowed to modify their statutory matrimonial property regime, or choose the regime of community property, or the regime of separation of property. However, the matrimonial property regime can only be modified or chosen by marital contract.
If the matrimonial regime of accrued gains applies, each spouse’s assets remain the property of the respective spouse regardless of whether they were acquired before or during the marriage. In the case of divorce or the death of one of the spouses, or if the matrimonial regime is changed to the separation of property, the spouses must equalise their accrued gains made during the marriage. For the calculation of accrued gains, the period between the day of marriage and the day the matrimonial regime ends is decisive. According to that, the amount to be paid due to the equalisation has to be determined by comparing the initial assets (ie, the assets at the time the spouses entered into the marriage) with the final assets of each spouse (especially on the day the divorce petition was delivered to the respondent).
Gratuitous transfers from a spouse to a third party will be taken into account for the calculation, unless they were performed more than ten years ago or were performed with the other spouse’s consent. Otherwise, such transfers will be added to the initial assets of the respective spouse.
In general, there are no differences between assets transferred during lifetime or at death. For income tax purposes, assets are also held with their updated historical acquisition costs after the transfer. Donees/heirs carry forward these historical costs, instead of the donor/decedent. The transfer itself usually does not trigger capital gains tax or exit taxes; therefore, no step-up occurs.
The gift and inheritance tax-free allowances listed under Section 16 of the IGTA are available every ten years. If estate planning is started at an early stage of the donor’s/testator’s life, these tax-free allowances can be utilised multiple times as donations are made over several decades. If the donor decides to donate profitable assets such as shares or rented real estate, they can make a gift while retaining a usufruct right. However, this usufruct right is taken into consideration when determining the value of the transfer of assets.
Family limited partnerships are used as tax-planning mechanisms, making the children of the donor/testator limited partners in this structure. The main benefit of such a structure is that the donor/testator can divide controlling rights to ease their children into the responsibilities of wealth management and limit their initial involvement in the operations of the structure, while at the same time retaining a large degree of control over the partnership structure. As limited partners, the children of the donor/testator have no ability to control, direct or otherwise influence the operations of the partnership structure.
Prenuptial and postnuptial agreements can also be a tax-efficient tool for transfers between spouses.
The digital estate is an interplay of inheritance law, fundamental rights, privacy and business practices of service providers. In Germany, there are only a few judicial verdicts in relation to the digital estate, so many legal issues are still unclear and somewhat controversial. There is no problem when the data is on a device such as a USB stick or a hard disk, as these objects are transferred by way of universal succession to the heirs.
A problem arises when the data is stored online – eg, on a cloud or in an online account. There is no agreement in the literature on whether digital assets should be included in the inheritance, as they are personal assets; it is argued that accounts and data of a private nature are not inheritable. According to the prevailing opinion in the relevant literature, the digital estate should be inheritable.
In a ruling in 2018, the German Supreme Court decided that the heirs were entitled to access the Facebook account of the deceased. The account would also be transferred to the heirs by way of universal succession. The court stated that neither the secrecy of telecommunications nor the post-mortem personal right to privacy stands in the way of inheritance.
In 2025, the Higher Regional Court of Oldenburg ruled that the contractual user relationship, with its rights and obligations for social media accounts (in this case: Instagram), is transferred to the heirs by way of universal succession. The heir may continue to actively use the account.
In a testamentary disposition, orders should also be made regarding digital assets. It should be noted, in particular, that the heirs should also be given access to the digital assets – for example, by deposition of the corresponding passwords.
As the German civil law system does not acknowledge the concept of trusts in its own right, trusts are not an estate planning vehicle in Germany.
The private law foundation plays a prominent role in the German tax and estate planning regime. This is especially true for the family foundation, which is not its own legal form but rather a private benefit foundation focused on beneficiaries who are related to the founder of the foundation. In addition to the regular tax burden of a private benefit foundation, a back-up inheritance tax is levied on the estate of the family foundation every 30 years. The gift and inheritance tax rate is favourable since it is based on the relationship between the settlor and the beneficiaries. Whether the back-up inheritance tax and the privilege of the tax rate violate European law is currently unclear. The German tax authorities hold that the privilege of the tax rate only applies to foundations established in Germany, as only these foundations are liable to the back-up inheritance tax. The provisions are not applicable to foreign foundations. In his statement to the European Court of Justice in 2025, the Advocate General expressed the opinion that such an application of the provisions does not violate the free movement of capital.
Another important structure for tax and estate planning is the limited partnership.
As stated in 3.1 Types of Trusts, Foundations or Similar Entities, trusts are not an estate planning vehicle in Germany, as the German civil law system does not acknowledge the concept of a trust in its own right.
Treatment of Trusts
Germany is not a member of the Hague Trust Convention and thus has not ratified its provisions. The German treatment of trusts is typically determined by analogising the trust in question to some other legal arrangement recognised under German law. The analogising procedure involves searching for “similar” or comparable legal structures that can be used for estate planning purposes in the German jurisdiction instead of a trust. The analogising procedure is mainly influenced by the specific trust structure.
Testamentary trusts
If German succession law applies to the decedent’s estate, it is not possible to establish a trust mortis causa nor to bequeath parts of the estate to an existing trust. In such a case, especially when the testator has established a last will under foreign laws together with a testamentary trust, the trust arrangement will be regarded as German executorship, and the trustee will be regarded as executor and not as heir/legatee. The trust beneficiaries will be treated as heirs/legatees.
Place of business management in Germany
However, if the trustee conducts business in Germany, the place of business management (see Section 10 of the German Fiscal Code) might be in Germany. Consequently, the trust itself will be considered a corporation with unlimited tax liability according to Section 1(1) No 5 of the CITA; as a result, all worldwide income gained by the trust will be subject to German corporation tax. Similarly, unlimited tax liability will be established regarding gift and inheritance tax according to Section 2(1) No 1 lit d) of the IGTA. Ultimately, if the place of business management is established outside Germany again, a taxable disjunction of trust assets can be triggered.
For tax purposes, whether the concrete trust is a fiduciary arrangement or a separate legal entity must be determined. The tax implications for beneficiaries are the following.
Trust as a separate legal entity for tax purposes
The creation of a testamentary trust triggers inheritance tax. As manager of the trust assets, the trustee is obliged to file an inheritance notification with the German tax authorities. In the creation of an inter vivos trust, the settlor and the trustee are obliged to file a gift notification.
In the case of distributions from the trust to the settlor and/or the beneficiaries, the persons concerned have to file income tax returns and gift tax returns. The trustee as asset manager is also obliged to do this.
If the trust fulfils the prerequisites for the unlimited or limited corporate income tax liability pursuant to Section 1(1) or Section 2(1) of the CITA, the trustee is obliged to file a notification pursuant to Section 137 of the German Tax Procedure Act after trust creation, and has to file corporate income tax returns annually.
The BFH issued three rulings in 2021 regarding the taxation of trusts. A trust is transparent for German tax purposes if the settlor still has power over the assets of the trust. In this case, the settlor is seen as the direct owner of the trust assets, and hence, the establishment of the trust is not subject to gift tax. If the settlor does not have power over the trust assets, the trust is considered to be opaque. The distributions from a foreign opaque trust to a German resident are generally subject to income tax and may simultaneously be subject to gift tax.
Family Trusts Within the Meaning of Section 15 of the FTA (Special Tax Regime for Undistributed Income)
Scope of application
Section 15 of the FTA contains a special income tax regime for foreign so-called family foundations that are not subject to taxation of worldwide income and thus could be utilised to shelter income from taxation.
Foreign family foundation and trusts
A foreign family foundation is defined as an entity that has neither a registered office nor a place of effective management in Germany, and that was created to benefit the members of a family. The latter requirement is fulfilled if more than half of the foundation’s property and income is set aside for the founder and/or their relatives (Section 15(2) of the FTA). In Section 15(1) of the FTA, a proportionate share of the foundation’s income is included annually in the income of the settlor or of those beneficiaries and remaindermen who are German residents. Section 15(4) of the FTA extends this taxation mechanism to foreign “pools of assets” that were set up to benefit a family as required by Section 15(2) of the FTA. The German Federal Fiscal Court ruled in 1992 (Jersey trust) and 1994 (US trust) that trusts are such foreign “pools of assets”.
Exemption for EU/EEA trusts
Section 15(6) of the FTA excludes family foundations that have their registered office or place of effective management in EU/EEA member countries from the special taxation regime, provided that the trust’s property is extracted from the power of disposition of the settlor and their relatives, and that Germany and the respective state have entered into a certain exchange of information agreement.
Typically, the place of management of a trust is with the trustee. Nevertheless, when determining the place of management of a trust, one should also consider the rights and duties of a protector’s committee, if one exists.
In 2024, the BFH ruled that the restriction in Section 15(6) of the FTA to foreign foundations that have their registered office or place of management in the EU/EEA violates the free movement of capital. Hence, the provision is generally applicable to all foreign family foundations and trusts if they fulfil the additional requirements of Section 15(6) of the FTA.
Tax consequences and taxation regime pursuant to Section 15 of the FTA
Property and (positive) income of the family trust are attributed to the beneficiary on a pro rata basis if the beneficiary is a German resident. As long as the beneficiary is alive and the trust income accumulates to the trust, the trust income – as determined by German tax law – is added to the taxable income of the beneficiary on a pro rata basis. The beneficiary is entitled to a foreign tax credit with respect to foreign income taxes paid on the income by the trust. The trust income is included in the taxable income of the beneficiary in the taxable year in which the income arises, under general income tax rules on the level of the trust. Distributions of accumulated trust income that was subject to taxation in a prior year are not taxed a second time.
If the trust qualifies as a foreign family trust within the meaning of Section 15 of the FTA, and is not exempt under Section 15(6), its property and income are attributed to the beneficiary on a pro rata basis and added to their taxable German income.
According to Section 20(1) of the FTA, double tax treaties cannot prevent the allocation of income pursuant to Section 15(1) of the FTA. However, distributions of accumulated trust income that have been taxed under Section 15 of the FTA will not be taxed a second time when distributed to the German beneficiaries, according to Section 20(1) No 9 of the ITA.
Possible reform of Section 15 of the FTA
On 18 November 2025, the Federal Ministry of Finance published a draft for the reform of Section 15 of the FTA. A central change is the introduction of a low-tax threshold. The concept of a family foundation would be expanded to related parties and persons acting in concert. The current escape clause based on the settlor’s loss of control over foundation assets would be replaced by the BFH-inspired concept of an “artificial arrangement”. The escape clause would be extended to third countries.
Trust distributions of income or capital to German residents
The distribution of the income or capital of the trust to a German beneficiary may trigger income tax as well as gift tax.
German income taxation
Generally, distributions of foreign irrevocable trusts are subject to German income tax pursuant to Section 20(1) No 9 of the ITA. This is true for periodic or ad hoc distributions of trust income, and generally also for distributions of trust property (repayment of capital). However, repayments at the expense of the capital contribution account in terms of Section 27 of the CITA are not taxable. Moreover, the Muenster Fiscal Court ruled in 2023, that in the event of dissolution of a trust, distributions might be subject to income tax but a step-up to the 2010 tax basis has to be granted. In 2023, the BFH ruled for foundations that they cannot establish a capital contribution account like a corporation. However, tax-free repayments of capital may be proven in a suitable manner.
Such distributions are taxed under the final flat-tax regime (withholding tax on capital gains) at a rate of 25% (plus solidarity surcharge and, if applicable, church tax) of the fair market value of the distributed assets. Under this law, not only income but also trust corpus is taxable income when distributed to a German beneficiary or remainderman.
A distribution from a foreign irrevocable trust to the German beneficiary or remainderman is not taxed under Section 20(1) No 9 of the ITA if the relevant income was already attributed to the German beneficiary under Section 15 of the FTA.
German gift tax
Distributions of trust property to remaindermen resident in Germany generally constitute taxable gifts under Section 7(1) No. 9 IGTA. In 2024, the Munich Fiscal Court confirmed that treating distributions from a US trust as gifts does not violate the free movement of capital. Moreover, distributions to “intermediate beneficiaries” are subject to gift tax. Following a 2019 ruling by the BFH, only beneficiaries who irrespective of a specific resolution on a distribution, are legally entitled to the assets tied up in the trust or foundation and/or the income generated by the entity, whether – according to German legal concepts – in the form of rights in rem or in the form of claims under the law of obligations, qualify as “intermediate beneficiaries”. The applicable tax rates depend on the beneficiary’s relationship to the settlor or decedent.
The BFH has further held that distributions from foreign foundations are taxable gifts under Section 7(1) No 1 IGTA if they clearly exceed the foundation’s statutory purpose, with tax authorities generally required to respect the foundation’s own assessment of whether a distribution serves that purpose.
Double Taxation
As highlighted above, trust distributions can trigger income tax as well as gift tax simultaneously. Pursuant to Section 35b of the ITA, inheritance tax can be credited against German income tax if triggered by inheritance but not by donation. However, German tax law does not provide for a credit of the income tax paid by the beneficiary on the gift tax, nor vice versa.
In 2023, the Muenster Fiscal Court ruled that, in the event of dissolution of the trust, the distributions might be subject to income tax as well as gift tax. However, a step-up for income tax purposes was granted.
Distributions From a Foreign Family Foundation
Distributions from a foreign family foundation may be subject to income tax if they are comparable to dividends. In the case of a Swiss family foundation, the BFH has ruled that the recipient of the distribution must be comparable to a shareholder. This is the case if they fulfil the requirements set out in the foundation’s statutes for receiving distributions, that is, if they belong to the group of beneficiaries and no consideration is to be paid in return. However, the recipient does not require any further asset or organisational rights under the foundation statutes.
In Germany, domestic family foundations are treated as opaque. The fact that an individual holds a dual or even triple role (founder, board member and beneficiary) within the foundation does not change this classification. This does not apply to foreign foundations or trusts. If the founder or settlor of a trust or foreign foundation retains powers of control, direction or disposal over the foundation or trust assets (eg, by having a role as a trustee or board member) or reserves rights of reversion or withdrawal, the foreign foundation or trust is generally regarded as transparent for tax purposes. In 2024, the Schleswig-Holstein Fiscal Court had to decide if a trust, validly established in accordance with the applicable law (in this case, Guernsey law), was subject to German inheritance tax following the death of the German resident settlor. As the settlor did not reserve any powers of control which would allow them to continue to dispose freely of the assets held in the trust, the trust was considered opaque and the assets held in the trust did not form part of the settlor’s estate on the death of the settlor. Hence, the trust assets were not subject to German inheritance tax.
The most popular methods for asset protection are prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, family foundations and partnership structures.
Marriage Agreement
With a marriage agreement, it is also possible to transfer assets from one spouse to the other without incurring taxes, removing the assets from the reach of creditors by doing so.
Family Foundations
Assets that are transferred to a family foundation have left the property sphere of the founder and are attributed to the foundation itself. In order for this effect to occur, it is a prerequisite that the founder has actually given up control over these assets, which is, in turn, assumed by the entities of the foundation.
Partnerships
Partnerships are often used (depending on the types of assets) to transfer wealth to the next generation but at the same time retain a degree of control over the gifted assets.
See 2.6 Transfer of Assets: Vehicle and Planning Mechanisms and 1.2 Exemptions.
A partial interest will generally be valued at the current market value of the underlying assets. However, the Muenster Fiscal Court decided in 2022 that a valuation discount may be applicable to a co-ownership share in a real property, compared to full ownership. The valuation discount is subject to a well-founded appraisal. The Higher Regional Court Hamm ruled in 2023 that a substantial discount (30% to 50%) is applicable to a co-ownership share in a real property held by a community of heirs.
Probate arbitration and mediation are considered as an alternative to probate litigation in solving wealth disputes. An effective way to avoid long and costly probate disputes is to establish an arbitration clause in a last will. This clause is usually combined with a no-contest clause.
There is no special mechanism for compensation in wealth disputes.
The use of corporate fiduciaries is not prevalent in German law.
Piercing the veil of a trust or foundation is unusual. Nevertheless, if a trust or foundation is regarded as a mere fiduciary agreement, the veil can be pierced and income as well as capital of the trust will be attributed to the settlor or – in rarer cases – to the beneficiaries.
The prudent investor rule is applicable to a fiduciary and also to an investment adviser.
There are very few investment theories or standards in this field in Germany. The Tax Court Munich (decision of 25 April 2016 – 7 K 1252/14) held that non-profit corporations are largely free to choose their investments. They may choose any form of investment that is economically reasonable, applying an ex ante perspective.
In general, German citizenship can be awarded automatically by law or upon the request of an individual by administrative act.
By law, German citizenship will be passed to children by way of kinship if one of the parents of the child is a German citizen. Another way of obtaining German citizenship is by way of adoption by at least one German citizen.
With certain prerequisites, citizenship can be acquired by administrative act if a person has immigrated lawfully to Germany and has had their habitual abode in Germany for longer than eight years. The same applies if an individual is willing to abandon their former citizenship and has a spouse or a registered partner with German citizenship. Alternatively, citizenship can be acquired if the individual has custody of a child who has German citizenship.
Former German nationals who were deprived of their citizenship by arbitrary expatriations by the Nazi regime on political, racial and religious grounds between 1933 and 1945, and their descendants, may apply for naturalisation (without further requirements).
Tax Residency
German tax residency may be obtained by maintaining a dwelling in Germany or by staying in Germany, when the stay is not merely temporary (generally, a stay of six months without interruptions suffices).
Citizens of the EU will be treated favourably in obtaining German citizenship as a result of the unity principle promoted by the EU.
On the one hand, they will not need to acquire a residence permit, but will be able to acquire this automatically if an application is filed with the responsible authorities. On the other hand, citizens of the EU are not required to drop their previous citizenship when obtaining German citizenship, thus gaining dual citizenship. Otherwise, EU citizens are held to the same standards as citizens of other countries.
A last will can be designed to focus especially on the needs of disabled children. In these cases, parents tend to consider specific provisions that ensure full support of the disabled child by state subsidy after their death, while keeping the estate itself untouched with regard to the day-to-day support of the child. This objective is reached by pairing a preliminary/posterior heirship with an executorship.
A guardian, conservator, or similar representative can only be appointed by a court and remains subject to court supervision, including reporting obligations. Since a 2023 reform, German law has strengthened the self-determination rights of people in need of support, tightened rules on managing and transferring a ward’s assets (including corporate shares), and introduced a limited right for spouses to make healthcare decisions for an incapacitated partner in emergencies.
German law provides several mechanisms to establish a legally secure framework in the event of future mental incapacity. A statutory emergency representation right for spouses has been codified in Section 1358 of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch or BGB). However, its scope is limited and subject to strict statutory requirements. For this reason, a lasting power of attorney (Vorsorgevollmacht) is generally the preferred instrument in practice. Owing to its broader scope and greater acceptance in legal and commercial transactions, it is considerably more effective than Section 1358 BGB. In addition, an advance healthcare directive (Patientenverfügung) pursuant to Section 1827 BGB enables individuals to determine in advance how medical treatment and healthcare decisions should be handled if they are no longer capable of making such decisions themselves. Furthermore, corporate governance documents, such as shareholders’ agreements or articles of association, should be reviewed and, where necessary, amended to ensure the function of the company in the event of incapacity of major shareholders or managing directors.
To avoid court-supervised care of a parent in the case of mental incapacity or something similar, it is common to produce a lasting power of attorney. However, such a power of attorney can only be established if the principal is still fully capable of acting in their own right. In this context, problems may arise, particularly in the event of dementia. The power of attorney may be revoked at any time.
A living will is usually drawn up together with a power of attorney.
In German tax and civil law, children born out of wedlock and adopted children are treated in the same way as children born in a marriage.
Same-sex marriages have been recognised in Germany since 1 October 2017; previously, it was possible to enter into a so-called registered partnership. It is possible to have a partnership that was registered before this date retroactively converted into a marriage. In addition, German registered partners are treated equally to other spouses regarding taxation.
Under German law, the mere cohabitation of a romantic couple does not give rise to any particular legal or tax consequences or rights. In particular, it does not establish any matrimonial property law or inheritance law position, such as entitlement to a compulsory share of an estate. Nor does it confer any tax privileges. A partial alignment with the rights and obligations of spouses was historically provided for registered civil partnerships under the German Civil Partnership Act (LPartG), which was available to same-sex couples. Section 5 LPartG regulated certain mutual rights and obligations between partners, while Section 10 LPartG set out the legal consequences upon death. However, the introduction of same-sex marriage significantly reduced the practical relevance of the LPartG. Today, it continues to apply only to civil partnerships entered into before 1 October 2017 that have not been converted into a marriage, as well as to certain civil partnerships established abroad to which German law applies. Where a civil partnership has been converted into a marriage, the legal provisions governing marriage become applicable. If no such conversion has taken place, the provisions of the LPartG continue to apply to the respective partnership.
Due to the high reliefs under the German income, inheritance and gift tax regime, structuring non-profit organisations can be a good way to combine private clients’ charitable interests with favourable tax planning.
Tax Reliefs
In general, tax reliefs are available for organisations that have tax-privileged purposes – that is, purposes that are in the public interest (defined as advancing the material, spiritual or ethical well-being of society), benevolent or religious. Donations to tax-privileged organisations are generally tax-deductible (up to 20% of income, plus up to EUR1 million for certain foundation endowments) and exempt from inheritance tax. The same rules apply to charities in EU and EEA member states, although gift tax may still apply unless an exemption is available.
The way in which charitable organisations are structured plays a significant role in German tax and estate planning. Charities can be set up in a variety of legal forms, including as foundations, corporations and associations.
Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49
MesseTurm
D-60308
Frankfurt am Main
Germany
+49 6971 7030
+49 697 170 3100
christian.von-oertzen@fgs.de www.fgs.de
Introduction of a Foundation Register in 2028
The introduction of the foundation register, originally planned for the end of 2026, has been postponed to 1 January 2028. All foundations with legal capacity must be registered in this register, including both newly established and existing structures. Existing foundations must complete registration by 31 December 2028. The primary objective of the register is to enhance transparency. Use of the online portal will be free of charge and accessible without prior registration.
Trusts in Germany
German civil law does not recognise common law trusts, and their tax treatment remains restrictive, particularly regarding distributions to German-resident beneficiaries. According to Federal Fiscal Court (Bundesfinanzhof or BFH) case law and the 2023 administrative guidance, a trust is treated as transparent if the settlor retains sufficient control over the trust assets, for example, through a right to revoke the trust and recover the assets. Otherwise, the trust is regarded as opaque. Distributions from opaque foreign trusts to German residents may be subject to both income tax and gift tax, while undistributed trust income can be attributed to German beneficiaries under certain circumstances. In 2023, the Münster Fiscal Court confirmed that distributions upon trust termination may trigger both taxes, although a step-up for income tax purposes is available. In 2024, the Munich Fiscal Court held that the gift-tax treatment of distributions from foreign trusts or foundations is compatible with EU law, as it is justified by the coherence of the German tax system. The Schleswig-Holstein Fiscal Court further clarified in 2024 that assets of a validly established opaque trust do not form part of the settlor’s estate for German inheritance tax purposes if the settlor has not retained continued control over the assets. Consequently, such trust assets are not subject to German inheritance tax upon the settlor’s death.
CFC rules regarding foreign family foundations and trusts partly violate European law
Assets and income of a foreign family foundation are attributed to the founder, if they are subject to German unlimited tax liability, or otherwise to German resident beneficiaries or remaindermen. If a family foundation has its place of management or its registered office in EU/EEA countries and if there are sufficient exchanges of information between the foreign country and Germany, this provision is not applicable under certain conditions. In December 2024, the BFH ruled that this restriction to family foundations in EU/EEA countries violates the free movement of capital. Thus, the provision is applicable to all foreign family foundations if it can be proved that the foundation assets are legally and actually withdrawn from the power of disposal of the settlor, beneficiary and remaindermen. The separation must be considered on a legal and not on an economic basis. However, the German tax authorities still use an economic approach. In a press release, the BFH extended the application of its decision to trusts. In the same ruling, the BFH stated that the qualification as a remainderman does not require an enforceable claim, but merely a secured legal position with regard to the accrual of the assets.
Possible reform of CFC rules regarding foreign family foundations and trusts
Section 15 of the German Foreign Tax Act (Außensteuergesetz or AStG) attributes the income of foreign foundations and trusts to German settlors or beneficiaries under certain conditions, even without distributions (“dry income”). Unlike beneficiaries of domestic foundations, who are taxed only upon receipt of distributions, this results in a significant disadvantage. Following the BFH’s December 2024 decision, the Ministry of Finance proposed a reform of Section 15 AStG in a discussion draft of 18 November 2025. A central change would be the introduction of a low-tax threshold: attribution would apply only where income is low-taxed. Moreover, active income would remain sheltered. The concept of a family foundation would be expanded to related parties and persons acting in concert, while the corporate foundation concept would be abolished and indirect beneficiaries brought within scope. The current escape clause based on the settlor’s loss of control over foundation assets would be replaced by the BFH-inspired concept of an “artificial arrangement”. This may exclude typical US/UK trust structures from attribution taxation. The escape clause would be extended to third countries in line with BFH case law. Multi-tier attribution would remain, but the possibility of proving the absence of an artificial arrangement would be assessed at the level of each subordinate company or foundation. Although the tax authorities view this as a clarification, this position has been criticised in legal literature.
Distributions from a foreign family foundation
Distributions from a foreign family foundation may be subject to income tax if they are comparable to dividends. In the case of a Swiss family foundation, the BFH ruled in 2024 that the recipient of the distribution must be comparable to a shareholder. This is the case if they fulfil the requirements set out in the foundation’s statutes for receiving distributions, that is, if they belong to the group of beneficiaries and no consideration is to be paid in return. However, the recipient does not require any further proprietary or governance rights under the foundation statutes.
European Court of Justice upholds limitation of tax class privileges to domestic family foundations
The German Gift and Inheritance Tax Act (Erbschaftsteuer- und Schenkungsteuergesetz, or ErbStG) provides a tax class privilege under Section 15(2) sentence 1 for domestic family foundations. While contributions to foreign foundations are taxed under tax class III, domestic family foundations benefit from this privilege, with taxation based on the kinship between the founder and beneficiaries. In return, they are subject to substitute inheritance tax every 30 years. Foreign family foundations do not benefit from this privilege and are also not subject to substitute inheritance tax. The Cologne Fiscal Court referred the compatibility of this distinction with EU law to the CJEU, which in 2025 held that the exclusion of foreign family foundations from the tax class privilege is compatible with the free movement of capital. Although this constitutes a restriction, it is justified by the coherence of the German tax system, as the privilege and substitute inheritance tax form a linked regime of relief and subsequent taxation. Extending the privilege without the corresponding substitute inheritance tax would disrupt this balance, so the limitation to domestic family foundations remains valid.
Recognition of foreign family foundations with domestic tax liabilities
The BFH ruled in June 2025 that foreign foundations with place of management in Germany are only subject to German substitute inheritance tax if they have legal capacity. Only civil-law ownership of assets is relevant; economic attribution is irrelevant. In the case of a Swiss family foundation managed in Germany, the BFH applied the seat theory, under which legal capacity is determined by German law. As the foundation had no legal capacity under German law, it did not qualify as a family foundation for substitute inheritance tax purposes. The BFH rejected the fiscal court’s view that foreign legal capacity alone suffices. The court also clarified conflict-of-laws rules: the seat theory generally applies to third-country foundations, while the incorporation theory may apply in the EU/EEA. The ruling confirms that substitute inheritance tax requires legal capacity, not merely a place of management in Germany.
In August 2025, the Munich Fiscal Court held in a related case that a Liechtenstein foundation does not lose legal capacity when its place of management is moved to Germany. The tax authorities had treated the relocation as a loss of legal personality and attributed a contribution to the founder for gift tax purposes. The court rejected this, holding that EEA foundations engaged in economic activity may rely on freedom of establishment, displacing the seat theory. As the foundation documents did not grant control rights to the founder, the foundation remained an independent opaque entity, so contributions were not attributable to the founder, and the gift tax assessment was annulled. The case is on appeal before the BFH.
Taxation of Crypto-Assets
In 2025, the German tax authorities released their latest guidelines regarding the taxation of crypto-assets, updating the guidelines published in 2022. According to the tax authorities, each transaction involving a crypto-asset of any kind may qualify as a taxable event, even if the transaction does not involve an exchange into fiat-money. The Nuremberg Fiscal Court ruled in 2025 that the taxation of these transactions without an exchange into fiat-money is not unconstitutional. The mere trading of crypto-assets (even in great volume) does not qualify as a commercial activity from a German tax perspective, if this activity is conducted in the usual manner of private investors. If crypto-assets are privately held, they can be sold income tax-free after a holding period of more than one year. This is not the case for crypto-assets which qualify as commercial assets. Where the sale of the crypto-assets is subject to German income tax, the gain is calculated either on the basis of the first-in-first-out method or the average method at the taxpayer’s discretion. Special activities, like forging or mining crypto-assets, are always considered commercial activities.
Some German political parties, such as “Bündnis 90/Die Grünen” and “Die Linke”, propose to abolish the holding period tax exemption in order to tax any gains derived from the disposal of cryptocurrencies, and they propose the introduction of a crypto-exit tax.
Taxation of Foreign Currency Exchange Gains
According to a 2022 Federal Ministry of Finance (Bundesministerium der Finanzen or BMF) decree, gains from foreign currency transactions are taxed either at the personal income tax rate or at the 25% flat withholding tax rate, and may be tax-exempt after a holding period of more than one year. In practice, tax authorities increasingly treat exchange-rate gains from interest-bearing foreign currency deposits as taxable capital income under Section 20 German Income Tax Act (Einkommensteuergesetz or EStG), even without an actual conversion into euros. In 2025, the Fiscal Court of Rhineland-Palatinate questioned this approach. The court doubted whether a taxable disposal gain can arise upon repayment of a foreign currency deposit, as this merely reflects the original investment without a realised gain. Taxation before conversion may therefore constitute generally impermissible “dry income” and could violate the ability-to-pay principle. The court also highlighted systemic inconsistencies and potential double taxation under Sections 20 and 23 EStG, which the subsidiarity approach does not fully resolve. This reasoning may also affect other foreign currency instruments, such as loans, and questions the current administrative practice.
Inheritance and Gift Tax
German limited inheritance tax liability in case of a real estate legacy
In 2022, the BFH ruled that German real estate was not subject to limited inheritance tax liability if the real estate was transferred by bequest. Generally, German real estate is taxable in the case of limited inheritance tax liability, especially if the beneficiary is appointed as heir. However, if the beneficiary was “only” a legatee (who, according to the applicable law of succession only acquires a claim against the heir to transfer the real estate), this claim was not subject to limited inheritance tax liability. This principle also applied if the real estate was later transferred to the legatee in order to fulfil the claim. The German legislator then amended the ErbStG to put domestic and foreign legatees on an equal footing.
Application of German forced heirship law despite choice of English law of succession
The Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof or BGH) ruled in 2022 that German forced heirship law is applicable even if the testator, an English national, has chosen English law to govern their succession. The last habitual residence of the testator was in Germany and hence German law of succession was generally applicable. According to the BGH, the choice of English law was (partially) contrary to German ordre public in so far as it excluded forced heirship rights due to the choice of English law. Therefore, the choice of English law was (partially) invalid and consequently, German forced heirship law was applied.
Deduction of liabilities in the case of limited inheritance tax liability
Generally, estate liabilities are deducted from taxable acquisition. In the case of limited tax liability, debts and encumbrances are not deductible to the extent that they are not economically attributable to assets that are subject to limited tax liability. Hence, the BFH ruled that claims arising from forced heirship law were not deductible in the case of limited inheritance tax liability. In 2021, the CJEU ruled that this provision violates the free movement of capital. In 2024, the German legislator amended the provision and a pro rata deduction is now permitted.
Tax relief of 10% for residential properties in non-EU/EEA countries
In principle, a 10% tax relief for gifts and inheritances was available for personally held real estate that was let for residential purposes and that was located in Germany or other parts of the EU or EEA. In 2023, the CJEU ruled that this provision violated the free movement of capital because properties in countries other than the EU/EEA were excluded from this relief. Since 31 December 2024, the relief has also applied to properties in non-EU/EEA countries that exchange inheritance and gift tax information with Germany.
Inheritability of social media accounts
The digital estate is an interplay of inheritance law, fundamental rights, privacy and business practices of service providers. In Germany, there are only a few judicial verdicts in relation to the digital estate, so many legal issues are still unclear and somewhat controversial. In 2018, the BGH decided that heirs are entitled to access the Facebook account of the deceased. The account would also be transferred to the heirs by way of universal succession. The court stated that neither the secrecy of telecommunications nor the post-mortem personal right to privacy stands in the way of inheritance. In 2025, the Higher Regional Court of Oldenburg ruled that the contractual user relationship with its rights and obligations for social media accounts (in this case: Instagram) is transferred to the heirs by way of universal succession. The heirs may continue to actively use the account.
Lifetime gifting of interests in corporations with reserve of usufruct
A common estate planning structure is lifetime gifting with reserve of usufruct. The attribution rules regarding usufruct rights for income tax purposes have changed recently. Decisions of the BFH in 2022, 2024 and 2025, as well as publications by the BMF in 2025, have produced some uncertainty regarding the attribution of income for income tax purposes. The income is generally no longer attributed to the usufructuary but to the shareholder unless the usufructuary qualifies as the beneficial owner of the shares (ie, by having the voting rights and by benefiting from an increase in the value of the shares as well as taking the risk of a decrease in value). The recent decisions of the BFH are unfortunately not 100% cohesive so this uncertainty remains.
Customary occasional gifts and their reference standard
Customary occasional gifts are exempt from gift tax under Section 13(1) No 14 ErbStG, without a fixed threshold; the qualification is based on an overall assessment of occasion, relationship, and the donor’s financial circumstances. The Fiscal Court of Rhineland-Palatinate held that a EUR20,000 cash gift for Easter does not qualify as a customary occasional gift and is therefore completely taxable. It rejected the previous relative approach focusing on the donor’s wealth and instead applied an objective standard based on general social practice, referring also to small-value exemption rules. This departs from established BFH case law as well as administrative practice and is rejected in legal scholarship.
Potential changes in tax law and pending case before the Federal Constitutional Court concerning gift and inheritance tax
The German transfer tax regime is currently in a stable phase. Germany elected a new federal parliament in 2025, with another “grand coalition” consisting of the Christian Democratic Union (Christlich-Demokratische Union or CDU) and the Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands or SPD), and led by the CDU. So far, no major changes in transfer taxes have been announced. Like many other countries, Germany is still facing the consequences of the war in Ukraine and lately in Iran; hence, changes might be expected. In order to close the growing fiscal budget gap, the SPD has publicly proposed an increase in income tax for high-income individuals as a possible (partial) solution.
Moreover, it remains unclear if the current gift and inheritance tax exemptions for business assets are constitutional. It can be expected that within the next two years the German Federal Constitutional Court will render a decision in this regard.
Exit Taxation
“Passive” exit taxation under new double taxation treaty provisions
The BFH held that a passive exit taxation event under Section 4(1) sentence 3 EStG can arise solely from a change in law, in particular the entry into force of a new or amended double taxation agreement (DTA), and does not require any active conduct by the taxpayer. The case concerned a German partnership holding shares in a Spanish corporation with predominantly Spanish real estate. Under the 2011 Germany–Spain DTA, Spain obtained a new taxation right over gains from the disposal of such shares, thereby restricting Germany’s taxation right and triggering exit taxation according to the tax authorities. The BFH clarified that the taxable event occurs in the “last legal second” before the restriction takes effect. If a DTA applies from 1 January, any exit gain must therefore be recognised as of 31 December of the previous year. In this case, any exit gain would have had to be accounted for on 31 December 2012, not in 2013 as assumed by the tax authorities.
Exit taxation relocation to Switzerland
The BFH ruled in 2023 on a 2011 relocation case to Switzerland – applying the previous legislation which did not provide a permanent, interest-free tax deferral for relocations to non EU/EEA countries – that such a tax deferral is applicable. Hence, it might be expected that the BFH would rule in favour of a permanent, interest-free tax deferral in current EU/EEA cases, even though the present legislation does not provide such a tax deferral. However, no adaption of the exit taxation in this case is in sight. The German tax authorities issued a decree in 2025 that the ruling will only be applied to relocation cases to Switzerland prior to 2022.
Tax authorities on exit taxation
Moreover, the German tax authorities published decrees in 2023 and 2025 on the application of the exit tax. In the case of temporary absence, the exit tax only lapses with retroactive effect if Germany’s right of taxation is directly re-established exactly as it was at the time of departure. Particularly in cases with double taxation conventions, it must be ensured that the double taxation convention (re)assigns the right of taxation to Germany directly upon re-establishment of German unlimited tax liability. Distributions made after 16 August 2023 by corporations whose shareholders are subject to exit taxation trigger immediate exit taxation regarding the shares if the distributions exceed one quarter of the fair market value of the corporation.
Friedrich-Ebert-Anlage 49
MesseTurm
D-60308
Frankfurt am Main
Germany
+49 6971 7030
+49 697 170 3100
christian.von-oertzen@fgs.de www.fgs.de