All direct tax-related aspects fall under the Income Tax Act, 2025 (ITA), together with all applicable by-laws, rules, regulations, orders, ordinances, directives and the like issued thereunder. The ITA and Income Tax Rules, 2026 were recently enacted to repeal and replace the Income Tax Act, 1961 and related rules, with effect from 1 April 2026, with the objective of having simplified, concise, and reader-friendly legislation.

Taxation for Individuals

As per the ITA, individuals are subject to tax in India based on their residential status in India. Individuals can be classified as:

• residents;
• non-residents; or
• resident but not ordinarily resident (RNOR).

An individual is considered to be tax-resident in India in any year if:

• the individual stays in India for a period of 182 days or more in a financial year; or
• the individual stays in India for a period of 60 days or more in a financial year and 365 days or more during the preceding four financial years.

In the case of an Indian citizen or persons of Indian origin (PIO) who visits India during the year, or an Indian citizen who leaves India in any financial year as a crew member of an Indian ship or for the purpose of employment outside India, the requirement of having to spend 60 days or more is taken as 182 days.

However, in the case of an Indian citizen or a PIO whose total income (excluding foreign-source income), exceeds INR1.5 million during the relevant financial year, the period of 182 days is reduced to 120 days.

Additionally, an Indian whose total income (excluding foreign-source income), exceeds INR1.5 million during the relevant financial year, is deemed to be a resident of India if he/she is not “liable to tax” in any other country by reason of domicile or residence or any other criteria of a similar nature.

A tax resident of India is considered to be RNOR if such a taxpayer:

• has been a non-resident in nine out of the ten financial years preceding the relevant financial year; or
• has not been in India for an overall period of 729 days during seven financial years preceding the relevant financial year.

Further, if an Indian citizen or PIO becomes a resident of India upon exceeding 120 days’ stay in India (but does not stay in India for more than 182 days), then such person would also qualify as a RNOR. Similarly, where an Indian citizen becomes a resident under the deemed residency rules, then such person would also qualify as a RNOR.

While Indian residents are typically taxed on their global income, non-residents are liable to pay income tax only on India-sourced income. Any income which is received or deemed to be received in India or has accrued or arisen or is deemed to accrue or arise in India shall be considered as India-sourced income. RNORs are taxed on their India-sourced income and such foreign income which is derived from a business controlled, or a profession set up, in India.

Under the ITA, income tax is levied under the following broad categories:

• salaries;
• income from house property;
• profits and gains from business or profession;
• capital gains; and
• income from other sources.

Income tax rates vary according to the age and applicable tax bracket of the taxpayer. There are two regimes for taxation: (i) new regime (default regime) and (ii) old regime. The current rates of the tax bracket for all individuals below 60 years of age under the new regime and old regime are as follows:

In the old regime (excluding applicable surcharges and cess):

• individuals who earned up to INR250,000 paid no tax;
• individuals who earned between INR250,001 and INR500,000 paid 5% of income in excess of INR250,000;
• individuals who earned between INR500,001 and INR1 million paid 20% of income in excess of INR500,000 plus INR12,500; and
• individuals who earned above INR1 million paid 30% of income in excess of INR1 million plus INR112,500.

In the new regime (excluding applicable surcharges and cess):

• individuals who earn up to INR400,000 pay no tax;
• individuals who earn between INR400,001 and INR800,000 pay 5% of income in excess of INR400,000;
• individuals who earn between INR800,001 and INR1.2 million pay 10% of income in excess of INR800,000 plus INR20,000;
• individuals who earn between INR1,200,001 and INR1.6 million pay 15% of income in excess of INR1,200,001 plus INR60,000;
• individuals who earn above between INR1,600,001 and INR2 million pay 20% of income in excess of INR1.6 million plus INR120,000;
• individuals who earn above between INR2,000,001 and INR2.4 million pay 25% of income in excess of INR2 million plus INR200,000; and
• individuals who earn above INR2.4 million pay 30% of income in excess of INR2.4 million plus INR300,000.

Moreover, for a taxpayer whose total income exceeds INR5 million but is less than INR10 million, an additional surcharge of 10% of the tax is levied. For persons whose total income is more than INR10 million but does not exceed INR20 million, a 15% surcharge on income applies. For income exceeding INR20 million but not exceeding INR50 million, a 25% surcharge is leviable and for income exceeding INR50 million a 37% surcharge is leviable. However, for taxpayers opting for the new regime, the surcharge has been capped at 25% for income exceeding INR20 million.

The taxpayers additionally have to pay a health and education cess at the rate of 4% of the income tax and the applicable surcharge. Additionally, the surcharge on certain capital gains income and dividends has been capped at 15%.

Further, there are no estate, inheritance or generational-skipping taxes in India. There is also no separate gift tax which is levied in India.

Under the ITA, income of trusts registered for charitable purposes are exempt from tax subject to certain conditions. For updates on taxation on trusts registered for charitable purposes under the ITA, see 10.1 Charitable Giving.

For taxation of private trusts, see 3.1 Types of Trusts, Foundations or Similar Entities.

Under the provisions of the ITA, any transfer of a capital asset by an individual or a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) under a gift or a Will is exempt from capital gains tax. However, Section 92(2)(m) of the ITA, an anti-avoidance provision, stipulates that any person who received money or property, for no consideration or for a consideration which is less than fair market value, then such difference between fair market value and consideration would be subject to tax under the head of “Income from Other Sources”. The term “property” under the said provision shall mean immovable property being land or building or both, shares and securities, jewellery, archaeological collections, drawings, paintings, sculptures, any work of art or bullion and virtual digital assets.

Accordingly, if a gift was made to a third party, then it would be taxed under the head of “income from other sources”, akin to a gift tax.

However, to provide benefit of tax exemption to genuine cases, inter alia, an exemption from taxation for gifts made to “relatives” was provided. The term “relatives” is defined under Section 92(5)(g) of the ITA. The following individuals would qualify as relatives for the purposes of the ITA:

• in the case of an individual:
1. spouse;
2. brother or sister;
3. brother or sister of the spouse;
4. brother or sister of either of the parents;
5. any lineal ascendant (maternal as well as paternal) or descendant;
6. any lineal ascendant (maternal as well as paternal) or descendant of the spouse; and
7. spouse of the persons mentioned to in (b) to (f); and
• in the case of an HUF, any member thereof.

There are no tax planning tools available for stepping up of capital assets to their fair market value. Under the provisions of the ITA, a transfer of a capital asset pursuant to inheritance or Will is exempt from capital gains tax. Hence any capital asset received pursuant to inheritance or Will shall be tax exempt. Further, the cost of acquisition of the asset shall be deemed to be the cost for which the previous owner of the property acquired the said asset. For the purpose of computing the period of holding, the period shall be calculated from the date of acquisition by the previous owner from whom such property is received.

As discussed in 1.1 Tax Regimes, non-residents pay tax only on India-sourced income, hence they may set up trusts or alternative investment funds (AIFs) or other tax planning vehicles depending on their requirements in order to defer their income tax liabilities. However, any such tax planning vehicle would have to be analysed separately on facts, to determine if they constitute a place of effective management in India or are subject to general anti-avoidance rules (GAAR).

The Indian taxation framework provides a transitional window before worldwide income becomes taxable. As discussed in 1.1 Tax Regimes, if a taxpayer qualifies as a RNOR, it is taxed only on Indian-source income and on such foreign-source income as is connected with a business controlled in India or a profession set up in India, rather than on global income.

Following the expiry of the RNOR period, the taxpayer would transition to resident status, resulting in their worldwide income becoming taxable in India.

Similarly, as discussed in 1.1 Tax Regimes, specific relaxations have been prescribed for Indian citizens and PIOs visiting India, as well as for Indian citizens leaving India for employment purposes, which may defer the onset of full residential status. These provisions can be strategically utilised to optimise the timing of residency and associated tax exposure.

Regarding real estate assets, the ITA seeks to tax (i) the annual value of the real estate assets, determined in a prescribed manner, under the heading of “income from house property”; and (ii) gains arising from disposal of such assets, under the heading of “profits and gains from business or profession” or “capital gains”, depending on whether the assets are held as capital assets or stock-in trade.

Income From House Property

The annual value of the property, determined in the prescribed manner, is taxed in the hands of the individual taxpayer at the applicable slab rates. Typically, it is not the rent recovered from a property (unless that is higher) which is subject to tax under this kind of income, but it is the income yielding capacity of the property which is subject to tax (ie, the annual value of the property), subject to certain conditions.

For the purpose of computing such income, self-occupied property and property utilised for the purposes of carrying on the business or profession of the owner, taxable in India, are excluded.

Gains From Disposal of Real Estate Assets

Gains arising on sale of property held as capital assets, would be subject to capital gains tax in India. Capital gains tax implications can be summed up as follows.

• If the asset (immovable property) has a short-term holding period (ie, two years or less), then the applicable tax rate (excluding surcharge and cess) ranges up to 30%.
• If the asset has a long-term holding period (ie, more than two years), then the applicable tax rate (excluding surcharge and cess) is 12.5%.

Where the real estate assets are held as stock-in-trade, gains arising from disposal of such assets would be subject to tax in the hands of the taxpayer, at the applicable slab rates.

Apart from tax on transfer of property, individuals are required to pay stamp duty on the instruments of transfer. The stamp duty rate can be fixed or variable (ad valorem), based on the value and location of the underlying property or asset forming the subject matter of the transaction. Stamp taxes on transfer of real estate are frequently significant; the rates depend on the location of the property, as this tax is levied at the state level. Several states, such as Maharashtra, Karnataka and Rajasthan, provide lower stamp rates for intra-relative transfers.

As previously discussed, there is no estate tax currently being levied in India.

However, fears of such potential estate tax do remain and continue to influence succession planning structures and outcomes. It is because of this fear that many people are creating discretionary trusts and then holding their estate through such discretionary trust. Discretionary trusts in India are taxed at the maximum marginal rate (MMR) – ie, approximately 42.74%. While this MMR is as per the old tax regime, the Finance Act, 2023 has reduced the surcharge rates under the new tax regime, thereby reducing the highest effective rate to 39%. Therefore, there exists an ambiguity as to whether to consider 42.74% or 39% as the MMR.

India has, inter alia, undertaken the following initiatives to address real or perceived abuses or loopholes in the tax laws.

• India entered into an Inter-Governmental Agreement with the USA in 2015, which provides that the Indian financial institutions will provide the necessary information to Indian tax authorities, which will then be transmitted to the USA automatically.
• India amended the ITA to include provisions to mandate financial institutions in India to provide the tax authorities information about specified financial transactions. This was done in order to implement the Common Reporting Standards in India.
• India introduced provisions for Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) in order to introduce transparency in the reporting obligations of large multinational enterprises (MNEs). Under the CbCR, tax authorities gain visibility to the revenue, income, tax paid and accrued, employment, capital, retained earnings, tangible assets and activities of such MNEs.
• India has adopted the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Crypto Asset Reporting Framework, pursuant to which virtual digital asset service providers will be required to report user transactions and related information.

In India, companies are mandated to maintain a register containing information of significant beneficial owners (SBO) – ie, shareholders being individuals, and themselves or together with other persons (including companies, limited liability partnerships (LLPs), partnerships, trusts, and others) hold at least 10% shares, voting rights, and the right to receive dividends from the Indian company or exercise significant influence/control in the Indian company.

SBO Rules prescribe various tests to determine the SBO depending on the nature of the holding entity. This reporting is required irrespective of whether the SBO or the entity through which it holds the shares of the reporting company is in India or overseas. The SBO Rules make it mandatory for the company to keep its SBO register maintained and available for inspection for its shareholders.

Succession in India is heavily influenced by culture and tradition. India’s succession regimes are linked to the religious communities that the relevant citizens hail from. They are governed by the specific legislations or personal laws and customs which have a huge influence on how individuals and families approach succession.

In India, the possibility of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) being made applicable to all citizens, irrespective of their religious denomination, has increased. The state of Uttarakhand became the first state to pass their state-specific UCC in 2024, followed by the states of Gujarat and Assam in 2026. The implications of the UCC on forced heirship, marital property and live-in relationships are discussed further in 2.3 Forced Heirship Laws, 2.4 Marital Property and 9.3 Cohabitation and Unmarried Couples, respectively.

Lately, India is moving away from the general consideration of any discussion on succession planning being considered taboo in India (culturally perceived to be reserved for the “ultra-wealthy”). An increasing portion of the population, especially the younger and middle-aged section, is understanding the importance of estate and succession planning and is seeking professional assistance in order to set up adequate, sustainable inter-generational structures. Helpful regulatory changes pertaining to simplifying nomination across various assets is also contributing to this progression, by reducing paperwork and the friction in the actual passing on of financial assets.

Corporate India continues to focus on building a robust governance by professionalising key managerial roles by inducting experts in the field who are not a part of the family into the family business. The trend of private equity firms and financial investors acquiring management control, controlling stakes and running companies has been gaining ground over the years.

Family businesses are seeking to strike a balance between keeping the blood lines close and triumphing a merit-based system. Recent years have also seen nuanced family splits by way of executing amicable family settlement agreements, brand-usage agreements and non-competes which aid in the seamless division of business operations.

The Indian foreign exchange regime restricts and qualifies the movement of capital assets overseas. Remittance of assets overseas from India – by both resident individuals and non-resident Indians (NRIs) is subject to regulatory controls imposed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). In practice, advisers typically undertake a detailed mapping of the family’s asset base, residency profile and intended jurisdictions at the outset, in order to identify the applicable regulatory pathway and structure cross-border transfers in a compliant and tax-efficient manner.

With the growth of businesses and families on a global stage and the international presence of multiple family members, a huge number of families are opting to create an irrevocable discretionary trust or a grantor trust through which they hold their assets in order to save them from tax implications in multiple jurisdictions, with suitable advice from multi-jurisdictional professionals.

In a case where the parents are Indian residents and the children are tax residents in the US, the parents cannot transfer the property directly to the children as that would attract US tax on such assets, because the US charges a tax on global income in addition to inheritance and estate tax. In such a scenario, the parents set up an irrevocable discretionary trust in India with themselves as beneficiaries and the children as secondary beneficiaries after their death. Typically, such grantor trusts are not subject to tax in the US while the primary beneficiaries are alive. Upon the demise of the primary beneficiaries, no probate or any regulatory approvals are required for securing the rights of the secondary beneficiaries to the trust property.

Overseas remittances by NRIs who receive distributions from India which are credited to their non-resident ordinary (NRO) accounts (ie, onshore Indian accounts held by NRIs) are governed by the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA). For most cases, such remittances are qualified and are subject to an annual limit of USD1 million out of their corresponding NRO accounts. Overseas remittances made by resident individuals out of their ordinary resident accounts are capped at USD250,000 per person, per annum, under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS). These varied thresholds dictated by residency status must be borne in mind when undertaking cross-border planning of succession and transfer of wealth.

Many Indian residents are also exploring structures under the Overseas Direct Investments (ODI) regime introduced in August 2022, in order to make investments in offshore jurisdictions. This regime has paved the way for Indian companies and LLPs to set up corresponding entities overseas.

Many families are exploring the ODI route for structuring their offshore wealth, depending on factors including availability of funds under the LRS, strategic positioning of a family member or a foreign entity outside India through which investments are routed, or specific regulatory dispensations and approvals to be obtained from the relevant authorities. Typically, an approval for setting up such entity outside India is essential only if required under the host country’s laws, which simplifies the process for setting up a global family office for Indians.

Notably, the new generation of wealthy and high-net-worth individuals have been focusing on wealth management and investments through FOs and this surge is attributed to a shift towards a more structured and professional approach to achieve the intended goals.

HNWIs are increasingly assessing the permissibility and structuring opportunities of investments routed through Gujarat International Finance Tec-city (GIFT City), India’s International Financial Services Centre (IFSC). As a free trade zone exempt from Indian foreign exchange regulations and offering a suite of tax incentives, GIFT City is particularly attractive for cross-border wealth planning.

To cater to family offices, the IFSCA introduced the Family Investment Fund (FIF) framework under the IFSCA (Fund Management) Regulations, 2022, now consolidated under the IFSCA (Fund Management) Regulations, 2025. The FIF framework is aimed at enabling setting up of single-family entities within GIFT City. As per news reports, the first approved FIF (April 2026) was for a non-resident, UK-linked family office, signalling growing traction among offshore families seeking India-linked exposure under a globally competitive regime. This development reflects GIFT City’s ambition to position itself as a hub for attracting global capital.

For Indian resident families, despite the positive regulatory framework, practical challenges continue to subsist for remitting domestic capital into FIF structures. Presently, non-resident Indian families are better positioned to leverage the FIF structure, as contributions from offshore capital are not subject to the same regulatory constraints as residents.

There is no forced heirship regime in India except in relation to Muslims, who are governed by Islamic law, and residents of the state of Goa, who are governed by the Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012.

Under Islamic law, a Muslim cannot by a Will dispose of more than one-third of the surplus of his or her estate after payment of funeral expenses and debts. Testamentary dispositions in excess of such one-third limit cannot take effect unless the heirs consent to them, after the death of the testator.

However, since the introduction of the UCC in Uttarakhand, Gujarat and Assam the principle of fixed shares does not apply to Muslims anymore in these states and general rules of succession regarding the estate of a Muslim dying intestate are now applicable. These rules would apply to relatives (of the deceased) specified in Class I and Class II of Schedule 2 of the UCC. Fathers (regardless of their religion) have been recognised as Class I heirs and are eligible to receive property by way of intestate succession in these states.

Goa has its own law influenced by its Portuguese history which governs succession to the estate of an individual domiciled or born in Goa. Residents of the state of Goa, regardless of their religion, cannot dispose of more than 50% of their estate (which is automatically transferred to that deceased’s surviving parents). Further, in case the deceased is not survived by his or her parents, the other ascendants of the deceased will be entitled to inherit one-third of the deceased’s estate.

In India, any property which is self-acquired does not become a jointly owned property by virtue of marriage as India does not follow the principle of communal ownership of property. Only ancestral property is treated differently.

The spouse who owns the self-acquired property can transfer such self-acquired property without the consent of the other spouse. Self-acquired property is protected under Hindu Law, and even the Class I legal heirs of a person (including his or her spouse) who have acquired such property cannot claim a share in it during the owner’s lifetime. However, after the owner’s death, the legal heirs can claim a share in the property as per the applicable rules of succession. A person who owns self-acquired property has the right to dispose of it as per his or her wishes. The owner can sell, gift, or Will away the property to anyone he or she desires.

Portuguese civil law as applicable in the state of Goa recognises the concept of community property wherein both spouses are considered joint owners of the property acquired during the marriage.

The Uttarakhand and Gujarat UCC eliminate the distinction between ancestral and self-acquired property as outlined in Hindu Law. The Uttarakhand and Gujarat UCC are silent on the coparcenary rights established by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Consequently, the same scheme of succession will apply to both ancestral and self-acquired property for Hindus.

Unlike other jurisdictions such as the USA and UK, India does not recognise the concepts of prenuptial and postnuptial agreements as legally tenable. The law considers such contracts against the public policy of India and thereby void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. However, this position can be qualified subject to the provisions of the personal and customary law applicable to the parties, and courts may enforce a pre- or post-marital agreement. Recently, courts in India have been attributing limited persuasive value to such agreements, provided that the said agreements do not attempt to dictate future separation. Agreements which stick to aspects of asset classification, financial contribution and entitlement may be considered during separation/divorce proceedings on a case-by-case basis.

See 1.3 Income Tax Planning.

There is no estate or inheritance tax in India. Further, property received under a gift, Will or inheritance is exempt from capital gains tax. Hence, any property whatsoever can be passed down the generations tax-free via a Will or even intestacy.

As per the anti-avoidance provisions, gifts made to third parties would not be tax exempt. However, such anti-avoidance provisions would not apply to relatives as discussed in 1.2 Exemptions. A gift is tax exempted provided it is made to a person who qualifies as “relative” under the definition provided under Section 92(5)(g) of the ITA. However, whilst the definition of “relative” is wide and covers most relationships, few relationships, like in the case of gifts from nephew to uncle, are not covered under its definition. Hence, a gift which is not covered under the purview of the definition could be taxed.

Typically, Indian trust deeds also follow the worldwide approach by including certain charitable organisations as an ultimate beneficiary in extreme remote scenarios. However, pursuant to an order dated 30 December 2024 in the matter of “Buckeye Trust”, the ability to add a charitable organisation/any beneficiary (who does not fall within the definition of “relative”) has been inhibited, as the trust cannot be regarded as having been established solely for the benefit of “relatives” under Section 92(5)(g) of the ITA. This ruling has since been recalled and the matter is to be reheard. The final decision will be crucial for all private trusts, as many Indian families may need to revisit their trust deeds to comply with the final outcome.

Nomination is considered a widely used tool for seamless transition of certain asset classes such as bank accounts, mutual funds and certain investments. While nominees are merely custodians, not necessarily the ultimate beneficiaries, it is advisable to align the named nominees with the intended legatees.

In 2025, the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has revamped the rules of nominations with an aim to ease the nomination process in mutual fund folios and demat (dematerialised) accounts. These revamped rules bring about various welcome simplifications such as reduction of the paperwork for claims, increase of permissible limit of nominees from three to ten and also enable the named nominees to act on behalf of incapacitated investors.

Nomination has been made mandatory for single account holding and optional for jointly held accounts/folios. Documents like affidavits, indemnities, undertakings, attestations, or notarisations from the nominee/s are no longer required post the revamp rules issued by the SEBI.

Building on this, the SEBI Board (in June 2026) approved comprehensive reforms to the transmission framework for securities, introducing a Quick Transmission Processing category for small-value claims with minimal documentation and doubling the limits for simplified documentation – from INR500,000 to INR1 million for physical holdings and from INR1.5 million to INR3 million for dematerialised holdings. These changes are yet to be formalised by way of publication, and the effective date will also be notified in due course.

India does not have a law governing the transfer or transmission of digital assets such as email accounts and there is currently no unified approach to their “inheritance” or access by heirs. Service providers have their own policies in dealing with digital property upon the death of the account holder and often provide an option for nomination of a “legacy contact”. One should examine the policies of the relevant websites and services, based on which one may leave written wishes (including by way of Will) for their family on how they would want their digital material to be accessed and treated after their demise and align the legacy contacts, if nominated, with their bequests.

Trusts in India are based on the common law principles and are classified under two broad categories being:

• private trusts (for family inheritance or private purposes); and
• public trusts (religious or charitable purposes).

Further, under Indian taxation laws and the ITA, trusts can be either irrevocable or revocable and discretionary or determinate.

Trusts are not recognised as a separate taxable unit under the ITA. However, the ITA provides that, in the case of a trust, trustees would be taxed as a “representative assessee” of the beneficiaries – ie, the trustees would be taxed in the same manner in which the beneficiaries would have been taxed.

The taxability of the trustee depends on whether or not the share of the beneficiaries in the trust is determinate or known – ie, whether the trust is a determinate trust or a discretionary trust. In the case of a determinate trust (ie, where the name and share or interest of the beneficiary is known or determinable), the tax officer has the option to either assess the beneficiaries, or alternatively, the trustees. Thus, the income of trust may be assessed at the option of the tax officer, either in the hands of the beneficiary or in the hands of the trustee(s) as a representative of the beneficiaries. In the case of a discretionary trust (ie, where the share/interest of the beneficiaries is unknown or left to the discretion of the trustees), the trustee(s) would be liable as a representative of the beneficiaries, at the MMR as discussed in 1.6 Stability of Tax Laws.

Further, in the event a settlor transfers the property to a trust under such provisions that any part of the income or assets so transferred may be retransferred to the settlor, such a trust is treated as a revocable trust under the ITA. In the case of a revocable trust, the income arising to such trust may continue to be taxed in the hands of such settlor.

The ITA also provides for certain tax exemptions in the case of trusts registered for charitable purposes. For taxation on trusts registered for charitable purposes under the ITA, see 10.1 Charitable Giving.

India also recognises trusts governed by another jurisdiction’s laws and which are created for foreign persons. Transfer of assets or income to such trusts must be aligned with India’s exchange control regulations.

In recent years, promoter families and startup founders have increasingly deployed irrevocable discretionary trust structures for succession planning and governance purposes. The asset protection and succession planning benefits of such structures are discussed further in 4.1 Asset Protection and 4.2 Succession Planning.

Trusts are widely recognised, respected and used as an effective tool of succession and ring-fencing of assets in India. India recognises private as well as public trusts.

Private trusts in India are governed by the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, (Trust Act) which primarily governs the rights and obligations of persons acting as settlor, trustees and beneficiaries of a private trust. Private trusts are a popularly chosen vehicle of succession and are established for holding joint family assets such as immovable property, shares of a family business, family jewels and so on. Members of the family are made beneficiaries of such family trusts in order to ensure a seamless inheritance of family-owned property and avoid the hassle of obtaining a probate.

From a tax perspective, India has included provisions incorporating the GAAR under the ITA, with effect from 1 April 2017. As per the GAAR provisions, an arrangement is classified as an impermissible avoidance arrangement, if its main purpose is to obtain a tax benefit and the arrangement satisfies one of the following four conditions:

• creates rights or obligations not ordinarily created between persons dealing at arm’s length;
• results, directly or indirectly, in the misuse or abuse of the provisions of the ITA;
• lacks commercial substance or is deemed to lack commercial substance in whole or in part; or
• is entered into, or carried out, by means, or in a manner, not ordinarily employed for bona fide purposes.

Thus, if a trust has been set up for the purpose of avoiding taxes, then such a structure could attract the GAAR provisions and it may be disregarded to determine the ultimate tax effect.

The statutes governing public trusts are set out in 10.1 Charitable Giving.

Additionally, under FEMA, private trusts are typically considered as pass-through structures. Assets held by the trust are subject to the same regulatory restrictions and permissions as would apply to the underlying parties in their individual capacity, and any cross-border transactions undertaken by the trust must comply with the foreign exchange regulations applicable to such persons.

When an Indian resident is a beneficiary in a foreign trust then that person is required to furnish details of their foreign assets in Schedule FA in their Income Tax Return (ITR). Schedule FA pertains to the disclosure of scheduled foreign assets of Indian residents to avoid tax evasion. Further, such beneficiary being an Indian resident will be taxed on their global income which will include the income they receive from such trust as a part of their share as a beneficiary.

There is no prohibition under the ITA on a beneficiary or settlor (donor) of a trust, foundation or similar arrangement simultaneously acting in a fiduciary capacity (eg, as a trustee). However, where such an arrangement results in the settlor retaining or exercising powers over the trust’s assets or income, the trust may be regarded as a revocable trust. In such circumstances, the income of the trust would be liable to be clubbed with that of the settlor in accordance with the applicable provisions of the ITA.

Trust structures are undisputedly the most popular method for asset protection and offer beneficial governance mechanisms to Indian families with Indian residents and non-resident members. A key benefit of trusts is that such structures ring-fence assets from potential creditor claims or matrimonial claims. Any claim on one’s estate in the event of insolvency or any other dispute can be curbed by setting up a trust as that would entail relinquishment of control and ownership by the owner. By virtue of such relinquishment, the assets held in a trust are safeguarded from being contested during litigation or claims from creditors. Trusts can be used for preservation of business assets as well as family wealth.

India is increasingly adopting private business trusts as a core structuring tool for promoter shareholding and succession planning, with promoter-owned shares now routed through trust structures in approximately 878 out of 2,757 listed companies. Trusts are widely used by both business families and new-age founders, with their presence in IPO structures rising materially (from approximately 12% of DRHPs in 2015 to approximately 37% by 2025).

Interestingly, India has also started embracing the concept of family constitutions (also known as family charters) which are set up by the patriarch or branch heads of powerful business families which set out the family and business governance aspects and also eligibility criteria and the succession of the next-gen of the families entering into the family business.

Along with the aforementioned documentation, more and more companies have also started adopting family shareholders’ agreements which record the understanding between promoters/respective promoter branches qua their shareholding in an entity. Such shareholders’ agreements lay down the rights and obligations such as exit obligations, rights of first offer/refusal, voting rights, etc.

There is no applicable information in this jurisdiction with respect to the transfer of partial interest.

Inheritance of wealth by the mechanism of a Will can be subject to various forms of challenges. A Will can be challenged on grounds of not being freely made or unjustly enriching one branch of the family over another. This is the most common type of wealth dispute in India.

Informal governance standards, desire for control and equal ownership in family-run companies often lead to conflicts, allegations and lengthy court battles. Misaligned ideologies of the next generation of business families also trigger disputes and disharmony affecting the day-to-day affairs of their business entities. While the majority of family businesses have proven to be inherently resilient, many next-gen family members are now keen to start independent entities rather than attempting to carry forward past legacies.

The increasing generation gap may result in a loss of communication between family members, which could prove detrimental to the business(es). As families grow, ownership fragments across members and generations. The unwillingness of families to talk about succession is slowly fading away, which is a positive sign.

Trust disputes in India are not very common and are often dealt with discreetly within the family.

Recent trends which have been driving trust-related disputes are:

• ambiguity in the terms of the trust, particularly in relation to tenure of the trust;
• lack of clarity regarding trustee succession;
• settlor’s conflicting wishes to trustees expressed in various documents; and
• possibility of tax implications if settlor and beneficiary are the same.

India follows the common law principle of balancing equities in compensation, depending on the facts of each dispute.

Parties often seek specific relief, especially where ancestral property with sentimental value is involved. Pecuniary damages may be awarded where specific relief is not possible.

Given the sensitivity of wealth disputes, alternative methods such as mediation and arbitration are increasingly popular to avoid court battles and maintain family unity.

Mediation in India has been formally recognised under a dedicated statute, the Mediation Act, 2023, which promotes cost-effective and timely dispute resolution by encouraging institutional mediation and prescribing clear procedural guidelines and timeframes.

Arbitration is also gaining popularity for family wealth disputes due to its flexibility, privacy and quick resolution. Singapore-seated arbitration is emerging as an option for families who prefer to keep disputes out of the Indian domain.

In India, corporate trustees are commonly used for private trusts. In the last few years, a number of such service providers have emerged. While not mandated by law, corporate trustees generally follow higher standards than individual trustees, favouring pragmatism and professionalism.

The Indian Trusts Act, 1882 governs the obligations and liabilities of trustees. For corporate trustees, their role, remuneration, and liabilities are set out in the trust deed. Typically, corporate trustees are not liable for losses or costs from good faith decisions if they act without bad intentions. Such protective clauses are common, even in private family trusts, offering comfort to trustees.

Wealth management companies are often preferred corporate trustees in India, especially when investing trust funds for a fee. Judicial forums in India recognise and allow the piercing of the corporate veil as provided under the Companies Act, 2013 to hold responsible officers accountable for fraud or defaults.

There are no specific laws for companies providing trusteeship services to private trusts. Corporate trustees follow the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, the trust deed, and other applicable laws.

Typically, a portion of the trust property desired by a settlor of a trust is used by a corporate trustee for the purpose of making investments or curating a portfolio. Such investment theory is not different from a typical modern portfolio consisting of high yielding stocks and mutual funds.

In India, there is no embargo on trusts holding the shares of a company having an active business. However, there are some reporting requirements for trusts holding ownership beyond certain specified thresholds.

Domicile

Domicile is relevant in India for the purpose of succession to the estate. In India, domicile has an impact on the succession to movable property. As in many countries, domicile in India depends on duration of stay and intention.

Residency in India

Residency in India can be determined on two counts.

Residency under the FEMA

Any individual who has been residing in India for more than 182 days during the course of the preceding financial year or a person who has come to or stays in India:

• for or on taking up employment in India;
• for carrying on a business or vocation in India; or
• for any other purpose in such circumstances as would indicate his/her intention to stay in India for an uncertain period,

is regarded as a resident under FEMA.

If an individual does not meet the residency parameters above, he/she is considered an NRI under FEMA. An NRI faces certain restrictions in terms of acquiring real estate in India as well as acquiring certain other asset classes such as equity shares. For instance, an individual who is an NRI under FEMA cannot purchase or acquire agricultural land in India.

Tax residency

See 1.1 Tax Regimes for details.

Citizenship

The primary provisions governing citizenship in India are contained in the Citizenship Act, 1955 (“Citizenship Act”) which provides for various methods of acquisition of Indian citizenship being:

• citizenship by birth;
• citizenship by descent;
• citizenship by registration;
• citizenship by naturalisation; and
• citizenship by incorporation of a territory.

Moreover, under the Citizenship Act, those who are a citizen of another country, but were a citizen of India at the time of, or were eligible to become a citizen at any time after, the commencement of the Constitution, can become an overseas citizen of India (OCI) by obtaining an OCI Card as per the prevalent guidelines contained in the Citizenship Act and underlying rules.

There is no applicable information in this jurisdiction regarding expeditious citizenship.

In India, a private trust is a commonly used structure for creating a secure future for a special-needs dependent, allowing parents to manage the child’s affairs as they wish. It ensures that the legacy left for the special-needs child is managed to provide for the lifetime care and needs of special-needs children or adults with disabilities in the absence of the parents. The trustee holds the trust assets in a fiduciary capacity for the benefit of the beneficiaries, thereby addressing concerns of the parents when they are no more.

There is no restriction in the Trusts Act as to who can set up a family private trust. Parents, grandparents or legal guardians can do so for their special-needs child’s future, and in most cases, a corporate trustee service provider is used.

Under Indian law, guardians can be appointed under different laws.

• The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.
• The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
• The National Trust Act, 1999.
• The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890

The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 is a secular act applicable to all religions, and authorises the District Court to appoint a guardian for a minor themselves, their property, or both.

Special Situation of Persons With Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Intellectual Disability or Multiple Disabilities

Persons with autism, cerebral palsy, intellectual disability or multiple disabilities are in a special situation as even after reaching 18 years of age, they may not always be capable of managing their own lives or taking legal decisions. However, in some cases, there may be a need for only limited guardianship because of enabling mechanisms which allow such persons to function with varying degrees of independence.

Under Section 14 of the National Trust Act, the Local-Level Committee (led by the District Collector) can receive applications for guardianship of persons with autism, cerebral palsy, intellectual disabilities and multiple disabilities, and monitor and protect their interests and properties.

Section 14 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 allows courts to appoint a representative for the welfare of mentally unfit individuals.

Guardianship Granted by High Courts

One can also approach the High Courts under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution (writ jurisdiction) for appointment of a guardian. Recently, High Courts have been granting conditional reliefs by exercising their special writ powers.

Unlike the systems of Lasting Powers of Attorney (LPAs) available in other common law jurisdictions which are designed to remain operative during periods of incapacity, India does not provide for any such continuation of authority. Once mental incapacity arises, the power of attorney ceases to have effect. For individuals residing overseas who rely on an Indian power of attorney, this presents a significant practical risk, as any subsequent transactions may be rendered invalid.

Notwithstanding the above, certain statutory mechanisms exist that may be utilised for incapacity planning.

The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (MHCA) introduced the concept of an “advance directive”, whereby an individual may specify, in writing, the manner in which they wish to be cared for and treated for a mental illness and may appoint a “nominated representative” to make decisions on their behalf during periods of incapacity. The advance directive must be made in the prescribed form and registered with the relevant Mental Health Review Board. While this mechanism is limited to decisions relating to mental healthcare and treatment, it represents one of the few statutory instruments in India that expressly contemplates decision-making during incapacity.

Guardianship under the National Trust Act, 1999 and the MHCA (as noted above) can also be sought.

Limited Guardianship Under the Rights of Persons With Disabilities Act, 2016

The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 provides for “limited guardianship” under Section 14, whereby a district court may appoint a suitable person to take jointly supported decisions with, or decisions on behalf of, a person with a disability, in respect of specific matters and for a limited duration.

Evolution of “Living Wills” in India

In 2018, the Supreme Court of India (Common Cause v Union of India) upheld the right to die with dignity through an “Advance Directive” or “Living Will”. On 24 January 2023, the Court updated the guidelines, simplifying procedures covering medical boards, Living Will implementation, withdrawal of treatment and digital health records.

Despite legal recognition, implementation has been fragmented. Very few medical boards have been established, with Kerala being the first state to put in place a Living Wills Counter in January 2025, followed by a hospital in Mumbai which established a clinic for Living Wills in June 2025.

Gift of residential property by a senior citizen in favour of a family member during their lifetime is common in India. Senior citizens can cancel registered gift deeds if their children fail to provide adequate care and maintenance, even absent explicit obligations in the gift deed. This is supported by the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, which protects senior citizens from neglect and exploitation after gifting away their residential properties.

Under prevalent Hindu personal laws in India, there is no differential treatment for children born out of wedlock, adopted children, surrogate children or posthumously conceived children. Such children are regarded as Class I heirs of the deceased and therefore are not subjected to any disparity as far as inheritance to the estate of the deceased is concerned.

Under the Hindu Adoption Act, 1956, from the date of adoption, the child is under the legal guardianship of the new adopted parent(s) and thus should enjoy all the benefits from those family ties. This also means that this child, therefore, is cut off from all legal benefits (eg, property and inheritance) from the family who had given them up for adoption.

Surrogacy

Surrogacy in India has been recognised via the Surrogacy Regulation Act, 2021 (SRA). The SRA defines surrogacy as a procedure in which a woman bears a child for the benefit of the intended parents and permits altruistic surrogacy but outlaws commercial surrogacy. Altruistic surrogacy does not entail financial remuneration to the surrogate mother (in cash or in-kind).

According to the eligibility language in the SRA, only a woman who is a family or close friend of the couple would be able to become a surrogate. Further, only legally wedded couples can opt for surrogacy – therefore LGBTQ+ couples or couples in live-in relationships are not permitted to avail surrogate pregnancy arrangements.

Presently, same-sex marriage is not a recognised form of legal marriage in India.

In October 2023, India’s Supreme Court, in Supriyo v Union of India, unanimously held that while decriminalising homosexuality was a major step forward, the right to marry is not a fundamental constitutional right and that any legal recognition – whether marriage or civil unions – must come from parliament, not the judiciary.

Since then, in January 2025 the Supreme Court dismissed review petitions against its 2023 verdict, reaffirming that marriage equality remains solely the legislature’s domain.

Meanwhile, in June 2025, the Madras High Court recognised the concept of “chosen families”, empowering LGBTQIA+ individuals to create familial bonds legally, even if formal marriage is not available yet.

While marriage equality in India remains unresolved and awaits legislative action, recent court decisions and evolving legal interpretations indicate better social recognition of same-sex couples.

In the absence of legal recognition of same-sex marriages, same-sex partners do not qualify as “relatives” under 92(5)(g) of the ITA and, consequently, any transfer of assets between partners may attract tax implications. Same-sex partners have no automatic inheritance rights under any personal law or the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and intestate succession laws do not recognise a surviving same-sex partner as an heir.

Civil/Domestic Partnerships

Civil partnerships are not expressly conferred legal status in India. However, the courts have recognised the rights of adults to live together consensually. The law creates a presumption in favour of marriage and against concubinage when long-term cohabitation has taken place between the couple over an extended period of time.

In the context of the Hindu law, the Supreme Court of India has held that a child born out of void or voidable marriage (which may cover civil partnerships) is conferred the status of a legitimate child and is entitled to claim a share in self-acquired properties of their parents.

Tax and succession planning

Similar to same-sex couples, for the purposes of tax and succession planning, unmarried partners are treated as separate individuals. They do not fall under the definition of “relatives” as per Section 92(5)(g) of the ITA and any inter se transfer of assets is not tax exempt. If a partner passes away without a valid Will, the surviving partner has no automatic inheritance rights and the deceased partner’s estate will devolve to their legal heirs. Insurance providers restrict beneficial nomination to close blood relatives or legal dependants. Most banks, however, permit nomination of any individual regardless of the nature of the relationship between the account holder and the nominee.

Cohabiting partners can avail limited legal protection where the relationship satisfies the judiciary’s “nature of marriage” criteria. Unmarried partners may claim maintenance (ie, financial support for those unable to maintain themselves) and women in civil partnerships can seek protection against domestic violence, including orders for residence, monetary relief and injunctions against abuse. Children born in long-term live-in relationships are legally recognised as legitimate and are entitled to the same maintenance and succession rights as children born within a traditional marriage.

Apart from these limited protections, unmarried partners do not acquire automatic succession rights, and deliberate estate planning (such as the execution of a Will or the creation of a trust) is essential to ensure that the surviving partner is adequately provided for.

Live-In Relationships Under UCC of Various States

State-wise UCC, while regularising live-in relationships in the respective states, makes it obligatory for a man and woman, who are living in the state, regardless of whether they are residents of that state or not, to submit a “statement of the live-in relationship” to the appointed official for registration.

While charities are recognised and widely regarded in India, there is no single central legislation which lays down the law governing charitable organisations in India. Charitable organisations can be set up under various laws, depending on the nature of the entity and the state in which the organisation is being set up.

Some of the central laws which govern public trusts are the Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920, the Religious Endowments Act, 1863, and the Charitable Endowments Act, 1890, while there are some state-specific laws like the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, Gujarat Public Trusts Act, 1950, Rajasthan Public Trusts Act, 1959, and Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951.

The ITA provides that a charitable purpose includes, inter alia:

• relief of the poor;
• education;
• yoga;
• medical relief;
• preservation of environment (including watersheds, forests and wildlife); and
• the preservation of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic interest and the advancement of any other object of general public utility.

There are many ways in which a person can undertake charity in India. All of the structures have more or less similar incentives and exemptions. The definition and governing law regarding the charities varies depending on type of structure set up for charitable purposes.

Income of charitable trusts and institutions, registered under the ITA, is exempt from tax subject to certain conditions such as:

• application of income for charitable purposes in India;
• filing of timely income-tax returns; and
• adhering with conditions set forth in the certificate of registration, etc.

Only trusts or institutions incorporated in India are eligible for the said exemption. Further, income of such trust or institution has to be applied wholly for charitable or religious purposes within India.

In order to encourage charitable giving, the donors making donations to charitable trusts or institutions registered under the ITA are allowed deductions for the amount of donations made by them, thereby reducing their taxable income. The deduction can be claimed up to a maximum of 50% or 100% of the donated amount, depending on the institution or fund to which the donation has been made.

A charitable organisation is usually formed by way of a trust, a society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 or a company limited by guarantee under Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013. The advantages and disadvantages of the forms are as follows.

Trusts

A trust is created when the author or the settlor of the trust sets apart some property for a charitable purpose so that the income can be devoted to fulfilling the said charitable purpose. Various states have enacted separate legislation to govern the administration of charitable trusts, such as the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Where no such separate state legislation exists, a public trust can be set up by registration of the trust deed with the registrar under the Registration Act, 1908.

The advantage of forming a trust is that control can lie with a few persons chosen as trustees who can be nominated for any period extending up to their lifetime. However, neither the objects of the trust nor the powers of the trustees can be changed without the approval of certain authorities such as the Office of the Charity Commissioner or the court of the competent jurisdiction.

Societies

A society is essentially an association of seven or more persons united together to achieve an identified common purpose (under the relevant regulations). For a society to be considered as a charitable organisation, the object of the society must conform to the definition of “charitable purpose” under the ITA.

While the Societies Registration Act, 1860 is the central legislation governing societies, various states have enacted independent legislation or amended the central legislation to ensure the proper functioning of societies. Thus, a society can be registered in any district of India with the Registrar of Societies in that particular area. Forming a society as a charitable organisation may be more suitable where there are numerous donors or where the control and management is sought to be more broad-based with greater participation.

The advantage of a society as a charitable organisation is that the objects and the powers can be easily changed by way of special resolutions and provides for democratic participation from a larger number of people.

However, there may be a lack of stability in a large organised charity in the form of a society as it is not possible to have office-bearers for life, and there are greater chances of interference from state authorities on compliance in societies.

Section 8 Companies

Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for the formation of a company with the objective to promote commerce, art, science, sports, education, research, social welfare, religion, charity, protection of environment or any such other objects. Any profit or income must be applied only for the promotion of the objects of the company, and members are not entitled to receive any dividend.

A company is more stable than a society but less rigid than a trust, as it is possible to amend the objects and powers by amending the charter documents according to the Companies Act, 2013. However, a charitable organisation in the form of a company must comply with all formalities under company law.

However, a charitable organisation in the form of a company must comply with all the formalities under company law for its registration, management and so on.