Private Wealth 2026

Last Updated August 11, 2026

Portugal

Law and Practice

Authors



Durham Agrellos is a boutique law firm specialising in tax and private wealth law.

Personal Income Tax (PIT)

Portuguese tax-resident individuals are taxed on their worldwide income.

Employment and pension income is subject to progressive tax rates up to 48% (an additional surcharge of 2.5% to 5% may apply).

Capital investment income and net worth increases (including capital gains) are usually subject to a 28% tax rate. There is a special tax rate on the disposal of shares for small enterprises – capital gains obtained from the disposal (including the redemption) of shares of small companies are subject to an effective tax rate of 14%.

A new special tax regime aimed to attract high and ultra high net worth individuals (HNWIs) entered into force on 1 January 2024. Such regime is applicable to individuals who perform certain qualified professional activities (eg, highly qualified professions including top managers and directors of entities operating in Portugal) and sets out a wide range of PIT exemptions and low tax rates.

The benefits of this special regime are set out below.

Portuguese-source income

Employment and professional income derived from eligible activities are subject to a reduced 20% PIT flat rate.

Foreign-source income

Employment income, professional income, financial (eg, dividends, interest, capital gains, income from funds), royalties and other income (except pensions) are tax exempt.

Wealth and Real Estate Tax

Portugal has no wealth tax.

The transfer for consideration of real estate property located in Portugal is subject to real estate property transfer tax (up to 7.5%) and stamp tax (0.8%).

The holding of real estate property is subject to real estate municipal property tax, between 0.3% and 0.45% (0.8% in case of rural properties), levied annually on the tax value of the property.

An additional tax of up to 1.5% on the global real estate property value (with a tax value higher than EUR600,000) is levied in the case of individuals. For companies, the applicable tax rate is 0.4% (without the exclusion of this EUR600,000).

Corporate Income Tax (CIT)

The general CIT rate applicable is set at 19% (municipal and state surcharges may apply). The following regimes should be mentioned regarding family-owned companies (from a domestic and transnational perspective):

  • inbound and outbound participation exemption regimes are applicable to dividends and capital gains, under certain conditions;
  • tax neutrality regimes apply to restructuring operations;
  • a special CIT regime is applicable to companies structured under the Madeira International Business Centre tax framework (5% CIT rate); and
  • exemptions under special tax regimes are applicable to funds or companies that carry out real estate and financial investments.

Trusts and Transparent Entities

Except for the Madeira trust regime, trusts are not foreseen under Portuguese civil law. Trusts are therefore usually considered in multi-jurisdiction family and tax planning situations.

The taxation of transparent entities raises technical difficulties (mismatches) and may, in some cases, generate disadvantageous tax treatment. Therefore, structures such as tax transparent entities are usually not recommended (although exceptions may apply).

Other Relevant Tax-Related Matters

Investment through family holding companies, unit-linked insurance policies, private investment funds or similar vehicles are often considered in Portuguese private wealth management.

Some general tax principles may be singled out.

  • Deferral mechanisms – structures implemented should consider deferral mechanisms to avoid unnecessary realisation (investment funds, unit-linked insurance, holding companies).
  • Offset mechanisms – with the aim to maximise the offset mechanism, structures such as companies, funds or other collective investment undertakings may be considered.
  • Tax haven avoidance – Portugal regards a wide range of jurisdictions as black-listed, applying aggravated taxes to income obtained on or through these jurisdictions; therefore, re-domiciling or extinguishing structures with connections to tax havens are matters of significant interest, which is highly relevant for immigrant families whose previous investment structures were planned in accordance with different jurisdictions (particularly UK non-doms and Latin American tax residents).
  • Compliance and exchange of financial information (particularly, the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA rules)).
  • Multi-jurisdictional approach – multi-layer protection of taxpayers considering international protection instruments (eg, EU law, double tax treaties, bilateral investment treaties).

Although donations and inheritances are generally subject to a 10% tax rate, significant exclusions or exemptions apply.

  • In accordance with the territorial scope applicable, only events taking place in Portugal are subject to tax (such exclusion is particularly relevant for transnational succession tax planning purposes).
  • Donations and inheritances are, in any case, tax-exempted between:
    1. spouses or members of unmarried couples living under de facto relationships;
    2. descendants; and
    3. ascendants.
  • Under certain circumstances special exemptions may apply (eg, life insurance premium payments; payments from investment funds).

Even when exclusions or exemptions apply, a step-up in the assets’ value may occur.

In general, there are no step-up planning tools in the Portuguese jurisdiction.

With regard to individuals intending to transfer their tax residence to Portugal, a prior analysis of their asset-holding structure is advisable, to ensure that it is tax-efficient and compliant with the Portuguese tax framework. This is particularly relevant given that Portuguese law includes specific provisions that may adversely impact pre-existing structures, such as the aggravated tax rates applicable to income derived from blacklisted jurisdictions and the potential application of the Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) rules.

Individuals intending to transfer their tax residence to another jurisdiction should also take into account the potential tax impact of such a change. In this context, it should be noted that, as a general rule, Portugal does not provide for an exit tax, with the exception of unrealised capital gains arising from the holding of crypto-assets and corporate restructuring transactions subject to the tax neutrality regime. In addition, Portuguese citizens who transfer their tax residence to a blacklisted jurisdiction will continue to be deemed tax residents in Portugal in the year in which the change of residence occurs and in the four subsequent years, unless they prove that the change is due to valid reasons, in particular the performance in that territory of a temporary activity on behalf of an employer domiciled in Portuguese territory.

Three different taxes must be considered in respect of the taxation of real estate owned by non-residents and non-citizens: (i) municipal property tax levied annually; (ii) real estate property transfer tax levied on the purchase of real estate; and (iii) PIT levied on capital gains obtained on the sale of real estate.

Municipal Property Tax

There are no major differences between residents and non-residents with regard to the municipal property tax, with the exception of non-resident entities domiciled in blacklisted jurisdictions. In such cases, an aggravated tax rate of 7.5% applies.

Real Estate Property Transfer Tax

As a general rule, there are no differences between residents and non-residents for the purposes of the real estate property transfer tax.

However, two relevant exceptions apply:

  • non-resident entities domiciled in blacklisted jurisdictions are subject to an aggravated tax rate of 10%; and
  • non-residents who purchase real estate properties intended exclusively for residential purposes are subject to a tax rate of 7.5%, unless one of the following situations applies: (i) the individual has qualified as a tax resident in Portugal; (ii) the individual becomes a tax resident in Portugal within two years from the date of acquisition; or (iii) the acquired property is intended to be let for residential purposes at a monthly rent not exceeding the limit set forth by law, provided that certain additional requirements are met.

Personal Income Tax

Capital gains obtained on the sale of real estate by non-residents are subject to PIT on 50% of the capital gains realised. Such capital gains are subject to the general progressive tax rates which can go up to 48%, plus a solidarity rate of up to 5% (meaning an effective tax rate of up to 26.5%).

Finally, it should be noted that real estate structuring may involve direct ownership, real estate investment funds or companies. Trusts are not suitable to directly hold real estate assets located in Portugal.

In the last decade, Portuguese tax law has been relatively stable. The gift and inheritance taxation framework, as well as special tax regimes, such as the Portuguese non-dom regime, have put Portugal on the map as a desirable jurisdiction for high and ultra high net worth individuals.

Companies incorporated in Portugal, their articles of association and their shareholders and beneficial owners must be registered before the Commercial Registry and the Central Register of Beneficial Owners. At least part of the information contained in the register may be accessed by third parties. However, Family Business Charters and other shareholders’ agreements are, in principle, not publicly disclosed.

Since 2017, several legislative measures have been taken to transpose Directive (EU) 2015/849, regarding the central register of beneficial owners. Such regime applies to any Portuguese or foreign entity with a Portuguese tax number.

Reporting entities must comply with the imposed reporting obligations to the central registry, filing an initial declaration (which must be updated whenever there is a variation in any of the declared data) and an annual declaration of confirmation of the information previously communicated.

For almost two decades, Portugal has enacted a general anti-avoidance rule and specific anti-avoidance tax rules (eg, CFC rules, transfer pricing or restructuring rules).

In 2019, relevant legislative measures were taken to transpose the EU BEPS Directive.

Portuguese legislation aligned the concept of “abuse” with the EU concept of “valid commercial reasons” as established in the BEPS Directive (resulting from CJEU case law). 

CFC rules have also been adapted and are applied when controlled foreign companies established outside the EU or the EEA are subject to an effective tax lower than 50% of the tax amount that would be due under Portuguese law, or if such companies are established in a tax haven.

Since 2017, Portugal has been integrated into the CRS/FATCA worldwide reporting system. In addition, the Portuguese legislature has extended the reporting regime to bank accounts containing more than EUR50,000 held by Portuguese tax residents.

In 2020, Portugal took several measures to transpose Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 of 25 May 2018, otherwise known as DAC 6.

Domestic legislation establishes a mechanism for the exchange of information not only in the context of cross-border tax-planning arrangements (as imposed by the Directive) but has also extended this burden to internal arrangements. Generic and specific hallmarks (some of which are linked to the main benefit test) are identified in the Portuguese legislation, which enable the identification of cross-border arrangements subject to reporting requirements.

Finally, with regard to privacy concerns, it should be noted that Regulation (EU) 2016/679, of 27 April (“General Data Protection Regulation” or GDPR) is directly applicable in Portugal and lays down the rules and principles governing the processing of personal data. All Portuguese public entities are bound by the GDPR. These data protection concerns prompted the recent amendment of the rules governing access to the central register of beneficial owners: the register is no longer accessible to the general public, and access is now conditional upon the demonstration of a legitimate interest.

Although each family has its own characteristics, some trends are still recognisable in the Portuguese market.

  • Resistance to succession – in a significant number of family-owned businesses, the founder is still a member of the board and demands to take part in the current decision-making process; some resistance to innovation or alternative financing sources may, consequently, be identified.
  • First real generation crisis – a significant number of family-owned businesses in Portugal were founded in the 1980s; thus, families are now facing the challenge of turning over the firm to the third generation.
  • Lack of succession planning – although there has been a shift in recent years, a significant number of families still do not invest in preparation for the succession process.
  • Informality – most families do not constitute family councils or family business agreements to discuss the management of the family businesses or assets; although this is beginning to change, there is still a certain degree of informality that threatens the stability and rationality of decision-making processes.

The transnational dimension of succession planning implies additional concerns regarding the applicable laws, the coherence of the succession process and the tax implications in the different jurisdictions.

International succession planning is simultaneously a challenge and an opportunity to choose the applicable law in accordance with the best interests of the testator. Determining the applicable law (when possible) is therefore an important part of the succession planning process.

As different jurisdictions may be involved, avoiding clashes is of the utmost importance, particularly in ensuring the smooth transition of the assets. If possible, submitting the regulation of the succession to the same jurisdiction is preferable. That goal may justify the modification of the assets’ detention structure or its location. Other areas of law should also be considered in this context, particularly family law and company law.

Regarding tax concerns, see 1. Tax.

Descendants and spouses (notwithstanding the marital property regime) and – in the absence of descendants – ascendants, are forced heirs. The percentage of the value of the assets they are entitled to varies between one third and two thirds.

Nevertheless, since August 2018, it has been possible for spouses to enter into a prenuptial agreement waiving their right to inherit. The effectiveness of this agreement depends on the choice of the separation-of-property regime (see 2.4 Marital Property). In any case, this agreement will not restrict the surviving spouse’s right to use the family residence for at least five years.

The Portuguese civil code establishes three regimes to regulate marital property:

  • general community of estate – all combined property is considered joint;
  • estate subsequent to marriage – only property earned during the marriage is considered joint property (framework applicable by default); and
  • separation of property between spouses.

If the separation-of-property regime does not apply, the consent of the other spouse is particularly relevant in the transfer of immovable property.

From a tax perspective, the transfer of property may imply a step-up of the asset value.

See 1.1 Tax Regimes, particularly the material on exclusions and exemptions on stamp tax, applicable to donations and succession.

No special rules apply to the transfer of digital assets. There is no relevant case law in Portugal concerning digital assets.

In general, domestic trusts and foundations are not used in Portugal for planning purposes. However, under international structures, such entities are used in certain cases.

See 1.1 Tax Regimes.

Payments made by fiduciary entities to beneficiaries who are tax-resident in Portugal are taxed at a 28% rate (or 35% if paid by an entity located in a blacklisted jurisdiction). Proceeds arising from the termination or liquidation of fiduciary entities are subject to tax if the beneficiary is the settlor, at a rate of 28% (or 35% if paid by an entity collated in a blacklisted jurisdiction).

CFC rules may apply if the fiduciary entity is located in a blacklisted jurisdiction.

As mentioned in 3.3 Taxation of Trusts, Foundation and Similar Entities Located in Other Jurisdictions, proceeds arising from the termination of fiduciary entities are subject to tax if the beneficiary is the settlor, at a rate of 28% (or 35% if paid by an entity collated in a blacklisted jurisdiction).

Asset protection planning in Portugal usually considers:

  • implementing family business structures with transnational elements in order to benefit from multi-layer protections (eg, national law, EU law, bilateral investment treaties, etc);
  • unit-linked insurance policies, especially in jurisdictions such as Luxembourg and Ireland; and
  • choosing the separation-of-property marital regime to avoid communication of debts.

Generally, business succession planning comprises the following elements.

  • Incorporation of family holding companies in accordance with the different branches of the family.
  • Elaboration of wills of the different family members.
  • Elaboration of a family business agreement.
  • Setting up of a family council and family assembly.
  • Corporate law instruments:
    1. establishing rules to nominate the family members who may integrate the family business and the applicable requirements (age, academic scores, etc);
    2. establishing rules to determine the company’s value;
    3. establishing (automatic) redemption mechanisms if some heirs become shareholders of the company;
    4. shareholder agreements establishing limitations on the free transfer of assets, as well as establishing pre-emption rights;
    5. establishing drag-along and tag-along clauses; and
    6. establishing penalty clauses.
  • Adjustments to the memorandum of association:
    1. considering the need for aggravated majorities for certain strategic options;
    2. setting out remuneration principles; and
    3. restricting the areas of free decision of board members.
  • Use of life insurance (unit-linked) policies and other similar instruments.
  • Designation of heirs by third parties (within the admissible legal limits) in order to cover different wills or circumstances (dynamic clauses).

Optimal tax results derive from the considered use of the tax exclusion or exemption regimes mentioned in 1.1 Tax Regimes.

When a partial interest in an entity is transferred, during lifetime or at death, the fair market value of the interest for transfer tax purposes is not adjusted to reflect a discount for lack of marketability and control.

Disputes regarding estates usually result from lack of succession planning.

Division procedures are time-consuming, and it may be several years until a final decision is taken. However, the parties do typically tend to conclude agreements.

Regarding payments from life insurance policies, the Portuguese Supreme Court has confirmed that such payments are not subject to succession laws (although an insurance premium should be considered a donation for succession purposes).

The use of arbitration for wealth disputes is increasing.

The calculation of damages follows general Portuguese civil law rules, essentially aimed at repairing the damages suffered by the parties.

No aggravated damages or punitive damages rules apply.

Penalty clauses included in succession planning instruments also play a very important role in this context.

The use of corporate fiduciaries is not prevalent in Portugal.

This is not applicable in Portugal.

This is not applicable in Portugal.

This is not applicable in Portugal.

Residence Permit

Any EU citizen may obtain a residence permit in Portugal if:

  • they have a professional activity as a worker or are self-employed in Portugal; or
  • they have sufficient funds and are covered by health insurance when the same applies to Portuguese citizens in their country of origin.

Regarding third-country citizens, a residence permit is granted for:

  • the exercise of independent professional activities;
  • the exercise of professional activities under an employment contract;
  • investment activity;
  • the exercise of a highly qualified activity or teaching;
  • students in secondary or higher education;
  • interns or trainees;
  • volunteers;
  • researchers; and
  • family reunification.

In 2012, Portugal enacted a special permit (expeditious and simplified) for investment activities (the so-called Golden Visa). Under this regime, the qualifying investment activities (carried out directly or through a single-member company incorporated in Portugal or in any other EU member state, as long as it has a permanent establishment in Portugal) entitle the applicant to a temporary residence permit. Furthermore, the investor’s family members may also benefit from a family reunification permit.

The Golden Visa grants the investor the right to remain in Portuguese territory and the right to free movement in the Schengen area. Moreover, after five years, the beneficiaries of the Golden Visa may apply for a permanent residence permit and, after seven years (in the case of citizens of Portuguese-speaking countries and of citizens of EU member states) or ten years (in the case of citizens of other countries) for Portuguese (and European) citizenship.

Portuguese Citizenship

As a rule, if an adult:

  • legally resides in Portugal for at least seven years, in the case of citizens of Portuguese-speaking countries and of citizens of EU member states, or ten years, in the case of citizens of other countries;
  • demonstrates, by means of a test or a certificate, sufficient knowledge of the Portuguese language and culture, national history and national symbols;
  • demonstrates sufficient knowledge of the fundamental rights and duties inherent in Portuguese citizenship and of the political organisation of the Portuguese State;
  • solemnly declare their adherence to the fundamental principles of the democratic rule of law;
  • has not been convicted to an effective prison sentence exceeding three years for crimes of terrorism, violent and especially violent crime, highly organised crime, crimes against State security or aiding illegal immigration, punishable under Portuguese law;
  • does not constitute a danger or threat to national security or defence, notably through their involvement in terrorist activities, violent, especially violent or highly organised crime;
  • is not subject to restrictive measures adopted by the United Nations or the EU; or
  • has the necessary means to ensure their own subsistence,

then that person may be granted Portuguese citizenship.

Currently, there are no expeditious or investment-based routes in force in Portugal for individuals to obtain citizenship.

The laws protecting vulnerable adults in Portugal were profoundly revised in 2018.

The new regime is characterised by the need to respect the individual’s autonomy as much as possible and, therefore, the protective measures applied by the court should be specifically designed for each individual in accordance with that individual’s wishes and disabilities.

The powers of the guardian will be specifically established by the court and limited to what is strictly necessary to guarantee the vulnerable adult’s safety and, as far as possible, their autonomy. Some management decisions, such as the sale of property, depend on court approval and the guardian must show accountability when requested by the court and on the termination of their guardianship. The protective measures applied must be periodically revised.

In addition, the law provides an incapacity mandate which allows the individual to anticipate the selection of the person or persons in charge of their assistance in personal and financial matters.

The guardian must always be appointed by the court. In any case, the court must consider (where possible) the wishes of the minor or vulnerable adult.

General instruments must be used to meet any particular needs of the person with disabilities. Such instruments include, among others, power of attorney, insurance instruments, appointment of trustee or fideicomisario, or other person responsible for the administration of the person with disabilities.

From a financial point of view, different alternatives are considered and sometimes combined when individuals prepare financially for their retirement:

  • pension funds;
  • insurance policies; or
  • constitution of surface rights or usufruct.

In addition, Portuguese law recognises advanced healthcare directives or mandates, in order to ensure that the correct medical actions are taken in case of illness or incapacity.

Children born out of wedlock and adopted children cannot be discriminated against for succession purposes. They are forced heirs.

Artificial insemination is permitted to infertile married (or under domestic partnership) different-sex couples and to any woman or female couple, regardless of their fertility.

Portugal recognises surrogacy arrangements only if a woman’s medical condition precludes her from getting pregnant naturally. The process must be authorised and supervised by the National Medically Assisted Procreation Council and must be free of any charge for the intended parents (except for medical expenses).

Portugal recognises same-sex marriage and domestic partnerships (uniões de facto).

In general, there are no specific tax or succession rules applicable to couples who are neither married nor under domestic partnership.

However, from a tax standpoint, it should be noted that only married couples and couples under domestic partnerships may opt for joint taxation for PIT purposes. From a succession standpoint, it should be noted that only married persons qualify as legal heirs, which is not the case for partners in other types of relationships.

Foundations are the most commonly used structures for charitable planning. Foundations that qualify as “public utility foundations” may benefit from a wide range of tax benefits. In particular, public utility foundations may be CIT-exempt and donations made to these foundations may be considered a deductible cost-plus for CIT purposes, or as a tax allowance for PIT purposes. Furthermore, donations to these foundations may also be exempt.

See 10.1 Charitable Giving.

Durham Agrellos

Avenida da Boavista
3265, 3.1
4100-137 Porto
Portugal

+351 226 167 260

+351 226 167 269

geral@da.pt www.da.pt
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Durham Agrellos is a boutique law firm specialising in tax and private wealth law.

Portugal’s Evolving Taxation of Financial Assets: New Rules, New Opportunities

Introduction

Portugal has quietly established itself as one of Europe’s favoured perches for the well-heeled. It levies no general wealth tax; transfers between spouses and lineal relatives are largely exempt; and successive governments have rolled out welcome mats for foreign talent and capital – most famously the Non-Habitual Resident (NHR) regime, whose perks continue to flow to those already enrolled, and, more recently, the Tax Incentive for Scientific Research and Innovation (IFICI), informally “NHR 2.0”.

Within that comfortable framework, the taxation of financial assets matters most. Investment portfolios are the most mobile, most actively traded slice of family wealth; small differences in tax treatment compound spectacularly over decades. Three recent developments deserve the attention of Portuguese tax residents who hold such assets.

Patience pays: short-term and long-term capital gains

The Portuguese personal income tax (PIT) code was recently amended to reward patience. Borrowing a distinction familiar to American investors, the code now separates long-term from short-term capital gains – those on financial assets held for more than a year, and those held for less. Long-term gains still face a flat 28%. Short-term gains, by contrast, are now bundled with the taxpayer’s other income and taxed at progressive rates that reach 48%, plus a solidarity surcharge of up to 5%, whenever annual income exceeds EUR86,634. For active investors the message is blunt: the holding period has become a first-order tax variable, and selling a few weeks too soon can nearly double the bill on the very same economic gain.

Lawmakers have gone further still. A partial exclusion now applies to gains on listed securities and units in open-ended collective investment undertakings held for more than two years. In place of the flat 28%, effective rates fall to 25.2%, 22.4% and 19.6% after two, five and eight years respectively – 10%, 20% or 30% of the gain being carved out from tax. The code has grown a loyalty ladder: the longer one holds, the less the taxman claims on the way out.

Investors would do well to take note. Rebalancing policies, the timing of disposals and portfolio composition all take on renewed weight. Existing structures deserve a review and, where possible, a repositioning to capture the new discounts.

Taxing real gains, not inflation: a constitutional question before the courts

The PIT code lets sellers of shares and other equity stakes adjust their acquisition cost by a coefficient – set each year by ministerial order – whenever more than 24 months separate purchase from sale. The purpose is sensible: tax the real gain, not the ghost of inflation. After Europe’s recent bout of high prices, that matters. For long-held assets, a hefty slice of the nominal gain can amount to nothing more than the shrunken value of money; in extreme cases, where appreciation merely kept pace with inflation, the coefficient wipes the taxable gain out altogether.

There is a catch. The adjustment applies only to shares and equity participations – not to bonds, other debt securities or units in investment funds. So an investor who bought a bond and a shareholding on the same day, held both for the same period and pocketed the same nominal gain will pay tax on different amounts. That is hard to defend, and it raises real doubts about the rule’s constitutionality, chiefly on equality grounds.

Litigation is under way challenging the exclusion, with a decision expected this year. Should the courts strike the rule down, affected taxpayers may – subject to conditions – seek annulment of past assessments and reclaim the tax overpaid. Anyone who has realised meaningful gains on bonds, debt securities or fund units in recent years would be well advised to review their position now.

Rethinking the blacklist: a shorter list on the horizon

Since 2004, Portugal has maintained a ministerial order listing jurisdictions with “clearly more favourable tax regimes” – the blacklist, in ordinary speech. Its latest revision, in force since 1 January 2026, struck Hong Kong, Liechtenstein and Uruguay, leaving 83 names on it.

The list reaches across the Portuguese tax legislation, from income taxes to property levies. Aggravated taxation kicks in whenever a taxable event has a relevant connection to a listed place – and it kicks in mechanically. The mere domicile of the payer or issuer suffices; the investor’s motives are irrelevant, and no actual tax advantage need have been obtained.

For personal income tax the punishment is stiff. Capital income – interest, dividends, distributions from funds or fiduciary structures such as trusts – paid by entities domiciled in a listed jurisdiction suffers a 35% rate. So do capital gains on bonds, other debt securities and fund units where the issuer is so domiciled, along with proceeds from the termination, liquidation, revocation or extinction of fiduciary structures. Worse, losses on such assets cannot be offset against taxable gains: the investor swallows the downside whole while the upside is taxed at penal rates.

In its current sweep, the order is a serious deterrent to investing in issuers from listed jurisdictions – and its drafting looks arbitrary. Some listed jurisdictions have concluded double taxation treaties with Portugal, complete with information-exchange clauses. Nor does the list stack up abroad: the European Union’s own roster of non-cooperative jurisdictions runs to just ten names, against Portugal’s 83.

Relief may be near. The government has said it plans to redraw the order in line with the criteria used by the European Union and the OECD. The exact terms are not yet public, but the direction is plain: a shorter, internationally aligned list, opening more of the investment universe to Portuguese residents on tax-neutral terms. For portfolios shaped – and constrained – by the current list, this is one to watch. Allocations, issuers and fund domiciles once penalised may soon return to viability.

Final remarks

Taken together, these shifts point in one direction: reward long-term investment, tax real rather than illusory gains, and bring Portugal’s defensive measures into line with international norms. The framework for taxing financial assets is anything but static – it is being actively reshaped by the legislature, tested in the courts and recalibrated against European Union and OECD benchmarks.

The message for private clients is simple. Existing wealth-holding structures deserve a fresh look. The timing of disposals, the holding period of each position, the domicile of issuers and funds within a portfolio – all now materially move the needle. A review with specialist advice, ideally before disposals rather than after, remains the surest way to preserve and grow family wealth in this new landscape.

Durham Agrellos

Avenida da Boavista, No 3265, 3.1
4100-137 Porto
Portugal

+351 226 167 260

+351 226 167 269

geral@da.pt www.da.pt
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Durham Agrellos is a boutique law firm specialising in tax and private wealth law.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Durham Agrellos is a boutique law firm specialising in tax and private wealth law.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.