Thailand is a civil law country. Therefore, although Thai Supreme Court opinions have a strong persuasive value, the source of all law in all areas, including real estate, is statutory.
Civil and Commercial Code
The Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) is perhaps the single most important law applicable to real estate in Thailand. Besides governing contracts, the CCC also creates ownership of immovable property and dictates how it may be transferred. It also creates and controls the various rights that may be registered over immovable property, such as mortgage, lease, superficies, usufruct, charge and servitude.
Land Act
The Land Act creates and controls the various titles of use and ownership of land.
Condominium Act
The Condominium Act creates a licensed development in which condominium units may be owned on a freehold basis and regulates the relationships between the owners.
Land Allocation Act
The Land Allocation Act does the same with respect to land, or land with a house on it.
Land Use Laws
Thailand’s three main land use laws are:
The Thai real estate sector continues to navigate the impact of Supreme Court Judgment No 4655/2566. By ruling that pre-arranged, long-term lease renewals violate the Civil and Commercial Code, the Court effectively invalidated the long-standing practice of “30+30+30” lease structures. The recent shift in the legal framework governing leasehold structures is occurring alongside increased regulatory oversight of corporate entities. Authorities are placing greater scrutiny on company frameworks, particularly those suspected of using Thai nominees to facilitate freehold land ownership by foreigners.
From an economic perspective, the Bangkok condominium sector continues to see a downward trend in new project launches. This slowdown is largely driven by persistent market challenges, including high levels of household debt, elevated mortgage rejection rates, and a substantial surplus of unsold developer inventory.
With regard to environmental law, the previously proposed changes for Phuket were enacted in December 2024. These regulations now permit private development on land at altitudes between 80 and 140 metres above mean sea level, which was previously restricted. However, such developments are subject to certain density controls, including a six-metre building height cap and a requirement that 70% of the land parcel remains as green space.
In Bangkok, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) is advancing the fourth revision of its comprehensive city plan, which is now scheduled for enactment in 2027. Significant updates include a 23% expansion of medium-density “orange zones” and the removal of height limits for certain high-rise developments located within 800 metres of mass-transit interchanges.
There are five main real estate titles. The chanote is one of only two true ownership titles in Thailand and is issued for land. The second is the Condominium Unit Title issued for a condominium unit.
There are also three possessory rights title documents for land. In order of preference they are:
Property rights, including transfer of ownership, can only be registered on the chanote, the Condominium Unit Title, Nor Sor 3 Gor and Nor Sor 3 deeds, but a Sor Kor 1 can usually be upgraded to a chanote or Nor Sor 3 Gor.
Immovable property may be leased for up to 30 years under the CCC, whereas leases for industrial or commercial purposes are eligible for a lease term of up to 50 years in some circumstances.
A registered usufruct gives the grantee the right to possess and benefit from immovable property for up to 30 years. A habitation may be registered and gives the holder the right of occupation of a structure for either up to 30 years or the life of the holder.
A superficies is the right to own a structure that is built on another party’s land for up to 30 years.
A servitude grants the owner of a property rights (eg, access) over another property owned by someone else. However, a servitude is not a personal right, it is registered in favour of one piece of real estate over another piece of real estate, and this remains the case regardless of who owns the properties. Thus, a servitude has no time limitation.
A charge is similar to a servitude, but it is a personal right that gives the holder rights over real estate owned by someone else, for either the holder’s life or up to 30 years.
The CCC applies to the transfer of real estate in Thailand. Special laws do not apply to a transfer of title for specific types of real estate, such as: residential, offices, retail, factories or hotels. However, some of these, eg, factories and hotels, are regulated uses of the real estate that require a licence to operate. Thus, if a new owner purchases real estate that is being used as a factory or hotel, that new owner would need to obtain a licence to use the real estate for either of those purposes.
All real estate in Thailand is registered and held under various forms of title (see 2.1 Categories of Property Rights) as prescribed by the Land Code.
The CCC requires an agreement to sell and purchase real estate to be in writing and registered at the local land office where the property is located.
Title insurance is not common in Thailand, but it is available. Buyers who are “land banking” (ie, whose sole purpose for the investment is to hold the real estate for a period of time and then resell for an anticipated profit), or who hold land for commercial purposes, are most likely to purchase title insurance which generally insures the owner against any flaw in the title which would invalidate it.
Buyers typically engage a law firm to perform legal due diligence into the property. This typically includes searches at the:
Title searches are particularly important, as wrongfully issued titles are not unknown in Thailand. Even if the title is not clearly invalid, official real estate records are sometimes lost or destroyed, which may make it impossible to verify the title to the real estate.
Additionally, commercial real estate investors typically conduct economic and physical due diligence into the property. The former will usually include an assessment of the revenue generated by the property, eg, from rental tenants, while the latter will typically include one or more physical surveys (eg, topographical, hydrological) of the property.
The seller typically provides contractual representations and warranties of ownership and proof that no third-party rights, such as any mortgage or lease, encumber the property. Such warranties generally do not expire nor do they vary based on whether or not the real estate is commercial in nature.
In the case of any defect in a property sold, of which the buyer was not, nor would have been expected to be, aware, this impairs either its value or fitness for ordinary purposes or for the purposes of the contract, and the seller is liable by statute regardless of whether or not the seller knew of the defect.
It should be noted that no action for liability for defect can be entered later than one year after the discovery of the defect. Though not typical, caps for liability can be used and parties can agree that the seller shall not incur any liability for defects or eviction. However, it is not possible to exonerate a debtor from their own gross negligence. Such an arrangement would be void. And any such caps are subject to the Unfair Contract Terms Act (if applicable) and must therefore stand the test of being “fair and reasonable” in the specific case.
The seller is also liable by statute for the consequences of any disturbance caused to the buyer’s possession of, or eviction from, the property by any person having a right over the property at the time of sale, of which the buyer was unaware, or by the fault of the seller.
The law allows parties to contract out of these statutory warranties, thus the sale and purchase typically releases the seller from liability or disturbance. However, such a non-liability clause does not exempt the seller from repayment of the purchase price, unless the clause specifies otherwise. Thus, this release is also typically included. At the same time, a non-liability clause may not exempt a seller from the consequences of their own acts or facts which they knew and concealed.
Lastly, if an immovable property is declared to be subject to a servitude (elsewhere often known as an “easement”) by law, the seller is not liable unless they have expressly guaranteed that the property was free of servitudes, or from that servitude. Thus, sellers often refuse to so warrant or explicitly represent otherwise.
Other than money damages, there is typically no security for such representations and warranties.
In Thailand, Representation and Warranty Insurance (RWI) is rarely used in commercial real estate transactions.
The CCC, which governs contracts such as sale and purchase and lease agreements, as well as real estate rights such as ownership, leaseholds and servitudes/easements, is a crucial area of law for all real estate investors. This is also true of Thailand’s three main land use laws (see 1.1 Main Sources of Law) which should be carefully evaluated by all buyers prior to investing. Depending on the type of property, the Land Act and the Condominium Act are also crucial areas of law as they determine the validity of title to land and condominiums.
Where the investor is a foreigner, laws that provide possible exemptions to Thailand’s restrictions on foreign ownership of real estate, such as the Investment Promotion Act and the Industrial Estate Authority Act, may also be relevant.
Under the Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act, the owner or possessor of any property that is a source of contamination that causes physical harm to any person or damage to someone else’s property is liable and must compensate the harmed party or parties. Furthermore, the owner or possessor must also compensate the government for all its costs in connection with cleaning up the contamination. The liability standard under the Act is strict – the owner or possessor need not have intended or been negligent with regard to the contamination from their property – and the very limited exemptions from this liability do not include the property having originally been contaminated by a prior owner or possessor. Thus, where there is any possibility of contamination, buyers typically require the seller to warrant that they have adhered to applicable environmental law and to indemnify the buyer against any liability arising from contamination from the property during the buyer’s ownership or possession thereof.
Thailand has three principal land use laws:
The Town and City Planning Act is applied by means of ministerial regulations issued under it that apply to specific regions. The BCA is applied by means of the royal decree issued under it which applies to specific geographic regions. The Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act is applied by means of the ministerial regulations issued under it which apply to specific geographic regions, or by announcements issued under it that apply to specific geographic regions for specified periods of time.
Other Applicable Laws
Some other laws may apply to land use in some areas, such as the Marine and Coastal Resources Management Act and the National Reserved Forest Act. Thus, it is important for a buyer to review all such laws applicable to the purchase property at the time.
There is no provision for a private party to apply for exemptions from applicable land use law in order to facilitate a development project. However, it is possible for local government offices to issue regulations that would allow for more permissive variations to land use restrictions in a specified location.
Land may be expropriated by the government for public purposes in accordance with the Immovable Property Expropriation Act. Once it is determined that a property is to be expropriated, the process is as follows:
The ownership transfer of immovable property in Thailand is subject to the following.
Most of these fees and taxes are the legal liability of the seller. However, it is not uncommon for the parties to agree to share these costs on a 50/50 basis.
In the case of a lease, a registration plus stamp duty fee in an amount equal to 1.1% of the total rent payable for the entire lease term being registered is applicable. The payment of this is subject to negotiation – however, the lessor will most commonly require the tenant to bear this cost.
Stamp duty of 0.001% of the share value applies to share transfers. There is no additional tax triggered by any change of corporate ownership and control of a company.
Effective from 10 April 2024, the registration fees for registering the sale and mortgage at the same time of detached houses, semi-detached houses, terraced houses, commercial buildings or any of the said structures with the accompanying land or condominium units, where (i) the sale price and the official appraised value of the property; and (ii) the mortgage amount, each does not exceed THB7 million and the purchaser is a Thai individual, are currently as follows:
The reduced rates were valid until 31 December 2024.
The Land Code generally restricts foreign ownership of land unless otherwise permitted by law. Such exemptions are available under certain conditions if the foreign party intends to make a business investment of the type that the Thai government wishes to attract at that time, and in some cases, at a particular location under either the Investment Promotion Act or the Industrial Estate Authority Act.
There is no prohibition against foreign investors owning a building or against leasing land or a building.
Foreign investors may also own up to 49% of the titled floor space of a condominium project. However, the money to purchase a condominium must either be brought into Thailand as foreign currency or held by the foreigner in a Thai foreign currency account.
Although sometimes financed by private equity, commercial real estate transactions in Thailand are most commonly financed by loans made by banks. The terms of such bank loans vary depending on the property, the type of development project, the borrower’s history and reputation, any available guarantee (and in such case, the guarantor’s standing) and the lender’s preferences. The loan may be made all at once or provided via a draw-down facility. Interest may be fixed or variable.
Thailand recently enacted a formal real estate investment trust (REIT) structure. Thailand’s REIT is similar to what is found under the same name elsewhere, eg, the USA. REITs in Thailand are listed on the stock exchange of Thailand and, although they initially got off to a slow start, they are picking up momentum and are now providing a modernised financing vehicle for large-scale commercial real estate investments in Thailand.
Typical security provided by commercial real estate developers to their lenders includes one or more of the following: mortgage, pledge, business collateral, assignment and guarantee.
Mortgage
A mortgage is a non-possessory security and may be registered over immovable property (eg, land or buildings) and some movable properties (eg, machinery) that has been registered under the Machinery Registration Act.
Pledge
A pledge is a possessory security where the lender takes possession of the security; it applies only to movable property such as machinery, whether registered or not, promissory notes, bills of exchange and, most commonly, shares of the borrower. A pledge is not registered but some types of pledged property may require additional steps to be legally valid, such as shares, which in addition to the share certificates being delivered to the creditor must have the pledge record in the share-issuing company’s share register book in order for the pledge to be enforceable.
Business Collateral
Under the Business Collateral Act, essentially all of a borrower’s business assets (eg, immovable property, movables, receivables and intellectual property) may be registered as security.
Assignment
A developer will also often assign its contractual rights, particularly those related to the project (eg, its contractual right to supply, construction, leasing, maintenance, insurance and bond).
Guarantee
Lenders typically also require a third-party guarantee which provides that if the borrower defaults, the guarantor will be obliged to satisfy the debt on behalf of the borrower.
There are no restrictions on granting security over real estate to foreign lenders. However, it is unclear whether a non-affiliated foreign lender would be considered to be conducting a service business under the Foreign Business Act. If this is the case, the lender would first need to apply for and receive a foreign business licence under the Act prior to entering the loan agreement.
There are no restrictions on repayments being made to a foreign lender. However, other requirements, such as exchange controls, may be applicable.
Normally, the registration fee for a mortgage over immovable property is an amount equal to 1% of the loan, but not exceeding THB200,000. However, see 2.10 Taxes Applicable to a Transaction for the current reduced rate.
Mortgages over machinery attract a registration fee of 0.001% of the amount of the loan, but not exceeding THB120,000. The fee to register business collateral is an amount equal to 0.1% of the loan but not more than THB1,000 unless the collateral is immovable property, in which case, the fee is an amount equal to 1% of the loan. De minimis stamp duties apply to loan, mortgage, pledge and guarantee transactional documents.
Enforcement fees may include court and execution office fees, as well as fees in connection with the official auction and sale of any property, eg, mortgaged land or pledged assets.
Where the borrower is a Thai company limited, as long as the borrower has reason to believe that the authorised director is acting within the scope of their authority to provide security to the lender over the company’s property, there are no further legal rules or requirements, such as financial assistance or corporate benefit rules, that must be complied with before such an entity can give valid security over its assets. However, if the articles of association do not specifically provide for the right of the director to mortgage property, a shareholder resolution is required.
Mortgage
Where the security provided is a mortgage, the lender must notify the debtor in writing to settle the debt within a reasonable time to be fixed in the notice. If the debtor fails to comply with the notice, the lender may then file an enforcement action in the Thai civil court to have the property seized and sold by public auction.
The typical range of time needed to realise and enforce on a real estate security varies most significantly depending on the parties’ chosen dispute resolution mechanism. Where the parties have chosen Thai courts, the typical range is 12-24 months. However, where the parties have chosen a competent arbitration procedure, the typical range is six to 12 months.
Pledge
Where the security provided is a pledge, the lender must also notify the debtor in writing to settle the debt within a reasonable time to be fixed in the notice and if the debtor fails to comply, the lender may sell the property but only by public auction, prior to which the lender must notify the debtor in writing of the place and time of the auction.
Business Collateral
If the security is provided under the Business Collateral Act, then the lender must send a notice to the debtor to settle the debt within 15 days of receipt of the notice. A copy of this notice must also be sent to any preferential creditors registered under the Act. If the debtor fails to comply, the lender may then sell the property.
There have been no restrictions on a lender’s ability to foreclose or realise on collateral in real estate lending that have been implemented by governmental entities in response to the pandemic.
Lenders have been actively exercising their rights to foreclose in the current market.
Thailand has an active secondary market for non-performing loans (NPLs), where financial institutions and investors trade these assets. The ongoing challenges in the real estate sector, along with high NPL levels, continue to sustain interest in this market.
In general, registered security rights over immovable property rank in order of registration. However, if the security is given by way of mortgage or registration under the Business Collateral Act, and a later preferential right in the property is registered based on preservation of or work done on the property, then such later registered right may be exercised in preference to a mortgage or business collateral security interest.
A lender holding or enforcing security over real estate cannot be held liable under the Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act for any pollution emanating from real estate that secures a loan, unless the lender actually caused the pollution.
Security interests created by a borrower in favour of a lender are not made void if the borrower becomes insolvent. However, insolvency is grounds for any relevant lender to force the debtor into bankruptcy. Under the Bankruptcy Act, a secured creditor may enforce their security rights without need of permission from the bankruptcy court, but the lender must allow the property to be examined by the bankruptcy receiver. Furthermore, if the juristic act that created the security occurred within the three months prior to the bankruptcy petition and such act is found to have been done in order to intentionally advantage one creditor to the disadvantage of any other creditor, the act may be cancelled. If the advantaged creditor is an insider of the debtor, the three months will be extended to one year prior to the petition.
Normally, the registration fee for a mortgage over immovable property is an amount equal to 1% of the loan, but not exceeding THB200,000. However, see 2.10 Taxes Applicable to a Transaction for the current reduced rate.
The Town and City Planning Act and the Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act control land use and zoning in Thailand.
The BCA controls the construction, refurbishment and demolition of buildings. The standard provisions of the Act apply to all such activities. However, under the Act, structures intended for a specific use (eg, hotels, condominiums and shopping malls) are considered “controlled structures”, which are subject to more detailed and rigorous regulations issued under the Act. Regulations may also be issued from time to time that apply to specific localities, prescribing particular design and appearance requirements for newly constructed or modified buildings.
The Town and City Planning Act, the Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act, and the BCA regulate the development and designated use of individual parcels of real estate throughout Thailand. However, the specific, detailed and varied application of these Acts is implemented by royal decrees, regulations and announcements issued under them that apply to specific geographic localities in Thailand. Local government administrations are responsible for the application and enforcement of the Acts and regulations issued thereunder.
The relevant local government administration under the BCA issues the construction permit. The local administration’s decision as to whether such permission will be granted must also take into account compliance with all other applicable land use law, such as the Town and City Planning Act and the Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act, as well as other controls applicable to certain types of construction. These may include an requisite initial environmental examination or, for larger projects, an environmental impact assessment report, including an analysis of a project’s expected effects on third parties.
As local government authorities are responsible for formally granting, denying and enforcing construction permission, an agreement with the local authorities regarding a construction project is required as a matter of course in Thailand. However, it is also not uncommon for permission to be conditional on the provision of benefits to the locality, such as new or upgraded public infrastructure.
A denial of construction permission under the BCA may be appealed to the relevant local government administration within 30 days of acknowledgement of the decision. The local government administration must then forward the appeal to the Appeal Consideration Committee, which must rule on the appeal within 60 days. If the appellant disagrees with the ruling, they may file an action in the Administrative Court within 30 days. During the appeal process, both the appellant and local government administration are prohibited from carrying out any construction, except where it poses danger to persons or property.
Third parties are entitled to challenge a construction permit only if they are an aggrieved person (directly affected). They must first file an internal appeal with the local government administration within 30 days of becoming aware of the permit. Only after the Appeal Consideration Committee issues a ruling can the party then bring the case before the Administrative Court.
In the event of there being construction, alteration, demolition or removal of a building in violation of the BCA or regulation issued thereunder, the local government administration has the power to:
A party that fails to comply with a demolition order may be imprisoned for up to six months and fined up to THB100,000.
Where a construction requires permission for a specific use, the local government administration may order a party not to use the construction in that manner until such permission has been obtained. Any party that is using a structure without the requisite permission may be imprisoned for up to six months, fined up to THB60,000 and additionally fined up to THB10,000 for each day that the unlawful use continues.
Any juristic person, such as a registered partnership, limited partnership, private company limited or public company limited, is eligible to hold real estate assets. Of these, the preferred entities for investors are private and public companies limited.
Furthermore, listed property funds and REITs are used for investment purposes.
A private limited company is required to maintain at least two shareholders at all times. The company must be managed by one or more directors, all of whom must be natural persons. The directors are not required to be shareholders of the company.
Public Limited Company
A public company limited is required to maintain at least 15 shareholders at all times. There is no minimum capital requirement. At least five directors must manage the company and at least 50% of such directors are required to reside in Thailand.
Limited Partnership
A limited partnership has two different kinds of partner subject to different liabilities:
Registered Partnership
In a registered partnership the individual partners are jointly and unlimitedly liable for the obligations of the partnership; the partnership is established through a contribution of money, other properties or service to the partnership by the partners; and the share of each partner in the profits and losses is determined by the amount of such contribution.
Property Fund
A property fund is established in the form of a juristic person listed on the stock exchange of Thailand. A property fund is established in order to collect funds from investors and use these funds to invest in real estate. The return of the fund’s investment is generally in the form of regular income through rent. The property fund is required to hold at least 75% of its net asset value in real estate or the leasehold rights of real estate, which must be located in Thailand and be at least 80% constructed.
A REIT takes the form of a trust and does not have juristic person status but is also listed on the stock exchange of Thailand. A REIT can also invest in real estate located abroad and can develop real estate projects.
The minimum registered capital for a private company limited is THB10.
There is no minimum capital requirement for a public company limited, limited partnership and registered ordinary partnership.
Property funds in Thailand are required to be closed-end funds with a minimum capital of THB500 million.
A REIT must also invest at least THB500 million in real estate assets.
The following governance requirements apply to each type of entity:
Accounting costs usually depend on the type of entity and the amount of the transaction.
A private company limited is required to prepare an audited balance sheet, file corporate income tax returns, as well as file its latest shareholder list yearly. Furthermore, it must maintain and update a register of shareholders.
A public company limited is required to hold an annual general meeting, prepare an audited balance sheet, file corporate income tax returns and file its latest shareholder list yearly. Furthermore, it must maintain and update a register of shareholders. It is also required to publish the balance sheet in a newspaper.
Limited partnerships and registered ordinary partnerships must prepare and submit annual financial statements.
Property funds and REITs must comply with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations.
The law recognises the following arrangements.
All leases are governed by the CCC as a specific contract.
Apart from standard lease provisions, the Hire of Immovable Property for Commerce and Industry Act introduces a specific form of commercial lease. The Act defines commercial purposes with regard to leasing commercial property. A lease that qualifies under the Act as “commercial” must be:
The commercial lease under such Act may have a term of up to 50 years. The maximum term for any other lease, whether residential or not qualifying under the conditions of the Act, is merely 30 years. In addition, a lease under the Act may also be mortgaged as security for a loan. A commercial lease under the Act is automatically inheritable by the tenant’s heir. Finally, a commercial lease may be sublet or transferred without the lessor’s prior consent.
Registration requirements exist in relation to the lease term. Any lease term exceeding three years must be registered with the land department in order to be enforceable for the term exceeding three years.
Furthermore, any lease term cannot exceed 30 years (see 6.2 Types of Commercial Leases for exceptions).
Other terms are only freely negotiable if the lease is not considered a “residential property leasing business”, which means a business that leases five or more property units to individual lessees for residential proposes. A residential property leasing business is a controlled business and certain contract terms are required by law. Any violation is subject to a fine and/or imprisonment (see 6.14 Specific Regulations).
Typically, short-term leases do not exceed a three-year term, in order to avoid the registration requirement. Land leases are usually for a longer term.
Tenants have specific liabilities to the owner of a property and any relevant provisions of their rental contract.
The use of the property is restricted to ordinary purposes or those provided for in the rental contract. A tenant is required to take ordinary care of the property, which includes maintenance and petty repairs, as such care would dictate. If the tenant fails to do so, the tenant may be required by the lessor to comply with such requirements. In the case of non-compliance with such request, the lessor may terminate the lease contract.
The tenant is liable for any resulting damage where the tenant fails to advise the lessor of the following facts of which the lessor is unaware:
The frequency of rent payments is dependent on the project. Payments are usually made monthly. It is also not uncommon for the full lease amount to be prepaid, which is usually the case with long-term land leases.
If the initial lease agreement is silent on this point, the parties are free to negotiate the new lease term and amount.
Variation in the rent will depend on the contractual arrangement between the parties.
Additionally, some leases shift the local property tax burden to the lessee. Any changes in the local tax would then affect the financial burden of the lessee.
Variation in the rent will depend on the contractual arrangement between the parties.
Additionally, some leases shift the local property tax burden to the lessee. Any changes in the local tax would then affect the financial burden of the lessee.
The following are typically payable by a tenant at the start of a lease:
The total amount payable by a tenant is commonly split into a rental component and a service component. The service component covers the payment for the maintenance and repair of the shared area.
Utilities and telecoms are typically charged as follows.
It should be noted that the utility rate must reflect the actual rate paid by the owner if the lease falls under certain regulations issued in accordance with the Consumer Protection Act, which regulates residential structure leases (as further explained in 6.14 Specific Regulations).
Landlords are legally responsible for property tax as property owners. However, lease agreements often shift the payment burden to the tenant, especially in long-term lease agreements.
The tenant must use the property for the contractually agreed purpose and refrain from using the property in any way that is not considered ordinary and usual. Further, the tenant has a duty to take care of the property as a person with ordinary prudence would do.
The tenant must use the property for the contractually agreed purpose and refrain from using the property in any way that is not considered ordinary and usual. Further, the tenant has a duty to take care of the property as a person of ordinary prudence would do.
Leases are generally governed by the CCC. However, there are two specific laws that additionally govern certain leases:
The regulations require that:
A tenant’s insolvency would commonly trigger the termination provisions of the rental agreement where the tenant fails to perform its obligation, such as paying the agreed rental amount.
Bankruptcy proceedings cannot be initiated by the debtor. However, a debtor can, under certain circumstances, apply for reorganisation. If the property is essential for the operation of the debtor’s business, the owner may not exercise their right to reclaim the property.
A security deposit is usually held to protect the landlord should the tenant fail to meet its obligations. In addition, the landlord might require the tenant to provide a guarantor for the performance of the tenant’s obligations.
The tenant has no right to occupy the property once the lease has terminated/expired. However, if after expiration of the agreed period the tenant remains in possession of the property with the knowledge of the landlord and the landlord does not object, then it is considered a renewal of the contract for an indefinite period.
Any eviction of the tenant requires an eviction order of the court. Only a court-appointed execution officer is entitled to take possession of the premises.
An assignment or sub-lease is only possible with the approval of the landlord. An exception to this rule is a legally defined “commercial lease” (as described in 6.2 Types of Commercial Leases).
According to the CCC, termination of the lease by the landlord requires:
A tenant may terminate a lease in accordance with the CCC if:
Any lease term of more than three years must be registered with the land department that has jurisdiction over the relevant immovable property in order to be enforceable for a term exceeding three years.
The lease will be registered on the land title. The parties to the lease must provide the documents for the relevant transaction in accordance with the Licensing Facilitation Act, which requires that the land department specifies what document must be provided in advance for each transaction. A Thai translation of the lease agreement must further be provided for registration purposes.
To complete the relevant registration, the parties must pay a registration fee and stamp duty equal to 1.1% of the total rental amount of the registered lease term.
A tenant is legally required to leave the premises when the underlying right to possess such premises is extinguished, be it by termination or expiration.
However, the eviction of a tenant requires an eviction order from the court against such tenant. After having obtained such order, the landlord will request the appointment of an execution officer who will then have the power to take possession of the premises.
The length of the proceedings varies from case to case.
A lease can be terminated by a government entity.
Under the Expropriation and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act (2019), subject to certain requirements, government entities can expropriate immovable property for the purposes of public utilities, military, natural resources or for any other benefits of the public including town planning, environmental preservation, agricultural development, land reform, historical sites preservation, special economic zones development and industrial purposes. The Act provides the government entities with the absolute and unilateral right to exercise this power, and the expropriated property owners must comply with any expropriation order. Any existing lease agreement over the expropriated property will be terminated due to the expropriation. However, both the landlord and the tenant will be entitled to receive compensation from the government entities as provided by the Act.
The length of the proceedings varies from case to case.
For a landlord not in breach of contract, the remedies that a landlord may pursue include seeking compensation and pursuing specific performance of the agreement. Additionally, injunctive relief may be sought to prevent actions that obstruct contractual duties or exacerbate harm to the non-breaching party, or to enforce compliance with contractual obligations.
Damages claims are generally confined to those resulting from the non-performance. However, the non-breaching party may demand damages stemming from special circumstances if they were foreseeable. Court intervention may adjust contractual damages if deemed excessive.
A security deposit is usually held to protect the landlord should the tenant fail to meet its obligations. In addition, the landlord might require the tenant to provide a guarantor for the performance of the tenant’s obligations. Under certain conditions, the security deposit cannot legally exceed one-month’s rent. The form of the deposit is negotiable between the parties.
The following are the most common structures used to price construction projects.
The liability for the design and build depends on the contractual arrangements of the parties. If the contractor in a design-build contractual relationship assumes the responsibility for the whole project, such contractor will be the sole responsible party. However, if the owner employs different entities in a design-tender approach, the design and construction will be performed by different parties. In that case, the responsibility of the parties is divided according to their respective contractual performance.
Indemnification is commonly used in construction contracts. Parties also usually agree to limit their liability to a fixed amount or in the form of a waiver of consequential damages.
Thai law implements consumer protection provisions in relation to agreements for the construction of residential houses. Such contracts cannot include any exclusion or limitation of liability for breach of contract by the contractor. Furthermore, warranty periods are specified and are not freely negotiable: liability for defects, such as five years for structure and one year for component parts and equipment, must be included in a consumer-related construction agreement.
Parties typically manage schedule-related risks by implementing milestone payments. Such payments are connected to penalty payments in the case of a delay, but also include incentives for early completion. Furthermore, early termination clauses are commonly agreed.
Thai law provides for automatic penalty provisions (ie, regardless of whether these are included in the contract between the parties) in certain commercial projects such as condominium buildings and consumer-related construction agreements. In both cases, any delay in completion of the project is subject to a daily penalty of 0.01% of the total contractual amount, limited to 10% of the contractual amount.
One or more of the following securities is typically provided:
By law, a contractor obtains a preferential right on the immovable property for work done on such immovable property. Such preferential right allows the creditor to receive performance of the obligation out of such immovable property in preference to other creditors. Since the preferential right is an ancillary right to the obligation, it will be extinguished by the performance of the obligation.
Use-Controlled Buildings
Certain “use-controlled buildings” are required to receive “use certification” after completion of construction. Such buildings are:
Inspection and Use Certification
On completion of the construction of the use-controlled building, notification must be given to the local government administration to inspect the structure. After the inspection, if the local government administration determines that the construction was completed in accordance with its building permit, permission to use the building will be granted and use certification for the purpose applied for in the building permit will be issued. If, however, the local administrative office does not inspect the building within 30 days of the notification of completion, the owner or possessor of the building may go ahead and use, or allow others to use, the building for the purpose stated in the building permit.
VAT is not applicable to the sale and purchase of real estate. However, specific business tax (SBT) of 3.3% applies to the sale of immovable property by juristic persons. Exemptions to the SBT requirement may apply to a sale by a natural person. Where SBT is not applicable, stamp duty at a rate of 0.5% applies.
If the real estate asset to be transferred is the only or main asset of the selling entity, an entire business transfer might be beneficial. The transfer of the real estate asset that is part of an entire business transfer is not subject to SBT. However, in order to take advantage of the tax benefits, the selling entity must be dissolved within the same accounting period as the business transfer takes place.
Municipal taxes do not apply specifically to business premises. However, real estate is subject to property tax, which is a local tax.
Withholding taxes apply to the rental and sale of immovable property.
A “tax resident” of Thailand is any person staying in Thailand for a period or periods aggregating 180 days or more per year. However, it is important to note that the duty to pay tax on rental income in Thailand does not depend on being a tax resident of Thailand or whether the income is received in Thailand. Rental income is considered taxable income regardless of Thai tax residency under the Thai Revenue Code. The relevant law states that a taxpayer (ie, “anyone”) who in the previous tax year derived assessable income from a property situated in Thailand must pay tax, whether such income is paid within or outside Thailand. Thus, anyone, tax resident or not, who earns rental income from a property in Thailand, must pay tax on that income, no matter whether the rental income is paid on-shore or off-shore.
It is the duty of the payer of the rent to deduct withholding tax from the rental payment and submit it to the local revenue department. However, both the lessee and the lessor are jointly liable for the payment of this withholding tax.
The amount of withholding tax depends on whether the lessor is a tax resident of Thailand and also whether the lessee is a juristic person or an individual. If the lessor is not a tax resident of Thailand, the withholding tax rate is 15%. The legal status of the lessee does not matter if the owner is not a tax resident of Thailand. If the lessor is a tax resident of Thailand and the lessee is a juristic person, the withholding tax rate is 5%. If the lessor is a tax resident of Thailand and the lessee is a natural person, there is no withholding tax applicable.
The taxation of a “capital gain” on the sale of real estate in Thailand depends on whether the seller is a natural or juristic person.
Juristic Person or Company
When a corporate entity sells an immovable property, withholding tax at the rate of 1% of the sale price is required to be deducted from the sale price and paid to the authorities on transfer. This is a prepayment of the corporate seller’s income tax for that tax year, and it will be credited against any tax owed for that year. However, both parties – the seller and any buyer – jointly bear the legal duty to withhold and pay this tax. A surcharge on any late or inadequate payment of the withholding tax at a rate of 1.5% per month of the late amount is applicable.
Any gain realised on the sale of immovable property must be declared by the selling company in the accounting period when the sale took place. Section 65 of the Revenue Code defines “net profit” as the result of income from business or arising out of business in one accounting year, less certain expenses. In other words, the net profit of the whole accounting year is the basis of taxation and not a single taxable event, such as the sale of immovable property.
Natural Person or Individual
When an individual sells an immovable property, the withholding tax is generally calculated based on the official appraised value of such property, less certain deductions. The deductions depend on the duration of ownership of the property to be transferred. The calculation is done using a specific formula created by the legislature which takes into account how long the property has been owned and the progressive tax rates applicable to individuals, but may be calculated without including any of the seller’s other annual taxable income. It should be noted that even if the transfer of immovable property is without consideration (ie, a gift) by an individual, it will be deemed a sale subject to personal income tax.
The following maximum depreciation rates apply.
Land does not depreciate.
Deductions on rental income are applicable and actual expenses may be deducted in the case of houses, buildings or other constructions. If the property is let by the owner, a standard deduction of 30% is allowed as expenses. Rental income tax recipients have the option to define the taxable income by sufficiently documenting their actual rental income-related expenses. If these expenses are higher than the standard 30% deduction, are reasonable and sufficiently documented, then such deduction can be effected.
Suite 1605
Chartered Square Building
152 North Sathorn Road
Silom
Bangkok 10500
Thailand
+66 0 22 675 424
contact@duensingkippen.com www.duensingkippen.com
Overview and Recent Trends in Thailand’s Real Estate Sector
Thailand’s economic growth has been driven significantly by the real estate sector. However, recent fluctuating market conditions have affected Thailand’s real estate sector in various ways.
Despite the changing trends in Thailand’s real estate sector, both Thai and foreign investors have continued to pursue new real estate development projects in Thailand. In recent years, Thailand’s real estate sector has continued to attract foreign investors, reflecting a growing trend in inbound investment.
Thai investors, being more familiar with local procedures, may find it easier to navigate the system. On the other hand, foreign investors must be diligent in understanding the local market conditions and adhering to the Thai regulatory framework, which, in some cases (eg, the foreign land ownership restrictions), is even stricter than that applicable to Thai investors.
Therefore, foreign investors must carefully consider the appropriate approach to entering Thai’s real estate market. In particular, they should be mindful of occasional amendments to the regulatory framework, which could impact operations in the real estate sector. This article further elaborates on key recent issues of note for foreign investors in Thailand’s real estate market.
Right to Hold Real Property in Thailand: Notable Core Insights for Foreign Investors
Restriction on foreign ownership of land
Prohibition on land ownership
It can be challenging for foreign investors to invest directly in Thailand’s real estate sector given the various practical and legal constraints, especially the stringent restrictions on land ownership by foreign investors. Under the Land Code of 1954 of Thailand (“Land Code”), a limited or public limited company is considered a foreign entity if (i) more than 49% of its registered capital is held by foreign nationals, or (ii) half of its shareholders are foreign nationals. If a company is considered a foreign entity under these criteria, it is generally not permitted to own land in Thailand unless a statutory exception applies.
In practice, most foreign investors opt to invest in Thailand through a locally incorporated company ‒ often in the form of a joint venture with local developers ‒ so that the joint venture company can legally own land in Thailand.
Since foreigners generally cannot own land, standalone ownership of buildings is practically and legally limited.
Limitation on foreign ownership of condominium units
While foreigners generally cannot own land in Thailand, under the Condominium Act B.E. 2522 (1979), foreigners can own condominium units subject to the “49% Foreign Quota,” which allows foreign investors to collectively hold up to 49% of the total floor area in a condominium project. Ownership of condominium units also includes co-ownership of common property, including the land on which the condominium project is located, in proportion to the area of the unit owned. This can be seen as an exception to the prohibition on foreigners owning land in Thailand.
Alternatives to land ownership
When foreign investors are unable to hold direct ownership of land, they need to secure their rights in real property through other legal approaches, for example, leasehold rights, superficies, usufruct, or other rights, which are further described below.
Long-term leasehold right
One of the most common approaches for foreign investors is a long-term leasehold. Such long-term leases are, however, subject to certain legal limitations. Under Section 538 of the Thai Civil and Commercial Code (CCC), a lease with a term exceeding three years must be registered with the land office; otherwise, it will be enforceable for no more than three years. Furthermore, under Section 540 of the CCC, a lease term cannot exceed 30 years; any agreed lease term exceeding this limitation will be deemed void and will be reduced to 30 years. Particularly in large-scale projects, investors often prefer to secure their rights over real property beyond this 30-year limitation.
The most common approach to address this 30-year limitation is to include a “promise of lease” provision within the original lease agreement, enabling renewal for consecutive 30-year terms. Such “promise of lease” is a unilateral offer binding only on the lessor. To be regarded as a “promise of lease”, the renewal terms and conditions, including the rent, must be agreed in advance, precluding further negotiation between the parties. If the terms remain open to negotiation, the arrangement will not qualify as a promise but will instead be deemed a right of first refusal. To exercise the right under a “promise of lease”, the lessee must exercise its right to accept the promise to renew the lease within the original lease term, after which a new lease is executed, effectively extending the lease term for a successive 30-year period. Nevertheless, this arrangement has given rise to a legal issue, as highlighted by a recent court case in 2023 (see below).
Exploring 30-year lease extensions as a long-term strategy: key insights from a landmark Supreme Court case
The arrangement of a promise of lease for successive 30-year periods has recently come under scrutiny following a Supreme Court judgment rendered in 2023, which highlights the legal risks associated with extending lease terms beyond the statutory 30-year limitation. A summary of the facts of the case, the judgment, and an evaluation of the judgment are set out below.
Summary of facts
The plaintiff, being a lessor and a property owner (ie, the land and the residential house thereon) in Phuket Province, Thailand, entered into a lease agreement with the defendant, as lessee, on 10 May 1990. The lease agreement stipulated a 30-year lease term (ie, 1990-2020) for a total rent of THB1.5 million and contained a promise of lease provision entitling the lessee to renew the lease upon expiry.
Additionally, on the execution date of the original lease agreement, the parties executed a separate agreement under which the defendant agreed to make early payment of THB1.2 million (the rent for two successive 30-year lease terms, ie, 2020-2050 and 2050-2080, with THB600,000 as the rent for each term), which was to be paid later in 1990, in order to secure two successive 30-year lease terms, ultimately extending the lease to 90 years.
Despite these agreements, in 2020, the plaintiff demanded that the defendant vacate the property and demolish the structures built on the land. The defendant refused, leading the plaintiff to file a complaint seeking monetary damages for failure to vacate the premises. In response, the defendant filed a counterclaim, requesting the Supreme Court to enforce the registration of a new 30-year lease term, for which partial payment had already been made.
Judgment
The Supreme Court first referred to the purpose of Section 540 of the CCC, which clearly prohibits leases exceeding 30 years to “protect the parties from disproportionate advantages or disadvantages resulting from long-term leases that could cause changes in the property’s condition and economic circumstances, making it impractical for the parties to predict the economic value of the leased property”.
Based on this purpose, the Supreme Court ruled that (i) the lessor’s promise, included in the initial 30-year lease, to renew the lease for two additional 30-year periods on identical terms and (ii) the lessee’s prepayment of rent for these future terms, implying acceptance of the lessor’s promise to renew the lease, showed an intent to circumvent the 30-year lease term limitation. Consequently, the agreement on the two successive 30-year terms became void.
Key takeaways
The Supreme Court strictly interprets Section 540 of the CCC. Any agreement that appears to create a lease term exceeding 30 years from the outset be deemed null and void. This interpretation is upheld despite the general principle of freedom of contract under Thai law. The Supreme Court expressed particular concern regarding lease renewals where the terms of the successive renewal periods remained identical to those of the initial term. This suggests that the renewal of a lease may be permitted if the terms and conditions for the successive periods appropriately reflect future conditions and circumstances of the leased property, economics, etc.
Careful consideration of the provisions of the lease agreement is crucial to ensuring the enforceability and validity of a long-term lease. In light of the above Supreme Court judgment, the parties should structure renewal arrangements in a manner that allows the parties to review and agree on key commercial terms ‒ particularly rent ‒ at the time of renewal in order to reflect prevailing market conditions. This approach helps balance the interests of the parties and reduces the risk of nullification of renewal provisions.
Other alternative property rights
In addition to a general leasehold, foreign investors may consider other legal mechanisms that enable the use of real property without freehold ownership, such as the following.
Lease under the Lease of Immovable Property for Commercial and Industrial Purposes B.E. 2542 (“Commercial and Industrial Lease Act”)
A lease under the Commercial and Industrial Lease Act (“50-Year Lease”) is conceptually the same as a general lease under the CCC. However, while a general lease is limited to a lease term of 30 years, the 50-Year Lease extends the lease term to 50 years, which is renewable for an additional 50-year period.
The 50-Year Lease is more complex and is subject to specific statutory limitations and conditions, including the following.
Given these conditions, to date, the 50-Year Lease has been used mainly in a limited number of large-scale projects.
Other real property rights such as superficies and usufructs
Unlike a leasehold, which is considered a contractual right between the parties, there are other types of rights available under the CCC (ie, real property rights that are created upon registration with a land office and are attached to the property itself). Examples of those real property rights are as follows.
However, the use of these rights remains uncommon among business operators compared to leaseholds due to certain legal and practical constraints. In particular, similar to leaseholds, these rights are subject to the 30-year term limitation, which means they are not significantly different from leaseholds. Thus, investors do not have a strong incentive to seek superficies or usufructs over leaseholds. In addition, particularly for usufructs that grant generous rights to the usufructuary and severely limit the owner’s abilities over the property, this may cause the owner to be reluctant to grant usufructs.
Data Centre Businesses: An Emerging Industry with Significant Impacts on the Real Estate Sector
Overview of data centre businesses in Thailand
Thailand has emerged as a strategic destination for data centre businesses since Thailand is well-equipped with, among other things, essential infrastructure that is vital for global communication.
There are several data centres located in Bangkok and surrounding provinces in Thailand as well as the Eastern Economic Corridor or EEC (an area-based development project aimed at boosting Thailand’s economy through the development of infrastructure and industrial zones, particularly in Chonburi, Rayong and Chachoengsao provinces).
Against this backdrop, the Thai government has actively enhanced its investment promotion framework through the Board of Investment (BOI) to accommodate the rapid growth in investment in data centre businesses in Thailand.
Legal framework for data centre businesses in Thailand
BOI investment promotion
The BOI plays a key role in promoting investment by both Thai investors and foreign investors (through a locally incorporated company) in Thailand in various target sectors, including data centre businesses in particular.
The BOI’s investment promotion will be granted to eligible businesses only if the applicant meets the specific conditions and criteria set forth for the relevant business category. Eligible businesses, including data centre businesses, may receive tax and/or non-tax incentives depending on the business category.
Recent regulatory updates on BOI regulations
In 2025 and early 2026, the BOI revised the conditions for investment promotion and the utilisation of incentives for data centre businesses in order to support efficient resource utilisation and to provide guidance for the preparation of project plans that generate benefits for Thailand.
For investment promotion applications, the key amendments related to data centre businesses can be summarised as follows.
Foreign ownership and land rights
To develop a data centre, securing land is essential. If investment promotion is obtained for the data centre, one of the key non-tax incentives that may be specifically granted to a foreign-majority-owned company is the right to own land. Thus, obtaining investment promotion can be an alternative approach for foreign investors to hold absolute ownership over land. This can be attractive for foreign investors in the data centre business sector.
Impact of data centre businesses on the real estate industry
As the demand for data centres increases, the real estate market is shifting its focus to locations that are suitable for these businesses. Prime locations for data centres are preferably areas that offer stable electricity, ample water supply and high-speed fibre optic networks. The proliferation of data centres is transforming previously quiet areas into active economic hubs.
However, data centres may also negatively impact the attractiveness of nearby residential areas due to visual obstruction from large windowless buildings, operational noise, heat emissions, etc, potentially resulting in decreases in housing values.
In conclusion, investors should carefully factor in data centre demand, infrastructure requirements and potential community impact when shaping their real estate strategies.
Key Updates in Recent Legal Amendments
The following updates (ie, the amendments to the Land Allocation Act B.E. 2543 (2000) (LAA) and the notification on residential building leasing as a contract-controlled business) are critical for developers as they redefine the operational and regulatory boundaries of Thailand’s real estate sector. These amendments necessitate a strategic reassessment of both their project development structures and their day-to-day lease management practices in Thailand.
Land allocation
Purpose of amendment
Land allocation (ie, the subdivision of land plots for sale, which is the common structure for housing projects in Thailand) is governed under the LAA, which originally imposed an inflexible requirement on land developers to maintain public utilities and services, such as roads, water supply, electricity and waste management, in their original condition within and throughout their projects.
The LAA was recently amended in 2025 to specifically address recurring disputes between land purchasers (ie, consumers) and land developers concerning the developer’s negligence in the management of public utilities and services (eg, incomplete road construction, unreliable water and electricity supply and inadequate waste management). This amendment applies to both existing and new land allocation projects.
Key amendments
Flexibility in maintaining utilities and services
Formerly, developers were required to maintain the quality and functionality of public utilities and services in accordance with their original condition, meaning the state in which they were initially completed. Following the amendment, developers are required to maintain them in normal operating conditions, which refers to a standard that is not lower than their original condition or an equivalent standard.
Accordingly, the amendment offers developers more flexibility to reasonably modify public utilities and services (eg, to accommodate technological advancements by replacing a damaged manual gate with an automatic gate offering better functionality).
Overall, this represents a significant step in improving legal requirements to enhance the effective management of public utilities and services, reduce disputes and strengthen project governance for the long-term asset management of housing projects.
Streamlined formation of housing estate juristic persons
In principle, in order for a developer’s obligation to oversee a project to cease, a housing estate juristic person must be established. Consequently, all responsibilities, including the management of public utilities and services, will be transferred to the housing estate juristic person.
Formerly, a housing estate juristic person could be established only with the approval of at least half of the actual total number of subdivided plots under the allocation plan.
Under the amendment to the LAA, the process for establishing a housing estate juristic person has been streamlined, enabling purchasers of at least half of the subdivided plots sold to initiate the process directly if the developer fails to do so or fails to maintain public utilities and services. If the number of purchasers does not meet the required threshold, a majority of land purchasers attending the meeting may still be sufficient to initiate the process.
This provision is particularly useful if a land purchaser cannot be located due to the length of time that has passed after the completion of land allocation project.
Residential building leasing business as a contract-controlled business
Purpose of amendment
Since 2018, leasing of residential buildings, excluding dormitories and hotels, had been classified as a contract-controlled business under the regulations issued by Thailand’s Consumer Protection Board to protect consumers, whereby the contract must strictly comply with standard forms or certain conditions and criteria.
In May 2025, a new regulation (“2025 Notification”) was announced to repeal the previous notification issued in 2019 and to standardise lease practices and enhance protections for lessees.
Key amendments
Operators subject to the 2025 Notification
One of the key revisions made under the 2025 Notification is the amendment to the criteria of the operators who are obligated to comply with the contract conditions and criteria. Formerly, the law targeted lessors who have five or more properties for leasing; however, the number of properties was reduced to three or more properties in the 2025 Notification. Notably, this requirement also applies even if the operator for a residential lease is a foreigner or consists of foreign investors.
Lease classifications and standardisation
Under the 2025 Notification, leases are classified into:
In light of these classifications, specific regulatory requirements that appropriately correspond to each type of lease are applicable. These approaches allow for the standardisation of contractual agreements and consumer protections.
34th Floor,
Bhiraj Tower at EmQuartier
689 Sukhumvit Road
Klongton Nuea Vadhana
Bangkok 10110
Thailand
+66 2 302 4800
+66 2 302 4899
shunsuke.minowa@nagashima.com www.nagashima.com/en/