Based on the provisions contained in the Bankruptcy Law (Ley de Concursos Mercantiles, hereinafter CBL), the Mexican legislator incorporated the legal framework to secure the survival and viability of companies in a situation of general breach of obligations. The objective of this framework is the implementation of a process aimed to increase the value of bankrupt companies, while focusing on their preservation. For the purposes of this restructuring process, it is necessary to make a prior analysis of the status of each property owned or held by the company (ie, the issuer) prior to declaring such entity as formally bankrupt.
According to Article 71 of the Securities Market Law (Ley del Mercado de Valores, hereinafter SML), it is possible to separate from the bankruptcy estate certain credits that are subject to a trust agreement (fideicomiso), so that they are separated from the bankruptcy assets. However, if the trust agreement by which these assets are transferred is executed within the 270-day period prior to the declaration of bankruptcy by a judge, it is presumed that the act was carried out in fraud to creditors and other third parties.
In Mexico, it is also possible to carry out the abovementioned transfer through a true sale or a secured loan. The main difference between these figures is that whereas in a true sale it is considered that the property of the accounts receivable has been transferred by the issuer, in a secured loan these assets continue to be part of the originator's patrimony and are subject to the bankrupt procedures – however, these type of agreements grant the creditor a preferential right within the bankruptcy procedures.
According to Article 83 of the SML, a public securitisation, for the transfer and acquisition of these type of assets, will require the authorisation of the Banking and Securities Commission (CNBV). The respective plea must be accompanied by, among others, the legal opinion issued by an independent lawyer about the legal validity and enforceability of the trust agreement, as well as the legal acts for the transfer of ownership over the goods or trust rights.
As indicated in the preceding section, property belonging to the trust will not be part of the bankruptcy assets. It is for the foregoing and based on the provisions of the SML that a trust is constituted as a Special Purpose Entity (SPE).
This SPE must have the character of irrevocability, and only credit institutions, brokerage firms and operating companies of investment companies may act as trustees of such trust. Also, as detailed below, it is highly recommendable that the tax and accounting structure of such a trust is considered as transparent for tax purposes, in order to avoid certain income tax rules.
Also, the trustee of a trust issuing indexed fiduciary certificates (ie, those that represent rights with respect to securities, goods, derivative financial instruments or other assets that seek to replicate the behaviour of one or more financial market indexes or reference parameters), are prohibited to: (i) have any type of link with the indexes generators, and (ii) maintain custody of the trust assets.
In accordance with the provisions set forth in the CBL, the issuing trust must have a technical committee (special board), in charge of executing the instructions of the trustors, with at least 25% independent board members.
Assets subject to a trust will not be considered as part of the bankruptcy assets, provided that the corresponding contract or contribution had not been made before the declaration of insolvency, knowingly defrauding the creditors. For the enforceability of such transfer, assets transferred to the trust must be registered in the Sole Registry of Movable Guarantees (Registro Único de Garantías Mobiliarias).
For the collection rights of a certain contractual transaction to be transferred into a trust, the authorisation of the debtor is not necessary, unless otherwise agreed in the original agreement.
If the parties have agreed that such authorisation is necessary, it should be supported through the corresponding notification document. In the event that nothing has been agreed upon, the notification of the assignment must be carried out through a notary public.
It is possible for legal practitioners to obtain opinions on bankruptcy remote transactions; however, such may not be valid for the tax and administrative authorities.
Securitisations in Mexico are usually structured in order to be 'pass-through' vehicles for tax purposes. When structuring a trust (such as an SPE), an appropriate tax and accounting treatment is essential in order to avoid withholdings and other adverse tax consequences. Generally, the intention of the parties is that the transfer of assets into a trust is not treated as a sale for tax purposes (in accordance with the Mexican Tax Code) but only for other legal purposes, therefore such an SPE is not classified as a separate business entity (fideicomiso de actividades empresariales).
As previously mentioned, a transfer of assets to a trust estate made by the settlors of the SPE would not be treated as a sale for Mexican tax purposes to the extent the settlors retain certain residual rights over the trust estate in accordance with Article 14 of the Mexican Federal Tax Code. This is generally achieved through the inclusion of the settlors as beneficiaries of the trust (fideicomisarios). The status as trust beneficiaries is, in most cases, subordinated to other third party rights (such as investor rights or financial institutions rights).
Pursuant to Mexican law, tax withholdings deriving from payments to foreign creditors apply with respect to interest payment at rates varying from 10% up to 40% of those foreigners whose main tax residence is registered in a country considered to be in a 'preferential tax regime' (refipres).
An additional tax issue to be addressed is the characterisation of the trust as a special vehicle not engaged in tax-generating activities – this is not considered as a vehicle to carry out business activities, which tends to be subject to Mexican income tax provisions. In the event such situation happens, the trust becomes subject to taxation in connection with such activities as if it were a separate business entity. It is therefore of the utmost importance that the activities carried out by this type of SPE trust are not deemed to fall within the scope of business activities.
There are no other specific general provisions, rules or criteria published by the Ministry of Finance (Secretaria de Hacienda y Crédito Público) or contained in Mexican tax regulations clarifying when a trust is deemed to be a fideicomiso de actividades empresariales; however, trusts may also be subject to VAT law in Mexico, depending on the activities carried on by such vehicles.
In conclusion, it must be made clear that a securitisation SPE is merely a vehicle to conduct a financing transaction, rather than to carry out commercial activities or industry services.
It is possible for legal practitioners to receive opinions on securitisation trust transactions; moreover, as described above, a legal opinion is an essential requirement for the authorisation of a public securitisation offer by the CNBV.
Laws and Regulations
In Mexico there are specific requirements and rules to be able to carry out securities public offers. Such rules are established in the SML, as well as in the General Provisions Applicable to Issuers and Other Participants in the Securities Market, which establish prior approval from the CNBV as a main requirement.
Forms of Disclosure
Public or private offerings are allowed in Mexico as material forms of disclosure. However, to obtain the approval for a public offering, the issuer must submit an application form to the CNBV, containing, among other aspects: (i) an informative brochure (prospectus); (ii) relevant corporate documentation of the issuer, (iii) a copy of the contracts or previous agreements with buyers, shareholders, directors; (iv) an abstract with the notice of public offering with the securities information; and (v) an opinion issued by an independent legal counsel in relation to the main aspects of the offer, including the price.
The CNBV is the institution in charge of reviewing, regulating and approving the actions of both individuals and corporations as well as credit institutions. Likewise, the Mexican Stock Exchange, although it does not have a direct participation in securitisation matters, is in charge of overseeing and supervising compliance with the obligations and procedures established by the SML in relation to the issue of securities. A third government sponsored entity is the Securities Deposit Institute (INDEVAL), which is the only authorised agency to serve as the depository of public securities.
Also, several other governmental agencies may participate as issuers; specifically, the State Productive Enterprises – ie, Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) and Comisión Federal de Electricidad (FCE) – may issue debt bonds and securities in both the Mexican and international financial markets. Finally, some governmental development banks and agencies may act as sponsors of securitisations, particularly those aimed at the development of infrastructure, energy and social welfare.
Violations and Penalties
The SML is the instrument in charge of establishing the sanctions applicable to the issuers in case of not complying with the requirements established in such law. In case of carrying out activities (such as the public offers mentioned in the previous paragraphs) without prior authorisation from the CNBV, penalties vary from five to 15 years in prison. Likewise, those who make public offers without having their registration in the corresponding registry may receive a sanction varying from three to fifteen years.
See above, 4.1 Specific Disclosure Laws or Regulations.
There are no laws or any special regulation on credit risk retention in Mexico. However, Mexican financial laws establish the guidelines and parameters by which credit operations must be carried out.
Both the SML and the General Provisions Applicable to Issuers and Other Participants in the Securities Market establish as a requirement for issuers to submit a series of reports to the CNBV, namely: (i) continuous reports related to corporate acts, agreements adopted, etc, (ii) quarterly reports that include financial statements and the results of operations and the financial situation, (iii) annual reports containing the annual financial statements, an opinion of external audit, (iv) reports on restructurings such as mergers.
Likewise, the aforementioned law establishes a requirement for the issuers to file a notice before the CNBV regarding the relevant events at the moment they become aware of them, as well as informing the CNBV about unusual movements in the market related to prices or volume and/or changes in the supply and demand of their securities or their price.
The CNBV is empowered by the SML to request, as a precautionary measure, the suspension of the registration of the securities of an issuer in the Registry for a term not exceeding 60 business days when the presentation of any of the reports is omitted or notices mentioned in the previous paragraphs.
Rating agencies' securitisation activities are regulated by the CNBV; among the activities carried out by them are conducting studies and analysis, as well as issuing opinions about the credit quality of an entity or issuance.
Currently, in Mexico there are only seven rating agencies – Fitch México, S&P Global Ratings, Moody's de México, HR Ratings de México, Verum, DBRS and AM Best. A rating agency's main objective is to analyse and inform the market about the risks of an investment.
The penalties applicable to the Rating Agencies are established in the SML, which establishes that the authorisation to operate as a rating agency may be revoked for committing serious infractions or repeatedly infringement of the rules as stipulated in the aforementioned law.
In general terms, the financial legislation applicable in Mexico has been created in accordance with (and adheres to) the provisions established in the Basel rules, taking into account that there are naturally certain differences.
The SML has included a series of provisions that regulate such matters. In fact, Article 364, subsection I of the SML provides that people who have privileged information may not carry out or instruct the holding of transactions with optional securities or derivative financial instruments that have such securities or securities as an underlying asset.
Moreover, since 2015, the Central Bank of Mexico (Banco de México) issued secondary general provisions (circulares) in relation with the requirements for the entities that intend to carry out derivative transactions – specifically, administration requirements (such as objectives, goals, and procedures for carrying out the transactions with customers and other intermediaries in the market and the maximum tolerance of market risk, credit risk and any other risks considered acceptable for the entity in the market) and other operational requirements.
No response provided.
Within the Mexican legislation, the SML establishes a series of general rules that financial institutions and brokerage firms must comply with in order to protect investors. Also, through the general provisions applicable to securities issuers (Disposiciones de carácter general aplicables a las emisoras de valores) the CNBV has set the standards of transparency, confidentiality and anti-money laundering requirements that any issuer should observe for the protection of and reporting to its investors. The CNBV is therefore the responsible institution for verifying the compliance of such provisions and ensuring that financial institutions and brokerage houses comply with confidential and secret information; failure to do so will result in the institution being obliged to pay damages.
No response provided.
Regarding the use of securitisation trusts in Mexico, see 1.2 Special-Purpose Entities, above.
Whenever there is a securities issue through a public offer and these securities are placed among the investing public, such offer and issue must be subject to the provisions of the SML.
There are many forms of enhancement for securitisations applicable in Mexico, including the following: (i) non-dispossessory pledges, (ii) valuation report of assets (tangible and intangible) given as collateral, (iii) cash reserves or deposits, (iv) letters of credit and credit default swaps, and (v) concentrator accounts.
As referred to above in 4.1 Specific Disclosure Laws or Regulations, there are several governmental agencies involved in the securities market, such as the CNBV (regulator), the BMV (stock exchange), INDEVAL (depositary of the securities issued through public offers) and others, such as PEMEX, CFE or even the Bank of Mexico, that may act as issuers or sponsors, as the case may be.
Pension fund managers (Administradores de Fondos para el Retiro – afores) and other private sector entities regularly invest in securitisations in Mexico; material rules may vary depending on the rules of the specific securitisation trust, as well as in the type of securities held by such trust.
Afores and other qualified investorsmay also invest in capital development certificates (CKDs) that are structured as trusts. The securities issued by a CKD are publicly registered and traded (although the liquidity of the market is quite limited).
The CNBV also issued rules in December 2015 to regulate a new vehicle called the Investment Project Certificate (Certificado de Proyectos de Inversion – CERPI). The CERPI is an investment vehicle intended for sophisticated investors only. The certificate would be issued through the BMV in the form of a restricted offering for investors (eg, pension funds and insurance companies) and would focus on a specific project rather than a pool of assets or portfolio companies.
For CERPIs and CKDs, afores are allowed to acquire 100% of a structured instrument as long as it does not exceed 3% of the pension fund entity (SIEFORE) net assets. The afore must have a co-investor for the project with at least 20% participation for issuances less than MXN4 billion or 50% for higher issuances.
The Mexican financial authorities have also enacted the rules for the creation of specific real estate securities trusts (FIBRA) and a new Energy and Infrastructure Investment Trust (FIBRA-E) that provide vehicles for investment in projects or assets of the energy and infrastructure sector, including activities such as generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, roads, highways and railways, among others.
Please see the description above regarding the use and characteristics of securitisation trusts in Mexico, in particular those related to the true sale of assets in order to avoid being subject to the bankrupt procedures or the secured loan agreements that grant the creditor a preferential right within the bankruptcy procedures.
With regard to private offerings, trusts may also be structured in order to securitise accounts receivable of a private entity among one or more investors. This is usually made through a package of trusts attached to one master trust agreement (as well as the corresponding administration agreement), by which a sole administrator, acting as a servicer, administers the receivable rights between the investing companies (banking institutions).
In general terms, issuers should back-up securitisation transactions with personal and/or in rem collateral agreements (such as pledges, mortgages or other asset-based securities). The issuer is liable to the trustee for the existence and lawfulness of the assets being securitised in any transaction; the trustee shall enforce such liability for the benefit of the investors only if the conditions for such enforcement are met (usually as provided in the specific agreement). If the assets transferred to the trust do not exist or are unlawful, the trustee may bring civil as well as criminal actions against the issuer, as such party will be held responsible to modify the terms of the agreement in case the securitised asset ceases to exist or becomes unlawful.
Recent judicial precedents have incorporated in Mexican punitive damages, as long as they are a direct and immediate consequence of a fraudulent action carried out by the issuer.
As indicated in 1.3 Transfer of Financial Assets, above, assets transferred to the trust must be registered in the Sole Registry of Movable Guarantees (Registro Único de Garantías Mobiliarias).
In this regard, parties in a securitisation usually look both at the positive obligations (to protect, promote and provide) and also at their negative obligations (to abstain from violations). Also, based on financial or operational considerations, financial covenants – such as financial leverage, credit ratings or eligibility rules – may be negotiated and be enforceable (if agreed by the parties) without prior judicial notice.
Usually, this type of financial transactions is executed together with a management services agreement (contrato de administración), by which a third party acts as the trust manager and is obliged to act for the benefit of all the parties and to operate in accordance with the rules, warranties and provisions set forth in such agreement and the securitisation trust itself.
Also, Mexican law allows brokerage firms to provide investment advisory services to make recommendations or offer personalised advice to a client and provide investment management services through the decision-making process, including advice on the investment in public securitisation trusts.
In our experience, the principal defaults may arise from: (i) failure to pay accrued interests included in the transaction documents; (ii) failure to comply with the financial covenants; (iii) bond administrators breach, failing to comply with their obligations under the administration agreements of the transaction; and (iv) breach of governmental contracts.
In securitisation trusts, contractual penalties are quite common, as the judiciary process for the enforcement of liquidated damages can become a time consuming and expensive procedure.
The main breaches which an issuer may incur are related to the payment of the principal and/or interest agreed in favour of the investors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the SML, with the aim of protecting the market, has established certain obligations for issuers in the event that issuers fail to comply with the preparation and delivery of the financial and corporate reports, including as a consequence the suspension of the registration of the securities of the issuer in the National Securities Registry for a term not exceeding 60 business days.
Additionally, the SML provides penalties for individuals who, having the obligation to maintain confidentiality, reserve or secrecy, provide by any means or transmit privileged information to third parties.
Usually standard contractual terms are incorporated into securitisation trusts. It has now become common to include privacy, data protection, anti-money laundering and other similar regulatory provisions, to ensure an effective compliance by all the parties, as personal data and sensitive financial and commercial information is usually transferred as part of the transaction.
No response provided.
In accordance with the provisions of the SML, the legal opinion issued by a licensed external lawyer shall be (depending on the case) on the following aspects:
Therefore, it becomes clear that the enforceability will vary from one operation to another. It is suggested to review the legal opinion in each case.
In accordance with the SML, the issuer is the entity that requests and, where appropriate, obtains and maintains the registration of its securities in the National Securities Registry. Likewise, the fiduciary institutions will be included when they act with the referred character, only with respect to the corresponding trust patrimony. As already mentioned, in a securitisation, the figure that is regularly used as SPE is a trust. As indicated in the body of this document, the issuer has, among others, the obligation to present periodically, financial and corporate reports, publish relevant events, among others.
Although sponsorship is not a regulated activity itself, it is common practice for banks, investment advisors and brokerage firms to sponsor securitisation transactions among qualified or sophisticated investors, as well as with private investors, depending on the type of underlying securitised asset or project.
Governmental development banks have recently promoted the use and acquisition of special types of securities, such as CKDs, CERPIs and FIBRAs, as detailed above.
According to the provisions of the SML, securities market intermediaries will be: (i) brokerage firms, (ii) credit institutions, (iii) operating companies of investment companies and retirement funds, and (iv) distribution companies of shares of investment companies and financial institutions authorised to act with the aforementioned character of distributor.
To organise and operate as a brokerage house, authorisation from the CNBV is required, with the prior agreement of its governing board. This authorisation shall be granted to the public limited companies organised in accordance with the special provisions contained in the SML and, in matters not foreseen by the latter, in the provisions of the General Law of Commercial Companies. By their nature, these authorisations will be non-transferable and will not imply certification on the solvency of the brokerage house in question.
Please see 3.5 Activities of Rating Agencies (RA), above, regarding the use of management services agreements.
In accordance with the SML and due to fiduciary certificates representing an individual participation of their holders in a collective credit, the holders' meeting will be the body empowered to make decisions in charge of them. The decision making will be made in accordance with the provisions that the General Law of Credit Titles and Operations sets for the obligations, both for the installation quorum and for the voting quorum. The holders must be represented by a common representative.
On complex security instruments – eg, CKDs, CERPIs and FIBRAS – investors need to meet special conditions and to qualify as sophisticated investors, such as pension funds or private equity funds focused only on this type of investment or infrastructure projects.
As previously stated, only credit institutions, brokerage firms and operating companies of investment companies may act as trustee in this type of trust. Trustees are in charge of a trust and the ownership of the assets that comprise it, and are bound by the instructions of the grantor for the benefit of a third party (beneficiary).
Since there is no specific prohibition, it is presumed that there is no impediment to carry out a synthetic securitisation. However, it is not something that is usual in Mexico.
Considering that there are no specific provisions in this regard, a synthetic securitisation must be subject to the general provisions of the securitisation. Among which is the authorisation of the CNBV, the preparation of the prospectus, and the issuance of legal opinions.
Assets used to back these transactions include short-term trade receivables, auto leases, loan receivables, commercial real estate leases, receivables from sales of real estate developments and service or manufacturing agreements.
Collateral management companies, servicers or companies with experience in monitoring collateral for asset-based lending transactions, are required to perfect a pledge of inventory (by delivery to the lender or a third party) and finance loans secured by inventory (such as avio credit or refaccionario loans).
Usually the most common structures are (i) asset-backed securities statistics structured through mortgage loans, consumer loans (including auto loans), and (ii) company loans (including small and medium-sized enterprises, and leases loans).
In some securitisation transactions, a pledge over the collection account is granted in favour of a financial entity in order to mitigate the commingling risk derived from a potential insolvency of the servicer.
Mexican companies usually turn to these schemes as an attractive financing alternative, instead of resorting to banking or financial institutions credits.
During the last few years, through a series of legislative and regulatory reforms, Mexico has tailored a legal and regulatory framework that has allowed different entities to access funding through the securities market.
In general, the legal and regulatory framework that has allowed the creation and growth of the securities market in Mexico is comprised of the following laws and regulations:
Such laws and regulations have been amended from time to time to allow new innovative structures and instruments that have fulfilled the needs of local and foreign issuers and investors such as the Mexican pension funds (Administradora de Fondos para el Retiro, or AFORES).
In 2005, the LMV was amended to incorporate the trust certificates (certificados bursátiles fiduciarios) that are key in the securitisation structures. Furthermore, in 2014, the Law was amended to incorporate the real estate trust certificates (certificados bursátiles inmobiliarios) known as Real Estate Investment Trusts (Fideicomiso de Inversión en Bienes Raíces, or FIBRAs) and Development Fiduciary Securitisation Certificates (certificados de capital de desarrollo, or CKDes), which is the vehicle that has allowed the AFOREs to invest in several types of projects. In 2015, the CUE was modified for the regulation and creation of Investment Project Fiduciary Securitisation Certificates (Certificados Bursátiles Fiduciarios de Proyectos de Inversión, or CERPIs), which are instruments to finance projects, for investments in shares or company financing.
Range of Products to Capitalise on Legal and Regulatory Framework
In general, structured products are found in Mexico that take advantage of the foregoing legal figures, such as (i) a CDO, which is a structured financial product backed by a pool of loans given usually by a bank before it is sold to an investment bank and repackaged into an investment product; (ii) an MBS, which is a financial security collateralised by a pool of mortgages; and (iii) future flow (FF) securities, which are debt instruments issued by companies whose repayment of principal and interest is secured by payments on future flow receivables.
In such regard, and due to the reforms above-mentioned, securitisations in Mexico have mainly been implemented through an administration trust (fideicomiso de administración), although Mexican companies may be used as a special-purpose acquisition company. Such a trust does not have legal personality and all acts are conducted by the financial institution in its capacity as trustee, making the administration more transparent for investors. It also provides the benefit of bankruptcy remoteness and the conveyance of the underlying assets implies a true sale for legal purposes. The transfer of these assets usually takes place under a purchase or assignment agreement between the originator and the trust.
The applicable tax regime to securitisations is usually defined by the securities and underlying assets, along with the kind of trust used in the structure, which, if properly implemented, should be considered as a fiscally transparent vehicle.
As for the Mexican debt securities market, in 2018, there are currently 328 structured issuances listed, which represents 39.1% (MXN494,788 million) of the total amount in circulation. During 2017, these types of issuances held 40.0% (MXN481,887 million). In December 2018, of the aforementioned issuances in circulation, 36.2% was concentrated in two types of instruments: ABS, with 16.5%, and future flow securities, with 19.7%. The pending 60.9% is equivalent to 251 issuances that correspond to non-structured debt distributed in several sectors, such as telecommunications, infrastructure, foods, automotive, federal agencies, retail and State-owned companies.
Of the long-term debt issuances, 47.8% is integrated by ten issuers, of which the State-owned companies Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX), Comisión Federal de Electricidad (CFE), Fondo de la Vivienda del Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (FOVISSSTE) and Instituto del Fondo Nacional de la Vivienda para los Trabajadores (INFONAVIT) have 33.1% of the total amount in circulation. PEMEX and CFE are first and second in the whole market, respectively. Moreover, 69.9% of the long-term debt in circulation in the sector is distributed within the following six sectors: infrastructure, telecommunications, housing support, federal agencies, financial services and State-owned companies.
Decree Aims to Stimulate Corporate Bond Market
After the global financial crisis, the main issuers of MBSs have been two governmental entities, FOVISSSTE and INFONAVIT. History has shown that presidential election years tend to be atypical for the market and 2018 was not an exception to some extent, since the accumulated amount of what was issued in 2018 (MXD177,298 million) is 22.2% lower than what was registered in 2017. Nevertheless, the new federal administration issued a Presidential Decree on 8 January 2018 that grants certain tax incentives with the aim of boosting the market and encouraging the acquisition of corporate bonds.
In general, the two main tax incentives of the aforementioned Decree are (i) a 100% credit of the income tax to be withheld in Mexico, generally by financial intermediaries acting as withholding agents, from the interest payments to foreign investors resident in a country with which Mexico has a double tax treaty or a Broad Exchange of Information Agreement, if the interests derive from publicly traded bonds issued by Mexican residents; and (ii) the application of a 10% tax rate over the earnings realised during 2019 to 2021 from the sale of shares not yet registered in the National Securities Registry issued by a Mexican entity, held either directly or through a venture capital trust (FICAPs or similar vehicles), so long as the transaction is carried out through an IPO and other requirements are fulfilled.
New Stock Exchange Expected to Increase Securitisation Activity
In addition, as one of the relevant trends and developments in securitisations, on 25 July 2018, the Mexican government approved the operations of a new stock exchange, the Bolsa Institucional de Valores (BIVA), which became the second exchange market to operate in Mexico and is expected to compete with the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (BMV). BIVA will trade the same instruments as the BMV, and the filing and listing process is very similar to the BMV.
The entrance of BIVA is expected to make the Mexican stock markets more attractive and easier for companies to become listed and develop these types of vehicles. This creates a positive expectation for securitisations and the possibility of the incorporation of an important number of these instruments during 2019.
In conclusion, the structured finance market in Mexico has developed over the past decade to the point where structures may now be implemented in accordance with international industry standards. The Mexican legislative landscape provides a strong fundamental statutory and regulatory framework for transactions. Structured finance transactions provide flexibility to allow the creation and implementation of innovative, workable solutions that help companies access different sources of funding.