Ireland is a leading domicile within Europe for securitisation activity and the leading European jurisdiction by value for securitisation special purpose entities (SPEs). While the legislative regime incorporates a number of supportive taxation measures, no equivalent measures exist in the area of insolvency law. Issuers and originators in Ireland are subject to the general insolvency law and utilise well-established structures to insulate the underlying assets from the balance sheet (and insolvency estate) of the originator. See 1.3 Transfer of Financial Assets.
While we have seen an increase in synthetic securitisations, an Irish securitisation of receivables is typically structured as a "true sale" via an assignment from the originator directly, or through an intermediary vehicle, to the issuer. True sale transactions are subject to two principal risks in an originator insolvency: recharacterisation of the sale as a secured loan and clawback on originator insolvency. Both true sale and synthetic securitisations may be impacted by rules on consolidation of assets, avoidance of certain contracts and examination of companies.
Recharacterisation as Secured Loan
A transfer of assets purporting to be a true sale may in certain circumstances be recharacterised by an Irish court as a secured loan. In determining the legal nature of a transaction, a court considers its substance as a whole, including economic features and the parties' intention; and irrespective of any labels.
Recharacterisation was considered by the High Court in Bank of Ireland v ETeams International Limited  IEHC 393 (subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal in Bank of Ireland v ETeams (International Ltd)  IECA 145), which endorsed the principles set out in the English cases of Re: George Inglefield  Ch.1, Welsh Development Agency v Export Finance Co. Limited  BCLC 270 and Orion Finance Limited v Crown Financial Management Limited  BCLC 78.
Re: George Inglefield prescribed three indicia distinguishing a sale from a security transaction.
None of the above indicia of a security transaction is necessarily inconsistent with a sale; a transaction may be a sale notwithstanding that it bears all three features. The following are generally considered as being consistent with a sale:
A sale transaction will be upheld unless it is (i) in substance, a security arrangement (for example, the transaction documents do not indicate a sale); or (ii) a sham (for example, the transaction documents do not reflect the parties' intentions).
Consequences of recharacterisation
Subject to the list of "excluded assets" set out in Section 408(1) of the Irish Companies Act 2014 (as amended) (the Companies Act), the particulars of security created by an Irish company must be registered with the Registrar of Companies within 21 days of creation. In practice, this is done at closing to secure priority under the Companies Act, which confers priority by time of registration. Failure to register within this timeframe renders the security void as against any liquidator or creditor of the company. It is not the practice in Ireland to make precautionary security filings. Consequently, a true sale which is recharacterised as a secured loan would constitute an unregistered security interest of the originator and render the issuer its unsecured creditor as regards the assets.
The issuer would rank pari passu with other unsecured creditors and behind the claims of secured and preferential creditors, the costs and fees of the insolvency process and certain insolvency officials, and certain amounts deducted from employees' remuneration.
Several provisions of Irish company law entitle a liquidator to seek to set aside pre-insolvency asset transfers.
Any transaction in favour of a creditor of a company which is unable to pay its debts as they become due, which occurs during the six months prior to the commencement of the company's winding-up, and with a view to giving that creditor a preference over other creditors constitutes an unfair preference and is invalid. Case law indicates that the company must have a dominant intent to prefer one creditor over its other creditors. No question of unfair preference can arise where the originator is able to pay its debts as they become due at the transaction date. An originator therefore certifies its solvency at closing.
The six-month period is extended to two years for transactions in favour of "connected persons" (including directors, shadow directors, de facto directors and "related companies" (as defined in Section 2(1) of the Companies Act).
Any conveyance (including an assignment, charge or mortgage) made with intent to defraud a creditor or other person is voidable by any person thereby prejudiced. However, this does not apply to any estate or interest in property conveyed for valuable consideration to any person in good faith not having, at the time of conveyance, notice of the fraudulent intention; or affect any other law relating to bankruptcy or corporate insolvency.
Invalidity of floating charge
A floating charge on the property of a company created during the 12 months before the commencement of its winding-up is invalid unless it is proved that the company, immediately after the creation of the charge, was solvent. This is subject to an exception for monies actually advanced or paid, or the actual price or value of goods or services sold or supplied to the company at the time of or subsequent to the creation of, and in consideration for, the charge and interest at the appropriate rate. The 12-month period is extended to two years if the chargee is a connected person.
Irish courts have a limited jurisdiction to consolidate assets where satisfied that it is just and equitable to do so.
An Irish court may order that two or more "related companies", which are being wound up, are treated as one company and wound up accordingly (a pooling order). In deciding whether to so order, it must consider:
An Irish court may also order the related company to contribute to the whole or part of the provable debts in the winding-up (a contribution order). The court must consider, as regards the related company, amongst other things, (i) its involvement in the management of, and conduct towards creditors of, the company being wound up; and (ii) the likely effect of a contribution order on its own creditors.
There is no reported judicial authority in Ireland addressing the circumstances in which a court would exercise these discretions. The use of an orphan SPE and compliance with standard separateness covenants reduces the likelihood of an issuer and an originator being considered related companies.
Disclaimer of Onerous Contracts
A liquidator may, with leave of the court, at any time within 12 months of the commencement of the liquidation, disclaim any property of a company being wound up which consists of unprofitable contracts or any property that is unsellable or not readily saleable.
Examinership is a protection procedure under the Companies Act to facilitate the survival of Irish companies in financial difficulty. Where an Irish company is, or is likely to be, unable to pay its debts, an examiner may be appointed if the court is satisfied that there is a reasonable prospect of the survival of the company and all or part of its undertaking as a going concern. Petitions may be presented by the company, its directors, contingent creditors, prospective creditors or members holding at least one tenth of the voting share capital. Non-petition provisions in transaction documents are intended to prevent the presentation of such petitions in respect of an issuer. However, an argument could be made that such provisions should not be given effect to on the basis that they oust the jurisdiction of, or restrict the right of access to, the courts. This point has not been judicially considered to date.
An examiner is appointed for a period of 70 days, which can be extended by a further 30 days where the court is satisfied that it is required to enable the examiner to complete their work. A court may order a further 50-day extension where exceptional circumstances exist in respect of the relevant company, pursuant to temporary measures (currently due to expire on 9 June 2021 but subject to prolongation) introduced by the Companies (Miscellaneous Provisions (Covid-19)) Act 2020.
During the period of protection, the examiner formulates proposals for a compromise/scheme of arrangement to assist the survival of the company or the whole or any part of its undertaking as a going concern. A scheme of arrangement may be approved by the court when at least one class of creditor has accepted it and the court is satisfied that the proposals are fair and equitable to members or creditors who do not support the proposals and whose interests would be impaired by their implementation.
There has been no instance to date of an examiner being appointed to an entity with the typical characteristics of a securitisation SPE.
Where an insolvent originator is a credit institution, Irish and EU rules on resolution and recovery of credit institutions and the Central Bank Acts 1942 to 2018 are also relevant.
Form and Structure
An Irish SPE is structured as a bankruptcy-remote orphan company and formed as a private limited company (an LTD), a designated activity company (a DAC) or a public limited company (a PLC). Its issued share capital is held on trust by a professional trustee for charitable purposes.
The form chosen will depend on the type of securities to be issued and whether or not they will be listed. An LTD can issue unlisted notes falling within the “excluded offer” exemption under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 (the Prospectus Regulation, or PR). A DAC can issue both listed and unlisted notes falling within the excluded offer exemption. Only a PLC may offer securities to the public, other than pursuant to an excluded offer and/or list securities other than debentures. Most securitisations involve the issuance of listed debt securities via a DAC.
The board of directors of the SPE should be comprised of at least two independent persons. A corporate service provider will usually provide the SPE's independent directors, company secretary, registered office and various reporting services. The SPE's contractual relations are structured on a non-petition/limited recourse and arm's length basis. Its constitution may also contain restrictions.
The transaction documents will seek to minimise the risk of consolidation of assets on originator insolvency by binding the SPE to separateness covenants, requiring it, for example to:
Requirements of Valid Transfer – Perfection
An Irish securitisation of receivables is typically structured as a true sale via an assignment from the originator directly, or through an intermediary vehicle, to the issuer. A true sale may also be achieved by declaration of trust, sub-participation or novation. These methods are generally employed only where an assignment is not feasible and are not discussed below.
A valid legal assignment of a debt must be:
Assignments not meeting the above requirements take effect in equity only. Both legal and equitable assignments can execute a true sale. Most Irish securitisations employ an equitable assignment (achieved by omitting notification to the underlying obligors). The issuer (or trustee) may, upon the occurrence of certain trigger events – for example, issuer insolvency – perfect the assignment by notifying the underlying obligors of the assignment.
Additional perfection requirements apply for certain asset classes. In particular, assignments of rights in real property must be registered with the Property Registration Authority in order to take effect as a legal assignment.
Prior to perfection, an equitable assignee is exposed to the following risks:
See the "Recharacterisation as Secured Loan" section of 1.1 Insolvency Laws. A legal opinion confirms the effectiveness of the sale; and subject to certain factual assumptions and qualifications, that such sale is not liable to be recharacterised as a secured loan.
If assignment is not possible, an originator may declare a trust over the assets in favour of the SPE. The SPE obtains an equitable interest in the assets. However, unlike an equitable assignment, this interest cannot be elevated to a legal interest by delivery of notice. As such, the SPE will remain subject to the risks set out in the "Requirements of Valid Transfer – Perfection" section in 1.3 Transfer of Financial Assets.
See also 7 Synthetic Securitisation.
A trust is validly constituted where there is certainty as to the intention to create the trust, the subject matter and the beneficiaries. A legal opinion will confirm that the trust satisfies these requirements subject to certain factual assumptions, including as to the correct identification in the transfer agreement of the assets.
Irish stamp duty is a tax on instruments and can apply on instruments of transfer (including agreements to transfer) which are executed in Ireland or which relate to Irish situated assets. The current rate of stamp duty on non-residential property is 7.5%, or 1% in the case of shares in an Irish incorporated company. While the transfer of assets without a change in beneficial ownership (eg, to a nominee of the beneficial owner) should not trigger a charge to stamp duty, a transfer of financial assets by an originator to an SPE would typically involve a change in beneficial ownership. However, a number of exemptions from the charge to stamp duty are available in respect of various financial assets. For example, an agreement for the sale, or a transfer on sale, of debts is exempt from stamp duty where the sale is in the ordinary course of business of the seller or the purchaser. This is commonly relied on in the case of the acquisition of loans by Irish SPEs which are in the business of buying and/or selling loans/receivables. In addition, loan capital (as defined) is exempt from stamp duty on transfer/sale. Exempt loan capital for these purposes means any debenture stock, bonds or funded debt, or any capital raised by a company which has the character of borrowed money. The exemption applies where the loan capital:
Other common exemptions include the transfer of shares in a non-Irish incorporated company, Irish shares which are traded on the Enterprise Securities Market (ESM) of the Irish Stock Exchange, American depositary receipts, swap agreements, forward agreements, financial futures agreements and options (each as defined). Specific exemptions also apply in case of stock borrowing and stock repos. The transfer of a mortgage is also outside of the charge to Irish stamp duty. Irish SPEs are also typically structured so as to take advantage of the Irish securitisation tax regime set out in Section 110 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 of Ireland, as amended (Section 110). The issue or transfer of securities issued by a Section 110 company is exempt from Irish stamp duty where the money raised by those securities is used in the course of its business. In circumstances where a stamp duty exemption is not available, non-Irish situate assets may occasionally be transferred by way of instrument executed outside of Ireland. Alternatively, it may be possible to effect a novation, or to transfer economic exposure only by way of sub-participation and not give rise to a stamp duty charge.
Value Added Tax (VAT)
Irish VAT at the standard rate (21% for the period from 1 September 2020 to 28 February 2021 and thereafter 23%) can apply on the supply of services (which can include the supply of intangible assets – eg, financial assets). However, financial services consisting of the issuing, transferring or otherwise dealing in existing stocks, shares, debentures and other securities are exempt from VAT.
Where the SPE qualifies as a Section 110 company, it would be subject to Irish corporation tax at the rate of 25% on taxable profits. Section 110 companies can take advantage of Ireland's favourable securitisation tax regime, which permits certain financial transactions to be carried out in a tax efficient manner where certain conditions are met. Section 110 provides for the taxable profits of a Section 110 company to be computed on the same basis as a trading company. This allows for the cost of funding and other revenue expenditure, incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of its business, to be tax deductible.
In addition, a Section 110 company can deduct profit participating interest (and interest which exceeds a reasonable commercial rate of return) in computing its taxable profits (subject to conditions). Accordingly, while a Section 110 company is subject to corporation tax at the higher 25% rate, the tax is levied on the company's net taxable profit which is generally maintained at a negligible level by matching deductible expenditure with income through the sweep-out mechanism of a profit participating loan or note.
A qualifying company, for the purposes of Section 110, is one which is resident in Ireland for tax purposes and which, among other things, carries on in Ireland a business of holding, managing, or both the holding and managing of qualifying assets (financial assets, commodities and plant and machinery) and apart from activities ancillary to that business, carries on no other activities. It is also a requirement of Section 110 that the first assets held or managed by the SPE have an aggregate value of not less than EUR10 million. This requirement applies only to the first transaction entered into by the Section 110 company and the value of subsequent transactions is irrelevant for this purpose. An SPE will not be a qualifying company for Section 110 if any transaction is entered into by it otherwise than by way of a bargain made at arm's length. However, there is an exception to this requirement in certain circumstances in relation to the payment of profit participating interest.
Exceptions to Anti-avoidance Rules
In accordance with Section 110 anti-avoidance rules, deductions for profit participating interest are disallowed except in the following circumstances:
The anti-avoidance rules generally do not apply to transactions where the debt is issued as a quoted Eurobond or wholesale debt instrument (see 2.3 Taxes on Transfers Crossing Borders) and the investors are third-party persons otherwise unconnected with (through the sale of assets or holding of shares or voting power or significant influence) the Section 110 company.
An interest restriction applies in respect of the payment of profit participating and/or excessive interest by Section 110 companies investing in Irish real estate-related assets (eg, Irish real estate-secured loans). Provided the financial assets acquired by the SPE are not related to Irish real estate, the interest restriction should not apply.
Irish withholding tax applies at the rate of 20% to payments of yearly interest which have an Irish source and are made to both Irish resident persons and non-Irish resident persons. Interest is considered to be yearly interest if the principal is outstanding (or is capable of being outstanding) for at least one year.
A number of exemptions from withholding tax are available to Section 110 companies such as the quoted Eurobond exemption for securities which are quoted on a recognised stock exchange (subject to conditions). There is also no obligation to withhold tax in respect of interest paid by a Section 110 company to a person who is tax resident in an EU member state (other than Ireland), or in a country with which Ireland has signed a double tax treaty. In addition, Section 110 companies can take advantage of the “wholesale debt” exemption, which, inter alia, applies to debt instruments which are issued in denominations of not less than EUR500,000 and which mature within two years (subject to conditions).
Where interest is profit dependent (or represents more than a reasonable commercial return), a Section 110 company is only entitled to claim a tax deduction for the interest if certain conditions are met (see discussion in 2.2 Taxes on SPEs). If these conditions are not met, the interest would be recharacterised as a non-deductible distribution and 25% dividend withholding tax may apply (subject to certain exceptions).
The issue or transfer of securities, issued by a Section 110 company, is exempt from Irish stamp duty where the money raised by those securities is used in the course of its business.
The activities of a Section 110 company are often exempt activities for the purposes of Irish VAT. However, if the Section 110 company's investments are located outside of the EU, partial VAT recovery may be available. There are specific exemptions from Irish VAT in relation to investment management and corporate administration services provided to a Section 110 company. However, legal and audit services provided to a Section 110 company in Ireland will be subject to VAT. To the extent that a Section 110 company receives taxable services from outside of Ireland the company will be obliged to register for VAT and self-account for Irish VAT on those services on the reverse-charge basis at the standard rate (21% for the period 1 September 2020 to 28 February 2021 and thereafter 23%).
Similar to all EU member states, Ireland is required to implement a number of corporation tax measures as a result of the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) – the EU's response to the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project of corporation tax reform. Of the measures proposed in ATAD, the "interest limitation rule" and the "hybrid mismatch provisions" could have an impact on Section 110 companies by restricting or denying a deduction for interest in certain circumstances. Hybrid mismatch legislation came into effect in Ireland on 1 January 2020. However, a noteholder should not in general be treated as an associated enterprise of a Section 110 company merely as a result of holding notes, meaning that in many cases payments of interest by a Section 110 company should not come within the scope of hybrid mismatch provisions. Reverse hybrid mismatch provisions are expected to be introduced by 2022. The implementation date for the interest limitation rule in Ireland is yet to be announced. However, an implementation date in Ireland of 1 January 2022 is currently considered to be the most likely based on the recent announcements made as part of the Irish Government's Budget 2021 process. Accordingly, the final form and impact of the interest limitation rule on Section 110 companies in Ireland remains uncertain.
Legal opinions are generally provided by counsel to the issuer in a securitisation. The opinion typically addresses, in an Irish tax context:
The accounting analysis is undertaken by accountancy professionals. Key considerations are balance sheet treatment of the transferred assets and consolidation for accounting purposes of the SPE into the originator's group. A securitisation may be considered on-balance sheet for accounting purposes and off-balance sheet at law.
No legal advice is provided on accounting matters.
The specific measures relating to securitisation are:
The SR imposes harmonised rules on due diligence, risk retention and disclosure for all securitisations and provides a framework for simple, transparent and standardised (STS) securitisations.
SR Article 7 requires the originator, sponsor and SPE to make available detailed information relating to the securitisation to the holders of a securitisation position, national competent authorities (NCAs) and, upon request, potential investors. They may designate one entity amongst themselves as responsible for this purpose – although market practice is still developing, it appears likely that SPEs will be designated. The disclosure obligations include making available:
For public deals, disclosures must be made via a securitisation repository – an entity registered with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) under the SR for that purpose. The means of disclosure for private deals is not prescribed. The ESMA Q&A on the Securitisation Regulation (ESMA33-128-563) confirms that, in the absence of any instructions or guidance from NCAs, reporting entities can use any arrangements that meet the conditions of the SR. Barring further guidance from the Central Bank of Ireland (the CBI), it is logical to assume that parties reporting to the CBI should use the same channels of communication as are used for CB Notifications (as defined below).
See 4.4 Periodic Reporting.
The Irish SR require the originator, sponsor or SPE – where one of them is located in Ireland – to notify the CBI of a securitisation within 15 working days of the first issue of securities (the CB Notification). This notification must include:
The CB Notification must be submitted in the manner set out on the CBI's Securitisation Regulation webpage. Firms supervised/regulated by the CBI must use their pre-existing channels of communication. SPEs subject to the CBI's financial vehicle corporation (FVC) registration regime must use the channels prescribed for that regime, and other in-scope entities must notify via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
FVC Regulation and Section 18 CBA 1971
See the "FVC Regulation and Section 18 CBA 1971" section of4.4 Periodic Reporting.
In addition to the specific disclosure regime, regard must be had to the general regime for issue of securities. Key measures include the following (each as amended as applicable):
An issuer seeking to list debt securities on a regulated market or offer securities to the public must publish a prospectus and have it approved by the appropriate NCA – the CBI in Ireland. A number of exemptions exist, including for debt securities where the offer:
A securitisation issuer rarely makes an offer of securities to the public. The obligations to publish a prospectus is usually triggered by listing on a regulated market. In such cases, the issuer must comply with the rules on format and content of a prospectus under prospectus law and applicable stock exchange listing rules.
A prospectus must contain the necessary information which is material to an investor for making an informed assessment of:
Risk factors in a prospectus must be specific to the issuer or securities, and material to making an informed investment decision. Detailed requirements are contained in Commission Delegated Regulation (2019/979) and Commission Delegated Regulation (2019/980), each as amended.
Market Abuse Regime
The market abuse regime prohibits insider dealing, unlawful disclosure of inside information and market manipulation in respect of financial instruments:
Issuers must make public as soon as possible inside information which directly concerns the issuer in a manner which enables complete and timely assessment by the public. Disclosures cannot be combined with marketing information and must be available on the issuer's website for at least five years. Disclosure can be delayed in limited circumstances; for the duration of such delay, the information must remain confidential.
The Irish Transparency Regulations specify minimum requirements for disclosure of periodic financial information and ongoing information by issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market. It also requires a holder of certain securities to notify the issuer if its holding reaches, exceeds or falls below specific thresholds.
The SR requires that an originator, sponsor or original lender (the retainer) holds, on an ongoing basis, a material net economic interest of not less than 5% in the securitisation for the duration of the transaction. This is satisfied where the retainer holds:
The retained interest may not be subject to risk mitigation techniques. In addition, investors must, prior to investing, verify compliance with the risk retention requirement.
Possible sanctions for contravention of the SR or Irish SR include:
Sanctions may be imposed on regulated financial service providers under the Central Bank Act 1942 (as amended) for contraventions of the Irish SR. Criminal liability may also attach.
Periodic reporting is required under a number of measures detailed below. Financial reporting is required under Irish company law but falls outside this chapter's scope.
The SR imposes two quarterly reporting obligations. Firstly, issuers must provide information on underlying exposures. Secondly, issuers must provide an investor report containing:
Technical Standards issued under SR Article 7 entered into force on 23 September 2020 and specify the precise information required (Commission Delegated Regulation 2020/1224) and templates to be used (Commission Delegated Regulation 2020/1225) for this purpose. The information must be made available simultaneously and at the latest one month after the due date for the payment of interest.
In relation to sanctions, see the "Sanctions" section of 4.3 Credit Risk Retention.
FVC Regulation and Section 18 CBA 1971
Irish securitisation SPEs which are FVCs must report statistical data to the CBI on a quarterly basis under the FVC Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 1075/2013). An FVC is an entity whose principal activity meets both of the following criteria:
Many Irish SPEs are FVCs. Since 2015, the CBI has extended this regime to non-FVC SPEs (via Section 18 CBA 1971) which must provide quarterly balance sheets and annual profit and loss data.
Credit Reporting Act
The Credit Reporting Act requires that in-scope lenders (including SPEs that acquire loan portfolios), provide detailed and ongoing information on the performance of certain loans to the CBI. A person who provides false information to the CBI may be liable to a fine (of unspecified amount) and/or up to five years imprisonment.
Regulation (EU) 1060/2009 (the CRA Regulation) and related regulatory technical standards established a regulatory framework for credit rating agencies (CRAs) in the EU requiring that they be registered with, and supervised by, an NCA, avoid conflicts of interest and apply sound rating methodologies. The CRA Regulation was amended by Regulation (EU) 513/2011 (CRA 2), which transferred the responsibility for registration and supervision to ESMA and by Regulation 462/2013 (CRA 3), which addressed issues including the reliance of firms on external credit ratings, sovereign debt ratings, competition in the CRA industry, the civil liability of CRAs and the independence of CRAs.
EU financial institutions can only use for regulatory purposes credit ratings that have been issued: (i) by a CRA registered with ESMA; (ii) in a third country and endorsed by a registered CRA; or (iii) by a third-country CRA certified by ESMA; and, in the case of (ii) and (iii), subject to compliance with certain conditions.
Additional requirements apply to rating securitisations: issuers must seek ratings for each tranche from at least two CRAs and consider appointing a CRA with less than 10% of the total market share. Issuer directors typically consider and note this at a board meeting.
From July 2021, CRAs must also have regard to ESMA's Guidelines on Internal Controls for Credit Rating Agencies.
See also 4.3 Credit Risk Retention.
The capital treatment of a securitisation position is principally determined for credit institutions and investment firms under Regulation (EU) 575/2013 as amended (the CRR) and for insurers and reinsurers under Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II). This response focuses on credit institutions and investment firms.
An originator which is a credit institution or an investment firm can exclude securitised exposures from the calculation of its risk-weighted exposure amounts and, where applicable, expected loss amounts under the CRR if:
The NCA may not permit this treatment if it considers that it not justified on the basis of the credit risk being effectively transferred; but may allow the treatment where the originator demonstrates that the reduction in own-funds requirements achieved by the securitisation is justified by a commensurate transfer of credit risk to third parties.
Preferential treatment may be available for positions in STS securitisations that satisfy the requirements of CRR Article 243 and positions in SME synthetic securitisations that satisfy the requirements for STS (other than simplicity) and of CRR Article 270. Non-SME synthetic securitisations currently receive the same prudential treatment as traditional non-STS securitisations. Preferential treatment is expected to be extended to qualifying balance sheet synthetic securitisations via the EU's COVID-19 recovery package (the Recovery Package), which includes proposals to make the STS designation available to such securitisations. The timeframe for implementation of these proposals is unknown at the time of writing.
Since 30 April 2020, positions held in STS securitisations meeting the requirements in Article 13 of the Commission Delegated Regulation 2015/61 (as amended) qualify as Level 2B high quality liquid assets (L2BHQLAs) under the CRR. This classification was previously available to all qualifying securitisations. However, non-STS deals that previously qualified as L2BHQLA were not grandfathered. L2BHQLAs can comprise a maximum of 15% of a credit institution's liquidity buffer.
See also 4.3 Credit Risk Retention.
The principal rules on derivatives are contained in:
The EMIR regime imposes obligations on parties to derivative contracts, according to whether they are "financial counterparties" (FCs), such as investment firms and credit institutions or "non-financial counterparties" (NFCs) or their third-country equivalents.
Broadly, EMIR's requirements in respect of derivative contracts are:
NFC+s are generally subject to more stringent requirements under EMIR than NFCs. Counterparties may exclude from their threshold calculations contracts that are objectively measurable as reducing risks directly relating to the NFC's commercial activity or treasury financing activity. EMIR Refit, amongst other things, introduced a new method for NFCs such as SPEs to determine whether clearing thresholds have been exceeded.
The Irish EMIR Regulations empower the CBI to:
Criminal liability may also attach.
In addition, from January 2021, an SPE constituting a non-financial counterparty under the Securities Financing Transactions Regulation (EU 2015/2365) (the SFTR) may be subject to additional trade reporting obligations in respect of its securities financing transactions (broadly, transactions deploying assets for funding, liquidity and collateral management and execution of investment strategies) not falling within the scope of EMIR.
Investors are afforded protection under the following regulations.
See 4.1 Specific Disclosure Laws or Regulations, 4.2 General Disclosure Laws or Regulations and 4.4 Periodic Reporting.
A bank securitising its assets must consider rules governing the origination and servicing of those assets, which vary depending on asset class. Banks typically warrant compliance with relevant measures up to the date of transfer, with breach of warranty triggering a repurchase obligation. Of particular relevance for banks are consumer and data protection laws; some key elements of which (each as amended as appropriate) are summarised below.
Mortgage loans are principally governed by the Consumer Credit Act 1995 (the CCA) and the EU (Consumer Mortgage Credit Agreements) Regulations 2016 (the MC Regulations). The CCA imposes rules on advertising, provision of information and mandatory warnings. The MC Regulations include obligations to verify a borrower's creditworthiness before lending, to explain prescribed information and to act in the borrower's best interests when advising on mortgage loans.
The Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears 2013 governs management of arrears and pre-arrears in respect of a borrower's principal dwelling or sole Irish residential property.
The Consumer Protection Act 2007 prohibits unfair, misleading, aggressive and prohibited commercial practices and applies to all Irish law consumer contracts.
The Consumer Protection Code 2012 specifies how regulated entities must deal with "personal consumers" and "consumers". Regulated entities must know their customers, assess their suitability for products or services and include prescribed information in their terms; and comply with requirements for post-origination ongoing information, complaints resolution and arrears handling.
The EC Communities (Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts) Regulations 1995 to 2000 apply to contracts for the supply of services to consumers, including loans. Contractual terms deemed "unfair" are unenforceable against consumers.
Data Protection Laws
Personal data of borrowers must be safeguarded as per the GDPR ((EU) 2016/679), the Irish Data Protection Acts 1988 to 2018 and SI 336/2011 (the Irish ePrivacy Regulations).
See 4.6 Treatment of Securitisation in Financial Entities.
See 1.2 Special-Purpose Entities and 2.2 Taxes on SPEs.
Securitisations are structured such that SPE activities are not characterised as banking, writing insurance or carrying on business as a retail credit firm.
Engaging in banking business or acceptance of deposits or other repayable funds from the public requires (i) an appropriate licence or authorisation from the CBI under the Central Bank Act 1971 (as amended) or the European Central Bank under Regulation 1024/2013 (the SSM Regulation); or (ii) a passported authorisation/licence. For (i), failure to hold the appropriate licence or authorisation is an offence punishable by a fine of up to EUR64,000 and/or up to five years' imprisonment.
An insurance company operating in Ireland must hold an authorisation from the CBI or appropriate authority in its home member state if passporting into Ireland. A synthetic securitisation may be structured using a credit derivative under which credit protection is provided by an SPE to an originator or third party (a beneficiary) in respect of losses occurring on an asset portfolio.
Retail Credit Firms
In general, a person providing cash loans directly to natural persons (other than professional clients under Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II) or another regulated financial services provider) is regulated as a "retail credit firm" under the Central Bank Act 1997 as amended.
Certain activities are excepted from this regulation, including the purchase loans originated by another party (unless credit is subsequently provided) and the provision of credit on a once-only/occasional basis. The provision of this credit must not involve a representation, or create an impression that the credit would be offered to other persons on the same or substantially similar terms. Contravention of this requirement is an offence punishable by fines of up to EUR100,000.
The type and level of credit enhancement in a securitisation is typically driven by rating requirements. Commonly utilised forms include:
Credit enhancement from the originator must be on arm's length commercial terms – see the "Clawback" section of 1.1 Insolvency Laws.
Irish government-sponsored entities have not yet participated in the securitisation market. Subject to their internal rules, there is no restriction on doing so.
The diverse investor base for securitisations includes credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment funds.
A bankruptcy-remote transfer is generally effected by a transfer agreement between the issuer, the originator and, in order to obtain the benefit of the contract only, the trustee. Key provisions include:
The originator representations and warranties include its corporate status, capacity and authority to enter into the securitisation, licensing and solvency. A breach of any of the foregoing would breach the relevant transaction document and may trigger an event of default. It may also entitle the issuer to seek rescission and/or damages. The originator also provides asset warranties addressing title to the assets and their compliance with any selection criteria and rules on origination. A breach of asset warranty may trigger a repurchase obligation.
See 1.3 Transfer of Financial Assets.
Issuer covenants include covenants to comply with the transaction documents and to join in any action necessary to preserve the portfolio assets, as well as standard separateness covenants. Originator (and servicer) covenants include compliance with applicable laws and maintenance of authorisations. Breach of covenant will constitute a breach of the transaction documents which may trigger an event of default.
The servicer is responsible for day-to-day administration including collections and enforcement. The transaction documents will typically provide for replacement of the servicer upon insolvency or material breach of obligations.
Where the originator acts as servicer, the servicing agreement requires the servicer to administer the portfolio assets in the same manner as equivalent assets on its balance sheet.
The Consumer Protection (Regulation of Credit Servicing Firms) Act 2015 (the 2015 Act) introduced protections for consumers and SMEs whose loans were purchased by entities that were unregulated by the CBI. It required the day-to-day servicing, management and administration of loans to “relevant borrowers” – ie, loans originated by a regulated financial service provider to: (i) natural persons within Ireland; and/or (ii) SMEs – to be undertaken by regulated "credit servicing firms" on behalf of the owners of that credit.
This regime was extended by the Consumer Protection (Regulation of Credit Servicing Firms) Act 2018 from 21 January 2019. Since that date, certain previously unregulated entities (eg, SPEs) that (i) hold legal title to relevant portfolios of Irish loans, and/or (ii) control the overall strategy or key decisions relating to credit, must seek authorisation as "credit servicing firms". There is an exemption for traditional securitisations, however, its availability should be analysed on case-by-case basis.
Standard events of default are issuer failure to pay principal or interest due within any applicable grace period, issuer breach of transaction documents and issuer insolvency. Default under the securities will typically entitle the holders of the securities to instruct the trustee to declare the securities immediately due and payable and to enforce the transaction security.
The issuer usually provides full indemnities to the trustee, agents and managers/arrangers in respect of losses and costs incurred in the performance of their roles. In addition, prior to a trustee taking action in relation to the transaction, it may require indemnification from the holders of the securities.
The role and responsibilities of an issuer will depend on the nature of the transaction. See 1.2 Special-Purpose Entities and 4 Laws and Regulations Specifically Relating to Securitisation.
The sponsor, often an originator, typically initiates and structures the securitisation. It, either directly or through an affiliate, will have originated or acquired the asset portfolio and will often act as servicer. The sponsor may be a credit institution, a large corporate or a fund. See also 4.3 Credit Risk Retention.
Underwriters and placement agents (also known as arrangers/managers) are typically investment banks. Where the originator is itself a bank, it may act as placement agent. At least two arrangers participate in most securitisations. They structure the transaction, market, and in some cases, underwrite the notes.
The servicer is responsible for the day-to-day administration of the assets. It is often the originator/an affiliate. However, specialist servicing companies are becoming more commonplace. See 5.5 Principal Servicing Provisions.
Investors are usually sophisticated market participants and include financial institutions, private equity investors and funds. An investor may have responsibilities under the terms of the notes or by virtue of being a regulated entity. See also 4.3 Credit Risk Retention.
The trustee role is performed by professional trustee companies. The trustee holds the benefit of the issuer's covenant to pay and other contractual undertakings on behalf of the holders of the securities and the benefit of the transaction security for the secured parties. It will represent the holders of the securities vis-à-vis the issuer.
Synthetic securitisations are permitted in Ireland and are used primarily to transfer the credit risk of exposures held on-balance sheet by credit institutions to third parties. They are also used to arbitrage between a higher spread received on an underlying asset and a lower spread paid on related structured securities. Synthetic securitisation has not been common amongst credit institutions in Ireland in recent years, despite its being a leading jurisdiction for credit-linked note (CLN) issuers.
Synthetic securitisations are regulated in the same manner as traditional securitisations. The requirements set out in 4 Laws and Regulations Specifically Relating to Securitisation apply equally to synthetic securitisations; however, a synthetic securitisation (other than a qualifying SME synthetic securitisation) cannot achieve STS designation.
The requirements described in 4.7 Use of Derivatives also apply to credit derivatives in synthetic securitisations. In addition, EMIR provisions on margining may also apply where the issuer's transactions in OTC derivative contracts exceed EMIR clearing thresholds. See also 4.11 Activities Avoided by SPEs or Other Securitisation Entities and the "As Investor" section of 4.6 Treatment of Securitisation in Financial Entities.
A synthetic securitisation may be structured to transfer the credit risk of underlying exposures to third party investors via:
In a direct structure, the originator buys credit protection on the underlying exposures directly from third party investors. Upon the occurrence of certain specified loss-producing credit events, for example a payment default, the protection seller pays an amount equal to the loss suffered (subject to any agreed de minimus or excess) to the originator. In return for this protection, the originator pays a periodic fee to the protection seller.
In a typical CLN structure, the originator transfers the credit risk on the underlying exposures to an SPE via a CDS or guarantee/credit protection deed (on terms similar to those outlined above for direct structures). The SPE issues CLNs, transferring the credit risk on to third party investors, and uses the proceeds to fund payments to the originator in respect of credit events under the CDS or guarantee/credit protection deed; and the periodic fee from the originator to pay the CLN coupon.
A wide range of asset classes have been securitised by Irish SPEs: residential mortgages, commercial mortgages, loan agreements, aircraft lease rentals, trade, credit card and hire purchase receivables. The Recovery Package includes proposals for securitisation of non-performing loans.
The structure of a securitisation is generally determined by desired regulatory capital treatment or investor requirements rather than underlying asset class.
The year 2020 was anticipated to be another record-setting one for Irish securitisation and structured finance products. As the full implications of the pandemic became apparent, attention quickly turned to whether the pandemic would trigger a global financial crisis in the securitisation market similar to 2008/2009. Thus far this does not appear to have materialised and the pandemic has demonstrated that, despite the scale of the crisis, experienced structures are performing as intended by allocating risk across the capital stack. Although overall issuance volume has fallen, issuers are still coming to the market and investor demand for securitisation paper has remained robust throughout the year. We would be optimistic for this trend continuing into 2021, despite the continued dual headwinds of the pandemic and the potential implications of Brexit.
At the date of writing (December 2020), the deadline for the European Union and the United Kingdom to reach an agreement before the Brexit transition period comes to an end, on 31 December 2020, is fast approaching. While Brexit poses a significant risk for many parts of the domestic Irish economy it marks a moment of opportunity for the Irish financial services industry.
Migration of banking functions to Ireland
As the largest common law, English speaking member state in the EU, Ireland has proven very attractive to financial institutions that require a new EU base for regulatory purposes. Since the passing of the Brexit referendum in 2016, many have migrated payment processing capability to Ireland and Irish entities are increasingly being used to house account bank and agency functions. Furthermore, investment banks are implementing contingency plans to allow Irish entities to act as placement agent/arranger for securities issuances. Ireland now also houses a number of CRA 3 (Credit Rating Agencies Regulation) approved ratings agencies, and its growth as a lending hub for investment funds and management continues at pace.
MiFID II implementation
While negotiations are ongoing the full effect of Brexit on the Irish securitisation market remains uncertain and we are continuing to assist clients with Brexit planning and contingency arrangements. For entities providing financial services from the City of London, regulated under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), their principal concern is that it appears increasingly unlikely that they will continue to enjoy "passport" rights in respect of their authorisations throughout the EU. While the answer to this question depends on the outcome of negotiations, the Irish MiFID II implementation may prove to be a useful tool for the Irish and other European securitisation markets prior to ESMA's third country MiFID II passport regime applying. This exemption allows non-EU authorised entities to provide investment services to professional clients or eligible counterparties in Ireland in particular circumstances without the requirement to be authorised under MiFID II.
Toward ever closer financial union
In a twist of irony one of the consequences of Brexit may be an intensification of efforts towards further European integration through the European Capital Markets Union (the CMU). In recent months, European authorities and regulators have adopted a number of CMU "quick fixes" to reduce the regulatory burden associated with securitisations. These include the extension of the STS framework (further described below) to on-balance sheet synthetic securitisations and a relaxing of the regulatory framework for the securitisation of non-performing exposures. This type of flexibility of approach by regulatory bodies is a trend we expect to continue into 2021 and Ireland is likely to be a net beneficiary of any further CMU initiatives/integration given the open nature of its economy.
Impact on RMBS and other Irish securitisation assets
As the effect of the pandemic first became clear in Ireland in March 2020, the CBI and members of the Banking and Payments Federation of Ireland (the BPFI), which includes all Irish retail banks, retail credit firms and major credit servicing firms, responded quickly. They announced payment extensions of up to six months, along with a deferral of court enforcement proceedings for consumer and retail customers who required assistance as a result of the pandemic. Shortly thereafter, the European Banking Authority (the EBA) published guidelines which gave Irish entities additional regulatory flexibility to provide customers with support while avoiding the automatic classification of exposures under the definition of "forbearance" or as "defaulted" under distressed restructuring definitions.
While the EBA guidelines were not extended, favourable regulatory treatment will continue to apply to all payment holidays granted under eligible payment moratoria prior to 30 September 2020. The BFPI has stated that its members will offer, on a case-by-case basis, additional three month payment breaks. However, it should be noted that the BFPI has not made further statements on the temporary suspension of enforcement proceedings.
According to a "Payment Breaks Update" released by the BPFI, over 149,000 accounts took advantage of these payment breaks at their peak. More than 74,000 of these were principal dwelling house mortgage accounts, with some 35,000 consumer credit accounts and 31,000 SME loan accounts. It should be noted that over 105,000 of these payment breaks had expired by 2 October 2020. While lockdown measures continue to have an impact, in positive news, the book value of accounts on payments breaks fell by EUR4.7 billion to EUR4.4 billion in the four weeks to 30 October 2020, therefore matters are stabilising. As a consequence, we have seen an increase in RMBS activity in recent months and we expect that loan portfolio sale activity will recommence next year.
Legislative protections for tenants
On the legislative front, the Irish government introduced the Residential Tenancies and Valuation Act 2020 to increase protections for tenants who lost their employment, had their wages reduced or are in receipt of the unemployment pandemic payment. These protections include a rent freeze as well as a ban on evictions up to 10 January 2021. As Ireland continues to experience lockdowns on an ongoing basis, it is likely that these measures will be extended for the duration of the pandemic.
Government stimulus package
As the scale of the pandemic became apparent, the Irish government announced the most significant stimulus package in the history of the state. It comprises relief programmes, COVID-19 loans and a range of other initiatives to assist SME businesses. The overall objective of these measures is to ensure that financial providers have the necessary support to continue to provide liquidity to Irish businesses.
One of the most significant of these was the introduction of the largest ever state-backed loan guarantee in Ireland. The EUR2 billion Credit Guarantee Scheme provides a partial 80% state-backed guarantee to participating finance providers lending to eligible SMEs, small mid-caps and primary producers. In addition, other state bodies – including the Irish Strategic Investment Fund (the ISIF), the Strategic Banking Corporation of Ireland, Enterprise Ireland and Microfinance Ireland – announced support for struggling businesses with loans available from EUR10,000 to EUR1.5 million plus. In the case of ISIF, it also made a EUR2 billion Pandemic Stabilisation and Recovery Fund available to support medium and large enterprises.
Anti-money Laundering Registration Requirements for Irish SPVs
The law in Ireland on anti-money laundering and the countering of the financing of terrorism is governed by the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010 (as amended). This Act introduced what has become known as the Schedule 2 regime, which requires otherwise unregulated firms that fall within its scope due to their business activity to conduct AML and otherwise comply with the Irish AML regime. This regime has been the subject of renewed focus since late 2018 when a registration regime for such Schedule 2 Firms was introduced to Ireland.
While SPVs have not traditionally been viewed as in the scope of AML, this question has recently been subject to renewed debate amongst market participants in respect of these Schedule 2 firms. Schedule 2 activity includes lending and financial leasing, but, in the absence of Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) guidance, advisors continue to apply their interpretations to the scope and nature of activity required of an SPV to fall within its scope (for example, RMBS, non-performing loan (NPL) portfolio owning SPVs, collateralised loan obligations, loan funds, treasury options and other inter-group arrangements, alternative lenders and retained forms of asset finance). In 2021, we expect these questions of law to further consolidate around accepted market practice and perhaps to be shaped further by express CBI guidance.
The introduction of the Securitisation Regulation in 2019 represented a long-awaited reform of the EU securitisation rules. It took the existing patchwork of legislation governing European securitisations and replaced them with harmonised rules on due diligence, risk retention and transparency applying to particular types of securitisations. Since its introduction we have often had to make the distinction to clients that it only regulates "securitisations" as defined in the Securitisation Regulation and that transactions that do not meet this definition are not regulated per se in Ireland.
New Transparency RTS
One provision of the Securitisation Regulation which was awaiting implementation was the development by the European Securities and Monetary Authority (the ESMA) of draft regulatory and technical standards (including detailed draft disclosure templates). These templates specify the information required to be disclosed in respect of underlying exposures and quarterly investor reports (the Transparency RTS). While they had been circulated in draft and subject to extensive industry scrutiny and discussion, for a considerable period of time, they were only formally published by the ESMA and became law on 23 September 2020. As a result, there has been a significant amount of activity in ensuring that in-scope securitisations (ie, those issued on or after 1 January 2019) comply with the finalised reporting requirements prior to each transaction's relevant next reporting date.
One of the key innovations of the Securitisation Regulation was the creation of a framework for "simple, transparent and standardised" securitisations which have become known in the market as STS securitisations. They have proven attractive as they allow certain institutional investors to potentially benefit from more favourable regulatory capital treatment for STS exposures. One of the requirements for a transaction to qualify as an STS securitisation is that the originator, sponsor and securitisation special purpose entity (SSPE) must be established in the European Union. This further enhances the attractiveness of Ireland as a post-Brexit location for securitisations. It is therefore unsurprising that a number of STS transactions came to market in 2020 and we expect this number to increase in 2021.
CBI oversight powers
The Securitisation Regulation gave the CBI, as competent authority, significant powers to supervise and enforce compliance with its provisions. Over the course of the last year, the CBI has taken steps to exercise these powers and has communicated with the market to detail the way in which it should be notified of securitisations that fall within the scope of the Securitisation Regulation. In addition, during the summer of 2020 the CBI issued a questionnaire to Irish originators to survey Securitisation Regulation compliance. We understand that respondents have yet to receive feedback from the CBI on their submissions to date but it is likely that the data set gathered will form the basis of future CBI action on guidance in the area (for example, in respect of required policies and procedures under Article 30 (Powers of the competent authorities) of the Securitisation Regulation).
The Securitisation Regulation was introduced to revive EU securitisation activity so as to better diversify funding sources, unlock capital and create one of the building blocks for the EU’s capital market. As we approach the two-year mark since its introduction, we believe that it is contributing to the accomplishment of these goals and is a net positive for securitisation participants across Europe.
There is significant political and public interest in the question of credit servicing in Ireland, particularly with respect to Irish RMBS. As a consequence, the Irish Consumer Protection (Regulation of Credit Servicing Firms) Act was introduced in January 2019. It radically altered the operation of the secondary acquisition, ownership and servicing of performing and non-performing Irish consumer loans, and certain small and medium enterprise (SME) loans, by extending the scope of regulated activities to include legal title holding in, as well as management and control of, such assets.
Increased focus on the legal title holder
The foregoing act resulted in a large number of SPVs holding Irish loan portfolios applying for credit servicing licences, with many of these applications still being actively scrutinised by the CBI. While the NPL primary and secondary market was largely put on hold this year due to the pandemic, the market had largely digested the new regime with the existing, traditional credit servicers expanding their service lines to include these two new regulated activity headings. Nonetheless, for those existing fund and bank participants who have obtained transitional or full licences, this may offer some competitive advantages as and when the market restarts.
European NPL law developments
There are questions as to whether this legislation conflicts with the EU’s proposed directive on credit servicers, credit purchasers and the recovery of collateral (the NPL Directive), the text of which was first published in March 2018. The draft NPL Directive largely reflects the position in Ireland before the introduction of the 2019 Irish credit servicing regime as it provides for the regulation of credit servicers – but not credit purchasers. In addition, the draft NPL Directive makes it clear that there is no justification for requiring investors on secondary markets to apply for authorisation, or to set special conditions when investors are buying existing credit at their own risk and do not cause prudential concerns.
The NPL Directive is still under discussion and at first reading stage by the EU Council. However, it is listed in the European Commission 2021 work programme as a proposal which requires swift progression. It is therefore likely that the NPL Directive will be implemented later in 2021 or 2022. When this occurs, the current Irish regime will need to adapt and so we expect that there will be further developments in this area in the coming year.
LIBOR Benchmark Reform
The year 2020 was a critical one for firms preparing for LIBOR transition. The deliberations and decisions published by the UK Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates have been closely followed by Irish financial institutions and funds to ensure that they are prepared for LIBOR cessation by the end of 2021.
The CBI has focused on ensuring that its supervisory expectations with respect to the LIBOR transition have been made clear to regulated entities. On 28 February 2020, the CBI circulated a letter to the industry reminding the boards of fund management companies that they are responsible for ensuring that preparations for the impact of the benchmark reforms are in place for each fund they manage.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
Historically, the securitisation market has not focused on environmental, social and governance factors. It is easy to understand why this was the case; however, one of the key lessons of the global financial crisis was the importance of considering the ESG implications of financial products, and the necessity for investors' interests to be aligned with those of broader society. As a consequence, the EU has pushed towards creating a framework for sustainable finance as part of a roll out of its "green agenda". The onset of the pandemic, and the systemic inequalities it has exposed, has seen focus on this topic intensify and there have been a number of key developments in 2020.
The EU Regulation on the Establishment of a Framework to Facilitate Sustainable Investment (which is more commonly referred to as the Taxonomy Regulation), adopted in June 2020, sets out an EU-wide classification system and provides a common method for investors to identify environmentally sustainable economic activities and encourage private investment in those activities. Currently the taxonomy is limited to environmental objectives, but the development of a social and governance-focused taxonomy is likely to be accelerated in light of the pandemic. It is expected that the regime prescribed by the Taxonomy Regulation will be established by the end of 2021 for implementation by the end of 2022.
While these measures are primarily directed towards AIFM/UCITS managers and MiFID portfolio managers or advisors they are demonstrative of a clear trend line in legal and regulatory developments. In the coming years we expect that securitisation vehicles will be increasingly structured to account for ESG requirements and market-driven demand in the area. For example, more and more European CLOs are coming to market with certain ESG labels or investment criteria. As banks and other originators create more green finance products, such as green mortgages, these will be pooled to exclusively or partially target ESG focused investors.
By providing the investment necessary to achieve sustainability ambitions, sustainable finance has a key role to play in solving the global climate crisis. Ireland has a strong track record of adapting to changes and demands in the global financial market and therefore it is not surprising that it has established itself as a "green" international finance hub. In November 2019, the Irish Stock Exchange (now trading as Euronext Dublin) launched the Euronext Green Bonds initiative. It is a dedicated area on the Euronext website where green bonds listed on all Euronext markets are consolidated onto one highly visible area. This offering gives investors the opportunity to discover and participate in sustainable investment opportunities across all Euronext exchanges. In order to be included in the initiative, the green bonds must be aligned with particular industry standards such as the International Capital Market Association's Green Bond Principles. International organisations have recognised Ireland's sustainable finance credentials, as was evidenced by the World Bank's decision to list its EUR1.5 billion ten-year Global Sustainable Development Bond on the Euronext Dublin in 2019.
In recent years, the key changes in Irish tax law of relevance to securitisation structures have related to Ireland's implementation of international tax initiatives such as the OECD BEPS project and the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directives (ATAD).
In 2019, Ireland implemented ATAD anti-hybrid rules. These rules have not had a significant impact on Irish securitisation vehicles as they primarily target arrangements between associated entities. Securitisation vehicles are usually structured in a manner which means that this test of association is not met and therefore the rules do not apply. By this point, the legal analysis is relatively streamlined and rating agencies have adapted to the new opinions being provided on this technical area.
At the end of 2019, the Irish legislature also expanded the Irish transfer pricing regime such that it became applicable to non-trading entities such as securitisation vehicles. However, in expanding these rules the legislature introduced a carve-out for payments of interest made on profit participating notes (PPNs) issued by Irish securitisation companies.
The most significant change was one to Irish anti-avoidance rules aimed at structures where over 20% of the equity tranche of notes was held by a person with a significant influence over the issuer. An unintended consequence of the legislation was felt in cases where the collateral manager or an affiliate, such as a risk retention vehicle, held horizontal risk retention notes. The rules can impact the deductibility of interest paid to such noteholders. This change has led to increased analysis of risk retention structures in the course of securitisation transactions. In general, most managers have adapted to these changes although it is an area best addressed in establishing the risk retention structure.
Looking to the year ahead, it is expected that the ATAD interest limitation rule will be implemented in Ireland with effect from January 2022. Further analysis of the potential impact of this on securitisation vehicles may be required when draft legislation is published although, given the nature of Irish securitisation vehicles, no material impact is expected.
Overall, while changes in Irish tax law over the past couple of years have given rise to certain additional analysis and structuring discussions, they have not tended to negatively impact securitisation transactions when properly addressed.