In Germany, freedom of testamentary disposition is accompanied by a tightly knit inheritance law that provides for specific legal forms for testamentary dispositions. Furthermore, there are some regulations, such as the right to a compulsory portion, which are strongly influenced by a conservative valuation. Certain family members are therefore entitled to a share of the deceased’s estate. It should also be noted that inheritance law is as old as the Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch – BGB) – ie, more than 100 years old.
Inheritance tax law is based on the principle that generous enrichment achieved without personal effort is taxed accordingly. At the same time, inheritance tax law offers a number of benefits for transfers, particularly for companies, so that they are not burdened with inheritance tax but can be continued for the benefit of the employees and not sold. Different tax classes in inheritance tax law reflect the idea that high allowances and lower tax rates are available for close family members, while only a small allowance and high tax rates apply to third parties.
Strong Family Protection and Limited Freedom of Testamentary Disposition
German inheritance law is codified primarily in the BGB and provides a high degree of protection for the family. Although there is freedom of testamentary disposition in Germany, this freedom is significantly restricted by the right to a compulsory portion. Children, spouses and, in some cases, parents are entitled to a cash claim amounting to half of their legal inheritance, regardless of the contents of the will. The right to a compulsory portion cannot be easily excluded.
Succession planning therefore often involves minimising the compulsory portion, structuring transfers during the lifetime of the deceased or securing assets.
Continuity of Family Businesses
Germany’s economic structure is strongly influenced by SMEs – ie, family-run small and medium-sized enterprises, often spanning several generations.
Inheritance and gift tax law provides for considerable relief (exemption rules) for qualified business assets if the level of employment and the holding period are maintained. This reflects a political consensus that the continuity of companies and employees justifies preferential treatment. The Federal Constitutional Court has ruled in several decisions that the exemption of business assets is permissible under certain conditions if this secures jobs and ensures the continuity of the company.
Transfers Between Living Persons and Anticipated Succession
Anticipated succession (through gifts during one’s lifetime) also plays an important role. In this case, a transfer subject to usufruct may be particularly useful. The donors retain the income from an asset, but in the event of inheritance, there is no longer any taxation.
Anticipated succession fulfils the following functions:
Limited History of Long-Term Trusts
Unlike common law countries, there are no trusts in Germany. The legal form does not exist, and Germany has not ratified the Hague Convention. Instead, there are foundations – in particular family foundations and charitable foundations. These are subject to foundation supervision, and many testators do not want such official supervision of their assets, especially since transferring them to a foundation also means that they must permanently part with their assets.
Instead of a trust, the following options are available:
Charity in Succession
Although charitable foundations – especially in the academic, cultural and social sectors – are highly regarded, there is no strong culture of generous testamentary donations in Germany.
Demographic Pressure and Changing Family Structures
Low birth rates, patchwork families and an increasing concentration of wealth among the older generation are changing the dynamics of succession. In patchwork families, certain mechanisms must be used in a will to ensure that the divorced spouse does not inherit. In many entrepreneurial families, it must be taken into account that the children do not always want to continue the business.
Summary
The German succession culture can be characterised as follows:
There are four groups of companies, which require different planning approaches:
There is basically no concept of domicile in Germany. Tax law is more concerned with the concepts of residence and habitual abode.
Inheritance Tax Liability
Inheritance tax liability in Germany is based on the personal domestic connection of the parties involved and the location of the assets. A distinction is made between unlimited and limited tax liability.
Unlimited tax liability exists if the testator or the acquirer is a resident at the time of inheritance – in particular if they have a domicile or habitual residence in Germany or are a domestic legal entity. In this case, the entire estate, including foreign assets, is subject to German inheritance tax.
A residence is where someone has a home in circumstances that suggest that they will retain and use that home. A certain minimum length of stay is not necessary; it is sufficient to have a key that allows access and use at any time. The habitual residence is the place where someone stays under circumstances that indicate that they are not only staying there temporarily. This is the case if someone stays in one place for more than six months, whereby short-term interruptions (eg, holidays) are irrelevant.
Both terms are based on the actual circumstances; registration or civil law regulations are irrelevant for tax assessment purposes.
Jurisdiction for Inheritance
In private international law, on the other hand, the question of which inheritance law is applicable depends on the habitual residence of the deceased at the time of their death (see the EU Succession Regulation). Here, a different term applies than in tax law, referring to the place where the deceased had the centre of their life at the time of their death – ie, where the actual centre of their life was in family, social and professional terms. The duration and permanence of the stay, personal integration into the social and family environment, and personal ties are all relevant factors. A mere temporary stay is not sufficient. However, the deceased may choose the law of the country of his or her nationality.
The question of the right to a compulsory portion is also determined by the last habitual residence of the deceased, unless he or she has made a choice of law.
Jurisdiction for Divorce Law
In most cases, the applicable law in a divorce with international implications is governed by Regulation (EU) No 1259/2010 (the “Rome III Regulation”) . The spouses may primarily determine the law applicable to the divorce. However, they may only choose the nationality of one spouse (the place of the court seised).
Otherwise, the following applies:
Income tax liability for natural persons is also linked to their place of residence or habitual abode in Germany. The terms “place of residence” and “habitual abode” as used in inheritance tax law apply. These criteria are relevant for both types of tax. If someone is liable for income tax, they are also liable for inheritance tax.
Legal succession in Germany is governed by the BGB. This applies if the deceased has not left a valid last will and testament. The order in which legal heirs are considered is determined by a specific order provided for in law.
The spouse has a special status. They are entitled to inherit alongside relatives and receive a certain share of the estate depending on the matrimonial property regime and the number of other heirs.
First-order heirs are the descendants of the deceased – ie, children, grandchildren, etc. A living descendant excludes descendants related to them through the deceased from the succession. If children have died, their descendants take their place and enter into the line of succession. Children generally inherit equal shares.
Only if there are no descendants – ie, no first-order heirs, do the parents of the deceased and their descendants (siblings, nieces, nephews; second-order heirs) inherit. If there are also no second-order heirs, the grandparents and their descendants (aunts, uncles; third-order heirs) inherit. From the fourth order onwards, the next relatives inherit.
In the legal succession, there may be numerous heirs who together form a community of heirs. In such a case, the individual heir cannot dispose of individual items of the estate. It should also be noted that illegitimate children are treated equally to legitimate descendants; adopted children may also be entitled to inherit, whereby a distinction must be made between the adoption of minors and adults.
Although German inheritance law is based on the principle of freedom of testamentary disposition, the right to a compulsory portion must always be taken into account in succession planning. Descendants (children, grandchildren), the spouse and the parents of the deceased are entitled to a compulsory portion if they have been excluded from succession by a disposition of property upon death (eg, will). The compulsory portion consists of half the value of the legal inheritance that the beneficiary would have received without disinheritance.
Beneficiaries
The following are entitled to a compulsory portion:
Amount
The compulsory portion amounts to half the value of the statutory inheritance. The starting point is the value of the estate at the time of inheritance. This can regularly lead to disputes because the beneficiary of the compulsory portion must know the value of the estate, and it is often a question of valuation as to how valuable the estate actually is. The claim is only monetary. A compulsory portion claim regularly encumbers illiquid assets, such as company assets, real estate or art estates. This forces the heirs who have to fulfil the claim to sell estate assets against their will, which can lead to fragmentation of the estate.
Withdrawal of the Compulsory Portion
There are only a few cases regulated by law in which the compulsory portion claim does not apply.
The testator can only withdraw the compulsory portion from a beneficiary if they have committed particularly serious offences. In such a case, the withdrawal of the compulsory portion should be made by means of a last will and testament, and the reason must be stated therein. The testator bears the burden of proof for the circumstances. The following may justify the withdrawal of a compulsory portion:
Family breakdown or severance of contact are not sufficient; the misconduct must go significantly beyond normal conflicts and seriously violate the family’s solidarity. It is even possible that the compulsory portion may be revived through the testator’s forgiveness.
Possibilities for Reduction
A reduction of the compulsory portion is only possible within narrow limits. One possibility is lifetime gifts to other persons or donations to the beneficiaries of the compulsory portion, which are credited against the compulsory portion.
Significance of the Compulsory Portion
Inheritance law assumes that the right to a compulsory portion is strictly linked to the statutory minimum share of close relatives and provides only limited possibilities for reduction. Case law also reflects the high requirements for deprivation of the compulsory portion.
Waiver of the Compulsory Portion
It is permissible to waive the compulsory portion, even in exchange for compensation. This is done by means of a notarial deed and must be desired by the beneficiary of the compulsory portion. Without their co-operation, this is not possible.
Limitation Period
The claim to a compulsory portion is subject to the standard three-year limitation period. The period begins at the end of the year in which the claim arose and the beneficiary became aware of the circumstances giving rise to the claim and the identity of the debtor, or should have become aware of them without gross negligence (opening of the will). The claim arises upon the opening of the succession.
Assertion
The claim to a compulsory portion is a monetary claim against the heir, which is asserted out of court by requesting payment; typically, information about the estate is first requested in order to calculate the compulsory portion. The claim is regularly asserted through a step-by-step lawsuit:
Community of Accrued Gains
If the spouses do not enter into a marriage contract under German law, the statutory matrimonial property regime of community of accrued gains applies. This is characterised by the fact that the spouses’ assets remain separate. Each spouse remains the owner of their assets and may dispose of them alone. Household items, on the other hand, belong to both spouses jointly. Restrictions only apply if one spouse wishes to dispose of their entire assets or household items. In such a case, the consent of the other spouse is required.
Only when this community of accrued gains is terminated does the spouse receive compensation for the accrued gains. A calculation is made to determine who has acquired more accrued gains during the marriage. The spouse who has acquired more must transfer half of the accrued gains to the other spouse. However, the claim only arises if the community of accrued gains ends due to a change to another matrimonial property regime, in the event of the death of the spouse or in the event of divorce.
In the event of inheritance, the surviving spouse in a community of accrued gains receives a lump-sum increase of one-quarter of their inheritance as a legal heir, regardless of the actual accrued gains. Alternatively, they can renounce the inheritance and instead demand the mathematically exact equalisation of accrued gains. The equalisation of accrued gains then takes place as a monetary claim against the estate.
Separation of Property
In the case of separation of property, there are no property relations between the spouses; the assets of each spouse remain completely separate. No equalisation takes place.
Community of Property
In the case of community of property, the assets of both spouses merge into joint property, known as the total property. The total property belongs to both spouses jointly – ie, they are joint owners and can only dispose of it jointly, unless the administration has been transferred to one spouse alone by marriage contract. In addition to the joint property, there is the separate property, which belongs to each spouse alone (eg, non-transferable rights), and the reserved property, which can be assigned to one spouse alone by marriage contract or third-party disposition.
German law provides for marriage contracts both before and after marriage; they can be concluded by engaged couples or spouses who are already married.
A marriage contract only makes sense if the spouses wish to deviate from the statutory matrimonial property regime of community of accrued gains. They can also remain in the community of accrued gains and modify it – eg, by excluding certain economic assets from the accrued gains or by agreeing on a lump sum to be paid out instead of the calculated accrued gains.
The matrimonial property regime may also be effectively limited, insofar as the spouses have a certain degree of freedom of contract.
For a marriage contract to be valid, it must be concluded in the presence of both parties and recorded by a notary. In terms of content, marriage contracts may, in principle, make extensive use of the spouses’ freedom of contract, but they are subject to judicial review: agreements that lead to a unilateral and unreasonable disadvantage for one spouse may be unconscionable and therefore invalid. In such a case, the statutory rights apply again, so this must be avoided in the marriage contract.
Provisions that affect the core area of statutory divorce law are viewed particularly critically, such as the complete exclusion of post-marital maintenance or pension rights equalisation, or both if the claim for equalisation of accrued gains and the maintenance provisions are excluded. A possible invalidity must be asserted; it will only be determined by the court if one spouse sues for claims and invokes the invalidity.
In the case of lifetime transfers (eg, gifts or anticipated succession), German law may impose gift tax, income tax (capital gains tax) and, in some cases, land transfer tax.
Gift Tax
Transfers of assets between living persons without consideration are generally subject to gift tax. The tax is payable upon execution of the gift. The amount is based on the value of the transferred assets, the family relationship (tax classes) and personal allowances. Exemption rules apply to certain transfers, such as the gift of the family home between spouses. Inheritance of the family home, on the other hand, is only taxable if the surviving spouse continues to live in the family home for the following ten years or only moves out for compelling reasons. This also applies to children, but only up to 200 square metres, and if they also move in after the death and live there for ten years. This rule is particularly unrealistic in cases where there are several children.
Income Tax (Capital Gains Tax)
Capital gains tax (in particular under Section 23 of the Income Tax Act) is only payable on transfers for consideration – ie, when the transferee provides consideration. In the case of gifts, there is no capital gain and therefore no income tax liability for the donor. However, if a property or other asset is transferred for consideration within the speculation period (eg, ten years for real estate), the gain is taxable.
In the case of mixed gifts (partly for consideration, partly free of charge), the part for consideration may be subject to income tax, and the part free of charge may be subject to gift tax.
Land Transfer Tax
Land transfer tax is generally payable on the transfer of land. However, gifts between living persons are exempt from land transfer tax if they are subject to gift tax (Section 3, No 2 of the German Real Estate Transfer Tax Act; Grunderwerbsteuergesetz – GrEStG). In the case of mixed gifts, the part for which consideration is paid is subject to land transfer tax, while the part for which no consideration is paid is subject to gift tax. The sale of real estate between spouses or close relatives may also be exempt from land transfer tax.
For income tax purposes, the so-called footsteps theory applies to transfers upon death: the heir follows in the footsteps of the deceased with regard to tax conditions (in particular acquisition costs and date of acquisition) – ie, there is no fictitious new purchase at market value on the date of death, but the heir continues to use the tax values of the deceased. This means, in particular, that if the heir subsequently sells the asset, the acquisition costs and date of acquisition of the deceased remain decisive for the calculation of any capital gains, so that the capital gains may be higher.
The footprint theory is thus a central principle for avoiding double taxation of increases in value: increases in value that have already occurred for the deceased are not taxed again for the heir as a fictitious capital gain.
In Germany, lifetime succession planning (vorweggenommene Erbfolge) is commonly used to transfer assets before death in order to reduce inheritance tax exposure, maintain control over family assets and structure ownership transitions smoothly. The most frequently used mechanisms combine civil law instruments, tax allowances and contractual arrangements. The following structures are typical.
Lifetime Gifts
Key features
Inheritance and gift tax allowances under the Inheritance and Gift Tax Act can be used repeatedly every ten years.
The typical allowances are:
Gifts are a common tool in German succession planning. This is because the allowances for inheritance and gift tax are identical and are available every ten years. Within these ten years, gifts/inheritances from the same persons are added together and are then subject to a higher progressive tax rate.
The gift is usually made with a right of usufruct, often to provide for the donor, so that the donor still secures the income. Unlike in other jurisdictions, the right of usufruct does not mean that the gift is not completed. The advantage is that it expires in the event of inheritance without incurring tax. It should be noted, however, that the usufructuary/donor generates income, which is then also inherited if not spent.
A gift agreement may also include rights of recovery – eg, if the donee dies before the donor. The expectation of a certain level of taxation may also be subject to a right of recovery. Unrestricted rights of recovery are not recommended.
Transfer of Business Interests With Retained Control
There is also the option of establishing a corporation or partnership as a so-called family holding company or family pool and gifting shares in it. This allows the next generation to be involved, with the parents retaining control but the children participating financially. This is also possible for minors.
When they reach the age of majority and continue to be involved in the company, control remains in place – eg, only all shareholders can make withdrawals at the same time.
The partnership agreement contains provisions stipulating that no third parties may become shareholders, that exclusion is possible under certain conditions and that a marriage contract is required if a shareholder marries, so as not to encumber the company’s assets.
German tax law provides substantial relief for business transfers if conditions are satisfied (eg, employment retention requirements under ErbStG).
Two main regimes exist:
These are widely used in succession planning for Mittelstand businesses. However, the requirements are only fulfilled if the company is not only administrating assets like holding or renting real estate or capital investments.
Currently, the relief for business assets is subject to a decision of the German Constitutional Court as to whether the provisions conform to German constitutional law for private assets (eg, whether tax relief does not apply).
Limited Use of Trust Structures
Unlike common law jurisdictions, Germany does not have a domestic trust regime comparable to Anglo-American trusts. Germany has not signed the Hague Convention so trusts do not exist in Germany. Thus, they cannot be used as a vehicle for succession planning.
Family Foundation (Familienstiftung)
A family foundation is a foundation with legal capacity whose purpose is exclusively or predominantly to promote or secure the welfare of the members of one or more specific families. Family foundations serve the welfare of the members of one or more specific families; this can be achieved, for example, by providing for, promoting or managing assets.
It should be noted that family foundations cannot be dissolved without due process and are therefore very stable. Amendments to the statutes can only be made with the approval of the foundation supervisory authority.
However, a family foundation can be interesting if certain assets are to be preserved. The heirs then no longer become owners, but merely beneficiaries of the foundation (as with a trust). This can also offer protection from the fragmentation of family wealth.
Charitable Foundation
Charitable foundations, on the other hand, must exclusively promote charitable causes. There are numerous tax breaks for this. The foundation itself is tax-exempt, as are transfers to the foundations. Donations are also tax-deductible. However, the assets cannot be returned to private use without tax disadvantages.
In principle, the foregoing rules are not only aimed at tax optimisation: these are economically sensible arrangements that do not constitute tax avoidance.
German tax law contains a general anti-abuse provision. This provision prohibits the abuse of legal structuring options in tax law. Tax law cannot be circumvented by abusing legal structuring options. This means that, in the event of abuse, the tax assessment will be based on the most economically appropriate structure rather than the chosen structure.
Abuse occurs when an inappropriate legal arrangement is chosen that, compared to an appropriate arrangement, leads to a tax advantage for the taxpayer or a third party that is not provided for by law.
Succession to digital assets is generally governed by the general rules of universal succession: upon the death of the testator, all property rights, including digital assets such as online accounts, email accounts, social media profiles, stored data and contractual relationships with internet providers, pass to the heirs.
The heir enters into a contractual relationship with the service provider and thus obtains material access to the data stored under the deceased’s account.
In practical terms, this means that heirs are granted access to and the right to view the digital assets, as the deceased had previously – without, however, assuming the deceased’s identity or actively continuing to use the account. The heirs can assert claims for information against service providers in order to gain access. A separation between highly personal and property-related content is neither practicable nor legally required.
Succession in crypto-assets is handled in the same way: upon the death of the testator, all property rights, including crypto-assets, are transferred to the heirs. The relevant object of reference in inheritance law is the private key, as this is the only way to access the crypto-assets. The heirs become the legal owners of the stored data (eg, private key on hardware, software or a paper wallet) and assume the legal position of the deceased.
The special feature of crypto-assets is that the tokens themselves are not stored on the storage medium, but are recorded as entries on the blockchain; the private key is the prerequisite for accessing and disposing of the crypto-assets. If this can no longer be found, the heirs are indeed no longer able to dispose of the assets. This must then be secured by means of a will.
Special Challenges and Recommendations
These include the following.
To date, the legislator has not created any special regulations for succession in digital assets or crypto-assets.
Family Companies
A family business often has special provisions in its articles of association. These include, for example, special provisions for the transferability of shares, redemption of shares, withdrawal in the event of misconduct, marriage contract clauses, succession clauses and severance payment rules. This ensures that only family members are and remain shareholders, and that measures can be taken in the event of misconduct.
Valuation of Family Businesses
For inheritance and gift tax purposes, the valuation of company shares is based on the Valuation Act. The fair market value is generally decisive.
Initially, the stock market price or actual sale price is used as a basis. In the case of unlisted companies, the purchase prices within a year may also be decisive if there have been sales. If this is not the case, the simplified statutory income approach is often used. This involves capitalising the sustainable annual income of the company. Alternatively, other recognised valuation methods may also be used if they reflect the fair market value more realistically. In this respect, the taxpayer has a right of choice.
Restrictions in the articles of association, such as transfer restrictions or compensation provisions, have no particular influence in the regular valuation procedure, although they do limit the actual realisability of the shares. In practice, succession plans are therefore often designed in such a way that tax advantages are optimally utilised and valuation effects are taken into account at the same time, for example through the gradual transfer of company shares within the family.
Tax breaks and valuation rules play a particularly important role in succession planning for family businesses in Germany.
Tax Breaks for Business Assets
The transfer of business assets by inheritance or gift is subject to tax breaks under certain conditions in accordance with the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act. The aim of these regulations is to ensure the continuation of businesses and jobs. There are two main exemption models for eligible business assets, such as shares in a limited liability company or interests in partnerships.
So-called administrative assets (eg, surplus funds or certain rental properties) are not eligible for relief if they exceed certain limits. Special rules apply to very large corporate assets.
In practice, the following legal forms are particularly popular for succession planning: foundations with legal capacity (especially family foundations), traditional corporations and partnerships (especially GmbH & Co KG).
Family Foundations
Family foundations and private charitable foundations ensure that the company’s assets remain tied up in the long term and allow for flexible succession planning.
Companies
Corporations (GmbH, AG) and partnerships (especially GmbH & Co KG) are traditional instruments of succession planning. GmbH & Co KG offers a high degree of flexibility and allows family members to be involved. The structure of the company (eg, transfer restrictions, special rights) can control influence and succession.
Differences Between Residents and Non-Residents
These are as follows.
Residents of Germany are subject to additional taxation if they benefit from a foreign family foundation or trust. In recent years, this has been repeatedly upheld by the European Court of Justice, albeit in favour of the taxpayer. Exceptions to additional taxation have so far only been provided for EU/European Economic Area (EEA) foundations in the law, but the Federal Finance Court has now ruled that they should also apply to third-country foundations, such as Swiss foundations. This also opens up further applicability for trusts and facilitates the tax treatment of beneficiaries in Germany.
German family foundations are subject to inheritance tax every 30 years, which does not apply to foreign family foundations and trusts.
Germany does not have its own trust law, as trusts do not exist as a separate legal form. Therefore, there is no special licensing system for trustees. However, if a trustee makes asset management or investment decisions within the framework of a trust, this may be considered a regulated financial service and require authorisation from the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority in accordance with the Banking Act.
Liability is governed by the general rules of German civil law. Professional trustees are regularly subject to a higher standard of care, which is based on the standards of their profession.
Private trust companies cannot be established under German law, as there is no domestic trust regime. Instead, family foundations are often used as long-term asset structures, such as the family foundation.
Whether trusts are subject to corporation tax depends on their classification under German tax law. According to the Corporation Tax Act, only certain corporations, associations of persons and asset pools are subject to corporation tax. Trusts are not legal entities under German law and are therefore not automatically treated as subject to corporation tax.
However, depending on its structure, a foreign trust may be classified as an asset pool subject to corporation tax, or as another type of corporation if its structure and function are comparable to those of a foundation or special-purpose fund and it has its own legal personality within the meaning of German tax law. This applies even though a trust does not exist as a legal entity under German law. The type comparison serves this purpose: if the trust corresponds in its structure to a foundation or special-purpose fund, it can be treated as subject to corporation tax.
If the trust is revocable and the settlor has secured extensive rights, the trust is generally not considered to be subject to corporation tax.
German inheritance law and inheritance tax treat same-sex spouses, adopted children and children born out of wedlock in the same way as opposite-sex spouses and legitimate children. However, there are special provisions for unmarried partners, surrogate children and posthumously conceived children.
Same-Sex Spouses and Registered Civil Partners
Same-sex partners can now also marry. Therefore, there are no longer any differences. They inherit legally as spouses and fall into tax class I, with the highest allowance and the lowest tax rates. This also applies to registered civil partners, provided that the civil partnership has not been converted into a marriage.
Unmarried Partners
Unmarried partners are not privileged in either inheritance law or inheritance tax law. They are not legal heirs and must be included in a will. For inheritance tax purposes, they are treated as strangers (tax class III, allowance of EUR20,000).
Children Born Out of Wedlock
Since 1998, children born out of wedlock have been treated equally to children born in wedlock, in terms of inheritance law, and have the same legal right to inherit.
Adopted Children
Adopted children are treated equally to biological children in terms of inheritance law and inheritance tax law; in inheritance tax law, this also applies to stepchildren (but not in inheritance law).
Surrogate Children (Children Born to Surrogate Mothers)
German law does not recognise surrogacy. Legal parenthood is determined by the law of descent. The woman who gave birth to the child is the mother; the intended parents can only be recognised as parents through adoption. Without adoption, there is no legal right to inheritance or tax privileges.
Posthumously Conceived Children
Children conceived by artificial insemination after the death of the father are entitled to inherit if paternity is recognised under German descent law.
Conflicts can arise in cross-border estate planning when family relationships are recognised differently in different legal systems. This occurs most frequently in relation to marriage contracts or inheritances. Germany primarily regulates such conflicts through European regulations on inheritance law and matrimonial property law.
The provisions of the European regulations specify which national law applies to family law issues such as the validity of a marriage and matrimonial property law.
According to this regulation, the following generally applies:
In inheritance matters, cross-border conflicts within the EU are largely governed by the EU Succession Regulation. This regulation generally applies the law of the deceased’s last habitual residence to the entire estate. It also allows individuals to choose the law of their nationality for estate planning purposes. This framework helps to ensure that the definition of heirs and family relationships is determined uniformly in all participating EU member states.
In Germany, there are no significant conflicts between state and federal law in this area, as family and inheritance law is uniformly regulated at the federal level by the BGB.
From a German perspective, there is only one federal tax regime in the area of inheritance and estate planning, as is the case in federal systems such as the United States. The relevant regulations are predominantly uniform across Germany, while European regulations and double taxation agreements play an important role in cross-border matters.
The Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act, which applies nationwide, is central to the taxation of inheritances and gifts. It determines both tax liability and allowances and tax rates. In addition, the Valuation Act regulates the tax valuation of transferred assets, such as real estate or company shares.
Unlimited tax liability applies if either the testator or the acquirer has their domicile or habitual residence in Germany at the time of acquisition. In this case, worldwide assets are generally subject to German inheritance or gift tax. For German citizens, unlimited tax liability can even continue for up to five years after moving away.
Limited tax liability applies if neither the deceased nor the acquirer is resident in Germany. In this case, only certain domestic assets are taxed, such as real estate located in Germany or shares in German companies.
To avoid double taxation, Germany has concluded double taxation agreements for inheritance tax (and in some cases also for gift tax) with a few countries. In double taxation agreements, both countries often have the right to tax an estate or a gift, but there are credit provisions. Ultimately, the higher tax rate prevails. Exemption from inheritance or gifts by a country is rarely found in common double taxation agreements.
If there is no double taxation agreement, tax credits apply. However, it should be noted that the national systems are not harmonised, so double taxation may still occur.
In addition to tax regulations, conflict-of-law rules also play an important role. For cross-border inheritance cases within the EU, the EU Succession Regulation applies, which basically applies the law of the deceased’s habitual residence to the entire succession. Substantive German inheritance law is itself regulated in the BGB. The German federal states have no independent substantive regulatory powers in this area for inheritance tax law or inheritance law. Their role is essentially limited to tax administration (tax offices) and, in some cases, the supervision of certain asset structures such as foundations.
Overall, succession planning with international implications is therefore primarily shaped by the interplay of federal tax rules, international double taxation agreements and European conflict-of-law rules. These determine which state may tax the assets and which law applies to the transfer of assets.
Fritz-Schäffer-Straße 1
53113 Bonn
North Rhine-Westphalia
Germany
+49 228 9594 0
bonn@fgs.de www.fgs.de
International Aspects of German Succession Planning – Best Practice
The increasing internationalisation of asset structures, company shareholdings and family relationships means that succession planning in Germany is increasingly taking on cross-border dimensions. Families own assets in several countries, family members live abroad and a company's operations can span several jurisdictions. This raises complex issues for advisers in international private law, international inheritance law and international tax law.
Whereas traditional succession planning used to be predominantly national in nature, modern succession structures increasingly require a co-ordinated approach across multiple legal systems. This applies in particular to the question of applicable inheritance law, the tax treatment of asset transfers and the risk of international double taxation. A fundamental understanding of these legal frameworks is therefore essential for foreign advisers working with German entrepreneurs or German assets.
International inheritance law and its significance for succession planning
One of the key issues in cross-border succession is determining the applicable inheritance law. In the European Union, this issue is largely regulated by the EU Succession Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 650/2012). The aim of this regulation is to avoid conflicts between different national inheritance laws and to create a uniform connection.
Principle: habitual residence is decisive for the application of substantive inheritance law
In principle, the law applicable to the estate is determined by the habitual residence of the deceased at the time of death. The principle of unity of the estate applies – ie, there can be no division of the estate. The entire estate is governed by the jurisdiction in which the deceased last had his or her habitual residence. If, for example, a German deceased person lives permanently in France or Spain, the inheritance law of that country applies to his or her entire estate, even if a large part of the assets are located in Germany.
Exception: choice of law
However, the EU Succession Regulation opens up an important option: the testator can choose the law of his or her nationality as the applicable inheritance law in his or her will. A German testator residing abroad can therefore ensure that German inheritance law continues to apply to his or her estate by making a corresponding choice of law. He or she should expressly state this in his or her will.
Application in relation to third countries?
Although the EU Succession Regulation (Europäische Erbrechtsverordnung – EuErbVO) only applies to member states, it also applies to Germany in relation to third countries. However, these countries are not bound by it. Therefore, uniform substantive inheritance law is usually only applied in EU countries. Third countries often apply their own conflict-of-law rules, which do not correspond to those of EuErbVO. It may therefore be that both a member state and a third country consider themselves to have jurisdiction or declare different laws applicable. In such a case, corresponding testamentary dispositions should be made in both jurisdictions in order to reconcile the two legal systems.
Violation of public policy as a limit to freedom of contract?
The various European legal systems differ considerably in some respects with regard to compulsory portion rights, freedom of testamentary disposition and succession rules under company law. While German inheritance law recognises compulsory portion claims but generally allows relatively extensive freedom of testamentary disposition, other legal systems provide for significantly stricter restrictions. It is therefore not unusual for a testator who lives in Germany but has a different nationality to invoke this nationality when choosing the applicable law because it contains more favourable provisions for him or her – for example with regard to compulsory portion rights.
However, this freedom of choice is not unlimited. A central barrier is the public policy of the state in question. In private international law, public policy serves as a corrective measure to prevent the application of foreign law if its outcome would be incompatible with the fundamental values of the legal system of the forum state. This mechanism is expressly provided for in the EU Succession Regulation. According to Article 35 of the EU Succession Regulation, the application of a provision of the foreign law chosen may be refused if it is manifestly incompatible with the public policy (ordre public) of the state in which the court is seised. It is important to note that the public policy exception must be applied restrictively. It does not serve to correct mere differences between legal systems. Foreign law is generally applied even if it deviates significantly from national law. Only if the result of its application would lead to a fundamental conflict with central principles of the domestic legal system can public policy intervene.
There is an example from German case law in which EuErbVO was corrected by the principle of public policy. A British citizen was living in Germany. According to EuErbVO, which also applied to the UK at the time, German inheritance law was therefore legally applicable to his succession. However, in this specific case, he did not want to apply German compulsory inheritance law. To avoid the compulsory portion, he therefore chose to apply British law to his succession by means of the permissible choice of law.
After his death, a legal dispute arose in Germany because a beneficiary of the compulsory portion objected to the application of British law and demanded his compulsory portion under German inheritance law. The German Federal Court of Justice concluded that German inheritance law should apply in this case despite the permissible choice of law. This is particularly the case if the chosen law does not provide for a minimum share for close relatives comparable to German compulsory inheritance law and disadvantages the respective relatives (as in the present case).
The Federal Court of Justice ruled that, if there is a sufficient domestic connection (eg, habitual residence and assets in Germany), the complete disinheritance of a child under English law may violate German public policy if the child does not receive a compulsory portion independent of need. The problem here is that, in principle, EuErbVO allows this choice of law. Nevertheless, public policy remains an important instrument of security. It ensures that international private law does not lead to the undermining of fundamental principles of national law.
Sharia and public policy?
Sharia may be a relevant case of application also potentially subject to the public policy reservation: if the application of Islamic inheritance law in individual cases leads to results that are incompatible with fundamental principles of German law, in particular the principle of equal treatment (eg, discrimination against female heirs), foreign law will not be applied in this respect. In particular, the unequal treatment of heirs based on gender or religion, and the absence of compulsory portion claims, may regularly constitute a violation of German public policy.
Consequences for international succession advice
For international advisers, this means that although the provisions of the EU Succession Regulation are primarily decisive when structuring cross-border successions, it should always be checked as to whether the application of the chosen law could lead to results that would be incompatible with fundamental principles of the relevant legal system. In such cases, there is at least a theoretical risk that a court will refuse to apply individual provisions on the grounds of a violation of public policy.
International inheritance tax law
In addition to inheritance law issues, the tax treatment of succession also plays a central role. Unlike civil law, there is no comprehensive international harmonisation in the area of inheritance tax. Each country has its own regulations on the taxation of inheritances and gifts. German inheritance tax is a wealth tax – ie, it is not the estate that is taxed, but the individual wealth of each person. Accordingly, each recipient has their own allowance and pays inheritance tax according to the progressive tax rate. From a German perspective, it therefore makes sense to transfer the estate assets to many different persons. Germany levies both inheritance tax and gift tax. Both taxes are largely identical in structure and generally cover transfers of assets free of charge.
Basis for tax liability
Tax liability can arise from several different bases. Unlimited tax liability applies in particular if the deceased or the acquirer has their domicile or habitual residence in Germany. In this case, the worldwide assets are generally subject to German inheritance tax.
In addition, there is limited tax liability for certain assets located in Germany. These include:
Accounts with German banks and cash are not included. These regulations mean that foreign heirs may also be subject to German inheritance tax if they acquire assets in Germany.
The problem of international double taxation
A key challenge in international inheritance tax law is the risk of double taxation. Since several countries can claim tax liability at the same time, there is a possibility that a transfer of assets will be taxed multiple times.
A classic example is the case of a German entrepreneur residing abroad who dies. The country of residence can tax the entire estate, while Germany simultaneously levies a tax on assets located in Germany.
To avoid such double taxation, some countries have concluded double taxation agreements for inheritance tax. However, Germany has only concluded such agreements with a few countries, including:
However, there are no such agreements with many important economic partners, including numerous EU countries.
In cases where there is no double taxation agreement, a unilateral relief provision applies under German law. Under certain conditions, foreign inheritance taxes can be credited against German tax. Although this does not result in double taxation, the higher tax rate of the two countries involved prevails. Careful tax planning is therefore necessary for international succession structures.
Significance of double taxation agreements
Existing double taxation agreements for inheritance tax generally follow certain basic principles. A distinction is often made between different types of assets – for example between immovable property, business assets and other assets. Real estate is usually taxed in the country where it is located, while movable assets are often attributed to the country of residence of the deceased. Company shareholdings may be treated differently depending on their structure.
Crediting of comparable taxes
If there is no double taxation agreement, only the other tax is credited. From a German perspective, foreign inheritance taxes are only credited at the request of the acquirer if the foreign assets are subject to inheritance tax both abroad and in Germany, and no double taxation agreement applies. The prerequisite is that the foreign tax corresponds to German inheritance tax – ie, it is triggered by death and applies to the estate upon transfer. Capital gains tax incurred in the event of the death of a testator is not creditable. In such cases, double taxation occurs. If the taxes are not comparable, only deduction as an estate liability is possible. The foreign tax must be assessed, paid and not subject to any reduction. Proof must be provided by means of documents. If the other foreign country does not levy the tax, it cannot be credited either.
Double taxation in an international context
In a German-Spanish inheritance case, double taxation that was prevented neither by a double taxation agreement nor by the ECJ occurred. An heiress resident in Germany inherited, among other things, a capital claim from a Spanish bank from her mother, who was also resident in Germany. This resulted in double taxation of the claim because it was subject to inheritance tax in Spain, and to worldwide asset taxation in Germany. However, the Spanish tax was not credited against the German inheritance tax because, in this case, the tax does not apply to so-called foreign assets within the meaning of the German Inheritance Tax Act. The tax office allowed the Spanish tax to be deducted as an estate liability, but not to be credited against the German tax. There is no double taxation agreement. The ECJ ruled that EU law does not provide for any obligation to credit foreign inheritance tax and that double taxation results from the parallel exercise of national taxation powers. Such cases should therefore be identified at an early stage in order to avoid double taxation through asset restructuring.
Cross-border business succession
The international dimension of succession planning affects not only the private assets of entrepreneurs, but also the structure of companies themselves. Many German family businesses operate internationally and have subsidiaries in several countries.
Additional tax and legal issues may arise when transferring such corporate structures. These include, for example:
This provision can have a significant impact on international succession planning, especially if entrepreneurs wish to relocate their residence as part of asset structuring.
Of particular relevance in this context is what is known as exit taxation. If a shareholder with significant holdings in a German corporation moves his or her residence abroad, a notional capital gains tax may be triggered. The aim of this regulation is to prevent the tax-free transfer of hidden reserves abroad.
Co-ordination of company law, inheritance law and tax law
The greatest challenge in international succession planning often lies in co-ordinating different areas of law. A company's corporate law regulations must be aligned with inheritance law requirements and tax requirements.
In many cases, the articles of association of German family businesses contain specific succession clauses, such as entry rights for certain family members or restrictions on the transfer of shares. These provisions must be compatible with the inheritance law regulations of the countries involved.
In addition, tax consequences both at home and abroad must be taken into account. In international constellations, it is generally not sufficient to consider individual legal systems in isolation.
Conclusion
The international dimension of German succession planning is becoming increasingly important. Cross-border asset structures, internationally active companies and mobile entrepreneurial families mean that succession arrangements often affect several legal systems at the same time.
Particularly relevant here are questions of international inheritance law, compulsory portion regulations and international inheritance tax law. The risk of double taxation and differing legal frameworks can have a significant impact on the structure of a succession.
It is therefore essential for foreign advisers to have a thorough understanding of German regulations and their international integration. Only through a co-ordinated consideration of company law, inheritance law and tax law can a long-term, stable and tax-efficient succession structure be developed.
Fritz-Schäffer-Straße 1
53113 Bonn
North Rhine-Westphalia
Germany
+49 228 9594 0
bonn@fgs.de www.fgs.de