Like the global M&A market, the Portuguese M&A market continued to be affected throughout 2024 by the slow decrease of inflation and interest rates, and by the consequent high cost of capital.

This economic backdrop continued to lead to lower deal volumes and lower company valuations in most sectors in the first nine months of 2024. In fact, transaction opportunities are being more thoroughly pondered and analysed by potential buyers/investors, which also leads to more slow-paced transactions.

Even though in the last 12 months the technology M&A sector in Portugal has not experienced substantial growth in aggregate terms (ie, encompassing both domestic and cross-border transactions), it continues to be the second most attractive and dynamic sector in Portugal for investments and M&A opportunities, ranking only after the real estate sector and ahead of other attractive sectors (such as renewable energy). In the first nine months of 2024, there was a significant increase in foreign acquisitions in the technology and internet subsectors, when compared to 2023 (as per Transactional Track Record’s 3T 2024 Iberian Market Report, available here). This is due in part to the increased global market demand for digital transition, which is a pillar of the Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRR), and in part to the innovative companies and highly qualified talent in the Portuguese ecosystem.

Even though in 2023 and in 2024 there has been a continuous shift from a sellers’ market to a more balanced market, a valuation gap between potential sellers and buyers persists. This has led to an increased use of price adjustment mechanisms (such as earn-outs) as well as dual-phased acquisition processes – where buyers first acquire an initial stake in the target company and the remainder at a later stage, usually with an updated valuation.

In the venture capital sector – and considering that the above-mentioned economic backdrop has not yet been fully overcome – one continues to witness a substantial number of bridge/extension rounds with existing investors, so as to attend to the (more urgent) funding requirements of start-ups.

Finally, growing importance can be seen being given to responsible business (environmental, social and governance – ESG) practices, social entrepreneurship, the blue/green economy and compliance, due also to recently enacted EU legislation (such as the Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence – CSDDD).

Typically, if the new start-up’s base of operations is in Portugal, that is where entrepreneurs (Portuguese or foreign) will seek to incorporate the company. Compared to other EU jurisdictions, the incorporation of a new company in Portugal is a quick and simple process. If handled efficiently, the process can be completed within two to three weeks.

The initial capital requirement for the incorporation of a limited liability company by quotas (sociedade por quotas) (LLCQ) is EUR1 for companies with a single quotaholder and EUR2 for companies with two quotaholders.

The initial capital requirement for incorporating a limited liability company by shares (sociedade anónima) (LLC) is EUR50,000.

As a rule, entrepreneurs are advised to establish an LLCQ at the first stage, since the initial capital requirements are lower, and the corporate structure and governance are less complex.

The early-stage financing available in Portugal takes many forms and involves a variety of investors, including:

• business angels;
• Portuguese venture capital funds, some of which are sponsored by government-sponsored funds and the European Investment Fund; and
• foreign venture capital funds.

Funding is also available through seeding and acceleration programmes (such as Fábrica de StartUps, StartUp Braga, Startup Leiria, Startup Lisboa, Maze X (an impact accelerator) and Fábrica de Unicórnios (directed at scale-ups)) as well as through international accelerators (such as Techstars). Typically, investments are made in exchange for equity or convertible instruments, so the underlying documentation is a standard term sheet that contains the general terms and conditions of the long-form investment documents. Examples include:

• simple agreements for future equity (SAFEs) and convertible loan agreements (CLAs) in the case of convertibles; and
• investment and shareholder agreements in the case of equity.

Please see 2.3 Early-Stage Financing. Portuguese venture capital and government-sponsored funds are available in Portugal. These have included the Venture Capital part of the “Consolidar” programme launched by Banco Português de Fomento in 2022, further to which 16 management companies were chosen to manage funds partially funded under the Portuguese Recovery and Resilience Plan (PRR) totalling up to EUR400 million, as well as the “Co-investment Deal by Deal” programme totalling up to EUR200 million, which enables a public fund managed by Banco Português de Fomento to directly perform venture capital co-investments along with private investors.

In addition, foreign venture capital firms are also increasingly and actively investing in Portugal. The fact that Portugal is one of the largest tech and start-up hubs in Europe (the Web Summit is held in Lisbon and there are currently six unicorns with Portuguese DNA) continues to attract the attention of foreign tech investors, as outlined in 1.1 Technology M&A Market.

Furthermore, a statute enacted in 2023 is designed to support and promote R&D companies (especially start-ups and scale-ups) and, among others, provides for tax benefits applicable to the stock options granted by start-ups. These tax benefits were further broadened in 2024, by including stock attributed by entities in a group, control or affiliate relationship with the start-up, regardless of geographical location. A reduced 12.5% corporate income tax rate applicable to the first EUR50,000 of start-ups’ taxable base (subject to EU de minimis rules and to the cumulative fulfilment of certain specific requirements) was also introduced in 2024.

In contrast with the UK and USA, which have standard model legal documents for venture capital funding established by the BVCA and NVCA, Portugal does not have such guidelines. Even so, Portuguese market practices closely follow international market standards and developments, from seed to late stage.

A new start-up company is usually incorporated in Portugal as an LLCQ, as described in 2.1 Establishing a New Company and 2.2 Type of Entity. As the start-up grows and attracts more investors, the LLCQ generally transforms into an LLC, which will:

• be able to issue different types of securities (including warrants convertible into shares);
• have a more sophisticated governance structure; and
• have the possibility of an initial public offering (IPO), which is not possible with LLCQs.

There are instances where a holding company may be incorporated in a foreign country (such as the USA or UK) for fundraising purposes while keeping the operational/subsidiary company in Portugal.

Portuguese capital markets have not been very active in terms of IPOs of Portuguese start-ups, so investors should expect a sale process instead of an IPO. As for dual-track processes, and although this is something that the Portuguese market and its players are aware of as a possible option, the choice between a sale and an IPO is usually made at the outset.

A company’s decision to list in a particular country will depend on its characteristics. A company with a global profile and market may choose a country with an internationally recognised market. Other companies may still prefer to list in Portugal. In any case, considering the Portuguese regulated market is Euronext Lisbon, a listing in Portugal provides access to other Euronext markets.

If a company chooses to list on a foreign exchange, this could bring more complexity to future transactions, as two legal frameworks will apply to the same company. As an example, this may complicate a future sale, since some jurisdictions apply a squeeze-out mechanism based on the country in which the company is listed and others based on where its registered office is located. As a result, sometimes neither regime applies. In a past transaction that involved a takeover of a Portuguese company listed in Spain, neither of the squeeze-out mechanisms was expressly applicable, and an ad hoc mechanism had to be agreed between the two regulators to allow minorities to exit the company, should the takeover be successful (which did not occur).

Even though both the auction and the bilateral negotiation are usual sale processes, the auction/competitive process is typically launched when the transaction has a significant/higher magnitude that justifies the underlying costs, and when the seller has specific timings in mind for the execution of the sale. Additionally, the auction process can be used by the sellers to increase competitive pressure for the potential buyers and to obtain better terms for the sale.

A sale chosen as a liquidity event is normally a sale of the majority of the share capital of the start-up company or a sale of all founder stock. In this scenario, venture capital investors have all sorts of typical exit options – including right of first refusal, drag-along and tag-along – and the sale of the entire company or the maintenance of the venture capital investors as shareholders will depend on the venture capital’s and buyer’s will.

Most transactions in Portugal are performed as sale of the entire company for cash. Stock-for-stock transactions are not very common in this jurisdiction.

Founders together with the start-up company are usually expected to stand behind representations, warranties and certain liabilities after closing. As a general rule, venture capital investors are only required to provide fundamental warranties, such as title and capacity. In Portugal, escrow/holdback or representations and warranties insurance is not customary for venture capital investment rounds. When dealing specifically with liquidity events (ie, sale of a majority or the entirety of the share capital of the company that entails the exit by venture capital investors), these mechanisms are more customary and in line with general M&A market practice.

In general terms, spin-offs are a common mechanism in Portugal for separating and ring-fencing a specific business unit. The key drivers for a spin-off are normally the separation and isolation of a specific business unit, with its subsequent development and specialisation through its own focused management and specialist employees.

Portuguese tax law provides for a special tax neutrality scheme for certain operations performed as part of group reorganisations, including all types of demerger, merger and demerger-merger (and asset transfers). Consequently, spin-offs can generally be structured as a tax-free transaction both at the corporate and shareholder levels, provided that the applicable conditions, requirements and formalities are met.

Among other conditions, this scheme applies only to operations performed for sound economic reasons – ie, not for tax reasons. In broad terms, more practical tax requirements require that the assets and liabilities transferred maintain their tax value, while shareholders must also maintain (for tax purposes) the original acquisition value of the shareholdings, as well as the original acquisition dates. Tax neutrality in demergers or asset transfers usually requires the transfer of autonomous business units.

A spin-off immediately followed by a business combination is possible and is one of the types of spin-offs permitted under Portuguese law (cisão-fusão). The key requirements are:

• the preparation of a demerger-merger plan (projeto cisão-fusão);
• its registration and publication; and
• its subsequent approval by each of the participating companies’ shareholders, followed by the definitive registry.

Typically, a spin-off takes about four months to complete, taking into account the preparation and submission of the necessary corporate documents and the observance of legal interim periods, such as the deadline for creditors to oppose the transaction (which was extended from one month to three months in the beginning of 2024). The spin-off of a company does not require a ruling from the tax authority.

The decision to acquire a minority stake in a Portuguese public company prior to making an offer depends on the target’s shareholder structure, as well as on the transaction structure. This is usually considered as one of the transaction structure options, as it may allow the acquisition of an initial stake at a cheaper price, and may limit the size of the offer and ensure the sale by reference shareholders before launching the offer. However, it also has disadvantages to consider, such as setting a minimum price for the offer or triggering acting in concert, which must be considered in the offer structure (please also refer to 6.6 Deal Documentation).

The minimum reporting threshold in Portugal is 5% of voting rights legally attributed to the holder (which may include other shares/voting rights controlled but not directly held by the holder). Disclosure of the purpose of the acquisition and other similar information is required only when a takeover bid is launched, and not when minority stakes are disclosed.

There is a mandatory offer threshold of one third and 50% of voting rights corresponding to the share capital, directly held or legally attributable to the potential offeror. The launch of the bid is not required if the potential bidder evidences to the Portuguese Securities Market Commission (CMVM) that it does not have control (influência dominante) over the target.

The most common types of acquisitions and mergers are takeovers and mergers. There are not many merger precedents, but the two most significant precedents are related to the technology sector.

Please see 6.3 Transaction Structures. The use of cash in merger transactions is subject to strict restrictions. The minimum price requirements are applicable to mandatory takeovers, generally in line with the takeover directive. The consideration in a mandatory takeover may not be less than the highest of the following amounts:

• the highest price paid by the bidder or by any related person (including control relationships, acting in concert, etc) for the acquisition of securities in the same class, or that the bidder or any of such persons undertook to pay, within the six months immediately preceding the date of publication of the preliminary announcement of the bid;
• the average price of the shares, calculated on a regulated market during the same period (weighted average price); or
• as determined by an independent expert, in certain cases.

Contingent value rights are not common in this type of transaction.

The most common conditions are regulatory and competition clearances (conditions to launch) and success conditions (conditions to complete). The acceptance condition is typically to acquire at least more than 50% of the shares of the company. Regulators usually look carefully at unusual conditions and restrict conditions that depend on the offeror. In addition to conditions, the offer is usually also subject to assumptions relating to the absence of material adverse changes in the target or market, etc.

Unlike in voluntary bids, no conditions (other than legal conditions, such as regulatory or competition authorisations or approvals) may be imposed on the launch of a mandatory takeover offer.

Transaction agreements in connection with the takeover offer or business combination are not very common considering the legal restrictions and implications, including the Market Abuse Regulation (which may require disclosure to the market) and acting-in-concert provisions that may trigger aggregation of voting rights between the parties.

In a recent precedent, agreements for shares acquisition were entered into by the offeror with certain major shareholders of the target, subject to certain conditions, ahead of the bid. This type of arrangement must be carefully structured and preferably discussed with the regulator to avoid triggering acting-in-concert provisions (and potentially a mandatory takeover bid).

The most common minimum acceptance condition is more than 50% of the voting rights, as explored in 6.5 Common Conditions for a Takeover Offer/Tender Offer.

The threshold is 90% of voting rights, further to a tender offer. The offeror may acquire the remaining shares within three months at the price offered in the bid (or higher if the offeror acquired shares at a higher price). In contrast with a takeover bid, a squeeze-out does not depend on the acceptance of an offer by the shareholders. The controlling shareholder who decides to squeeze out the minority shareholders must immediately publish a preliminary announcement and submit it to the CMVM for registration. A squeeze-out involves the immediate exclusion of shares from trading on a regulated market.

Funds must be provided by deposit, bank guarantee, undertaking to pay or other similar means accepted by the regulator in order to register and launch the offer.

The general rule is that directors need to act in the interest of the company and that the offerors (if there are competing offers) need to be treated equally. Break-up fees are increasingly used in private M&A transactions, but not in takeovers. In the case of mergers, the board needs to take the transaction to the general meeting for approval. In general, Portuguese law is more restrictive in measures that would negatively affect the deal – for example, the board is generally subject to the “stand still” rule during an offer, rather than to protecting it.

If 100% ownership of the target is not acquired, and assuming that the articles of association of the target do not establish higher thresholds, the acquisition of a stake representing more than 50% of the voting rights in a Portuguese company will allow the acquirer to individually decide on the composition of the company’s governing bodies (namely the board of directors), approval of accounts, etc. The acquisition of a stake representing more than two thirds of the voting rights will also enable the acquirer to approve the more structural matters concerning the company – eg, the amendment of articles of association, merger, demerger, capital increase, etc. The relevant votes for these matters are the votes cast, so in practice a lower holding (depending on the usual general meeting attendance) may also enable such approvals.

It is common to have statements from major shareholders confirming whether they will sell in the offer and whether they support the transaction. These commitments may have certain caveats/conditions including in relation to competing bids.

The CMVM needs to approve the prospectus and register the offer. The offeror needs to submit a draft prospectus within 20 days of the preliminary announcement of the offer. The CMVM then has eight days to review the offer documentation, but in practice this is an interactive process that will take several weeks. If the offer is subject to conditions to launch, these may delay the process for several months. A competing offer may only be launched up to the fifth day before the end of the first offer period, and both offer periods must finish on the same date, so adjustments to the calendar may be required.

It is typical for parties to obtain regulatory and competition clearances between announcement and launch. In fact, these are usually legal conditions to launch. Hence, they do not usually affect the offer period length.

The regulation will depend on the type of technology industry at stake. For example, the setting-up and starting of operations of information and communications technology (ICT) companies in Portugal in sectors such as media and electronic communications is subject to specific regulations. The National Communications Authority (ANACOM) and the Portuguese Regulatory Authority for the Media (Entidade Reguladora para a Comunicação Social – ERC) are the regulatory bodies involved in the approval of provision of media (radio and television broadcasting) or electronic communications networks and services.

Companies present in the market with offers that fall under the category of electronic communications networks and/or services must undergo certain procedures to provide their networks/services. If the provision of the latter does not require spectrum or numbering resources, companies may start operating immediately after notifying ANACOM of their intention to provide those networks or services, in accordance with the procedure set out in the relevant regulations. If the provision of the network or service requires radio frequencies or numbering resources subject to licensing/rights of use, licensing may take up to eight months (in the case of spectrum) or 30 business days (for numbering resources) to obtain.

Television activity is subject to licensing by means of a public tender launched by the government when the use of radio spectrum is required, and the service consists of:

• the organisation of unconditional-access television programme services; and
• the selection and aggregation of television programme services of conditional access or non-conditional access with subscription.

In such circumstances, it may take up to eight months to obtain the licence.

The provision of television services is subject to authorisation, at the request of interested parties, if it consists of the organisation of television programme services that:

• do not require the use of radio spectrum intended for broadcasting; and
• are intended to be included in the offer of a distribution operator previously licensed for television activity.

No specific deadline is established for the issuance of the ERC’s approval.

The CMVM is Portugal’s primary securities market regulator for public M&A transactions.

The Portuguese government may exceptionally oppose investments made by residents outside the EU or the European Economic Area (EEA), or made by legal entities directly or indirectly controlled by residents outside the EU or EEA, that directly or indirectly allow direct or indirect control over strategic assets, which are defined as key infrastructures or assets related to defence and national security or to the provision of essential services in the energy, transportation or communications sectors.

There is no mandatory notification procedure. Nonetheless, the prospective buyer may, on a voluntary basis, request an ex ante confirmation that an opposition decision will not be adopted. If the government does not begin an assessment procedure within 30 business days of the date of the request, a non-opposition decision is deemed to have been tacitly adopted.

Unless an ex ante confirmation is requested, a review of the transaction can be conducted by the government ex officio within 30 business days of the conclusion of the transaction or the date it becomes public. This ex officio procedure does not have suspensory effect. However, if an opposition decision is adopted, all legal acts and transactions relating to the transaction in question will be considered null and void.

There are no foreign capital entry restrictions or export control regulations in this jurisdiction, and Portuguese law does not allow any discrimination between investments based on nationality. In fact, the Portuguese legal framework is in line with the EU guidelines (except for Russian investment restrictions as sanctions following the war in Ukraine), which point to non-discrimination of investment on the grounds of nationality. Therefore, the Portuguese legal framework encourages foreign investments.

In line with this openness to foreign investment, Portugal also maintains specific security standards for sensitive sectors, particularly in electronic communications. Resolution No 1/2023 of the Portuguese Commission for Security Assessment (CAS) outlines criteria for assessing security risks related to 5G technology in publicly available electronic communications networks. This measure, which was adopted in line with Article 62(3) of the Electronic Communications Law (Law No 16/2022, enacted on 16 August), provides a framework for identifying and mitigating security threats related to 5G equipment and services, ensuring safe technological growth within an open investment environment.

Resolution No 1/2023 introduces several essential considerations that may be relevant for M&A transactions in Portugal involving electronic communications operators, while respecting the country’s non-discriminatory stance towards foreign investment.

• Companies wishing to acquire electronic communications operators are required to carry out thorough due diligence, particularly regarding the target company’s security posture, in line with the 5G security criteria.
• Following an acquisition, operators will be required to meet the security standards set by the due diligence. This may require acquiring companies to invest in infrastructure upgrades or adjust operational practices to ensure compliance with national security guidelines.

This CAS Resolution is facing legal challenges, as Huawei Portugal filed an administrative action aiming to safeguard its legal rights. This company contends that the CAS Resolution violates its rights and has a significant negative impact on its operations and partners. According to publicly available information, this administrative proceeding is still pending.

The outcome of this case could have implications for future M&A activities in Portugal’s electronic communications sector, particularly concerning the involvement of non-EU, non-NATO or non-OECD-based companies.

Takeover offers are reportable to the Portuguese Competition Authority when they determine a change of control in the target company and meet one of the following criteria:

• the transaction creates or reinforces a market share in excess of 50%;
• the transaction creates or reinforces a market share in excess of 30%, and each of the parties achieves a turnover of at least EUR5 million in Portugal; and/or
• the parties to the transaction achieve a combined turnover of at least EUR100 million in Portugal, and each of the parties achieves a turnover of at least EUR5 million in the country.

In the case of a transfer of undertaking, the employment contracts are automatically transferred to the new employer by operation of law. The transferor and the acquirer must inform the employees’ representative body and the employees covered by the transfer, in writing, of:

• the date, reasons and consequences of the transfer for the employees; and
• the measures to be taken (if any) concerning the employees.

They must also begin a consultation period with the employees’ representative body to reach an agreement on the measures to be applied to the employees as a result of the transfer. The information and consultation process should be initiated in advance of the transfer, but the employees’ representative body opinion is not binding on the employer. However, the consultation must be conducted in good faith, and the employees’ representative body input should be considered in the decision-making process. If there are no measures to be applied due to the transfer, then the consultation stage may not take place.

The information and consultation process must be documented and shared with relevant parties, including employees, even if no agreement is reached on the measures affecting employees due to the transfer.

The acquirer will be responsible for all employment obligations and liabilities that arose prior to the transfer date. Employees covered by the transfer are entitled to maintain their existing employment contracts with the same terms and conditions under the new employer.

Employees have the right to oppose the transfer of their employment contracts where they have reasonable grounds to believe that the transfer could cause them serious harm. In the event of a share deal, employees remain employed by the same legal entity (the company being acquired).

No currency control regulation or central bank approval applies for an M&A transaction, except when it comes to financial regulated entities.

Litigation in M&A and technology mainly takes place before arbitral tribunals, and as arbitral decisions are not made public, there are no significant public court decisions relating to technology M&A.

When providing information regarding technology companies, it is important to determine whether the company has certain statutory or compliance rules in place (eg, ISO 27001 certification) which may prevent disclosure of specific information to external parties.

From a capital markets perspective, the same level of information must be provided to all bidders. Moreover, the Market Abuse Regulation applies, and therefore no inside information should, in principle, be shared with bidders (some exceptions may apply). Inside information consists of information that:

• has not been made public;
• relates, directly or indirectly, to the target or a financial instrument; and
• would be likely to have a significant impact on the prices of those financial instruments or on the prices of related derivative financial instruments if it were made public.

If any inside information is shared, the receivers of that information cannot trade the shares or other financial instruments of the target until such information is made public or is no longer relevant.

Sharing commercially sensitive information may create competition law concerns where the public company is competing with a bidder or with more than one bidder. In such cases, commercially sensitive information regarding current or future prices, volumes, rebates or any other commercially sensitive information should only be shared between advisers.

If the due diligence requires the transfer of data to countries outside the EU/EEA, the disclosing and receiving parties must adopt the Standard Contractual Clauses to provide appropriate safeguards for such transfers pursuant to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Regarding transfers of personal data between the EU and the USA, based on the adequacy decision for the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, personal data can flow freely from the EU to companies in the USA that participate in the Data Privacy Framework.

Furthermore, disclosure of personal data must be done in accordance with the GDPR regarding the purpose and basis for the processing of personal data, and following the principle of minimisation and information when providing to data subjects.

In addition, if the technology company operates a critical digital infrastructure, access to personal data during the due diligence cannot compromise the security of network and information systems of the company.

The takeover bid is announced through a preliminary announcement, which must be disclosed as soon as a final decision is taken to bid. A final decision is considered as having been taken when all essential elements, including price, have been determined (price and structure test). Although there are no express “put up or shut up” rules in Portugal, the CMVM has previously made potential bidders (and potential competing bidders) disclose their intentions to the market. Up to that moment, all persons involved in the process have a legal obligation of non-disclosure.

In general, a prospectus is required for the issuance of shares in a stock-for-stock takeover offer or business combination, but there may be exemptions in accordance with the Prospectus Regulation or if another document containing the relevant information is available. The prospectus of a takeover bid must contain complete, truthful, up-to-date, clear, objective and lawful information, including:

• the identification and registered office of the offeror and the issuer;
• the identification and specific characteristics of the securities being offered;
• the type of offer;
• the consideration offered, its justification and payment conditions;
• the minimum and maximum quantities of securities that the offeror proposes to acquire;
• the term of the offer; and
• the conditions of effectiveness to which the bid is subject, among other requirements defined in the Portuguese Securities Code.

In a takeover, the bidder generally does not need to produce specific accounts or include them in the prospectus. There is a general requirement for listed companies to prepare their accounts in IFRS-EU format.

In a takeover bid, the offer documents (preliminary announcement, prospectus and possibly other ancillary documents) are published, as is a report for the target’s board of directors on the merits of the bid. After the offer period, the results of the offer are also published.

Directors are generally bound by two fundamental duties – the duty of care and the duty of loyalty, which are also applicable to business combinations. They must fulfil these duties diligently, in good faith and for the company’s benefit, taking into account the interests of the shareholders, employees, creditors and other stakeholders.

In a limited liability company by shares (LLC), the board may establish an executive committee to which certain management powers will be delegated (and which is, inter alia, typically in charge of negotiating and implementing business combinations), as well as specialised committees. In the case of listed companies, the most typical specialised committees are on corporate governance, remuneration, evaluation, appointments and risk, as recommended by the Portuguese Corporate Governance Code. In certain regulated sectors, specialised committees (such as remuneration, risk and selection committees) are legally required.

The shareholders may, in turn, create and appoint a remuneration committee, which will be responsible for establishing and managing the remuneration policy for the company’s corporate bodies, including the directors.

The board is generally not limited to a recommending role, and can be actively involved in the negotiations. However, in the case of a takeover, which is launched over a listed company, the Portuguese Securities Code provides for a board neutrality rule, applicable in most cases. This rule stipulates that as soon as the board of directors becomes aware that a bid will be launched to acquire more than one third of a specific category of the company’s shares, and until or before the conclusion of the takeover process, the board of directors cannot make any decisions that could significantly impact on the bidder’s objectives outside the normal management of the company. This rule can be bypassed, however, by a decision of the shareholders’ general meeting expressly convened for the purpose of deciding on such actions and approved by two thirds of votes issued.

Nevertheless, the board of directors plays a very important role in the takeover process over a listed company, as it is required to issue a report on the terms and conditions of the takeover bid that must be shared with the bidder and with the CMVM and must be published within eight days of receipt of the draft prospectus. This report must contain an autonomous and reasoned opinion on, at least:

• the type and amount of the consideration offered;
• the offeror’s strategic plans for the target company;
• the repercussions of the bid on the interests of the target company, in general, and in particular on the interests of its employees and their terms of employment, as well as the locations where the company carries out its activity; and
• the intentions of the members of the management body, who are simultaneously shareholders in the target company, as to the acceptance of the bid.

Shareholder activism is not significant in Portugal, especially due to the fact that most M&A transactions are made in alignment with the majority shareholders’ interests.

Directors usually seek independent outside advice in mid- to high-profile business combinations to allow them to analyse the potential implications of a transaction.

Normally, independent outside advice is obtained from legal and tax advisers, auditors, accountants, investment banks, strategic consultants or consultants specialising in certain fields of expertise (such as intellectual property – IP). Financial advice is usually sought for:

• the structuring of the deal;
• the due diligence; and
• input in the drafting and negotiation of the transaction documents.

Financial advisers can also be asked by the board to issue a fairness opinion.