Trade Marks
In Bangladesh, the key legal framework for trade marks is the Trademarks Act, 2009, delineating registration procedures, conferred rights, and infringement mechanisms. The Trade Marks Rules, 2015 complement this by detailing practical aspects of trade mark registration.
Copyright
In Bangladesh, the Copyright Act, 2023 safeguards creators’ and owners’ rights for original software, literary, artistic and musical works. It sets conditions for protection, outlines copyright owners’ rights, and provides remedies for infringement.
Unregistered Rights
While primarily following a statutory approach, Bangladesh also recognises unregistered trade marks under specific circumstances. The Trademarks Act incorporates “passing off”, protecting unregistered trade marks based on common law principles and international treaties.
Bangladesh is a party to several international treaties and conventions related to intellectual property, including trade marks and copyrights. These include:
In Bangladesh, the rights of foreign trade mark and copyright holders are governed by both domestic laws and international agreements.
Domestic Law
Under domestic law, foreign trade mark owners are protected under the Trademarks Act, 2009. This legislation provides a framework for the registration and protection of trade marks, applicable to both domestic and foreign entities. The rights conferred by trade mark registration apply equally to foreign trade mark holders. The newly enacted Copyright Act, 2023 extends protection to foreign copyright holders, outlining conditions for copyright protection without discrimination based on nationality. Foreign authors and creators enjoy the same rights as their Bangladeshi counterparts.
International Agreements
The following international agreements apply in Bangladesh:
In Bangladesh, the legal system acknowledges and safeguards various trade mark and source identifier categories.
Types of trade mark include:
A wide range of source identifiers can be registered and protected, including words, images, sounds, shapes and colours.
Bangladesh lacks specific statutory protections beyond the Trademarks Act framework. However, it allows protection for well-known trade marks, preventing their use in unrelated classes. Bangladesh also recognises well-known or famous marks, even if not in use or registered, extending protection under the famous marks doctrine.
Elements necessary to qualify for trade mark protection include:
Marks lacking inherent distinctiveness may acquire it through extensive use. To prove acquired distinctiveness or secondary meaning, there must be:
In Bangladesh, trade mark owners enjoy specific rights as stipulated by statute, primarily governed by the Trademarks Act, 2009. The key rights encompass:
In Bangladesh, establishing a trade mark’s use requires meeting specific requirements, demonstrating its use in connection with goods or services. To prove use, one must show actual commercial use in Bangladesh, specifically tied to the registered or sought-for goods or services. Meeting the trade mark use requirements in Bangladesh necessitates demonstrating distinct and ongoing commercial use, indicating the mark’s origin in commercial transactions. Continuous and bona fide use underscores the mark’s ongoing significance.
There are no specific legal requirements for using symbols such as ® or the trade mark symbol to denote trade mark ownership. However, their usage is common and holds practical value. Practical purposes served by these symbols include providing notice of registration status or asserting trade mark rights.
The consequences of not providing notice are limited in Bangladesh but the use of symbols can be beneficial in legal proceedings, aiding in establishing notice. Unlike in some jurisdictions, there is no legal presumption of notice due to the ® symbol in Bangladesh, subject to judicial interpretation.
In Bangladesh, trade marks and copyright represent distinct intellectual property rights. The following highlights key considerations regarding the nexus between trade marks, copyright and related rights in Bangladesh:
Protection of Trade Marks and Copyright
Trade marks, governed by the Trademarks Act, 2009, may extend protection to logos and artistic elements through copyright laws. Original logos meeting copyright criteria can enjoy dual protection.
Interaction With Moral Rights Laws
For trade marks featuring surnames, the connection with moral rights laws in Bangladesh is indirect. Concerns primarily revolve around distinctiveness, consumer confusion and registration challenges.
Limitations on Trade Mark Laws Based on Copyright or Related Rights
Though overlap occurs, trade mark and copyright protection operate under distinct frameworks. Trade mark laws focus on distinctiveness, while copyright safeguards original works, including artistic ones. Protection criteria differ, with trade marks emphasising distinctiveness and commercial use, while copyright requires originality and tangible fixation. Logos and trade mark elements often coexist, enabling comprehensive brand identity protection.
Practical Considerations
Owners should consider both trade mark and copyright registration for comprehensive protection. Legal actions may involve both trade mark and copyright laws for infringements.
In summary, while Bangladesh recognises trade marks and copyrights as distinct, overlapping protection exists for logos and artistic elements. Surnames in trade marks are primarily addressed under trade mark laws, with limited moral rights interaction. The coexistence of trade mark and copyright protection offers a holistic approach to safeguarding intellectual property rights.
Copyright protection encompasses a diverse array of works spanning various categories. Works eligible for safeguarding include (non-exhaustively):
Underpinning these rights is the Copyright Act, 2023. Industrial designs, not typically within the purview of copyright, fall under the Designs Act, 2023. These designs, governed by design law, protect visually appealing non-utilitarian objects. Copyright protection automatically arises upon work creation, though registration – while not obligatory – offers enforcement advantages.
In Bangladesh, copyright protection hinges on specific prerequisites. The critical components for securing copyright include the following.
Authorship
Authorship finds its definition within the Copyright Act, 2023. As per statute, the author is the originator of the work. Authorship, for copyright considerations, demands original and creative contributions from an individual. Intellectual effort must be evident in the creation of the work.
Work created by an employee during employment or designated as such by agreement falls under “work made for hire”. In these instances, the employer or the commissioning party assumes authorship.
Bangladesh’s Copyright Act does not explicitly address non-human authors such as AI or animals. The legal acknowledgment of non-human authors remains a complex and evolving area.
Joint Authorship
Joint authorship arises when two or more contributors create a single work with interdependent or inseparable contributions. This demands substantial contributions with an intention that each author’s input forms inseparable parts of the whole. Independent or non-interdependent contributions may not qualify.
Each joint author has the right to exploit the entire work, accounting for profits to other joint authors. Unless agreed otherwise, joint authors can independently exploit the work. Determining ownership percentages in joint authorship can be intricate, relying on the nature of the various contributions. In the absence of an agreement, equal ownership may be presumed, but parties can negotiate varied ownership shares.
In Bangladesh, under the Copyright Act, 2023, copyright owners hold a set of exclusive rights. These rights encompass:
In Bangladesh, copyright protection is generally based on the author’s life plus a specified number of years. The Copyright Act, 2023 specifies the following durations:
It is crucial to understand that copyright protection is finite, and works enter the public domain after the specified term.
Bangladesh has implemented collective rights management systems, mainly for music and performing rights. These systems oversee the collective administration of copyright owner rights. The primary organisation overseeing music rights is the Bangladesh Copyright Office (BCO). It is crucial to acknowledge potential alternative mechanisms for other creative sectors, as the legal landscape may change, introducing new organisations or systems.
Copyright registration in Bangladesh is not mandatory for copyright protection qualification. Protection is automatically granted upon creating a qualifying work; registration is not a prerequisite for basic copyright rights. Despite this, registration offers benefits:
The BCO maintains the copyright register. The register may not be publicly available online; access may involve contacting the BCO. Local and foreign applicant individuals and legal entities – including authors and creators – can register.
In Bangladesh, specific legal requirements for a copyright notice are absent, and the use of copyright symbols is not obligatory for protection validity. Nonetheless, employing such symbols or notices can enhance clarity over rights ownership. Key points on notices and symbols include that Bangladesh does not mandate special copyright notices on works and that, though not legally required, a notice can inform the public about copyright existence and the owner’s identity.
While globally recognised, © is not required for validity in Bangladesh. The term “Copyright” or its abbreviation is also not mandatory but supports in notice.
The Copyright Act, 2023 regulates copyright registration in Bangladesh, overseen by the BCO. Key guidelines for copyright registration are outlined below.
The copyright registration application requirements and procedures are as follows:
The processing time varies, and the BCO may take some time to review and process the application.
Absolute grounds for refusal of registration include:
Applicants can appeal a copyright registration refusal through an administrative appeal, which is an initial appeal to the administrative body and involves addressing concerns or providing additional information. Subsequently, if the administrative appeal fails, further judicial appeal may be an option.
Providing incorrect information in connection with a copyright application can lead to various consequences, typically involving the BCO or relevant authorities.
The consequences for providing incorrect information include rejection or denial. The BCO may refuse registration if the provided information is inaccurate. Providing false information could also have legal consequences, violating legal obligations. Inaccurate information may impact the validity of registration, affecting enforceability of rights.
The BCO reviews applications and may seek clarification or take action. Applicants may appeal or correct inaccuracies, including through amendments or corrections promptly communicated to the BCO. Applicants may also appeal rejections, varying by jurisdiction.
Copyright, trade marks and related rights represent different facets of intellectual property safeguarding, each with distinct functions. Copyright shields original authorship works, trade marks defend unique signs in commerce, and related rights encompass neighbouring rights such as those of performers and musicians.
Overlap and Interaction
Copyright and trade marks can coexist and occasionally overlap. For instance, a logo or graphic design may qualify for both copyright and trade mark protection. Copyright guards expression of ideas in original works, while trade marks protect identifiers (names, logos, slogans) distinguishing goods or services. Copyright and trade mark laws typically operate independently. However, legal considerations arise when both protections relate to a specific subject.
Specific Considerations
Trade dress, involving a product’s visual appearance or packaging, may encompass elements protectable by both copyright and trade mark. Logos, artistic works and commerce’s creative elements can receive copyright protection and function as trade marks identifying the source. Owners may strategically co-ordinate copyright and trade mark rights for comprehensive protection, such as trade mark registration for a brand name alongside copyright protection for artistic elements.
Differences Between Trade Marks and Copyrights
Copyright and trade mark laws operate within distinct legal frameworks, focusing on expression protection and preventing marketplace confusion, respectively. It should also be noted that copyright protection arises automatically, while trade mark protection necessitates registration and commercial use. The enforcement mechanisms for copyright and trade mark infringement differ, prompting separate legal actions for each type of infringement.
In Bangladesh, the acquisition of trade mark rights is tied to the formal registration process. It is necessary to file a trade mark application for registration to use the mark in public and obtain legal protection. The following are the key points for trade mark registration.
Different standards for registration include the following.
Bangladesh has a Trade Marks Registry, and it maintains a register of trade marks. This registry is responsible for receiving and processing trade mark applications, examining their registrability, and maintaining records of registered trade marks. Access to specific information about registered trade marks may require direct communication with the Bangladesh Trade Marks Registry or a visit to its office. There are no specific distinctions between principal and supplemental registers.
It is common and advisable to conduct a thorough search for prior trade marks before applying for registration. Direct inquiries with the Bangladesh Trade Marks Registry can provide information on registered trade marks in the country.
The initial term of trade mark registration in Bangladesh is seven years from the date of filing and ten years thereafter. Trade mark owners have the option to renew their registrations to maintain protection beyond the initial ten-year period.
The renewal application should be filed with the Bangladesh Trade Marks Registry before the expiry of the current registration term. There is typically a grace period (six months) for renewal after the expiry date, but it may be subject to additional fees. After the grace period, it may be possible to file for renewal with additional fees, but this is subject to specific conditions.
Trade mark owners are required to submit a prescribed renewal application along with the prescribed renewal fees.
Trade mark registrations can be updated or refreshed through amendments. Amendments may include changes to the representation of the mark or identification of goods or services. Material alterations from the original mark or the identified goods or services may be subject to certain limitations, and legal advice may be needed to navigate such changes.
The following provides a general overview of the requirements and procedures for applying for the registration of a trade mark in Bangladesh.
Materials
The materials required for an application are:
Application Process Overview
Bangladesh does not currently allow for multi-class trade mark applications.
Trade marks can be registered by individuals, legal entities (such as companies) and trade bodies in Bangladesh.
It is recommended to engage a local attorney or agent familiar with the registration process and requirements.
The application process involves the following steps:
Bangladesh does not strictly require trade mark use in commerce before registration. Application filing is possible without prior use.
Evidence of actual use in commerce may be needed. Proof includes documents demonstrating use and evidence of commercial activity.
Bangladesh does not have a specific grace period requirement. Actual use is still crucial for building and maintaining strong trade mark rights.
The Trade Marks Registry considers existing rights during application examination. This includes registered trade marks and other prior rights affecting registrability.
It is generally possible to make certain amendments or corrections to a trade mark application during the registration process in Bangladesh. The ability to make changes may vary based on the nature of the amendment and the stage of the application process.
For revocation, change, amendment or correction:
With regard to obtaining authority for amendments:
The concept of dividing a trade mark application is not explicitly provided for in the laws and regulations of Bangladesh.
The consequences for providing incorrect information in an application include:
The Trade Marks Registry is typically responsible for examining applications and may initiate actions or raise objections if incorrect information is identified.
In certain situations, the applicant or registrant may be allowed to correct innocent mistakes or inadvertent errors by submitting amendments to the Trade Marks Registry.
Common circumstances under which the registration of a trade mark can be refused on absolute grounds include:
Process for Overcoming Objections
If the Trade Marks Registry raises objections based on absolute grounds, the applicant generally has the opportunity to respond and overcome these objections. The process may involve submitting written arguments, evidence or amendments to address the concerns raised by the Trade Marks Registry. If the Trade Marks Registry is satisfied with the response and considers that the objections have been adequately addressed, the application may proceed to registration.
Bangladesh is not a member of the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks.
A party is permitted to file an opposition to a trade mark application after the application has been published in the official Trade Marks Journal. As per the Trademarks Act, 2009, the opposition period is 60 days from the date of publication. During this period, any person who believes that the registration of the trade mark would adversely affect their rights may file an opposition with the Registrar of Trade Marks.
The law does not allow any extension of time beyond the 60-day opposition period. If an opposition is not filed within this timeframe, the application proceeds towards registration. Additionally, there is no statutory provision for a formal “cooling-off” period in Bangladesh. However, the parties may negotiate and attempt to resolve disputes amicably outside the formal opposition process.
Under the Trademarks Act 2009, some grounds for cancellation are time-sensitive:
For copyrights, there is no strict time limit for cancellation, but challenges based on fraudulent registration should be made as soon as possible to prevent prolonged enforcement of an invalid copyright.
Under the Trademarks Act, 2009 of Bangladesh, an opposition to a trade mark application may be filed on the following grounds:
Opposition must be filed within two months from the date of publication of the application in the Trade Marks Journal as per the Trade Marks Rules, 2015.
Trade Mark Revocation/Cancellation
A registered trade mark in Bangladesh may be cancelled or revoked under the Trademarks Act, 2009 for the following reasons:
The application for cancellation or revocation can be filed with the Registrar of Trade Marks or before the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.
Copyright Revocation/Cancellation
Copyright in Bangladesh is governed by the Copyright Act, 2000. While copyright is generally not subject to cancellation like trade marks, it can be challenged or invalidated in cases such as:
Copyright disputes are generally handled by the Copyright Office or in civil courts.
Expungement or Re-Examination Procedure
Under the Trademarks Act, 2009, an expungement (removal of a trade mark from the register) can be initiated through:
For copyright, there is no formal “re-examination” process after registration, but disputes over ownership or originality can be addressed in court.
Opposition to Trade Mark Registration
Any person may file an opposition to a trade mark application in Bangladesh. The opponent does not necessarily need to be a registered trade mark owner, but they must have a valid interest in the matter, such as prior use of a similar mark, a reputation in the mark, or potential harm from the registration of the opposed mark.
Holding a registered trade mark is not a requirement. An opponent can rely on prior use, reputation or earlier rights in an unregistered mark to oppose a trade mark application. However, having a prior registered trade mark strengthens the case.
While it is not mandatory to have an attorney, it is highly recommended to engage a trade mark attorney or an intellectual property agent to ensure compliance with procedural requirements and strengthen the opposition case.
Revocation/Cancellation of a Trade Mark
The following parties can initiate a cancellation action:
A cancellation applicant must demonstrate a legal or commercial interest in the matter. This can be satisfied by:
Grounds for Revocation/Cancellation
These grounds are as follows:
Opposition Procedure in Bangladesh
The opposition process in Bangladesh follows a structured procedure under the Trademarks Act, 2009 and the Trade Marks Rules, 2015. The key steps include the following.
Revocation/Cancellation Actions in Bangladesh
In Bangladesh, revocation or cancellation of a registered trade mark can be initiated before both:
The Registrar of Trade Marks has jurisdiction to remove a registered trade mark on certain grounds, such as non-use for five consecutive years or registration obtained by fraud. However, more complex disputes – especially those involving ownership disputes, passing off, or infringement claims – are generally handled by the civil courts.
Similarly, copyright-related cancellation actions are typically handled by the BCO or through civil litigation in the courts, particularly in cases of copyright infringement or disputes over authorship.
Partial Revocation/Cancellation
Partial revocation or cancellation of a trade mark is possible in Bangladesh. This can occur in the following circumstances:
In Bangladesh, legal remedies against a decision of the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (DPDT) regarding a trade mark application or registration are governed by the Trademarks Act, 2009 and the relevant procedural laws. The available remedies and appeal process are outlined below.
Legal Remedies Against a Decision of the Trade Marks Office
If a party is aggrieved by a decision of the Registrar of Trade Marks, they have the right to challenge the decision through an appeal process.
Appeal to the High Court Division
As per Section 123 of the Trademarks Act, 2009, any person aggrieved by a decision or order of the Registrar may appeal to the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.
Judicial Review
If a party believes that the decision of the Registrar or the High Court Division is contrary to law or involves an abuse of power, they may seek judicial review under Article 102 of the Constitution of Bangladesh.
Appeals against decisions of the Registrar of Trade Marks are filed directly with the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. There is no separate trade mark appeal court/board in Bangladesh.
If the High Court Division’s decision is unfavourable, a further appeal may be made to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court.
In general, only final decisions of the Registrar of Trade Marks are appealable.
However, in cases where the decision of the Registrar substantially affects the rights of a party (eg, refusal of registration or rectification orders), an appeal can be made without waiting for further administrative procedures.
Likely Timescales for Appeals
The timeline for an appeal varies depending on the complexity of the case and the court’s docket. The approximate timescales are as follows:
Amendment is possible in revocation/cancellation proceedings in Bangladesh, subject to the provisions of the Trademarks Act, 2009 and the Patents and Designs Act, 1911, as applicable. The amendment may be allowed under the following circumstances.
Amendment in Revocation Proceedings (Patents and Designs)
Under the Patents and Design Acts, 1911, revocation proceedings can be initiated on various grounds, including lack of novelty, obviousness, or failure to comply with statutory requirements. During such proceedings:
The amendment is subject to the approval of the DPDT, and must not introduce new matter that substantially alters the original claims.
Amendment in Cancellation Proceedings (Trade Marks)
Under the Trademarks Act, 2009, cancellation proceedings may be initiated based on non-use, fraud or lack of distinctiveness. During such proceedings:
Any amendment must comply with Section 57 of the Trademarks Act, 2009, ensuring that it does not substantially alter the original nature of the case.
Courts’ and the DPDT’s Discretion
The Registrar of Trade Marks and the courts have the discretion to allow amendments, provided they do not:
Amendment applications should be filed at an early stage, and permission is granted on a case-by-case basis.
In Bangladesh, actions involving revocation/cancellation and infringement are generally heard separately, as they serve different legal purposes and follow distinct procedures under the Trademarks Act, 2009 and the Patents and Designs Act, 1911.
Revocation/Cancellation Versus Infringement – Separate Proceedings
Revocation/cancellation
A revocation or cancellation action is initiated to remove a registered trade mark or patent from the register due to invalidity, non-use or other legal grounds.
This is typically filed before the DPDT or, in some cases, before the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh.
Infringement
An infringement action is filed when an unauthorised party uses a registered trade mark, patent or design without permission, leading to a lawsuit for damages, injunctions or other reliefs.
These cases are heard by civil courts (district courts) or, in serious cases, may also involve criminal prosecution.
Differences in Timing of Decisions
Infringement cases
These are civil or criminal matters and are usually heard on a priority basis when urgent relief (eg, injunctions) is sought.
The timeline depends on the complexity of the case, the evidence presented and court backlog.
Interim relief, such as a temporary injunction, may be granted early, though final decisions take longer.
Revocation/cancellation cases
These cases often take longer, as they involve administrative or judicial review.
If filed before the Registrar of Trade Marks, the process includes hearings, evidence submission and arguments.
If the matter escalates to the High Court, it may take a significant amount of time before a final judgment is rendered.
Interplay Between the Two
If a defendant in an infringement case argues that the plaintiff’s trade mark or patent is invalid, they may file a revocation/cancellation action.
In some cases, the infringement suit may be stayed (put on hold) pending the outcome of the revocation/cancellation case.
However, courts can still grant interim relief (such as injunctions) in infringement cases while a cancellation action is pending.
Revocation/cancellation and infringement cases are generally not heard together in Bangladesh. Infringement cases may be resolved faster if immediate relief is needed, while revocation cases take longer due to procedural complexities. However, a revocation action can impact an infringement case if the trade mark or patent in question is ultimately invalidated.
In Bangladesh, both trade marks and copyrights can be revoked or cancelled if they were filed fraudulently.
Trade Marks
Under the Trademarks Act, 2009, any aggrieved person may apply for the cancellation or rectification of a fraudulently registered trade mark.
The application for cancellation can be filed with the Trade Marks Registry (DPDT) or the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh under Section 51 of the Act.
The Registrar may also cancel the registration suo motu if it finds sufficient evidence of fraud.
If an opposition or cancellation proceeding is initiated due to fraudulent filing, the registration process is generally put on hold until the matter is resolved. If the trade mark has already been registered, it remains valid until a final decision is made by the DPDT or the court.
If an applicant is found to have filed a fraudulent trade mark application, the registration may be cancelled under Section 51 of the Trademarks Act, 2009. The applicant may face civil and criminal liability for fraudulent misrepresentation. If the fraud caused damage to another party, they may sue for damages and injunctions.
Copyrights
Under the Copyright Act, 2000, if a copyright is obtained fraudulently, any interested party can challenge its validity.
The BCO can review such claims, and legal action can be taken in the High Court for cancellation.
Copyright is automatically granted upon creation, and registration is not mandatory. However, if fraud is alleged in a copyright registration, the BCO or the court may suspend its effect until the dispute is resolved.
If fraud is proven, the copyright registration may be declared invalid. If the fraud involved false claims of ownership, the guilty party may face legal penalties, including fines and imprisonment under the Copyright Act, 2000.
Assignment of Trade Marks and Copyrights in Bangladesh
Procedures, requirements and restrictions for assigning a trade mark or copyright
Trade marks
Under the Trademarks Act, 2009, a trade mark can be assigned with or without the goodwill of the business.
The assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor and assignee.
If the trade mark is registered, the assignment must be recorded with the DPDT to be legally effective against third parties.
Approval from the DPDT is required if the assignment might cause confusion or if there are restrictions based on public interest.
Consideration (payment or value) is generally required, though is not explicitly mandated by law.
Copyright
Under the Copyright Act, 2000, an assignment of copyright must be in writing and signed by the copyright owner.
The agreement must specify the rights being transferred, the duration, and the territorial scope of the assignment.
The assignment must be for a specific purpose and time period unless stated otherwise.
No approval from the BCO is required, but registration of copyright can help establish ownership and avoid disputes.
Partial assignment of trade marks and copyrights
Trade marks
Partial assignments are permitted under the Trade Marks Act, 2009.
A trade mark owner can assign rights for specific goods or services (division by class) or for a specific geographical area.
Copyright
Copyright can be assigned partially under the Copyright Act, 2000.
The copyright owner may transfer some of the rights (eg, only reproduction rights or distribution rights) while retaining others.
Transmissibility of copyright or trade mark rights upon death
Trade marks
Trade mark rights are transmissible upon death under inheritance laws.
The legal heirs or successors must apply to the DPDT to record the change in ownership.
Copyright
Copyright is inheritable under the Copyright Act, 2000.
Copyright lasts for 60 years after the author’s death, and the legal heirs or successors acquire ownership unless assigned otherwise in a will.
Licensing of Trade Marks and Copyright in Bangladesh
Trade mark licensing
Under the Trademarks Act, 2009, a trade mark owner can grant a licence to another party to use the mark.
Copyright licensing
Under the Copyright Act, 2000, a copyright owner can license their rights to another party.
Copyright licensing must be in writing and signed by the copyright owner.
Unlike trade marks, registration is not mandatory for copyright to be protected or licensed. However, having the copyright registered with the BCO provides stronger legal standing.
No prior approval from the BCO is required to execute a licence agreement.
Types of Licences and Additional Rights
The following types of licences can be granted for both trade marks and copyrights.
Licensing of Applications
Trademark applications
In Bangladesh, a pending trade mark application cannot be licensed. Licensing is only possible after the trade mark is registered.
Copyright applications
Since copyright protection exists automatically upon creation, a copyright application can be licensed even before formal registration.
Trade mark and copyright licensing in Bangladesh require written agreements, with trade marks requiring prior registration before licensing. Different types of licences are allowed, and copyright licences can be perpetual. Trade mark applications cannot be licensed, but copyright applications can be. Proper documentation and registration with relevant authorities help ensure enforceability and legal protection.
In Bangladesh, the registration and recordal requirements for the assignment or licensing of trade marks and copyrights differ.
Trade Marks
Under the Trademarks Act, 2009, an assignment or licence of a registered trade mark must be recorded with DPDT to be legally effective against third parties.
Risks of non-registration
Copyright
Under the Copyright Act, 2000, assignment or licensing of copyright does not require mandatory registration to be valid. However, voluntary recordal with the BCO can serve as strong evidence in the case of disputes.
Risks of non-registration
For trade marks, registration of assignments and licences is highly recommended to ensure enforceability and protection against third-party claims. For copyrights, while not mandatory, registration provides additional legal security.
Bangladesh has specific provisions addressing the timeframes for filing infringement lawsuits in its intellectual property laws, depending on different circumstances; these lawsuits must be filed within three years of the cause of action arising.
The limitation period for filing an infringement lawsuit is typically measured from the time the cause of action accrues, which is often when the infringement is discovered or should have been discovered with reasonable diligence. Courts may consider whether the plaintiff exercised reasonable diligence in discovering the infringement. Delay in bringing a lawsuit without a justifiable reason may affect the plaintiff’s ability to recover certain remedies.
Trade Marks
Legal claims for trade mark infringement may include:
While registered trade marks typically benefit from statutory protection, unregistered trade marks may still have common law protection, and claims can be pursued based on common law rights.
The key elements of infringement are ownership of a valid trade mark and the likelihood of confusion among consumers due to the alleged infringing use.
Copyright
Legal claims for copyright infringement may include:
The key elements of infringement are ownership of a valid copyright and unauthorised use of the copyrighted work by the alleged infringer
Legal Remedies
Trade mark and copyright infringement may include injunctive relief, damages and, in some cases, the destruction of infringing goods.
The key factors in determining trade mark infringement are:
The key factors in determining copyright infringement are:
In Bangladesh, before filing a trade mark or copyright lawsuit, certain prerequisites and restrictions must be considered:
Prerequisites include the following.
Restrictions include the following.
Jurisdiction
District courts have original jurisdiction over trade mark and copyright infringement matters. Appeals from district court decisions go to the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. Appeals against certain High Court Division judgments can be made to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court.
Initiating Infringement Proceedings
A trade mark or copyright owner can initiate infringement proceedings by filing a lawsuit directly with the district court within whose jurisdiction the infringement occurred or where the defendant resides.
Foreign Trade Mark or Copyright Owners
Foreign trade mark or copyright owners can bring infringement claims in Bangladesh. Registration in Bangladesh is not mandatory for infringement claims, but it can strengthen the owner’s legal standing and simplify the enforcement process.
Declaratory Judgment Proceedings
An alleged trade mark or copyright infringer can initiate declaratory judgment proceedings in Bangladesh under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This allows them to seek a court declaration that their actions do not constitute infringement.
The potential defendant must have a legitimate and well-founded fear of being sued for infringement by the trade mark or copyright owner. This is often based on threats or communications from the owner or actual initiation of infringement proceedings elsewhere.
Potential Defendant’s Protections
Filing a protective brief with the Registrar of Trade Marks or the Registrar of Copyrights can document the potential defendant’s good faith use of the mark or work and potentially serve as a deterrent to an infringement lawsuit.
In rare cases, courts may require the trade mark or copyright owner to post a bond to cover potential damages if the infringement claim is ultimately found to be invalid. However, this is not customary in Bangladesh.
Unfortunately, Bangladesh currently does not offer a dedicated small claims track for intellectual property matters such as trade marks and copyrights.
In Bangladesh, the effect of Trade Marks and Copyright Registry decisions on infringement actions is more nuanced than a simple “yes” or “no” answer.
Decisions made by the Registrar of Trade Marks and the Registrar of Copyrights (or Tribunal on appeal) are not strictly binding on civil courts in infringement cases. However, they carry significant weight and can be highly persuasive to the court.
A registered trade mark certificate issued by the Registrar of Trade Marks serves as prima facie evidence of the trade mark’s validity and ownership. This means that the infringer has the burden of proving its invalidity in court. However, this does not apply to copyrights in Bangladesh.
Both Registry decisions and the underlying evidence on which they were based can be introduced as evidence in an infringement lawsuit. Civil courts will consider this evidence alongside other relevant factors to reach their own decision.
Counterfeiting
Special procedures and remedies addressing counterfeiting include:
Parties can also face criminal prosecution.
Bootlegging
Bootlegging in Bangladesh typically refers to unauthorised reproduction and sale of copyrighted works.
Special procedures and remedies addressing bootlegging include:
Unauthorised reproduction and sale can lead to criminal charges.
There are special procedural provisions for trade mark and copyright proceedings in Bangladesh.
Pre-Filing Requirements
Prior to initiating a trade mark lawsuit, parties are often encouraged to attempt mediation or send a warning letter to the alleged infringer. No pre-filing requirements are mandated for copyright lawsuits, but registrations can strengthen a case.
Specific Law and Courts
Trade marks cases are governed by the Trademarks Act, 2009 and copyright cases are governed by the Copyright Act, 2023. Cases are heard in district courts, with appeals going to the High Court Division and ultimately the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court. The Tribunal at the High Court handles appeals from decisions made by the Registrar of Trade Marks and the Registrar of Copyrights.
Advantages of registering trade marks include presumption of validity and exclusive right to use for registered goods/services. Further, after five years, certain defences become unavailable for the infringer. The advantage of registering copyrights is that it serves as evidence of copyright ownership, simplifying legal proceedings. In both cases, it becomes easier to initiate legal action and obtain evidence, and there is potential for higher damages awards.
Overall, registration offers litigation benefits, but unregistered rights can still be protected under common law principles.
The costs of litigating trade mark or copyright infringement actions in Bangladesh vary widely depending on factors such as court fees, lawyer fees, expert witness fees, survey costs and investigation expenses. These costs can be influenced by the complexity of the case, duration of proceedings, settlement versus trial, lawyers’ experience and court location. It is challenging to predict exact costs due to these variables.
Statutory Defences
Those found in the Trademarks Act, 2009 include:
Common Law Defences
These include:
Fair Dealing
Bangladesh recognises fair dealing under the Copyright Act, 2023, allowing limited use of copyrighted works for purposes such as criticism, research, news reporting, education or incidental inclusion in another work. Factors considered include the nature and purpose of the work, the portion used, its effect on the market value, and the character of the use.
Satire/Parody
While not explicitly stated, satire and parody are accepted expressions falling under fair dealing when they humorously critique or transform original works without commercial exploitation.
Free Speech and Information
Bangladesh does not have a specific exception for free speech in copyright law, but uses promoting public interest or facilitating information access may be protected under fair dealing or outside copyright protection, considering their educational value and potential harm to the copyrighted work.
Bangladesh applies a limited exhaustion principle to trade marks. Only goods physically imported with the owner’s consent can be freely resold within the country. Unauthorised imports – even when genuine – infringe rights.
Exhaustion of copyright applies to first authorised sales of physical copies, allowing subsequent resale. The situation with regard to digital content remains unclear, often depending on licence agreements and content type.
In addition, courts may consider the specific circumstances when assessing exhaustion in cases of fire and authorised sales.
Available Relief
Bangladeshi courts can grant various injunctive reliefs, including:
Requirements for Injunctive Relief
Preliminary injunctions require proof of:
Perpetual injunctions have similar requirements to preliminary injunctions, but the likelihood-of-success standard may be stricter.
Impoundment and Destruction
This is available for trade marks through administrative and criminal channels for counterfeit goods. Destruction orders are also possible for copyright infringement civil cases, but the process can be complex.
Courts can award actual damages, accounting of profits, disgorgement of profits, enhanced damages for wilful infringement, and statutory damages (for registered works).
Actual damages involve financial analysis and expert evidence. Accounting and disgorgement require forensic accounting investigations. Enhanced damages need evidence of deliberate infringement.
Statutory damages offer fixed sums for registered works, simplifying calculations, but are available only for registered trade marks and copyrights, strengthening claims and potentially increasing damages.
In Bangladesh, the loser in trade mark and copyright cases usually pays both sides’ costs, including court fees and expenses.
Generally, courts require notice to the defendant before granting relief in trade mark or copyright infringement cases to uphold due process. Exceptions exist, such as rare ex parte injunctions in trade mark cases involving counterfeiting and imminent harm, but they require evidence of a high likelihood of success in the main case. Ex parte relief for copyright infringement is highly unlikely.
Bangladesh’s legal system provides for customs seizures of counterfeits and parallel imports under the Customs Act, 1969 and the Copyright Act, 2023.
Process for Customs Seizure
The trade mark or copyright owner files an application with the Directorate of Customs Intelligence and Investigation (DCII), providing:
The applicant may be required to post a security bond to cover potential costs and damages if the seizure is deemed wrongful.
The DCII investigates the application and verifies the information provided. They may also conduct raids or inspections. If infringement is confirmed, the DCII issues a seizure order authorising customs officials to detain the infringing goods. Detained goods are either released if no infringement is found or confiscated for further legal proceedings.
Infringement claims are adjudicated in court, and confiscated goods may be destroyed or released based on the court’s decision.
Owner Actions
Trade mark owners should register their marks, record them with customs, provide accurate information and co-operate with investigations.
Copyright owners should register their works, provide evidence of ownership and co-operate with customs.
Trade mark decisions can be appealed to the High Court Division and then to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court. Copyright decisions from the Registrar are appealed to the High Court Division, with further appeals to the Appellate Division.
Appeals must be filed within specific timeframes, based on legal errors or procedural irregularities. A formal appeal memorandum is submitted, followed by hearings where both parties can present arguments. The appellate body issues a final decision, potentially modifying or overturning the initial decision.
For trade marks and copyrights, appeals from Registrar decisions must be filed within 60 days with the High Court Division. Appeals from the High Court Division decisions must be filed within 30 days to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court.
There are no strict timeframes for appellate decisions. Factors influencing duration include case complexity, backlog of cases, court schedules and evidence presented. Resolution times typically range from several months to several years, possibly exceeding two years in complex cases.
Key emerging intellectual property issues in Bangladesh include:
There have not yet been any specific laws or landmark decisions regarding AI in intellectual property. International developments through WIPO may influence future frameworks.
Trade Marks
There are no internet-specific rules regarding trade marks; existing provisions apply. Procedures do, however, exist for resolving domain name disputes, and online platforms may have internal policies regarding trade mark compliance.
Copyright
There are limited safe harbour provisions for online service providers under specific conditions. No registration is required for takedowns, but it can strengthen claims. Some notice-and-takedown procedures are followed by ISPs for removing infringing content.
Doulah House
Plot 153/2 (1st–4th Levels), Road 2/2, Block-A
Section-12 East Pallabi
Mirpur, Dhaka-1216
Bangladesh
+880 1970482175
sodoulah@doulah.com www.doulah.comThe Trade Marks Act, 2009 (Act No XIX of 2009) (“Act 2009”) is the governing statute relating to the law of trade marks. The Act has been effective since 1 July 2008, repealing the earlier Trade Marks Act, 1940. Subsequently, in accordance with Section 124 of the Act 2009, the Trade Marks Rules 2015 were implemented, repealing the Trade Marks Rules of 1963. The common law jurisdiction relating to this area is quite rich and, particularly in recent years, the courts of Bangladesh have passed multiple judgments settling several landmark principles.
It is common knowledge that one of the major spirits of the law of trade marks is to protect the interest of the honest earlier user and/or restrict the dishonest adopter. The Act 2009 comprises several sections which facilitate upholding this spirit, some of which are discussed in this article. According to Section 2(5)(a) of the Act 2009 “False trade description” means ⎯ to use a trade description which is untrue or misleading in a material respect as regards the goods or services to which it is applied. As per Section 8(g) of the Act 2009, no mark or part of a mark shall be registered as a trade mark if the application is made in bad intention and faith. The Apex Court also considers the issue of honesty with utmost importance and has rejected trade mark applications filed with dishonest intentions. In the judgment reported in 60 DLR (AD) 161, the High Court Division held that that the applicant (former agent) committed fraud upon the registrar by claiming the ownership themselves in order to obtain the registration, and hence the application is liable to be rejected.
The issue of likelihood of deception is also another key factor for granting registration. Section 8(c) of the Act 2009 provides that no mark or part of a mark shall be registered as a trade mark if its use would be likely to deceive or cause confusion. Section 10(1) of the Act 2001 provides that no trade mark shall be registered in respect of any goods or description of goods or in respect of any services or description of services which is identical with or deceptively similar to a trade mark which is already registered in the name of a different proprietor in respect of the same goods or description of goods or in respect of the same services or description of services, as the case may be. At the time of incorporation, Section 10(5) Act 2009 restricted registration of a trade mark which is similar to a well-known and registered trade mark in Bangladesh. In order to ensure protection against use of deceptive marks, the legislature in 2015 brought an amendment in Section 10(5) and added the terms “confusingly similar” and “trade description” as well. Section 2(20) of the Act 2009 defines “deceptively similar mark” as a mark which is likely to deceive or cause confusion and nearly resembles another mark registered under this act. The Apex Court of Bangladesh has clearly held that in deciding the question of similarity between the two marks, the test is whether a member of the public is at risk to be confused or deceived. In determining the same, actual confusion or deception is not necessary; mere likelihood of confusion or deception will be enough [73 DLR (AD) 33]. The High Court Division, while explaining the role of the registrar, held that the Act 2009, read with the Rules 2015, mandate certain definite responsibilities that oblige the registrar to further assist in the overall objective in obviating any possibility of deception arising from and confusion caused by similar and competing trade marks used in conjunction with similar of kinds of goods [28 BLD (HCD) 31]. In another reported judgment, the High Court Division held that, use of an essential part of the mark is liable to create confusion [6 ALR 300].
Until recently, the Trade Mark Authority has been strict in granting registration of trade marks with common dictionary words or descriptive words. However, in recent times, several applicants obtained registration with descriptive and/or common dictionary words. The Trade Mark Authority now accepts the legal submissions that a descriptive trade mark may be entitled to protection if it has assumed secondary meaning which identifies it with a particular product or as being from a particular source, and common words of a language and/or descriptive words can be trade marked, when they have acquired distinctiveness/secondary meaning.
Another important aspect of development in the realm of trade mark laws is the protection of internationally well-known industrial property including, inter alia, trade marks and trade names in Bangladesh. For such protection, the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property was signed between the countries on 20 March 1883. Bangladesh joined the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in 1985 and became a member country of the Paris Convention on 3 March 1991. The Trade Marks Act 2009 defines the Paris Convention in Section 2(19) and Sections 119 and 120 of the Act 2009 provide special provisions relating to Convention countries.
The protection of well-known trade marks in the modern word is inseparable from another principle called the “doctrine of trans-border reputation”. As per recent judgments of the apex courts of the sub-continent, including Bangladesh, the traditional concept mandating presence product/business in the local market has faded. The High Court Division now holds the view that, in this age and time, the world has become a small one for all practical purposes and one should not strictly adhere to the traditional concept of local/national market. There is free movement of commodities and capitals. The law must be given a new interpretation to suit the needs of the day and the interest of the original owner of the mark must be protected [57 DLR 93]. In a 2024 judgment, the High Court Division granted protection to a trade mark based on international registrations, advertisements and international use.
Keeping in mind the spirit of the legislature, judicial decisions and WIPO, the Ministry of Industry has published a booklet/guide book in which it was stated that “well known marks are entitled to much protection, even if they are not registered”. The booklet also mentions that, in case of well-known trade marks, the marks are entitled to get protection against the products of different classes. In light of the above it can be said that the concept of well-known mark is receiving much attention and proprietors of such well-known marks are getting better protection.
Beside the issue of use of deceptive trade marks, the Trade Mark Authority and courts have also started recognising the concept of use of deceptive trade dress. The courts now consider that ingredients of trade dress, get up, colour combination, lay out of the container or packing acquire significance and relevance for determining the offence of passing off. If similarities of trade dress are substantial from the look of two goods, it comes within the mischief of passing off. Recently, the High Court Division granted an injunction restraining the use of the deceptive colour combination and bottle shape, despite the trade marks being quite different from each other. The courts recognise that the test is whether there is likelihood of confusion or deceptiveness in the minds of unwary customers, irrespective of dissimilarities in the trade name.
In case of international registrations, the Trade Mark Authority also gives priority to issues like registration in the country of origin, registration with EU and international registrations in a neighbouring country. Beside registration, the Court also emphasises the right of an earlier user. The High Court Division in a judgment reported in 4 SCOB [2015] HCD 89 held that “the paramount important question in a trademark dispute is that, who is the earlier user of the trademark?”.
The very recently enacted Copyright Act 2023 (Act No XXXIV of 2023) (“Act 2023”) came into effect on 18 September 2023, repealing the earlier Copyright Act 2000. The amount of case law is negligible with regard to copyright disputes in comparison with trade mark disputes. The main reasons for non-enforcement of copyrights are many, including (i) lack of knowledge on both sides – ie, creators and public, (ii) non-availability of special or exclusive adjudicating forum and (iii) lack of effective remedies and penalties.
Despite the aforesaid realities, the Act 2023 was enacted in order to ensure more balance between the rights of creator and free accessibility of information. Some of the changes and developments that have been introduced in the 2023 Act in comparison to the former Act of 2000 are mentioned below. The government has not enacted new Rules under the Act 2023 and the Copyright Rules 2006 are still operative.
The list of activities treated as “Work” has been expanded in the new Act, covering architectural design, performance, database, digital activities based on information technology, folk-cultural expressions, etc. In the same way, the definition of “artistic work” and “author” has also been expanded. The new Act ensures protection against copyright violation on different digital platforms. The chapters relating to infringement of copyright, civil remedies and criminal offences under the new Act of 2023 ensure more protection than the prior Act 2000. The number of fines and imprisonment for unauthorised publications has been increased.
The Act 2023 introduced a much-enhanced mechanism for search and seizure. Section 110 empowers the government to create a task force to ensure protection against infringement of copyright. Section 115 of the Act 2023 ensures applicability of the Mobile Court Act, 2009 for adjudication of the offences committed under this Act. Section 114 of the Copyright Act 2023 provides a detailed outline about the course of action with regard to confiscated items.
In the light of the above we can certainly say that the laws of trade marks and passing off in Bangladesh are always developing in order to meet the standard of protection of intellectual property rights that is required in modern times. The awareness of consumers, delinquents and true proprietors is also significantly increasing. In comparison to that, the enforcement mechanism and public awareness for copyright matters are low. It is hoped that, as a result of the recent developments in the Act 2023, enforcement mechanisms will become more effective and vibrant.
Shareef Mansion (2nd Floor)
56-57 Motijheel C/A
Dhaka 1000
Bangladesh
+880 222 338 0705
hnh@bangla.net.bd www.hnhcompany.com