Alternative Energy & Power 2023

Last Updated July 20, 2023

Brazil

Law and Practice

Authors



Tauil & Chequer Advogados in association with Mayer Brown is a full-service law firm, offering clients in-depth local knowledge combined with global reach. Founded in 1992, the firm has grown rapidly, forming an association with Mayer Brown in December 2009. Today, the firm has approximately 160 lawyers and more than 40 partners in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Vitória and Brasilia, with a team of specialists in several areas of business law in Brazil, who advise in operations ranging from the routine to the highly complex and sophisticated. The firm offers clients the full range of legal services and has a particularly strong and long-standing presence in the energy, oil and gas, and infrastructure industries. It offers a full-service alternative energy and power practice, providing legal advice to domestic and international clients, financial institutions and government agencies.

Early Years

The development of the power industry in Brazil started at the turn of the 20th century with small and localised private investments, made to serve specific companies or municipal lighting. Canadian Light and the American & Foreign Power Company (Amforp) later entered the market by means of a series of acquisitions of these existing assets and development of additional ones. Therefore, the industry was originally developed and owned by private companies.

However, a very important change took place around 1930, during the government of President Getúlio Vargas: with the Great Depression affecting international investment and political nationalism growing in the country, the federal government passed new legislation, increasing oversight and tariff regulations, leading to diminishing returns. Public companies – such as Chesf, Cemig, CEEE, and Eletrobras – were then created to compensate for the lack of private incentives for investments, marking a new phase of the direct government intervention in the sector.

The phase of public investments in the power sector began to be reversed with the transition from a military dictatorship to a liberal democratic regime. When the current Federal Constitution was enacted in 1988, it provided that services related to power facilities may be performed either directly by the federal government or indirectly through the granting of concessions, permissions or authorisations.

The Development of a Market-Driven Industry in the 1990s

In the 1990s, in the context of a broader privatisation programme, the Brazilian government implemented a series of measures to increase private investment in the power sector and to privatise three federal and 20 state-owned power generation and distribution companies.

In 1995, Law No 8,987, also known as the “Concessions Law”, established the general rules for concessions and permissions relating to public services, and Law No 9,074 introduced the concepts of independent power producers and free customers with open access rights to all distribution and transmission facilities.

In 1996, Law No 9,427 created the National Electricity Regulatory Agency (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica or ANEEL), an independent federal regulatory agency that regulates and supervises the power industry in accordance with the policies set forth by the Ministry of Mines and Energy (Ministério de Minas e Energia or MME).

In 1998, Law No 9,648 completed the legal framework for the development of a market-driven industry, as it established a regime of free power contracting among holders of concessions, permissions and authorisations of power services, as well as certain initial rules for the unbundling of power companies in the generation, transmission, distribution and trading segments. Such law also created the Power Wholesale Market (Mercado Atacadista de Energia Elétrica or MAE), which was later replaced by the CCEE, as defined below, and the National Electric Grid Operator (Operador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico or ONS), a non-profit private entity that co-ordinates and regulates the power generation and transmission operations in the National Interconnected System (Sistema Interligado Nacional or SIN) under the ANEEL’s regulation and supervision.

Power Shortage and Reforms after 2001

After a serious power shortage crisis in 2001, the federal government carried out an extensive reform of the power industry to further attract private investment in power generation, transmission and distribution facilities with the purpose of providing customers with a stable power supply at reasonable prices. Accordingly, Law No 10,848/2004 created:

  • the free and regulated power contracting markets and the Electricity Trading Chamber (Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica or CCEE), a non-profit private entity responsible for, among other things, registering, accounting for and clearing all energy sale and purchase transactions in the free and regulated markets;
  • the Energy Research Company (Empresa de Pesquisa Energética or EPE), a federal public company responsible for conducting strategic studies and research in the energy sector; and
  • the Power Sector Monitoring Committee (Comitê de Monitoramento do Setor Elétrico or CMSE), a committee of the executive branch responsible for monitoring power service conditions and recommending preventative measures to ensure power supply safety.

It also indicated new attributions for the National Energy Policy Council (Conselho Nacional de Política Energética or CNPE), which provides advice to the President of the Republic of Brazil regarding the development and creation of national energy policies.

Law No 10,848/2004 also imposed an additional level of unbundling of the power industry by preventing the power distribution concessionaires from developing power generation and transmission activities, selling power to free customers, holding equity interests in other companies, and performing activities unrelated to power distribution services.

In 2012, the Brazilian government enacted:

  • Provisional Measure No 577, later converted into Law No 12,767/2012; and
  • Provisional Measure No 579, later converted into Law No 12,783/2013, also known as the “Concession Renewal Law”.

Law No 12,767/2012 established the obligation of the granting authority to render power services in the event of a termination of a power concession, as well as new rules related to the intervention of the granting authority in power concessions to ensure adequate performance of utility services.

The Concession Renewal Law established new rules that changed concessionaires’ ability to renew concession agreements. Under this Law, generation and distribution concessionaires were allowed to renew their concession agreements that were in effect as of 1995, and transmission concessionaires were allowed to renew their concession agreements that were in effect prior to and as of 1995 for an additional period of 30 years, provided that the concessionaires agreed to amend their concession agreements to reflect a new tariff regime established by the ANEEL.

Re-allocation of Hydrological Risks

In 2015, the Brazilian government enacted Provisional Measure No 688/2015, later converted into Law No 13,203/2015, to revise the allocation of the hydrological risks borne by hydroelectric power plants that share hydrological risks under the Energy Reallocation Mechanism (Mecanismo de Realocação de Energia, or MRE). In 2014 and 2015, given the poor hydrological conditions, the MRE participants generated less power than their assured energies, which was confirmed by a significant decrease of the Generating Scaling Factor (GSF), a measurement of the proportion between the power generated by the MRE participants and their respective assured energy. These generation deficits resulted in losses for the MRE participants given their exposure to hydrological risks.

As a consequence, Law No 13,203/2015 established an optional mechanism that allows each generation plant to transfer these risks to final customers upon payment of a risk premium to the Brazilian government, as well as certain temporary extensions of generation concessions and authorisations to compensate for losses during such period. While the government attempted to solve the issue in 2015, the option then was only attractive for power generators in the regulated market and left those hydropower plants with sales in the free market mostly unattended.

New Re-Allocation of Hydrological Risks

The Brazilian government launched a new framework with Law No 14,052, of 2020, and ANEEL Normative Resolution No 895, of 2020, to address additional structural issues in the MRE, this time specific to the free market. In exchange for withdrawing certain lawsuits regarding the GSF, the hydropower generators who chose to adhere to this new framework received an extension of their generation concessions and authorisations.

Impact of COVID-19

Also in 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic affected the financial situation of utilities with a reduction in energy consumption and an increase in payment defaults. As a result, Decree No 10,350/2020, further regulated by ANEEL Normative Resolution No 885/2020, created the so-called COVID Account, providing a centralised credit line to support the liquidity of the power distribution concessionaires to be passed on to tariffs.

At the turn of 2021, Provisional Measure No 998, converted into Law No 14,120/2021, implemented measures to reduce the tariff impacts arising from the COVID-19 pandemic and the privatisations of power utilities in the North and Northeast regions. It also ended the benefit of discounts on power transmission and distribution tariffs for renewable energy projects with authorisations requested after March 2022.

Privatisation of Eletrobras

After a long period of study, the Brazilian government enacted Provisional Measure No 1,031/2021, converted into Law 14,182/2021, determining the privatisation of the largest power company in Latin America, Eletrobras, created in 1954 in the phase of strong public investment. Tauil & Chequer Advogados in association with Mayer Brown assisted the Brazilian Development Bank (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social or BNDES) in structuring and implementing the transaction. The privatisation was concluded successfully in June 2022 with a market capitalisation of BRL29.3 billion to BRL33.7 billion. This has been the first and only privatisation in Brazilian history implemented by means of a public offering, and the largest privatisation in terms of absolute numbers.

These developments from the 1988 Constitution to the privatisation of Eletrobras allowed the relevant increase of private investment in the electricity sector in Brazil, which represent the vast majority of the power generation, distribution and transmission assets, and few companies remain state-owned today.

Federal State-Owned Entities

Few companies are still under the control of the federal states, as follows.

  • Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais – CEMIG, controlled by the state of Minas Gerais.
  • Companhia Paranaense de Energia – COPEL, controlled by the state of Parana (currently undergoing a privatisation process).
  • Centrais Elétricas de Santa Catarina SA – CELESC, controlled by the state of Santa Catarina.
  • Empresa Metropolitana de Águas e Energia SA – EMAE, controlled by the state of São Paulo.
  • Petróleo Brasileiro SA – Petrobras, the federal state-owned oil and gas company in Brazil, also owns certain thermal power generation assets.
  • Empresa Brasileira de Participações em Energia Nuclear e Binacional SA – ENBPar is a federal state-owned company that was incorporated in the context of Eletrobras’ privatisation to ensure that the federal government would maintain its control of Eletronuclear SA (which owns Angra 1, 2, and 3 nuclear power plants) and Itaipu Binacional (which holds a 50% stake in Itaipu hydropower plant).

Investor-Owned Entities

Generation

Some of the main investor-owned companies in the generation segment are:

  • Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras SA – Eletrobras;
  • Engie Brasil Energia SA;
  • Norte Energia SA;
  • Santo Antonio Energia SA;
  • China Three Gorges Brasil Energia Ltda;
  • Energia Sustentável do Brasil SA;
  • SPIC Brasil;
  • AES Tiete Energia SA;
  • Energias do Brasil SA – EDP Brasil;
  • Neoenergia SA;
  • CPFL Energia SA e CPFL Energias Renováveis SA;
  • Enel Brasil SA;
  • Eneva SA;
  • Companhia Estadual de Geração de Energia Elétrica – CEEE-G;
  • Novta Energia Renovável;
  • Centrais Elétricas de Sergipe SA – Celse;
  • Gás Natural Açu – GNA;
  • New Fortress Energy;
  • EDF;
  • Ceiba Energy;
  • Casa dos Ventos Energias Renováveis SA;
  • PEC Energia;
  • Atlas Renewable Energy;
  • Auren Energia;
  • Alupar Investimentos SA;
  • Companhia Energética de São Paulo – CESP;
  • Light SA;
  • Cubico SA;
  • Brennand Energia;
  • Rio Energy;
  • Canadian Solar;
  • Omega Geração SA;
  • Aliança Energia;
  • Voltalia SA;
  • Statkraft Energias Renováveis SA;
  • CER Energia;
  • Atlantic Energias Renováveis;
  • Echoenergia Participações SA;
  • Acciona Energía;
  • Enerfin do Brasil;
  • Total Eren; and
  • Diamante Energia.

Transmission

Some of the principal investor-owned companies in the transmission segment are:

  • Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras SA– Eletrobras;
  • Companhia de Transmissão de Energia Elétrica Paulista– Isa CTEEP;
  • Transmissora Aliança de Energia Elétrica SA – TAESA;
  • State Grid Brazil Holding SA;
  • Alupar Investimentos SA;
  • Engie Brasil Energia SA;
  • Equatorial Energia SA;
  • Energias do Brasil SA – EDP Brasil;
  • Grupo Energisa SA;
  • CPFL Energia SA;
  • Neoenergia SA;
  • Argo Transmissão de Energia SA;
  • Celeo Redes; and
  • Evoltz (acquired by Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board).

Distribution

The principal investor-owned companies in the distribution segment are:

•       Equatorial Energia SA;

•       Grupo Energisa SA;

•       Enel Brasil SA;

•       CPFL Energia SA;

•       Neoenergia SA;

•       Energias do Brasil SA – EDP Brasil; and

•       Light SA.

The only restriction to private investment in the power industry – whether foreign or domestic – is in nuclear power generation, as the Brazilian Federal Constitution provides for the federal government’s monopoly over this and does not provide for delegation of such activity through the granting of concessions, permissions or authorisations.

The Sixth Constitutional Amendment of 1995 revoked Article 171 of the Brazilian Federal Constitution, which provided for preferential treatment for companies controlled by Brazilians over companies directly or indirectly controlled by foreigners. Since then, equal and non-discriminatory treatment of companies, whether controlled by Brazilians or foreigners, is a constitutional principle.

There are certain restrictions to the acquisition or lease of rural lands by foreign companies or Brazilian companies directly or indirectly controlled by foreign companies, which commonly impact power generation, transmission and distribution projects, but there are alternative legal structures for foreign investors, which have been accepted by lenders and stakeholders in the development of power projects in Brazil. There are also restrictions on the acquisition of land within the country’s border areas, but this restriction is not usually relevant in the development of power projects in Brazil.

Finally, concessions, permissions and authorisations related to power activities must be granted to companies incorporated pursuant to Brazilian laws.

The Concessions Law provides that the transfer of the concession or the control of the concessionaire is subject to prior approval of the competent authority, and the interested party must meet the requirements of technical and financial capacity, as well as legal and tax compliance, and must commit to comply with all the terms and conditions of the concession agreement. This provision in the Concessions Law was confirmed after passing judicial scrutiny by the Federal Supreme Court.

The ANEEL is the entity in charge of approving the transfer of concessions, permissions or authorisations, or the change of control of companies that hold concessions, permissions or authorisations related to power activities.

As a general rule, the transfer of concessions, permissions or authorisations (asset deal) is subject to the ANEEL’s prior approval, while the change of control of companies (equity deal) in the power industry may or may not be subject to the ANEEL’s prior approval.

ANEEL Normative Resolution No 948/2021 (Module III) provides the rules applicable to change of control of companies in the power industry and, in summary, requires the prior approval of the ANEEL for the following companies:

  • power generation, transmission and distribution companies that hold concessions and permissions; and
  • hydro and nuclear power generation companies, whether holders of concessions or authorisations.

In accordance with the guidelines of the Concessions Law, ANEEL Normative Resolution No 948/2021 (Module III) establishes that the potential purchaser must submit evidence to the ANEEL with respect to its financial and technical capacity; legal, tax and regulatory compliance; and commitment to comply with the terms and conditions of the concession, permission or authorisation.

The change of control of oil, coal, gas, biogas, biomass, wind and solar power generation companies is usually not subject to prior approval by the ANEEL. Nevertheless, the purchaser has an obligation to inform the ANEEL about the change of control within 30 days after implementation of the transaction, upon the competent corporate registration.

The central authority that oversees and administers the technical aspects of the electricity supply and the development of transmission facilities to ensure the reliability of the electricity system and the adequacy of supply to satisfy the demand for electricity is the ONS, which is a non-profit private entity comprised of generation, transmission, distribution, importation and exportation companies and free customers.

The primary role of the ONS is to co-ordinate and regulate the generation and transmission operations in the SIN, subject to the ANEEL’s regulation and supervision.

The ONS’s main responsibilities include, among others:

  • operational planning for the generation industry;
  • organising the use of the SIN and international interconnections;
  • ensuring that industry participants have access to the transmission network in a non-discriminatory manner;
  • proposing plans to the MME for extensions of the SIN; and
  • formulating regulations regarding the operation of the transmission system, subject to the ANEEL’s approval.

The MME is responsible for planning the expansion of the electricity system, with the support from the EPE and ONS, and it determines directives for conduction of generation and transmission auctions by the ANEEL.

The market operator that oversees and manages the electricity trade is the CCEE, which is also a non-profit private organisation comprised of generation, distribution, traders and consumers.

The CCEE is responsible for comparing the actual measurements of electrical energy consumption and generation with the agent’s respective agreements for the purchase and sale of energy, and for calculating the settlement price difference (Preço de Liquidação de Diferenças or PLD).

Other of the CCEE’s main responsibilities include:

  • collecting measurement data of generation and consumption;
  • registering power purchase agreements;
  • conducting regulated auctions for the supply of power distributors or for backup reasons;
  • conducting competitive procedures for the sale of energy surplus by power distributors; and
  • managing sectoral funds.

There have been material changes in the laws and regulations of the power industry over the past year.

  • Foreign Exchange Law (Law No 14,286/2021, which came into effect on 30 December 2022) – revoked Decree-Law No 857/1969 and expressly authorised the contractual parties to stipulate the foreign currency indexation in agreements (such as PPAs) entered into between exporters and holders of concessions, permissions, authorisations or lessees in infrastructure sectors (such as power companies).
  • The Distributed Generation Law (Law No 14,300/2022) – established the new distributed generation legal framework and redefined the corresponding net metering rules. It also provided the transition process from the prior distributed generation regime set by ANEEL Normative Resolution No 482/2012 (recently revoked by ANEEL Normative Resolution No 1,059/2023).
  • The New Distributed Generation Regulation (ANEEL Normative Resolution No 1,059/2023) – regulates the new rules established by the Distributed Generation Law. It revoked ANEEL Normative Resolution No 482/2012 (prior distributed generation regulation) and amended ANEEL Normative Resolution No 1,000/2021 (which establishes general conditions for the power supply to consumers by the utilities).
  • The Legal Framework for Offshore Power Generation (Decree No 10,946/2022) – established the first legal framework for offshore power generation, which establishes that the federal government will assign offshore areas to the winning bidders under public bidding processes, followed by ANEEL’s authorisation to implement the power generation project in such assigned offshore areas.
  • Bidding and Term Extension of Existing Power Transmission Concessions (Decree No 11,314/2022) – establishes a new bidding process as a general rule for the expiring transmission concessions agreements. The extension of transmission concessions’ term may occur exceptionally and at the sole discretion of MME when the bidding process is deemed (i) unfeasible or (ii) detrimental to the public interest. From 2025 and, more intensely, between 2030 and 2042, 170 transmission concessions will reach their respective contractual terms, according to data made available by MME.

Some recent bills of law may materially affect the power industry.

  • Modernisation of the Power Industry Model (Bills of Law No 1,917/2015 and No 414/2021) – several improvements have been made to the power industry model as per discussions in the MME Public Consultation No 32 and 33/2017. They provide for free market expansion, unbundling of the contracting of capacity and power, and a self-production regime, among other topics.
  • Offshore Generation Bill (Bill of Law No 576/2021) – regulates the process for the executive authority to grant authorisations for offshore power generation. Considering that certain provisions of Bill of Law No 576/2021 and Decree No 10,946/2022 were not compatible (both govern the same matter, as mentioned in 1.6 Recent Changes in Law or Regulation), the Infrastructure Services Commission of the Senate proposed certain amendments to the bill in an attempt to align the directives of the bill with the existing decree. The bill is still pending its approval from the House of Representatives.
  • Hydrogen Bill (Bill of Law No 725/2022) – establishes mechanisms for the insertion of hydrogen in the national energy sector and parameters to encourage the use of sustainable hydrogen (ie, produced solely from solar, wind, biomass, biogas or hydro sources). It also amends the Petroleum Law (Law No 9,478/1997) to provide that the National Agency for Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis or ANP) would be competent to regulate, authorise and supervise all activities in the hydrogen chain. Finally, it sets a mandatory blending of hydrogen in natural gas transportation pipelines at certain minimum percentages by volume as of 2032 and 2050.
  • Green Hydrogen Bill (Bill of Law No 1,878/2022) – aims to regulate solely Green Hydrogen, providing guidelines for its uses and routes of production for energy purposes with the objective of promoting the development of this energy vector, and also amends the Petroleum Law to provide that ANP would be competent to regulate, authorise and supervise the activity of the green hydrogen chain and have its name altered to National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas, Biofuels and Green Hydrogen.

Brazil has one of the cleanest energy matrices in the world, as 83.61% of its power generation capacity comes from renewable sources. This share is led by hydroelectric plants (56.76%), followed by wind (13.34%), biomass (8.57%) and solar photovoltaic power plants (4.94%). Brazilian energy is clean and meets international commitments for the environment, such as those signed by Brazil at COP 21 in Paris (Brazil’s first round of commitments).

Highlights include wind power, which has grown rapidly (especially in Brazil’s North-East region), sugar cane biomass thermal power generation and, more recently, both centralised and distributed solar power generation.

Investments in renewable energy will continue to flow in parallel with investments in gas-fuelled thermal power plants, which increase the stability and safety in the power supply.

Brazil is a continental country that has been making continuous investments in energy transmission and distribution facilities, despite the continuous increase of distributed generation resources. 

With an increasing energy demand of 570 TWh (reference year: 2021), Brazil is among the top ten countries in the world in terms of electricity demand, and only around 40% of such demand is contracted in the free market – 60% of the demand is still supplied by power distribution companies in the regulated market.

The structure of the electricity market in Brazil is divided between the regulated market (Ambiente de Contratação Regulada or ACR) and the free market (Ambiente de Contratação Livre or ACL).

It can be said that the regulated market aims ultimately at serving the retail electricity market, considering that all power distribution utilities mandatorily purchase 100% of the demand of their consumers’ market (captive customers) through public auctions defined by the MME and carried out by the ANEEL and CCEE. In these public reverse auctions, power generation companies compete to be awarded long-term power purchase agreements at the lowest electricity prices. This results in regulated prices for consumers. Around 60% of the total energy demand in Brazil is supplied through the regulated market.

On the other hand, the free market covers power sale and purchase transactions freely negotiated among generation companies, trading companies, export and import companies, and free consumers. Due to requirements for entering the free market, it can be said that this currently serves the wholesale electricity market.

This distinction between the regulated market and the free market was created in 2004 by Law No 10,848/2004. The regulated market has been primarily responsible for the development of greenfield power generation projects, but recently the free market has been gaining relevance, as:

  • the free market offers lower energy prices;
  • requirements for migrating to the free market are being reduced; and
  • the BNDES and other lenders have been financing projects in the free market.

Power generation companies have been building mixed portfolios of power purchase agreements to develop greenfield power generation projects, both in the regulated and free markets.

The importation or exportation of electricity is an activity subject to authorisation by the MME pursuant to MME Ordinance No 596/2011. Pursuant to Decree No 5,668/2006 and ANEEL Normative Resolution No 1,009/2022, electricity import and export transactions are subject to the ANEEL’s approval through the importation licence or exportation registry with the Foreign Trade Integrated System (Registro de Exportação no Sistema Integrado do Comércio Exterior or SISCOMEX). 

MME Normative Ordinance No 60/2022 and MME Ordinance No 418/2019 regulate specific importation and exportation transactions to and from Argentina and Uruguay.

According to information available on the ANEEL’s website (reference date: June, 2023), the supply mix of electricity in Brazil is composed of the following principal sources, with corresponding rounded percentages based on installed capacity:

  • hydro – 56.76%;
  • wind – 13.34%;
  • biomass – 8.57%;
  • natural gas – 9.09%;
  • oil – 4.48%;
  • coal – 1.79%;
  • solar – 4.94%; and
  • nuclear – 1.03%.

Law No 12,529/2011, also known as the “Competition Law”, provided for an institutional reorganisation of the Brazilian System for the Defence of Competition. Under this law, the Administrative Council for Economic Defence (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica or CADE), an independent agency reporting to the Ministry of Justice, is the authority with jurisdiction over the national territory responsible for investigating and ultimately deciding on competition issues.

Pursuant to the Competition Law, concentration acts (amalgamations, mergers, share or asset acquisitions, associations, consortia, or joint ventures) must be submitted for the CADE’s prior approval if one of the groups involved in the transaction has an annual gross revenue equal to or greater than BRL750 million and the other group involved in the transaction has an annual gross revenue equal to or greater than BRL75 million.

The electricity market is divided, according to the case law of the CADE, into four distinct relevant markets:

  • generation;
  • transmission;
  • distribution; and
  • trading.

There are no concentration limits regarding percentage of market share in these segments of the power industry. In general terms, the CADE understands that there is “competition by the market” in the power transmission and distribution segments, where concessions are granted after a public bidding procedure with the participation of Brazilian and foreign bidders.

As mentioned in 2.4 Law Governing Market Concentration Limits, the CADE is the authority with jurisdiction over national territory responsible for investigating and ultimately deciding on competition issues. The ANEEL supports the CADE’s activities by analysing concentration acts and behaviours violating competition laws by power companies pursuant to ANEEL Normative Resolution No 948/2021.

In the event of violation of competition laws, the CADE may impose fines for an amount equivalent to 0.1% to 20% of the company’s or group’s gross revenues, as well as other penalties, such as:

  • prohibition from entering into contracts with official financial institutions and participating in public tenders for a five-year period;
  • denial of payment by instalment of federal taxes and cancellation of tax incentives or public subsidies; and
  • the transfer of corporate control, sale of assets or partial suspension of activities.

Furthermore, companies may be subject to prosecution in the civil sphere and individuals in the criminal sphere.

Brazil ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1994, as well as the Kyoto Protocol, which was promulgated by Decree No 5,445/2005.

Law No 12,187/2009 introduced the National Policy on Climate Change, establishing Brazil’s commitment to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by between 36.1% and 38.9% by 2020, based on emissions registered in 2005.

Following the 21st Paris Conference of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 2015, Brazil’s First Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) came into force in 2016. After this, Brazil revised its NDC twice, and its last version was filed on 21 March 2022, which provides for Brazil’s commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 37% below 2005 levels by 2025, and to 50% below 2005 levels by 2030. In 2018, Decree No 9,578 consolidated rules related to the National Fund of Climate Change, which financially supports studies and projects related to mitigation of climate change effects, and updated the regulation on the National Policy on Climate Change.

In 2022, Decree No 11,075/2022 established the procedures for the elaboration of Sectoral Plans for Mitigation of Climate Change and created the National System for the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

There are no laws and/or policies in Brazil requiring early retirement of carbon-based generation.

In fact, in the context of the opening of the gas market in Brazil, there are policies encouraging the development of new gas-fired thermal power plants to improve safety in the power supply and cover the increasing power intermittency of wind and solar power generation. In particular, Law No 14,182/2021 specifically required the purchase of over 8 GW of installed capacity from new gas-fired power plants in regulated auctions up to 2030.

Oil-fuelled thermal power plants have a higher operational cost compared to other sources available in Brazil. The federal government therefore recently announced that it will recommend the replacement of oil by gas-fuelled thermal power plants to reduce the cost of electricity in the country. 

Coal-fuelled thermal power plants, which have the highest CO₂ emission levels among carbon-based power plants despite Brazil’s technological developments to reduce such emissions, face significant resistance from environmental entities.

Notwithstanding, Law No 14,299/2022 renewed until 2040 the authorisation of a coal-fired power plant located in the South of Brazil and established the Programme of Fair Power Transition. The programme is focused on preparing the Santa Catarina State for the possible phase-out of its coal market by 2040, however, one of the Programme’s committee roles encompasses studying alternatives to maintain the coal-fired power plant operation but with net carbon emissions equal to zero.

Brazil has implemented several programmes and incentives for the development of alternative energy sources in the past 20 years, including feed-in tariff programmes and alternative energy auctions, tax incentives, grid charge incentives, preferential financing, market reserve and net metering.

PROINFA and Public Auctions

The 2002 Programme of Incentives for Alternative Electricity Sources (Programa de Incentivo a Fontes Alternativas de Energia Elétrica or PROINFA) has granted 20-year PPAs with Eletrobras to greenfield wind, small hydro and biomass power plants. The government recently allowed the extension of such agreements in exchange for a change in the inflation index. In addition, from 2005 to 2019, several public auctions exclusively directed to greenfield renewable energy projects have been promoted in Brazil.

Grid Charge Incentives

In relation to grid charge incentives, pursuant to Law No 9,427/1996 and ANEEL Normative Resolution No 1,031/2022, solar, wind, biomass, qualified co-generation and small hydro power plants, subject to certain limits of power injection capacity, have the right to discounts ranging from 50% to 100% over the transmission and distribution grid use tariffs (Tarifas de Uso do Sistema de Distribuição e Transmissão or TUSD and TUST). Such discounts are also applied to the purchasers of power generated by these qualified projects.

Notwithstanding, Law No 14,120/2021 has amended Law No 9,427/1996 in order to extinguish the benefit of discounts ranging from 50% to 100%, applicable to power transmission and distribution tariffs. Pursuant to that law, such discount was maintained for:

  • projects that have filed an authorisation request to the ANEEL up to 2 March 2022, provided that all generating units of the project reach commercial operation within 48 months of the authorisation date; and
  • an installed capacity increase request filed to the ANEEL up to 2 March 2022, provided that all generating units associated with such increase reach commercial operation within 48 months of the authorisation date. 

“Special Customers”

Law No 9,427/1996, as amended, also created the so-called special customers who may migrate from the captive to the free market to purchase power from renewable sources only, provided that they have a minimum demand of 500 kW.

Preferential Financing

In addition, the BNDES and Banco do Nordeste do Brasil, or BNB, provide long-term financing for renewable energy projects that meet local content requirements. Renewable energy projects have also been raising funds through the so-called infrastructure debentures introduced by Law No 12,431/2011, which establishes a set of tax and regulatory incentives for domestic and foreign investments in infrastructure projects.

There are also certain tax exemptions on the import and purchase of equipment for renewable energy projects at federal and state levels.

Net Metering

Furthermore, Law No 14,300/2022 and ANEEL Normative Resolution No 1,059/2023 (that revoked ANEEL Normative Resolution No 482/2012 as mentioned in 1.6 Recent Changes in Law or Regulation) recently set the new legal framework for the distributed power generation market in Brazil, but kept net metering for captive consumers with renewable energy-distributed generation projects up to 5 MW. Solar power distributed generation projects have been booming in Brazil in the past years since its first regulation.

Pursuant to Law No 9,074/1995 and the Concession Renewal Law, the construction and operation rights of power generation facilities may be granted through concessions or authorisations by the MME or ANEEL, depending on the source and size of the power plant. Both concessions and authorisations grant the concessionaire or authorised agent a 35-year term in which to act as an independent power producer or self-producer.

The construction and operation of large hydro and thermal power plants (equal to or greater than 50 MW of installed capacity) is subject to a concession, which is granted after a public bidding process. The construction and operation of small hydro, wind, solar, biomass and fossil fuel thermal power plants is subject to authorisation by the MME or ANEEL. Power generation projects with installed capacity equal to or lower than 5 MW simply need to register with the ANEEL after construction.

Environmental licences at federal or state level are also required for the construction and operation of power generation facilities, as well as certain construction and operation permits at local level. Depending on the project’s characteristics, other permits may also be required, such as a water-usage permit.

Access to the electricity grid is also a critical part of the process, and is subject to specific regulations, such as the ONS’s Grid Procedures, ANEEL’s Transmission Rules and ANEEL’s Distribution Procedures.

Hydro power generation concessions are usually granted after a public auction, in which the winning bid criterion is the lowest power price, considering the payment of a fee for the use of a public good (Uso do Bem Público or UBP).

Authorisations for power generation facilities will be granted by the ANEEL upon fulfilment of certain legal, technical and financial requirements pursuant to ANEEL Normative Resolutions No 875/2020 (small hydro power plants) and No 876/2020 (thermal, wind and solar power plants).

Authorisations are also automatically granted, by the MME or ANEEL, to the winners of the new energy auctions. To participate in these auctions, the projects need to be technically qualified by the EPE upon evidence of certain technical, environmental, real estate, grid connection and fuel supply (if applicable) conditions that confirm the project’s feasibility.

Obligations

Hydro power plants may be granted by means of public service concessions or concessions for the use of the public good, since all hydro resources in Brazil are considered public. Concession agreements for power generation place several obligations on concessionaires regarding the regularity, continuity, safety, efficiency and quality of public services, as well as payment of the UBP, if applicable. 

Authorisation acts make reference to the obligation of authorised agents to comply with ANEEL Normative Resolution No 921/2021, which sets forth the rights and obligations of independent power producers and self-producers under authorisations.

Construction Schedule

Both the concession agreements and authorisation acts of greenfield projects establish a construction schedule with the dates for achieving intermediary milestones and the dates for commencing the commissioning and commercial operation of the power plant; and, specifically for solar, wind and thermal power plants, authorisation acts indicate a 36-month term for commencing their commercial operation. Projects that sell energy in the regulated market, in contrast, usually have the commercial operation date required to meet the supply term for the specific auction in which they negotiated power, unless the entrepreneur requests a shorter term (for example, in order to sell power in the free market in such earlier period).

Performance Bond

In relation to greenfield power generation projects that have sold energy in the regulated market as well as for greenfield hydro and wind power generation projects regardless of their energy destination, a performance bond must be submitted by the concessionaire or authorised agent to the ANEEL, usually for an amount equivalent to 5% of the project’s CAPEX (as indicated by bidders in energy auctions in the regulated market or calculated by the ANEEL based on BRL4,000/kW for wind and BRL8,400/kW for hydro), to guarantee the timely implementation of the project pursuant to its approved construction schedule.

Physical Guarantee

Concession agreements and authorisation acts may also indicate the officially approved power output of the project, the so-called physical guarantee (garantia física), which is the maximum amount of power that the concessionaire or authorised agent is entitled to sell to the market. The project’s physical guarantee can be revised in cases specified in the regulations.

Penalties

Non-compliance with the terms and conditions of concession agreements and authorisation acts is subject to penalties imposed by the ANEEL after an administrative proceeding, based on ANEEL Normative Resolution No 846/2019. Depending on the seriousness of the violation, the ANEEL may impose penalties of a warning; fine; suspension of works or activities; specific performance; temporary prohibition from participating in public auctions for new concessions, permissions, or authorisations and entering into contracts with the ANEEL; revocation of the authorisation; intervention and forfeiture of the concession or permission.

If the proponent fails to reach an amicable agreement with landowners over compensation for the construction and operation of power generation facilities on their land, the proponent may request the issue of a Declaration of Public Utility (Declaração de Utilidade Pública or DUP) by the ANEEL, pursuant to ANEEL Normative Resolution No 919/2021, which entitles the proponent to easement or expropriation rights over these lands. Based on the DUP, the proponent may judicially obtain injunctions against landowners to access their land, and the court will define the fair compensation due to landowners, usually based on market value.

However, according to the ANEEL’s precedents, the DUP shall only cover lands required for construction of hydro power plants or high-voltage transmission lines and substations necessary to connect power plants of any source to the electricity grid.

Apart from certain environmental obligations applicable to decommissioning of nuclear power plants, there are no specific requirements for decommissioning of generation facilities in Brazil.

Power generation facilities under the concession regime will revert to the federal government, upon compensation if the investment by the concessionaire has not been fully amortised. Power generation facilities under the authorisation regime, except hydro power facilities, may be freely disposed of by the authorised agent.

Pursuant to Law No 9,074/1995 and the Concession Renewal Law, the construction and operation rights of power transmission facilities may be granted through concessions following public auctions. The MME defines the transmission facilities to be auctioned, the cap for the annual revenue of each concession (Receita Annual Permitida or RAP) and the deadline for commencement of the commercial operation of such facilities. The ANEEL then promotes the reverse auction, where the winning bid criterion is the lowest RAP. The concessions have a 30-year term.

Environmental licences at federal or state level are also required for the construction and operation of power transmission facilities, as well as certain construction and operation permits at local level.

Power transmission facilities are composed of transmission lines, substations, and other equipment with voltages equal to or higher than 230 kV. There are over 200 power transmission concessionaires, operating approximately 180,000 km of transmission lines in Brazil, and around 40% of these facilities are operated by Eletrobras.

The winning bidders must submit evidence of their legal, technical, economic-financial and tax qualification after the auction session. The winning bidders are also required to replace their bid bonds with performance bonds, for an amount equivalent to 5% of the project’s CAPEX, to guarantee the timely implementation of the project in accordance with the construction schedule set forth in their concession agreements.

The process from the publication of the auction documents up to the signing of the concession contract usually takes four months.

Concession agreements provide for several obligations of concessionaires regarding the regularity, continuity, safety, efficiency and quality of public services provided, and establish the construction schedule with dates for achieving intermediary milestones and dates for commencing the commissioning and commercial operation of the power transmission facilities.

Power transmission concessionaires are subject to regulations established by the ANEEL and ONS’s grid procedures, as well as the conditions defined in the concession contract and in the Transmission Service Agreement (Contrato de Prestação de Serviços de Transmissão or CPST), entered into by and between the concessionaire and the ONS, which provides for the payment of the RAP based on the availability of the power transmission facilities.

Similarly, in relation to power generation facilities, if the proponent fails to reach an amicable agreement with landowners over compensation for the construction and operation of power transmission facilities on their land, the proponent may request the issue of a DUP by the ANEEL, in accordance with ANEEL Normative Resolution No 919/2021, which entitles the proponent to easement or expropriation rights over the land. Based on the DUP, the proponent may judicially obtain injunctions against landowners to access the land, and the court will define the fair compensation due to landowners, usually based on market value.

Power transmission concessionaires have an exclusive right to construct and operate the transmission facilities under the scope of their concession agreements. The construction of new facilities or the expansion of the capacity of existing facilities may be required by the ONS and authorised by the ANEEL, subject to an additional parcel of the RAP.

A concessionaire has no exclusive right within a specified geographical territory, but there is no competition among concessionaires, as the RAP is not based on the amount of power transmitted by the concessionaires’ transmission facilities, but on the availability of such facilities.

The principal laws governing the provision of transmission services, as well as transmission charges and terms of service, are:

  • the Concessions Law;
  • Law No 9,074/1995;
  • Law No 9,427/1996;
  • Law No 9,648/1998;
  • Law No 10,848/2004;
  • Law No 14,120/2021; and
  • the Concession Renewal Law.

All of these have been previously discussed throughout this guide.

As mentioned in 5.1 Regulation of the Construction and Operation of Transmission Lines and Associated Facilities, power transmission concessions are under a revenue cap regulation. These concessions may be divided into three categories, as follows:

  • concessions granted prior to 1998 – their RAP is adjusted annually based on the IPCA index, they were renewed for an additional 30 years in 2013 and have a tariff review every five years;
  • concessions granted from 1999 to November 2006 – their RAP is adjusted annually based on the IPCA or IGP-M indexes and is reduced by 50% in the 16th year of their commercial operation, they have a 30-year term and no tariff review; and
  • concessions granted after November 2006 – their RAP is adjusted annually based on the IPCA index, they have a 30-year term and three limited tariff reviews within five, ten and 15 years of the granting of the concessions, which only takes into account changes in the cost of capital.

The ANEEL adopts the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) methodology to review the transmission tariffs. In 2023, the current WACC of transmission companies is 7.25% (after taxes), as defined by the ANEEL.

The RAP is adjusted annually and revised periodically, as applicable according to the concession agreement.

In general terms, in the periodic tariff review, the ANEEL covers the recalculation of the cost of capital, efficiency gains in operation and maintenance of the facilities, and the partial or total deduction of revenues arising from other activities (so-called other revenues). The tariff review process follows a procedure of public hearing, where the company, consumers and any other party may submit contributions to the ANEEL prior to definition of the new tariffs.

The RAP is supported by revenues arising from payments of the transmission tariff (TUST) by users of the transmission grid in accordance with Transmission System Use Agreements (Contratos de Uso do Sistema de Transmissão or CUST) entered into by and between the ONS and such users. Concessionaires collect their allowed share of the TUST from each user of the national transmission grid, despite the location of their assets. The TUST is calculated on a monthly basis by the ONS according to a nodal methodology and applicable regulations that differentiate consumers from generators, and also observing the rights of certain generators that participated in auctions with stabilised TUSTs.

Law No 9,074/1995, Decree No 2,655/1998 and ANEEL Resolution No 281/1999, as amended, provide open-access rights to all power transmission facilities on a non-discriminatory basis for any power generator, distributor, or consumer, subject to payment of the applicable transmission charges. Nonetheless, access can be subject to technical restrictions and to the performance of studies and works by the accessing party, as determined by the ONS in each case.

The transmission charges are divided into:

  • connection charges that cover the costs incurred by the local transmission concessionaire in the construction and operation of the connection point of the user; and
  • usage charges to be paid to all transmission concessionaires and the ONS (TUST) according to the capacity contracted by the user.

The ONS is responsible for the procedure of access to transmission facilities and it issues the access opinion required for the execution of the Transmission Usage and Connection Agreements (CUST and Contrato de Conexão ao Sistema de Transmissão or CCT).

Pursuant to Law No 9,074/1995 and the Concession Renewal Law, the construction and operation rights of power distribution facilities may be granted through concessions or permissions. The concessions and permissions have a 30-year term.

Environmental licences at state level are also required for the construction and operation of power distribution facilities, as well as certain construction and operation permits at local level.

Power distribution facilities are composed of distribution lines, substations, and other equipment with voltages lower than 230 kV. Certain equipment over 230 kV is maintained by power distribution companies and called “Other Transmission Facilities” (DITs). There are 105 distribution companies in Brazil, composed of 53 concessionaires and 52 permissionaires.

The permissionaires are mainly power distribution co-operatives in rural areas. Of the concessionaires, 48 out of 53 are controlled by private capital and the remaining five are controlled by states and municipalities. In 2016, CELG D was privatised and sold to Enel, and in 2018, Eletrobras’s six distribution concessionaires in the North and North-East regions were also privatised and sold to Energisa, Equatorial, Oliveira Energia and Atem. In 2020, CEB and CEEE-D were privatised and sold to Neoenergia and Equatorial, respectively. In 2021, CEA and CELG D (currently EDP Goiás) was privatised and sold to Equatorial and EDP, respectively.

The existing concessionaires and permissionaires have monopoly rights over the totality of the geographical territory of Brazil, and they have the right and the obligation to construct and operate distribution facilities within their concession or permission areas.

Concession and permission agreements provide several obligations for concessionaires and permissionaires regarding the regularity, continuity, safety, efficiency and quality of the public services provided, as well as the universalisation or accessibility rights of consumers, and the affordability of tariffs.

Power distribution concessionaires and permissionaires are subject to regulations established by the ANEEL. The quality and continuity of the services is regulated by the Procedures for Distribution of Electricity in the National Electrical System (Procedimentos de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica no Sistema Elétrico Nacional or PRODIST) approved by ANEEL Normative Resolution No 956/2021. Interruptions in the power supply are assessed by two indicators called the DEC (Duração Equivalente de Interrupção por Unidade Consumidora) and FEC (Frequência Equivalente de Interrupção por Unidade Consumidora), which measure the duration and frequency of the interruptions, respectively.

ANEEL Normative Resolution No 1,000/2021 establishes the directives related to the general conditions of the supply of power to consumers by distribution companies.

Similarly, in relation to power generation and transmission facilities, if the proponent fails to reach an amicable agreement with landowners over compensation for the construction and operation of power distribution facilities on their land, the proponent may request the issue of a DUP by the ANEEL, in accordance with ANEEL Normative Resolution No 919/2021, which entitles the proponent to easement or expropriation rights over the land. Based on the DUP, the proponent may judicially obtain injunctions against landowners to access the land, and the court will define the fair compensation due to landowners, usually based on market value.

The power distribution concessionaires and permissionaires have the exclusive right to construct and operate distribution facilities within a specified geographical territory. The concession or permission agreement indicates the areas subject to the concessionaire’s or permissionaire’s monopoly rights.

The principal laws governing the provision of distribution services, as well as distribution charges and terms of service, are the same as those governing transmission services. See 5.6 Transmission Charges and Terms of Service.

The ANEEL adopts the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) methodology to review the distribution tariffs. The definition of remuneration base considers only the value of the assets which are effectively rendering services to the customers, compared to the referential models established by the ANEEL, specific to each company, which reflect the economic and geographic conditions of their respective concession or permission areas and the efficiency levels in services. In 2023, the current WACC of distribution companies is 7.42% (after taxes), as defined by the ANEEL.

Power distribution tariffs are subject to adjustments and reviews as provided in the concession or permission agreements.

In the annual tariff adjustments, non-manageable costs are fully passed on to the consumers and manageable costs are adjusted in line with inflation, based on the IGP-M or IPCA index, reduced by a factor – the so-called X Factor – determined by the ANEEL so that distribution companies can share the gains of productivity with their consumers.

Every four or five years, there is a periodic tariff review to ensure the necessary revenues to cover efficient operational costs and adequate compensation of investment. There is also an extraordinary tariff review, on a case-by-case basis, to compensate for unpredicted costs, including taxes and charges which significantly change the cost structure of the distribution company. 

In the process of review of the tariffs, the ANEEL takes into account the costs and the company’s markets, comparing them and other similar companies abroad, the company’s efficiency, and the need for fairer tariffs and appropriate returns to shareholders. The tariff review process follows a procedure of public hearing, where the company, consumers and any other party may submit contributions to the ANEEL prior to definition of the new tariffs.

Tauil & Chequer Advogados in association with Mayer Brown

Aqwa Corporate Building
Av. Oscar Niemeyer 2000
15th floor
Rio de Janeiro
RJ 20.220-297
Brazil

+55 21 2127 4210

+55 21 2127 4210

BR-DEPT-Marketing@mayerbrown.com www.tauilchequer.com.br
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Author



Advocacia Bettiol was founded in 1961 in Brazil and specialises in litigation, having a strong presence at the Federal Supreme Court, Superior Court of Justice and main Brazilian courts, as well as at national administrative bodies. The firm has highly qualified professionals in public and private law and is recognised for its performance in lawsuits involving administrative, power, alternative energy, tax and business matters, as well as a prominent role in regulatory law, operating in both administrative, judicial litigation and advisory in energy, mining and telecommunication. Uniting experience and innovation, strategic vision and commitment to ethics, in partnership with its clients and collaborators, the firm has consolidated itself as a national reference, standing out in the permanent search for effective solutions to legal demands.

New Role of the Brazilian Federal Court of Accounts in the Adequate Resolution of Disputes

In line with the global trend towards adequate conflict resolution, on 7 June 2023, through Judgment No 1,130/2023, the Brazilian Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) approved its first case of consensual dispute resolution. The procedure, ruled by the Normative Instruction (NI) No 91, issued on 22 December 2022, under the presidency of Minister Bruno Dantas, involves the emergency contracting of electricity, related to the hydrological crisis in 2021.

The search for efficiency, the public interest and the structuring of public governance has driven the development of the so-called “Consensual Administration”. The Brazilian state is undergoing an evolution of the management model, once focused on the unilateral administrative act to contemplate an open model, based on bilateralism and multilateralism, contemplating consensual agreements.

TCU innovated and expanded its action’s scope. Alongside the traditional functions of accounting, financial, budgetary, operational and patrimonial inspections, which allows the Court of Accounts to make coercive determinations to public bodies and sanction managers, and secondo-order control over the choices made by the Administrative Authority and Regulatory Agencies, which allows the TCU to make recommendations for improvements to the regulatory framework (without being able to enforce them), a new role arises for the Court of Accounts to promote, as an intermediary, appropriate conflict resolution.

The Factual and Institutional Context of the Brazilian Electricity Sector

The Brazilian electric system is based on renewable generation, mainly hydroelectricity, with sharing of hydrological risks, foreseen in the Presidential Decree No 2,655/98. The expansion of generation power plants, historically, was based on long-term contracts for energy supply, with contracts of up to 30 years. The model for expansion of new generation assets aims to facilitate the financing of investments, in the project finance format.

The operation of the electric system is centralised by an independent entity, the National Electric System Operator (ONS). The accounting of power purchase and sale transactions, on the other hand, is conducted by another independent entity, the Electricity Trading Chamber (CCEE). This factual context and institutional framework generate a network of contracts that are linked to each other. Consequently, any dispute between an agent and the Granting Authority or between an agent and the Regulatory Agency has a high probability of having a multilateral impact on other agents in the Brazilian electricity sector.

This reality makes the consequences of litigation in the electricity sector more complex. Many times, agents impacted in a reflex manner by multilateral accounting of the effects of a judicial decision, enter litigation. The challenges related to the legal-regulatory framework and the technical issues of the case make it difficult to issue judicial decisions quickly. Over the years of dispute, the impacts and effects of litigation tend to increase. Furthermore, in the face of unpredictable climate change, the system is not hydrological-crisis proof, which can impose an excessive burden on some agents and catalyse litigation.

Notwithstanding the efforts of responsive regulation to make the decision-making process of Regulatory Agencies more permeable to the effective participation of regulated parties, the asymmetry of information between regulated and regulator demand more participation of the regulated in the decision-making process, not only as a spectator, but as a protagonist alongside the Administration.

For all these reasons, the Brazilian power sector has historically sought more efficient solutions to resolve disputes, which is why the TCU’s new role in dispute resolution should be celebrated.

History of Conflicts and Alternative Solutions in the Brazilian Electricity Sector

Relevant cases in the Brazilian electricity sector have pointed to the need for more efficient and timely solutions to its complex litigation. After the 2001/2002 hydroelectric crisis and in face of the immense judicialisation that stopped the operations of the Wholesale Energy Market (MAE), the famous General Agreement of the Electric Sector was signed. The solution was regulated by Federal Law No 10,438/2002, but still in 2023, the judiciary appraises litigation from that time with massive amounts involved and reflexes over dozens of agents.

In 2015, the impact of the hydrological crisis on hydroelectric power plants was over BRL25 billion and still extended through the following years. Burdened by the mechanism for sharing hydrological risk, known by the acronym “GSF” (Generation Scaling Factor), hydroelectric generators filed hundreds of lawsuits. Subsequently, the other agents affected by the multilateral accounting of judicial decision regarding the GSF filed hundreds of other lawsuits with the purpose of ruling out the financial effects. The solution to the problem was the “GSF Agreement”, which also required the enactment of Federal Law No 13,203/2015, however, endless judicial debates persist.

An important precedent for alternative solutions in the electricity sector is the case of the Linhão de Tucuruí (Transmission Line) that will connect the State of Roraima, the only isolated state, to the National Interconnected System (SIN). The TCU acted in this case (Judgment No 1,552/2020), which analysed several scenarios for the outcome of the problem and recommended a consensual agreement.

The first agreement for the Linhão de Tucuruí involved the electric (i) energy agency (ANEEL), (ii) the Federal Government, the environmental agency (IBAMA), (iii) the indigenous protection foundation (FUNAI) and (iv) the transmission concessionaire. The lawsuit filed by the concessionaire for contract extinction was terminated and the definition of the economic-financial rebalancing of the contract was referred to arbitration, regulated by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). The second agreement was necessary, adding (v) the Waimiri Atroari Indigenous Community and (vi) the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office, to enable the start-up of works on the Linhão de Tucuruí: a project which had been delayed for 11 years by legal disputes.

From the recent history of relevant conflicts in the Brazilian electricity sector, we can draw important conclusions: (i) the crises are cyclical and have high potential to generate conflicts; (ii) the pre-established rules are not always sufficient for efficient and proportional solution to the conflicts, (iii) the judicialisation and the delay in the solution entail high transaction costs and negative externalities with impacts on the final consumers.

This scenario demands more adequate solutions to conflicts since the time lost in disputes can often generate more damage.

Legislative Authorisation for Self-Composition Within the Administration

Among the recent legislative advances, it is worth highlighting Law No 13,140 of 26 June 2015, which provided a role for the self-composition of conflicts within the public administration, bringing specific legal authorisation for agreements. Also noteworthy is Law No 13,655 of 25 April 2018, which added to the Law of Introduction to the Rules of Brazilian Law – LINDB (Decree-Law 4,657/1942) Articles 20 to 30. According to Article 20 of LINDB, whether in the administrative, judicial or TCU sphere (control sphere), the decision must consider the practical effects of the administrative act. It is essential to demonstrate the need for and appropriateness of the act, including the possible alternatives for resolving the conflict.

The soleparagraph of Article 21 of the LINDB also requires that in the event of any irregularity in an administrative act or contract, the Administration must “indicate the conditions for the regularisation to occur in a proportional and equitable manner and without prejudice to the general interests”. Article 26 of the LINDB expressly authorises the execution of commitments “to eliminate irregularity, legal uncertainty or contentious situation in the application of public law”, as a “proportional, equitable, efficient legal solution that is compatible with the general interests”. Decree No 9,830, of 10 June 2019, regulated Articles 20 to 30 of the LINDB and determined, in its Article 13, § 1, that “the actions of control bodies will privilege preventive actions before sanctioning processes”.

From the legal-regulatory framework that disciplines the “Consensual Administration” in Brazil, we can extract, in brief summary, the following set of principles, values and premises that must be considered: (i) practical effects of the administrative decision that is the object of the controversy; (ii) necessity, proportionality and adequacy of the possible alternatives; (iii) opportunity for regularisation in a proportional and equitable manner; (iv) prohibition to impose excessive burdens on the administered companies; and (v) proportional solution that meets the general interests.

The Controversy Related to the Water Emergency Decreed in 2021

In 2021, Brazil again faced a severe hydrological crisis that required the emergency contracting of reserve capacity and inflexible energy. On 28 June 2021, the President of the Republic issued Provisional Measure No 1,055/2021 with the objective of establishing emergency measures to optimise the use of hydro resources and to deal with the water shortage situation. The Explanatory Memorandum of the Provisional Measure emphasised the hydrological situation as an emergency and demanded urgent auction, called Simplified Competitive Procedure (PCS).

As noted, at the time of PCS No 01/2021, there was no prospect of increased rainfall, leading to an emergency scenario, with 24,900 TWh of energy contracted, with the availability of 1,220 MW to the Brazilian system, at an annual cost of BRL11 billion and an estimated impact of almost 5% in the final bill of the electric energy distribution consumer.

However, challenges related to environmental licensing processes, issuance of state authorisations, crisis in logistics and supply chains arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, customs service strikes, among other elements, impacted the schedules of the emergency projects and culminated in a series of administrative and judicial litigation, because of the imposition of billions worth of fines issued by the Regulatory Agency to the generators, contracted in PCS No 01/2021.

Unforeseeable Change in Hydrological Context – 2022

In line with the unpredictability of drastic climate change, there was a change in hydrological conditions in 2022. Rainfall exceeded historical averages and with the increase in affluent natural energy, the hydrological emergency dissipated. In the hydrological conjuncture at the beginning of 2023, with spillages in Brazilian hydroelectric power plant reservoirs, there was an increase in the national system’s energy security and the possibility of a reduction in inflexible generation to mitigate costs for final consumers.

In addition to the entire normative framework of self-composition already highlighted, it is important to emphasise that the legal possibility of application of the Change in Circumstances Theory to government contracts is supported by Article 65, II, subsection “d” of the General Law of Public Auctions and Government Contracts (Federal Law No 8,666/93), as in Article 124, II, “d”, of Federal Law No 14,133/2021, and by the Brazilian Civil Code, Articles 478 and 479. The extraordinary climatic event drastically changed the hydrological conditions existing in 2021 and created a favourable environment for PCS No 01/2021, since it is possible to re-establish the contractual balance.

TCU’s Recommendation for Conciliation

Aware of the new hydrological scenario and the delay of the generators, TCU, through Judgment 2,699/2022, set a deadline for the Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME) to evaluate the opportunity and convenience of maintaining the contracts with a consensual solution. The first attempt of MME, created by Normative Ordinance No 55/GM/MME, of 19 December 2022, was not very productive. Only one agent adhered to that proposal, with no sensible impacts for the final consumers. The other generators, pressed by billionaire confiscatory sanctions, started administrative, judicial and arbitral litigation against the Regulatory Agency (ANEEL).

After rounds of dialogue with the agents, on 28 March 2023, the MME requested the TCU to open a consensual dispute resolution procedure in accordance with the new rule (NI No 91/2022). The negotiations between the Federal Union, ANEEL and the generators continue under the co-ordination of the recently created Secretariat of External Control of Consensual Settlement and Conflict Prevention (SecexConsensus/TCU) and with the technical support and monitoring of the Secretariat of External Control of Energy and Communications (SecexEnergia/TCU).

With highly qualified technical staff, knowledgeable of the technical and legal-regulatory complexity of the Brazilian electricity sector, the TCU can mediate discussions between the parties and contribute to the self-composition. Discussions have sought to identify alternatives to make the contract execution compatible with the public interest, which in this case is the reduction of the tariff impact resulting from emergency contracting and preserving the legal security of the contracts signed.

As an outcome of this leading case, the first agreement intermediated by the Court of Accounts was signed, in the form homologated by Judgment No. 1,130/2023, under the reporting of the experienced Minister and renowned professor of administrative law, Mr Benjamin Zymler, with the following parameters: (i) benefit for consumers with the reduction of inflexible generation in the amount of BRL580 million in the second semester of 2023, (ii) preservation of the generation licences and supply contracts, (iii) preservation of the reliability of supply with the maintenance of the installed capacity of 560 MW available to the system and (iv) suspension of judicial, administrative and arbitral litigation. The conditions agreed between the parties in this first agreement anticipated benefits to consumers and served as standstill agreement so that the parties can sign a second self-composition and put an end to all litigation in a definitive manner.

Conclusion

The Brazilian electricity matrix, strongly centred on renewable and hydroelectric generation, makes the system more susceptible to hydrological crises and unpredicted drastic climate changes. Linked contracts make litigation complex and allow reflections on third parties, due to the multilateral accounting performed by the CCEE and ONS.

The traditional methods of unilateral decision by the Public Administration fail to build creative solutions in line with public interest and end up catalysing long, drawn-out and costly judicial litigation.

Brazilian legislation already provides the necessary means to develop Consensual Administration focused on dialogue, bilateral and multilateral solutions that serve the public interest. With IN No 91/2022 and the precedent of Judgment No 1,130/2023, the Federal Court of Accounts made an important contribution to legal security in an investment-intensive environment such as the Brazilian electric sector.

Advocacia Bettiol

SGA/norte Quadra 601
conjunto Q
Cep 70830-026
Brasilia-DF
Brazil

+55 61 4501 5050

contato@bettiol.com.br www.bettiol.com.br/
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Tauil & Chequer Advogados in association with Mayer Brown is a full-service law firm, offering clients in-depth local knowledge combined with global reach. Founded in 1992, the firm has grown rapidly, forming an association with Mayer Brown in December 2009. Today, the firm has approximately 160 lawyers and more than 40 partners in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Vitória and Brasilia, with a team of specialists in several areas of business law in Brazil, who advise in operations ranging from the routine to the highly complex and sophisticated. The firm offers clients the full range of legal services and has a particularly strong and long-standing presence in the energy, oil and gas, and infrastructure industries. It offers a full-service alternative energy and power practice, providing legal advice to domestic and international clients, financial institutions and government agencies.

Trends and Developments

Author



Advocacia Bettiol was founded in 1961 in Brazil and specialises in litigation, having a strong presence at the Federal Supreme Court, Superior Court of Justice and main Brazilian courts, as well as at national administrative bodies. The firm has highly qualified professionals in public and private law and is recognised for its performance in lawsuits involving administrative, power, alternative energy, tax and business matters, as well as a prominent role in regulatory law, operating in both administrative, judicial litigation and advisory in energy, mining and telecommunication. Uniting experience and innovation, strategic vision and commitment to ethics, in partnership with its clients and collaborators, the firm has consolidated itself as a national reference, standing out in the permanent search for effective solutions to legal demands.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.