Alternative Energy & Power 2023

Last Updated July 20, 2023

Netherlands

Law and Practice

Authors



Fieldfisher has been active in the energy and natural resources sector for over 50 years. Its team of more than 100 energy lawyers has acted for a diverse range of renewable clients, including developers, operators, contractors, equipment suppliers, sponsors and institutional investors. Fieldfisher has worked on projects generating several thousand megawatts of electricity worldwide, and advised across all aspects of renewable energy. The firm understands the issues that arise in developing large and small-scale wind, solar power, energy from waste, storage and biomass energy projects, and works collaboratively with its clients to deliver successful projects on time and on budget. Fieldfisher’s appreciation of the complex financial, regulatory and commercial drivers of renewable projects means it delivers cost-effective and pragmatic legal advice, tailored to client and project needs in jurisdictions across Europe, Africa, the CIS and, increasingly, the rest of the world.

The Netherlands’ electricity market has been fully liberalised pursuant to the applicable EU directives. This liberalisation process has led to heavy regulation, in particular of the electricity market, which largely depends on a sophisticated power transportation and transmission infrastructure, whereby third-party access to this network infrastructure had to be secured. The liberalisation process began with the introduction of the Electricity Act in 1998.

In line with the process of liberalisation, the Dutch electricity market has adopted an unbundled structure, separating the generation, transmission, distribution, and supply sectors. The generation of power is predominantly in the hands of private enterprises. State-owned TenneT takes charge of electricity transmission, maintaining efficient operation of the high voltage grid. Distribution of electricity through the lower voltage grid is overseen by distribution system operators owned by local governments. Finally, the electricity supply sector thrives on competition, with a variety of private entities vying to deliver services to consumers. This unbundled approach fosters competition, prevents monopolies, and enhances the efficiency of the Dutch electricity market.

Based on, and pursuant to, the Electricity Act, a large amount of secondary legislation such as codes, regulations and decrees has been adopted and implemented. The Third Energy Package Directive (2009/72/EG) and Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 were implemented by an Act of 12 July 2012 amending the Electricity Act.

The Electricity Act makes a distinction between:

  • the national high voltage network, being the network for transmission of electricity at 110 kV or higher, which is used for such purpose, as well as networks that cross national borders at 500 V or higher (the “high voltage network”); and
  • the other regional low voltage – ie, up to 50 kV, electricity distribution networks (the “distribution networks”).

Transmission and Distribution

There is one transmission system operator (TSO) for the entire high voltage network, the previously mentioned TenneT. TenneT is responsible for operating the high voltage network, maintaining the (cross-border) interconnectors and balancing supply and demand, both on the high voltage network and the distribution networks. Seven regional distribution system operators (DSOs) operate the distribution networks.

The Electricity Act prescribes that, in order to be allowed to operate an electricity transmission or distribution network, a separate company must be appointed as electricity network operator by the owner of the transmission or distribution network, with approval by the Minister of Economic Affairs (MEA). The Electricity Act imposes several legal, managerial and accounting unbundling requirements on network owners and network operators. Consequently, management and operation of a network must be entrusted to a separate legal entity, the network operator, which has to keep separate accounts in respect of the management of the network.

Network operators are usually part of the same corporate group as the owner of the network. The network operators are subject to legal obligations imposed on them by the Electricity Act, in order to prevent them from abusing their dominant position.

In order to further increase the independent position of network operators, the Electricity Act provides for mandatory transfer of the economic ownership of the distribution networks to the relevant DSO.

Furthermore, network operators and the networks under their supervision may no longer belong to an energy company that also supplies or produces energy. Ownership of the network operator must be transferred to the public shareholders of the energy company. The legislature intended that, as such, network operators operate entirely independently in the Dutch market.

In this context, the Electricity Act imposes four key prohibitions on network operators:

  • the grouping or integration prohibition – network operators (national or regional) are not allowed to undertake any energy supply activities;
  • the prohibition to undertake any side-activities – network operators are not allowed to undertake any activities that may conflict with interests of the network management or operation, and therefore can only undertake infrastructural activities;
  • the non-compete prohibition – network operators can only undertake that which is prescribed by the law, and against regulated tariffs; and
  • the privatisation prohibition – the shares in a network operator always need to be, directly or indirectly, owned by the government (local or national).

The aforementioned prohibitions underline the following differences:

  • the distinction between a generation/supply company and a network operator;
  • the distinction between network operators and other (group) companies;
  • the distinction between a network operator and a network owner; and
  • the distinction between public and private.

As mentioned in 1.1 Law Governing the Structure and Ownership of the Power Industry, TenneT, the TSO, owns the electricity transmission network, while there are seven DSOs that own the distribution networks – Coteq Netbeheer, Enduris, Enexis, Liander, RENDO Netwerken, Stedin and Westland Infra.

Acquisitions of (i) distribution networks or (ii) shares of a DSO by non-public entities are prohibited pursuant to the Electricity Act. The Electricity Act does not contain an explicit prohibition on the (partial) privatisation of the TSO. However, in October 2013, the Dutch government decided not to initiate any (partial) privatisation of TenneT. This government policy is in line with the State Participation Policy.

The largest energy companies selling electricity to end-users are Essent, Eneco, Vattenfall, Nuts Energie and Greenchoice. They are all privately owned, whereas the following companies only deliver green electricity, mostly generated in the Netherlands: Pure Energie, Om, Vandebron, PowerPeers, Huismerk Energie and Greenchoice.

At present, incoming foreign direct investment is controlled exclusively in the electricity sector through the Electricity Act and the Regulation for notification of changes of control of the Electricity Act 1998 and the Gas Act (Regeling melding wijziging zeggenschap Elektriciteitswet 1998 en Gaswet). According to this regulation, a notification must contain information covering:

  • the installations and relevant parties involved;
  • the intended change in control;
  • the financial position; and
  • the strategy intentions and past performance.

Pursuant to the Electricity Act, the MEA may prohibit an envisaged transaction or attach certain conditions to it on grounds of public safety or security of supply. Moreover, under the Electricity Act all transactions that result in a change of control over an electricity production plant with a capacity of at least 250 MW must be notified to the MEA. Such a notification must be made no later than four months before the intended change of control.

Finally, any investment in the power industry, whether Dutch or foreign, will be subject to mandatory merger control pursuant to the Competition Act (please see 2.4 Law Governing Market Concentration Limits and 2.5 Surveillance to Detect Anti-competitive Behaviour). The top three electricity supply companies – ie, Essent, Vattenfall (formerly Nuon) and Eneco – are in the hands of foreign shareholders (E.ON, Vattenfall, and Mitsubishi and Chubu respectively).

Please see 1.3 Foreign Investment Review Process, 2.4 Law Governing Market Concentration Limits and 2.5 Surveillance to Detect Anti-competitive Behaviour, dealing with any relevant competition law legislation.

The ACM

The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) is the national regulatory authority for energy. The ACM regulates the energy markets in order to safeguard affordability, quality, continuity and accessibility in these markets. Enforcement of the Electricity Act and secondary legislation is one of the ACM’s core tasks. The ACM aims to prevent and/or resolve market and consumer problems.

The ACM has a specialised Energy Department, supervising the exercise of dominance in the electricity sector, including regulation of third-party access and tariffs related to the distribution networks.

The MEA

In addition to the ACM, the MEA plays an important role. The MEA is responsible for security of supply, network access conditions and tariff structures (imposed by way of ministerial decree) in particular. The MEA is accountable to Parliament for the performance of these duties.

Pursuant to the Electricity Act, the MEA has the authority to issue so-called ministerial regulations. Accordingly, the regulating influence of the MEA is substantial, which means that the MEA plays an important role in the power industry, in particular with regard to the cross-border transmission of electricity. The MEA uses the Energy Report, published every four years, to set out the government’s medium and long-term energy policy. The Energy Report sets out guidelines for the government for the following four years regarding reliable, sustainable and efficient energy supply.

The Environment and Planning Act

On 14 March 2023, the Senate (Eerste Kamer) voted in favour of the entry into force of the long-awaited Environment and Planning Act on 1 January 2024. The implementation of the Environment and Planning Act has been postponed five times due to problems with the Digital System Environment and Planning Act that supports the technical implementation of the act. With the Environment and Planning Act, the government aims to simplify and consolidate the regulations for spatial development.

Environmental law was previously governed by 26 different acts. These have been consolidated into the Environment and Planning Act, which provides a coherent system of planning, decision-making, and procedures. The act has several goals, including:

  • providing better opportunities for integrated policies;
  • improving the usability of environmental law; and
  • substantial simplification of environmental law.

Plans and permits are bundled as much as possible, and procedures are expedited. An estimated 50,000 zoning plans and management regulations will be consolidated into approximately 400 environmental plans. This consolidation should result in cost savings, reduce research burdens, and increase the possibility of digital determination and availability of plans, decisions, and studies. The Senate approved the Environment and Planning Act in 2016 and the law regulating the implementation of the Environment and Planning Act in 2020.

The Climate Act

In May 2019, the Climate Act (Klimaatwet) was adopted by Parliament, establishing a long-term legal framework for government climate policies; please also see 3.1 Climate Change Law and Policy.

The Energy Act

EU Directive 2019/944 is being implemented in the Netherlands by a bill containing rules on energy markets and energy systems (the “Energy Act”). The proposal for an Energy Act was submitted for consultation on 17 December 2020. The Energy Act will replace the current Gas Act and Electricity Act 1998 and aims to provide a transparent and future-proof framework for both electricity and gas.

The Energy Act has the aim of supporting the energy transition and contributing to a sustainable, low-carbon energy supply that, according to the proposal, must be spatially compatible, safe, reliable and affordable. Among other things, the bill further elaborates the frameworks for future system integration, sets preconditions for the way in which energy data is collected, aims to encourage active consumers to participate in the energy transition, and should offer greater protection to consumers.

On 7 July 2022, the legislature submitted the legislative proposal of the Energy Act (the “Bill”). On 6 February 2023, the Advisory Division of the Council of State (Raad van State) commented firmly on the Bill. The advice from the Division is to reconsider the Bill. It is expected that the Minister of Economic Affairs and Climate will soon come up with a comprehensive response. Meanwhile, grid operators have warned that delaying the Bill will slow down the energy transition.

The Minimum CO₂ Price for Industry Act

The Minimum CO₂ Price for Industry Act (Wet minimum CO₂-prijs industrie) provides for the introduction of a minimum CO₂ price for the industry starting from 1 January 2023. This minimum CO₂ price is part of the existing industry CO₂ levy and complements the proposed reassessment and tightening of this levy. This addition ensures that a minimum price will apply to the exempt threshold of the industry CO₂ levy. This ensures that a minimum price applies to the industry for the entirety of its greenhouse gas emissions, allowing the government to determine the level of the incentive for sustainability for all emissions.

ACM Policies

On 28 June 2023, the ACM announced that DSOs will be allowed to offer alternative distribution rights in order to create more capacity on the power grid. They will be able to provide contracts where a (complete) distribution connection would not be available throughout the day, and the distribution capacity could be limited when the grid is not in use (“use it or lose it”).

Furthermore, DSOs will be allowed to limit contracted transmission capacity when it is not (fully) used for a period of two years. This measure will only apply in areas experiencing (potential) distribution congestion.

Moreover, the ACM announced in March 2023 that in the future, DSOs will have the flexibility to deviate from the “first come, first served” principle for projects serving a societal function or addressing congestion issues. The ACM anticipates publishing a draft proposal for the modification of the Network Code in the summer of 2023.

Measures to Meet Climate Targets

On 26 April 2023, the Dutch Minister for Climate and Energy Policy announced additional measures to meet climate targets by 2030. The measures will provide an additional emission reduction of around 22 megatons, which is expected to meet the target of a 55–60% reduction in CO₂ emissions in 2030 compared to 1990. The main plans are:

  • the electricity sector becoming climate neutral by 2035;
  • am energy tax adjustment – a reduced rate will be introduced up to a certain gas consumption and above that the rate for gas will go up;
  • subsidies for housing co-operatives (woningcorporaties) for solar panels in the rental sector;
  • phasing out tax breaks for fossil fuels and raw materials, such as abolishing the coal tax for dual use by 1 January 2028;
  • investments in hydrogen generation and infrastructure;
  • the introduction of a battery obligation for solar parks;
  • various measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture; and
  • an obligation for manufacturers of plastic products to blend recycled or bio-based plastic into their products, in a percentage to be determined later.

TenneT’s Wind Energy Road Map and the MEA's Hydrogen Vision

On 10 June 2022, TenneT published the Wind Energy Road Map for additional tasking around 2030. With this publication the order and method of development of the designated wind energy areas has been established. The Development Framework (Ontwikkelkader) has also been amended by the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Change. This gives TenneT the legal task of connecting a further 10.7 GW of wind energy to the high-voltage grid. This means that by 2030 TenneT will have connected some 21 GW to the Dutch grid. This would make offshore wind energy the most important source of electricity for the Netherlands by 2030. The construction of the additional connections for the offshore electricity grid will require an estimated investment of approximately EUR16 billion.

Furthermore, on 30 March 2020 the MEA issued the government’s Hydrogen Vision, including medium and long-term policy objectives for the development of a green hydrogen policy. The Hydrogen Vision fits well within the framework of the Climate Agreement, which called for the launch of a national hydrogen programme by the Dutch government.

Leading Cases in the Energy Industry

Two recent court cases are relevant in this context: the RWE case and the Shell case.

The RWE case

International arbitration

In February 2021, the Germany-based energy company RWE initiated arbitration proceedings against the Netherlands before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in Washington, DC. Under the Energy Charter Treaty, RWE claimed compensation for the premature mandatory decommissioning of the hard-coal-fired Eemshaven power plant – per 2030 – pursuant to the 2019 Act to phase out the use of coal for generating electricity (ICSID Case No ARB/21/4).

In December 2022, Uniper filed a request with the arbitral tribunal to withdraw the international arbitration proceedings at ICSID. The Dutch state has granted its consent to this withdrawal. The motivation behind this decision was the German support package for Uniper, as the situation of the German corporation significantly deteriorated following the conflict in Ukraine, which included a condition stipulating the withdrawal of the arbitration procedure.

The international arbitration proceedings initiated by RWE against the Dutch state have been adjourned until 19 July 2023, at the request of RWE, pending the publication of the judgment by the German appellate court.

Proceedings in Germany

On 1 September 2022, the Cologne District Court granted the request of the Dutch state and ruled that the ICSID procedures are in violation of European law. RWE and Uniper appealed against these judgments on 23 November 2022, and 7 December 2022, respectively.

The Dutch state filed its legal documents for these proceedings on 7 February 2023. The Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe arranged a hearing for 17 May 2023, during which the parties had the opportunity to present their arguments once again and address any queries from the court. It is anticipated that the court will render its decision on or around 27 July 2023.

Proceedings in the Netherlands

RWE and Uniper also took legal action against the Dutch government before the Dutch courts. They claimed financial compensation stating that the “Act banning coal in power generation” (Wet verbod op kolen bij elektriciteitsproductie) infringed on their property rights. They claimed that the Act should not have been introduced without financial compensation, as it means that the coal plants will have to close much earlier than the companies anticipated at the outset. RWE claimed EUR1.4 billion in damages and Uniper around EUR1 billion. On 30 November 2022, the Hague District Court rejected their claims.

The court ruled that while the law infringes on property rights, that infringement is not unlawful. The measures taken by the Dutch state to reduce carbon emissions are proportionate. The interests of the owners have been sufficiently taken into account.

Both RWE and Uniper have now filed an appeal against these judgments. It is expected that RWE and Uniper will submit their substantive objections against the judgments in the first instance in the summer of 2023.

The Shell Case

As a result of legal action brought by Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie), together with six other non-governmental organisations and more than 17,000 individual co-plaintiffs, the Hague District Court ruled on 26 May 2021 – in what is generally considered to be a landmark decision – that Royal Dutch Shell plc (RDS) is obliged to reduce the CO₂ emissions of the Shell group’s activities by a 45% by 2030, compared to its emissions in 2019, through the Shell group’s corporate policy.

This reduction obligation includes RDS’s own emissions (scope 1 emissions), but also the emissions from the energy it purchases (electricity, heat and steam) by its energy suppliers (scope 2 emissions), and all other indirect emissions resulting from its activities, including emissions by the end-users of its products (scope 3 emissions). For the scope 1 emissions, the court imposes an obligation of result, meaning that, leaving acts of God aside, RDS can only meet this obligation by achieving the result. For scope 2 and scope 3 emissions, the reduction obligation is a serious best-efforts obligation, meaning that RDS is expected to take the necessary steps to eliminate or prevent the serious risks arising from these CO₂ emissions, and to use its influence to minimise any lasting effects.

The court derives this reduction obligation from the unwritten standard of care (ongeschreven zorgvuldigheidsnorm) applicable to RDS, which the court has fleshed out using the facts of the matter and internationally accepted standards.

The court points to the fact that the CO₂ emissions of the Shell Group, its suppliers and consumers exceed those of many countries. They contribute to global warming, which leads to dangerous climate change and poses serious risks to human rights, such as the right to life and family integrity. It is generally accepted that companies should respect human rights.

It is the first time that a court order has been issued against a private company obliging it to reduce its total CO₂ emissions by a fixed percentage within a certain period of time.

On 24 August July 2021, RDS has lodged its appeal against the ruling of the Hague District Court. Two new parties – both apparently supporting RDS - have sought to intervene in the proceedings before the Hague Court of Appeal. On 25 April 2023, the Court admitted one of them. The court ordered all parties to appear on 6 June 2023 to discuss further procedural arrangements. At the time of publication, no updates are known.

Currently, the transition from a traditional fossil fuel-driven energy market to a renewable energy market is a hot topic in the Netherlands. This is due both to climate changes concerns and also the ongoing problems pursuant to a series of earthquakes in the north-eastern part of the Netherlands where the largest natural gas field is located. As a consequence, the government has decided to stop natural gas production within the next few years, but in any event by 2030. This has led to a different pace in working towards the original target to achieve an electricity market in the Netherlands that is driven by renewable energy. This all started with the Energy Agreement in 2013.

In September 2013, the Dutch government and a number of stakeholders reached a society-wide Energy Agreement for Sustainable Growth (the “Energy Agreement”), laying out the actions needed to reach certain targets by 2020. On the basis of the Agreement and the Climate Agenda of October 2013, the country reaffirmed its ambition to reduce CO₂ emissions in the transport sector by 17% by 2030 and by 60% by 2050. It also supports an EU-wide reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of at least 40% by 2030 and further reductions of between 80% and 95% by 2050, in line with international commitments. The government considers this 40% goal by 2030 a minimum commitment.

The Energy Agreement unites various organisations, including the Dutch central and local government, employers’ associations, trade unions, financial institutions, environmental organisations and other NGOs. The Energy Agreement has the goal of aligning the interests of the various involved parties towards a more sustainable and secure energy supply, of creating additional jobs in the energy sector and lower prices for consumers. Two main targets of the Energy Agreement are to achieve an average energy consumption saving of 1.5% per year and an increase of the renewable energy share to 14% by 2020 and 16% by 2023, with as its ultimate goal being a fully renewable energy generation industry by 2050.

The wholesale electricity market in the Netherlands is governed by the Electricity Act and has various aspects. Electricity can be traded or exchanged via two official electricity exchanges, APX and ICE Endex. APX is an electronic exchange for spot market trading, offering day-ahead trading and intraday trading. It is part of the pan-European energy-trading platform EPEX Spot. ICE Endex facilitates trading in electricity in the form of futures.

Electricity is also traded directly between trading parties or via a broker on the over-the-counter market. Furthermore, the TSO, TenneT, operates an imbalance market for regulating reserve capacity, assuring that the balance between electricity injected into and taken from the Dutch electricity network is preserved. On this single buyer market, parties can offer regulating or reserve capacity to TenneT.

In order to be able to supply electricity to consumers and small businesses, a licence is required from the ACM. The ACM also establishes the tariff structures and conditions for the transmission of electricity and supervises TenneT, which has primary responsibility for the transmission of electricity from producers to consumers.

Moreover, TenneT is responsible for supervising and recognising each balance-responsible party (BRP, formerly also known as a programme responsible party). Any party that has a connecting point to the electricity network bears balance responsibility for such connecting point. This means that the BRP is obliged to draw up programmes relating to expected electricity supply to, and expected consumption from, the electricity network. These electricity programmes have to be supplied to TenneT on a daily basis. TenneT settles the differences between the volumes agreed and the actual measured volume.

To be able to trade on APX and ICE Endex, membership is required. Each of these platforms impose their own regulations on members. Exchanges for derivatives fall under the supervision of the Financial Markets Authority since derivatives may qualify as financial products within the meaning of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), which has been implemented in the Financial Supervision Act.

Finally, in this context, corporate power purchase agreements (PPAs) should be mentioned. Both direct and virtual PPAs are allowed in the Netherlands. Direct PPAs are made between an energy generator and an end user and provide for physical supply to the end user by the generator. In virtual PPAs, the electricity does not necessarily come from the energy generator’s own generation facility.

In the Netherlands, an electricity producer can sell electricity at the meter from the point of exit of the generation facility to the end user, even in the absence of a direct physical connection. The end user purchases electricity through the virtual PPA, together with the associated guarantees of origin. The latter are generally used by the end user to set them off against its own electricity consumption or to trade them on the guarantees of origin market, which is facilitated by CertiQ, the Dutch authority issuing and supervising the guarantees of origin market.

In respect of electricity, the Dutch government stimulates TenneT as TSO as well as DSOs to work across borders, since an integrated north-west European energy market simplifies trade and enables network operators to invest elsewhere in Europe. Moreover, electricity can then be generated at the most cost-efficient location. TenneT, in its role as TSO, is responsible for the operation and construction of cross-border interconnections.

With four connections with Germany, two with Belgium, one with Norway (NorNed, 580 km long and with a capacity of 700 MW, the world’s longest high-voltage subsea direct current link) and one with the UK (BritNed, a two-way 1,000 MW high-voltage direct current connection with a length of 260 km), the Dutch electricity network forms an important link in the north European electricity grid. Moreover, TenneT and Energinet.dk – the TSO of the Danish high-voltage electricity network – have installed a high-voltage direct current submarine cable (the COBRA cable) that connects the electricity grids of the two countries.

TenneT is able to recoup its investment costs by auctioning off the available transmission capacity on the interconnector to the highest bidder. Capacity at the interconnectors is made available to the market through the Joint Allocation Office. This central European interconnection capacity auction office has been set up by 20 TSOs throughout Europe, including TenneT. The rules applicable to the auction have been included in the Network Code, a regulation issued by the ACM.

The ACM has established the electricity codes (including the aforementioned Network Code) that outline technical, operational, and market-related requirements for grid connection and operation. These codes serve as the framework within which market participants, including importers and exporters, must operate. Compliance with these codes is crucial to maintain a well-functioning and secure electricity network.

According to the Dutch national statistical office, Statistics Netherlands (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, CBS), the following preliminary division of energy sources in the Netherlands applied in 2022:

  • coal accounted for 16.48 billion kWh (14.5%) of the total energy consumption;
  • oil accounted for 3.16 billion kWh (2.8%) of the total energy consumption;
  • natural gas accounted for 46.88 billion kWh (41.1%) of the total energy consumption; and
  • renewable energy accounted for 47.44 billion kWh (41.6%) of the total energy consumption.

Within the category of renewable energy, wind energy accounted for 21.15 billion kWh (44.5%), solar energy accounted for 17.68 billion kWh (37.3%), biomass accounted for 8.56 billion kWh (18.1%), and hydropower accounted for 0.05 billion kWh (0.1%).

In addition to European Union rules, the principal laws relevant for the Dutch electricity market are (i) the Competition Act (Mededingingswet), and (ii) the Electricity Act.

The principal merger control provisions are set out in Chapter 5 of the Competition Act. If a party or combination of parties have more than 40% of the market, a dominant position will generally be considered to exist. In case of a market share of more than 50%, dominance may be presumed. Undertakings with such market share must ensure they do not abuse their dominant position (the prohibition of abuse of a dominant position is laid down in Article 24 of the Competition Act).

While the prohibition of abuse of a dominant position does not provide for any exemptions, it does allow for the possibility of obtaining a waiver (Article 25 of the Competition Act). Undertakings entrusted with the supply of services of general economic interest may request such waiver.

The ACM is the authority for matters in relation to Regulation (EC) 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (Merger Regulation). The ACM is responsible for the enforcement of the Competition Act.

If the thresholds set out in Article 29 of the Competition Act are met, the filing of a notification is mandatory. These thresholds are as follows:

  • the combined turnover of all undertakings concerned is more than EUR150 million in the calendar year preceding the concentration; and
  • at least two concerned undertakings have each earned at least EUR30 million in the Netherlands.

Although there are further specific criteria regarding gas assets, no such further criteria exist for the Dutch electricity sector. If merger control rules are not observed, the ACM may impose an administrative fine of up to EUR900,000, or 10% of the annual turnover of an undertaking, whichever is higher. In the case of an implementation of a concentration before approval or after prohibition, the same fines apply.

The principal laws are (i) the Competition Act, and (ii) the Act Establishing the ACM (Instellingswet, ACM).

As mentioned in 2.4 Law Governing Market Concentration Limits, the authority responsible for the enforcement of competition rules in the Netherlands is the ACM. The ACM has investigative and enforcement powers. The ACM can perform dawn raids, either in its own name or on behalf of the European Commission. ACM officials are authorised to enter premises, ask for information, demand inspection of documents and copy data.

In addition to the administrative fines specified in 2.4 Law Governing Market Concentration Limits, the ACM may impose fines on individuals of up to EUR900,000. Finally, the ACM may also impose an order that the undertakings concerned cease or reverse the infringement. This order may be subject to periodic penalty payments.

Netherlands Law and Policy

To combat climate change, the Dutch government wants to reduce the Netherlands’ greenhouse gas emissions by 49% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels, and a 95% reduction by 2050. This follows from the Climate Act (please see 1.6 Recent Changes in Law or Regulation). On 11 February 2022, the Minister of Energy and Climate (formerly the MEA) proposed two amendments to the Climate Act. The first step concerns an amendment that is necessary in the short term to bring the Climate Act in line with the European Climate Act. The 2030 target will be adjusted from 49% to at least 55% including land use emissions. The target for 2050 will be tightened from 95% CO₂ reduction to climate neutrality.

The Climate Agreement (Klimaatakkoord) was concluded in June 2019 and contains agreements with industry sectors on what they will do to help achieve the climate goals. The participating sectors are electricity, industry, built environment, traffic and transport and agriculture.

EU Law and Policy

The Netherlands adheres to the European Union’s climate policy. Together with other ambitious member states, the Netherlands lobbied for the targets that were laid down in the 2021 EU Climate Law: climate neutrality within the EU in 2050 and a 55% emission reduction in 2030. The EU Climate Law (Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999) was adopted on 30 June 2021. Climate neutrality by 2050 means achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions for EU countries as a whole, mainly by cutting emissions, investing in green technologies and protecting the natural environment. The EU Climate Law aims to ensure that all EU policies contribute to this goal and that all sectors of the economy and society play their part. The EU Climate Law forms part of the European Green Deal, a set of proposals by the European Commission to make the EU’s climate, energy, transport and taxation policies fit for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels.

International Agreements

The Netherlands has also committed to several international agreements on tackling climate change, such as the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol of 1997, which lays down different emission reduction targets for different countries and allows countries to trade in emissions. In 2015, the Netherlands signed up to the UN climate agreement at the Paris Climate Conference. The Dutch climate policy is based on the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Carbon Taxes

Energy and carbon taxes in the Netherlands are levied within the framework of the 2003 EU Energy Tax Directive, which sets minimum rates for the taxation of energy products in member states. Within this framework, the main taxes on energy use in the Netherlands are the following:

  • an energy tax on the consumption of oil products, natural gas and coal and coke; and
  • electricity output is taxed (per MWh).

The tax rates at which these taxes apply differ across fuels and different users. Fuels used to generate electricity benefit from a full refund on the tax paid, if the installation has a capacity of more than 1 MW. It is assumed all users benefit from the full refund on the tax paid on fuels used for electricity generation. The government is currently considering the introduction of a carbon tax to tackle climate change. This may affect, in particular, the energy-intensive industrial processes (metallurgic, electrolytic and chemical reduction processes), which are currently exempt from the tax on electricity output.

There are no incentives provided by the government to encourage the early retirement of carbon-based generation. However, on 18 March 2019, a bill was proposed to Parliament, subsequently adopted by the Senate on 10 December 2019, which targets the phasing out of the use of coal for generating electricity (Wet verbod op kolen bij elektriciteitsproductie). The bill, which became effective on 20 December 2019, prohibits the use of coal in power generation plants for generating electricity. Pursuant to the bill, these power stations will be prohibited as from 1 January 2025. Power stations with less than a 44% yield in generating electricity will be prohibited as from 1 January 2030.

In the explanatory memorandum to the bill, the MEA explains that the substance of the bill has been foreseeable for the owners of the relevant power stations. Therefore, in principle, the owners of the power stations will not be compensated for their stranded assets. However, compensation will be possible if the owner of the power station can demonstrate that the measures will affect it disproportionately. As explained above (see 1.7 Announcements Regarding New Policies), RWE has initiated arbitration proceedings, seeking compensation for the mandatory early decommissioning of its Eemshaven power plant.

Of the five coal-fired power plants in use in the Netherlands in 2019, the Hemweg power plant was shut down in December 2019. The next power plant designated to close down is the Amercentrale, on 31 December 2024. The remaining three plants have to follow within five years thereafter.

Pursuant to the Energy Agreement, the Netherlands has set the targets of having – by 2023 – 16% of its energy requirements generated by renewable energy facilities. The Energy Agreement provides for a number of measures to scale up renewable energy generation, by means of a strong focus on onshore and offshore wind farms and the closing down of coal plants.

The Energy Agreement also provides for tax incentives for consumers to generate their own renewable energy and for insulating their houses and other incentives such as the renewable energy incentive subsidy scheme (SDE++, standing for Stimulation of Sustainable Energy Transition, previously known as the Stimulation of Sustainable Energy Production, or SDE+).

The SDE++ scheme is an operating subsidy aimed at businesses, institutions and non-profit organisations. While pursuant to the original SDE+ scheme, producers of renewable energy received financial compensation for the energy they generated (effectively neutralising the difference between the generally lower cost price of energy derived from fossil fuels and the higher cost price of energy derived from renewable resources), under the SDE++ scheme various technologies compete on the basis of amounts of CO₂ and other greenhouse gases that have been avoided. The goal of the SDE++ scheme is to reduce CO₂ and greenhouse gas emissions by 49% by 2030 (compared with 1990 levels).

The Energy Agenda is a policy document that can be considered as a follow-up to the Energy Agreement. It discusses overarching themes for the entire energy transition and describes the choices to be made to implement the energy transition from a carbon-based energy system in the Netherlands to a renewable energy-based energy system.

The government formed following the 2021 Dutch general election has entered into the Climate Agreement (Klimaatakkoord) with relevant stakeholders in June 2019. The government’s central goal with the Climate Agreement is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the Netherlands by 49% in 2030 compared to 1990 levels. The three key issues of the Climate Agreement are:

  • by 2030, 70% of electricity has to be generated from renewable sources;
  • by 2050, 7 million houses and 1 million buildings have to stop using gas as an energy source; and
  • by 2050, the industry needs to be circular and thus should be CO₂-neutral.

The offshore wind electricity policy is laid down in the Offshore Wind Energy Roadmap 2030. This policy instrument intends to maintain continuity in the realisation of offshore wind energy to meet the goals set in the Energy Agenda and the Climate Agreement, and to provide a clear policy framework regarding the realisation of offshore wind farms for the market so as to ensure the confidence of wind farm developers, which may result in cost reduction and willingness to invest.

The Energy Act, as discussed in 1.6 Recent Changes in Law or Regulation, obviously also plays a role in encouraging the development of alternative energy sources.

Regarding the construction of power plants, the Electricity Act does not impose a specific licence or permit requirement for generation facilities. Consequently, the generic permit framework, and from 1 January 2024 the Environment and Planning Act, applicable to construction of buildings in the Netherlands, applies. This includes requirements pursuant to both planning and environmental legislation.

The National Co-ordination Regulation (Rijkscoördinatieregeling), which is laid down in the Spatial Planning Act (Wet ruimtelijke ordening) is applicable to energy construction projects. In this procedure, all rulings are to be made available for inspection at the same time. In summary:

  • phase 1 – the initiator will make its plans known at an early stage to the MEA, using the standard form;
  • phase 2 – if the project does not fit in the current zoning plan, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Ministry of Interior Affairs will prepare a spatial ruling (ruimtelijk besluit) in consultation with the initiator and the government authorities involved; often an environmental impact assessment will be prepared;
  • phase 3 – the Department Energy Projects (Bureau Energieprojecten), together with the initiator, will review which permits and exemptions are necessary;
  • phase 4 – the initiator will have to apply for all permits and discretionary exemptions with the applicable authorities; the co-ordinating minister will arrange a joint schedule;
  • phase 5 – the involved authorities will jointly prepare a draft decision;
  • phase 6 – the draft decision will be made available for inspection, together with an environmental impact assessment, in the event that that has been made;
  • phase 7 – the authorities will process the advice provided and will give a definitive ruling;
  • phase 8 – the definitive rulings will be made available for inspection – interested parties can appeal proceedings before the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State (Raad van State); and
  • phase 9 – if interested parties appeal against the definitive rulings, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State will give its ruling in one judgment, within six months of the appeal period.

Nowadays the focus in the Netherlands is on the construction of renewable energy generation facilities. Typically, these are wind and solar power facilities. Therefore, this chapter will focus on these facilities only, describing the requirements for constructing an onshore wind farm, an offshore wind farm, and a solar power park, respectively.

Onshore Wind Farms

In order to be able to install an onshore wind turbine in the Netherlands, the first step is to report this to the municipal authority in charge. Typically, the applicable zoning plan must allow for wind energy facilities. Wind turbines are subject to general rules for the protection of the environment and the surroundings. Prior to starting to build an onshore wind turbine or wind farm, the initiator must have a Permit for Physical Aspects (Omgevingsvergunning). Sometimes there may also be a need for an environmental permit, as well as other permits and exemptions with respect to aspects of conservation, water management and soil protection. In addition, municipalities may have different additional requirements.

Offshore Wind Farms

Building and operating an offshore wind farm requires a licence under the Offshore Wind Energy Act. The licence application procedure is combined with the application for the SDE++ subsidy. In order to obtain a licence, the applicant must be able to demonstrate that the construction and exploitation of the wind farm is financially and technically practicable and economically feasible within the term stated in the application. Once a licence pursuant to the Offshore Wind Energy Act has been granted, there is no need to obtain other separate licences under the Nature Conservation Act, the Flora and Fauna Act and the Water Act that might otherwise be required. A licence may be granted for a maximum period of 30 years (including construction and removal). The licence is transferable, subject to MEA’s consent.

Solar Power Parks

For the building and operation of a solar power park, the following conditions apply:

  • the construction of a solar power park must be permitted under the applicable zoning plan;
  • an environmental permit for building under the Environmental Permitting Act (Wet algemene bepalingen omgevingsrecht) is required for the construction of the solar power park;
  • construction activities must comply with the Buildings Decree 2012 (Bouwbesluit 2012);
  • no permit is required for the operation of a solar power park, unless the park contains a substation with an electric capacity of 200 MVA or more;
  • operation of a solar power park must, however, comply with the general rules regarding environmental control of the Activities Decree (Activiteitenbesluit milieubeheer); and
  • if a solar power park is projected near protected areas or waterways, or if it impacts local flora and fauna, additional consents may be required.

In the Netherlands, a private party does not have the authority to take land by eminent domain. Moreover, a Dutch government entity can only implement an expropriation order on the basis of public interest and if compensation of the parties involved has been agreed upon. Expropriations are always preceded by amendments to, or renewal of, the applicable zoning plan.

In order to demolish or decommission a generation facility under Dutch law, it is necessary to comply with the Buildings Decree 2012 (Bouwbesluit 2012). This decree contains the technical regulations that represent the minimum requirements for all structures in the Netherlands. The requirements relate to safety, health, usability, energy efficiency and the environment. Moreover, in most cases there will be a need for a Permit for Physical Aspects (Omgevingsvergunning).

In addition, when undertaking demolition activities regarding a generation facility that result in more than 10 m³ demolition waste or if removal of asbestos is involved, a demolition notification must be submitted to the relevant authority. Normally this is the municipality where the facility is located.

Specifically, in relation to the demolition of a generation facility containing asbestos, firstly a certified asbestos abatement company must be contracted to inspect the building. Then, after submitting a demolition notice, the certified asbestos company must remove the asbestos.

If the generation facility to be demolished is a protected monument, an all-in-one Permit for Physical Aspects is needed in addition to the demolition notification.

Apart from the above, specific municipal building rules may apply, relating for example to urban planning and to how to deal with contaminated land. Such building rules may differ from one municipality to another.

The Electricity Act prescribes that the high voltage network and the interconnector networks are built, extended, operated and maintained by a network operator appointed by the MEA (ie, the TSO). As pointed out in 1.1 Law Governing the Structure and Ownership of the Power Industry, TenneT is the Dutch TSO. Pursuant to the Electricity Act, the TSO must have ownership of the high voltage network it operates. The TSO also needs to secure safe, reliable and efficient electricity transport, provide a connection to the network and look after the safety of the use of electric installations. The TSO is also in charge of the operation of existing and future interconnectors. Finally, TenneT has been commissioned to build and operate an offshore network to provide grid access to an additional 10.7 GW of North Sea windfarms by 2030. This is discussed in more detail in 1.7 Announcements Regarding New Policies.

Besides the Electricity Act, the Network Code is relevant since it sets out arrangements between the TSO and connected parties in order to enable the TSO to provide transmission services. Furthermore, it includes provisions regarding the high voltage network, as well as for determination and allocation of transport capacity on cross-border connections.

New high voltage electricity transmission lines with a voltage level of 110 kV and 150 kV are, in principle, laid underground, while new transmission lines with a voltage level of 220 kV and 380 kV will be installed above ground. Quite often, a route of a new high voltage transmission line has not been included in the applicable zoning plan. In that case, the zoning plan must be either changed or deviated from by a new environmental permit. For connections to 110 kV and 150 kV, the municipality is the competent authority. The procedure as specified in 4.2 Obtaining Approvals for the Construction and Operation of Generation Facilities is applicable.

If, for a new transmission network connection, the zoning plan needs to be amended, the procedure as laid down in the Spatial Planning Act (Wet ruimtelijke ordening), as specified in 4.2 Obtaining Approvals for the Construction and Operation of Generation Facilities, applies. In addition to the procedure for the amendment of the applicable zoning plan, local municipal participation rights may apply, granting interested parties the right to present their views on the proposed change of the zoning plan.

In addition to the amendment of an applicable zoning plan, there may be a need for the TSO (or the relevant DSO in case of electricity distribution lines) to apply for a Permit for Physical Aspects (Omgevingsvergunning). Such permit application has to be submitted to the competent authority (usually the municipality). Said competent authority will have to make an assessment of the permit application against the eligible policy framework, including applicable laws, zoning plans and regulations.

For the construction of an electricity transmission line, an agreement has to be reached with all property owners concerned. However, if parties are unable to come to such an agreement, the Minister of Infrastructure and Environment can impose upon the property owner an obligation to consent (gedoogplicht) under the Public Works Act (Belemmeringenwet Privaatrecht). Such an obligation to consent will only be imposed if the TSO or the relevant DSO, as the case may be, can prove that it is in the public interest to indeed have the transmission line constructed. A decision pursuant to the Public Works Act is subject to judicial review. The property owner may claim damages.

Pursuant to the Electricity Act, TenneT is responsible for the transmission of electricity in the Netherlands to large companies and DSOs, who in turn pass it on to households, businesses and non-commercial organisations. The government has decided that TenneT is the only operator that is entitled to transmit high voltage electricity. In other words, TenneT, which is a wholly state-owned enterprise, holds a monopoly in the electricity transmission market of the Netherlands.

The ACM supervises TenneT on behalf of the MEA. Its task is to ensure that TenneT does not make any unnecessary or needlessly expensive investments in the maintenance and expansion of the electricity network, and that TenneT does not overcharge its consumers for the transmission of electricity. The ACM is also responsible for setting standards for the network’s quality and capacity.

The Minister of Finance manages TenneT as a state-owned enterprise, acting as the sole shareholder on the state’s behalf.

The Electricity Act and the Tariff Code, a regulation issued by the ACM, are the two principal sources of regulation of transmission charges, connection tariffs and service terms. The Tariff Code contains a description of the tariff structures governing connection, transmission and system services. In fixing the tariff structures and technical codes, the ACM takes into account the aim of securing a reliable, sustainable and effective electricity supply.

Pursuant to the Electricity Act, there are two regulated tariffs: the tariff for transport services and the tariff for supply services. The tariffs for the supply services have been liberalised, whereas the tariffs for transport services remain regulated.

For the regional distribution networks, a yardstick regime is applicable. Pursuant to this regime, the allowed annual change in average industry charges is limited to consumer CPI–x%. CPI–x is an incentive-based form of price/revenue control whereby the regulator sets a price-path for the utilities.

Changes in price or revenues of controlled goods and services are limited to: (i) the increase in a general price index – ie, the consumer price index (CPI) minus (ii) a factor (x) determined by the regulatory authority, the ACM, to reflect anticipated efficiency gains that will lower the cost of producing the regulated goods and services. The ACM determines the anticipated efficiency gains.

In addition, an adjustment of the tariffs for quality of service performance is possible. It is again up to the ACM to establish this adjustment, which is referred to as the “q factor” (ie, quality factor).

The tariffs set by the ACM include an appropriate return, based on a WACC (“weighted average cost of capital”) method. This WACC gives an allowance for both the cost of debt and the cost of equity. When setting the WACC, the ACM looks at the market return instead of the actual costs that the system operators face. By looking at the market return, the ACM ensures that the return is no higher than what would be appropriate in a competitive environment. If, according to the ACM, it had looked at the actual costs of a system operator, the operator would have had an incentive to drive up the costs for debt and equity.

The WACC (real, pre-tax) for all system operators was set at 3.0% in 2021 for the period 2022–2026. The method accounts for embedded debt. The ACM applies the same WACC for the TSO and the DSOs, because the reference group it uses for the WACC is representative for both TSOs and DSOs.

As the TSO, TenneT has a duty to provide non-discriminatory (first come, first served) network access to any party; this duty has been enacted in the Electricity Act. Network capacity shortage and technical reasons are the only reasons for refusing transmission and/or a network connection. When implementing the first EU Electricity Directive, the Netherlands has chosen regulated third-party access to the networks. However, as noted in 1.7 Announcements Regarding New Policies, DSOs will in the future have the flexibility to deviate from the “first come, first served” principle for projects serving a societal function or addressing congestion issues. Please refer to 1.7 Announcements Regarding New Policiesfor more information on this topic.

The technical terms and conditions to ensure regulated third-party access to the electricity transmission and distribution networks are laid down in the specific codes – ie, the Network Code, the System Code and the Metering Code. The substance of these codes can be modified by the ACM, on the basis of a joint proposal by the TSO and the DSOs. The Network Code has recently been amended to address growing concerns regarding shortage of transport capacity and congestion management, mainly caused by increased power demand.

The Network Code also provides for service level criteria for customer services to be met by the relevant network operator, for financial compensation of consumers in case of a network failure.

Under the Electricity Act, the distribution networks are operated by seven regional DSOs. The Electricity Act prescribes that they only need to have economic ownership (ie, not legal ownership) of the distribution networks they operate. DSOs need to operate, maintain and extend existing distribution networks, and build new distribution networks. This duty is imposed by the Electricity Act. Moreover, the Network Code may be relevant in this context.

The procedure as specified in 4.2 Obtaining Approvals for the Construction and Operation of Generation Facilities is applicable.

Please see 5.3 Terms and Conditions Imposed in Approvals for the Construction and Operation of a Transmission Line and Associated Facilities, which also applies to distribution.

Please see 5.4 Eminent Domain, Condemnation and Expropriation Rights, which also applies in regard to distribution.

DSOs have an exclusive right to construct and operate distribution networks in their defined geographical area. As previously pointed out, the Electricity Act prescribes that, in order to be allowed to operate a distribution network, a separate company must be appointed as “electricity network operator” by the owner of the distribution network, with ministerial approval by the MEA. To further secure their independence, acquisitions of (i) distribution networks or (ii) of shares of a DSO by non-public entities are prohibited pursuant to the Electricity Act.

Please see 5.6 Transmission Charges and Terms of Service.

Fieldfisher

Amsteldijk 220
1079 LK
Amsterdam
Netherlands

+31 20 225 2211

louis.bouchez@fieldfisher.com www.fieldfisher.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Fieldfisher has been active in the energy and natural resources sector for over 50 years. Its team of more than 100 energy lawyers has acted for a diverse range of renewable clients, including developers, operators, contractors, equipment suppliers, sponsors and institutional investors. Fieldfisher has worked on projects generating several thousand megawatts of electricity worldwide, and advised across all aspects of renewable energy. The firm understands the issues that arise in developing large and small-scale wind, solar power, energy from waste, storage and biomass energy projects, and works collaboratively with its clients to deliver successful projects on time and on budget. Fieldfisher’s appreciation of the complex financial, regulatory and commercial drivers of renewable projects means it delivers cost-effective and pragmatic legal advice, tailored to client and project needs in jurisdictions across Europe, Africa, the CIS and, increasingly, the rest of the world.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.