Banking Regulation 2024 Comparisons

FINMA as Regulator of the Banking Sector

Swiss banks and Swiss branch offices or representative offices of foreign banks are subject to prudential supervision by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).

Principal Laws and Regulations for Banks

The Swiss Federal Banking Act of 8 November 1934 (the “Banking Act”) and the ordinances issued thereunder are the relevant pieces of legislation governing banks under Swiss law.

The key ordinances under the Banking Act include:

• the Swiss Federal Banking Ordinance of 30 April 2014 (the “Banking Ordinance”);
• the Capital Adequacy Ordinance of 1 June 2012 (the “Capital Adequacy Ordinance”), covering the rules on capital requirements for all banks and securities firms, including banks of systemic importance;

• the FINMA Ordinance on the insolvency of banks and securities firms of 30 August 2012 (BIO-FINMA);
• the Ordinance on the liquidity of banks and securities firms of 30 November 2012 (the “Liquidity Ordinance”);
• the Ordinance on foreign banks in Switzerland of 21 October 1996 (the “Foreign Banks Ordinance”); and
• the FINMA Ordinance on accounting rules of 31 October 2019 (the “FINMA Accounting Ordinance”).

FINMA issues circulars on various topics, specifying its supervisory practice (see finma.ch). In addition, various self-regulatory organisations (in particular the Swiss Banking Association – SBA) issue regulations that affect the banking business (eg, the Agreement on the Swiss banks’ code of conduct with regard to the exercise of due diligence – CDB 20: www.swissbanking.org).

Further Relevant Laws and Regulations

Other laws and regulations that are most relevant for the banking sector include:

• the Swiss Financial Market Supervision Act of 22 June 2007 (FINMASA), including the competences of FINMA to proceed with enforcement actions and issue sanctions in respect of firms subject to FINMA supervision;
• the Swiss National Bank Act of 3 October 2003 (NBA) and the ordinance thereto of 18 March 2004 (NBO), setting out the regulatory framework for the Swiss National Bank (SNB) and its powers;
• the Swiss Financial Institutions Act of 15 June 2018 (FinIA) and the ordinance thereto of 6 November 2019 (FinIO), including the rules on the prudential supervision of securities firms, asset managers, asset managers of collective investment schemes, fund management companies and trustees, as well as the licensing requirements for foreign financial institutions (other than banks) with a Swiss branch of representative office;
• the Swiss Financial Services Act of 15 June 2018 (FinSA) and the ordinance thereto of 6 November 2019 (FinSO), including the rules of conduct for financial services providers, the organisational requirements for financial services providers, registration requirements for financial services providers not subject to prudential supervision in Switzerland, the obligation to adhere to an ombudsman service for financial services providers not only interacting with professional or institutional clients, and the primary market rules for securities offerings;
• the Swiss Financial Market Infrastructure Act of 19 June 2015 (FMIA) and the ordinance thereto of 25 November 2015 (FMIO), including the rules governing financial market infrastructure (including trading venues for securities, central counterparties, central securities depositories and payment systems), the rules of conduct for dealing in OTC derivatives and exchange-traded derivatives, the rules on the disclosure of significant shareholders in listed companies and the rules on market abuse and insider dealing;
• the Ordinance of FINMA on Financial Market Infrastructures and Market Conduct in Securities and Derivatives Trading of 3 December 2015 (FMIO-FINMA);
• the Swiss Federal Act on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing of 10 October 1997 (AMLA) and the ordinance thereto of 11 November 2015 (AMLO);
• the FINMA Ordinance on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing of 3 June 2015 (AMLO-FINMA), including the rules on implementing the AML framework by FINMA-regulated financial institutions;
• the Swiss Federal Act dated 25 September 2020 on amendments to several acts in view of accommodating requirements of distributed ledger technology (DLT) (DLT Act); and
• the Ordinance dated 18 June 2021 on amendments to several acts in view of accommodating the requirements of distributed ledger technology (DLT) (the “DLT Ordinance”).

Types of Licences

A bank incorporated in Switzerland can apply for the following types of licences:

• a full banking licence in the sense of Article 1a of the Swiss Banking Act (a “Bank Licence”); and
• a bank licence in the sense of Article 1b of the Swiss Banking Act (a “Fintech Licence”).

Foreign banks can apply for the following types of licences, depending on the type of activity conducted in Switzerland:

• a licence as a Swiss branch of a foreign bank duly licensed and supervised in its place of incorporation, if it operates an office in Switzerland that enters into transactions, maintains client accounts or commits the bank legally (a “Swiss Branch Licence”); or
• a licence as a representative office of a foreign bank duly licensed and supervised in its place of incorporation, if it operates in another way in or from Switzerland – eg, by passing on client orders to the foreign bank or representing it for advertising or other purposes (as an introducing broker) regarding banking services in the sense of the Banking Act or financial services in the sense of the FinSA (a “Swiss Representative Office Licence”).

Where a foreign bank does not have a presence in Switzerland and does not engage in the activity of an introducing broker in Switzerland as regards banking or financial services, an inbound cross-border activity alone is currently not subject to a licensing requirement.

However, separately from such licensing requirements, please note that a question arises as to what extent a foreign bank must register front-office staff dealing with clients in Switzerland with a registration body for client advisers in the sense of Article 28 et seq of FinSA. While this is not the case for front-office staff based in a Swiss branch of a foreign bank that is duly licensed by FINMA with a Swiss Branch Licence, the registration requirement arises if a foreign bank only has a Swiss Representative Office Licence or if it acts in Switzerland on a mere cross-border basis, provided that the foreign bank interacts with retail clients or elective professional clients.

Categories of Banks

Depending on the balance sheet total, the assets under management, the deposits subject to a depositor protection scheme and the own funds, FINMA classifies banks into categories 1 to 5, with category 1 being the largest banks requiring most attention from the regulator. The category allocated to each bank is published on www.finma.ch.

In addition to such categorisation, FINMA and the SNB are mandated to identify Swiss banks of systemic importance for the Swiss market in terms of size, interconnectedness with the financial system and the economy, and the short-term substitutability of the services provided by the bank. In making this assessment, particular attention must be paid to the importance of the deposit and lending business, the importance of the payment transaction business, the amount of secured deposits, the ratio between the balance sheet total and the annual Swiss gross domestic product and the risk profile of the bank (Article 8 para 2 of the Banking Act). UBS and Credit Suisse were classified as global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), while the Zurich Cantonal Bank, Raiffeisen and Postfinance were classified as domestic SIBs (D-SIBs).

On the other end of the scale, Swiss banks categorised by FINMA in categories 4 or 5 may opt-in to a “small banks regime” if they have own funds resulting in a simplified leverage ratio of at least 8% (calculated as the CET1 capital divided by the total balance sheet without the goodwill, participations and off-balance sheet positions), an average liquidity ratio of at least 110% and a refinancing ratio of at least 100% (calculated as the ratio of (i) the liabilities resulting from deposits, money market obligations, debt obligations and covered bonds with a remaining term of more than one year and own funds divided by (ii) the claims against clients and counterparties, including claims resulting from mortgage lending). These thresholds must be met on an entity and group-wide level. If FINMA agrees to grant such “small bank” status, the own funds requirements are not calculated according to the minimum requirements that would otherwise apply pursuant to Articles 41-46 of the Capital Adequacy Ordinance.

Activities and Services Covered by a Bank Licence

The following activities trigger a requirement for a Bank Licence:

• accepting, or offering to accept, deposits from 20 or more persons or companies on an ongoing basis, provided that this calculation would not take into account any deposits received from:
1. banks or other companies subject to prudential supervision;
2. shareholders holding at least 10% of the voting rights or the capital and affiliates thereof or persons related to such shareholders;
3. institutional investors with professional treasury operations;
4. employees or former employees; and
5. persons benefiting from a guarantee by a bank licensed by FINMA; and
• providing financing to an unlimited number of unaffiliated persons or companies, provided that this activity shall be refinanced by unaffiliated banks.

For these purposes, deposits would include any liabilities except the following:

• deposits held by securities or precious metal traders, asset managers or similar businesses (but not by a “currency trader”) in settlement accounts for their clients, provided that such settlement accounts are exclusively used for the execution of client transactions that will occur in the foreseeable future, the settlement accounts are not interest-bearing and the funds are on-transferred within a maximum period of 60 days (such maximum time period does not apply to deposits held with securities traders);
• deposits held in settlement accounts with DLT multilateral trading facilities, provided that such accounts are not interest-bearing;
• funds paid as consideration for goods or services;
• bonds and other fungible debt obligations issued on the basis of offering documentation, including certain minimum information specified in the Banking Ordinance;
• funds up to CHF3,000 pre-paid to a payment solution in view of a future use for the payment as consideration for goods or services, provided that no interest is paid on such funds;
• funds guaranteed by a Swiss bank; and
• funds paid on a life insurance or social security plan.

A “sandbox” exemption allows a deposit-taking activity without triggering a banking licence if the deposits are below CHF1 million and are not reinvested with the aim of generating a profit, and if the depositors are informed that the entity is not licensed as a bank and that they do not benefit from a depositor protection scheme.

According to Article 6 of FinIA, and because the Bank Licence is the “highest status” in the hierarchy of FINMA licences, an entity licensed as a Swiss bank may conduct the regulated activities of the following entities:

• a securities firm;
• an asset manager of collective investment schemes;
• an asset manager of assets not held in a collective investment scheme; and
• a trustee.

Activities and Services Covered by a Fintech Licence

The Fintech Licence is applicable to companies that either (i) accept deposits from the public up to a maximum of CHF100 million or (ii) hold crypto-assets that serve a payment purpose (eg, cryptocurrencies) for depositors in omnibus accounts (subject to the general exemptions from a deposit-taking activity (eg, to the extent that the depositors are only institutional investors with treasury operations or the assets are only held for settlement purposes with an on-transfer within 60 days)), provided in both cases that such deposits or crypto-assets are not reinvested and not interest-bearing. FINMA may increase the CHF100 million threshold in particular cases if customers are adequately protected.

The Fintech Bank Licence requires investors to be informed in advance about the business model, the services provided and the risks associated with the technologies used, that the deposits are not covered by a deposit protection system and that there is no immediate reimbursement in the case of bankruptcy.

The accepted deposits must be held separately from the company’s own funds. The deposits have to be held in the currency they were made as sight deposits or as highly liquid assets. Deposits in the form of crypto-assets have to be held in the same type of crypto-assets (ie, the same cryptocurrency or the same tokens) as they were accepted from the clients.

Conditions for Granting a Bank Licence

FINMA requires Swiss banks to meet the following licensing conditions.

• Legal form: the Banking Act does not provide for any special rules regarding the legal form of banks, with the exception of the cantonal banks that are established as public entities or joint stock corporations under the relevant legislation of the Canton pursuant to Article 3a of the Banking Act.
• Minimum capital: the bank must have a fully paid-up minimum capital of CHF10 million (Article 3 para 2 lit b of the Banking Act and Article 15 of the Banking Ordinance).
• Business activity description: in accordance with Article 3 para 2 lit a of the Banking Act and Article 9 of the Banking Ordinance, a bank is obliged to precisely define its business area in the articles of association and organisational regulations in terms of subject matter and area of operation. The scope of tasks and the geographical area of operation must be aligned with the financial possibilities and the administrative organisation.
• Organisation: Article 3 para 2 lit a of the Banking Act requires that separate bodies must be set up for management and for the supervision and control of at least three members. According to Article 11 of the Banking Ordinance, no member of the body responsible for the overall supervision and control may be a member of the management. In accordance with Article 12 of the Banking Ordinance, the bank must also ensure an internal separation of functions between trading, asset management and settlement.
• Internal controls: the bank must set up an internal control system and appoint an “internal audit” function that is independent from the management, in addition to appointing external auditors (see 4.1 Corporate Governance Requirements).
• Fit and proper requirements: members of the management and the material shareholders (ie, shareholders holding at least 10% of the capital or voting rights) must meet the relevant fit and proper requirements (see 4.2 Registration and Oversight of Senior Management).
• Operation in Switzerland: the bank must be managed in Switzerland, with the management being present in Switzerland.
• Foreign-controlled banks: if a foreign shareholder holds at least 50% of the capital or voting rights or otherwise exercises control, FINMA may require the relevant jurisdiction to grant reciprocity (see 3.1 Requirements for Acquiring or Increasing Control over a Bank).
• Consolidated supervision: if the bank is part of a foreign-controlled financial group, FINMA may require that it is subject to appropriate consolidated supervision by foreign supervisory authorities (Article 3b of the Banking Act), and the licence may be subject to the approval of the relevant foreign supervisory authority. Not all jurisdictions meet the requirement of “adequate consolidated supervision” within the meaning of the Banking Act.

Conditions for Granting a Fintech Licence

FINMA requires Swiss banks with a Fintech Licence to meet the following licensing requirements.

• Legal form: it must be established as a joint stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft), a partnership limited by shares (Kommanditaktiengesellschaft) or a limited liability company (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung).
• Minimum capital: the bank must have a fully paid-up minimum capital of at least 3% of the deposits it has taken; such capital must be at least CHF300,000 (Article 17a of the Banking Ordinance).
• Business activity description: the bank is obliged to precisely define its business area in the articles of association and organisational regulations in terms of subject matter and area of operation. The scope of tasks and the geographical area of operation must be aligned with the financial possibilities and the administrative organisation (Article 14b of the Banking Ordinance).
• Organisation: separate bodies must be set up for management and for the supervision and control of at least three members. According to Article 14d para 2 of the Banking Ordinance, at least a third of the members of the body responsible for the overall supervision and control must be independent from the management.
• Internal controls: the bank must set up an internal control system and appoint an “internal audit” function that is independent from the management, in addition to appointing external auditors.
• Fit and proper requirements: members of the management and the material shareholders (ie, shareholders holding at least 10% of the capital or voting rights) must meet the relevant fit and proper requirements.
• Operation in Switzerland: the bank must be managed in Switzerland, with the management being present in Switzerland (Article 14c of the Banking Ordinance).

Conditions for Licensing Foreign Banks

As regards a Branch Office Licence and a Representative Office Licence, the relevant requirements set out in the Foreign Bank Ordinance must be met.

Duty to Notify FINMA

Any natural or legal person that intends to hold or cease to hold a qualified participation in a bank, directly or indirectly, is required to notify FINMA in advance. A qualified participation exists if a natural person or legal entity holds directly or indirectly at least 10% of the capital or the voting rights of a bank, or can otherwise exercise significant influence over the management of the bank. The duty to notify also applies to the holder of a participation who intends to increase or decrease that participation above or below the thresholds of 10%, 20%, 33% and 50%. The bank must report to FINMA any person who is acquiring or selling a qualified participation or whose participation increases or decreases below the thresholds of 10%, 20%, 33% and 50%. The bank must update its list of qualified participants at least once a year.

Proper Business Conduct Requirement

Any person who intends to hold a qualified participation in a bank must guarantee that the influence to be acquired will not be used in a way that is detrimental to the prudent and proper management of the bank. To assess compliance with the proper business conduct requirement, FINMA must be provided with certain indications and documents, as set forth in Article 8 of the Banking Ordinance. In addition, any person acquiring a qualified participation must indicate whether the participation is acquired for own account or on a fiduciary basis, and whether any options or similar rights will be granted on the participation.

Banks Under Foreign Control

If a Swiss-controlled bank passes under foreign control as a result of the acquisition of a participation, it must require an additional licence from FINMA. A new additional licence is also required if there is any change in a qualified participation held by a foreigner in a foreign-controlled bank. A bank is under foreign control if foreigners holding qualified participations directly or indirectly hold more than half of the voting rights, or if the bank is controlled in any other way by foreigners. A “foreigner” is either a physical person who has neither Swiss nationality nor a type C Swiss residence permit, or a legal entity whose registered office is located abroad or that is controlled directly or indirectly by foreigners.

The granting of the additional licence is subject to the following conditions:

• reciprocity must be guaranteed by the countries in which the foreigners holding the qualified participation have their domicile or registered office (however, reciprocity does not need to be verified in the case of contradictory provisions in international agreements, such as vis-à-vis the member states of the World Trade Organization);
• the bank’s corporate name must not indicate or suggest a Swiss character of the bank; and
• if the bank becomes part of a financial group or financial conglomerate, FINMA may make the granting of the additional licence dependent on the approval of the transaction by the competent foreign supervisory authority and appropriate consolidated supervision.

Overview

Banks must comply with the specific corporate governance requirements defined in the banking legislation, particularly the Banking Act and the Banking Ordinance, as well as in various FINMA circulars, particularly FINMA Circular 2017/1 “Corporate governance – banks” and, to the extent applicable, with the general corporate governance requirements set forth in Swiss corporate law.

Board of Directors

The board of directors of the bank must be comprised of at least three members. A third of the board members must be independent, and none of the independent board members is allowed to be part of the bank’s executive management, unless FINMA agrees to grant an exception. Banks in supervisory categories 1 to 3 must establish an audit committee and a risk committee (these committees may be combined into a single committee in banks assigned to supervisory category 3). The audit and risk committees must be comprised of a majority of independent board members. The chairman of the board of directors cannot be a member of these committees. In addition, systemically important institutions must establish a compensation and nomination committee, at least at group level.

The board of directors is the governing body for the guidance, supervision and control of the institution. It has specific duties regarding the bank’s business strategy and risk policy, organisation, financial situation, personnel and other resources, as well as the monitoring and control of the executive management, and is responsible for taking decisions on major structural changes and investments.

Executive Management

The executive management is responsible for conducting the operational business activities of the bank in accordance with the strategy, targets and internal regulations set forth by the board of directors. It has specific duties and responsibilities in terms of financial and risk management, representation of the institution towards third parties, the transmission of information to the board of directors, and the establishment of effective internal processes, including an appropriate management information system, an internal control system and the necessary technological infrastructure.

Risk Management Framework and Internal Control System

Banks must adopt and maintain an institution-wide risk management framework that defines their risk policy and risk tolerance as well as the corresponding risk limits in all key risk categories. In addition, the internal control system must provide for at least two controlling bodies: the revenue-generating units and the controlling bodies independent therefrom (covering the risk control and compliance functions).

Internal Audit

Banks must have an internal audit function, in addition to their regulatory audit firm. The internal audit function can be internalised or delegated, inter alia, to the internal audit of a group company if certain requirements are met or to an external audit firm that is independent from the bank’s regulatory audit firm. The internal audit function reports directly to the board of directors and has an unlimited right of inspection, information and audit within the institution in the context of its duties.

Other Organisational Requirements

Banks face numerous other organisational requirements, depending on the type of activities conducted.

Board of Directors

The board of directors must have adequate management expertise and specialist knowledge and experience of the banking and financial services sector. It must be sufficiently diversified so that all key aspects of the business are adequately represented, including finance, accounting and risk management. Board members are appointed by the shareholders’ meeting (if the bank is organised in the form of a joint stock company).

The board of directors must define the requirements for its members, the chairman and the members of its committees. The board of directors must critically assess its performance at least once a year and must record the results in writing.

Executive Management

The members of the executive management, both individually and as an overall body, must have adequate management expertise and the specialist knowledge and experience of banking and financial services required to ensure compliance with licensing requirements in the context of the bank’s operational activities. They are appointed by the board of directors, which must also appoint the chief risk officer and the head of internal audit. The requirements for the chief executive officer are defined by the board of directors, which also approves and periodically reviews the requirements for the other members of the executive management, the chief risk officer and the head of internal audit.

Good Reputation and Proper Business Conduct

Each member of the board of directors and executive management must maintain a good reputation and fulfil the requirement of proper business conduct (“fit and proper” requirements). Any change in the board of directors or the executive management must be notified to and approved by FINMA prior to such change occurring. The information and documents to be provided to FINMA are set out in Article 8 of the Banking Ordinance and the relevant FINMA guidelines. Members of the executive management must have their domicile in a place that allows them to perform their tasks in an effective and responsible manner.

Compensation System for Independent Control Bodies

As a general rule, the compensation system for the members of the independent control bodies and the internal audit function must not create incentives that could lead to conflicts of interest with the duties of these bodies or function.

FINMA Circular 2010/1

FINMA has adopted Circular 2010/1 “Remuneration schemes”, defining the minimum standards for the design, implementation and disclosure of remuneration schemes in financial institutions. It defines the various principles that must be reflected in the bank’s remuneration policy, including that the structure and level of total remuneration must be designed so as to enhance risk awareness, and that variable remuneration must be funded through the long-term economic performance of the bank and shall depend on sustainable and justifiable criteria reflecting the bank’s business and risk policies.

However, this circular only applies to banks that are required to maintain equity capital of at least CHF10 billion, either in their capacity as a single entity or at the financial group or conglomerate level. All other banks are recommended to follow the principles set out therein as best practice guidelines.

Specific Provisions for Systemically Important Banks and Listed Companies

The Banking Act provides for the right of the Swiss Federal Council to impose measures relating to remuneration packages for employees of systemically important banks or their group company if they receive state aid from federal funds.

Finally, if the bank is a listed company, it must follow the remuneration requirements applicable to listed companies, particularly those set forth in the Ordinance against Excessive Remuneration in Listed Companies Limited by Shares.

The AMLO-FINMA specifies the general provisions in the AMLA and sets out how Swiss banks must implement the obligations to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. Regarding the requirements for the identification of the contracting parties and the determination of the beneficial owner of assets, the AMLO-FINMA refers to the provisions of the Agreement on the Swiss banks’ code of conduct with regard to the exercise of due diligence of 13 June 2018 (CDB 20).

Swiss banks must identify natural persons by an official identification document with a photograph. In the case of legal entities and partnerships, the identification of the contracting party generally takes place by means of an official register extract. Banks must further record the means by which the identity has been verified and put a copy of the corresponding identification documents on record. A business relationship can be established in person, by correspondence or,  in accordance with the applicable FINMA Circular 2016/7 “Video and online identification”, via an online process that is deemed to be equivalent to an establishment by correspondence. According to such FINMA Circular, it is also possible to apply a video identification process that is deemed to be equivalent to the in-person process, provided that the requirements of the FINMA Circular are met.

The contracting party of a Swiss bank is required to declare the beneficial owner (natural person) of the assets. The beneficial owner of an operating legal entity is defined as the natural person who ultimately controls the legal entity (controlling person). The contracting party must record the information of the beneficial owner or controlling person by means of a written declaration or specific form as provided by CDB 20.

According to the AMLO-FINMA, among others, details of payment transactions must be indicated, the reasons for using domiciliary companies must be clarified, and criteria for identifying business relationships or transactions with increased risks must be developed. In the case of business relationships or transactions with increased risks, Swiss banks are required to make additional clarifications.

Swiss banks shall prepare documentary evidence of the transactions carried out and the clarifications required, and shall ensure checks and the adequate training of staff.

Swiss banks must immediately report the following to the Money Laundering Reporting Office (MROS):

• if they know or have reasonable grounds to suspect that the assets involved in the business relationship are connected with money laundering or criminal organisations, derive from a crime or a qualified tax offence, or serve to finance terrorism;
• if they terminate negotiations for the establishment of a business relationship on reasonable suspicion in accordance with the above; or
• if they know or have reason to suspect, on the basis of the investigations carried out, that the data of a person or organisation forwarded by a supervisory authority or organisation corresponds to the data of a person of their own business relationships or transactions.

Swiss banks must block the assets entrusted to them as soon as MROS informs them that it will forward their report under the first point above to a prosecution authority, but must immediately block any assets that are connected with a report under the third point above. Swiss banks may inform neither the person concerned nor third parties that they have made a report to MROS.

In Switzerland, clients’ cash deposits are protected by both the depositor protection scheme and the preferential treatment granted in the event of a bank’s bankruptcy. Deposits totalling CHF100,000 per client are regarded as privileged deposits.

In essence, depositor protection is based on a three-tier system.

First, privileged deposits are paid out of the remaining liquidity of the failed bank. This must occur immediately, to the extent that the deposits are booked in Switzerland and, to the extent that the place of booking is outside Switzerland, as soon as the bank is, from a legal and operational perspective, in a position to pay out such deposits. FINMA determines the maximum amount of deposits payable in this process. As a result, the largest possible number of retail clients will be paid out before bankruptcy proceedings are instituted.

Secondly, if the bank’s available liquidity fails to cover all privileged deposits, the depositor protection scheme is used to pay out privileged deposits, provided that they were booked in Switzerland (so-called secured deposits). All banks in Switzerland that accept client deposits are obliged to participate in the depositor protection scheme. When FINMA has declared bankruptcy, it notifies the depositor protection scheme and informs it about the liquidity required to pay out the secured deposits. The amounts guaranteed through the scheme are capped at the greater of (i) CHF6 billion or (ii) 1.6% of the total amount of privileged deposits overall. Up to such cap, the guaranteed amounts must be paid out within a period of seven days since the date the scheme was notified of the bankruptcy or the relevant FINMA measures triggering the payout. Half of the amount that members of the depositor protection scheme are obliged to contribute must either (i) be held as highly liquid securities or cash deposits with a third-party custodian, or (ii) pre-financed as loans funded in cash to the scheme. As an additional measure towards achieving full payment of all privileged deposits at the latest during bankruptcy proceedings, banks must hold assets in Switzerland equivalent to at least 125% of the privileged client deposits.

Thirdly, privileged deposits are treated preferentially and are paid out at the same time as other second-class claims in the event of bankruptcy – ie, after first-class claims such as employee salary and pension fund claims have been paid out.

Unlike cash deposits in bank accounts, custody assets held in custody accounts such as shares, units in collective investment schemes and other securities are set-aside in their entirety and released to clients in the event of a bankruptcy.

Deposits with pension and vested benefits foundations, particularly vested benefits accounts and pillar 3a pension funds, benefit from a separate privilege up to a maximum of CHF100,000 per client in addition to the privileged deposits of the client itself. However, these deposits do not fall under the depositor protection scheme but are treated preferentially in the event of bankruptcy and qualify as second-class claims.

Client deposits and pension savings of more than CHF100,000 per client are regarded as third-class claims and are treated the same as the claims of other non-privileged creditors.

The Banking Act is the primary law governing bank secrecy in Switzerland, Article 47 of which states that anyone who, intentionally or in negligence, discloses confidential data that has been entrusted to them in their capacity as a member of an executive or supervisory body, employee, representative or liquidator of a bank, or that they have learned when exercising their profession, is liable to prosecution. Swiss banks also have a civil law obligation to respect the confidentiality of customer data, arising out of the customer’s right to personal privacy and the contractual relationship between the customer and the bank.

The definition of confidential information is broad, and includes information on the customer as a private individual, on deposits and withdrawals, on loans, investments, the customer’s financial circumstances, etc. However, the Banking Act only protects information related to an identified or identifiable customer, so customer data may be disclosed by, for example, anonymising the customer name, account number or other identifying information, or by aggregating customer data.

Several exceptions allow a bank to disclose customer data protected by the banking secrecy obligation, including:

• disclosure of customer data when requested under a Swiss statute requiring the disclosure of such information to a government authority;
• disclosure to a parent company that is supervised by a banking or financial market supervisory authority if the disclosure is necessary for consolidated supervision purposes, subject to certain conditions;
• disclosure of customer data in cases of an overriding private or public interest; and
• disclosure of customer data to comply with agreements Switzerland has entered into with other countries (such as the OECD Model Tax Convention, the Agreement on the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) or the Agreement between the USA and Switzerland for Cooperation to Facilitate the Implementation of FATCA).

In addition, in the account opening documents (including the general terms and conditions), banks typically obtain customer consent for disclosures not permitted under the Banking Act. For this purpose, banks need to clearly define the scope of consent, as a general waiver of bank secrecy is not sufficient.

The SBA published its guidelines for the secure use of cloud services in banking dated as of June 2020 (the “SBA Guidelines”), according to which the deployment of customer identifying data (CID) to a cloud provider outside Switzerland does not constitute a breach of banking secrecy, subject to a number of specifically defined technical (eg, anonymisation, pseudonymisation or encryption, etc), organisational (eg, monitoring and auditing) and contractual (eg, specification of the proceeding in the event of requests by foreign authorities, securing the auditability at all times, definition of an access concept, etc) security measures as generally set out in the SBA Guidelines. As far as is known, the SBA Guidelines have not been endorsed by FINMA, so the risk of migrating to the cloud remains with the individual banking institutions.

In addition to the Banking Act, the Federal Act on Data Protection of 25 September 2020 (FADP) and its implementing Ordinance apply to the processing of personal data pertaining to individuals and legal persons. In its current form, the  FADP entered into force on 1 September 2023 and only applies to data pertaining to individuals (data pertaining to legal persons is no longer protected). In EU/EEA cross-border relationships, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) may also need to be considered, given its extraterritorial reach.

Non-compliance with any of the general data processing principles of lawfulness, good faith, proportionality, purpose limitation and transparency would require a legal justification (ie, the data subject’s consent, overriding private or public interest or a Swiss statutory provision). In particular:

• personal data may only be processed for the purpose indicated at the time of collection, which is evident from the circumstances or provided for by Swiss law;
• the principle of transparency requires that the collection of personal data and the purpose of its processing must be evident to the data subject; and
• the principle of proportionality provides that personal data is disclosed only to the extent required for the specific purpose – ie, any personal data should be appropriately anonymised, pseudonymised or encrypted or, if the customer data needs to be processed in cleartext, then access should only be granted to the extent required (eg, by the implementation of an appropriate authorisation and access concept with regard to personal data).

Finally, FINMA Circular 2018/3 “Outsourcing – banks and insurers” is applicable to the outsourcing of a function that is significant to the company’s business activities and that will be mandated to a third party in order to independently and on an ongoing basis perform all or part of such function. Significant functions are those that have a material effect on compliance with the aims and regulations of financial market legislation. Outsourcing is not considered an unlawful disclosure under the Banking Act if the outsourcing provider and its employees are obliged to comply with bank secrecy rules.

Basel III Standards

Switzerland has, to a large extent, implemented the Basel III standards by means of amendments to its Capital Adequacy Ordinance, Liquidity Ordinance and various FINMA circulars.

Capital Requirements

Subject to any exception granted by FINMA, the fully paid-in minimum share capital of a bank shall amount to at least CHF10 million, although FINMA may require a higher amount of share capital depending on the bank’s intended business activities.

Non-systemic banks must hold a minimum regulatory capital of at least 8% of their risk-weighted positions, and must have a capital buffer of between 2.5% and 4.8%. Upon the request of the SNB, an additional countercyclical buffer to address excessive credit growth risks can be introduced. The Federal Council decided in January 2022 to reactivate the countercyclical capital buffer at a level of 2.5% on loans secured against residential properties in Switzerland. The Federal Council had previously approved, in 2020, the deactivation of the countercyclical capital buffer in order to give banks more flexibility in granting credits as a way to limit the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Banks with a balance sheet amount of at least CHF250 billion, of which the total foreign commitment amounts to at least CHF10 billion, or with a total foreign commitment of at least CHF25 billion, are further required to hold an extended countercyclical buffer of up to 2.5%. Furthermore, FINMA may require a bank to hold additional capital if the minimum regulatory capital and capital buffer do not ensure an appropriate level of security in view of the specific risks faced by the bank. Finally, a bank that is not an SIB must maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 3% based on Tier 1 capital and its unweighted exposures (total exposure).

There are additional requirements for SIBs, which must hold enough regulatory capital to continue their operations even if they incur large losses (going concern capital) and must provide additional loss-absorbing funds (gone concern capital). The going and gone concern requirements together comprise the bank’s total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC). The going concern capital requirements for SIBs consist of the following elements:

• a base requirement of a risk-weighted capital ratio of 12.86% and a leverage ratio of 4.5%;
• a surcharge that depends on the degree of systemic importance; and
• countercyclical buffers.

The gone concern capital requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) amount to a minimum of 40% of their going concern capital, subject to rebates. The gone concern capital requirements for the two global SIBs (G-SIBs) at the consolidated group level are 100% of their going concern capital minus certain rebates granted by FINMA.

Following a pilot phase, on 1 January 2020 FINMA implemented a small bank regime exempting small, particularly liquid and well-capitalised banks from certain regulatory requirements. Such banks benefit from less complex requirements under the Capital Adequacy Ordinance, which allows them, for instance, to forego the calculation of risk-weighted positions. Please see 2.1 Licences and Application Process for a description of the requirements that a bank must meet in order to be allowed to participate in the small bank regime.

Risk Diversification

Banks are obliged to limit concentration risks and must comply with various requirements in this respect. The standard upper limit for any large exposure is, in principle, 25% of the bank’s adjusted eligible core capital (Tier 1), save for any exceptions or other specific requirements provided in the Capital Adequacy Ordinance and in FINMA Circular 2019/1 “Risk diversification – banks”.

Liquidity Requirements

The Liquidity Ordinance implemented Basel III’s liquidity standards into Swiss law, and regulates the qualitative and quantitative liquidity requirements applicable to banks. Further specifications are contained in FINMA Circular 2015/2 “Liquidity risks – banks”.

Under the Liquidity Ordinance, banks are required to appropriately manage and monitor their liquidity risks.

A liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) has been introduced into the Liquidity Ordinance in accordance with international liquidity standards, and shall ensure that banks have an adequate portfolio of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) to cover the expected net cash outflow for a 30 calendar day liquidity stress scenario on an ongoing basis. Banks have to report their LCR to the SNB on a monthly basis.

The net stable funding ratio (NSFR) was introduced into the Liquidity Ordinance on 1 July 2021 and ensures that the stability of a bank’s funding over a one-year horizon is guaranteed at all times. Banks have to report on the NSFR to the SNB at various frequencies, depending on their classification.

SIBs are subject to more stringent liquidity requirements than non-systemic banks.

Applicable Insolvency Rules

The Banking Act sets out the debt enforcement and insolvency proceedings in Articles 25 et seq, as further specified in the BIO-FINMA. These provisions apply to banks licensed in Switzerland under the Banking Act (with either a Bank Licence or a Fintech Licence). They also apply to:

• the material group companies of a bank, including:
1. a holding company of a bank; or
2. a group company incorporated in Switzerland that is classified by FINMA as fulfilling a material function in the group, such as liquidity, treasury or risk-management, accounting, IT or HR services or the performance of the legal and compliance functions for group companies);
• securities firms; and
• to fund management companies regulated under the FinIA and licensed by FINMA.

According to Articles 25 et seq of the Banking Act, where FINMA has reasons to believe that a bank it regulates or supervises either is over-indebted or has incurred serious liquidity problems, or does not fulfil the capital requirements upon a respective rectification period granted by FINMA, it may, as appropriate:

• take protective measures under Article 26 of the Banking Act;
• initiate bank reorganisation proceedings under Articles 28-32 of the Banking Act; or
• order the liquidation of the bank (bankruptcy proceedings) under Articles 33 et seq of the Banking Act.

The Swiss Parliament adopted, on 17 December 2021, an amendment to the Banking Act largely focused on amendments to the rules on bank reorganisation proceedings. These rules entered into force in January 2023. The revision essentially anchors reorganisation and insolvency rules for banks and strengthens the position of cantonal banks that have sovereign guarantees. They cover, among other updates, the following:

• they incorporated the rules regarding the waterfall of how rights, equity and debt instruments are bailed-in into the Banking Act (such rules are currently part of the BIO-FINMA);
• they introduced the power to carve out certain financial instruments issued by cantonal banks with a guarantee by the sovereign from the bail-in waterfall;
• they introduced a reform of the rules on the pay-out of proceeds in the depositor protection scheme; and
• they introduced an obligation for securities custodians to segregate their own positions from client positions.

Protective Measures

Protective measures may be ordered by FINMA either on a standalone basis or in connection with bank reorganisation proceedings or the liquidation of a bank. Article 26 para 1 of the Banking Act mentions the following protective measures:

• instructions to the corporate bodies of the bank;
• the appointment of an investigating officer;
• the withdrawal of the power of the corporate bodies to represent the bank or the removal of the corporate bodies from office;
• the removal of the bank auditors or corporate auditors from office;
• a restriction on the business activities of the bank;
• a prohibition on making or receiving payments or entering into securities transactions;
• the closure of the bank; and
• ordering a stay (Stundung) or postponement of maturity (Fälligkeitsaufschub), except for debts owed to central mortgage bond institutions (Pfandbriefzentralen), which are secured by a pledge.

The above list of measures is not exhaustive and FINMA may also take other measures, as it deems appropriate. From a Swiss perspective, any such protective measures ordered by FINMA may also be ordered in respect of the bank’s assets located outside Switzerland in a foreign branch.

Reorganisation Proceedings

Reorganisation proceedings may be ordered by FINMA if there is a reasonable expectation that the failing bank may be successfully restructured or if at least some parts of it may be saved from insolvency. In such event, FINMA may appoint an administrator (Sanierungsbeauftragter) and regulate the business activities of the bank during such proceedings (Article 28 of the Banking Act). Where reorganisation proceedings are commenced, a reorganisation plan will be prepared by the administrator, which must be approved by FINMA (such approval may occur when FINMA resolves to commence the reorganisation proceedings). There is no requirement for an approval by a general shareholders’ meeting of the bank (Article 31 of the Banking Act). Moreover, the creditors of an SIB may not reject the reorganisation plan (Article 31a para 3 of the Banking Act).

A reorganisation plan may provide for the transfer of the entire business of the financial institution or certain parts of the assets and liabilities as well as contracts to another legal entity (eg, a bridge bank), or for a bail-in of debt, or for a haircut on claims. Under the new rules that entered into force in January 2023, FINMA is also able to order (ie, in addition to the transfer of assets, liabilities and contracts) that (i) the bank merges with another company to form a new legal entity, (ii) another legal entity takes over the bank or (iii) the legal form of the bank is changed.

If the reorganisation plan provides for a bail-in of debt or a haircut on claims, such measures must ensure that, after a reorganisation, the bank meets the capital requirements necessary for the purposes of continuing business activities. In any such case, Swiss law provides for a creditors’ hierarchy (waterfall). Under such rules, before a bail-in of debt or a haircut on claims would apply, the share capital must be reduced exhaustively, any contingent convertibles or other capital instruments qualifying as Additional Tier 1 Capital or Tier 2 Capital must be converted into equity or written off, and any other claims ranking junior must be converted into equity or written off. In such a waterfall, deposits (in respect of the amount not protected by any deposit insurance scheme) would rank last.

Any such bail-in of debt or haircut could not be applied in respect of privileged claims (eg, deposits up to CHF100,000 – see 6.1 Depositor Protection Regime), secured claims up to the value of the collateral assets and, under certain conditions, claims subject to a right of set-off.

Under the new rules that entered into force in early 2023, FINMA shall, as regards a cantonal bank, take into account its particular situation with a state guarantee, and FINMA shall consult with the Canton in the context of deciding on the application of reorganisation proceedings. Under these new rules, FINMA may agree to exemptions from the general reorganisation rules, particularly as regards the order in which debt is bailed-in, in view of applying such a bail-in before the equity capital of the cantonal bank.

Insolvency Proceedings

FINMA may order bankruptcy proceedings under Articles 33 et seq of the Banking Act, regardless of whether it first ordered protective measures under Article 26 of the Banking Act or bank reorganisation proceedings under Articles 28-32 thereof.

Article 34 para 1 of the Banking Act provides that bankruptcy proceedings ordered by FINMA have the same effect as the start of bankruptcy proceedings pursuant to Articles 197-220 of the Swiss Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Act (DEBA) and, according to Article 34 para 2 of the Banking Act, the bankruptcy proceedings are administered according to the rules of Articles 221-270 of the DEBA. However, this is subject to any rules departing from the DEBA in the Banking Act, and FINMA may deviate from the rules of the DEBA as it deems appropriate.

Swiss and foreign creditors are equally entitled to file their claims in Swiss insolvency proceedings, including creditors of foreign branches (Article 3 para 2 of the BIO-FINMA).

From a Swiss perspective, the principle of universality applies in respect of insolvency proceedings commenced in respect of a bank under Articles 33 et seq of the Banking Act. As a result, all assets owned by a bank at the time of the opening of insolvency proceedings against it form part of the bankruptcy estate, regardless of their physical location, provided that such assets are not exempted from bankruptcy proceedings (as would be the case for assets subject to sovereign immunity).

Based on the general rules of the DEBA, in bankruptcy proceedings a bank may no longer dispose of the assets of the bankruptcy estate – such dispositions would be void towards the creditors (Article 204 of the DEBA). For these purposes, the time specified by FINMA as the start of the bankruptcy proceedings is relevant. Moreover, claims forming part of the bankruptcy estate can no longer be validly discharged by payment to the debtor, but must be paid into the bankruptcy estate.

As regards liabilities, the opening of bankruptcy proceedings has the effect that all obligations of such bank become due against the bankruptcy estate, with the exception of those secured by mortgages on the bank’s real estate (Article 208 of the DEBA). Non-monetary claims will be converted into monetary claims of corresponding value (Article 211 of the DEBA).

Implementation of International Commitments

With the Swiss rules on reorganisation proceedings, Switzerland implemented the Financial Stability Board recommendations on effective resolution regimes. It also introduced a competence for FINMA to exercise resolution stay powers.

Under Article 30a of the Banking Act, and in connection with protective measures under Article 26 or reorganisation proceedings under Articles 28-32, FINMA has the power to order a temporary stay of:

• any contractual termination right of a counterparty or the exercise of any rights of set-off;
• the enforcement of collateral; or
• the “porting” of derivatives transactions, in any case for up to two business days, if such contractual termination or other right would otherwise be triggered by such protective measures or reorganisation proceedings (Article 30a paras 1 to 3 of the Banking Act).

According to Article 12 para 2bis of the Banking Ordinance, when entering into new agreements or amending existing agreements, a bank licensed by FINMA must agree with the counterparty the application of the resolution stay powers of FINMA according to Article 30a of the Banking Act, provided that the agreement is subject to a law other than Swiss law or provides for the jurisdiction of courts other than Swiss courts, and provided that the agreement is included on a list of contracts in the scope of such obligation (Article 56 para 1 lit a to h of the BIO-FINMA), including derivatives transactions, repo transactions, intrabank credit agreements and master agreements in relation thereto.

Revised Rules on Operational Risks and Resilience

On 1 January 2024, the FINMA Circular 2023/1 “Operational Risks and Resilience – Banks” will replace the previous FINMA Circular 2008/21 (Operational Risks – Banks). In some respects, the new FINMA Circular replaces the previous rules with a more principles-based approach.

Under the new FINMA Circular, “critical data” is data that the firm considers as material (eg, from the perspective of confidentiality or from the perspective of integrity or availability) for the purposes of providing its services or that must be stored for a regulatory compliance purpose, replacing the previous concept of “client identifying data” (CID). Data that is classified as critical data for reasons of confidentiality is data that must be protected against an unauthorised disclosure (eg, personal data, client data, business secrets, etc).

A matter that is of particular relevance is the treatment of employees with privileged access rights. Banks and securities firms other than those in the supervisory categories 4 and 5 must, for instance, apply “increased security requirements” and “keep and update a list of all persons with privileged access rights on a regular basis” for any “persons with privileged access rights” regarding critical data. However, this should not apply to persons with only limited access rights (ie, limited in terms of permissions, subject matter, duration and/or type of data).

Revised AML Standards

On 30 August 2023 the Federal Council launched a new consultation regarding a revision of the Swiss AML legislation that aims at the following:

• A non-public Swiss federal register shall be introduced, where companies and other legal entities will have to be registered, together with information on their beneficial owners. A simplified registration shall apply to certain types of entities (such as limited liability companies, sole proprietorships, associations and foundations).
• The scope of AML due diligence requirements may be extended beyond the current scope of entities subject to prudential supervision and financial intermediaries to apply also to certain advisory roles, including in certain cases to the legal profession (eg, when lawyers are involved in structuring of companies or transactions with real estate).
• A series of additional measures shall be introduced to strengthen the current anti-money laundering framework. These include for instance measures to prevent sanctions under embargo legislation from being breached or circumvented.

DLT Rights

Prior to the adoption of the DLT Act, Swiss securities law was a limiting factor in the issuance and trading of capital markets instruments in the form of digital assets issued on a distributed ledger (crypto-assets or tokens). Aiming to expand the potential use-cases of such DLT going forward and at the same time put the transactions on a robust legal basis, the Swiss Parliament adopted the DLT Act, which fully entered into force on 1 August 2021 together with the implementing secondary legislation and introduced the following:

• Without regulating or endorsing any particular technology, the DLT Act amended various existing laws in order to remove legal obstacles that hampered the development of a functioning market for tokens that are a digital representation of financial instruments. The most important innovation of the DLT Act was the introduction of “DLT rights” as a new type of right designed for digital assets.
• A right to set-aside crypto-assets held by a custodian for clients;.
• New licence categories for trading venues for DLT rights and foreign securities that are transferred on a distributed ledger.

DLT rights have the potential to become the digital equivalent of certificated securities or uncertificated securities by linking a right to a registration on a distributed ledger instead of a certificated security instrument or a registration in an uncertificated securities register and would therefore be key to any tokenisation project that shall be governed by Swiss law. DLT rights may not be exercised or transferred outside of the relevant distributed ledger. Any rights that could be issued as certificated or uncertificated securities may be issued as DLT rights.

Certain standards have in the meantime been developed by the Swiss industry for tokenised equity instruments (eg, by the Capital Markets and Technology Association, CMTA).

However, any such solutions using DLT rights governed by Swiss law are subject to any prospectus or registration requirements that may apply, depending on the investors to whom offers are directed. The scope of such requirements will depend on the place of domicile of the investors, the type of investors concerned (eg, offers to retail or professional clients) and the number of investors who are the addressees.

Moreover, any such solution would be subject to the relevant regulatory requirements that apply to the issuance of the relevant instruments (eg, for the issuance of derivatives or in the event the structure is classified as the operation of a payment system).

Revision of the FMIA

At present, preliminary steps for a revision of the FMIA are currently underway and a consultation is expected to be publicly available in due course.

ESG Reporting Requirements

The largest banks and insurance companies (firms in supervisory categories 1 and 2) must already describe the significant climate-related financial risks to their business, their impact on the business and risk strategy and any effects on existing risk categories as part of their ongoing reporting according to Circulars 2016/1 “Disclosure – banks” and 2016/2 “Disclosure – insurers”. The revised circulars entered into force on 1 July 2021. In addition, these firms must disclose the risk management structures and processes for identifying, measuring and addressing these risks as well as relevant quantitative data, including a description of the methodology used. Furthermore, they have to describe the main features of their governance structure in relation to climate-related financial risks. Information about the criteria and methods used to evaluate the materiality of risks must also be disclosed (please see the FINMA evaluation of these reports in the FINMA supervisory guidance 03/2022).

Climate Reporting Ordinance

As of January 2024, the ordinance on climate reporting (the “Climate Reporting Ordinance”) will apply in Switzerland and implement certain reporting obligations on environmental matters more widely. This implements reporting obligations on non-financial matters according to Article 964b of the Swiss Code of Obligations of 30 March 2011 (CO).

The Climate Reporting Ordinance is intended to improve sustainability in the financial sector (sustainable finance) and strengthen the position of the Swiss financial market with respect to sustainable financial services. From a financial market regulatory perspective, transparency regarding environmental criteria is considered an important measure for the implementation of sustainable finance.

The purpose of the Climate Reporting Ordinance is to create reliable and comparable data on climate considerations and climate targets through the binding implementation of the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) established by the Financial Stability Board in 2015, so that these can be taken into account in investment advice, balance sheets of investors and the financial system generally. Provided that a company complies with the requirements under Article 3 of the Climate Reporting Ordinance, it is presumed that the company has fulfilled its obligation to report on environmental matters under Article 964b para 1 of the CO. Otherwise, the company must demonstrate – in the sense of “comply or explain” – how it has fulfilled this obligation in other ways or why the company does not pursue a concept for climate reporting.

Climate matters include – in the sense of the principle of “double materiality” – both the impact of the climate on companies and the impact of the company’s activities on the climate.

The obligations under the Climate Reporting Ordinance shall apply to Swiss companies which cumulatively fulfil the following criteria:

• companies of public interest as defined in Article 2 litera c of the Audit Oversight Act of 16 December 2005 – ie, listed companies pursuant to Article 727 para 1 No 1 of the CO or companies which require authorisation, recognition or registration by a financial market supervisory authority under a financial market law pursuant to Article 3 of FINMASA (eg, banks, securities firms, insurance companies, fund management companies, asset managers or financial market infrastructures);
• which, together with their controlled domestic or foreign undertakings, have an annual average of at least 500 full-time equivalent positions in two consecutive financial years; and
• which, together with their controlled domestic or foreign undertakings, have reached a balance sheet total of at least CHF20 million or a turnover of CHF40 million for two consecutive financial years.

However, the Climate Reporting Ordinance is not applicable to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Swiss Approach to Regulation of Greenwashing

Whilst the Climate Reporting Ordinance applies to financial institutions and companies within its scope, it does not currently contain any definitions of climate impact or sustainability indicators, which create transparency in relation to all financial products and thus minimise the risk of greenwashing on a product level.

FINMA provided information on its expectations regarding the current practice in the management of sustainability-related collective investment schemes at fund and institution level on preventing and combating greenwashing in its supervisory guidance 05/2021 dated 3 November 2021 (FINMA supervisory guidance 05/2021) and warned financial service providers who offer sustainability-related financial products of potential greenwashing risks in the advisory process. However, FINMA also concluded that its powers to intervene with respect to greenwashing are currently limited.

However, it should be noted that even without specific provisions on greenwashing, generally applicable legal requirements must be complied with which are intended to prevent the deception and misleading of clients. For instance, Article 12 para 1 of the Collective Investment Schemes Act of 23 June 2006 sets out that the designation of collective investment schemes must not give rise to confusion or deception. Also, the Federal Act against Unfair Competition prohibits deceptive conduct or conduct that violates the principle of good faith.

As regards the Swiss approach on tackling greenwashing risks, as communicated by the Federal Council in December 2022, the expectation is still that a product should not be advertised or labelled as having sustainable characteristics, unless it pursues at least one of the following:

• alignment with one or more specific sustainability goals (eg, investments into equity or debt issued by a company pursuing a sustainability goal); and/or
• contribution to achieving one or more specific sustainability goals (eg, impact investment through a product aimed at reducing the negative impact of selected target companies on the climate or biodiversity).

Principles of the Swiss Bankers Association

On a financial services level, the Swiss Bankers Association (SBA) adopted self-regulation for member institutions addressing ESG criteria for investment advisory and portfolio management relationships in June 2022.

For transactions with new clients, the guidelines for the financial service providers on the integration of ESG preferences and ESG risks into investment advice and portfolio management (the “SBA ESG Guidelines”) will have to be applied by members of the SBA as of January 2024. The SBA ESG Guidelines are intended to implement minimal standards for the consideration of ESG preferences and  risks in investment advice and portfolio management and to prevent greenwashing (Article 1). The SBA ESG Guidelines replace the Guideline for the integration of ESG considerations into the advisory process for private clients from June 2020. Non-members may implement the SBA ESG Guidelines on a voluntary basis and register themselves on a list maintained by the SBA.