Australia is a common law jurisdiction whose legal tradition derives from England. It is a federation comprising six states and two self-governing territories, operating under a written federal Constitution that distributes power between the Commonwealth (national) and the states.
Law is sourced from legislation enacted by the Commonwealth and state parliaments and from the common law and equity developed by the courts, applied through the doctrine of precedent. The Commonwealth Parliament legislates within enumerated heads of power: the corporations power is the foundation of nationally uniform company, competition and consumer laws, while areas such as real property, conveyancing, stamp duty and retail leasing remain principally matters of state law.
The High Court of Australia sits at the apex of the judicial system as the final court of appeal and the arbiter of constitutional questions. Federal jurisdiction is exercised mainly by the Federal Court of Australia, which hears corporations, competition, consumer, intellectual property, taxation and administrative matters, and by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. Each state and territory has its own hierarchy, headed by a Supreme Court with a Court of Appeal, beneath which sit intermediate and lower courts, and merits review of many government decisions lies with the Administrative Review Tribunal and its state equivalents.
For foreign investors, the practical consequence is that the rules most relevant to acquiring and operating a business – ie, company, competition, consumer, foreign investment, intellectual property and tax law – are federal and apply uniformly across the country. State-based differences in property, duty and leasing matter chiefly to multi-site and franchised operations, which may need to account for variation between jurisdictions.
Foreign investment is regulated by the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Cth) and the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Regulation 2015, supported by Australia’s Foreign Investment Policy and published guidance. The Foreign Investment Review Board is a non-statutory body that advises the Treasurer, who is the decision-maker; the Treasury’s Foreign Investment Division administers the regime, and clearances are given as a no objection notification.
A foreign person must generally notify, and obtain a decision, before taking certain actions. The most common triggers are acquiring a substantial interest (20% or more) in an Australian entity, or acquiring interests in Australian land or businesses, where the relevant monetary threshold is met. A national security overlay applies separately: acquiring a direct interest (10% or more, or any interest conferring control or influence) in a national security business or national security land is notifiable regardless of value, as is starting such a business.
Monetary thresholds are indexed annually on January 1st. For 2026, the principal thresholds are as follows.
Approval must be obtained before the action is completed, so the regime is suspensory in effect. The Treasurer assesses each proposal against the national interest and, where relevant, national security; neither term is exhaustively defined, and the factors considered include security, competition, tax, the impact on the economy and the community, and the character of the investor. Where a transaction is also notifiable under the merger control regime, foreign investment approval does not substitute for Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) approval or a waiver, and the two assessments should be managed as parallel workstreams.
Applications are lodged electronically through the Foreign Investment Portal, which the government launched in 2025, and a fee is payable on lodgement. Fees generally range from AUD1,125 to AUD1,205,200 for non-residential actions, depending on the acquisition type and value. The statutory decision period is 30 days, with a further short period to notify the applicant; it can be extended by an interim order of up to 90 days, and applicants are frequently asked to agree to a voluntary extension. Foreign investors should build the Foreign Investment Review Board timetable into conditions precedent and long-stop dates in their transaction documents, particularly where ACCC approval is also required.
The outcome is either a no objection notification, which may be unconditional or subject to conditions, or, in rare cases, a prohibition. Investing without a required approval, or breaching conditions, exposes the investor to civil and criminal penalties, which for individuals can reach into the millions of dollars and are substantially higher for corporations; investors could also be exposed to divestiture orders, infringement notices and value-based penalties. Foreign persons also have ongoing obligations to notify holdings to the Register of Foreign Ownership of Australian Assets.
The Treasurer routinely attaches conditions to a no objection notification, calibrated to the national interest and national security risk presented by the particular investment. Standard tax conditions are common, requiring the investor to comply with Australian tax law, co-operate with the Australian Taxation Office and refrain from arrangements that shift profits offshore.
Other conditions may address:
Conditions are negotiated in practice, and early engagement with the Treasury helps investors understand and shape the likely conditions before a binding decision is made.
A decision of the Treasurer on the national interest or national security is an exercise of executive discretion, and there is no merits review of such a decision by a tribunal. An affected investor may seek judicial review of the legality of the decision, under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) or under Section 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) and Section 75(v) of the Constitution.
Judicial review is confined to questions of legality, such as jurisdictional error, denial of procedural fairness or taking into account irrelevant considerations, and does not allow the court to substitute its own view of the merits. Applications are subject to time limits, and reasons may be requested under the judicial review legislation. In practice, formal challenges are uncommon; investors generally manage risk through early and co-operative engagement rather than litigation.
The principal vehicle is the company, incorporated and regulated under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and administered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). The liability of shareholders is limited to any amount unpaid on their shares, and there is no general minimum share capital requirement. The most common forms are as follows.
The choice of vehicle is driven mainly by tax treatment, asset protection and liability, and by the commercial purpose. In transactions, a proprietary company is the standard acquisition or bid vehicle, while trusts frequently sit above operating entities as holding vehicles.
A company is registered with the corporate regulator, and is issued an Australian Company Number on registration. The company then obtains an Australian Business Number and registers for goods and services tax and pay-as-you-go withholding where required, and each director must first obtain a director identification number.
The company needs:
Registration is inexpensive and is typically completed within one to two business days. A foreign company that prefers to operate through a branch instead registers as a registered foreign company and receives an Australian Registered Body Number.
All companies must keep their details current with the regulator, notifying ASIC of prescribed changes, including changes to officeholders, the registered office, the share structure and, where applicable, ultimate holding company details, within the prescribed periods, and confirming their details and paying an annual review fee each year. Public companies, and some companies in particular circumstances, must also lodge special resolutions or changes to their constitution. Financial reporting and audit obligations then depend on size and ownership.
Public companies, and large proprietary companies that meet two of three thresholds for revenue, gross assets and employees, must prepare, have audited and lodge annual financial reports. Small proprietary companies are generally exempt, but a small proprietary company that is controlled by a foreign company must usually lodge audited accounts, unless relief applies. These obligations are relevant in transactions because they determine the financial information available on a target.
Companies must maintain a register of members, while substantial-holding disclosure applies principally to listed companies and registered schemes rather than to private companies generally, and a broader beneficial ownership transparency reform is in progress. Customer due diligence under anti-money laundering law, which from 1 July 2026 extends to certain designated services provided by lawyers, conveyancers, accountants and real estate agents, is increasing scrutiny of ultimate beneficial ownership in dealings and acquisitions.
Disclosure (typically via a prospectus or other disclosure document) is required when raising capital. There are exemptions and short-form disclosures where the capital raise is limited to sophisticated investors.
Where the company operates a franchise system, complex franchising disclosure documents are required.
Australia is a highly regulated environment, and industry-specific registrations, permits and disclosures are typically required.
Australian companies have a single-tier board; there is no separate supervisory board or two-tier structure, but the company may adopt an informal advisory committee-style body. The directors are responsible for managing or supervising the management of the company, and day-to-day operations are usually delegated to officers and senior management.
A public company must have at least three directors and a company secretary, while a proprietary company needs only one director and is not required to appoint a secretary. Shareholders exercise residual powers in general meetings, including amending the constitution and approving certain related-party and major transactions. Listed companies are additionally subject to the Listing Rules and the corporate governance recommendations of the Australian Securities Exchange.
Directors and officers owe statutory duties under the Corporations Act, including the duty of care and diligence (protected by the business judgement rule), the duty to act in good faith and for a proper purpose, and the duty not to misuse their position or information, alongside equivalent general law and fiduciary duties. Directors may also be personally liable for insolvent trading where a company incurs debts while insolvent, subject to the safe harbour available where they pursue a course of action that is reasonably likely to lead to a better outcome for the company.
Personal exposure can arise under tax law through director penalty notices, and under work health and safety, environmental, competition (including as an accessory) and franchising laws. Breach can lead to civil penalties, compensation, disqualification and, for dishonest conduct, criminal liability.
Limited liability is the governing principle, and Australian courts only rarely pierce the corporate veil, generally where there is fraud or a sham or a genuine agency, with specific statutory exceptions such as insolvent trading. In acquisitions, directors’ and officers’ insurance, indemnities and run-off cover are standard, and buyers assess director penalty and accessorial exposure as part of diligence.
Most private sector employment is governed by the national workplace relations system established by the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The National Employment Standards set a floor of minimum entitlements; modern awards set additional industry and occupation minimums; and enterprise agreements, individual contracts and the common law operate above that floor.
The Fair Work Commission is the national workplace tribunal and the Fair Work Ombudsman is the regulator, while work health and safety is governed by largely harmonised state and territory laws, and anti-discrimination obligations arise under both Commonwealth and state legislation. The framework has recently been reshaped by:
There is no requirement for an employment contract to be in writing; a contract may be made orally, although written contracts are standard practice. Whatever the contract says, the National Employment Standards, the applicable modern award and any enterprise agreement apply and cannot be displaced by agreement, so an employer cannot contract below the statutory floor.
Contracts commonly deal with duties, remuneration, hours, leave, confidentiality, intellectual property assignment and post-employment restraints. The use of fixed-term contracts is now limited, with a general maximum of two years including renewals and some exceptions, and casual employment has a statutory definition together with a pathway by which eligible employees may choose to convert to permanent employment. Probationary periods are common, although the qualifying period for unfair dismissal protection is six months, or 12 months for small business employers.
The National Employment Standards set maximum weekly hours of 38 for a full-time employee, plus additional hours where reasonable. There is no single statutory overtime rate; overtime, penalty rates and loadings are set by the applicable modern award or enterprise agreement, and casual employees receive a loading (commonly 25%) in lieu of paid leave.
Employees now have a right to disconnect, allowing them to refuse to monitor or respond to unreasonable out-of-hours contact, which, following a later commencement date, now applies to small business employers as well. The national minimum wage is reviewed annually by the Fair Work Commission, and paid leave entitlements (including annual leave, personal and carer’s leave, parental leave and long service leave) arise under the National Employment Standards and state legislation.
Australia is not an employment-at-will jurisdiction. An employer must have a lawful basis to terminate and must give the minimum notice set by the National Employment Standards (scaled by length of service) or pay in lieu, unless the employee is summarily dismissed for serious misconduct.
Several statutory protections apply. Eligible employees may bring an unfair dismissal claim if a dismissal is harsh, unjust or unreasonable, with remedies of reinstatement or compensation capped at six months’ pay. The general protections regime prohibits adverse action taken for a prohibited reason, such as the exercise of a workplace right, carries no compensation cap and reverses the onus of proof; separate protections address unlawful termination and discrimination.
A genuine redundancy is a defence to an unfair dismissal claim, and redundancy pay is provided for under the National Employment Standards, with consultation obligations arising under awards and agreements. Where 15 or more employees are to be made redundant, the employer must notify Services Australia and any relevant registered employee association, with consultation obligations arising mainly under the applicable award, enterprise agreement or workplace instrument. In transactions, the transfer of business rules can transfer employees and entitlements to a buyer. Acquirers plan for redundancies, accrued leave and transferring instruments, while post-employment restraints are enforceable only to the extent they are reasonable.
There is no general system of mandatory works councils or board-level employee representation. Trade unions represent their members and may exercise rights of entry, and the Fair Work Commission oversees enterprise bargaining, which may be conducted at a single enterprise or, in defined streams, across multiple employers.
Consultation obligations arise under modern awards and enterprise agreements, particularly in relation to major workplace change and redundancy. Employees enjoy freedom of association, and adverse action taken because of union membership or activity is prohibited. Health and safety representatives may be elected under work health and safety laws.
An individual’s liability to Australian income tax depends on residency: residents are taxed on worldwide income and non-residents on Australian-source income. Personal income tax is progressive, with a top marginal rate of 45% plus a 2% Medicare levy, and is collected from employees through pay-as-you-go withholding by the employer.
Employers must:
From 1 July 2026, under the Payday Super reforms, the superannuation guarantee must be paid at the same time as salary and wages, rather than quarterly, and is calculated on an employee’s qualifying earnings. Employers are also liable for state payroll tax on wages above the relevant state threshold, with rates and thresholds varying between the states and territories.
A company is subject to Australian tax on its income if it is resident in Australia (by incorporation, or by having its central management and control in Australia) or derives Australian-source income. The main taxes are as follows.
Australia has implemented Pillar Two of the OECD and G20 Two-Pillar Solution. The Taxation (Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) Act 2024 and its rules establish a 15% global minimum tax for large multinational groups with consolidated annual revenue of at least EUR750 million, comprising an income inclusion rule and a domestic minimum tax for fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2024, and an undertaxed profits rule from 1 January 2025. Australia’s domestic minimum tax is recognised as a Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax with QDMTT safe harbour status on the OECD central record, effective from 1 January 2024.
The principal broad-based incentive is the Research and Development Tax Incentive, which provides a refundable or non-refundable offset depending on the company’s turnover. A range of more targeted concessions is also available, including:
The government has also introduced production incentives in priority areas, such as clean energy and critical minerals. Eligibility criteria apply to each measure, and the states and territories offer their own payroll tax and investment incentives to attract particular industries or projects.
Tax consolidation is available for wholly owned Australian groups. A consolidated group, made up of a head company and its wholly owned Australian resident subsidiaries, is treated as a single taxpayer, so that intra-group transactions are generally disregarded and the group lodges a single income tax return.
Tax cost-setting rules apply when entities join or leave the group, and a multiple entry consolidated group can be formed by certain foreign-owned groups. The election to consolidate is irrevocable, and the head company is primarily liable for the group’s income tax.
Thin capitalisation rules apply. The earnings-based rules that took effect from 1 July 2023 limit debt deductions for multinational entities, with a default fixed-ratio test that caps net debt deductions at 30% of tax earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation, and alternative group-ratio and third-party debt tests.
A separate debt-deduction-creation rule disallows deductions arising from certain related-party arrangements that lack genuine commercial substance. The rules apply to both inbound and outbound investors above a de minimis level of debt deductions.
Transfer pricing rules apply. Division 815 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) requires cross-border dealings between associated enterprises to be priced on an arm’s length basis, consistent with the OECD transfer pricing guidelines.
Taxpayers must keep contemporaneous documentation to access penalty protection, and large multinational groups are subject to country-by-country reporting. The Australian Taxation Office actively reviews transfer pricing, and advance pricing arrangements are available to provide certainty for significant cross-border dealings.
Australia has a general anti-avoidance rule in Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), under which the Commissioner of Taxation may cancel a tax benefit obtained from a scheme entered into for the dominant purpose of obtaining that benefit. Part IVA includes the multinational anti-avoidance law and the diverted profits tax, which imposes tax at 40% on profits diverted offshore, and the goods and services tax has its own anti-avoidance rule.
There is a promoter penalty regime for those who promote tax exploitation schemes, together with specific integrity rules addressing matters such as hybrid mismatches and debt deductions. Enforcement is supported by a well-resourced tax avoidance taskforce within the Australian Taxation Office.
Customs duties are imposed under the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (Cth) and are generally low, with many goods entering duty-free and a standard rate of 5% applying to some categories. Australia maintains an extensive network of free trade agreements, including with China, the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom and the parties to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which provide preferential or zero rates for qualifying goods.
Anti-dumping and countervailing measures provide targeted protection for some domestic manufacturing, such as steel, aluminium and certain chemicals. Tariffs are not a significant protectionist instrument in Australia; the more material current sensitivities arise from global trade tensions and from supply chain and critical-minerals policy rather than from tariff barriers.
A new mandatory and suspensory merger control regime commenced on 1 January 2026 under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), as amended by the Treasury Laws Amendment (Mergers and Acquisitions Reform) Act 2024 (Cth). The ACCC is the sole first-instance decision-maker, replacing the former voluntary and informal clearance model and the separate authorisation process. This is the most significant change to Australian merger control in five decades.
An acquisition of shares or assets that has a connection to Australia must be notified, and must not be completed if it meets a monetary threshold or falls within a designated class. The principal thresholds, measured by Australian revenue, are as follows.
The regime covers acquisitions of shares, units and interests in managed investment schemes and acquisitions of assets, and brings joint ventures and certain land and development acquisitions within scope, subject to exemptions, while small acquisitions are excluded. Because the thresholds are objective and financial, many transactions that previously raised no competition concern now require notification, so deal timetables and conditions must build in clearance, and the competition assessment that was once considered within the foreign investment process is now conducted separately by the regulator.
An acquisition is notified through the regulator’s acquisitions portal. Pre-notification engagement is encouraged but not mandatory, and a filing fee applies, from which small businesses are exempt. The regulator publishes notified acquisitions on a public register and publishes its reasons for decisions, which over time will give the market greater visibility of its approach.
For suitable acquisitions that plainly raise no competition concern, a party may instead apply for a notification waiver, which, if granted, removes the obligation to notify. Where no waiver is sought or available, the notified acquisition proceeds through the regulator’s phased review. A first phase, with a statutory timetable, is expected to resolve the substantial majority of matters by clearance, while transactions that raise concerns proceed to a more detailed second phase, with a longer timetable and the ability to consider remedies and undertakings; a public benefit pathway also exists, and decisions are subject to limited review by the Australian Competition Tribunal.
The substantive question is whether the acquisition would have the effect, or be likely to have the effect, of substantially lessening competition, which now expressly includes creating, strengthening or entrenching a substantial degree of market power. Completing a notifiable acquisition without approval, a waiver or an applicable exemption can have serious consequences, including the risk that the transaction is void and significant penalties, as follows:
Premature integration or co-ordination between the parties before clearance also carries risk.
Part IV of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) prohibits cartel conduct, including price fixing, restricting outputs, allocating markets or customers and rigging bids, both as criminal offences and as civil contraventions, with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions prosecuting serious cases. The Act also prohibits anti-competitive agreements and concerted practices, and exclusive dealing, that have the purpose or effect of substantially lessening competition.
The prohibitions have extraterritorial reach, applying to conduct engaged in outside Australia by bodies corporate carrying on business in Australia, and to conduct affecting a market in Australia. Penalties mirror those for the merger regime, and an individual convicted of a criminal cartel offence may be imprisoned for up to ten years, in addition to receiving fines. An immunity and co-operation policy is available to the first participant in a cartel to come forward.
Australia prohibits the misuse of market power under Section 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth): a corporation that has a substantial degree of power in a market must not engage in conduct that has the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition. There is no separate prohibition on abuse of dominance, and no general prohibition on the abuse of economic dependence of the kind found in some civil law systems.
Imbalances in commercial dealings are instead addressed through other tools, including:
The regulator continues to advocate for a general prohibition on unfair trading practices to capture conduct that distorts decision-making but is not presently unlawful. Contraventions of the unilateral conduct prohibition attract the same penalties as other competition contraventions.
Patents are governed by the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) and registered by IP Australia. A standard patent protects an invention that is novel, involves an inventive step and is useful, for a term of 20 years, extendable to 25 years for certain pharmaceutical patents. New innovation patents are no longer available, although innovation patents granted before the phase-out continue until they expire.
Protection is obtained by application and examination leading to grant. Infringement is enforced by proceedings in the Federal Court, and remedies include injunctions, damages or an account of profits, and delivery up or destruction of infringing articles.
Trade marks are governed by the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) and registered by IP Australia. A sign that distinguishes goods or services may be registered for an initial period of ten years and renewed indefinitely, giving the owner the exclusive right to use the mark, and to authorise others to use it. Registration is enforced by infringement proceedings, and unregistered marks and get-up are protected by the tort of passing off and by the misleading-conduct provisions of the Australian Consumer Law.
Trade marks are central to franchising, because the brand is the core asset of a franchise system. Franchisors register their marks and license them to franchisees on controlled-use terms, and protect their get-up, domain names and social media handles. In inbound and master-franchise arrangements, registering the marks early guards against brand squatting. Security can be granted over registered intellectual property to support financing.
Designs are protected under the Designs Act 2003 (Cth) and registered by IP Australia. Registration protects the overall visual appearance of a product, comprising its shape, configuration, pattern or ornamentation, where the design is new and distinctive.
A registered design is protected for an initial period of five years, renewable to a maximum of ten years, and must be both registered and certified before it can be enforced. Remedies for infringement are consistent with those available for other intellectual property rights. A reform to align Australian design protection more closely with international practice has been under consideration.
Copyright is governed by the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) and arises automatically on creation, without any system of registration. It protects original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, as well as films, sound recordings, broadcasts and published editions, generally for the life of the author plus 70 years, with other terms applying to other subject matter.
The owner has exclusive rights to reproduce, communicate and publish the work, and authors enjoy moral rights of attribution and integrity. Infringement is enforced in the Federal Court, with remedies including injunctions, damages or an account of profits, and additional damages for flagrant infringement.
Software is protected as a literary work under copyright law. There is no separate database right; a database or other compilation is protected only to the extent that copyright subsists in the originality of its selection, arrangement or compilation, rather than in the underlying data as such. Trade secrets and confidential information are protected not by registration but by the equitable action for breach of confidence and by contract, through non-disclosure agreements and the duties owed by employees.
Other rights include protection for circuit layouts under the Circuit Layouts Act 1989 (Cth) and for plant varieties under the Plant Breeder’s Rights Act 1994 (Cth), and the protection of unregistered get-up and reputation through passing off and the Australian Consumer Law. Domain names are administered by the national domain authority.
Data protection is governed principally by the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and the 13 Australian Privacy Principles, which regulate how entities handle personal information. The Act applies to Australian government agencies and to private sector organisations – generally those with annual turnover above AUD3 million together with certain others. The Notifiable Data Breaches scheme requires eligible data breaches to be reported to the regulator and to affected individuals.
The regime was significantly strengthened by the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 (Cth), which introduced:
A further tranche of reform is being progressed, which may include a fair and reasonable test for the handling of personal information. Sector and state laws on matters such as health records, surveillance and unsolicited communications operate alongside the Act.
The Privacy Act has extraterritorial reach. It applies to organisations that carry on business in Australia, including foreign organisations, even where personal information is collected or held outside the country, so a foreign business that targets or deals with customers in Australia can be subject to the Australian Privacy Principles.
The disclosure of personal information overseas is regulated by Australian Privacy Principle 8, under which an entity generally remains accountable for the handling of information by an overseas recipient unless an exception applies, such as comparable protection or informed consent. The statutory tort for serious invasions of privacy may also be relevant to cross-border conduct affecting individuals in Australia, although questions of jurisdiction and applicable law will need to be considered case by case.
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, led by the Privacy Commissioner, regulates privacy at the federal level. It investigates complaints and conducts own-motion investigations, accepts enforceable undertakings, makes determinations and issues guidance, and can seek civil penalties in the Federal Court.
The 2024 reforms expanded the regulator’s toolkit, adding tiered penalties, infringement notices for specified breaches and a mid-tier penalty for interferences with privacy that are not serious, and the Commissioner has signalled a more enforcement-focused approach. In addition, individuals can now bring proceedings directly under the statutory tort, without relying on the regulator to act.
Several reforms across the fields above are expected to remain prominent through 2026 and beyond.
Merger Control
The new mandatory merger regime commenced on 1 January 2026, and further thresholds capturing certain asset acquisitions and voting power changes came into effect from 1 April 2026. The regulator’s guidance and its decision-making practice will continue to develop as the market adjusts to the new system.
Franchising
Australia has the most comprehensive and complex franchising regulation in the world. The remade Franchising Code, made as the Competition and Consumer (Industry Codes—Franchising) Regulations 2024, commenced on 1 April 2025 with a grace period to 1 November 2025, implementing recommendations of the independent review by Dr Michael Schaper. It expands civil penalties, extends protections relating to a reasonable opportunity to make a return on investment and to early termination, and gives the small business ombudsman a power to name franchisors who do not engage in dispute resolution. The government has consulted on, but not yet legislated, a possible franchisor licensing scheme.
Foreign Investment
In May 2026, the government announced a package of reforms to streamline and strengthen the foreign investment framework. From 1 January 2027, it will aim to decide all low-risk applications within 30 days, remove mandatory notification for selected low-risk acquisitions, and extend the default validity of approvals from 12 to 24 months, while strengthening its tools to scrutinise sensitive sectors and to enforce compliance. Where a transaction also requires ACCC clearance, foreign investment approval will continue to follow the regulator’s decision.
Privacy, Data and Anti-Money Laundering
A second tranche of privacy reform is being progressed, with the Children’s Online Privacy Code and transparency obligations for automated decision-making to take effect by December 2026. Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing obligations extend to certain designated services provided by lawyers, accountants, conveyancers and real estate agents from 1 July 2026, which is significant for professional advisers and for property and corporate transactions.
Tax, Superannuation, Climate and Consumer Law
Australia’s Pillar Two global and domestic minimum tax is bedding in, with its domestic minimum tax recognised as having QDMTT safe harbour status on the OECD central record, alongside public country-by-country reporting and continuing multinational integrity measures. The Payday Super reforms, requiring the superannuation guarantee to be paid each payday, take effect from 1 July 2026.
Mandatory climate-related financial disclosure is being phased in for large entities and financial institutions, with thresholds expanding through 2026 and 2027. The government is considering a general prohibition on unfair trading practices, while enforcement of the unfair contract terms regime, which has carried civil penalties since November 2023, remains a regulator priority.
Level 27
101 Collins Street 3000
Melbourne
Australia
+61 03 8777 2221
Scott.colvin@archerscott.com.au www.archerscott.com.au
Doing Deals in Australia in 2026: Merger Reform, Franchising and the New Compliance Frontier
2026 is a landmark year for anyone investing in, acquiring or franchising a business in Australia. Several structural shifts have arrived more or less together: a mandatory merger control regime, a recalibrated foreign investment framework, a comprehensively remade Franchising Code, and a tighter cross-cutting compliance environment spanning employment, privacy, financial crime, climate reporting and tax. Each alone would reshape deal practice; together they change how transactions are planned, priced and executed.
These reforms did not appear in isolation. They reflect a broader policy direction that has brought Australia closer to the practice of its international peers and that responds to public concern about market concentration, the fairness of dealings with small business, and the protection of personal information. For international investors and their advisers, the headline is not that Australia has become harder to do business in; it remains an open, rule-of-law market with transparent institutions and a deep professional and financial services sector. What has changed is that the sequence and certainty of deal execution now demand earlier and more integrated planning.
This article looks past the black-letter detail to the commercial consequences:
The common thread is that 2026 rewards preparation and penalises improvisation.
The merger gateway becomes mandatory, and strategic
The most consequential change is the move away from a voluntary and informal clearance culture, from 1 January 2026, to a mandatory and suspensory regime in which the competition regulator is the gatekeeper for transactions that meet objective financial thresholds. For decades, parties could close many deals without ever engaging the regulator, and even contentious matters were handled through an informal, often confidential process. That optionality has gone.
The practical effect is felt first in deal certainty and timing. Where a transaction is caught, completion is conditional on Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) approval. A notifiable acquisition completed without that approval, or without an applicable waiver or exemption, carries serious consequences, including the risk that it will be declared void and significant penalties will be imposed. Acquirers can no longer treat competition as a residual risk to be managed after signing; it becomes a gating condition that shapes the timetable from the outset.
The substantive question the regulator asks is whether a transaction would substantially lessen competition – a test that now expressly extends to acquisitions that create, strengthen or entrench a substantial degree of market power. That formulation signals particular attention to consolidation in already concentrated sectors, and to the acquisition by large incumbents of smaller or emerging rivals. Investors in areas that have drawn regulatory interest – including digital platforms, supermarkets and retail, healthcare and essential services – should expect closer review, and should prepare a competition narrative that addresses entrenchment as well as any direct overlap.
A central feature of the new system is the notification waiver. For acquisitions that clearly raise no competition concern, parties can apply to the ACCC for a waiver that, if granted, removes the obligation to notify, offering a faster and less burdensome route than a full notification. Choosing between a waiver application and a Phase 1 notification has quickly become one of the first strategic decisions in a deal. The early figures bear this out: in the regime’s first quarter, to 31 March 2026, the ACCC reported receiving 50 notifications and 108 waiver applications, clearing 39 matters in Phase 1 and moving two to Phase 2, while meeting its commitment to decide around 80% of acquisitions within 20 business days.
A second effect is on deal structuring and risk allocation. Conditions precedent, long-stop dates and the allocation of regulatory risk between buyer and seller are now central negotiating points in Australian share and asset sale agreements, as they have long been in larger cross-border deals. Parties are debating who bears the risk of a clearance that is delayed or refused, whether the buyer must accept remedies through so-called “hell or high water” obligations, and how break fees and reverse break fees should be calibrated. Sellers in competitive auctions increasingly screen bidders for regulatory deliverability, not merely on price.
In practical terms, this changes how deals are run from the very first conversation.
At the level of transaction documents, the regime is driving more elaborate regulatory provisions. Sale agreements increasingly specify the standard of effort a buyer must use to obtain clearance, the extent to which it must accept divestitures or behavioural commitments, and the consequences if clearance is not obtained by the long-stop date. Ticking fees that compensate a seller for a prolonged clearance period, reverse break fees payable if approval fails, and detailed co-operation and information-sharing covenants are becoming familiar features. Allocating these risks well at the drafting stage is now a core part of protecting deal value.
Private equity and roll-up acquirers feel this most acutely. Buy-and-build strategies (a staple of mid-market private equity and of franchising consolidation) depend on executing a series of smaller acquisitions quickly. The aggregation rules mean that a programme of bolt-ons can attract scrutiny that no individual transaction would, so sponsors are now mapping their pipeline against the regime before the first deal rather than after the third.
The change is also felt well beyond large, obviously contentious mergers. Because the thresholds are financial and objective, mid-market transactions that raise no real competition concern can still require notification, adding cost and time to deals that would previously have closed without regulatory contact. For acquirers pursuing several transactions, the cumulative compliance burden is material, and building notification capability and budget into the deal model is now part of disciplined planning. The publication of decisions and reasons on the public register will, over time, give the market a clearer sense of how the regulator approaches particular sectors, but in the first year the prudent course is to treat clearance as a project to be managed from day one.
Foreign investment: open, but security-conscious
For inbound investors, foreign investment review sits alongside merger control as the second approval gateway, and the two must be planned together. Australia continues to welcome foreign capital, and the Treasury’s stated direction is a framework that is faster for low-risk, passive investment and more demanding where national security is engaged. A streamlined pathway for clearly low-risk proposals is being developed, while sensitive areas attract closer scrutiny, including critical infrastructure, critical minerals, defence-related capability, and data and technology.
The practical consequences for deal makers are about sequencing and conditionality. A foreign investment approval is not a substitute for an ACCC approval or waiver, so the two workstreams run in parallel, and the transaction timetable must accommodate both. Acquirers in sensitive sectors should expect conditions and should engage early, while those in non-sensitive sectors can increasingly expect a more predictable and faster path. Identifying which category a deal falls into, at the outset, is now a core part of deal planning.
The Franchising Code, reset
Australia has one of the most developed franchising sectors in the world, spanning food and beverage, retail, health and fitness, and a wide range of service businesses, and it is a common route for international brands to enter the market. That prominence is precisely why the sector attracts close regulatory attention, and why the remade Franchising Code, which took effect in 2025 following an independent review, is significant to inbound investors as much as domestic operators.
For franchisors, whether established domestic networks or international brands expanding into or within Australia, the reset is best understood not as a technical compliance update but as a shift in the balance of the franchisor and franchisee relationship, and in the consequences of getting it wrong. The most commercially significant features are the expanded penalty exposure and the strengthened protections for franchisees. A wider range of obligations now carries civil penalties, and the regulator and the small business ombudsman have sharper tools, including the ability to publicise franchisors who decline to participate in dispute resolution. For brand owners, the reputational dimension of that power can be as material as the financial one, particularly for consumer-facing brands.
Enhanced protections around a franchisee’s reasonable opportunity to make a return on investment, and around compensation for early termination and exit, change network economics. Franchisors are revisiting their unit economics, disclosure practices and termination pathways, because arrangements that once shifted most of the risk onto franchisees are now more closely scrutinised. The Code also sharpens transparency around marketing and other co-operative funds, requiring franchisors to administer and account for them more rigorously, and it reinforces the pre-contract disclosure process on which prospective franchisees rely. The practical message is that a franchise system must be able to demonstrate, not merely assert, that its model is fair and sustainable.
The minimum requirements in Australia require a franchisor to provide a comprehensive disclosure document and independent advice certificates in a proscribed format prior to a franchisee making an investment decision to purchase a franchise or master franchise.
For transactions, this reshapes diligence on both the buy side and the sell side.
Looming over the sector is the prospect of a franchisor licensing scheme. The government has consulted on, but not yet legislated, such a regime; if introduced, it would represent a further step-change, moving franchising closer to a regulated-entry model. Even as a possibility, it is prompting well-advised franchisors to professionalise their governance and compliance now, both to reduce present risk and to be ready if the regulatory perimeter expands. Franchising in Australia remains attractive and well supported, but the margin for casual compliance has narrowed.
An expanding compliance perimeter shapes deal value
Beyond competition, foreign investment and franchising, a cluster of reforms in employment, privacy, financial crime and sustainability is quietly reshaping how deals are valued and integrated. Individually, these are compliance developments; collectively, they have become factors in price, warranties and completion planning.
Employment
Recent workplace reforms have changed the cost and risk profile of the workforce that comes with a business. The Secure Jobs, Better Pay changes limited the use of fixed-term contracts, and the later Closing Loopholes reforms addressed casual employment, labour hire, “same job, same pay” and the criminalisation of intentional wage underpayment. Acquirers must now diligence workforce classification and pay compliance carefully, because historical underpayment is not only a financial liability but, where intentional, a potential criminal exposure, and it features increasingly in warranties, indemnities and purchase price adjustments. In franchise conversions and multi-site businesses, where workforces are large and award-covered, this is a first-order issue.
Privacy and data
Australia’s privacy regime has been materially strengthened, with a new statutory cause of action for serious invasions of privacy that commenced in June 2025, tougher penalties and a more enforcement-minded regulator. Data assets and data-handling practices are now a standard part of diligence, and exposure for historical breaches is a live warranty topic. For technology-, consumer- and data-rich targets in particular, the quality of a target’s privacy compliance has become a value and risk issue in its own right.
Financial crime and gatekeeper reforms
From 1 July 2026, anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing obligations extend to certain designated services provided by lawyers, conveyancers, accountants, trust and company service providers, real estate professionals and dealers in precious metals and stones. For transactions, the practical effect is likely to be more formal customer due diligence, beneficial ownership checks and source-of-funds processes around property, corporate structuring and related deal services. Advisers and their clients should expect these steps to become a routine part of deal execution.
Climate and sustainability
Mandatory climate-related financial disclosure, which is a sustainability reporting obligation under the Corporations Act, is being phased in for large entities and financial institutions, with the largest entities reporting for periods from 1 January 2025 and the net widening over the following years. For deal makers, this elevates climate and sustainability information from a reputational consideration to a disclosure obligation, with consequences for representations, warranties and ongoing reporting in transactions involving larger targets.
The cumulative effect is that diligence is broader and deal documents are doing more work. Buyers are pricing compliance risk, sellers are preparing more thorough disclosure, and integration plans are accounting for obligations that did not exist a few years ago. The advisers who add the most value are those who can connect these threads across competition, foreign investment, franchising, employment, privacy, financial crime and sustainability into a single coherent transaction strategy.
Financing and structuring: the tax overlay
Tax is rarely the first thing international investors consider when they look at Australia, but it increasingly shapes how acquisitions are structured and financed. Three features in particular warrant early attention in any inbound deal.
First, the earnings-based limits on debt deductions, which broadly cap net debt deductions by reference to 30% of tax EBITDA for multinational groups, constrain how much benefit a buyer can extract from leveraging an Australian acquisition. Highly geared structures that once delivered substantial interest deductions may now see those deductions capped, which affects after-tax returns and the choice between debt and equity funding. Acquisition structures and shareholder loan arrangements should be modelled against these limits at the outset rather than assumed.
Second, for large multinational acquirers, the global and domestic minimum tax, which underpins a minimum effective rate of 15%, adds a layer of analysis to any structure that touches low-taxed jurisdictions, and it is now a standard item in structuring and diligence for groups above the relevant size. Third, on the disposal side, a foreign resident capital gains withholding obligation applies to acquisitions of certain Australian property and relevant interests from foreign residents, at a rate of 15% since 1 January 2025, so buyers and sellers alike now build clearance and withholding mechanics into completion. None of this is prohibitive, but each rewards early, joined-up tax and legal planning.
Entrants into Australia should also be aware of proposed changes to the taxation of Australian trusts (formerly a common corporate vehicle). The government has proposed a minimum 30% tax on trusts, which would see trusts taxed at the same effective rate as many Australian private companies, lessening their use case in many circumstances.
Outlook for 2026 and beyond
None of this diminishes Australia’s appeal. It remains an open economy with transparent institutions, a sophisticated professional and financial services sector, and deep connections to both Asia and the major Western markets through an extensive free trade network. Capital continues to flow into infrastructure, the energy transition, resources, healthcare, technology, and consumer and franchised businesses, even against a softer regional deal backdrop.
What has changed is the premium on preparation. The mandatory merger regime rewards parties who plan competition and foreign investment strategy together and from the outset; the remade Franchising Code rewards franchisors who can demonstrate fair and sustainable systems; and the wider compliance frontier rewards buyers and sellers who diligence and document thoroughly. The transactions that struggle in 2026 will be those that treat these elements as afterthoughts.
For international investors, the practical takeaway is straightforward: engage early, build realistic timetables and risk allocation into transaction documents, and choose advisers who can integrate the competition, foreign investment, franchising, employment and tax dimensions of a deal into one strategy. Approached that way, Australia in 2026 is as attractive a place to do business as ever, and a more predictable one for those who come prepared.
Level 27
101 Collins Street 3000
Melbourne
Australia
+61 03 8777 2221
Scott.colvin@archerscott.com.au www.archerscott.com.au