Greece is a civil-law jurisdiction, primarily based on written law, codes and statutes, rather than on binding case law. The main sources of law are the Constitution, legislation enacted by Parliament, codes such as the Civil Code, Criminal Code and Codes of Procedure, as well as European Union law.
The Greek courts are organised into separate branches. Civil courts deal with private disputes between individuals or legal entities, while criminal courts handle criminal offences. Administrative courts hear disputes between individuals or businesses and the State or public authorities.
At first instance, cases are heard by lower courts, depending on the nature and value of the dispute or the seriousness of the offence. Appeals are generally heard by courts of appeal. At the highest level, Areios Pagos acts as the supreme court for civil and criminal matters, while the Council of State is the supreme administrative court. The Court of Audit also has supreme jurisdiction regarding specific public finance matters.
Unlike common-law systems, Greek judges do not formally create binding precedent in the same way as UK courts. Their role is mainly to interpret and apply written law. However, decisions of Areios Pagos are highly influential and help ensure consistency in the interpretation of legislation. In particular, when Areios Pagos issues a judgment and refers the case back to a lower appeal court, this latter court is bound by the legal interpretation adopted by Areios Pagos in relation to the specific legal matter decided. Nevertheless, such rulings do not constitute generally binding precedent for all courts in future cases.
Overall, the Greek legal system reflects the civil-law tradition – ie, Parliament-made statutes and codified rules are the primary source of law, while case law plays an important supporting role in clarifying how those rules are applied in practice.
General Framework
Greece introduced its first standalone foreign direct investment (FDI) screening mechanism through Law 5202/2025 (the “Law”), implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 on the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union on grounds of security or public order. The regime became operational in November 2025 following the issuance of the implementing Joint Ministerial Decision No 64260/2025 regulating the notification process and supporting documentation.
The Greek FDI regime applies to investments by third-country investors, as well as by EU-based entities directly or indirectly controlled by third-country persons or governments.
The regime applies to both greenfield investments and acquisitions resulting in direct or indirect control, or qualifying minority participations, in businesses active in covered sectors.
Screening Criteria and Sectors
A filing obligation arises where the following cumulative conditions are met:
The Law distinguishes between “sensitive” and “particularly sensitive” sectors.
Sensitive sectors include energy, transport, health, information and communication technologies, and digital infrastructure. In these sectors, notification is generally triggered upon the acquisition of at least 25% participation rights, with additional filings required upon crossing certain higher thresholds.
Particularly sensitive sectors include defence, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, critical port and submarine infrastructure, and certain tourism infrastructure located in border regions. In these sectors, the filing obligation is triggered at a lower threshold of 10%, reflecting heightened national security considerations.
The regime is mandatory and suspensory, in that transactions falling within its scope must be notified prior to completion.
Review Process
The review process is administered by the B1 Directorate of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Interministerial Committee for the Screening of Foreign Direct Investments (ICSFDI).
The authority initially reviews whether the transaction falls within the scope of the regime and whether the filing is complete. Following referral to the Interministerial Committee, the authority may either clear the transaction at a preliminary stage or initiate an in-depth review.
Within 30 days of a complete filing, ICSFDI either clears the investment or opens an in-depth review. Following an in-depth review, ICSFDI submits a recommendation to the Minister of Foreign Affairs, who decides whether to approve, prohibit or condition the investment. If no decision is issued within 60 days from the date of ICSFDI’s recommendation, the investment is deemed approved.
The timetable may be suspended where additional information requests are issued.
Consequences of Non-Compliance
The regime imposes a mandatory pre-closing obligation. Failure to notify, late notification, or submission of inaccurate or misleading information may trigger significant sanctions:
Proceeding with an investment despite an explicit prohibition, obtaining approval on the basis of false information, or failing to comply with the mitigation measures or the reversal of the investment imposed may result in a fine of up to twice the value of the investment.
A decision to prohibit, reverse, or impose conditions on an investment entails the automatic nullity of the relevant transaction, which may include reversal of the share sale agreement and any measures necessary to remedy the consequences of the transaction.
Although the regime is still new and no established enforcement practice has yet emerged, investors should approach filing obligations conservatively, particularly in infrastructure, technology, defence and data-driven sectors.
The Greek FDI regime allows the authorities to approve transactions subject to conditions or mitigation measures aimed at addressing national security or public order concerns.
Although the Law does not provide an exhaustive list of remedies, possible mitigation measures may include governance safeguards, restrictions on access to sensitive information or infrastructure, cybersecurity and data localisation obligations, continuity commitments and limitations on the transfer of strategic assets or technologies.
The authorities may also monitor compliance with imposed conditions and request information or supporting documentation from the parties.
Given that the Greek regime only recently became operational and that there is no published decisional practice, there are currently no clear indications regarding the authorities’ substantive approach to remedies or mitigation measures.
Law 5202/2025 does not establish a specific administrative appeal mechanism against FDI screening decisions.
However, as a matter of general Greek administrative law, final administrative acts may in principle be challenged before the competent administrative courts and, ultimately, before the Council of State.
The principal corporate vehicles used in Greece are the société anonyme (Ανώνυμη Εταιρεία – SA) and the private company (Ιδιωτική Κεφαλαιουχική Εταιρεία – PC), both providing limited liability. Among smaller enterprises, the limited partnership (Ετερόρρυθμη Εταιρεία – LP) is a commonly used vehicle.
Prior to the introduction of PCs in the Greek legal framework in 2012, the limited liability company (Εταιρεία Περιορισμένης Ευθύνης – EPE) was the most widely used vehicle for SMEs; however, given its more restrictive formalities (eg, mandatory notarial execution of its articles of association (AoA)), it has gradually fallen into disuse, and new EPE incorporations are rare in practice.
SA
Main characteristics
The SA is the preferred vehicle for large operating companies, regulated entities, public companies and large-sized holding companies. Regulated activities (e.g. credit and financial institutions and investment services activities) may only be conducted through an SA. As a rule of thumb, an SA is more appropriate in case of many shareholders, external investors, or a large volume of business activities.
PC
Main characteristics
The PC is the most flexible and frequently used vehicle for SMEs, greenfield projects and a small or medium-sized Greek holding company due to its flexibility, low costs, and simplified governance.
LP
An LP consists of at least one general partner, with unlimited personal liability, and at least one limited partner, whose liability is limited to their agreed contribution.
Main characteristics
In the LP, partner identity is central to the company’s operation and object. Therefore, unless the partnership agreement provides otherwise, the partner’s death, bankruptcy, or legal incapacity will generally lead to the company’s dissolution, and any change in the partnership structure requires the remaining partners’ consent.
The LP is predominantly used by small enterprises and is unsuitable for regulated activities and large-scale operations, being preferred for activities with a low creditor exposure, such as the provision of services.
All company types follow a broadly similar incorporation process, completed either online through the E-One-Stop-Shop of the General Commercial Registry (GEMI) or before a notary public, serving as the one-stop-shop, by notarial deed, where required by law (eg, for in-kind real estate contributions) or agreed by the founders.
For online incorporation, the Model AoA (with either standardised or additional provisions) must be used, while for notarial incorporation, bespoke AoA may be used.
In all cases, the incorporation process is carried out in Greek and is completed within the same day. Online incorporation is more straightforward and cost-efficient, and upon completion, the company is automatically registered with GEMI, as well as with the tax and social security authorities.
Prior to incorporation, any foreign shareholder or partner, and any foreign director/administrator, must first register with the Greek tax authority and obtain a Tax Identification Number (TIN).
Under all of the above corporate forms, shareholders and partners may be either legal entities or individuals.
In addition to the incorporation fees, the incorporation of an SA is subject to a duty payable to the Competition Commission, amounting to 1‰ of the share capital.
Both the SA and the PC are subject to filing and disclosure obligations with GEMI, while LPs are subject to similar, albeit less extensive, compliance requirements.
Key obligations include:
Further, Greek law requires companies to register their UBOs (ie, individuals holding an interest of at least 25% in the company) in the Central UBO Register. Initial registration and updates must generally be made within 60 days of the triggering event.
Greek companies operate on a one-tier management structure; Greek law does not provide for a formal two-tier supervisory/management model.
SA
It is administered by a board of directors (BoD) of three to fifteen members elected by shareholders.
SAs classified as “very small” or “small” may appoint a sole director-administrator (being a natural person), with the same duties and powers as a full board, provided that the AoA so permit.
A legal entity may be elected as a director, provided a specific individual is expressly designated to act on its behalf.
The BoD may delegate its powers to its members or to non-members, provided that such delegation is permitted under the ΑοΑ.
Board members who receive remuneration or hold at least a 3% participation in the company must be registered with e-EFKA.
PC
It is administered by one or more administrators, who must be individuals, elected by the partners.
Administrators may delegate certain responsibilities to one or more individuals provided that such delegation is permitted under the AoA.
Administrators must be registered with e-EFKA.
LP
It is managed and represented by the general partner(s). The partnership agreement, however, may assign such powers to a limited partner, who is then liable as a general partner for any act of representation, unless the third party was aware of their limited partner status.
Directors and administrators owe duties of care and loyalty to the company, assessed under a business judgment standard; those acting in good faith and in the corporate interest are typically protected from personal liability, though culpable acts/omissions or company debts, including unpaid tax and social security obligations, may attract personal liability. SA shareholders and PC partners are not liable beyond their contributions. Greek courts may exceptionally “lift the corporate veil” where the corporate form is abused to defraud creditors. In PCs, guarantee-contribution partners are directly liable towards third parties up to the AoA amount. In LPs, general partners bear unlimited liability; limited partners are liable only up to their agreed contribution.
Employment relationships in Greece are governed by the Greek Constitution, national legislation (ie, the Labour Code and the Civil Code, laws, presidential decrees and ministerial decisions), EU law and international treaties, as well as collective and individual employment agreements.
Case law is not a formal source of law but serves an interpretative function in applying statutory provisions.
The duration of the employment contract is agreed between the parties and may be either indefinite or fixed-term, on a full-time or part-time basis.
Fixed-Term Employment Agreements
A fixed-term contract may be renewed up to three consecutive times within a total period of three years and may not exceed an overall duration of three years. A break exceeding 45 calendar days is required to avoid consecutive fixed-term contracts being characterised as indefinite-term contracts.
Conclusion of Employment Agreements
There is no general legal requirement for employment agreements to be concluded in writing, except in specific cases (eg, part-time or temporary employment, renewal of fixed-term contracts).
Essential Terms of Employment
Although employment contracts do not generally need to be in writing, employers must provide employees with written information on their essential employment terms (job description, remuneration, working time, etc) within specific time limits (one week/month, depending on the information).
Maximum Working Hours
The statutory working time in Greece is eight hours per day, 40 hours per week, for employees under a five-day weekly work schedule, and six hours and 40 minutes per day (40 hours per week) under a six-day schedule, except for certain employee categories with reduced working hours.
The total weekly working time may not exceed, over a reference period of up to four months, an average of 48 hours, including overtime.
Overwork
Legal working hours may be exceeded by up to five hours per week (one hour per day under a five-day weekly schedule) due to workload. Under a six-day weekly schedule, overwork covers work performed between the 41st and 48th hour. Overwork is paid with a 20% surcharge on the hourly wage (unless an offset clause is included in the employee’s contract allowing set-off against the agreed salary exceeding the statutory minimum wage).
Overtime
Any work above the 45-hour limit and nine hours per day is “overtime”. Employees may perform overtime of up to four hours per day and up to 150 hours per year. Every hour of legal overtime is paid with a 40% surcharge on the hourly paid wage.
Overtime not complying with the statutory formalities and approval procedures is considered “illegal”, and employees are entitled to the hourly wage plus 120% for such overtime.
A special permit for overtime beyond the 150 hour limit may be granted by the Ministry of Labor, if justified for specific reasons and extraordinary work. Such overtime is paid with a 60% surcharge on the hourly wage.
The provision of paid time off in lieu of statutory overwork or overtime compensation is not permitted.
The parties may agree that the part of the employee’s salary exceeding the statutory minimum can be offset with overwork compensation; however, such offsetting is not allowed for overtime compensation.
Work During Sundays/Public Holidays
Employees may not work on Sundays or public holidays, unless legally exempt. Compensation amounts to 75% on top of the legal hourly wage. In urgent cases, such work may be authorised by the authorities; otherwise, it is considered as “illegal”. If work exceeds five hours on Sunday, the employee is entitled to a day off.
Work on the Sixth Day
For employees under a five-day weekly schedule, work on the sixth day is not permitted and the employees are entitled to receive an increase of 30% on their normal hourly wage.
By exception, employees of undertakings of continuous operation with rotating shift systems, or undertakings which are not of continuous operation but may operate on a six-day (24/5 or 24/6) shift basis, may be required to work on the sixth day. Prior notification to the Labour Inspectorate and registration through the ERGANI II platform are required, and work is limited to eight hours (no overwork/overtime permitted), and is remunerated with a 40% surcharge on the hourly wage.
Night Work
Night work is from 22.00 until 06.00 and is compensated with a 25% increase in the hourly wage.
Executive Employees
Under Greek law, only executive employees are exempt from working time provisions and are therefore not entitled to compensation for overwork or overtime. Executive employees are managerial employees, as defined by law, declared as such in the ERGANI II platform, and employed under a contract reflecting their status.
Termination of Indefinite-Term Contracts
Requirements
Termination of indefinite-term employment agreements does not require a “serious cause”; however, in case of litigation, the employer must demonstrate that the termination was justified and the “last resort”.
The validity of the termination requires:
Where the employee has committed a criminal offence and the employer has filed a complaint, termination without severance may take place. In the event of the employee’s acquittal, statutory severance becomes payable.
Employers are also required to notify the labour authorities.
Notice period
The employer may terminate the employment with prior notice or immediate effect. Where the statutory notice period is observed, the employee’s severance is reduced by 50%.
Severance payment
The statutory severance in Greece consists of the basic severance, applicable to all employees on indefinite contracts, and the additional severance, applicable to employees who, as of 12/11/2012, have completed 17 years of service with the employer.
Basic severance amount (and applicable notice period) depends on the employee’s length of service with the employer and is capped at 12 monthly salaries. It is calculated on the employee’s total regular monthly remuneration of the last month before termination, multiplied by 14 (to include statutory allowances), and divided by 12, to produce a monthly average. Additional benefits provided regularly, without reservation of amendment or revocation, should also be included.
Employees who, as of 12 November 2012, had 17 years of service with the same employer are entitled to additional severance of one monthly salary per year beyond 17 years, up to 12 monthly salaries, based on last month’s earnings under full employment, capped at EUR2,000.
Termination of Fixed-Term Contracts
Fixed-term contracts are terminated automatically when their agreed term expires. Early termination is permitted for a “serious cause”, without notice or severance. In the absence of serious cause, all salaries due until the initially agreed expiration date are payable.
Redundancies
Any type of redundancy is considered a justified reason for dismissal. However, the employer should be able to demonstrate, in potential litigation, that the position was genuinely made redundant and that selection complied with statutory criteria. Available alternatives (eg, redeployment) should be assessed before termination.
Selection criteria apply to comparable employees and include performance (the prevailing criterion), seniority, age, family burdens, financial status and the possibility of finding a new job.
Collective Dismissals
Specific provisions exist for collective dismissals. The procedure is triggered where an employer with 20-150 employees dismisses more than six employees in a calendar month, or where an employer with more than 150 employees dismisses more than 5% of its workforce and, in any event, more than 30 employees in a calendar month.
Specific information and consultation requirements exist for collective dismissals, as well as notifications to the Ministry of Labour. Failure to follow the prescribed procedure renders the dismissals null and void.
The general rules on valid termination and severance continue to apply.
The establishment of employee representative bodies and participation therein is not generally mandatory and is exercised where the relevant legal requirements are met. Employee representation is primarily exercised through trade unions and works councils.
Trade Unions
Union membership is a fundamental right under the Greek Constitution, ensuring employees’ freedom to organise and advocate collectively. Any adverse treatment, including dismissal, due to union involvement is prohibited.
Trade unions are structured at three levels:
The establishment of a trade union requires at least 20 employees. Founding members apply for recognition to court, upon which the union acquires legal personality.
Trade unions aim to preserve and promote employees’ labour, financial, insurance, social and collective interests. Their main rights include collective bargaining and the right to strike, as well as information and consultation rights in cases of collective dismissals, transfer of undertakings, restructuring, the introduction of new technologies, etc.
Works Councils
Works councils may be formed in enterprises employing at least 50 employees, or more than 20 employees, where no trade union exists. They are elected by employees and consist of three, five, or seven members, depending on the size of the workforce.
Their primary function is advisory, with information and consultation rights regarding matters affecting employees, including health and safety, introduction of new technologies, collective redundancies, transfers of undertakings and restructuring measures (in the absence of a trade union).
European Works Councils
For multinational enterprises, European Works Councils are established for the protection of employees’ rights in a broader, multinational form. Employees from all countries in which the enterprise is engaged participate in an EWC.
A taxpayer may be subject to taxation either based on their tax residence or because they derive income from a Greek source. Accordingly, any person who is considered a tax resident of Greece is subject to tax on their taxable income arising both in Greece and abroad earned during a specific tax year, whereas a taxpayer who is not a tax resident of Greece is subject to tax only on taxable income arising in Greece and earned during the relevant tax year. However, domestic law provisions apply subject to any double taxation treaty.
With respect to taxes imposed in the context of an employment relationship, employees are subject to progressive income tax brackets, while employers are liable for withholding such (payroll) tax and social security contributions calculated on the employee’s income.
The following tax rates apply to the employee’s income, from 1 January 2026 onwards, subject to applicable reductions:
With regard to tax breaks/incentives available for employees, from FY 2021, a taxpayer/employee who transfers their tax residence to Greece may qualify for a special tax regime if certain conditions are met, including prior non-residence in Greece and relocation from an eligible country (ie, an EU or EEA member state or from a state with which Greece has an administrative co-operation agreement in the field of taxation in force). Under this regime, 50% of employment income earned in Greece is exempt from income tax for up to seven tax years.
Under domestic tax rules, a company is subject to corporate income tax either based on its tax residence or if it maintains a permanent establishment under domestic rules or applicable double tax treaty provisions. Accordingly, a company is considered tax resident in Greece and subject to tax on its worldwide income if any one of the following conditions is met; in essence, a company is regarded as tax resident in Greece if it has been incorporated or established under Greek law, or if it has its registered seat in Greece, or if its place of effective management (POEM) is located in Greece for any period during the tax year.
With regard to taxable income and applicable tax rates, a Greek company and a permanent establishment are subject to corporate income tax at a rate of 22%, after deducting business expenses, provided that all the relevant conditions provided for the deduction under the Greek Income Tax Code (GITC) are met, as well as depreciation and provisions for doubtful receivables (with respect to a permanent establishment, subject to the provisions of any applicable double tax treaty, which may override domestic provisions).
Taxable business profits are generally determined on the basis of accounting profits, as adjusted by the specific rules and classifications set out in the GITC. In principle, they correspond to total revenues minus deductible business expenses, tax-allowable depreciation, and certain provisions for bad debts. As a rule, incorporated businesses are taxed on an accrual basis, while any profits not previously taxed become taxable upon distribution or capitalisation.
Withholding Tax on Income: Interest, Royalties, Dividends
Income derived from interest, royalties, and dividends falls under the general category of investment income and is subject to withholding tax at a rate of 20% for Greek-source royalties, 15% for Greek-source interest, and 5% for dividends, subject to the provisions of any applicable double tax treaty) or, where applicable, the provisions of the EU Interest–Royalties Directive and the Parent–Subsidiary Directive.
In short, dividend exemption applies where the conditions of the EU Parent–Subsidiary Directive are met, including a minimum 10% participation held for at least 24 months, qualifying EU tax residency and inclusion in Annex I companies, as well as subject-to-tax requirements without exemption options; similarly, exemption from withholding tax on interest and royalties applies to payments between qualifying EU associated companies where a minimum 25% direct or indirect participation is held for at least 24 months, and the beneficiary satisfies the requirements of the EU Interest and Royalties Directive regarding qualifying entity status, EU tax residence (without third-country treaty residence), and full corporate tax liability without option or exemption. Until the minimum holding period is completed, a bank guarantee may be provided for the withholding tax due, instead of immediate payment of the withholding tax and subsequent refund claim.
A special anti-avoidance rule prohibits the withholding tax exemption on the qualifying dividend payments where the relevant exemption is claimed in the context of artificial arrangements.
Pillar 2 Directive, Law 5100/2024
Greece has implemented EU Council Directive 2022/2523 (Pillar Two Directive) through Law 5100/2024, establishing a global minimum taxation framework for multinational groups and large-scale domestic groups.
Under this regime, the GloBE Information Return (GIR) must generally be filed within 15 months after the end of the relevant reporting fiscal year (or 18 months for the transitional year). The corresponding tax return must then be filed by the last working day of the month following the submission of the GIR.
The law introduces the QDMTT safe harbour, the CbCR transitional safe harbour, and the UTPR transitional safe harbour. It also expressly provides that these safe harbours are to be interpreted in line with the OECD Model Rules.
VAT Considerations
VAT is imposed on all transactions for consideration involving the supply of goods and the provision of services. The standard VAT rate is 24%, although reduced rates also apply in certain cases.
Digital Transaction Duty (DTD)
The DTD is a tax introduced in Greece through Law 5135/2024 and codified by Law 5177/2025, imposing a proportional levy on specific transactions that fall outside the scope of VAT. The DTD applies to transactions where at least one party is a Greek tax resident or has a permanent establishment in Greece, provided that the transaction is connected to that establishment. The duty is calculated as a specific percentage of the financial value of the transaction or the highest debit/credit balance.
Special Real Estate Tax (SRET)
The ownership of Greek real estate through non-transparent structures is addressed through the imposition of a special tax on property held as of 1 January each calendar year, calculated at a rate of 15% on the imputed/statutory value of the real estate. In practice, the tax does not apply to a significant number of incorporated entities holding real estate in Greece due to various exemptions, particularly where the owning company is not considered to be used as a vehicle for tax evasion or avoidance. Recent amendments to the special real estate tax framework have aligned the exemption for regulated investment vehicles with applicable domestic and EU legislation governing such schemes.
Unified Real Estate Tax (URET)
The URET (ΕΝ.Φ.Ι.Α.) constitutes an annual property tax imposed on all real estate situated in the country. It is calculated on the basis of objective property values, considering factors such as floor area, age, and location, with main tax rates for buildings ranging from EUR2 to EUR16.20 per square metre.
Capital Concentration/Accumulation Tax
CCT is levied at a flat rate of 0.2% on contributed capital, including share capital increases made in cash or in kind. This duty applies to commercial companies and corporate transformations, rather than to the initial establishment of a company.
Listed Shares Sales Tax
Capital gains arising from the sale of listed and unlisted shares are treated as business income and are subject to corporate income tax at the standard CIT rate. However, where such gains are realised by foreign legal entities tax resident abroad, they are taxable in Greece only to the extent that the entity maintains a permanent establishment in Greece to which such gains can be attributed. In addition, the transfer of listed shares is subject to a transaction duty at a rate of 0.1%.
Incentives Offered for All Enterprises
The GITC introduces tax incentives in the form of enhanced “super” deductions for specific business expenses. Scientific and technological research costs, including depreciation of related equipment, are deductible with a 100% uplift. Similar enhanced deductions apply to expenses related to the green economy, energy efficiency, and digitalisation for SMEs, as well as to costs connected with the listing of SME shares or equivalent securities on a regulated Greek market, also with a 100% uplift and a cap on the resulting tax benefit of EUR200,000. The provision aims to encourage investment in research, sustainable development, digital transformation, and capital market participation.
Digital Business
Greece provides a broad set of tax incentives that may be relevant to digital businesses. Expenditure on scientific and technological research, including depreciation of relevant equipment and instruments, is deductible with an additional 100% uplift. Following amendments introduced by Law 5162/2024 (applicable from FY 2025), this enhanced deduction rises to 150% for eligible research costs linked to collaborations with entities registered in the National Startup Registry, accredited research centres, and universities that are independent from the recipient of the services, as well as for depreciation of research-related equipment. In certain cases, SMEs may benefit from an increased deduction of up to 215%.
Furthermore, GITC establishes a “Patent Box” regime, which allows, subject to specific conditions, tax exemption for income generated from self-developed, internationally recognised patents. Greece also offers a favourable regime for angel investors, providing income tax relief for certified investments in qualifying start-ups.
Corporate Transformations
Corporate reorganisations, including mergers, demergers, transformations, spin-offs, and contributions of assets, are governed by two parallel legislative frameworks. From a corporate law perspective, Law 4601/2019 provides a comprehensive framework regulating all forms of corporate transformations. From a tax law perspective, rules have recently been introduced to consolidate and modernise the tax provisions and incentives applicable to corporate reorganisations (Articles 47–59 of Law 5162/2024), replacing the previously fragmented framework under Laws 1297/1972, 2166/1993, 2778/1998, and 4172/2013. At the same time, the incentive regime introduced by Law 4935/2022 – primarily aimed at micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – remains in force. In addition, the special restructuring framework applicable to credit institutions under Law 2515/1997 continues to apply.
Special Regime of Law 89/1967
Under Law 89/1967, a favourable regime is available to foreign companies operating in Greece that provide specific services to their parent companies, affiliated entities, or other non-Greek businesses, including consultancy, accounting support, quality control, planning, marketing, data processing, and similar activities. In essence, such entities are required to determine their gross revenues on a cost-plus basis, calculated by adding a pre-approved profit margin to total operating expenses and tax-allowable depreciation, excluding income tax, following an audit or review by the competent Committee. The profit margin is set by a committee appointed by the Minister of Development and Investments and is reassessed every five years, subject to significant changes in market conditions.
No response was provided in this jurisdiction.
Interest deductibility in Greece is limited under the thin capitalisation (interest limitation) rules set out in GITC. Under these provisions, net interest expenses are generally deductible up to 30% of EBITDA (calculated on a tax basis). Any amount exceeding this threshold is not deductible in the relevant tax year. However, disallowed net interest expenses can be carried forward indefinitely and deducted in future tax years.
An exemption applies where net interest expenses do not exceed EUR3 million, in which case the limitation does not apply. In addition, certain entities – such as credit institutions, insurance and reinsurance companies, and pension institutions – are excluded from the scope of these rules.
In Greece, transfer pricing is mainly regulated under the GITC, supplemented by administrative guidance from the Independent Authority for Public Revenue (IAPR). In addition, the Tax Procedure Code sets out the framework governing tax audits as well as the documentation and procedural requirements applicable to transfer pricing compliance.
Furthermore, the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines are recognised and applicable in Greece as an interpretative framework for applying the relevant legal provisions. In particular, the GITC stipulates that the arm’s length principle must be applied and interpreted in line with the general principles and the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines in relation to intra-group transactions.
Transfer pricing rules apply to transactions between “related parties” as defined under the GITC. Greek tax legislation adopts a broad definition of related parties, covering both direct and indirect relationships that may influence the pricing of intra-group transactions. In more detail, a 33% threshold is applied to determine related-party status, based on direct or indirect participation in capital or voting rights. In addition, parties may also be treated as related where one entity exercises managerial control or decisive influence over another, regardless of whether any participation in capital or voting rights exists.
Greece has introduced Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) rules, a General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR), and hybrid mismatch provisions in accordance with ATAD I and II, whereas there are special anti-avoidance rules regarding the taxation on corporate transformations.
The GAAR applies to both domestic and cross-border arrangements, provided that the relevant double tax treaty does not contain its own anti-abuse provisions, such as a Principal Purpose Test. Under this rule, the Greek tax authorities may disregard arrangements or series of arrangements that are primarily, or have as one of their main purposes, the obtaining of a tax advantage that contradicts the intent or purpose of the applicable tax law.
Under the revised CFC framework, even where all applicable conditions are met, the rules will not apply if the foreign entity is located in an EU or EEA jurisdiction and demonstrates genuine economic activity, such as having sufficient staff, premises, assets, and equipment.
Lastly, the hybrid mismatch rules aim to prevent double deductions or deductions without corresponding taxation arising from differences in the tax treatment of entities or instruments across jurisdictions, thereby safeguarding against base erosion.
Greece, as part of the European Union, is subject to the Union Customs Code (UCC). The aforementioned code was adopted in 2013, and its substantive provisions have applied since 1 May 2016, with the aim of bringing EU customs legislation into line with the requirements of the Lisbon Treaty. It supersedes the former Community Customs Code (CCC).
Having said that, tariff classification is governed by the Combined Nomenclature (CN) and specific tariff classification decisions and updates are formally adopted through Commission Implementing Regulations. The European Commission updates this list on an annual basis, with the most recent revisions adding specific subheadings for advanced technologies such as batteries, photovoltaics, hydrogen, and advanced materials (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/360 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/333).
Countries with extensive trade agreements with the European Union benefit from significantly reduced or eliminated tariffs, creating heavily integrated market access. For example, the EU–South Korea Free Trade Agreement has eliminated customs duties on nearly all goods traded between the parties. In addition, it has reduced numerous non-tariff barriers affecting exports of products such as automobiles, pharmaceuticals, electronics, and chemicals. The agreement has also liberalised a wide range of services sectors, facilitating market access and investment opportunities for both EU and South Korean businesses. Another example is the EU–Central America Association Agreement, which has been provisionally applied since 1 August 2013 with Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama; since 1 October 2013 with Costa Rica and El Salvador; and since 1 December 2013 with Guatemala.
Greek merger control is governed by Law 3959/2011 (the “Greek Competition Act”), which is closely aligned with the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR). The system is primarily administered by the Hellenic Competition Commission (HCC) and operates on a mandatory and suspensory basis. In the electronic communications and postal sectors, competition law enforcement powers are exercised exclusively by the Hellenic Telecommunications and Post Commission (EETT) within its sectoral remit.
Transactions Covered
The Greek merger control regime applies to concentrations resulting in a lasting change of control.
Notifiable transactions include:
The concept of control is interpreted consistently with EU merger control principles and may arise through shareholdings, contractual arrangements or veto rights.
Jurisdictional Thresholds
A concentration must be notified to the competent competition authority prior to implementation where the following cumulative turnover thresholds are met:
The Greek regime is exclusively turnover-based and does not provide for market share thresholds.
Transactions meeting the EU thresholds fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the European Commission unless referred to the HCC under the EUMR referral mechanisms.
Filing and Pre-Notification
Notification must be submitted prior to completion of the transaction. Although not mandatory, pre-notification contacts are frequently used in complex cases to discuss jurisdictional and procedural issues, as well as substantive matters.
Within seven working days after the filing, the HCC shall assess whether the notification form is incomplete and request the parties concerned to provide additional information. If they fail to submit complete and precise information as requested, the one-month time limit of Phase I does not commence; thereby, the progress of the procedure is delayed. In practice, it is common that the competent competition authority demands additional information, resulting in a delay of the procedure for 10 to 15 additional days.
Phase I Review
The HCC conducts an initial review within one month from receipt of a complete filing.
During Phase I, the authority may:
Requests for additional information are common in practice and may suspend or delay the review timetable.
20 calendar days after the notification date, the parties may also offer commitments intended to address potential competition concerns.
Phase II Investigation
Where the HCC opens an in-depth investigation, the statutory review period is generally 90 days from the decision initiating Phase II. The case is brought before the HCC within 45 days from that decision, and remedies may be proposed within 20 days from the case being brought before the HCC.
The Phase II investigation period is automatically extended by 15 days, if the parties propose remedies later than the 20-day limit. Thus, the maximum duration of Phase II is 105 days.
The authority may ultimately:
If the HCC fails to issue a decision within the applicable statutory deadline, the concentration is deemed approved.
Gun-Jumping and Sanctions
The Greek merger control regime prohibits implementation prior to clearance.
Failure to notify a notifiable transaction, early implementation (“gun-jumping”), or breach of remedies may result in significant administrative fines. The HCC also has powers to impose behavioural or structural measures where necessary.
Legal Framework
Article 1 of the Greek Competition Act mirrors Article 101 TFEU and prohibits agreements, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices that have as their object or effect the restriction of competition. Typical infringements include price-fixing, market sharing, output restrictions, bid-rigging and exchanges of commercially sensitive information.
The Greek Competition Act also recognises in its Article 1(3) the equivalent of the Article 101(3) TFEU exemption, allowing restrictive agreements where efficiency gains outweigh anti-competitive effects and consumers receive a fair share of the resulting benefits. EU Block Exemption Regulations also apply mutatis mutandis to agreements, decisions or concerted practices which are not likely to affect trade between EU member states.
Additional National Rules
Greek law also prohibits invitations to collude and certain unilateral disclosures of future pricing intentions by large undertakings (Article 1A of the Greek Competition Act).
Territorial Scope
Greek competition law follows the effects doctrine. Under Article 46 of the Greek Competition Act, the regime applies to anti-competitive conduct capable of affecting competition in Greece, irrespective of where the conduct occurred or whether the undertakings involved are established in Greece.
Accordingly, agreements concluded or implemented outside Greece may still fall within the jurisdiction of the HCC where they produce actual or potential effects on the Greek market.
Abuse of Dominance
Article 2 of the Greek Competition Act mirrors Article 102 TFEU and prohibits abusive conduct by undertakings holding a dominant position in the Greek market or a substantial part thereof.
Unlike the EU system, Greek law expressly allows settlement procedures not only in cartel cases but also in abuse of dominance investigations.
As with cartel enforcement, the Greek abuse of dominance regime is based on the effects doctrine. Under Article 46 of the Greek Competition Act, abusive conduct may fall within Greek jurisdiction where it takes place in Greece or produces actual or potential effects on the Greek market, regardless of the location of the undertaking concerned. This allows the HCC to investigate foreign undertakings whose conduct materially affects competition in Greece, even absent a physical presence in the jurisdiction.
Abuse of Economic Dependency
Greek law separately prohibits the abusive exploitation of economic dependency (under Article 18a of the Unfair Competition Act (Law 146/1914)), which may exist where a trading partner is substantially reliant on a commercial relationship and lacks an equivalent alternative.
Article 18a is enforced exclusively by the Greek civil courts, which may order the cessation of the abusive conduct and/or its non-repetition, award damages (actual loss and/or loss of profits) and impose fines of EUR5,000 to EUR50,000 on responsible natural persons. Furthermore, any agreement giving rise to the abusive conduct is void under Article 174 of the Greek Civil Code.
Foreign undertakings without a principal establishment in Greece may invoke Article 18a only if reciprocity is established, namely if Greek undertakings enjoy equivalent protection in the relevant foreign jurisdiction. Accordingly, beyond the existence of effects of the conduct in Greece, Article 18a is subject to an additional limitation, with reciprocity restricting access to protection under the provision.
Definition
A patent is an intellectual property right protecting technical inventions that are novel, involve an inventive step and are capable of industrial application. The main applicable framework in Greece is Law 1733/1987.
Length of Protection
Patents are protected for 20 years from the filing date, subject to annual renewal fees. Protection may be extended by up to five years for medicinal and plant protection products through a supplementary protection certificate.
Registration Process
Patent protection in Greece may be obtained through the following:
Greece has signed but has not yet ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement.
Enforcement and Remedies
Patent rights are enforced primarily through civil proceedings, including injunctions, damages and the removal or destruction of infringing products. Damages may be based on lost profits, reasonable royalties or the infringer’s profits. Information claims and publication of court decisions are also available.
Definition
A trade mark is any sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of another and of being represented on the register with clarity and precision.
Length of Protection
Protection in Greece is available through:
Protection lasts ten years from the filing date/from the date of international registration and may be renewed indefinitely for successive ten-year periods.
Registration Process
A national trade mark application is filed with OBI. Upon its formal examination, the application is published and becomes subject to a three-month opposition period. If no opposition is filed, or any opposition is rejected, the trade mark is registered. A similar procedure applies to EUTMs before the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
For international registrations, the application is filed through the applicant’s national or regional office and submitted to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Following formal examination by WIPO, the designation of Greece is notified to OBI, which examines the application under national law. In the absence of a refusal, the mark enjoys protection in Greece as a national trade mark.
Enforcement and Remedies
Enforcement includes:
Signs that have acquired distinctive character through use may also enjoy protection without registration.
Definition
Industrial designs, governed mainly by Presidential Decree 259/1997, protect the appearance of the whole or part of a product, provided it is new and has individual character.
Length of Protection
Registered designs are protected for five years from filing, renewable for successive five-year periods up to a maximum of 25 years.
Unregistered Community designs are protected for three years from first disclosure within the EU.
Registration Process
Protection is available through the following:
Enforcement and Remedies
Right holders may seek cessation of the infringement, injunctions against future infringements and damages. Courts may also order withdrawal, removal from the market or destruction of infringing goods. A design may additionally qualify for trade mark and/or copyright protection where applicable.
Definition
Copyright is an intellectual property right granted to original literary, artistic or scientific works in any form, including both economic and moral rights. The main applicable framework is Law 2121/1993.
Length of Protection
Copyright lasts for the author’s life plus 70 years, calculated from 1 January of the year following the author’s death.
Registration Process
In Greece, copyright is not subject to registration. Protection arises automatically upon creation of the work.
Enforcement and Remedies
Enforcement mechanisms include:
Software is protected as a literary work under copyright law, covering source and object code. Software-related inventions may be patentable if they produce a technical effect.
Databases are protected through:
Law 4605/2019 protects trade secrets. Protection requires that the information be secret, have commercial value and be subject to reasonable confidentiality measures.
Sources of Data Protection Law in Greece
Cross-Border Application of Data Protection Law
Data Protection Authority and Regulatory Enforcement Framework
The Hellenic Data Protection Authority
Data protection in Greece is enforced primarily by the HDPA, established under Law 2472/1997 and operating within the framework of the GDPR, Law 4624/2019 and Law 3471/2006. The Authority exercises a broad range of powers, including monitoring compliance and issuing guidelines and recommendations.
Enforcement activity is largely complaint-driven, although the HDPA also initiates ex-officio investigations in cases of broader public interest. Proceedings before the HDPA follow administrative procedures and typically involve the preparation of a case file, a hearing, and the issuance of a reasoned, binding decision after the parties have been heard.
Where a breach of data protection law is established, the HDPA exercises its corrective powers, including the imposition of administrative fines. Decisions of the HDPA are binding but may be challenged before the Council of State (see also below).
Enforcement trends
Recent enforcement practice indicates an increasing focus on high-risk areas, including employment-related processing and data breaches. Violations of data subject rights remain a consistent priority, with particular emphasis in the past year on the right of access.
Looking ahead, greater emphasis is expected on transparency obligations, in line with co-ordinated enforcement actions of the European Data Protection Board and the participation of the HDPA therein.
Other relevant authorities
The Hellenic Authority for Communication Security and Privacy is responsible for safeguarding the confidentiality of communications. It issues regulations, conducts audits, and investigates complaints, particularly in relation to telecommunications and lawful interception.
The Hellenic Cybersecurity Authority is responsible for cybersecurity oversight. It supervises the implementation of the NIS2 framework and co-ordinates incident reporting at the national level.
In the financial sector, additional supervisory responsibilities arise under the Digital Operational Resilience Act. These are exercised by authorities such as the Bank of Greece and the Hellenic Capital Market Commission, which oversee digital operational resilience and ICT risk management.
Judicial proceedings
Explanatory Note: The above avenues of redress operate independently; none is contingent upon the initiation of another.
Merger Control: More Interventionist Enforcement and Procedural Modernisation
The most significant development in Greek merger control is not legislative but enforcement-driven. Recent cases suggest that the HCC is increasingly willing to subject transactions affecting concentrated domestic markets to rigorous scrutiny and, where necessary, require far-reaching remedies or allow transactions to be abandoned. This trend was illustrated by the proposed EUR217 million acquisition by Allwyn International of a controlling stake in Novibet’s parent company, Logflex MT Holding. Following the issuance of a Statement of Objections in December 2025, the parties abandoned the transaction in March 2026 (HCC Decision No 904/2026). The HCC’s concern was the elimination of OPAP’s only meaningful competitor in the Greek online betting market. This follows the HCC’s prohibition of the Alphabet/Delta transaction in July 2025, its first merger prohibition in over two decades. Parties considering acquisitions in concentrated sectors, particularly involving digital markets or the elimination of a key competitive constraint, should expect rigorous scrutiny. At the same time, Greece is continuing to modernise its merger control framework. Recent amendments have simplified certain procedural aspects of the notification process and further aligned domestic practice with EU standards. An additional point to watch will be the interaction between Greek enforcement practice and the European Commission’s ongoing review of the EU Merger Guidelines. While the Commission’s draft guidelines emphasise innovation and efficiencies, recent HCC decisions reflect a comparatively cautious approach to consolidation in concentrated markets, a divergence that may become particularly relevant where jurisdiction could fall to either authority.
Foreign Direct Investment Screening: From New National Regime to European Harmonisation
The most significant development in the field of foreign investment is the introduction of Greece’s first comprehensive foreign direct investment (FDI) screening mechanism under Law 5202/2025, coupled with the ongoing reform of the EU FDI screening framework. As the regime is still in its infancy, a key issue for market participants will be how the competent authorities interpret and apply the new framework in practice, particularly with respect to jurisdictional questions, substantive assessment criteria and the types of mitigation measures that may be imposed. Further refinement of the recently enacted national framework is expected as the EU’s new FDI Screening Regulation – approved on 8 June 2026 and expected to take full effect by early 2028 – will require member states to maintain screening mechanisms meeting common minimum standards and to extend mandatory screening to a broader set of strategic sectors – including artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, advanced semiconductors, electoral systems, designated financial entities and strategic raw materials. Investors should therefore expect the Greek FDI regime to remain a developing area over the next several years, with additional implementing measures and administrative guidance likely to emerge as both domestic and EU rules evolve. From a transactional perspective, deals involving strategic assets or sensitive sectors will increasingly require parallel merger control and FDI screening reviews, alongside any sector-specific regulatory approvals.
Reform of Greek Succession and Family Law
Whilst not directly relevant to the sections set out above, it is worth noting that with Law 5303/2026 published in the Government Gazette on 22 May 2026, Greece has enacted its most comprehensive reform of succession and family law in eight decades. This reform is expected to give a boost to the attractiveness of Greece as a jurisdiction for high-net-worth individuals, family offices, and internationally mobile wealth. Combined with the existing non-dom tax regime and the Golden Visa programme, the reform adds a further dimension to Greece’s offer as a destination for wealth relocation and long-term investment.
Dim. Soutsou
28 street
Athens
Greece
+30 210 817 1500
kg.law@kglawfirm.gr kglawfirm.gr/
Introduction
Greece’s economy is growing at a moderate but steady pace as it enters 2026. Following the debt crisis of the previous decade, the country has emerged as one of the more dynamic jurisdictions in the European legal and commercial landscape. The environment is defined by economic expansion, accelerating investment, and an increasingly dense regulatory framework driven by EU law.
The European Commission’s Spring Economic Forecasts indicate that Greece will continue to outperform the EU and eurozone averages, even as the country’s economic growth is expected to gradually moderate from 2.1% in 2025 to 1.8% in 2026 and 1.6% in 2027, mainly due to rising energy costs. Economic growth and investment are projected to remain strong in 2026, driven mainly by sustained investment inflows and the continued deployment of funds, particularly under the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). The imperative to complete all RRF milestones by August 2026 is driving the pace and priorities of public procurement, infrastructure delivery and several key sectors, including energy, technology, healthcare, gaming and hospitality.
This economic momentum has produced a corresponding surge in transactional activity and regulatory output. The Greek M&A market reached unprecedented levels in 2025, recording record deal volumes and values across a wide range of sectors. At the same time, the legislative landscape has undergone substantial transformation, with new frameworks governing foreign direct investment screening, corporate governance, capital markets, employment, market surveillance, and sustainability all coming into force in rapid succession. For businesses operating in Greece – whether domestic companies or international investors – the environment is simultaneously opportunity-rich and compliance-intensive.
This article aims to provide an overview of the key trends, developments and challenges for doing business in Greece in 2026.
2025: An Exceptional Year for M&A – Setting the Scene for 2026
Greece experienced robust M&A activity in 2025, with landmark transactions mainly across financial services, healthcare, energy, gaming, technology, hospitality and real estate. Several defining deals characterised the year, including the following:
Beyond the ultra-luxury segment, mid-market hospitality transactions demonstrated equal vitality. A notable example was the strategic partnership between a renowned entrepreneurial Greek Cypriot Family and Donkey Hotels and Resorts and funds managed by AZORA, through which the parties formed a closed-ended joint venture to own, manage, and upgrade a portfolio of Greek hospitality assets.
This volume and diversity of transactional activity reflect both the increased attractiveness of Greek assets and a broader shift in investor confidence, underpinned by the country’s achievement of investment-grade credit status.
Yet this dynamic environment also brings complexity. Deal timelines have extended considerably, driven by heightened regulatory scrutiny, more rigorous due diligence requirements, and persistent valuation gaps between buyers and sellers. Transactions that advance to late stages are failing to complete at higher rates than in previous cycles, a trend consistent with broader EMEA market conditions. For clients, this underscores the importance of comprehensive pre-deal preparation, robust structuring, and early engagement with experienced local counsel capable of navigating both the commercial and regulatory dimensions of each transaction.
The medium-term outlook remains cautiously optimistic, particularly in the mid-market segment, where inbound investor interest is sustained and family-owned businesses are increasingly exploring strategic alternatives. Sectors such as technology, hospitality, healthcare, and renewable energy are expected to continue generating deal flow, while Greece’s improved macroeconomic fundamentals and regulatory clarity make it well-positioned to attract assets offering visible cash flows and long-term strategic value.
Notwithstanding the generally positive medium-term outlook, several geopolitical risks and sustained inflationary dynamics are likely to weigh on economic performance. Higher energy prices are anticipated to erode household purchasing power and slow private consumption growth. Consumer price inflation is projected to accelerate from 2.9% in 2025 to 3.7% in 2026, driven by rising energy expenditure, robust domestic demand and wage pressures, before moderating to an estimated 2.4% in 2027 as energy markets stabilise. Government measures, such as tax cuts, public sector wage increases and energy support policies, are expected to ease some pressure. Concurrently, imports will likely stay high, reflecting the high import content of ongoing investment activity. However, risks remain if the energy crisis deepens, impacted also by the recent geopolitical developments in the Middle East, and begins to exert adverse effects on critical sectors such as transport and tourism.
FDI Screening: Reshaping the Landscape of Cross-Border Transactions
One of the most consequential developments for transactional practice in Greece is the enactment of Law 5202/2025, which came into force in May 2025 and established the country’s first comprehensive foreign direct investment (FDI) screening regime. Implementing EU Regulation 2019/452, the law introduces a two-tier screening mechanism: investments in sensitive sectors – including energy, transport, healthcare, and ICT and digital infrastructure – are subject to screening where a foreign (non-EU) investor acquires a stake exceeding 25%, while a more stringent 10% threshold applies to particularly sensitive sectors such as defence and national security, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, ports and critical underwater infrastructure, and tourism infrastructure in border areas. The screening criteria apply both to direct third-country investors and to EU-based investors where the ultimate controlling entity or beneficial interest is connected to third-country individuals, undertakings, or governments.
For investors and advisers, the practical implications of this new regime are significant. In addition to the FDI screening framework, foreign investments remain subject to pre-existing restrictions on the acquisition of real estate in border regions and certain islands on national security grounds, as well as sector-specific licensing and approval requirements. Together, these overlapping frameworks demand earlier and more strategic engagement with regulatory authorities, more thorough due diligence processes, and carefully drafted transaction documentation.
Capital Markets Reform and Renewed Investor Confidence
The revival of Greece’s capital markets has been one of the defining features of the country’s economic rehabilitation, and 2025 saw that revival deepen and broaden considerably. The acquisition of ATHEX by Euronext is significant from a structural perspective, providing Greek-listed companies with access to a deeper pan-European investor base and enhanced market infrastructure. The anticipated upgrade of Greece by MSCI – together with the country’s investment-grade credit rating – further strengthens the case for international portfolio and strategic investment, improving the perception of Greek assets among institutional investors subject to index-linked mandates.
Against this backdrop, Law 5193/2025, enacted in April 2025, introduced significant capital markets reforms designed to modernise the Greek capital market regulatory framework, strengthen investor protection, improve financing access for Greek companies, and align Greek law with EU standards. Equity fundraisings and corporate bond issuances throughout 2025 drew oversubscribed interest from international investors, reflecting the scale of the improvement in sentiment towards Greek assets over a relatively short period.
For companies and their advisers, this environment creates a widened range of financing options. The improved capital markets framework means that equity fundraisings, initial public offerings, and bond issuances are increasingly viable alternatives to traditional bank lending, which, while improved, remains selective and pushes several businesses – particularly in the mid-market – towards alternative funding sources. The evolving regulatory landscape also demands careful attention to disclosure, corporate governance, and compliance requirements applicable to listed and pre-IPO companies, reinforcing the value of integrated legal and financial advisory support throughout the capital-raising process.
Governance, Compliance, Regulatory Modernisation and Interconnection
The pace of legislative reform in the corporate governance sphere has been considerable, and its cumulative effect is to raise the baseline of compliance obligations applicable to Greek companies across several dimensions.
Law 5178/2025, enacted in February 2025, transposed Directive (EU) 2022/2381 on improving the gender balance among directors of listed companies into Greek law, introducing significant amendments to both Law 4706/2020 on corporate governance and Law 4548/2018 on sociétés anonymes. In particular, the law raised the minimum representation threshold for the under-represented sex to 33% on the boards of listed non-SME companies, and – for the first time – extended the application of gender balance requirements to certain categories of non-listed companies (ie, companies bidding for public procurement or concession contracts). These developments reflect Greece’s alignment with the broader EU agenda on corporate diversity and signal that governance standards will continue to be shaped by European policy priorities in the years ahead.
Law 5255/2025, enacted in November 2025, established the Independent Authority for Market Control and Consumer Protection, consolidating the market surveillance, consumer protection, and dispute resolution functions previously dispersed across several public authorities and administrative bodies into a single, unified regulatory entity. The consolidation is intended to improve regulatory coherence and enforcement effectiveness; businesses will need to familiarise themselves with the new authority’s jurisdiction, procedures, and enforcement posture as it becomes fully operational.
Corporate formation and ongoing compliance have also been modernised. Full automation of the interconnection between the General Commercial Registry (GEMI) and the Independent Authority for Public Revenue (AADE) became operational in 2026, enhancing transparency and tax compliance across corporate registrations and ongoing reporting obligations.
Administrative penalties for GEMI non-compliance are now being enforced for the first time under Joint Ministerial Decision 46982/2025, which activated the administrative sanctions under Article 50 of Law 4919/2022 for breaches of corporate publicity requirements. Businesses that have not maintained up-to-date GEMI filings or have failed to meet statutory deadlines face a materially increased risk of administrative sanctions, and a proactive review of corporate records is strongly advisable for all entities operating in Greece.
In the employment sphere, Law 5239/2025 – re “Fair Work for All” – introduced a suite of digitalisation measures, including the “Fast Track Hiring” mechanism for expedited employment registrations and mandatory work-time monitoring through the ERGANI II digital platform. These measures bring greater transparency and accountability to employment relationships and provide a more auditable record of workforce management. Companies should ensure that their human resources, payroll, and operational processes are fully aligned with the new digital requirements to avoid administrative penalties and to be well-positioned in the event of employment disputes.
Sustainability, Cybersecurity, Digital Regulation and Taxation: Navigating an Expanding Regulatory Landscape
Sustainability
The regulatory agenda in Greece in 2026 extends well beyond corporate and transactional law. Three interconnected regulatory frameworks – sustainability reporting, cybersecurity, and digital finance – are placing growing and convergent compliance demands on businesses operating across virtually all sectors, and their combined effect represents one of the most substantial increases in regulatory complexity that Greek companies have faced in recent years.
On sustainability, Law 5164/2024 implemented the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) into Greek law, imposing mandatory sustainability reporting obligations on in-scope companies. However, the EU’s 2025 “stop-the-clock” directive – which introduced a delay to the application timeline for certain categories of companies – has created planning uncertainty, as businesses must now carefully assess whether, and when, their own obligations are triggered. Despite this uncertainty, companies would be prudent to proceed with readiness assessments and internal data collection exercises rather than awaiting formal clarification: the underlying obligations are not in question, and early preparation will reduce both compliance risk and the operational disruption associated with a compressed implementation timeline when obligations do crystallise.
More broadly, Greece has placed particular emphasis on the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals, reflecting a wider institutional commitment to embedding sustainability considerations across the regulatory and corporate landscape. In furtherance of this objective, the Athens Stock Exchange (now Euronext Athens) has developed a dedicated ESG Reporting Guide, which, while principally directed at Greek-listed companies, serves as a practical reference tool for non-listed entities seeking to adopt or enhance their own ESG reporting practices on a voluntary basis.
In addition, Greece is required to transpose Directive (EU) 2024/1760 – the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) – into national law. The transposition deadline has been extended to 26 July 2028 by virtue of Directive (EU) 2026/470, affording Greek legislators and in-scope companies additional time to prepare for a regime that will require covered undertakings to identify and address adverse human rights and environmental impacts arising from their own operations, those of their subsidiaries, and those occurring across their chain of activities. The Directive is intended to promote a sustainable and responsible corporate culture, and its eventual implementation will impose significant due diligence, reporting, and remediation obligations on companies meeting the applicable size and activity thresholds. Businesses that anticipate falling within scope would be well advised to begin mapping their value chains and assessing their existing due diligence processes in advance of formal transposition, in order to mitigate the compliance burden when the obligations take effect.
In a related development reinforcing Greece’s commitment to the green transition, the European Commission granted approval in February 2026 to a Greek state aid scheme valued at EUR400 million, designed to incentivise investment in clean technology manufacturing in furtherance of the objectives underpinning the Clean Industrial Deal and the broader transition to a net-zero economy. The scheme was authorised pursuant to the Clean Industrial Deal State Aid Framework (CISAF) and will deliver support to eligible undertakings through a combination of direct grants and tax incentives. The programme is open to companies operating in Greece and will remain in effect until 31 December 2030, providing a sustained and structured incentive framework for businesses seeking to establish or expand clean technology manufacturing operations in the country.
Cybersecurity
In the cybersecurity domain, Law 5160/2024 transposed the NIS2 Directive into Greek law, significantly expanding the scope of entities subject to cybersecurity obligations and introducing more stringent incident reporting, risk management, and governance requirements. Financial sector entities face the additional layer of the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), which imposes prescriptive requirements in relation to Information and Communication Technology (ICT) risk management, third-party provider oversight, and operational resilience testing. For many companies, the combined effect of NIS2 and DORA represents a substantial increase in the technical and organisational resources required for cybersecurity compliance. Legal advisers should be prepared to support clients in mapping their obligations, reviewing contracts with critical ICT third-party providers, and adapting internal governance frameworks accordingly.
Digital regulation
In the domain of digital regulation, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 – the Artificial Intelligence Act – entered into force on 1 August 2024 and is being implemented on a phased basis, with prohibitions on certain AI practices applying from February 2025 and obligations for high-risk AI systems taking effect progressively through 2026 and 2027. The AI Act establishes a risk-based classification framework for AI systems deployed or made available in the EU, imposing graduated compliance obligations ranging from transparency requirements for limited-risk systems to comprehensive conformity assessments, risk management, and human oversight obligations for high-risk systems. Companies operating in Greece that develop, deploy, or distribute AI systems should undertake a thorough classification exercise to determine whether their systems fall within the scope of the Regulation and, if so, which tier of obligations applies. Early engagement with the compliance requirements is strongly advisable, given the complexity of the conformity assessment procedures and the significant penalties – up to EUR35 million or 7% of global annual turnover – for non-compliance.
Taxation
Tax law has also evolved considerably. Greece adopted the OECD’s Pillar Two global minimum tax rules through Law 5100/2024, extending minimum tax obligations to Greek-headquartered multinational groups and to Greek subsidiaries of foreign groups that fall within the scope of the rules. Law 5104/2024 modernised the Tax Procedure Code, introducing procedural changes relevant to tax audits, assessments, appeals, and enforcement. Taken together, these tax developments require businesses to ensure that their group structures, transfer pricing policies, and tax compliance processes are appropriately calibrated to the new international standards and that internal reporting capabilities can meet the associated data and documentation demands.
Emerging Sector: Defence and Defence-Tech
The defence and defence-tech sector merits specific attention as a driver of deal activity and legal complexity in the period ahead.
Greece is emerging as an attractive destination for defence, automotive and aerospace investment. The country’s twelve-year, EUR26 billion defence modernisation programme – supplemented by EUR787.7 million in SAFE funding – is generating substantial procurement and investment activity. The establishment of the Hellenic Centre for Defence Innovation as a state-backed co-ordinator for defence research, development, and commercialisation provides an institutional framework for private sector engagement with the national defence agenda. Dual-use technologies – commercial platforms with defence applications spanning robotics, cybersecurity, space services, and surveillance – are a particular area of interest for both strategic and financial investors.
While defence-tech M&A remains a niche segment compared to larger European markets, it presents emerging opportunities for strategic investors and consolidating players in the region as the sector matures.
Clients operating in this space should be alert to the convergence of FDI screening obligations, export control requirements, and national security clearance processes that together characterise defence-related transactions and demand a rigorous and co-ordinated regulatory approach from the outset of any deal process.
Succession Law Reform: New Framework for Family Business Planning
Whilst not directly relevant with the sections set out above, it is worth noting that with Law 5303/2026 published in the Government Gazette on 22 May 2026, Greece has enacted its most comprehensive reform of succession and family law in eight decades. Key innovations include the introduction, for the first time in modern Greek law, of inheritance contracts – binding agreements executed before a notary that determine how specific assets will pass on death – alongside a recalibration of the reserved-share (forced heirship) framework. The reform also strengthens the position of surviving spouses in intestate succession, equalises the inheritance rights of civil union partners with those of married spouses, and tightens the validity requirements for holographic wills. Although Law 5303/2026 was published in May 2026, the majority of the substantive reforms – including inheritance contracts – will become effective on 16 September 2026. This reform carries direct practical implications for estate planning, business succession structures, and cross-border wealth management involving Greek assets and is expected to give a boost to the attractiveness of Greece as a jurisdiction for high net worth individuals, family offices, and internationally mobile wealth.
Conclusion
The Greek legal and commercial landscape in 2026 reflects a striking balance of opportunity and complexity. Record levels of M&A activity, a revitalised capital market, and growing investment across sectors such as energy, healthcare, hospitality, gaming, technology and defence highlight a jurisdiction that has undergone meaningful and lasting transformation. The accelerating pace and breadth of regulatory change – encompassing corporate law, FDI screening, sustainability reporting, cybersecurity, digital transition and taxation – is placing increasing demands on businesses across all sectors and sizes. Yet this regulatory maturation, far from deterring investment, reinforces the institutional credibility and predictability that international businesses and investors increasingly require when committing capital to a market over the medium and long term. For businesses and investors prepared to engage with this evolving landscape, Greece – despite rising energy costs and inflationary pressures – offers one of the most compelling commercial and investment environments in Southern Europe.
Looking ahead, Greece’s strengthened credit profile and deepening capital markets infrastructure are expanding financing options and enhancing its appeal as a destination for both strategic and portfolio investment. The country has firmly established itself as a jurisdiction of genuine commercial and investment significance, where a dynamic deal environment, an ambitious reform agenda, and resilient economic fundamentals combine to create a compelling setting for businesses prepared to navigate both its opportunities and its complexities.
Dim. Soutsou 28 street
Athens
Greece
+30 210 817 1500
kg.law@kglawfirm.gr kglawfirm.gr/