Employment 2024

Last Updated September 05, 2024

China

Law and Practice

Authors



King & Wood Mallesons is a leading law firm with exceptional legal expertise and depth of knowledge. The firm provides comprehensive one-stop-shop legal solutions to clients in China as well as internationally. The labour and employment department has six partners and more than 20 attorneys and assistants based in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Suzhou, which enables them to quickly and effectively resolve labour law issues across Mainland China. The firm has provided legal services to more than 300 Fortune 500 companies, multinational companies, large state-owned enterprises and well-known domestic enterprises. Its extensive experience in handling both adversarial and non-adversarial matters as well as direct participation in legislation facilitates a deep and accurate understanding of the complicated and rapid changes in PRC labour and employment laws and policies, as well as the latest HR, management and employment issues.

There is no clear distinction between blue-collar and white-collar workers under PRC employment laws. As long as workers are employed by enterprises, individual economic organisations, private non-enterprise entities, state organs, public institutions or social organisations within the boundary of the PRC, no matter whether they are employed as senior staff or frontline workers, they uniformly hold the status of “employees” as protected by PRC employment laws.

Under the current PRC employment laws, employees can generally be divided into directly employed employees and labour dispatched employees.

  • Directly employed employees: The employees can be further divided into full-time employees and part-time employees. Full-time employment is the most common form of employment. Part-time employees do not work more than four hours on average per day and 24 hours per week for one employer; they can work for more than one employer simultaneously.
  • Labour dispatched employees: Labour dispatch is an indirect employment arrangement under which an employee is employed by a dispatch agency and then seconded to work for a company. Labour dispatch applies to temporary, auxiliary or substitutable positions, and the law stipulates that the ratio of the number of dispatched employees versus the number of total employees (direct hires plus dispatched employees) of the company shall not exceed 10%, unless otherwise provided by law.

According to the PRC Employment Contract Law (“Employment Contract Law”), there are three types of employment contract terms:

  • a fixed-term contract
  • an open-ended contract; and
  • a project-based contract expiring at the completion of a specific task or project.

A written employment contract shall be entered into within one month from the date on which the employee commences work; otherwise, the employer shall pay twice the monthly salary to the employee from the second month of the commencement of employment until the date when a written employment contract is concluded. If, after a year from the commencement of the employment, an employer still fails to conclude a written employment contract, an open-ended employment contract will be deemed automatically concluded between the employer and the employee.

The following information must be included in an employment contract:

  • the employer՚s name, address and legal representative/person in charge;
  • the employee՚s name, home address and the number of his/her valid identification card;
  • the term of the employment contract;
  • the job description and the work location;
  • the working hours, rest time and leaves;
  • remuneration;
  • social insurance;
  • labour protection, working conditions and protection against occupational hazards; and
  • specific provisions on the protection of the rights and interests of female employees.

Part-time employees may enter into oral agreements with the employer. The employer is not allowed to stipulate a probation period with the employee.

Working Hours

For full-time employees, there are three types of working hour systems, under which different rules for working hours apply:

  • Standard working hours system: Employees work no more than eight hours per day and no more than 40 hours per week (“Statutory Standard”), and are entitled to at least one rest day every week. Otherwise, overtime will occur.
  • Comprehensive working hours system: Generally applicable to certain special industries requiring long shifts (eg, transportation, airlines, fishery industry, offshore oil exploration) and the employer must obtain approval from the competent authorities, unless otherwise provided by local regulations and rules. Working hours are calculated within a certain calculation cycle (month/quarter/year). The average daily working hours and the average weekly working hours must not exceed the Statutory Standard. Otherwise, overtime will occur.
  • Flexible working hours system: Only applicable to certain job positions (eg, executives, sales personnel, taxi drivers). Similarly, the employer must obtain approval from the competent authorities, unless otherwise provided by local regulations and rules. The employee can perform his/her duties on a flexible schedule, provided that he/she properly completes the work assignment in a timely manner.

Part-time employees are employees who generally work with an employer for no more than four hours per day on average and no more than 24 hours per week in total. There are no special rules/restrictions applicable to working hours for part-time employees.

Overtime

Overtime refers to the working time that the employer arranges or approves the employees to work, which is beyond the Statutory Standard. According to the PRC Labour Law (“Labour Law”), overtime shall not exceed three hours per day or 36 hours per month.

  • Under the standard working hours system, the employer shall compensate the employee’s overtime work in the following ways:
    1. For overtime work during working days, the employer should pay not less than 150% of the employee’s normal hourly wage. In general, alternative rest days should not be used to substitute overtime pay for working days.
    2. For the overtime work during rest days, the employer can first consider making arrangements for employees to take alternative rest days. If such alternative rest days cannot be arranged, the employer should pay not less than 200% of the employee’s normal daily or hourly wage.
    3. For the overtime work during a statutory holiday, the employer should pay not less than 300% of the employee’s normal daily or hourly wage. In general, alternative rest days should not be used to substitute overtime pay for statutory holidays.
  • Under the comprehensive working hours system, for the extra hours worked during the calculating cycle (regardless of whether the extra hours are for work days or rest days), the employer should pay not less than 150% of the employee’s normal hourly wage, and for the extra hours worked on statutory holidays, 300% of the employee’s normal daily or hourly wage should be paid.
  • Under the flexible working hour system, generally the employees shall not be entitled to overtime pay, but the rules are slightly different among provinces and cities. For example, in Beijing, employees under the flexible working hour system are not entitled to any overtime pay at all. However, in some other cities, if employees work extra hours on statutory holidays, they will still be entitled to overtime pay of not less than 300% of their normal daily or hourly wage.

If an employer does not make overtime payment for its employee’s overtime work, the competent labour authorities have the right to order the employer to make such payment within a limited period; if the employer fails to comply with such order, it will be required to pay 150-200% of the outstanding overtime pay.

There is no nationwide minimum wage, and the local government of each region sets its local minimum wage, which is normally updated at least every two years and applies to all employees, regardless of their age, position and experience. The minimum wage generally includes a monthly minimum wage and an hourly minimum wage. The monthly minimum wage applies to all full-time employees, while the hourly minimum wage applies to all part-time employees.

It is not statutorily required for employers to provide bonuses on top of basic salaries; however, it is common to see employers reward employees through various bonuses, eg, the 13th month’s salary, year-end bonus, commission, performance bonus. Generally, the issuance of bonuses is solely at the employer’s discretion. If it is stipulated in the employment contract or the employer՚s internal policies to provide a certain bonus to the employee, the employer shall be bound by those stipulations.

Apart from the minimum wage requirements, there are no mandatory requirements on salary increase (although the local government of each region generally issues a salary increase guideline every year, it is only a reference document to guide enterprises to reasonably determine salary increases and is not mandatory). Salary deduction can only be made upon the employee’s consent unless on certain statutory grounds (eg, sick leave period).

Holidays

Generally, holidays in China include 11 days of statutory holiday (New Year’s Day, Spring Festival, Labour Day, Mid-Autumn Festival, National Day, etc) for all employees as well as holidays for certain groups of people (eg, a half-day’s leave for female employees on Women’s Day, and a half-day’s leave for 14 to 28-year-old employees on Youth Day).

Leaves

All employees shall be entitled to fully paid statutory annual leave, sick leave and other leaves (maternity leave, childcare leave, etc) in accordance with the PRC laws and the employer’s internal policies. The main categories of leave include the following:

  • Statutory annual leave:
    1. Any employee whose accumulated service years (including all the prior service years with current and former employers) is more than one year shall be entitled to paid statutory annual leave. The number of days of statutory annual leave shall be calculated based on the accumulated service years of the employee as follows:
      1. 1 to 10 years ‒ 5 days;
      2. 10 to 20 years ‒ 10 days; and
      3. more than 20 years ‒ 15 days
    2. If the employer fails to arrange the statutory annual leave for an employee due to its operational needs, with the consent of the employee, such statutory annual leave does not need to be arranged by the employer, but the employer shall pay the employee 300% of the wage (including the 100% normal wage and thus 200% shall be additionally made) on a daily basis for the unused statutory annual leave.
  • Sick leave: Where an employee suffers from illness or a non-work-related injury, the employee has the right to take sick leave to recover from the illness or injury. The minimum salary standard during sick leave required by laws and regulations may be different among provinces and cities, and the commonly used standard is 80% of the local minimum wage. There are also provinces and cities with different sick leave pay standards; eg, Shanghai has its own sick leave and sick pay regulations.
  • Maternity leave: Female employees who give birth in compliance with PRC birth control policies are entitled to 98 days of maternity leave, of which 15 days may be taken before delivery. The leave can be extended by an additional 15 days under special circumstances such as dystocia and multiple births. Additionally, extra maternity leave is granted by local regulations where the specific length varies from city to city. For example, in Beijing and Shanghai, the total length of maternity leave is 158 days, including a base 98-day period per national law and 60 days granted by local regulations. According to national law, female employees who suffer a miscarriage during the first four months of pregnancy shall be entitled to 15 days of maternity leave, and those who suffer a miscarriage after four months of pregnancy shall be entitled to 42 days of maternity leave.
  • Marriage leave: An employee is entitled to three days of marriage leave according to the national law. Moreover, all legally married couples will be entitled to additional marriage leave granted by local regulations.
  • Paternity leave: Paternity leave for male employees is granted by local regulations only. For instance, paternity leave for male employees in Beijing and Shanghai is 15 days and ten days respectively.
  • Childcare leave: Childcare leave is granted by local regulations only. For instance, both Beijing and Shanghai have introduced childcare leave which entitles eligible parents to five days of fully paid leave each year until the child reaches three years of age.
  • Elderly care leave: Elderly care leave is also stipulated in local regulations only. For instance, in Beijing, an employee who is the only child in his/her family is entitled to no more than ten working days of fully paid elderly care leave per calendar year to take care of his/her parent(s) (including legal adoptive parents) who need nursing care due to illness, injury or disability. Shanghai currently does not have elderly care leave.
  • Bereavement leave: According to the current law, when a parent, spouse or child of an employee of a state-owned enterprise dies, the employee is entitled to take one to three days of bereavement leave. Employers generally refer to this standard in providing bereavement leave to employees.

Confidentiality and Non-defamation

An employer may formulate internal policies, or agree with employees in the employment contract or a separate confidentiality agreement, on relevant matters of confidentiality, including the protection of the employer’s trade secrets and other confidential information. The scope of confidential information shall be defined in the agreement at the discretion of the employer. At present, there are no nationwide regulations requiring the payment of compensation for adhering to a confidentiality obligation. Therefore, in practice, employers need not pay their employees in exchange for their complying with the confidentiality requirements. If an employee violates the confidentiality requirements and causes economic losses to the employer, the employer can claim compensation against the employee based on the internal policy, relevant stipulations in the employment contract or the confidentiality agreement.

Similarly, employers can set requirements on non-defamation for employees by formulating policies, or by stipulating relevant requirements in the employment contract or a separate agreement, and claim compensation for any employee violation and losses caused.

Non-compete is a commonly seen post-termination restrictive covenant for employees so as to protect the confidential information of the employer. Under PRC employment laws, an employer can agree with an employee on non-compete obligations through stipulations in the employment contract or through a separate non-compete agreement. Key stipulations on non-compete include the following.

  • Restricted competitive behaviours: Working for a competing company that produces the same type of products, engaging in the same type of business as their former employer, establishing their own business to produce the same type of products, engaging in the same type of business, or competing with their former employer in any other way.
  • Scope of employees: Employees subject to non-compete clauses shall be senior management, senior technicians or other employees under confidentiality obligations.
  • Scope of regions: The geographical region for non-compete clauses shall be stipulated by the employer and the employee, and is generally limited to the fair and reasonable scope of region that can form an actual competitive relationship with the employer (factors to consider include business coverage and industry characteristics).
  • Non-compete period: The effective period for non-compete clauses shall be stipulated by the employer and the employee, and shall not exceed two years post-termination.
  • Non-compete compensation: In order to enforce the non-compete clause, the employer must pay compensation to the employee on a monthly basis throughout the non-compete period. The parties can agree on the compensation amount. According to the national rules, where there is no such agreement on the specific amount, the default amount is 30% of the employee’s average monthly salary over the previous 12 months before the termination or expiration of the employment contract for each month. Local rules may have specific requirements on the compensation standard.
  • Liabilities for breach: Under PRC employment laws, if an employee breaches the non-compete obligations, the employer can claim for the liabilities for breach of contract as agreed by the parties, including liquidated damages and/or recovery of the non-compete compensation paid by the employer. Meanwhile, the employer can require the employee to continue performing the non-compete obligations for the rest of the non-compete period (if any).

PRC employment laws are silent on the topic of non-solicitation; however, non-solicitation clauses are commonly used by employers in practice to prevent former employees from soliciting clients and employees of the employer.

As violating non-solicitation is not a scenario stipulated by the law where the employer can claim for liquidated damages as agreed with the employees, employers can generally only claim for recovery of financial losses suffered due to an employee’s breach of a valid non-solicitation obligation. If the employer claims for a breach of non-solicitation by employees, the employer needs to prove the solicitation behaviours and the financial losses incurred.

Data Privacy Laws

The PRC Civil Code (effective on 1 January 2021) contains a chapter regarding right to privacy and personal information (“PI”) protection. The PRC Cybersecurity Law (effective on 1 June 2017), the PRC Data Security Law (effective on 1 September 2021) and the PRC Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”, effective on 1 November 2021) collectively constitute the three fundamental and framework laws regulating data security protection in the PRC. Among these laws and regulations, the PIPL provides the most details regarding PI protection, establishing comprehensive and systematic rules on the processing and protection of PI. Employers should also comply with the PIPL when processing the employees’ PI; the sections below briefly summarise the key points under the PIPL.

PI Processing Principles

  • Lawful, transparent, accurate and secured: PI shall be processed in accordance with the principles of legality, legitimacy, necessity, good faith, openness and transparency. In addition, the quality and security of PI shall be guaranteed during the processing.
  • With specified purpose: PI shall be processed for a specified and reasonable purpose. The processing shall be directly relevant to the processing purpose and in a manner that has the minimum impact on personal rights and interests.
  • Minimised collection: The collection of PI shall be limited to the minimum scope necessary for achieving the processing purpose and shall not be excessive.
  • With limited retention period: The retention period of PI shall be the shortest time necessary for achieving the processing purpose, except as otherwise provided by any law or administrative regulation.

Legal Grounds for Processing Employees’ PI

According to the PIPL, PI can only be processed based on statutory grounds, among which, the two grounds most related to the employment sphere are:

  • the individual’s consent has been obtained; and
  • the processing is necessary for the conclusion or performance of a contract to which the individual is a contracting party or for conducting human resource management under the employment rules and regulations legally established and collective contracts legally concluded.

However, the PIPL does not stipulate specific standards for determining what constitutes “necessary for conducting human resource management”, and thus, it is suggested that the employers try to obtain consent from the employees for PI needed in the first place.

Consent and Separate Consent

As the key legal ground for processing PI, the PIPL sets out requirements on obtaining “consent”. The consent shall be voluntarily and explicitly given by the individual on a fully informed basis. The PI processor shall truthfully, accurately and completely inform individuals of the required matters (“Items to Inform”):

  • the name and contact information of the PI processor;
  • the purposes and methods of processing the PI, the categories of PI to be processed, and the retention periods;
  • the methods and procedures for individuals to exercise the rights provided by the PIPL; and
  • other matters that should be notified as provided by laws and administrative regulations.

The PIPL also requires “separate consent” for certain circumstances (eg, sharing PI with third parties, processing sensitive PI, outbound transferring PI), which is a form of consent with higher requirements. The specific requirements and form of separate consent are not specified by the PIPL. Based on the current understanding and practice, to constitute a separate consent, the specific item involving PI processing should be listed as a separate item requesting the individual’s specific consent explicitly for this item, instead of being hidden in a package of items pending the individual’s joint consent.

Sharing Employees’ PI with Third Parties

The most relevant employment-related scenarios include engaging third parties in background checks, recruitment, payroll services and labour dispatch, etc. When sharing employees’ PI with third-party processors, apart from the Items to Inform, the employer shall also inform the employees of the recipient՚s name, contact information, purposes and methods of processing, and categories of PI, and obtain the employee’s separate consent.

Outbound Transfer of Employees’ PI and SCCs

The outbound transfer of employees’ PI is not unusual, especially for multinational employers sharing employees’ PI within a global management system. Given the special nature of outbound transfer, the PIPL sets out detailed requirements in this regard. Apart from informing employees of the Items to Inform and additional items, and obtaining separate consent, the PI processor also needs to conduct a PI protection impact assessment and adopt one of the three following legal mechanisms:

  • a security assessment organised by the National Cyberspace Department;
  • a certification by a specialised agency for protection of personal information in accordance with the provisions of the National Cyberspace Department; or
  • a standard contract (“SCC”) formulated by the National Cyberspace Department with the overseas recipient (the “SCC Approach”).

Among the above outbound transfer mechanisms, detailed rules have been laid out regarding the SCC Approach, and the SCC template has been published. Employers who are eligible to adopt the SCC Approach shall follow the relevant rules for complying with the PI outbound transfer requirements.

The Provisions on Promoting and Regulating the Cross-border Transfer of Data promulgated on 22 March 2024 exempt the PI processor from adopting one of the above three legal mechanisms for PI outbound transfer on certain grounds, including employers’ cross-border transfer of employees’ PI where it is necessary for conducting human resource management according to the rules and regulations and collective contracts established/concluded in accordance with the law.

Retaining Employees’ PI

According to the PIPL, the retention period of PI shall be the shortest time necessary for achieving the processing purpose, though the specific length of the retention period is not specified. It is suggested that employers decide the retention period according to the type of PI and the specific stage in the employment life cycle.

Legal Liabilities

PI processors that violate the PIPL in their PI processing will be subject to the following legal liabilities:

  • Civil liabilities: Individuals can file lawsuits against PI processors according to the PRC Civil Code claiming an infringement regarding their PI. As provided by the PIPL, the burden of proof for such cases is on the PI processor to prove that it is not at fault. Otherwise, the PI processor shall be liable for damages and other civil liabilities. Where PI processors violate the requirements under the PIPL during PI processing and infringe the rights and interests of multiple individuals, the People’s Procuratorate, consumer organisations prescribed by the laws, and organisations determined by the state cyberspace authorities may file lawsuits.
  • Administrative liabilities: Competent PI protection authorities can also issue orders for rectification and warnings, and confiscate unlawful income against PI processors for violations of the PIPL. In the case of failure to rectify, legal liabilities include fines, rectification and confiscation of unlawful income.
  • Criminal liabilities: The PIPL refers to the PRC Criminal Law for relevant behaviours constituting crimes. According to the PRC Criminal Law, fines and/or up to seven years of imprisonment can be imposed for illegally acquiring PI, or illegally selling or providing PI to third parties.

Foreigners working in the PRC should abide by laws and regulations such as the Law on the Management of the Entry and Exit of the PRC, and the Regulations on Management of Foreigners Working in China. According to these regulations, for foreigners to work legally in China, the following requirements shall be met:

  • they have reached the age of 18 and are in good health;
  • they have professional skills and work experience required by the job;
  • they do not have a criminal record;
  • they have a definite employer; and
  • they have a valid passport or other international travel document.

In addition, for foreign workers to work legally in China, the prior approval of competent labour administrative authorities, a work permit and a residence permit shall be obtained. Failure to obtain the valid permits will lead to penalties for both the employer and employee, and detention may be imposed on the foreign employee. These rules do not apply to foreign employees of foreign embassies, consulates, offices of the United Nations and other international organisations in China, which enjoy diplomatic privileges and immunities.

As a side point, the term of an employment contract between an employer and a foreign worker may not exceed five years. The employer may apply for renewal within 30 days prior to the expiration date, and the employment contract can be renewed upon the labour administrative authorities’ approval and completion of the work permit extension procedures.

General Registration Requirements

All foreign workers shall obtain valid work permits to work in China, except in very special circumstances, eg, if the duration of stay in China is less than 90 days and the worker enters China for certain reasons including:

  • to conduct a trial for sports training in China;
  • to purchase machinery or equipment for supporting maintenance, installation, commissioning, disassembly, guidance or training; or
  • to be dispatched to domestic branches, subsidiaries or representative offices to complete short-term work.

In other circumstances, the registration can generally be divided into two kinds depending on the duration of the stay (ie, whether it is over 90 days). Generally, there are two kinds of arrangement commonly adopted in practice for employers to have foreign nationals work in China:

  • the foreign national is directly employed by a PRC entity, which acts as the employer of that foreign national (“direct hiring”); or
  • the foreign national is employed by a foreign entity and then seconded to work in a PRC entity (“international secondment”).

To implement the international secondment mode, the foreign worker must be in a managerial or technical position in China, and the foreign entity shall issue a secondment letter, stipulating contents including but not limited to workplace, term, salary and position. The PRC entity shall apply for the work permit with the secondment letter.

Type of Foreign Workers

There are different types of foreign workers permitted to apply for work permits, including high-end talent (Category A), foreign professionals (Category B) and other foreign personnel (Category C). There are specific criteria indicating which category shall apply to each foreign employee when applying for work permits.

Procedures for Obtaining a Work Permit and a Residence Permit for a Foreigner who Comes to Work in China From Abroad

For a PRC employer to hire a foreign employee who comes from abroad, the general procedures for obtaining a work permit and a residence permit are as follows:

  • the employer is to register in the “Service System for Foreigners Working in China” and upload the relevant documents required;
  • the employee may apply for a Z visa after the work permit notice has been issued and enter China with the work permit notice;
  • within 15 days of entry with the work permit notice, the employer should apply for a work permit; and
  • the foreign employee shall then apply for a residence permit after receiving the work permit.

Mobile work (remote work) is not a new concept and has been widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Post-pandemic, some employers still keep the remote work option open to their employees or adopt a hybrid work mode (onsite and remote).

Work location is a mandatory term in an employment contract, and normally it will be an onsite location. Switching from onsite work to remote work will generally require the mutual consent of both the employer and the employee. In practice, there remain some uncertainties or difficulties related to remote work, mainly those set out below:

  • Employee management: In the remote work mode, employers may lack adequate channels to monitor employees՚ working status, and thus supporting policies are suggested to be incorporated during remote work mode, including a request for the employee to check in online through attendance software during his/her normal working hours and retain all remote work software and instant messaging tools online and responsive during working hours.
  • Work-related injury: For employees who get injured during remote work, there is some uncertainty about how to prove that an injury occurred during work hours, in the workplace and for work-related reasons. According to the judicial practice, if it can be proved that the injury occurred during the working hours required by the employer, and that the employee was working at that time (eg, there is an online record of the work, there is a description of the work in the work log, and there is even an email sent as proof of the work done at the time), it is still likely that work-related injury will be recognised and the employer needs to bear the relevant statutory obligations.
  • IP protection: In the remote work arrangement, the vast majority of information is transmitted through the internet, and it is more difficult to monitor employees՚ behaviours and ensure that they do not disclose confidential information from the employer. Therefore, it is suggested that the employer strengthen the confidentiality requirements during remote work periods and co-operate with IT software suppliers to establish a comprehensive mechanism for the protection of the employer’s IP during remote work.

Although some universities in China have been trying to implement this kind of leave for teachers, “sabbatical” is not a legal concept stipulated by PRC employment laws, but rather a kind of optional leave granted by universities to teachers. Consequently, there is a lack of stipulations on the terms of employment (salary standard, etc) during the sabbatical period at the national level, and there are no related cases where the attitude of the arbitration commission/court can be seen.

With the development of the platform economy and the need for more flexible employment, new forms of employment have developed and infiltrated a growing number of industries in the past year; typical new manifestations include delivery persons, online platform taxi drivers and network anchors. The identification of the relationship between the platform enterprises and the individuals engaged, and the protection of such individuals’ rights and interests, are of most concern.

The national and local governments have been issuing regulations and policies governing new forms of employment in recent years. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, together with seven other departments, issued a guiding opinion in 2021, which for the first time introduced a new concept called a “less-than-complete employment relationship” (as opposed to an ordinary employment relationship or a civil law relationship). It also set out comprehensive provisions to ensure platform workers’ rights and interests, including reasonable pay, accident insurance participation and vocational training. In 2024, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security further issued three guidelines regulating platform employment, including a guideline on working hours, rest and remuneration for platform workers; a guideline on the publication of labour rules for platform enterprises; and a guideline on services to safeguard the rights and interests of platform workers. Local rules and regulations have also been issued, providing more detailed guidance, including allowing work-related injury insurance to be paid separately for individuals under new forms of employment. It will be important to pay attention to any new rules introduced in the future concerning these new forms of employment.

According to the Labour Law, trade unions shall represent and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of employees, and carry out their activities independently in accordance with the law. The Trade Union Law of the PRC (“Trade Union Law”) (last revised in 2021) further clarifies the status of a trade union, which is a voluntary organisation formed by employees of their own free will.

Trade unions have the general right to represent and protect the rights of employees. According to the Trade Union Law, specific rights of trade unions include but are not limited to:

  • supervising employers’ violation of relevant policies, demanding that employers rectify any violations, and ensuring that the employees exercise their right to democratic management in accordance with the law;
  • assisting and guiding the employees in signing employment contracts, attending negotiation and signing collective contracts with the employers on behalf of the employees, and filing arbitration or cases on behalf of the employees; and
  • providing advice regarding the employers’ disposition of employees and reviewing the reason for unilateral termination of employees.

Under PRC employment laws, employees can exercise their right to democratic management through the employee representatives’ congress, which has the right to inspect the daily operation of the employer and is responsible for representing the employees’ legal interests.

The employee representatives shall be elected by employees; the specific proportion and number shall be determined in accordance with the implementation measures of the employee representatives’ congress of the enterprise, or determined by the enterprise through consultation with the trade union, but shall be no fewer than 30 people.

In most cases, employment terms and conditions are agreed and executed individually, but collective bargaining also takes place at both the enterprise level and the industry level. According to PRC employment laws, collective employment contracts shall be concluded between the employer and the trade union that represents employees (for an employer which has not established a trade union, the next higher-level trade union shall guide the representatives elected by the employees to conclude a collective contract with the employer) on matters relating to remuneration, working hours, rest and vacation/holidays, occupational safety and health, insurance and welfare; or specialised collective contracts on matters relating to occupational safety and health, female employees’ rights protection, salary adjustment mechanism, etc while requiring that the draft be submitted to the employee representatives’ congress or all employees for discussion. Currently, most collective contracts are negotiated at the enterprise level, and collective contracts are more common in enterprises in the manufacturing and retail industries.

The collective contract shall be submitted to the labour administrative department after being concluded, and shall become effective after the lapse of 15 days from the date of receipt by the labour administrative department unless any objections to the contract are raised.

The PRC employment laws set strict limitations on employment relationship terminations, and there is no concept of “termination at will” for full-time employees. The statutory grounds can be divided as follows.

Non-fault Termination

Termination upon mutual agreement

An employment contract may be terminated upon mutual agreement between the employer and the employee, and the employer is obliged to pay the employee the statutory severance.

Unilateral termination by the employer

An employer is entitled to unilaterally terminate the employment contract with 30 days’ prior written notice or one month’s salary in lieu, and with statutory severance pay:

  • where an employee suffers from an illness or a non-work-related injury and is unable to undertake the original job or other job arranged for them by the employer following completion of the stipulated medical treatment period;
  • where the employee is proved incompetent in their job and remains incompetent after receiving training or a position amendment by the employer; or
  • where the objective circumstances on which the conclusion of the employment contract was based have undergone major changes and, as a result, the employment contract can no longer be performed, and upon negotiation between the employer and the employee, both parties are unable to reach an agreement on the change of the employment contract.

Unilateral termination by an employee (ie, resignation)

An employee has the right to unilaterally terminate the employment contract by giving his/her employer three days՚ prior written notice during the probation period. After completion of the probation period, an employee may terminate his/her employment contract upon 30 days’ prior written notice to the employer.

Fault Termination

Unilateral termination by the employer

An employer is entitled to unilaterally terminate the employment contract of an employee without prior notice or any severance pay under any of the following circumstances:

  • where the employee is proven to have failed to satisfy the recruitment requirements during the probation period;
  • where the employee has seriously violated the internal policies of the employer;
  • where the employee has committed serious dereliction of duty or practises graft, causing material damage to the employer;
  • where the employee has established an employment relationship with another employer concurrently, which materially affects the completion of his/her tasks with the current employer, or the employee refuses to rectify the matter as demanded by the employer;
  • where the employee is prosecuted for criminal liability according to the law; or
  • where an employment contract is rendered wholly or partially void when the employee causes the employer to conclude or amend the employment contract against the employer’s true intention by means of fraud, coercion or taking advantage of the employer՚s disadvantaged position.

Unilateral termination by the employee

If any of the following circumstances occurs, an employee may terminate the employment contract immediately and is entitled to statutory severance paid by the employer:

  • where an employer fails to provide labour protection or working conditions pursuant to the provisions in the employment contract;
  • where an employer fails to pay the remuneration in full and/or on a timely basis;
  • where an employer fails to make social insurance contributions for the employee in accordance with the PRC laws;
  • where an employer’s internal rules and policies violate the law and cause damages to the employee’s rights and interests;
  • where an employment contract is rendered wholly or partially void when the employer causes the employee to conclude or amend the employment contract against the employee’s true intention by means of fraud, coercion or taking advantage of the employee՚s disadvantaged position; or
  • where an employer uses means such as violence, threats or unlawful restriction of personal freedom to coerce an employee to work, or where an employer gives orders which violate safety rules or force an employee to engage in dangerous operations which endanger the employee’s safety.

End of Employment

An employment contract will be ended when any of the following occurs:

(a) the term of the employment contract expires;

(b) the employee starts to take his/her pension entitlement or the employee reaches legal retirement age;

(c) the employee is dead or declared dead or missing by the People’s Court of the PRC;

(d) the employer is declared bankrupt;

(e) the employer has its business licence revoked, is ordered to close down or decides on early dissolution; or

(f) any other situation stipulated by applicable PRC laws.

Under circumstances (a), (d) and (e), the employer shall pay the employee statutory severance.

Economic Layoffs

If an employer is reducing its workforce by 20 persons or more, or by 10% or more of the total number of its employees, the termination ground of economic layoff can be invoked under any of the following circumstances:

  • restructuring pursuant to the PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law;
  • serious difficulties in production and/or business operations;
  • the employer switches production, introduces a major technological innovation or revises its business method and, after the amendment of employment contracts, still needs to reduce its workforce; or
  • other major changes in the objective economic circumstances relied upon at the time of execution of the employment contracts, rendering them unable to be performed.

Before the layoffs, the employer has to follow the procedural requirements as stipulated in the Employment Contract Law as follows:

  • to explain the circumstances to its trade union or all of its employees 30 days in advance;
  • to consider the opinions of the trade union or the employees; and subsequently
  • to report the layoff plan to the competent labour authorities.

Notice Period

Whether prior notice is necessary depends on the specific statutory ground for the termination. As per 7.1 Grounds for Termination for the circumstances listed under “Unilateral termination by employer” in the “Fault Termination” section, an employee must be given 30 days’ prior written notice or one month’s salary in lieu of notice. An employee shall also give prior notice to the employer upon resignation.

In the case of economic layoffs, an employer shall explain the situation to the trade union or all of its employees 30 days in advance (which can be regarded as a form of prior notice) and seek their opinions before reporting the proposed layoffs to local administrative authorities.

Additionally, though not required by the Employment Contract Law, some local regulations in cities such as Beijing require the employer to give prior notice (or salary in lieu of notice) to employees when the term of an employment contract expires and the employer decides not to renew it.

Severance

Please refer to 7.1 Grounds for Termination and the list of termination grounds on which the employee is entitled to severance pay.

Generally, statutory severance is calculated as one month՚s salary for every year of service of the employee. Since the Employment Contract Law took effect on 1 January 2008, statutory severance pay must be calculated in two parts:

  • For the service period before 1 January 2008: Statutory severance pay will be calculated in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations before 1 January 2008 (these can vary from the calculations that apply after 1 January 2008).
  • For the service period after 1 January 2008: Statutory severance pay will be one month՚s salary for every year of service (any period of six months or more but less than a year will be counted as one year), and half a month՚s salary for a service period of less than six months. The one month՚s salary is calculated based on the employee՚s average monthly salary during the 12 months prior to termination. However, when the average monthly salary of an employee exceeds three times the social average monthly remuneration issued by local government at the locality of the employer, the employee՚s average monthly salary shall be capped at three times of the social average monthly remuneration, and the length of service years shall be capped at 12 years.

Procedural Requirements for Termination

The requirements to be observed include:

  • notifying the trade union of the ground for termination (for grounds of unilateral termination by the employer);
  • delivering the termination notice to the employee and making the statutory severance payment if needed (for grounds of unilateral termination by the employer);
  • registering the termination with the labour authorities if so required by local regulations, and assisting with the social insurance and housing fund transfer for the employee; and
  • issuing an employment termination certificate to the employee.

Under PRC employment laws, dismissal for serious cause is generally understood as Article 39 of the Employment Contract Law; see 7.1 Grounds for Termination, “Unilateral termination by the employer” in the “Fault Termination” section. Among the circumstances listed, the second bullet point, “where the employee has seriously violated internal policies of the employer” is the most commonly used one in practice. For an employer to successfully terminate an employee for serious violation of the employer’s internal policies, the following conditions must be met:

  • the burden of proof is on the employer to prove relevant disciplinary violation behaviour;
  • the company՚s internal rules and regulations clearly stipulate that the behaviour is a serious violation of discipline, and the company consequently has the right to unilaterally terminate its employment contract; and
  • the above-mentioned internal rules and regulations fulfil the democratic and publicising procedures.

The employer also needs to fulfil the procedural requirements as summarised in 7.2 Notice Periods.

Normally, a written termination agreement will be reached between both parties upon mutual termination of the employment contract. There are no statutory requirements on the format or must-have terms regarding the termination agreement. According to the judicial interpretations, the release clause shall be generally enforceable as long as it does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations or fall under fraud, duress or exploitation of an unfavourable position.

An employer cannot unilaterally terminate the employment of employees in the following circumstances (unless termination is based on Article 39 of the Employment Contract Law):

  • the employee is engaged in operations that expose him/her to occupational disease hazards and has not undergone a pre-departure occupational health check-up, or is suspected of having contracted an occupational disease and is being diagnosed or is under medical observation;
  • the employee has been confirmed as having lost (or partially lost) his/her working capacity as a result of contracting an occupational disease or sustaining a work-related injury with his/her current employer;
  • the employee has contracted an illness or sustained a non-work-related injury, and the statutory medical period has not expired;
  • the employee is a female employee on pregnancy, maternity or breastfeeding leave; or
  • the employee has been working for the employer continuously for at least 15 years and has less than five years before the statutory retirement age.

In addition, if an employee falls into any of the above circumstances, the employment contract shall not be ended upon expiration of his/her employment contract. Instead, his/her employment contract must be extended until the relevant circumstance ceases to exist.

Employees who consider that they have been wrongfully dismissed may bring a wrongful dismissal claim to the judicial authorities; the grounds generally include:

  • substantive violations of the law: the basis (factual basis or the statutory grounds invoked) for unilateral termination cannot be substantiated; or
  • procedural violations of the law: including not notifying the trade union and not fulfilling relevant formalities requirements.

If their claim is supported, the remedy will be either reinstatement of employment with back pay or a double severance payment.

Discrimination is prohibited by PRC employment law. The Labour Law generally provides that people should not be treated unfairly due to race, gender, religion, etc, and women should have equal rights of employment to men. Additionally, the PRC Employment Promotion Law provides that employees are entitled to equal employment, and individuals seeking employment shall not be discriminated against because of ethnicity, race, gender, religious belief, disability, and whether the individuals are from rural places. The PRC Law on the Protection of Rights and Interests of Women, which was newly amended and took effect on 1 January 2023, further ensures equal employment rights for female employees and prohibits discrimination against female employees. There are also specific regulations prohibiting discrimination against individuals who are hepatitis B carriers.

“Equal employment rights disputes” has been listed as a separate cause of action since 2019. Generally, individuals can file “equal employment rights disputes” lawsuits before the court requiring the company to bear the corresponding legal responsibilities. The burden of proof is usually on the individual to prove that the enterprise conducted discriminative actions. Remedies available to employees vary depending on the specific cause of action, while monetary compensation for economic loss and emotional loss in certain circumstances is the main remedy. Other possible remedies include requiring the enterprise to apologise to the individual publicly.

Currently in China, labour arbitration procedures are generally conducted onsite.

However, for court proceedings, online litigation is now widely used, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the Rules of Online Litigation of People’s Courts, the court may rely on the electronic litigation platforms to complete all or part of the litigation procedures of case docketing, mediation, exchange of evidence, questioning, court trial and service online.

The court shall decide whether to conduct an online court trial via video based on the opinions of the parties, the circumstances of the case, social impact, technical conditions and other factors. However, there are also circumstances where online court trials shall not apply, specifically:

  • all parties expressly disagree, or any of the parties disagrees with a good reason;
  • none of the parties has the technical conditions and capability to participate in an online court trial;
  • it is necessary to ascertain identities, verify originals or check physical objects onsite through the court trial;
  • the case is difficult and complicated and there is a wide variety of evidence, such that the application of an online court trial is not conducive to finding out the facts and applying laws;
  • the case involves national security or state secrets;
  • the case has a great social impact and has attracted wide public attention; or
  • the court considers that there is any other circumstance that is not suitable for an online court trial.

Besides this, the arbitration committee and people’s court in some regions are also trying to provide an asynchronous hearing approach, which refers to hearings where the parties may choose to log on to the online arbitration/court platform at their own discretion within the time period specified by the arbitral committee/court to complete the hearing procedures (defence, investigation, adduction of evidence, cross-examination, etc. Under this approach, the parties may log on to the platform at different times to complete the relevant hearing procedures.

In China, most employment-related disputes are resolved under a two-stage framework, ie, labour arbitration followed by litigation. According to the PRC Employment Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law, before filing an employment dispute with a court, it is mandatory to submit the dispute to the competent local labour arbitration commission, an institution specialising in hearing employment dispute cases. If any party is unsatisfied with the arbitration award, except for certain situations where the arbitration award is final, the party is entitled to bring the lawsuit to the competent people’s courts (the first instance court and then the second instance court).

According to the PRC Employment Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law, where a labour dispute involves more than ten employees and the employees have the same claim, they may recommend their representatives to participate in the mediation, arbitration or litigation.

In addition to arbitration and litigation, an employer and employee are encouraged to consult with each other and to reach a mediation agreement on employment dispute settlement under PRC employment laws. Even if the employment disputes have been submitted to arbitration or litigation, an employer and employee still could negotiate and reach a mediation agreement, as long as the final arbitral award or court decision has not been made. The conciliation is not mandatory and must be based on both parties’ voluntary decision. The parties may choose to directly submit their employment disputes to arbitration without any pre-claim conciliation.

In addition, labour supervision is also an available option. According to the Regulation on Labour Security Supervision, any organisation or individual shall have the right to report to the labour supervisory authority (an administrative department responsible for the supervision of labour security administration) any act of violating labour laws, regulations or rules. The labour supervisory authority will accept the reports and complaints, and investigate, correct and impose punishment for any relevant acts.

Under PRC law, generally, the arbitration commission/court will not award the prevailing party attorney’s fee or other costs. However, there may be special rules; eg, according to a local rule in Shenzhen, where the employee is the prevailing party in a labour dispute arbitration or litigation case, the attorney’s fee paid by the employee may be borne by the employer while the maximum amount shall not exceed CNY5,000. The portion exceeding CNY5,000 shall be borne by the employee.

King & Wood Mallesons

18th Floor, East Tower
World Financial Center
1 Dongsanhuan Zhonglu
Chaoyang District
Beijing
100020
People’s Republic of China

+86 010 5878 5161

+86 010 5878 5566

linda.liang@cn.kwm.com www.kwm.com
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



King & Wood Mallesons is a leading law firm with exceptional legal expertise and depth of knowledge. The firm provides comprehensive one-stop-shop legal solutions to clients in China as well as internationally. The labour and employment department has six partners and more than 20 attorneys and assistants based in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Suzhou, which enables them to quickly and effectively resolve labour law issues across Mainland China. The firm has provided legal services to more than 300 Fortune 500 companies, multinational companies, large state-owned enterprises and well-known domestic enterprises. Its extensive experience in handling both adversarial and non-adversarial matters as well as direct participation in legislation facilitates a deep and accurate understanding of the complicated and rapid changes in PRC labour and employment laws and policies, as well as the latest HR, management and employment issues.

With the continuing uncertainties in the worldwide economy, China is also under the pressure of recurring economic downturn and thus redundancy has been more frequently seen in recent years. To promote and stabilise the economy, China has been launching new measures over the past year, bringing many developments to the market, including the labour market. Among the dynamics in the employment law area, the following are particularly noteworthy: (1) gradual implementation of postponed retirement ; (2) the newly amended PRC Company Law and its employment law complications; and (3) redundancy approaches commonly seen in practice and relevant judicial practice trends.

Gradual Implementation of Postponed Retirement

With the trends towards an increasingly ageing population and a decline in the working-age population, China is actively taking measures to address the population structure issue, including gradually implementing “postponed retirement”. This section aims to provide an overview of the background of postponed retirement, attempts in practice and the newly adopted decision on gradually raising the statutory retirement age.

Current statutory retirement age

According to the current PRC law, the statutory retirement ages for employees are generally 60 for male employees, 55 for female employees in managerial/technical positions, and 50 for female employees in non-managerial/technical positions. In addition to the default rule, the law sets some exceptions for certain groups of employees. For example, the statutory retirement ages are lowered for employees engaged in special types of work harmful to health (eg, work at a high temperature or underground) and employees who become incapacitated due to sickness or non-work-related injuries. There are also special rules for senior experts where the law permits them to raise their statutory retirement ages if certain conditions are met.

By contrast, the statutory retirement ages in most other countries are higher. For instance, the general retirement age in the European Union has been raised to 64, and the general retirement age is 66 in the United States and in the United Kingdom.

Background of the postponed retirement reform

With the increasing population ageing problem in China, there has been a growing gap between the relatively low statutory retirement age and the practical challenges. As a response to address this issue, postponed retirement has been proposed, and the necessity for reform keeps growing. The reasons mainly consist of the following:

  • Rising life expectancy: The current rule for statutory retirement age in China was established in the 1950s when the average life expectancy was less than 50. According to the latest statistics issued by the National Health Commission, the average life expectancy currently stands at around 78 years, an increase of nearly 30 years. Postponing retirement would be a wise step to adapt to China’s current average life expectancy, increase the utilisation of the labour force to a greater extent, and keep pace with the retirement age rules worldwide.
  • Population structure change: China is currently facing the increasing challenges of an ageing population and a low fertility rate at the same time, leading to a decreased proportion of the population at working age. The proportion of the population over 60 rose from 5.5% in 1964 to 19.8% in 2022, while the rate of new births dropped from 3.4% in 1957 to 0.8% in 2021. The elderly dependency rate has continuously risen for a decade, climbing from 11.9% in 2010 to 19.7% in 2020. These trends will lead to significant changes in population structure. To make better use of the workforce and promote sustainable economic and social development, postponed retirement will be a vital step in response in order to adjust the workforce structure.
  • Pressure on pension budget: With a growing number of retirees retrieving pensions from the pension fund pool and a relatively smaller workforce contributing to the pool, the pension budget is getting tighter. It is estimated that the pension fund balance will decrease year by year after 2027, and the pension fund will face continuous operating pressure in the foreseeable future. Postponed retirement is a good approach to ease pressure on the pension budget and improve the operation of the social insurance system.

Preparation for Postponed retirement reform

Discussions on the postponed retirement at the national level over the years

In 2008, a spokesman of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (“Human Resource Ministry”) said that relevant departments are considering raising the statutory retirement age when circumstances permit.

In 2013, the third plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee passed a decision proposing to establish a fairer and more sustainable social security system, and to study and establish a policy on gradual extension of the retirement age. This was also the first official description of the postponed retirement policy at the national level.

In the following years, postponed retirement has been repeatedly mentioned by relevant authorities. In June 2021, the Human Resource Ministry proposed the principle of “gradual adjustment, flexible implementation, classified promotion and comprehensive consideration” for postponed retirement. Later, at the end of 2021, the State Council proposed, in a notice regarding elderly care service system planning, to “encourage professional and technical personnel to reasonably extend their service years in accordance with the principle of the employer’s demands and the voluntariness on the part of the employee”.

Then lately, in July 2024, the third plenary session of the 20th CPC Central Committee proposed that the implementation of the gradual policy for the retirement age shall be in a prudent and orderly manner and in accordance with the principles of voluntariness and flexibility.

Attempts in local practice regarding postponed retirement

There have been attempts made in local practice by some regions. Typically:

  • Jiangsu was the first region nationwide to make innovative stipulations on postponed retirement applying to all employees and all positions. In an Implementation Measure issued by the Human Resource Department of Jiangsu province, which came into force in March 2022, postponed retirement is permitted for at least one year upon application by the employees, consent of the employers, and filing with the relevant authorities. According to the local rule in Jiangsu, rather than a mandatory rule to raise the statutory retirement age, employees have the say on whether to apply for postponed retirement. However, according to anonymous consultations with relevant authorities in Jiangsu, the application of the rule in practice has not been seen yet, and detailed implementing rules have not been introduced by cities in Jiangsu province. Therefore, we still need to wait for further regulations to be introduced and see what developments take place in future judicial practices in Jiangsu.
  • In some regions, although local rules have not been introduced on postponed retirement applying to all employees, there have been rules for certain types of employees. For example, Shandong province issued a notice regarding raising the retirement age for senior experts in enterprises and public institutions in 2020.
  • In some other regions, although there have not been rules specifically stipulating postponed retirement, there are rules and practices regarding the extension of social insurance contributions when certain conditions are met, also allowing employees beyond the current statutory retirement ages to continue working and making social insurance contributions. For example:
    1. In Shanghai, employees with qualifications for professional and technical positions can apply to extend social insurance contributions and postpone the time to start receiving a pension upon consent of the employer and filing with the relevant authorities.
    2. Similar practices can be seen in Beijing, where the employer may apply to extend employees’ social insurance contributions and postpone the time they start receiving pensions, although subject to review and final approval by the relevant authorities.

With the current attempts in local practice and the newly adopted decision on gradually raising the statutory retirement age introduced below, it is anticipated that detailed implementation rules and more local rules will be introduced soon.

The newly adopted decision on gradually raising the statutory retirement age at the national level

On September 13, 2024, the Standing Committee of the 14th National People’s Congress officially announced the decision on gradually raising the statutory retirement age at the national level. The decision adopted the Measures of the State Council on Gradual Raising of the Statutory Retirement Age ("Measures"), which will come into effect on January 1, 2025. According to the Measures, the statutory retirement age for male employees will be gradually raised from 60 to 63 in the course of 15 years starting 2025, while that for female employees will be raised from 55 to 58 and from 50 to 55, respectively. Below are the relevant key points from the Measures worth noting:

• New Statutory Retirement Ages: Starting from January 1, 2025, for male employees (original statutory retirement age 60), the new statutory retirement age will be gradually raised by one month of every four months’ period until it reaches 63. For female employees, if the original statutory retirement age is 55 (for female employees in managerial/technical positions), the new statutory retirement age will be gradually raised by one month of every four months’ period until it reaches 58; If the original statutory retirement age is 50 (for female employees in non-managerial/technical positions), the new statutory retirement age will be gradually raised by one month of every two months’ period until it reaches 55. For example, under the newly published Measures, a male employee born in January 1970 who originally scheduled to reach the statutory retirement age of 60 in January 2030, will reach the raised statutory retirement age of 61 years and 4 months in May 2031 as the statutory retirement age for male employees raised by one month for every four months from January 1, 2025.

• Flexibility in Retirement Time under the Measures: Despite of the postponement of the statutory retirement age, under the newly published Measures, employees will still have some flexibility regarding their retirement timing. Where an employee has met the minimum contribution period for pension insurance, the employees may voluntarily opt for early retirement, provided that the period for early retirement does not exceed 3 years, and the actual retirement age should not be lower than the original statutory retirement age (ie 60 for male and 50/55 for female). Employees may also, after consultation and reaching agreement with their employer, opt for postponed retirement provided that the period for postponed retirement does not exceed 3 years. For example, a male employee with the new statutory retirement age of 62 can voluntarily choose to retire at a time between the ages of 60 and 62, or, after consultation and reaching agreement with his employer, choose to postpone his retirement at a time between the ages of 62 and 65. The Measures also emphasizes that during the implementation, it is not allowed to illegally force employees to choose the retirement age directly or in a disguised form against their will. 

• Increasing the Minimum Contribution Period for Pension Insurance ("Minimum Contribution Period"): The current Minimum Contribution Period for employees to receive pension benefits is 15 years. According to the Measures, starting from January 1, 2030, the Minimum Contribution Period will increase by six months each year, until it reaches to 20 years. For employees who have reached their statutory retirement age while have not met the Minimum Contribution Period, they can satisfy the requirement of the Minimum Contribution Period either by extending the contribution period or by making a one-time contribution in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations.

To sum up, after preparation for postponed retirement reform for years, the newly adopted decision marks the official implementation of China's postponed retirement reform effective from January 1, 2025.

Summary

To sum up, with the official adoption of the decision at the national level on postponed retirement reform, the China's postponed retirement reform has officially entered a new stage. It can be anticipated that more supporting regulations and rules will be released both at the national level and regional level. Both employers and employees are advised to pay ongoing attention to relevant policies and judicial practices.

Newly Amended PRC Company Law and its Employment Law Implications

The newly amended PRC Company Law (“New Company Law”) just came into effect on 1 July 2024. The revision this time is the second comprehensive revision of the Company Law since its first promulgation in 1993, introducing substantial changes to various aspects, including capital system, corporate governance structure, senior executives’ liabilities, etc.

The New Company Law also has implications for the employment law area. In addition to protecting employees’ rights and interests to a higher level, the New Company Law further expands the breadth and depth of employees’ participation in the democratic management of the company, and improves the requirements on duties of directors, supervisors and senior executives. Below we highlight the key implications of the New Company Law to the employment law area.

Strengthening employees’ participation in corporate governance

Defining the Employee Representative Congress (“ERC”) as the basic form of democratic management system

According to Article 17 of the New Company Law, companies shall, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws, establish and improve a democratic management system, with the ERC as the basic form. Democratic management shall be carried out through the ERC or other forms. Compared with the previous Company Law, the New Company Law makes it clear that the ERC shall be the basic form of democratic management.

In addition, according to Article 17, when making a decision on restructuring, dissolution, application for bankruptcy or any other major issue in respect of business operation, or formulating any important regulation, a company shall listen to the opinions of its trade union and listen to the opinions and proposals of the employees through the ERC or by any other means. Among the instances of issues listed, “dissolution and application for bankruptcy” has been newly added by the New Company Law, which also chimes with the change to expand the scope of employees’ participation in corporate governance.

Expanding the scope where employee directors are required

To promote the participation of employee representatives in corporate governance, the rules on employee directors have been established since 1993 when the Company Law was first introduced. However, for a long time, the law only stipulated that certain state-owned limited liability companies had to have employee representatives on the board of directors (“BOD”). The New Company Law expands the scope of companies required to have employee directors, specifically:

  • for wholly state-owned companies, there shall be employee representatives on the BOD of the company; and
  • for limited liability companies with 300 employees or more, except where there is a board of supervisors (“BOS”) with employee representatives on the BOS, there shall be employee representatives on the BOD of the company.

In short, according to the New Company Law, for large companies (over 300 employees), an employee director is required unless there is already an employee supervisor.

Setting new requirements for the BOS and employee representatives thereon

The BOS was previously one of the standing supervisory bodies of the company; however, according to the New Company Law, it is no longer a body mandatorily required for a company, and the powers may be exercised by audit committees established under the BOD.

If the company has a BOS, the legal requirements for the proportion of employee representatives on the BOS (no less than one-third) remain the same. However, where the company does not set a BOS (or alternatively a supervisor where permitted by law), the New Company Law does not require the audit committee to include employee representatives; rather, the law only stipulates that employee directors can be included in the audit committee.

A noteworthy point

In view of the above changes, a problem arises where the company has more than 300 employees while there is no BOD (eg, companies with a small number of shareholders) but only an executive director. Does the only director have to be an employee representative?

Some hold the view that the New Company Law only requires an employee director if the company has a BOD. If there is no BOD but only an executive director, it is not reasonable to require that the director shall be an employee representative, as it will interfere with the management of the company. Therefore, to answer the above question, the only director does not need to be an employee representative.

Note that, pursuant to the view above, if a company with more than 300 employees sets only one non-employee director, and the company does not set an employee supervisor, it remains unclear whether the company will face challenges from employees and relevant authorities for limited employee participation in corporate governance.

Enhanced liabilities of directors, supervisors and senior executives

Refining the requirements regarding the duty of loyalty and duty of diligence for directors, supervisors and senior executives

The New Company Law elaborates on the meanings of the duty of loyalty and the duty of diligence:

  • Duty of loyalty: Directors, supervisors and senior executives shall take measures to avoid the conflict between their own interests and those of the company, and may not seek any improper interests by taking advantage of their powers.
  • Duty of diligence: When performing their duties, directors, supervisors and senior executives shall, for the best interests of the company, exercise the reasonable care that should be generally possessed by a manager.

The New Company Law further improves the stipulations on connected transactions, acquisition of business opportunities that belong to the company, and competition with the company.

Strengthening the liabilities of directors, supervisors and senior executives regarding capital enrichment

Although capital enrichment is the obligation of shareholders, the New Company Law strengthens the liabilities of directors and supervisors in verifying and urging shareholders’ contributions, preventing improper capital reduction or distribution of profits to shareholders, etc.

In addition to the above, the New Company Law provides more detailed rules on the liabilities of directors, supervisors and senior executives in many other aspects, bringing more responsibilities to the directors, supervisors and senior executives when fulfilling their duties.

Summary

The New Company Law has wide-ranging and significant implications for the employment law area. On the one hand, the law sets stricter requirements for companies to protect employees’ rights and interests, enhance the democratic management system, ensure employees’ participation in corporate governance, and other aspects. On the other hand, the new law imposes more detailed requirements on the responsibilities of directors, supervisors and senior executives, of which individuals serving in relevant positions should be fully aware.

Approaches to Redundancy Commonly Seen in Practice and Relevant Judicial Practice Trends

PRC employment law is more protective to employees than employers and sets strict requirements on employers regarding employment contract termination. Affected by factors including the external economic situation, many employers in China are facing cost pressures and thus are considering adjusting the internal organisational structure and reducing the number of employees. As a result, redundancy has been seen more frequently in practice. Disputes regarding redundancy have also occurred from time to time, and some cases later ended up at courts as unlawful termination, which did not achieve the purpose of cost saving but instead further increased the lawsuits burden. This section aims to introduce the commonly seen approaches to redundancy under PRC employment law and relevant judicial practice trends.

Approaches to redundancy under PRC employment law

Among the statutory termination grounds under PRC law, the grounds that are most relevant to mass layoff generally consist of the following:

(1) termination based on major change to the objective circumstances (Article 40(3) of PRC Employment Contract Law);

(2) economic layoff (Article 41 of PRC Employment Contract Law);

(3) employment contract ending upon dissolution of the employer (Article 44(5) of PRC Employment Contract Law); and

(4) mutual termination (Article 36 of PRC Employment Contract Law)

Approach (3) can only be revoked upon dissolution of the employer and thus the situations to which it applies are limited. Approach (4) is subject to the employees’ consent, and even though it is commonly adopted as the final approach to redundancy, there should be another unilateral termination ground as a backup in case the employee does not agree. In light of this, approaches (1) and (2) are generally the two commonly considered unilateral termination grounds in practice for mass layoff.

Termination based on major change to the objective circumstances

According to Article 40(3) of the Employment Contract Law, the following conditions must be met in order to successfully invoke this termination ground:

(1) There has been a major change in objective circumstances resulting in the consequence that an employment contract can no longer be performed;

(2) The employer and the employee could not reach an agreement on amending the employment contract; and

(3) The employer has provided 30 days’ prior notice of unilateral termination or made payment in lieu of notice (in the amount of the monthly salary of the month preceding that of the unilateral termination).

Disputes are more likely to arise regarding the first two conditions, and judicial practice also varies from place to place.

Major change to the objective circumstances

In terms of what constitutes a major change in objective circumstances, according to the national rule, situations are defined narrowly to mainly include force majeure, relocation of the employer, merger, or transfer of assets of the employer.

Some local rules and regulations further specify the situations that constitute a major change in objective circumstances. For example, according to the local regulations of Beijing, “major change to the objective circumstances” mainly include: (1) a force majeure event due to a natural disaster such as earthquake, fire or flood; (2) significant changes due to legal, regulatory or policy shifts leading to relocation, asset transfers or restructuring; and (3) changes in the business scope of government-authorised business.

When considering redundancy, many employers will argue that organisational restructuring and the removal of positions/departments also constitute “major change to the objective circumstances”. Local practices vary on this point:

  • According to the judicial practice in Beijing, situations not explicitly listed by local regulations are generally not deemed as “major change to the objective circumstances”. The arbitrator/judge in Beijing will generally not support the employer’s claim that organisational restructuring and the removal of positions/departments constitute “major change to the objective circumstances”. Rather, they have tended to hold that organisational restructuring and removal of positions/departments are measures taken by the employers on their own initiative.
  • However, in judicial practice in Shanghai, similar situations might be considered as “major change to the objective circumstances”.

Failure to reach agreement on amendments to the employment contract

If there is a major change in objective circumstances, the employer has to try to reach an agreement with the employee on amending the employment contract, often by providing another reasonable position (same pay level, similar responsibilities) within the employer to the employee, and only after the employee refuses to accept the position can the employer proceed to unilaterally dismiss the employee. Judicial practice may also vary regarding the reasonableness of the alternative position. Factors that will generally be considered include the salary standard, working location, job responsibilities, etc.

Economic layoff

Article 41 of the PRC Employment Contract Law contains the requirements for economic layoff. According to Article 41, when the production and operation of an employer face severe difficulties, and if it is necessary for the employer to terminate at least 20 employees, or if the employer terminates fewer than 20 employees but they account for at least 10% of all employees, the employer should inform and consult the trade union or all the employees 30 days in advance of the layoff. Prior to layoff, it is also required that the employer should file the economic layoff plan and other required documents to the local labour bureau, and if the filing is accepted by the local labour bureau, the employer can then proceed to unilateral termination based on economic layoff.

In recent years, employers have grown much more interested in exploring the possibilities of utilising economic layoff.

Below we look at two of the conditions for economic layoff that can best demonstrate the new developments and judicial practice trends.

An employer needs to have a required economic circumstance

There are four economic circumstances that will allow an employer to conduct economic layoff, and the employer’s situation must fall under one of the circumstances in order to be considered eligible. Judicial practices in different regions may vary on the standards applied to specific circumstances. For example, with respect to “severe difficulties in operations”, in some cities (such as Shanghai), it is required that an employer should have been in a deficit for the last three years in a row before being considered as having severe difficulties in operations, while in other cities, the requirements may not be as strict.

Filing to the local labour bureau should be accepted

Filing with the local labour bureau is a procedural requirement for implementing economic layoff; if the filing submitted by the employer to the local labour bureau is not accepted, the employer will not be able to implement economic layoff. The severity of the filing review varies from place to place in practice. For example, the redundancy plan will be strictly reviewed by the authorities in Shanghai, where the probability of acceptance is very low. The review in Beijing is comparatively loose, and the employers might only need to provide the relevant financial statements, audit reports and other supporting documents.

The acceptance of filing by the local labour bureau does not guarantee the lawfulness of economic layoff (since the local labour bureau for acceptance will not carry out substantive examination of the materials). Even if a filing had been accepted by the local labour bureau, arbitrators and judges would still consider and determine whether the termination is lawful or not, once challenged by employees. However, that being said, in practice, if the filing to the local labour bureau is accepted, this can increase the success rate of economic layoff when employees challenge it through arbitration and litigation.

Summary

With many constantly evolving factors and requirements in practice, termination based on major change to the objective circumstances and economic layoff are quite research-worthy topics. When considering mass layoff in practice, employers are advised to select an appropriate approach according to their actual situations and also the local practices, and ensure that the termination is in line with PRC law requirements.

Conclusion

The issues addressed in this article, including the postponed retirement reform, the employment law implications of the newly amended Company Law, together with commonly seen approaches to redundancy and relevant practices, represent just a snapshot of the ongoing trends and developments in PRC employment law. Employers are encouraged to consider these topics carefully and stay focused on further changes and developments to ensure ongoing compliance and effective management.

King & Wood Mallesons

18th Floor, East Tower
World Financial Center
1 Dongsanhuan Zhonglu
Chaoyang District
Beijing
100020
People’s Republic of China

+86 010 5878 5161

+86 010 5878 5566

linda.liang@cn.kwm.com www.kwm.com
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



King & Wood Mallesons is a leading law firm with exceptional legal expertise and depth of knowledge. The firm provides comprehensive one-stop-shop legal solutions to clients in China as well as internationally. The labour and employment department has six partners and more than 20 attorneys and assistants based in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Suzhou, which enables them to quickly and effectively resolve labour law issues across Mainland China. The firm has provided legal services to more than 300 Fortune 500 companies, multinational companies, large state-owned enterprises and well-known domestic enterprises. Its extensive experience in handling both adversarial and non-adversarial matters as well as direct participation in legislation facilitates a deep and accurate understanding of the complicated and rapid changes in PRC labour and employment laws and policies, as well as the latest HR, management and employment issues.

Trends and Developments

Authors



King & Wood Mallesons is a leading law firm with exceptional legal expertise and depth of knowledge. The firm provides comprehensive one-stop-shop legal solutions to clients in China as well as internationally. The labour and employment department has six partners and more than 20 attorneys and assistants based in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Suzhou, which enables them to quickly and effectively resolve labour law issues across Mainland China. The firm has provided legal services to more than 300 Fortune 500 companies, multinational companies, large state-owned enterprises and well-known domestic enterprises. Its extensive experience in handling both adversarial and non-adversarial matters as well as direct participation in legislation facilitates a deep and accurate understanding of the complicated and rapid changes in PRC labour and employment laws and policies, as well as the latest HR, management and employment issues.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.