There is no clear distinction between blue-collar and white-collar workers under PRC employment laws. As long as workers are employed by enterprises, individual economic organisations, private non-enterprise entities, state organs, public institutions or social organisations within the boundary of the PRC, no matter whether they are employed as senior staff or frontline workers, they uniformly hold the status of “employees” as protected by PRC employment laws.
Under the current PRC employment laws, employees can generally be divided into directly employed employees and labour dispatched employees.
According to the PRC Employment Contract Law (“Employment Contract Law”), there are three types of employment contract terms:
A written employment contract shall be entered into within one month from the date on which the employee commences work; otherwise, the employer shall pay twice the monthly salary to the employee from the second month of the commencement of employment until the date when a written employment contract is concluded. If, after a year from the commencement of the employment, an employer still fails to conclude a written employment contract, an open-ended employment contract will be deemed automatically concluded between the employer and the employee.
The following information must be included in an employment contract:
Part-time employees may enter into oral agreements with the employer. The employer is not allowed to stipulate a probation period with the employee.
Working Hours
For full-time employees, there are three types of working hour systems, under which different rules for working hours apply:
Part-time employees are employees who generally work with an employer for no more than four hours per day on average and no more than 24 hours per week in total. There are no special rules/restrictions applicable to working hours for part-time employees.
Overtime
Overtime refers to the working time that the employer arranges or approves the employees to work, which is beyond the Statutory Standard. According to the PRC Labour Law (“Labour Law”), overtime shall not exceed three hours per day or 36 hours per month.
If an employer does not make overtime payment for its employee’s overtime work, the competent labour authorities have the right to order the employer to make such payment within a limited period; if the employer fails to comply with such order, it will be required to pay 150-200% of the outstanding overtime pay.
There is no nationwide minimum wage, and the local government of each region sets its local minimum wage, which is normally updated at least every two years and applies to all employees, regardless of their age, position and experience. The minimum wage generally includes a monthly minimum wage and an hourly minimum wage. The monthly minimum wage applies to all full-time employees, while the hourly minimum wage applies to all part-time employees.
It is not statutorily required for employers to provide bonuses on top of basic salaries; however, it is common to see employers reward employees through various bonuses, eg, the 13th month’s salary, year-end bonus, commission, performance bonus. Generally, the issuance of bonuses is solely at the employer’s discretion. If it is stipulated in the employment contract or the employer՚s internal policies to provide a certain bonus to the employee, the employer shall be bound by those stipulations.
Apart from the minimum wage requirements, there are no mandatory requirements on salary increase (although the local government of each region generally issues a salary increase guideline every year, it is only a reference document to guide enterprises to reasonably determine salary increases and is not mandatory). Salary deduction can only be made upon the employee’s consent unless on certain statutory grounds (eg, sick leave period).
Holidays
Generally, holidays in China include 11 days of statutory holiday (New Year’s Day, Spring Festival, Labour Day, Mid-Autumn Festival, National Day, etc) for all employees as well as holidays for certain groups of people (eg, a half-day’s leave for female employees on Women’s Day, and a half-day’s leave for 14 to 28-year-old employees on Youth Day).
Leaves
All employees shall be entitled to fully paid statutory annual leave, sick leave and other leaves (maternity leave, childcare leave, etc) in accordance with the PRC laws and the employer’s internal policies. The main categories of leave include the following:
Confidentiality and Non-defamation
An employer may formulate internal policies, or agree with employees in the employment contract or a separate confidentiality agreement, on relevant matters of confidentiality, including the protection of the employer’s trade secrets and other confidential information. The scope of confidential information shall be defined in the agreement at the discretion of the employer. At present, there are no nationwide regulations requiring the payment of compensation for adhering to a confidentiality obligation. Therefore, in practice, employers need not pay their employees in exchange for their complying with the confidentiality requirements. If an employee violates the confidentiality requirements and causes economic losses to the employer, the employer can claim compensation against the employee based on the internal policy, relevant stipulations in the employment contract or the confidentiality agreement.
Similarly, employers can set requirements on non-defamation for employees by formulating policies, or by stipulating relevant requirements in the employment contract or a separate agreement, and claim compensation for any employee violation and losses caused.
Non-compete is a commonly seen post-termination restrictive covenant for employees so as to protect the confidential information of the employer. Under PRC employment laws, an employer can agree with an employee on non-compete obligations through stipulations in the employment contract or through a separate non-compete agreement. Key stipulations on non-compete include the following.
PRC employment laws are silent on the topic of non-solicitation; however, non-solicitation clauses are commonly used by employers in practice to prevent former employees from soliciting clients and employees of the employer.
As violating non-solicitation is not a scenario stipulated by the law where the employer can claim for liquidated damages as agreed with the employees, employers can generally only claim for recovery of financial losses suffered due to an employee’s breach of a valid non-solicitation obligation. If the employer claims for a breach of non-solicitation by employees, the employer needs to prove the solicitation behaviours and the financial losses incurred.
Data Privacy Laws
The PRC Civil Code (effective on 1 January 2021) contains a chapter regarding right to privacy and personal information (“PI”) protection. The PRC Cybersecurity Law (effective on 1 June 2017), the PRC Data Security Law (effective on 1 September 2021) and the PRC Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”, effective on 1 November 2021) collectively constitute the three fundamental and framework laws regulating data security protection in the PRC. Among these laws and regulations, the PIPL provides the most details regarding PI protection, establishing comprehensive and systematic rules on the processing and protection of PI. Employers should also comply with the PIPL when processing the employees’ PI; the sections below briefly summarise the key points under the PIPL.
PI Processing Principles
Legal Grounds for Processing Employees’ PI
According to the PIPL, PI can only be processed based on statutory grounds, among which, the two grounds most related to the employment sphere are:
However, the PIPL does not stipulate specific standards for determining what constitutes “necessary for conducting human resource management”, and thus, it is suggested that the employers try to obtain consent from the employees for PI needed in the first place.
Consent and Separate Consent
As the key legal ground for processing PI, the PIPL sets out requirements on obtaining “consent”. The consent shall be voluntarily and explicitly given by the individual on a fully informed basis. The PI processor shall truthfully, accurately and completely inform individuals of the required matters (“Items to Inform”):
The PIPL also requires “separate consent” for certain circumstances (eg, sharing PI with third parties, processing sensitive PI, outbound transferring PI), which is a form of consent with higher requirements. The specific requirements and form of separate consent are not specified by the PIPL. Based on the current understanding and practice, to constitute a separate consent, the specific item involving PI processing should be listed as a separate item requesting the individual’s specific consent explicitly for this item, instead of being hidden in a package of items pending the individual’s joint consent.
Sharing Employees’ PI with Third Parties
The most relevant employment-related scenarios include engaging third parties in background checks, recruitment, payroll services and labour dispatch, etc. When sharing employees’ PI with third-party processors, apart from the Items to Inform, the employer shall also inform the employees of the recipient՚s name, contact information, purposes and methods of processing, and categories of PI, and obtain the employee’s separate consent.
Outbound Transfer of Employees’ PI and SCCs
The outbound transfer of employees’ PI is not unusual, especially for multinational employers sharing employees’ PI within a global management system. Given the special nature of outbound transfer, the PIPL sets out detailed requirements in this regard. Apart from informing employees of the Items to Inform and additional items, and obtaining separate consent, the PI processor also needs to conduct a PI protection impact assessment and adopt one of the three following legal mechanisms:
Among the above outbound transfer mechanisms, detailed rules have been laid out regarding the SCC Approach, and the SCC template has been published. Employers who are eligible to adopt the SCC Approach shall follow the relevant rules for complying with the PI outbound transfer requirements.
The Provisions on Promoting and Regulating the Cross-border Transfer of Data promulgated on 22 March 2024 exempt the PI processor from adopting one of the above three legal mechanisms for PI outbound transfer on certain grounds, including employers’ cross-border transfer of employees’ PI where it is necessary for conducting human resource management according to the rules and regulations and collective contracts established/concluded in accordance with the law.
Retaining Employees’ PI
According to the PIPL, the retention period of PI shall be the shortest time necessary for achieving the processing purpose, though the specific length of the retention period is not specified. It is suggested that employers decide the retention period according to the type of PI and the specific stage in the employment life cycle.
Legal Liabilities
PI processors that violate the PIPL in their PI processing will be subject to the following legal liabilities:
Foreigners working in the PRC should abide by laws and regulations such as the Law on the Management of the Entry and Exit of the PRC, and the Regulations on Management of Foreigners Working in China. According to these regulations, for foreigners to work legally in China, the following requirements shall be met:
In addition, for foreign workers to work legally in China, the prior approval of competent labour administrative authorities, a work permit and a residence permit shall be obtained. Failure to obtain the valid permits will lead to penalties for both the employer and employee, and detention may be imposed on the foreign employee. These rules do not apply to foreign employees of foreign embassies, consulates, offices of the United Nations and other international organisations in China, which enjoy diplomatic privileges and immunities.
As a side point, the term of an employment contract between an employer and a foreign worker may not exceed five years. The employer may apply for renewal within 30 days prior to the expiration date, and the employment contract can be renewed upon the labour administrative authorities’ approval and completion of the work permit extension procedures.
General Registration Requirements
All foreign workers shall obtain valid work permits to work in China, except in very special circumstances, eg, if the duration of stay in China is less than 90 days and the worker enters China for certain reasons including:
In other circumstances, the registration can generally be divided into two kinds depending on the duration of the stay (ie, whether it is over 90 days). Generally, there are two kinds of arrangement commonly adopted in practice for employers to have foreign nationals work in China:
To implement the international secondment mode, the foreign worker must be in a managerial or technical position in China, and the foreign entity shall issue a secondment letter, stipulating contents including but not limited to workplace, term, salary and position. The PRC entity shall apply for the work permit with the secondment letter.
Type of Foreign Workers
There are different types of foreign workers permitted to apply for work permits, including high-end talent (Category A), foreign professionals (Category B) and other foreign personnel (Category C). There are specific criteria indicating which category shall apply to each foreign employee when applying for work permits.
Procedures for Obtaining a Work Permit and a Residence Permit for a Foreigner who Comes to Work in China From Abroad
For a PRC employer to hire a foreign employee who comes from abroad, the general procedures for obtaining a work permit and a residence permit are as follows:
Mobile work (remote work) is not a new concept and has been widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Post-pandemic, some employers still keep the remote work option open to their employees or adopt a hybrid work mode (onsite and remote).
Work location is a mandatory term in an employment contract, and normally it will be an onsite location. Switching from onsite work to remote work will generally require the mutual consent of both the employer and the employee. In practice, there remain some uncertainties or difficulties related to remote work, mainly those set out below:
Although some universities in China have been trying to implement this kind of leave for teachers, “sabbatical” is not a legal concept stipulated by PRC employment laws, but rather a kind of optional leave granted by universities to teachers. Consequently, there is a lack of stipulations on the terms of employment (salary standard, etc) during the sabbatical period at the national level, and there are no related cases where the attitude of the arbitration commission/court can be seen.
With the development of the platform economy and the need for more flexible employment, new forms of employment have developed and infiltrated a growing number of industries in the past year; typical new manifestations include delivery persons, online platform taxi drivers and network anchors. The identification of the relationship between the platform enterprises and the individuals engaged, and the protection of such individuals’ rights and interests, are of most concern.
The national and local governments have been issuing regulations and policies governing new forms of employment in recent years. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, together with seven other departments, issued a guiding opinion in 2021, which for the first time introduced a new concept called a “less-than-complete employment relationship” (as opposed to an ordinary employment relationship or a civil law relationship). It also set out comprehensive provisions to ensure platform workers’ rights and interests, including reasonable pay, accident insurance participation and vocational training. In 2024, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security further issued three guidelines regulating platform employment, including a guideline on working hours, rest and remuneration for platform workers; a guideline on the publication of labour rules for platform enterprises; and a guideline on services to safeguard the rights and interests of platform workers. Local rules and regulations have also been issued, providing more detailed guidance, including allowing work-related injury insurance to be paid separately for individuals under new forms of employment. It will be important to pay attention to any new rules introduced in the future concerning these new forms of employment.
According to the Labour Law, trade unions shall represent and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of employees, and carry out their activities independently in accordance with the law. The Trade Union Law of the PRC (“Trade Union Law”) (last revised in 2021) further clarifies the status of a trade union, which is a voluntary organisation formed by employees of their own free will.
Trade unions have the general right to represent and protect the rights of employees. According to the Trade Union Law, specific rights of trade unions include but are not limited to:
Under PRC employment laws, employees can exercise their right to democratic management through the employee representatives’ congress, which has the right to inspect the daily operation of the employer and is responsible for representing the employees’ legal interests.
The employee representatives shall be elected by employees; the specific proportion and number shall be determined in accordance with the implementation measures of the employee representatives’ congress of the enterprise, or determined by the enterprise through consultation with the trade union, but shall be no fewer than 30 people.
In most cases, employment terms and conditions are agreed and executed individually, but collective bargaining also takes place at both the enterprise level and the industry level. According to PRC employment laws, collective employment contracts shall be concluded between the employer and the trade union that represents employees (for an employer which has not established a trade union, the next higher-level trade union shall guide the representatives elected by the employees to conclude a collective contract with the employer) on matters relating to remuneration, working hours, rest and vacation/holidays, occupational safety and health, insurance and welfare; or specialised collective contracts on matters relating to occupational safety and health, female employees’ rights protection, salary adjustment mechanism, etc while requiring that the draft be submitted to the employee representatives’ congress or all employees for discussion. Currently, most collective contracts are negotiated at the enterprise level, and collective contracts are more common in enterprises in the manufacturing and retail industries.
The collective contract shall be submitted to the labour administrative department after being concluded, and shall become effective after the lapse of 15 days from the date of receipt by the labour administrative department unless any objections to the contract are raised.
The PRC employment laws set strict limitations on employment relationship terminations, and there is no concept of “termination at will” for full-time employees. The statutory grounds can be divided as follows.
Non-fault Termination
Termination upon mutual agreement
An employment contract may be terminated upon mutual agreement between the employer and the employee, and the employer is obliged to pay the employee the statutory severance.
Unilateral termination by the employer
An employer is entitled to unilaterally terminate the employment contract with 30 days’ prior written notice or one month’s salary in lieu, and with statutory severance pay:
Unilateral termination by an employee (ie, resignation)
An employee has the right to unilaterally terminate the employment contract by giving his/her employer three days՚ prior written notice during the probation period. After completion of the probation period, an employee may terminate his/her employment contract upon 30 days’ prior written notice to the employer.
Fault Termination
Unilateral termination by the employer
An employer is entitled to unilaterally terminate the employment contract of an employee without prior notice or any severance pay under any of the following circumstances:
Unilateral termination by the employee
If any of the following circumstances occurs, an employee may terminate the employment contract immediately and is entitled to statutory severance paid by the employer:
End of Employment
An employment contract will be ended when any of the following occurs:
(a) the term of the employment contract expires;
(b) the employee starts to take his/her pension entitlement or the employee reaches legal retirement age;
(c) the employee is dead or declared dead or missing by the People’s Court of the PRC;
(d) the employer is declared bankrupt;
(e) the employer has its business licence revoked, is ordered to close down or decides on early dissolution; or
(f) any other situation stipulated by applicable PRC laws.
Under circumstances (a), (d) and (e), the employer shall pay the employee statutory severance.
Economic Layoffs
If an employer is reducing its workforce by 20 persons or more, or by 10% or more of the total number of its employees, the termination ground of economic layoff can be invoked under any of the following circumstances:
Before the layoffs, the employer has to follow the procedural requirements as stipulated in the Employment Contract Law as follows:
Notice Period
Whether prior notice is necessary depends on the specific statutory ground for the termination. As per 7.1 Grounds for Termination for the circumstances listed under “Unilateral termination by employer” in the “Fault Termination” section, an employee must be given 30 days’ prior written notice or one month’s salary in lieu of notice. An employee shall also give prior notice to the employer upon resignation.
In the case of economic layoffs, an employer shall explain the situation to the trade union or all of its employees 30 days in advance (which can be regarded as a form of prior notice) and seek their opinions before reporting the proposed layoffs to local administrative authorities.
Additionally, though not required by the Employment Contract Law, some local regulations in cities such as Beijing require the employer to give prior notice (or salary in lieu of notice) to employees when the term of an employment contract expires and the employer decides not to renew it.
Severance
Please refer to 7.1 Grounds for Termination and the list of termination grounds on which the employee is entitled to severance pay.
Generally, statutory severance is calculated as one month՚s salary for every year of service of the employee. Since the Employment Contract Law took effect on 1 January 2008, statutory severance pay must be calculated in two parts:
Procedural Requirements for Termination
The requirements to be observed include:
Under PRC employment laws, dismissal for serious cause is generally understood as Article 39 of the Employment Contract Law; see 7.1 Grounds for Termination, “Unilateral termination by the employer” in the “Fault Termination” section. Among the circumstances listed, the second bullet point, “where the employee has seriously violated internal policies of the employer” is the most commonly used one in practice. For an employer to successfully terminate an employee for serious violation of the employer’s internal policies, the following conditions must be met:
The employer also needs to fulfil the procedural requirements as summarised in 7.2 Notice Periods.
Normally, a written termination agreement will be reached between both parties upon mutual termination of the employment contract. There are no statutory requirements on the format or must-have terms regarding the termination agreement. According to the judicial interpretations, the release clause shall be generally enforceable as long as it does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations or fall under fraud, duress or exploitation of an unfavourable position.
An employer cannot unilaterally terminate the employment of employees in the following circumstances (unless termination is based on Article 39 of the Employment Contract Law):
In addition, if an employee falls into any of the above circumstances, the employment contract shall not be ended upon expiration of his/her employment contract. Instead, his/her employment contract must be extended until the relevant circumstance ceases to exist.
Employees who consider that they have been wrongfully dismissed may bring a wrongful dismissal claim to the judicial authorities; the grounds generally include:
If their claim is supported, the remedy will be either reinstatement of employment with back pay or a double severance payment.
Discrimination is prohibited by PRC employment law. The Labour Law generally provides that people should not be treated unfairly due to race, gender, religion, etc, and women should have equal rights of employment to men. Additionally, the PRC Employment Promotion Law provides that employees are entitled to equal employment, and individuals seeking employment shall not be discriminated against because of ethnicity, race, gender, religious belief, disability, and whether the individuals are from rural places. The PRC Law on the Protection of Rights and Interests of Women, which was newly amended and took effect on 1 January 2023, further ensures equal employment rights for female employees and prohibits discrimination against female employees. There are also specific regulations prohibiting discrimination against individuals who are hepatitis B carriers.
“Equal employment rights disputes” has been listed as a separate cause of action since 2019. Generally, individuals can file “equal employment rights disputes” lawsuits before the court requiring the company to bear the corresponding legal responsibilities. The burden of proof is usually on the individual to prove that the enterprise conducted discriminative actions. Remedies available to employees vary depending on the specific cause of action, while monetary compensation for economic loss and emotional loss in certain circumstances is the main remedy. Other possible remedies include requiring the enterprise to apologise to the individual publicly.
Currently in China, labour arbitration procedures are generally conducted onsite.
However, for court proceedings, online litigation is now widely used, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the Rules of Online Litigation of People’s Courts, the court may rely on the electronic litigation platforms to complete all or part of the litigation procedures of case docketing, mediation, exchange of evidence, questioning, court trial and service online.
The court shall decide whether to conduct an online court trial via video based on the opinions of the parties, the circumstances of the case, social impact, technical conditions and other factors. However, there are also circumstances where online court trials shall not apply, specifically:
Besides this, the arbitration committee and people’s court in some regions are also trying to provide an asynchronous hearing approach, which refers to hearings where the parties may choose to log on to the online arbitration/court platform at their own discretion within the time period specified by the arbitral committee/court to complete the hearing procedures (defence, investigation, adduction of evidence, cross-examination, etc. Under this approach, the parties may log on to the platform at different times to complete the relevant hearing procedures.
In China, most employment-related disputes are resolved under a two-stage framework, ie, labour arbitration followed by litigation. According to the PRC Employment Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law, before filing an employment dispute with a court, it is mandatory to submit the dispute to the competent local labour arbitration commission, an institution specialising in hearing employment dispute cases. If any party is unsatisfied with the arbitration award, except for certain situations where the arbitration award is final, the party is entitled to bring the lawsuit to the competent people’s courts (the first instance court and then the second instance court).
According to the PRC Employment Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law, where a labour dispute involves more than ten employees and the employees have the same claim, they may recommend their representatives to participate in the mediation, arbitration or litigation.
In addition to arbitration and litigation, an employer and employee are encouraged to consult with each other and to reach a mediation agreement on employment dispute settlement under PRC employment laws. Even if the employment disputes have been submitted to arbitration or litigation, an employer and employee still could negotiate and reach a mediation agreement, as long as the final arbitral award or court decision has not been made. The conciliation is not mandatory and must be based on both parties’ voluntary decision. The parties may choose to directly submit their employment disputes to arbitration without any pre-claim conciliation.
In addition, labour supervision is also an available option. According to the Regulation on Labour Security Supervision, any organisation or individual shall have the right to report to the labour supervisory authority (an administrative department responsible for the supervision of labour security administration) any act of violating labour laws, regulations or rules. The labour supervisory authority will accept the reports and complaints, and investigate, correct and impose punishment for any relevant acts.
Under PRC law, generally, the arbitration commission/court will not award the prevailing party attorney’s fee or other costs. However, there may be special rules; eg, according to a local rule in Shenzhen, where the employee is the prevailing party in a labour dispute arbitration or litigation case, the attorney’s fee paid by the employee may be borne by the employer while the maximum amount shall not exceed CNY5,000. The portion exceeding CNY5,000 shall be borne by the employee.
18th Floor, East Tower
World Financial Center
1 Dongsanhuan Zhonglu
Chaoyang District
Beijing
100020
People’s Republic of China
+86 010 5878 5161
+86 010 5878 5566
linda.liang@cn.kwm.com www.kwm.comWith the continuing uncertainties in the worldwide economy, China is also under the pressure of recurring economic downturn and thus redundancy has been more frequently seen in recent years. To promote and stabilise the economy, China has been launching new measures over the past year, bringing many developments to the market, including the labour market. Among the dynamics in the employment law area, the following are particularly noteworthy: (1) gradual implementation of postponed retirement ; (2) the newly amended PRC Company Law and its employment law complications; and (3) redundancy approaches commonly seen in practice and relevant judicial practice trends.
Gradual Implementation of “Postponed Retirement”
With the trends towards an increasingly ageing population and a decline in the working-age population, China is actively taking measures to address the population structure issue, including gradually implementing “postponed retirement”. This section aims to provide an overview of the background of postponed retirement, attempts in practice and the newly adopted decision on gradually raising the statutory retirement age.
Current statutory retirement age
According to the current PRC law, the statutory retirement ages for employees are generally 60 for male employees, 55 for female employees in managerial/technical positions, and 50 for female employees in non-managerial/technical positions. In addition to the default rule, the law sets some exceptions for certain groups of employees. For example, the statutory retirement ages are lowered for employees engaged in special types of work harmful to health (eg, work at a high temperature or underground) and employees who become incapacitated due to sickness or non-work-related injuries. There are also special rules for senior experts where the law permits them to raise their statutory retirement ages if certain conditions are met.
By contrast, the statutory retirement ages in most other countries are higher. For instance, the general retirement age in the European Union has been raised to 64, and the general retirement age is 66 in the United States and in the United Kingdom.
Background of the postponed retirement reform
With the increasing population ageing problem in China, there has been a growing gap between the relatively low statutory retirement age and the practical challenges. As a response to address this issue, postponed retirement has been proposed, and the necessity for reform keeps growing. The reasons mainly consist of the following:
Preparation for Postponed retirement reform
Discussions on the postponed retirement at the national level over the years
In 2008, a spokesman of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security (“Human Resource Ministry”) said that relevant departments are considering raising the statutory retirement age when circumstances permit.
In 2013, the third plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee passed a decision proposing to establish a fairer and more sustainable social security system, and to study and establish a policy on gradual extension of the retirement age. This was also the first official description of the postponed retirement policy at the national level.
In the following years, postponed retirement has been repeatedly mentioned by relevant authorities. In June 2021, the Human Resource Ministry proposed the principle of “gradual adjustment, flexible implementation, classified promotion and comprehensive consideration” for postponed retirement. Later, at the end of 2021, the State Council proposed, in a notice regarding elderly care service system planning, to “encourage professional and technical personnel to reasonably extend their service years in accordance with the principle of the employer’s demands and the voluntariness on the part of the employee”.
Then lately, in July 2024, the third plenary session of the 20th CPC Central Committee proposed that the implementation of the gradual policy for the retirement age shall be in a prudent and orderly manner and in accordance with the principles of voluntariness and flexibility.
Attempts in local practice regarding postponed retirement
There have been attempts made in local practice by some regions. Typically:
With the current attempts in local practice and the newly adopted decision on gradually raising the statutory retirement age introduced below, it is anticipated that detailed implementation rules and more local rules will be introduced soon.
The newly adopted decision on gradually raising the statutory retirement age at the national level
On September 13, 2024, the Standing Committee of the 14th National People’s Congress officially announced the decision on gradually raising the statutory retirement age at the national level. The decision adopted the Measures of the State Council on Gradual Raising of the Statutory Retirement Age ("Measures"), which will come into effect on January 1, 2025. According to the Measures, the statutory retirement age for male employees will be gradually raised from 60 to 63 in the course of 15 years starting 2025, while that for female employees will be raised from 55 to 58 and from 50 to 55, respectively. Below are the relevant key points from the Measures worth noting:
• New Statutory Retirement Ages: Starting from January 1, 2025, for male employees (original statutory retirement age 60), the new statutory retirement age will be gradually raised by one month of every four months’ period until it reaches 63. For female employees, if the original statutory retirement age is 55 (for female employees in managerial/technical positions), the new statutory retirement age will be gradually raised by one month of every four months’ period until it reaches 58; If the original statutory retirement age is 50 (for female employees in non-managerial/technical positions), the new statutory retirement age will be gradually raised by one month of every two months’ period until it reaches 55. For example, under the newly published Measures, a male employee born in January 1970 who originally scheduled to reach the statutory retirement age of 60 in January 2030, will reach the raised statutory retirement age of 61 years and 4 months in May 2031 as the statutory retirement age for male employees raised by one month for every four months from January 1, 2025.
• Flexibility in Retirement Time under the Measures: Despite of the postponement of the statutory retirement age, under the newly published Measures, employees will still have some flexibility regarding their retirement timing. Where an employee has met the minimum contribution period for pension insurance, the employees may voluntarily opt for early retirement, provided that the period for early retirement does not exceed 3 years, and the actual retirement age should not be lower than the original statutory retirement age (ie 60 for male and 50/55 for female). Employees may also, after consultation and reaching agreement with their employer, opt for postponed retirement provided that the period for postponed retirement does not exceed 3 years. For example, a male employee with the new statutory retirement age of 62 can voluntarily choose to retire at a time between the ages of 60 and 62, or, after consultation and reaching agreement with his employer, choose to postpone his retirement at a time between the ages of 62 and 65. The Measures also emphasizes that during the implementation, it is not allowed to illegally force employees to choose the retirement age directly or in a disguised form against their will.
• Increasing the Minimum Contribution Period for Pension Insurance ("Minimum Contribution Period"): The current Minimum Contribution Period for employees to receive pension benefits is 15 years. According to the Measures, starting from January 1, 2030, the Minimum Contribution Period will increase by six months each year, until it reaches to 20 years. For employees who have reached their statutory retirement age while have not met the Minimum Contribution Period, they can satisfy the requirement of the Minimum Contribution Period either by extending the contribution period or by making a one-time contribution in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations.
To sum up, after preparation for postponed retirement reform for years, the newly adopted decision marks the official implementation of China's postponed retirement reform effective from January 1, 2025.
Summary
To sum up, with the official adoption of the decision at the national level on postponed retirement reform, the China's postponed retirement reform has officially entered a new stage. It can be anticipated that more supporting regulations and rules will be released both at the national level and regional level. Both employers and employees are advised to pay ongoing attention to relevant policies and judicial practices.
Newly Amended PRC Company Law and its Employment Law Implications
The newly amended PRC Company Law (“New Company Law”) just came into effect on 1 July 2024. The revision this time is the second comprehensive revision of the Company Law since its first promulgation in 1993, introducing substantial changes to various aspects, including capital system, corporate governance structure, senior executives’ liabilities, etc.
The New Company Law also has implications for the employment law area. In addition to protecting employees’ rights and interests to a higher level, the New Company Law further expands the breadth and depth of employees’ participation in the democratic management of the company, and improves the requirements on duties of directors, supervisors and senior executives. Below we highlight the key implications of the New Company Law to the employment law area.
Strengthening employees’ participation in corporate governance
Defining the Employee Representative Congress (“ERC”) as the basic form of democratic management system
According to Article 17 of the New Company Law, companies shall, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws, establish and improve a democratic management system, with the ERC as the basic form. Democratic management shall be carried out through the ERC or other forms. Compared with the previous Company Law, the New Company Law makes it clear that the ERC shall be the basic form of democratic management.
In addition, according to Article 17, when making a decision on restructuring, dissolution, application for bankruptcy or any other major issue in respect of business operation, or formulating any important regulation, a company shall listen to the opinions of its trade union and listen to the opinions and proposals of the employees through the ERC or by any other means. Among the instances of issues listed, “dissolution and application for bankruptcy” has been newly added by the New Company Law, which also chimes with the change to expand the scope of employees’ participation in corporate governance.
Expanding the scope where employee directors are required
To promote the participation of employee representatives in corporate governance, the rules on employee directors have been established since 1993 when the Company Law was first introduced. However, for a long time, the law only stipulated that certain state-owned limited liability companies had to have employee representatives on the board of directors (“BOD”). The New Company Law expands the scope of companies required to have employee directors, specifically:
In short, according to the New Company Law, for large companies (over 300 employees), an employee director is required unless there is already an employee supervisor.
Setting new requirements for the BOS and employee representatives thereon
The BOS was previously one of the standing supervisory bodies of the company; however, according to the New Company Law, it is no longer a body mandatorily required for a company, and the powers may be exercised by audit committees established under the BOD.
If the company has a BOS, the legal requirements for the proportion of employee representatives on the BOS (no less than one-third) remain the same. However, where the company does not set a BOS (or alternatively a supervisor where permitted by law), the New Company Law does not require the audit committee to include employee representatives; rather, the law only stipulates that employee directors can be included in the audit committee.
A noteworthy point
In view of the above changes, a problem arises where the company has more than 300 employees while there is no BOD (eg, companies with a small number of shareholders) but only an executive director. Does the only director have to be an employee representative?
Some hold the view that the New Company Law only requires an employee director if the company has a BOD. If there is no BOD but only an executive director, it is not reasonable to require that the director shall be an employee representative, as it will interfere with the management of the company. Therefore, to answer the above question, the only director does not need to be an employee representative.
Note that, pursuant to the view above, if a company with more than 300 employees sets only one non-employee director, and the company does not set an employee supervisor, it remains unclear whether the company will face challenges from employees and relevant authorities for limited employee participation in corporate governance.
Enhanced liabilities of directors, supervisors and senior executives
Refining the requirements regarding the duty of loyalty and duty of diligence for directors, supervisors and senior executives
The New Company Law elaborates on the meanings of the duty of loyalty and the duty of diligence:
The New Company Law further improves the stipulations on connected transactions, acquisition of business opportunities that belong to the company, and competition with the company.
Strengthening the liabilities of directors, supervisors and senior executives regarding capital enrichment
Although capital enrichment is the obligation of shareholders, the New Company Law strengthens the liabilities of directors and supervisors in verifying and urging shareholders’ contributions, preventing improper capital reduction or distribution of profits to shareholders, etc.
In addition to the above, the New Company Law provides more detailed rules on the liabilities of directors, supervisors and senior executives in many other aspects, bringing more responsibilities to the directors, supervisors and senior executives when fulfilling their duties.
Summary
The New Company Law has wide-ranging and significant implications for the employment law area. On the one hand, the law sets stricter requirements for companies to protect employees’ rights and interests, enhance the democratic management system, ensure employees’ participation in corporate governance, and other aspects. On the other hand, the new law imposes more detailed requirements on the responsibilities of directors, supervisors and senior executives, of which individuals serving in relevant positions should be fully aware.
Approaches to Redundancy Commonly Seen in Practice and Relevant Judicial Practice Trends
PRC employment law is more protective to employees than employers and sets strict requirements on employers regarding employment contract termination. Affected by factors including the external economic situation, many employers in China are facing cost pressures and thus are considering adjusting the internal organisational structure and reducing the number of employees. As a result, redundancy has been seen more frequently in practice. Disputes regarding redundancy have also occurred from time to time, and some cases later ended up at courts as unlawful termination, which did not achieve the purpose of cost saving but instead further increased the lawsuits burden. This section aims to introduce the commonly seen approaches to redundancy under PRC employment law and relevant judicial practice trends.
Approaches to redundancy under PRC employment law
Among the statutory termination grounds under PRC law, the grounds that are most relevant to mass layoff generally consist of the following:
(1) termination based on major change to the objective circumstances (Article 40(3) of PRC Employment Contract Law);
(2) economic layoff (Article 41 of PRC Employment Contract Law);
(3) employment contract ending upon dissolution of the employer (Article 44(5) of PRC Employment Contract Law); and
(4) mutual termination (Article 36 of PRC Employment Contract Law)
Approach (3) can only be revoked upon dissolution of the employer and thus the situations to which it applies are limited. Approach (4) is subject to the employees’ consent, and even though it is commonly adopted as the final approach to redundancy, there should be another unilateral termination ground as a backup in case the employee does not agree. In light of this, approaches (1) and (2) are generally the two commonly considered unilateral termination grounds in practice for mass layoff.
Termination based on major change to the objective circumstances
According to Article 40(3) of the Employment Contract Law, the following conditions must be met in order to successfully invoke this termination ground:
(1) There has been a major change in objective circumstances resulting in the consequence that an employment contract can no longer be performed;
(2) The employer and the employee could not reach an agreement on amending the employment contract; and
(3) The employer has provided 30 days’ prior notice of unilateral termination or made payment in lieu of notice (in the amount of the monthly salary of the month preceding that of the unilateral termination).
Disputes are more likely to arise regarding the first two conditions, and judicial practice also varies from place to place.
Major change to the objective circumstances
In terms of what constitutes a major change in objective circumstances, according to the national rule, situations are defined narrowly to mainly include force majeure, relocation of the employer, merger, or transfer of assets of the employer.
Some local rules and regulations further specify the situations that constitute a major change in objective circumstances. For example, according to the local regulations of Beijing, “major change to the objective circumstances” mainly include: (1) a force majeure event due to a natural disaster such as earthquake, fire or flood; (2) significant changes due to legal, regulatory or policy shifts leading to relocation, asset transfers or restructuring; and (3) changes in the business scope of government-authorised business.
When considering redundancy, many employers will argue that organisational restructuring and the removal of positions/departments also constitute “major change to the objective circumstances”. Local practices vary on this point:
Failure to reach agreement on amendments to the employment contract
If there is a major change in objective circumstances, the employer has to try to reach an agreement with the employee on amending the employment contract, often by providing another reasonable position (same pay level, similar responsibilities) within the employer to the employee, and only after the employee refuses to accept the position can the employer proceed to unilaterally dismiss the employee. Judicial practice may also vary regarding the reasonableness of the alternative position. Factors that will generally be considered include the salary standard, working location, job responsibilities, etc.
Economic layoff
Article 41 of the PRC Employment Contract Law contains the requirements for economic layoff. According to Article 41, when the production and operation of an employer face severe difficulties, and if it is necessary for the employer to terminate at least 20 employees, or if the employer terminates fewer than 20 employees but they account for at least 10% of all employees, the employer should inform and consult the trade union or all the employees 30 days in advance of the layoff. Prior to layoff, it is also required that the employer should file the economic layoff plan and other required documents to the local labour bureau, and if the filing is accepted by the local labour bureau, the employer can then proceed to unilateral termination based on economic layoff.
In recent years, employers have grown much more interested in exploring the possibilities of utilising economic layoff.
Below we look at two of the conditions for economic layoff that can best demonstrate the new developments and judicial practice trends.
An employer needs to have a required economic circumstance
There are four economic circumstances that will allow an employer to conduct economic layoff, and the employer’s situation must fall under one of the circumstances in order to be considered eligible. Judicial practices in different regions may vary on the standards applied to specific circumstances. For example, with respect to “severe difficulties in operations”, in some cities (such as Shanghai), it is required that an employer should have been in a deficit for the last three years in a row before being considered as having severe difficulties in operations, while in other cities, the requirements may not be as strict.
Filing to the local labour bureau should be accepted
Filing with the local labour bureau is a procedural requirement for implementing economic layoff; if the filing submitted by the employer to the local labour bureau is not accepted, the employer will not be able to implement economic layoff. The severity of the filing review varies from place to place in practice. For example, the redundancy plan will be strictly reviewed by the authorities in Shanghai, where the probability of acceptance is very low. The review in Beijing is comparatively loose, and the employers might only need to provide the relevant financial statements, audit reports and other supporting documents.
The acceptance of filing by the local labour bureau does not guarantee the lawfulness of economic layoff (since the local labour bureau for acceptance will not carry out substantive examination of the materials). Even if a filing had been accepted by the local labour bureau, arbitrators and judges would still consider and determine whether the termination is lawful or not, once challenged by employees. However, that being said, in practice, if the filing to the local labour bureau is accepted, this can increase the success rate of economic layoff when employees challenge it through arbitration and litigation.
Summary
With many constantly evolving factors and requirements in practice, termination based on major change to the objective circumstances and economic layoff are quite research-worthy topics. When considering mass layoff in practice, employers are advised to select an appropriate approach according to their actual situations and also the local practices, and ensure that the termination is in line with PRC law requirements.
Conclusion
The issues addressed in this article, including the postponed retirement reform, the employment law implications of the newly amended Company Law, together with commonly seen approaches to redundancy and relevant practices, represent just a snapshot of the ongoing trends and developments in PRC employment law. Employers are encouraged to consider these topics carefully and stay focused on further changes and developments to ensure ongoing compliance and effective management.
18th Floor, East Tower
World Financial Center
1 Dongsanhuan Zhonglu
Chaoyang District
Beijing
100020
People’s Republic of China
+86 010 5878 5161
+86 010 5878 5566
linda.liang@cn.kwm.com www.kwm.com