There are two formally recognised employment categories, namely “workers” and “employees”.
Workers
Workers, as defined by the Nigerian Labour Act, encompass those who perform manual labour or clerical work. This category includes casual workers, contract staff and part-time workers. They may engage in physical tasks like construction, manufacturing and maintenance. Workers are entitled to the basic minimum protections prescribed under the Labour Act. Accordingly, employment contracts issued to workers are required to comply with the statutory minimum terms and conditions set out therein. In any instance where a contract of employment with a worker fails to meet such requirements, the relevant provisions of the Labour Act shall prevail.
Employees
Under the Labour Act, any individual engaged in administrative, executive, technical or professional functions is not a worker and is not covered under the Labour Act. Such persons are commonly referred to as employees. They typically work under formal employment contracts. Examples include full-time managers, engineers and lawyers.
Other Statuses
Apart from employees and workers, independent contractors form another significant category within the Nigerian labour market. These individuals, such as freelancers, operate without formal employee status or the full statutory protections provided to workers. They negotiate contracts for specific services and operate more independently within their respective professions.
There are three basic types of employment contracts.
Requirement of Contracts
Section 7 of the Labour Act requires employers to issue a written contract to workers within three months of starting the employment relationship.
For employees, while there is no statutory requirement for contracts to be in writing, it is highly advisable to have written contracts. Written contracts provide clarity and serve as a reference point, forming the basis of the formal employment relationship between the parties.
The Labour Act does not stipulate maximum working hours for workers. However, guidance is generally derived from the ILO Hours of Work Convention, 1919, which limits work hours in industrial undertakings to eight hours per day and 48 hours per week.
The Labour Act also permits flexible arrangements, stating that normal working hours can be determined:
Flowing from the above, the Labour Act allows for flexible working arrangements within the legal limit of eight hours per day.
It is important to note that the Labour Act generally prohibits women and young persons from engaging in night work in the industrial and agricultural sectors. Therefore, flexible working arrangements must adhere to these restrictions.
While the Labour Act specifically applies to workers, it is generally expected to serve as a guideline for employers when setting work hours.
Terms Required for Part-Time Contracts
Section 7 of the Labour Act requires the inclusion of the following terms for workers:
Employers may adopt similar terms for part-time employees.
Overtime
The Labour Act defines overtime as any work performed beyond the normal working hours stipulated in the agreement or contract between the employer and employee. The Labour Act does not mandate a specific limit on overtime hours or prescribe a set rate for overtime pay.
Regulation on overtime is minimal beyond this definition. Generally, the preferred approach is for the employer and employee to mutually agree on the rate of overtime compensation in the employment contract.
The Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) has approved a new minimum wage threshold for Nigerian workers. This new development was confirmed in the statement from the Office of the Minister of Information announced on Thursday, 18 July 2024. The Executive Bill for this wage adjustment was presented to the National Assembly by Tuesday, 23 July 2024. The National Minimum Wage, as approved by the federal government, is NGN70,000 (USD43).
Thirteenth-month salaries and bonuses are not stipulated benefits under the law. These payments are typically outlined in employment contracts and can be determined by mutual agreement between the employer and employee. The agreement between the parties also determines whether such payments shall be mandatory or at the discretion of the employer, and under which circumstances they may be paid.
Vacation/Leave in Nigeria
The Labour Act outlines the following provisions regarding leave and benefits.
While the provisions of the Act specifically cover workers, the National Industrial Court (NIC) often uses them as a standard for leave benefits for employees in Nigeria. Employers are also encouraged to adhere to international standards and best practices as the NIC has statutory authority to apply ratified international laws in its judgments.
Limitations on Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Agreements
Nigeria does not have statutory provisions addressing confidentiality and non-disparagement agreements comprehensively. However, the NIC generally considers the following limitations when evaluating the enforceability of such agreements.
Employee Liability for Breach of Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Agreements
An employee may incur the following liabilities.
Limitation of liability
For these liabilities to apply, the employer must be able to demonstrate that a breach occurred and provide evidence of the damages incurred or profits obtained by the employee.
Requirement of Reasonableness for the Validity of Non-Compete Clauses
Nigerian courts emphasise the importance of reasonableness in non-compete agreements. The restrictions imposed by any such clause – such as geographic scope, duration and the specific line of business being restricted – must be fair and balanced. The terms must be clearly defined and proportionate to protect the legitimate business interests of the employer.
Enforcement of Non-Compete Clauses
The enforceability of non-compete clauses hinges on their reasonableness and their necessity to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests, rather than merely stifling competition. Each case is evaluated on its merits. For instance, in the case of Lacasera Company v Mr Prahad Gangadharan, the court deemed a non-compete clause invalid and unfair for prohibiting the employee from accepting any job in a similar field for five years post-employment. Similarly, in 7th Heaven Bistro Limited v Mr Amit, the NIC ruled against a three-year non-compete clause deemed excessively restrictive and unfair.
Courts assess factors such as the nature of the employer’s business, the employee’s access to confidential information or trade secrets, and the impact of the restriction on the employee’s ability to earn a livelihood.
Non-solicitation clauses in employment contracts are designed to prevent former employees from enticing current employees to leave the company and join a competitor or a new business venture. Non-solicitation clauses relating to customers prevent former employees from contacting or soliciting the former employer’s clients, customers or business contacts after they leave the company. These clauses are essential for protecting the company’s business relationships, workforce and client base.
For non-solicitation clauses to be enforceable, they must be reasonable in scope, duration and geographical area. The Nigerian courts typically seek to ensure that these clauses are not overly restrictive and do not unfairly limit an individual’s ability to work. For instance, in the case of Infinity Tyres Limited v Mr Sanjay Kumar & 3 Others (Unreported Suit No NICN/LA/170/2014), the NIC emphasised the importance of specificity and reasonableness in non-solicitation clauses. The court noted that while it could have upheld the clause if it specified the industry or company to which the restraint applied, it ultimately rejected the clause for being overly broad. The clause attempted to prevent Mr Kumar from taking up any employment in Nigeria, which the court found unreasonable and non-specific.
Nigeria does not have a comprehensive regulation specifically protecting data privacy in the workplace. However, several existing laws can be applied to address data privacy protection in the workplace.
Foreign employees and companies hiring foreign employees must obtain the necessary permits, including an expatriate quota, a visa, and a Combined Expatriate Residence Permit and Aliens Card (CERPAC) or temporary work permit, depending on the duration of the work.
Employers must facilitate skill transfer from expatriates to local employees through training programmes to enable Nigerians to take over such positions after a period. The government enforces local content policies, especially in sectors like oil and gas, to prioritise Nigerian employment. Companies must prove they have conducted labour market testing to show the unavailability of local talent before hiring expatriates.
Business Permit
A Business Permit is a statutory approval issued by the Federal Ministry of Interior that allows a foreign-owned company to legally operate and engage in business activities in Nigeria. It is a prerequisite for companies with any level of foreign participation before applying for expatriate quotas or employing foreign nationals.
Expatriate Quota
Companies intending to employ expatriates must register and obtain an expatriate quota from the Ministry of Interior.
Combined Expatriate Residence Permit and Aliens Card (CERPAC)
Foreign employees employed by a Nigerian company must register with the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS) upon arrival and obtain a CERPAC. This serves as both a residence permit and a work authorisation document.
ECOWAS Residence Card
Foreign nationals from ECOWAS member states are exempt from the CERPAC requirement. In place of this, they must obtain an ECOWAS Residence Card, which authorises them to live and work in Nigeria in accordance with the ECOWAS Protocol on Free Movement of Persons, Residence and Establishment.
E-Migrant Registration
Foreign employees must also complete e-migrant registration with the NIS. This involves providing personal details, employment information and any other relevant documentation required by the NIS.
There are no specific regulations regarding mobile work in Nigeria.
Data Privacy
While there is no specific law on data privacy during mobile work, the NDPR requires organisations to protect personal data collected or processed within Nigeria. Employers must ensure that data accessed or processed during mobile work is handled in compliance with this regulation. Employees must also be informed about how their data will be collected, used and protected.
Occupational Safety and Health
Employers are required under the Factories Act and the Labour Act to ensure the safety and health of their employees, including those engaged in mobile work. Employers must conduct risk assessments for mobile work environments and provide necessary safety equipment and training to mitigate risks. Employees must also adhere to safety protocols and report any hazards encountered during mobile work.
There is no specific national legislation governing sabbaticals, but they are a well-established practice in academia and public service.
Public Sector
In the Nigerian public sector, under the provision of the Public Service Rules, officers on Grade Level 15 and above are eligible for a one-year sabbatical leave.
Academic Institutions
Sabbatical leave is most common in academic institutions. Universities and research centres typically grant sabbatical leave to faculty members for research, further education or other scholarly activities. This leave is usually granted every seven years for a duration of up to one year.
Private Sector
Some progressive private sector companies may offer sabbatical leave as part of their employee benefits package or may grant such on request. This leave can be used for personal growth, for skill development or to prevent burnout.
There is no regulatory provision with regard to desk sharing; however, since the COVID-19 pandemic, many private employers that have designed remote work policies have added desk sharing as part of the policy in order to manage office space.
Trade unions play a significant role in the labour market in Nigeria, serving as vital intermediaries between workers, employees and employers. They have a strong historical presence and continue to influence labour relations, workplace conditions and labour laws. Once a union is duly registered by the Registrar of Unions, it gains recognition under Nigerian law and possesses the legal authority to exercise various powers as stipulated by the Trade Unions Act, including negotiation and advocacy, dispute resolution, legal representation in disputes, etc.
Role of Unions
Trade unions are involved in the following:
See 6.1 Unions.
Collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) are legally binding contracts negotiated between employers and labour unions or representatives on behalf of employees. These agreements record the terms and conditions of employment, including the following:
The process of negotiating a CBA involves both parties bargaining in good faith to reach mutually acceptable terms that balance the interests of labour and management. They are enforceable under Nigerian labour law and provide a framework for resolving disputes through agreed-upon procedures, thereby promoting harmonious employer–employee relations.
In Nigeria, CBAs are recognised in both public and private employment.
Motive for Termination of Employment
Previously, the law on termination was that motive was irrelevant as long as the terms of the contract were complied with, and an employer had the right to terminate an employee’s contract either with or without reason, provided this was done within the ambit of the law and the clearly stated provisions of the employment contract. That position has, however, shifted, with the NIC specifying that an employer must now provide a valid reason for such termination connected with the capacity or conduct of the worker or based on the operational requirements of the undertaking, establishment or service, as held in Duru v Skye Bank Plc and Aloysius v Diamond Bank Plc.
Procedure for Dismissal
An employer has the right to terminate an employment contract through dismissal without notice in cases of gross misconduct, as defined by common law. This right is typically outlined in the employment contract, which specifies the grounds for such dismissal. Commonly reaffirmed grounds under Nigerian law include fraud, criminal conduct, professional misconduct, incapacity, dishonesty, etc. The procedural requirements for dismissal vary depending on the grounds for termination.
Performance-related dismissal
The procedure for performance-related dismissal is as follows.
Misconduct-related dismissal
The procedure for misconduct-related dismissal is as follows.
Generally, where the employment contract has set out the procedure, it should be followed, and the employers must ensure they align with best practices and legal standards.
Collective Redundancies
Collective redundancies are permitted and recognised under Nigerian law. The Labour Act, which is the primary legislation regulating labour and employment, defines redundancy as an involuntary and permanent loss of employment caused by excess manpower. Flowing from this, various reasons have been accepted/endorsed by the Nigerian courts as being valid grounds for redundancy, including technological advancement.
Procedure for Collective Redundancies
The Labour Act outlines the steps an employer must take in the event of redundancy.
The above procedure applies to workers as defined by the Labour Act.
For employees
In the case of employees, redundancies are regulated by the terms of the employment contract, the CBA (if applicable) and the company’s handbook (collectively referred to as the “Documents”). When a dispute arises, the court will enforce the terms of these Documents.
Additionally, with the NIC’s growing reliance on international best practices, employers are encouraged to observe the provisions of the International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No 158 on the Termination of Employment, particularly where the contract or internal policy is silent. This Convention provides for:
Though Nigeria has not ratified ILO Convention No 158, the NIC has in several decisions applied its principles, thereby making compliance a matter of best practice and risk mitigation.
Entitlements for workers
For workers, entitlements will be determined by the outcome of negotiations between the trade union/employee representatives and the employer.
The law states that the removal of an employee by redundancy does not entitle them to any benefits beyond those specified in the employment contract. Therefore, the entitlements of an employee declared redundant are strictly as agreed in the contract. If the employment contract or applicable document specifies redundancy payments or benefits, the employer must comply with these terms; otherwise, it may constitute a breach of contract.
However, where the contract is silent, it is advisable to negotiate redundancy benefits as required under ILO Convention No 158.
Notice Period
The Labour Act provides statutory notice periods for workers in Nigeria. The length of the notice period typically depends on the worker’s length of service and the terms specified in the employment contract. According to the Labour Act, the notice periods are as follows:
For employees, the notice periods are generally defined under the employment contract. However, most employers are guided by the provisions of the Labour Act in defining their notice periods.
Formalities to be Observed
Written notice
The notice of termination must be in writing.
Employment contract
The employment contract may specify certain formalities to be observed in the case of termination. Where this is the case, the employer must carry out all the necessary formalities.
Payment in lieu of notice
By virtue of Sections 11 (6) and (9) of the Labour Act, employers can terminate employment immediately by paying the worker for the notice period instead of requiring them to work through it. The same applies for employees if so provided under the employment contract. The termination notice must inform the employee of this.
Payment of outstanding benefits
The employer is required to pay any outstanding benefits, including:
Severance Pay
The Labour Act does not mandate severance pay for general terminations. However, the terms of the employment contract or CBA may stipulate severance pay and, in such cases, the employer is obligated to comply with those terms. Many employment contracts include clauses that provide for severance pay in the event of termination, especially for higher-level employees or where CBAs are in place. Employers must adhere to these contractual obligations.
Furthermore, in cases of redundancy, the Labour Act requires that redundancy payments be negotiated with the trade union or workers’ representatives. The specific amount and terms of redundancy pay are not defined by law but can be determined through negotiations between the employer and the workers’ representatives.
While external advice is not legally required for terminating employment, it is often advisable for employers to seek legal counsel before proceeding with termination to ensure compliance with relevant laws and reduce the possibility of wrongful termination claims. For mass lay-offs and redundancies, notifying the relevant labour authorities may be necessary.
Summary Dismissal
Summary dismissal is the immediate termination of an employee’s contract without notice due to serious misconduct or significant failure in performance. This is justified under common law based on the employee’s conduct or capabilities. The Nigerian case Jombo v Petroleum Equalisation Fund (Management Board) & Others highlights the distinction between termination and dismissal: ‘‘termination’’ or ‘‘dismissal’’ of an employee by the employer means bringing the employment to an end. Under a termination of appointment, the employee is enabled to receive the terminal benefits under the contract of employment. Dismissal, on the other hand, is punitive and, depending on the contract of employment, very often entails a loss of terminal benefits.
Generally, where the employment contract has set out the procedure, the contract specifies a procedure for dismissal, and it must be strictly followed. Employers must ensure the procedure outlined under the contract is in alignment with best practices and legal standards.
The procedural requirements for dismissal vary depending on the grounds for termination.
Performance-related dismissal
The procedure for performance-related dismissal is as follows:
Misconduct-related dismissal
The procedure for misconduct-related dismissal is as follows:
Consequences
Failure to follow the appropriate process or lack of valid grounds for dismissal can lead to several adverse outcomes.
Termination agreements are permissible in Nigeria. They stand as legally binding contracts between an employer and an employee that outline the terms and conditions of the employee’s departure from the company. Termination agreements must comply with the requirements/formalities of a contract under law. These include the following.
Limitations on Termination Agreement Terms
Non-disparagement clauses
Such clauses must not infringe on the employee’s freedom of speech to an unreasonable extent.
Confidentiality agreements
Any confidentiality clauses should be specific and not overly broad to avoid being considered unenforceable.
Restrictive covenants
Restrictive covenants such as non-compete or non-solicitation clauses must be reasonable in terms of duration, geographical scope and scope of activities restricted.
Waivers of future claims
The agreement cannot lawfully waive the employee’s right to bring future claims relating to issues that may arise after the agreement is signed.
Lay-offs and redundancies
In cases of mass lay-offs or redundancies, employers may need to comply with additional regulatory requirements, such as notifying the relevant labour authorities before concluding such termination agreements.
By virtue of Section 54 (4) of the Labour Act, employers are prohibited from terminating the contract of any female worker who is absent due to maternity leave, or who remains absent from her work for a longer period as a result of illness that arose out of her pregnancy or confinement and renders her unfit for work.
Furthermore, under the Guidelines for the Release of Staff in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry 2019, employers that hold an oil mining lease, licence or permit (or an interest therein) issued under the Petroleum Act or under regulations made pursuant to the Petroleum Act are required to obtain an approval from the Minister of Petroleum Resources (the “Minister”) for the dismissal of a worker. The Department of Petroleum Resources will conduct an inquiry into the circumstances of the proposed staff release and make a decision on whether to convey the Minister’s approval or otherwise.
The Staff Release Guidelines stipulate a penalty, not exceeding the sum of USD250,000, for failure to comply with the Staff Release Guidelines.
Wrongful dismissal claims can arise from several factors, including:
Consequences of Wrongful Dismissal Claim
Failure to follow the appropriate process or lack of valid grounds for dismissal can lead to several adverse outcomes.
Grounds for Claims of Discrimination
The NIC rules provide that where there is a claim of alleged workplace discrimination, the claimant shall state on which grounds the claim is based, which may include the following:
Burden of Proof
In Nigeria, the burden of proof for discrimination in the workplace primarily rests on the employee (the one who alleges the discrimination). The employee must provide sufficient evidence to support their claim of discriminatory practices by the employer. Once the employee establishes a prima facie case of discrimination, the burden shifts to the employer to provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the actions in question. The decision of the court is usually based on the balance of probabilities.
In termination cases where there is a claim of termination for discriminatory reasons, it is not for the employee to show that the termination was discriminatory; it is for the employer to justify the said termination. The law is that once an employer gives a reason for terminating or dismissing an employee, the burden lies with the employer to justify the said reason (Angel Shipping & Dyeing Ltd v Ajah (2000) 13 NWLR (Pt. 685) 551 CA).
Virtual Hearings and Remote Court Sittings
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the NIC was prompted to commence virtual hearings, as recommended by the Court of Appeal. Following this, the NIC Practice Directions of 2020 included provisions for virtual proceedings. The NIC continues to practise virtual hearings, allowing parties to participate in their proceedings from any part of the country via their website.
The NIC encourages and promotes virtual court sittings (also referred to as “remote court sittings” or “online court sittings”) for matters that do not require the taking of evidence.
E-filing Centre
The NIC Rules, Order 6A, establishes an E-filing Centre for electronic filing and the payment of filing fees for processes and documents relating to or connected with a matter before the court.
It provides that a party or counsel to a party may e-file any process or document that may be filed with the court in paper form, except:
Specialised Employment Forums
The NIC is the primary forum for employment disputes in Nigeria. As established by the 1999 Nigerian Constitution (Third Alteration) Amendment Act 2010, it has exclusive jurisdiction over the following matters:
In furtherance of its authority, the NIC has established an additional forum for hearing employment disputes through means of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) – the NIC Alternative Dispute Resolution Centre. The NIC offers parties the option of ADR using two mechanisms – mediation and conciliation. The ADR Centre may handle:
Class Action Claims
Class action claims are permitted in employment disputes in Nigeria. According to Order 13 Rule 11 of the NIC Rules, if numerous persons have the same interest in one suit, one or more such persons may sue or be sued on behalf of all interested parties.
Representation in Court
In employment litigation before the NIC, parties can be represented by the following.
Arbitration in Employment Disputes
Where arbitration is provided under the employment contract as the means of dispute resolution, the parties may resort to arbitration to resolve any dispute arising from the employment contract. However, while such clauses may serve a guiding or persuasive role, they do not oust the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Industrial Court (NIC) of Nigeria. Parties are just given the avenue and possibility of settling their dispute amicably out of court. A party to an agreement with an arbitration clause has the option either to submit to arbitration or to have the dispute decided by court.
This position was confirmed by the NIC in Mr Ibitola Oludemi v Alcon Nigeria Limited (NICN/PHC/120/2022), where the defendant objected to the court’s jurisdiction on the grounds of an arbitration clause in the employment contract not being fulfilled. The court dismissed the objection, holding that the existence of such a clause does not bar a party from initiating proceedings before the NIC. The court stated clearly that “parties have the option to either submit to arbitration or to have their dispute decided by Court”, and concluded that it had the jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter.
In summary, while parties may include arbitration clauses in employment contracts, such provisions are not strictly enforceable, and either party may approach the NIC directly without first submitting the dispute to arbitration.
Arbitration Agreements
Arbitration agreements are enforceable in Nigeria where the court has jurisdiction. For the court to have jurisdiction over an application for recognition and enforcement of an award, one of the following conditions must be met:
A prevailing employee or employer can be awarded attorney’s fees or other costs. According to Order 55 of the NIC Civil Procedure Rules, the following rules apply to the award of costs in employment disputes.
15, Agodogba Avenue
Parkview
Ikoyi
Lagos
Nigeria
+234 1454 2130
enquiries@bloomfield-law.com www.bloomfield-law.comNigeria’s Employment Law Landscape in 2025: Quiet Evolution, Global Ambition
Nigeria’s employment law in 2025 is not standing still – it is quietly but steadily reshaping itself to meet the realities of a changing workplace. A careful blend of statutory reform, global labour standards and regulatory tightening is being seen, all moving towards a more modern and responsive system.
Recent milestones tell the story: the National Minimum Wage Amendment Act 2024 has both increased the wage floor and shortened the review cycle, creating more predictable upward adjustments. The Informal Sector Employment Agents (Registration & Licensing) Bill aims to bring structure to Nigeria’s vast informal workforce (one of the largest in Africa) while the Revised National Employment Policy 2025 refreshes the country’s employment blueprint to reflect international labour norms and the realities of the modern workplace. Even regulators, such as the National Pension Commission, have stepped up enforcement, tightening pension compliance across the board.
On the judicial front, the National Industrial Court of Nigeria continues to play an active role in shaping the workplace of tomorrow. Its progressive decisions (often in line with international practice) are steadily expanding the interpretation of employee rights and employer duties, ensuring that the law keeps pace with the shifting nature of work.
The picture that emerges is one of quiet but deliberate transformation. Nigeria’s labour framework is moving towards greater alignment with global best practices while grappling with uniquely local challenges. The following sections explore these developments in more detail, unpacking both their practical and strategic implications for employers and their advisers.
Statutory and Regulatory Trends
The National Minimum Wage (Amendment) Act 2024
Following extensive negotiations and agreement between the Nigerian federal government and labour unions, the National Minimum Wage Amendment Act 2024 was enacted in July 2024. This amendment increased the minimum wage from the previous sum of NGN30,000 to NGN70,000, and reduced the statutory review cycle from five to three years; the new minimum wage was to apply retroactively from 1 May 2024.
This long-awaited amendment better aligns wages with inflationary trends and the rising cost of living in Nigeria.
The Informal Sector Employment Agents (Registration & Licensing) Bill
The proposed Informal Sector Employment Agents (Registration & Licensing) Bill addresses the absence of structured legal protection for informal workers engaged through non-standard recruitment channels. The Bill also introduces licensing requirements for employment agents, operational guidelines, and penalties for non-compliance with labour standards.
If enacted, it will expand the protective scope of Nigerian labour law to millions of informal workers in domestic service, artisanal trades, internships and casual labour, many of whom currently operate without contracts, dispute resolution mechanisms, or access to social security schemes. The National Directorate of Employment (NDE) would have oversight and enforcement functions upon enactment.
The Bill passed second reading in May 2025 and is currently under committee review.
The Revised National Employment Policy 2025
The Revised National Employment Policy 2025 (the “NEP 2025”) presents a strategic reorientation of Nigeria’s labour agenda and signals a decisive shift from reactive labour management to anticipatory workforce planning. The NEP 2025 focuses on digital economy integration, green industry growth and remote work. It looks to address Nigeria’s widening skills gap through targeted vocational training, incentives for technology start-ups, and infrastructure investment to support online and platform-based enterprises. The NEP 2025 also acknowledges remote work as a legitimate mode of employment, with implications for taxation, social security and occupational safety in decentralised work environments.
The NEP 2025 will become significant, as it paves the way for future statutory definitions and protections tailored to geographically flexible labour relationships.
Pension reforms and compliance
The National Pension Commission (PenCom) issued two major directives in 2025 that jointly reshape the administration of retirement benefits and the compliance obligations of businesses engaging with pension-regulated entities.
Removal of PenCom pre-approval for retirement benefits
On 12 March 2025, PenCom reformed the approval and payment process under the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS). Previously, pension fund administrators (PFAs) were required to submit all retirement benefit applications to PenCom for approval before instructing pension fund custodians (PFCs) to make payments.
Since 1 June 2025, PFAs have independently processed and approved programmed withdrawals, annuities, voluntary contributions and other entitlements, and the PFCs are to disburse within 24 hours of receiving instructions to do so. PenCom’s approval remains necessary for depleted RSA cases and death benefits, but PFAs now bear direct responsibility for verifying compliance with PRA requirements before payment.
This reform accelerates benefit delivery and reduces the bureaucratic lag in the pension system.
Pension clearance certificate requirement for LPFO transactions
On 22 May 2025, PenCom issued a directive requiring all licensed pension fund operators (LPFOs) to ensure that vendors, service providers and counterparties are compliant with the Pension Reform Act 2014, through the presentation of a valid Pension Clearance Certificate (PCC).
By this directive, LPFOs are authorised to conduct business only with entities that can produce a PCC, making it the principal proof of compliance for pension remittance obligations. The requirement applies to operational contracts and financial transactions, establishing the PCC as a foundational condition for engagement across public and private sectors. A six-month transition period was provided before full enforcement, which allows organisations time to align internal processes.
By embedding pension compliance into commercial eligibility and routine corporate governance, the directive reinforces accountability, strengthens statutory adherence, and elevates the role of social security obligations within business operations.
Judicial Trends
Beyond legislative and policy reforms, the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) has been actively shaping the direction of Nigerian employment law through recent jurisprudence. These decisions are not only relevant domestically but offer valuable insights for multinational employers, cross-border counsel and investors who must navigate Nigeria’s rapidly evolving labour landscape. The following notable cases illustrate key principles that align Nigerian law with (or distinguish it from) international employment law standards.
Accrued leave: a mandatory right that cannot be forfeited
Sir Timothy Amobi Nwosu v Union Bank of Nigeria Plc (NICN/EN/54/2019, 20 June 2025)
In a decision with significant implications for workforce management policies, the NICN held that leave entitlements are a mandatory health-preserving right, not a discretionary perk. Even if an employee does not formally apply for leave, systemic failure to grant it constitutes a breach of contract. The court rejected arguments that expired collective agreements or employee inaction extinguish the entitlement.
Why this matters
Employers with global operations in Nigeria must note that “use it or lose it” leave policies common in some jurisdictions may be unenforceable locally. The ruling underscores that Nigerian law imposes a proactive obligation on employers to ensure that staff actually take leave – a standard that could affect compliance audits, HR practices and cross-border policy harmonisation.
Conversion of employment status: consent under duress is no consent
Ms Busayo Sodipe v Minnesota Nigeria Limited (NICN/LA/117/2017, 28 March 2025)
The court found fault with a restructuring exercise that converted permanent employees to contract status, finding that the claimant’s “agreement” was obtained under economic coercion. Permanent employment rights and accrued benefits cannot be unilaterally eroded, even in financial distress.
Why this matters
The judgment sends a clear warning that cost-saving measures and contractual changes in Nigeria will be closely scrutinised for genuine consent and procedural fairness. For multinationals, restructuring templates used elsewhere may need localisation to withstand Nigerian legal tests.
Currency of salary payments: contract terms override employer discretion
Mr Salim Ally Buckus v Greenstone Auto Repairs Limited and Others (NICN/LA/08/2018, 11 March 2025)
Where an employment contract specifies payment in a foreign currency, an employer cannot unilaterally switch to Nigerian naira, even during foreign exchange shortages. The NICN awarded compensation for exchange rate losses and upheld other contractual entitlements.
Why this matters
This is particularly relevant for expatriate contracts and international secondees. The ruling emphasises that Nigerian courts will enforce currency clauses notwithstanding regulatory or market constraints, heightening the need for careful drafting and contingency planning.
Next-of-kin versus legal heirs: administrative designation is not inheritance law
Olalekan Anthony Akande v Associated Maritime Services Ltd and Others (NICN/PHC/76/2021, 11 February 2025)
The court clarified that naming someone as “next-of-kin” in employment records does not override statutory inheritance rights. Legal heirs (typically spouses and children) take precedence in accessing terminal benefits.
Why this matters
HR teams in Nigeria should ensure that employee documentation aligns with estate planning laws. Relying solely on next-of-kin forms for benefits designation can create disputes and delay payments, especially for multinational firms managing death-in-service benefits.
Redundancy: lawful reason, wrongful execution
Charles Omenukwa v EnerMech Nigeria Limited (NICN/LAG/344/2021, 11 July 2025)
While the court accepted redundancy as a legitimate basis for termination, it still found the process wrongful for failure to pay contractual notice. The decision highlights that even valid restructuring reasons cannot excuse procedural breaches.
Why this matters
This aligns with global “substance + process” termination standards. Multinationals implementing redundancies in Nigeria must ensure both justification and strict adherence to notice/payment requirements.
Fixed-term contracts: no reason required for non-renewal
Mr Constantine Alimonos v Honeywell Flour Mills Plc (NICN/LA/161/2023, 28 July 2025)
The NICN confirmed that, in the absence of a renewal agreement, a fixed-term contract can end without stating a reason. However, failing to give the required notice may still constitute wrongful termination.
Why this matters
This reflects a stricter contractualist approach than in some jurisdictions where non-renewal can be scrutinised for fairness. Employers should ensure clear drafting of duration, renewal and notice provisions.
Jurisdiction over domestic work
SJ Abed General Enterprises Ltd v Mrs Patience Friday Emmanson (NICN/PHC/22/2019, 11 February 2025)
The court reaffirmed its jurisdiction over all workers, including domestic staff, but found no company liability where the engagement was purely personal to a director.
Why this matters
This reinforces that the NICN’s reach covers unconventional or informal work arrangements. Employers and individuals alike must be mindful that “private” engagements can still fall under Nigerian labour jurisdiction.
Workplace safety and co-employment liability
Bayem P Mirabel v Top Steel Nigeria Limited and Others (NICN/LA/570/2017, 24 July 2025)
The court held that both a principal employer and its contractor could be jointly liable for workplace injuries under a triangular employment relationship, where control and supervision were shared. The judgment also faulted the defendants for not complying with mandatory injury-reporting obligations under the Employees’ Compensation Act and the Factories Act.
Why this matters
Outsourcing does not dilute safety responsibilities. Employers in Nigeria, whether direct or indirect, must ensure protective equipment, safe working conditions, and compliance with statutory reporting. Neglecting these obligations can result in joint liability and damages, even where injuries are temporary.
Key themes
Several cross-cutting themes emerge from these decisions.
“Substance + process” (always both)
The NICN will accept legitimate business reasons – redundancy, restructuring, fixed-term expiries – but will still penalise procedural missteps (such as notice pay) and consent defects (such as coerced status conversions). Employers should not assume that commercial justifications alone will carry the day; execution must be immaculate.
Contract is king and courts will enforce it
From currency-of-pay clauses to accrued leave and gratuity, the NICN takes a strict contractualist approach: agreed terms are enforceable, and unilateral deviations (including FX-driven changes) attract liability. This resonates with common-law predictability while cautioning that operational convenience (or macroeconomic pressure) will not override clear drafting.
Rights with real teeth
The NICN treats certain protections (annual leave, fair treatment in restructurings, proper succession of benefits) as substantive rights, not mere HR policy. The court’s insistence that employers proactively ensure leave is taken, and that “next-of-kin” does not trump legal heirs, are examples of rights being operationalised in ways that directly affect payroll, policy, and benefits administration.
The fixed-term contract exception
While the NICN has consistently required employers to justify terminations, especially in permanent employment and in line with international labour standards, it appears that this principle may not apply strictly to fixed-term contracts. In such cases, if the agreement permits termination on notice (or by other stipulated means), the employer may end the contract without stating a reason, and this will not amount to unfair labour practice. This creates a narrow but important carve-out from the “no-reason-no-termination” trend.
Shared duty, shared liability
The NICN treats workplace safety as a non-delegable duty, meaning that principal employers and contractors alike can be held jointly liable where both exercise control over work conditions. Subcontracting or outsourcing does not insulate from liability; all statutory safety, equipment and injury-reporting obligations apply across the employment chain. For employers with multi-tier labour structures, compliance must cascade through all operational layers.
Practical Takeaways for Multinational Employers and Counsel in Nigeria
Draft with precision and prepare for stress scenarios
Contracts and HR policies should be watertight and tailored to Nigerian legal realities. Where salaries are denominated in foreign currency, include clear foreign exchange (FX) contingency clauses that specify conversion rates, fallback payment mechanisms, or indexed values in the event of currency shortages. For termination provisions, set out notice periods in unambiguous terms and link them to practical payment timelines. For leave entitlements, expressly state the employer’s obligation to schedule and enforce leave – this is not just an administrative task, it is a legal duty.
Review “conversion” exercises and fixed-term contracts carefully
Any change from permanent to contract status must be supported by genuine and uncoerced consent. Economic pressure or implied threats can render employee “agreement” invalid. Similarly, for fixed-term contracts, ensure that expiry and renewal processes align with notice requirements and that contractual language leaves no ambiguity on renewal rights or termination triggers.
Treat leave as a legal duty, not as a discretionary benefit
Nigerian law places the onus on employers to ensure that staff take their statutory leave, regardless of whether an employee requests it. This means actively tracking leave balances, scheduling rest periods and enforcing compliance. Relying on a “use it or lose it” approach common in other jurisdictions may breach Nigerian law.
Align HR beneficiary records with succession law
Naming someone as “next-of-kin” in company records is not the same as legally designating them as a beneficiary. In Nigeria, death benefits and pension payouts must follow statutory succession rules, typically requiring probate or letters of administration. HR teams should ensure that benefit designation forms are harmonised with legal succession processes to prevent disputes and payment delays.
Keep meticulous records – everything matters in disputes
Contemporaneous documentation often determines the outcome of litigation or arbitration. Maintain clear records of employee consent, notice issuance, payment receipts, leave schedules and policy implementation. In disputes before the NICN, a lack of proper documentation can be fatal to a defence, regardless of the substantive merits.
Extend safety compliance to all categories of workers
Occupational health and safety obligations apply broadly in Nigeria, including in multi-tier labour arrangements where contractors, subcontractors or agency workers are involved. Employers must ensure that safety policies, training programmes and protective equipment are implemented and monitored across all tiers of labour supply, as duty of care is shared between principal employers and intermediaries.
Leadway Marble House, 4th Floor
1 Kingsway Road
Falomo
Ikoyi
Lagos
Nigeria
+234 201 2793 3659
+234 201 461 7092
info@aelex.com www.aelex.com