There is no clear distinction between blue-collar and white-collar workers under PRC employment laws. Workers uniformly hold the status of “employees” as protected by PRC employment laws, as long as they are employed by enterprises, individual economic organisations, private non-enterprise entities, state organs, public institutions or social organisations within the boundary of the PRC, no matter whether they are employed as senior staff or frontline workers.
Under the current PRC employment laws, employees can generally be divided into directly employed employees and labour dispatched employees.
According to the PRC Employment Contract Law (the “Employment Contract Law”), there are three types of employment contract terms:
A written employment contract shall be entered into within one month from the date on which the employee commences work; otherwise, the employer shall pay twice the monthly salary to the employee from the second month of the commencement of employment until the date when a written employment contract is concluded. If an employer still fails to conclude a written employment contract after a year from the commencement of the employment, an open-ended employment contract will be deemed automatically concluded between the employer and the employee.
The following information must be included in an employment contract:
Part-time employees may enter into oral agreements with the employer. The employer is not allowed to stipulate a probation period with the part-time employee.
For full-time employees, there are three types of working hour systems, under which different rules for working hours apply.
Part-time employees are employees who generally work with an employer for no more than four hours per day on average and no more than 24 hours per week in total. There are no special rules/restrictions applicable to working hours for part-time employees.
Overtime
Overtime refers to the working time that the employer arranges or approves the employees to work over the Statutory Standard. According to the PRC Labour Law (the “Labour Law”), overtime shall not exceed three hours per day or 36 hours per month.
Under the standard working hours system, the employer shall compensate the employee’s overtime work in the following ways.
Under the comprehensive working hours system, the employer should pay not less than 150% of the employee’s normal hourly wage for the extra hours worked during the calculating cycle (regardless of whether the extra hours are for work days or rest days), and not less than 300% of the employee’s normal daily or hourly wage for the extra hours worked on statutory holidays.
Under the flexible working hour system, employees shall not generally be entitled to overtime pay, but the rules are slightly different among provinces and cities. For example, in Beijing, employees under the flexible working hour system are not entitled to any overtime pay at all. However, in some other cities, employees who work extra hours on statutory holidays will still be entitled to overtime pay of not less than 300% of their normal daily or hourly wage.
If an employer does not make the overtime payment for its employee’s overtime work, the competent labour authorities have the right to order the employer to make such a payment within a limited period; if the employer fails to comply with that order, it will be required to pay 150–200% of the outstanding overtime pay.
There is no nationwide minimum wage. The local government of each region sets its local minimum wage, which is normally updated at least every two years and applies to all employees, regardless of their age, position and experience. The minimum wage generally includes a monthly minimum wage and an hourly minimum wage. The monthly minimum wage applies to all full-time employees, while the hourly minimum wage applies to all part-time employees.
It is not statutorily required for employers to provide bonuses on top of basic salaries; however, it is common to see employers reward employees through various bonuses – eg, the 13th month’s salary, year-end bonus, commission, performance bonus. Generally, the issuance of bonuses is solely at the employer’s discretion. If the employment contract or the employer’s internal policies stipulate the provision of a certain bonus to the employee, the employer shall be bound by those stipulations.
Apart from the minimum wage requirements, there are no mandatory requirements on salary increase (the local government of each region generally issues a salary increase guideline every year, but it is only a reference document to guide enterprises to determine salary increases reasonably and is not mandatory). Salary deduction can only be made upon the employee’s consent, unless it is done on certain statutory grounds (eg, a sick-leave period).
Holidays
According to the newly updated Regulation on Public Holidays for National Annual Festivals and Memorial Days (effective on 1 January 2025), holidays in China include 13 days of statutory holiday for all employees (New Year’s Day, Spring Festival, Labour Day, Mid-Autumn Festival, National Day, etc), as well as holidays for certain groups of people (eg, a half-day’s leave for female employees on Women’s Day, and a half-day’s leave for 14 to 28-year-old employees on Youth Day).
Leaves
All employees shall be entitled to fully paid statutory annual leave, sick leave and other leaves (maternity leave, childcare leave, etc) in accordance with the PRC laws and the employer’s internal policies. The main categories of leave include the following.
Statutory annual leave
Any employee whose accumulated service years (including all the prior service years with current and former employers) is more than one year shall be entitled to paid statutory annual leave. The number of days of statutory annual leave shall be calculated based on the accumulated service years of the employee as follows:
If the employer fails to arrange the statutory annual leave for an employee due to its operational needs, that statutory annual leave does not need to be arranged by the employer (with the consent of the employee), but the employer shall pay the employee 300% of the wage (the 100% normal wage and an additional 200%) on a daily basis for the unused statutory annual leave.
Sick leave
An employee who suffers from illness or a non-work-related injury has the right to take sick leave to recover from the illness or injury. The minimum salary standard during sick leave required by laws and regulations may be different among provinces and cities, and the commonly used standard is 80% of the local minimum wage. There are also provinces and cities with different sick leave pay standards – eg, Shanghai has its own sick leave and sick pay regulations.
Maternity leave
Female employees who give birth in compliance with PRC birth-control policies are entitled to 98 days of maternity leave, 15 days of which may be taken before delivery. The leave can be extended by an additional 15 days under special circumstances such as dystocia and multiple births. Extra maternity leave is granted by local regulations where the specific length varies from city to city. For example, in Beijing and Shanghai, the total length of maternity leave is 158 days, including a base 98-day period under national law and 60 days granted by local regulations.
According to national law, female employees who suffer a miscarriage during the first four months of pregnancy shall be entitled to 15 days of maternity leave, and those who suffer a miscarriage after four months of pregnancy shall be entitled to 42 days of maternity leave.
Marriage leave
An employee is entitled to three days of marriage leave, according to the national law. Moreover, all legally married couples will be entitled to additional marriage leave granted by local regulations.
Paternity leave
Paternity leave for male employees is granted by local regulations only. For instance, paternity leave for male employees in Beijing and Shanghai is 15 days and ten days respectively.
Childcare leave
Childcare leave is granted by local regulations only. For instance, both Beijing and Shanghai have introduced childcare leave that entitles eligible parents to five days of fully paid leave each year until the child reaches three years of age.
Elderly care leave
Elderly care leave is also stipulated in local regulations only. For instance, in Beijing, an employee who is the only child in their family is entitled to no more than ten working days of fully paid elderly care leave per calendar year to take care of their parent(s) (including legal adoptive parents) who need nursing care due to illness, injury or disability. In Shanghai, an employee who bears statutory obligations to support an elderly person is entitled to take up to five working days (up to seven working days if the employee is the only child and was born within the prescribed period) of fully paid leave per year to accompany the elderly person during hospitalisation.
Bereavement leave
According to the current law, when a parent, spouse or child of an employee of a state-owned enterprise dies, the employee is entitled to take one to three days of bereavement leave. Employers generally refer to this standard in providing bereavement leave to employees.
Confidentiality and Non-Defamation
An employer may formulate internal policies – or agree with employees in the employment contract or a separate confidentiality agreement – on relevant matters of confidentiality, including protection of the employer’s trade secrets and other confidential information. The scope of confidential information shall be defined in the agreement at the discretion of the employer.
At present, there are no nationwide regulations requiring the payment of compensation for adhering to a confidentiality obligation. Therefore, in practice, employers need not pay their employees in exchange for their compliance with the confidentiality requirements. If an employee violates the confidentiality requirements and causes economic losses to the employer, the employer can claim compensation against the employee based on the internal policy, relevant stipulations in the employment contract or the confidentiality agreement.
Similarly, employers can set requirements on non-defamation for employees by formulating policies, or by stipulating relevant requirements in the employment contract or a separate agreement and can claim compensation for any employee violation and losses caused.
A non-compete clause is a commonly seen post-termination restrictive covenant for employees designed to protect the confidential information of the employer. Under PRC employment laws, an employer can agree with an employee on non-compete obligations through stipulations in the employment contract or through a separate non-compete agreement. Key non-compete stipulations include the following.
PRC employment laws are silent on the topic of non-solicitation; however, non-solicitation clauses are commonly used by employers in practice to prevent former employees from soliciting clients and employees of the employer.
As violating non-solicitation is not a scenario stipulated by the law where the employer can claim for liquidated damages as agreed with the employees, employers can generally only claim for recovery of financial losses suffered due to an employee’s breach of a valid non-solicitation obligation. If the employer claims for a breach of non-solicitation by employees, the employer needs to prove the solicitation behaviours and the financial losses incurred.
Data Privacy Laws
The PRC Civil Code (effective on 1 January 2021) contains a chapter regarding the right to privacy and personal information (PI) protection. The PRC Cybersecurity Law (effective on 1 June 2017, newly revised on 28 October 2025), the PRC Data Security Law (effective on 1 September 2021) and the PRC Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL, effective on 1 November 2021) collectively constitute the three fundamental and framework laws regulating data security protection in the PRC. Of these laws and regulations, the PIPL provides the most details regarding PI protection, establishing comprehensive and systematic rules on the processing and protection of PI. Employers should also comply with the PIPL when processing employees’ PI; the following sections briefly summarise the key points under the PIPL.
PI Processing Principles
Legal Grounds for Processing Employees’ PI
According to the PIPL, PI can only be processed based on statutory grounds, with the two grounds most related to the employment sphere being that:
However, the PIPL does not stipulate specific standards for determining what constitutes “necessary for conducting human resource management”, and thus it is suggested that the employers try to obtain consent from the employees for PI needed in the first place.
Consent and Separate Consent
As the key legal ground for processing PI, the PIPL sets out requirements on obtaining “consent”. The consent shall be voluntarily and explicitly given by the individual on a fully informed basis. The PI processor shall truthfully, accurately and completely inform individuals of the following required matters (“Items to Inform”):
The PIPL also requires “separate consent” for certain circumstances (eg, sharing PI with third parties, processing sensitive PI, outbound transferring of PI), which is a form of consent with higher requirements. The specific requirements and form of separate consent are not specified by the PIPL. Based on the current understanding and practice, to constitute a separate consent, the specific item involving PI processing should be listed as a separate item requesting the individual’s specific consent explicitly for this item, instead of being hidden in a package of items pending the individual’s joint consent.
Sharing Employees’ PI With Third Parties
The most relevant employment-related scenarios include engaging third parties in background checks, recruitment, payroll services and labour dispatch, etc. When sharing employees’ PI with third-party processors, apart from the Items to Inform, the employer shall also inform the employees of the recipient's name and contact information, the purposes and methods of processing, and the categories of PI, and obtain the employee’s separate consent.
Outbound Transfer of Employees’ PI and Standard Contract
The outbound transfer of employees’ PI is not unusual, especially for multinational employers sharing employees’ PI within a global management system. Given the special nature of outbound transfer, the PIPL sets out detailed requirements in this regard. Apart from informing employees of the Items to Inform and additional items, and obtaining separate consent, the PI processor also needs to conduct a PI protection impact assessment and adopt one of the three following legal mechanisms:
Of these transfer mechanisms, detailed rules have been laid out regarding the SCC Approach, and the SCC template has been published. Employers who are eligible to adopt the SCC Approach shall follow the relevant rules for complying with the PI outbound transfer requirements.
The Provisions on Promoting and Regulating the Cross-border Transfer of Data promulgated on 22 March 2024 exempt the PI processor from adopting one of the above three legal mechanisms for PI outbound transfer on certain grounds, including employers’ cross-border transfer of employees’ PI where it is necessary for conducting human resource management according to the rules and regulations and collective contracts established/concluded in accordance with the law.
Retaining Employees’ PI
According to the PIPL, the retention period of PI shall be the shortest time necessary for achieving the processing purpose, although the specific length of the retention period is not specified. It is suggested that employers decide the retention period according to the type of PI and the specific stage in the employment life cycle.
Legal Liabilities
PI processors that violate the PIPL in their PI processing will be subject to the following legal liabilities.
Civil liabilities
Individuals can file lawsuits against PI processors according to the PRC Civil Code, claiming an infringement regarding their PI. As provided by the PIPL, the burden of proof for such cases lies with the PI processor to prove that it is not at fault. Otherwise, the PI processor shall be liable for damages and other civil liabilities. Where PI processors violate the requirements under the PIPL during PI processing and infringe the rights and interests of multiple individuals, the People’s Procuratorate, consumer organisations prescribed by the laws, and organisations determined by the state cyberspace authorities may file lawsuits.
Administrative liabilities
Competent PI protection authorities can also issue orders for rectification and warnings and can confiscate unlawful income from PI processors for violations of the PIPL. In the case of failure to rectify, legal liabilities include fines, rectification and the confiscation of unlawful income.
Criminal liabilities
The PIPL refers to the PRC Criminal Law for relevant behaviours constituting crimes. According to the PRC Criminal Law, fines and/or up to seven years of imprisonment can be imposed for illegally acquiring PI or illegally selling or providing PI to third parties.
Foreigners working in the PRC should abide by laws and regulations such as the Law on the Management of the Entry and Exit of the PRC, and the Regulations on Management of Foreigners Working in China. According to these regulations, for foreigners to work legally in China, the following requirements shall be met:
In addition, for foreign workers to work legally in China, the prior approval of competent labour administrative authorities, a work permit and a residence permit shall be obtained. Failure to obtain the valid permits will lead to penalties for both the employer and the employee, and detention may be imposed on the foreign employee. These rules do not apply to foreign employees of foreign embassies, consulates, offices of the United Nations and other international organisations in China, which enjoy diplomatic privileges and immunities.
As a side point, the term of an employment contract between an employer and a foreign worker may not exceed five years. The employer may apply for renewal within 30 days prior to the expiry date, and the employment contract can be renewed upon the labour administrative authorities’ approval and completion of the work permit extension procedures.
General Registration Requirements
All foreign workers shall obtain valid work permits to work in China, except in very special circumstances – eg, if the duration of their stay in China is less than 90 days and the worker enters China for certain reasons, including:
In other circumstances, the registration can generally be divided into two kinds, depending on the duration of the stay (ie, whether it is over 90 days or not). Generally, there are two kinds of arrangement commonly adopted in practice for employers to have foreign nationals work in China:
To implement the international secondment mode, the foreign worker must be in a managerial or technical position in China, and the foreign entity shall issue a secondment letter, stipulating contents including but not limited to workplace, term, salary and position. The PRC entity shall apply for the work permit with the secondment letter.
Type of Foreign Workers
There are different types of foreign workers permitted to apply for work permits, including high-end talent (Category A), foreign professionals (Category B) and other foreign personnel (Category C). There are specific criteria indicating which category shall apply to each foreign employee when applying for work permits.
Procedures for Obtaining Work Permits and Residence Permits for Foreign Employees
For a PRC employer to hire a foreign employee who comes from abroad, the general procedures for obtaining a work permit and a residence permit are as follows:
Mobile work (remote work) is not a new concept and was widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Post-pandemic, some employers are still keeping the remote work option open to their employees or adopting a hybrid work mode (on-site and remote).
Work location is a mandatory term in an employment contract, and it will normally be an on-site location. Switching from on-site work to remote work will generally require the mutual consent of both the employer and the employee. In practice, there remain some uncertainties or difficulties related to remote work, as follows.
Employee Management
In the remote work mode, employers may lack adequate channels to monitor employees՚ working status, so it is suggested that supporting policies are incorporated during the remote work arrangement, including a request for the employee to check in online through attendance software during their normal working hours and retain all remote work software and instant messaging tools online and responsive during working hours.
Work-Related Injury
For employees who are injured during remote work, there is some uncertainty about how to prove that an injury occurred during work hours, in the workplace and for work-related reasons. According to judicial practice, if it can be proved that the injury occurred during the working hours required by the employer, and that the employee was working at that time (eg, there is an online record of the work, there is a description of the work in the work log, and there is even an email sent as proof of the work done at the time), it is likely that work-related injury will be recognised and the employer will need to bear the relevant statutory obligations.
IP Protection
In the remote work arrangement, the vast majority of information is transmitted through the internet, and it is more difficult to monitor employees՚ behaviours and ensure that they do not disclose confidential information from the employer. Therefore, it is suggested that the employer strengthen the confidentiality requirements during remote work periods and co-operate with IT software suppliers to establish a comprehensive mechanism for the protection of the employer’s IP during remote work.
Although some universities in China have been trying to implement this kind of leave for teachers, the “sabbatical” is not a legal concept stipulated by PRC employment laws, but rather a kind of optional leave granted by universities to teachers. Consequently, there is a lack of regulations on the terms of employment (salary standard, etc) during the sabbatical period at the national level, and there are no related cases demonstrating the attitude of the arbitration commission/court.
New Forms of Employment Under Platform Economy
With the development of the platform economy and the need for more flexible employment, new forms of employment have developed and infiltrated a growing number of industries in the past year; typical new manifestations include delivery persons, online platform taxi drivers and network anchors. The identification of the relationship between the platform enterprises and the individuals engaged, and the protection of such individuals’ rights and interests, are of most concern.
The national and local governments have been issuing regulations and policies governing new forms of employment in recent years. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, together with seven other departments, issued a guiding opinion in 2021, which for the first time introduced a new concept called a “less-than-complete employment relationship” (as opposed to an ordinary employment relationship or a civil law relationship). It also set out comprehensive provisions to ensure platform workers’ rights and interests, including reasonable pay, occupational injury protection participation and vocational training.
In 2024, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security further issued three guidelines regulating platform employment, including:
In 2025, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, together with eight other departments, issued a notice further expanding the pilot programme for occupational injury protection for individuals under new forms of employment. It will be important to pay attention to any new rules introduced in the future concerning these new forms of employment.
Overage Workers
China's aging population has driven another significant new manifestation of work: post-retirement employment. Under PRC employment law, individuals who reached the statutory retirement age could no longer form standard employment relationships, leaving their rights inadequately protected. To fill this legislative gap, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and four other departments jointly issued the Interim Provisions on the Protection of Basic Rights and Interests of Overage Workers (“Provisions”), which took effect on 1 July 2026. The Provisions introduce key safeguards for this growing demographic, including but not limited to:
Some regions have already issued a template agreement for overage workers, while the specific requirements on work-related injury insurance contributions, among other matters, remain pending. Overall, the Provisions represent a meaningful enhancement of protections for overage workers. It is advisable to continue monitoring the upcoming detailed rules and practice on this topic.
According to the Labour Law, trade unions shall represent and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of employees and carry out their activities independently in accordance with the law. The Trade Union Law of the PRC (the “Trade Union Law”) (last revised in 2021) further clarifies the status of a trade union, which is a voluntary organisation formed by employees of their own free will.
Trade unions have the general right to represent and protect the rights of employees. According to the Trade Union Law, specific rights of trade unions include but are not limited to:
Under PRC employment laws, employees can exercise their right to democratic management through the employee representatives’ congress, which has the right to inspect the daily operation of the employer and is responsible for representing the employees’ legal interests.
The employee representatives shall be elected by employees; the specific proportion and number shall be determined in accordance with the implementation measures of the employee representatives’ congress of the enterprise or determined by the enterprise through consultation with the trade union but shall be no fewer than 30 people.
In most cases, employment terms and conditions are agreed and executed individually, but collective bargaining also takes place at both the enterprise level and the industry level. According to PRC employment laws, collective employment contracts shall be concluded between the employer and the trade union that represents employees (for an employer that has not established a trade union, the next higher-level trade union shall guide the representatives elected by the employees to conclude a collective contract with the employer) in
Currently, most collective contracts are negotiated at the enterprise level, and collective contracts are more common in enterprises in the manufacturing and retail industries.
The collective contract shall be submitted to the labour administrative department after being concluded and shall become effective after the lapse of 15 days from the date of receipt by the labour administrative department, unless any objections to the contract are raised.
The PRC employment laws set strict limitations on employment relationship terminations, and there is no concept of “termination at will” for full-time employees. The statutory grounds can be divided as follows.
Non-Fault Termination
Termination upon mutual agreement
An employment contract may be terminated upon mutual agreement between the employer and the employee, and the employer is obliged to pay the employee the statutory severance.
Unilateral termination by the employer
An employer is entitled to terminate the employment contract unilaterally with 30 days’ prior written notice or one month’s salary in lieu, and with statutory severance pay, in the following circumstances:
Unilateral termination by an employee (resignation)
An employee has the right to terminate the employment contract unilaterally by giving their employer three days՚ prior written notice during the probation period. After completion of the probation period, an employee may terminate their employment contract upon providing 30 days’ prior written notice to the employer.
Fault Termination
Unilateral termination by the employer
An employer is entitled to terminate the employment contract unilaterally of an employee without prior notice or any severance pay under any of the following circumstances:
Unilateral termination by the employee
If any of the following circumstances occurs, an employee may terminate the employment contract immediately and is entitled to statutory severance paid by the employer:
End of Employment
An employment contract will be ended when any of the following occurs:
Under the first three circumstances, the employer shall pay the employee statutory severance.
Economic Lay-offs
If an employer is reducing its workforce by 20 persons or more, or by 10% or more of the total number of its employees, the termination ground of economic lay-off can be invoked under any of the following circumstances:
Before the lay-offs, the employer has to follow the procedural requirements as stipulated in the Employment Contract Law, as follows:
Whether prior notice is necessary depends on the specific statutory ground for the termination. In the circumstances outlined in 7.1 Grounds for Termination (under Non-Fault Termination: Unilateral termination by the employer), an employee must be given 30 days’ prior written notice, or one month’s salary in lieu of notice. An employee shall also give prior notice to the employer upon resignation.
In the case of economic lay-offs, an employer shall explain the situation to the trade union or all of its employees 30 days in advance (which can be regarded as a form of prior notice) and seek their opinions before reporting the proposed lay-offs to local administrative authorities.
Although not required by the Employment Contract Law, some local regulations in cities such as Beijing also require the employer to give prior notice to employees when the term of an employment contract expires and the employer decides not to renew it.
Severance
See 7.1 Grounds for Termination and the list of termination grounds on which the employee is entitled to severance pay.
Generally, statutory severance is calculated as one month's salary for every year of service of the employee. Since the Employment Contract Law took effect on 1 January 2008, statutory severance pay must be calculated in two parts.
Procedural Requirements for Termination
The requirements to be observed include:
Under PRC employment laws, dismissal for serious cause is generally understood under Article 39 of the Employment Contract Law; see 7.1 Grounds for Termination (under Fault Termination: Unilateral termination by the employer). Among the circumstances listed, the one most commonly used in practice is “where the employee has seriously violated internal policies of the employer”. For an employer to terminate an employee successfully for serious violation of the employer’s internal policies, the following conditions must be met:
The employer also needs to fulfil the procedural requirements summarised in 7.2 Notice Periods.
Normally, a written termination agreement will be reached between both parties upon mutual termination of the employment contract. There are no statutory requirements on the format or must-have terms regarding the termination agreement. According to judicial interpretations, the release clause shall be generally enforceable as long as it does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations nor fall under fraud, duress or exploitation of an unfavourable position.
An employer cannot unilaterally terminate the employment of employees in the following circumstances (unless termination is based on Article 39 of the Employment Contract Law):
In addition, if an employee falls into any of the previously mentioned circumstances, the employment contract shall not be ended upon the expiry of their employment contract. Instead, the employment contract must be extended until the relevant circumstance ceases to exist (unless the employee has lost (or partially lost) their working capacity listed in the aforementioned second situation, in which case the end of their employment contract shall be in accordance with relevant regulations related to work-injury insurance).
PRC employment laws also set some special dismissal protections for certain trade union members and individuals elected for collective bargaining on behalf of employees (“Employee Bargaining Representative”).
Employees who consider that they have been wrongfully dismissed may bring a wrongful dismissal claim to the judicial authorities. The grounds generally include:
If their claim is supported, the remedy will be either reinstatement of employment with back pay or a double severance payment.
Discrimination is prohibited by PRC employment law. The Labour Law generally provides that people should not be treated unfairly due to race, gender, religion, etc, and that women should have equal rights of employment to men. In addition, the PRC Employment Promotion Law provides that employees are entitled to equal employment, and that individuals seeking employment shall not be discriminated against because of ethnicity, race, gender, religious belief, disability or whether the individuals are from rural places. The PRC Law on the Protection of Rights and Interests of Women, which was amended and took effect on 1 January 2023, further ensures equal employment rights for and prohibits discrimination against female employees. There are also specific regulations prohibiting discrimination against individuals who are hepatitis B carriers.
“Equal employment rights disputes” has been listed as a separate cause of action since 2019. Generally, individuals can file “equal employment rights disputes” lawsuits before the court, requiring the company to bear the corresponding legal responsibilities. The burden of proof is usually on the individual to prove that the enterprise conducted discriminatory actions. Remedies available to employees vary depending on the specific cause of action, with monetary compensation for economic loss and emotional loss in certain circumstances being the main remedy; other possible remedies include requiring the enterprise to apologise to the individual publicly.
In China, labour arbitration procedures are currently generally conducted on site.
However, online litigation is now widely used for court proceedings, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the Rules of Online Litigation of People’s Courts, the court may rely on the electronic litigation platforms to complete all or part of the litigation procedures of case docketing, mediation, exchange of evidence, questioning, court trial and service online.
The court shall decide whether to conduct an online court trial via video based on the opinions of the parties, the circumstances of the case, social impact, technical conditions and other factors. However, there are also circumstances where online court trials shall not apply, including where:
Besides this, arbitration committees and people’s courts in some regions are also trying to provide an asynchronous hearing approach, which refers to hearings where the parties may choose to log on to the online arbitration/court platform at their own discretion within the time period specified by the arbitral committee/court to complete the hearing procedures (defence, investigation, adduction of evidence, cross-examination, etc). Under this approach, the parties may log on to the platform at different times to complete the relevant hearing procedures.
In China, most employment-related disputes are resolved under a two-stage framework – ie, labour arbitration followed by litigation. According to the PRC Employment Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law, before filing an employment dispute with a court, it is mandatory to submit the dispute to the competent local labour arbitration commission, an institution specialising in hearing employment dispute cases. Any party that is unsatisfied with the arbitration award is entitled to bring the lawsuit to the competent people’s courts (the first instance court and then the second instance court), except in certain situations where the arbitration award is final.
According to the PRC Employment Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law, where a labour dispute involves more than ten employees and the employees have the same claim, they may recommend their representatives to participate in the mediation, arbitration or litigation.
In addition to arbitration and litigation, an employer and employee are encouraged to consult with each other and to reach a mediation agreement on employment dispute settlement under PRC employment laws. Even if the employment disputes have been submitted to arbitration or litigation, an employer and employee could still negotiate and reach a mediation agreement, as long as the final arbitral award or court decision has not been made. The conciliation is not mandatory and must be based on both parties’ voluntary decision. The parties may choose to submit their employment disputes directly to arbitration without any pre-claim conciliation.
Labour supervision is also an available option. According to the Regulation on Labour Security Supervision, any organisation or individual shall have the right to report any act violating labour laws, regulations or rules to the labour supervisory authority (an administrative department responsible for the supervision of labour security administration). The labour supervisory authority will accept the reports and complaints, and will investigate, correct and impose punishment for any relevant acts.
Under PRC law, the arbitration commission/court will not generally award the prevailing party attorney’s fees or other costs. However, there may be special rules – eg, according to a local rule in Shenzhen, where the employee is the prevailing party in a labour dispute arbitration or litigation case, the attorney’s fee paid by the employee may be borne by the employer. The maximum amount shall not exceed CNY5,000; the portion exceeding CNY5,000 shall be borne by the employee.
18th Floor, East Tower
World Financial Centre
1 Dongsanhuan Zhonglu
Chaoyang District
Beijing 100020
People’s Republic of China
+86 010 5878 5161
+86 010 5878 5566
linda.liang@cn.kingandwood.com www.kingandwood.com/global/en/home.html
Facts, Process and Accountability: Employment Law Trends in China for 2026
Economic restructuring is changing how businesses organise their workforces, while a dense stream of regulatory rules is bringing new issues into contact with long-standing arrangements. China’s employment landscape is therefore under pressure on several fronts. In this setting, the most significant compliance development for 2026 is not the number of new, discrete obligations, but a shift from formal review to substantive review: whether an agreement or policy corresponds to a genuine management relationship and an actual business need, whether a decision was made through an appropriate process, and whether accountability can be assigned to an identifiable person or body. Facts, process and accountability must all withstand scrutiny. Courts and regulators rarely stop at whether a document is complete; they increasingly examine the underlying facts, decision-making process and implementation record.
The questions that compliance must answer are also expanding beyond conventional labour law. Algorithmic management, state-owned asset accountability and outbound-investment regulation are each bringing employment arrangements within their own review frameworks. For businesses operating in China, whether domestic or foreign-invested, this means revisiting not only arrangements introduced under new rules, but also long-standing practices whose factual basis, decision-making process or accountability record may no longer withstand present scrutiny.
Documents Cannot Substitute for Facts: The Substantive Turn in Judicial Review
The Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation (II) on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Labour Dispute Cases (Judicial Interpretation [2025] No 12) (the “Interpretation (II)”), effective from 1 September 2025, is increasingly shaping court decisions across China in 2026. Its underlying logic is consistent: written form remains important, but form cannot create a legal basis that does not exist, nor can it relieve a party of obligations that the law requires it to perform.
For non-compete restrictions, the Interpretation (II) ties enforceability directly to a genuine confidentiality interest. A non-compete clause is ineffective where an employee neither knows nor has access to the employer’s trade secrets or confidential information relating to intellectual property. Even for employees who may validly be subject to a non-compete, any scope, territory or duration that is disproportionate to the confidential information they know or can access is invalid to that extent. In the past, requiring all employees to sign broad restrictions was often viewed as a prudent precaution. The correspondence between the restriction and the confidentiality interest now directly determines its effectiveness. The focus of compliance must therefore move earlier: during employment, companies should establish and continuously update the link between their inventory of trade secrets, access permissions and restricted personnel as roles change, rather than attempting to supplement evidence once a termination dispute arises.
For social insurance, the Interpretation (II) reiterates that statutory obligations cannot be waived by agreement. An employee’s undertaking not to participate in social insurance, or an arrangement under which a “social insurance allowance” is paid instead of contributions, does not relieve the employer of its contribution obligation. Where an employer has failed to make contributions as required by law, the employee may terminate the employment contract and claim statutory economic compensation. The degree of certainty differs by risk: arrangements involving non-enrolment or non-payment are clear violations with established consequences, whereas issues concerning the contribution base, the entity responsible for contributions, or historic contribution periods require item-by-item assessment against local collection practice and judicial standards. In both cases, historical liability does not disappear of its own accord; it often crystallises as a real cost when employees leave or retire, or during M&A due diligence.
For continued performance following an unlawful termination, the Interpretation (II) identifies situations in which an employment contract may be found incapable of continued performance, including its expiry during the dispute, the employee’s beginning to receive basic pension benefits, and the employer’s bankruptcy or dissolution, while retaining room for an assessment of objective impossibility. The practical lesson is that a termination decision should not be assessed only by asking whether the stated reason is valid. Whether the position objectively exists, whether an organisational adjustment has genuinely been completed, whether the employee is subject to special protection, and how wage exposure should be measured while a dispute is pending should all be assessed together. The legality of a termination and the practical possibility of restoring the employment relationship are related questions, but they are not the same question.
Employment of Over-age Workers: Decoupling Basic Rights Protection from Relationship Characterisation
On 10 May 2026, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, together with the National Health Commission, the Ministry of Emergency Management, the State Taxation Administration and the National Healthcare Security Administration, issued the Interim Provisions on the Protection of Basic Rights and Interests of Over-age Workers (the “Interim Provisions”), effective from 1 July 2026. Key points include the following: where over-age workers provide normal labour, their remuneration may not be lower than the local minimum wage and must be paid at least monthly, employers must reasonably arrange working time and rest, generally avoid overtime and comply with labour law where overtime is genuinely necessary, and employers must enrol over-age workers in work-related injury insurance and pay the corresponding premiums, while individuals do not contribute.
The key to understanding the Interim Provisions lies in their design. Rather than making a uniform finding of the employment relationship a precondition, they establish baseline rights to remuneration, working time, rest and work-injury protection directly for over-age workers who are subject to an employer’s labour management and perform remunerated work. This substantially mitigates the previous binary outcome in which all entitlements depended on whether an employment relationship existed. The nature of the relationship, the cause of action and the application of other benefits nevertheless remain matters for case-by-case assessment under the relevant rules. For employers, the Interim Provisions have two implications. First, they make obligations clearer: return-to-work arrangements after retirement once depended largely on contractual terms, while local approaches to work-injury protection and relationship characterisation varied; remuneration, working time and work injury now have a common baseline, and existing re-engagement agreements should be reviewed against it. Second, baseline obligations make compliance costs capable of being calculated in advance. That certainty is itself valuable.
Paid Annual Leave: Stronger Enforcement of Existing Obligations
The development in paid annual leave differs from the first two areas: it concerns stronger enforcement of existing obligations, not a change to the underlying rules. In March 2025, the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council issued the Special Action Plan to Boost Consumption, requiring strict implementation of paid annual leave and including compliance in trade unions’ work to protect workers’ rights. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security has also publicly indicated that it will promote revision of the Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees, which have been in force for 18 years. How the revision will address recurring disputes over service-length calculations, leave offsets, cross-year arrangements and the effectiveness of leave-waiver agreements remains to be seen in the formal text.
For employers, the current rule is unchanged: where an employee, for personal reasons, submits a written request not to take annual leave, the employer need only pay normal wages for the working period. What has changed is the evidential burden on the employer. In a more enforcement-focused environment, the same rule may produce very different outcomes in practice. Employers need to show that leave was actually arranged, that any waiver reflected the employee’s genuine and clear intention, and that written formalities are complete. A standard-form waiver alone will become progressively less persuasive. Compensation for untaken annual leave should be included with social insurance in a self-review of historical liabilities.
Algorithmic Management: Transparency, Explainability and Human Accountability
The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security has issued three guidance documents for workers in new forms of employment, covering rest and remuneration rights, the disclosure of labour rules, and rights-protection services. Together, they treat algorithmic rules as labour rules. Order allocation, remuneration composition, working time, rewards and penalties, and complaint mechanisms should be clearly disclosed; workers’ views should be heard when the rules are formulated or materially adjusted. These documents directly regulate platform companies, but their requirements of transparency, consultation and redress signal a clear regulatory direction. Any digital rule that continually affects workers’ income, opportunities or work intensity may ultimately be expected to be transparent, reasonable and open to challenge.
Within internal management, a growing number of employers are introducing AI and algorithmic systems into recruitment screening, performance assessment, rostering and disciplinary recommendations. The Personal Information Protection Law requires automated decisions based on personal information to be transparent and fair and gives individuals the right to request an explanation and to refuse decisions made solely by automated means where those decisions materially affect their rights and interests. At a minimum, companies should:
The boundary should be clear. For decisions materially affecting rights, such as recruitment rejection, performance grading, pay adjustment or disciplinary action, automated output should not alone determine facts or the final decision. An algorithmic output cannot replace fact-finding, and efficiency cannot replace accountability. Algorithmic management does not create a separate compliance test; it remains subject to the same inquiry: whether inputs and outputs correspond to real facts, whether decisions are made through an explainable process, and whether a clearly identified person is accountable for the result.
Employment Decisions in State-Owned Enterprises: Higher Expectations for Basis and Record-Keeping
On 28 November 2025, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council published the Measures for Accountability for Illegal Business Operations and Investments of Central Enterprises (SASAC Order No 46), effective from 1 January 2026, replacing the 2018 trial measures. The list of circumstances triggering accountability expanded from 72 to 98 across 13 areas, including newly added financial business and technological innovation; the Measures also systematically provide for exemptions, maintain lifelong accountability for major decisions and connect with the Regulations on Disciplinary Measures for Managers of State-Owned Enterprises (SOE).
The Measures do not specifically regulate employment, but employee placement and compensation expenditure are often part of an overall business decision in restructuring, investment exit, organisational adjustment or overseas operations. If an arrangement exceeds the relevant approval authority, is missing the decision-making procedure, results in loss of state-owned assets or other adverse consequences, it may fall within an accountability assessment. The effect is twofold. In decision-making, when a state-owned enterprise deals with material personnel matters, it must be able to explain the basis of its proposal in addition to its compliance with labour law. This is particularly important where compensation exceeds the statutory level: the rationale, calculation and approval authority for the excess must withstand subsequent audit and accountability review. The rationale for the decision, records of collective deliberation and approval records therefore become integral parts of the arrangement itself. In implementing accountability, measures ranging from position adjustment and reduced benefits to disciplinary termination must still be tested at the intersection of labour law and the Regulations on Disciplinary Measures for Managers of State-Owned Enterprises. Employment decisions are now more readily seen through the accountability lens, while the implementation of accountability returns to labour law. Together, these directions raise the standard for evidentiary basis and record-keeping in SOE employment decisions.
Conclusion: From Domestic Operations to Overseas Operations, and from Labour Law to Broader Regulation
Article 14 of the State Council’s Provisions on Outbound Investment (State Council Order No 837), effective from 1 July 2026, lists trade in goods and technology, cross-border services, cross-border data flows, entry and exit management, export controls and state-owned asset supervision among the rules with which outbound investment must comply. Article 16 requires investors and their overseas enterprises to provide the necessary personnel and financial resources to safeguard employees and assets. For Chinese companies going abroad, this means that an action long treated as an HR matter – posting an engineer or technical specialist overseas – now also falls within investment regulation, export controls and cross-border service rules. Overseas assignment, technology licensing and personnel management need to be designed together, rather than divided among business, HR and legal functions.
The changes across these areas point in the same direction and develop along two lines. First, algorithmic governance, state-owned asset accountability and outbound-investment regulation are bringing traditional labour-law arrangements within their respective review frameworks, so a single employment decision may need to satisfy several sets of rules at once. Second, the geographic scope of review is extending from domestic operations to overseas operations.
This returns to the article’s starting point. The older practices now being re-examined fall into three categories: some have always breached statutory obligations, but enforcement and accountability were previously insufficient, as with agreements not to make social-insurance contributions, some have long occupied an area of uncertain rules, with employment of over-age workers as the typical example, and others have acquired new legal significance through digital management, accountability regimes and cross-border regulation. Their outcome is the same: none can continue simply because it has always been done that way. What businesses need to accomplish in 2026 is not another round of document updates, but ensuring that every significant employment arrangement can answer three questions: what are the facts, what process was followed, and who is accountable?
29th Floor, Tower B, Third Estate Mansion
No 1 Shuguangxili
Chaoyang District
Beijing
China
86 10 5228 7777
86 10 5228 7777
info@lantai.cn www.lantai.cn