Indonesian employment law does not distinguish between blue- and white-collar workers. The only distinction it makes between employees relates to the type of employment agreement (ie, whether it is permanent or fixed term). The two types of employment agreements differ in various aspects, including the employee’s rights and entitlements, the possibility of probation, the duration of employment, the type of work performed by the employee, and entitlements that accrue upon termination.
Aside from the above, GR No 35/2021 (as defined below) recognises outsourcing arrangements under Indonesian employment law, whereby a user company may engage an outsourcing company holding the requisite business licence to perform certain work on its behalf, with the assigned personnel remaining employees of the outsourcing company. Recently, the government issued Minister of Manpower Regulation No 7 of 2026 on Outsourcing Arrangements, which restricts outsourcing to six categories of supporting services: security personnel; cleaning service; catering business; drivers; operational support services; and supporting activities in the mining, oil, gas, and electricity sectors. The regulation provides for a transitional period, during which existing outsourcing arrangements may remain in place, and companies are granted two years (ie, until 30 April 2028) to align their outsourcing activities with the new requirements. It is worth noting that the government is likely to amend the above categories in the coming months. Also see 7.2 Notice Periods and 7.3 Dismissal for (Serious) Cause.
An employment agreement for a specified period (fixed term) must be in writing and in Indonesian (or Indonesian should prevail if the agreement is bilingual). It is established based on either the employment period or the completion of specific work. If based on an employment period, the agreement will have a maximum cumulative period of five years (including any extension thereof). If based on the completion of specific work, the agreement must pertain to work that is either completed in a single assignment or is temporary in nature.
However, an employment agreement for a permanent employee may be made orally or in writing. In the former case, the employer must issue a letter to the employee confirming permanent employment. The appointment letter must at least contain:
The terms and conditions that must be included in a written employment agreement include:
Regular working hours in Indonesia are considered to be:
Flexible-working-hour arrangements are possible subject to consensus between the parties under the employment agreement, employee handbook (also known as company regulations) or a collective bargaining agreement.
An employee is considered part time if the working hours are fewer than seven hours per day and 35 hours per week. Wages for part-time employees may be calculated on an hourly basis.
Overtime work can only be performed at the request of the employer and with the employee’s consent, which must be provided in either hard copy or digital form. Employees may work a maximum of four hours of overtime per day and 18 hours per week.
Employees subject to overtime work are entitled to receive overtime pay. The amount in overtime pay is based on hourly rates, calculated as 1/173 x monthly wages (basic salary and fixed allowance). In addition to receiving overtime pay, employees must be given sufficient rest opportunities. If employees work overtime for four hours or more, they must also be provided with food and beverages totalling at least 1,400 kcal.
The working hours that exceed the maximum daily and weekly limits are only applicable in specific sectors and for specific positions, including:
Exclusion from overtime pay exists for employees in roles such as thinker, planner, implementer or supervisor, whose work hours differ from those of other employees such that they receive a higher wage. These exempted positions must be clearly defined in the employment agreement, employee handbook or collective bargaining agreement.
Minimum wages vary between provinces and sectors of business, and only apply to employees who have been with a particular company for less than one year. The governor of a province stipulates minimum wages based on the suggestions and considerations of a wages council. The governor of a province may also set minimum wages for cities or regencies (districts) under their jurisdiction.
There is no mandatory 13th-month salary for employees in the private sector. Further, incentives, bonuses or reimbursement of work facilities are based on an agreement between an employer and employee, as well as the employer’s policy.
No government intervention takes place with respect to determining the procedure for and amount of compensation, pay increases, etc, apart from the minimum wage stipulation. These matters are left to the discretion of the employer and the terms agreed with the employee.
Additionally, Indonesian employment law recognises a mandatory religious holiday allowance of one month’s wages for employees with 12 months of consecutive service. For those with service periods of one to 12 months, the allowance is paid pro rata. The allowance should be paid at least seven days before the relevant religious holiday (eg, Eid al-Fitr or Christmas, depending on the employee’s religion or the employer’s policy).
Employees are entitled to paid leave, as further explained in 5.2 Sabbaticals.
No specific regulations exist on confidentiality or non-disparagement under Indonesian employment law; the applicability depends on the agreement between the employer and employee. These obligations are commonly inserted and agreed under the employment agreement or in a separate document (as the case may be).
There is no specific limitation on employee liability under the law. Pursuant to the Indonesian Civil Code, employers are liable for losses or damage caused by their employees. However, under the employment law, employers may make a deduction of up to 50% from an employee’s monthly salary to compensate for loss or damage suffered by the employer, subject to provisions in the employment agreement, employee handbook or collective bargaining agreement. The deduction can be made from the employee’s monthly wages until the loss or damage suffered by the employer is fully compensated.
Indonesian employment law does not specifically regulate non-compete clauses. Non-compete clauses can be agreed in practice by an employer and employee in an employment agreement or termination agreement (as the case may be). Given that there is no specific regulation on non-compete clauses, the validity and enforcement of non-compete clauses are subject to general contract law. They can be enforced should a breach occur, according to the dispute resolution terms specified under the agreement and the prevailing Indonesian civil procedural law.
As with non-compete clauses, Indonesian employment law does not expressly contain non-solicitation clauses. The matter can be agreed upon in an employment agreement or termination agreement (as the case may be). The validity and enforcement of non-solicitation clauses are also subject to general contract law. Non-solicitation can be enforced should a breach occur.
There is currently no specific data privacy law or regulation in the employment sphere.
In so far as an individual’s private or personal data or information is used, collected, processed, analysed, stored, displayed, sent, shared, destroyed or transferred via electronic media, the following apply: Law No 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection as amended (the “PDP Law”), as well as Law No 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions, as most recently amended by Law No 1 of 2026 on Penal Adjustments (the “EIT Law”). The PDP Law and the EIT Law set the principal standard for the handling of general electronic information and data protection.
The PDP Law stipulates that the processing of personal data must be based on a specific lawful basis, including the following:
In this regard, depending on the specific purpose of processing, an employer may or may not be required to obtain express consent, which will require further assessment on a case-by-case basis.
An implementing regulation of the EIT Law is the Ministry of Communications and Informatics (MOCI) Regulation No 20 of 2016 on Protection of Personal Data in Electronic Systems (“MOCI Regulation No 20/2016”). Under the PDP Law and MOCI Regulation No 20/2016, every company is required to increase awareness and prevention, and implement organisational steps (internal regulations) to protect the personal data of their employees. This can be done by, among other steps, conducting training to prevent the failure to protect personal data managed by human resources, and determining the level of security of personal data based on its nature and associated risks.
Expatriates can only be employed under a fixed-term employment agreement, and such employment is strictly subject to the validity and scope of their work permit issued by the relevant Indonesian government authorities. Expatriates cannot be employed for multiple positions in the same company and are prohibited from holding positions that involve responsibility for employment-related matters.
The holding of multiple positions at different companies is permissible, provided the positions are at the board of director or commissioner level (for a limited liability company); trustee, manager or supervisor level (foundation); or employee level in the context of vocational education and training, the digital economy, or the oil and gas sectors for contractors under co-operation agreements.
There are no statutory limitations or maximum quotas on the number of expatriates a company may employ. Nonetheless, Indonesian employment law explicitly requires that employers prioritise the hiring of Indonesian nationals, reflecting the government’s commitment to support and strengthen the local workforce.
In addition, the company must appoint an Indonesian mentee for each expatriate. The expatriates are required to provide education and training programmes to the Indonesian mentees to transfer their knowledge and skills.
Registration requirements that apply to the use of foreign workers include:
To date, there are no specific regulations and/or restrictions on mobile work in Indonesia. Consequently, whether or not mobile work is to be performed depends on the agreement between the employer and the employee and/or the employer’s policies.
Nevertheless, Indonesian employment law stipulates that an employment agreement must at least include information on the location of the workplace. As such, if a mobile work arrangement is agreed between the employer and the employee, conservatively, it must be specified under the employment agreement, employee handbook, or collective bargaining agreement.
Data privacy regulations in relation to mobile work will follow the general data privacy regulations, as there are no specific data privacy regulations related to mobile work. See 3.1 Data Privacy Law and Employment.
In terms of occupational safety and health (OSH) in relation to mobile work, there are also no specific regulations and/or restrictions in this regard, and general OSH regulations would apply.
Similarly, there are also no specific regulations and/or restrictions for social security regarding mobile work. The Manpower Social Security and the Health Social Security programmes will also cover employees engaging in mobile work.
What would generally be an issue in a mobile work arrangement, concerning OSH and social security, would be how to determine work accidents. Under OSH regulations, employers are required to report every work accident that occurs to the authorities. Work accidents will further be covered under the social security programme. Generally, work accidents are:
With the above definition of work accident in mind, in a mobile work arrangement, it would be difficult to determine a work accident, which would also affect employers’ obligation under the OSH regulations.
Indonesian employment law does not explicitly recognise the concept of sabbatical leave.
The types of leave that are recognised in Indonesia are as follows:
For each consecutive month exceeding the above period until the employer terminates the employment relationship, the employee continues to be entitled to 25% of their wages. After this period, the employer may terminate employment by paying the stipulated severance package to the employee.
Religious obligations – employees are entitled to paid leave due to the performance of a religious obligation (such as the Hajj in Mecca). The duration of leave permitted for a religious pilgrimage is determined by the Ministry of Religious Affairs. This obligation to pay wages during leave due to the performance of a religious obligation is applicable only once for each employee during their respective service period.
Additionally, employees are entitled to paid leave in the event of:
Other than the above, although not stipulated, in practice, employees may also take unpaid leave based on the employer’s policies, at the employer’s discretion, or subject to an agreement between the employer and the employee, bearing in mind the principle of “no-work-no-pay” that is recognised under Indonesian employment law.
Thus, sabbatical leave may refer to an extended period of leave, such as paid long leave, unpaid leave, prolonged illness, and/or leave due to religious obligations, with no specific restrictions other than those pertaining to the particular leave period, as well as work benefits and the payment of salary (ie, paid or unpaid).
There are currently no new legal developments or anticipated regulatory changes in the field of “new work” in Indonesia. The government is not expected to issue any laws or regulations regarding this matter.
Despite the absence of formal regulation, companies in Indonesia have introduced the use of certain new practices, such as:
As these practices are not currently regulated by Indonesian employment law, their implementation is subject to each company’s internal policies or mutual agreements between the employer and the employee. This allows employers to have flexibility in having work arrangements that best suit their business models, provided such arrangements remain in general compliance with Indonesian employment law.
It is worth noting that, in 2023, the Indonesian Constitutional Court issued Decision No 168/PUU-XII/2023 dated 31 October 2024 (“Decision 168”), which clarifies several provisions of Indonesian employment law without making any major changes or amendments, and suggests that a new employment law will be drafted within two years. In line with this, the proposed amendment has been included in the 2025–2029 National Legislation Program. However, no draft has been released, and no official updates on its progress have been made available to date.
Rules related to labour unions are contained primarily in Law No 21 of 2000 on Labour Unions. For a labour union to be recognised, following its establishment, it must:
A recognised labour union is entitled to:
Other than labour unions, Indonesian employment law also recognises bipartite co-operation bodies (BCBs). Employers that employ more than 50 employees are obliged to establish a BCB.
A BCB functions as a communication-and-consultation forum between an employer and representatives of a labour union and employees, to improve industrial relations.
Members of a BCB comprise representatives of the employer and employees/labour union (with equal composition and at least six members).
Indonesian employment law recognises collective bargaining agreements as instruments for collective bargaining between one or several registered labour unions and one or several employers or employer organisations. Collective labour agreements are valid for two years from execution and extendable for one year. Collective labour agreements must be registered with the manpower agency with jurisdiction over the employer’s work location.
Collective bargaining agreements contain the rights and obligations of the employer, labour union and employees, but in more detail. As a general rule, the quality and quantity of the conditions of employment stipulated in the collective labour agreements must not be less beneficial than those regulated under the prevailing laws and regulations.
Although there are some instances where bargaining takes place at the industry level, the majority of bargaining over collective bargaining agreements takes place within companies.
Additionally, despite the similarities, collective bargaining agreements must be differentiated from an employee handbook. A collective bargaining agreement is drafted and agreed upon based on negotiations between the employer and the registered labour union(s). In contrast, the employee handbook is drafted by the employer, taking into account suggestions from employee/labour union representatives, and further approved by the manpower agency with jurisdiction over the employer’s work location. Similar to collective bargaining agreements, the employee handbook stipulates the general rights and obligations of the employer and the employee.
A company may maintain only one of these work rules at a time. Collective bargaining agreements will be prepared if there are any labour union(s) in the company that qualify the minimum requirement to initiate a collective bargaining agreement negotiation. An employee handbook must be prepared if the company employs at least ten employees.
In principle, the prevailing Indonesian laws discourage termination of employment. Employers, employees, labour unions, and the Indonesian government are required to make every possible effort to avoid it. If termination seems inevitable despite all of these efforts, it must be effected by following the rules and procedures prescribed in Indonesian employment law.
Employment termination may not be carried out unilaterally by an employer without stating a reason that has been specified in the prevailing manpower law and regulations, employee handbook, collective labour agreement, or the employment agreement. Consequently, to unilaterally terminate an employee, the employer must be able to identify suitable grounds for termination and prepare sufficient/appropriate justification. The reason for termination of employment must be clearly stated in the written notice for termination (see 7.2 Notice Periods).
Employment termination may be initiated by either the employer or the employee for reasons related to an individual employee or for business-related reasons.
For Reasons Related to an Individual Employee
Employment may be terminated in the following circumstances:
For Business-Related Reasons
Employment may be terminated in the following circumstances:
Other than the grounds for termination listed above, an employment relationship can also be terminated by way of mutual agreement (ie, with the consent of both the employer and the employee) via execution of a Mutual Employment Termination Agreement (META) (see 7.4 Termination Agreements).
Specifically, for a contract employee employed under a definite-term employment agreement, the employer has the right to terminate the employment (before the expiry of the agreement’s term) regardless of the grounds for termination. The employer must pay compensation to the employee, the amount of which is equal to the amount of salary that the contract employee would have received until the expiry of the definite-term employment agreement and (only for an Indonesian contract employee) the compensation at the end of the employment, the amount of which depends on the employee’s length of service.
There are no procedures for specific grounds for termination that differ according to the number of employees that will be terminated (including collective redundancy/mass termination). All terminations must be implemented using the same procedure.
Unilateral Termination of Permanent Employees
If the employer unilaterally terminates the employment, they must provide written notice of termination to both the employee and the labour union (if the employee is a member) at least 14 business days before the intended termination date. For employees in a probationary period, the notice period is seven business days. If the employment agreement, employee handbook or collective labour agreement stipulate a longer notice period, the employer must comply with this specified notice period or make payment in lieu of notice, if permissible. As for termination due to an employee’s serious violation (gross misconduct), prior notification is not required; thus, the termination can be effective immediately upon issuance of notice of termination.
Rejection of the termination by the employee
The employee may reject the termination in writing, with reasons for the rejection, within seven business days of receipt of the notice of termination.
If, after being notified, the employee rejects termination, the employer and the employee will undergo the bipartite negotiation. If the employer and the employee successfully reach a mutual agreement during the bipartite, the parties may settle the issue amicably by entering into a META (see 7.4. Termination Agreements) reflecting the terms of the settlement. However, if that fails, the parties will undergo the industrial relations dispute settlement mechanism provided under prevailing laws and regulations. These include:
In the event of rejection, the employment relationship will continue until the parties reach a mutual settlement or the issuance of a final and binding court decision declaring employment termination. Consequently, the employer must continue paying the employee’s salary until the employment termination date, and the employee must continue to perform their work obligation, unless the employee’s suspension is in place.
Severance package
Employees are entitled to a severance package upon termination, comprising severance pay, service appreciation pay and compensation of entitlements. The amount in the severance package depends on the employee’s length of service and the reason for termination. The standard computation to calculate the severance package is stipulated in Article 40 of Government Regulation No 35 of 2021 on Fixed-Term Employment Agreements, Outsourcing, Work and Rest Hours, and Termination of Employment (GR No 35/2021). This standard computation of the severance package is then increased by the multiplier specified for each reason for termination. Employees may be suspended on full pay during the termination process.
Based on Decision 168, which provides further clarification on how the provisions of the employment law must be interpreted, the amount of the severance package payable by the employer must be, at a minimum, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the employment law; by extension, the provisions of GR No 35/2021.
The Indonesian employment law and GR No 35/2021 do not regulate the size of the severance package payable under mutual termination. Therefore, the amount paid is subject to mutual agreement between the employer and the employee. In a META, both parties may also waive the notice requirement, and the employer will make a payment in lieu of notice.
Termination of a Contract Employee
For the termination of a contract employee before the expiry of the contract, the contract employee will not be entitled to a severance package. The employer, however, must provide compensation in an amount equal to the amount of salary the employee would have received until expiry of the contract’s term, unless the termination is for reasons that may cause termination of the agreement as specified in the employment agreement, employee handbook or collective labour agreement. In addition, specifically for an Indonesian contract employee, the employer must also pay compensation at the end of employment, calculated according to the formula stipulated in GR No 35/2021.
Reporting the Termination
External advice/authorisation is not required before an employer terminates an employee or serves written notice. However, the employer must report the termination to the Ministry of Manpower or the manpower agency with jurisdiction over the employee’s work location. In the event of mutual termination, the META must be registered with the relevant Industrial Relations Court.
Indonesian employment law recognises termination of employment for a serious violation (gross misconduct). Unlike regular employment termination, termination for gross misconduct does not require a minimum notice period; thus, the termination can be effective immediately upon issuance of the notice of termination. Employees terminated for gross misconduct will not be entitled to severance pay or service appreciation pay. Instead, they will be entitled to compensation of entitlements and separation pay in the amount regulated under the employment agreement, employee handbook or collective labour agreement.
The notice of termination for gross misconduct can be challenged or objected to by the employee; in which case, the employment relationship will continue until both parties reach a mutual settlement or a final and binding court decision is issued declaring the termination of employment. As a result, the employer must continue to pay the employee’s salary until the employment termination date, and the employee must continue to fulfil their work obligations, unless the employee is under suspension.
As the law is silent on types of gross misconduct, violations considered gross misconduct must be explicitly stipulated in the employment agreement, employee handbook or collective labour agreements.
For reference, GR No 35/2021 provides the following examples of action that can be classified as gross misconduct (to be further stated in the employment agreement, employee handbook or collective labour agreement):
Even though it is not expressly required under Indonesian employment law, if the gross misconduct constitutes a criminal act, the Industrial Relations Court may require a final and binding criminal court decision declaring that the employee has indeed committed a criminal act, as proof of the employee’s violation, in relation to their termination.
Termination agreements (or METAs) are permissible under Indonesian employment laws and regulations, which are usually entered into between the employer and employee if the employment relationship is mutually terminated. The META is usually formed based on the mutual consensus of the employer and the employee, wherein the parties’ agreement to enter into a META is done under the principle of freedom of contract provided under the Indonesian Civil Code.
Upon execution, the META must be registered with the Industrial Relations Court that has jurisdiction over the META-signing location. A duly executed META is valid and binding upon execution of the META and the payment of the severance package. Registration of a META is only a procedural formality.
There are no specific requirements or limitations on the terms of a META, as these will be based on the parties’ agreement. In general, a META can stipulate the effective date of termination, the amount in the severance package that the employer will pay to the employee, and even post-employment termination obligations such as non-solicitation, non-compete and confidentiality provisions that the employee must adhere to for a certain period, provided they do not contravene the law, general principles and public order.
There is no specific protection against dismissal for particular categories of employees. However, employers are prohibited from terminating an employee for the following reasons:
Wrongful dismissal is regarded as termination of employment without valid reasons (as stipulated under the Indonesian employment law) or if the termination is not carried out through proper procedure.
The consequences of wrongful dismissal claims may include the following, subject to the consideration and discretion of the court judges on hearing and examining the industrial relations dispute:
Indonesia has ratified the International Labour Organisation Convention No 111 of 1958 on Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation. Thus, discrimination regulated in this Convention is sufficient grounds for an anti-discrimination claim. In other instances, it can encompass:
The burden of proof for anti-discrimination claims follows the general civil procedural law, as it lies with the claimant.
Under the Indonesian employment law, anyone applying for a job has the same opportunity to obtain the job without being discriminated against on the grounds of gender, ethnicity, race, religion, or political orientation, in accordance with the person’s interest and capability. Equal treatment also applies to persons with disabilities.
Further, employees have the right to receive equal treatment without discrimination from their employer, and employers are obliged to provide their employees with equal rights and responsibilities, free from discrimination on the basis of gender, ethnicity, race, religion, skin colour or political orientation.
The Indonesian employment law imposes administrative sanctions for violations of the discrimination rules. However, it does not specifically stipulate the damages/relief applicable in an anti-discrimination claim. Nevertheless, under the general tort provision in the Indonesian Civil Code, a person who commits an unlawful act that causes harm to another person must compensate that person for the damages caused.
Alternatively, if an employee opts to file an employment termination claim with an Industrial Relations Court, they may receive a severance package if the court accepts the claim.
An electronic court or e-court system has been established in Indonesian courts as a follow-up to Supreme Court Decree No 7 of 2022 on the Amendment to Regulation of the Supreme Court No 1 of 2019 on the Administration of Cases and Legal Proceedings in Courts Via Electronic Means, which stated that administration and legal proceedings via electronic means will apply to special civil law cases, including those under the Industrial Relations Court. The regulation of an e-court only applies to court proceedings before the Industrial Relations Court and does not provide further regulations regarding employment disputes undergoing bipartite negotiation, mediation, conciliation, or arbitration.
In practice, the implementation of the e-court proceedings at the Industrial Relations Court of Jakarta is still in development and is generally subject to the discretion of the judges handling the respective cases.
Industrial relations disputes in Indonesia are settled via a three-tier mechanism:
An appeal to the Supreme Court may be filed by any of the parties against a decision of the Industrial Relations Court. An Industrial Relations Court’s decision, which is not appealed, and a Supreme Court’s decision will be final and binding on the parties.
There are no specific rules on class action for an employment dispute, nor has this ever been tested via class action. However, in regular Industrial Relations Court proceedings, there is no limitation on the number of plaintiffs. In practice, it could be hundreds in a mass termination case.
Parties to an industrial relations dispute may act on their own behalf, or be represented by attorneys, by a labour union or by an employer’s organisation of which they are a member.
The industrial relations dispute settlement mechanism mandates that the employer, employee and labour union (if relevant) first try to settle the dispute through bipartite and/or mediation proceedings, both of which are also considered alternative dispute resolution avenues, before commencing proceedings in the Industrial Relations Court.
Arbitration is another possible alternative method for resolving an industrial relations dispute. However, it is only allowed for:
As a matter of general Indonesian arbitration law, pre-dispute arbitration agreements are enforceable. However, agreements to arbitrate, post-dispute, are also recognised.
Attorneys’ fees cannot be awarded to the other party. As stipulated under Indonesian Civil Procedural Law, attorneys’ fees are borne by those who utilise the attorneys.
Graha CIMB Niaga 24th Floor
Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kav 58
Jakarta 12190
Indonesia
+62 212 505 125
+62 212 505 001
info@abnrlaw.com www.abnrlaw.com
Key Reforms and Employer Considerations
Indonesia’s employment law landscape is moving through a period of significant adjustment. Alongside discussions on a new standalone manpower law, recent developments have covered areas such as outsourcing, minimum wages, labour inspections, workplace safety committees, and protection for domestic workers.
These developments reflect a broader trend towards greater regulation and oversight of employment and workforce arrangements. For employers, the impact extends beyond HR compliance and may affect workforce planning, transaction due diligence, vendor management, employment costs, and internal governance.
Employers also continue to face practical challenges that are not directly related to recent reforms. One common example is the structuring of remuneration for internationally mobile employees and executives, which can raise employment, tax, immigration, and compliance considerations across multiple jurisdictions.
This article outlines the key employment law developments in Indonesia during 2026 and highlights the considerations for employers as the regulatory framework continues to evolve.
A Constitutional Deadline Drives the Reform Agenda
The current reform agenda has been driven largely by Constitutional Court Decision No 168/PUU-XXI/2023, issued on 31 October 2024. The court found that some employment provisions under Law No 6 of 2023 on the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No 2 of 2022 on Job Creation into Law (the “Job Creation Law”) overlapped with Law No 13 of 2003 on Manpower, as amended from time to time (the “Manpower Law”). This created uncertainty over which rules employers and employees were required to follow.
Rather than immediately invalidating the relevant provisions, the court gave the government and the house of representatives (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, or DPR), Indonesia’s legislative body, two years to move employment provisions from the Job Creation Law into a dedicated Manpower Law. The deadline is 31 October 2026.
A draft Manpower Bill is currently being discussed. It contains 19 chapters and 224 articles and is expected to introduce changes in areas such as fixed-term employment, outsourcing, foreign worker employment, wages, termination, and severance entitlements.
Two proposed changes may have a significant impact on employers. First, the maximum duration of fixed-term employment may be reduced from the current five-year limit. Second, outsourcing may be subject to further restrictions. These changes could require employers to review their workforce arrangements.
The bill has not yet been enacted, and its final content remains uncertain. Employers should continue monitoring developments and avoid relying on draft provisions until the new law is passed.
Workforce Structures Under Greater Scrutiny
Although the new Manpower Law is still being discussed, employers may wish to review how potential changes could affect their workforce arrangements. This is particularly relevant for companies that rely on fixed-term employees, outsourced personnel, or other flexible workforce models.
Fixed-term employment is likely to remain a key area of focus. Under current Indonesian law, a fixed-term employment agreement that does not meet the legal requirements may be treated as a permanent employment relationship. Any future changes to the rules could increase the compliance risks for employers that continue using outdated employment contracts, including unplanned permanent headcount, retroactive employee entitlements, and employment disputes.
Outsourcing may also be affected by the new law. If the scope of permitted outsourcing is narrowed or additional requirements are introduced, companies may need to review both their outsourcing agreements and their existing operating arrangements. This may be especially relevant in sectors where support functions, project-based activities, or non-core business operations are commonly outsourced.
The implications may also be relevant in transaction contexts. In mergers, acquisitions and business restructurings, workforce composition, employment status, vendor reliance, and potential termination exposure often form part of the legal and commercial assessment. Any future tightening of the rules on fixed-term employment or outsourcing may therefore affect transaction due diligence, valuation assumptions, and post-completion integration planning.
In practical terms, employers should not wait for the final law before reviewing their existing arrangements. A preliminary workforce mapping exercise may help identify areas where the company relies on categories of workers that could be affected by future reform.
Outsourcing Rules Tighten Ahead of the Wider Reform
While the new Manpower Law is still under discussion, the government has already introduced significant changes to outsourcing through Minister of Manpower Regulation No 7 of 2026, which took effect on 30 April 2026. These rules apply immediately and independently of the proposed legislation.
The regulation limits outsourcing to certain supporting activities, such as cleaning, catering, security, transportation, and specified support services in the extractive and energy sectors. It also allows outsourcing for operational support services, although the regulation does not clearly define this category. As a result, companies may need to review existing outsourcing arrangements to determine whether they remain compliant.
The regulation also introduces more detailed requirements for outsourcing agreements. These agreements must be in writing and include key information such as the scope of work, contract term, workplace, and number of outsourced workers. They must also address employee entitlements, including wages, working hours, leave, occupational health and safety, social security, and termination rights.
The outsourcing provider remains the legal employer of the outsourced workers. However, user companies are expected to take a more active role in ensuring compliance with labour law requirements. This may require stronger oversight of outsourcing providers and more robust contractual protections.
The regulation also increases regulatory oversight. Outsourcing agreements must be registered with the local manpower office within three working days after signing. Registration may be suspended if the outsourced activities are not permitted or if the agreement does not meet the regulatory requirements. Non-compliance may result in administrative sanctions.
Existing outsourcing arrangements remain valid but must comply with the new regulation by 30 April 2028. Companies should use the transition period to review their outsourcing arrangements and make any necessary changes before the deadline.
A New Focus on Wage Growth and Compensation Planning
Another important development relates to wage growth and compensation management. On 16 December 2025, the government issued Government Regulation No 49 of 2025, which amended the wage framework under Government Regulation No 36 of 2021 on Wages. The regulation introduced a revised method for calculating minimum wages and provided the basis for setting provincial minimum wages in 2026.
Under the new rules, annual minimum wage adjustments are determined by considering inflation and economic growth, with both factors adjusted through an alpha co-efficient. The practical impact has been seen in minimum wage increases across many provinces in 2026. In Jakarta, for example, the provincial minimum wage increased to more than IDR5.7 million (approximately USD350) per month.
For employers, the key challenge is often not the increase in minimum wages itself, but its wider effect on overall workforce costs. Indonesian minimum wages apply only to employees with less than one year of service. Employers are also required to maintain wage structures and scales for more senior employees. As minimum wages rise, employers may need to review compensation for longer-serving employees to preserve appropriate differences between junior and more experienced roles.
The challenge can be more complex for businesses operating in multiple provinces or sectors, where different provincial, regency, municipal, or sectoral minimum wages may apply. In these cases, wage compliance and compensation planning may require a more tailored approach.
More broadly, these developments highlight the growing importance of workforce cost planning. As labour costs continue to change, employers may wish to review their compensation arrangements regularly to maintain compliance and remain competitive in the labour market.
Remuneration Structures for Internationally Mobile Executives
As multinational groups become more integrated across jurisdictions, it is increasingly common for executives in Indonesia to hold both local and regional responsibilities. This raises practical questions regarding the employing entity, allocation of responsibilities between group companies, and the manner in which compensation is structured and paid.
Under Law No 7 of 2011 on Currency, and Bank Indonesia Regulation No 17/3/PBI/2015 on the Mandatory Use of Rupiah within the Territory of the Republic of Indonesia, salaries paid in Indonesia must generally be paid in rupiah. This requirement is also reflected in Government Regulation No 36 of 2021 on Wages. As a result, an Indonesian employer generally cannot pay a salary entirely in a foreign currency.
A limited exception may apply where a foreign employee is assigned to Indonesia by an overseas employer under a genuine secondment arrangement, as per the Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No 17/11/DKSP of 2015 stipulation. In practice, foreign-currency payments may be possible if the arrangement is properly documented. Given the limited regulatory guidance, current practice should be confirmed before relying on this exception.
Some multinational groups also use split-contract arrangements, under which an executive has separate contracts with an Indonesian entity and an overseas group company. The Indonesian contract typically covers local duties and is paid in rupiah, while the overseas contract covers regional or group responsibilities and may be paid in a foreign currency.
These arrangements are generally feasible, provided they reflect the executive’s actual duties and reporting lines. If the arrangement is viewed as a single employment relationship in substance, compensation paid overseas could be treated as part of the employee’s wage for Indonesian employment law purposes, potentially affecting severance, social security, and other statutory entitlements.
Employers should ensure that these arrangements are supported by clear documentation and reflect the commercial reality of the role, including employment agreements, secondment documents, role descriptions, payroll arrangements, tax treatment, and immigration records.
Formal Protection for Domestic Workers
Indonesia has also introduced Law No 2 of 2026 on the Protection of Domestic Workers. The law creates a dedicated legal framework for domestic workers, including housekeepers, caregivers, drivers, and other household support workers, who were previously not specifically regulated under Indonesian labour law.
For most multinational companies and corporate employers, the direct impact of the law is likely to be limited, as domestic workers generally do not form part of their workforce. However, the law is relevant because it reflects the direction of Indonesia’s employment policy.
The law is part of a broader effort to provide greater protection and legal certainty for workers and to strengthen regulatory oversight of employment relationships.
More broadly, it shows that Indonesian labour regulation is expanding to cover categories of work that have traditionally been less regulated. This trend is likely to continue as the government develops its wider employment law reforms.
Workplace Safety Committees and Internal Governance
Workplace health and safety requirements have also been updated through Minister of Manpower Regulation No 13 of 2025, which replaces the previous 1987 rules on Occupational Safety and Health Committees (Panitia Pembina Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja, or “P2K3”). The regulation updates the requirements for establishing and operating a P2K3.
A company must establish a P2K3 if it employs at least 100 workers. The requirement also applies to high-risk workplaces, regardless of the number of employees. This means that companies in sectors such as manufacturing, construction, mining and energy may be required to establish a P2K3 even if they have fewer than 100 workers.
The P2K3 must include representatives from both management and employees. It must be chaired by a senior management representative and have a registered occupational safety and health expert as its secretary.
The regulation also introduces new reporting requirements. The chairperson of the P2K3 must submit activity reports every six months, or as otherwise required, through the Ministry of Manpower’s electronic reporting system. Companies that are required to have a P2K3 should ensure that it has been properly established, registered, and is operating in accordance with the new requirements.
More broadly, the regulation reflects a growing focus on workplace compliance and internal governance. Employers are expected not only to comply with health and safety requirements, but also to maintain proper records and demonstrate compliance during inspections or following workplace incidents.
Labour Inspections Become More Structured
The labour inspection regime has also been updated through Minister of Manpower Regulation No 11 of 2026. The regulation introduces a more structured process for labour inspections and enforcement.
Under the new framework, inspections generally follow three stages: preventative guidance, corrective action through an Inspection Notice, and criminal investigation. However, serious violations may lead directly to criminal investigation. These include fatal workplace accidents, permanent disabilities, unlawful child labour, and certain other criminal employment offences.
The regulation also introduces clearer deadlines for compliance. Employers generally have 30 working days to correct violations identified in an Inspection Notice. If the violation is not remedied, a second notice may be issued with a shorter compliance period of 14 working days. Continued non-compliance may result in administrative sanctions or criminal investigation.
The powers of labour inspectors have also been expanded. Inspectors may obtain information from employers, employees, labour unions, employer associations, occupational safety and health professionals, and designated company compliance personnel. They may also order employers to pay outstanding employment entitlements, including unpaid overtime, minimum wage shortfalls, and work accident or occupational disease benefits.
For employers, labour inspections should no longer be viewed as routine administrative exercises. Companies should ensure that employment records are properly maintained and that processes are in place to respond to inspection requests and address compliance issues within the required timelines.
More broadly, the regulation reflects a stronger focus on labour law enforcement. Employers are expected not only to comply with employment requirements, but also to demonstrate compliance when requested by labour inspectors.
Practical Priorities for Employers
While some of the recent reforms include transition periods, employers should use this time to review their workforce arrangements and identify any compliance gaps.
Outsourcing should be a key area of focus. Companies that use outsourced personnel should assess whether the outsourced activities are permitted under Minister of Manpower Regulation No 7 of 2026. They should also review existing outsourcing agreements to ensure they meet the new requirements and contain the required worker protections.
Employers should also review wage compliance. This includes confirming that employees are paid at least the applicable minimum wage, and assessing whether current wage structures remain appropriate across the work location.
Workplace health and safety compliance should also be reviewed. Companies should confirm whether they are required to establish a P2K3 and ensure that all registration and reporting obligations have been fulfilled. Given the increased focus on labour inspections, employers should also have procedures in place to respond to inspection requests and address any identified issues promptly.
Multinational companies should separately review arrangements for internationally mobile employees and executives. This includes ensuring that secondment, foreign currency payment, tax, immigration, and other cross-border arrangements are properly documented and implemented.
Finally, employers should continue monitoring the proposed new Manpower Law. Areas such as fixed-term employment, outsourcing, termination procedures, severance pay, and other termination-related benefits may change. Although the final legislation is still being discussed, early planning can help businesses prepare for future compliance requirements.
Looking Ahead
The Constitutional Court has set a deadline of 31 October 2026 for the enactment of the new Manpower Law. However, the final content of the law remains uncertain, particularly in areas that could have a significant impact on employers.
At the same time, employment law reform is already under way. Recent developments include new outsourcing rules, changes to the minimum wage framework, updated labour inspection procedures, revised P2K3 requirements, and the introduction of a law on the protection of domestic workers.
The new Manpower Law is also unlikely to be the final stage of the reform process. Further implementing regulations are expected and will play an important role in determining how the new rules apply in practice.
For employers, this is a good opportunity to review existing workforce arrangements and strengthen compliance processes. Although the final form of the new law is still being discussed, early preparation can help businesses respond more effectively once the new legal framework is introduced.
Note: This article reflects the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of EY or any member of the EY organisation. It is provided for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice.
Indonesia Stock Exchange Building Tower 1
12th Floor Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 52–53
Jakarta 12190
Indonesia
+62 215 289 5000
+62 215 289 5201
Fahrul.Yusuf@id.ey.com www.ey.com/en_id/services/law