Changing Times
While operating in the gambling industry in Great Britain continues to be challenging, particularly with the Gambling Commission’s ongoing focus on enforcement, 2023 has been a pivotal year for the industry as the review of the Gambling Act 2005 (the “Gambling Review”) progresses and following the publication of the White Paper in April 2023.
The Gambling Review was launched by the UK government in December 2020. Following a series of delays driven by the COVID-19 pandemic and political instability, the long overdue White Paper High stakes: gambling reform in the digital age (the “White Paper”) was published on 27 April 2023, nearly 30 months after the Gambling Review was launched. The White Paper is designed to “protect vulnerable users in [a] smartphone era” by striking a better balance between consumer freedoms and the protection of the vulnerable. It covers the following six sections:
The intention is for the proposals to be introduced through a combination of:
Key proposals included in the White Paper are discussed below.
Online protections (players and products)
Proposals include the following.
Marketing and advertising
Proposals include the following.
The Gambling Commission’s powers and resources
Proposals include the following.
Dispute resolution and customer redress
The government proposes that the industry, along with other stakeholders in the industry, creates an operationally independent ombudsman. The ombudsman would deal with disputes relating to social responsibility or gambling-related harm where operators are unable to resolve those issues, and will provide appropriate redress where a customer suffers losses due to the operator’s social responsibility failures. It is expected that the ombudsman will be established within a year of publication of the White Paper. However, if this is not achieved, the government will legislate to create a statutory ombudsman.
Children and young adults
Proposals include the following.
Land-based gambling
Proposals include the following.
The White Paper is an enormous milestone and a one-in-a-generation opportunity for the industry. However, there is still significant work to be done, and the White Paper is only the end of the beginning of the Gambling Review. At the time of writing, several proposals have already been subject to public consultation, with further consultations expected. The intention is that most key proposals from the White Paper will be implemented by Summer 2024, although this is optimistic, particularly for those changes that require primary or secondary legislation.
See 13.1 Anticipated Reform for more information on the government’s and the Gambling Commission’s public consultations. Please also see the UK Trends & Developments chapter for further insight and commentary.
Enforcement
Anti-money laundering, safer gambling and consumer protection have been continuing areas of key focus across UK gambling sectors in recent years, as reflected in high-profile enforcement action; and this is not set to change. The Gambling Commission has also been carrying out thematic work on fee categories, regulatory returns and source of funding, and it is expected that enforcement regarding these wider LCCP and 2005 Act requirements will be seen in 2023 and 2024.
During the 2022–2023 financial year, the Gambling Commission issued over GBP60 million in penalty packages, as well as three suspensions and one revocation. They also revoked one personal functional licence, and issued warnings to three personal management licence holders. At the time of writing, in 2023/2024, there has already been nearly GBP7.5 million in penalty packages, as well as one suspension.
The new “special measures” process is now a permanent feature of the Gambling Commission’s regulatory toolkit and is used where serious failings are revealed as part of a compliance assessment, with the licensees being invited to submit and agree on an action plan to rectify the failings, to avoid a formal licence review being commenced.
Recent Changes
New remote customer interaction guidance
Following consultation, the Gambling Commission has updated the remote customer interaction guidance which came into effect from 31 October 2023. The guidance accompanies Social Responsibility Code Provision (SRCP) 3.4.3, which was introduced partly in September 2022 and partly in February 2023. Publication of the customer interaction guidance was delayed while the consultation was pending. Under SRCP 3.4.3, licensees are required to take the guidance into account, which has been created to assist them in understanding and complying with the remote customer interaction requirements. However, the guidance is complex, despite issues being raised in response to the Commission’s consultation on the ambiguity of its content.
Marketing and advertising
In April 2023, the Premier League announced its voluntary decision to prohibit Premier Clubs from having gambling sponsors on the front of football shirts. This voluntary prohibition is set to take effect from the end of the 2025–2026 football season.
In July 2023, the government responded to its Online Advertising Programme consultation, which was set up in March 2022 with the purpose of establishing a framework for protecting consumers against harmful paid-for adverts online. The government plans to implement a new statutory framework to combat illegal advertising and better protect children and young people. Firstly, there will be a Ministerial-led taskforce to drive non-legislative action, such as bolstering the evidence base, together with a further consultation to shape and determine the content of the legislation. The response will have consequences for gambling advertisers, including marketing affiliates and the publishers and platforms with which they work.
Anti-money laundering
In June 2023, the Gambling Commission revised its casino AML guidance to explicitly address “proliferation financing”, which pertains to the act of financing the illegal creation, supply or use of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear-related weapons, goods and technology. Casino operators must now consider any such risk to their business in their policies and procedures and in their money laundering risk assessment.
Changes to the LCCP
In October 2023, the Gambling Commission published its response to its consultation on proposed changes to the LCCP. The Gambling Commission has confirmed that the following changes will be made to the LCCP.
Industry forum
The Gambling Commission announced in September 2023 that it would be establishing an industry forum, to comprise around ten members and representatives of the gambling industry. The members’ role will be to provide the Gambling Commission with further insight into the perspectives of gambling businesses. The recruitment of the Chair began in September 2023.
Economic crime levy
On 1 April 2022, HM Treasury implemented the obligation for firms supervised under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 to pay a levy in relation to economic crime and anti-money laundering. The Levy was introduced under The Economic Crime (Anti-Money Laundering) Levy Regulations 2022. For casinos (including B2Bs holding a casino (game host) operating licence), the levy is collected by the Gambling Commission, and first payments for the financial year 2022–2023 were due by 30 September 2023. The levy payable is dependent on the casino’s UK revenue (not GGY) for the financial year, as follows.
The following online sectors are regulated in Great Britain:
Free-to-play social gaming is not regulated. The Gambling Commission concluded, following a scoping review in 2015, that the sector did not require regulation but would continue to be monitored by the Gambling Commission for any potential risks.
See 2.2 Land-Based for product definitions.
The following land-based sectors are regulated in Great Britain.
The key legislation applicable to the gambling sector is as follows:
The 2005 Act is set out as follows:
The Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP) is issued under the 2005 Act, Section 24, and is, in the authors’ opinion, the key reference document with which all licence holders should familiarise themselves. See also 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes.
Gambling, in the 2005 Act, means gaming, betting or participating in a lottery.
Gaming means “playing a game of chance for a prize”, including games where the chance element can be eliminated by superlative skill. “Prize” constitutes money or money’s worth and “playing” means a chance of winning, irrespective of whether there is a risk of any loss.
Betting means the making of, or acceptance of, bets on:
Subcategories of betting include:
Lotteries are classed as “simple” or “complex” and they cannot be run for private or commercial gain. Lotteries are “simple” if:
Complex lotteries differ on the point of prize allocation, whereby prizes are allocated by a series of processes, the first of which relies wholly on chance.
Subcategories of lotteries include:
The 2005 Act also addresses the following cross-category activities in the event that products satisfy more than one of the above definitions of gambling:
Land-based gambling is not specifically defined under the 2005 Act.
Online gambling is referred to as “remote gambling” and means “gambling in which persons participate by the use of remote communication”. Remote communication includes:
Part 3 of the 2005 Act covers all offences; however, key offences are as follows.
“Providing facilities for gambling” occurs where a person satisfies at least one of the following:
Other key offences of note include:
See 9.5 Sanctions/Penalties for advertising sanctions and penalties.
The penalties for the key offences listed in 3.5 Key Offences and 9.5 Sanctions/Penalties are a maximum of 51 weeks’ imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.
See 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes and 13.1 Anticipated Reform.
The Gambling Commission and various licensing authorities enforce the 2005 Act. Under the 2005 Act, Part 2, the Gambling Commission’s primary functions include:
The ASA regulates gambling advertising in the UK. See 11. Enforcement.
The Gambling Commission’s approach to regulation is risk-based, with the aim of continuing to raise standards. The Gambling Commission indicated in its Business Plan, of 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024, that its five strategic objectives continue to be:
See 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes and 13.1 Anticipated Reform.
The types of licences are:
Generally, the operating licence types are:
The 2005 Act enables the Gambling Commission to authorise all regulated land-based and online activities outlined in 2.1 Online and 2.2 Land-Based, including gambling software. Licences authorising multiple licensable activities (for instance, bingo and casino) are classed as a “combined operating licence”. Subject to exceptions, licences are also amenable to “umbrella” arrangements for those acting in the course of another’s business. “Umbrella” arrangements are approved at the Gambling Commission’s discretion following a review of various factors, including:
See also 6. Online Gambling.
Premises Licences
Premises licences, issued by the relevant licensing authority (not the Gambling Commission), are available that authorise the following activities:
See 5.1 Premises Licensing for requirements.
Personal Licences
Personal licences are governed by the LCCP and issued by the Gambling Commission. They allow the Gambling Commission to regulate individuals and to hold key decision-makers accountable for any inadvertent or deliberate breaches of the LCCP. General conditions for licences, as stipulated by the 2005 Act, Section 75, are listed under Part 3 of the LCCP.
The two types of personal licences are:
The LCCP requires persons with responsibility for any of the below key positions to hold a PML:
At the time of writing, specified management offices are subject to a Gambling Commission consultation. The consultation proposes to:
The consultation closed on 18 October 2023.
Individuals working in a casino who are involved in gaming or handling cash (for example, croupiers, dealers and cashiers) must hold a PFL. Under the 2005 Act, Section 133, personal licences may not be issued to individuals who already hold such a licence, but may authorise the performance of more than one function.
Operating licences and personal licences are readily available subject to the fulfilment of application criteria and payment of the application fee.
Land-based casino premises licences are subcategorised into “small”, “large” and “converted”. Converted casino premises licences were awarded under the repealed Gaming Act 1968. They may be moved to alternative premises within the same licensing authority area, but there are no new licences available. 16 “small” and “large” casino premises licences were issued under the 2005 Act and awarded by the relevant licensing authority area following a public competition. To date, four of the large casino premises licences have been awarded, with one casino since closing. The White Paper proposes to reallocate any unused 2005 Act casino premises licences to other local authority areas. (See Premises Licences in 4.4 Types of Licences.)
Pursuant to the 2005 Act, Section 110, operating licences are indefinite in duration, subject to the payment of annual fees and compliance with licence terms and conditions.
Key Application Requirements for Operators
Operating licence applications must be submitted to the Gambling Commission, which will conduct an extensive investigation (having regard to the licensing objectives) in order to determine the applicant’s suitability to carry out the licensed activities. The Gambling Commission broadly uses the following principles to assess any application:
The 2005 Act, Section 69(2), requires that operating licence applications:
Currently, there are no server location or data storage obligations.
Key Differences, If Any, Between Application Requirements for Land-Based and Online Operators
Land-based casinos are generally considered to be a high-impact activity in terms of the Gambling Commission’s work, which means that applications may attract a high level of scrutiny and interest. In addition, non-remote casino operating licence applications must be accompanied by a casino premises licence application, which must be submitted to the licensing authority of the area in which the premises are situated.
Key Application Requirements for Directors, Owners or Senior Management
Individuals who are controllers (generally, with 10% or more equity and/or voting rights) in an existing or proposed licensee, must apply for an Annex A authorisation from the Gambling Commission.
Individuals who occupy a specified management office (known as a key position) must hold a PML.
Key individuals for small-scale operators may be exempt from this requirement to hold a PML and may apply instead to hold an Annex A authorisation. See 4.4 Types of Licences for further information on personal licences.
The Gambling Commission assesses personal licences according to the same suitability criteria listed above for operating licences. Furthermore, the Gambling Commission introduced a strict policy, from April 2018, to reject incomplete applications.
Subject to full information being provided, Gambling Commission guidance indicates that operating licence applications take approximately 16 weeks to process, although the Gambling Commission acknowledges on its website that applications may take longer. In the authors’ experience, this timeframe is often exceeded, depending on several factors, including:
Application fees for operating licences are determined by the types of activities and financial projections for the first year. These can be calculated using the Gambling Commission’s online fees calculator. As announced in the White Paper, fees are expected to increase, with a DCMS consultation on reviewing fees expected in 2024.
At the time of writing, application fees for personal licences are GBP370. There is no application cost for Annex A applications.
Annual fees are determined in the same way as application fees, outlined in 4.9 Application Fees. Annual fees may be found on the Gambling Commission’s website or may be calculated using the online fees calculator. As announced in the White Paper, fees are expected to increase, with a DCMS consultation on reviewing fees expected in 2024.
The requirements for a premises licence are:
See 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes and 13.1 Anticipated Reform.
Historically, remote operating licences did not reflect the distinction between B2B and B2C business models. B2B operators hosting games through B2C websites required a licence authorising remote casino, bingo, betting (virtual events) or betting (real events), in addition to gambling software, as hosting games constitutes providing facilities for gambling. However, new legislation introduced in April 2017, the Gambling (Operating Licence and Single-Machine Permit Fees) Regulations 2017 (SI 2017 No 303), created B2B-specific “host” subcategories:
However, these licences are subject to various requirements, including that:
See 6.1 B2C Licences.
Affiliates are not regulated by the Gambling Commission, as companies only providing advertising services or branding to a gambling operator do not require an operating licence. SRCP 1.1.2 provides that responsibility for third-party compliance lies squarely with the licence holder, who must ensure that third parties “conduct themselves in so far as they carry out activities on behalf of the licensee as if they were bound by the same licence conditions and subject to the same codes of practice as the licensee”. This positive obligation on licensees was confirmed in the White Paper and by the current Gambling Commission Deputy CEO, Sarah Gardner, reiterating the obligation on licensees on 15 June 2023 by stating that “many operators” should check “whether appropriate oversight of affiliates is in place”.
See 6.3 Affiliates.
See 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes and 13.1 Anticipated Reform.
There are no technical measures in place regarding consumer protection, and the Gambling Commission does not have direct powers to enforce either payment or website blocking. However, it seeks to protect consumers’ rights, through its powers under the 2005 Act for seeking enforcement action.
Responsible gambling – now coined “safer gambling” by the Gambling Commission – is one of the Gambling Commission’s biggest areas of focus, across licensing, compliance and enforcement. Its oversight and requirements are broad, meaning they cannot be summarised in this chapter. The focus, which stems from the third licensing objective (protecting children and other vulnerable persons from being harmed or exploited by gambling), is proper identification and engagement with those who may be at risk of, or experiencing, harm, ensuring that terms and conditions are clear, fair and straightforward for consumers and do not target vulnerable or self-excluded customers.
There have been repeated examples of customers being allowed to gamble significant sums of money in short timeframes, considerably beyond their personal affordability, and without any intervention from the operator.
Key SG requirements include:
See 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes and 13.1 Anticipated Reform.
Gambling management tools include:
The Multi-Operator Self-Exclusion Scheme (MOSES) assists land-based operators with identifying at-risk gamblers. GAMSTOP is the online equivalent, initiated by the Gambling Commission and led by the Remote Gambling Association. Since 31 March 2020, all online gambling operators have been required, under the LCCP, to join GAMSTOP. From 1 April 2024, this requirement extends to all gambling operators that make and accept bets by telephone and email.
The current primary legislation is the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (implementing the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive).
Money-laundering offences are outlined in the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) and the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT).
The Gambling Commission has also issued guidance for casinos, and separately for non-casinos, regarding their duties and responsibilities under the POCA. The Gambling Commission most recently updated its guidance for casinos in May 2023 to incorporate requirements surrounding “proliferation financing”. Proliferation financing is the act of providing funds for the manufacture, acquisition, use or supply of chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapons, goods or technology. The updated guidance requires casino operators to undertake a proliferation financing risk assessment to identify, assess and mitigate the risk of proliferation financing.
See 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes and 13.1 Anticipated Reform.
See 8.1 AML Legislation. The AML requirements are complex and cannot be adequately summarised here, particularly given the Gambling Commission’s ongoing focus and extensive casework in this area. Generally, the Gambling Commission expects licensees to comply fully with the terms of their licence, as relevant to AML and CTF, and to pay close regard to the various guidance documents it issues.
Compliance and enforcement activity continue to reveal that operators’ AML policies, procedures and controls are not fit for purpose and, in many cases, customers are allowed to gamble using the proceeds of criminal activity. The Gambling Commission has warned the industry that “a failure to digest [its] guidance and implement the legislative requirements applicable to Great Britain... must change, for these are not just regulatory matters but breaches of UK law. Those failing to learn these lessons will face further draconian action”.
The ASA regulates UK advertising and, therefore, gambling advertising. However, it does not carry any enforcement powers. Instead, and as the LCCP has specific rules on advertising, any gambling advertising breaches by a licence holder may lead to enforcement action by the Gambling Commission. This includes seeking criminal prosecution, as breach of a licence condition is a criminal offence under the 2005 Act, Section 35.
“Advertising” is widely defined under the 2005 Act, Section 327, and generally encompasses any action that encourages one or more persons, either directly or through an agent, to engage in facilities for gambling. This covers most forms of advertising, including online content and emails to consumers.
See 9.2 Definition of Advertising. Advertising must be socially responsible and comply with the LCCP; in particular, SRCP 5.1.6. The key LCCP advertising provisions are that:
The following codes are also applicable:
The ASA also provides the following additional guidance:
The Gambling Commission’s web page “Advertising/marketing rules and regulations” provides an overview covering the various LCCP and industry regulations.
See 9.3 Key Legal, Regulatory and Licensing Provisions. In addition, since 1 November 2014, gambling operators wishing to advertise in the UK must hold a Gambling Commission operating licence pertaining to the type of activity advertised. Separately, the Gambling Commission confirmed that advertising-only licences will not be granted.
Since August 2019, a voluntary “whistle-to-whistle” sports-betting advertising ban initiated by the UK betting sector (including a ban on all TV betting adverts during pre-watershed live sport) has been effective.
In relation to online search activity, from 1 October 2020, the industry introduced a list of negative keywords against which no online gambling advertising should be served. This is a voluntary measure that was introduced in the Industry Code.
In 2022, the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) announced the introduction of tough new rules for gambling advertisements. The new rules, which have been in effect since 1 October 2022, comprise a strong appeal test, which prohibits advertisements that are “likely to be of strong appeal to children or young persons, especially by reflecting or being associated with youth culture”, meaning that sportspeople, social media influencers and other celebrities who are prominent in youth culture are prohibited from being used in gambling advertisements.
The White Paper did not materially restrict gambling advertising. However, it proposed that additional protections be required relating to cross-selling, free bets and bonuses, and the need to strengthen safer gambling messaging.
In April 2023, the Premier League made a voluntary commitment to banning advertising on the front of football shirts commencing at the end of the 2025/2026 season. Sports’ governing bodies also made a commitment to developing a cross-sport gambling sponsorship code.
The following constitute criminal offences and attract up to 51 weeks’ imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.
The Gambling Commission also has the power to take regulatory enforcement action for breaches, including seeking to prosecute offenders.
See 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes and 13.1 Anticipated Reform.
Disclosure to the Gambling Commission is required within five working days (or as soon as possible) via a key event notification using the Gambling Commission’s eServices, an online self-serve portal.
Separately, a change-of-control application providing detailed information and the appropriate fee must be submitted to the Gambling Commission for assessment of the suitability of the new controller(s) to uphold the licensing objectives regarding the existing licence. The application or notification of licence surrender must be provided within five weeks of the change occurring; otherwise, the licence will be revoked.
Under the 2005 Act, Section 103, advance applications for persons or entities expected to become a controller can also be made prior to the change occurring. Subject to the Gambling Commission’s assessment of all necessary information, which it indicates typically takes around 12 weeks, the existing licence will either be granted continuance under the new controller(s) or will be revoked.
A change of corporate control is defined in Section 102 of the 2005 Act and occurs when a person or legal entity becomes a new “controller” (as derived from the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, Section 422). This is a complex definition, and needs to be considered in detail, but is generally broken down as:
Where there is a non-alignment, a cumulative assessment must be made.
The same requirements as previously stated in 10. Acquisitions and Changes of Control apply as there are no exemptions for passive investors.
Under the 2005 Act, Part 2, the Gambling Commission has the power to investigate and prosecute offences directly. Its regulatory powers also include calling licences for review and initiating investigations in the following circumstances:
The Gambling Commission’s regulatory powers include:
The Gambling Commission also has the power to commence a criminal prosecution. Where serious failings are revealed from a compliance assessment, the Gambling Commission may place a licensee in “special measures”, which requires the licensee to prepare, submit and agree to an action plan to remedy the identified failings.
The Gambling Commission’s approach to enforcement is currently set out in three key documents:
Contravention of the 2005 Act, including the LCCP (issued under the 2005 Act), results in criminal liability. In August 2017, the Gambling Commission set out its “new vision” for its enforcement, emphasising its focus on putting consumers first. The key changes proposed included:
In recent years, the Gambling Commission has garnered a reputation for taking enforcement against its licensees. In certain cases, a “regulatory settlement” is reached, meaning that it is not a sanction and stops short of a formal licence review. This is subject to the Gambling Commission’s discretion and will only be considered if various factors are met, including:
The regulatory settlements and licence reviews are detailed in numerous public decisions or public statements issued on the Gambling Commission’s website and usually include a financial penalty. A record penalty package of GBP19.2 million was issued to William Hill Group in March 2023. Recent financial penalties imposed by the Gambling Commission also include a GBP3.25 million fine against Done Bros (Cash Betting) (trading as Betfred) Limited in July 2023, and a GBP2 million fine against Videoslots Limited in June 2023. Both fines were issued as a result of numerous social responsibility and anti-money laundering failures.
A financial penalty imposed by the Gambling Commission will usually consist of two elements:
The Gambling Commission will take into account all material circumstances of the case, such as:
The Gambling Commission may discount the financial penalty where an operator has been transparent and co-operative.
It is worth noting that the financial elements of regulatory settlement, which are not sanctions, are calculated differently, and the Gambling Commission has the power to impose a financial penalty without carrying out a licence review.
The Gambling Commission is responsible for issuing and enforcing financial penalties regarding any LCCP breaches. Any contravention of the 2005 Act itself is a criminal offence and will trigger a potentially unlimited fine, enforced by the courts, and imprisonment for up to 51 weeks (see 3.6 Penalties for Unlawful Gambling and 9.5 Sanctions/Penalties).
It is worth noting that any payment made as part of a regulatory settlement is not a financial penalty (as it is not a sanction) and is a payment made in lieu of a financial penalty. These are treated differently by the Gambling Commission and could, theoretically, be enforced by recommencing the licence review.
Following a review of a personal licence, the Gambling Commission may impose:
To date, the Gambling Commission has not imposed a financial penalty or reached a payment in lieu of a financial penalty (as part of a regulatory settlement) in respect of a personal licence.
The Gambling Commission keeps a regulatory sanctions register, which contains details of sanctions imposed on personal licence holders following licence reviews.
The following rates are effective from 1 April 2022 and are applicable at the time of writing.
Bingo:
Betting:
Casino (“gaming duty”):
Lottery:
Machine games:
Remote gaming duty:
Please note, the majority of gambling activities are exempt from VAT.
White Paper Consultations
See 1.1 Current Outlook and Recent Changes. Following publication of the White Paper in April 2023, Government and the Gambling Commission have published several consultations regarding implementing the proposals in the White Paper.
The first of these consultations were published in 2023, as follows.
At the time of writing, the responses to these consultations are pending.
On 17 October 2023, the DCMS published its consultation on the statutory levy, including its proposed rates and distribution. At the time of writing, the consultation is still open, and closes on 14 December 2023.
Further consultations in respect of White Paper proposals are expected to be published in November 2023, and are expected to include socially responsible inducements and gambling management tools.
See the UK Trends & Developments chapter for further insight and commentary on the consultations.
Reform of the AML and Counter-terrorism Financing (CTF) Supervisory Regime
In July 2023, HM Treasury published its consultation on reform of the AML and CTF supervisory system, seeking view from stakeholders on four possible models for improving the UK’s current regime. The Gambling Commission is a statutory supervisor for the casino industry. Three of the proposed models would have little impact on the Gambling Commission’s regulation of AML/CTF. However, the fourth model proposes a Single Anti-Money Laundering Supervisor (SAS) which, if implemented, would result in the Gambling Commission relinquishing its supervisory duties.
Given the cross-over between AML/CTF and safer gambling, there has been confusion about the Gambling Commission’s approach to AML/CTF. The SAS model would certainly introduce some consistency to the AML/CTF supervision of UK casinos. However, any appointed SAS would undoubtedly have less industry expertise than the Gambling Commission, and this also opens up the possibility of dual regulation of Gambling Commission licensees.
HM Treasury’s consultation closed on 30 September 2023, and at the time of writing, the response to this consultation is pending.
Introduction
Gambling is a popular leisure activity enjoyed by 44% of the adult population. As the government acknowledges, most players spend small amounts and do so safely, not experiencing harm.
At the time of writing, the UK remains the largest online gambling market, generating over GBP14 billion gross gambling yield in the year 2021–2022. Very few regulated industries contribute so significantly to the economy and the public purse.
The relevant gambling legislation dates back to 2005 and was designed to be future-proof. However, the landscape has changed significantly since 2005, particularly with the invention of the smartphone, which has reshaped not just gambling but also our society and the way we communicate.
The government launched its review of the Gambling Act 2005 in December 2020 to ensure the UK’s framework was effective and fit for the digital age, and to assess whether further protections were needed. This has been hugely controversial and contested, with the loudest voices often coming from the anti-gambling lobby. Many would acknowledge that the regulatory framework (as opposed to the legislation) needed some change, though tensions have arisen in considering what, and how much, change is necessary. This has been heightened by the powerful anti-gambling lobbyists, who believe gambling is immoral and should be prohibited completely, rather than in looking to reduce problem gambling.
The authors welcome the government’s publication of High stakes: gambling reform for the digital age (the “White Paper”) in April 2023 (originally expected by the end of June 2021 and leaked in July 2022), which was a significant moment and a once-in-a-generation opportunity for the gambling industry. Having waited nearly 30 months for its publication, the White Paper provides the beginnings of some certainty and direction regarding the government’s policy objectives.
While balanced and coherent, the White Paper lacks a lot of details, meaning there is a significant amount of work still to be done. The consultation phase (currently ongoing in various forms) will be critical, with both the government and the Gambling Commission under immense pressure to implement White Paper proposals, as well as to listen to industry.
Recently, the Gambling Minister, Stuart Andrew MP, and the Gambling Commission reiterated that consultation must mean meaningful consultation (and not simply the illusion of consultation), given the risk of legal challenge for failure thereof. The authors welcome this acknowledgement.
Aside from the White Paper and over 60 related workstreams for which the Gambling Commission is responsible, compliance and enforcement continue to be areas of focus. The Gambling Commission recently formed an industry forum, strengthening and further increasing its collaboration with the industry. The Gambling Commission is also consulting on other fundamental policy changes, including regulatory panel reforms that would erode fairness, and extending the requirement for those who need to hold personal licences.
The White Paper
The publication of the White Paper has provided a glimmer of certainty, as the government’s proposals and intentions for the industry can now be more clearly understood. Its publication is an important moment in the history of the industry and a clear step in the right direction, particularly given the frustrating uncertainty the delay caused. The government’s intention was to propose substantial and meaningful reforms meant to make gambling safer, striking a balance between consumer freedoms and protection from harm; overall, it seems the White Paper has achieved that. Broadly speaking, the White Paper has something good for every stakeholder, for which the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) should be commended.
Mirroring the topics in the government’s call for evidence, the White Paper includes approximately 20 significant policy changes in the following areas:
The key proposed reforms are as follows.
The government has not published the 16,000 submissions it received to its call for evidence in December 2020, but it is worth noting that:
Implementation of White Paper Proposals
The proposals in the White Paper will be implemented through a combination of:
At the time of writing, a number of the proposals have been subject to DCMS and Gambling Commission consultations (please see the UK Law and Practice guide for details of the content of consultations). The first consultations were published in July and October 2023, with further consultations expected in November 2023. The authors strongly encourage the industry and its stakeholders to participate in the consultations.
The government and the Gambling Commission aim to implement most key White Paper measures by Summer 2024, but given the significant volume of work, this is very optimistic, and it is likely only a handful of proposed changes will be in place by the deadline. The authors expect that the proposals relating to player protection will likely be prioritised, including:
Given the next General Election, the authors expect any proposals requiring primary or secondary legislation to be most at risk of delay.
Financial Vulnerability Checks and Financial Risk Assessments
The most vexing White Paper proposal is as regards the financial vulnerability checks and financial risk assessments, which are new terms that will replace affordability checks.
The affordability debate has been at the heart of the industry for some time. While its aims are reasonable, many stakeholders and commentators (including this firm) have commented on the importance of the Gambling Commission balancing individual freedoms with the need to ensure that vulnerable people are prevented from suffering harm, as highlighted by Sir Alan Budd in 2001, at the time of the last review of the UK’s gambling legislation.
While the Gambling Commission previously consulted on affordability (in conjunction with customer interaction) in 2021, it was decided (no doubt by the government) that affordability should be addressed as part of the Gambling Review.
Currently, the checks that are in place to identify unaffordable losses are complex and cause a lot of friction, requiring players to disclose bank statements and payslips, etc. Lucy Frazer, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, branded these checks as “inconsistent, ad hoc and unnecessarily onerous” – something with which the authors agree.
The government’s intention is that these new checks will be frictionless. The authors understand this to mean limited customer involvement. Financial vulnerability checks will be “light touch” and “unintrusive” and will be carried out using publicly available data. The purpose is to identify customers who are particularly financially vulnerable – for example, those subject to a bankruptcy order. The Gambling Commission estimates that approximately 20% of customer accounts will meet the threshold required for a financial vulnerability check, and it considers these checks to be “necessary, suitable and proportionate”. Financial risk assessments are intended to be enhanced checks for customers with unusually high losses. The intention is that the risk assessments will be informed by credit reference agency data or through open banking to obtain income, expenditure and current account turnover data (estimated to affect 3% of customer accounts).
The authors welcome the government’s proposal. However, the challenge is its implementation, particularly given that “frictionless” has not been defined. Further, the Gambling Minister recently indicated that “the proposed checks will not be mandated across the sector until we are confident that they are frictionless for the vast majority of customers who are caught by them”. This suggests the possibility that they will not be frictionless for everyone, which goes to the heart of the serious concerns held by the industry and its stakeholders, including British Racing, which had launched a petition to stop the implementation of financial risk checks on the basis that they are inappropriate and discriminatory.
At the time of writing, the Gambling Commission’s consultation on financial risk checks closed on 18 October 2023. Lucy Frazer confirmed that the Gambling Commission received 2,400 responses to the consultation, and that the “government is listening”. The authors await the consultation response. In the meantime:
Regulatory Panel Reform
In addition to White Paper proposals, the Gambling Commission’s consultation of July 2023 included questions regarding further Regulatory Panel reforms. The Regulatory Panel is still, in fact, the Gambling Commission and is not an appeal process, but provides an opportunity for applicants and licensees to attend an oral hearing to challenge decisions made by Gambling Commission staff under delegated powers. Very often, it is the last step before a final decision is made. All decisions made by the Gambling Commission, including those made by the Regulatory Panel or employees acting under delegated powers, are all administrative decisions, meaning they must comply with the 2005 Act and the principles of fairness and natural justice.
The Gambling Commission originally published a consultation in July 2020 in respect of Regulatory Panel reform, which received 22 written responses from the industry (including Harris Hagan). The July 2020 proposals included:
The Gambling Commission published its response on 21 July 2021, and the overwhelming majority (including this firm) disagreed with the proposals, with a key concern being that “the independence and impartiality of the Panel would be adversely affected by the proposal to use Adjudicators”. It was intended that these changes would come into effect during 2021 to 2022, but to date no changes have been implemented.
The July 2023 consultation proposed two further changes, as follows.
Quorum and composition
Instead of the Regulatory Panel being comprised of up to two or three Commissioners (advised by an independent legal adviser), it will be chaired by a legally qualified Adjudicator sitting alongside one Commissioner and one senior Gambling Commission employee. The Adjudicator will not sit alone on case management matters and personal licensing cases. The Adjudicators will only need five years’ post-qualified experience (PQE) and will be employed by the Gambling Commission. The idea that someone with potentially as little as five years’ PQE would be adjudicating on a GBP20 million fine, suspension or revocation of a licence is frightening. No evidence was put forward by the Gambling Commission to support five years’ PQE being a sufficient or appropriate level of experience.
Default of paper decisions
The default of oral hearings will be changed to paper-based decisions. Oral hearings will only take place:
The authors’ main concern is that applicants and licensees will be denied the opportunity to bring their arguments to life. The requirements of fairness are flexible and fact-specific. Legal history places huge importance on oral argument and (in the authors’ view) with good reason. The authors feel strongly that the Gambling Commission’s proposals do not conform to the necessary standards of fairness. The proposed barrier should therefore be removed, and the policy should simply say that an oral hearing can be chosen on request. This will address the Gambling Commission’s main reason for the proposed change, while still enabling a fair hearing for those who want one.
When looking at the regulatory landscape, the Gambling Commission is proposing to make these significant changes (likely focused on cutting costs only) at the same time as it is escalating fines and sanctions. Effective regulation requires effective accountability, and it seems to the authors that the Gambling Commission is removing a weakening mechanism which holds the regulator to account for its own policies and procedures and under the law.
The consultation closed on 18 October 2023, and the authors await the Gambling Commission’s response.
Industry Forum
On 14 September 2023, the Gambling Commission announced that it would be establishing an industry forum to be comprised of approximately ten representatives from the British gambling industry. The purpose of the industry forum is to provide the Gambling Commission with insight into gambling businesses and to share industry views. The recruitment of a Chair began in September 2023, and the Gambling Commission is expected to invite expressions of interest from the industry.
The announcement of an industry forum is welcome news. It is a clear signal that the Gambling Commission has listened to the need for industry engagement to increase, and hopefully this will foster a better relationship between the Gambling Commission and the industry.
However, it is disappointing that the industry forum was not created earlier and before many of the most important consultations had commenced. It is further disappointing that it has been created as a “forum”, rather than as a panel or advisory board (as with the Gambling Commission’s other groups), suggesting it may not be placed on an equal footing.
Customer Interaction
On 23 August 2023, following consultation, the Gambling Commission published updated remote customer interaction guidance, effective from 31 October 2023. In April 2022, the Gambling Commission introduced more prescriptive customer interaction requirements for remote gambling operators under new Social Responsibility Code Provision (SRCP) 3.4.3, which tightened the requirements on identifying customers at risk of gambling-related harms and the taking of appropriate and timely action.
SRCP 3.4.3 came into effect in two tranches: partly in September 2022 and partly in February 2023. One requirement is for remote licensees to take into account the Gambling Commission’s customer interaction guidance. The guidance was originally published in June 2022; however, the Gambling Commission decided to consult on the guidance while partial implementation of SRCP 3.4.3 was delayed. Seven months after the consultation closed, the Gambling Commission published its final customer interaction guidance.
The purpose of the guidance is to assist licensees in understanding how to comply with the new remote customer interaction requirements under SRCP 3.4.3. However, the guidance remains complex and ambiguous, despite issues being raised in response to the Gambling Commission’s consultation. It remains to be seen whether the guidance will be workable and whether it will assist licensees with the onerous requirements of SRCP 3.4.3.
Ongoing Enforcement
Over the past 12 months, the Gambling Commission has continued to exercise its enforcement powers against licensees; both operating licensees and personal licensees. Anti-money laundering, safer gambling and consumer protection have been continuing areas of key focus for the Gambling Commission, and this is not set to change. Enforcement of wider LCCP and 2005 Act requirements is expected to increase over the next year as the Gambling Commission has been undertaking thematic work on discrete areas such as regulatory returns, fee categories and sources of funding.
Conclusion
The aim of the Gambling Review, when it was published on 8 December 2020, was as follows.
“The government wants all those who choose to gamble in Great Britain to be able to do so in a safe way. The sector should have up-to-date legislation and protections, with a strong regulator with the powers and resources needed to oversee a responsible industry that offers customer choice, protects players, provides employment, and contributes to the economy.”
The White Paper is true to that laudable aim. As the Secretary of State says in her Ministerial Foreword, at the heart of the government’s review is ensuring it has the balance right between consumer freedoms and choice on the one hand, and protection from harm on the other. The government seeks to achieve this balance through an extensive package of measures across all facets of gambling regulation. If it is to be successful, the government – and the Gambling Commission – will need to retain an unerring focus on this balance. This is essentially the spirit and intention of the White Paper, inevitably buffeted by vested interests through consultation, regulation and legislation.
With a General Election looming, the industry and its stakeholders should continue to engage with the government and the Gambling Commission to ensure that the proposed reforms are delivered in a timely, sensible and (critically) workable way. Vigorous engagement will certainly be required in relation to certain proposals such as financial risk checks, given their importance and complexity.
Significant work is required from all parties in the forthcoming year to ensure that the White Paper proposals are implemented in a way that both achieves the government’s policy objectives and ensures the sustainability of the gambling industry. The authors strongly recommend that all stakeholders engage with the consultations, wherever possible, providing robust evidence to substantiate their positions. In his recent speech, Tim Miller, executive director of the Gambling Commission, stated that “collaboration is vital” and that “collaboration can deliver greater results than working alone”. While his focus was on the Gambling Commission’s relationships with international gambling regulators in respect of tackling illegal online gambling (and with whom they are accordingly entering into memoranda of understanding), the sentiment applies as the industry, government and Gambling Commission work towards implementing the White Paper proposals.
Significant change is on the horizon for the industry. While the government’s timeline is ambitious, it is very clear that the industry will look a little different in 12 months’ time.